Podchaser Logo
Home
A National Disgrace

A National Disgrace

Released Wednesday, 21st June 2023
 1 person rated this episode
A National Disgrace

A National Disgrace

A National Disgrace

A National Disgrace

Wednesday, 21st June 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

It was George Kasuf's job to be nosy.

0:03

He was essentially a detective based

0:05

out of Washington, D.C. And

0:07

he had a very specific niche. What

0:10

I did, and it was pretty much a one-person

0:13

operation, was investigate

0:15

whoever would be nominated to the federal

0:18

courts. Kasuf

0:20

knew how to dig through a judge's professional past,

0:23

excavating their true beliefs from long-forgotten

0:26

rulings and speeches. A lot

0:28

of it was just going to the library

0:31

and also talking to lots of people.

0:34

That's what I think I was really good at, is just letting

0:36

people talk to me. That's at least what my boss

0:38

always thought, anybody will talk to you, George. He

0:41

worked for a progressive advocacy group

0:43

called the Alliance for Justice. And

0:46

in the late 80s and early 90s, with

0:48

Republicans controlling the White House, pretty

0:50

much every judge he vetted was conservative.

0:53

My job became simply to be

0:55

the early warning signal to

0:58

staffers on the Hill, specifically

1:00

Senate Judiciary Committee staffers. Kasuf's work

1:03

never stopped. There were dozens

1:05

of new nominees every year, but

1:07

there was one man he was really focused

1:09

on. I sort of became the walking

1:12

encyclopedia on Clarence Thomas.

1:15

By the time Thomas got nominated to

1:17

the Supreme Court in 1991, he'd

1:20

been touted as a top contender for a couple of

1:22

years. Kasuf had been on his trail

1:24

that whole time, building the case

1:27

that Thomas was a judicial extremist and

1:29

a disaster for civil rights. He

1:31

put everything he found into the world's most

1:34

comprehensive Clarence Thomas dossier.

1:36

I probably reviewed over

1:39

a million pages of documents. And

1:41

I would estimate that I

1:44

talked to over a hundred people, either

1:46

on the phone or face-to-face.

1:49

Once, Kasuf got the chance to

1:51

watch Thomas in action up close. A

1:53

Black leader had invited both men to come visit

1:55

her.

1:56

In that meeting, Thomas tried to sell

1:58

himself as a civil rights champion. champion.

2:01

And I'm starting to write things down. You know,

2:03

I'm thinking that's not true. That's not true.

2:05

That's not true. This man would

2:08

say anything to get ahead.

2:10

In the run up to Thomas's confirmation hearings,

2:13

Kasuf gave his dossier to anyone who would

2:15

take it. But

2:16

it didn't mean my research was now

2:18

closed. I just kept going, looking

2:21

for anything else that people wanted to send

2:23

me.

2:23

In July 1991, Kasuf was at a meeting when

2:27

he got a call from a friend.

2:28

He said, I got some information last night. I was

2:31

at a dinner party. And someone was there

2:33

who had a friend that worked with Clarence

2:36

Thomas who said she

2:38

had been sexually harassed by him when

2:41

she worked for him in DC. And

2:43

now she teaches law in Oklahoma.

2:46

I didn't have a name. I

2:49

didn't have a time or anything like that.

2:51

Before that phone call, Kasuf had never

2:54

heard anything about Clarence Thomas and sexual

2:56

harassment.

2:57

This was something he needed to check out. And

2:59

quickly,

3:00

Thomas's confirmation hearings were less than two

3:02

months away.

3:03

If I didn't have Google, I had lots

3:06

of phone books and directories. So

3:08

I went to a directory I had of all

3:10

law professors in the United States, looked

3:12

at the various law schools of Oklahoma,

3:15

found the name of some women, looked

3:17

at each one's biography. And I found, oh, she

3:19

was there at the Office of Civil Rights at the

3:21

Department of Education at the same time. Oh, and

3:24

she worked at the EEOC at the same time. And

3:26

here's her office phone number. And

3:28

that was it.

3:30

Her name is Anita Hill. This

3:34

is Slow Brand.

3:44

I'm your host,

3:46

Joel Anderson. That tip

3:49

about a law professor in Oklahoma was

3:51

just the beginning of a nationwide spectacle.

3:54

Anita Hill's accusations launched urgent

3:56

and heated conversations about racism

3:58

and sexual harassment.

3:59

They also stonked in anger and Clarence

4:02

Thomas that's never stopped reaching. This

4:05

today is a travesty.

4:08

I think that it is disgusting. The

4:10

Supreme Court is not worth it. No

4:13

job is worth it.

4:15

I have no personal vendetta against

4:18

Clarence Thomas. But

4:20

when I was asked by a representative

4:23

of this committee to report

4:26

my experience, I

4:28

felt that I had to tell the truth.

4:31

I could not

4:32

keep silent.

4:36

This is our season finale. Episode 4.

4:40

A National Disgrace.

4:49

This episode is brought to you by SAP. Welcome

4:52

to the window. The window of opportunity.

4:55

When your next move can either make your business

4:57

famous or obsolete. So you

4:59

need to be ready. Be handling good

5:02

surprises and bad ones ready. Be

5:04

opening a Portland, Houston and Providence location

5:06

on the same day ready. Be stock

5:09

options plus paid family leave ready. SAP

5:12

has been there and can help you be ready for

5:14

anything that happens next. Because it will. Be

5:17

ready with SAP.

5:24

Alright, so now let

5:26

me look a little bit from your

5:29

life and history. You are somewhat

5:31

of an enigma. Which brings

5:34

us to the question of what is the real Clarence

5:36

Thomas like? What will the real Clarence

5:38

Thomas do on the Supreme Court if he

5:41

is confirmed? I

5:43

am the real Clarence Thomas and

5:45

I don't know that I would call myself

5:47

an enigma. I'm just Clarence

5:50

Thomas.

5:53

When George Kasuf got a tip about Clarence

5:55

Thomas and sexual harassment. He felt like

5:57

he was racing against time. It took him

5:59

only.

5:59

two hours to figure out Anita Hill's name

6:02

and to pass it along to his boss. As soon

6:04

as he did, she gave him very clear

6:06

instructions. You are not talking

6:08

to her. You're not calling her. You're giving

6:11

this name to the Judiciary Committee. Kasuf

6:14

did as he was told and then he waited

6:16

and waited and waited.

6:18

We

6:20

were getting a little worried because now we're into

6:22

August and I would periodically check

6:25

in to see what was going on. Kasuf

6:27

was still in the dark when Thomas' confirmation

6:30

hearings got started on September 10, 1991.

6:34

Every day he went to Capitol Hill to watch

6:37

Thomas testify in person.

6:38

It was sort of like watching your team

6:41

slowly lose. Oh,

6:43

you just struck out with that question. You

6:45

let him slide right over this.

6:48

As you're sitting there, are you wondering

6:51

whether or not the Anita Hill allegations are going to come

6:53

up? Oh, God, yes.

6:55

Those allegations never did come up

6:57

and the hearings ended without much controversy

6:59

or suspense.

7:01

It looked like Clarence Thomas would be on the Supreme

7:03

Court for life, but then just

7:05

two days before the Senators were scheduled to cast

7:07

their votes, everything changed.

7:09

The shockwave reeling through Capitol

7:11

Hill. Switchboards were frantic with

7:13

calls from constituents with one opinion

7:16

or another on Judge Thomas or Professor Anita

7:18

Hill. Anita Hill. Anita Hill.

7:23

Anita Hill grew up on a farm in segregated

7:25

Oklahoma. The youngest of 13 children,

7:28

she was the valedictorian of her high school, graduated

7:31

from college with honors, and got her law

7:33

degree from Yale, Clarence Thomas' alma

7:35

mater. When Hill went to work for Thomas

7:37

in 1981, she thought he might become

7:40

her mentor, but two years later, she

7:42

ended up in the hospital with stress-related stomach

7:44

pains. Not long after that, she

7:47

left Washington, D.C. for good. For

7:50

almost a decade, Hill tried to put that

7:52

period of her life behind

7:53

her. In 1991, she

7:55

was living in her home state, working as a professor

7:58

at the University of Oklahoma Law School.

7:59

Then, her old boss

8:02

got nominated to the Supreme Court. Most

8:05

of the controversy over Clarence Thomas stems

8:07

from his stormy eight-year tenure as

8:09

head of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

8:12

That summer, Hill wrestled with whether

8:14

to come forward, which she didn't realize

8:16

is that the Senate Judiciary Committee already

8:18

had her name. When she did finally

8:21

hear from them, it was extremely late

8:23

in the game.

8:24

By the time Hill gave the committee a typewritten

8:27

statement, the hearings had been over

8:29

for three days, but Hill's allegations

8:32

revved everything back up again. The

8:34

substance of the information was really startling. That's

8:38

Mark Schwartz. In 1991,

8:40

he was a lawyer for the Judiciary Committee. One

8:43

of his jobs was investigating nominees.

8:46

You know, raise your eyebrows, like, wow, there's

8:48

a lot more work ahead for us. The

8:50

next step was figuring out what that work should

8:52

be. Should we be investigating?

8:54

Who's the best parties to do the investigation?

8:57

Should we get the FBI back in to do it?

8:59

The FBI did talk to Hill. They

9:02

also interviewed Clarence Thomas, who denied

9:04

everything. The public didn't know any

9:06

of this, but Joe Biden did. The

9:08

chairman of the Judiciary Committee weighed the

9:11

evidence and couldn't decide what to do.

9:14

For days, he'd dithered and did nothing,

9:16

but the media was about to force his hand.

9:20

A woman who served as personal assistant

9:22

to Clarence Thomas for over two years

9:25

has accused him of sexually harassing

9:27

her.

9:28

Anita Hill had given the Judiciary Committee

9:30

her statement on the condition it wouldn't

9:32

go to the press. NPR's Nina

9:35

Totenberg got her hands on it anyway.

9:37

Her story aired on Sunday morning, October

9:39

6th,

9:40

two days before the full Senate was scheduled

9:42

to vote on Clarence Thomas' nomination. According

9:45

to Hill's affidavit, Thomas soon began

9:47

asking her out socially and refused to

9:49

accept her explanation that she did not think

9:52

it appropriate to go out with her boss. The

9:54

relationship, she said, became even more

9:56

strained when Thomas, in work situations,

9:59

began to decide.

9:59

When Totenberg asked Phil for

10:02

an interview, she decided to go ahead. If

10:04

her story was going to be told, the public might as well

10:06

hear it from her. She

10:09

says she will always remember her last

10:12

conversation with Clarence Thomas at the EEOC. Well,

10:15

he made a statement about his

10:17

behavior that if

10:20

I ever did disclose it, it

10:22

would be enough to

10:25

ruin his

10:26

career. That

10:28

first report introduced Anita Hill to America.

10:32

It also made her a target. Her answering

10:34

machine was full of death and rape threats. This

10:37

was what she worried might happen if she came forward. But

10:40

it was too late for her to stop now.

10:45

Senator John Danforth knew that his protege

10:48

Clarence Thomas had been accused of sexual harassment.

10:51

But that late in the confirmation process,

10:53

Danforth thought it was no big deal.

10:55

He was wrong. And Thomas was

10:57

frantic. He was sobbing.

11:00

He said his life was ruined.

11:04

He was just destroyed. Just

11:07

absolutely destroyed.

11:09

He reached out during the time and said, man, this

11:12

is rough. That's Lester

11:14

Johnson, an old friend of Thomas's from

11:16

Savannah. I said, I know it's rough,

11:18

man. I said, but God is the best planner.

11:21

If it's as it meant to be, you're

11:23

going to be on that bench.

11:25

If it's not meant to be, you won't. As

11:28

old black folk used to say, give it to God,

11:31

give it to God.

11:34

I had the same phone number for many years.

11:37

So he reached me at a law school

11:39

where I was teaching. Thomas's

11:41

ex-girlfriend, Lillian McEwen, says

11:43

he called her in tears.

11:45

He said, why is she doing this? I don't

11:48

understand. Do you remember how the conversation

11:50

ended? I just said, I don't know.

11:55

In his autobiography, Thomas wrote that

11:57

he felt betrayed by Hill, who he had hired at the the

12:00

Department of Education and brought with him

12:02

to the EEOC. He also

12:04

worried that the media would accept her version

12:06

of events uncritically.

12:08

Thomas quickly released a sworn affidavit

12:11

in which he totally and unequivocally

12:13

denied Hill's allegations.

12:15

His conservative allies also went

12:17

to work on his behalf. We got to win

12:19

this by any means necessary, whatever

12:21

we got to do.

12:22

That's Thomas' longtime friend Armstrong

12:25

Williams. After Hill came forward,

12:27

he told the Wall Street Journal, there's a thin

12:29

line between her sanity and her insanity.

12:33

It was not time to be weak. It was not time

12:35

to feel sorry for yourself. We're at war.

12:38

That war was fought on television.

12:39

Aren't these crimes

12:42

without evidence, so to speak? It's a he

12:44

said, she said kind of situation. Well,

12:47

but faith, the woman's word is evidence.

12:49

And I think what we have to do is give that more value,

12:52

give that more weight.

12:53

There was also a battle on the Senate

12:55

floor. Democrat Barbara Mikulski,

12:58

one of only two women in the chamber, called

13:00

for a full investigation.

13:02

What disturbs me as

13:04

much as the allegations

13:06

themselves is that the United

13:09

States Senate appears not

13:11

to take the charge of

13:13

sexual harassment seriously.

13:18

Thomas is leading advocate John Danforth

13:20

fired back. It cannot

13:23

be true that

13:25

we are going to tolerate a situation

13:28

where anybody who wants to throw the

13:30

mud gets to throw the

13:33

mud. And if it sticks, that's

13:35

just wonderful.

13:37

I mean, I was mad. That

13:40

was really mad.

13:42

Danforth believed that the Thomas he knew

13:45

would never harass anyone.

13:47

I wanted him to win, not just

13:50

because I wanted to be on the Supreme Court.

13:52

That seemed beside the point. But

13:55

I wanted him to have

13:57

some sense of indication and restructure.

13:59

restored pride.

14:02

But it wasn't clear how to get him that vindication.

14:06

An immediate vote without reopening the hearings

14:08

might help Thomas because his confirmation

14:10

it seemed like a shoe in. Or maybe

14:13

it would hurt him since he wouldn't get a chance

14:15

to rebut Anita Hill publicly.

14:18

The Senate's leaders have been meeting all afternoon

14:20

trying to decide how to proceed, but

14:22

there's so much confusion here now because

14:24

of all these counter charges and charges no

14:26

one can say for sure what's about to happen.

14:29

The truth was Thomas and his

14:31

defenders weren't in control. In 1991,

14:34

the Democrats had a big majority of the Senate, 57

14:37

seats to the Republicans

14:40

That meant they had most of the power if

14:42

the chairman of the Judiciary Committee wanted to use

14:45

it. But Joe Biden had been slow to

14:47

act ever since Anita Hill came forward. And

14:49

now he was desperate to find some kind

14:51

of compromise.

14:53

In the beginning, voting against Judge

14:55

Thomas was considered a very dangerous

14:57

vote politically. Now it appears voting

14:59

for him is dangerous. So the Senate,

15:02

I think, is looking for a safe way out.

15:04

Biden decided to reopen the hearings almost

15:06

immediately on Friday, October 11th. Clarence

15:10

Thomas and Anita Hill would both testify.

15:12

And then no matter what, the Senate would

15:14

vote on Thomas's confirmation four days

15:16

later. Those ground rules guaranteed

15:19

that there would be no comprehensive investigation.

15:22

The Democrats were really completely

15:25

outmaneuvered by the Republicans. That's

15:28

Jill Abramson, the coauthor of Strange

15:30

Justice. She says that

15:32

wasn't the end of Biden's concessions. He

15:34

also agreed to limit the scope of the hearings.

15:37

The senators could only ask about sexual

15:40

harassment, not anything else about Thomas's

15:42

personal conduct. And while Thomas

15:45

was protected and bubble wrapped,

15:48

there were no ground rules for Anita

15:50

Hill.

15:51

And there was one more thing. Thomas

15:53

would testify first and last.

15:55

Please speak before Hill and have the last

15:58

word.

16:00

On the morning of October 11th, Clarence

16:02

Thomas and his wife, Jenny, headed to John

16:04

Danforth's Senate office.

16:06

In the hours before the hearing, Danforth

16:09

led the couple and his wife, Sally, in prayer,

16:11

and then he had another idea.

16:13

So I said at the end, this might

16:15

seem corny to you, but follow

16:17

me.

16:18

Danforth led them into the bathroom, where

16:21

the acoustics were better. I had a tape

16:23

machine and I had teed up a

16:26

Mormon Tabernacle choir

16:29

singing Onward Christian Soldiers.

16:32

Onward Christian soldiers

16:37

marching us to

16:39

war. He was holding my hand, we were

16:41

all for holding hands, and his

16:44

eyes were closed. It

16:48

was an effort to try to strengthen

16:50

him. That

16:52

wasn't the only effort to lift Thomas'

16:54

spirits during the hearings. Busloads

16:56

of conservative activists came to Washington

16:59

to show their support. Jenny

17:01

Thomas talked about that in a 2020 documentary.

17:04

And we came out of Senator Danforth's

17:06

office and we were going down the hallway

17:09

and all these people were clapping and

17:12

very excited.

17:17

And he said to me, who are those

17:20

people? And I said, I think they're

17:22

angels. Good

17:28

morning, Judge. If you have

17:30

an opening statement, please proceed. Mr.

17:35

Chairman, Senator

17:37

Thurmond, members of the

17:39

committee, as

17:41

excruciatingly difficult as

17:44

the last two weeks have been, I

17:47

welcome the opportunity to

17:49

clear my name today.

17:52

his

18:00

integrity and his character had all

18:02

been harmed.

18:03

There is nothing this committee, this

18:06

body, or this country can do

18:09

to give me my good name back. Confirm

18:13

me if you want. Don't

18:15

confirm me if you are so led, but

18:19

let this process end. After

18:22

less than an hour, Clarence Thomas was done.

18:25

But the day was just getting started. Welcome

18:28

Professor Hill. At 11

18:31

30 a.m. Anita Hill took Clarence Thomas's

18:33

place at the witness table.

18:35

I instruct the officers do not

18:37

let anyone in or out of that

18:39

door while Professor Hill was making her statement.

18:42

Hill wore a bright blue linen seat and

18:44

stared straight ahead into the flashing cameras.

18:47

Professor, do you swear to tell the whole truth and nothing

18:50

but the truth will help you God? I do.

18:52

Thank you. Professor Hill, please

18:56

make whatever statement you would wish to make to

18:58

the committee. It

19:01

is only after a great deal of

19:03

agonizing consideration and sleepless

19:06

nights that I am able to talk

19:09

of these unpleasant matters to anyone

19:12

but my close friends.

19:14

Hill ran through her allegations from beginning

19:16

to end, how Thomas had asked her to

19:18

go out with him, how he pressured her

19:21

even when she'd said no,

19:22

how over and over again he'd called

19:24

her into his office and steered their conversations

19:27

to sex.

19:28

He spoke about acts that he had

19:30

seen in pornographic films involving

19:33

such matters as women having sex with

19:35

animals and films showing group

19:38

sex or rape scenes.

19:40

On other occasions he

19:43

referred to the size of his own penis

19:45

as being larger than normal

19:47

and he also spoke on some occasions

19:50

of the pleasures he had given to

19:52

women

19:52

with

19:54

oral sex. Oh

19:57

my god, oh my god, and here I'm

19:59

thinking. with every detail that

20:01

she's offering. What

20:03

the hell did I do? George

20:06

Kasu's tip about Anita Hill had led

20:08

indirectly to all of this. Kasu

20:11

stood in the back of the hearing room, transfixed.

20:14

The whole world was hearing about testimony

20:17

dealing with a nominee to

20:19

the Supreme Court and his genitals. As

20:22

she talked, everyone was quiet.

20:26

Hill said that Thomas would comment on what

20:28

she was wearing and whether it made her more

20:31

or less sexually attractive. She

20:33

also described a peculiar incident

20:35

involving Thomas in a soda can.

20:38

He got up from the table at

20:40

which we were working, went over

20:43

to his desk to get the Coke,

20:46

looked at the can, and asked, who

20:48

has put pubic hair on my Coke?

20:52

Her testimony was so detailed

20:54

that I found it, as a reporter,

20:57

credible.

20:58

Jill Abramson was also in the hearing

21:00

room that day.

21:01

I went to lunch with my Wall

21:04

Street Journal colleague. And as we

21:06

chatted, I mean, both of us were saying,

21:08

like,

21:08

how does Clarence Thomas survive?

21:12

There's no way they

21:14

can vote to confirm him after this.

21:17

That was the mood. And if it took her

21:19

testimony for them to finally realize

21:22

that this man is unfit for judicial

21:24

office, so be it.

21:26

It wasn't just that Hill was laying out all

21:29

those damning details. She also

21:31

maintained her composure during hours

21:33

of cross-examination. Her main interrogator

21:36

on the Republican side was Pennsylvania's

21:38

Arlen Spector.

21:40

You took it to mean that

21:44

Judge Thomas wanted to have sex with

21:46

you. But in fact,

21:48

he never did ask you to have sex, correct?

21:50

No, he did not ask me to have sex. He

21:53

did continually pressure me to

21:55

go out with him, continually. And

21:57

he would not accept my explanation

21:59

as a

21:59

one is being valid. So

22:03

that when you said you took it to mean,

22:05

we ought to have sex, that that was an inference

22:08

to you, Drew. Yes.

22:10

A former prosecutor, Spector

22:12

pushed Hill on the minor inconsistencies

22:14

between her testimony and which she told

22:17

the FBI. But it wasn't just the

22:19

Republicans who were asking probing

22:21

questions. Again, it's

22:23

difficult, but for the record, what was the

22:25

content of what he said? Joe

22:27

Biden spent a good chunk of his allotted

22:29

time asking Hill to spell

22:32

out everything Thomas had done to her.

22:34

And he used the

22:37

name that he had been referred to in

22:39

the pornographic material.

22:44

Do you recall what it was? Yes,

22:47

I do. The name

22:49

that was referred to was Long

22:51

Donk Silver. I'll

22:55

be honest, as a 13-year-old kid watching the hearings, I thought

22:57

that moment was hilarious. All of these

22:59

very serious adults in a very

23:01

serious-looking room having an incredibly

23:04

serious conversation about Long Donk Silver. In

23:08

my defense, I

23:09

was just a kid, and I didn't know what sexual

23:11

harassment meant or how serious it was. But

23:15

I wasn't the

23:16

only one laughing. Here's how Saturday Night Live

23:18

kicked off that weekend. The

23:20

committee calls its next witness. Sir,

23:25

would you please state your name? Long Donk Silver.

23:32

In the early 90s, Anita Hill was up against a

23:35

culture that barely recognized workplace sexual misconduct. A

23:38

big problem is

23:39

the way some men and women view the same

23:41

situation. In the case

23:43

of Judge Thomas, that's something that happened 10 years ago,

23:45

allegedly happened 10 years ago, I think to

23:47

bring it up now is completely different. I

23:51

don't think there is any man who can actually

23:54

feel what a woman feels if she

23:57

perceives herself as having been harassed.

23:59

In the Senate Judiciary Committee, there was

24:02

no difference in how men and women viewed things.

24:05

That's because there were no women on the committee

24:07

at all.

24:07

In skepticism about sexual harassment

24:10

crossed party lines, Dennis DeConcini,

24:12

a Democrat from Arizona, said there was

24:15

ample cause to question Hill's credibility.

24:17

If you're sexually harassed, you ought to get mad about it,

24:20

and you ought to do something about it, and you ought to complain. Instead

24:23

of hanging around a long time, and

24:25

then all of a sudden calling up anonymously and

24:27

saying, oh, I want to complain.

24:30

Anita Hill's testimony was broadcast

24:32

live on all three major networks, plus

24:34

C-SPAN, CNN, and Court TV.

24:37

But Clarence Thomas refused to look at any of

24:39

it.

24:39

After he read his statement on Capitol Hill, Thomas

24:42

had gone home to suburban Virginia.

24:44

That afternoon, he paced around the house,

24:47

while his wife Jenny tuned in and gave

24:49

him updates. He had to respond

24:53

that day.

24:54

In the early evening, John Danforth

24:56

called Thomas back to his office.

24:58

The doors were closed, and the lights were turned

25:00

down low, so Thomas could relax and

25:03

think. He was searching for just the

25:05

right words, something that would convey

25:07

his anger and unsettle his critics.

25:10

He's on a couch, and I'm in a chair,

25:12

and nobody else was in the room, just

25:14

the two of us.

25:16

At one point, he said, you know what

25:18

this is, Jack? It's a lynching.

25:21

It's a high-tech lynching.

25:26

And I said, that's the way you

25:28

feel, go up and say it.

25:33

This wasn't necessarily a flash of inspiration.

25:36

Thomas had used the same word in his opening statement

25:38

that morning, saying, I will not

25:41

provide the rope for my own lynching.

25:44

For decades, Thomas had bristled

25:46

at the assumption that he got where he was because

25:49

he was black. But

25:51

now, in a moment of great personal crisis,

25:53

he was prepared to use race to his advantage.

25:56

He wanted all those white senators to know that

25:59

he'd been victimized.

25:59

And he wanted America to see

26:02

them squirm when he said it.

26:08

Committee will please come to order. Judge,

26:14

it's a tough day and tough night for you, I know. It

26:16

was after 7 p.m. when Thomas sat

26:19

back down at the witness table. He started

26:21

speaking before Joe Biden could even finish

26:23

asking him a question. Do you have anything

26:25

you'd like to say? Senator, I would like to start

26:28

by saying unequivocally, uncategorically,

26:32

that I deny each and every

26:35

single allegation against me today.

26:37

The way Thomas said

26:38

it, Anita Hill seemed almost incidental.

26:41

That night, he turned his anger toward the proceedings

26:43

themselves. This is a

26:45

circus. It's a national disgrace.

26:50

And from my standpoint, as

26:53

a black American, as far as I'm concerned,

26:56

it is a high-tech lynching

26:58

for uppity blacks who

27:00

in any way deign to think for themselves,

27:03

to do for themselves,

27:05

to have different ideas. And

27:07

it is a message that unless

27:09

you cow-tow to an old order,

27:12

this is what will happen to you. You

27:16

will be lynched, destroyed,

27:18

caricatured by

27:23

a committee of the U.S. Senate

27:26

rather than hung from a tree. With

27:29

that, Thomas leaned back in his

27:31

chair and tinted his fingers below his

27:34

chin.

27:35

Biden didn't know what to say. We

27:38

will have... It

27:43

did the trick. Jill Labrimson.

27:46

If

27:46

anything is going to freeze them,

27:48

it's basically being branded

27:51

not only racist, but

27:54

as people

27:55

who would commit the most heinous crimes

27:58

that have been committed in the U.S. Senate. in our nation's

28:00

history. I remember

28:03

wherever I was sort of stopping, just

28:06

thinking about those words. Judiciary

28:09

committee lawyer, Mark Schwartz, was in a room

28:11

just off the main chamber listening in. Just

28:14

stopping and being pretty offended

28:17

that verbal accusations

28:19

were equated to, you know, these

28:21

pernicious acts where

28:23

people were slaughtered. I mean, when

28:26

he's talking about a high-tech lynching,

28:29

he's talking about the work that you were doing,

28:31

right? Like that you and your

28:33

team. Look, you know, my

28:36

role was a very

28:38

small role. I think that we were

28:40

just doing our best in an incredibly difficult

28:42

situation to try to have a fair process.

28:45

And obviously it wasn't the way anybody

28:47

wanted it to happen, but

28:50

when you say it's a high-tech lynching, it

28:53

imparts an intent, a malicious

28:55

intent. I vehemently

28:58

disagree with that. That was not what was

29:00

happening.

29:02

However you felt about that phrase, Thomas

29:05

had clearly changed the narrative. He'd

29:08

shifted the focus away from his workplace

29:10

behavior and onto his persecution.

29:13

And the way he told it, that assault

29:16

on his character was based on one woman's

29:18

unproven claims. That was in keeping

29:20

with the Thomas Camps broader strategy to

29:23

isolate Anita Hill as a single, unreliable

29:25

witness.

29:28

But the truth was, she was not a lone

29:30

accuser. In the days leading up to

29:32

the hearing, Mark Schwartz and the Judiciary

29:34

Committee had learned about three other women who

29:37

could potentially testify. Thomas's

29:41

opponents on the committee now had a lot

29:43

more ammunition.

29:46

The only question was,

29:48

would they use it? We'll

29:53

be back in a minute.

30:07

This episode is brought to you by Saatchi

30:09

Art, where you can shop original artwork

30:12

by the world's top emerging artists right

30:14

from your home. Just like the enduringly

30:16

relevant history we talk about on Slow Burn,

30:19

art has this incredible ability to be a product

30:21

of its own time and maker, while also being

30:23

timeless and universal. For more

30:25

than a decade, Saatchi Art and their team

30:28

of experts have helped art enthusiasts around

30:30

the world discover art they love. From

30:32

one-of-a-kind abstracts and gorgeous landscape

30:34

paintings, to sculptures, photographs,

30:37

and much more. With their vast collection

30:39

and intuitive search options, finding

30:41

the perfect artwork has never been easier.

30:44

And Saatchi Art takes care of everything. You'll

30:46

enjoy hassle-free delivery and a 7-day

30:49

money-back guarantee. Slow Burn

30:51

listeners get 10% off their first order

30:53

with code SLATE. Just

30:55

go to SaatchiArt.com and enter

30:57

SLATE at checkout. That's S-A-A-T-C-H-I-Art.com,

31:03

code SLATE. Discover one-of-a-kind

31:06

art you love today

31:07

and support emerging artists around

31:09

the world. Go to SaatchiArt.com.

31:18

You need to check out the newest season of

31:20

the podcast, Commons, which will examine

31:22

the past, present, and future of the sport

31:24

of hockey. It's a podcast that shines

31:26

a light on never-before-heard stories through

31:29

the voices of those that live them. From

31:32

the forgotten history of the colored hockey league

31:34

of the Maritimes to the creep of pro-military

31:36

nationalism, Commons will cover why

31:38

such a gentile country worships such

31:41

a violent sport. Commons

31:43

will challenge your preconceptions and leave you

31:45

wondering, is this a sport or a

31:47

cult?

31:48

To listen to the show, just

31:50

search for Commons in your podcast app.

32:00

Millions of Americans had watched Anita Hill

32:02

describe what Clarence Thomas had done to her and

32:04

how it made her feel.

32:06

Some of them thought she was a liar. Others

32:08

thought she was brave. Sukari Hardnet

32:10

thought she could help.

32:13

I really felt so sorry

32:15

for Anita Hill and so proud

32:17

of her. And I just knew

32:19

that somebody needed to

32:21

come to her aid to

32:24

corroborate what she was saying because

32:26

she was telling the truth.

32:28

You heard from Hardnet in our previous episode.

32:30

She worked for Thomas at the EEOC, starting

32:33

two years after Hill's departure.

32:35

What she said was exactly what he'd done

32:37

when I was there. She wrote a

32:39

brief statement about her experience working

32:41

with Thomas. Dear Senators,

32:45

I worked as a special assistant to Clarence

32:47

Thomas at the EEOC from 1985 to I'm

32:52

ready

32:52

for this. Hardnet, who's an attorney, asked the

32:54

dean of her law school to help her draft the document.

32:58

If you were young, black, female,

33:00

and reasonably attractive, you

33:02

knew full well you were being inspected

33:05

and auditioned as a female.

33:07

Hardnet's statement got passed along

33:09

to the Senate Judiciary Committee. I felt obligated

33:12

to communicate this in writing in

33:14

order to put this on the record publicly.

33:17

Sincerely, Sukari Hardnet.

33:20

She was careful to say that she didn't

33:22

believe Thomas had harassed her. She

33:25

thought that it would be better if that

33:27

wasn't a part of the letter and

33:30

that it would be better to just talk about

33:32

my experiences to support what

33:35

Anita Hill was saying.

33:37

She was just one of the women who were willing

33:39

to share their experiences working with Clarence

33:41

Thomas. If the Senate Judiciary Committee

33:43

asked them to testify, it seemed possible,

33:46

maybe even likely, that his nomination

33:48

would be sunk.

33:50

I remember being in my office

33:52

in the Senate office building. Mark Schwartz

33:54

again.

33:59

with a phone number and

34:02

the woman's name was Angela Wright.

34:06

You also heard about Wright in our last episode.

34:09

She was the public affairs director at the EEOC.

34:12

She said that Thomas told her that the hair

34:14

on her legs was sexy.

34:16

He also showed up uninvited at her apartment.

34:19

And then in 1985, he fired her.

34:23

Six years later, Wright was working

34:25

as an editor at the Charlotte Observer. Schwartz

34:28

got her on the phone two days before Anita

34:30

Hill was scheduled to testify.

34:32

She wouldn't know who I was from a hole in the wall.

34:34

So I introduced myself. I said, you know, who I

34:36

worked for. I asked her if

34:38

she had some time to answer some questions and she said

34:41

she did.

34:42

Schwartz found that Wright was a lot scrappier

34:44

than the poised and serene Anita Hill. She

34:47

told him that Thomas was like an annoying

34:49

fly, but she sounded like a credible

34:51

witness. She was pretty specific about

34:53

some of the

34:55

comments that the nominee had made.

34:57

So I, at the time, was remembering

34:59

I better take really good notes because this

35:02

is going to be important. Schwartz asked

35:04

Wright if she would be willing to come to Washington

35:06

to testify.

35:07

She said no, she was a working

35:09

journalist and didn't want to put herself at

35:11

the center of a news story.

35:13

Schwartz thanked her and told her he would follow

35:15

up.

35:16

Then he rushed over to Joe Biden's

35:18

office.

35:19

He was very respectful, listened very

35:21

carefully, but I don't think it was the kind of

35:23

thing where he was like happy that

35:26

I was there because usually people were showing

35:28

up from my unit to brief him. It's like

35:31

we're only doing it because there's some

35:34

swirl going on.

35:35

The day after that meeting, federal marshals

35:38

showed up at Wright's house. They came with a subpoena

35:41

compelling her to fly to Washington right away.

35:43

Back in D.C., Schwartz was continuing

35:46

to work the phones.

35:47

There was a woman who I actually

35:50

ended up interviewing. Rose

35:53

Jourdain was her name, who provided

35:56

some

35:57

very strong corroboration.

36:00

Jordane had been Wright's confidante to

36:02

EEOC.

36:03

Wright had told her about Thomas's

36:05

behavior and even asked her to stick around

36:07

the office until Thomas left in the evenings.

36:10

I felt actually pretty bad about

36:12

having to engage in a telephone interview

36:14

with her because she was in a lot of pain.

36:17

In

36:17

October 1991, Jordane

36:19

was bedridden in the hospital. I

36:22

remember Rose was there with her daughter at

36:24

the time, I think, in the hospital room explaining, the

36:26

things that Angela Wright has told you are absolutely

36:30

what she related to me about how the

36:33

nominee had come by her house and

36:35

how she was uncomfortable. And

36:37

she was very emphatic and solid

36:40

in her statements.

36:42

In spite of her condition, Jordane

36:44

said she'd be willing to testify. Schwartz

36:47

reported back to the Judiciary Committee, which

36:49

started thinking about how to transport her from the

36:51

hospital to the hearing room.

36:54

You

36:54

know, a month before it, we're talking about the writings

36:56

of Thomas Sowell and here we're talking about

36:59

how to transport somebody in an ambulance to

37:01

come and testify. It was

37:03

crazy.

37:05

NBC News has been told that the Judiciary

37:07

Committee has informed Thomas's team that

37:10

it is interviewing another potential witness. Two

37:12

others were already scheduled.

37:14

Angela Wright, Rose Jordane

37:16

and Sakari Hartnett were now on deck. The

37:19

minute one of them testified, Anita

37:21

Hill would no longer be alone. On

37:23

Saturday, October 12th, Clarence

37:27

Thomas sat back down at the witness table. Here to come to order. Anita

37:29

Hill spent the day in a Washington hotel room

37:32

as the hearings carried on without her. Morning,

37:34

judge. And it didn't take long for them to go

37:36

totally off the rails.

37:38

Let me just read to you from page seven

37:42

the best particular version of the exorcist. The Republicans of

37:44

the Judiciary Committee were doing everything

37:47

they possibly could to discredit Hill, accusing

37:49

her of being a witness to the hearing. Accusing

37:53

her of being a scorn former lover or

37:55

a lesbian or a radical feminist

37:57

or in the case of Utah Senator Oran.

38:00

and Hatch, accusing her of stealing material

38:02

from the best-selling novel, The Exorcist.

38:05

Dennings had remarked to him in passing, said Sharon,

38:08

that there appeared to be, quote, an alien

38:11

pubic hair floating around in my

38:13

gym, unquote.

38:16

I mean, where they thought

38:18

there's a connection to The Exorcist,

38:20

I don't know. Jill Abramson. The

38:22

question seemed to be saying,

38:24

well, clearly you plagiarized

38:27

the allegation that Thomas

38:30

asked her, who put pubic

38:32

hair on my can of Coke? What

38:35

do you think about that, Judge? Senator,

38:38

I think this whole affair is sick. I

38:40

think it's sick too. I don't

38:42

think I should be here today. I

38:45

don't think that this inquisition should be going

38:47

on. The inquisition kept

38:49

on going,

38:50

and it wasn't directed at Clarence Thomas. Her

38:53

statements and actions in my presence

38:56

were in my opinion, yet another

38:58

example of her ability to fabricate

39:01

the idea that someone was interested

39:03

in her when in fact no

39:06

such interest existed.

39:08

On Sunday, October 13th, the

39:10

committee called a man named John Doggett

39:12

to testify. Doggett was Clarence

39:15

Thomas's Yale Law School classmate,

39:17

and he'd met Anita Hill when they were both working in

39:19

Washington, D.C. Now, Doggett

39:22

told the Judiciary Committee that Hill had been

39:24

obsessed with him.

39:26

Miss Hill's fantasies about

39:28

my sexual interest in her were

39:30

an indication of the fact that she was having

39:33

a problem with being rejected

39:35

by men she was attracted to.

39:38

Hill couldn't believe what she was hearing. She

39:41

barely remembered John Doggett.

39:43

Now, Republicans were using his

39:45

unverified testimony to argue that Hill

39:47

suffered from iratomania.

39:50

That's a delusional disorder where someone

39:52

thinks another person is in love with them.

39:55

That was just garbage. There

39:57

was really no credible evidence about

39:59

that. this at all.

40:03

This is something I remember, and this is so

40:05

bizarre. Mark Schwartz says he had

40:07

to chase down all kinds of leads, no

40:09

matter how unhinged they were.

40:11

One of the Republican senators had found somebody

40:14

who had alleged that they were in a class taught

40:16

by Professor Hill, and that

40:18

she would pass back their test books, and that

40:20

there was pubic hair

40:23

in them. I mean, even

40:25

thinking about it today, it's insane.

40:29

In the scenes, Republican senators wielded

40:31

this story as a threat.

40:33

They said that if the Democrats talked about

40:35

Thomas' history with pornography, they'd

40:38

tell the world that Anita Hill sprinkled

40:40

pubic hairs on a student's papers.

40:46

I've got letters hanging out my pocket.

40:48

I've got faxes saying, watch

40:51

out for this woman.

40:54

Nobody's got the guts to say that because it gets

40:56

all tangled up in this sexual harassment

40:59

crap.

41:00

That was Senator Alan Simpson, a Republican

41:02

from Wyoming, and that Saturday, he

41:05

didn't just go after Anita Hill.

41:07

Angela Wright will

41:09

soon be with us, we think.

41:13

But now we're told that Angela Wright has what

41:15

we used to call in the legal trade, cold

41:17

feet.

41:19

Wright heard that remark while she was polishing

41:21

her opening statement. She was at a Washington

41:24

law office, dressed in a borrowed skirt

41:26

with her hair pulled up in a bun.

41:28

As she waited to get called to the hearing room,

41:31

she listened as Simpson called her a totally

41:33

discredited witness.

41:44

The Bush White House also got a hold of her

41:46

government work history, and began circulating

41:48

the fact that she'd been fired from a previous job.

41:51

As the campaign against her gained steam,

41:54

the Judiciary Committee met behind closed

41:56

doors. In that meeting, the

41:58

Committee made a very big decision.

42:00

and on Sunday night, October 13th,

42:03

Chairman Joe Biden announced it to the world.

42:05

Ms. Wright and Ms. Jordanne

42:08

will not testify at the hearing.

42:11

Their extensive interviews conducted

42:13

by the majority and minority staff

42:17

will be placed in the official

42:19

record

42:20

available to... In their book, Strains Justice,

42:23

Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer reported

42:25

that Senate Democrats became frightened of

42:27

Wright's checkered employment record. The

42:30

senators also talked about her tendency

42:32

to lose her temper and whether her sexiness

42:35

might make her less credible.

42:38

It

42:38

seems all the more unbelievable to

42:40

me now than it did then that Joe

42:42

Biden did not call her to testify.

42:46

She was literally waiting in the wings.

42:51

That was it.

42:52

Angela Wright had come to Washington, D.C.

42:54

for nothing, and there would be no ambulance

42:56

to bring Rose Jordanne to Capitol Hill. And

43:00

what about Sakari Hardinett, who said that

43:02

black women in Clarence Thomas' office were

43:04

getting inspected and auditioned? She

43:06

was ready to say those words publicly,

43:09

but she never got the chance.

43:11

When did you realize that you wouldn't be called

43:13

to testify? When they didn't

43:15

call me to testify. Like

43:18

what was that like the waiting for

43:20

a response that never came? Well,

43:24

it's

43:26

a part of being black in America. You

43:29

know, it's a part of not

43:31

just being black in America, but being a black

43:33

female in America. So

43:40

how do you feel about the fact

43:42

that those women didn't get to tell their stories on

43:45

camera in front of the committee? Like do you think it

43:48

might have changed things?

43:50

The only thing I'm going to say about that is if they

43:52

had testified, it would have changed

43:55

the conversation we're having now.

43:57

I'm not smart enough to know that

43:59

it would. would have changed the result.

44:01

The Clarence Thomas confirmation

44:04

story is finally over. Today's

44:06

vote followed one of the most bitter confirmation

44:08

battles in recent history. On this vote,

44:11

the yeas are 52 and the nays

44:13

are 48. The

44:15

nomination of Clarence Thomas of Georgia

44:18

to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme

44:20

Court is hereby confirmed.

44:25

On October 15, 1991, the Senate confirmed Thomas by

44:29

the smallest margin for a Supreme Court nominee

44:32

in more than a century. He

44:34

got the votes of 41 out of 43 Republicans and 11

44:37

of 57 Democrats.

44:41

Clarence Thomas was soaking in a warm

44:43

bath at home during the Senate roll call. When

44:46

his wife, Jenny, told him the count had gone his

44:48

way, he said, whoop-de-damn-do,

44:51

where do I get my reputation back? Thomas

44:54

may not have been in the mood to celebrate, but

44:56

he had won, and his political allies

44:59

learned an important lesson. The best defense

45:02

is a good offense.

45:04

Listen, I had a lot to pray about

45:07

after the confirmation process was over.

45:09

That's Thomas's friend Armstrong Williams.

45:12

He's the one who told the press that there was a

45:14

thin line between Anita Hill's sanity and

45:16

her insanity.

45:18

You know, I never believed Anita Hill, but Anita

45:20

was a good person. I liked Anita. She

45:22

was a friend. When in war,

45:25

your job is to destroy the enemy who's trying

45:27

to destroy you. And at that time,

45:29

I just had to paint a pitch of hers being unstable.

45:32

Do I believe she's unstable? No. Do

45:35

I believe this is something she really wanted to do? No.

45:38

Did she do it? Yes. And so in

45:40

doing that, other things were

45:43

unleashed that

45:44

had to be done in order to save my man.

45:47

After everything she'd gone through in Washington,

45:49

DC, Anita Hill went back home

45:51

to Oklahoma to watch the confirmation vote.

45:54

When it was over, she told reporters

45:56

that she was disappointed, but not surprised.

45:59

That's

45:59

That same day, she started getting a

46:01

bulk delivery of letters, up to 3,500 pieces

46:04

of mail and each shipment.

46:06

Many were from women who'd lived through sexual harassment

46:09

and didn't know who else to tell.

46:12

And she has kept that famous

46:15

blue outfit that she wore,

46:17

along with the

46:20

thousands upon thousands of letters

46:22

of support. I think that that

46:25

has sustained her through the years.

46:27

Her telling the truth of exactly

46:29

what happened gave other

46:32

women courage to come forward.

46:35

We reached out to Anita Hill for an interview,

46:37

but never heard back.

46:41

In 1999, Hill became

46:44

a professor at Brandeis University. Eleven

46:47

years later, she got a voicemail on

46:49

her office phone line. It was

46:51

from Jenny Thomas. I just wanted to reach

46:53

across the airwaves

46:55

and the years and

46:58

ask you to consider

47:01

something. I would

47:03

love you to consider an

47:05

apology sometime and

47:07

some full explanation of why

47:10

you did what you did with my husband.

47:13

So, give it some thought. I

47:17

certainly pray about this and hope

47:19

that one day you'll help us understand

47:21

why you did what you did.

47:35

We'll be right back.

47:44

The Supreme Court was designed to be above

47:46

the fray, but right now, are

47:48

the nine justices living up to that promise? On

47:51

the new season of More Perfect, host

47:53

Julia Longoria brings the highest

47:55

court in the land down to earth. You'll

47:58

meet people on all sides of crucial

47:59

cases as she shares history that

48:02

explains how we got here. More

48:04

perfect from WNYC Studios.

48:07

Listen wherever you get your podcasts.

48:14

Get comfortable like Clarence

48:16

Thomas on a conservative billionaire's yacht comfortable

48:19

and tune into crooked media's strict scrutiny to

48:21

stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court decisions.

48:23

I'm Leah Littman and each week I'm joined by my co-hosts

48:26

and fellow law professors Kate Shaw and Melissa

48:28

Murray to break down the latest headlines and the biggest

48:30

legal questions facing our country from if a prisstone

48:32

to trans bands. With the 2024 elections

48:35

approaching, it's crucial to understand the impact

48:37

of these decisions and how to fight back. So

48:39

listen to new episodes of strict scrutiny every Monday

48:42

wherever you get your podcasts.

48:45

See them three boys up there?

48:48

That's my son with the blue shirt on. This

48:53

is Jamal, Clarence, and Kathy.

48:56

His first wife. You have

48:58

a picture of Kathy in here? Yeah, that's Kathy

49:00

right there. Do you have a picture?

49:03

A Virginia in the living room. Okay,

49:05

okay. And you see this picture up here? When

49:08

I stepped inside Leola Williams' home in Savannah,

49:10

there was a photo I couldn't stop looking at.

49:13

I mentioned it at the top of our first episode.

49:16

It showed Miss Leola on October 15, 1991, the day the

49:18

U.S. Senate voted to send her son

49:22

to the Supreme Court.

49:23

She was in Pinpoint, Georgia, surrounded

49:25

by family and friends.

49:27

A reporter from NBC showed up too. Miss

49:30

Williams, how does it feel to be the mother of Supreme

49:32

Court justice? It feels good. It feels

49:34

good. Now some people

49:36

have said that your son isn't qualified.

49:38

What do you think? You know, I'll

49:42

tell you what my dad said one time. Sticks

49:46

and stones may break my bones, but words will

49:48

never harm you. Yeah, yes, yes. That's

49:50

it. He talked

49:52

about him, but that's all right. That's all right. They

49:55

talk about Jesus Christ. Yes.

49:57

I read your son's book, and

49:59

he's... said that you were very upset

50:02

about how he was treated during

50:04

the conference. Yes, I was, very. We

50:07

was at the White House.

50:10

He was taking his first sworn

50:12

in. And these tall

50:16

men's coming to us,

50:18

coming to real tall. And

50:20

they said, oh, you're Miss Lillah?

50:24

I said, yeah. And

50:27

he said, well,

50:29

my name is Joe Biden. And

50:32

the other one said, my name is Kennedy.

50:35

I said, oh, I

50:38

said, is this a free country? And

50:42

he, both of them said, yeah.

50:45

I said, well, I do not shake

50:48

Hippocrates' hands. And

50:52

walk right by my head, turn

50:54

in my son's head, say, boy,

50:58

I can't take you nowhere.

51:01

Did you ever forgive Joe Biden for that? Yeah,

51:04

I had to forgive him. As a Christian,

51:07

I had to. Yes, ma'am. I don't love him, but

51:09

I forgive him.

51:11

I never forget, though.

51:14

Clarence Thomas never forgot either. And

51:16

it doesn't seem like he's forgiven anyone, even

51:18

all these years later.

51:20

Reading his memoir, I was surprised

51:22

by how often he talks about his enemies and

51:24

critics, like he was some up and coming rap

51:26

artist.

51:27

The truth is, those

51:29

enemies and critics are totally irrelevant.

51:32

He's on the Supreme Court for life. And

51:34

in his case, life means life.

51:37

Thomas turned 75 this June, and

51:39

he's currently the most senior justice on the court.

51:42

If he stays for five more years, he'll

51:44

have the longest tenure of any Supreme Court

51:46

justice in history.

51:48

When I first started covering the

51:51

court 20 years ago, Clarence Thomas was

51:53

an outlier. Dahlia Lithwick

51:55

writes about the Supreme Court for Slate. But

51:58

I think what's changed in the decade

52:00

since he's been on the court as he went from

52:02

being kind of the fringe

52:05

of the fringe to being the

52:07

decider in a whole bunch of ways.

52:11

For a decade, Thomas didn't ask

52:13

a single question during oral arguments,

52:15

but his votes and his opinions speak for themselves.

52:19

He voted to strip away much of the enforcement

52:21

power of the Voting Rights Act.

52:23

He sided with the majority and Dobbs

52:25

v Jackson Women's Health Organization, which

52:28

overturned Roe v. Wade. In his

52:30

concurrence in that case, he urged his

52:32

colleagues to go much further and reconsider

52:34

the Supreme Court's rulings on contraception

52:37

and same-sex marriage.

52:39

And now, Thomas is closer than

52:41

ever to eliminating his lifelong nemesis,

52:44

affirmative action.

52:46

As we record this episode, that

52:48

decision could be just days away.

52:51

And again, to me, that is

52:53

evidence that this is 100% Clarence Thomas's

52:55

world. We all just

52:58

get to live in it.

53:01

He's become a revered figure, and

53:03

not only in the conservative movement, because people

53:06

are beginning to watch his ideas that he

53:08

championed from the margins turn into

53:10

the law of the lab. Armstrong

53:12

Williams again. That's where the court is

53:14

moving in his direction now, and

53:16

his influence, even his control, is

53:19

ascendant. And it is the Thomas

53:21

Court.

53:23

It's not just the Thomas Court. It's

53:26

also Thomas's Republican party. At

53:28

least 10 of his former clerks have served

53:30

in or worked on behalf of the Trump administration.

53:34

That includes John Eastman, the attorney

53:36

who came up with the plot to overturn the 2020

53:38

election.

53:39

His wife, Jenny, now a lobbyist

53:41

and activist, also got involved in that effort.

53:45

I would like to thank a

53:47

great woman named Jenny Thomas. You

53:49

know Jenny Thomas? The wife

53:52

of a great man, Justice Clarence

53:54

Thomas, for her courage and strength. But

53:58

Clarence Thomas has not recused him.

53:59

himself from any case relating to the January

54:02

6th insurrection.

54:03

In fact, he was the only justice

54:06

to side with Donald Trump when he attempted to

54:08

block the release of White House records about that

54:10

day. Thomas has also accepted

54:12

gifts worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and

54:15

didn't disclose them.

54:16

I'm just taking aback. You

54:18

know, I think the

54:20

young Clarence Thomas that

54:23

I knew would think that this

54:25

was not in keeping

54:27

with ethical behavior. That's

54:30

journalist Juan Williams. He's been covering

54:32

Clarence Thomas for more than 40 years.

54:35

I just think that's not

54:37

good for Clarence Thomas. I think it's not good for

54:39

the Supreme Court. I think it's not good for our

54:41

democracy. And I'm surprised

54:44

that he's put himself in that position. You

54:46

know, to be frank, I'm disappointed

54:49

that someone who

54:52

is a hardworking, thoughtful

54:55

man had that kind

54:57

of ethical lapse.

54:59

Thomas did work very hard to get where he

55:01

is today,

55:02

but he's also had a lot of help

55:04

from John Danforth and George H.W.

55:06

Bush

55:07

and Harlan Crow, the Texas

55:09

real estate magnate who's flown Thomas around

55:11

the world on his private jet and paid

55:13

for his grand nephew's private school tuition.

55:16

I wanted to ask Thomas about all this, but

55:18

he declined my interview request. So

55:21

all I can tell you is what I saw.

55:23

In Thomas's hometowns, Crow's

55:25

fingerprints are everywhere. He donated

55:28

money to rename one wing of a savannah

55:30

library in Thomas's honor. He

55:32

also paid to convert an old cannery into

55:34

the Pinpoint Heritage Museum.

55:37

I'd like to thank my good friend

55:39

in absentia, my friend Harlan

55:41

Crow, who against

55:43

my better advice, insisted

55:46

that he would preserve the heart of

55:48

this community from the bulldozer's blade.

55:52

I'm glad.

55:54

Clarence Thomas loaves welfare. He

55:56

thinks affirmative action is demeaning, but

55:58

there's no denying that Thomas's

55:59

white conservative friends have elevated

56:02

him at every step.

56:04

I don't think he ever realized

56:06

that he was being manipulated and

56:09

used by the white

56:13

Republicans. I don't think he realizes

56:16

it now.

56:17

That's Thomas's ex-girlfriend, Lillian

56:20

McEwen. He took their

56:22

approval as friendship and appreciation

56:24

for what he

56:25

had done. And

56:30

I think he still does. Dahlia

56:33

Lithwick isn't so sure. You

56:36

know, is Carlen Crow using Clarence Thomas

56:38

or is Clarence Thomas using Harlan

56:40

Crow? I think it's that their

56:42

interests are perfectly aligned.

56:45

So I don't know that who's using

56:47

who is the most useful framing.

56:50

I think the useful framing is Clarence

56:52

Thomas had a vision of the Supreme Court

56:55

as a political juggernaut for the far

56:58

right. And he got

57:00

it.

57:01

In an earlier episode, I talked about

57:04

Clarence Thomas and racial solidarity.

57:06

A poll released the day the Senate confirmed him

57:09

showed that 70% of black Americans

57:11

wanted him on the Supreme Court. After

57:13

the hearings, I remember black leaders doing

57:15

their best to be optimistic. One

57:17

of my professional idols, the late writer,

57:20

Ralph Wiley, wrote, I'm in the habit

57:22

of forcing myself into hoping for black

57:24

people.

57:26

Here's what I remember about what came next.

57:28

In the nineties, my family subscribed

57:30

to the black owned magazine emerge

57:33

twice. We got copies in the mail that had

57:35

caricatures of Thomas on the cover. And

57:38

one of them, he was wearing a handkerchief like

57:40

aunt Jemima's. The second one had

57:42

this headline, uncle Thomas, Lon

57:45

Jockey for the far right. Those

57:47

cartoons, ginned up outrage from

57:49

some conservative black commentators.

57:52

But among the black folks I knew

57:53

they were the consensus.

57:55

So I've been holding back my thoughts.

57:59

And I did not. want to talk much about

58:02

Clarence Thomas.

58:03

Eddie Jenkins was the only one of Thomas's

58:05

college friends from Holy Cross who agreed to

58:07

talk with us. That's likely because

58:09

their friendship ended more than 30 years ago

58:12

when Thomas took offense to something Jenkins

58:14

said in an interview.

58:15

And so I come to find out that after he got

58:18

the nomination, that he didn't

58:20

want me to come to swimming

58:22

in.

58:23

Now, Jenkins watches his old friend

58:25

from a distance. And all this time later,

58:28

he's still waiting for that friend to return.

58:30

When you know someone for a long time

58:33

and you believe and trust in them, it's

58:36

more than a history lesson. It's

58:39

something that goes deep because

58:43

you develop a certain affection

58:45

and affinity for the brother that you know. And

58:47

the reason why I decided to come on this

58:51

program with you

58:53

is because this

58:56

brother ain't going nowhere.

58:59

He is going to be on the bench

59:02

until he catches his last breath. So

59:05

there is hope that he realizes

59:07

that. You know what?

59:10

We all have the same God. And

59:12

there is a reckoning. And so

59:15

there's still time.

59:17

And that's why I'm here, to

59:19

tell you that

59:21

there's still time. Wow.

59:26

Hey, I kind of poured it all out, didn't I? Would

59:36

you ever want to live in Pinpoint? I'd

59:38

rather stay here.

59:40

Leola Williams' father, Myers

59:43

Anderson, built the modest home she

59:45

now lives in way back in the 1950s. In 2014,

59:49

Harlan Crow bought it.

59:51

This street used to be bad. What

59:54

do you mean? Drugs and stuff. But

59:59

they don't do it anymore. the morning they

1:00:01

tear down all those houses and

1:00:03

we don't have those people on the street anymore.

1:00:06

If she enjoys the neighborhood now, it's

1:00:08

at least in part because Crow helped fix it up.

1:00:11

Her property was one of several that Crow's company

1:00:13

bought on the same street.

1:00:15

His company later sold those other lots and

1:00:17

they've since been replaced by upscale homes.

1:00:20

I'm so glad I got to see the famous

1:00:22

house, man, that he built

1:00:24

with this. I mean, that's just unbelievable, by

1:00:26

the way. She was clean, but I could do so much.

1:00:30

Oh, your house is great. What

1:00:32

are you talking about? I look

1:00:34

in the living room right on this side.

1:00:35

On my way out, I took a bunch of pictures

1:00:38

and jotted down some details so I wouldn't forget.

1:00:41

There was the lived-in den with a pair

1:00:43

of old recliners, a tidy living

1:00:45

room that no one seemed to spend much time in.

1:00:48

The china cabinet in the corner, a large

1:00:50

painting of Jesus carrying a fallen black

1:00:53

man on a deserted beach.

1:00:55

The home felt warm and it felt familiar.

1:00:58

If you're around my age and grew up black

1:01:00

in America, it would probably feel familiar

1:01:02

to you, too.

1:01:04

This could have been my grandmother's house or your

1:01:06

grandmother's. Yeah. Okay.

1:01:10

Okay.

1:01:11

Yes, my boy.

1:01:15

All right. Well, I mean, you know

1:01:18

what, Miss Lola, I think I didn't

1:01:20

held you for so long and I'm so glad I

1:01:22

got to see you and meet you. Go ahead, just

1:01:24

you. You take care of that baby. Miss

1:01:26

Lola and I had gotten to talking about my baby

1:01:28

boy and before I left, she

1:01:30

insisted on seeing the video. I'll show you this little video.

1:01:33

Oh, look at that. Look at that. Listen.

1:01:36

Listen. Isn't that cute? He's

1:01:38

looking for his daddy.

1:01:39

Yeah, he's looking for me. You better get back to that baby. He's

1:01:41

not used to

1:01:43

me being gone.

1:01:54

Harlan Crow said he wants to preserve Miss Lola's

1:01:56

house as a historic site and

1:01:58

it legitimately is one.

1:02:00

It still looks as sturdy as it must have when

1:02:02

Clarence and his brothers showed up on the doorstep as

1:02:04

children with their possessions and a pair

1:02:06

of grocery bags.

1:02:09

You know, I can remember being herded

1:02:11

into our little den. It's where

1:02:13

the Motorola TV was. And

1:02:17

we all had to watch what was going

1:02:19

on in Little Rock and being

1:02:22

horrified. You know, we'd

1:02:24

watch what happened in Birmingham, the fire

1:02:26

hoses, the dogs, things like

1:02:28

that. And it really, oh, absolutely

1:02:30

had a tremendous impact on all of us.

1:02:34

Clarence Thomas' grandparents raised him

1:02:36

to reject that racism and overcome

1:02:38

it.

1:02:39

They turned this house into a lunch pad

1:02:42

that took him to places they could never imagine.

1:02:44

It's a humble place,

1:02:46

but something to be proud of. A

1:02:48

family heirloom.

1:02:50

And now,

1:02:51

it's owned by someone else.

1:02:59

It's a humble place to be. Slow

1:03:10

Burn is produced by Sophie Summergrad, Sam

1:03:13

Kim,

1:03:14

Sophie Codner, and me, Joel

1:03:16

Anderson. Josh Levine is the editorial

1:03:19

director of Slow Burn. Derek John

1:03:21

is our executive producer.

1:03:24

This episode was edited by Josh

1:03:26

Levine, Derek John, Sophie

1:03:28

Summergrad, and Joel Meyer. Susan

1:03:31

Mathews is Slate's executive editor. Merit

1:03:34

Jacob is our senior technical director.

1:03:37

Our theme music was composed by Alexis

1:03:39

Codrada. Ivy Lee Simones

1:03:42

did the cover art. We had production

1:03:44

help from Benjamin Payne and Savannah, Patrick

1:03:46

Fort, James Rettick, Vic

1:03:48

Whitley Berry, Alyssa Midcalf,

1:03:51

and Jesus Vivar at Mix Theory Studios.

1:03:55

We couldn't make Slow Burn without support from

1:03:57

our members, and I strongly encourage you to sign

1:03:59

up for Slow Burn.

1:03:59

for Slate Plus today. It's only $15 for

1:04:03

your first three months. Head over to slate.com

1:04:06

slash slowburn to join. Slate

1:04:08

Plus members get ad free listening on this

1:04:10

show and all Slate shows, unlimited

1:04:13

reading on the Slate site, and all kinds

1:04:15

of perks, like a member exclusive episode

1:04:17

of Slow Burn each week. In this week's

1:04:20

Plus episode, you'll hear a lot more from

1:04:22

Dahlia Lithwick and Mark Joseph Stern,

1:04:24

Slate's in-house experts covering the Supreme

1:04:27

Court. They talk about how Thomas' path

1:04:29

to the court

1:04:29

continues to influence his rulings on

1:04:32

the court. If you're looking for breaking

1:04:34

news analysis of everything going on with the Supreme

1:04:36

Court right now, you can also find Mark

1:04:38

and Dahlia on Slate's legal podcast,

1:04:41

Amicus. Amicus has new episodes

1:04:43

every Saturday this month to tell you all about

1:04:45

the big decisions being released this SCOTUS

1:04:47

term. There'll be special episodes

1:04:49

for Slate Plus members, too. Special

1:04:53

thanks to Jenea Desmond-Harris, Emily

1:04:55

John, Jessica Seidman, Paul

1:04:58

Somergrad, Danielle Conley,

1:04:59

Robert Wilson, Michael

1:05:02

Fletcher, Rachel Strom, and

1:05:05

Slate's Christina Cotarucci, Evan

1:05:07

Chung, Kelly Jones, Katie

1:05:10

Shepard, Kaitlyn Schneider, Cleo

1:05:13

Levin, Bill Carey, Seth

1:05:15

Brown, Katie Rayford, Daisy

1:05:18

Rosario, Hillary Fry,

1:05:20

and Alicia Montgomery, Slate's VP of

1:05:23

Audio.

1:05:24

Appreciate y'all listening to our show.

1:05:41

Get comfortable, like Clarence

1:05:43

Thomas on a conservative billionaire's yacht comfortable,

1:05:45

and tune into Crooked Media's Strict Scrutiny to

1:05:47

stay up to date on the latest Supreme Court decisions.

1:05:50

I'm Leah Lippman, and each week I'm joined by my co-hosts

1:05:52

and fellow law professors, Kate Shaw and Melissa

1:05:54

Murray, to break down the latest headlines and the biggest

1:05:56

legal questions facing our country, from Iffy Pristone

1:05:59

to trans bans. With the 2024 elections

1:06:01

approaching, it's crucial to understand the impact

1:06:03

of these decisions and how to fight back. So

1:06:06

listen to new episodes of Strict Scrutiny every Monday,

1:06:08

wherever you get your podcasts.

Rate

From The Podcast

Slow Burn

In 1978, state Sen. John Briggs put a bold proposition on the California ballot. If it passed, the Briggs Initiative would ban gays and lesbians from working in public schools—and fuel a growing backlash against LGBTQ+ people in all corners of American life. In the ninth season of Slate’s Slow Burn, host Christina Cauterucci explores one of the most consequential civil rights battles in American history: the first-ever statewide vote on gay rights. With that fight looming, young gay activists formed a sprawling, infighting, joyous opposition; confronted the smear that they were indoctrinating kids; and came out en masse to show Briggs—and their own communities—who they really were. And when an unthinkable act of violence shocked them all, they showed the world what gay power looked like.Want more Slow Burn? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately access all past seasons and episodes of Slow Burn (and your other favorite Slate podcasts) completely ad-free. Plus, you’ll unlock subscriber-exclusive bonus episodes that bring you behind-the-scenes on the making of the show. Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/slowburnplus to get access wherever you listen.Season 8: Becoming Justice ThomasWhere Clarence Thomas came from, how he rose to power, and how he’s brought the rest of us along with him, whether we like it or not. Winner of the Podcast of the Year at the 2024 Ambies Awards.Season 7: Roe v. WadeThe women who fought for legal abortion, the activists who pushed back, and the justices who thought they could solve the issue for good. Winner of Apple Podcasts Show of the Year in 2022.Season 6: The L.A. RiotsHow decades of police brutality, a broken justice system, and a video tape set off six days of unrest in Los Angeles.Season 5: The Road to the Iraq WarEighteen months after 9/11, the United States invaded a country that had nothing to do with the attacks. Who’s to blame? And was there any way to stop it?Season 4: David DukeAmerica’s most famous white supremacist came within a runoff of controlling Louisiana. How did David Duke rise to power? And what did it take to stop him?Season 3: Biggie and TupacHow is it that two of the most famous performers in the world were murdered within a year of each other—and their killings were never solved?Season 2: The Clinton ImpeachmentA reexamination of the scandals that nearly destroyed the 42nd president and forever changed the life of a former White House intern.Season 1: WatergateWhat did it feel like to live through the scandal that brought down President Nixon?

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more
Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features