Podchaser Logo
Home
The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

Released Tuesday, 9th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

The 1977 Women's Conference That Changed America

Tuesday, 9th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production

0:04

of iHeartRadio.

0:11

Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:13

there's Chuck and Jerry's here too, and

0:16

this is stuff you should know. The

0:19

watershed moment in American

0:21

history edition.

0:23

That's right, in which we tackle not

0:26

literally take on no

0:30

cover.

0:31

Yeah.

0:31

Yes, the

0:35

Houston, Texas Conference, the National

0:37

Women's Conference in Houston, that

0:40

was from November eighteenth to twenty first,

0:42

nineteen seventy seven, which was

0:45

the only time that

0:48

the US government got together and

0:50

said here's some money, go

0:53

out and put together a conference

0:55

and a group of delegates that represent

0:57

the women in this country and come

0:59

back to us with ideas on

1:02

action we can take but

1:04

mostly won't.

1:05

Well, they left off the mostly won't part.

1:07

They didn't find that out until afterward.

1:09

Yeah.

1:11

Gloria Steinem, who is one of the co founders

1:13

of Now and like a quintessential second

1:15

wave feminist, she called

1:17

this the most important event nobody

1:19

knows about, and it really

1:21

was. This was a very specific

1:24

moment in time where

1:26

Olivia helped us with this, where she pointed out that

1:30

this is probably the last moment where

1:32

the federal government would be like, sure, we're going

1:35

to fund a conference

1:37

to find out how

1:40

to better womenkind

1:42

womenkind, and then

1:45

at the same time the last moment where those

1:48

women could go into that conference

1:50

assuming that the stuff they came up

1:52

with was going to actually have legs

1:55

and move forward in Congress.

1:56

Yeah. Did you see the FX mini series

2:00

This Is America?

2:01

I did not, which is surprising because

2:03

I've been chewing around the edges of it in

2:05

other research and I've still not seen

2:07

it.

2:08

It was really good.

2:10

Oh, I'm sure it looked like it's

2:12

just a murderer's row of great actors.

2:14

Great actors, and it's

2:17

I'm sure you can still watch it. But

2:20

a lot of the people in this story figure

2:22

in that mini series.

2:23

Well, that's the thing. This is a It was a huge,

2:26

huge deal. The historian named

2:28

Marjorie J. S. Spruell wrote

2:30

a book on this, and she called

2:32

it the crest of the second wave of US feminism.

2:35

It is also conceivably

2:39

the time the moment

2:42

where the Christian right became

2:44

a thing, where the religious

2:47

rite, i should say more specifically, and

2:49

that the religious right became came

2:51

to hold tremendous way over

2:53

the Republican Party. A lot of people point

2:55

to the election of Ronald Reagan. Some

2:58

people take it a little further back and point

3:01

to Jerry Folwell's organization

3:03

of the Moral Majority Political Action Committee.

3:06

Nope, Apparently it happened two years before

3:08

Fallwell in Houston, Texas, and

3:10

it was an rally that was designed

3:13

to oppose this women's conference

3:16

by women who were threatened by

3:18

the idea of women being stripped

3:21

of their traditional roles

3:23

of homemaker. There was a huge opposition

3:25

of women who believed

3:28

that the family was the basic

3:31

unit of society and

3:33

that that family was meant to have the mom

3:35

stay home with the kids and the dad go off

3:38

and be the wage journer. And that worked fine

3:40

in Dandy after the post war

3:43

World War two era, but that became

3:46

increasingly difficult as

3:48

this time war on wag's

3:50

real wages failed to keep up with inflation, and

3:52

all of a sudden, you actually kind of needed the mom

3:54

to go out and work. And so to these women, this

3:57

is like a literal breakdown in the fabric

3:59

of society, and they were very upset about this,

4:01

and they very much blamed feminists

4:04

who seemed to want to push things in that direction.

4:06

Not only weren't opposed to it, they wanted to

4:09

push things in that direction, and so this huge

4:11

opposition came up.

4:12

That's right. And it was also a time

4:15

specifically, you

4:17

know, you were talking about the opposition movement just

4:19

in general, but specifically to oppose

4:22

the Equal Rights Amendment, which

4:24

was proposed first in nineteen twenty three, technically

4:29

passed the House and Senate in nineteen seventy two,

4:31

still not written into the US Constitution.

4:36

We can't get into it now because it is a very

4:38

long and convoluted story.

4:40

Well, we did an episode on it, did we on.

4:43

The whole thing? How

4:45

when was that?

4:48

I know, man, I know, I would

4:50

say in the last three years.

4:52

Interesting because there's new stuff that's happened

4:54

in the last few years. So I wonder, yeah, if it was

4:56

before that, dish

4:58

well, I mean, just like lawsuits

5:01

like Virginia coming on board,

5:04

which meant which

5:06

means we had three quarters of the state approval

5:08

basically everything in place that is

5:10

required to make a constitutional amendment.

5:13

But then people are like, well wait a minute, other

5:15

people rescinded THEIRS and Virginia

5:18

came on late and there said previously

5:20

been rescinded. So then there were lawsuits

5:22

and here I said, we weren't getting

5:24

into it, and I'm kind of getting into it. But I think

5:27

the last lawsuit said

5:31

it's still not happening, man,

5:33

and that was in the last couple of years.

5:35

That's still just crazy to me.

5:37

Yeah it is. But anyway, Yeah, we did do an

5:40

episode on that. That's why it seems so familiar. But we

5:42

did.

5:42

And the reason why

5:44

it seems familiar is because Phillis Shaffley figured

5:46

Big into that, and she figures Big into this too.

5:49

Yeah. So Phillis Shafflee was an

5:51

attorney, a very much

5:54

conservative right wing activist,

5:56

and who was played by Cate Blanchette

5:59

wonderfully in Missus America.

6:02

Yeah, she did a great job. She

6:06

founded the Stop Era.

6:10

I was about you call it a club or

6:12

organization, and I just have

6:14

to shout out the fact that stop

6:17

is what's called a backronym. That's

6:19

when you have an acronym that's already

6:21

a word, So all

6:24

you really needed was an organization called

6:26

stop Era. It actually

6:28

stands for stop taking our privilege

6:31

privileges. And you

6:33

can't use a word from

6:35

the acronym or backronym in

6:37

your acronym or backronym, it's

6:40

no.

6:40

Or else you're just saying it twice, right, Yeah.

6:42

It's just so clumsy, and we like to critique acronyms

6:45

as good or bad. I

6:47

give stop Era just an unnecessary.

6:50

Okay, yeah, we need a rubber

6:52

stamp for that, or no, a metal

6:55

clanging sound like you've embossed

6:57

it.

6:58

At any rate, philishafflete foun you

7:00

don't want to work this out? All

7:03

right? What are we doing?

7:04

The So you remember like the old

7:07

production company that created

7:09

Dragnet, It was like Mark seven or something

7:11

like that.

7:12

Don't remember that, but sure, well

7:14

we'll go.

7:15

Off and watch an episode of Dragnet and then at the end

7:17

I'll point it out to you, okay.

7:18

And it was like a set ubu set good

7:20

dog thing.

7:21

Kind of but yes, exactly it was the same premise,

7:23

but it was it was somebody like putting like a

7:26

metal stamp and they hit it with

7:28

like, ah, like a hammer.

7:31

Yeah. It made that that metal emboss

7:33

engraving sound. Okay, that I want

7:35

to rip off is what I'm saying.

7:38

All right, so we give stop e r a an

7:41

unnecessary Oh.

7:44

That sounds good. That was really good, Jerry.

7:49

The we should talk about the beginnings, the seed

7:51

of this conference It happened on

7:54

the heels of the UN saying nineteen

7:57

seventy five is the International

8:00

Woman's Year, and they had

8:02

a international conference in Mexico

8:04

City that year. And that's when

8:06

gerald Ford stood up and said, all right,

8:09

here's an Executive Order number one one eighty

8:11

three to two. We'll give you five million

8:13

bucks to about twenty nine

8:15

million dollars today to create

8:18

the National Commission on

8:20

the Observance of in an International

8:22

Women's Year, and like, go

8:24

have your big conference, work

8:26

out what you want to bring back to us, which is what

8:28

we're refer too earlier.

8:30

Yeah, and that five million sounds like a lot to fund

8:32

some conferences, and it is, but I've read

8:34

from somebody who was kind of sour on

8:36

the whole thing point out that that's less

8:38

than a nickel a woman for every woman

8:40

that was in America at the time.

8:43

Yeah, but twenty nine million comparatively,

8:46

you can't pull a conference off for that. I'm

8:48

with you, But okay, they'll do it for a million.

8:51

A very important point was

8:53

it was also a series of conferences. First.

8:55

They had state conferences first, Yeah,

8:58

figure out what they were going to bring the

9:00

national conference. So it was like this

9:02

year long of conference, and like

9:05

looking back now, you're like, wow, people

9:07

were talking about women and women's rights a

9:09

lot at the time, and it was

9:12

a huge like there was. It was just in

9:14

the zeitgeist, like women's rights was moving

9:16

forward at this incredible clip. Just two

9:19

things. Time declared the

9:21

nineteen seventy five Man of the Year to

9:23

be the American Woman. Yeah,

9:25

and I read that the nineteen seventy

9:27

one seventy two Congress, I think that

9:29

was the ninety second Congress, they passed

9:32

more women's rights legislation

9:34

than all previous legislative sessions

9:37

combined. So it was it was a

9:39

huge It seemed like a juggernaut. And of course

9:41

women were going to have all the rights that men

9:43

have. The Equal Rights Amendment was going to be

9:46

become a part of the Constitution. It was just in

9:48

the air. So this conference just made sense.

9:51

Yeah. Can I read that Time magazine quote

9:53

because it's pretty great. Yeah, this was in

9:55

the quote unquote Man of

9:57

the Year article said enough US

10:00

women have so deliberately taken possession

10:02

of their lives that the event

10:04

is spiritually equivalent to

10:06

the discovery of a new continent.

10:08

That's so awesome.

10:09

Man, whoever wrote that, nice work.

10:12

James time.

10:14

Oh, Jimmy time. So there's

10:17

a congress person named Bella Abzug

10:19

battling Bella Abzug from New

10:22

York who was a real

10:24

firebrand and was one

10:26

of the biggest advocates for this congress.

10:29

I'm sorry for this conference in Congress. And

10:32

she got together with some other organizers,

10:34

like you mentioned, there were state and regional

10:36

conferences. They were

10:38

gonna choose about two thousand delegates,

10:41

and they were really really smart because

10:45

and you know, maybe if we told Josh I

10:47

was putting together sort of a easily

10:50

two parter on just the history of feminism.

10:55

Oh, you weren't talking to me just that.

10:56

I see, No, let's talk to the listener.

10:58

You know. I got to people out

11:00

there in podcast land.

11:02

I'm psyched about that one. I've been wanting to do that

11:04

forever and we need to We

11:06

need to do that sooner than later, for sure, because I've

11:08

been wanting to do that one for years.

11:10

Yeah, for sure. But I think where

11:12

I was going was that they were

11:14

really smart in that. Uh oh, I nowhere

11:16

else head it is that in

11:19

certain ways of feminism, there was not

11:22

the most representation and as feminism

11:24

grew through the different movements

11:26

that expanded, and this was one of those moments

11:29

where they got really smart and they were like, you know,

11:31

we can't just make this about

11:35

white suburban women or white you know, I

11:37

guess urban women either. We need to

11:39

expand our pool

11:42

and talk to women who are farmers

11:44

and women who are basically

11:48

women who haven't been you know, minority

11:50

women who haven't been included as much in

11:52

this conversation. Will provide,

11:55

provide childcare. If

11:57

you can't afford to come, we'll pay your entrance fee.

12:00

Like it was just a really smart way to go about it, which

12:02

is like, let's bring everybody together finally

12:04

here in the nineteen seventies.

12:06

Yeah, and it is the conference encouraged

12:08

that they were trying to get the best representation

12:11

of women in America that they possibly could,

12:14

and so that conference kind of inadvertently

12:17

encouraged all these different types of feminists

12:20

to come together like they never had before. That

12:22

was a huge lasting

12:24

impact of it. Yeah, a lot of there

12:27

was a lot of infighting in

12:29

feminism at the time. There was the old

12:31

Guard, kind of personified by Betty Ferdan

12:34

who wrote The Feminine Mystique,

12:36

who was kind of opposed to

12:40

say, the gay contingent, which she called

12:42

the lavender menace, which she believed

12:45

prevented mainstream society from accepting

12:47

feminism and seeing it as credible. Like

12:51

you said, feminism was largely viewed

12:54

through the lens of white, middle class

12:56

women. This

12:59

was an expand scope

13:01

and it was it made some people nervous. They were like,

13:03

well, how are we going to get anything done with all these

13:05

opposing views? And it

13:08

was very fortunate that there was that small

13:10

contingent of conservatives who were

13:12

super mad about this, it still attended

13:14

this conference that allowed all

13:16

the other groups to come together to oppose

13:19

them and get these planks pushed

13:21

forward rather than fighting it amongst

13:23

one another. And it actually brought together different

13:26

branches of feminism that are still just

13:28

part of this coalition today.

13:30

Yeah, there was a lot of coalescing on both

13:32

sides because of this event. It's pretty incredible.

13:34

Yeah, because philis Shaffley

13:37

early on championed

13:39

to try and stop this from even happening,

13:42

like, hey, Congress, don't fund this thing. That

13:45

didn't work. And so a woman

13:47

named Lottie Beth Hobbes of Texas,

13:50

who features pretty prominently here, had

13:53

the idea to like to show up

13:55

and rabble rows and make their

13:57

voices heard on the other side. She

14:00

initially proposed it, and interestingly, Shaffley,

14:02

I think you found this wasn't immediately

14:05

on board because she was very

14:08

you know, she liked to play chess and not

14:10

checkers, and she was like, Hey,

14:13

if we show and there's a

14:15

low opposition turnout, we're going to look like

14:17

fools. But Lottie

14:20

Beth Hobbs said no, we're going

14:22

and you should get on board, and she did.

14:24

Yeah. That was Marjorie J. Sproule,

14:27

the historian turned that up, which

14:29

is fascinating as we'll see how that played out.

14:31

And the committee that was actually formed

14:35

by the anti era activist was

14:37

the IWY Citizens

14:39

Review Committee, and

14:42

again a coalescing, They're like, are you anti

14:44

gay, come and join us? Are you anti abortion?

14:47

Get over here? Do you not want the era

14:51

bill passed? Come along Catholics,

14:53

Mormons, evangelicals, And

14:56

this is what you were talking about earlier. That really

14:58

sort of galvanized the beginning of the

15:00

religious right.

15:01

Yeah. So the more inclusive the

15:03

feminists were in the conference, the

15:05

more targets it presented to

15:07

people opposed to it, the more likely

15:09

it made for those opponents to come together

15:12

in opposition and form like an

15:15

actual movement with real political clout,

15:17

and that became the religious

15:20

right. And apparently it was the inclusion

15:23

of a woman's right to abortion included

15:26

as part of the like the goals of this conference

15:29

that really kind of created

15:32

that what had not been a coalition

15:34

before where it was basically the Catholics

15:36

who were anti abortion up to that point and

15:39

the Evangelicals were saying, like anti gay.

15:41

Well, now they had something in

15:43

common feminism. Feminism is going

15:45

to ruin everything. There are other people who are anti era,

15:48

and it just brought all of them together. Like

15:50

you were saying, it's just nuts

15:54

how the fabric of our society today

15:57

formed over this weekend essentially in November.

16:00

Yeah, it's insane to me, Like

16:02

history so rarely tucked

16:05

into one little tiny corner three

16:08

days. Yeah, and this is a

16:10

really good example of that rare, rare

16:12

instance.

16:13

Yeah, because you know, you mentioned the

16:16

anti abortion like Roe v. Wade went

16:18

through in seventy three, but it didn't even

16:20

become officially part of the Republican platform

16:23

anti Roe v. Wade until nineteen seventy

16:25

six, And like you said,

16:28

it was something to coalesce

16:30

and bring people together. So like

16:32

both sides it's almost like they're going to war,

16:34

you know, both sides are bringing in

16:36

back up and they're mounting

16:39

the troops to sort of dig in on both sides.

16:41

At this one weekend in Houston, there

16:44

were conservative delegates

16:47

that did get elected. Utah,

16:49

Mississippi had delegates there. They

16:52

got elected because they had more you know, conservative

16:54

voters in those states.

16:55

Yeah, those state conferences that were held

16:58

before the nation conference. Yeah,

17:00

that's where they elected delegates. And if you're in a conservative

17:03

state, you were sending conservative delegates.

17:05

So much so Mississippi sent six men

17:08

to the women's conference, as I

17:10

guess a symbol as well of like

17:13

these are the men, these are this is who in charge.

17:15

Is in charge, they should be the ones who are the

17:17

delegates. There was actually seven

17:20

men. South Carolina sent

17:22

a male delegate too, but he apparently didn't

17:25

show up. So you will very frequently

17:27

see that out of the two thousand delegates, only

17:29

only six were men.

17:31

Yeah, and Mississippi also sent Dallas

17:33

Higgins, who was married to George

17:37

Higgins, who was the leader of

17:39

the Kukux Klan in Mississippi. So

17:42

do with that what you will.

17:43

Got a lot of ground to cover Mississippi.

17:46

So as far as the other

17:49

delegates on the you know, the non

17:51

conservative delegates, they were obviously

17:54

feminists there with their agenda.

17:57

A lot of them were political insiders

18:00

who had been around for a long time. They

18:03

brought out all the stars though, they're like, Gloria

18:05

Steinem, you get in here, Correta,

18:08

Scott King, come on down, Shirley

18:11

Chisholm, who Ruby

18:13

just did a project on Churley

18:15

Chislm for Black History Month, so I learned

18:17

all about her, which is amazing.

18:19

She was the first black woman elected to Congress.

18:21

Right, first black woman elected to Congress,

18:23

and first black woman to run for president of

18:25

the United States.

18:26

Oh, I didn't know that, nat.

18:27

Which is incredible. Barbara Jordan

18:29

of course was there. And if you want

18:31

a real showstopper, you

18:34

got to get my Angelou to write a

18:36

custom poem for the event.

18:38

Yeah. What was it called? Like toward to More Perfect.

18:40

Union, to form a more Perfect

18:42

Union that was written for this conference.

18:44

Yeah, pretty cool. So

18:48

we keep talking about Houston and Texas and if

18:50

you're like, well, why would they hold a women's rights

18:52

conference in Houston? Or in Texas.

18:55

There are a couple of reasons why Texas was actually

18:57

one of the states that had already ratified

18:59

the ER, and Houston

19:02

was a well. Also, Barbara Jordan was

19:04

a congress person from Texas from

19:06

Houston, so they had even more feminist

19:08

cred And then Houston actually had a

19:12

an agency

19:15

basically a Woman's Advocate agency

19:17

in the city office.

19:20

And so like all of these things put together, mete

19:22

Houston seemed like, hey, this is a city on the rise

19:24

as far as feminism goes in.

19:27

In reaction and response to finding

19:29

out that Houston was where the national conference

19:31

was going to be, the Governor of Texas declared

19:33

that week national Family Week. Very

19:36

clearly through his lot or Texas's

19:38

lot in with the anti era people,

19:42

the Houston

19:44

City Council had diminished the

19:46

funding for that Woman's Advocate office

19:48

to one dollar a year and

19:51

essentially just eliminated it. They

19:53

took a lot of steps to kind of go backwards when

19:56

they found out this is this is going to be in Houston,

19:58

like most of Houston's establishment

20:01

was not happy that this was going to happen here.

20:04

I thought you were going to say it happened in Houston, because

20:06

that meant that I'm one day closer to you. M

20:09

Mmm, No, No, you

20:14

ever heard that song?

20:15

No? Is that a tron D song?

20:17

No, it's uh, he's a Gallon Brothers

20:19

or Larry Gatlin.

20:20

Maybe what's the song?

20:22

Houston? Parentheses means

20:24

I'm one day closer to you. It's

20:27

a good song.

20:28

Okay, I've not heard it.

20:29

Stun means that I'm one day closer

20:32

to you.

20:33

Nope, still have not heard that.

20:35

Yeah, I guess maybe she lived in Dallas

20:37

or something. Anyway, that

20:39

joke didn't work. So let's take a break.

20:42

Is this our first break?

20:44

It's got to be Yauza. All right,

20:46

we'll be right back. All

21:14

right. So this conference began with a very symbolic

21:18

event or gesture, I guess, or a series of gestures.

21:21

They modeled it on the Seneca Falls Convention

21:23

of eighteen forty eight, which was the

21:25

big sort of bedrock event

21:28

of the beginnings of the woman's suffrage

21:30

movement. And so they

21:32

got a torch Olympic style,

21:35

got all these athletes, all these women to go,

21:38

I mean all across the board, like high school girls,

21:41

all the way to Olympians

21:43

themselves, and they passed that torch

21:45

quite symbolically from Seneca

21:47

Falls all the way to Houston. Maya

21:50

Angelou comes in with that poem, brings

21:53

the house down. All the heavy hitters

21:55

are there. That national

21:57

news coverage is just going bonkers.

22:00

There were morning TV shows that literally set up

22:02

camp. There was in all the magazines.

22:05

The first Ladies got together. I

22:07

think Roslynd Carter was the active

22:10

first Lady at the time, but Lady brig Johnson,

22:12

Betty Ford, they all came and got on stage

22:15

together and in the end, including

22:19

the delegates, anywhere between

22:22

seventeen and mid thirty thousand people,

22:25

it depends on who's counting.

22:27

Yeah, that's a significant number of people

22:29

who came to show up. And

22:31

so they were talking about a

22:33

ton of different stuff. Remember all each

22:36

state sent delegates. In each delegate

22:38

or group of delegates had their own

22:41

pet project that they wanted to pass

22:43

their own The point was

22:45

to put together a bunch of planks to form a platform

22:48

to send to Congress and the President and say this

22:50

is what you start passing this and women

22:52

will be much more equal in the United States.

22:55

Right. So Olivia pointed

22:58

out, some of the planks are all of the planks

23:00

in The final plan covered

23:03

arts and humanities. May I do this one

23:05

sure? Battered women, business,

23:07

child abuse, childcare, credit, disabled

23:10

women, education, elective and appointed

23:12

office, employment, equal Rights Amendment,

23:14

health, homemakers, insurance, international

23:17

affairs, media, minority women,

23:19

offenders, older women, rape,

23:21

reproductive freedom, rural women,

23:24

sexual preference statistics, and

23:26

women welfare and poverty. Those

23:28

are the planks that ended up in this final

23:31

platform. It covered everything, and that was a

23:33

direct result of bringing so many

23:36

different women from so many different walks

23:38

of life together and say like, what do you need

23:40

to be to thrive in the United

23:42

States?

23:43

Yeah, they've tried foot rubs here, Like

23:46

can we just get like one a week from

23:48

our partner? Is that too much to ask without

23:50

some without grousing?

23:51

Is that okay? Can you imagine if the federal

23:53

government mandated that you have to do that would

23:56

be hilarious.

23:56

Well at the time they probably said, all right, you get your foot rub,

23:59

but we get two in return.

24:00

Oh yeah, So.

24:03

There was You know, I mentioned that the

24:05

news was covering it big time, and

24:09

I don't think this is any accident that it was a woman's

24:11

conference. There was a lot of talk of like of

24:14

in fighting and even fighting or

24:17

not even fighting, but obviously fighting

24:19

between the two sides, and

24:21

they may even physically confront one another

24:24

and get in fistfights, and it's

24:26

just that sort of old, you know, cat

24:28

fight trope that's so worn out, and

24:30

it was I'm sure worn out in the

24:32

mid seventies as well. Of

24:34

course that did not happen. One

24:37

of the reasons is because there were only about three

24:40

hundred Conservatives there and

24:42

they were just far out numbered. They

24:45

did have ribbons, they had lapel

24:48

ribbons that said majority, which

24:50

is kind of where this whole idea of hey

24:54

with a moral majority, like we

24:57

are the majority, Like most American women

25:00

don't want what you're suggesting, so

25:02

here's our little pin to suggest.

25:04

That, right, And so that

25:06

was kind of how the media portrayed the

25:09

people who were what the feminists

25:12

the other delegates called antis. The

25:15

conservative delegates were called antis

25:17

by everybody else because they were anti everything. When

25:19

they passed passed the platform,

25:22

you could vote on individual planks, they just

25:24

voted against the whole thing. So it was viewed

25:26

as this kind of single coalition and

25:29

step with philis Shaffley. And

25:31

it turns out that there was a reporter for the Nation

25:34

named Lucy Kamasar, who did

25:36

more digging than the rest of the media and

25:38

found that actually, no,

25:41

like a lot of the women walking around with

25:43

majority pins on are

25:46

like, yes, they're anti federal government, but

25:48

they're pro federally

25:50

funded healthcare or childcare.

25:53

They oppose rape like they weren't.

25:55

It wasn't just like complete locksteps

25:57

she showed, but that wasn't the story that got

26:00

told about the opposition at

26:02

the conference by the rest of the media.

26:05

I'm loath to make another music

26:08

joke, now, let's hear it. I

26:11

just wonder if every time she walked into the room they

26:13

said, hey, don't turn around.

26:17

Is that a Ace of bass joke?

26:19

You get this one?

26:20

Ace of bass?

26:21

No Falco, don't

26:24

turn around? They're commisars in town.

26:27

Oh yeah, okay.

26:29

That's got better or worse than the other one?

26:31

Uh, much better because i've heard that song.

26:33

Yeah, different spelling.

26:34

Plus it's a good song. I'm not convinced that

26:37

the Houston one day closer to the song

26:39

is good.

26:40

Oh you probably like it. Larry Gatlin, Sure

26:42

you remember the Gatlin Brothers.

26:44

What was their big hit?

26:47

Houston? Was it?

26:48

Really? Because I've heard them before, but I've never

26:51

heard a big hit of that song.

26:53

They were big. That was that whole seventies thing when country

26:56

just had a big sort of movement country

26:59

music with a Mandres Sisters and all that.

27:00

But there was another song of theirs that I would

27:02

have heard of.

27:04

Well, how about this. You look that up and

27:08

I'll bring us forward. I haven't set it back

27:10

like I keep doing. So

27:12

the platform itself passed,

27:16

you know, and with flying colors, like most people

27:18

expected it would, with all the progressive

27:20

delegates there. One of the biggest

27:22

exceptions of that, though, was how

27:26

they were dealing with racial inequality, because

27:28

they had put together a brief

27:31

addressing this that basically just said, hey,

27:35

no double discrimination here, Like,

27:38

it's already bad enough that women

27:41

of color are being discriminated against because of

27:43

their skin tone, but you can't

27:45

double up because they're women as well. And

27:47

maybe let's get some bilingual programs

27:49

going. So they trot this out

27:51

to their delegation and

27:54

a lot of women of color stood up,

27:56

and I was like, this isn't enough. This is very

27:58

vague. So we

28:01

actually have a plan that we put together beforehand.

28:04

It's called the Black Women's Plan of

28:06

Action, the b w p A and

28:08

we would like to swap that in for this minority

28:11

resolution that you've crafted.

28:14

Right, And that was a that

28:16

was a big deal that it actually got

28:18

that far, and even better than that, it

28:21

actually was voted on enthusiastically.

28:23

It was like a six page plank that

28:26

really covered everything that the

28:29

that women of color generally

28:31

were interested in seeing resolved,

28:35

and it got added to this to this platform.

28:37

Kreta Scott King presented it on

28:39

the last night to the delegation

28:42

and it received it

28:45

passed by an overwhelming majority. And

28:48

this was really kind of part

28:50

of the spirit of this conference.

28:54

The women broke into singing,

28:56

we shall overcome together after

28:59

they voted in favor of adding that

29:01

plank, rather than just the hey,

29:03

let's all be you know, let's be considerate

29:06

of women of color, like that was the original

29:08

plank.

29:09

Yeah. And it's also notable because

29:11

once the Black Women's Plan

29:13

of Action was presented and they came

29:16

forward, then Asian women

29:18

and Puerto Rican women and Chicana

29:21

Native American women they were delegates.

29:24

There were delegates there as well representing them and they were

29:26

like, well, hey, like we

29:28

should all have our voice. And I

29:31

think it was just one of those big moments like

29:33

we've been talking about of coalescing, where

29:36

a lot of these white feminists

29:39

were like, hey, you know, I don't know if we've

29:41

done right by our sisters

29:43

of color, So like, we

29:46

we're all about inclusion, yet we're not

29:48

being as inclusive as we should be,

29:51

right, And this was that moment when it happened.

29:53

Yeah, a very similar thing happened with the

29:55

gay contingent of the feminist

29:58

second Wave, which again Betty

30:00

Fredaine called the lavender Menace,

30:03

not because she necessarily had a personal

30:05

problem with lesbians,

30:07

but because she saw

30:10

that as a huge obstacle to mainstream

30:12

America taking feminism

30:14

seriously. And one of the reasons why

30:16

is because at the

30:18

time, you've heard of man

30:21

haters, right, it was just kind of like a trope

30:23

that was funny, and it was usually assigned

30:25

to all feminists. That was what they used

30:27

to describe lesbians before. That's

30:29

what they were characterized as in

30:32

the media and in the popular culture. Man

30:34

haters. That's the only reason anybody could

30:36

ever be a lesbian. You'd have to hate men. And

30:39

that also kind of dovetailed with

30:41

an actual thread of like real

30:44

disdain for the patriarchy

30:46

and male dominance that was alive

30:49

and well in some sections of second

30:51

wave feminism at the time. And

30:53

although they represented a minority

30:56

of feminists in general, including

30:58

the feminists at this convention, those

31:00

are the ones who get the microphone stuck in their face

31:02

because they made the great the best press, So

31:04

they had a disproportionately large

31:07

voice, and they seemed like

31:09

they were hobbling feminism as a result,

31:11

because who wants to

31:13

get in league with man haters?

31:15

You know, Yeah, for sure, And I

31:17

think that was a real It seems like at least there was

31:19

a realization within this conference

31:22

and within the delegation that they were like,

31:24

this is really our moment to bring everybody

31:27

together because there's obviously

31:29

going to be you know, it's going to be a stronger

31:31

movement if we're representing everyone

31:33

and everyone's on board. So Betty

31:35

for Dan during the debate,

31:38

very publicly endorsed the resolution, completely

31:41

reversed her previous position, and that

31:43

was, you know, people within the movement,

31:46

Betty for Dan was a very sort

31:49

of a founding member and a voice that was important.

31:51

So it was a big deal.

31:53

Yeah. And so when they voted overwhelmingly

31:55

again in favor of including

31:59

the gay and less being contingent

32:01

as part of that. I don't remember exactly what

32:03

the plank was, but it was essentially

32:06

saying like, guess we're your

32:08

legit human beings and we recognize

32:10

that, and everybody should. They broke out

32:13

into song again and they sang, Houston, I'm

32:15

one day closer than to you.

32:18

I thought you were going to say, like an Indigo Girl song.

32:20

No, but I did look up Larry Gatlin.

32:23

Still no clue. I have no idea how I've ever

32:25

heard of him, because I've not heard of any of his songs.

32:28

That the Gatlin Brothers nothing.

32:29

Nope, all right, there's a song

32:31

called Broken Lady, which sounds awful,

32:33

but that's their biggest hit, and I

32:36

don't think i've heard that one.

32:38

H Was it Broken

32:40

Lady? Parentheses? Get

32:42

me some glue?

32:44

What is going on with you today?

32:46

I don't know. I'm a big lover of the parenthetical

32:50

song title. You don't see those anymore.

32:51

It's true, It's true, you really

32:53

don't who What was it?

32:56

Oh? That Cutting Crew song? I Just

32:58

Died in your Arms tonight song? Great

33:01

song?

33:01

Is that a parenthetical?

33:02

Yes? I just is in

33:04

parentheses? Is need?

33:06

Yes?

33:07

The title of the song is in parentheses. I just in

33:09

parentheses died in your arms tonight,

33:11

Like it couldn't just be died in your arms tonight.

33:14

Wow, a frontloaded parenthetical. That's unique.

33:16

But also I say we brand this one unnecessary

33:19

too, shall we? Okay, very

33:23

nice. I did not see that coming up

33:25

again, frankly.

33:28

So they did not sing that song. But after

33:30

that vote, there was also obviously

33:33

a reproductive Freedom resolution.

33:36

This supported government funding for

33:38

abortion and sex said that

33:41

passed very easily as well, like

33:43

everything else, But the Conservatives

33:45

were really upset about this one obviously, And

33:47

say they got up on stage

33:50

with a huge blown up picture of an

33:53

aborted fetus and they

33:55

sang everyone's getting up and singing, I

33:58

imagine, much to John and Yoko's may

34:01

they saying. All we were saying is give life a

34:03

chance. And in

34:05

the meantime, the other side

34:07

is out there chanting choice, choice,

34:10

choice, and it's just a you

34:13

know, it's quite a scene happening there.

34:15

Like the energy in that conference

34:18

center must have been incredible for sure.

34:20

And then everybody got brought down when

34:22

the plank, the proposal to create

34:25

a cabinet level Department

34:27

of Women's Affairs was voted

34:29

down, and they had good reason too.

34:31

Actually, there were a lot of women who are like, sure,

34:34

that sounds good. There are a lot of other

34:36

women at the conference who are like, no, we do not

34:38

want to pigeonhole all of

34:40

women's problems into one agency.

34:43

Like our problems and the thing are our goals

34:45

and our hopes. They spread over

34:47

everything else, Like we're humans,

34:50

like we should we have all the same interests

34:52

that men do. Why should we just have one cabinet

34:55

position that all of our stuff is shoveled

34:57

into. It doesn't make any sense. So they actually

34:59

combine their votes with the anties, who again, we're voting

35:01

against literally everything that

35:04

everybody else was voting yes on,

35:07

and they actually managed to scuttle that one. I

35:09

think that was a good move.

35:11

I think so too, because I wonder if all

35:14

the eggs had been in that one basket, if you

35:16

know, four years later, they're like, you know what we're gonna We're

35:18

gonna acts that position and all together,

35:21

yeah, or that cabinet.

35:23

Yeah, like they did with the Woman's Advocate Agency

35:26

in Houston.

35:27

Yeah, And then all of a sudden, you're nowhere again.

35:30

Right. All we're

35:32

saying is give life a chance, you

35:34

want to take our second break and then come back

35:36

and talk a little bit more about the counter mobilization

35:39

and what came of that.

35:40

Let's do it all,

36:08

right, So we mentioned at the beginning in

36:10

sort of pepper throughout some of these counter

36:12

protests. These

36:14

aren't the actual conservative

36:17

conservative delegates that are there at the

36:19

conference. This is the group

36:21

headed by Texan

36:24

Lottiebeth Hobbes, who was

36:27

the president of an anti era group

36:29

called Women who Want

36:31

to Be Women, the w W w

36:34

W. This was happening across

36:36

town. There was also a woman named Nellie

36:39

Gray. She was the president of March

36:41

for Life. They had their own big

36:43

rally, and this is where they really

36:45

brought together. Like we mentioned

36:47

earlier, like hey, if you're if

36:49

you lead a group, a

36:52

Catholic group or a conservative group

36:54

or any sort of this

36:57

is where they started sort of

36:59

dubbing themselves the

37:02

I don't know about traditional family, but just the family

37:05

movement, the pro family movement, right,

37:08

which is a bit of a

37:10

thumb in the eye to the other side, saying you

37:12

don't care about families.

37:14

Exactly, you must be anti family standard

37:16

grade school tactics, and you still see it today

37:18

oh.

37:19

You absolutely do. But this was the moment where

37:21

they got together on the other side

37:23

of town and said, everyone who

37:26

is against this stuff come together

37:29

and will will

37:32

at least try to put our differences aside

37:34

and coalesce as well.

37:36

Yes, they also got huge support

37:38

from No Ma'am, the National Organization

37:40

for Men against Amazonian Masterhood,

37:45

and I think something

37:47

like fifteen thousand people

37:49

came out for this antier,

37:52

anti feminist rally that

37:54

they held in opposition to the Women's Conference.

37:57

Remember the high end

37:59

of Women's Conference was thirty two thousand

38:02

the lower and that the number

38:04

ICEE bandied about most often is around twenty

38:07

thousand, So this is a significant

38:09

number of people in opposition coming to Houston

38:12

for this. And remember Philis

38:14

Shaffley was like, I don't think we should do this,

38:16

and had Lottie Beth Hobbs not been like,

38:18

we're doing it anyway,

38:21

this probably never would have happened. And

38:23

Philis Shafflee gets all like

38:25

across the board the credit for

38:28

founding this rally. It was almost all Lotti

38:30

Beth Hobb But once Lotti Beth

38:32

Hobb was like, we're doing it anyway, Phylis Shaffley was like, Okay,

38:34

can't beat them, join them, And so she came

38:36

and spoke and

38:39

in establishing a lot of like that, like

38:41

you said, thumb and the eye kind of tactics

38:44

that we still see today. The first

38:46

thing she said when when Philis

38:48

Shafflee gave her remarks

38:50

on stage, she thanked her husband

38:52

for allowing her to be there, and

38:54

apparently the crowd just went wild for that

38:56

one. And one of the other things

38:59

that I saw is that a lot of the people

39:01

there had signs or boasted to

39:03

the press about how they had paid their own

39:05

way to make it there, which was a shot at

39:07

the women who needed help

39:10

or government funding to attend the Houston

39:12

conference. It's not very nice stuff.

39:14

So it was a really very

39:17

targeted, very specific, very

39:20

effective anti er

39:22

anti women's conference rally, the

39:25

pro family rally, and it got a lot

39:27

of press attention as well, Like people

39:29

would report from the women's conference then they go over

39:31

to the proe pro family rally and

39:34

it was just crazy amazing press.

39:37

Yeah, totally, And it was the moment where they

39:39

were like, not only did the press

39:41

notice, but and this was one of the bigger

39:43

reasons why they did this is they wanted and

39:45

got the attention of the Republican Party. So

39:49

it's like all of this stuff wasn't

39:51

officially platformed yet, and

39:53

or some of it wasn't, and so this

39:56

was when the Republican Party was like, all right, listen,

39:58

we need to platform all this stuff officially.

40:01

And it was just again,

40:03

just this this three days. It's really incredible how

40:06

much it shaped things. I know, you found an

40:09

interview where Lottie Beth Hobbs,

40:12

you know, because she was from Houston

40:14

and a Texan, like, had

40:16

this big rally, and like, what would have happened

40:19

had this not even been in Texas? And

40:21

who knows? You can only speculate of what

40:24

would have happened. I imagine, you know, Jerry

40:26

Folwell came around not too long afterward

40:28

anyway, So I'm sure this movement would

40:30

have taken hold, but maybe not as soon.

40:32

Here's the thing. Maybe not as soon, maybe

40:34

not as tenaciously. Because that

40:37

rally, the pro Family rally that

40:40

was in opposition of the Women's Conference, it

40:42

attracted fifteen thousand attendees,

40:46

that got the attention of a lot of different people,

40:48

including the Republican Party. But

40:50

also it showed those people

40:53

the attendees, like hey, you're

40:55

an orthodox Jew. Hey you're Catholic.

40:58

Hey you're an evangelical Christian. Hey,

41:00

you just hate the idea of the federal government

41:02

overstepping its bounds. All of us,

41:05

we have all sorts of stuff that we disagree on.

41:07

Doesn't matter because we all hate this other

41:09

stuff more and want it to not happen.

41:12

So if we just hang in together, if we just

41:14

stay together, like

41:16

we can actually have a lot of political

41:18

clout as a coalition. That

41:21

rally showed them that. So

41:23

had that rally not happened, it's entirely

41:26

possible that coalition might not have formed

41:28

or not have formed in the way that it did form,

41:31

and it certainly wouldn't have formed in time

41:33

to basically take over the Republican

41:36

Party and support the Reagan presidency

41:38

for the vast majority of the eighties.

41:41

Like it's sounding to think for

41:43

good and bad, what how

41:46

different the United States

41:49

would be? Like this is a turning point

41:51

in American modern American history

41:53

this weekend.

41:54

Yeah, for sure, it's crazy.

41:56

That was by the way, that was Marjorie's sprule again

41:59

that historian who was being interviewed in Houstonia

42:01

magazine sisod

42:04

interview.

42:04

Yeah, so the

42:07

outcome of all this was obviously

42:09

you know, they passed all these planks. They

42:12

ride up their report,

42:14

I guess called the Spirit of Houston, and

42:17

they handed it over to President

42:19

Carter and Congress. So

42:21

Carter says, you know, I support all this stuff.

42:24

Of course, your goals look pretty

42:26

great to me. But then, like

42:28

I said at the very very beginning, not a lot

42:30

actually happened. As far

42:32

as real practical moves there

42:35

was. They extended the and

42:39

we talked about this in my freshly

42:41

remembered era episode

42:44

where there are a lot of different cutoff dates, like

42:46

you got to get it done by this year or else it's

42:48

off the table. He extended the time

42:51

for ratification to nineteen eighty two. There

42:54

was some protections against

42:57

discrimination based on pregnancy. They

43:00

said, hey, you can get

43:02

some Social Security benefits if

43:04

you have been a homemaker your whole life and you got divorced,

43:06

Like we're recognizing that as a job

43:09

for the first time. And a

43:12

lot of feminists that were there were like pretty

43:14

upset by inaction and by

43:17

the fact that Carter supported the High Amendment, which

43:20

totally took down the reproductive

43:22

Funding Plank, basically

43:24

banning the use of federal funding

43:26

for abortion.

43:27

Yeah. They were also really mad at Carter for cutting

43:30

social programs to pay for increased defense

43:32

spending as well, which is

43:34

not what you think of when you think of Jimmy Carter. But

43:37

apparently he got a little more conservative later

43:39

in his presidency. And

43:42

so it just essentially

43:44

went nowhere. Like if you read like

43:47

assessments of what came out

43:49

of the Women's Conference of nineteen seventy seven

43:52

in Houston, most of

43:54

the most of the positive

43:56

silver lining parts are

43:58

that it

44:01

helped women come together

44:04

who otherwise would not have ever met and

44:06

basically swap strategies, stop

44:08

swap organizing methods,

44:11

saying like, hey, we're organizing

44:13

like domestic abuse shelters

44:15

and rape crisis centers, and this is how we're doing it.

44:17

And basically it helped on the grassroots.

44:20

It took a bunch of different germs

44:22

and put them together and they spread beneath

44:26

the federal level and the state and local level,

44:28

and it really helped women advance

44:30

in that sense. But federally

44:32

it went nowhere almost

44:35

at all. It went almost nowhere.

44:38

Yeah, And you know, we talked

44:41

a lot in this episode about the fact that you

44:44

know, galvanizing different kinds of women

44:46

together, but one that we haven't mentioned yet that

44:49

Lucy Kammas are don't turn around.

44:52

She was a nation reporter said to her,

44:55

the most remarkable aspect was not

44:57

bringing together like necessarily bringing

45:00

lesbians under their wing and women

45:02

of color, but bringing women who might

45:04

typically vote Republican in

45:07

their past, bringing them in because

45:09

they cared about some of this stuff as well, and

45:12

you don't have to care about all of it to support

45:15

this thing. And she was just like, that

45:17

was the most remarkable part to her.

45:19

Yeah, which makes a lot of sense. But

45:21

unfortunately, one of the other outcomes

45:23

of that weekend was you do have to

45:25

choose, Like these groups,

45:28

these coalitions solidified

45:31

and in opposition to one another,

45:33

so and both of the political

45:35

parties were essentially forced to choose. There

45:38

was no like, oh, actually,

45:40

I kind of agree with this point over here, So

45:42

I guess I'm independent. I don't know

45:45

the state of the country that we live in today, that polarized

45:47

country. You can actually date

45:49

it back to this. This is the cradle of it. It's

45:53

I just can't stop being in awe

45:55

of the effect that it had.

45:57

Yeah, totally, I'm always very

46:00

fascinated by the independent voter. It's

46:02

really interesting. To be clear, I'm not knocking independent

46:04

voters. I just i'd find it fascinating.

46:06

Sure, I wasn't knocking them either. It just made

46:08

me think of something else.

46:10

I was just trying to cut off the emails or like Chuck didn't,

46:13

Chuck thinks you should vote all one way. That's not what I'm

46:15

saying.

46:16

No, no, no, no, no no, I don't think that came

46:18

across like that at all. No. So ok yeah, if anybody

46:20

was sending in that email, they would have been wrong, wrong,

46:23

wrong, Have you got anything else?

46:25

All right? No, I'm done, done, done.

46:26

Okay, Well, Chuck said done three times in a

46:29

row, which of course automatically unlocks listener

46:31

mail.

46:34

I thought that meant the candy man appeared.

46:36

The candy man reads listener mail.

46:39

But the candy man I'm talking about, you.

46:41

Know, you mean the kind that brings you eminems

46:43

and stuff, right.

46:44

No, the kind that smoked

46:47

with a glass eye.

46:49

No, okay, all

46:51

right, this is that's

46:53

fromer, an eighth grader. We love reading these kinds of things.

46:56

Hey, Josh, Chuck and Jerry. My

46:59

name is Beatrix, great name. Yeah,

47:01

I'm an eighth grader in mckinville, Oregon.

47:03

I listen to your episodes constantly all

47:06

caps, and I really wanted to make it

47:08

to your Portland show, but unfortunately I missed it.

47:10

My mom and I live almost an hour away from where I

47:12

go to school and where she works, so we

47:14

often listen to your stuff on the way. I recently

47:17

listened to the Rock, Paper Scissors app

47:19

and you mentioned that no one plays just refined, but without

47:22

needing to make a decision. But

47:24

my class does and it really annoys

47:26

me because there's no point. Also,

47:29

I would love an episode on ADHD, specifically

47:32

what causes it Beatrix.

47:34

That's coming sort of soon. I

47:37

do have a small convention though, Guys, though I've been listening

47:40

for over a year, I still can't tell

47:42

which one of you is which That's okay. I

47:44

can tell your voices apart, but if I was asked, I wouldn't

47:46

be able to say which one of you is Josh

47:48

and which one is.

47:49

Chuck if we switched from time

47:51

to time.

47:52

That's right, And if you go to that live show in Portland

47:55

next year, then you.

47:56

Can tell yeah, there you go. That's the way

47:58

they talk about cognitive DISMCE.

48:00

That's yeah, And how about this, Beatrix,

48:03

send us an email from that same thread when

48:06

we go to Portland next year and you and

48:08

someone else can get on the guest list.

48:10

Very nice.

48:11

How about that you'll get to that's freebe tickets.

48:14

So Beatrix finishes

48:16

up by saying, I'd love if you gave

48:18

a shout out to tech stuff and stuff they don't

48:20

want you to know.

48:21

Nice. Oh,

48:24

we're gonna shout them out. Hey, way to go tech

48:26

stuff and stuff they don't want you to know too. Excellent

48:28

podcasts, you have great take.

48:30

Coourse tricks, our longtime

48:32

friends and colleagues sit to those shows. And

48:35

finally, I would love it if you would read

48:37

this on the air so me and my mom get

48:39

hear it on the way to school and wish

48:41

me good luck in high school next year.

48:43

Good luck Beatrix, high school kids.

48:45

Fun.

48:46

You're gonna do great. Don't you worry about

48:49

it. From the sounds of this email, You're

48:51

just gonna tear it apart. I love it.

48:53

Knock it out of the park.

48:55

Knock it out of the park.

48:56

Well, if you want to be like Beatrix and send us

48:58

a just patently awesome email,

49:01

you can send it to Stuff podcast

49:03

at iHeartRadio dot com.

49:16

Stuff you Should Know is a production of iHeartRadio.

49:19

For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit

49:21

the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

49:23

or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features