Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
Hey, this is Annie and Samantha and welcome
0:07
to Stefan never told you a production of iHeartRadio.
0:18
And welcome and Happy Women's
0:21
International Day, International Women's Day.
0:23
That says it wrong, International Women's
0:25
Day.
0:26
Annie, Yes, Happy International
0:28
Women's Day to you as well.
0:29
And y'all, we are actually recording the day
0:32
of just to give you a
0:34
time frame. Yes, this is March eighth,
0:37
four and yeah, this is very
0:39
current affairs, so
0:41
everything we speak of is going to be relatively
0:44
current, so in the last couple of years
0:46
for sure. But yeah, it's International Women's
0:49
Day and what better day
0:51
than to talk about the declining
0:54
birth rate? No,
0:57
yeah, yes, that's
1:00
a hell of an introduction, right, yes, definitely,
1:05
And we're gonna go ahead and put a content warning
1:08
so we're not necessarily talking about anything
1:10
to a graphic, but there's going
1:12
to be a conversation about children
1:15
and babies and birthy and reproductive
1:17
health. So there you go, and
1:20
limited rights of women and marginalized
1:23
communities.
1:24
All right, let's have
1:26
ce Wenesday.
1:29
That's how we do it. So I think we talked about
1:31
this actually this week. We always
1:33
have these ideas for our shows, and we oftentimes,
1:37
especially me underestimate
1:40
how deep some of these topics
1:42
run. I will say I was able to
1:44
do this one in one episode,
1:48
I hope, unless we get to really
1:50
deep conversations, so I want to edit all that.
1:53
But yes, uh, this
1:56
is a little larger than
1:58
what I had, which we were going to do as a Monday
2:00
mini because I've
2:03
seen so many tiktoks about it and I was like, yes, we
2:05
need to talk about this, and I really thought
2:07
that this specific topic was going to be a
2:09
quick rundown of the declining
2:11
population and the people who have
2:13
refused to have more children as
2:15
a form of protests to the ill treatment
2:18
and constant abuse that they've had to
2:20
suffer at the hands of the patriarchy and misogynists
2:23
in Asian countries specifically.
2:26
But as per usual, while doing the
2:28
research, we found some
2:30
connections, some disturbing connections all
2:32
around the world on how politicians and
2:34
people in power i e. Men in
2:36
power and racists are trying
2:38
to find against people who can get pregnant and who are choosing
2:40
not to have children. So we've
2:43
had several episodes talking
2:46
about different perspectives on choosing
2:48
whether or not to have children. People
2:50
who are not physically able to have children and
2:52
for those who do have children, the good,
2:54
the bad, the difficulties, and the rewards.
2:57
We've talked about the sexism, racism, able
3:00
ism, and so many other isms when
3:02
it comes to the overturning of Roe v. Wade
3:05
and all the other violations that are part
3:07
of the aftermath. Go
3:10
back to our recent episode on the Comstock
3:12
Act. But today we're
3:14
not just talking about those who
3:17
have decided to go gett societal norms and
3:19
not star families, which is causing
3:22
a decline in birthsen and the population,
3:24
but also talking about the link between
3:26
the declining birth rate and current abortion
3:29
bands that are happening today. And that's just a
3:31
really minor part in this, but
3:33
we thought it was important to talk
3:35
about it because the link is there,
3:38
the connections are there, and we need to have
3:40
a broader conversation about that and where
3:42
we're going with this and where it
3:45
is getting frightening. It's been frightening.
3:47
So with all of that, let's talk
3:49
numbers. We love some numbers. According
3:51
to recent reports and data, the number of people
3:54
choosing not to have children has caused
3:56
a significant decline of the birth
3:58
rates, so much so that many
4:01
governments are approaching panic. To
4:03
try to adjust those numbers and
4:06
to help us discuss this topic, we wanted to add
4:09
this quote from visualcapitalist dot
4:11
com titles charted the rapid
4:13
decline of global birth rates, which
4:15
differentiates birth rate and fertility
4:18
rate so quote. Birth rates are
4:20
commonly measured using a metric called the
4:22
crude birth rate or CBR, which
4:24
represents the number of live births per
4:26
one thousand individuals in a given population
4:29
during a specific period, usually
4:31
one year. The measured decline
4:34
in CBR is also a result of plummeting
4:36
fertility rates across the globe. Not
4:38
to be confused with birth rates, fertility
4:41
rates measure how many children a woman will
4:43
have over the course of her lifetime. While
4:46
the country's birth rate is directly impacted
4:48
by the fertility rate, it also
4:50
takes into account other factors population
4:53
size, a structure of the population, access
4:55
to contraception, cultural norms, government
4:58
policies, and socioeconomic.
5:00
So with that, a research article
5:03
that we found on the United Nations Population's
5:05
fund Are UNFPA
5:07
titled policy responses to low
5:10
Fertility? How effective are they? Says
5:12
quote. In the last three decades,
5:14
sub replacement fertility has spread
5:17
around the world one
5:19
half of the global population today lives
5:21
in countries where the period total fertility
5:24
rate is below two point one burst
5:26
per woman. East Asia, Southern
5:28
Europe, and parts of Central, Eastern
5:30
and Southeastern Europe reached ultra
5:33
low fertility rates, with the period
5:35
total fertility at one to
5:37
one point four and family size at one
5:40
point four to one point six verths per
5:42
woman born in the mid nineteen
5:44
seventies.
5:45
Right, and the information that was
5:47
released in twenty twenty three seems to only
5:50
confirm these ideas, so that was from twenty
5:52
nineteen. According to the same Visualcapitalist
5:55
dot com, every country on
5:57
the list has seen a decline in birth rates
5:59
in the last seventy years, with some
6:01
declines more staggering than the others.
6:03
For example, China recorded forty
6:05
one births per one thousand people in nineteen
6:08
fifty. By twenty twenty one, that
6:10
number had fallen to just seven point six
6:12
at an eighty one percent decrease. South
6:15
Korea, the twenty ninth most populous
6:17
country in the world in twenty twenty one, saw
6:19
an even larger eighty six percent
6:22
drop in its birth rates since nineteen
6:24
fifty. In fact, almost
6:26
every single country in this data set
6:28
has seen a double digit fall in their birth
6:30
rates over the past seventy years. Only
6:33
the Democratic Republic of Congo has
6:35
seen a single digit percentage decline between
6:37
nineteen fifty and twenty twenty one. And
6:41
you know what's happening with the DRC.
6:43
So I feel like those numbers are askewed.
6:46
And the list they show or talk about is
6:48
quote a snapshot of the CBR for
6:50
the forty nine most populous countries of the world
6:53
at different years from nineteen fifty to twenty
6:55
twenty one. Just to add some contexts, right.
6:58
The Economists featured in an article in twenty two three
7:00
addressing the possible consequences of the
7:02
declining birth rate. The article says, quote,
7:05
and they're roughly two hundred and fifty years since
7:07
the Industrial Revolution. The world's population,
7:09
like its wealth, has exploded. Before
7:12
the end of the century, however, the number of people
7:14
on the planet could shrink for the
7:16
first time since the Black Death.
7:19
The root cause is not a surge
7:21
in deaths, but a slump and burse
7:24
across much of the world. The fertility rate, the
7:26
average number of burst per woman, is collapsing,
7:30
and it continues quote in two thousand,
7:32
the world's fertility rate was two point seven burst
7:34
per woman, comfortably above the replacement
7:37
rate of two point one at which a
7:39
population is stable. Today it is two
7:41
point three and falling. The
7:43
largest fifteen countries by GDP all
7:46
have a fertility rate below the replacement
7:48
rate. That includes America
7:51
and much of the rich world, but also China
7:53
and India, neither of which is rich,
7:55
but which together account for more than a third
7:57
of global population. The
8:00
result is that in much of the world, the
8:02
patter of tiny feet is being drowned out
8:04
by the clatter of walking sticks. The
8:06
prime examples of Asian countries are no
8:08
longer just Japan and Italy, but also
8:11
include Brazil, Mexico, and Thailand.
8:14
By twenty thirty, more than half the inhabitants
8:16
of East and Southeast Asia will be over
8:18
forty. As the old dye and are not
8:21
fully replaced, populations are likely
8:23
to shrink. Outside Africa, the
8:25
world's population is forecast to peak in
8:27
the twenty fifties and end the centuries
8:29
smaller than it is today. Even in
8:31
Africa, the fertility rate is falling
8:34
fast.
8:35
So of course, the reasons behind
8:37
the lower birth rates may differ all over
8:39
the world, as does the possible
8:41
solutions, But according to the earlier
8:44
article from UNFPA, quote, among
8:46
the main drivers of low fertility is
8:48
the incompatibility between professional career
8:51
and family life. In times of women's
8:53
massive post secondary education and labor
8:55
force participation on the one hand,
8:57
and rising individualistic aspirations
9:00
on the other hand, the inability to combine
9:02
paid work with child rearing often
9:04
results in childlessness or having
9:06
one child only. This is closely
9:09
connected with persistent gender inequalities
9:11
and housework divisions. For decades,
9:14
societies with strong traditional gender role
9:16
norms have been continuously witnessing
9:18
very low fertility. More recent
9:20
factors contributing to fertility decline
9:22
include the trend towards intensive parenting,
9:25
as well as labor market uncertainty and
9:27
instability coupled with soaring house
9:29
prices. And though
9:32
some narratives may try to point at
9:34
feminism and it's kind of true and
9:36
the overall lack of desire for children in the first
9:38
place as the reason for birth rates
9:40
declining, there's a lot of research
9:42
showing that desirability for children hasn't
9:45
gone down at all.
9:56
Yeah. I actually read an interesting
9:58
article kind of relating to to this the other day
10:01
about how a lot of
10:03
parents can only afford to have one kid, like they want
10:05
kids, but they can only have the run. So there's this like
10:08
really big explosion of single
10:11
only children. But that puts
10:13
pressure on them because, at least in the US,
10:16
a lot of times the children have to pay for your
10:19
parents when they get older, when they get sicker, and
10:22
so it's sort of causing this
10:25
this really negative effect
10:28
of these kids
10:30
not being able to afford that and kind of getting
10:33
really in bad financial
10:35
situations because they're the only child,
10:38
which is right, A lot of that situation is
10:40
messed up anyway, Like we shouldn't write our
10:42
medical system in the US is not
10:45
good exactly but exactly. I
10:47
thought that was interesting because I hadn't really considered
10:49
that before.
10:50
Well, I've definitely been told many times, who's
10:52
going to take care of you when you were old?
10:54
Yes, me too, exactly how are
10:56
you going.
10:56
To be all alone?
10:57
I think? Mom? Thanks?
11:03
Okay, Well, here's
11:05
a quote from the Conversation dot com about
11:08
the US birth rates and some data they had found
11:10
during their research. Quote. We found
11:12
remarkable consistency and childbearing
11:14
goals across cohorts. For example,
11:17
if we look at teenage girls in the nineteen eighties,
11:19
the cohort born in nineteen sixty
11:21
five to sixty nine, they planned
11:24
to have two point two children on average.
11:26
Among the same age group in the early twenty
11:28
first century, the cohort born in nineteen
11:30
ninety five to nineteen ninety nine girls
11:33
intended to have two point one children on average.
11:35
Slightly more young people planned to have no
11:38
children now than thirty years ago, but still
11:40
the vast majority of US young adults
11:42
planned to have kids, around eighty eight
11:44
percent of teenage girls and eighty nine
11:46
percent of teenage boys. We
11:49
also found that as they themselves get older,
11:51
people plan to have fewer children, but
11:54
not by much. This pattern
11:56
was also pretty consistent across cohorts
11:59
among those born in nighte teen seventy five to seventy
12:01
nine. For instance, men and women when they
12:03
were twenty to twenty four planned to have
12:05
an average of two point three and two
12:07
point five children, respectively. These
12:10
averages fell slightly to two point one children
12:13
for men and two point two children for women
12:15
by the time respondents for thirty five to thirty
12:17
nine. Still, overwhelmingly
12:20
most Americans plan to have children, and the average
12:22
intended number of children is right around.
12:24
Two Right and I think you and I have
12:26
talked about when we saw ourselves in
12:28
early twenties, we really thought
12:31
by twenty five we would have two
12:33
children. I had
12:35
two children in mind, it had
12:37
to be an even number. And I just saw TikTok about
12:39
that about how like because one of them will be alone
12:42
of activities are like if they have to ride
12:44
a plane and then you have to separate, like all these
12:47
things about wanting to have either two
12:49
or four to make sure that didn't
12:51
happen, And I was like, yeah,
12:53
and also like the middle child syndrome, the fact
12:55
that you don't want to have one middle child of
12:57
the three because that's too traumatic. At least have two
12:59
so I.
13:00
Can bond as
13:02
a middle child.
13:05
Of course I would not. I'd never plan to have a big
13:07
family. I also had
13:09
said that it would depend on my
13:11
husband, like even being very much
13:13
into the like the Jesus world,
13:16
I knew that if I was doing this alone, Hellna.
13:21
Right, Yeah, I mean
13:23
that's another factor to consider in
13:25
this conversation.
13:26
Right, But I really did think that I was going to
13:28
have that many children. And then as I
13:30
get older and older, and at this point it's almost
13:33
almost too late, I say, not really but because
13:35
like I have friends my age who
13:37
just had children. I'm like, congratulations, and they're
13:39
all happy and healthy, and I love that for them. But like, up
13:43
until recently, like the last three four
13:45
years, I could not have afforded. I
13:47
was living with people, I was actually having
13:49
roommates. So there's no way to me that
13:52
I could have actually had a child to pay
13:54
for all the things and had a full time job,
13:56
and like the amount
13:58
of responsibility to me was
14:02
too much, and just the thought of it made me
14:04
have a panic attack.
14:07
Yeah, that's one
14:09
of the things that frustrates me the most. And I'll
14:11
see sort of the like millennials
14:14
or whatever generation that's younger is rooting
14:16
everything. They're not buying houses, they're not getting
14:18
kids, Like we can't afford it, right, I
14:21
mean, this is different. I'm
14:23
sure plenty of people would like to, but actually
14:25
it's kind of a responsible decision to be like, you
14:27
know what, I can't afford
14:29
it. It's sad if you want kids
14:31
and you can't afford them, but it is thought
14:34
is going into it of like Okay,
14:37
I can't do this right now.
14:38
And I'm sure many people will be like we turned
14:40
out fine. We weren't rich all these things, But then you
14:42
also have to be like, yeah, but there's also a lot of trauma,
14:46
not a lot of people who are not okay, So
14:48
I just don't forget that far, Like,
14:51
yes, for sure, absolutely, And this
14:53
is not even adding on to like health
14:55
issues. So if you are a disabled individual
14:58
trying to manage all of that on
15:01
top of like, there's so many two points
15:03
to this conversation that we even
15:05
leave out because all of these studies and all of these
15:07
incentives and I should have put this at the top, are
15:09
very much based on a heteronormative CISC
15:12
couple and an ablistic idea
15:14
that they are perfectly able to have children without
15:16
complications. So because
15:19
yeah, one of the things that we are not going to mention, and
15:21
here's the medical expenses, which
15:23
should be one of the number one things because well,
15:27
the US being the biggest problem with like
15:29
sulbsized healthcare anyway,
15:32
mumble mumble, because the healthcare sucks. But
15:35
when we talk about that in general, that
15:37
the cost of all of that is also
15:39
a problem, but we don't mention that here. And again
15:42
when we're talking about these who they are actually
15:45
going after especially and
15:49
these countries they're going after a heteronormative
15:52
couples because we don't
15:54
mention it. But like Japanese government is not focused
15:56
at all on the queer community, as
15:58
in fact, it's almost like doubling down saying
16:00
that they don't need rights at one point. So
16:04
just a reminder. Yeah,
16:06
and along with all the facts found in the
16:08
UNFPA article, it speaks
16:10
to the fact that many couples are waiting much
16:13
later to have children, which may limit
16:15
the amount of because they intend to have they
16:17
write compared with earlier eras
16:19
people today start having their children later,
16:23
these delays also contribute to declining
16:25
birth rates. Because people start
16:28
later, they have less time to meet their child
16:30
bearing goals before they reach biological
16:32
or social age limits for having kids.
16:34
As people wait longer to start having children,
16:37
they are also more likely to change their minds
16:39
about parenting.
16:40
And yes, that's where I am, y'all. But
16:45
they also note that the reasons stated
16:47
earlier were very much linked
16:49
to the decline. The article continues, but
16:51
why are people getting a later start on having
16:53
kids? We hypothesize that Americans
16:56
see parenthood is harder to manage than
16:58
they might have in the past. Although
17:00
the US economy overall recovered after
17:02
the Great Recession. Many young people
17:04
in particular feel uncertain
17:07
about their ability to achieve some of
17:09
the things they see as necessary for having children,
17:12
including a good job, a staple relationship,
17:14
and safe, affordable housing. At
17:17
the same time, the cost of raising children,
17:19
from childcare and housing to college education
17:22
are rising, and parents
17:24
may feel more pressure to live up to
17:26
high intensive parenting standards and
17:29
prepare their children for an uncertain world.
17:32
Yeah, all of that is absolute
17:34
reasons for me that I decided
17:36
I did not want to have children. Now we've
17:39
gotten the general numbers and facts, so we've got
17:41
a good base. We're going to look more closely
17:43
at some of the countries that have been making headlines
17:46
when it comes to this conversation,
17:49
and we will start with the original idea behind
17:51
this episode of the Asian countries, and we're
17:53
only focused on three majors. Don't come
17:55
at me because there's so much more out there. But we were just
17:57
trying to get examples, and we're talking
17:59
about the way men who've made a not so
18:01
subtle statement, you know, Like
18:05
we've talked a little bit about the feminist movement
18:07
in South Korea and the activists who've been
18:09
fighting back against at an administration
18:11
that has been using every misogynistic
18:13
tactic to reverse a lot of
18:16
the work that seemed to be happening once upon
18:18
a time when it came to moving forward in
18:20
feminism and that included
18:22
the four BE Movement. Check out our Feminists
18:24
around the World episode we talked about, but
18:27
just as a quicker reminder, the four BE movement is
18:29
the four Nos, which originated in twenty
18:31
eighteen twenty nineteen, according
18:33
to Like being public and
18:36
stands for no sex with men, no child rearing,
18:38
no dating men, and no marriage
18:40
to men. And although this is a simple
18:42
version of what the overall movement means, the
18:45
stance is to amplify the stark disadvantage
18:47
is placed on women in the nation, as well
18:49
as the overall abusive nature of the patriarchal
18:52
state of the country. And this
18:54
with the attributing factors we mentioned before,
18:56
it's not surprising that South Korea is currently
18:58
the number one country with the lowest
19:01
current birth rate in the world, and it's been like
19:03
that for about three four years.
19:06
Well. According to a recent
19:09
BBC article published this month, South
19:11
Korea has the lowest birth rate in the world
19:13
and it continues to plummet, beating its
19:15
own staggeringly low record year
19:18
after year. Figures released
19:20
on Wednesdays show it fell by another eight
19:22
percent and twenty twenty three to zero
19:24
point seven to two. This refers
19:27
to the number of children a woman is expected
19:29
to have in her lifetime for a population
19:31
to hold study, that number should be two
19:33
point one. If this trend continues,
19:36
Korea's population is estimated to have
19:38
by the year twenty one hundred.
19:41
Right, I don't know where North Korea
19:43
comes into the play with this. I'm
19:46
guessing it doesn't because the statistics
19:48
aren't from there. But that's
19:50
that's that's drastic and
19:52
honestly, yeah, like we said, this may
19:55
be one of those situations where
19:57
they could blame feminism for
19:59
the declining population because
20:02
the people they've had enough for
20:04
many of the women in Korea, they have learned that having
20:06
a child could not only be adding on more responsibility,
20:09
but also cost them their job, their
20:11
independence, and overall their freedom.
20:14
According to the same BBC article, they say the
20:16
Korean women know too much. Essentially,
20:19
One twenty eight year old woman who worked in HR
20:21
said she's seen people who were forced to leave
20:23
their jobs or who were passed over for promotions
20:26
after taking a maternity leave, which had
20:28
been enough to convince her to never
20:31
have a baby. Korean women are
20:33
the most highly educated of those in
20:35
the OECD countries, and yet
20:37
the country has the worst gender pay gap
20:40
in a higher than average proportion of women out
20:42
of work compared to men. Researchers
20:45
say this proves they're being presented
20:47
with a trade off have a career
20:50
or have a family. Increasingly
20:52
they are choosing a career, and
20:54
for those who would gladly choose family over career,
20:57
they can't afford to do it. The article
20:59
will continue. More than half the population
21:01
live in or around the capital
21:04
Soul, which is where the vast majority
21:06
of opportunities are, creating
21:08
huge pressure on apartments
21:10
and resources. Soul's birth rate
21:12
has sunk to zero point five point
21:14
five, the lowest in the country. Then
21:16
there's the cost of private education. While
21:20
unaffordable housing is a problem the world
21:22
over. This is what makes Korea truly
21:25
unique.
21:26
But housing isn't the only
21:28
problem. The price for education for children
21:30
also adds up. Here's another quote
21:33
from the age of four. Children are sent to an
21:35
array of expensive extracurricular classes,
21:38
from mass and English to music. In taekwondo.
21:41
The practice is so widespread that to opt
21:44
out is seen as setting your child
21:46
up to fail, an inconceivable
21:48
notion in hyper competitive Korea,
21:50
this has made it the most expensive country
21:52
in the world to raise a child. A
21:55
twenty twenty two study found that only
21:57
two percent of parents did not pay for
21:59
private too days well ninety four
22:01
percent said it was a financial burden.
22:04
And y'all, if you've watched any K dramas,
22:08
you know this is true. Like people will get real
22:10
really like people have died according
22:13
to the K dramas.
22:14
Oh my goodness.
22:16
Trying to get these kids into these classes, and
22:18
like it's it is like, from what I
22:20
understand, people private tutors who are
22:23
acclaimed they're almost as
22:25
famous as K pop people like wow,
22:29
education is very valued and we've kind of always
22:31
known this to the point that it became a joke. But
22:34
it is costly, which I'm
22:37
like, huh. I always think, I'm like, what, I've
22:39
been one of those two percent that didn't make it. Probably
22:41
oh sad me. And of course this
22:44
all comes with the expectation that
22:46
women will continue their level of housework
22:49
and child rearing at the same time. Is helping
22:51
with income. That BBC article continues,
22:54
over the past fifty years, Korea's
22:57
economy has developed a breaknext
23:00
propelling women into higher education and
23:02
the workforce and explaining their
23:04
ambition, But the roles of wife and
23:06
mother have not evolved at nearly
23:09
the same price. And still
23:11
I think there's a whole thing about in laws
23:13
too, and who takes care of them, and
23:16
it's the wife. Like it's this like
23:18
over the top understanding that you are taking
23:20
over not only your own household but his household.
23:23
And in some respect that
23:25
tradition is still pretty steeped. And
23:28
the government I've seen it coming
23:30
and instead of seeing that they need to actually
23:33
talk to those that's affected by
23:35
it. But the most they try to throw some
23:37
money at their problems.
23:39
Of course, here's
23:51
the quote from a March
23:53
twenty twenty four article published in Time
23:56
dot com. President Moonjayan launched
23:58
several policies to try and incentivize
24:00
women to have more children, including
24:02
cash incentives for families. Under
24:05
the scheme, every child born from twenty
24:07
twenty two onwards receives a cash bonus
24:09
of two million, one eight
24:12
hundred and fifty US dollars to help
24:14
cover prenatal expenses. In addition
24:16
to a monthly payout that increases every
24:18
month until the baby turns one. Other
24:21
incentives include free day care, subsidized
24:23
pay during childcare leave, and even
24:26
group blind dates for public servants
24:28
to try and match make couples.
24:31
Oh yeah, so they can help.
24:32
So.
24:33
In fact, the country has spent an estimated
24:35
two hundred billion US dollars
24:37
to try to fix this problem, but
24:40
as of today hasn't resulted to
24:42
any changes, and they've tried
24:44
other solutions, including hiring nannies
24:47
from Southeast Asian countries and
24:49
paying them below minimum wage
24:52
gross gross, trying
24:55
to incentivize exempting men from
24:57
military services if they have children
24:59
when at the under the age of thirty,
25:02
which sounds like a misdirect but apparently,
25:04
according to another study, men are
25:06
part of the big problem too as well, maybe
25:08
because they can't find women. I
25:11
don't know, but I said that and
25:14
other texts like this. But it
25:17
wasn't until just recently that the politicians,
25:19
and I mean like twenty twenty three, that
25:22
the politicians realize that maybe talking
25:24
to the citizens, specifically women
25:27
or those who can give birth, may be helpful.
25:30
And yeah, in the past year they have been going around
25:32
the country talking to the younger generations.
25:34
But yeah, still no results as of yet
25:36
that we have.
25:37
Seen or talked about.
25:39
I haven't seen any published saying that that's helping
25:41
and anybody's changing their minds, because most
25:43
of them are not. And
25:46
China has been going through a similar
25:48
decline. Of course, the history of
25:50
China and babies not good.
25:53
Not good. In nineteen eighty, the Chinese
25:55
government implemented the one child policy,
25:58
which was so strict that women were into
26:00
situations they did not choose for themselves.
26:03
According to an article written for the Global Institute
26:05
of Women's Leadership, a Chinese researcher wrote,
26:07
for thirty five years from nineteen eighty to
26:09
twenty fifteen, the Chinese
26:11
government maintained a one child
26:13
policy, subjecting millions of women
26:16
to force contraception, for sterilization,
26:18
and forced abortion, and there have
26:20
been stories about the level of cruelty the
26:22
government would use in order to maintain
26:24
that one child policy, including killing,
26:27
the killing of newborn infants, kidnapping
26:29
of women if they had were on their
26:31
second or more pregnancy, or even
26:33
taking family members of the pregnant person
26:36
as hostages if that expectant
26:39
person was in hiding, so they went
26:41
all out, and it was in twenty
26:43
sixteen, a year after they dropped
26:45
the one child policy, the government
26:47
increased it to two and it now has
26:50
risen to a three child policy, allowing
26:52
people to have up to three children now
26:56
right, But.
26:58
There are many who are so ch traumatized
27:00
by the past policies that
27:03
they still live as if
27:05
they are still under those policies. Here's
27:07
a quote from an article from NPR.
27:10
The policy permeates through Chinese
27:12
society in other, sometimes unexpected
27:15
ways, because many prioritized
27:17
having a son over a daughter. Orphotages
27:19
experienced a surge, and baby girls who
27:22
are abandoned or put up for adoption. Singles
27:24
Day, China's biggest online shopping holiday
27:27
akin to Black Friday in the US, is
27:29
a recognition of the many bachelors
27:31
who are unable to find partners in a gender
27:33
skewed society.
27:35
So that could be part of the reason. It could be, But
27:37
the understanding is also there's still kind of a preference
27:40
to men two boys,
27:43
which doesn't make sense. Yeah,
27:46
and the greatest scream of things, But
27:48
I digress. And though
27:51
they have changed the policy since then and now
27:53
seem to recognize that there may be a problem
27:55
with the fact that the population has declined. They
27:58
have been second largest. For the past
28:00
few years, India has been number
28:02
one for the most populous, which seems
28:04
to be a blow to the nation's ego. That
28:07
surprised me, how figured that's what they wanted. But okay,
28:09
but their new policies hasn't changed
28:11
the birthway.
28:12
Yes, adding on to the imbalance
28:15
of gender in the population, the cost of living
28:17
in gender inequality has also affected the
28:19
numbers, much like South Korea. According
28:21
to CNBC, as more women
28:23
attain higher qualifications and rise up
28:25
the ranks in the workplace, they expect their husbands
28:28
to earn more than them. In twenty twenty,
28:30
female students accounted for almost forty two
28:32
percent of doctorate degree enrollment and
28:34
a significantly higher number of women enrolled
28:37
for a master's degree than men. Satista
28:40
data showed.
28:41
Yeah, and of course, so that means people
28:43
have been twosier when
28:45
it comes to finding their man, to
28:48
the point that people have been throwing money
28:50
people, governments and corporations
28:52
haven't thrown money at men to make
28:55
them look better for mating
28:57
purposes. Like, I don't know how else to say that.
29:02
I mean, you're right, but it sounds so like
29:06
documentary.
29:06
Nafety cut is this is where we're
29:08
going at and just as a reminder,
29:11
but this still is the expectation that women will
29:14
take on all the household work and
29:16
that women have less rights and
29:19
will be responsible for
29:21
this entirety
29:23
of growth of populations essentially, and
29:26
of course add to that the rising
29:28
costs of housing and supplies as we talked about
29:30
earlier, along with the increase of children
29:32
allowed per household, the government and even corporations
29:35
have tried to add incentives for people to have more children.
29:37
Trip dot Com has tried to help with
29:39
the situation. Specifically, according
29:41
to that same CNBC article, trip dot
29:44
com is one Chinese company that takes
29:46
pride in trying to encourage more women to have
29:48
children. In an organization
29:50
where more than half of its thirty thousand employees
29:53
are women, the online travel agency
29:55
came up with its own solution to encourage women
29:57
in the company to have more children, and
30:00
a part of that instead of is offering subsidies
30:02
to help with the cost of freezing
30:04
eggs, which actually kind of smart to
30:06
me, Yeah, because
30:08
they do talk about the fact that that time frame
30:11
that women specifically use to
30:13
get their career and all that stabilized
30:16
is that, you know, I guess the
30:19
critical time, but it's a short time,
30:21
so they can actually help them pause
30:24
that process. Maybe that will increase
30:26
in the likelihood that they will have children later on.
30:28
They were talking about this and they helped
30:31
by giving this money, which
30:34
ranges from fifteen thousand dollars
30:36
to three hundred thousand dollars. Again,
30:39
kind of a smart idea. I might have done that, to
30:41
be honest, not now with the IVF stuff in
30:44
the US. No, but you know, like this is
30:46
like to me, it's one of the smart plans.
30:48
I don't know.
30:50
Yeah, yeah.
30:52
I saw a flyer once at my university.
30:54
I was like, we'll pay you this much money to freeze your
30:56
eggs. And I thought about it, but then I was like, why
31:00
I.
31:00
Had people who said they want my eggs.
31:02
Oh, they would pay you for your eggs?
31:05
Really, you know,
31:07
you know you didn't get
31:09
those the only.
31:11
One I mean, I saw a flyer. I don't recall
31:13
an.
31:15
I got an email like okay,
31:17
okay, Like I was like what and I thought about
31:19
it for a split seconds, not gonna lie, like, but
31:22
they wanted white babies, so didn't
31:24
help.
31:28
Well, the government has tried
31:30
a few tactics as well. Going back to China.
31:33
According to Time Quote, Chinese government
31:35
also tried to introduce new policies to
31:37
encourage couples to have more children,
31:39
enhance childcare, and improve housing
31:41
facilities for families with children. Recently,
31:44
some academics have even proposed
31:47
taxing couples for having too few children
31:50
while making access to abortion and divorce
31:52
harder. M and
31:55
yeah pay attention to that last part, limiting
31:57
access to divorce and abortions right.
32:00
So. The Japanese birth rate has also
32:02
been greatly declining, very similar
32:05
to South Korea. Many have chosen not to have children
32:07
due to the inequality and gender rights and opportunities,
32:09
as well as the overall financial burden of
32:12
having a family.
32:13
According to financialpolicy dot com
32:15
quote, today Japanese women on average
32:17
have just one point twenty six children, far
32:20
below the rate of two point one children per
32:22
woman, considered by demographers
32:24
as necessary to maintain a stable population.
32:27
Up to forty percent of adult Japanese women
32:29
and fifty percent of men will not
32:31
have children in their lifetime according
32:34
to government estimates.
32:36
And again, much like South Korea,
32:38
a lot of the reasons boiled down to the
32:40
cost of living, cost of education for children,
32:42
and according to the same foreign policy dot Com
32:44
article, the cost for childcare alone
32:46
in Japan for two children is about
32:49
half the earnings of a couple who
32:51
have full time incomes, and
32:54
the wages have barely been raised in
32:56
the past thirty years, so significant
32:58
amount. And just the overall
33:00
lack of interest in being married, although
33:03
that could also have something to do with the affordability.
33:06
So here's another quote from Foreign policy dot
33:08
Com. It's not just the desire
33:10
to have children that's diminished. Surveys
33:13
point to waning interest in relationships
33:16
and sex, especially
33:18
among young people. For Haruku
33:20
Sakamato, a researcher at the Department of Global
33:22
Health Policies at the University of Tokyo, this
33:25
too is an economic story.
33:28
Young people, she explained, simply do not
33:30
earn enough to plan for the long term,
33:32
making stable relationships seem far fetched.
33:35
She says, while in the past people have explained
33:38
Japan's low sex and relationship
33:40
culture as steaming from interest in anime
33:42
and fictional characters that supplant interest
33:45
in real life relationships, is actually
33:47
an economic issue. I
33:50
just really like that they blame the anime on this. So
33:54
and the article continues. Michika
33:56
uit A Balmer, a political scientist at
33:58
Syracuse University in the US who
34:01
studies social isolation among Japanese
34:03
youth, said, many young Japanese women
34:05
would like to get buried, but they
34:08
simply cannot afford it. Survey
34:10
data shows that young people don't have the
34:12
financial stability necessarity
34:14
build themselves as a viable partner.
34:17
The result is that people don't get married.
34:20
And because Japan has the lowest rate of children
34:22
born outside of marriage among developed countries,
34:25
this also means they are unlikely
34:27
to have children. So
34:30
in twenty thirteen, they had
34:32
what was considered women nomics policies,
34:35
which quote promised to integrate women into
34:37
the workforce and propel them to hire paying
34:40
jobs. But the policy
34:42
hasn't solved women's economic
34:44
problems. So,
34:47
like many other nations, women
34:49
were not only responsible for the house, home, and children,
34:52
but they also took on the financial responsibility
34:54
abortion as well.
34:55
Here's another quote in the Age
34:57
of Women Nomics, Japanese women are caught
35:00
in a double bind. High living costs
35:02
mean they are no longer expected to stop
35:04
working once they have children, Yet because
35:06
they still bear the brunt of domestic work.
35:08
Even Japan's generous parental leap benefits,
35:11
which few men choose to take, are
35:13
not enough to insulate women from the pressure
35:15
to drop out of the labor force after having children.
35:18
Even highly educated women who
35:20
leave the labor force after having children
35:23
struggle to eventually reintegrate back
35:25
into it. Some fear that in case
35:27
of divorce they'll be unable to stay afloat
35:29
financially, in part because of
35:32
the stark gender pay gap.
35:33
So the Japanese government has followed suit
35:35
with many of the East Asian countries. Late
35:38
twenty twenty three, the Prime Minister announced
35:40
and estimated twenty two billion dollars
35:42
to childcare spending in order to help the
35:44
birth rate, and he plans to increase
35:47
subsidized housing for families with children and
35:49
flexible work hours. Of course,
35:51
as we've seen, money may not be
35:54
the answer to all the problems.
35:56
But hey, I guess he's trying, I
36:01
will say, and we're going to talk about this in
36:03
the sec better than what the US is
36:05
doing.
36:06
That's true.
36:08
And though we just used again these three
36:10
countries for the examples, the
36:12
steady decline of birthrate has been
36:14
seen throughout the world. Taiwan
36:16
has spent over three billion dollars trying
36:19
to encourage people to have more children, including
36:22
more parental leave and large
36:24
increases in salary and
36:26
in fact, one presidential candidate offered
36:29
a free bet if they have a child. I'm not
36:31
gonna lie. That could have worked on me too.
36:32
Then you have to pay for the pet.
36:34
I know, I know, I don't know that he added money to that,
36:36
but I was like, well, that's an interesting time.
36:38
I've got to pay for the kid in the pet.
36:43
And according to the Vox article titles,
36:46
you can't even pay people to have more
36:48
kids quote. Other countries have
36:50
tried direct payments to parents. Russia
36:52
began offering a one time some of about
36:54
seven thousand dollars to families with
36:56
more than two kids, while Italy and Greece
36:59
have experimented with per child baby
37:01
bonuses. In twenty nineteen, Hungary
37:03
introduced a loan of about thirty thousand
37:06
dollars to newlyweds if
37:08
they have three children, the loan is forgiven.
37:13
I actually saw something. I think it's Sweden.
37:17
Y'all correct me if I'm wrong that
37:19
literally are trying to bring people in
37:21
with children, Oh wow,
37:23
twoth and they'll they'll give you and then you have to live there
37:25
for ten years and they'll give you money
37:28
and incentives.
37:29
I had a friend that moved to Sweden. I should to ask her,
37:31
what's okay?
37:32
I think Sweden. It's one of the s European
37:35
countries. So y'all tell me Switzerland,
37:38
Sweden?
37:39
Sure?
37:39
Okay?
37:41
And yes, again, declining
37:43
birthrate includes the US, so
37:46
we said this earlier. The US, the
37:49
birth rate of the population is declining. Here's
37:51
a quote from that same Fox article,
37:53
which is mentioned in the US,
37:56
the birthrate has been falling since the Great Recession,
37:58
dropping almost twenty three percent between
38:01
twenty seven and twenty twenty two. Today,
38:03
the average American woman has about one
38:05
point six children, down down
38:08
from three in nineteen fifty and significantly
38:11
below the replacement rate of two point one children
38:13
needed to sustain a stable population.
38:16
And as we mentioned previously, many people have decided
38:18
to wait to have children.
38:21
And though the birth rate has declined overall, the
38:23
birth rate for people thirty five to thirty nine
38:25
has actually increased. According to Census
38:27
dot Gov. In the thirty year period, it
38:30
has increased by sixty seven percent.
38:32
Here's a bit from cnn dot Com from the article
38:34
titled fertility rates dip People are
38:36
having babies later the stage of birth
38:39
rates in the US. Quote. Birth rates
38:41
have declined in most states across
38:43
the US in recent years, while women are having babies
38:45
at an older age. According to new
38:47
data released by the US Centers for Disease
38:50
Control and Prevention and
38:52
it continues, birth rates among
38:54
women in their late thirties and early forties
38:56
rose in the last decade, and the birth rate
38:59
among women over forty five also
39:01
exceeded one birth per one thousand population
39:04
for the first time in more than a decade.
39:06
Meanwhile, the teen birth rate dropped to a record
39:09
blow. In twenty twenty two, there were
39:11
thirteen point five burths for every one thy
39:13
teens ages fifteen to nineteen, down
39:15
from thirteen point nine in twenty twenty one. According
39:18
to the new CDC data.
39:21
Thirteen then, yeah,
39:24
those numbers are so high,
39:27
and I feel like they are purposeful, especially
39:29
now. And though there was a small
39:31
increase during the initial pandemic and lockdown,
39:34
nothing shows any actual signs of the race
39:36
on the on the incline. Here's
39:38
a quote from the scene an article. Despite
39:41
the short term plunge and comeback
39:43
during the early years of the COVID pandemic,
39:45
the race have been consistently trending
39:47
down. Nearly three point seven million
39:50
babies were born in twenty twenty two. According
39:52
to the CDC analysis of birth certificates,
39:54
the overall fertility rate was fifty
39:56
six point one births per one thousand
39:58
women ages fifteen to four twenty four, holding
40:01
relatively steady from the rate of fifty six point
40:03
three in twenty twenty one. After a sharp
40:05
drop in twenty twenty, birth rates rose in twenty
40:08
twenty one, the first increase since twenty
40:10
fourteen, but the numbers still reflect
40:12
the declines that began before the pandemic.
40:24
Okay, of course, unlike the other countries,
40:27
US hasn't been publicly talking
40:30
about the population decline or
40:32
even talking about policy changes directly
40:34
related to having more children, such
40:37
as giving money to parents directly helping
40:39
childcare costs, or the such. Although
40:42
they did alter some tax deductions
40:44
for children, they made higher
40:46
tax deductions and gave a little more
40:49
incentive, but I definitely did
40:51
not seem as it was about population control
40:53
or population increase. But
40:56
much like how we mentioned, China has been doing
40:58
more restricted when it comes to abortion access
41:00
and divorce. The US
41:02
has implemented the same practices,
41:05
but using alternative languages
41:07
for it. So during campaign runs for
41:09
the Republican Party, a couple of significant
41:11
figures may have said the quiet
41:13
part out loud. In
41:15
twenty twenty three, Nebraska Republican
41:17
state senator used an old racist
41:20
theory to argue for the ban on abortion.
41:23
According to New republic dot com
41:26
quote, Senator Steve Erdman decided
41:28
that the best argument in favor of the
41:30
ban was quote the Great Replacement
41:32
theory, which the Southern Poverty Law
41:34
Center defines as quote racist
41:37
conspiracy narrative that falsely asserts
41:40
there's an active, ongoing and covert
41:42
effort to replace white populations
41:45
in current white majority countries.
41:47
Our state populations have not grown except
41:49
by those foreigners who've moved here or refugees
41:52
who've been placed here, Erman told the chamber, and
41:54
it continues. Erman also says that
41:56
all of the aborted fetuses could
41:58
be working and filling some of those positions
42:01
that we have vacancies in response to
42:03
jobs.
42:05
Okay, yeah, yeah.
42:07
Yeah, So before
42:09
we continue, so here's a look about the
42:12
Here's a quick look at the Great Replacement theory
42:15
from a PREBIS article simply put
42:17
the conspiracy theory says there's a plot
42:19
to diminish the influence of white people. Believers
42:22
say this goal is being achieved both through
42:24
the immigration of non white people into societies
42:27
that have largely been dominated by white
42:29
people, as well as through simple
42:31
demographics, with white people having lower birth
42:33
rates than other populations.
42:36
And how does all of that equal
42:38
to combating of the declining
42:40
birth rate. Here's some more from Senator
42:43
Erdmann. According to Vice dot com,
42:45
our state population has not grown except
42:47
by those foreigners who have moved. Here are refugees
42:50
who have been placed here. Why is that?
42:52
It's because we've killed two hundred thousand
42:55
people. These are people we've
42:57
killed. Erdmann said during debate after
42:59
lamenting that if abortion had been illegal,
43:02
that would have resulted to more people who
43:05
could be working and feeling some of
43:07
those positions that we have vacancy.
43:10
And he's not the only one to say these
43:13
things out loud. Seapack Republican
43:15
leader also made a point to use the same
43:17
rhetoric. He said, if you say there's
43:20
a population problem in the country, but you're killing
43:22
millions of your own people through legalize the abortion
43:24
every year, if that were to produce
43:27
some of that problem is solved. A Schlap said,
43:29
you have millions of people who can take many
43:31
of these jobs. How come no one brings that
43:34
up. If you're worried about this quote unquote
43:36
replacement, why don't we start there, start
43:39
with allowing our own people to live. And
43:41
again he's not the only one. The Ohio
43:44
representative says something similar as well.
43:47
This narrative has been around for
43:49
a very long time. As in fact, it's actually been around
43:51
also targeting the Jewish community as
43:53
well. But this has been a constant
43:56
rhetoric. And if you want to talk about
43:59
our episod so is when it comes to tradwives,
44:01
our episodes, when it comes to the Red
44:04
Pill, our episodes, when it comes to religious trauma.
44:06
They're all linked in this same conversation
44:09
with this white supremacist rhetoric that
44:13
we have to bring more white people
44:15
in to bring in power, that they've lost power, so therefore
44:17
they need to have babies, and that abortion ban
44:20
is the key.
44:22
Unfortunately, these tactics have worked enough
44:24
to sway what is happening within the
44:26
US, but politics alone is not what is
44:29
controlling this narrative. So are the corporations.
44:31
The economic threat of a population's decline
44:34
has become clear to many experts
44:36
around the world, but not
44:38
all corporations have come to this
44:41
same understanding at this point. Like
44:43
we said, Trip dot Com
44:45
and Japan has kind of figured
44:47
it out. They're like, Okay, we need to help with this. There's
44:49
other companies that have been adding to that.
44:52
We know some of the companies here in
44:54
the US, and usually the smaller companies
44:56
that'll been like, we'll give you a longer, maternitically
44:59
better MATERI we have free childcare
45:01
here. But not everybody Amazon Prime
45:04
example, could care less.
45:06
It was an accidental fun I.
45:11
Didn't even know. A lot of the corporations
45:13
are seeking to strip even more rights
45:16
from their employees, many encouraging
45:18
discrimination for those who become pregnant,
45:22
and in fact, recently federal courts
45:24
ruled that the Quote Pregnancy Workfairness
45:27
Act was unenforceable against
45:30
the state government and it's in its agency
45:32
which This act protects accommodations
45:35
for pregnant employees in the workplace
45:37
and allows workers to sue employers
45:40
for failing to do so. It prohibited
45:42
employers from denying employment opportunities
45:45
or forcing pregnant workers to go on leave
45:47
if alternative accommodations were possible.
45:50
And this is from the Texas Tribune dot org,
45:52
which is where all of this was coming
45:55
out from. So that is significant
45:57
to know that that was on a federal
45:59
appeal. And it's very scary
46:01
because not only are
46:03
we being told you have to be pregnant if
46:06
you were to conceive, if
46:08
you were to get pregnant,
46:10
do you have to remain pregnant and go and
46:13
give birth, but that you
46:15
have no rights and they're not going to
46:17
help you. We've talked there are several
46:19
articles that we talked about within the great
46:22
Replacement theory, and these senators
46:24
who literally kept saying, oh, social Security will
46:27
help, which we know is dwind linked
46:29
very quickly and it is pretty much non existent
46:31
for any of us who want to retire at this point. I
46:33
believe the boomers are the last to be able to really
46:36
get anything from
46:38
the Social Security Administration. There's
46:41
so much that we have to look
46:43
at when we talk about this, because there it goes
46:46
hand in hand when we talk
46:48
about the declining of birth birth rates, and
46:50
as we're again we're looking at other countries.
46:54
We're looking at European countries who have a little
46:56
better incentives and that kind
46:58
of are willing to pay
47:00
a lot more and it's costly,
47:03
as men will say, to make
47:05
it better. There's
47:07
many who won't do that here in the US,
47:09
and in fact, again they're doing the opposite by
47:12
kind of leaning towards China's policies,
47:14
which is really funny and ironic right
47:17
now to me, with trying
47:20
to force a population
47:22
boom, and it's working, and it's
47:24
working, and that's what's scary. But again
47:27
this seems to be have
47:29
your cake and eat it to situation for
47:32
both the politicians and corporations. And
47:34
I will say some activists in the US
47:36
have talked about similar tactics to those
47:38
in other countries. I know there's like the sex strike.
47:40
During one point that was
47:43
in talks talking about not
47:45
having children, talking about not
47:47
getting married, talking about remaining single,
47:49
which you know, I get it. But with
47:51
what is happening, and
47:54
as rights continue to be stripped, it will
47:56
be likely that the decline will only continue
48:00
because people are fed up.
48:04
Yeah. I have at least
48:06
two friends who have
48:08
pretty much said the
48:11
shop is closed, like
48:13
they're just and it breaks my heart
48:15
because like, if you want to have sex, if you want to have kids.
48:17
It shouldn't be, but
48:20
they've been like, as long as this what is
48:22
this is the situation, I'm not gonna do it, which
48:25
feels very upset.
48:28
It's very upsetting, but it also feels kind
48:30
of funny because I don't think that's what they
48:32
wanted the outcome to right
48:35
of these things, but that's what I've heard from
48:37
multiple people. It's like, Okay, right, cool.
48:40
I will be interested to see what happens in the next
48:42
couple of years, because we know that practancy
48:44
is due to rape has increased,
48:48
which is horrifying. But at
48:50
the same time, I don't know if it's just
48:52
me, but I have getting more and more
48:55
disturbing pieces about
48:58
children's deaths, some
49:00
of them like literal. I've just watched
49:02
one, I guess the crime
49:04
thing where a mom was so
49:07
flustered because she could not financially
49:10
provide, she did not trust her
49:13
for the children's
49:15
father to take care of them and so
49:18
gave them the best day and then unfortunately
49:21
murdered them. I guess this is
49:23
a side say, and that's not the only case I've seen.
49:25
As of recently, I've seen more and more.
49:28
I feel like this may honestly
49:30
be a thing that we
49:33
see because women are
49:35
not seen. Again, we've talked about the fact that
49:37
the abortion band is only going to kill women, but
49:39
I don't think people can estimate
49:42
the route of desperation that
49:45
many people will have from these
49:48
situations. Again, same thing with
49:52
forced labor, force
49:55
birth for those who have been molested
49:57
and raped. Similar similar
50:00
to that conversation of the desperation that you're not going to
50:02
understand. I'm horrified, aby what's
50:04
happening. But I don't think any
50:06
of these tactics are going to push to an
50:09
increase in birth the
50:11
way they think it will now.
50:13
I don't think so either. There's so much, like really
50:17
fundamental systemic things that have
50:20
to change. I believe for
50:22
people to write.
50:23
Again, hello, having
50:26
childcare, having money to feed
50:28
yourself, having money to have a bedroom
50:30
for your child, those
50:33
are all things that are dictating
50:35
whether or not we want to have children.
50:37
Yeah, yeah,
50:40
seems pretty obvious, you
50:43
would.
50:43
Think, But I feel like twenty twenty
50:45
three South Korea really
50:48
like, oh, I guess we should talk to those
50:50
who can give birth what.
50:52
Maybe we should ask them?
50:54
Maybe we should maybe we should ask them? And
50:56
then we have literally gone backwards
50:59
in the US on how to handle it again
51:02
again, the pretenses we're saving
51:04
lives.
51:04
Yeah, yep.
51:08
Well, well we have a lot of episodes about
51:11
this. As you said, Samantha, it
51:13
is related to a lot of other
51:16
issues. This is another very intersectional
51:18
thing.
51:19
But yeah,
51:23
Happy International Women's Day.
51:24
Happy International Women's Day, Samantha.
51:27
Good luck everybody of Gosh.
51:29
I'm glad to spend it with you.
51:31
I'm glad to be with you too, and
51:33
I'm glad.
51:34
For anyone who joined us on this day
51:36
or any other day. If you have any thoughts about
51:39
this, please let us know. You can
51:41
email us at Stuffania mom Stuff at iHeartMedia
51:43
dot com. You can find us on Twitter at
51:45
mom Stuff podcast or on TikTok and
51:47
Instagram at stuff I Never Told You. We have
51:49
a tea public store, and we have a
51:51
book you can get wherever you get your books things.
51:54
As always to our super producer Christina, are executive
51:56
Bruce and Maya, and our contributor Joey, thank
51:58
you and thanks to you for listening. Steffan
52:00
Never Told You his production by iHeart Radio. For more podcasts
52:02
from iHeart Radio, you can check out the heart Radio app Apple
52:04
Podcasts wherever you listen to your favorite shows,
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More