Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:06
Hey everyone, it's
0:06
Simi Shah, and welcome to
0:10
trailblazers. On this podcast, I
0:10
dive deep into the journeys of
0:14
trailblazing South Asians,
0:14
sharing the stories of the
0:18
leaders and dreamers lighting
0:18
the way across the South Asian
0:22
diaspora. Hello, my Trailblazers
0:22
I'm so thrilled to be back after
0:27
our very short midseason hiatus,
0:27
and today I have an exciting
0:31
announcement we are hosting Yes,
0:31
another events, a breakfast for
0:36
South Asian founders in the CPG
0:36
space on Friday, May 19 in New
0:40
York City. If you are a CPG
0:40
founder, operator or stakeholder
0:44
and you're interested in
0:44
attending, please email us at
0:48
South Asian
0:48
0:51
message us on Instagram,
0:51
LinkedIn wherever you like. As
0:55
always, we will continue hosting
0:55
events for leaders in our space
0:59
and community as well as
0:59
amplifying other community
1:03
events in our newsletter. So if
1:03
you haven't already, be sure to
1:08
subscribe at South Asian
1:08
trailblazers.com. With that,
1:11
let's get to the very special
1:11
episode I have for you guys.
1:15
Today I'm thrilled to welcome
1:15
Pooja Goyal. Pooja is the chief
1:20
investment officer of Carlisle
1:20
global infrastructure, co head
1:24
of the Carlyle global
1:24
infrastructure Opportunity Fund,
1:28
and head of renewable and
1:28
sustainable energy. In case you
1:32
aren't familiar, Carlyle is one
1:32
of the world's largest
1:36
investment firms. They
1:36
specialize in private equity and
1:40
private credit, and with over
1:40
381 billion assets under
1:44
management. Carlyle is one of
1:44
the world's largest megaphones.
1:48
Prior to joining Carlyle, Pooja
1:48
was the head of the alternative
1:53
energy investing group at
1:53
Goldman Sachs, where she led
1:56
Goldman's investments in the
1:56
renewables sector. She's been
2:01
investing in this sector since
2:01
2005, when she joined the group
2:05
as an associate. She was
2:05
promoted to managing director in
2:09
2012 and took over as head of
2:09
the group in 2013. And under her
2:13
leadership, the group builds a
2:13
portfolio of investments
2:17
dedicated to the renewable
2:17
energy and sustainable resources
2:22
sector. Pooja has held several
2:22
board and committee positions
2:26
including the boards of Vivint
2:26
Solar and the American Council
2:30
of renewable energy, and the
2:30
investment committees that all
2:34
his power and Goldman Sachs is
2:34
America's special situations
2:39
group. Prior to 2005, she was
2:39
part of the investment banking
2:43
division of Goldman Sachs. Pooja
2:43
is a graduate of the University
2:47
of Pennsylvania, where she
2:47
received a BS in finance from
2:51
Wharton, and a BA BS in computer
2:51
and cognitive science from the
2:56
School of Engineering and
2:56
Applied Sciences. She's on the
3:00
board of advisors of the School
3:00
of Engineering, and on the Board
3:04
of Trustees for the ethical
3:04
culture fieldston school in New
3:09
York City. Pooja, and I have so
3:09
much to discuss in regards to
3:13
her leadership at the
3:13
intersection of finance and the
3:17
future of energy. And as many of
3:17
you know, I spent an early part
3:21
of my career in the world of
3:21
investing, which makes me all
3:26
the more excited to talk to her
3:26
today. Pooja, thank you so much
3:30
for being here.
3:33
Well, first of all,
3:33
thanks for having me, Simi. I'm
3:36
just so excited to be part of
3:36
this podcast.
3:39
Absolutely. Now, as I
3:39
said, we have a lot to discuss
3:44
in regards to your leadership at
3:44
the intersection of finance and
3:47
the renewable sector and
3:47
infrastructure, broadly
3:50
speaking, what I found that when
3:50
someone finds their niche early
3:55
in their career as you did, that
3:55
propensity is usually rooted in
4:00
their upbringing. And so I'm
4:00
curious in what ways did growing
4:04
up in Mumbai shape your early
4:04
interest in the world of energy
4:08
and infrastructure?
4:11
It's so interesting
4:11
that you asked that question
4:14
Simi. And I do think that people
4:14
have a tendency to plan out
4:18
their careers or their
4:18
education, which will eventually
4:21
lead to what we all hope are
4:21
fulfilling careers commercially,
4:25
as well as personally and
4:25
professionally. But growing up
4:29
in India, I had your typical
4:29
Indian upbringing, where there
4:33
was just a lot of focus on
4:33
academic excellence, and that if
4:37
you got the right grades, you
4:37
would go to the right college.
4:40
And then after that, I come from
4:40
a family of serial
4:44
entrepreneurs. And my father had
4:44
told me at a very early age that
4:48
the ultimate success of a
4:48
business is quite dependent on
4:52
the availability of capital. And
4:52
so I knew that I want to do
4:55
study something in finance or
4:55
end up getting a job in finance.
4:59
So at least So I would
4:59
understand how financial markets
5:03
work. So I would say that first
5:03
and foremost, my focus was on
5:07
understanding how capital
5:07
markets work, and really how the
5:11
financial system operates. And
5:11
then after that, a little bit of
5:15
it is coincidence, a little bit
5:15
of it is what I ended up doing
5:19
in college that ended up with me
5:19
getting a job in the leveraged
5:23
finance group at Goldman Sachs.
5:23
And I ended up focusing
5:26
primarily on either placing
5:26
complex insurance risks in the
5:30
capital markets, or capital
5:30
markets risk in the insurance
5:34
market or focusing on commodity
5:34
linked financings. And the way
5:38
it happens on Wall Street
5:38
sometimes is you end up getting
5:41
pigeonholed almost quite early
5:41
on in your career. And so that's
5:45
really how I got my foot in the
5:45
door when it came to the
5:49
commodity markets. And then
5:49
after that one thing led to the
5:53
other. And I ended up
5:53
specializing in the energy transition.
5:58
super interesting.
5:58
And I'm quite familiar with how
6:02
that process works, because I
6:02
spent part of my early career in
6:05
finance. And I'm curious, I
6:05
mean, as you said, you
6:08
immigrated to the US to attend
6:08
the University of Pennsylvania,
6:12
you followed a relatively
6:12
traditional path of starting
6:15
your career in finance, in
6:15
investment banking at Goldman
6:18
Sachs. But your introduction to
6:18
the firm started with a project
6:22
on catastrophe bonds, can you
6:22
tell us a little bit about how
6:26
that all came to pass?
6:27
Yeah, it was super
6:27
interesting, because I was
6:30
studying under the dual degree
6:30
program at the University of
6:34
Pennsylvania, it is a fantastic
6:34
program, which enables you to
6:38
get two degrees from two
6:38
different colleges at the
6:41
University. So I was already
6:41
studying for a finance degree at
6:45
the Wharton School. And I
6:45
decided to also get a degree in
6:49
computer science from the
6:49
engineering school. And I needed
6:52
to find a job because two
6:52
degrees meant a full course
6:56
load. But I also didn't want to
6:56
spend five years getting my two
7:00
degrees. So I was accelerating,
7:00
my car slowed a little bit. And
7:04
I wanted to support my parents
7:04
also, to a certain extent in
7:08
terms of the obligation they
7:08
taken on with my tuition. So I
7:11
wanted to get an on campus job.
7:11
And so I started applying for
7:15
these research jobs, which was a
7:15
great way for me to get some
7:19
sort of experience in terms of
7:19
the practical application of
7:23
what I was studying in the
7:23
classroom. And there was this
7:27
one research project. And it was
7:27
a bit of a hybrid between the
7:31
engineering school as well as
7:31
Wharton. And it was around the
7:34
study of catastrophe bonds,
7:34
which is how do you take risks
7:38
and losses associated with
7:38
earthquakes or hurricanes, which
7:42
are natural disasters or
7:42
catastrophes, and you place that
7:46
risk in the capital markets. And
7:46
it just so happened, that the
7:50
previous students who had had
7:50
that job, they all came from
7:53
this dual degree background, so
7:53
I think they were somewhat
7:57
partial to recruiting students
7:57
who had that technical skill
8:01
set. And then by the time I
8:01
ended up applying for my summer
8:05
internship to Goldman Sachs, one
8:05
of my predecessors from that
8:08
research program was already an
8:08
analyst at Goldman Sachs. And
8:12
they were working on these
8:12
catastrophe bonds, which for me,
8:16
was like intellectually, very
8:16
exciting, but I could see a real
8:20
world application to what I'd
8:20
been studying at the university.
8:24
And so that's really how I ended
8:24
up getting my job at Goldman.
8:28
Wow. And, you know,
8:28
as you alluded to earlier,
8:31
bankers and people in the world
8:31
of finance are often corralled,
8:35
if not pigeon holed into
8:35
specific industry groups pretty
8:39
early on. And as a banker, you
8:39
know, you might work on
8:42
everything from underwriting
8:42
IPOs, to massive m&a
8:45
transactions, and you began your
8:45
career in leveraged finance.
8:49
Banking is, of course, a
8:49
notoriously intense job. But I'm
8:52
curious in what ways this
8:52
experience helps cement your
8:56
interest in the world of energy
8:56
and energy transition and our alternatives.
9:01
You know, you make
9:01
such a good point. And I do
9:03
think that that is a criticism
9:03
for our industry that we do tend
9:06
to pigeonhole people or
9:06
specialized people very early
9:10
on. And that is where I did feel
9:10
that my peers who had more of a
9:14
network either because they had
9:14
family members who had worked at
9:18
a bank previously or understood
9:18
financial services previously,
9:22
really benefited from just
9:22
mentorship and guidance. And
9:27
coming out of university. I
9:27
still remember you know, joking
9:30
around about this. When I was a
9:30
junior applying for internships
9:34
at an AI bank. We used to all
9:34
call it AI bank. For the longest
9:38
time I thought it was internet
9:38
banking. I didn't know that it
9:41
stood for investment banking.
9:41
And so you know, I do feel that
9:46
in order to make the industry
9:46
more inclusive, we need to allow
9:50
for people to have mobility,
9:50
absolutely, or develop more
9:53
flexible skill sets so they
9:53
don't get specialized so early
9:56
on in their career, because in
9:56
the absence of that mentors
10:00
trippin guidance, it becomes
10:00
very, very difficult to try to
10:03
do something else. But I will
10:03
say for me working in leveraged
10:07
finance at Goldman, I almost
10:07
turned around that narrative
10:11
where it was a lot easier to
10:11
explain to people if you had
10:15
worked on a large m&a
10:15
transaction that was on the
10:17
front page of the Wall Street
10:17
Journal. And I said that while I
10:21
might not be doing that, I was
10:21
also not using your standard m&a
10:25
model. Because of the complexity
10:25
of the deals that I was doing, I
10:29
was able to build these models
10:29
from scratch, really understand
10:33
the nitty gritty of how these
10:33
different balance sheet work,
10:37
how to think about raising money
10:37
for transactions or acids in the
10:42
commodity markets, and it kind
10:42
of gave me an edge. So I almost
10:46
use that to my advantage a
10:46
little bit while talking to
10:49
people, which is that, yeah,
10:49
these might not be the most
10:52
topical deals that people were
10:52
reading about in the newspapers.
10:57
But I was creating almost like a
10:57
proprietary skill set, and maybe
11:01
one day that would be of use to someone.
11:04
Wow. I mean, I spent
11:04
a summer in banking. And then I
11:08
started my career in private
11:08
equity. But I remember, even in
11:11
my intern years, so much of the
11:11
conversation would be that
11:14
people working in love fin have
11:14
the toughest job and the models
11:18
that they were building, and the
11:18
analyses they were doing, were
11:21
just not comparable to any other
11:21
industry group, because they
11:24
were so complex to your point.
11:24
So it's really interesting how
11:26
you took that and turn it into a
11:26
strength when you were having
11:29
these conversations.
11:31
Yeah, and you know,
11:31
later on to that the complexity
11:34
of commodity markets,
11:34
understanding how gas markets
11:37
work, or power markets work, or
11:37
even the oil markets work, it's
11:41
completely different. And those
11:41
markets can oftentimes get
11:44
disrupted with events that might
11:44
not be related to what's
11:47
happening in the capital
11:47
markets, either. Weather
11:50
patterns can have an impact on
11:50
commodity prices. So look at
11:53
what's intellectually
11:53
interesting to me. You know,
11:56
oftentimes, people have a
11:56
tendency when choosing their
11:59
first job, or even subsequent
11:59
jobs, they tend to go where the
12:03
tide is, or catch the tide,
12:03
rather. And you know, I always
12:06
say this to people, which is
12:06
find something that is
12:09
intellectually interesting to
12:09
you, and the rest will follow.
12:12
If you continue to find it
12:12
interesting, you're continuing
12:14
to be challenged, you're
12:14
learning, you do have to be
12:18
strategic about planning your
12:18
career. But first and foremost,
12:21
you got to feel like you're
12:21
really learning and pushing
12:24
yourself, at least in the early
12:24
innings of your career.
12:28
Absolutely, I
12:28
appreciate that. And definitely
12:31
advice I will continue to take
12:31
to heart. Now after spending
12:35
three years as a banker, you
12:35
decide to switch over the buy
12:39
side, you join Goldman's
12:39
alternative energy investing
12:42
group, where you eventually
12:42
became a managing director and
12:46
served as head of alternative
12:46
energy investing. What was it
12:50
like making the transition to
12:50
role of investor and aside from
12:53
the obvious what drew you to
12:53
this role, and this sector,
12:57
it's very simple.
12:57
It was the lifestyle that made
13:00
me put my head down. And I said
13:00
that I wanted to move to the buy
13:04
side, it was incredibly hard
13:04
being an investment banking at
13:08
Goldman, it is a fantastic
13:08
training ground, you learn a
13:12
lot, you work with management
13:12
teams, of small to mid sized
13:17
companies, all the way to
13:17
companies that have a market cap
13:21
and the 10s of billions of
13:21
dollars. And you're working with
13:24
some incredibly smart and
13:24
talented people. But yes, it
13:28
really was a decision that I
13:28
made, I think, even today,
13:32
sometimes when my friends and
13:32
family look at my three years,
13:35
so that time period for those
13:35
three years when I was in
13:37
Goldman banking, I'm just
13:37
missing from pictures, I'm just
13:41
not there. And so it was a
13:41
lifestyle decision where I put
13:44
my hand up and I said that look,
13:44
I would like to move to the buy
13:47
side, I will also say by that
13:47
point in time, I had a lot of my
13:51
friends and peers who had moved
13:51
to the buy side. And it wasn't
13:55
that you worked less hours, it
13:55
was more that the hours tended
13:59
to be a bit more predictable.
13:59
And so that gives you some you
14:04
know, sense of control over your
14:04
schedule, I think it was the
14:07
lack of control. That at least
14:07
bothered me. And I felt like I
14:11
was ready for a change. The
14:11
second thing, which is also
14:15
equally important, if not more
14:15
important, was that I did
14:19
conclude that in order for me to
14:19
have more visibility on how I
14:25
would be compensated or
14:25
promoted, I needed to own my own
14:30
p&l. And the clearest way for me
14:30
to do that was to move to the
14:36
buy side where you either make
14:36
money or you don't make money.
14:41
And so that was a very
14:41
deliberate decision that I made.
14:44
And you know, I'm not the sort
14:44
of person who generally thrives
14:47
in ambiguity, and I like to
14:47
control outcomes and fully
14:51
recognizing that you can never
14:51
control outcomes, but I would
14:54
like to influence them as much
14:54
as possible. And so I wanted to
14:57
have p&l associated with my
14:57
name. And which is why I decided
15:01
to also move to the buy side. I
15:01
was very happy with my time at
15:05
Goldman. And so it would be
15:05
obvious for me to at least see
15:08
if there would be another
15:08
opportunity there. And it just
15:11
so happened to be that the
15:11
special situations group at
15:13
Goldman, was looking for someone
15:13
with a corporate finance
15:17
background, who understood how
15:17
commodity markets worked to join
15:21
their alternative energy
15:21
investing business, which was
15:24
basically the business that was
15:24
investing primarily in renewable
15:28
energy assets, as well as clean
15:28
coal and those kinds of energy
15:32
transition projects.
15:34
Yeah, and as you just
15:34
mentioned, you had the
15:37
opportunity to invest in private
15:37
and public companies across the
15:41
energy sector, coal, as you
15:41
said, natural gas power grid
15:44
solar wind, I assume. Can you
15:44
tell us about some of the
15:47
meaningful investments you made
15:47
while at Goldman, you know, one
15:50
that taught you a particular
15:50
tenant of investing, or that was
15:53
just personally very impactful?
15:56
That's an
15:56
interesting question. I guess
15:58
the one deal that's always been
15:58
quite close to my heart was
16:02
actually a business that we
16:02
incubated from scratch at
16:06
Goldman. It was called Vivint.
16:06
Solar. It's a residential solar
16:11
platform. And at that time,
16:11
Goldman and SSG through another
16:16
business, not the alternative
16:16
energy business already had a
16:19
relationship with this company,
16:19
it was called Vivint. And it was
16:22
a home security business where
16:22
this company went door to door
16:27
selling home security systems to
16:27
customers, incredibly talented
16:31
management team and employee
16:31
base. And we had a specific
16:35
thesis around residential solar
16:35
in the US, this is right around
16:39
the 2009 or 10 timeframe. And we
16:39
concluded that this was a market
16:46
that was positioned for a lot of
16:46
growth, the residential solar
16:49
market, especially if you could
16:49
bring clean and green energy to
16:53
us homeowners, where it would
16:53
cost them no money upfront, and
16:57
save them some money on their
16:57
utility bill. And so it was an
17:01
economic value proposition, it
17:01
wasn't just about saving the
17:03
planet and procuring renewable
17:03
energy, but there was a savings
17:07
to be had. But one of the key
17:07
drivers of success for that
17:10
business has to be your customer
17:10
acquisition cost. And so we
17:14
concluded because we already had
17:14
access to this business that had
17:18
very attractive customer
17:18
acquisition costs in the home
17:20
security space, maybe we could
17:20
leverage that into residential
17:24
solar. And so it was almost like
17:24
coming up with a business plan
17:28
from scratch with the management
17:28
team. And it was just incredibly
17:31
fulfilling. And it obviously
17:31
ended up being a very successful
17:34
company. Even today, when I fly
17:34
into Salt Lake City, and I see
17:38
the Vivint arena, it just makes
17:38
me incredibly proud. We
17:43
eventually sold that company to Blackstone.
17:46
Wow. Very, very cool.
17:46
Now, while you are Goldman, you
17:50
rose to senior leadership fairly
17:50
quickly as becoming head of the
17:53
group just eight years into your
17:53
career as an investor. What do
17:57
you think set you apart?
18:01
You know, there were a lot of changes at Goldman. So I joined the special
18:03
situations group in 2005. And
18:08
then we had the financial crisis
18:08
in 2008. And so that was
18:12
incredibly interesting, sitting
18:12
in a balance sheet investing
18:15
business in the middle of a
18:15
financial crisis. I guess, there
18:19
were many moments in time where
18:19
you would wonder about the long
18:22
term viability about the
18:22
renewable sector energy
18:25
transition, the viability of
18:25
balance sheet investing, also
18:29
sitting at a bank that was
18:29
becoming a bank holding company.
18:33
I guess for me, it was more that
18:33
I again, gravitated towards what
18:37
I could influence, which is
18:37
doing deals, and whether those
18:41
deals made money or not. And I
18:41
guess I didn't look up too often
18:44
to be questioning where things
18:44
were headed, let's say three,
18:48
five years down the road. I'm
18:48
not necessarily saying that is
18:51
the advice I would give to
18:51
everyone. Because I do recognize
18:55
that I've been incredibly
18:55
fortunate that the energy
18:58
transition has become so
18:58
mainstream, I know. But I do
19:01
have examples of people who are
19:01
incredibly talented. And God
19:05
pigeonholed focused on niche
19:05
parts of the capital markets.
19:08
And sometimes those things have
19:08
gone sideways as well. So what
19:13
worked for me was that I kept
19:13
focusing on deals and the deals,
19:17
whether they performed or not,
19:17
but that worked well for me.
19:22
Absolutely. Now, as
19:22
you said, in 2019, you joined
19:26
Carlyle as a partner, and sort
19:26
of as head of their renewable
19:31
and sustainable energy fund.
19:31
What drew you to Carlyle after
19:35
spending the bulk of your career
19:35
at Goldman?
19:38
Well, you know,
19:38
Carlyle has a fantastic brand
19:41
name as an investment firm. It
19:41
really is a storied brand name.
19:46
Our founders have a fantastic
19:46
reputation amongst the investor
19:50
community. So I would say that
19:50
coming from Goldman, especially
19:54
as much as I would have liked to
19:54
maybe even start Bucha coil
19:58
Investments, LLC. I tend to look
19:58
at things on a downside
20:02
protected basis. And Carlyle was
20:02
just a fantastic brand name. The
20:06
second was, it was getting a
20:06
little complicated to invest out
20:11
of the bank's balance sheet. And
20:11
ultimately, I was looking for a
20:15
lot more flexibility in terms of
20:15
being able to work with the
20:19
management teams that I was
20:19
partnering with. And an
20:23
investment firm offered that
20:23
flexibility. But really what
20:27
moved the needle for me was that
20:27
Carlyle's vision around the
20:31
energy transition was really
20:31
very much consistent with what I
20:35
thought the market opportunity
20:35
was back in early 2019. And if
20:39
you think back to 2019
20:39
renewables so the energy
20:42
transition was not as mainstream
20:42
as it is today. You know, back
20:47
in 2019, most of Carlyle's peers
20:47
invested in renewables. So the
20:51
energy transition more as a sub
20:51
sector within a broader
20:55
diversified fund, whereas
20:55
Carlyle really took the view
20:58
that like, look, we think that
20:58
this is a multi decade
21:02
opportunity, and it needs a
21:02
dedicated platform to be able to
21:06
really capitalize on that
21:06
opportunity. And that is what I
21:10
thought it was at that point in
21:10
time as well. So having that
21:14
shared vision, really is what
21:14
moved the needle for me. And
21:18
then obviously the benefit of
21:18
the platform itself. The other
21:22
thing is that you come from a
21:22
large company like Goldman
21:26
Sachs, and you're joining on a
21:26
relative basis, a smaller
21:30
investment firm when it comes to
21:30
like number of people, number of
21:34
employees. Sure, I did do my due
21:34
diligence, I did ask people a
21:39
lot about the culture. And this
21:39
has been my experience. Also at
21:43
Carlyle, it's an incredibly
21:43
collaborative culture. And women
21:47
are a significant portion of our
21:47
investment professional
21:51
population at Carlyle, in fact,
21:51
almost 50% of our AUM are
21:55
managed by women. That is an
21:55
outlier. I saw that. And so that
21:59
made a difference as well. Yeah,
21:59
I want to
22:02
backtrack a little
22:02
bit on something that you said
22:05
about switching over to
22:05
something that had more of a
22:08
pure investment mandate, because
22:08
it gave you the opportunity to
22:11
work more closely with
22:11
management teams. As an
22:14
investor, you have the
22:14
opportunity to sit on boards of
22:19
companies that are innovating in
22:19
this space. And I'm curious,
22:24
having had this experience, what
22:24
trends you've become attuned to
22:28
and what you've seen develop in
22:28
the space over the past number
22:31
of years. Yeah,
22:33
I mean, I have to
22:33
say that is the most exciting
22:36
and fulfilling part of my job,
22:36
which is working with these
22:39
management teams with these CEOs
22:39
and founders as they are looking
22:44
to kind of execute on their
22:44
vision for the energy
22:48
transition, that is probably the
22:48
most fulfilling part about my
22:52
job, I really enjoy it. I do
22:52
enjoy even spending time with my
22:56
investors, especially because
22:56
it's a fairly diversified set of
23:00
investors globally. And everyone
23:00
has different challenges that
23:04
they're dealing with. But I
23:04
really do like rolling up my
23:07
sleeves and getting involved
23:07
with the management teams, in
23:10
terms of you know how to execute
23:10
on their business strategy. And
23:14
we are in a very complex
23:14
environment right now,
23:17
specifically around the energy
23:17
transition, you've got complex
23:20
geopolitical factors at play,
23:20
you've got inflationary
23:23
pressures, you've got supply
23:23
chain related issues, but then
23:27
you're also in a sector that's
23:27
positioned for a tremendous
23:30
amount of growth right now. And
23:30
that growth requires a lot of
23:34
capital. And then you are seeing
23:34
interesting capital markets
23:38
right now, both on the equity as
23:38
well as credit side. And so it's
23:43
just incredibly interesting to
23:43
be working with these management
23:46
teams, and are often times find
23:46
that I actually learn a lot from
23:51
these teams as well, when it
23:51
comes to building the right
23:53
organizational structure,
23:53
establishing the right culture
23:56
within your organization,
23:56
recruiting as well as retaining
23:59
talent in a very competitive
23:59
market for talent right now,
24:03
especially around renewables and
24:03
the energy transition. So it's
24:06
just been incredibly fulfilling,
24:06
working with these management
24:09
teams, and the set of issues
24:09
keeps evolving. And so it keeps
24:13
you on your toes. Yeah,
24:16
I want to spend a
24:16
second on that, that this set of
24:19
issues continues evolving. I
24:19
mean, it say consider, take me a
24:23
novice in this sector. What are
24:23
the biggest challenges we're
24:27
facing in this sector today? And
24:27
how is that evolved? I mean,
24:29
I've heard you speak a little
24:29
bit at times about how the 1.0
24:33
evolution of this industry was
24:33
around renewables. What's 2.0?
24:37
What's 3.0? Where are we at today?
24:40
So you know, 1.0 is
24:40
obviously renewables 2.0. You
24:43
are talking about batteries and
24:43
electric vehicles and charging
24:47
infrastructure green hydrogen,
24:47
green ammonia, so you're
24:50
definitely the opportunity set
24:50
is expanding. In terms of the
24:54
complexities in front of us,
24:54
obviously, look, you know,
24:56
you've got to deal with higher
24:56
interest rates, that means your
24:59
cost of capital On Skarner,
24:59
you're dealing with inflationary
25:02
pressures, I would say that
25:02
those kinds of issues are pretty
25:06
much par for the course for any
25:06
illiquid equity strategy right
25:10
now, one could argue even for
25:10
liquid markets. But for energy
25:15
transition, specifically, having
25:15
been an investor in this market
25:18
for over 18 years at this point,
25:18
and I've seen the roller coaster
25:22
around energy transition, there
25:22
have been plenty of ups and
25:25
downs, you know, the thing that
25:25
I always get concerned about are
25:29
momentum investors, so people
25:29
who aggregate bowls of capital,
25:33
or who make investments simply
25:33
because it is mainstream and
25:37
topical, and these are complex
25:37
projects, they're expensive
25:42
projects, they require time,
25:42
they require expertise,
25:45
resources, and a lot of capital.
25:45
So anyone who's in for a quick
25:51
flip, or to be in and out of the
25:51
market, or draws an analogy to
25:55
tech investing, it's simply not
25:55
the same. It is very different.
26:00
And so that is one thing that
26:00
always concerns me a little bit
26:04
about renewables and energy
26:04
transition, which is the noise
26:07
that gets created by momentum
26:07
investors, because to the extent
26:12
there are winners and losers, if
26:12
there are losers, it always
26:15
taints people's experience with
26:15
the sector. And that does a
26:19
disservice not only to
26:19
investors, like myself, but also
26:22
to management teams.
26:25
Yeah, absolutely. And
26:25
I mean, you are obviously the
26:28
antithesis of a momentum
26:28
investor, you dug your heels
26:32
into this space back in 2005,
26:32
pre financial crisis, pre all
26:35
the hype that we see today, what
26:35
gave you conviction back then,
26:41
I wouldn't say I
26:41
had a very high degree of
26:44
conviction for the last 18
26:44
years. I do think there were
26:47
moments in my career where I was
26:47
really questioning my career
26:51
decisions. I think it's what I
26:51
said, which was that, look, as
26:55
long as you're finding deals to
26:55
do, and you have the capital to
26:59
do those deals, keep doing those
26:59
deals. That's my job as an
27:02
investor. First and foremost, it
27:02
is to find deals, do deals and
27:06
generate target returns. If
27:06
you're doing that, the rest will
27:10
follow. And so maybe I should
27:10
have been a little bit more
27:14
proactive about the bigger
27:14
picture. I know everyone talks
27:17
about a three year plan and a
27:17
five year plan. And your I
27:21
didn't focus as much on that.
27:21
But as long as I was finding the
27:25
deals to do and those deals,
27:25
were making money, I was
27:28
generally okay with what I was doing.
27:31
Yeah, well, clearly
27:31
it worked out because today you
27:34
serve as Chief Investment
27:34
Officer for all of Carlyle's
27:36
global infrastructure. In
27:36
addition to being co head of the
27:40
global infrastructure
27:40
Opportunity Fund and head of
27:42
renewable and sustainable
27:42
energy. Can you contextualize
27:45
the broader infrastructure
27:45
division? And what all of these
27:49
roles entail?
27:50
Yeah, so look, you
27:50
know, we've got one integrated
27:53
infrastructure platform at
27:53
Carlyle. And there are really
27:56
five sectors that we focus on,
27:56
we focus on transport, we are
28:00
redeveloping new terminal one at
28:00
JFK Airport. Exciting, it is
28:04
incredibly exciting, it is very
28:04
easy for me to explain to my two
28:09
young daughters exactly what it
28:09
is that I do, every time we fly
28:13
in and out of JFK airport. We
28:13
also invest in digital
28:17
infrastructure. So that includes
28:17
data centers, fiber towers, and
28:22
telecommunications,
28:22
infrastructure, energy,
28:25
midstream infrastructure, so
28:25
that's pipelines, storage
28:29
terminals, tanks, we also have a
28:29
focus on water and utilities. So
28:34
those are your classic
28:34
utilities, water, gas,
28:37
wastewater utilities. And then
28:37
the fifth sector, which is the
28:41
one that we're seeing a lot of
28:41
growth on. And that is kind of
28:44
more correlated with what I've
28:44
done historically, is the energy
28:47
transition space, which includes
28:47
renewables, as well, as you
28:51
know, what I referred to as
28:51
energy transition 2.0.
28:56
end to end, can you
28:56
walk me through what happens
28:59
when a potential opportunity
28:59
comes across your desk? And, and
29:02
specifically, I'm curious, you
29:02
know, every time I talk to
29:05
seasoned investors, there are
29:05
certain individual principles
29:08
that they've developed over the
29:08
years just as a product of
29:10
seeing as many deals as we've
29:10
seen. I'm curious what yours
29:14
are.
29:15
Yeah, so we
29:15
definitely have some very basic
29:19
parameters around cheque size
29:19
target returns, we focus a lot
29:25
on portfolio construction. Is
29:25
this the right deal for where we
29:29
are in our portfolio
29:29
construction as we think about,
29:33
you know, how we build robust
29:33
portfolios that offer the right
29:36
diversification as well as
29:36
return potential for our
29:40
investors. So portfolio
29:40
construction is incredibly
29:42
important to everything that we
29:42
do, and time and resources are
29:46
incredibly precious. So we have
29:46
a limited number of investment
29:50
professionals and we can't be
29:50
chasing every single deal that
29:53
comes our way. So sometimes we
29:53
do have to turn deals down
29:56
because it just might not be the
29:56
right moment in time for what
29:59
well Looking to do within a
29:59
certain portfolio or strategy
30:02
within our platform, at the end
30:02
of the day, when we're looking
30:06
at deals, number one, we care
30:06
about the management team who is
30:11
running the company? What has
30:11
been their track record? In
30:15
terms of running the platform?
30:15
Yes, we can get involved in
30:18
situations where we can make
30:18
changes. But we would like to
30:22
understand the talent and the
30:22
caliber of the management team.
30:24
And hopefully that is a check on
30:24
the list. So a, what is the
30:28
management team look like? Be
30:28
other barriers to entry? Is
30:32
there a moat around the
30:32
business? What is it that the
30:35
company does? Do they develop
30:35
assets? Or do they own and
30:38
operate existing assets, and my
30:38
analysis might be different from
30:42
a private equity investor that
30:42
you're talking to, because I
30:45
tend to focus more on asset
30:45
oriented investments. So I do
30:49
those assets are in the ground
30:49
and already operating, or
30:52
otherwise those assets are going
30:52
to be developed. And so what is
30:55
really the secret sauce around
30:55
what the company does, either
30:59
they have a unique strategy
30:59
around developing those assets,
31:01
or those assets are monopolistic
31:01
in nature, or have high barriers
31:06
to entry in terms of can you
31:06
have competing assets around
31:09
that. And then after that,
31:09
having come from commodity
31:12
markets, we always want to make
31:12
sure that you are competitive
31:16
with the marginal cost producer
31:16
for the commodity market that
31:19
your product is going to be
31:19
active in. So you know, that is
31:22
where we get into discussions
31:22
around government subsidies. In
31:25
general, we do not like to
31:25
underwrite any future government
31:29
subsidies in order to make our
31:29
investments successful.
31:34
super interesting. I
31:34
mean, it's very clear and
31:37
obvious that you're very good at
31:37
what you do. What gets you up in
31:41
the morning and excited to go to
31:41
work every day.
31:44
I really enjoy the
31:44
people that I've worked with, we
31:47
have a good group of people,
31:47
you're at Carlyle, and there is
31:49
a level of care at Carlyle as
31:49
well. So it is incredibly
31:53
collaborative. It's also kind of
31:53
been cool for me, you know, from
31:56
day 120 19, I built my team from
31:56
scratch. And we're a relatively
32:02
new and emerging business. And
32:02
so it's given us an opportunity
32:06
to establish our own culture,
32:06
your and that's been exciting.
32:09
So it's definitely the people, I
32:09
actually prefer coming into the
32:13
office every day, because I just
32:13
want to run into people in the
32:16
hallway and talk to them. It's
32:16
very organic, the interaction,
32:19
so I enjoy the people that I
32:19
work with. But it's really what
32:22
I said that at the end of the
32:22
day, you're working with these
32:24
companies, and helping them
32:24
execute on their vision. And
32:29
that's just super exciting.
32:29
Yeah.
32:33
You know, in that
32:33
same vein, there are a lot of
32:35
people who work in this space
32:35
that feel a lot of existential
32:38
dread around climate and just
32:38
where this industry is broadly
32:42
heading and where the world is
32:42
broadly heading. Do you ever
32:45
grapple with that? I mean, how
32:45
do you deal with that?
32:48
Yeah, I mean, as a
32:48
parent, right, I do think about
32:52
it. I do think about the studies
32:52
that come out. But like I said,
32:57
I tend to gravitate towards
32:57
things that I can focus on an
33:00
influence. And I've been
33:00
fortunate in the sense that I'm
33:04
not just reading about climate
33:04
change, I'm not just reading
33:08
about energy security, I'm
33:08
actually able to make a
33:11
difference. And that's pretty
33:11
neat, because you don't
33:15
generally tend to find careers
33:15
where there is kind of that
33:18
overlap between your personal
33:18
goals, as well as what would be
33:22
a academically lucrative career?
33:25
Absolutely. I mean,
33:25
it's definitely hard to exist at
33:28
the intersection of the two. And
33:28
I think most people are trying
33:30
to find how they can, I want to
33:30
spend a second on the causes of
33:34
some of that drive. And it's,
33:34
you know, for example, I
33:37
remember I studied government in
33:37
college, and we would often talk
33:40
about the concept of race to the
33:40
bottom, whereby a lot of nations
33:44
compete by lowering their
33:44
environmental standards in hopes
33:48
of attracting foreign investment
33:48
and just broader industry. And
33:51
this relates to obviously,
33:51
broader conversations around
33:53
global climate agreements, like
33:53
the Paris Accords, we're
33:56
developing nations who haven't
33:56
necessarily industrialized as
33:59
much as we have, are saying, you
33:59
know, it's not necessarily fair
34:01
that suddenly we have to abide
34:01
by these rules. But the point
34:04
being that global warming is a
34:04
very real thing. And we all need
34:07
to work to mitigate our impact
34:07
on climate change. How do you
34:10
feel as an investor, you help
34:10
accelerate that transition and
34:13
accelerate that Biden?
34:16
You know, it's a question that comes up quite often. And the question also
34:18
comes up in the context of this
34:22
private capital have a role to
34:22
play in infrastructure, or
34:26
generally speaking, the energy
34:26
transition, and I will tell you
34:29
every single day I am reminded
34:29
that private capital has an
34:33
incredibly important role to
34:33
play. It's because these
34:37
companies and management teams
34:37
that we're working with are
34:40
dealing with some complex
34:40
issues. And sometimes they also
34:44
need expertise and resources to
34:44
think through them but also
34:48
capital that has patience and is
34:48
able to withstand volatile
34:53
market conditions. And so
34:53
private capital has an
34:57
incredibly important role to
34:57
play now. I'm also not the sort
35:01
of person who says that you know
35:01
what private capital can only
35:05
play a role in isolation. I
35:05
think there are plenty of
35:09
examples of public private
35:09
partnerships, partnerships, not
35:12
only between private equity
35:12
firms, local governments, but
35:16
also including strategics. And
35:16
that may include oil and gas
35:19
companies as well, you will have
35:19
to show flexibility around
35:24
creating these kinds of
35:24
collaborative ecosystems where
35:27
everyone can come together share
35:27
expertise in order to make these
35:31
projects successful. So, you
35:31
know, I do think private capital
35:35
has a role to play. And that
35:35
role will not just be in OECD
35:38
markets, it can include emerging
35:38
markets as well. The only thing
35:42
I would add to this, and this is
35:42
more of my experience, as
35:45
someone who grew up in India,
35:45
you cannot be prescriptive, and
35:49
you cannot step into complex
35:49
jurisdictions and assume the
35:54
same rules apply, you need to
35:54
show a little bit of
35:57
flexibility, which might also
35:57
include the pool of capital that
36:00
you're deploying out of. But you
36:00
need to be able to adapt and be
36:04
flexible, if you're operating in
36:04
markets where you've not
36:07
historically operated before.
36:07
Yeah,
36:11
I appreciate the deep
36:11
insight. Because, again, I think
36:14
it's a conversation a lot of us
36:14
are having often superficially
36:17
because climate is such a hot
36:17
button conversation right now.
36:21
You've worked at two behemoth, I
36:21
mean, stalwart institutions in
36:25
the financial sector at the
36:25
intersection of energy and
36:28
energy transition. And today, as
36:28
you said, you're building a new
36:33
business for what has been a
36:33
long standing institution, what
36:37
is the most rewarding part of the job?
36:41
I mean, nothing is more rewarding than having a successful investment and a
36:43
successful exit. Yeah, that is
36:48
incredibly rewarding. I do think
36:48
building a business of scale is
36:53
just incredibly important. And
36:53
the reason that is the case is
36:57
because that growth kind of
36:57
permeates through the
37:00
organization. Like I said, I
37:00
built my team from scratch. You
37:04
know, we believe that we have a
37:04
shared mission, you're at
37:07
Carlyle, and just seeing people
37:07
get excited about milestones
37:12
that we're hitting, is just
37:12
incredibly fulfilling, because
37:15
we feel like we're well on our
37:15
way on executing on that
37:19
mission. So just seeing that
37:19
enthusiasm and energy kind of
37:22
permeate through the deal team
37:22
has been incredibly fulfilling.
37:26
Absolutely. And
37:26
obviously, no institution is
37:30
perfect, but private equity over
37:30
the last number of years has
37:34
faced its share of scrutiny as
37:34
even though they've often lean
37:37
vested and oriented towards ESG.
37:37
They're often regarded as
37:40
contributors to the climate
37:40
crisis from a dollars
37:43
perspective. How do you grapple
37:43
with that? And what do you say
37:46
to people that are sort of
37:46
trying to deal with this paradox
37:48
in their minds?
37:50
I mean, look, you
37:50
know, at Carlyle, we have a
37:53
fantastic ESG practice, you
37:53
know, we were the leader in
37:57
terms of the ESG data
37:57
convergence project, one of the
38:00
most important things for us has
38:00
been that you not only need to
38:03
set up ESG reporting metrics,
38:03
those metrics need to be
38:07
standardized as well. And we
38:07
were able to get important LPs,
38:11
as well as other GPS to sign up
38:11
to that ESG data convergence
38:15
project. And that has just been
38:15
something that's made me
38:18
incredibly proud about the
38:18
leading position Carlyle's taken
38:21
amongst candidate investment
38:21
firm peer group. And candidly,
38:25
I'll tell you semi that's been
38:25
an important recruiting tool for
38:28
me as well. People who join my
38:28
team, you know, obviously, they
38:31
are focused on climate change,
38:31
they are focused on the energy
38:33
transition. But they also want
38:33
to be part of Carlyle, because
38:37
we are one of the leaders when
38:37
it comes to thinking through
38:40
these kinds of complex issues.
38:40
Absolutely.
38:44
You've achieved remarkable heights in the financial world. But I also
38:46
imagine that it wasn't easy,
38:50
particularly when you're getting
38:50
started as a woman as a woman of
38:54
color as an immigrant. I mean,
38:54
today, you're a mom, how did you
38:57
surmount those barriers to entry
38:57
and avoid being intimidated, not
39:01
just by the dollars at stake,
39:01
but the cultural environment?
39:05
Maybe that's where
39:05
you say ignorance is bliss. I
39:09
never kind of walked into a room
39:09
and said that, oh, geez, it
39:12
looks like I'm the only woman
39:12
your or I might be a minority
39:17
woman, your I guess, you know, I
39:17
never really thought about that.
39:20
I was too focused on whether I
39:20
knew what I was presenting, or I
39:25
was prepared for a negotiation
39:25
session. And so maybe that has
39:30
helped me a little bit in terms
39:30
of dealing with that. Having
39:33
said that, the most complex
39:33
thing I've done, or I'm still in
39:37
the process of doing is being a
39:37
parent. It is incredibly hard.
39:42
It is incredibly humbling. And
39:42
maybe I can tell you 15 years
39:46
from now, whether it worked out or not,
39:49
I'm sure well,
39:52
so I don't know
39:52
about that. I think that that
39:55
has been the challenging part.
39:55
So of all the things that you
39:57
mentioned in terms of the
39:57
complexities of being Being a
40:00
woman and Indian woman, the one
40:00
thing that I still constantly
40:04
deal with is the fact that
40:04
you've got two kids at home and
40:08
you have to do your job. I mean,
40:08
it is constant triage.
40:11
Yeah, I want to spend
40:11
an extra second on that, because
40:15
as you mentioned, Carlyle very
40:15
uniquely has almost 50% of its
40:20
assets under management, managed
40:20
by women, which is quite
40:24
incredible. I mean, what have
40:24
they done to foster that growth?
40:27
And how personally do you think
40:27
about balancing your roles in
40:31
all these senior positions at
40:31
Carlyle while also being a mom
40:34
at home?
40:35
You know, they're
40:35
incredibly supportive. It is an
40:37
incredibly supportive
40:37
organization. And by being
40:41
supportive, I don't just mean
40:41
they are providing me with
40:45
resources and all but just being
40:45
able to talk to other women at
40:48
Carlyle, who understand that
40:48
you're managing a portfolio,
40:53
you're managing a team. And you
40:53
may be potentially working with
40:57
various stakeholders, including
40:57
investors, it is a complex set
41:01
of issues. So getting that
41:01
guidance and mentorship is
41:05
important. I'm not really
41:05
talking about sponsorship here,
41:08
I'm just talking about practical
41:08
advice that's been incredibly
41:12
useful. So I mean, of course,
41:12
we've got different kinds of
41:16
employee groups that also
41:16
provide support, we've made
41:19
investments in developing our
41:19
talent as well, we provide
41:23
executive coaching to members of
41:23
our team, but it's more of the
41:28
organic interactions that result
41:28
in practical advice that has
41:31
been incredibly useful to me. I
41:31
have said this before, and I
41:35
will say it now, which is that
41:35
look, you know, Carlyle hired me
41:38
as a fund head when I was
41:38
relatively young, with very
41:43
young kids in preschool. And
41:43
they didn't bat an eye. They
41:47
supported me. And that's just
41:47
been quite incredible. So I
41:51
really do believe that Carlyle
41:51
puts its money where its mouth
41:54
is.
41:55
Yeah, well, I love to
41:55
hear that makes me very happy.
41:58
And it's, like I said, the whole
41:58
point of Trailblazers is for us
42:01
to have a line of sight to leaders like you. And it's really incredible to see them
42:03
making strides in this way. But
42:06
also to see you there doing
42:06
that, and making those strides
42:09
for us today is obviously it's a
42:09
challenging time, in that the
42:15
financial system is relatively
42:15
unstable, which has three banks
42:19
have failed, which has a ripple
42:19
effect on the grander part of
42:22
our economy. Being someone
42:22
that's live through 2008 lived
42:26
through a lot of volatility,
42:26
just given the sector and space
42:28
that you're in, what are some
42:28
learnings you can share with
42:31
aspiring young professionals who
42:31
are looking to start their
42:34
careers in the financial sector,
42:37
I just have to say
42:37
it is an incredibly attractive
42:41
learning opportunity right now.
42:41
I mean, think about it, we've
42:45
not had these market conditions,
42:45
really, since the financial
42:49
crisis. And as an investor,
42:49
nothing gets me more interested
42:54
than these kinds of market
42:54
conditions. It's an incredible
42:57
opportunity for people across
42:57
all levels, whether you're
43:00
starting off your career, or you
43:00
are a business leader, it is a
43:04
learning opportunity. I would
43:04
also say that, learn from people
43:08
around you, but also learn from
43:08
what your clients are doing, or
43:13
your peers are doing. And make
43:13
sure that in your interactions
43:17
with everyone around you, you're
43:17
not transactional, and you're
43:20
really thinking strategically,
43:20
because you know, what, if you
43:23
are there for your clients right
43:23
now, and you're able to think
43:27
through various iterations and
43:27
give them good counsel, they
43:30
will be there for you when you
43:30
need them as well. And so you're
43:34
just thinking through
43:34
strategically in terms of your
43:37
relationships, and your
43:37
interactions with people is
43:39
incredibly important, versus
43:39
just focusing on what's
43:42
happening in a particular moment
43:42
in time right now, but it is an
43:46
incredibly important learning
43:46
opportunity right now.
43:51
I love hearing that.
43:51
And it reminds me of a piece of
43:53
advice I received when I first
43:53
started my career in private
43:56
equity. And we were being
43:56
assigned portfolio companies.
43:59
And they said everyone wants the
43:59
portfolio companies that are
44:02
smooth sailing, have no
44:02
problems. But they were like the
44:05
place where you learn the most
44:05
is in the companies that are
44:08
struggling and really going
44:08
through it. And I feel like
44:11
that's exactly what you're
44:11
saying is that there's an
44:13
incredible opportunity to learn
44:13
right now because market
44:16
conditions aren't perfect.
44:17
Yeah. Just make
44:17
sure you don't get pigeonholed
44:20
as the workout posted either.
44:25
I believe that I
44:25
believe it. No, I have to ask
44:28
your seasoned investor who's
44:28
been in this space for as you
44:31
said almost two decades and I
44:31
know you alluded to the idea of
44:36
Pooja Goyal investments, would
44:36
you ever consider starting your
44:39
own fund?
44:40
No, I'm incredibly happy at Carlyle.
44:44
Well, thank you so
44:44
much Pooja for being here. I
44:46
really, really appreciate you
44:46
taking the time to share your
44:48
story. And I personally enjoy it
44:48
because again, I've spent a
44:51
formative part of my life in
44:51
this arena, and it's really
44:54
exciting to see women like
44:54
yourself trailblazing the path
44:57
that you are.
44:58
Well, it's incredibly accurate. waiting to see what you're doing Simi. Your
45:00
content is excellent. And so
45:03
thank you very much for
45:03
including me, but out keep doing
45:06
what you're doing. It's such an
45:06
important avenue for young South
45:10
Asians out there, and even those
45:10
South Asians who are established
45:13
in their career, so keep doing
45:13
what you're doing.
45:16
Absolutely. And I
45:16
can't wait for your daughters to
45:19
listen to this episode and 15
45:19
years and hear what they say.
45:23
Thank you. Thank you. Thanks for
45:23
joining us for today's episode.
45:27
If you want to get new episodes
45:27
straight to your inbox,
45:30
subscribe to our newsletter at
45:30
SouthAsianTrailblazers.com And
45:34
follow us at South Asian
45:34
Trailblazers on Instagram,
45:37
Facebook, and LinkedIn.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More