Podchaser Logo
Home
Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Released Tuesday, 18th July 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Ep. 57: Primavera De Filippi on The Network State vs. Coordi-Nations, the Tragedy of the Commons as a Governance Challenge and New Institutional Structures for Global Cooperation

Tuesday, 18th July 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Primavera De Filippi is a researcher at several institutes, including the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University.

Her research focuses on the legal challenges and opportunities of blockchain technology and artificial intelligence, with a specific focus on governance and trust.

Primavera is the author of the book “Blockchain and the Law,” published in 2018 by Harvard University Press (co-authored with Aaron Wright).

Primavera led a collective effort during Zuzalu (Vitalik Buterin's pop-up village in Montenegro) to offer an alternative to Balaji Srinivasan's "The Network State".

Her main critiques are its overreliance on market- and exit-based approaches.

This conversation highlights the differences, but Primavera cautions that there are more commonalities between these different approaches than differences. Most importantly, they share the goal to experiment with governance and approaches to sovereignty to improve on failures of the private and public sectors.

We start by defining the problem of the tragedy of the commons: individually rational behavior can lead to collectively worse outcomes.

There are three approaches to overcome the problem:

a) the Leviathan approach where a public authority manages the commons

b) the market-based approach with defined property rights and trade

c) the polycentric governance approach

The last one was developed by Vincent and Elinor Ostrom (the latter receiving a Nobel Price for her work) and is the starting point of Primavera's approach.

Niklas has more confidence in market-based solutions than Primavera, so a fruitful discussion ensues discussion the potential pros and cons of these approaches.

Both discussants agree that pluralism is the right way forward, trying out different approaches to solve issues such as climate change, immigration, or poverty.

The Coordi-Nations approach is encapsulated in a recent blog article, but it's just at the beginning of being formulated and will be discussed in future iterations of Zuzalu and within Ethereum/web3 and governance innovation circles.



This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.strandedtechnologies.com

Show More
Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features