Podchaser Logo
Home
The Child Prodigy

The Child Prodigy

Released Monday, 2nd December 2013
Good episode? Give it some love!
The Child Prodigy

The Child Prodigy

The Child Prodigy

The Child Prodigy

Monday, 2nd December 2013
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:03

Welcome to Stuff Mom Never told

0:05

You. From House toupports dot com.

0:12

Hello, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Kristen

0:14

and I'm Caroline, and Caroline a little

0:17

with something about me. I usually

0:19

start out my day listening

0:21

to Morning Edition on NPR,

0:24

as you I am. I am

0:26

an NPR listener, I'm an NPR

0:28

fan. And a little while ago

0:31

a story caught my attention because

0:33

it was on Child Prodigies

0:36

and the subject of the story was

0:39

this young woman who started

0:42

composing these gorgeous

0:45

piano pieces when she

0:48

was three years old. Three

0:50

man as someone who started playing the piano when

0:53

she was twenties six, I'm

0:55

quite oppressed. Yeah, And she had already

0:57

recorded a few albums, she

0:59

had played Carnegie Hall she was twelve,

1:02

and she even played an impromptu

1:05

peace for the host. He asked.

1:08

He set the scene of going having to show up

1:10

at the NPR studios really really early

1:12

in the morning to record Morning Edition. How quiet

1:14

and kind of gloomy it is there, And

1:16

so he asked if she could play piece

1:19

inspired by that, and she did

1:21

and it was beautiful, and I thought,

1:23

there, you know, it's interesting to

1:25

hear about this young

1:27

woman being focused on as

1:29

a child prodigy, because I feel like a

1:31

lot of times it's always

1:34

the boy prodigy, right, And

1:36

you don't even realize when you're reading

1:38

all of these articles and things about prodigies

1:42

that it is all boys. It's very

1:44

very male focused, right. And so

1:46

some commonly cited prodigies

1:49

that a lot of people bring up in

1:51

these articles include Mozart,

1:53

who began playing the piano with three, picked

1:56

up the violin at four, wrote his first

1:58

symphony by eight, and read his first opera by twelve

2:00

N B D New Big Deal Um.

2:02

There's also William James Sidis,

2:05

who could read at eighteen months, had

2:07

written four books by seven, and was fluent

2:09

in eight languages at the same time. Gave

2:11

a lecture at Harvard at nine and entered

2:14

Harvard at eleven, and his background was in

2:16

the field of math and cosmology.

2:19

And for lovecraft fans out there,

2:22

yes, HP Lovecraft, one of the most

2:24

influential horror writers of the twentieth century,

2:26

learned to read at two and

2:28

was writing complex poetry by six.

2:31

I would like to note, though, that I was also

2:33

writing poetry around the same time,

2:36

and my first poem was called

2:38

I Had a Little Ladybug I'm not even lying,

2:41

and my mother told me it was beautiful. That's

2:43

a horribul So I didn't start

2:46

writing poetry until around

2:49

puberty when everything was the worst. Yeah,

2:51

yeah, the dark, angsty poems.

2:54

You know, Caroline, we should just do an

2:56

episode of bringing in our teenage

2:59

poetry so time. No, well, you know, when

3:01

Geo City has wiped out its entire archive,

3:04

my poetry was lost to the ages.

3:07

No. Yeah, Well.

3:09

Some other prodigies include Kim

3:11

On young, who's a Korean professor

3:14

now, but at three years old

3:16

he went to college as a physics student and

3:19

no big deal, was invited

3:21

to the US by NASA to study as

3:23

he got his pH d in the US.

3:26

Yeah, I want to say at one point, and

3:28

maybe he still does hold the Guinness

3:31

World Record for being the smartest person

3:33

on the planet. I

3:35

mean, you'd have to be pretty smart to study physics

3:37

at three, But that's that's just me.

3:40

Well, what about Picasso? He had

3:42

a total grasp of the fundamentals

3:44

of art before the age of

3:46

twelve. But again, these lists,

3:48

like you said, are so dominated by

3:51

guys. And we have nothing against boy geniuses,

3:54

not not at all. But when

3:56

I came upon not one, but two

3:58

countdowns that shaller remain nameless,

4:01

that contained between both of them

4:04

a single female

4:06

prodigy. You start to wonder

4:08

what's going on with this, And as we'll get

4:10

into in the podcast, there

4:12

are some compelling patterns

4:16

within or among i should say,

4:18

prodigies that does skew

4:21

towards certain peculiarities

4:23

with the male brain, right

4:25

and Lynn Goldsmith addressing

4:28

the lack of girls from these lists,

4:30

she cited a study that

4:32

describes an uncomfortably large

4:35

number of historical cases of exceedingly

4:37

gifted women scientists and mathematicians

4:40

who found that they had to fight for the

4:42

simple privilege of instruction in their

4:44

chosen fields. And this is something that we kind

4:46

of touched on in our stem

4:48

episodes because the fact that you have to fight

4:51

to even study something really

4:53

affects whether you can develop the skills

4:55

and abilities in those areas. Yeah,

4:57

and this is a subject for an

5:00

their podcast, but it

5:02

often relates to perhaps

5:05

our concept of the genius

5:08

as being male. But

5:10

when we look at some of these incredible

5:13

lady minds, we can't leave out

5:15

seventeenth century naturalist and philosopher

5:18

and Conway. By the time she was twelve,

5:21

she had already learned several languages and had

5:23

begun serious study of science and philosophy

5:26

under her older brother. She continued

5:28

these studies throughout her lifetime,

5:30

and in her early forties she wrote a treatise

5:33

entitled Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern

5:35

Philosophy, which ended

5:38

up influencing to

5:40

to make a long story short, influencing a

5:42

lot of mathematical minds at the time. And

5:44

speaking of math, when we look at the

5:46

story of Maria Agnesi, who became

5:48

known for the math studies

5:51

that she completed while still in her twenties,

5:54

we see why there might

5:56

have been more impediments

5:58

to women being recognized

6:00

as geniuses to being able to pursue

6:04

those scholarly interests

6:07

that they would naturally have as

6:09

these prodigies um Her father,

6:11

who was also a math professor

6:14

at the University of Bologna, first

6:16

noticed her intellectual precocity,

6:19

and he hired a fellow mathematician to service

6:21

her tutor. But on top of having to study

6:24

all this math that she was really great at, she

6:26

also had to oversee the education

6:28

and care of her twenty

6:31

younger siblings. Uh,

6:34

there's so much ah with that.

6:37

But but she still was able

6:39

to publish a collection of a hundred and

6:41

ninety essays on philosophy, logic mechanics,

6:44

elasticity, celestial mechanics, and

6:46

of course Newton's theory of universal

6:48

gravitation at the age of twenty. So

6:51

absolutely this woman is a prodigy

6:53

if she is able to care for twenty children.

6:56

She reminds me of Lillian Gilbreath,

6:59

the mother or modern management, who

7:01

we talked about in our engineering podcast,

7:03

who did all of this amazing work

7:05

with an engineering and also had twelve

7:07

kids. Moving into a

7:10

female prodigy of the more modern

7:12

era is Schicuntla Devi, who was born

7:15

in She is a mental calculator,

7:17

able to perform exceedingly complex arithmetic

7:20

calculations with lightning speed.

7:23

And you know, if you've ever read any Oliver

7:25

Stacks, you know about these incredible

7:28

brains who can make these computations

7:31

at lightning speed. But what's so awesome

7:33

about Debby is she's the only

7:35

case of a girl calculator

7:38

described in literature. So

7:40

who knows how many there have been, but

7:42

she is the one that the history

7:44

books shall remember well. Speaking

7:46

of being a human calculator,

7:49

you do see just with those three prodigies. Right

7:51

there, this pattern that you'll see

7:53

among other prodigies

7:56

of being really drawn

7:58

to man and science,

8:01

two very rules oriented

8:03

disciplines. Um, But first, can we

8:05

take a moment away from the numbers and talk

8:08

just a tiny bit about words

8:11

and what prodigy really

8:13

means, because it didn't just start out as

8:17

a child who could do something exceptional

8:20

with their baby brains. Right.

8:22

The origins of the word lie with the Latin word

8:24

prodigum, which means prophetic sign or omen,

8:27

and in the late fifteenth century the word prodigy

8:30

was used to refer to a sign portent, something

8:32

extraordinary from which omens

8:34

are drawn. But then by the

8:37

sixteen fifties that meaning of

8:39

the child with exceptional abilities

8:41

is first recorded. But

8:43

moving to today, when we hear

8:46

about child prodigies, gifted

8:48

children, savants, the

8:50

lines between them are often murky,

8:53

but they are distinct things,

8:56

and we're focusing specifically

8:58

in this episode on prodigies.

9:01

And even though prodigies and savants are

9:03

marked by their remarkable capabilities

9:06

in specific domains like music,

9:08

art, math, chess, in particular,

9:11

savant syndrome is more

9:13

of a marker of an overall

9:16

disability. Right, uh noted

9:19

researcher Daryld Trefford uh talks

9:21

about savant syndrome as islands

9:24

of genius and ability in persons with

9:26

certain limitations or disability, like

9:29

kids with autism, spectrum disorders,

9:31

or other central nervous system injuries,

9:33

diseases or disorders. So it's kind

9:35

of like you're a genius despite

9:37

the fact that you have a disability.

9:39

And so the approach to savants is often

9:42

clinical. We need to fix their deficits.

9:44

Whereas when you look at the definition of

9:46

prodigy coming from David Feldman,

9:48

who's a psychologist at University,

9:51

a prodigy is a child, typically

9:53

under ten, who performs at the level

9:55

of a highly trained adult in a very demanding

9:58

field or endeavor. The approach

10:00

to prodigies is for more of

10:02

a psychological perspective. We assume

10:04

they're blessed and we want to foster

10:07

their incredible abilities. Yeah, And

10:09

whereas gifted kids do perform

10:12

at a high level academically, prodigies

10:15

are above and beyond and it's

10:17

usually focused in one

10:20

area. Um, but where did

10:22

the modern interests and gifted children and prodigies

10:25

come from? Its fascinating

10:27

because we have to talk about

10:29

this. Stanford psychologist named

10:32

Louis Terman who coined the term

10:34

gifted to describe

10:37

these kids who he felt like, we're

10:39

a lot like himself. Um and and

10:41

really what he wanted to do with his research

10:44

on gifted kids and prodigies was

10:46

to crush the stereotype

10:49

of the brainy, bookish kid

10:51

as just a frail oddball who

10:53

couldn't get along with other people, right,

10:55

because he himself had grown up on a farm with a

10:58

lot of hardy siblings, but

11:00

he himself was was kind of bookish, and

11:02

he was sick of the stereotype that he was somehow

11:04

weaker just because he used

11:06

his brains over his brawn. And

11:09

so when he came to Stanford in nineteen ten,

11:11

he was eager to measure intelligence

11:13

and get to work in that field. And so he

11:15

adopted Benet's intelligence test

11:17

for US kids, calling at the

11:19

Stanford Binet Test, and he

11:23

called this level of intelligence that he

11:25

was trying to capture the intelligence

11:27

quotient i Q. And

11:30

in nineteen sixteen, when he released the

11:32

book The Measurement of Intelligence, it

11:34

ushered in widespread i Q

11:36

testing. But there is a dark underbelly

11:39

to these i Q tests

11:42

because womp

11:44

womp Terman was also kind

11:46

of a fan of eugenics. Yeah,

11:48

this was a major push behind

11:51

his effort to identify these

11:53

gifted kids because he and his

11:55

group of intelligence tester testers

11:58

envisioned i Q scores dictating

12:00

what kind of education and jobs a

12:02

person could get. So whatever you're

12:04

a queue was, you would be a leader

12:08

or you would be institutionalized

12:10

and discouraged from having children. Yeah.

12:12

In other words, Termin was pro sterilization

12:16

for people who did not consider that's

12:18

smart um. But through i Q

12:21

testing, Termin identified

12:23

more than a thousand subjects between the ages

12:25

of three and twenty eight with

12:28

high i q s for his grand

12:31

study called the Genetic Study

12:33

of Genius, which has since been renamed

12:36

the Term and Study of Gifted Children.

12:38

And he tracked these

12:41

kids as long as he lived, and some

12:43

of these kids, who are obviously now adults, are

12:45

still being tracked to see

12:47

what the correlations are between having

12:50

these high i q s. And he also collected

12:52

their personal information from them obviously, and

12:54

how they performed in life in terms of

12:57

marriage, in terms of jobs, uh,

13:00

whether or not they got any professional awards,

13:02

things like that. And while this

13:05

incredible study basically helped establish

13:07

methods for longitudinal studies

13:09

and gave a great snapshot of

13:12

lives affected by World War one,

13:14

World War two, the Depression, all

13:16

of this stuff. There were some things that were

13:18

undermining his study. That included his personal

13:21

relationships with the kids, the fact that the group

13:23

was overwhelmingly white, urban and middle

13:25

class, and the gender imbalance

13:27

eight hundred and fifty six boys versus six hundred

13:29

seventy two girls, not to mention that there was

13:32

no comparison group. And even Terman himself

13:34

was confused by the gender imbalance

13:37

because he, you

13:39

know, he had asked for he had enlisted teachers

13:41

basically to help him identify the top

13:43

students in the class, and so he was

13:46

surprised too that they were more boys. Yeah,

13:48

but I mean it's when you look at that

13:51

sample population, they're almost all exclusively

13:54

too, from California, for instance.

13:56

So it's more, how do kids

13:59

in California who were brought

14:01

up with significant financial

14:04

means fair? And they fair

14:06

all right? Um, two thirds

14:08

of the men and women earned bachelor's degrees,

14:10

which is at ten times the national

14:12

rate, and that was happening during the Great Depression.

14:15

On top of that, and for instance, they

14:17

collectively earned three d and fifty

14:19

patents. Although this was something that was pointed

14:21

out in a few articles. None

14:24

of the kids in that Genius

14:26

study went on to become Nobel

14:29

Prize winners. And actually

14:31

I think three two or three of

14:34

the boys who signed

14:36

up for it but were later turned away

14:39

went on to win Nobel Prizes in physics.

14:42

Boom, there you go. Um. One

14:45

interesting thing gender related from

14:47

this term and study is that the women in

14:49

Termans study had fewer children

14:52

and bore them later in life than others of their generation.

14:54

More went to college and grad school, and more

14:56

had careers, and more remained

14:59

unmarried, and the sort of foreshadows

15:02

later trends. So these California

15:05

termites as they called themselves,

15:07

were sort of ahead of the curve. And despite

15:09

the methodological flaws in terman study,

15:12

he was able to highlight

15:14

shared characteristics among

15:17

the termites that you would still

15:19

see today with child prodigies.

15:22

And there are three big factors

15:24

that stood out. Obviously, these kids have high i

15:26

q s, but there's also a lot of parental

15:28

encouragement going on and confidence

15:31

rather than just having a

15:34

high i Q. Right, And

15:36

when you look into the definition of

15:38

prodigy that we get with

15:41

help from Terman, but also people like

15:43

Feldman Um. The definition of prodigy

15:45

puts an emphasis on performance as

15:47

a criterion for calling someone a prodigy,

15:50

as opposed to things like i Q testing

15:52

just looking at their i Q prodigiousness

15:55

as a distinctly human phenomenon.

15:57

So, Kristen, you just mentioned parental encouragement,

16:00

so tied up and being a prodigy

16:02

is that it can only occur with the support and

16:04

assistance of other human beings.

16:07

And so when you look at parents roles, they're

16:09

often involved in the same or related

16:12

field as their child prodigies.

16:15

For example, Picasso and Mozart's parents

16:17

were in the same fields as

16:19

their prodigious children. And

16:22

these parents are often older when they have kids

16:24

and are generally willing to devote major chunks

16:26

of time and energy to develop their children's

16:28

talents. And so behind this is the whole idea

16:30

that like, okay, well, you might be a frigant

16:33

genius, but if nobody helps

16:35

foster your abilities, you're not

16:37

going to flourish. And when it comes to fostering

16:40

abilities, there's also this emphasis

16:42

on the specific realms within which

16:45

prodigious behavior appears,

16:47

as opposed to again, psychometric intelligence,

16:50

which aims to assess general intellectual

16:53

ability. You have kids who are incredible

16:56

at math, incredible at chess, who

16:58

are creating the incredible

17:01

complex paintings, and

17:04

they tend to be unusually focused,

17:07

determined, and highly motivated to reach

17:09

the highest levels of their fields. One

17:11

father of a prodigy

17:14

described his son's passion

17:16

for math as a rage

17:19

to master. Yeah, in

17:21

order to punish him, they would tell him that he

17:23

had to go play outside, because that's

17:25

all the kid wanted to do was read and

17:27

do math problems. Interesting,

17:30

It's like an addict feeding their

17:32

math addiction. Well. Some other common

17:34

characteristics of prodigies include

17:37

great confidence in their abilities, along

17:39

with a naive sense of these abilities

17:42

in relation to those of others. There's often

17:44

a surprise that these kids experience that

17:46

others don't have their same abilities. They're

17:48

like, you weren't three when you want a Nobel prize?

17:51

Yeah, exactly,

17:53

And I would never want to

17:55

play a chess prodigy. They would

17:57

be sorely disappointed. Yeah, I would

17:59

just start giggling nervously and walk away.

18:03

But when you look at the science behind

18:05

prodigies, asking the question

18:07

of what exactly is going on in these kids

18:10

brains what sets them apart.

18:13

Scientists still aren't sure. Yeah,

18:16

it is still a little murky. And while

18:18

we talked about how you can't have a prodigy without

18:20

a supportive parent, most of

18:22

the arguments talking about the science of

18:24

prodigies focuses on nature

18:27

over nurture, Because yes, you might

18:29

have a supportive parent who make sure

18:31

that you do all your studying and you have the money

18:33

to go to college at the age of five, But

18:36

if you don't already have some

18:38

of that structural foundation

18:41

in place already that

18:44

you know, becoming a prodigy isn't going to happen anyway.

18:46

Yeah, and Ellen Winner, who was a psychologist

18:49

who has studied and written about prodigies,

18:51

told NPR quote, I believe

18:54

that anything that shows up so early without

18:56

training has got to be either a genetic

18:58

or some other bio logical basis.

19:01

But at the same time, it's still not clear

19:04

whether her hunch is right, whether that

19:06

prodigy brain is any different from the

19:08

brain of other kids, partially because

19:11

they simply have not done a

19:13

lot of neurological research on

19:15

these exceptional children. Because like we

19:17

talked about earlier, it's the savants

19:19

who have a lot of the scientific research, because

19:22

that's like, we need to fix these kids. It's

19:24

more of a psychologist's full

19:27

philosophical debate over over

19:29

prodigies. Almost, yeah, I mean because also with the

19:31

savants, if they can find the areas of the

19:34

brains that are working in overdrive,

19:36

then maybe they can apply

19:39

that to help other areas of the

19:41

brain catch up, whereas prodigies

19:43

will be fine most likely. Yeah,

19:46

And so looking at brain differences, there is

19:48

the possibility that gifted children,

19:50

for instance, have greater specialization

19:52

in brain areas that control motor

19:54

behavior and increased communication

19:57

between the two hemispheres,

19:59

although nobody's quite sure whether prodigies are

20:01

born with superior motor skills or if

20:03

they developed them through intense practice. Well,

20:05

and there are also issues of genetics

20:08

that come up a lot because the

20:10

kids from term and study those termites

20:12

went on to have exceptionally bright children

20:15

as well, with six scoring

20:17

in the gifted range, although again there's

20:20

a nature question of whether or not those kids

20:22

were being brought up told

20:24

that they were bright because they have exceptionally

20:27

bright parents as well. And then

20:29

there's this theory of ancestral

20:32

memory, which is something that a guy named

20:34

darryld Trefford has talked about and

20:36

and he thinks that maybe something

20:38

called epigenetics is responsible

20:41

for this. And epigenetics is essentially

20:43

a mechanism in which

20:45

environmental influences

20:48

will make small changes in our d N

20:50

a that helped to control

20:53

the systems that switch genes

20:55

off and on and pass those changes down.

20:57

In other words, DNA in

20:59

our acts with the environment to improve

21:03

our mental functioning. Yeah, there's

21:05

the commonly cited um

21:07

story of Yehudi Menuhin, who is a

21:09

violinist, and his

21:12

family story is really interesting. He comes

21:14

from a long line of extremely

21:17

musical, extremely spiritual

21:20

uh Jewish Men who

21:23

incorporated music into

21:25

their religious practices, and

21:28

so he's used as an example of this

21:30

ancestral memory theory because

21:32

even though his family immigrated

21:35

to the US and distanced

21:37

themselves from their extremely traditional

21:39

and religious ancestors, there

21:42

was something in him, as people

21:44

talk about being in other

21:47

prodigies, that that drew him

21:49

to music from a very young

21:51

age to become this incredible, amazing,

21:54

talented prodigy. And that sounds

21:56

very similar to this idea of prodigies

21:58

being quote unquote re tuned to

22:01

grasp and master particular areas. And this

22:03

is something put forward by that toughs psychologist

22:06

Feldman Um who thinks that maybe

22:08

they are equipped with a readiness to absorb

22:11

and also express knowledge,

22:14

and that would explain how

22:16

and why prodigies are drawn to very domain

22:18

specific skills. You know, there we talked

22:20

about how they're extreme specialists finally

22:23

attuned to a particular field of knowledge,

22:26

rather than having these kids just

22:29

be amazing across the board. And

22:31

then finally there's this theory put forward by

22:33

Larissa Shavivna and Martha Morlock

22:35

of the increased sensitivity.

22:38

They think that there are these sensitive

22:41

periods that occur when

22:43

basically your mental

22:45

development can accelerate really

22:48

rapidly, and and part of

22:50

what makes that process so rapid

22:52

is the actualization

22:55

of the intellectual potential

22:58

and the growth of those cognitive resources

23:01

at the same time. And it manifests as

23:03

a child's passionate pursuit of consuming

23:05

interest. But you can almost think of it as

23:08

like really rapidly building

23:10

a lego ladder, but of knowledge

23:12

and memory, a lego ladder of knowledge.

23:14

Um. But but speaking you mentioned

23:17

memory, there is obviously two

23:19

ties with exceptional working

23:22

memory in these kids. This is something that

23:24

studies do seem to bear out in terms

23:26

of prodigies having brains

23:29

that have just a finer

23:31

tuned ability to hold information

23:34

in the memory while being able to manipulate

23:37

and process other incoming information.

23:40

Because when we when we think about our

23:42

working memory, and how telephone

23:45

numbers, for instance, are split

23:48

up those three digits and in the four digits

23:50

to help us hold them in our brains, and

23:52

even then sometimes I have trouble remembering them,

23:54

whereas prodigies can

23:57

see a whole string of numbers

23:59

and many manipulate them at the same

24:01

time. Right, And that basically

24:04

you have all of this stuff stored

24:06

up in the back of your mind, but a prodigy

24:08

is taking new information that comes in

24:11

and immediately being able to kind of rummage

24:13

around in the long term memory closet

24:15

and pull some stuff out and apply the

24:18

new information to the old information. And therefore,

24:20

like we just talked about, build that sort

24:22

of cognitive ladder to

24:25

come to new and faster

24:28

conclusions. Yeah, and research

24:30

on gifted kids by Camilla Benbo

24:33

has also highlighted uh

24:35

specializations in whether

24:37

the child is more mathematically oriented

24:40

or more verbally oriented, and how the

24:42

math talent has a working

24:44

memory that's really great obviously at

24:46

retaining numerical, spatial,

24:48

and visual information, whereas

24:51

verbal kids tend to retain

24:53

the words. Because I'm telling you, if

24:55

you read I had a little ladybug,

24:58

I mean just the playful

25:01

puns kid,

25:03

I did have some good rhymes in there, though, oh

25:06

no, I'm sure you did um well.

25:08

So the researchers talk about how

25:11

this enhanced memory, like let's

25:13

go back to the ladder one more time. This enhanced memory

25:15

is a function of a match between the

25:18

kind of information that is needing

25:20

to be recalled and the kind of talent

25:22

possessed. So in a prodigy, it's that

25:24

unique intersection of I

25:27

already sort of have this capability,

25:30

this foundation of information that I've

25:32

grasped onto, whether it's math, whether

25:34

it's chest, whether it's the piano,

25:37

and you know, and that just

25:40

intersects with what they're able to do well.

25:43

Speaking of the brain of the

25:45

prodigy, and also this

25:47

puzzle of why we hear about

25:50

male prodigies boy prodigies a

25:52

lot more often, or at least we have historically compared

25:55

to female prodigies. We

25:58

have to talk about a potential link

26:00

with autism spectrum disorders

26:03

because this is also some of the

26:05

newer research that is coming up

26:07

with these extremely gifted children.

26:10

Right in Joanne Ruthstats

26:12

and Jordan Rbach looked at eight high i Q

26:14

kids whose various abilities were all over the place,

26:17

but in common they had an extraordinary working

26:19

memory. Each kid scored off the charts better

26:22

than the general population. But

26:24

in that study, four out of the eight

26:27

prodigies had family members who either had

26:29

an autism diagnosis or had a first or

26:31

second degree relative with an autism diagnosis.

26:34

Three of the prodigies themselves had

26:36

been diagnosed with autism, and as

26:38

a group, they all showed higher

26:40

levels of autistic traits than a control

26:43

group. And people have pointed out to

26:45

how autistic like traits

26:47

stand out in prodigies, like that attention

26:50

to detail, that rage to master.

26:53

The kids scored higher on

26:55

this and people diagnosed with Asperger's

26:57

in fact, which is a high functioning form

26:59

of autism. And on top of

27:01

that, both prodigies and kids

27:04

on the autism spectrum are

27:06

more likely to be male, and both

27:08

are associated to with difficult pregnancies.

27:11

Very interesting. Yeah Well, Time

27:13

magazine and pointed out that prodigies

27:15

appear to benefit from certain autistic

27:18

tendencies while avoiding the shortfalls

27:20

of others. So think of a savant versus the prodigy

27:23

um and the researchers Rustats and Herbak

27:25

wrote one possible explanation for the

27:27

child prodigies lack of deficits

27:30

is that while the child prodigies may have

27:32

a form of autism, a biological

27:35

modifier suppresses many of the typical

27:37

signs of autism, but leaves attention

27:39

to detail, a quality that enhances

27:41

their prodigiousness undiminished

27:44

or even enhanced. So, in other

27:46

words, prodigies genetic traits don't

27:49

compromise their social skills or lead them

27:51

to suffer from disabilities that typically typically

27:53

accompany autism spectrum

27:55

disorders. Yeah, for instance, when you look at

27:57

a kid like Jacob Barnett, who might stump

27:59

from earlier because his name is popped up

28:01

in the media a lot in the past

28:03

couple of years because he was diagnosed with

28:06

autism at two and

28:08

his mom eventually took him out of special

28:10

lett. I think when he was in elementary school

28:12

because the teachers told her that

28:14

he would really just never even be able to tie

28:17

his shoes. But now he's

28:19

fourteen and have

28:21

having been allowed to

28:24

kind of guide his own studies. He's

28:27

now studying condensed matter of physics

28:29

in college. And I watched part

28:31

of a ted X talk that he gave

28:34

about math and about

28:36

how when he first applied

28:39

to college he had to wait

28:41

a semester because the administrators

28:43

weren't sure whether or not he was really ready.

28:46

And he was like, you know what I did. I

28:48

just started studying this theorem

28:51

that some people are saying, if

28:53

I solve it, I could be up for the

28:55

Nobel Prize. No

28:57

big deal, No big deal. But

29:00

I mean clearly he's I mean he's giving

29:02

a TEDEX talk. I mean that he's he's socialized

29:04

very well and is performing far

29:07

above what special ed

29:09

teachers thought that he would be able to. And

29:12

talking about her son's just incredible

29:15

abilities, Barnett's mom

29:17

talks about how, you know, he wasn't

29:19

speaking, There was just no getting

29:21

through to him. She was afraid she would lose him,

29:24

almost But it was a matter, in her

29:26

opinion, as his mother, of getting

29:28

him in front of something that just absolutely captured

29:31

that incredible focus. Yeah,

29:33

and surprisingly it was shadows.

29:36

He was fascinated by shadows and how they played

29:38

on the wall and and you know, in other environments

29:41

and was also fascinated by

29:43

stars, and she just

29:46

let him kind of go with that

29:48

and really start exploring and

29:51

and it brings up all of these

29:53

theories about how you have

29:56

you know, those either those sensitive periods

29:58

or that pre tunement to

30:01

just absorb all that knowledge in that specialized

30:03

field at such an accelerated

30:06

pace. And there's I feel like there's

30:08

a lot of um like

30:11

media questioning as far as what happens

30:13

to prodigies when they grow up. There's less,

30:15

as we've talked about, less actual research

30:17

into what happens to these kids when they become

30:20

adults. One suggestion

30:22

is that just the prodigy, the quote unquote

30:24

prodigy disappears as the child gets

30:27

older and they catch up to adults

30:29

and kids catch up with them.

30:32

Yeah. I mean, there's sort

30:34

of a limitation to the kinds of

30:36

fields that prodigies are often drawn to,

30:39

in that it is very mathey

30:42

or very focused on chess. It's often

30:45

uh fields within very specific

30:47

and laid out rules, like that the work has kind

30:49

of already been done, and

30:52

so the prodigy sometimes tapers off

30:55

when they have to

30:58

think more creatively and

31:00

to apply their knowledge to more open

31:02

ended kinds of things, right,

31:04

which is why it's so rare to see a prodigy like

31:07

writing, uh, you know, writing a novel

31:09

or writing a play, because a lot of the

31:11

time, something like writing a play

31:13

or writing a scientific paper calls

31:16

on so many other resources

31:18

in life experiences that a three year old,

31:20

however, brilliant, would not have. Although you see

31:22

so many visual art

31:25

prodigies, or specifically with painting, I

31:27

feel like that's kind of the hot prodigy today

31:29

is the child painter. And that's one

31:32

reason why that psychologist Ellen Winner

31:34

was really impressed by the story

31:37

of a child prodigy

31:39

cellist who was

31:41

I think he's now in his late twenties

31:44

early thirties and is

31:46

branching out from classical and

31:49

trying to do more experimental

31:51

types of music. And she said, that's

31:53

really rare to see within a prodigy

31:56

because it's almost like that that

31:58

specialized part of the brain is so specialized

32:01

they get locked in right well,

32:04

and and I mean not even just being

32:06

locked into a specialty, but also being

32:08

told your entire freaking life by your

32:10

parents and teachers and whoever else is around you that your

32:12

omite, you're so incredible, you're so incredible, You're

32:14

so gifted your genius. I mean a lot

32:16

of in interviews, a lot of these child

32:18

prodigies and gifted children grow

32:21

up and they are like, God, you

32:23

guys put too much pressure on me. I

32:26

you know, I couldn't live up to a single

32:28

thing that you expected of me. There was one kid who

32:31

was a math prodigy and he is an

32:33

adult working at McDonald's. You

32:35

know. I mean a lot of these kids are just like, there was way

32:37

too much pressure when when I

32:39

was no longer the hot thing, you

32:42

know, I just felt like I was a failure. Yeah.

32:44

There's a young artist right now who

32:46

first made her name a couple

32:49

of years ago when she was a

32:51

six year old I believe painter. And

32:54

now she came out with a new exhibit

32:57

as a nine year old painter.

32:59

And people aren't disinterested because it

33:01

becomes less fascinating the older

33:03

that they get. But for that reason, Ellen

33:05

Winner says, it's so dangerous

33:08

to call children geniuses.

33:11

Instead, she says, say something along the lines

33:13

of your terrifically musical, and you're

33:15

going to have a wonderful musical

33:18

life. Um. And I also thought it

33:20

was noteworthy that in that

33:23

story on child prodigies that

33:25

first got me thinking about this subject.

33:27

On NPR, the twelve

33:30

year old pianists that they were interviewing

33:33

hates the word prodigy. She says,

33:35

please don't call me a prodigy. Yeah,

33:37

it's it's a lot of pressure

33:39

I can't imagine. Well, and especially

33:41

these days, if you're a prodigy,

33:44

you are going to be immediately

33:47

blasted out onto the internet too. That's

33:49

going to become your identity, probably forever.

33:52

But I do still wonder though, with

33:54

that gender aspect, with

33:57

overall the names

34:00

of prodigies usually being

34:02

more boy names than girl

34:05

names, if it does link

34:08

over to that relationship,

34:10

possibly with autism and maybe how

34:12

autism affects the male brain more

34:16

or differently. I mean, so

34:18

if we look at one and eight kids has

34:20

autism, but that number is one in fifty

34:22

four for boys, were naturally going

34:24

to find more boys with autism, And if autism

34:27

is linked to being a prodigy,

34:29

I would think those numbers would translate over. But I also

34:32

think that researcher Goldsmith, who

34:34

we mentioned at the top of the podcast, has

34:37

there's something to her theory that hey,

34:39

if women aren't welcome in a field,

34:42

you're not going to be able to even ever recognize

34:45

their genius in it exactly because

34:47

autism obviously can't explain that

34:50

gap entirely, because not

34:52

all prodigies are autistic,

34:54

and not all autistic kids are prodigies,

34:58

And so I have a feeling that the nature

35:00

side of that argument is maybe more

35:03

to blame, because I do I

35:05

do you think there's something to this

35:07

theory that we think

35:10

of geniuses as men? Mhm.

35:14

Podcast for another time, Podcast for another

35:16

time. Maybe our listeners have the answer. Oh, if

35:18

there are any prodigies listening, please

35:21

right into us, or parents of prodigies.

35:23

If you are a parent too, do

35:25

you think about whether or not your child is a prodigy?

35:28

I thought about this while reading

35:30

up on all of these children, and

35:33

I can see how if you're a parent and all of a sudden

35:35

your child starts playing the piano magnificently,

35:38

and you might get so overzealous,

35:41

But it seems like there's also a lot of responsibility

35:44

for the parent as well. Yeah,

35:46

but what about you, Caroline, would you want a

35:48

child prodigy of your own? Of

35:51

my very own? That does seem

35:53

like a really big responsibility. I

35:55

would in no way be able to teach or

35:57

tutor a child in math. So

36:00

I guess I would I would like a prodigy

36:03

dog. A prodigy dog

36:06

like it had a pre

36:08

tunement for not wedding

36:11

the carpet and a pretunement for

36:13

fetching you treats. That's right,

36:16

Yeah, the dog catches me the treats.

36:18

I think we're onto something. So follow

36:20

up episodes on boy

36:23

geniuses and prodigy

36:26

dogs. Correct great? Well

36:29

with that, we want to hear from you mathematicians,

36:32

pianists. Who's listening

36:35

less? No, mom Stuff at Discovery

36:37

dot com is where you can send your

36:39

emails. You can also tweet us at mom Stuff

36:41

podcast and find us on Facebook and messages

36:44

there as well. And we have a couple of messages

36:46

to share with you when we come right back

36:48

from a quick break. And now back

36:50

to our letters. Well,

36:54

we have a couple of letters here from some

36:56

women and engineering. All

36:59

right, Uh, this is obviously

37:01

in response to our episode on women in

37:04

engineering. Yeah, yeah,

37:06

who's the prodigy now? And this letter

37:09

is unsigned, so I'll just dive

37:11

right in. As a recent female graduate

37:13

with a degree in biochemical engineering, I

37:15

think that the STEMS series is awesome. I

37:18

was lucky enough to have family members in

37:20

the engineering field to encourage me to

37:22

pursue an engineering degree since

37:24

I chose biomedical. The male to female

37:26

ratio is pretty good at my school, but now

37:28

that I'm in the real world, I am one of three women

37:31

in my department. I don't find this intimidating,

37:33

though. I find it empowering that I am

37:35

just as capable as all of the men in the room,

37:38

and I love the field that I'm working in.

37:40

As for the industrial engineering being

37:42

a quote unquote joke engineer, at least

37:44

at my school, that didn't originate

37:46

from the amount of women in the field, but from the fact

37:49

that they only take half engineering

37:51

classes and half business classes,

37:54

which when you compare the workloads, seems

37:56

much easier. Although this may be true,

37:58

I think there are also many in engineers who don't

38:01

have a skill set to work in a more people oriented

38:03

setting, so the two are very hard to compare.

38:06

So thanks for that insight, UM.

38:08

I have a letter here from Sherry, who followed

38:11

her father's footsteps into engineering.

38:13

Sherry says engineering work can be interesting,

38:16

challenging, and project oriented, and many jobs

38:18

are just eight am to five pm on week

38:20

days, and she says it's usually

38:22

a more family friendly career path compared to others.

38:25

Plus, demand for engineers tends to be stronger

38:27

than in most other professions. In my experience,

38:30

I found that male attitudes, especially in undergrad

38:32

tended to be very positive towards women being

38:34

in engineering. The guys love that they could

38:36

discuss science and math with a girl, and they seemed to

38:38

wish they were more in engineering. I must

38:41

confess, though, that my experience and undergrad

38:43

as an engineering student was miserable,

38:45

suffering from the impostor syndrome and from a desire

38:48

to have good enough grades for law school. I studied

38:50

very hard and had very little social life.

38:52

I can remember studying on many a Friday

38:55

night. In the end, those miserable four years were definitely

38:57

worth it, though, because I am very happy with

38:59

my career now. I

39:01

think many women don't realize that engineering

39:03

is a valuable stepping stone toward other careers

39:06

like management, law, and even sales and marketing.

39:08

You have to be able to understand the product in order

39:11

to spell it. More and more folks on Wall

39:13

Street have backgrounds in physics, math

39:15

and engineering too, so even if you aren't

39:17

passionate about engineering itself, it can set

39:19

you on a path to and open doors for other

39:22

fulfilling careers. So thank you Sherry

39:24

for sharing your story, and thanks again

39:26

to everyone who's written in. Mom Stuff at

39:28

discovery dot com is where you can send your letters.

39:31

You can also tweet us at mom Stuff Podcasts

39:33

and message us on Facebook, and

39:36

you can also follow us on Instagram

39:38

and stuff mom Never Told You. Also

39:40

check out our tumbler it's stuff Mom Never

39:42

Told You dot tumbler dot com, and

39:45

you most certainly should check out our YouTube

39:47

channel. We're at YouTube dot com slash

39:49

stuff Mom Never Told You, and

39:51

don't forget to subscribe

39:56

for more on this and thousands of other topics.

39:59

Is it, how stuff more dot com.

40:08

Audible dot com is the leading provider of

40:10

downloadable digital audio books and

40:12

spoken word entertainment. Audible

40:15

has over one hundred thousand titles to choose

40:17

from to be downloaded to your iPod or MP

40:19

three player. Go to audible podcast

40:21

dot com slash stuff Mom

40:24

to get a free audio book download

40:26

of your choice when you sign up today.

40:28

That's Audible podcast dot com

40:30

slash stuff Mom

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features