Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:06
For Sloanies particularly, I
0:06
mean, I don't know how they do it,
0:10
but they do manage to put groups of people
0:10
together that can be so like-minded.
0:15
I would always say soak up
0:15
all the learning that you can,
0:19
but also really soak up all those
0:19
friendships and relationships that will
0:24
also stay with you your whole life. Welcome to Sloanies Talking with Sloanies,
0:30
a candid conversation with alumni and
0:30
faculty about the MIT Sloan experience and
0:35
how it influences what
0:35
they're doing today.
0:38
So what does it mean to be a Sloanie?
0:38
Over the course of this podcast,
0:43
you'll hear from guests who are making
0:43
a difference in their community,
0:45
including our own very
0:45
important one here at Sloan.
0:51
Hi, I'm your host Christopher Reichert, and welcome to Sloanies
0:53
Talking with Sloanies.
0:55
My guest today is Yda
0:55
Bouvier a 1998, MIT Sloan,
1:00
MBA graduate. Welcome. Hi. Yda joins us from London and
1:02
before we begin our conversation,
1:06
I just want to give our listeners some background. So Ida's an executive coach
1:09
now for 15 years and an author.
1:13
She works with both individuals
1:13
and companies looking to
1:17
the greatest potential and she just
1:17
released her first book Leading With the
1:22
Right Brain. So congratulations. Thank You.
1:25
Before being an executive
1:25
coach and an author.
1:28
She was a senior manager at the Boston
1:28
Consulting Group, also known as B C G,
1:33
where her experience included
1:33
international corporate
1:37
integration projects across
1:37
industries. In addition to her M B A,
1:42
she holds a master of science
1:42
in applied physics. So wow,
1:46
I'd love to know more about
1:46
that and how you use that today.
1:50
She's a sailor. Oh yes. And she met
1:50
her husband at Sloan. So welcome Ida.
1:55
Tell us about what motivated
1:55
you to write it and
2:00
what's the message you
2:00
want people to get from it.
2:02
Recently a couple of people have
2:02
been, or from different sides,
2:05
I get that question. What prompted you
2:05
to write the book? At first I thought,
2:10
well, I sort of started writing,
2:13
but I realized there was a little bit
2:13
more behind it when I started working as a
2:17
coach. I think a lot of people who
2:18
come from sort of analytical and
2:23
consulting and using your
2:23
left brain a lot kind of
2:27
job and education, I found myself always tempted
2:29
to solve everybody's problem.
2:34
Somebody would ask me a
2:34
question and I would think, oh,
2:37
do I have the right answer?
2:37
And when I trained as a coach,
2:41
I realized that that actually
2:41
doesn't work so well.
2:45
And I stumbled more or
2:45
less by coincidence,
2:49
sort of a more creative way of working
2:49
with where I could kind of let go of all
2:53
that problem solving focus. Now as I started working
2:55
in different ways,
2:59
I realized how powerful that
2:59
was. I started working it
3:03
it was sort of the way I
3:03
distinguished myself professionally.
3:06
I then started teaching other coaches
3:06
what this way of working was and by then I
3:11
had spent some time studying neuroscience
3:11
and neurobiology and I realized that
3:16
what I was doing was
3:16
using the right brain.
3:19
And so I thought was teaching coaches
3:19
how to use the right brain and to work
3:23
with their clients. And as I've
3:23
now been doing this for a while,
3:27
I'm realizing I'm sitting on this sort
3:27
of gigantic secret that it feels a
3:31
little bit awkward to just keep us, keep it to myself and the small world
3:34
of coaching. On the cover of my book,
3:38
I put a genie lamp with the idea of smoke
3:44
and shape of a brain coming out of it. And I did it because the
3:45
right brain is really this
3:49
enormous power that we all have,
3:52
like this your personal genie and you
3:52
just have to figure out how to get it out
3:56
of the bottle. And it's such a wonderful
3:57
thing that I thought I have to
4:02
make this available to a much wider
4:02
group of people than I can reach by
4:07
myself simply by doing my work. So
4:07
that prompted me to write a book.
4:12
One of the professors I
4:12
studied under years ago was Ron
4:17
Heifetz who teaches about
4:17
adaptive leadership.
4:20
And I kind of took it as
4:20
soft power versus hard power
4:25
in some ways guiding people
4:25
towards their own solutions versus
4:30
pressing them to the solution
4:30
that you may have come up with.
4:34
Is that an element to your
4:34
executive coaching for people?
4:38
I think there are a lot of
4:38
different words that come close
4:43
to this context of left and
4:43
right and hard and soft can be
4:47
one of them. I think the real important thing
4:48
is that you see what your left
4:53
brain always tries to do is it
4:53
tries to describe the world as
4:58
concretely as possible and then make
4:58
it tangible. And by making it tangible,
5:02
you can actually manipulate
5:02
and utilize it. Now,
5:06
that is of course an extremely
5:06
useful thing and we try with our
5:11
mutual, with our left brains, we try to making it concrete
5:12
in relatively similar ways.
5:15
And then it becomes in a way this notion
5:15
of, okay, it's concrete, it's hard,
5:19
and we can exchange between us. What your right brain does is
5:21
it actually experiences the
5:26
world in its entirety.
5:28
And that also means that the way I
5:28
experience the world might actually be
5:31
slightly different from the way you're
5:31
experienced the world and we even
5:34
influence each other in how
5:34
we experience the world.
5:37
I don't know if soft is
5:37
the right word for it.
5:40
I think the left brain tries to categorize
5:40
left is hard and therefore right is
5:44
soft. But for me, the right
5:44
brain's not soft at all.
5:48
I don't even have one word for
5:48
it other than it's very powerful.
5:52
So when you said hard, in other words the left brain tries to
5:53
make the world as concrete as possible
5:58
to then be able to hold it,
6:01
I guess is how I'm visualizing it as
6:01
something that can then be exchanged
6:05
or changed or observed.
6:08
Exactly. Exactly. Does that also imply that it becomes
6:14
rigid in the sense that once
6:14
you make it into an object,
6:18
then it's hard to change it again? And
6:23
it becomes rigid and what you see is
6:23
that the left brain can get stuck in
6:28
its own simplification of the world.
6:32
And where we often need our right
6:32
brain is to find something new,
6:36
anything new first materializes
6:36
in your right hemisphere and then
6:41
hey, it gets translated and your left brain
6:41
tries to a little bit later on grasp it
6:46
and interpret it again. But
6:46
the left brain really gets,
6:50
can get stuck just as the word
6:50
that you use in its own rigidity.
6:55
So I read a definition of right brain
6:55
people and I'll just read it out because
6:59
in some ways I agree with it in other
6:59
ways I'm outraged as a left-handed person,
7:05
alright? Right. Brainers can
7:05
be disorganized, unpredictable,
7:09
and more often than not very good with
7:09
people. So I agree with part of that.
7:13
They're spontaneous, creative and
7:13
more emotional than left brainers,
7:16
which outrages me, but I'm
7:16
joking. There are also intuitive,
7:21
good at problem solving and more
7:21
comfortable with the unknown,
7:26
I suppose once you kind of define
7:26
it. So the mere fact of defining it,
7:30
I think is a left brain activity. Yeah, you totally got that.
7:34
So I take these with a grain of salt I guess. But I mean there is
7:36
also some truth in that.
7:39
And so when I think about
7:44
corporate, and this is going to be a gross
7:45
exaggeration when I think about corporate
7:50
expectations for decision-making,
7:54
for leadership styles for
7:58
the people that I think
7:58
succeed in that environment,
8:01
my observation is is that when I look
8:01
at this image that's in front of me,
8:04
it shows on the left
8:04
the logic, the language,
8:08
the sense of time and science and
8:08
on the right creative intuition,
8:12
imagination. I guess this is a long-winded way
8:14
of asking a question about how do
8:18
people who I think their career has pushed
8:18
them to be as left brain as possible
8:23
because at the end of the day you have
8:23
to show results and explain them and then
8:27
show them how do they bring in
8:27
the right brain side and not
8:32
be scoffed at as squishy
8:32
and loosey goosey.
8:35
I think it's absolutely true
8:35
that through our education and
8:40
when we first land in the workplace
8:40
and we learn to basically be
8:45
effective in the existing system,
8:45
the left brain is a huge asset to us.
8:50
I find that by the time a
8:50
leader comes to me for coaching,
8:54
it's because they're experiencing
8:54
some of those limitations.
8:57
And I often right at
8:57
the start I say, look,
9:00
what we will do is we will work with
9:00
all your resources and you're probably
9:05
pretty good with using
9:05
your left side resources.
9:07
So we are going to quite regularly tap
9:07
into your right side resources and nobody
9:12
really understands what that means in the beginning. And one of the key things about your
9:14
right brain is that it doesn't process in
9:18
words, but it really processes in images.
9:20
We don't say for nothing a picture
9:20
says more than a thousand words,
9:24
because it really does. And so I,
9:28
often as one of the first things we do, is we work with pictures to describe
9:30
a situation and somebody always
9:34
immediately experiences that gives a
9:34
richness that they weren't before able
9:39
to articulate. And just by having an image
9:41
often provides new insights.
9:46
And that's when people start
9:46
getting it and they're like, okay,
9:48
there is this ability that I have that
9:48
I don't tap in very often that can
9:53
really lift me as a person and
9:53
as a leader to a new level.
9:57
And that sort of points
9:57
to the power of metaphors.
10:01
Absolutely. And you often have,
10:04
I'm sure you've experienced that yourself. Maybe an example even pops to mind where
10:06
somebody is trying to convince you of
10:10
something in a very articulate,
10:10
logical way and then they say, well,
10:14
what I'm really trying
10:14
to achieve here is this,
10:19
I just want to create a new garden.
10:19
And you're like, ah, now, I get it.
10:25
Tell me more about that revelation. I am just using that as an example
10:27
because I'm looking at my own garden,
10:31
literally, literally looking at my garden.
10:35
But what I mean is that when
10:35
we communicate in metaphors,
10:38
we also can feel aligned
10:38
and connected in a way
10:43
that we by purely exchanging
10:43
logic sometimes don't arrive
10:48
at. And so because if we are connected
10:48
with our right brains as much as with our
10:52
left brains, then we to convince somebody else
10:53
to influence and inspire others,
10:58
that's really important. And I was thinking about
11:00
effective speakers, communicators.
11:07
Do you find in your work with
11:07
your clients or organizations
11:12
that there are patterns there that you can
11:14
see that are successful and unsuccessful?
11:19
So I think in the past, people who want to become very
11:21
good speakers and influencers,
11:25
what they have often focused
11:25
on is on the one hand side,
11:30
have a really good argument and on the
11:30
other hand side have a lot of charisma.
11:34
When you're standing in
11:34
front of a group of people,
11:37
you exude a lot of confidence
11:37
and hand and it's often
11:42
very important that what you
11:42
show physically is the same.
11:46
It can be in contrast with
11:46
the words that you use. Now,
11:50
I think what we've noticed very vividly
11:50
the past two years is that when we
11:55
had to work with each other virtually
11:55
all of a sudden and we had to start
12:00
influencing people almost
12:00
exclusively, virtually,
12:03
we started realizing that all of a sudden
12:03
you can't rely on your body anymore
12:07
because it's only this
12:07
piece is on the camera.
12:11
And even though we're
12:11
on the camera like this,
12:14
we are not even biologically able to
12:14
pick up the same signals from each other
12:17
over the camera that we can do when we
12:17
were speaking in person. All of a sudden
12:22
as a leader, if you are influencing people not
12:23
only by at a combination of your
12:27
words in your presence,
12:27
but only by your words,
12:30
you are realizing that it's
12:30
not flying in the same way.
12:35
And that is because if we're
12:35
only using structure and logic,
12:39
it's only a left brain activation
12:39
and not the right brain activation.
12:43
If you activate your
12:43
right brain, for example,
12:46
by using metaphors to stimulate
12:46
your audience right brain,
12:50
then all of a sudden you can actually
12:50
be a lot more engaging and inspiring
12:55
also over zoom and using the virtual
13:00
platforms, which in today's world
13:00
I think is absolutely essential.
13:04
If you look at sustainability, we can't be all be flying around the
13:06
world to show everybody our physical
13:10
presence at every odd moment
13:10
where we need to influence,
13:13
we need to do it in other ways. And so the ability to
13:15
provoke a good right brain
13:20
connection virtually seems to me
13:20
that that's a leadership skill that's
13:25
really important for the coming
13:25
decade. And interestingly,
13:30
the dean of MIT, David Schmittlein
13:30
of Sloan, he said exactly that,
13:35
what is it, about two years
13:35
ago. And so I was like,
13:38
we're on the same
13:38
wavelength here, visioning.
13:41
I know that Sloan has been
13:41
pushing leadership studies as part
13:46
of a well-rounded graduate. And I think that those are, in my mind,
13:54
I think it's positive, but to my mind it's a counterpoint
13:56
to the accounting class
14:01
where accounting is a hard skill in the
14:01
sense that the numbers have to add up or
14:06
not type of thing. Leadership,
14:09
in my opinion is more, it builds,
14:12
I guess on the raw materials of each
14:12
individual and try to bridge that
14:17
personality with then the hard skills
14:17
that you still have to have, right?
14:21
Yes. For me, it's absolutely not a
14:21
question of either or. It's both.
14:25
And I don't know if this
14:25
was the same for you,
14:29
but for me it was by
14:29
the time I was at Sloan,
14:32
I was definitely still a little bit in
14:32
my left brain development phase first at
14:36
B C G and then at Sloan I
14:36
joined. So when I joined BCG,
14:41
I really knew nothing about business.
14:43
I just came straight out of
14:43
the physics cellars doing my
14:48
research. And so I was
14:48
like, oh, balance sheet.
14:53
So I sort of survived for two years,
14:55
and then thankfully they helped me to
14:55
do an M B A. And so for me at Sloan,
15:00
I was soaking up the accounting and
15:00
the economics and the strategy and
15:05
all those more hardcore business
15:05
skills because I still really needed,
15:09
I needed that solid ground on my feet.
15:15
And some of the leadership topics or
15:15
organizational behavior classes as
15:20
we also had, I was actually in my
15:20
late 20s, not even that interested in
15:26
it. That came a couple of years later when
15:31
I felt I've covered this field now,
15:33
but there seems to be a lot more
15:33
other interesting things out there.
15:37
So tell us about your applied
15:37
physics background and
15:43
I guess how do you use that now
15:43
and why the transition from,
15:48
how does that fit in? Let's put it that way. After school, I remember you go,
15:54
who knows what they want to do
15:54
when there are 17, 18 right?.
15:59
So I was definitely of the variety of
15:59
let's keep as many options open as I
16:03
possibly can. A good family friend said,
16:08
oh, if you study physics, that means that's essentially no choice
16:10
because then you can still do everything
16:14
you want afterwards. And I
16:14
thought, that sounds great.
16:18
It's also the kind of
16:18
thing that it looks good,
16:22
it's considered a hard thing to do.
16:22
And so I was like, you know what?
16:25
That makes a lot of sense. So
16:25
off I went studying physics.
16:29
It was so difficult.
16:33
I have to say the first two years I really
16:37
scraped myself over the finish line
16:41
kind of learning how to work and study. I think it's not uncommon if you've had
16:43
it relatively easy at school that if you
16:48
all of a sudden are at a top
16:48
university and a difficult degree,
16:51
then you really have to shape up.
16:55
It is a muscle, right? Yeah, it's exactly that. It's a muscle.
16:58
So I had to very quickly train mine.
17:03
But then as I was nearing the end of
17:06
my degree, which at my
17:06
university was like a two,
17:09
two and a half year research project,
17:13
a lot of that really a lot of
17:13
more hardcore research work,
17:19
which in my case was the
17:19
orientation dependency of silicon.
17:23
So that would then ultimately
17:23
be interesting for the
17:28
Interesting. So I worked in clean rooms and things
17:30
like that, but it was all very detailed,
17:35
far away from immediate application.
17:38
And I thought after
17:38
doing that for some time,
17:44
I need to be a little bit
17:44
more in the real world,
17:48
and then I thought, okay,
17:51
how do I transition from
17:51
that kind of academics
17:56
into the business world? And
17:56
BCG, like other consultancies,
18:00
seems to welcome people
18:00
who've done technical degrees
18:05
and then things that they can just
18:05
teach them about business along the way.
18:09
And so that was my saving grace,
18:11
and that kind of brought
18:11
me to BCG after my studies.
18:16
Well, it certainly shows
18:16
that you can apply yourself.
18:19
Yeah, I mean,
18:23
you are asking me what the value, what's the value of that education now.
18:30
some of the value of that education is
18:30
that you don't need to prove to anybody
18:33
that you're smart. And
18:33
that sounds really stupid,
18:37
but it's relevant.
18:39
Right? To me, it's the equivalent
18:39
of in the business world,
18:43
wearing a suit and tie, there's a certain assumption
18:44
about what the person is so that
18:49
you don't have to fight that
18:49
battle. That's been, we agree.
18:51
That's boxes ticked. The other real value that it has for
18:54
me is that when I started coaching,
19:00
which is a totally different field,
19:02
I was definitely looking for
19:02
some angle to really satisfy my
19:07
more intellectual curiosity. The findings from
19:09
neuroscience and neurobiology
19:14
were streaming in by it was impossible to
19:19
keep up with everything that was
19:19
surfacing in the past 20 years
19:24
question of how do you take those insights
19:24
into really practical applications so
19:28
that a leader in a business
19:28
can use some of that?
19:33
That was really kept me interested and so
19:37
that my scientific appetite
19:37
was fed and proved out
19:42
to be also very useful for understanding
19:42
this dynamic between the left and the
19:47
right brain. When I think about the right brain and
19:47
even the definition that I read before,
19:52
which was that there's
19:52
disorganization and unpredictableness
19:56
and emotional, how do you tap?
20:00
So even going to your image on the
20:00
cover of your book, the Aladdin's lamp,
20:06
with this coming out, how do you sort of control that
20:07
in a way and allow people or teach
20:12
executives or organizations to
20:16
listen to those intuitions or that
20:16
information coming from the right brain
20:21
and trust it? That requires a little
20:23
bit of trial and error.
20:28
So you take something like
20:28
working with an image.
20:32
In my early in the book, I use an example of a client who was
20:33
describing a really complicated challenge
20:38
in his relatively new leadership role.
20:42
And after we were really getting
20:42
lost in details, I said to him,
20:47
paint me a picture of what
20:47
the situation looks like.
20:51
And he then said, well, it feels like I'm hanging off
20:52
a rock cliff without a safety
20:57
cord. And I thought, hhh,
20:57
like, it feels a little scary.
21:01
And we sort of talked a bit about
21:01
the image and he said, well,
21:04
I really like rock climbing, actually.
21:04
This is a source of enjoyment for me,
21:09
but what worries me is that I don't
21:09
have a safety net. And so I said,
21:14
so we then said, well, what's that safety rope actually at work?
21:20
What he ended up saying was that
21:20
the safety rope felt really like a
21:25
support network of colleagues and peers.
21:25
And
21:30
so we then talked about
21:30
how we could build that.
21:33
But by the time we then met a month
21:33
later for our next coaching session,
21:36
he had started taking some
21:36
actions and seeing the
21:41
results because you then experience
21:41
something that's valuable,
21:45
you then get more curious saying,
21:47
How do I experience more of those
21:47
insights because they seem to be
21:53
bringing me something relevant? Now,
21:56
what's always very important is
21:56
that you, on the one hand side,
21:59
you want to benefit from the intuition
21:59
and the wisdom of your right brain,
22:03
but you then do need to translate it
22:03
into something that's really concrete and
22:07
tangible where you also
22:07
need your left brain.
22:11
So it's almost about you want
22:11
to establish the collaboration.
22:16
And here is something really
22:16
interesting, really interesting,
22:20
which is that your right hemisphere
22:20
is really fine to collaborate with the
22:25
left, but the left doesn't want
22:25
to collaborate with the right.
22:29
And that must be manifested in
22:29
leadership power struggles or
22:33
boardroom challenges, strategy sessions.
22:37
All those and it is also why
22:37
it's often so tricky to bring
22:42
this kind of right brain intuition
22:42
into the boardroom, for example,
22:46
because somebody might say in a boardroom,
22:53
I just don't really
22:53
like the smell of this.
22:56
And another person, that's
22:56
a right brain comment,
23:00
that's a right brain intuition that says,
23:03
I'm feeling uncomfortable about something. The left brain responses
23:05
is often, immediately,
23:09
I'm not quite sure what you
23:09
mean. Everything's fine here.
23:13
Facts and figures. Yeah, look, it looks like a fantastic
23:14
opportunity. Here are the numbers.
23:18
And so unless you are on the
23:18
lookout for those kind of
23:24
intuitions, it's very easy for our very powerful
23:25
and competent left brains to
23:29
sort of go. So you did your applied physics and then,
23:33
which was very theoretical and
23:33
education research conceptual,
23:38
and then you dove into corporate
23:38
consulting management consulting.
23:44
And correct me if I'm wrong, were you
23:44
at BCG throughout your time at Sloan?
23:49
Yeah, so I was at BCG before and then
23:49
I also went back to BCG afterwards.
23:54
So how did Sloan change you? And you
23:54
better mention your husband here.
23:59
Yes. How did Sloan change me?
24:03
So the first thing it did was that it
24:03
did really give me this solid ground
24:08
in terms of business education on all the
24:11
dimensions that we talked about before.
24:14
So I went back to BCG, and
24:14
my confidence was like I felt
24:19
in a completely different
24:19
place, and that was very nice.
24:22
I enjoyed the work also a lot more
24:22
because of that on all fields, very, very,
24:27
I just felt like I was,
24:30
what I did was solid and
24:30
not just grasping at straws.
24:36
You had created and sharpened some tools, right? Yeah, of course.
24:40
The other thing which I hope
24:40
many people get from not only
24:44
Sloan but attending their business school
24:44
is these network of lifelong friends.
24:49
That's just phenomenal. Some of them we've been in contact
24:51
for on a very regular basis having
24:56
holidays together. But even if
24:56
you don't see somebody for five,
24:59
10 years and they pass through
24:59
London and you sit down for dinner,
25:02
you're right back. And I think it's unique in life those
25:03
times where you build those kind of
25:08
that intensity of relationships
25:08
afterwards, you get busy
25:13
And I think those friendships
25:13
are, we treasure them a lot.
25:17
And since Laurent and I are
25:17
also from different countries,
25:20
we have those sets of friendships in our
25:20
respective countries. But from Sloan,
25:24
they're mutual friends. And so that's also what makes
25:26
a double special in our life.
25:30
And he's a banker, right? Yeah.
25:32
He's a banker. So he is very left brained.
25:35
You think. But maybe not.
25:38
Left and right brain. No. And what else?
25:41
So the one thing that I
25:41
really learned at school,
25:45
which only over time and certainly
25:45
is also I think underlies what
25:50
I write about in the book, is that one of the courses that really
25:51
made a huge impact on me was system
25:55
dynamics. And this notion of if something
25:56
is happening in a system
26:01
which doesn't produce the
26:01
outcomes that you expect,
26:04
there are forces that you're
26:04
missing or need to be uncovered.
26:09
And that idea that it
26:09
has informed, of course,
26:14
a lot of what I do, not only as
26:14
a consultant, but as a coach,
26:18
that is one of these foundation
26:18
principles that informs a lot of
26:23
my work because somebody comes to
26:23
coaching and sometimes they say they
26:28
want something, but they don't do
26:28
the things that would get them there.
26:31
And then just this idea of there are
26:31
forces in this system that we're trying to
26:36
uncover is a very useful way of thinking.
26:40
And so system dynamics I think has
26:40
informed a lot my career in ways that
26:44
I totally didn't expect when
26:44
I was sitting in a class.
26:49
And that presumes a certain
26:49
rationalness to it all. Right?
26:52
Yes, I suppose so. Or at
26:52
least again, something to,
26:56
it's another way to make things
26:56
tangible. But I like the idea of,
27:02
I like the language of force
27:02
because forces are kind of a kind of
27:07
energy, and even though yes,
27:07
you can describe a force,
27:10
but you can never really fully describe
27:10
it, it has that sort of energy.
27:15
It has something magical and ungraspable
27:15
to it. I suppose even as a physicist.
27:20
I mean, when you're coaching
27:20
someone and they make a tweak,
27:25
so this is one of those things where
27:25
you're introducing some dynamism into the
27:29
system, right? Tweaking
27:29
the knob, pushing a lever.
27:32
Is part of your coaching to have people
27:32
think two or three steps ahead as to
27:36
what the consequences or the
27:36
various consequences could be.
27:39
So thinking in a system dynamics way.
27:42
Yes, we very often, and you can do that.
27:44
You can imagine we have this amazing
27:44
ability to be able to imagine ourselves in
27:49
the future. I think one of the unique
27:51
human capabilities.
27:55
Sometimes you can use it to uncover forces, but also to check whether you really
27:57
are taking everything into consideration
28:02
that you should. What is your definition of success
28:04
in the success of writing a book?
28:08
I can see that would be satisfying, but
28:08
working with clients or just generally.
28:13
My definition of success. So there's
28:13
a couple of different angles to that.
28:18
I would say I definitely
28:18
am somebody who likes to
28:23
experience lots of
28:23
different things in life.
28:28
So I like a life where I am a parent and
28:32
I have time to do my sailing and
28:32
I can travel and I can enjoy my
28:37
work and I can cook. And that richness is, for me,
28:43
very important.
28:46
So I would say part of has
28:46
success is just to be able to
28:51
experience a lot of richness
28:51
that life has to offer us,
28:56
including spending a lot of time
28:56
in beautiful natural environments.
29:01
In terms for myself, what has been my personal definition of
29:03
success for a really long time is that
29:10
it's always been very important
29:10
to me to show our daughters
29:15
that as a parent, and
29:15
certainly as a woman,
29:22
which for whom, that tends to be
29:22
still more of a question than for
29:28
men, I'm usually generalizing
29:28
here, but as a parent,
29:32
to not have to make the
29:32
trade-off between being an active
29:37
and engaged parent and having
29:37
a really rich and interesting
29:42
professional life. So that is not either or that
29:44
you can really have both.
29:48
And that informed a lot of my
29:48
choices for the past 20 years and
29:52
still does because I wanted to show
29:52
that to my daughters. And so that, yeah,
29:58
if I'm able to first achieve that myself,
30:02
but also at least role
30:02
model it for some people,
30:06
then that would be a big chunk
30:06
of my definition of success.
30:10
That's excellent. And so as a
30:10
professional woman who's a parent
30:15
and a partner, have you seen
30:15
over the course of, say,
30:20
your 25 years since Sloan, what sort of evolution have you seen
30:22
in that challenge of integrating
30:27
those different sides,
30:27
even in your own career?
30:30
And do you find that the challenges
30:30
for women who are just leaving
30:35
Sloan or graduating college is easier or
30:39
harder or different? So it's funny,
30:44
I don't have a perfect answer
30:44
to this question partly because
30:49
it's just coming up in some
30:49
of the work that we're doing,
30:51
and I'm wondering about what's
30:51
has been really changing.
30:55
On the one hand side, a lot of challenges do
30:56
still feel very similar.
31:01
It is still very complex
31:01
to figure out how you
31:05
combine a parent life
31:05
and a professional life,
31:08
what kind of parent you want to be,
31:08
what kind of professional, what,
31:11
none of those questions are easy.
31:11
And I still see by and large,
31:16
again, forgive me for the generalization,
31:20
is that it is much more often for women a
31:24
difficult choice to combine those two. No,
31:27
they're constantly worrying if
31:27
they're doing the right thing.
31:30
And I see a lot of my
31:30
male coachees not asking
31:35
themselves if they should even
31:35
combine the two things. Yes,
31:38
they should combine them, maybe
31:38
not happy with the combination,
31:40
but it's not like they were stopped
31:40
working or do I not have kids? And that
31:44
question doesn't appear
31:44
that for women that it's
31:48
still a more difficult and
31:48
more complex question so
31:53
that you might on the one hand
31:53
side say, oh, nothing has changed.
31:57
But that is not true. I do think things are changed and
31:58
there are things that have changed.
32:02
I do see a lot of my male coachees
32:02
much more concerned about making the
32:07
right choices. I see a lot more women wanting
32:08
to make the combination work and
32:13
not stepping out of work fully or
32:13
not accepting that they have to
32:19
make a choice, really
32:19
wanting to combine the two.
32:22
Whereas I think my generation still, there are still a lot of very talented
32:24
women that more or less stop working
32:27
completely. And so I do think
32:27
there's a shift, but it's slow.
32:32
So any parting advice
32:32
for perspective Sloanies?
32:37
I think the idea of spending
32:37
a couple of years in the
32:42
workplace and then stepping out
32:42
again and going back to school,
32:47
I think that I wish everybody
32:47
was able to do that.
32:51
I think that experience of learning when
32:51
you're a little bit older as opposed to
32:56
teenagers, I think that is
32:56
really rich and valuable.
32:59
And I don't know about you,
33:02
but I still remember the first time
33:02
I was putting my backpack on again
33:06
and walking to class after having worked
33:06
for several years, I was like, wow,
33:11
I appreciated that freedom in a way that I
33:16
didn't do before. I think that so that I wish for as many,
33:22
I already wished it on
33:22
everybody to enjoy learning
33:27
at several, maybe even with
33:27
several stages in your life.
33:33
For Sloanies particularly, I mean,
33:33
we're diehard. I'm a diehard fan.
33:38
I'm sure you are too. I think
33:38
Sloan, I don't know how they do it,
33:42
but they do manage to put groups
33:42
of people together that can be so
33:48
like-minded and so, I would always say soak
33:49
up all the learning that
33:54
you can, but also really soak up all those
33:55
friendships and relationships
34:00
that will also stay with
34:00
you your whole life.
34:04
Well, thank you to Yda Bouvier, class of 1998 for joining us on this
34:06
episode of Sloanies Talking with
34:11
Sloanies. You can learn more about Yda
34:11
and connect with her on her website,
34:15
which is www.bouvierltd.com,
34:22
if you wanted to reach out and
34:22
thank you very much for joining us.
34:26
Thank you. Christopher. Sloanies Talking with Sloanies is produced
34:31
by the Office of External Relations
34:34
at MIT Sloan School of Management.
34:37
You can subscribe to this
34:37
podcast by visiting our website,
34:40
mitsloan.mit.edu/alumni,
34:44
or wherever you find
34:44
your favorite podcasts.
34:46
Support for this podcast comes in
34:46
part from the Sloan Annual Fund,
34:50
which provides essential flexible
34:50
funding to ensure that our community can
34:54
pursue excellence. Make your gift today by
34:56
visiting giving.mit.edu/sloan.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More