0:00

Hello you awakening wonders,

0:02

there on Spotify, Apple,

0:04

Stinkwhistle, Gurgle Dot or

0:06

wherever you download your podcasts these

0:08

days to remain at least peripherally connected

0:11

to some tendril of truth in a

0:13

bewildering miasma of lies and propaganda.

0:15

We appreciate you and we love you,

0:17

you're part of our community. So that's

0:20

why we're very happy to give you

0:22

an audio version of our live Rumble

0:24

show five days a week. It's

0:26

on Monday and Friday, we decipher the

0:29

latest news stories, we break down current

0:31

topics that the mainstream media should be covering

0:33

and if they aren't then we

0:35

critique why they're not and what they

0:37

are covering. Every week as well right

0:40

we do brilliant conversations with people like

0:42

Jordan Peterson, RFK, Tucker Carlson, Sam Harris,

0:44

Fandana Shiva, Gabo Matto, these things are

0:46

already up and you can listen to

0:48

them now. So remember this is an

0:51

audio version of our daily live show.

0:53

To tune in live

0:55

go to rumble.com/Russell Brand. You'll

0:58

find it easily and I

1:00

hope that you will love it. Now

1:02

please enjoy this episode of Stay

1:04

Free with Russell Brand. Thanks. Hello

1:16

there you awakening wonders, thank you so

1:18

much for joining us today for Stay

1:20

Free with Russell Brand. If

1:22

you're watching this anywhere else in the world,

1:24

I don't mean here in this room,

1:26

I understand how space works, I

1:28

mean outside the platform of Rumble.

1:31

Rumble the platform that has stood

1:33

up boldly in Brazil and said

1:35

no more, no more

1:37

censorship. You will speak Portuguese

1:39

freely in Brazil, you will say whatever you

1:41

want to and if you want noticed that

1:44

once again the situation in

1:46

Brazil is demonstration that the

1:48

language of liberalism is used

1:50

to legitimize yet more authoritarianism and

1:52

yet more censorship. Let me know

1:54

if you have noticed that Extraordinary

1:57

phenomena for we will be

1:59

talking. About. Brazil.

2:01

And censorship and sale on mosques

2:03

position as the potential no soul

2:06

by significant opponent of this censorship

2:08

in Brazil and what we have

2:10

today we're all of us have

2:13

to do collectively for. The.

2:15

Messiah will not be a human messiah

2:17

that much. We surely know it will

2:19

be. No one's come and save us

2:22

in human form. Honor: think lemme know

2:24

you love. Think on that. With Una

2:26

Musk censorship we're going to be talking

2:28

a lot about some things of miss

2:31

cause did not dweller browns have been

2:33

awake choir laws I'm hoping that are

2:35

look at least well. I. Mean I'm

2:37

essentially looking for the Rumble trap mouth

2:39

for some form of compliments. If you

2:41

wanna support our content you can join

2:43

us becoming a white and wonder on

2:45

locals which is why we've got home

2:47

to get additional video every single week.

2:49

would program project paperclip this week which

2:51

other the sad and of not researchers

2:53

yes it's were at the end of

2:55

the Second World war whole bunch of

2:57

scientists were imported from a little a

3:00

drink or Germany to do some research

3:02

for Nasa and the like. Lemon as

3:04

you wanna get an additional bitter and

3:06

five his all of. The content will be

3:08

doing on locals. This week's got Roseanne Barr.

3:10

You may I join us tomorrow for a

3:12

conversation with Roseanne. Lot put your questions to

3:14

Roseanne. Sending you all of our

3:16

loved operation. Paperclip than a call it

3:18

the right thing to the site or

3:21

thanks So Listen has been extremely interesting

3:23

and peculiar time since we've been. One

3:25

is bright. Hope you've enjoyed some of

3:27

our conversations. Revive.a lap dog. Latter

3:29

part of. a lot of

3:31

pipes and the steve bannon shadows

3:34

pretty fantastic out of bronze to

3:36

thank you that has not been

3:38

a somebody or been in florida

3:40

a baby or been in the

3:42

seventies land of it in a

3:45

sweet lad afraid i'm i'm free

3:47

space vehicle florida and it seems

3:49

the absolutely fantastic thanks for the

3:51

compliment than i africa operation pay

3:54

perhaps as brunswick starbucks all this

3:56

is been extraordinary times even cosmic

3:58

events and celestial orchestration have

4:00

informed us that this is a magical

4:02

time and current president of

4:05

the United States of America

4:07

Joe Biden has advice for all

4:09

of us facing a topsy-turvy world

4:11

where they will become night and

4:13

night will become day Folks enjoy

4:16

the eclipse, we'll play it safe,

4:18

don't be

4:20

silly Don't

4:22

be silly in an eclipse, don't be silly

4:24

about it When the moon

4:27

crosses the sun, remain calm

4:29

I've seen people actually like, do you see

4:31

how everyone's trying to hijack that eclipse and

4:34

still go This eclipse will cause more c-

4:36

Get vaccinated from that eclipse! Like,

4:38

everyone's trying to say that it's

4:41

somehow connected to their single issue

4:43

But if one person has utilized

4:45

that eclipse for remarketing, it's

4:48

your friend And I know many of

4:50

you hope the next president of the United States

4:53

of America Yes In

5:24

the chat, Jardin68 goes, the eclipse

5:27

gave me fibrous white blood clots

5:30

It's pretty funny I tell you already,

5:32

you can see, like, say what you like

5:34

about Trump The guy knows how to meme

5:49

Oh my god! There

5:52

it is! Oh My

5:54

God! Promo

6:24

task of promo. The dude understands market

6:26

and there's no question about that. He's

6:28

also I think in the use of

6:30

that a silhouette showed us have a

6:32

good personality and a good sense of

6:34

humor about his own image and likeness

6:36

events. Or it's aid for our Muslim

6:38

brothers and sisters out there. Happy a

6:40

the other now the say on a

6:42

visit purple were saying it you know

6:44

about are now have set bus if

6:46

you all muslims copied to all of

6:48

you. If you are christian say I

6:50

hope you're enjoying this is the season

6:52

if you're an atheist. Sides come

6:54

on over to us. Join

6:56

our religious revolution by a

6:59

Holy Christ. I

7:01

pod slow fade role as a stupid

7:04

name a married our it was absolutely

7:06

bloody pointless. Doesn't even do anything, it's

7:08

made up later. Be bad for angry.

7:10

About five minutes into neither of us

7:13

would have thought him. and since you

7:15

can't not just introduce a draw, we've

7:17

gotta have some of that money to.

7:19

Apparently you'd be better off having a

7:21

simple cup of tea. Or my

7:24

is why no one in England.toby

7:26

as off that was ah have

7:28

that misinformation and this information on

7:30

malice my sense does a little

7:32

thing we used to have of

7:34

this bloody coup to jump agrees

7:36

that much about have a laugh

7:38

before centralized authoritarian forces vampiric. he

7:40

sucks the joy out Every aspect

7:42

of our last. smoking us to

7:44

did an unwinnable cold was a

7:46

brutal. he's other a not be

7:48

able to rise up together and

7:50

oppose this kind of peculiar fascism.

7:53

That has emerged been there are some people

7:55

we can rely on. There are some people

7:57

we can rely on to come from the

7:59

stuff. among. them, your friend and

8:01

mine, Tucker Carlson, in an

8:03

extraordinary position of kicking

8:05

off Kid Rock's tour. Like, Kid

8:07

Rock, I feel like he's an

8:10

old school, like, Billy Idol style

8:12

performer. Like I've not met

8:14

Kid Rock before, but I feel like, you know

8:16

there are some people you feel like it might

8:19

be hard to get on a relaxed, normal, alright

8:21

mate, how's it going Kid Rock? Like I feel

8:23

like he's always quite intense, I don't know, because

8:25

I don't know him, but Tucker Carlson's gone out

8:27

there and intro'd him on tour. Remember, if you're

8:29

watching us on YouTube or anywhere else, YouTube's not

8:31

personal, though corporations, didn't they say that they've got

8:33

the same rights as people? I don't know how

8:36

it works. Hey, if YouTube was a person, what

8:38

kind of person would they be? We

8:40

did a thing earlier, didn't we? Like a

8:43

little poll to see which platforms you trust. We'll show

8:45

you the results of that in a little while. Remember,

8:47

later we're going to be talking about Elon and Brazil,

8:50

we've got a whole bunch of fantastic

8:52

topics and subjects to discuss with you

8:54

on Rumble, the one platform that will

8:56

stand up and not even scream in

8:58

Brazil because of Brazil's lack of respect for free

9:00

speech. They're already out of France

9:02

because France wanted to ban Russia today. What worries

9:05

me is those are both likely World Cup winner

9:07

countries, so you could have, like you know, France

9:09

win a lot of World Cups. Brazil, they win

9:11

a lot of World Cups. You won't care because

9:13

you're likely an American of some description, are you?

9:16

We care about stuff like that and we care

9:18

about freedom and so does Tucker, but he also

9:20

is introducing Kid Rock. Let me see this,

9:22

I've not watched this yet. Tucker

10:00

making a lot of new friends out there.

10:03

As a comedian who has in the past performed

10:05

with musical acts, it's no joke. It's no fun

10:07

to have to go up on a stage and

10:09

sort of do talking and then like have bands

10:11

on. You remember I used to do things like

10:14

the MTV VMA Awards and stuff like that. That

10:17

is a pressurized environment, man. Thank you Heavenly

10:19

Father for releasing me from that. Tucker's been

10:21

on that show Kill Tony, so a lot

10:24

of people are saying he must have gone

10:26

on Rogan, which that's the first time I

10:28

figured those two have spoke together. That

10:30

would be interesting if that's what's gone down because

10:32

let's face it, the two of them are

10:35

dominant figures in American media and determine

10:37

more now, I suppose, the nature of

10:39

the conversation in public spaces than your

10:42

CNNs or your MSNBCs or

10:44

your Fox. It's fascinating. Gustavo XD

10:46

on the Rumble Chat saying, definitely getting fired

10:48

from Fox was the best thing ever

10:50

to happen to Tucker. Meanwhile,

10:52

Oopidoop says if YouTube was

10:54

a person, he would be

10:57

sensorial. Eid Mubarak. Thanks, man.

10:59

Thanks for giving me that phrase, mate.

11:02

Okay, let's have a look at Tucker

11:04

on Kill Tony. And Patterson, and high

11:06

five, and this is... My

11:10

grandma hates you, nigga. Hahahaha! Hahahaha!

11:13

Hahahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahaha!

11:15

Hahahaha! Hahahaha!

11:17

Hahahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahaha!

11:20

Hahahaha! Hahahaha! Hahahaha!

11:24

Hahahaha! It's good because

11:26

that's the use of N-word there

11:28

to call Tucker Carlson N-word. Nice.

11:31

That's good. There's no coming back

11:34

from that. Also, it's a grandma's loathing

11:36

that's being conveyed. Yep, I would say

11:38

that's near confirmation that there'll be two

11:40

to three hours of Joe Rogan and

11:43

Tucker Carlson coming soon. So, that's going

11:45

to be an interesting show for us

11:47

to check out. We're talking a lot

11:50

about censorship today. Later, we'll be talking

11:52

about Brazil's threatened censorship of X and

11:54

Rumble's departure. Rumble already departed

11:57

that nation in anticipation and...

12:00

in awareness of some of the censorship

12:02

that's already being implemented. We asked you

12:04

a little earlier what platforms you most

12:06

trust and you've said

12:08

Rumble X way, way, way more

12:10

than meta, your Googles and Alphabet

12:12

companies and that makes perfect sense.

12:15

So coming up in the show

12:17

later, we've got all sorts of

12:19

stuff about Elon Musk and elsewhere.

12:22

I mean, do you guys care about this anymore? Do

12:24

you care at all about, you

12:28

can't see my naked chest, it feels weird. Well,

12:30

it's there, it's all in there. Do you not

12:32

care anymore about what celebrities think about presidents? Evidently,

12:34

a lot of people do. Do you remember when

12:36

there was all that sort of chaos about who

12:38

Taylor Swift would be into and stuff? Do you

12:41

remember that? People like, remember like, and Joe Biden

12:43

posted that red eye picture of himself. I remember

12:45

the rock endorsed evidently Biden

12:47

at some point previously, but this is

12:49

an endorsement that he appears to be

12:51

withdrawing. Let's have a look at that.

12:54

You met that North in 2020, are you happy with

12:56

the state of America? Am

12:59

I happy with the state of America right now?

13:01

Well, that answer is no. Do I believe we're

13:03

gonna get better? I believe in that. I'm an

13:05

optimistic guy and I believe we can get better.

13:10

The endorsement that I made years

13:12

ago with Biden was

13:14

one I thought was the best decision for me at

13:17

that time. And I thought back then, when

13:19

we talk about, hey, I'm in this

13:21

position where I have

13:23

some influence and it's

13:26

my job then. I felt like

13:29

that then. It's my job now to

13:31

exercise my influence and share with, this

13:34

is who I'm gonna endorse. Am I gonna

13:36

do that again this year? That answer is no. There

13:39

you go, that's interesting. Is it, a lot of you are

13:41

saying that you don't care. You

13:44

don't care about that. And I suppose, look, I've

13:47

been on a journey of celebrity myself where I

13:49

was on that carousel

13:51

and immersed in that world already today.

13:54

I've mentioned VMAs and

13:56

sometimes like maybe I'll see a bit of SNL and

13:58

think, wow, I hosted that. Or I'll see. rolling

14:00

stone, wow I was on the cover of that and now

14:03

I am a, what do you say,

14:05

apostate of that world. You

14:07

know it's a sickly

14:09

seductive dark, dark world as is

14:11

being experienced now because barely a

14:13

day goes by when you don't

14:15

hear yet more, even rumours and

14:18

obviously I've been the subject of

14:20

scourless untrue rumours myself so I'm

14:22

pretty cautious about repeating them but

14:24

by God it seems like a dark,

14:26

dark world doesn't it Hollywood. The, this

14:29

is an interesting story, let me know what you

14:31

think about this in the chat right because Trump

14:34

has told billionaires he'll keep taxes low

14:36

okay and that's, I guess if

14:39

you're a fundraiser these are the kind of

14:41

things people say. Now how is this being

14:43

covered by MSNBC and CNN and all that

14:45

kind of stuff, how are they covering that?

14:48

Are they attacking Trump for that? Because and if

14:50

so why are they

14:52

not more transparent about this? You know

14:54

like it was a moment for me

14:57

when I heard that Joe Biden told like

14:59

Wall Street financiers and stuff that nothing

15:01

would fundamentally change if he were elected. I

15:04

thought what is all this hysteria about? What

15:07

is all of the condemnation of

15:09

Trump, that wall to wall damnation?

15:12

What is it about when Joe

15:14

Biden has told the powerful

15:16

plainly and in plain sight

15:19

that he ain't going to do

15:21

nothing to impair or impede their

15:23

agenda? Pretty extraordinary. Over

15:25

the course of this week we're looking

15:27

more and more about how public spaces

15:30

are controlled and curated. Like even when

15:32

something like that, it's not a whistleblower

15:34

is it, when that sting operation has

15:37

been pulled on that CIA and

15:39

FBI operative where they admit that

15:41

they've been nudging and

15:44

implementing measures against Alex

15:46

Jones. You think how come

15:48

these stories don't gain more traction?

15:50

How come like you know when

15:52

Aaron Bushnell sets himself on fire

15:55

and posts it as an anti-war

15:57

protest is kind of scrubbed from

15:59

the internet. It's not easy to find that

16:01

image now. Imagine if that protest, as I've said

16:03

to you before, had been demonstrating

16:05

against something that could be utilized by

16:08

the establishment. You'd have an Aaron Bushnell

16:10

day by now. There ain't no Aaron

16:12

Bushnell day. So let's

16:15

have a look at one of the measures

16:17

by which information is funded. The creation of

16:19

that category of misinformation in

16:22

and of itself. Here's a

16:24

new extraordinary piece of anti-misinformation

16:27

propaganda. This is a US government

16:29

funded comic book that tries to

16:31

give us all some new perspectives.

16:34

Flower Power 678, why don't you allow free speech on your

16:36

ex account? I do allow it. You know that ex account,

16:39

I just post stuff on there. You can do what you

16:41

want on there, mate. You can do what you want on

16:43

there. Real

16:46

Fake, the first graphic novel in

16:48

Fizzo's Resilience series explores the deceitful

16:51

tactics of disinformation. Follow

16:54

protagonist Rachel Wannandre as they travel the

16:56

world and expose a vast network of

16:59

people who are manipulating. They're going around on a

17:01

private jet. Anyway, I would say that they're very,

17:04

very well funded. Content

17:06

and pushing American voters to the brink. With

17:10

elections coming up, we'll be able to follow the

17:13

trail of deep fakes. How really?

17:16

Send synthetic media and stop the

17:18

real assailants from causing

17:20

chaos, confusion and division. Look

17:28

at the badge of the people that sort of is making it. Like

17:34

that, that's CISO, Cyber

17:36

Security and Infrastructure Security Agency.

17:38

It's like an eagle with a badge and

17:41

like a circuit board on its wing. That's

17:43

not a bad bit of design. It's actually

17:45

quite beautiful. But that does not fill

17:47

me with confidence. Why

17:49

Does Russell talk about American news? Well, because I

17:51

believe that America is still the most powerful nation

17:54

in the world that generates the most powerful information.

18:00

The Commons. Their politics. not only

18:02

the United States, but of many

18:04

many nations. And even though a

18:06

country like yours is becoming subordinates

18:08

groups like night or in particular

18:10

we got some interesting information on

18:13

how Nato are trying to trump

18:15

prove their funding coming up a

18:17

little like Us, American culture still

18:19

determines the agenda and events affects

18:21

many many lives. Would you agree

18:24

that with your Americans or noise

18:26

America after all gave us the

18:28

F B I and the Cia.

18:30

See him as America that gave us

18:32

the deep state. I'm not saying that

18:35

the Kgb a powerful or that their

18:37

communist party in China dogs have their

18:39

own steep site power. Thoughts: Have a

18:42

look at this this reason sting operation

18:44

where a Cia officer was caught bragging

18:46

about being able to put right wing

18:49

journalists in jail. How the F B

18:51

I had a Insiders and Asians are

18:53

jammy Six Happy Birthday shown. Pay happy

18:56

Birthday Just a simple request. Best us

18:58

we've got a you after. A

19:00

recognizes the most powerful nation in the

19:02

world for some of the most powerful

19:04

and influential agencies in the world and

19:06

their power goes way beyond American politics

19:09

and what was on your experience is

19:11

the criminalization and demonization of entire segments

19:13

of the population. Courses began with Trump

19:15

A prior to the as he didn't

19:17

begin because the F B I belongs

19:20

on operations are again for your Muslim

19:22

South and it during the Civil Rights

19:24

movement they were for continually looking for

19:26

ways to criminalize. And Bring Sounds

19:28

activists, and evidently. Alex Jones is

19:30

now dinner Elise has grounds for a

19:33

case in says he's gonna say the

19:35

F, B, I and C. I often

19:37

seeing this incredible staying will show you

19:39

a little bad ass courses with us

19:41

in A but. says. His

19:43

wife Joan said this is a. Boss.

19:49

His contract overlords operate at

19:51

a boss. Excessive.

19:54

She's saying all of this and

19:56

add it all of this like

19:58

it's no big deal. He needs

20:00

to be subpoenaed by congress or I am

20:03

planning our to watch. The lawsuits are are

20:05

just the Cia and the up the odds

20:07

we have to bring all the south. Noisy.

20:10

You are So the reason for that

20:12

of course is because of this thing

20:15

of her. I since they seem to

20:17

as I recall from our friend James

20:19

are t through good. He's staying against

20:21

that dude from Pfizer. Often it

20:24

seems to take the form. Of

20:26

the same sex date and as

20:28

I don't know una details but

20:30

this seems to be a same

20:32

sex bates think also is pretty

20:34

interesting his a Cia office our

20:36

lisa Cia officials bragging about been

20:38

output right wing journalists in jail

20:41

or potentially Vfb. I were present

20:43

on Jan receipts and that I've

20:45

been specifically Target and I still

20:47

have look from the bureau is

20:49

in progress Far enough to be

20:51

suffered from Isis is one of

20:53

the want to. Save

20:57

your site and you're looking to

20:59

your phone Lie that that date

21:01

I'm going anywhere gathered in South

21:03

Not only loose lips sink ships

21:05

when it comes to try and

21:07

about sci secrets, when you're the

21:10

eye contact asked questions or do

21:12

you do? oh that's interesting. canoeing

21:14

as a major loss since. The

21:18

details in the to do. Is

21:26

lisa situations where may have no choice that

21:28

an. Estimate.

21:31

Of my own have a hobby mad

21:33

point of soup set of up your

21:35

to put him in a situation where

21:37

they're unable but death on their impulses

21:39

and in a minute when he does

21:41

crossing the line he demonstrates the line

21:43

that can be crossed as a so

21:46

of have some so a blood oath

21:48

camp fish swimming across a shoreline of

21:50

and. It's

21:52

a fine line. Is

21:55

bill passes from a fine line.

21:59

is it Not officially. We

22:01

get as close as we can to it without

22:04

doing it. So

22:07

they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing

22:09

things that they don't... Yeah, we

22:12

call it a nudge. A nudge. A nudge.

22:15

Mmm. Sometimes you just gotta get in quick real

22:17

quick. Just to see what happens, right? How does

22:19

that happen? You put

22:21

a post out there or

22:23

you... Sweetest CIA official

22:25

I've ever... Just set them up.

22:28

You play little games with

22:30

their minds and with their emotions. We have

22:32

some fake profiles, they've been saying that triggers...

22:34

We already know what's gonna trigger them. We

22:37

already know what's gonna trigger them. If we're

22:39

to that point, we already know everything about

22:41

it. So we're like, oh, that's a

22:43

system. Oh! Sometimes

22:46

you like the fuse and just wait for it to

22:48

follow, right? Like a railing. Like

22:51

a, oh! So when a railing happens...

22:53

A journalist who's doing great work there

22:55

at Sound Investigations is overplaying

22:57

the part of their... Oh!

23:00

Tell me more, tell me more! Did they get very far? Ah

23:03

ha do do, ah ha do do, ah

23:05

ha do do do do do. Sometimes the

23:07

bureau behind it... Sometimes... Nothing

23:10

with putting a fake social media thing, but like really good

23:12

people may have. Mmm-hmm. Post

23:14

fake news. Sometimes it's... Man,

23:17

isn't it? We've just seen that

23:19

the government are spending money creating

23:22

comic books to warn us of

23:25

the problems of fake news and

23:27

misinformation, while a deep state CIA

23:29

official admits that they create

23:32

fake posts themselves. So the

23:34

government are preventing other people,

23:36

institutions and organizations doing what

23:39

they do. So there

23:41

is no morality, there are no values,

23:43

there is simple utility. If something is

23:45

useful to them, they'll do it, but

23:47

you are not allowed to do it.

23:49

Fake? It's embellished a

23:51

little bit. It would be like a big

23:54

influence to your... influence to the

23:56

ear after... Like a... I

23:59

don't know, like a... I

24:01

mean you know the things like a fucking or center on.

24:08

E O two the biggest smiles like

24:10

that would. Limit said. That

24:14

even. Though

24:17

we were after him, he was. More

24:25

evidence that what the establishment engage

24:27

in the is more fair where

24:29

they. Engage in legal complexity,

24:32

opponents or dissidents in order to

24:34

drain their resources. Were the last

24:36

Donald Trump or Alex Jones or

24:39

Ad In for Night and any

24:41

truly dissidents or dissenting voice my

24:43

face a series of measures to

24:46

bring them down, but the common

24:48

problem is descent and the ability

24:50

to convey information to you that

24:53

may make you less obedient. A

24:55

more complex let me know in

24:57

the chat whether or not you

25:00

think Alex. Jones has got case against

25:02

the Cia. Why? or and and we are

25:04

going to have to leave you tube right

25:06

now because we're gonna be. So what are

25:08

a loan on Brazil? When to be talking

25:10

a lot about the a crime or going

25:12

to be talking about Nato Trump proving their

25:14

funding. Before I leave you guys on

25:16

you tube I want to indoors and

25:18

am ends. This is a potential therapy

25:20

for age related diseases and ultimately I

25:22

can affect this all cardiovascular disease. Neurodegenerative

25:25

disorders Diabetes Big

25:27

Pharma. One a monopolize

25:30

charging thousands. Of dollars in some

25:32

cases and taken away your rights. The non

25:34

pharmaceutical. Alternatives you know what he has

25:36

the I like they are well I would

25:39

say due to their funding models and due

25:41

to recent events and as the opioid crisis

25:43

or the Corona virus period not worthy of

25:45

our trust transitioning. And him into a

25:47

drug Could inflight costs and prescription face

25:50

up there. And this is ridiculous. Thirty

25:52

thousand dollars The almighty Completely unattainable without

25:54

insurance. Black Forest partnered with Natural Products

25:56

Association and of fighting as the if

25:59

the ice. This stance on eminence this

26:01

amazing but for a supplemental become the first

26:03

anti aging as the I approved drugs were,

26:05

you wouldn't wouldn't A prescription to buy is

26:08

going to cost you a bunch. So fight

26:10

against Big Pharma and if the ice corruption

26:12

as well as Fi in time itself law

26:14

against time by this and I'm in. And

26:17

if you use this a code that we've

26:19

got a veil know that there are those

26:21

of us are working so please their got

26:23

a bribe for. supplements.com force less wrestled

26:25

you get twenty five percent off. By

26:28

the way, under round will know that

26:30

Arabs. Work which is good for our business. Scuse

26:32

me. Hold

26:35

on a minute to not just button myself

26:37

right back into adolescence. I think that it's

26:39

I will leaving do if he watches on

26:41

you tube now of runs a rumble we

26:43

can We talk about a loans and Brazil.

26:45

We're going to talk a lot more about

26:48

the censorship wolf We've got so much to

26:50

discuss with you you might want to become

26:52

an away from wonders. You can join us

26:54

Live rock conversations with Roseanne Barr some are

26:56

have a more importantly you will be part

26:58

of a movement the opposes corruption across the

27:00

world that believes in your individual sovereignty, freedom

27:03

and ability. To. Self determined while

27:05

building communities of joy on one.together Whether

27:07

you are religious, no religious, we believe

27:09

in the glory for all of you.

27:11

See you in a few seconds. Click

27:13

the link in the description. come on

27:16

over to run the broke my nose

27:18

is not broken. Kenzie was wrong with

27:20

yeah Ok guys so us we finish

27:22

off that laughing with covered that the

27:24

Alex Jones thinks this is fascinating about.

27:27

They are on of ends in the

27:29

Ukraine more. This is a comparable story

27:31

in some ways about how democracy and

27:33

freedom of. Heads, for example, Nato

27:35

or Trump proofing Ukraine. I'd

27:37

so stanza innocent at subversion

27:39

of democracy and a subordination

27:42

of national sovereignty in order

27:44

to ensure ongoing perpetuation. Forgive

27:46

the to tolerate of an

27:48

unpopular war and people that

27:50

happened to be anti Trump

27:52

will ring or that's a

27:54

great thing. Simply. Because

27:56

they are anti Trump and god knows is a

27:58

lot of on a Trump messaging out. Their coaching

28:00

people to distrust Donald Trump and here

28:02

are you know where I stand on.

28:04

they saw no show the we should

28:06

be working within those models at all.

28:08

I believe in decentralization on the empowerment

28:10

of your community I think is the

28:12

only by first us go over some

28:14

of the tanks is a defining the

28:16

world right now but the people that

28:18

supportive of Nato's ability to trump prove

28:20

Ukraine I'd are short termist in their

28:22

think it's cause you may not agree

28:24

with the next time Before they say

28:26

several of our former Prime Minister David

28:28

Cameron admit it publicly. But

28:30

the Ukraine, Russia conflict.

28:32

In spite of the hundreds or thousands

28:34

of lives lost and inspired is devastation,

28:37

evident corruption and media deception and to

28:39

say is good value for money? Look

28:41

at the way that they see the

28:43

world in economic terms know in humans

28:45

have let me know If you think

28:47

that's. Kind of the ferry and

28:49

in some way to even place a

28:52

monetary value on something as devastating and

28:54

terrifying as war since me, I argue

28:56

that it is extremely good value for

28:59

money for the United States and for

29:01

others. Com pops group by five or

29:03

ten percent of your defense budget was

29:05

half of Russia's free will Military equipment

29:08

is war is a Baltimore States five

29:10

percent. Ten percent of we can annoy

29:12

like the entire book and region. Since

29:15

no money last set my money back,

29:17

no income. Tax of the I

29:19

take been destroyed For without the

29:21

most the single American life. This

29:24

is an investment in United States

29:26

securities. How does that? Sally with

29:28

the. Ongoing for

29:31

up till now about.

29:34

this is humanitarian more the

29:37

we have a duty to

29:39

support ukraine and ukraine are

29:41

being attacked by and an

29:43

unprovoked was extraordinary about lack

29:45

of morality suddenly and occasionally

29:47

you will witness symptoms of

29:49

a deeper truth you will

29:51

say that these geopolitical conflicts

29:53

are the observable signs of

29:55

advancing globalism on an attempt

29:57

in many people's view to

29:59

korea a one world government which you can

30:01

oppose by becoming an awakened wonder. Have you seen this thing?

30:03

This is our item of the week this week. I've not

30:05

worn this one yet, but have I worn it? I think

30:07

I've had a little go in it. Have a look at

30:09

this thing. Can you guys see it? This

30:12

week, the 25% off this glorious item. Let me

30:15

know if you fancy it. Now check this out.

30:19

NATO to ensure that even in

30:21

the event of a Trump victory,

30:23

they will be able to continue

30:25

to wage war, proxy

30:28

war in fact, between

30:30

Ukraine and Russia by protecting their aid.

30:32

This is an extraordinary story and a

30:34

great indicator of how the politics of

30:37

your nation and the world at large

30:39

play out now. In the

30:41

event that you might vote for a

30:43

president or any politician that is anti-war

30:46

or anti-globalism more broadly, I would argue,

30:48

the globalist machine will find a

30:50

means to ensure that its agenda

30:52

can still be pursued. And I

30:54

would say that this is, aside

30:56

from the bureaucratic language and legalese

30:58

and the peculiar normalization of a

31:01

war-like geopolitical agenda, this is evidence

31:03

of that. Have a look. NATO

31:06

foreign ministers met on Wednesday to discuss a

31:08

proposal for a 100 billion euro five-year

31:12

fund. It is a plan seen

31:14

as a way to Trump-proof aid

31:16

for Ukraine. The proposals would give

31:18

the Western Alliance a more direct

31:20

role in coordinating the supply of

31:23

arms, ammunition and equipment to Kiev

31:25

as it fights Russia's invasion, diplomats

31:27

say. Speaking before the meeting,

31:29

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said the

31:31

proposal aims to send a message to

31:33

Russia that it cannot win the war.

31:35

What is obvious is that we need

31:37

new and more money for Ukraine and

31:40

we need it over many years. And

31:43

the whole idea of now discussing frameworks,

31:45

commitments, an institutionalized

31:48

framework for

31:51

the support is to ensure more

31:53

predictability. It's like gym membership. It's like

31:55

they're trying to get you to sign

31:58

up for more years of war. without

32:00

the possibility to withdraw. As

32:03

if we're supposed to forget what

32:05

happened for a decade in Afghanistan

32:07

and the two trillion dollars that

32:09

that conflict cost and

32:11

for what. Because now there

32:13

are ongoing very public conversations

32:15

and public opposition to both

32:17

the conflicts in the Middle

32:19

East and this war there

32:22

is an attempt to bypass

32:24

public opinion, to shut down

32:26

dissent and to ensure most

32:28

importantly of all that the

32:30

funding can continue uninterrupted

32:33

excuse me regardless

32:35

of very obvious

32:37

public opposition. You

32:40

will notice that across the world

32:42

there appear to be ongoing pilot

32:44

schemes whether it's for censorship or

32:46

extreme measures during the coronavirus pandemic

32:48

that sometimes play out in nations

32:51

like Australia or Canada almost as

32:53

if we're being prepared for new

32:55

globalist measures the legitimization of further

32:58

authoritarianism. It's happening right now

33:00

in Brazil a Brazilian Supreme Court

33:02

judge is introducing new measures to

33:04

legitimize censorship and control of social

33:06

media platforms. Rumble has already left

33:08

Brazil because they don't want to

33:10

be bogged down and tied up

33:12

in this type of censorship and

33:14

this type of corruption. Now what

33:16

you will remember is when Bolsonaro

33:18

was in office he was regarded

33:20

as the Brazilian Trump. We got

33:22

to get rid of this guy

33:25

he's a tyrant he's a dictator

33:27

he's an authoritarian lunatic we got

33:29

to bring in Lula da Silva

33:31

a liberal politician a person who's

33:33

gonna bring freedom back to

33:35

Brazil and yet under the

33:37

guise of neoliberalism we're seeing

33:39

more authoritarianism more censorship

33:42

this is extraordinary. Now

33:44

whatever you think of Elon Musk when it comes to

33:46

matters such as these as you

33:48

will see Michael Schallenberg as say in

33:51

a minute he is uniquely positioned and

33:53

empowered to oppose the type of censorship

33:55

that will affect all of

33:57

us sooner or later because increasingly

33:59

it becomes clear to me that

34:02

once the terrorist was regarded as

34:04

a foreign invader and a mad

34:07

renegade. But increasingly this term terrorist could

34:09

be applied to you or to me

34:12

or to any dissenting voice. Let's

34:14

have a look at how Brazil are

34:16

now using censorship laws that would have

34:18

been unthinkable a few years ago, how

34:20

Elon Musk is opposing it and what we're

34:23

all going to have to do if we

34:25

don't want Brazil to become a test case

34:27

for global censorship. We've seen it in Canada,

34:29

we've seen it in our country, the UK,

34:32

online censorship bills. They're not being fully utilised

34:34

and pushed yet, but you can bet they

34:36

will be. And notably we've

34:38

seen it in Ireland with their new

34:41

hate speech laws. You have to firstly

34:43

demonise the public, legitimise the use of

34:45

moral authority and I believe that an

34:47

integral part of it when there's a globalist

34:49

model that's being craved and worked towards

34:52

is piloting it in territories where you

34:54

might be able to get away with

34:56

a little more. Let's see how this

34:58

Brazil thing plays out and let's have

35:00

a look at some legacy media reporting

35:02

on the story to kick us off.

35:04

Musk says he will challenge an order

35:06

by a Supreme Court judge in Brazil

35:08

who ordered his company X, formerly known

35:10

as Twitter, to block some accounts. In

35:12

a post on X, Musk accused the

35:14

judge of violating Brazil's constitution and he

35:16

called for him to resign or be

35:18

impeached. The judge has been involved in efforts to

35:20

crack down on... So it's unconstitutional,

35:22

brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the

35:25

constitution and people of Brazil.

35:27

He should resign or be

35:29

impeached. Imagine these measures

35:31

were being passed under Bolsonaro. They

35:34

would have said, see the Brazilian

35:36

Trump fear these right

35:38

wing populist figures, these

35:41

neo 20th century dictators. We've got

35:43

to shut them down. And yet once again,

35:45

it's under the guise of liberalism that

35:48

we're seeing this authoritarianism being

35:50

legitimised. Information in Brazil

35:52

and threatened to impose heavy fines

35:54

for any reactivation of the

35:56

accounts in question. So

35:58

Is it only sensible... ship when it's

36:00

used to shut down the free speech

36:03

of people who you think should be

36:05

silenced or is the principle of free

36:07

speech something that you would afford to

36:10

those that most oppose you clearly is

36:12

allow this True Michael Shellenberger friend Michelle

36:14

great journalist in my view has spoken

36:17

out on this is have a look

36:19

This is Michael Sullenberger reporting from Sao

36:21

Paulo, Brazil. Last. Night around

36:23

eight Pm local time Federal Supreme

36:25

Court Justice Alexandre Dumas Dice announced

36:27

the criminal investigation into Human Mosque,

36:30

the owner of acts grammarly known

36:32

as Twitter for allegedly spreading disinformation,

36:34

obstructing justice, and allowing people who

36:36

do more. I had been from

36:38

social media to freely express their

36:40

views gym what I said he

36:42

would find x twenty thousand dollars

36:44

per day for every band person

36:46

who must allow us to speak.

36:49

As a similar Isis taken Brazil one

36:51

step closer to being a dictatorship, What's.

36:53

More, the events of the last few weeks

36:55

make clear that Human Mosque is the only

36:58

thing seen in the way of global to

37:00

told terrorism. Without free speech, there can be

37:02

no democracy. If X goes down,

37:04

we must continue to fight. We. Can

37:06

continue to communicate through email and other

37:08

social media platforms such as Facebook. But.

37:11

Email is no substitute for

37:13

the capacity of social media

37:15

platforms to share information instantaneously

37:17

with millions of people is

37:19

extraordinary. That a platform of

37:21

that scale on a person

37:23

who wields the kind of

37:25

financial and political and social

37:27

power that Elon Musk currently

37:29

at size can be opposed

37:31

in this wife is extraordinary

37:33

To make the free speech

37:35

appears now to be I

37:37

knew a bomb us the

37:39

A Really When people. Talk about

37:42

free speech and censorship style. Continually

37:44

read: collaborate in more free space,

37:46

cause issues more is legitimate to

37:48

censor and control now. Rumble somewhat

37:50

know billie one has to say

37:53

had already left Brazil precisely because

37:55

I don't want to be subject

37:57

to this topic compromises and know

37:59

about. These kind of finds that why

38:01

do you think about Elon musk? You

38:03

know, cause he's got high interest. He

38:05

got interest in electronic vehicles is got

38:07

interest. In satellites and space exploration

38:10

is even. Got interesting fire extinguishers

38:12

when it comes to this issue.

38:14

Even Musk says he is on

38:16

appears to be behaving like a

38:18

free speech. Absolute is if Brazil

38:20

are able to ultimately prevent X

38:22

from freely publishing and are able

38:25

to ensure through finds that X

38:27

Senses Sir and accounts presumably to

38:29

shut down opponents of the style.

38:31

Of course I'm on site all

38:33

their opponents of the site. As

38:35

I say this information or misinformation.

38:38

This is another step towards. The kind

38:40

of centralized totalitarianism. I think all

38:42

of you in the Freedom Movement

38:44

all terrified of her, for all

38:46

of us are collectively trying to

38:48

oppose. You've heard that the A

38:50

are implementing comparable measures. You know

38:52

the in Ireland hate laws are

38:55

being proposed. The would mean that

38:57

the police would have the right

38:59

to come in, search your house,

39:01

search your devices. You're aware from

39:03

the story was just saying about

39:05

Alex Jones that the Deep State

39:07

confess that I themselves publish. Information

39:09

that I know not to be truth

39:12

in order to buy unprovoked and control

39:14

and shop down this sense is an

39:16

extraordinary moment for all of us this

39:19

have a looker Elon Musks explanation on

39:21

his own platform. acts with were roots

39:23

of getting these demands from. Or

39:27

the served. Drugs.

39:29

Or Alexander. That

39:32

says that his name on twitter

39:34

of that Alexander. Even

39:37

a low musk still cause it to

39:39

our butts. Are you going to get

39:41

this rebrand over? If musk forget his

39:44

buddies be called at smell of there

39:46

would be to suspend that sounds. Immediately.

39:50

Were given topic be two hours to suspend

39:52

of account or for his massive fires. And

39:55

the before the final straw is what we

39:58

were swoop been different demands to says. Than

40:00

sitting sitting members of the

40:02

parliament and major Federalists. And

40:06

moreover we could not tell them that

40:08

it's a bus was at the behest

40:10

of fab as undeveloped Ross with we

40:12

have to pretend that it was due

40:14

to our rules of service. And

40:16

that was the final straw. And we said no. is

40:20

extraordinary. I suppose what we being

40:22

invited to do. Is. Ignore

40:24

that principles are being violated.

40:27

Which. Many people are willing to

40:29

do just because of the side

40:31

of the argument I happened to

40:33

be on. They'll be many people

40:35

that because of their disdain for

40:37

Donald Trump will not know is

40:39

how terrifying is that night out?

40:42

A bypassing the national sovereign a

40:44

of the nation of America let

40:46

alone the population of America by

40:48

ensuring that the funding model for

40:50

the ongoing Ukraine, Russia conflict is

40:52

protected in the event of a

40:54

Trump presidency is seems that even

40:56

becoming. President of the United States is

40:59

not enough to ensure that democracy endures

41:01

when it comes to what's happening now

41:03

in the nation of Brazil. With it

41:05

you know cause when Trump and mosque

41:07

little bit about some of the most

41:09

powerful and to authoritarian voices I don't

41:11

know if you like Elon musk with

41:13

on from another be people here watching

41:15

this the low the lawn masks that

41:17

love Donald Trump said despair of me.

41:20

That's why it's important. Have values and principles.

41:22

Good Evil Values and principles. The personality the

41:24

North I relevant. Do I believe in free

41:26

space? Yes. Do I recognize that is at

41:28

the value of free speech means the I

41:30

will sometimes he is based I disagree with

41:32

and in fact that has to be the

41:35

space the I can see the most valuable

41:37

and most worthy protection. Will. then now

41:39

we can have an argument about

41:41

morality and philosophy and all of

41:43

those things can happen in a

41:45

democratic forum spot for now what

41:47

we are all somali eva from

41:49

passivity or by active endorsements engaging

41:51

in his the legitimization of further

41:53

authoritarianism let's look at this in

41:55

a little more detail or deceased

41:57

from public alexander them all right

42:00

Morais, Brazil's powerful president of

42:02

the Superior Electoral Court and

42:04

Supreme Federal Court Justice, on

42:06

Sunday ordered the federal police

42:08

to launch a digital malicious

42:10

investigation prompted by ex-owner Elon

42:12

Musk's conduct. Musk

42:14

was posting about restrictions imposed on

42:17

accounts on X at the behest

42:19

of Brazil's authorities, and on Sunday

42:21

said he would publish everything demanded

42:23

by Morais and how those requests

42:26

violate Brazilian law. He also called

42:28

for external justice Alexandre de Morais

42:30

to resign or to be impeached. Since

42:33

taking office, President Lula da Silva

42:35

has massively increased government funding of

42:37

the mainstream corporate news media, most

42:40

of which are encouraging increased censorship.

42:42

I always think this when you

42:44

see a dissident being attacked. And

42:46

obviously, I'm not pretending that I've

42:48

not been personally affected by that.

42:50

I have. But the legacy media

42:53

are not neutral observers. They got

42:55

skin in the game. They are

42:57

heavily invested in shutting down independent

42:59

media. And as your

43:01

great comedian George Carlin said,

43:03

where interests converge, no

43:06

conspiracy is required. If

43:08

the state want people on

43:10

lockdown, if Big Pharma want people

43:12

to take a medication, if

43:15

the legacy media receive a significant amount

43:17

of their funding from Big Pharma,

43:19

those interests converge. No conspiracy is

43:21

required. I'm not saying that there

43:23

isn't a conspiracy. But as you

43:25

know, on this channel, we believe

43:27

it is important to corroborate our

43:29

claims. Plainly what's

43:31

happening in Brazil is the

43:33

simultaneous subsidy of corporate media

43:36

in exchange, I

43:38

would assume, for their

43:40

support of Lula's presidency.

43:42

And in conjunction with that, more

43:45

draconian and punitive measures for

43:47

social media, but in particular,

43:49

independent media operatives utilizing

43:52

those platforms. If they can do it in Brazil,

43:55

they can do it in America, they can do

43:57

it in the UK. Already rumble

43:59

of less. France, Rumble are out of

44:01

Brazil. I'm not saying Rumble is a

44:03

perfect platform but they have been perfect

44:05

when it comes to the principle of

44:08

free speech saying simply this we

44:10

don't get involved in what the

44:12

content creators create we simply provide

44:14

a platform that leaves the moral

44:16

choices to you. You can decide

44:18

whether you like me or trust

44:20

me or don't like me or

44:22

think I'm lying that's entirely up

44:24

to you and I would

44:26

say that that discernment your ability to

44:29

decide for yourself where your government's

44:31

lying the judiciary are lying the

44:33

legacy media are lying that is

44:35

your freedom don't allow anybody in

44:37

that space between you and what

44:39

I would call God and what you might call

44:42

intuition there's no way

44:44

that we can legitimize or

44:46

allow the legitimization of authoritarianism

44:48

of this nature this is

44:50

cause for I would

44:52

say deep concern since taking

44:54

office I've mentioned to you

44:57

he's massively increased government funding Maurice illegally

44:59

demanded that Twitter reveal private information about

45:01

Twitter users we've seen more of this

45:03

we've seen Google given a cache of

45:06

information we've seen your American government using

45:09

private firms to capture

45:11

information which they then

45:13

purchase bypassing laws that

45:15

prevent them doing that

45:17

directly. Twitter users who used

45:19

hashtags he considered inappropriate he demanded access

45:21

to Twitter's internal data violating the platforms

45:24

policy let alone never mind the platforms

45:26

policy what about the laws of that

45:28

nation he censored on

45:30

his own initiative and without any

45:32

respect for due process posts on

45:34

Twitter by parliamentarians from the Brazilian

45:36

Congress and Maurice tried to turn

45:38

Twitter's content moderation policies into a

45:40

weapon against the pause of then

45:42

president Gere Bolsonaro remember that guy was the

45:44

baddie do you remember that do you remember

45:46

that you rarely mentioned that in America when

45:49

you do you get it wrong listen man

45:51

well this is you check those sources you

45:53

check that you can check the sources our

45:55

sources are here for you to observe yourself

45:57

the Twitter files also revealed that Google Facebook

46:00

Uber, WhatsApp and Instagram betrayed the

46:02

people of Brazil. They provided the

46:04

Brazilian government with personal registration data

46:06

and telephone numbers without a court

46:08

order, therefore violating the law. Oh

46:10

well, if you've done nothing wrong,

46:12

you've got nothing to hide. Yeah,

46:14

well let's just hope that one

46:16

day the stuff you care about, the stuff you

46:19

believe in doesn't transgress the

46:21

internal policies of an increasingly

46:23

authoritarian Brazilian government, and yet more

46:25

terrifyingly than that, even though Brazil is

46:28

of course one of the most populous and glorious

46:30

nations on this planet, an entire planet

46:33

yielding to this kind of mentality. When

46:36

Twitter refused to provide Brazilian authorities

46:38

with private user information, including direct

46:41

messages, the government attempted to sue

46:43

Twitter's top Brazilian lawyer. Mark

46:45

Zuckerberg, the owner of Facebook, abandoned his

46:47

principled free speech position in 2020 after

46:51

three years of relentless pressure

46:53

from activist NGOs, Democrats and

46:55

corporate advertisers. Today,

46:57

Facebook actively represses the spread of

46:59

news. Indeed, you will

47:02

recall that Instagram just

47:04

slyly, suddenly, without any

47:06

announcement or fanfare, just

47:09

flipped a switch within the app that

47:11

meant you will not see news on

47:13

that platform unless you directly

47:16

request it. And I can already see

47:18

that the way that some of our

47:20

posts are being received on that platform

47:22

has been impacted. They're not

47:25

trying to protect you. You would have to

47:27

have almost limitless trust in their motives to

47:29

believe that this is anything other than

47:31

the protection and assertion of power.

47:35

But I will say that they've introduced me to a

47:37

pretty novel concept. For the first time ever there, I

47:39

felt, except for when I was watching the social network

47:41

movie, I felt a little bit sorry for Mark Zuckerberg

47:43

because it feels like, well, even though he's one of

47:45

the world's most powerful men, he's only powerful in that

47:48

role. He's only powerful if

47:50

he complies. He only has the

47:52

power to support the system, getting

47:54

pressure from NGOs, Democrats, corporate advertisers.

47:57

He's a human being like you and me,

47:59

and he is a part of the system.

48:01

system and a part of the machine. And

48:03

I guess, again, whatever you think about Elon

48:05

Musk, he ain't yielding. So I

48:08

know a lot of people, I see cynicism and

48:10

I see people attacking me. I see people attacking

48:12

all sorts of people. But

48:15

he is standing up, he's participating in

48:17

the fight right now when it comes to this

48:19

issue. The mainstream corporate news

48:21

media have never been more corrupt and

48:23

totalitarian with few exceptions. They spread government

48:25

propaganda as a matter of policy. They

48:28

demand censorship more than the corporate media,

48:30

which benefit from governments shutting down their

48:33

competitors. Again, this is something I can

48:35

speak about with some personal

48:37

experience and understanding. The legacy

48:39

media want to destroy independent

48:42

media voices because day by

48:44

day, their audience is diminishing

48:46

because you don't trust them

48:48

and you're right not to trust

48:51

them because they see it as

48:53

their role to normalize, popularize and

48:55

convey the agenda of the powerful

48:57

with as little circumspection as possible.

48:59

Think of any shiny floor American

49:01

news show you like and just

49:03

hear the dumb tambra of the

49:06

voice and the constant conveyance of

49:08

the agenda of the powerful. The

49:10

pandemic was a seismic, epochal moment

49:12

because it showed us how these

49:14

institutions work together to ensure a

49:16

kind of 360 orb of

49:18

power impenetrable by all but the

49:20

most awakened of minds. That's why we

49:23

have a duty to engage in personal

49:25

disciplines that allow us to awaken together

49:27

and discern and a set of values and

49:29

principles about the freedom of speech of people

49:31

we disagree with. Governments

49:35

are either not protecting free speech or

49:37

actively participating in the war upon it.

49:40

So again, Schellenberg here makes the

49:42

point that legacy media and governments

49:44

don't, they don't need to be

49:46

drilled. The legacy media do not

49:48

like Joe Rogan's success or Tucker

49:51

Carlson's success or even my success.

49:53

They don't like it. Me

49:55

and you have this vibe that we trust one

49:57

another, that you know I'm different from you in

49:59

a high. that you would disagree with

50:01

me on a thousand topics, but I believe in your

50:03

freedom. I believe in your right to disagree with me.

50:06

I believe in your right to your religion

50:08

or lack of religion or your culture or

50:10

your identity. We have a set

50:12

of basic principles that they're pretending

50:15

aren't there, about free speech,

50:17

about consent, about care, about

50:19

love, about community. And they're

50:21

saying, although these things, they're

50:23

a post-structuralist, bizarre concoction. There's

50:25

no such thing as meaning. There's no

50:27

such thing as God. There's no such

50:29

thing as friendship. We're just blobs here

50:32

to consume and devour whatever's put in

50:34

front of us, whether it's bad information

50:36

or bad, bad television, bad content, bad

50:38

food. They just put it in front

50:40

of us and expect us to consume.

50:43

Last month, the US Supreme Court held a

50:46

hearing where justices made clear that they were

50:48

fine with the US government pressuring social media

50:50

companies to censor. Last

50:52

week, the Scottish government implemented a law to

50:55

crack down on so-called hate speech,

50:57

including jokes by comedians. Are

50:59

you starting to notice a trend

51:01

yet? Are you noticing how it's never

51:03

to empower their opponents? Are you noticing

51:05

how it's never to empower ordinary people?

51:08

Do you notice how there's always some

51:10

slew of victims that they can

51:12

utilize? It's all that we've got to

51:14

protect these people. Do you really think

51:16

that's what got them into politics? What

51:18

got them into business? Got them into

51:20

media? Anything other than this wild and

51:22

vapid appetite for power? Although even this

51:24

I want to retract because I know

51:26

they're human beings too, and we must

51:28

operate from a place of love and

51:30

forgiveness. That's the

51:32

end of that piece, huh? Or is

51:34

there another one? There's another one. In

51:37

Ireland, the government wants the power to send

51:39

police into people's homes to search computers and

51:41

phones for hate speech. In Canada, the governing

51:43

liberal party wants the power to send people

51:45

to prison for life, for the things they've

51:47

said. And the European Union has empowered a

51:49

tiny group of bureaucrats to decide what is

51:51

true and false and engage in mass censorship.

51:54

All of this is happening at the

51:56

very same moment that government intelligence organisations

51:58

are working through NGOs to... in the

52:00

theory and elections by spreading this

52:02

information about populist activists and political

52:04

candidates. Indeed, it's these kinds of

52:06

NGOs and organizations that were instrumental

52:09

in the attacks on me in

52:11

September. We have Freedom of

52:13

Information Act requesting with several significant agencies

52:15

and government departments that have already

52:18

been incredibly revealing and they're still

52:20

trying to control that information. It's

52:22

an astonishing time. In

52:24

other words, governments are demanding censorship in

52:26

order to protect their ability to spread

52:28

this information. Of course it's that. Of

52:30

course they don't care about you. What

52:32

would make you imagine for even a

52:34

moment that your government cares about you?

52:37

What have they done for you

52:39

lately? Which of the wars? Which

52:41

of the policies? What aspect of

52:43

the facilitation of global corporations or

52:45

unelected globalist bodies is it that makes

52:47

you think they love you and

52:49

your family and the people you

52:51

care about? What have they done

52:53

for you lately? Making matters worse,

52:55

governments are directly financing corporate news media.

52:57

The current Brazilian government is spending

52:59

30 times more than the previous

53:01

government on media advertising in order

53:03

to spread its disinformation. Similarly, in

53:05

recent years, the political party that runs

53:08

our country, the conservative party, spent more

53:10

money than any other organization on advertising.

53:12

I'd love to fact check that but

53:14

I seem to recall it. We'll get

53:16

a fact check on it before

53:18

I convey it because we take this stuff

53:20

pretty seriously. After

53:23

Musk bought Twitter, the Biden administration and

53:25

the Democratic party declared war on him.

53:27

Various government agencies filed multiple frivolous lawsuits

53:29

against Musk and his companies in ways

53:31

very similar to the war the Brazilian

53:33

government is waging against X. What all

53:35

of this reveals is that until Musk

53:37

bought Twitter, he didn't really have freedom

53:39

of expression. The US government felt that

53:41

it controlled both the corporate news media

53:43

and social media companies. We saw in

53:45

the Twitter files that the FBI orchestrated

53:48

a disinformation and censorship campaign in order

53:50

to protect Joe Biden. The amounts to

53:52

anti-democratic practices. We know that

53:54

Google filter control and

53:56

curate information to ensure favorable

54:00

to the Biden administration can be met. And

54:02

that's not because they love Joe Biden and

54:04

his ice cream lick and lips and his

54:06

aviator shades. It's because Joe Biden is astute

54:08

of the establishment that the Democrat Party is the

54:11

party of war, the party of censorship, the party

54:13

of power now. After that,

54:15

the US Department of Homeland Security and

54:17

the Stanford Internet Observatory engaged in a

54:19

mass censorship effort around the 2020 elections

54:22

and COVID. And that's why COVID

54:24

was such a significant time for

54:26

all of us. We all learned

54:28

a great deal during that period,

54:31

primarily legacy media works together with

54:33

government organizations, state departments, peculiar, shaded,

54:35

often publicly funded, yet private organizations

54:37

that are interested in censorship and

54:40

de-amplification of information that

54:42

empowers you. And here's a

54:44

significant piece in all this. This

54:47

is Bernie Sanders in 2022 talking

54:49

about Joe Biden sending the CIA

54:51

to ensure democracy

54:54

in Brazil. Fortunately,

54:56

that election went the way that

54:58

the Biden administration would have it,

55:00

having a companion and ally in

55:03

Lula, something they did not have

55:05

in the previous incumbent

55:07

of office in that country. Let's have a

55:10

look at Bernie Sanders saying that. I believe

55:12

this is from 2022. And by the way,

55:16

in fairness to the

55:18

Biden administration before we talk about

55:20

their relationships with

55:22

progressive governments, they

55:24

have, and I think in an unusual

55:26

way, sent

55:29

the CIA and set the Secretary of

55:31

Defense down to Brazil over

55:35

the last several months to make it clear that

55:38

they did not want to see a rigged

55:41

election or a coup. And

55:43

that's what the Biden people did. And

55:45

I appreciate that. Why

55:47

would you trust the CIA?

55:49

Isn't that in a way

55:51

comparable to the CIA involvement

55:53

in Ukrainian elections and even

55:55

a Ukrainian coup in 2014?

55:58

You got democracy. as long

56:00

as that democracy is in absolute alignment

56:03

with the interests of the powerful. Otherwise,

56:05

you ain't got no democracy, you ain't

56:07

got no free speech at all. But

56:09

hey, but that's just what I think.

56:11

Let me know what you think in

56:13

the comments. Stay free and

56:16

check this out. This is an extraordinary

56:18

story. The CDC have been accused of

56:20

redacting every single word of 148 page

56:22

study on myocarditis after COVID-19, after

56:27

the vaccination, excuse me. Now,

56:29

this can't be entirely verified, but it's

56:32

something that's been subject to discussion in

56:34

a significant hearing, and you're gonna love

56:36

this story. And we know that the

56:38

CDC has a history of not publishing

56:40

large portions of its COVID data. And

56:42

you know that it's likely that they

56:44

covered up myocarditis risks. I wanna welcome

56:46

all of you that are new members

56:48

of our community. If you're an Awakened

56:51

Wonder, thank you for participating. Remember, you

56:53

can get that glorious, where the hell

56:55

is that glorious sweatshirt? That's been stolen,

56:57

it's a brilliant piece of merch. We've

56:59

got so much fantastic content coming up for

57:01

you. Stay with us, and we've got

57:03

a fantastic show with you tomorrow. Here's the

57:05

news. No, here's the effing news. Thank

57:08

you. Here's the news. Here's the news. Bye.

57:11

Here's the fucking news. The CDC appear

57:13

to have redacted 148 pages of

57:16

a 148 page document looking

57:18

into the impact of mRNA vaccines

57:21

into myocarditis. So what are they

57:23

covering up? Really good news about

57:25

how it doesn't have any impact.

57:30

Without independent media, where would we be

57:32

now when it comes to our understanding

57:34

of what happened during the pandemic period?

57:36

What is the official narrative now? I

57:38

find it difficult to even identify it

57:40

in the midst of all of the

57:42

fallen truths and discovered deceptions that have

57:44

taken place in the last couple of

57:46

months. Now we know, or at least

57:48

it appears, that the CDC censored a

57:50

document of 148 pages in

57:52

its entirety. We certainly know in the

57:55

past they have withheld significant information. And

57:57

indeed, the claim that they redacted an

57:59

entire document. can be seen by

58:01

all of us is made in a

58:03

committee hearing which will show you a

58:05

little bit of now. If this practice

58:07

of reduction continues how will we ever

58:09

get to the truth about what's happened

58:11

in the last five years and what

58:13

that tells us about these sets of

58:15

institutions and how they behave when they

58:17

face dissent or any threat to their

58:19

authority. Just keep happening the CDC

58:21

redacts every single word of a

58:23

148 page study on a

58:26

myocarditis after Covid vaccination. So I asked

58:28

research to print the study for me.

58:32

148 pages. The entire thing

58:34

is redacted. Good news is you could

58:36

put that straight back into the photocopier and

58:38

it could go through again with minimal impact

58:40

on the environment and surely it's the environment

58:42

that must be up most in our concerns

58:45

now although I'd be worried about dying in

58:47

a pandemic or from a nuclear war then

58:49

probably environment. What good does the study do

58:53

if there's nothing there? Then I want to

58:55

know wait what might have been there that

58:57

they needed to redact it. That's even scarier.

58:59

We're witnessing an active cover-up of

59:03

a colossal consumer product

59:05

safety debacle that

59:08

is basically affecting the entire world.

59:10

This is Dr. Peter McCulloch's testimony

59:12

and I wonder where this committee

59:14

and its findings will ultimately lead

59:16

because already in his first sentence

59:19

he's told us that there's been

59:21

a debacle and a cover-up. Are

59:23

we ever likely to hear those

59:25

terms spoken at the level of

59:27

authority necessary for there to be

59:30

the obviously required reckoning? So in

59:32

the United States our CDC National

59:35

Institutes of Health and the FDA are

59:39

actively involved in a cover-up

59:41

and the same is occurring in the UK with

59:43

the MHRA, Europe with

59:46

European medicine agencies and Australia with

59:48

the Therapeutic Goods Administration. So

59:50

evidently the regulatory bodies

59:52

in all territories are

59:54

willing to participate it

59:56

seems in facilitating these

59:58

pharmaceutical companies. They've been avoiding

1:00:01

the consequences or even an investigation

1:00:03

into the inefficiency of their product,

1:00:05

possibly said dangers of their products

1:00:07

because it doesn't matter where taking

1:00:09

place by be Australia, the Uk,

1:00:11

the United States. There's no clear

1:00:13

accountability, Neither is this sufficient journalistic

1:00:15

investigation. Neither are they sufficient clinical

1:00:17

trials. Everything that P A metallic

1:00:19

was at this point, no being

1:00:21

a hundred percent verifiable early seems

1:00:23

plausible something is going on. It's

1:00:26

very big. He's.

1:00:28

One of these companies that puts

1:00:30

out a product has an obligation

1:00:32

to produce ninety days. Of.

1:00:34

Safety. Monitoring after their product comes

1:00:37

out. it's a regulatory dossiers. If somebody

1:00:39

has a problem with the new product

1:00:41

and they call the company like Pfizer,

1:00:43

Pfizer has to report. Write down what

1:00:45

happened. And they have to college. Debt

1:00:47

in a report and produce admit it

1:00:49

publicly available. When. It came to

1:00:52

ninety days with Pfizer. The first vaccine

1:00:54

they came out of, Pfizer was approved

1:00:56

December tenth, twenty twenty five or didn't

1:00:58

produce a report and then people started

1:01:00

asking what's happening with your vaccine and

1:01:02

Pfizer would not disclose what happened and

1:01:04

then what to call. A lawyer

1:01:06

for the of the a stuffed is in

1:01:08

said they don't want to release Pfizer Stasi

1:01:11

a for fifty five years. Of

1:01:13

fifty five years and

1:01:15

the. That. The

1:01:17

slightest pushed. And. Finally

1:01:20

slowly the Pfizer. Dossier

1:01:22

came out. So we'll start with the

1:01:24

claim that indeed, the Cdc of redacted

1:01:26

one hundred for we I paid a

1:01:29

hundred and forty eight page documents. His

1:01:31

bloody ridiculous. Then we'll look at comparable

1:01:33

recent instances where information has been withheld.

1:01:36

They will look at how we know

1:01:38

something extraordinary is happening because of the

1:01:40

increase in excess deaths, the change in

1:01:42

weather, excess deaths, a calculated, and the

1:01:45

necessity of insurance companies to reevaluate the

1:01:47

way they imposed premiums and charges because

1:01:49

people have saw yang as surprising times.

1:01:52

from surprising things since about twenty twenty

1:01:54

one that's as a result of the

1:01:56

recession inquiry mostly of peer corey says

1:01:59

doesn't seem from together and see

1:02:01

if in the face of a good

1:02:03

deal of propaganda we can discern some

1:02:05

important truths. The Centers for Disease Control

1:02:07

and Prevention CDC released 148 page

1:02:10

study on myocarditis after COVID-19, mRNA

1:02:12

vaccination and every single word on

1:02:14

every page has been completely redacted.

1:02:16

The 148 page document

1:02:18

released by the CDC was in response

1:02:20

to a Freedom of Information Act FOIA

1:02:22

request by the Epoch Times. They could

1:02:25

have left in words like the and

1:02:27

and is that's an overredaction.

1:02:30

Perhaps when you

1:02:33

hear a name like Epoch Times

1:02:36

you think well this is a new and

1:02:38

emergent media space and maybe don't trust them

1:02:40

maybe you need legacy media to make you

1:02:43

feel comfortable that the information you're consuming has

1:02:45

been verified. So this is a piece from

1:02:47

the New York Times in 2022 that shows

1:02:49

that the CDC redacting and controlling information is

1:02:51

a sort of par for the course. For

1:02:53

more than a year the Centers for Disease

1:02:55

Control and Prevention has collected data on hospitalizations

1:02:57

for COVID-19 in the United States and broken

1:02:59

it down by age race and vaccination status

1:03:01

but it has not made most of the

1:03:04

information public. When the CDC published the first

1:03:06

significant data on the effectiveness of boosters in

1:03:08

adults younger than 65 two

1:03:10

weeks ago it left out the numbers for a huge

1:03:13

portion of that population 18 to 49

1:03:15

year olds the group least likely to

1:03:17

benefit from extra shots. So in a

1:03:19

way that's the New York Times a

1:03:21

couple of years ago observing that this

1:03:24

information was being controlled presumably with in

1:03:26

this case a financial outcome. So even

1:03:28

if you want to look at this

1:03:30

whole exercise simply as an opportunistic

1:03:32

way to make money this piece of

1:03:34

information from the New York Times is

1:03:36

cause for concern. That's before you get

1:03:38

into the health impact and the sort

1:03:41

of stuff that Pierre McCulloch and Dr.

1:03:43

Pierre Corey are talking about there's already

1:03:45

way there in the midst of the mainstream

1:03:47

cause for concern. Two full years into the

1:03:50

pandemic the agency leading the country's response to

1:03:52

the public health emergency has published only a

1:03:54

tiny fraction of the data is collected several

1:03:56

people familiar with a data set but the

1:03:58

CDC has been routinely collecting information

1:04:01

since the Covid vaccines were first rolled

1:04:03

out last year, according to a federal

1:04:05

official familiar with the effort. The agency

1:04:07

has been reluctant to make those figures

1:04:09

public, the official said, because they might

1:04:11

be misinterpreted as the vaccines being ineffective.

1:04:13

Which seems like a reasonable interpretation. And

1:04:16

if data leads you to a particular

1:04:18

interpretation, then if data is legitive, it's

1:04:20

not speculative at that point, is it?

1:04:22

Hey, we've got a lovely partner today.

1:04:24

It's our friends at Hallo. Hallo is

1:04:26

the number one prayer app in the

1:04:29

world. I use it. You can explore

1:04:31

Christianity with over 10,000 prayers, meditations and

1:04:33

music. And as Lent continues, what better

1:04:35

way to deepen your connection to the

1:04:37

loving Lord Christ. It's been downloaded 4

1:04:39

million times in 150 countries. It's been

1:04:42

like Calm or Headspace, but for Christians.

1:04:44

Hallo helps you pray and meditate and sleep

1:04:46

better. He's helped me build a daily routine

1:04:48

of habit and prayer. I do the

1:04:50

rosary. I know it off my heart,

1:04:52

except the end bit. I've got to

1:04:54

learn that. You can pray alongside Mark

1:04:57

Wahlberg, Jim Caviezel. He was Jesus, Jonathan

1:04:59

Rumi. He was Jesus in the chosen.

1:05:01

You can choose your own Jesus. What

1:05:03

version of Christianity do you want? And

1:05:05

you know, Jonathan Rumi was my body

1:05:07

double in ballers. Jesus was my body

1:05:09

double. Download it today. Reclaim your rightful

1:05:11

peace and grow closer to God. Go

1:05:13

to hallo.com/brand to try the Hallo prayer

1:05:15

app. You will love it. Okay, let's

1:05:17

get back to the content. There's

1:05:19

also some evidence that the CDC

1:05:21

facilitated coverups and certainly delayed the

1:05:23

release of information according to rhythms

1:05:26

that are not immediately clear. A

1:05:28

mounting body of evidence shows that

1:05:30

the CDC and White House chose

1:05:32

to ignore and cover up evidence

1:05:34

of a significant myocarditis safety signal

1:05:36

in early 2021, putting young people

1:05:38

at risk of serious adverse events.

1:05:40

On April the 27th, 2021, then

1:05:43

director of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky

1:05:45

stated, we have not seen any

1:05:47

reports of post-vaccination myocarditis, but this

1:05:49

was a false statement at the time

1:05:51

journalist Zachary Stiver of the Epoch Times

1:05:53

obtained internal CDC emails through a Freedom

1:05:56

of Information Act request notice this information

1:05:58

only comes available because Because independent

1:06:00

journalists make inquiries using what amount to legal

1:06:02

loopholes. As a person who's made Freedom of

1:06:05

Information Act inquiries and requests, it's really difficult.

1:06:07

They delay it as long as possible. They

1:06:09

put you off. You have to involve lawyers.

1:06:11

It's a total nightmare to get information that's

1:06:13

yours by right. So remember, this is not

1:06:16

an example of, well, look, they're being clear

1:06:18

and transparent now. They're

1:06:20

not being clear and transparent now. The information

1:06:22

that we have is a result of independent

1:06:24

journalism and independent inquiry, and they continue, it

1:06:26

appears, based on this committee, to redact significant

1:06:28

information even now. And I think we're all

1:06:30

beginning to get a picture of just

1:06:32

why that might be. Although even perhaps

1:06:34

the most skeptical, cynical, and fearful among

1:06:36

us might not understand the full scale

1:06:38

of what we are facing. When Wollensky

1:06:40

claimed to have not seen any reports,

1:06:42

there were dozens of reports in the

1:06:45

US vaccine adverse event reporting system VAERS.

1:06:47

Although we can't know for sure if

1:06:49

Wollensky had seen reports of post-vaccine myocarditis,

1:06:51

a US government memorandum from March 2021,

1:06:53

also obtained by Stieber, stated there were

1:06:55

27 cases myocarditis, myoprocarditis, and pericarditis,

1:06:58

inflammation of the lining around the

1:07:00

heart, on VAERS. In

1:07:02

June 2021, after most people who were

1:07:05

planning to get vaccinated had received at

1:07:07

least one dose, the CDC began publicly

1:07:09

investigating myocarditis and speaking to the news

1:07:11

media about it. So I suppose the

1:07:14

implication is they waited till people were

1:07:16

vaccinated before telling them that there were

1:07:18

risks associated with vaccines, and that doesn't

1:07:21

seem responsible. The CDC notes Stieber

1:07:23

was warned by Israel on February 28, 2021 about a

1:07:25

large number of

1:07:27

myocarditis cases after Pfizer COVID-19

1:07:30

vaccination, documents obtained by the Epoch Times

1:07:32

show. Internally, the warning was designated as

1:07:34

high importance and set off a review

1:07:37

of US data. Wollensky

1:07:39

let months go by after receiving a warning

1:07:41

from the Israeli Ministry of Health, and even

1:07:43

when more information about myocarditis became public, her

1:07:45

agency continued to downplay the risks. The

1:07:49

Biden administration announced sweeping mandates for working-age

1:07:51

people, many of whom were in the

1:07:53

group, men under 30, who would be

1:07:55

most at risk. So actually, there were

1:07:57

mandates in place to ensure that the

1:08:00

necessity of taking a medication that they

1:08:02

knew had risks and indeed they insisted

1:08:04

the most at risk group be mandated

1:08:06

to take that medication. When you're watching

1:08:09

something like the hunt of Biden inquiries

1:08:11

and whether or not Joe Biden should

1:08:13

be impeached because of financial impropriety and

1:08:15

being involved in his son's business dealings,

1:08:18

you forget that actually in recent memory

1:08:20

there's been corruption and negligence of

1:08:22

such scale that the entire government needs

1:08:25

to be reviewed and you might

1:08:27

argue replaced. In fact the challenge is

1:08:29

so enormous that even people that are

1:08:32

enthusiastic about change slightly balk at recognizing

1:08:34

the significance of just a piece of

1:08:36

information like that. It may be that

1:08:38

Walensky chose to disregard the safety signals

1:08:40

from Israel and the military because he

1:08:42

did not want to interrupt the vaccination

1:08:44

campaign. After a few reports of

1:08:47

blood clots following Johnson & Johnson shots, the

1:08:49

CDC placed a temporary pause on the company's

1:08:51

vaccines. Doing something similar for Pfizer and

1:08:53

Moderna might have brought the whole vaccine

1:08:55

rollout to a halt. Right, I see.

1:08:58

So they were just managing the perception

1:09:00

of the vaccine knowing that all that

1:09:02

while hesitancy, shaming, reluctance, really what should

1:09:04

have been happening is there are risks.

1:09:07

These are the risks. Actually they were

1:09:09

being bombastic, assertive, propagandist and mandating the

1:09:11

taking of those medications and now they

1:09:14

are curious as to why there is

1:09:16

significant and maybe even historic mistrust in

1:09:18

the government and in the pharmaceutical industry.

1:09:20

To this day the CDC has not

1:09:23

released complete updated data on myocarditis.

1:09:25

The agency's cover-up of adverse cardiac

1:09:27

events has had profound consequences and

1:09:29

represents a major breach of trust

1:09:31

and abuse of authority. Because of

1:09:33

that lack of transparency, there are

1:09:35

now datasets of billions of people

1:09:38

that have taken vaccines and now

1:09:40

a study has revealed just how

1:09:42

significant a portion of people suffered

1:09:44

adverse effects and injuries. A new

1:09:46

study on Covid-19 vaccines that looked

1:09:48

at nearly 100 million vaccinated individuals

1:09:50

affirmed the vaccines previously observed links

1:09:53

to increased risks for certain adverse

1:09:55

effects including myocarditis and gilean bar

1:09:57

syndrome. Both mRNA vaccines from Pfizer

1:09:59

and Moderna were associated with the incidence

1:10:01

of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle,

1:10:03

which occurred more than was expected in

1:10:06

the study, with the condition having a

1:10:08

significant observed to expected ratio consistently after

1:10:10

the first, second and third doses. Significantly

1:10:13

higher than expected cases of pericarditis, inflammation

1:10:15

of the sacrilegic structure that surrounds the

1:10:17

heart, were also observed following first and

1:10:20

fourth doses of Moderna's vaccines. So that's

1:10:22

perhaps an indication as to why the

1:10:24

CDC have been reluctant to fully release

1:10:27

information on myocarditis. It's likely that the

1:10:29

information is significant. And now the

1:10:31

subject that represents the jewel in the

1:10:33

crown of coronavirus conspiracy theories, excess deaths.

1:10:35

There is significant evidence to suggest that

1:10:37

excess deaths, well, there are calculations, not

1:10:39

theories, excess deaths are higher. There are

1:10:42

attempts to manipulate those figures, but they

1:10:44

are not manipulating those figures when it

1:10:46

comes to assessing life insurance. There, of

1:10:48

course, because of the financial implications, they

1:10:50

have to be rigorous in understanding how

1:10:52

likely you are to get sick and

1:10:55

die because it would cost them financially

1:10:57

if they miscalculated. So let's get into

1:10:59

excess deaths and the evidence that excess deaths

1:11:01

is something that we can take very seriously. 21

1:11:04

British MPs and peers have accused the Health

1:11:06

Secretary of withholding data that could link the

1:11:08

Covid vaccine to excess deaths and criticized a

1:11:10

wall of silence on the topic. Ministers

1:11:13

have blamed the rising excess deaths on

1:11:15

record NHS waiting lists and the pandemic

1:11:17

backlog. But the parliamentarians are demanded to be

1:11:19

showing the underlying data to support the government's assertion

1:11:21

that there is no evidence linking excess deaths to

1:11:24

the vaccines for Covid-19. If

1:11:26

the government's data do indeed exist, please

1:11:28

share them. If thorough investigations have already

1:11:30

ruled out such a link, please share

1:11:32

the relevant reports their letter says. There

1:11:34

is no place here for blind faith.

1:11:36

They believe potentially critical data, which maps

1:11:38

the date of people's Covid-19 vaccine doses

1:11:41

to the date of their deaths, have been

1:11:43

released to pharmaceutical companies but not put into

1:11:45

the public domain. The MPs argue that the

1:11:47

data should be released on the same anonymized

1:11:49

basis that it was shared with pharmaceutical groups and

1:11:51

there seems to be no credible reason why that

1:11:53

should not be done immediately. If indeed the information

1:11:56

has been shared within the pharmaceutical industry and not

1:11:58

shared with the public, it's a further indication

1:12:00

that something is being significantly masked and

1:12:02

you've got to assume that if evidence

1:12:04

existed to show that there was no

1:12:07

correlation that that evidence would be being

1:12:09

pretty loudly shared and trumpeted. This while

1:12:11

life insurance actuaries are finding that more

1:12:13

people are continuing to die alarming rates

1:12:15

even more than before the pandemic that

1:12:17

cannot be accounted for by covid. For

1:12:20

instance the society of actuaries research institute

1:12:22

found there was a 34 increasing deaths

1:12:25

among working age people 35 to 44 in the last quarter

1:12:27

of 2022. Many of them are working age people

1:12:31

who are in the prime of their life

1:12:33

who are suffering deaths from cardiac and

1:12:35

neurological disorders. Life insurers have been consistently sounding

1:12:37

the alarm over these unexpected or excess

1:12:39

deaths which claimed 158 000

1:12:41

more Americans in the first nine months of 2023 than in the same period

1:12:45

in 2019. That exceeds America's combined

1:12:47

losses from every war since Vietnam.

1:12:49

So whatever this collection of cover-ups

1:12:52

are ultimately about it appears that

1:12:54

by piecing together a mosaic of

1:12:56

the known and indications of what

1:12:58

the unknown might include that as

1:13:01

you have long suspected something significant

1:13:03

is taking place. But given that

1:13:05

the bureaucracies whether they are apparent

1:13:07

regulatory bodies or state institutions like

1:13:09

the CDC are ultimately either financially

1:13:12

entwined with the interest of the

1:13:14

pharmaceutical industry or ideologically entwined with

1:13:16

the sets of systems that have

1:13:18

coalesced around this issue presumably existed

1:13:20

prior to the pandemic and will

1:13:22

continue to remain in some form

1:13:25

of power until that trajectory and

1:13:27

tendency is interrupted we are unlikely

1:13:29

to receive the truth until it's too

1:13:31

late. In fact the example of the information

1:13:33

about my kite diet being withheld till people

1:13:36

have taken the vaccinations is probably a pretty

1:13:38

good metaphor for how these things are generally

1:13:40

handled. They give you the information sure but

1:13:43

only when it's too late for you to

1:13:45

do anything about it. That's why we in

1:13:47

independent media are keen to share this information

1:13:49

while we can still assess and to a

1:13:52

degree intuit what might be happening right now.

1:13:54

It seems significant that the inquiry into Covid

1:13:56

in our country the UK has with regards

1:13:59

to vaccines They're not even

1:14:01

willing to commit to when they look

1:14:03

into some of these questions. And in

1:14:05

Australia there still seems to be a

1:14:07

degree of skepticism and inhibition. And of

1:14:09

course in America, the belly of the

1:14:11

beast you might say, as usual, the

1:14:13

influence and power of the pharmaceutical industry

1:14:16

and this set of subsidiary industries, ultimately

1:14:18

the regulatory bodies you might argue aren't

1:14:20

powerful enough to impose sanctions or expose

1:14:22

truth or be transparent means that it's

1:14:24

going to be left to you and

1:14:26

organisations like ours to investigate and piece

1:14:28

together this information and perhaps critically make

1:14:31

decisions going forward based on what we

1:14:33

understand now and to acknowledge that we're

1:14:35

unlikely to be able to impact institutional

1:14:37

corruption of this scale simply by voting

1:14:39

for one of two parties within a

1:14:41

system that seems to have been broadly

1:14:43

speaking co-opted. But that's just what I

1:14:45

think. Let me know what you think

1:14:48

in the chat.