Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
It was George Kasuf's job to be nosy.
0:03
He was essentially a detective based
0:05
out of Washington, D.C. And
0:07
he had a very specific niche. What
0:10
I did, and it was pretty much a one-person
0:13
operation, was investigate
0:15
whoever would be nominated to the federal
0:18
courts. Kasuf
0:20
knew how to dig through a judge's professional past,
0:23
excavating their true beliefs from long-forgotten
0:26
rulings and speeches. A lot
0:28
of it was just going to the library
0:31
and also talking to lots of people.
0:34
That's what I think I was really good at, is just letting
0:36
people talk to me. That's at least what my boss
0:38
always thought, anybody will talk to you, George. He
0:41
worked for a progressive advocacy group
0:43
called the Alliance for Justice. And
0:46
in the late 80s and early 90s, with
0:48
Republicans controlling the White House, pretty
0:50
much every judge he vetted was conservative.
0:53
My job became simply to be
0:55
the early warning signal to
0:58
staffers on the Hill, specifically
1:00
Senate Judiciary Committee staffers. Kasuf's work
1:03
never stopped. There were dozens
1:05
of new nominees every year, but
1:07
there was one man he was really focused
1:09
on. I sort of became the walking
1:12
encyclopedia on Clarence Thomas.
1:15
By the time Thomas got nominated to
1:17
the Supreme Court in 1991, he'd
1:20
been touted as a top contender for a couple of
1:22
years. Kasuf had been on his trail
1:24
that whole time, building the case
1:27
that Thomas was a judicial extremist and
1:29
a disaster for civil rights. He
1:31
put everything he found into the world's most
1:34
comprehensive Clarence Thomas dossier.
1:36
I probably reviewed over
1:39
a million pages of documents. And
1:41
I would estimate that I
1:44
talked to over a hundred people, either
1:46
on the phone or face-to-face.
1:49
Once, Kasuf got the chance to
1:51
watch Thomas in action up close. A
1:53
Black leader had invited both men to come visit
1:55
her.
1:56
In that meeting, Thomas tried to sell
1:58
himself as a civil rights champion. champion.
2:01
And I'm starting to write things down. You know,
2:03
I'm thinking that's not true. That's not true.
2:05
That's not true. This man would
2:08
say anything to get ahead.
2:10
In the run up to Thomas's confirmation hearings,
2:13
Kasuf gave his dossier to anyone who would
2:15
take it. But
2:16
it didn't mean my research was now
2:18
closed. I just kept going, looking
2:21
for anything else that people wanted to send
2:23
me.
2:23
In July 1991, Kasuf was at a meeting when
2:27
he got a call from a friend.
2:28
He said, I got some information last night. I was
2:31
at a dinner party. And someone was there
2:33
who had a friend that worked with Clarence
2:36
Thomas who said she
2:38
had been sexually harassed by him when
2:41
she worked for him in DC. And
2:43
now she teaches law in Oklahoma.
2:46
I didn't have a name. I
2:49
didn't have a time or anything like that.
2:51
Before that phone call, Kasuf had never
2:54
heard anything about Clarence Thomas and sexual
2:56
harassment.
2:57
This was something he needed to check out. And
2:59
quickly,
3:00
Thomas's confirmation hearings were less than two
3:02
months away.
3:03
If I didn't have Google, I had lots
3:06
of phone books and directories. So
3:08
I went to a directory I had of all
3:10
law professors in the United States, looked
3:12
at the various law schools of Oklahoma,
3:15
found the name of some women, looked
3:17
at each one's biography. And I found, oh, she
3:19
was there at the Office of Civil Rights at the
3:21
Department of Education at the same time. Oh, and
3:24
she worked at the EEOC at the same time. And
3:26
here's her office phone number. And
3:28
that was it.
3:30
Her name is Anita Hill. This
3:34
is Slow Brand.
3:44
I'm your host,
3:46
Joel Anderson. That tip
3:49
about a law professor in Oklahoma was
3:51
just the beginning of a nationwide spectacle.
3:54
Anita Hill's accusations launched urgent
3:56
and heated conversations about racism
3:58
and sexual harassment.
3:59
They also stonked in anger and Clarence
4:02
Thomas that's never stopped reaching. This
4:05
today is a travesty.
4:08
I think that it is disgusting. The
4:10
Supreme Court is not worth it. No
4:13
job is worth it.
4:15
I have no personal vendetta against
4:18
Clarence Thomas. But
4:20
when I was asked by a representative
4:23
of this committee to report
4:26
my experience, I
4:28
felt that I had to tell the truth.
4:31
I could not
4:32
keep silent.
4:36
This is our season finale. Episode 4.
4:40
A National Disgrace.
4:49
This episode is brought to you by SAP. Welcome
4:52
to the window. The window of opportunity.
4:55
When your next move can either make your business
4:57
famous or obsolete. So you
4:59
need to be ready. Be handling good
5:02
surprises and bad ones ready. Be
5:04
opening a Portland, Houston and Providence location
5:06
on the same day ready. Be stock
5:09
options plus paid family leave ready. SAP
5:12
has been there and can help you be ready for
5:14
anything that happens next. Because it will. Be
5:17
ready with SAP.
5:24
Alright, so now let
5:26
me look a little bit from your
5:29
life and history. You are somewhat
5:31
of an enigma. Which brings
5:34
us to the question of what is the real Clarence
5:36
Thomas like? What will the real Clarence
5:38
Thomas do on the Supreme Court if he
5:41
is confirmed? I
5:43
am the real Clarence Thomas and
5:45
I don't know that I would call myself
5:47
an enigma. I'm just Clarence
5:50
Thomas.
5:53
When George Kasuf got a tip about Clarence
5:55
Thomas and sexual harassment. He felt like
5:57
he was racing against time. It took him
5:59
only.
5:59
two hours to figure out Anita Hill's name
6:02
and to pass it along to his boss. As soon
6:04
as he did, she gave him very clear
6:06
instructions. You are not talking
6:08
to her. You're not calling her. You're giving
6:11
this name to the Judiciary Committee. Kasuf
6:14
did as he was told and then he waited
6:16
and waited and waited.
6:18
We
6:20
were getting a little worried because now we're into
6:22
August and I would periodically check
6:25
in to see what was going on. Kasuf
6:27
was still in the dark when Thomas' confirmation
6:30
hearings got started on September 10, 1991.
6:34
Every day he went to Capitol Hill to watch
6:37
Thomas testify in person.
6:38
It was sort of like watching your team
6:41
slowly lose. Oh,
6:43
you just struck out with that question. You
6:45
let him slide right over this.
6:48
As you're sitting there, are you wondering
6:51
whether or not the Anita Hill allegations are going to come
6:53
up? Oh, God, yes.
6:55
Those allegations never did come up
6:57
and the hearings ended without much controversy
6:59
or suspense.
7:01
It looked like Clarence Thomas would be on the Supreme
7:03
Court for life, but then just
7:05
two days before the Senators were scheduled to cast
7:07
their votes, everything changed.
7:09
The shockwave reeling through Capitol
7:11
Hill. Switchboards were frantic with
7:13
calls from constituents with one opinion
7:16
or another on Judge Thomas or Professor Anita
7:18
Hill. Anita Hill. Anita Hill.
7:23
Anita Hill grew up on a farm in segregated
7:25
Oklahoma. The youngest of 13 children,
7:28
she was the valedictorian of her high school, graduated
7:31
from college with honors, and got her law
7:33
degree from Yale, Clarence Thomas' alma
7:35
mater. When Hill went to work for Thomas
7:37
in 1981, she thought he might become
7:40
her mentor, but two years later, she
7:42
ended up in the hospital with stress-related stomach
7:44
pains. Not long after that, she
7:47
left Washington, D.C. for good. For
7:50
almost a decade, Hill tried to put that
7:52
period of her life behind
7:53
her. In 1991, she
7:55
was living in her home state, working as a professor
7:58
at the University of Oklahoma Law School.
7:59
Then, her old boss
8:02
got nominated to the Supreme Court. Most
8:05
of the controversy over Clarence Thomas stems
8:07
from his stormy eight-year tenure as
8:09
head of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
8:12
That summer, Hill wrestled with whether
8:14
to come forward, which she didn't realize
8:16
is that the Senate Judiciary Committee already
8:18
had her name. When she did finally
8:21
hear from them, it was extremely late
8:23
in the game.
8:24
By the time Hill gave the committee a typewritten
8:27
statement, the hearings had been over
8:29
for three days, but Hill's allegations
8:32
revved everything back up again. The
8:34
substance of the information was really startling. That's
8:38
Mark Schwartz. In 1991,
8:40
he was a lawyer for the Judiciary Committee. One
8:43
of his jobs was investigating nominees.
8:46
You know, raise your eyebrows, like, wow, there's
8:48
a lot more work ahead for us. The
8:50
next step was figuring out what that work should
8:52
be. Should we be investigating?
8:54
Who's the best parties to do the investigation?
8:57
Should we get the FBI back in to do it?
8:59
The FBI did talk to Hill. They
9:02
also interviewed Clarence Thomas, who denied
9:04
everything. The public didn't know any
9:06
of this, but Joe Biden did. The
9:08
chairman of the Judiciary Committee weighed the
9:11
evidence and couldn't decide what to do.
9:14
For days, he'd dithered and did nothing,
9:16
but the media was about to force his hand.
9:20
A woman who served as personal assistant
9:22
to Clarence Thomas for over two years
9:25
has accused him of sexually harassing
9:27
her.
9:28
Anita Hill had given the Judiciary Committee
9:30
her statement on the condition it wouldn't
9:32
go to the press. NPR's Nina
9:35
Totenberg got her hands on it anyway.
9:37
Her story aired on Sunday morning, October
9:39
6th,
9:40
two days before the full Senate was scheduled
9:42
to vote on Clarence Thomas' nomination. According
9:45
to Hill's affidavit, Thomas soon began
9:47
asking her out socially and refused to
9:49
accept her explanation that she did not think
9:52
it appropriate to go out with her boss. The
9:54
relationship, she said, became even more
9:56
strained when Thomas, in work situations,
9:59
began to decide.
9:59
When Totenberg asked Phil for
10:02
an interview, she decided to go ahead. If
10:04
her story was going to be told, the public might as well
10:06
hear it from her. She
10:09
says she will always remember her last
10:12
conversation with Clarence Thomas at the EEOC. Well,
10:15
he made a statement about his
10:17
behavior that if
10:20
I ever did disclose it, it
10:22
would be enough to
10:25
ruin his
10:26
career. That
10:28
first report introduced Anita Hill to America.
10:32
It also made her a target. Her answering
10:34
machine was full of death and rape threats. This
10:37
was what she worried might happen if she came forward. But
10:40
it was too late for her to stop now.
10:45
Senator John Danforth knew that his protege
10:48
Clarence Thomas had been accused of sexual harassment.
10:51
But that late in the confirmation process,
10:53
Danforth thought it was no big deal.
10:55
He was wrong. And Thomas was
10:57
frantic. He was sobbing.
11:00
He said his life was ruined.
11:04
He was just destroyed. Just
11:07
absolutely destroyed.
11:09
He reached out during the time and said, man, this
11:12
is rough. That's Lester
11:14
Johnson, an old friend of Thomas's from
11:16
Savannah. I said, I know it's rough,
11:18
man. I said, but God is the best planner.
11:21
If it's as it meant to be, you're
11:23
going to be on that bench.
11:25
If it's not meant to be, you won't. As
11:28
old black folk used to say, give it to God,
11:31
give it to God.
11:34
I had the same phone number for many years.
11:37
So he reached me at a law school
11:39
where I was teaching. Thomas's
11:41
ex-girlfriend, Lillian McEwen, says
11:43
he called her in tears.
11:45
He said, why is she doing this? I don't
11:48
understand. Do you remember how the conversation
11:50
ended? I just said, I don't know.
11:55
In his autobiography, Thomas wrote that
11:57
he felt betrayed by Hill, who he had hired at the the
12:00
Department of Education and brought with him
12:02
to the EEOC. He also
12:04
worried that the media would accept her version
12:06
of events uncritically.
12:08
Thomas quickly released a sworn affidavit
12:11
in which he totally and unequivocally
12:13
denied Hill's allegations.
12:15
His conservative allies also went
12:17
to work on his behalf. We got to win
12:19
this by any means necessary, whatever
12:21
we got to do.
12:22
That's Thomas' longtime friend Armstrong
12:25
Williams. After Hill came forward,
12:27
he told the Wall Street Journal, there's a thin
12:29
line between her sanity and her insanity.
12:33
It was not time to be weak. It was not time
12:35
to feel sorry for yourself. We're at war.
12:38
That war was fought on television.
12:39
Aren't these crimes
12:42
without evidence, so to speak? It's a he
12:44
said, she said kind of situation. Well,
12:47
but faith, the woman's word is evidence.
12:49
And I think what we have to do is give that more value,
12:52
give that more weight.
12:53
There was also a battle on the Senate
12:55
floor. Democrat Barbara Mikulski,
12:58
one of only two women in the chamber, called
13:00
for a full investigation.
13:02
What disturbs me as
13:04
much as the allegations
13:06
themselves is that the United
13:09
States Senate appears not
13:11
to take the charge of
13:13
sexual harassment seriously.
13:18
Thomas is leading advocate John Danforth
13:20
fired back. It cannot
13:23
be true that
13:25
we are going to tolerate a situation
13:28
where anybody who wants to throw the
13:30
mud gets to throw the
13:33
mud. And if it sticks, that's
13:35
just wonderful.
13:37
I mean, I was mad. That
13:40
was really mad.
13:42
Danforth believed that the Thomas he knew
13:45
would never harass anyone.
13:47
I wanted him to win, not just
13:50
because I wanted to be on the Supreme Court.
13:52
That seemed beside the point. But
13:55
I wanted him to have
13:57
some sense of indication and restructure.
13:59
restored pride.
14:02
But it wasn't clear how to get him that vindication.
14:06
An immediate vote without reopening the hearings
14:08
might help Thomas because his confirmation
14:10
it seemed like a shoe in. Or maybe
14:13
it would hurt him since he wouldn't get a chance
14:15
to rebut Anita Hill publicly.
14:18
The Senate's leaders have been meeting all afternoon
14:20
trying to decide how to proceed, but
14:22
there's so much confusion here now because
14:24
of all these counter charges and charges no
14:26
one can say for sure what's about to happen.
14:29
The truth was Thomas and his
14:31
defenders weren't in control. In 1991,
14:34
the Democrats had a big majority of the Senate, 57
14:37
seats to the Republicans
14:40
That meant they had most of the power if
14:42
the chairman of the Judiciary Committee wanted to use
14:45
it. But Joe Biden had been slow to
14:47
act ever since Anita Hill came forward. And
14:49
now he was desperate to find some kind
14:51
of compromise.
14:53
In the beginning, voting against Judge
14:55
Thomas was considered a very dangerous
14:57
vote politically. Now it appears voting
14:59
for him is dangerous. So the Senate,
15:02
I think, is looking for a safe way out.
15:04
Biden decided to reopen the hearings almost
15:06
immediately on Friday, October 11th. Clarence
15:10
Thomas and Anita Hill would both testify.
15:12
And then no matter what, the Senate would
15:14
vote on Thomas's confirmation four days
15:16
later. Those ground rules guaranteed
15:19
that there would be no comprehensive investigation.
15:22
The Democrats were really completely
15:25
outmaneuvered by the Republicans. That's
15:28
Jill Abramson, the coauthor of Strange
15:30
Justice. She says that
15:32
wasn't the end of Biden's concessions. He
15:34
also agreed to limit the scope of the hearings.
15:37
The senators could only ask about sexual
15:40
harassment, not anything else about Thomas's
15:42
personal conduct. And while Thomas
15:45
was protected and bubble wrapped,
15:48
there were no ground rules for Anita
15:50
Hill.
15:51
And there was one more thing. Thomas
15:53
would testify first and last.
15:55
Please speak before Hill and have the last
15:58
word.
16:00
On the morning of October 11th, Clarence
16:02
Thomas and his wife, Jenny, headed to John
16:04
Danforth's Senate office.
16:06
In the hours before the hearing, Danforth
16:09
led the couple and his wife, Sally, in prayer,
16:11
and then he had another idea.
16:13
So I said at the end, this might
16:15
seem corny to you, but follow
16:17
me.
16:18
Danforth led them into the bathroom, where
16:21
the acoustics were better. I had a tape
16:23
machine and I had teed up a
16:26
Mormon Tabernacle choir
16:29
singing Onward Christian Soldiers.
16:32
Onward Christian soldiers
16:37
marching us to
16:39
war. He was holding my hand, we were
16:41
all for holding hands, and his
16:44
eyes were closed. It
16:48
was an effort to try to strengthen
16:50
him. That
16:52
wasn't the only effort to lift Thomas'
16:54
spirits during the hearings. Busloads
16:56
of conservative activists came to Washington
16:59
to show their support. Jenny
17:01
Thomas talked about that in a 2020 documentary.
17:04
And we came out of Senator Danforth's
17:06
office and we were going down the hallway
17:09
and all these people were clapping and
17:12
very excited.
17:17
And he said to me, who are those
17:20
people? And I said, I think they're
17:22
angels. Good
17:28
morning, Judge. If you have
17:30
an opening statement, please proceed. Mr.
17:35
Chairman, Senator
17:37
Thurmond, members of the
17:39
committee, as
17:41
excruciatingly difficult as
17:44
the last two weeks have been, I
17:47
welcome the opportunity to
17:49
clear my name today.
17:52
his
18:00
integrity and his character had all
18:02
been harmed.
18:03
There is nothing this committee, this
18:06
body, or this country can do
18:09
to give me my good name back. Confirm
18:13
me if you want. Don't
18:15
confirm me if you are so led, but
18:19
let this process end. After
18:22
less than an hour, Clarence Thomas was done.
18:25
But the day was just getting started. Welcome
18:28
Professor Hill. At 11
18:31
30 a.m. Anita Hill took Clarence Thomas's
18:33
place at the witness table.
18:35
I instruct the officers do not
18:37
let anyone in or out of that
18:39
door while Professor Hill was making her statement.
18:42
Hill wore a bright blue linen seat and
18:44
stared straight ahead into the flashing cameras.
18:47
Professor, do you swear to tell the whole truth and nothing
18:50
but the truth will help you God? I do.
18:52
Thank you. Professor Hill, please
18:56
make whatever statement you would wish to make to
18:58
the committee. It
19:01
is only after a great deal of
19:03
agonizing consideration and sleepless
19:06
nights that I am able to talk
19:09
of these unpleasant matters to anyone
19:12
but my close friends.
19:14
Hill ran through her allegations from beginning
19:16
to end, how Thomas had asked her to
19:18
go out with him, how he pressured her
19:21
even when she'd said no,
19:22
how over and over again he'd called
19:24
her into his office and steered their conversations
19:27
to sex.
19:28
He spoke about acts that he had
19:30
seen in pornographic films involving
19:33
such matters as women having sex with
19:35
animals and films showing group
19:38
sex or rape scenes.
19:40
On other occasions he
19:43
referred to the size of his own penis
19:45
as being larger than normal
19:47
and he also spoke on some occasions
19:50
of the pleasures he had given to
19:52
women
19:52
with
19:54
oral sex. Oh
19:57
my god, oh my god, and here I'm
19:59
thinking. with every detail that
20:01
she's offering. What
20:03
the hell did I do? George
20:06
Kasu's tip about Anita Hill had led
20:08
indirectly to all of this. Kasu
20:11
stood in the back of the hearing room, transfixed.
20:14
The whole world was hearing about testimony
20:17
dealing with a nominee to
20:19
the Supreme Court and his genitals. As
20:22
she talked, everyone was quiet.
20:26
Hill said that Thomas would comment on what
20:28
she was wearing and whether it made her more
20:31
or less sexually attractive. She
20:33
also described a peculiar incident
20:35
involving Thomas in a soda can.
20:38
He got up from the table at
20:40
which we were working, went over
20:43
to his desk to get the Coke,
20:46
looked at the can, and asked, who
20:48
has put pubic hair on my Coke?
20:52
Her testimony was so detailed
20:54
that I found it, as a reporter,
20:57
credible.
20:58
Jill Abramson was also in the hearing
21:00
room that day.
21:01
I went to lunch with my Wall
21:04
Street Journal colleague. And as we
21:06
chatted, I mean, both of us were saying,
21:08
like,
21:08
how does Clarence Thomas survive?
21:12
There's no way they
21:14
can vote to confirm him after this.
21:17
That was the mood. And if it took her
21:19
testimony for them to finally realize
21:22
that this man is unfit for judicial
21:24
office, so be it.
21:26
It wasn't just that Hill was laying out all
21:29
those damning details. She also
21:31
maintained her composure during hours
21:33
of cross-examination. Her main interrogator
21:36
on the Republican side was Pennsylvania's
21:38
Arlen Spector.
21:40
You took it to mean that
21:44
Judge Thomas wanted to have sex with
21:46
you. But in fact,
21:48
he never did ask you to have sex, correct?
21:50
No, he did not ask me to have sex. He
21:53
did continually pressure me to
21:55
go out with him, continually. And
21:57
he would not accept my explanation
21:59
as a
21:59
one is being valid. So
22:03
that when you said you took it to mean,
22:05
we ought to have sex, that that was an inference
22:08
to you, Drew. Yes.
22:10
A former prosecutor, Spector
22:12
pushed Hill on the minor inconsistencies
22:14
between her testimony and which she told
22:17
the FBI. But it wasn't just the
22:19
Republicans who were asking probing
22:21
questions. Again, it's
22:23
difficult, but for the record, what was the
22:25
content of what he said? Joe
22:27
Biden spent a good chunk of his allotted
22:29
time asking Hill to spell
22:32
out everything Thomas had done to her.
22:34
And he used the
22:37
name that he had been referred to in
22:39
the pornographic material.
22:44
Do you recall what it was? Yes,
22:47
I do. The name
22:49
that was referred to was Long
22:51
Donk Silver. I'll
22:55
be honest, as a 13-year-old kid watching the hearings, I thought
22:57
that moment was hilarious. All of these
22:59
very serious adults in a very
23:01
serious-looking room having an incredibly
23:04
serious conversation about Long Donk Silver. In
23:08
my defense, I
23:09
was just a kid, and I didn't know what sexual
23:11
harassment meant or how serious it was. But
23:15
I wasn't the
23:16
only one laughing. Here's how Saturday Night Live
23:18
kicked off that weekend. The
23:20
committee calls its next witness. Sir,
23:25
would you please state your name? Long Donk Silver.
23:32
In the early 90s, Anita Hill was up against a
23:35
culture that barely recognized workplace sexual misconduct. A
23:38
big problem is
23:39
the way some men and women view the same
23:41
situation. In the case
23:43
of Judge Thomas, that's something that happened 10 years ago,
23:45
allegedly happened 10 years ago, I think to
23:47
bring it up now is completely different. I
23:51
don't think there is any man who can actually
23:54
feel what a woman feels if she
23:57
perceives herself as having been harassed.
23:59
In the Senate Judiciary Committee, there was
24:02
no difference in how men and women viewed things.
24:05
That's because there were no women on the committee
24:07
at all.
24:07
In skepticism about sexual harassment
24:10
crossed party lines, Dennis DeConcini,
24:12
a Democrat from Arizona, said there was
24:15
ample cause to question Hill's credibility.
24:17
If you're sexually harassed, you ought to get mad about it,
24:20
and you ought to do something about it, and you ought to complain. Instead
24:23
of hanging around a long time, and
24:25
then all of a sudden calling up anonymously and
24:27
saying, oh, I want to complain.
24:30
Anita Hill's testimony was broadcast
24:32
live on all three major networks, plus
24:34
C-SPAN, CNN, and Court TV.
24:37
But Clarence Thomas refused to look at any of
24:39
it.
24:39
After he read his statement on Capitol Hill, Thomas
24:42
had gone home to suburban Virginia.
24:44
That afternoon, he paced around the house,
24:47
while his wife Jenny tuned in and gave
24:49
him updates. He had to respond
24:53
that day.
24:54
In the early evening, John Danforth
24:56
called Thomas back to his office.
24:58
The doors were closed, and the lights were turned
25:00
down low, so Thomas could relax and
25:03
think. He was searching for just the
25:05
right words, something that would convey
25:07
his anger and unsettle his critics.
25:10
He's on a couch, and I'm in a chair,
25:12
and nobody else was in the room, just
25:14
the two of us.
25:16
At one point, he said, you know what
25:18
this is, Jack? It's a lynching.
25:21
It's a high-tech lynching.
25:26
And I said, that's the way you
25:28
feel, go up and say it.
25:33
This wasn't necessarily a flash of inspiration.
25:36
Thomas had used the same word in his opening statement
25:38
that morning, saying, I will not
25:41
provide the rope for my own lynching.
25:44
For decades, Thomas had bristled
25:46
at the assumption that he got where he was because
25:49
he was black. But
25:51
now, in a moment of great personal crisis,
25:53
he was prepared to use race to his advantage.
25:56
He wanted all those white senators to know that
25:59
he'd been victimized.
25:59
And he wanted America to see
26:02
them squirm when he said it.
26:08
Committee will please come to order. Judge,
26:14
it's a tough day and tough night for you, I know. It
26:16
was after 7 p.m. when Thomas sat
26:19
back down at the witness table. He started
26:21
speaking before Joe Biden could even finish
26:23
asking him a question. Do you have anything
26:25
you'd like to say? Senator, I would like to start
26:28
by saying unequivocally, uncategorically,
26:32
that I deny each and every
26:35
single allegation against me today.
26:37
The way Thomas said
26:38
it, Anita Hill seemed almost incidental.
26:41
That night, he turned his anger toward the proceedings
26:43
themselves. This is a
26:45
circus. It's a national disgrace.
26:50
And from my standpoint, as
26:53
a black American, as far as I'm concerned,
26:56
it is a high-tech lynching
26:58
for uppity blacks who
27:00
in any way deign to think for themselves,
27:03
to do for themselves,
27:05
to have different ideas. And
27:07
it is a message that unless
27:09
you cow-tow to an old order,
27:12
this is what will happen to you. You
27:16
will be lynched, destroyed,
27:18
caricatured by
27:23
a committee of the U.S. Senate
27:26
rather than hung from a tree. With
27:29
that, Thomas leaned back in his
27:31
chair and tinted his fingers below his
27:34
chin.
27:35
Biden didn't know what to say. We
27:38
will have... It
27:43
did the trick. Jill Labrimson.
27:46
If
27:46
anything is going to freeze them,
27:48
it's basically being branded
27:51
not only racist, but
27:54
as people
27:55
who would commit the most heinous crimes
27:58
that have been committed in the U.S. Senate. in our nation's
28:00
history. I remember
28:03
wherever I was sort of stopping, just
28:06
thinking about those words. Judiciary
28:09
committee lawyer, Mark Schwartz, was in a room
28:11
just off the main chamber listening in. Just
28:14
stopping and being pretty offended
28:17
that verbal accusations
28:19
were equated to, you know, these
28:21
pernicious acts where
28:23
people were slaughtered. I mean, when
28:26
he's talking about a high-tech lynching,
28:29
he's talking about the work that you were doing,
28:31
right? Like that you and your
28:33
team. Look, you know, my
28:36
role was a very
28:38
small role. I think that we were
28:40
just doing our best in an incredibly difficult
28:42
situation to try to have a fair process.
28:45
And obviously it wasn't the way anybody
28:47
wanted it to happen, but
28:50
when you say it's a high-tech lynching, it
28:53
imparts an intent, a malicious
28:55
intent. I vehemently
28:58
disagree with that. That was not what was
29:00
happening.
29:02
However you felt about that phrase, Thomas
29:05
had clearly changed the narrative. He'd
29:08
shifted the focus away from his workplace
29:10
behavior and onto his persecution.
29:13
And the way he told it, that assault
29:16
on his character was based on one woman's
29:18
unproven claims. That was in keeping
29:20
with the Thomas Camps broader strategy to
29:23
isolate Anita Hill as a single, unreliable
29:25
witness.
29:28
But the truth was, she was not a lone
29:30
accuser. In the days leading up to
29:32
the hearing, Mark Schwartz and the Judiciary
29:34
Committee had learned about three other women who
29:37
could potentially testify. Thomas's
29:41
opponents on the committee now had a lot
29:43
more ammunition.
29:46
The only question was,
29:48
would they use it? We'll
29:53
be back in a minute.
30:07
This episode is brought to you by Saatchi
30:09
Art, where you can shop original artwork
30:12
by the world's top emerging artists right
30:14
from your home. Just like the enduringly
30:16
relevant history we talk about on Slow Burn,
30:19
art has this incredible ability to be a product
30:21
of its own time and maker, while also being
30:23
timeless and universal. For more
30:25
than a decade, Saatchi Art and their team
30:28
of experts have helped art enthusiasts around
30:30
the world discover art they love. From
30:32
one-of-a-kind abstracts and gorgeous landscape
30:34
paintings, to sculptures, photographs,
30:37
and much more. With their vast collection
30:39
and intuitive search options, finding
30:41
the perfect artwork has never been easier.
30:44
And Saatchi Art takes care of everything. You'll
30:46
enjoy hassle-free delivery and a 7-day
30:49
money-back guarantee. Slow Burn
30:51
listeners get 10% off their first order
30:53
with code SLATE. Just
30:55
go to SaatchiArt.com and enter
30:57
SLATE at checkout. That's S-A-A-T-C-H-I-Art.com,
31:03
code SLATE. Discover one-of-a-kind
31:06
art you love today
31:07
and support emerging artists around
31:09
the world. Go to SaatchiArt.com.
31:18
You need to check out the newest season of
31:20
the podcast, Commons, which will examine
31:22
the past, present, and future of the sport
31:24
of hockey. It's a podcast that shines
31:26
a light on never-before-heard stories through
31:29
the voices of those that live them. From
31:32
the forgotten history of the colored hockey league
31:34
of the Maritimes to the creep of pro-military
31:36
nationalism, Commons will cover why
31:38
such a gentile country worships such
31:41
a violent sport. Commons
31:43
will challenge your preconceptions and leave you
31:45
wondering, is this a sport or a
31:47
cult?
31:48
To listen to the show, just
31:50
search for Commons in your podcast app.
32:00
Millions of Americans had watched Anita Hill
32:02
describe what Clarence Thomas had done to her and
32:04
how it made her feel.
32:06
Some of them thought she was a liar. Others
32:08
thought she was brave. Sukari Hardnet
32:10
thought she could help.
32:13
I really felt so sorry
32:15
for Anita Hill and so proud
32:17
of her. And I just knew
32:19
that somebody needed to
32:21
come to her aid to
32:24
corroborate what she was saying because
32:26
she was telling the truth.
32:28
You heard from Hardnet in our previous episode.
32:30
She worked for Thomas at the EEOC, starting
32:33
two years after Hill's departure.
32:35
What she said was exactly what he'd done
32:37
when I was there. She wrote a
32:39
brief statement about her experience working
32:41
with Thomas. Dear Senators,
32:45
I worked as a special assistant to Clarence
32:47
Thomas at the EEOC from 1985 to I'm
32:52
ready
32:52
for this. Hardnet, who's an attorney, asked the
32:54
dean of her law school to help her draft the document.
32:58
If you were young, black, female,
33:00
and reasonably attractive, you
33:02
knew full well you were being inspected
33:05
and auditioned as a female.
33:07
Hardnet's statement got passed along
33:09
to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I felt obligated
33:12
to communicate this in writing in
33:14
order to put this on the record publicly.
33:17
Sincerely, Sukari Hardnet.
33:20
She was careful to say that she didn't
33:22
believe Thomas had harassed her. She
33:25
thought that it would be better if that
33:27
wasn't a part of the letter and
33:30
that it would be better to just talk about
33:32
my experiences to support what
33:35
Anita Hill was saying.
33:37
She was just one of the women who were willing
33:39
to share their experiences working with Clarence
33:41
Thomas. If the Senate Judiciary Committee
33:43
asked them to testify, it seemed possible,
33:46
maybe even likely, that his nomination
33:48
would be sunk.
33:50
I remember being in my office
33:52
in the Senate office building. Mark Schwartz
33:54
again.
33:59
with a phone number and
34:02
the woman's name was Angela Wright.
34:06
You also heard about Wright in our last episode.
34:09
She was the public affairs director at the EEOC.
34:12
She said that Thomas told her that the hair
34:14
on her legs was sexy.
34:16
He also showed up uninvited at her apartment.
34:19
And then in 1985, he fired her.
34:23
Six years later, Wright was working
34:25
as an editor at the Charlotte Observer. Schwartz
34:28
got her on the phone two days before Anita
34:30
Hill was scheduled to testify.
34:32
She wouldn't know who I was from a hole in the wall.
34:34
So I introduced myself. I said, you know, who I
34:36
worked for. I asked her if
34:38
she had some time to answer some questions and she said
34:41
she did.
34:42
Schwartz found that Wright was a lot scrappier
34:44
than the poised and serene Anita Hill. She
34:47
told him that Thomas was like an annoying
34:49
fly, but she sounded like a credible
34:51
witness. She was pretty specific about
34:53
some of the
34:55
comments that the nominee had made.
34:57
So I, at the time, was remembering
34:59
I better take really good notes because this
35:02
is going to be important. Schwartz asked
35:04
Wright if she would be willing to come to Washington
35:06
to testify.
35:07
She said no, she was a working
35:09
journalist and didn't want to put herself at
35:11
the center of a news story.
35:13
Schwartz thanked her and told her he would follow
35:15
up.
35:16
Then he rushed over to Joe Biden's
35:18
office.
35:19
He was very respectful, listened very
35:21
carefully, but I don't think it was the kind of
35:23
thing where he was like happy that
35:26
I was there because usually people were showing
35:28
up from my unit to brief him. It's like
35:31
we're only doing it because there's some
35:34
swirl going on.
35:35
The day after that meeting, federal marshals
35:38
showed up at Wright's house. They came with a subpoena
35:41
compelling her to fly to Washington right away.
35:43
Back in D.C., Schwartz was continuing
35:46
to work the phones.
35:47
There was a woman who I actually
35:50
ended up interviewing. Rose
35:53
Jourdain was her name, who provided
35:56
some
35:57
very strong corroboration.
36:00
Jordane had been Wright's confidante to
36:02
EEOC.
36:03
Wright had told her about Thomas's
36:05
behavior and even asked her to stick around
36:07
the office until Thomas left in the evenings.
36:10
I felt actually pretty bad about
36:12
having to engage in a telephone interview
36:14
with her because she was in a lot of pain.
36:17
In
36:17
October 1991, Jordane
36:19
was bedridden in the hospital. I
36:22
remember Rose was there with her daughter at
36:24
the time, I think, in the hospital room explaining, the
36:26
things that Angela Wright has told you are absolutely
36:30
what she related to me about how the
36:33
nominee had come by her house and
36:35
how she was uncomfortable. And
36:37
she was very emphatic and solid
36:40
in her statements.
36:42
In spite of her condition, Jordane
36:44
said she'd be willing to testify. Schwartz
36:47
reported back to the Judiciary Committee, which
36:49
started thinking about how to transport her from the
36:51
hospital to the hearing room.
36:54
You
36:54
know, a month before it, we're talking about the writings
36:56
of Thomas Sowell and here we're talking about
36:59
how to transport somebody in an ambulance to
37:01
come and testify. It was
37:03
crazy.
37:05
NBC News has been told that the Judiciary
37:07
Committee has informed Thomas's team that
37:10
it is interviewing another potential witness. Two
37:12
others were already scheduled.
37:14
Angela Wright, Rose Jordane
37:16
and Sakari Hartnett were now on deck. The
37:19
minute one of them testified, Anita
37:21
Hill would no longer be alone. On
37:23
Saturday, October 12th, Clarence
37:27
Thomas sat back down at the witness table. Here to come to order. Anita
37:29
Hill spent the day in a Washington hotel room
37:32
as the hearings carried on without her. Morning,
37:34
judge. And it didn't take long for them to go
37:36
totally off the rails.
37:38
Let me just read to you from page seven
37:42
the best particular version of the exorcist. The Republicans of
37:44
the Judiciary Committee were doing everything
37:47
they possibly could to discredit Hill, accusing
37:49
her of being a witness to the hearing. Accusing
37:53
her of being a scorn former lover or
37:55
a lesbian or a radical feminist
37:57
or in the case of Utah Senator Oran.
38:00
and Hatch, accusing her of stealing material
38:02
from the best-selling novel, The Exorcist.
38:05
Dennings had remarked to him in passing, said Sharon,
38:08
that there appeared to be, quote, an alien
38:11
pubic hair floating around in my
38:13
gym, unquote.
38:16
I mean, where they thought
38:18
there's a connection to The Exorcist,
38:20
I don't know. Jill Abramson. The
38:22
question seemed to be saying,
38:24
well, clearly you plagiarized
38:27
the allegation that Thomas
38:30
asked her, who put pubic
38:32
hair on my can of Coke? What
38:35
do you think about that, Judge? Senator,
38:38
I think this whole affair is sick. I
38:40
think it's sick too. I don't
38:42
think I should be here today. I
38:45
don't think that this inquisition should be going
38:47
on. The inquisition kept
38:49
on going,
38:50
and it wasn't directed at Clarence Thomas. Her
38:53
statements and actions in my presence
38:56
were in my opinion, yet another
38:58
example of her ability to fabricate
39:01
the idea that someone was interested
39:03
in her when in fact no
39:06
such interest existed.
39:08
On Sunday, October 13th, the
39:10
committee called a man named John Doggett
39:12
to testify. Doggett was Clarence
39:15
Thomas's Yale Law School classmate,
39:17
and he'd met Anita Hill when they were both working in
39:19
Washington, D.C. Now, Doggett
39:22
told the Judiciary Committee that Hill had been
39:24
obsessed with him.
39:26
Miss Hill's fantasies about
39:28
my sexual interest in her were
39:30
an indication of the fact that she was having
39:33
a problem with being rejected
39:35
by men she was attracted to.
39:38
Hill couldn't believe what she was hearing. She
39:41
barely remembered John Doggett.
39:43
Now, Republicans were using his
39:45
unverified testimony to argue that Hill
39:47
suffered from iratomania.
39:50
That's a delusional disorder where someone
39:52
thinks another person is in love with them.
39:55
That was just garbage. There
39:57
was really no credible evidence about
39:59
that. this at all.
40:03
This is something I remember, and this is so
40:05
bizarre. Mark Schwartz says he had
40:07
to chase down all kinds of leads, no
40:09
matter how unhinged they were.
40:11
One of the Republican senators had found somebody
40:14
who had alleged that they were in a class taught
40:16
by Professor Hill, and that
40:18
she would pass back their test books, and that
40:20
there was pubic hair
40:23
in them. I mean, even
40:25
thinking about it today, it's insane.
40:29
In the scenes, Republican senators wielded
40:31
this story as a threat.
40:33
They said that if the Democrats talked about
40:35
Thomas' history with pornography, they'd
40:38
tell the world that Anita Hill sprinkled
40:40
pubic hairs on a student's papers.
40:46
I've got letters hanging out my pocket.
40:48
I've got faxes saying, watch
40:51
out for this woman.
40:54
Nobody's got the guts to say that because it gets
40:56
all tangled up in this sexual harassment
40:59
crap.
41:00
That was Senator Alan Simpson, a Republican
41:02
from Wyoming, and that Saturday, he
41:05
didn't just go after Anita Hill.
41:07
Angela Wright will
41:09
soon be with us, we think.
41:13
But now we're told that Angela Wright has what
41:15
we used to call in the legal trade, cold
41:17
feet.
41:19
Wright heard that remark while she was polishing
41:21
her opening statement. She was at a Washington
41:24
law office, dressed in a borrowed skirt
41:26
with her hair pulled up in a bun.
41:28
As she waited to get called to the hearing room,
41:31
she listened as Simpson called her a totally
41:33
discredited witness.
41:44
The Bush White House also got a hold of her
41:46
government work history, and began circulating
41:48
the fact that she'd been fired from a previous job.
41:51
As the campaign against her gained steam,
41:54
the Judiciary Committee met behind closed
41:56
doors. In that meeting, the
41:58
Committee made a very big decision.
42:00
and on Sunday night, October 13th,
42:03
Chairman Joe Biden announced it to the world.
42:05
Ms. Wright and Ms. Jordanne
42:08
will not testify at the hearing.
42:11
Their extensive interviews conducted
42:13
by the majority and minority staff
42:17
will be placed in the official
42:19
record
42:20
available to... In their book, Strains Justice,
42:23
Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer reported
42:25
that Senate Democrats became frightened of
42:27
Wright's checkered employment record. The
42:30
senators also talked about her tendency
42:32
to lose her temper and whether her sexiness
42:35
might make her less credible.
42:38
It
42:38
seems all the more unbelievable to
42:40
me now than it did then that Joe
42:42
Biden did not call her to testify.
42:46
She was literally waiting in the wings.
42:51
That was it.
42:52
Angela Wright had come to Washington, D.C.
42:54
for nothing, and there would be no ambulance
42:56
to bring Rose Jordanne to Capitol Hill. And
43:00
what about Sakari Hardinett, who said that
43:02
black women in Clarence Thomas' office were
43:04
getting inspected and auditioned? She
43:06
was ready to say those words publicly,
43:09
but she never got the chance.
43:11
When did you realize that you wouldn't be called
43:13
to testify? When they didn't
43:15
call me to testify. Like
43:18
what was that like the waiting for
43:20
a response that never came? Well,
43:24
it's
43:26
a part of being black in America. You
43:29
know, it's a part of not
43:31
just being black in America, but being a black
43:33
female in America. So
43:40
how do you feel about the fact
43:42
that those women didn't get to tell their stories on
43:45
camera in front of the committee? Like do you think it
43:48
might have changed things?
43:50
The only thing I'm going to say about that is if they
43:52
had testified, it would have changed
43:55
the conversation we're having now.
43:57
I'm not smart enough to know that
43:59
it would. would have changed the result.
44:01
The Clarence Thomas confirmation
44:04
story is finally over. Today's
44:06
vote followed one of the most bitter confirmation
44:08
battles in recent history. On this vote,
44:11
the yeas are 52 and the nays
44:13
are 48. The
44:15
nomination of Clarence Thomas of Georgia
44:18
to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme
44:20
Court is hereby confirmed.
44:25
On October 15, 1991, the Senate confirmed Thomas by
44:29
the smallest margin for a Supreme Court nominee
44:32
in more than a century. He
44:34
got the votes of 41 out of 43 Republicans and 11
44:37
of 57 Democrats.
44:41
Clarence Thomas was soaking in a warm
44:43
bath at home during the Senate roll call. When
44:46
his wife, Jenny, told him the count had gone his
44:48
way, he said, whoop-de-damn-do,
44:51
where do I get my reputation back? Thomas
44:54
may not have been in the mood to celebrate, but
44:56
he had won, and his political allies
44:59
learned an important lesson. The best defense
45:02
is a good offense.
45:04
Listen, I had a lot to pray about
45:07
after the confirmation process was over.
45:09
That's Thomas's friend Armstrong Williams.
45:12
He's the one who told the press that there was a
45:14
thin line between Anita Hill's sanity and
45:16
her insanity.
45:18
You know, I never believed Anita Hill, but Anita
45:20
was a good person. I liked Anita. She
45:22
was a friend. When in war,
45:25
your job is to destroy the enemy who's trying
45:27
to destroy you. And at that time,
45:29
I just had to paint a pitch of hers being unstable.
45:32
Do I believe she's unstable? No. Do
45:35
I believe this is something she really wanted to do? No.
45:38
Did she do it? Yes. And so in
45:40
doing that, other things were
45:43
unleashed that
45:44
had to be done in order to save my man.
45:47
After everything she'd gone through in Washington,
45:49
DC, Anita Hill went back home
45:51
to Oklahoma to watch the confirmation vote.
45:54
When it was over, she told reporters
45:56
that she was disappointed, but not surprised.
45:59
That's
45:59
That same day, she started getting a
46:01
bulk delivery of letters, up to 3,500 pieces
46:04
of mail and each shipment.
46:06
Many were from women who'd lived through sexual harassment
46:09
and didn't know who else to tell.
46:12
And she has kept that famous
46:15
blue outfit that she wore,
46:17
along with the
46:20
thousands upon thousands of letters
46:22
of support. I think that that
46:25
has sustained her through the years.
46:27
Her telling the truth of exactly
46:29
what happened gave other
46:32
women courage to come forward.
46:35
We reached out to Anita Hill for an interview,
46:37
but never heard back.
46:41
In 1999, Hill became
46:44
a professor at Brandeis University. Eleven
46:47
years later, she got a voicemail on
46:49
her office phone line. It was
46:51
from Jenny Thomas. I just wanted to reach
46:53
across the airwaves
46:55
and the years and
46:58
ask you to consider
47:01
something. I would
47:03
love you to consider an
47:05
apology sometime and
47:07
some full explanation of why
47:10
you did what you did with my husband.
47:13
So, give it some thought. I
47:17
certainly pray about this and hope
47:19
that one day you'll help us understand
47:21
why you did what you did.
47:35
We'll be right back.
47:44
The Supreme Court was designed to be above
47:46
the fray, but right now, are
47:48
the nine justices living up to that promise? On
47:51
the new season of More Perfect, host
47:53
Julia Longoria brings the highest
47:55
court in the land down to earth. You'll
47:58
meet people on all sides of crucial
47:59
cases as she shares history that
48:02
explains how we got here. More
48:04
perfect from WNYC Studios.
48:07
Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
48:14
Get comfortable like Clarence
48:16
Thomas on a conservative billionaire's yacht comfortable
48:19
and tune into crooked media's strict scrutiny to
48:21
stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court decisions.
48:23
I'm Leah Littman and each week I'm joined by my co-hosts
48:26
and fellow law professors Kate Shaw and Melissa
48:28
Murray to break down the latest headlines and the biggest
48:30
legal questions facing our country from if a prisstone
48:32
to trans bands. With the 2024 elections
48:35
approaching, it's crucial to understand the impact
48:37
of these decisions and how to fight back. So
48:39
listen to new episodes of strict scrutiny every Monday
48:42
wherever you get your podcasts.
48:45
See them three boys up there?
48:48
That's my son with the blue shirt on. This
48:53
is Jamal, Clarence, and Kathy.
48:56
His first wife. You have
48:58
a picture of Kathy in here? Yeah, that's Kathy
49:00
right there. Do you have a picture?
49:03
A Virginia in the living room. Okay,
49:05
okay. And you see this picture up here? When
49:08
I stepped inside Leola Williams' home in Savannah,
49:10
there was a photo I couldn't stop looking at.
49:13
I mentioned it at the top of our first episode.
49:16
It showed Miss Leola on October 15, 1991, the day the
49:18
U.S. Senate voted to send her son
49:22
to the Supreme Court.
49:23
She was in Pinpoint, Georgia, surrounded
49:25
by family and friends.
49:27
A reporter from NBC showed up too. Miss
49:30
Williams, how does it feel to be the mother of Supreme
49:32
Court justice? It feels good. It feels
49:34
good. Now some people
49:36
have said that your son isn't qualified.
49:38
What do you think? You know, I'll
49:42
tell you what my dad said one time. Sticks
49:46
and stones may break my bones, but words will
49:48
never harm you. Yeah, yes, yes. That's
49:50
it. He talked
49:52
about him, but that's all right. That's all right. They
49:55
talk about Jesus Christ. Yes.
49:57
I read your son's book, and
49:59
he's... said that you were very upset
50:02
about how he was treated during
50:04
the conference. Yes, I was, very. We
50:07
was at the White House.
50:10
He was taking his first sworn
50:12
in. And these tall
50:16
men's coming to us,
50:18
coming to real tall. And
50:20
they said, oh, you're Miss Lillah?
50:24
I said, yeah. And
50:27
he said, well,
50:29
my name is Joe Biden. And
50:32
the other one said, my name is Kennedy.
50:35
I said, oh, I
50:38
said, is this a free country? And
50:42
he, both of them said, yeah.
50:45
I said, well, I do not shake
50:48
Hippocrates' hands. And
50:52
walk right by my head, turn
50:54
in my son's head, say, boy,
50:58
I can't take you nowhere.
51:01
Did you ever forgive Joe Biden for that? Yeah,
51:04
I had to forgive him. As a Christian,
51:07
I had to. Yes, ma'am. I don't love him, but
51:09
I forgive him.
51:11
I never forget, though.
51:14
Clarence Thomas never forgot either. And
51:16
it doesn't seem like he's forgiven anyone, even
51:18
all these years later.
51:20
Reading his memoir, I was surprised
51:22
by how often he talks about his enemies and
51:24
critics, like he was some up and coming rap
51:26
artist.
51:27
The truth is, those
51:29
enemies and critics are totally irrelevant.
51:32
He's on the Supreme Court for life. And
51:34
in his case, life means life.
51:37
Thomas turned 75 this June, and
51:39
he's currently the most senior justice on the court.
51:42
If he stays for five more years, he'll
51:44
have the longest tenure of any Supreme Court
51:46
justice in history.
51:48
When I first started covering the
51:51
court 20 years ago, Clarence Thomas was
51:53
an outlier. Dahlia Lithwick
51:55
writes about the Supreme Court for Slate. But
51:58
I think what's changed in the decade
52:00
since he's been on the court as he went from
52:02
being kind of the fringe
52:05
of the fringe to being the
52:07
decider in a whole bunch of ways.
52:11
For a decade, Thomas didn't ask
52:13
a single question during oral arguments,
52:15
but his votes and his opinions speak for themselves.
52:19
He voted to strip away much of the enforcement
52:21
power of the Voting Rights Act.
52:23
He sided with the majority and Dobbs
52:25
v Jackson Women's Health Organization, which
52:28
overturned Roe v. Wade. In his
52:30
concurrence in that case, he urged his
52:32
colleagues to go much further and reconsider
52:34
the Supreme Court's rulings on contraception
52:37
and same-sex marriage.
52:39
And now, Thomas is closer than
52:41
ever to eliminating his lifelong nemesis,
52:44
affirmative action.
52:46
As we record this episode, that
52:48
decision could be just days away.
52:51
And again, to me, that is
52:53
evidence that this is 100% Clarence Thomas's
52:55
world. We all just
52:58
get to live in it.
53:01
He's become a revered figure, and
53:03
not only in the conservative movement, because people
53:06
are beginning to watch his ideas that he
53:08
championed from the margins turn into
53:10
the law of the lab. Armstrong
53:12
Williams again. That's where the court is
53:14
moving in his direction now, and
53:16
his influence, even his control, is
53:19
ascendant. And it is the Thomas
53:21
Court.
53:23
It's not just the Thomas Court. It's
53:26
also Thomas's Republican party. At
53:28
least 10 of his former clerks have served
53:30
in or worked on behalf of the Trump administration.
53:34
That includes John Eastman, the attorney
53:36
who came up with the plot to overturn the 2020
53:38
election.
53:39
His wife, Jenny, now a lobbyist
53:41
and activist, also got involved in that effort.
53:45
I would like to thank a
53:47
great woman named Jenny Thomas. You
53:49
know Jenny Thomas? The wife
53:52
of a great man, Justice Clarence
53:54
Thomas, for her courage and strength. But
53:58
Clarence Thomas has not recused him.
53:59
himself from any case relating to the January
54:02
6th insurrection.
54:03
In fact, he was the only justice
54:06
to side with Donald Trump when he attempted to
54:08
block the release of White House records about that
54:10
day. Thomas has also accepted
54:12
gifts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and
54:15
didn't disclose them.
54:16
I'm just taking aback. You
54:18
know, I think the
54:20
young Clarence Thomas that
54:23
I knew would think that this
54:25
was not in keeping
54:27
with ethical behavior. That's
54:30
journalist Juan Williams. He's been covering
54:32
Clarence Thomas for more than 40 years.
54:35
I just think that's not
54:37
good for Clarence Thomas. I think it's not good for
54:39
the Supreme Court. I think it's not good for our
54:41
democracy. And I'm surprised
54:44
that he's put himself in that position. You
54:46
know, to be frank, I'm disappointed
54:49
that someone who
54:52
is a hardworking, thoughtful
54:55
man had that kind
54:57
of ethical lapse.
54:59
Thomas did work very hard to get where he
55:01
is today,
55:02
but he's also had a lot of help
55:04
from John Danforth and George H.W.
55:06
Bush
55:07
and Harlan Crow, the Texas
55:09
real estate magnate who's flown Thomas around
55:11
the world on his private jet and paid
55:13
for his grand nephew's private school tuition.
55:16
I wanted to ask Thomas about all this, but
55:18
he declined my interview request. So
55:21
all I can tell you is what I saw.
55:23
In Thomas's hometowns, Crow's
55:25
fingerprints are everywhere. He donated
55:28
money to rename one wing of a savannah
55:30
library in Thomas's honor. He
55:32
also paid to convert an old cannery into
55:34
the Pinpoint Heritage Museum.
55:37
I'd like to thank my good friend
55:39
in absentia, my friend Harlan
55:41
Crow, who against
55:43
my better advice, insisted
55:46
that he would preserve the heart of
55:48
this community from the bulldozer's blade.
55:52
I'm glad.
55:54
Clarence Thomas loaves welfare. He
55:56
thinks affirmative action is demeaning, but
55:58
there's no denying that Thomas's
55:59
white conservative friends have elevated
56:02
him at every step.
56:04
I don't think he ever realized
56:06
that he was being manipulated and
56:09
used by the white
56:13
Republicans. I don't think he realizes
56:16
it now.
56:17
That's Thomas's ex-girlfriend, Lillian
56:20
McEwen. He took their
56:22
approval as friendship and appreciation
56:24
for what he
56:25
had done. And
56:30
I think he still does. Dahlia
56:33
Lithwick isn't so sure. You
56:36
know, is Carlen Crow using Clarence Thomas
56:38
or is Clarence Thomas using Harlan
56:40
Crow? I think it's that their
56:42
interests are perfectly aligned.
56:45
So I don't know that who's using
56:47
who is the most useful framing.
56:50
I think the useful framing is Clarence
56:52
Thomas had a vision of the Supreme Court
56:55
as a political juggernaut for the far
56:58
right. And he got
57:00
it.
57:01
In an earlier episode, I talked about
57:04
Clarence Thomas and racial solidarity.
57:06
A poll released the day the Senate confirmed him
57:09
showed that 70% of black Americans
57:11
wanted him on the Supreme Court. After
57:13
the hearings, I remember black leaders doing
57:15
their best to be optimistic. One
57:17
of my professional idols, the late writer,
57:20
Ralph Wiley, wrote, I'm in the habit
57:22
of forcing myself into hoping for black
57:24
people.
57:26
Here's what I remember about what came next.
57:28
In the nineties, my family subscribed
57:30
to the black owned magazine emerge
57:33
twice. We got copies in the mail that had
57:35
caricatures of Thomas on the cover. And
57:38
one of them, he was wearing a handkerchief like
57:40
aunt Jemima's. The second one had
57:42
this headline, uncle Thomas, Lon
57:45
Jockey for the far right. Those
57:47
cartoons, ginned up outrage from
57:49
some conservative black commentators.
57:52
But among the black folks I knew
57:53
they were the consensus.
57:55
So I've been holding back my thoughts.
57:59
And I did not. want to talk much about
58:02
Clarence Thomas.
58:03
Eddie Jenkins was the only one of Thomas's
58:05
college friends from Holy Cross who agreed to
58:07
talk with us. That's likely because
58:09
their friendship ended more than 30 years ago
58:12
when Thomas took offense to something Jenkins
58:14
said in an interview.
58:15
And so I come to find out that after he got
58:18
the nomination, that he didn't
58:20
want me to come to swimming
58:22
in.
58:23
Now, Jenkins watches his old friend
58:25
from a distance. And all this time later,
58:28
he's still waiting for that friend to return.
58:30
When you know someone for a long time
58:33
and you believe and trust in them, it's
58:36
more than a history lesson. It's
58:39
something that goes deep because
58:43
you develop a certain affection
58:45
and affinity for the brother that you know. And
58:47
the reason why I decided to come on this
58:51
program with you
58:53
is because this
58:56
brother ain't going nowhere.
58:59
He is going to be on the bench
59:02
until he catches his last breath. So
59:05
there is hope that he realizes
59:07
that. You know what?
59:10
We all have the same God. And
59:12
there is a reckoning. And so
59:15
there's still time.
59:17
And that's why I'm here, to
59:19
tell you that
59:21
there's still time. Wow.
59:26
Hey, I kind of poured it all out, didn't I? Would
59:36
you ever want to live in Pinpoint? I'd
59:38
rather stay here.
59:40
Leola Williams' father, Myers
59:43
Anderson, built the modest home she
59:45
now lives in way back in the 1950s. In 2014,
59:49
Harlan Crow bought it.
59:51
This street used to be bad. What
59:54
do you mean? Drugs and stuff. But
59:59
they don't do it anymore. the morning they
1:00:01
tear down all those houses and
1:00:03
we don't have those people on the street anymore.
1:00:06
If she enjoys the neighborhood now, it's
1:00:08
at least in part because Crow helped fix it up.
1:00:11
Her property was one of several that Crow's company
1:00:13
bought on the same street.
1:00:15
His company later sold those other lots and
1:00:17
they've since been replaced by upscale homes.
1:00:20
I'm so glad I got to see the famous
1:00:22
house, man, that he built
1:00:24
with this. I mean, that's just unbelievable, by
1:00:26
the way. She was clean, but I could do so much.
1:00:30
Oh, your house is great. What
1:00:32
are you talking about? I look
1:00:34
in the living room right on this side.
1:00:35
On my way out, I took a bunch of pictures
1:00:38
and jotted down some details so I wouldn't forget.
1:00:41
There was the lived-in den with a pair
1:00:43
of old recliners, a tidy living
1:00:45
room that no one seemed to spend much time in.
1:00:48
The china cabinet in the corner, a large
1:00:50
painting of Jesus carrying a fallen black
1:00:53
man on a deserted beach.
1:00:55
The home felt warm and it felt familiar.
1:00:58
If you're around my age and grew up black
1:01:00
in America, it would probably feel familiar
1:01:02
to you, too.
1:01:04
This could have been my grandmother's house or your
1:01:06
grandmother's. Yeah. Okay.
1:01:10
Okay.
1:01:11
Yes, my boy.
1:01:15
All right. Well, I mean, you know
1:01:18
what, Miss Lola, I think I didn't
1:01:20
held you for so long and I'm so glad I
1:01:22
got to see you and meet you. Go ahead, just
1:01:24
you. You take care of that baby. Miss
1:01:26
Lola and I had gotten to talking about my baby
1:01:28
boy and before I left, she
1:01:30
insisted on seeing the video. I'll show you this little video.
1:01:33
Oh, look at that. Look at that. Listen.
1:01:36
Listen. Isn't that cute? He's
1:01:38
looking for his daddy.
1:01:39
Yeah, he's looking for me. You better get back to that baby. He's
1:01:41
not used to
1:01:43
me being gone.
1:01:54
Harlan Crow said he wants to preserve Miss Lola's
1:01:56
house as a historic site and
1:01:58
it legitimately is one.
1:02:00
It still looks as sturdy as it must have when
1:02:02
Clarence and his brothers showed up on the doorstep as
1:02:04
children with their possessions and a pair
1:02:06
of grocery bags.
1:02:09
You know, I can remember being herded
1:02:11
into our little den. It's where
1:02:13
the Motorola TV was. And
1:02:17
we all had to watch what was going
1:02:19
on in Little Rock and being
1:02:22
horrified. You know, we'd
1:02:24
watch what happened in Birmingham, the fire
1:02:26
hoses, the dogs, things like
1:02:28
that. And it really, oh, absolutely
1:02:30
had a tremendous impact on all of us.
1:02:34
Clarence Thomas' grandparents raised him
1:02:36
to reject that racism and overcome
1:02:38
it.
1:02:39
They turned this house into a lunch pad
1:02:42
that took him to places they could never imagine.
1:02:44
It's a humble place,
1:02:46
but something to be proud of. A
1:02:48
family heirloom.
1:02:50
And now,
1:02:51
it's owned by someone else.
1:02:59
It's a humble place to be. Slow
1:03:10
Burn is produced by Sophie Summergrad, Sam
1:03:13
Kim,
1:03:14
Sophie Codner, and me, Joel
1:03:16
Anderson. Josh Levine is the editorial
1:03:19
director of Slow Burn. Derek John
1:03:21
is our executive producer.
1:03:24
This episode was edited by Josh
1:03:26
Levine, Derek John, Sophie
1:03:28
Summergrad, and Joel Meyer. Susan
1:03:31
Mathews is Slate's executive editor. Merit
1:03:34
Jacob is our senior technical director.
1:03:37
Our theme music was composed by Alexis
1:03:39
Codrada. Ivy Lee Simones
1:03:42
did the cover art. We had production
1:03:44
help from Benjamin Payne and Savannah, Patrick
1:03:46
Fort, James Rettick, Vic
1:03:48
Whitley Berry, Alyssa Midcalf,
1:03:51
and Jesus Vivar at Mix Theory Studios.
1:03:55
We couldn't make Slow Burn without support from
1:03:57
our members, and I strongly encourage you to sign
1:03:59
up for Slow Burn.
1:03:59
for Slate Plus today. It's only $15 for
1:04:03
your first three months. Head over to slate.com
1:04:06
slash slowburn to join. Slate
1:04:08
Plus members get ad free listening on this
1:04:10
show and all Slate shows, unlimited
1:04:13
reading on the Slate site, and all kinds
1:04:15
of perks, like a member exclusive episode
1:04:17
of Slow Burn each week. In this week's
1:04:20
Plus episode, you'll hear a lot more from
1:04:22
Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern,
1:04:24
Slate's in-house experts covering the Supreme
1:04:27
Court. They talk about how Thomas' path
1:04:29
to the court
1:04:29
continues to influence his rulings on
1:04:32
the court. If you're looking for breaking
1:04:34
news analysis of everything going on with the Supreme
1:04:36
Court right now, you can also find Mark
1:04:38
and Dahlia on Slate's legal podcast,
1:04:41
Amicus. Amicus has new episodes
1:04:43
every Saturday this month to tell you all about
1:04:45
the big decisions being released this SCOTUS
1:04:47
term. There'll be special episodes
1:04:49
for Slate Plus members, too. Special
1:04:53
thanks to Jenea Desmond-Harris, Emily
1:04:55
John, Jessica Seidman, Paul
1:04:58
Somergrad, Danielle Conley,
1:04:59
Robert Wilson, Michael
1:05:02
Fletcher, Rachel Strom, and
1:05:05
Slate's Christina Cotarucci, Evan
1:05:07
Chung, Kelly Jones, Katie
1:05:10
Shepard, Kaitlyn Schneider, Cleo
1:05:13
Levin, Bill Carey, Seth
1:05:15
Brown, Katie Rayford, Daisy
1:05:18
Rosario, Hillary Fry,
1:05:20
and Alicia Montgomery, Slate's VP of
1:05:23
Audio.
1:05:24
Appreciate y'all listening to our show.
1:05:41
Get comfortable, like Clarence
1:05:43
Thomas on a conservative billionaire's yacht comfortable,
1:05:45
and tune into Crooked Media's Strict Scrutiny to
1:05:47
stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court decisions.
1:05:50
I'm Leah Lippman, and each week I'm joined by my co-hosts
1:05:52
and fellow law professors, Kate Shaw and Melissa
1:05:54
Murray, to break down the latest headlines and the biggest
1:05:56
legal questions facing our country, from Iffy Pristone
1:05:59
to trans bans. With the 2024 elections
1:06:01
approaching, it's crucial to understand the impact
1:06:03
of these decisions and how to fight back. So
1:06:06
listen to new episodes of Strict Scrutiny every Monday,
1:06:08
wherever you get your podcasts.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More