Podchaser Logo
Home
We Were Enemies of God

We Were Enemies of God

Released Friday, 10th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
We Were Enemies of God

We Were Enemies of God

We Were Enemies of God

We Were Enemies of God

Friday, 10th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:28

Hello Friends were cocoa. Here stand to reason

0:30

is the show of God. You're part of it.

0:33

Thank you for joining me! Eight five

0:36

five to Four Three Nine Nine seven

0:38

Five is the number you can call

0:40

during the live show, which is now

0:42

for me a four to six on

0:44

Tuesday. Afternoon and

0:46

early evening. A Los Angeles time.

0:48

I'm still a kind of i'm.

0:51

Processing. The response to

0:54

my recent solid ground. Ah, it's

0:56

something that I have been putting

0:58

the other for a couple of

1:00

years because of the push back

1:03

on one aspect. Of. The

1:05

story of reality relating to the

1:07

cross or that I've received an

1:09

number of letters. Some very long

1:11

letters were tons of vs. And.

1:14

I've saved all this and the

1:16

my thoughts in musings about it

1:18

over time in a file and

1:20

then pull that fi allowed Decided

1:22

I wanted. Respond. Here

1:24

and try to put together. A

1:27

characterization of Arm of The

1:29

Atonement and what was going

1:31

on there are that is.

1:34

I'm. Affirmed.

1:38

In. Scripture. In. My

1:40

view it seems to me and this is part

1:42

of my own. My.

1:45

Own. Frustration here are

1:47

the it's it with. It.

1:49

It appears. Completely.

1:52

Clear. And

1:55

are ought not be controversial.

1:58

On. As I was talking. The and

2:00

it has to do with the

2:02

anger of the father towards sinners

2:04

that needs to be. Satisfied.

2:08

Appears. Propitiation, whatever worthy

2:10

you want to use. and people.

2:12

Lots of times they choose words.

2:14

They're. Appeased. Really, we

2:16

have to please god as a while. Dig

2:19

trees whatever you want, but the a debt

2:21

has to be paid. We.

2:24

Owe him. And the

2:27

debt has to be paid. So there are different. Ways

2:29

of characterizing this in the

2:32

New Testament, but it's largely

2:34

forensic language that is a

2:37

characterization, but there's also brass

2:39

language. All. Over. The.

2:41

New Testament and The Old Testament

2:43

and the A D of the

2:46

Wrath is satisfied. By. A

2:48

substitute. Jesus.

2:50

Himself, it's interesting as we're talking.

2:54

Just before the show, Amy and I.

2:57

See mention Romans Five. And do you remember

2:59

that passage? You exactly where it's at a

3:01

Me. I want to just look it up

3:04

here and read it. It's Romans Five. It

3:06

has to be doing has has to do

3:08

with we're at odds with God. I think

3:11

the word, his enemies. Ah,

3:13

we were enemies of God before

3:16

Christ came. Romans

3:19

Five Ten Okay, let me just

3:21

get past actually or know Amy

3:23

as the Romans experts are. She

3:25

really was right on top of

3:27

this one. And here's what it

3:29

says: For while

3:31

we. Were. Enemies.

3:36

We. Were reconciled to God.

3:39

To. The death of his son. While.

3:45

We. Were enemies. I.

3:48

Don't know how else to take this. A

3:52

It isn't as if we dislike

3:54

God, but he's benevolent towards us.

3:56

I mean, without qualification. He's.

3:59

The Nice: The over there no

4:01

with this is a hostile relationship.

4:05

Gods. Mad at us because we have

4:07

rebelled against him. He's the sovereign, He's

4:09

the king. It's.

4:12

An enemy relationship. That's.

4:16

What it says here in Romans five

4:18

and in fact is not just like

4:20

I'm isolating versus there is a. A

4:23

line of thinking that. That

4:25

Paul offers. That.

4:28

Is he moves through the Book of Romans.

4:32

Here's. The problem. People.

4:35

Are with out excuse he says that

4:37

twice and Romans one. And

4:40

doesn't matter how you slice it. People.

4:43

Are bad. And.

4:46

Everybody is shut up completely

4:48

under sin. For.

4:51

All of sand. And fallen

4:53

short of the glory of God. And.

4:57

How do you fix that? Because.

5:00

It isn't just that we send and there's

5:02

a in the abstract. I'm

5:04

that's not good. It's

5:07

that we are sitting against

5:10

someone. It's.

5:13

Personal. That's.

5:15

Why in Romans Five here? First.

5:19

Ten it says we are

5:22

enemies. And why

5:24

we were. Enemies. We.

5:27

Were reconcile while we are of you

5:29

know. Against him he moved

5:31

towards us. That's a I mean

5:33

that's what makes the at the

5:36

the The Love Of God so

5:38

incredible. It's easy and

5:40

I'm paraphrasing here from some other place.

5:42

Aromas: It's easy to love people who

5:44

love you. And.

5:46

Who are nice to you? but. God

5:49

shows his love towards us and

5:51

even while we were yet sinners,

5:54

Christ. Died for us. Even.

5:57

While there was this enemy relationship.

6:01

And that's why in Romans of five

6:03

at the beginning you see therefore being

6:05

having been. Justified

6:07

by faith, we have peace with God. Through.

6:10

Our Lord Jesus Christ by the way, notices this

6:12

is not the piece. Of

6:14

God. That's. Different. Piece

6:17

of God is a subjective thing.

6:20

Be anxious for nothing but now

6:22

everything with parents application with Thanksgiving

6:24

Make your request known to God

6:26

and the and a piece of

6:29

God. With. Surpasses

6:31

all understanding showed. Guard your hearts and

6:33

your minds across seas as that's the

6:35

subjective thing. We. Pray

6:37

We put it in God's hands. We let it

6:40

go and then. We

6:42

have a and there's an effective

6:44

element their we feel different. That's.

6:47

Not what star who had to pause referring

6:50

to in. Romans. Five,

6:52

This is peace with God.

6:55

That. Means God is not angry at

6:57

us anymore. Two.

7:00

Groups that were. Hostile

7:02

towards each other, For.

7:04

Very particular reasons we were hostile: A God:

7:07

because we are sinners. God was house interest

7:09

because his God is morally perfect in his

7:11

the sovereign. This been wronged. Those.

7:17

Two groups have been reconciled. There.

7:19

Is no peace with. Each

7:22

other, which is why we rejoice.

7:28

We. Have also obtained are introduction.

7:31

By. Faith into this grace in which we

7:33

stand and we exult in the hope of the

7:35

glory of God. And this helps

7:37

us. By the way, with tribulation that comes

7:39

next week also result in our tribulation. Knowing.

7:44

That. Tribulation brings about perseverance of perseverance,

7:46

proven care to prove a character. Hope

7:48

and Hope does not disappoint. Because.

7:51

The love of God has been poured out

7:53

with in our hearts to the Holy Spirit

7:55

who was given to was the Holy Spirit

7:57

was given to us when we believed. When

8:00

we trusted in Christ. And.

8:03

Then the love of God is poured out. Because.

8:07

The barriers. Have. Been

8:09

removed. While.

8:13

We're still helpless of the right time. Christ

8:15

died for the ungodly for one would hardly

8:18

die for righteous man though perhaps for the

8:20

good man, someone would dare even to die.

8:22

but God demonstrates his own love toward us.

8:25

In that while weary of sinners, christ.

8:27

Died. For us, much more than

8:30

having now been justified by his

8:32

blood, we shall be saved from

8:34

the ras. To

8:37

him. The. Wrath of

8:39

God in my translation of gotta know, tell Us

8:41

To It's not a the original bit. we're a

8:43

where else is there are coming from. That's the

8:45

point. Saved!

8:48

From the rescue him. For.

8:52

While we were enemies. Were.

8:55

Reconciled. To. God. To

8:58

the death of his son. Is

9:00

the death of his son

9:02

that is the means of

9:04

reconciliation. What? Was it

9:06

about the death of the Sun

9:09

that was able to accomplish reconciliation?

9:13

That's the nature. That's the question of

9:15

the atonement. And I answer their question

9:17

from the texts that speak to them.

9:20

It. Was a suffering of Jesus. It is

9:22

impossible for the blood of bulls and going

9:25

to take away sin. Does

9:29

he says when he comes into the world. Sacrifice

9:33

and burn off ratio of

9:35

not desired but a body

9:37

you have prepared for me.

9:39

Behold I have come to

9:41

do your will. Oh god.

9:45

The Father prepares a body for Jesus.

9:47

The incarnations of that body can be

9:49

the perfect sacrifices is the whole point,

9:52

especially of Hebrew. stan. A.

9:55

it i don't know why this is confusing

9:57

the people i am just misses hide I

10:01

can see how it can be distasteful to

10:03

some. It

10:07

just is mystifying to me that it's

10:12

there's such aggressive pushback. I just

10:14

read an email with the person

10:17

was very, hmm, how

10:20

could I characterize this? Let's

10:23

say you use very strong language

10:30

to describe what

10:32

he thought was an inaccurate

10:34

view of God on

10:36

the cross. He actually called it blasphemy and that

10:40

essentially only an idiot, you know,

10:43

a nitwit would believe that would be me. It

10:46

wasn't exactly his words but something

10:48

to that effect. Okay, I'm

10:52

just mystified. I am

10:54

honestly mystified because

10:57

I think the text is so clear

11:02

and this is what I wanted people to see what

11:04

the text actually teaches and have

11:06

that bring them to a deeper and more

11:11

profound appreciation for the

11:14

love of God that

11:17

provided a means of forgiveness at

11:21

His expense. It

11:24

cost God something to forgive us so

11:27

that we could be rescued that

11:30

we could be saved. Anyway,

11:32

I had one other thing I wanted to mention

11:34

to you. It's kind of a commercial and then

11:37

I'll get into some other calls. If

11:41

you haven't read, by the way, the solid ground,

11:43

you go to our website simply titled, Why the

11:45

Blood. If you don't

11:47

receive it on a regular basis in the upper

11:49

right hand corner, it says subscribe. Click

11:52

the button and subscribe. Is that where it is on our website?

11:54

Upper right hand corner, I think it is. Subscribe.

11:56

That means you're going to get stuff from us free. You're

11:59

going to get. These pieces we called Solid Ground

12:01

which is an article by three Thousand Thirty Five

12:03

Hundred Words every other month. And

12:06

by the way, on. Every

12:10

book that I've written, Every

12:13

chapter almost without excess exception came

12:15

from a prior solid ground. So

12:17

what? You're going to get his

12:19

all the good stuff before somebody

12:21

else has to pay for a

12:23

book. Okay, Anyway,

12:27

You can sign up for that, you get solid ground,

12:29

and ultimately monsieur get a one page mentoring letter. Eight

12:33

hundred words. This

12:36

way that I can. And other

12:38

staffers who participate in how About.

12:41

Ah, In writing what we're going to be sending you

12:43

things and a regular basis of you sign up for them.

12:47

And then you will have already received a

12:49

Why The Blood. Which came out

12:51

the first of May. Mrs.

12:57

Okay will do that it in a bit.

12:59

I wanted a mentioned or something and at

13:02

a at us a product we have and

13:04

I don't know what the cost is not

13:06

as I'm not trying to sell products but

13:08

it is for sale. I'm trying to train

13:11

up disciples. A many,

13:13

many years ago I taught a course called

13:15

The Bible Fast Forward. It. Was

13:17

actually the course when I was

13:19

in charge of a program at

13:21

Hope Chaplin her most a beach

13:23

called the Ah Hope Chapel Ministry

13:25

Institute Hc I and it was

13:27

is our way of doing adult

13:29

education. We had courses you taken.

13:31

One of them was the Bible.

13:33

Fast forward that was when I

13:35

met Melinda Penner who was the

13:37

cofounder Standard Recent thirty one years

13:39

ago. And

13:42

I met her in their class. She

13:44

was a student there. And

13:46

this was a class that I

13:48

put together because. early

13:51

on in my christian life i had

13:53

been given some teaching at this crazy

13:55

place called the jesus christ lane bar

13:57

house and kind of a crushing can

13:59

be that I

14:02

lived at for two and a half years right

14:04

after he became a Christian during the Jesus movement.

14:08

And there was a course that

14:11

gave me an overview of

14:14

Scripture that positioned

14:17

the covenants

14:19

of the Old Testament in a

14:21

way that I could understand their

14:23

relationship to Jesus in the New

14:26

Testament. Alright? And what

14:28

I have done in these what eight

14:31

sessions and they're 50 minutes each is

14:35

I give a practical in the same spirit

14:37

of that course that I had that helped me so

14:39

much I wanted to give two

14:41

other students and so this was birthed

14:43

in H CMI Hope Chapel Ministry Institute

14:46

but also we

14:48

revived that course and

14:50

I upgraded it and did

14:54

recordings in a few years back so

14:56

that it would be available on DVD

14:58

and you could watch it there. Maybe

15:01

we got mp3s I don't know if you're so want to listen

15:03

to it but and

15:06

there's a workbook that goes with it and it's about

15:08

150 pages that you print it

15:10

out it's a PDF and

15:12

if you print it out it's basically

15:15

the entire syllabus. You

15:17

don't have to take notes it's all right there for

15:19

you okay and

15:21

it gives a practical historical overview of

15:24

the Old Testament emphasizing

15:26

the unfolding plan of salvation as

15:28

God reveals it through his covenants

15:30

with the nation of Israel and

15:34

in the fulfillment of those covenants in

15:36

the person of Jesus of Nazareth and

15:38

what you're going to get here is

15:40

an understanding of the unity of the

15:42

Bible through God's plan

15:45

of salvation in a

15:47

way that you probably never grasped it

15:49

before all right many

15:52

of you have read the story of reality

15:54

that's great that gives you an overview but

15:56

notice how you go from God man to Jesus

16:00

God, man, Jesus, cross resurrection. Those are the

16:03

five key words of the plot line of

16:05

the story. Well,

16:07

between man, Genesis 3, and Jesus,

16:12

Matthew chapter 1, there's

16:14

a whole lot of stuff. There's

16:16

like thousands of years in the entire history

16:19

of the nation of Israel. And what the

16:21

Bible fast-forward does is it fills

16:23

in that gap with

16:26

theology. And

16:28

it's more complicated because

16:31

the Hebrew Scriptures are complicated. And what

16:33

I try to do is help you

16:35

to understand how these things all are

16:37

woven together. Because if

16:39

you don't understand the covenants of the Old Testament, you're

16:41

going to have a hard time understanding a whole bunch

16:43

of stuff in the New Testament. And

16:47

in this seminar, you'll be able to, here's a

16:49

couple of things that I go over, identify the

16:51

unifying theme of the entire Bible. You'll

16:54

be able to explain five ways

16:57

the Jews are God's chosen people.

16:59

You'll be able to chart the 12 main historical

17:01

events of the nation of Israel, starting

17:04

with the call of Abraham and ending with Jesus

17:06

the Messiah. You'll

17:08

have an historical overview. You know how this

17:10

all fits together. You'll

17:13

be able to list the basic elements of the

17:15

Abrahamic covenant, the Mosaic covenant, and the

17:17

New Covenant. So those are the key ones. And

17:20

also understand the relevance of those covenants

17:23

for today. And

17:26

also see, and this to me is the

17:28

coolest thing, is see how the events

17:30

and the covenants and the promises

17:32

of the Old Testament come

17:35

to their perfect focus and

17:37

fulfillment in Christ. Which,

17:39

by the way, is what we're talking about a little bit with the

17:42

piece I wrote, Why the Blood, and the blood atonement. It

17:45

didn't just fall out of the sky. There's a

17:48

deep, profound history in

17:51

the practices, the religious practices of

17:53

ancient Israel as

17:55

dictated by God that ties directly

17:57

into Jesus' own

17:59

sacrifice. on the cross. And

18:02

hopefully you see that the Bible presents one cohesive

18:06

plan of salvation. So

18:09

I'm going to mention this more in the future just

18:11

because I think this is an overlooked tool

18:13

or resource for you. It

18:19

is one of the greatest things that ever

18:21

happened to me in my Christian life to

18:23

have the understanding that

18:26

I try to pass on

18:29

in this educational material

18:31

that we call the Bible

18:34

fast-forward. Okay so that's

18:36

available for you. You go to sdr.org and go

18:38

to the store and just

18:40

check that out. I think we have mp3s. The videos

18:43

are there. I don't know how long

18:45

ago we did that. I don't

18:48

think I was completely gray when we did that.

18:50

It was maybe 10 years ago right? I

18:54

did it at my church or a home church in

18:56

Thousand Oaks. They provided the venue in

18:58

the audience and it was great. It worked out. So I

19:00

hope you consider getting that. Alright let's

19:04

take a little break here and then we'll

19:06

come back to our callers on standard

19:08

reason. Do

19:10

you want to become a more knowledgeable

19:12

Christian ambassador without sitting through a formal

19:14

course on apologetics? Well we've made that

19:16

possible for you through our SDR quick

19:18

reference app. Available for free on iTunes

19:20

and Google Play, the SDR quick reference

19:22

app holds a wealth of information summarizing

19:24

what you need to know on a

19:26

range of topics. Learn how

19:28

to defend the faith, see how other

19:31

worldviews compare to Christianity, and master the

19:33

biblical view of morality all through short

19:35

engaging videos. Before you know it you'll

19:37

be well versed on a number of

19:39

important apologetics topics. In Addition:

19:42

The Quick Reference app also includes a

19:44

Bible with text and audio as well

19:46

as some featured SDR resources, all to

19:48

enhance your learning experience. The SDR Quick

19:50

Reference app will equip you to engage

19:52

in thoughtful conversation about the key issues

19:55

of life from classical Christian perspective. Visit

19:57

iTunes or the Google Play Store Today

19:59

and. Download the Str quip reference

20:01

at and if you enjoy the At, make

20:03

sure you give it a five star review.

20:07

Friends. Or be a like this broadcast.

20:09

I know you'll love Hashtag Str asks.

20:11

It's are shorter twenty minute podcast where

20:13

I am paired with a wonderful Amy

20:15

Hall and together we answer the questions

20:17

you send us on twitter hashtag s

20:20

tier. Ask his release twice a week

20:22

mondays and Thursdays and it's only about

20:24

twenty minutes long so it's perfect to

20:26

listen to on your morning jog or

20:28

while driving around running errands or cleaning

20:31

your garage or just plain laughing at

20:33

home. Amy and I tackle your questions

20:35

on theology and ethics and culture. And

20:37

Loss more. Offering our insight on

20:39

the questions you're asking or the

20:41

challenges you face. You can listen

20:44

apple podcasts or wherever you download

20:46

your own shows. Just. Remember,

20:48

send us your questions on

20:50

Twitter Using the name of

20:53

the podcast hashtag of Tier

20:55

asks that hashtag a serious.

21:09

Problem is you're finished the season

21:11

for reality, but we wanted or

21:14

know we're already planning and we

21:16

have been doing it for months.

21:18

The next season of Reality starting

21:20

in September and Southern California, October

21:22

in Seattle, november in Minneapolis with

21:24

February in. Dallas

21:27

barge in Philly? an April? we're

21:29

not sure. Ah, We

21:31

don't have a home. Yeah for the

21:33

and we need a home in the

21:35

South East. Aerial Okay we been in

21:37

Birmingham a number of years. Words: they

21:39

get what Atlanta arm were looking for

21:41

a home. So if you know of

21:43

a church sick hold that least three

21:46

thousand p people. Possess. or

21:48

look an hour or so we

21:50

don't outgrow it right away and

21:52

ah with with a staff that is

21:54

and it is interested in what we

21:56

do and it's really important that we

21:59

have top-down buy-in from the

22:01

staff. It's a big event and it's

22:03

a great feather in the church's cap.

22:06

We'd love to talk with them about

22:08

that event coming up and

22:10

about having a home in

22:13

about a year for

22:16

our next reality. So if you have

22:19

some ideas about that or

22:21

have a church where you're

22:23

interested in that, contact Dawn

22:25

Yell D-A-W-N-I-E-L-L-E Dawn

22:28

Yell at

22:32

str.org. Dawn Yell

22:34

at str.org. And

22:38

all the information that we have for next

22:40

year's reality, it's going to be a focus

22:42

on the Word of God and the theme

22:44

is, It is Written

22:48

and the website will be live

22:50

May 14. Okay, May

22:52

14 realityapologetics.com. And incidentally, we also

22:54

need a Southern California home for

22:56

the fall of 25. Not the

22:59

fall of 24, we got

23:01

that covered, we'll be at

23:03

Biola. But the fall of

23:05

25, we need a home there too

23:07

in Southern Cal. Okay, same idea. Big

23:10

church and

23:13

ideally around 3,000 or something like

23:16

that with classrooms.

23:19

Four breakouts, 10 breakouts is what

23:21

we characteristically have. So take that 3,000 divided by

23:23

10, you see the size of room

23:26

that we have. We need rooms

23:28

that hold 300 people, something like that depending on the

23:31

actual numbers, but you get the idea. Once

23:33

again, Dawn Yell at str.org.

23:35

Alright, let's go to

23:37

Nancy in Ontario, Canada.

23:40

Nancy, welcome to Stand to Reason. Hi

23:43

Greg, so appreciate you taking

23:45

my call. I appreciate your

23:47

wise counsel. Thank you. Question

23:49

for you, could you

23:52

suggest two to three starter questions

23:55

to ask a prospective

23:57

speaker that

23:59

we would be in to a youth retreat.

24:03

So we're just trying to get a sense of

24:06

denominational differences or anything like that

24:08

but more so just with the

24:10

various progressive leanings

24:13

of some how we

24:15

could ascertain. Sure okay this is

24:17

good. So your

24:19

concern is maybe bringing someone in who's

24:21

a little bit too progressive is that

24:24

right? Yeah exactly. Well

24:26

I think a couple

24:28

of really obvious questions. Well maybe here's the

24:31

best way for me to frame this and

24:33

that is the way in the past

24:36

I have suggested things to look for

24:38

in a Christian school, Christian

24:41

University alright and there

24:43

were five things and I mean it used

24:46

to be four then they became five and then they

24:48

changed order a little bit because the culture shifted but

24:50

these are the kinds of things that they're most important

24:52

to find out okay. First is their

24:55

understanding of the gospel okay

24:58

and to put it in simple

25:00

terms is Jesus the only way and

25:03

does that mean you have to believe in

25:05

Jesus? Now this is called exclusivism. Is

25:08

Jesus not only the exclusive means

25:10

to salvation but does someone

25:12

need to actually put their faith in

25:14

Jesus to benefit from Jesus? Because

25:17

there is a teaching called inclusivism that's

25:19

going on. You have religious pluralism that

25:21

says all religions are equally valid paths

25:24

to God. Then you have inclusivism

25:27

which is a it's kind of

25:29

a Christian hybrid of pluralism. It

25:32

says well Jesus is necessary in

25:35

order to pay for sins but you

25:37

don't have to believe in Him to benefit from Him and

25:39

that's the view of the Roman Catholic Church now and

25:41

some others as well. So I'm just you just

25:43

want to find out we're

25:46

training kids right? We

25:48

want them to have the truth the most important

25:50

truth that is the truth of the gospel. What

25:53

is that? What is that truth

25:55

of the gospel? Okay and

25:57

so that that

25:59

would be the first thing. The second thing is an

26:02

understanding of the nature of the of

26:04

the revelation that we call the Word

26:06

of God. Do the

26:08

Bible, do they believe it is the Word of God?

26:10

And if they do believe it is the Word of

26:12

God, what do they mean when they say that? And

26:15

what I'm looking for, and by the way you can you

26:18

can form these

26:20

questions any way you want, but here's the I'm

26:22

just giving you the raw substance. And

26:26

I'm looking for something akin

26:28

to inerrancy. We can

26:31

trust the Bible because God says it so.

26:34

God's speaking through these writers

26:37

and chapter and verse,

26:39

jot and tittle, that kind of thing, the Word

26:41

of God can't be broken, so we can trust

26:43

what it teaches to be the truth. That's

26:47

the view of the Bible that's I

26:49

think really critical. Okay, okay

26:51

the next one, let's see, I have

26:53

one, two, three. The next three are

26:55

kind of cultural issues that are issues

26:57

now. I used to be be concerned

27:00

about theistic evolution and

27:03

I'm not as concerned about that as

27:05

I used to be, all right? And

27:08

it's because other two other things have have

27:11

moved above that in terms

27:13

of primacy. And one

27:15

of those is the the view of

27:19

sex and gender and

27:21

marriage and homosexuality in particular. And

27:24

the problematic view

27:27

is anything that approaches being

27:31

theologically gay affirming. All

27:35

right, and there are tons and tons and tons of

27:37

Christian groups out there that are like that. Okay,

27:42

and we don't want and are affirming

27:45

therefore in this kind of

27:47

flexible sexual category affirming of

27:50

same-sex marriage and then affirming

27:52

of gender dysphoria

27:55

or gender transgenderism maybe.

28:00

dysphoria, that's a problem, but they would say

28:02

the solution is transgenderism. So you don't want

28:04

any of that confusing your kids. They're going

28:06

to get so much of that in the

28:09

world already, wherever they go, they can't avoid

28:11

it. And so we want

28:13

to make sure that they have a clear

28:15

understanding of this, of what

28:18

God's Word says. I have a talk that

28:21

I give, I used to call it, that

28:23

faithfulness is not theologically difficult.

28:27

And I have a little yellow posted tab I'm

28:29

looking at right now on the inside of my

28:31

Bible where, you know, during a show I got

28:33

so frustrated, I just wrote that down. Why are

28:35

people confused on these things? The Bible is very

28:38

clear. Now the talk is called, because that's not

28:40

a very good title for a

28:42

talk, faithfulness is not theologically difficult. I just

28:44

call it five easy issues. And

28:47

those easy issues are religious pluralism,

28:50

abortion, gender, sex,

28:53

and marriage. You know, yes, easy, right?

28:55

Well, they are. Textually, they're easy. And

28:57

I want people to be confident on

29:01

what the Bible teaches about these things because they're

29:04

not ambiguous. And

29:06

so that's kind of part of what

29:08

I'm talking about here regarding these qualifications

29:10

for the speaker. Are

29:12

we on the same page here? Yes, absolutely.

29:14

You got that. We're

29:17

looking for. I do. Yeah. So that's one,

29:19

two, three I got. Yeah. Okay. So the

29:21

odd one, put

29:25

it at the end, just the theistic evolution. It's

29:28

not as weighty as these other

29:30

concerns are. And so the fourth

29:32

one then would be things

29:35

related to very broadly wokeness

29:38

or critical theory. Or

29:41

equity, diversity, equity, and inclusion,

29:43

DEI. I mean, these are

29:45

broader categories, but it's just

29:47

a way of looking

29:49

at the world that is descended

29:52

upon Christianity aggressively.

29:55

And many people have bought into it because

29:57

they care about justice. And so they hear

29:59

the word. social justice and

30:01

they think, well, that's what Jesus was all

30:04

about, which is not true, but

30:06

nevertheless, they care about justice and so they're

30:08

taken in by a counterfeit

30:12

understanding of justice and a worldview that

30:15

is at odds with the

30:17

Christian worldview. And

30:19

that's where, you know, I'm not even sure how to ask

30:22

the question, but it has to do

30:25

with that

30:28

broad category. Critical theory, it shows

30:31

up in race issues, it shows up

30:34

in sexual issues, it shows up in

30:36

women's issues. These are all subsets of

30:38

critical theory, which basically

30:41

pits one group against another and

30:44

the powerful group is always the bad one and

30:46

the weaker group is always the good one.

30:49

I mean, in fact, they can't even be

30:51

bad because they're the weaker group, they're the

30:53

oppressed group. That's why they say that blacks

30:55

can't be, or people of

30:57

color in general, can't be racist. They

30:59

just can't because of

31:01

the power relationship. Anyway,

31:04

so you don't want any of

31:06

that stuff being brought into the

31:08

kids. So those are the five

31:11

things I'd put theistic evolution at the

31:13

very end. But if he's not dealing

31:15

with evolutionary issues and maybe

31:17

he's sympathetic to theistic evolution, I'm not going

31:20

to really fuss about that.

31:22

The other ones are critical in the

31:24

order that I offered and

31:26

that is who is Jesus and the work

31:28

of the cross and what's necessary. Religious

31:31

pluralism, the second one is the

31:33

authority of the Bible. The third

31:35

one has to do with the

31:37

sexual matters, especially homosexuality. And

31:40

the fourth one has to do with critical

31:42

theory and the whole woke business. And then

31:44

the final one is theistic evolution. It's really

31:46

trailing off the back end compared to these

31:49

other four. Got it. Okay.

31:52

And by the way, since this is the foil

31:54

that I use for

32:00

trying to decide whether a

32:03

school is genuinely true

32:05

blue and a safe place to go. I don't

32:07

actually do that. I

32:10

had it on my notes to do a show on

32:12

that or do a commentary on that as I do

32:14

once a year. But I've kind of given up because

32:16

there's too many Christian

32:18

schools that have compromised in a lot of

32:20

areas. So now I

32:22

say, look, don't look for a school

32:24

that's got, when you think about sending

32:26

your kid to a Christian school, don't

32:29

think that this school, though it

32:31

claims to be Christian, is going to be true blue in

32:33

all these areas. You gotta have your guard up,

32:35

okay? Just think of a Christian school as

32:37

a school with a lot of Christians go

32:39

to. Yeah, exactly.

32:41

Okay, make no assumptions. Number

32:44

four, can I just go back to you for a second? Could

32:46

you ask a question related to

32:48

sin in

32:50

terms of, I was just

32:52

thinking you'd said, they're

32:55

wanting justice and they see it as the

32:59

group in power versus the oppressed

33:02

group. Is there a question

33:04

that you can ask specific to, it's

33:07

not an oppressor

33:09

problem, it's a sin problem, or is there a

33:11

way to? I think that, I

33:15

think the way that I'd wanna, I'd

33:18

wanna ask this question is, what

33:20

do you, I guess, and again, I'm just

33:22

off the top of my head, so I may

33:24

wanna work on this, but I might ask something

33:26

like, what is your understanding of social justice and

33:28

the role that it has with

33:30

Christians? That's kind of

33:33

a loaded term. What I

33:35

wanna hear is, I wanna hear, well,

33:37

this is a misleading phrase, because

33:40

in critical theory, social justice is

33:44

the means of salvation. It's

33:46

salvation on this earth, there's not salvation afterward,

33:48

this is the way, but social justice, in

33:51

my view, is just simply paybacks. That's

33:54

all it amounts to, is paybacks. I mean,

33:57

this is what you saw, look, in South

33:59

Africa, had apartheid. for a long time and

34:01

then it got reversed. And now all they did

34:03

is turn the whole thing upside down and entirely

34:05

different. The oppressed group is now in power and

34:07

it's oppressing those that used to be in power.

34:11

And this happens all the time. So

34:13

it just goes from one kind of oppression to

34:15

another. And as I look

34:17

at social justice, I see that

34:20

as the antidote is just

34:22

paybacks. Now, I think there are legitimate ways of

34:25

cashing some of those concepts

34:31

out, but we have to be very careful about it.

34:34

So maybe that's the kind of question just to

34:36

test them a little bit. What are you thinking

34:39

about diversity,

34:42

equity, and inclusion? What's your view? You

34:44

might use that DEI. And

34:48

keep in mind that diversity is for

34:50

diversity's sake. And equity

34:52

means not equal treatment, but equal

34:54

consequence. You don't begin in the

34:58

same place, you end in the same place. This

35:01

is an equitable why because

35:03

they have more than somebody

35:05

else has. So it's

35:07

a distortion of

35:09

equality. And

35:12

you have to surrender. I mean, there's

35:14

a lot of detail involved in these

35:16

concepts now, but you have to surrender.

35:22

Very foundational understandings of liberty

35:25

in order to impose the equity

35:27

that those people have

35:31

in mind on the culture.

35:33

And it's very dangerous. But in any event,

35:35

I mean, people absorb these words and they get some

35:37

of the concepts and they're kind of taken with them

35:40

and they think they're cool. And they don't understand the

35:42

philosophic background and where these things are going and what

35:46

these things are actually teaching. So I mean,

35:48

that's something like that is what I'd ask

35:52

maybe. Okay. So justice and equity, diversity,

35:54

equity, inclusion. They don't talk about critical

35:57

theory anymore. nobody

36:00

teaches that. Well that's nonsense. They

36:19

just do it under a different name.

36:21

I mean it's all over the place

36:23

now everywhere. This is something that

36:25

you're going to hire or is this somebody who's

36:27

just going to speak for an event? Just

36:30

for an event. I see. And where is

36:32

the event at? I see you're in Ontario, right?

36:34

Yeah, just outside

36:37

of Toronto. Well you might

36:39

consider Tim Barnett because he

36:41

lives in town there. You

36:44

know what? We actually have. We have

36:46

no doubt to him. We have reached

36:48

out to him. So that'll be for

36:50

a different event. We have a few

36:52

of them upcoming. So we have

36:55

him on a request as well. I see.

36:57

Okay. Well he's a true blue. And you

36:59

might even check with him because he might know some

37:01

other people in the area that would

37:03

be good candidates for this other event

37:05

that you're planning right now. Okay, fantastic. I

37:07

think you've got him busy running around the

37:09

two countries. But

37:12

I'll see if he has some ideas as well. Yeah,

37:15

okay. I actually had lunch with him

37:17

today. So he's in town. I wanted

37:20

him to come on the show. But he

37:22

said, well, I got my whole family here. And everybody's

37:24

going to be mad at me if I don't take

37:26

them out, you know, wherever we're going. And do the

37:28

fun things that we're planning to do. Say, okay, I

37:30

won't fuss about it. But

37:33

you know, he's learned that I'm sure.

37:35

Yeah, well, he's fun to be with.

37:37

And he's a great communicator. Anyway,

37:39

he'll have some ideas, I'm sure. Or let me

37:41

back up. If he doesn't, if he does have

37:44

some ideas, they're going to be people you can

37:46

trust. Let's put it that way. Yeah,

37:48

okay. All right. Thank you

37:50

for your time. All right. Bye bye. Now. Thanks. Let's

37:53

see. Is it time for another break here?

37:55

Yep. Oh, sorry. I should have pushed your button so she

37:58

didn't click off. Okay, let's take a quick break and then. And

38:00

we'll come back with a couple of

38:02

questions, open mic questions.

38:04

Will do. Have

38:06

you ever wondered how Stand to Reason is

38:09

able to produce fresh, accessible content each week?

38:11

We rely on generous donors so that we

38:13

can provide you with the tools and tactics

38:16

you need to be an effective ambassador for

38:18

Christ. If you've benefited

38:20

from this podcast or any of

38:22

our donor-provided resources, including our apps,

38:24

blog posts, articles, and short videos,

38:27

consider making a financial contribution to

38:29

Stand to Reason today. Just

38:32

visit str.org/donate to show

38:34

your financial support. It

38:37

has been an honor providing you with a host

38:39

of free resources for more than 27 years to

38:42

help you give voice to the Christian worldview.

38:45

Help us continue by making

38:47

a financial gift today at

38:49

str.org/donate. Do you have a

38:51

passion to train people in apologetics, but you don't

38:54

know where to start? You

38:56

may be interested in starting an

38:58

STR outpost. STR outposts

39:00

are local communities of Christians seeking

39:02

answers to the hard questions about

39:05

Christianity. Each outpost is

39:07

led by a qualified director who

39:10

trains others with STR content and

39:12

curriculum in their local church. By

39:15

becoming an outpost director, you will be equipped

39:17

with the content and coaching you need

39:19

to lead your own outpost. We

39:21

currently have more than 60 outposts across the

39:23

country and we're adding more each month. If

39:26

you're interested in learning more about starting an

39:29

outpost or you want to find a current

39:31

outpost in your area, visit

39:34

str.org/outposts. You

39:37

can also email me,

39:39

robylashwa, at outposts at

39:41

str.org. Okay,

39:57

we're going to go to some open mic

39:59

calls. here and that of course is when

40:01

you call in to a

40:04

number I'll give you in a minute and

40:06

leave your question or go to our website

40:08

and leave your question and then you

40:10

don't have to wait in the queue but you

40:12

and I can't interact either but it's a way of

40:14

getting your question answered if you can't wait.

40:18

So the number that you can call is 857-342-5787. 857-342-5787 or

40:29

857-DIAL-STR if you want words.

40:34

But the preferred way according to Amy is

40:36

if you just go to our website str.org

40:39

and then on the

40:41

home page look for podcasts

40:43

and then under podcasts live

40:45

broadcast live broadcast and

40:48

then follow the prompts. Okay this

40:50

is from Tom Poitner and

40:52

it's about the covenants. So Tom?

40:58

Hey Greg, Tom Poitner here.

41:01

Hi Tom. I'm from Winfield, Illinois

41:03

and in one of your recent

41:05

STR Ask

41:07

podcasts you had said that

41:09

Christianity is the fulfillment of

41:12

covenantal Judaism. Now I've got

41:14

a dear friend, one of my best

41:16

friends, who along with his family have a real heart for

41:19

Jewish believers and as such they have

41:21

adopted many of the more traditional Jewish

41:25

practices, festivals, strict

41:27

Sabbath observance, Friday nights,

41:29

Shabbat dinners, and

41:31

we've had many discussions with regards to

41:33

their, I'm gonna call it a soft

41:36

conversion to Judaism even though they are

41:38

completely devoted to Jesus and I really

41:40

don't question their belief in

41:42

Christ. All that to

41:45

say my question is is that

41:47

if Christianity truly is the fulfillment

41:50

of covenantal Judaism then why don't

41:52

all Christians embrace truly

41:54

Jewish traditions as my friend has?

41:57

Now I'm pretty sure that your response would

42:00

be that that's because we are under the

42:02

new covenant and not the old one. And

42:04

I think that my friend would say that

42:06

the new covenant did not do away with

42:09

the old covenant or invalidated it anyway, but

42:11

rather it completed it and fulfilled

42:13

it and that we should thus practice Judaism

42:16

as Jesus did. So I'm not

42:18

really sure how best to think about this and

42:20

I would love to hear your thoughts. Thank

42:22

you Greg, blessings. Well

42:25

thanks for that question Tom and it's a

42:27

fair question although the

42:29

response that you offered that you

42:32

anticipate your friend would have

42:35

used is frustrating to hear.

42:37

The old covenant is

42:40

the old covenant. The new

42:42

covenant is the new covenant. The

42:45

way that Christianity is a fulfillment of

42:49

covenantal Judaism is that we

42:52

are entering into the

42:54

reality and the details

42:58

of the new covenant

43:00

prophesied in Jeremiah

43:02

and Ezekiel. And it's interesting the

43:05

way Jeremiah puts the words here.

43:09

The way he introduces it's Jeremiah

43:11

31 and 31 and

43:13

following. And he says

43:15

here, Behold the days are coming declares the

43:17

Lord when I

43:19

will make a new

43:21

covenant with the house of Israel

43:23

and with the house of Judah. Now

43:27

just the fact, I'm just pausing for a

43:29

moment here, just the fact that he identifies

43:31

the covenant as a new one suggests

43:37

a replacement. That

43:39

one, there's an old one that is

43:41

now being replaced by new. Just the

43:44

language by itself suggests that. Okay

43:47

but it's more than just the language of new and

43:49

old. It gets more

43:51

explicit. Verse

43:54

32, Not like the covenant

43:57

which I made with their fathers in the

43:59

day I took them by the hand to

44:01

bring them out of the land of Egypt. Which

44:04

covenant is that? That's the Mosaic. A

44:08

covenant which they broke. So

44:11

that covenant is broken, is

44:14

what Jeremiah is saying here. There was

44:16

an old covenant that I gave to Moses,

44:18

to the people. They broke that covenant.

44:21

I'm going to give you a new

44:23

one. That one's broken. This one's new.

44:27

The covenant which they broke. I'm

44:33

looking for my spot here. Although

44:37

I was a husband to them declares the Lord. But this

44:40

is the covenant which I will make with the house of

44:42

Israel. After those days I will put my law within them

44:44

and on their heart I will write it and I will

44:46

be their God and they shall believe that people etc.

44:49

etc. And

44:51

Ezekiel talks more about that and the giving

44:54

of the Spirit. Now when Jesus at

44:57

the Last Supper had the Last Supper,

44:59

he said, this is

45:01

my body and this is the blood of

45:03

the new covenant which

45:07

will be broken and shed for

45:10

you. He may have said

45:13

for the forgiveness of sins but that's mentioned

45:15

in other passages in the New Testament as

45:17

characteristic of the new covenant which

45:19

is what Jeremiah is

45:21

saying here in Jeremiah 31, 31 and

45:23

following. Now

45:26

when you read the book of Hebrews, the book

45:28

of Hebrews makes it also clear. By

45:31

the way when a thing is fulfilled that means it's

45:33

fulfilled. This

45:35

doesn't become like a way of getting back

45:38

to the old law. Okay,

45:40

well Jesus did get rid of

45:42

the old law. He fulfilled it. Yes, but

45:44

if it's fulfilled then it's fulfilled. It

45:48

does not function in the same way that

45:50

it used to and that

45:52

is the reason the book of Hebrews is written

45:55

to show us that the function of the

45:57

law is different. I should say the function.

46:00

of the law is passé, or the

46:02

law does not function in our

46:04

lives at all anymore. And

46:06

in one verse, I'm just going from memory here, I

46:09

think it says, what is

46:12

talking about the shadow of the things to

46:14

come and that it's passing away. So

46:18

as a way to relate to

46:20

God, the

46:24

law no longer serves that

46:27

purpose. Now,

46:32

what happened very soon after the

46:34

book of Hebrews was written, the temple

46:36

was destroyed. The

46:39

entire mosaic system

46:41

was built around the temple. When

46:44

the temple gets destroyed, that shows

46:46

you cannot keep the mosaic law

46:48

anymore. It's not possible anymore. You

46:50

have to make adjustments as the

46:52

Jews have done. So

46:56

when I say that the Christianity

47:00

is truly a fulfillment

47:02

of covenantal Judaism, we

47:05

are operating in the New Covenant, which

47:07

is a Jewish covenant that the Gentiles

47:09

have been grafted into. So

47:13

it is the next step of

47:15

Jewish covenantal religious practice. You have

47:17

the Old Covenant and then we

47:20

transfer into, forget about Gentiles for

47:22

a moment, just leave Gentiles completely

47:24

out of the picture. What

47:27

we call Christianity is just

47:29

Judaism. It's Judaism,

47:33

New Covenant Judaism, that's

47:35

all. But if it's New Covenant Judaism

47:37

that we're living in, then we're not

47:39

living in Old Covenant Judaism. Now,

47:43

that doesn't mean that there's

47:46

anything wrong with practicing the feasts

47:48

and doing a lot of things

47:51

that were characteristic of the culture of

47:53

Israel, reflecting on and remembering God.

47:56

But they are not obligatory. like

48:01

they were under the Old

48:03

Covenant. They are

48:05

things that still could be practiced. But

48:08

you did say they are strict

48:11

Sabbath keepers. I'm

48:13

not sure exactly about how

48:15

that plays itself

48:17

out. To consistently

48:19

keep the Sabbath, if this is their

48:22

desire, fine. If they're thinking

48:24

there's a moral obligation to do it in

48:26

a very precise way and they are careful

48:29

to do it precisely that way so

48:31

they can fulfill their moral obligation then

48:33

their misunderstanding. The

48:37

relationship of the Old Covenant to the New Covenant.

48:40

You want to worship on Friday

48:43

sundown to Saturday sundown and take that day

48:45

off and make that for the Lord? Fine.

48:48

Paul says as much in Colossians. Some people think

48:50

one day above the other. Some consider that I'm

48:52

all the same. Whatever. So

48:59

it's fine to continue

49:01

to practice those things and there are

49:03

satyrs that I know Christian people who

49:05

are not Jewish that

49:08

will practice that and

49:10

Jewish Christians who perform

49:12

satyrs in non-Jewish Christian's homes

49:14

to help them understand how

49:16

the satyr gives a beautiful

49:18

picture of Christ there on

49:20

Passover. That's fabulous. If

49:23

you're viewing it as an obligation though this

49:25

is not that's

49:28

not biblically sound because

49:30

it's not an obligation. That

49:33

system of relating to God is

49:35

now been replaced by a new

49:37

system. In fact, going back

49:39

to the Jeremiah passage, they will not teach

49:41

again each man his neighbor and each man

49:44

his brother saying know the Lord for they

49:46

will all know me from the

49:48

least of them to the greatest of them because

49:50

the Lord for I will forgive their iniquity and

49:53

their sin I will remember no more.

49:56

In other words, there is a complete and

49:59

permanent forgiveness of sin that

50:03

is characteristic of the New

50:05

Covenant. I mentioned earlier about the

50:07

Bible fast-forward. That's

50:11

a course that helps you to see the

50:13

way the relationship is between these

50:15

two. I just don't... it's

50:19

crazy... I'm sorry, maybe I shouldn't use that word.

50:21

It just frustrates me when somebody says, oh yeah,

50:23

well Jesus fulfilled the law. That means we have

50:25

to still live in the law. He

50:28

didn't do away with the law. He fulfilled it. Yes,

50:31

the law is no longer effective in our life,

50:33

not because it's been done away with, but because

50:35

it's been fulfilled. And once it's fulfilled, that's it.

50:38

There is no further legal obligation

50:41

that we have regarding that law.

50:45

And when I say Christianity is

50:48

the fulfillment of covenantal Judaism, I'm

50:50

saying that Christianity is the word

50:52

that we use to describe New

50:54

Covenant Judaism. And also we

50:57

have a clearer picture that the Gentiles are

50:59

now grafted into the New Covenant. It's

51:02

always part of the plan right from the

51:04

beginning with Abraham in Genesis 12, but there

51:09

is a much more explicit characterization of that

51:11

plan. My spirit I

51:13

will pour out on all men, the prophecy

51:16

from the book of Joel that's cited

51:18

in Acts chapter 2 and Pentecost Sunday.

51:21

Okay, so these things are, there was a

51:23

progression. You move from

51:25

one to the other. So

51:30

it's funny to me if I say that

51:33

Christianity is the fulfillment of covenantal

51:36

Judaism, that somehow this

51:38

suggests that I ought to be

51:40

arguing we should go back and

51:42

do the old system with Jews.

51:45

Quite the contrary. It's

51:49

the fulfillment of that. It's the next step.

51:51

You go from old to new. Not

51:54

like the one that I gave you when

51:56

you came out of Egypt when I rescued

51:58

you. That one that you... you broke,

52:01

but here's one you can't break. It's

52:04

the New Covenant, a totally different provision.

52:08

The book of Hebrews is a

52:10

remarkable theological

52:14

treatise to

52:16

make this point really clear.

52:20

The point is, the

52:23

oldest is older than the newest is new. You

52:26

have Jesus now who's a better priest.

52:28

He's not a Levitical priest. After the

52:30

order of Melchizedek, you

52:33

have Jesus' sacrifice, which is a better

52:35

sacrifice. It's not the sacrifice of blood

52:37

and bulls and goats, which

52:40

can never take away sin. But

52:43

instead, he says when he comes into the world, sacrifice

52:47

you have not desired, but a body you

52:50

have prepared for me. What

52:54

for? Because the blood of bulls

52:56

and goats can't take away sin. That's the old system.

52:59

Now we have the perfect. When the perfect comes, the

53:01

partial is gone. I'm paraphrasing

53:03

there from, I think, Hebrews 10, but maybe

53:05

I should just look it up. When

53:08

the perfect comes, the partial is gone. It's

53:10

passing away. That's the point. So

53:13

we are just kind of, as Gentiles,

53:17

climbing on for the ride, as

53:19

it were, of the plan

53:21

that God had for Israel all along, to leave

53:23

one behind and to come out with the new.

53:27

And that's why we call it the new covenant. And

53:31

it's contrasted with the old. Now

53:33

Jesus makes a point, obviously, in Matthew 5,

53:36

that you

53:38

can't do away with the law.

53:41

And I remember Jesus is speaking

53:43

under an old covenant system until

53:46

he initiates the new covenant system,

53:50

in one sense, at his last supper, but formally

53:53

at the cross and then

53:55

inaugurating that system on Pentecost.

53:58

So events are strung together. as

54:01

this transition is taking place. Okay?

54:05

And it's Jesus'

54:07

body that is now

54:10

the perfect sacrifice that the blood of bulls

54:12

and goats used

54:15

to at least fill

54:18

in for, so to speak, temporarily.

54:22

And the Jewish

54:24

nation was supposed to move in

54:26

this direction, leaving the old behind.

54:29

Jesus says you cannot, in Matthew

54:31

5, you know, you can't do away with the law.

54:34

He's speaking under that system, but he's trying to show

54:36

the guilt that everybody has. No,

54:39

you can't just get rid of the law. The law makes

54:41

its demand on you, and it makes a bigger demand

54:44

than you thought. Don't

54:46

commit murder. Didn't do that. Do

54:48

you ever call your brother a fool? Yeah. Well,

54:51

then you're going to hell. That's

54:53

what the law demands. That's

54:55

Jesus. Don't commit adultery.

54:57

Haven't done that. Did you ever think about

55:00

it? Yeah, you're

55:03

going to hell. That's Jesus.

55:05

So what he's doing there is he's saying

55:07

the law cannot just

55:10

simply be dismissed. It

55:13

demands, moral demands,

55:15

weigh on you heavier than you

55:17

thought. Now, there

55:20

is a way out, and that's

55:22

when the law is fulfilled through

55:24

Jesus, and

55:27

that fulfillment then moves.

55:30

He keeps the law perfectly

55:32

and then suffers under the law, as

55:34

it were, as the

55:36

perfect sacrifice so that we can

55:39

die to the law. That's

55:43

what Romans identifies.

55:46

Just like if you were betrothed

55:49

or you're married to someone, there

55:53

has to be a death before you can be

55:55

married to somebody else, right, until death do us part. Well,

55:57

that's the way it was with the law. We have died

55:59

to it. the law. Now we

56:01

can be betrothed to Christ in the new covenant.

56:04

Why? Because the law is gone. So

56:07

it's just in

56:09

a certain sense,

56:11

frustrating to hear these kinds of

56:13

characterizations, Tom, of why

56:15

we should keep in the

56:18

old system when that

56:21

reflects, I think, a lack of understanding of

56:23

what the new was meant to do. There

56:26

are many aspects of that that we are free to

56:28

participate in. You're not going to do the sacrifices

56:31

anymore, anything akin to that, because the

56:33

final sacrifice has been made and the

56:35

temple has been destroyed. All

56:37

right, so that's out. You want to keep

56:40

Passover? You want to keep Shabbat? Oh, great!

56:43

Do it! Knock yourself out. You want to

56:45

do Hanukkah? Great! There could

56:47

be all kinds of celebration that one participates in

56:49

if they want, Jewish or

56:51

Gentile. But if

56:53

you make the old law the substance of

56:55

our behavior and relation

56:58

to God, that somehow the new just gets

57:00

added on top of the

57:02

old, then that's confused. The

57:06

new replaces the old, and

57:10

it's able to replace the old

57:12

because the old gets its perfect

57:14

fulfillment in the person of Jesus.

57:16

There you go. Hope that helps, Tom. Thank you

57:18

for the question. Greg Coeckel here for

57:20

Stand to Reason. Give them a hand, friends.

57:22

Bye-bye.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features