Podchaser Logo
Home
Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Released Wednesday, 30th August 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Leading with the Right Brain with Yda Bouvier, MBA '98

Wednesday, 30th August 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:06

For Sloanies particularly, I

0:06

mean, I don't know how they do it,

0:10

but they do manage to put groups of people

0:10

together that can be so like-minded.

0:15

I would always say soak up

0:15

all the learning that you can,

0:19

but also really soak up all those

0:19

friendships and relationships that will

0:24

also stay with you your whole life. Welcome to Sloanies Talking with Sloanies,

0:30

a candid conversation with alumni and

0:30

faculty about the MIT Sloan experience and

0:35

how it influences what

0:35

they're doing today.

0:38

So what does it mean to be a Sloanie?

0:38

Over the course of this podcast,

0:43

you'll hear from guests who are making

0:43

a difference in their community,

0:45

including our own very

0:45

important one here at Sloan.

0:51

Hi, I'm your host Christopher Reichert, and welcome to Sloanies

0:53

Talking with Sloanies.

0:55

My guest today is Yda

0:55

Bouvier a 1998, MIT Sloan,

1:00

MBA graduate. Welcome. Hi. Yda joins us from London and

1:02

before we begin our conversation,

1:06

I just want to give our listeners some background. So Ida's an executive coach

1:09

now for 15 years and an author.

1:13

She works with both individuals

1:13

and companies looking to

1:17

the greatest potential and she just

1:17

released her first book Leading With the

1:22

Right Brain. So congratulations. Thank You.

1:25

Before being an executive

1:25

coach and an author.

1:28

She was a senior manager at the Boston

1:28

Consulting Group, also known as B C G,

1:33

where her experience included

1:33

international corporate

1:37

integration projects across

1:37

industries. In addition to her M B A,

1:42

she holds a master of science

1:42

in applied physics. So wow,

1:46

I'd love to know more about

1:46

that and how you use that today.

1:50

She's a sailor. Oh yes. And she met

1:50

her husband at Sloan. So welcome Ida.

1:55

Tell us about what motivated

1:55

you to write it and

2:00

what's the message you

2:00

want people to get from it.

2:02

Recently a couple of people have

2:02

been, or from different sides,

2:05

I get that question. What prompted you

2:05

to write the book? At first I thought,

2:10

well, I sort of started writing,

2:13

but I realized there was a little bit

2:13

more behind it when I started working as a

2:17

coach. I think a lot of people who

2:18

come from sort of analytical and

2:23

consulting and using your

2:23

left brain a lot kind of

2:27

job and education, I found myself always tempted

2:29

to solve everybody's problem.

2:34

Somebody would ask me a

2:34

question and I would think, oh,

2:37

do I have the right answer?

2:37

And when I trained as a coach,

2:41

I realized that that actually

2:41

doesn't work so well.

2:45

And I stumbled more or

2:45

less by coincidence,

2:49

sort of a more creative way of working

2:49

with where I could kind of let go of all

2:53

that problem solving focus. Now as I started working

2:55

in different ways,

2:59

I realized how powerful that

2:59

was. I started working it

3:03

it was sort of the way I

3:03

distinguished myself professionally.

3:06

I then started teaching other coaches

3:06

what this way of working was and by then I

3:11

had spent some time studying neuroscience

3:11

and neurobiology and I realized that

3:16

what I was doing was

3:16

using the right brain.

3:19

And so I thought was teaching coaches

3:19

how to use the right brain and to work

3:23

with their clients. And as I've

3:23

now been doing this for a while,

3:27

I'm realizing I'm sitting on this sort

3:27

of gigantic secret that it feels a

3:31

little bit awkward to just keep us, keep it to myself and the small world

3:34

of coaching. On the cover of my book,

3:38

I put a genie lamp with the idea of smoke

3:44

and shape of a brain coming out of it. And I did it because the

3:45

right brain is really this

3:49

enormous power that we all have,

3:52

like this your personal genie and you

3:52

just have to figure out how to get it out

3:56

of the bottle. And it's such a wonderful

3:57

thing that I thought I have to

4:02

make this available to a much wider

4:02

group of people than I can reach by

4:07

myself simply by doing my work. So

4:07

that prompted me to write a book.

4:12

One of the professors I

4:12

studied under years ago was Ron

4:17

Heifetz who teaches about

4:17

adaptive leadership.

4:20

And I kind of took it as

4:20

soft power versus hard power

4:25

in some ways guiding people

4:25

towards their own solutions versus

4:30

pressing them to the solution

4:30

that you may have come up with.

4:34

Is that an element to your

4:34

executive coaching for people?

4:38

I think there are a lot of

4:38

different words that come close

4:43

to this context of left and

4:43

right and hard and soft can be

4:47

one of them. I think the real important thing

4:48

is that you see what your left

4:53

brain always tries to do is it

4:53

tries to describe the world as

4:58

concretely as possible and then make

4:58

it tangible. And by making it tangible,

5:02

you can actually manipulate

5:02

and utilize it. Now,

5:06

that is of course an extremely

5:06

useful thing and we try with our

5:11

mutual, with our left brains, we try to making it concrete

5:12

in relatively similar ways.

5:15

And then it becomes in a way this notion

5:15

of, okay, it's concrete, it's hard,

5:19

and we can exchange between us. What your right brain does is

5:21

it actually experiences the

5:26

world in its entirety.

5:28

And that also means that the way I

5:28

experience the world might actually be

5:31

slightly different from the way you're

5:31

experienced the world and we even

5:34

influence each other in how

5:34

we experience the world.

5:37

I don't know if soft is

5:37

the right word for it.

5:40

I think the left brain tries to categorize

5:40

left is hard and therefore right is

5:44

soft. But for me, the right

5:44

brain's not soft at all.

5:48

I don't even have one word for

5:48

it other than it's very powerful.

5:52

So when you said hard, in other words the left brain tries to

5:53

make the world as concrete as possible

5:58

to then be able to hold it,

6:01

I guess is how I'm visualizing it as

6:01

something that can then be exchanged

6:05

or changed or observed.

6:08

Exactly. Exactly. Does that also imply that it becomes

6:14

rigid in the sense that once

6:14

you make it into an object,

6:18

then it's hard to change it again? And

6:23

it becomes rigid and what you see is

6:23

that the left brain can get stuck in

6:28

its own simplification of the world.

6:32

And where we often need our right

6:32

brain is to find something new,

6:36

anything new first materializes

6:36

in your right hemisphere and then

6:41

hey, it gets translated and your left brain

6:41

tries to a little bit later on grasp it

6:46

and interpret it again. But

6:46

the left brain really gets,

6:50

can get stuck just as the word

6:50

that you use in its own rigidity.

6:55

So I read a definition of right brain

6:55

people and I'll just read it out because

6:59

in some ways I agree with it in other

6:59

ways I'm outraged as a left-handed person,

7:05

alright? Right. Brainers can

7:05

be disorganized, unpredictable,

7:09

and more often than not very good with

7:09

people. So I agree with part of that.

7:13

They're spontaneous, creative and

7:13

more emotional than left brainers,

7:16

which outrages me, but I'm

7:16

joking. There are also intuitive,

7:21

good at problem solving and more

7:21

comfortable with the unknown,

7:26

I suppose once you kind of define

7:26

it. So the mere fact of defining it,

7:30

I think is a left brain activity. Yeah, you totally got that.

7:34

So I take these with a grain of salt I guess. But I mean there is

7:36

also some truth in that.

7:39

And so when I think about

7:44

corporate, and this is going to be a gross

7:45

exaggeration when I think about corporate

7:50

expectations for decision-making,

7:54

for leadership styles for

7:58

the people that I think

7:58

succeed in that environment,

8:01

my observation is is that when I look

8:01

at this image that's in front of me,

8:04

it shows on the left

8:04

the logic, the language,

8:08

the sense of time and science and

8:08

on the right creative intuition,

8:12

imagination. I guess this is a long-winded way

8:14

of asking a question about how do

8:18

people who I think their career has pushed

8:18

them to be as left brain as possible

8:23

because at the end of the day you have

8:23

to show results and explain them and then

8:27

show them how do they bring in

8:27

the right brain side and not

8:32

be scoffed at as squishy

8:32

and loosey goosey.

8:35

I think it's absolutely true

8:35

that through our education and

8:40

when we first land in the workplace

8:40

and we learn to basically be

8:45

effective in the existing system,

8:45

the left brain is a huge asset to us.

8:50

I find that by the time a

8:50

leader comes to me for coaching,

8:54

it's because they're experiencing

8:54

some of those limitations.

8:57

And I often right at

8:57

the start I say, look,

9:00

what we will do is we will work with

9:00

all your resources and you're probably

9:05

pretty good with using

9:05

your left side resources.

9:07

So we are going to quite regularly tap

9:07

into your right side resources and nobody

9:12

really understands what that means in the beginning. And one of the key things about your

9:14

right brain is that it doesn't process in

9:18

words, but it really processes in images.

9:20

We don't say for nothing a picture

9:20

says more than a thousand words,

9:24

because it really does. And so I,

9:28

often as one of the first things we do, is we work with pictures to describe

9:30

a situation and somebody always

9:34

immediately experiences that gives a

9:34

richness that they weren't before able

9:39

to articulate. And just by having an image

9:41

often provides new insights.

9:46

And that's when people start

9:46

getting it and they're like, okay,

9:48

there is this ability that I have that

9:48

I don't tap in very often that can

9:53

really lift me as a person and

9:53

as a leader to a new level.

9:57

And that sort of points

9:57

to the power of metaphors.

10:01

Absolutely. And you often have,

10:04

I'm sure you've experienced that yourself. Maybe an example even pops to mind where

10:06

somebody is trying to convince you of

10:10

something in a very articulate,

10:10

logical way and then they say, well,

10:14

what I'm really trying

10:14

to achieve here is this,

10:19

I just want to create a new garden.

10:19

And you're like, ah, now, I get it.

10:25

Tell me more about that revelation. I am just using that as an example

10:27

because I'm looking at my own garden,

10:31

literally, literally looking at my garden.

10:35

But what I mean is that when

10:35

we communicate in metaphors,

10:38

we also can feel aligned

10:38

and connected in a way

10:43

that we by purely exchanging

10:43

logic sometimes don't arrive

10:48

at. And so because if we are connected

10:48

with our right brains as much as with our

10:52

left brains, then we to convince somebody else

10:53

to influence and inspire others,

10:58

that's really important. And I was thinking about

11:00

effective speakers, communicators.

11:07

Do you find in your work with

11:07

your clients or organizations

11:12

that there are patterns there that you can

11:14

see that are successful and unsuccessful?

11:19

So I think in the past, people who want to become very

11:21

good speakers and influencers,

11:25

what they have often focused

11:25

on is on the one hand side,

11:30

have a really good argument and on the

11:30

other hand side have a lot of charisma.

11:34

When you're standing in

11:34

front of a group of people,

11:37

you exude a lot of confidence

11:37

and hand and it's often

11:42

very important that what you

11:42

show physically is the same.

11:46

It can be in contrast with

11:46

the words that you use. Now,

11:50

I think what we've noticed very vividly

11:50

the past two years is that when we

11:55

had to work with each other virtually

11:55

all of a sudden and we had to start

12:00

influencing people almost

12:00

exclusively, virtually,

12:03

we started realizing that all of a sudden

12:03

you can't rely on your body anymore

12:07

because it's only this

12:07

piece is on the camera.

12:11

And even though we're

12:11

on the camera like this,

12:14

we are not even biologically able to

12:14

pick up the same signals from each other

12:17

over the camera that we can do when we

12:17

were speaking in person. All of a sudden

12:22

as a leader, if you are influencing people not

12:23

only by at a combination of your

12:27

words in your presence,

12:27

but only by your words,

12:30

you are realizing that it's

12:30

not flying in the same way.

12:35

And that is because if we're

12:35

only using structure and logic,

12:39

it's only a left brain activation

12:39

and not the right brain activation.

12:43

If you activate your

12:43

right brain, for example,

12:46

by using metaphors to stimulate

12:46

your audience right brain,

12:50

then all of a sudden you can actually

12:50

be a lot more engaging and inspiring

12:55

also over zoom and using the virtual

13:00

platforms, which in today's world

13:00

I think is absolutely essential.

13:04

If you look at sustainability, we can't be all be flying around the

13:06

world to show everybody our physical

13:10

presence at every odd moment

13:10

where we need to influence,

13:13

we need to do it in other ways. And so the ability to

13:15

provoke a good right brain

13:20

connection virtually seems to me

13:20

that that's a leadership skill that's

13:25

really important for the coming

13:25

decade. And interestingly,

13:30

the dean of MIT, David Schmittlein

13:30

of Sloan, he said exactly that,

13:35

what is it, about two years

13:35

ago. And so I was like,

13:38

we're on the same

13:38

wavelength here, visioning.

13:41

I know that Sloan has been

13:41

pushing leadership studies as part

13:46

of a well-rounded graduate. And I think that those are, in my mind,

13:54

I think it's positive, but to my mind it's a counterpoint

13:56

to the accounting class

14:01

where accounting is a hard skill in the

14:01

sense that the numbers have to add up or

14:06

not type of thing. Leadership,

14:09

in my opinion is more, it builds,

14:12

I guess on the raw materials of each

14:12

individual and try to bridge that

14:17

personality with then the hard skills

14:17

that you still have to have, right?

14:21

Yes. For me, it's absolutely not a

14:21

question of either or. It's both.

14:25

And I don't know if this

14:25

was the same for you,

14:29

but for me it was by

14:29

the time I was at Sloan,

14:32

I was definitely still a little bit in

14:32

my left brain development phase first at

14:36

B C G and then at Sloan I

14:36

joined. So when I joined BCG,

14:41

I really knew nothing about business.

14:43

I just came straight out of

14:43

the physics cellars doing my

14:48

research. And so I was

14:48

like, oh, balance sheet.

14:53

So I sort of survived for two years,

14:55

and then thankfully they helped me to

14:55

do an M B A. And so for me at Sloan,

15:00

I was soaking up the accounting and

15:00

the economics and the strategy and

15:05

all those more hardcore business

15:05

skills because I still really needed,

15:09

I needed that solid ground on my feet.

15:15

And some of the leadership topics or

15:15

organizational behavior classes as

15:20

we also had, I was actually in my

15:20

late 20s, not even that interested in

15:26

it. That came a couple of years later when

15:31

I felt I've covered this field now,

15:33

but there seems to be a lot more

15:33

other interesting things out there.

15:37

So tell us about your applied

15:37

physics background and

15:43

I guess how do you use that now

15:43

and why the transition from,

15:48

how does that fit in? Let's put it that way. After school, I remember you go,

15:54

who knows what they want to do

15:54

when there are 17, 18 right?.

15:59

So I was definitely of the variety of

15:59

let's keep as many options open as I

16:03

possibly can. A good family friend said,

16:08

oh, if you study physics, that means that's essentially no choice

16:10

because then you can still do everything

16:14

you want afterwards. And I

16:14

thought, that sounds great.

16:18

It's also the kind of

16:18

thing that it looks good,

16:22

it's considered a hard thing to do.

16:22

And so I was like, you know what?

16:25

That makes a lot of sense. So

16:25

off I went studying physics.

16:29

It was so difficult.

16:33

I have to say the first two years I really

16:37

scraped myself over the finish line

16:41

kind of learning how to work and study. I think it's not uncommon if you've had

16:43

it relatively easy at school that if you

16:48

all of a sudden are at a top

16:48

university and a difficult degree,

16:51

then you really have to shape up.

16:55

It is a muscle, right? Yeah, it's exactly that. It's a muscle.

16:58

So I had to very quickly train mine.

17:03

But then as I was nearing the end of

17:06

my degree, which at my

17:06

university was like a two,

17:09

two and a half year research project,

17:13

a lot of that really a lot of

17:13

more hardcore research work,

17:19

which in my case was the

17:19

orientation dependency of silicon.

17:23

So that would then ultimately

17:23

be interesting for the

17:28

Interesting. So I worked in clean rooms and things

17:30

like that, but it was all very detailed,

17:35

far away from immediate application.

17:38

And I thought after

17:38

doing that for some time,

17:44

I need to be a little bit

17:44

more in the real world,

17:48

and then I thought, okay,

17:51

how do I transition from

17:51

that kind of academics

17:56

into the business world? And

17:56

BCG, like other consultancies,

18:00

seems to welcome people

18:00

who've done technical degrees

18:05

and then things that they can just

18:05

teach them about business along the way.

18:09

And so that was my saving grace,

18:11

and that kind of brought

18:11

me to BCG after my studies.

18:16

Well, it certainly shows

18:16

that you can apply yourself.

18:19

Yeah, I mean,

18:23

you are asking me what the value, what's the value of that education now.

18:30

some of the value of that education is

18:30

that you don't need to prove to anybody

18:33

that you're smart. And

18:33

that sounds really stupid,

18:37

but it's relevant.

18:39

Right? To me, it's the equivalent

18:39

of in the business world,

18:43

wearing a suit and tie, there's a certain assumption

18:44

about what the person is so that

18:49

you don't have to fight that

18:49

battle. That's been, we agree.

18:51

That's boxes ticked. The other real value that it has for

18:54

me is that when I started coaching,

19:00

which is a totally different field,

19:02

I was definitely looking for

19:02

some angle to really satisfy my

19:07

more intellectual curiosity. The findings from

19:09

neuroscience and neurobiology

19:14

were streaming in by it was impossible to

19:19

keep up with everything that was

19:19

surfacing in the past 20 years

19:24

question of how do you take those insights

19:24

into really practical applications so

19:28

that a leader in a business

19:28

can use some of that?

19:33

That was really kept me interested and so

19:37

that my scientific appetite

19:37

was fed and proved out

19:42

to be also very useful for understanding

19:42

this dynamic between the left and the

19:47

right brain. When I think about the right brain and

19:47

even the definition that I read before,

19:52

which was that there's

19:52

disorganization and unpredictableness

19:56

and emotional, how do you tap?

20:00

So even going to your image on the

20:00

cover of your book, the Aladdin's lamp,

20:06

with this coming out, how do you sort of control that

20:07

in a way and allow people or teach

20:12

executives or organizations to

20:16

listen to those intuitions or that

20:16

information coming from the right brain

20:21

and trust it? That requires a little

20:23

bit of trial and error.

20:28

So you take something like

20:28

working with an image.

20:32

In my early in the book, I use an example of a client who was

20:33

describing a really complicated challenge

20:38

in his relatively new leadership role.

20:42

And after we were really getting

20:42

lost in details, I said to him,

20:47

paint me a picture of what

20:47

the situation looks like.

20:51

And he then said, well, it feels like I'm hanging off

20:52

a rock cliff without a safety

20:57

cord. And I thought, hhh,

20:57

like, it feels a little scary.

21:01

And we sort of talked a bit about

21:01

the image and he said, well,

21:04

I really like rock climbing, actually.

21:04

This is a source of enjoyment for me,

21:09

but what worries me is that I don't

21:09

have a safety net. And so I said,

21:14

so we then said, well, what's that safety rope actually at work?

21:20

What he ended up saying was that

21:20

the safety rope felt really like a

21:25

support network of colleagues and peers.

21:25

And

21:30

so we then talked about

21:30

how we could build that.

21:33

But by the time we then met a month

21:33

later for our next coaching session,

21:36

he had started taking some

21:36

actions and seeing the

21:41

results because you then experience

21:41

something that's valuable,

21:45

you then get more curious saying,

21:47

How do I experience more of those

21:47

insights because they seem to be

21:53

bringing me something relevant? Now,

21:56

what's always very important is

21:56

that you, on the one hand side,

21:59

you want to benefit from the intuition

21:59

and the wisdom of your right brain,

22:03

but you then do need to translate it

22:03

into something that's really concrete and

22:07

tangible where you also

22:07

need your left brain.

22:11

So it's almost about you want

22:11

to establish the collaboration.

22:16

And here is something really

22:16

interesting, really interesting,

22:20

which is that your right hemisphere

22:20

is really fine to collaborate with the

22:25

left, but the left doesn't want

22:25

to collaborate with the right.

22:29

And that must be manifested in

22:29

leadership power struggles or

22:33

boardroom challenges, strategy sessions.

22:37

All those and it is also why

22:37

it's often so tricky to bring

22:42

this kind of right brain intuition

22:42

into the boardroom, for example,

22:46

because somebody might say in a boardroom,

22:53

I just don't really

22:53

like the smell of this.

22:56

And another person, that's

22:56

a right brain comment,

23:00

that's a right brain intuition that says,

23:03

I'm feeling uncomfortable about something. The left brain responses

23:05

is often, immediately,

23:09

I'm not quite sure what you

23:09

mean. Everything's fine here.

23:13

Facts and figures. Yeah, look, it looks like a fantastic

23:14

opportunity. Here are the numbers.

23:18

And so unless you are on the

23:18

lookout for those kind of

23:24

intuitions, it's very easy for our very powerful

23:25

and competent left brains to

23:29

sort of go. So you did your applied physics and then,

23:33

which was very theoretical and

23:33

education research conceptual,

23:38

and then you dove into corporate

23:38

consulting management consulting.

23:44

And correct me if I'm wrong, were you

23:44

at BCG throughout your time at Sloan?

23:49

Yeah, so I was at BCG before and then

23:49

I also went back to BCG afterwards.

23:54

So how did Sloan change you? And you

23:54

better mention your husband here.

23:59

Yes. How did Sloan change me?

24:03

So the first thing it did was that it

24:03

did really give me this solid ground

24:08

in terms of business education on all the

24:11

dimensions that we talked about before.

24:14

So I went back to BCG, and

24:14

my confidence was like I felt

24:19

in a completely different

24:19

place, and that was very nice.

24:22

I enjoyed the work also a lot more

24:22

because of that on all fields, very, very,

24:27

I just felt like I was,

24:30

what I did was solid and

24:30

not just grasping at straws.

24:36

You had created and sharpened some tools, right? Yeah, of course.

24:40

The other thing which I hope

24:40

many people get from not only

24:44

Sloan but attending their business school

24:44

is these network of lifelong friends.

24:49

That's just phenomenal. Some of them we've been in contact

24:51

for on a very regular basis having

24:56

holidays together. But even if

24:56

you don't see somebody for five,

24:59

10 years and they pass through

24:59

London and you sit down for dinner,

25:02

you're right back. And I think it's unique in life those

25:03

times where you build those kind of

25:08

that intensity of relationships

25:08

afterwards, you get busy

25:13

And I think those friendships

25:13

are, we treasure them a lot.

25:17

And since Laurent and I are

25:17

also from different countries,

25:20

we have those sets of friendships in our

25:20

respective countries. But from Sloan,

25:24

they're mutual friends. And so that's also what makes

25:26

a double special in our life.

25:30

And he's a banker, right? Yeah.

25:32

He's a banker. So he is very left brained.

25:35

You think. But maybe not.

25:38

Left and right brain. No. And what else?

25:41

So the one thing that I

25:41

really learned at school,

25:45

which only over time and certainly

25:45

is also I think underlies what

25:50

I write about in the book, is that one of the courses that really

25:51

made a huge impact on me was system

25:55

dynamics. And this notion of if something

25:56

is happening in a system

26:01

which doesn't produce the

26:01

outcomes that you expect,

26:04

there are forces that you're

26:04

missing or need to be uncovered.

26:09

And that idea that it

26:09

has informed, of course,

26:14

a lot of what I do, not only as

26:14

a consultant, but as a coach,

26:18

that is one of these foundation

26:18

principles that informs a lot of

26:23

my work because somebody comes to

26:23

coaching and sometimes they say they

26:28

want something, but they don't do

26:28

the things that would get them there.

26:31

And then just this idea of there are

26:31

forces in this system that we're trying to

26:36

uncover is a very useful way of thinking.

26:40

And so system dynamics I think has

26:40

informed a lot my career in ways that

26:44

I totally didn't expect when

26:44

I was sitting in a class.

26:49

And that presumes a certain

26:49

rationalness to it all. Right?

26:52

Yes, I suppose so. Or at

26:52

least again, something to,

26:56

it's another way to make things

26:56

tangible. But I like the idea of,

27:02

I like the language of force

27:02

because forces are kind of a kind of

27:07

energy, and even though yes,

27:07

you can describe a force,

27:10

but you can never really fully describe

27:10

it, it has that sort of energy.

27:15

It has something magical and ungraspable

27:15

to it. I suppose even as a physicist.

27:20

I mean, when you're coaching

27:20

someone and they make a tweak,

27:25

so this is one of those things where

27:25

you're introducing some dynamism into the

27:29

system, right? Tweaking

27:29

the knob, pushing a lever.

27:32

Is part of your coaching to have people

27:32

think two or three steps ahead as to

27:36

what the consequences or the

27:36

various consequences could be.

27:39

So thinking in a system dynamics way.

27:42

Yes, we very often, and you can do that.

27:44

You can imagine we have this amazing

27:44

ability to be able to imagine ourselves in

27:49

the future. I think one of the unique

27:51

human capabilities.

27:55

Sometimes you can use it to uncover forces, but also to check whether you really

27:57

are taking everything into consideration

28:02

that you should. What is your definition of success

28:04

in the success of writing a book?

28:08

I can see that would be satisfying, but

28:08

working with clients or just generally.

28:13

My definition of success. So there's

28:13

a couple of different angles to that.

28:18

I would say I definitely

28:18

am somebody who likes to

28:23

experience lots of

28:23

different things in life.

28:28

So I like a life where I am a parent and

28:32

I have time to do my sailing and

28:32

I can travel and I can enjoy my

28:37

work and I can cook. And that richness is, for me,

28:43

very important.

28:46

So I would say part of has

28:46

success is just to be able to

28:51

experience a lot of richness

28:51

that life has to offer us,

28:56

including spending a lot of time

28:56

in beautiful natural environments.

29:01

In terms for myself, what has been my personal definition of

29:03

success for a really long time is that

29:10

it's always been very important

29:10

to me to show our daughters

29:15

that as a parent, and

29:15

certainly as a woman,

29:22

which for whom, that tends to be

29:22

still more of a question than for

29:28

men, I'm usually generalizing

29:28

here, but as a parent,

29:32

to not have to make the

29:32

trade-off between being an active

29:37

and engaged parent and having

29:37

a really rich and interesting

29:42

professional life. So that is not either or that

29:44

you can really have both.

29:48

And that informed a lot of my

29:48

choices for the past 20 years and

29:52

still does because I wanted to show

29:52

that to my daughters. And so that, yeah,

29:58

if I'm able to first achieve that myself,

30:02

but also at least role

30:02

model it for some people,

30:06

then that would be a big chunk

30:06

of my definition of success.

30:10

That's excellent. And so as a

30:10

professional woman who's a parent

30:15

and a partner, have you seen

30:15

over the course of, say,

30:20

your 25 years since Sloan, what sort of evolution have you seen

30:22

in that challenge of integrating

30:27

those different sides,

30:27

even in your own career?

30:30

And do you find that the challenges

30:30

for women who are just leaving

30:35

Sloan or graduating college is easier or

30:39

harder or different? So it's funny,

30:44

I don't have a perfect answer

30:44

to this question partly because

30:49

it's just coming up in some

30:49

of the work that we're doing,

30:51

and I'm wondering about what's

30:51

has been really changing.

30:55

On the one hand side, a lot of challenges do

30:56

still feel very similar.

31:01

It is still very complex

31:01

to figure out how you

31:05

combine a parent life

31:05

and a professional life,

31:08

what kind of parent you want to be,

31:08

what kind of professional, what,

31:11

none of those questions are easy.

31:11

And I still see by and large,

31:16

again, forgive me for the generalization,

31:20

is that it is much more often for women a

31:24

difficult choice to combine those two. No,

31:27

they're constantly worrying if

31:27

they're doing the right thing.

31:30

And I see a lot of my

31:30

male coachees not asking

31:35

themselves if they should even

31:35

combine the two things. Yes,

31:38

they should combine them, maybe

31:38

not happy with the combination,

31:40

but it's not like they were stopped

31:40

working or do I not have kids? And that

31:44

question doesn't appear

31:44

that for women that it's

31:48

still a more difficult and

31:48

more complex question so

31:53

that you might on the one hand

31:53

side say, oh, nothing has changed.

31:57

But that is not true. I do think things are changed and

31:58

there are things that have changed.

32:02

I do see a lot of my male coachees

32:02

much more concerned about making the

32:07

right choices. I see a lot more women wanting

32:08

to make the combination work and

32:13

not stepping out of work fully or

32:13

not accepting that they have to

32:19

make a choice, really

32:19

wanting to combine the two.

32:22

Whereas I think my generation still, there are still a lot of very talented

32:24

women that more or less stop working

32:27

completely. And so I do think

32:27

there's a shift, but it's slow.

32:32

So any parting advice

32:32

for perspective Sloanies?

32:37

I think the idea of spending

32:37

a couple of years in the

32:42

workplace and then stepping out

32:42

again and going back to school,

32:47

I think that I wish everybody

32:47

was able to do that.

32:51

I think that experience of learning when

32:51

you're a little bit older as opposed to

32:56

teenagers, I think that is

32:56

really rich and valuable.

32:59

And I don't know about you,

33:02

but I still remember the first time

33:02

I was putting my backpack on again

33:06

and walking to class after having worked

33:06

for several years, I was like, wow,

33:11

I appreciated that freedom in a way that I

33:16

didn't do before. I think that so that I wish for as many,

33:22

I already wished it on

33:22

everybody to enjoy learning

33:27

at several, maybe even with

33:27

several stages in your life.

33:33

For Sloanies particularly, I mean,

33:33

we're diehard. I'm a diehard fan.

33:38

I'm sure you are too. I think

33:38

Sloan, I don't know how they do it,

33:42

but they do manage to put groups

33:42

of people together that can be so

33:48

like-minded and so, I would always say soak

33:49

up all the learning that

33:54

you can, but also really soak up all those

33:55

friendships and relationships

34:00

that will also stay with

34:00

you your whole life.

34:04

Well, thank you to Yda Bouvier, class of 1998 for joining us on this

34:06

episode of Sloanies Talking with

34:11

Sloanies. You can learn more about Yda

34:11

and connect with her on her website,

34:15

which is www.bouvierltd.com,

34:22

if you wanted to reach out and

34:22

thank you very much for joining us.

34:26

Thank you. Christopher. Sloanies Talking with Sloanies is produced

34:31

by the Office of External Relations

34:34

at MIT Sloan School of Management.

34:37

You can subscribe to this

34:37

podcast by visiting our website,

34:40

mitsloan.mit.edu/alumni,

34:44

or wherever you find

34:44

your favorite podcasts.

34:46

Support for this podcast comes in

34:46

part from the Sloan Annual Fund,

34:50

which provides essential flexible

34:50

funding to ensure that our community can

34:54

pursue excellence. Make your gift today by

34:56

visiting giving.mit.edu/sloan.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features