Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
This is Hear Me Out. I'm Celeste Headley. There's
0:04
a lot to dislike and distrust
0:06
about the American healthcare system. We
0:09
know about disparities in care quality,
0:11
in the ability to access care,
0:13
and in education about health. The
0:16
anti-vax or vaccine skeptical movement is
0:18
growing faster than ever in the
0:20
modern history of vaccines. And
0:22
a lot of us have a hard
0:24
time dredging up any sympathy for those people.
0:27
But what if they're responding to the
0:29
frustrations and fears that we all
0:31
have about medical care? For
0:34
all of us, it's important to speak
0:36
from a place of empathy and try
0:38
to understand. It's not just the characterizations
0:40
that we see in the news, or
0:42
it's not just the worst case scenario
0:44
that we think of when we think
0:46
of people asserting certain viewpoints. Johanna
0:48
Richland of the University of Maine joins Hear Me
0:50
Out in just a moment. Stay with us.
0:58
Welcome back to Hear Me Out. I'm Celeste
1:00
Headley. More Americans now
1:02
oppose vaccine requirements for school
1:04
children. Not a majority, but
1:07
more. Data from the Pew Center last
1:09
year found that between October 2019 to
1:11
March of 2023, the number
1:14
of parents who think vaccines should
1:16
be optional went up. To
1:19
be clear, the increase was modest, going from
1:21
16% to 28% of all Americans surveyed. And
1:25
again, the vast majority of
1:27
Americans believe vaccines should be mandatory
1:29
in public schools. Still, the
1:32
results look different when sorted for a
1:34
political party. In recent
1:36
years, the percentage of self-described
1:38
conservatives who oppose vaccine requirements
1:40
more than doubled. The
1:43
ratio of conservatives for and against
1:45
vaccine requirements is now almost
1:47
1 to 1. And look,
1:49
this is a show about debating, but
1:51
there is no debate that vaccines work. The
1:54
ones we require children to have before attending
1:56
public schools are safe And effective
1:58
at keeping individuals and children safe.
2:00
the collective says more than ninety
2:03
percent of doctors believe adults and
2:05
children should receive all recommended vaccines,
2:07
and it's hard to get that
2:09
kind of consensus in science on
2:12
anything. so vaccine skepticism can be
2:14
hard to understand and really easy
2:16
to vilify or guess today. Monsters
2:18
to rethink that condemnation because she's
2:20
spoken to vaccine skeptical mothers and
2:23
found it's not ignorance or etiology
2:25
fueling the skepticism all the time.
2:27
It sometimes real issues with the
2:29
way. We run our healthcare system to
2:31
head of Richland is an anthropologist at the
2:34
University of Maine. either pay So for those
2:36
who don't know, you tell us who you
2:38
are in what you do. So.
2:41
I am an assistant professor of
2:43
Anthropology at the university of Me
2:45
and where I teach classes on
2:47
cultural anthropology and in the classroom
2:50
and I'm also a writer or
2:52
who publishes research and academic channels
2:54
and rates are popular pieces on.
2:56
My research at most recently
2:59
on vaccine skepticism. Among mothers
3:01
my broader incest or kind
3:03
of on how police and
3:05
feelings circulate in Us society.
3:07
And so before looking. At Vaccine
3:09
Skepticism I was really interested
3:11
in religious. Belief and Evangelical Christianity
3:13
among migrants recently moving to the
3:16
United States. So.
3:19
Your arm point of view that you're
3:21
bringing to us is that. It
3:24
it may be easy
3:26
to criticize an insult.
3:28
People who don't vaccinate their kids.
3:31
But. Sat is
3:34
not always deserved, right?
3:36
I mean either that
3:38
the general view. On
3:41
by the majority of Americans who see no
3:43
problem with a vaccine. Is
3:45
that if you oppose vaccines, it's either.
3:48
As you said, for political reasons. Or
3:50
because you don't. Get
3:53
it, I'm don't understand.
3:56
Why is that? Wrong.
3:59
Well. I think it's an oversimplification. I
4:01
mean I think that their first why
4:04
one as as process what. I'm gonna
4:06
say by noting that my research is
4:08
ongoing that I think there are many
4:10
different ways people arrive a vaccine skepticism
4:12
and my researches really highlighting one avenue
4:15
that I don't think I don't think
4:17
gets very much attention so I think
4:19
it helps to complicate and bring new
4:21
to the conversation. I also think it's
4:23
important to note that it's very possible
4:25
for people to have adverse. Interactions.
4:28
And encounters with the medical system and
4:31
not end up this using or rejecting
4:33
vaccine. So I think there's more kind
4:35
of nuance there as well. But for
4:37
many of the people that I spoke
4:40
to, it was not random that they
4:42
arrived at a position of feeling. Like.
4:45
The medical system writ large. Was
4:47
untrustworthy, And that
4:50
their personal experiences from
4:52
childhood through. Childbirth through,
4:54
you know, reproductive years
4:56
in general had been
4:58
fairly on traumatizing for
5:01
many women. And. That that experience
5:03
as day to day repeated experiences.
5:05
And encounters on strip them
5:07
of trust for not only
5:10
their individual doctors or nurses
5:12
or providers on where they
5:15
experienced or perceived harm. But.
5:17
As an insider system writ large and
5:19
that's really where I think the problem.
5:22
Lies is that we know I'm
5:24
and as my article goes into
5:26
and other research goes into we
5:29
know that on medical errors and
5:31
medical harm especially for when women
5:33
and underrepresented minorities. Remains very
5:36
high staggeringly so in the
5:38
United States on and that
5:40
happens disproportionately for an people
5:42
of color and for. A
5:45
non binary folks. And ah,
5:47
all of that means that
5:49
people are sustaining these kinds
5:51
of experiences. That are either demeaning
5:53
are diminishing or be no more
5:55
serious or been misdiagnosed or they're
5:58
not being diagnosed correctly. I'm
6:00
and that leads people to therefore question
6:02
the kind of terror that they're getting.
6:04
And then to extend that questioning.
6:07
To the public health care system
6:09
more generally on. And so I
6:11
think it's important to clean it looked
6:13
at our own systems and sixers in
6:15
this is what kind of cultural anthropology
6:18
can help us do and instead is
6:20
kind of place the blame on individuals
6:22
and see that seen skepticism as individual
6:24
pathologies or he then. On.
6:27
Political pathologies, That
6:29
we can see how our own
6:31
systems actually generate a predisposition. Towards
6:33
distrust that actually exists and
6:36
lived experience. And that
6:38
maybe if we kind of
6:40
validate that experience or address
6:42
that, that people would be
6:44
more willing. Potentially on to.
6:47
To take on something that they feel
6:49
otherwise concerned about that it wouldn't be
6:51
so easy to dismiss. Okay
6:53
slimming some been here because
6:55
of let me start with
6:57
the the the question about.
7:00
By put people on which.
7:03
A lot of people still have
7:05
in their minds this idea that
7:07
vaccine uptake is lower among African
7:09
Americans and and Hispanic or Latino
7:11
Americans, which was true at the
7:14
very beginning of the pandemic, but
7:16
is not true anymore. And
7:19
in fact, the people who are most
7:21
likely. To. Receive vaccines,
7:24
Statistically, Speaking are. White.
7:26
Americans, especially those who are
7:29
conservatives. That
7:31
to me flies in the face of
7:33
this idea that is not related to
7:35
politics because. We're talking
7:38
about I'm a group of people. When
7:40
you talk about those who. Were. In
7:43
large numbers oppose
7:46
vaccines. They're mostly
7:48
conservatives. Things as conservative as a
7:50
month so much more likely to
7:53
to that the resist and oppose
7:55
vaccine mandates than any. Other group
7:57
chef at that's not and true at
7:59
all. In, I don't and I I just want to
8:01
be clear that my research. Is not primarily
8:04
about. Necessarily the covered nineteen
8:06
vaccine, but rather is kind of
8:08
longer simmering history as axiom skepticism
8:10
within the United States And so
8:13
there are lots of different demographics.
8:15
And has lots of different kind
8:17
of populations and certainly that politicization
8:19
of the class and has become
8:22
extreme in the last an innocence
8:24
the pandemic through trump his arms
8:26
on through the rise. Of the
8:28
Medical Freedom Movement and cent of
8:30
political organizing. On the right to
8:32
meet medical freedom and the idea
8:35
of parental choice and medical autonomy
8:37
to be very very on foundational
8:39
central key issues in their political
8:41
platforms. So I certainly agree with
8:43
all that. And that's not really
8:46
what my research is on my
8:48
researches. really looking at how people
8:50
in how mothers in particular in
8:52
this piece that I'm writing about
8:54
are talking about their own arrival
8:56
at Vaccine. Skepticism And this is
8:58
at the beginning, the research was done
9:01
and Twenty Twenty Twenty Twenty One. So
9:03
that kind of medical freedom movement was
9:05
gaining traction. And now and Twenty Twenty
9:08
Four has kind of exploded. so there's
9:10
a whole other thing going on. That.
9:12
Is not really weird. My research
9:15
began and are a lot of
9:17
people who are studying the kind
9:19
of more political piece of it.
9:21
But what I'm trying to look
9:23
at is what provides an inroad
9:25
for people to begin doubting rights.
9:27
And so maybe it is the
9:30
political piece that is kind of
9:32
what people are seeing most clearly
9:34
right now. and that's clearly very
9:36
consequential. And I'm yes, very much
9:38
falls along the line of the
9:40
kind of conservative. And liberal divide.
9:43
But I'm kind of insists it again and may insist
9:45
of. Of the. Circulation Of
9:47
Feeling The Circulation of belief
9:50
is why did these stances
9:52
become believable? For so many people when
9:54
we. Do have some as evidence to
9:57
the contrary regarding vaccines and why
9:59
there and. Organ and how they do
10:01
protect. The children
10:03
and elderly and. All of us.
10:05
So if we know all about why,
10:07
does it become so believable? Why isn't
10:10
so easy for politicians to kind of
10:12
appropriate language a vaccine, skepticism and pray
10:14
and people's feelings of distrust? Where do
10:16
these broader feelings of distress come from?
10:19
On And so I their lots of
10:21
places on the. Political side of things
10:23
where we can look at you know he
10:25
can look at conservative Christian the we can
10:27
look at rural populations and the kind of
10:30
on you know. Disillusionment and the loss
10:32
of jobs and and of grievance.
10:34
And in those areas in the
10:37
United States that are kind of
10:39
affiliated with. Far
10:42
right extremists arm and and unfurl rural
10:44
loss in many places. But my research
10:46
to this point at least has really
10:48
been looking at: how can we think
10:51
about our systems in the cell years
10:53
and health care of themselves for how
10:55
they at least meet people more likely
10:57
to believe. That. Ah that
11:00
vaccines are not protecting them and
11:02
that medical care and public health
11:04
care systems are not intent. On.
11:07
Are providing for their health rather than making
11:09
their own mouth. Why is that so easy
11:11
for people to believe? I'm and so I
11:14
think the gender dimension here is really important
11:16
and my research and that for women in
11:18
particular is a lot of data. About.
11:20
Birth trauma, obstetric harm,
11:22
adverse outcomes for for
11:24
women and for babies
11:26
at a much higher
11:29
rate. Than pure any sense You're
11:31
in the United States and the all
11:33
of that data means that you know
11:35
people aren't just crazy. The women that
11:37
I'm talking to or not just crazy
11:39
that their feelings of not being taken
11:41
care of are not really trusting their
11:43
medical providers. On, you know,
11:46
Is unreasonable or rather than those
11:48
feelings and those experiences with lead
11:50
to an after effect and a
11:53
spillover offense and be potentially co
11:55
opted by the political sphere to
11:57
me makes makes some sense. So
12:01
we have to take a break with the there's
12:03
a lot last. Still more to talk about so
12:05
stay with us on Celeste Headley This is hear
12:07
me out from Slate and will be back. Where.
12:14
Bath this is Hear Me Out! a podcast
12:16
from Slate. I'm Solas Headley and today we're
12:19
talking about. The
12:21
parents. Especially women who.
12:23
Hesitate to get vaccines not just
12:26
themselves but especially for their children
12:28
arm and are just says we
12:31
should not be so quick. To
12:34
call them names. I'm. Were.
12:36
As for the majority of
12:39
society who sees the importance
12:41
of vaccines, it can be
12:43
really easy to get angry.
12:46
At the hesitant, I'm.
12:48
It almost immediately. So johanna
12:51
out a want to ask about. That,
12:53
especially for those I can absolutely
12:55
imagine. I've read a number of
12:57
pieces from people in the disabled
13:00
community saying this is not okay
13:02
regardless of what somebody his motivations
13:04
are for avoiding vaccines, you're putting
13:06
a lot of people at risk
13:08
and there are a number of
13:10
studies including some that predate. Cove.
13:13
It showing that vaccine
13:15
hesitancy leads to absolutely.
13:18
Preventable. Deaths so.
13:22
I mean, it's natural for people to
13:24
get angry, isn't it? Oh
13:27
absolutely yeah. I mean, I think
13:29
that and in a large reason
13:32
why it's important to study vaccine
13:34
non vaccination practices. Weather sucks to
13:36
vaccination. Or vaccine refusal outlay,
13:39
or, you know, Any
13:41
form of and and police said
13:43
are not confident I think are
13:45
important to study exactly. Because they are
13:47
important. So if were trying to improve uptake
13:49
and we're trying to improve. Utilization and
13:52
we don't want vaccines to become
13:54
a flashpoint that enters. Ah, you
13:56
know, politicization and the culture wars?
13:58
And shouldn't we. understand why it
14:00
is that people are refusing
14:03
and rejecting or feeling suspicious
14:05
and take that seriously. And so that's
14:07
part of what motivates my research is to
14:09
try to understand rather than dismiss
14:12
you know an entire swath of
14:14
the population as being crazy and
14:17
hysterical is to try to understand
14:19
from the ground how it is
14:21
that these belief systems and these
14:23
approaches and orientations again become reasonable
14:26
and make sense for the people who are asserting
14:28
them. And I think a couple of things are
14:30
going on. The first I kind of outlined in
14:33
terms of the real ways that
14:35
our healthcare system fails large populations
14:38
and so makes people more distrusting
14:40
and again that's not just mothers
14:42
but there are other populations where
14:45
vaccine skepticism tends to circulate. The
14:47
second thing that I think is important
14:50
is that because of this distrust there's
14:52
kind of a gap and a void
14:54
that is then filled by alternative messaging
14:56
and that is the kinds of materials
14:58
and disinformation that we've seen absolutely
15:02
kind of exponentially grow
15:04
in the last several years. There was just an
15:06
article I saw on healthcare misinformation
15:09
on the New York Times
15:11
front page today that these
15:13
materials become taken up and
15:15
then circulate so quickly and become
15:17
the talking points of people who
15:19
no longer trust the FDA or
15:21
the CDC precisely because they
15:23
have reasons in their own lived
15:25
experience to distrust. They've lost the
15:27
trust of physicians or of nurses
15:29
or of their family clinics or
15:31
they've heard stories of friends and
15:33
families who've lost trust and therefore
15:35
it becomes easier for those folks
15:38
to then reach for these alternative
15:40
framings that not only seem to
15:42
make sense to them and give kind
15:44
of credence to what they believe but
15:46
to validate their concerns in a way
15:48
that's not dismissive and so I think
15:50
that that's part of the issue that
15:52
we're seeing. Yeah except,
15:55
except Johanna I don't
15:57
think we can get away from the fact that even though
16:00
those who are vulnerable to have vaccine
16:02
hesitancy, we
16:04
cannot separate this from people who are
16:06
being manipulated by political actors and by
16:08
misinformation. And the reason I say that
16:10
is because to my
16:12
mind, black Americans have more reason to
16:15
distrust the healthcare system in the United
16:17
States than pretty much any other group.
16:19
There's no other group of Americans who've
16:22
been ethically and illegally
16:24
tested on and abused by
16:26
healthcare providers than black Americans.
16:29
And yet, even though
16:32
black Protestants have a high
16:34
rate of skepticism about, say,
16:36
the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine,
16:40
the percentage who think that
16:42
children shouldn't
16:45
be required to get it
16:47
for school is by
16:50
orders of magnitude lower than white
16:52
evangelicals and other conservatives. I mean,
16:55
we're talking about a group of
16:57
people, you have
16:59
this combination of partisanship,
17:01
hyper partisanship, and then
17:03
this politically
17:06
driven identity of
17:08
parental rights. Parental rights
17:11
trumping everything. And then you combine
17:13
that with a conservative tendency in
17:16
recent years to denigrate
17:19
authority, to
17:23
denigrate or lessen
17:25
any respect in experts and
17:27
expert opinions. And
17:30
that creates, sorry to
17:32
use the cliche, but the sort of perfect storm of
17:36
people who are not gonna get vaccines. I
17:38
mean, I get what you're saying, that these
17:40
are people who have a reason to trust
17:42
the healthcare system, but quite frankly, every
17:45
single American has a reason to distrust
17:47
the healthcare system. Exactly, yeah, I think
17:49
that's an excellent point and that's part
17:51
of the research too, which is why
17:53
is it that certain populations and certain
17:56
demographics, even if, as you
17:58
say, they have... personal
18:01
experiences, collective
18:03
histories, ongoing
18:05
kind of exposures and traumas to medical
18:08
harm, why is it that
18:10
there's this kind of divide? Why is
18:12
it that some people end up then
18:14
writing off the entire system, including public
18:16
health care and mandatory or recommended
18:20
vaccines and other... And the safety of the people around
18:22
them. Yes, and other people don't. And so that's
18:24
why, again, I think it's important to
18:27
remember that we don't
18:29
know all of these answers, but I think
18:31
that they are important questions to ask
18:33
and not to think that all
18:36
of these different pieces of the puzzle
18:39
are unrelated. Just to your point
18:41
about how people are being
18:43
manipulated by disinformation, I think that this
18:46
is a really important aspect, that the manipulation
18:48
and the kind of
18:50
disinformation that
18:53
gets circulated, one of the
18:55
reasons that people are compelled
18:57
by it and find it attractive is
19:00
because for some people, not
19:02
for everybody, but for some people, it
19:04
seems to answer questions that they
19:06
otherwise haven't had answered, or
19:09
it validates things that they already have concerns
19:12
about. And so it
19:14
is a perfect storm, I think,
19:16
that there is a kind of
19:18
increasing anxiety, increasing distrust, increasing loss
19:21
of feeling settled and oriented in
19:24
the contemporary US landscape and reaching for
19:27
many different ways of trying to answer
19:31
which way is up. And for people
19:33
that don't have trusted institutions, then look
19:35
to the kind of refusal
19:39
and the rejection of authority, then absolutely
19:41
this is one piece of that as well. And
19:43
we know that that's become increasingly
19:45
so as the kind of Republican Party and the
19:47
right have made
19:50
kind of vaccine refusal and rejection of
19:52
mandatory vaccines as key kind of components
19:54
of their platform. So
19:59
another argument
20:01
I would have is that, I mean,
20:04
we know, science knows that
20:06
the least accurate information you can get
20:09
about human beings
20:11
is self-reports. And
20:13
I know that when it comes to things
20:16
that are connected to, especially things that are
20:18
connected to politics, especially
20:20
when they involve so-called
20:23
hot button topics like
20:25
gender and disability and
20:28
race, people will give
20:31
motivations for the reason why they're doing
20:33
things, whether it's why they voted for
20:35
a certain person, why they took a particular
20:37
stance, that are not the truth. And
20:41
the other thing I'll say is that we have
20:43
a bunch of studies showing that the people who
20:46
mistrust vaccines,
20:49
doctors, medical advice,
20:52
they are much
20:54
more likely to overestimate their own
20:56
knowledge about medicine
20:58
and science. Like these are
21:00
people who think they know
21:02
better. So
21:05
I mean, it sounds
21:07
to me like you're saying, look, have some
21:09
empathy, we won't be able to convince them
21:11
to get vaccines unless we treat them like
21:13
humans who have complicated
21:15
and nuanced motivations.
21:18
Is that accurate? That
21:20
close to what you're saying to me? Yeah.
21:23
I mean, look, I'm going
21:25
to draw a parallel here because I think this
21:27
is a similar audience and it
21:29
gives you kind of a window into my own research
21:33
progression from studying evangelical Christianity
21:36
to then vaccine skepticism is that I think
21:38
that there are ways
21:40
in which popular media in
21:43
broad strokes distills entire
21:45
groups of people and entire
21:47
kind of ways of believing
21:49
and frameworks as being
21:52
distasteful or being despicable
21:54
even and being completely
21:56
irrational. And One
21:58
of my jobs as an anthropologist. And
22:00
you know this is the kind of work
22:02
that Anthropologist you all over the world is
22:04
to show is not to say that this
22:06
is right or wrong. I'm a cultural observer,
22:08
right? This is not. I'm not saying that
22:10
you know with events also Christianity I we
22:12
said son ontological question. I'm not saying yes.
22:14
this is a right to system A bully
22:16
for this is wrong system of beliefs but
22:18
rather how is it. Something. That
22:21
makes sense to so many people. That's
22:23
my job And so that's what I
22:25
would say here is that's my job
22:27
is not to say that. Ah, you
22:29
know that. This entirely make
22:31
sense. Services. This is a
22:33
right way of believing, but rather if
22:36
we dig a little bit and we
22:38
try to learn from the people who
22:40
are actually experiencing and making these decisions
22:43
and perhaps we can understand it better
22:45
and maybe understand our own society and
22:47
the problems that face us and the
22:49
kinds of divisions and divisiveness that we
22:52
have with some potentially positive ways of
22:54
moving the needle because right now we
22:56
don't really see those ah in terms
22:59
of this and South isn't if our
23:01
current way of talking. About it has
23:03
not been helpful and has in some ways
23:05
and of further polarized and is there a
23:08
way that may be bringing a different. Landscape
23:10
of understanding or month or
23:12
attention to a different horizon
23:14
are part of the problems.
23:16
Might might help us further.
23:19
Things. So. We steps
23:21
take another break a but they're still more to
23:23
say so stay with us on Celeste said we're
23:25
listening to hear me out a broadcast from sleep
23:27
and we will return. Good.
23:37
To have you back this is
23:39
hear me out. a pot. That
23:41
some slight I'm Solas Hadley and
23:43
we're talking about the vaccine. Hesitant
23:45
and Johanna Ritalin says, ah, we
23:47
should not vilify them. So.
23:51
He will have a few minutes left
23:53
here. Johanna and I have to get
23:55
to the point of why does it
23:57
matter And I say that not because
23:59
they're. Human beings and we should all
24:01
try to make connections and respect one
24:03
another as human beings, regardless of what
24:06
their opinions are split from a practical
24:08
standpoint. If
24:10
if you don't believe
24:12
that right red lights.
24:15
Are. Fair. Maybe. You
24:17
think that you're a better driver
24:19
than anybody you know Better send
24:21
the urban planners and you shouldn't.
24:23
Have to. Stop.
24:25
At a red light. He.
24:28
Doesn't matter, right? Like you
24:30
have to keep the everybody you're not
24:32
lucky people sense if you stop keeps
24:34
running through red lights. It causes a
24:36
lot of deaths and so we make
24:38
laws and says it doesn't matter, your
24:41
feelings don't matter here. This is the
24:43
rule because we know there is an
24:45
answer to whether vaccines are safe or
24:47
not and the answer is they are
24:49
So. We're. Going to make this
24:51
law. So. Understanding
24:54
that your whole job is to
24:56
study. The wise motivations for
24:58
a practical. Standpoint: Why should
25:00
I? Why should it matter to me?
25:04
And think that that's a good question
25:06
and mean I think that if we
25:08
are interested in having building bridges and
25:10
living in a. World. Where perhaps there's
25:12
less. Intense polarization and
25:15
inability. To talk across different demographics
25:17
and across the front lines are
25:19
to people that we think we
25:21
have complete inability. To understand or they
25:23
have a complete inability to understand Asked
25:25
us if that's an important value. Or
25:28
an important way to conceive as a
25:30
potential future that has more opening in
25:32
it and more bridges. And then I
25:34
would say for all of us it's
25:36
important to speak from a place of
25:38
empathy and try to understand. You know
25:40
if it's not just the characterization think
25:42
we see in the news or if
25:44
it's not just the worst case scenario
25:46
that we think as than we think
25:48
as on people asserting certain viewpoint sense
25:51
how is this as a team to
25:53
those you points. And again and
25:55
in I think that seen as
25:57
skepticism is in the news. Ah.
26:00
That's funny right now because of the political
26:02
dimensions and how it's become mapped onto a
26:04
very you know right. Wing. Far
26:06
right kind of and belief system,
26:09
but prior. To that many, many
26:11
people. Prior to the politicization, many
26:13
people on the right had their
26:15
children vaccinated, You know before co that
26:17
and didn't start writing off vaccines and
26:19
Tell and more recently and says this
26:22
isn't a new problem people. Have always
26:24
kind of projected their fears and anxieties
26:26
onto that. Seems I'm onto phobias
26:28
about the medical system and about
26:30
health care and that could be
26:32
trusted. And so if Nance has
26:34
this moment components and plane as
26:36
a broader kind of famer understanding
26:38
where these feelings come from and
26:40
how people apply these feelings in
26:42
terms of their dated a decision
26:44
making. Whether that's medical care or
26:46
whether that's political decisions that there
26:48
something to be learned by. Doubling
26:51
into these issues. Yes,
26:55
I mean that look. You're never gonna
26:57
get pushback from me on treating people
26:59
with empathy. And with basics respect
27:01
regardless of of your agreement
27:04
on. I mean I
27:06
gotta say, I get pretty. Impatient.
27:09
At. This point with people who
27:11
have been. Who
27:14
have had a lot of
27:16
compassionate conversation with who have
27:18
seen this ah, celebrities come
27:20
out and give these patients
27:22
loving conversations about why vaccines
27:25
are important. They've had people
27:27
leaders in the disabled community
27:29
say listen, this is about
27:31
saving lives, arms and yet.
27:34
They people will push all that
27:36
aside. Because. Donald.
27:39
Trump Suss it is making them
27:41
feel vaccine hesitant or whoever they're
27:43
right wing. Leader
27:45
is is saying don't believe any
27:47
that stuff They're all wrong. They're
27:50
all lying to you. Because.
27:52
Of whatever conspiracy theory or there as
27:54
part of Joe Biden or whatever it
27:56
may be, I don't mean to downplay
27:58
people's political the police on saying. That
28:00
they will take all of the
28:02
messages. From experts from
28:04
ah. Public. Figures and.
28:08
Toss. It in the garbage. Because.
28:10
Of what some a political party politician.
28:13
Is saying that's what's happening today
28:15
and I think that that's an
28:17
important data point which is that
28:19
on people who feel strongly that
28:21
they don't trust or ninth and
28:23
in be convinced. They're. Not gonna
28:25
be convinced by reasoning or not
28:27
any convinced that information. that's. Partly
28:29
why I think I'm public Health
28:31
messaging often falls really flat for
28:34
for these groups because they can't
28:36
be convinced. it's not about convincing,
28:38
so as convincing doesn't work. And.
28:40
If it's not about. Information. Then.
28:43
It's about the level of feeling
28:45
and assets and that's a whole
28:47
different kind of conversation and. Terrain
28:49
that's about a question of ceiling and
28:52
trust and effect on and emotion. and
28:54
that's partly why it's such a dicey
28:56
and difficult subject matter. And and as
28:59
you also rightly. Demonstrate. It's not just
29:01
the people who feel strongly. About
29:03
I'm. Not wanting to
29:05
get vaccines are not trusting the system,
29:07
but it's people feeling really really some
29:09
ways that people who don't do that
29:11
are causing inordinate harm and are being
29:13
very, very selfish. And so as those
29:15
are the two kind of polarized sides
29:17
of the debate, it doesn't seem like.
29:20
There's. Much place to go, right?
29:22
But if there's a way of trying to
29:24
cysts the kinds. Of conversations that we're having.
29:26
I mean, you said just a little while
29:29
ago. All Americans, we all have
29:31
reasons to distrust health care, right? We
29:33
can all understand that is that the
29:35
jumping off point and neither the dataset.
29:38
Seen well. Where where do people go
29:40
off the tracks? Right? Where. is it
29:42
that you go from the state point
29:44
to data point to then something all
29:46
the way to this position that become
29:48
cemented and and trends that you have
29:51
a very difficult time moving from and
29:53
so i think that says something to
29:55
consider also say that i think it's
29:58
also really important to know that people
30:00
who feel suspicious of vaccines or medicine
30:02
are not just on the right by
30:04
any means. They're
30:06
all over the political spectrum, which
30:09
makes a third party candidate very,
30:11
very, you know, for
30:14
many people, very compelling and popular.
30:16
And so I Robert Kennedy. Yeah,
30:18
exactly. And so it's, again, this isn't
30:21
just a question of far right extremism
30:23
and Trump ism. But it's actually something
30:25
that is much more deeply embedded in
30:28
US society and history, and was kind
30:31
of ignited, you know, there was a
30:33
match blown on to it during COVID-19
30:35
that has burst it to the fore
30:37
and made it a real something really
30:40
to contend with, which
30:42
I think, again, is another reason why we
30:44
ought to take some time to understand more
30:46
nuance surrounding the issue. I mean,
30:49
that's fair enough. It's a it's a fair point. Either
30:52
way, I really appreciate you coming on to the
30:54
show to talk about it because it's a really
30:56
important issue. Well, thank you. Thank you very much
30:59
for taking the time to chat. Listen,
31:07
nothing gets more email than
31:09
hot takes on vaccines. I
31:12
know you have thoughts about this. And
31:15
I also know I want to hear them. So
31:17
email us let us know what you think
31:20
about the vaccine hesitant. Maybe you're one of
31:22
them. Maybe you're angry at them. Maybe whatever
31:26
your point of view is, we
31:28
want to hear it. It's hearmeoutatslate.com.
31:30
And honestly, we love hearing your
31:32
thoughts, whether you agree with our
31:34
guests or you don't. Last
31:36
week, we spoke with Richard Friedman about
31:39
his idea that therapy should not be
31:41
something we do all the time. We
31:43
got some very thoughtful email from you about that
31:46
conversation. So before we go, we wanted to share
31:48
a note we got from Pam. Pam
31:50
wrote this. Just a quick
31:52
way in the program on therapy
31:54
was absolutely ridiculous. Yes, more
31:56
people are feeling comfortable about talking about the
31:59
fact that they have a therapist. Most people
32:01
do come into the world with confusion because
32:03
we're asked to make sense of the world
32:05
at a very young age. Unpacking
32:07
that and putting a new strategy in place
32:09
is no easy feat. Sadly,
32:11
there's still an incredible resistance from
32:13
everyday people who are causing themselves
32:15
and others damage because they won't take
32:18
a look inside. I fear the
32:20
message your guest might be sending." You
32:22
know, Pam, that was the bulk of my
32:24
pushback on our guest as well, the fear that
32:27
people would take what he
32:29
was saying as a reason not to
32:31
get therapy. So thank you for sending
32:33
that in and for the rest of
32:35
you, please send in your thoughts as
32:37
well because we do want to hear
32:39
from you. Our email address is hearmeouttslake.com.
32:41
Keep your emails coming. Hear
32:44
Me Out is a podcast from Slate.
32:46
The show is produced by Maura Curry.
32:49
Ben Richmond is the Senior Director of
32:51
Podcast Operations and Alicia Montgomery is the
32:53
VP of Slate Audio. I'm your host,
32:55
Ted Lee. Until next time, speak your
32:57
mind, but keep it open.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More