Podchaser Logo
Home
Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Released Wednesday, 8th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Wednesday 8th May Clyde 1 Superscoreboard

Wednesday, 8th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

0141 951 1025 it's

0:03

time to talk football

0:08

it's Clyde 1 Super Scoreboard

0:17

good evening and welcome to Clyde 1

0:20

Super Scoreboard as the build-up continues to

0:22

potentially title the siding weekend in Scotland

0:24

Brendan Rogers says Celtic arrive into

0:26

Saturday's game in the best place they've

0:29

been in all season Derek McInnes is

0:31

bracing himself for summer bids for young

0:33

player of the year David Watson

0:35

and it's all square between airdrain partic

0:38

fissile as they look to secure playoff

0:40

promotion I'm Gordon Duncan and joining me

0:42

tonight you have Simon Donnelly and

0:44

Cammie Bell Cammie it is just getting

0:47

busier and busier as we build up to

0:49

the big one this weekend yeah massive

0:51

match this weekend we all know we spoke about

0:53

for a few weeks now building up to the

0:55

game and it's all or nothing for Rangers for

0:58

me Celtic have probably got the

1:00

luxury of taking a draw for the game but

1:02

they want the job done as well on Saturday

1:04

so it's going to be an absolute blockbuster at

1:07

this stage in the week as a player we just

1:09

desperate to get over with yeah I'm talking less I'm

1:11

just thinking about it obviously you

1:13

talk about you react in the games at

1:15

the weekend there and now it's you know

1:17

homing in quickly on the big one at

1:19

the weekend this is chemistry is all to

1:21

play for Celtic with advantage

1:24

obviously being at home 60,000 Celtic

1:26

fans they are the three point

1:28

gap Rangers with all to do

1:30

but it's set up nicely see that's

1:32

the difference when you're a player is now upon

1:34

that so we can't be done with the talking

1:36

because that's sort of how this show works between

1:39

now and 8 o'clock but 1-1-4-1-9-5-1-1-1-2-5 come on down

1:43

the latest installment of your build up to

1:46

Saturday's match between Celtic and Rangers what are

1:48

you thinking now if your emotions changed since

1:50

last night you always say it's this sort

1:52

of rollercoaster so was last night a nervous

1:55

night and today it's an optimistic night or

1:57

vice versa of course let's get specific about

1:59

players and systems and tactics and

2:01

all that sort of stuff Brendan Rodgers feels

2:04

Celtic arrive into the game in the best place they've

2:07

been in all season. Do you agree with that? Celtic

2:09

fans we're gonna hear from a former Rangers striker

2:12

who thinks Rangers can still kick on and

2:14

win that title. Elsewhere still what's happening playoffs

2:16

last night I'd like to hear from you

2:19

Airdrie and Partik Thistle fans a really entertaining

2:21

game I think we would agree and it's

2:24

finally poised heading into the second

2:26

leg. St. Merengue fans Alex Gogic signed

2:29

the new three-year deal we're gonna hear

2:31

from him and here's one that would

2:33

maybe interest more than just you come on like fans

2:35

maybe come on like fans want to put your fingers

2:37

in your ears at this moment but Derek McInnis says

2:40

he's expecting offers for young player of the

2:42

year David Watson this summer so I wonder

2:44

would you expect those bids to come from

2:46

here in Scotland which would probably only mean

2:48

a couple of teams obviously or would you

2:50

expect those bids to come from elsewhere if

2:52

you are a fan of those teams I

2:54

think we all know who they're on about

2:56

would you like to see a potential

2:59

bid put in for David Watson and come

3:01

on like fans I'm sure you're desperate to hold

3:03

on to them but your own manager is speaking

3:05

about expecting offers for him so

3:07

where would you expect those offers to

3:09

come from 0141 951 1025 get

3:12

your calls in right now as quick

3:16

as you can of course you can tweet as

3:18

well at Clyde SSB but let's

3:20

share a busy week across Scottish

3:23

football together I know you're a

3:26

keen observer of the championship and all things the

3:28

lower league Cammy I love that I always love

3:30

the playoffs I said it last night absolutely love

3:32

them and last night there's no

3:34

different yeah another brilliant brilliant

3:37

game in the championship which always produces

3:39

and two brilliant teams I've really enjoyed

3:41

watching the injury this season I think

3:43

Reese McCabe's got them playing some fantastic

3:45

football got some really good talented players

3:47

as well and they are Adam

3:50

Frizzell who started off at

3:52

Comaracano from there and just had some

3:54

some bad injuries didn't gain off game

3:56

time and he's on this year's really

3:58

hard and really influential player there but

4:00

Patrick Fissell I've got Brian Graham

4:03

up front who's a yeah listen

4:05

he's a later stage player.

4:07

He's better with age I think you're meant to say. He

4:09

is. He's a school

4:12

some some brilliant goals so no it's so

4:14

exciting with the playoffs up and down the

4:16

league as I found myself at Dumbarton last

4:18

night and strangely I was dropping my daughter.

4:21

That's strange I have to say. I was

4:23

dropping my daughter and wife off at the

4:25

Olivia Rodrigo concert. So I had three hours

4:27

to kill. So yeah I had to look

4:29

at the fixtures

4:31

I know Matt Dunning I used to play

4:33

with him at Dundee United he's Dumbarton's captain

4:35

so he got me so he got me

4:37

a ticket. It was actually a good game

4:40

it was really good game. He even round

4:42

about the houses to see where you could

4:44

get. So who would you think was more

4:46

entertaining Olivia Rodrigo or Dumbarton against Sterling Albans?

4:48

Definitely Dumbarton for me. Absolutely. He's

4:51

a music connoisseur that's not your street though is it?

4:53

I'm puzzled with that one. That's over your

4:55

head. 0141

4:59

951 125 come on get your calls in big weekend coming up I

5:01

can tell already looking at social media the calls

5:03

on Monday and Tuesday already people thinking about you

5:06

know who should play and who shouldn't and who

5:08

goes into the game and what type

5:10

of mood or form to

5:12

get all that general stuff over Celtic fans

5:15

Brendan Rodgers thinks you're in the best place

5:17

you've been in all season would you agree

5:19

with that or not? Rangers fans do you

5:21

need to do something a bit

5:23

different a bit drastic there's obviously more onus and you to

5:25

go on and try and win that game and turn

5:28

things around and you come

5:30

on Celtic Rangers Scotland fans

5:33

David Watson who do you think Derek McInnes

5:35

says he's expecting bids this summer? What do

5:37

you think the future holds for him Celtic

5:40

and Rangers fans is that one that should

5:42

be on your radar? Kelly fans do you

5:44

think he is better served staying put going

5:46

elsewhere going to another country going to another

5:49

league you let us know 0141

5:52

951 1025 you know he's just having

5:54

a quick look I mean you have

5:56

to go way back in the history

5:58

books obviously for a man. of your age

6:00

I was just looking to see what you're first experience of

6:02

the fixture

6:05

September 96 would that

6:07

be right Rangers 2 Celtic nil

6:10

what no what for example this rain just

6:12

no there is no other fixture right so

6:14

you've got it wrong yes

6:17

before that it was 90 my

6:19

first game was the one I

6:22

broke so there was no Celtic fans see

6:24

that Jen genuinely I know we last

6:26

I think it's because the website I

6:28

usually use for the go I think

6:30

it stops getting it must stop getting

6:32

reliable in the mid 90s eight minutes

6:34

old and that's a genuinely must

6:37

right because it does

6:39

have a lot of your games missing from that period because

6:41

now that look at it it's not a nice decision for

6:43

the last knows it was me

6:46

John Collins one yeah I'm well aware of it that

6:48

the one with the predator boots

6:51

as well yeah another story yeah the

6:53

predator boots it was a foster you

6:55

kick and he actually went back there

6:57

the following season and almost scored an

6:59

identical free kick

7:01

again I think the first one was

7:04

against Colin Scott and then Andy Gordon was on

7:06

to the second one remember that you thought those

7:08

boots you could just kick it in any direction

7:10

it would go like a boomerang and you find

7:12

this we entered about wasn't you still needed a

7:14

wee bit of ability to go along with it

7:16

but they were great the first ones went great

7:18

the first ones had the big huge ridges and

7:20

I didn't like them but what for John Oh

7:22

vintage boots they are they're gonna go away with

7:24

them no I wouldn't

7:26

say Danny goal is back in the day

7:28

listen and this day and I just swear

7:30

when your goal kicks you see what the

7:33

goal is wearing this day and age the

7:35

way all sorts of colored boots and gloves

7:37

we've talked about Olivia Rodrigo colored boots and

7:40

website doesn't go back long enough that

7:42

you need to dig into the archives to find

7:44

Simon Donnelly's details but hopefully we

7:46

can move on to more familiar topics

7:48

with Martin who's been striving to kick

7:51

things off Martin on our wedding tonight

7:53

what is the pregame feeling So

8:00

it's confident then, there's no apprehension or anything

8:02

that's full confidence for you. So

8:33

that would obviously

8:37

involve James Forrest going over to the right

8:39

side where he's not played in the last

8:41

couple of games. But you don't think that's

8:43

an issue? No,

8:45

definitely not. Simon,

8:47

what would you... It's

8:49

an interesting one, I was thinking about it in the car

8:51

in the way in because obviously we were going to be

8:54

talking about the team and I think it's the only debate

8:56

really in the 11 and

8:59

I side with Martin there.

9:03

I think my head

9:05

in Forrest, only because how

9:07

effective my head has been in this fixture,

9:09

he's super fit so I

9:11

don't think that would be an issue that he's missed games. Coon

9:15

has shown signs, he's done well, he's came in

9:17

and found it difficult at the beginning, I think

9:19

he's did well of late. But

9:21

James Forrest has found a

9:23

second wind at the end of the season, he hasn't

9:25

played a lot through injury but he popped

9:28

into these really important games,

9:30

the semi-final at Hamden, he came on, made

9:33

it impact, scores the goal, cut

9:35

the goals at Denz Park, looked lively again at

9:37

the weekend, I think he's back at

9:39

the top of his game and I think getting into

9:41

these games, you lean towards

9:43

the experience of how's know-how and my head

9:46

is, I think it will be there too.

9:48

I know what you're saying about... Forrest moving

9:50

back to... ...playing on that side, yeah, but

9:52

I just think his experience and his form

9:54

might get him the nod ahead of Coon.

9:57

If you're Rangers, tell me. Specifically,

10:00

if you're James Tavernier, you're really hoping

10:02

that it isn't Dyson made up against

10:04

you. Is that fair? We're not exaggerating

10:07

that stuff. Yeah, no, I totally agree.

10:09

I think my

10:11

either will play because again, he's such

10:13

a threat and he pushes James

10:16

Tavernier forward back the pitch and

10:19

listen, it's a different game for James

10:21

Tavernier if he's facing my either. So

10:24

I really do think that'll play a part in

10:26

in Célix's choice. I know he's not match fit,

10:28

but listen, this is an old fun game. And

10:30

it's not even been out that long either. No,

10:33

and it's an old fun game with so much

10:35

riding on it as well, close to the end

10:37

of the season. So you're taking that little bit

10:39

of a risk for me. If he's 80%

10:42

fit, you're still taking a chance because

10:44

he's so influential in these games because

10:46

he plays against Tavernier who's a player

10:48

that ranges look to try and get forward.

10:50

But again, it nullifies Tav getting forward as

10:53

much. So I believe he will play for

10:55

Celtic. Martin,

10:57

he dies in my

10:59

either thing. He's only been out a couple of weeks as

11:01

we said. So that's not an issue for you. You don't

11:03

think there's any question here he gets his pitch back in.

11:06

I don't think. I think

11:09

he's an old brainer.

11:36

You spoke about your confidence and I think lots

11:38

of Celtic fans will probably be similar. Is there

11:41

anything that I don't know if worries you is

11:43

the right word. Are there any doubts or any

11:45

weaknesses that concern you in the slightest? We

12:00

can now go

12:03

on and debate the penalty from

12:06

last year. I

12:31

don't mean to take it negative, it's just

12:33

because every Celtic fan is feeling confident. Brendan

12:36

Rodgers says they're in the best place that they have

12:38

been. They are in the driving seat, they

12:40

are favourite. So I'm just wondering from Martin

12:43

and maybe from your perspective, what

12:45

would be the factor that

12:48

affects your confidence the most? Because it's

12:50

this fixture. So the unpredictability

12:52

of it? Yes. I

12:54

think that would be the first thing. It was

12:56

great. Last week, I

12:59

think that's one of the best performances Celtic have had

13:01

this season. However, at

13:03

0-0, there was a couple of little chances at how it's

13:05

had. Shanklin had an opportunity inside

13:08

the box. But I think

13:10

one Celtic found their rhythm,

13:12

especially when they get a second goal. Some

13:14

of the nicest football I've seen them play this year. I

13:17

think that led to Brendan's comments after

13:19

the game, saying they're in a good

13:21

place, they've got players back. The

13:24

fans were exceptional last

13:26

week, but again, they react to what they're

13:28

watching on the pitch. And I thought they

13:30

were really good. And if they can take

13:33

that performance into the game, I think Celtic

13:35

should win it. But

13:38

it's never as straightforward as that. And

13:40

that's what you said, the unpredictability of

13:42

this fixture is the thing that kind

13:45

of sits at the back of your

13:47

mind. That said, and I always have a pop-up people,

13:49

or at least test this theory that form goes out

13:51

the window. I wasn't going to use

13:53

that. Rangers don't win

13:55

many games at Celtic Park over the last... Take

13:57

whatever time frame you like, you know. 20

14:01

years, it's not that many,

14:03

so is it that unpredictable? I

14:07

just look at the fixer and I see

14:09

who said this thing is probably Rangers biggest

14:11

strength at the moment. They're not in great

14:13

form with regards to how they're playing, but

14:16

I think the unpredictability of this fixer, anything

14:18

can harm. But that's what I'm saying, can

14:20

it? If Rangers don't actually go to Celtic

14:22

Park and win that often, I

14:24

just think it's unpredictable. There's a huge amount of pressure on

14:27

this game as well. It's a little bit different from any

14:29

other old fun game because we're so close to the end

14:31

of the season. It's for

14:33

me, if Celtic draw the game,

14:35

probably their title, it looks like it would

14:38

be. Rangers know they need to go to

14:40

Celtic Park and win the game of football.

14:42

That's the minimum they need to take away

14:44

from it. Lesson decisions as well. I

14:47

grudge to talk a bit of that. But in

14:49

the last game, you

14:52

can argue it was proved correctly with

14:54

the silver penalty, but that swung the

14:56

momentum of that game because Celtic really

14:58

should have been in that half time

15:00

on their performance possibly at Dino. And that swung the

15:02

game. So

15:04

things like that within the game can change it. I

15:06

think getting the big moments right clearly, because you mentioned

15:08

that the weekend, both things can

15:10

be true. It is one of the best Celtic

15:13

performances of the season. Celtic fans are right to

15:15

be happy about it. The

15:17

heart could have scored that level. Yeah, they had, Chuck.

15:19

And then if they do, what does that do to

15:21

the rest of it? The corners, the seat go up

15:23

save Cammy from Cammy Devlin was brilliant, wasn't it? Again,

15:27

people kind of forget because early on in the

15:29

game and Celtic end up winning the game so

15:31

comfortable. But again, it's a fantastic save. And again,

15:33

just at the right moment, and he's done that

15:36

time and time again for Celtic, he's been a

15:38

great servant. He'll be fully

15:40

focused to try and get them over the line

15:42

because they want to finish his career off with

15:44

another title in the bag. But yeah, I think

15:46

there is moments for me looking at from

15:48

a Rangers point of view, they can get

15:50

at Celic's defence. If you put high

15:53

pressure on them, you make them nervous, you make

15:55

them make mistakes early on in the game. Rangers

15:57

need to start the game better than the last

15:59

few old-for-n games that's without doubt

16:01

but I think there's definitely weaknesses

16:03

at the back for Celtic and

16:06

Rangers are going to need an almighty performance but they've got

16:08

it in them. But

16:10

everyone is raving about Hugo's performance

16:12

at the weekend understandably. Simon

16:16

that must have been a real shot

16:18

in the arm even though he's gone

16:20

into previous fixtures against Rangers and done

16:23

the business anyway but just to have

16:25

that extra bit of feel

16:27

good factor to fall back on. He looks

16:29

back to his usual self. He

16:31

took the goals really well. The first one sharp

16:33

inside the box. The second one's a fantastic one

16:36

because he has to concentrate on it coming out

16:38

the air for so long and

16:40

he takes it first time. He looks to be as

16:42

I say back to his sharp best. Does

16:44

that coincide with the likes of Hitati coming back

16:46

into the team? Celtic are looking more

16:49

like the strongest, the

16:51

loving possibly. But certainly

16:53

the way they pop the ball especially when it got

16:56

to 2-0 there was a lot of confidence, a lot

16:58

of energy there and I

17:00

think another performance like that at the weekend is

17:02

enough for Celtic. I don't see Rangers being

17:05

able to compete with that. Let's thank Martin and

17:07

bring in Paul for the range of perspective on

17:09

things. What are you thinking? A few days out

17:11

Paul? I

17:13

got, I was getting nervous and excited

17:15

at the same time. I think

17:19

some of my thoughts in the game are throwing

17:21

the guys back. I

17:24

think when we've done well at Celtic Park there's

17:26

been some big and self-ticking and a classic in

17:28

sleep. Maybe we'll get

17:30

some egg yolks on the side deck.

17:32

Maybe we'll get some of the other

17:34

people on top of the goal and I

17:36

think I'll take you over a spin. I think

17:39

we'll be like, in this point and maybe we'll

17:41

be well up front and I need another

17:44

fight simply to play. I think we'll

17:47

be able to get some of the other people on

17:49

the side deck. I think we'll be

17:52

able to It's

18:00

days after purgatory. Go

18:21

in the field, no idea

18:23

I thought it would be the best, it was

18:25

usually that. So, in a funny way,

18:27

I do like to laugh. I'm

18:30

not sick, because we are going to help the part

18:32

with a tight one in the line, and no one

18:34

can help us. But I love the whole game thinking.

18:37

I need to get on your own, because I draw a

18:39

citizen behind and I know it's a bit hard to operate,

18:41

so I'm not funny with it. I

18:43

love the amateur psychology of this week,

18:45

because you can spin and spin and spin into

18:47

your heart's content. So Paul's theory

18:50

is, because Celtic know that a draw

18:52

might be enough, it

18:54

doesn't provide the same clarity of thought that it does to

18:56

Rangers, and only then they go and win. I mean, I

18:58

get it. I don't know how

19:00

that stuff plays out. It

19:03

might follow the game goes on, so

19:06

the last 10 minutes, if it's a draw, do

19:08

Celtic players start to think that a draw does them?

19:10

And then it would change your approach at the start

19:12

of a game. No, absolutely not. It's not going to

19:15

change Celtic's approach. They know that if they win the

19:17

game, the title's done, so they'll be approaching it. But

19:19

as the game goes on, if it's

19:22

still tight with 15, 20

19:24

minutes to go, it might just

19:26

start to creep into the minds of

19:28

the Celtic players. And again, all it

19:30

takes is one set piece for Rangers,

19:32

one decision, one free kick, one mistake,

19:34

deflection, brilliant moment from Lawrence or whoever,

19:36

and it changes the game and it flips

19:38

the whole title race completely. So

19:41

absolutely no, I won't change the Celtic's approach. They'll

19:43

go to win the game, but during the game,

19:45

before the game goes on, potentially could change the

19:47

mindset. I think that's what

19:49

Paul's saying as well. Rangers approach,

19:52

you know, if they can stay in the game and

19:55

begin to sustain, then they'll scope to go

19:57

and build on that. it

20:00

will go for the jugular. I have no doubt

20:02

of that from the start, but I think that

20:04

Paul's all in today about referring back to Otter

20:06

Smith and indeed my time as well. There was

20:08

a lot of times, thanks for reminding me Paul,

20:10

where we did have a lot of the play

20:13

in Rangers with breaking score. So

20:15

I think that's, I don't think it will be

20:17

designed but I think they'll try and,

20:20

they'll need to be dogged at the start, they'll need

20:22

to stay in the game because I think the first

20:24

15, 20 minutes of the game I think

20:27

will go for it. Is there anything,

20:29

because Rangers have that poor

20:31

head to head record this season? Is there anything

20:33

different that's not been tried this season?

20:35

You know, a three-career there that you

20:37

think gave you a better chance than what you've seen

20:39

so far in the head to heads? Not

20:42

definitely. I think, I don't think you do have a

20:45

lot of what I would say,

20:47

an average mark for it because

20:49

it's still to be used to tarping in and passing

20:51

your new master team to the left back, or

20:56

flying up the wings and then that sort of thing is

20:58

might be because once you're in the end you want to

21:00

be a team mark because

21:02

you're playing and you want the leading

21:04

player to be the master of catching

21:06

the same. So I would, if

21:09

I was the manager at the time, please tell me the mark,

21:11

be better at Rangers and kind

21:13

of utilise him, to be honest. But that's the way I

21:15

would do it. But like I said, I know that's the

21:17

way I put in a threat from Tavenir and

21:20

then Gunnar, but then Tavenir's better

21:22

than free kicks and things like that. So they're not

21:24

really losing that and I think I would kind of

21:26

use it. When there's more often like silver or it

21:29

seems like it's going to be there and kind

21:31

of use them and keep a rigid back forward.

21:33

Yeah, but I mean that's the problem is that's

21:35

the team that's fit, Cammy, and I don't know

21:37

if he is and I don't know if Matondo's

21:40

fit either and that, you know, Rangers don't have

21:42

loads of width. I'm sure everyone's seen it. It's

21:45

in the graphic that's been shared today from the FA

21:48

Cup, the Youth Cup 2015-16.

21:50

You seen this? Chelsea's

21:53

FA Cup, Youth Cup winning team of 2016.

21:55

It's like, where are they now? Some really

21:57

famous names in there. Mason

22:01

Mound, Tammy Abraham and so on

22:03

and up front for Chelsea, Dushon

22:05

Sterling. Is there any where

22:07

he doesn't play? I don't know if that's

22:09

a sign of things to come this weekend,

22:11

probably not, but you do wonder what Philippe

22:13

Cremont will do with what pieces

22:15

he has. Yeah, it's difficult. They've got injuries,

22:17

but they can't dwell on that. They need

22:19

to deal with their injuries. They've got, again,

22:22

a positive from the weekend with Tom Lawrence

22:24

coming back. I think he's a brilliant,

22:26

brilliant player. And again, Todd Cantwell

22:28

has not done enough for me.

22:31

He just looks a little bit out

22:33

of form. He looks

22:35

a little bit unhappy at the moment.

22:38

I think Lawrence brings a little bit

22:40

more control and spark. Sterling's got to

22:42

play for me. I think you

22:45

get a good performance, solid performance on

22:47

every single game. So you've

22:49

got to find a place in the pitch for him. But listen,

22:52

Philippe Cremont has got a big job on his hand

22:54

because he needs to find a team and a formation

22:56

that is going to win him the game. Thank you,

22:58

Paul. If you want involved, it's 1-4-1,

23:01

9-5-1, 1-0-2-5. And if you call right

23:03

now, we will do our very best

23:05

to get you on net. You are

23:07

the voice of Scottish football. Call 0-1-4-1,

23:09

9-5-1, 1-0-2-5. Clyde Wong, Super Scoreboard. Cammy

23:16

Bell and Simon Dornley are here building up to

23:18

the big weekend. Of course, we

23:20

can reflect on the playoff action if you so

23:22

wish, Airdream, Partik Thistle fans. Where are you? And

23:25

some interesting comments made today by Derek

23:27

McKinnis about Young Player of the Year,

23:29

David Watson. So lots to get your

23:31

teeth into if you fancy it. Pick

23:33

up that phone or tweet us at

23:36

ClydeSSB. Get all

23:38

your thoughts over if you can.

23:41

Let's see what we've got a message from

23:43

David McKeirmy. He says, I'm far too confident

23:45

going into this Saturday. First half of my

23:47

life, we never got a result. Last 24

23:49

years have been party time, enjoying the moment.

23:51

But the closer we get, the more nervous,

23:54

says David. Let's go onto the phone. David,

23:56

clearly a Celtic fan judging by those...

24:00

references to the recent record. What about Robert

24:02

then who's a Rangers fan? What

24:04

are your main thoughts at the stage Robert? I'm

24:07

confident to be honest. I wouldn't have said I was

24:10

going to be confident before I watched it on the

24:12

weekend but if they can repeat that kind

24:14

of performance they're going to feel take the other thing with every

24:16

chance. Do you think the weekend there

24:18

the commandment game was a good performance one that

24:20

stands you in good stead? Yeah

24:23

definitely the what the main thing is we actually

24:25

would be capable of being physical. It's

24:27

first thing I've thought that of as a season can

24:30

be a particular look a lot more physical but

24:34

getting into the challenges and it's just

24:36

we believe we definitely still believe we

24:38

can win this week and

24:40

that's what I was beginning to wonder. The team actually did still

24:42

believe or not but based on what

24:44

I've seen there I don't think they've given up so

24:46

I don't see any reason why they can't do it.

24:50

I mean ultimately to state the obvious Rangers

24:52

have to find belief from somewhere so if

24:55

Robert's finding it from the previous game

24:58

at the weekend, Philippe Clement regularly speaks

25:00

about he's been so clear

25:02

to try and remind everyone that still since

25:04

he got here they've gained more points

25:07

than Celtic have he's been repeating that so these

25:09

are obviously the types of places he'll

25:11

be looking at for that belief. Yeah

25:13

definitely I think again they've

25:15

got to believe and I'm pretty sure they

25:18

will believe the players in there know that

25:20

there's an opportunity and that's probably the biggest

25:22

thing there's still an opportunity here for Rangers.

25:24

They know as I said before if they

25:26

win the game they close the gap but

25:28

obviously then Celtic depending on

25:30

the school line we probably head on goal

25:32

difference still but they've then to go to

25:34

Robbie Park which is a difficult game midweek

25:36

so Rangers need to believe that

25:39

they can get the victory, apply the pressure

25:41

on to Celtic and then again they've just

25:43

got to take care of business so yeah

25:47

I think listen I won't write Rangers off at

25:49

all I believe they have got a performance in

25:51

there I believe they've got the players in there

25:53

the mentality to do it but they need to

25:55

go and show it they need to go and

25:57

show it they've probably not shown it enough this

25:59

season But as I said, the

26:01

opportunity is still there so go and do it. What

26:04

did you make of the performance at the weekend? Because

26:06

Robert's happy, he's taking that

26:08

as the

26:10

indication that things will be okay this weekend.

26:13

I think Robert was probably one of the

26:15

few Rangers fans that were probably really happy

26:17

with the performance. Komanuk

26:19

was a big moment in the game where they obviously went

26:21

down to 10 men and it's never easy playing against 10

26:23

men, you've got to say that first and foremost. But

26:26

it just seemed a little bit slow and labour. They

26:28

got the job done, this goal is four goals, so

26:30

fantastic, that's what you really need to do. But

26:34

I just think the intensity,

26:36

it wasn't totally fluid. There

26:40

was something missing in that game for me from

26:42

Rangers just to give it the spark. Again probably

26:44

a big spark for me was Tom Lawrence coming

26:46

on. I think he made a big difference, gave

26:48

Rangers fans a lot of hope that he'll be

26:50

fitting off to start the game on Saturday and

26:53

hopefully have a huge impact in it. Robert,

26:57

who can you hang your hat on? Who are the

27:00

Rangers players you think are set for this

27:02

occasion going to step up and make the difference for you in

27:04

the weekend? Lawrence

27:06

I would say definitely, but the notion

27:09

that he's going to start to be

27:11

careful honestly because I would probably

27:14

like to see Lawrence starting but I think I'd be on

27:16

John Canwell. I wouldn't like to pick the team

27:18

for it that way. The

27:20

ones that hang out, I genuinely don't know but I thought

27:22

the way they felt was going to impact the team in

27:24

the way that, like why is it

27:26

bigger than Ben Davies came out of

27:28

nowhere? It seemed to work. Getting

27:31

those from defense is not a thing we really get

27:33

in this season and even

27:36

John Sitter. Those

27:38

are the kind of things that could potentially win us an old fun

27:40

game. Quite often there are

27:42

strikers that are scoring in these games. But

27:45

I think realistically if the enemy can stop scoring and goes

27:47

into his own net and maybe like not

27:50

only are they scoring the first 90 seconds, well if

27:52

they're scoring the first 90 seconds that'd be a help

27:54

as well. Good advice there, sound advice from Robert. You

27:57

think back, you kind of think you've seen it

27:59

all. in this fixture, not sure we've

28:01

seen a start like we saw the last

28:04

time. Incredible, it was incredible. I barely sat

28:06

down and it's a really one-off

28:08

type of, well it hasn't a finish, it just

28:11

blocks the clearance and it was

28:13

a fantastic start for Celtic. Just

28:16

to touch on Roberts, you know, I think

28:19

as Cammie said, they got the job done

28:21

at the weekend, you know, after going 1-0

28:23

down and I think the positive for Rangers,

28:25

I agree again with Cammie, it's Tom

28:27

Waughans, I think, you know,

28:29

if I was the Rangers manager, I would be

28:31

starting him. I think he's got the qualities in

28:34

the final third, he scores a great goal,

28:37

I think he's a decent player and I

28:39

think he might have done

28:41

enough in his game last week

28:43

to get a start this week. It's make or

28:45

break now as well for Rangers, they know that,

28:47

so again, if he's not 100% fit,

28:49

you've got four games left, you've got four games

28:52

of the season left, so again, I think it's

28:54

make or break, if he's fit enough, I think

28:56

he needs to start the game because he's something

28:58

different for Rangers for me as well. I think

29:00

he's different from Cantwell. So

29:02

play them both for instead of, because

29:04

Rangers don't have lots of wide options either, so one

29:07

of them, and I know it's not always been a

29:09

totally successful move, but

29:11

one of them can play off a side, if

29:13

you have the choice, one of them, both of them. At this

29:17

moment in time, I would probably

29:20

play Lawrence instead of Cantwell to

29:22

be honest and again, I

29:24

just think you need to stay on playing

29:26

somewhere on the pitch. I think the energy,

29:28

again, his physicality, he can get up and

29:30

down the pitch for a period of time.

29:33

Silva's done okay, so you could probably

29:35

flip him with Cantwell if it wasn't

29:37

working and Desser's are only sort of

29:39

striker at the moment, Ruth's not played

29:41

enough. So limited options to

29:43

be perfectly honest. And the

29:45

great thing about Sittier Desser has been debated on

29:48

this over and over again is the

29:51

ultimate mixed bag. I saw lots

29:53

of complaints about his performance at the weekend.

29:55

It still wouldn't be that surprising that he

29:57

does pop off at this weekend.

30:00

and have his moment. Now again, 20

30:02

goals this season. So he's got a

30:04

fantastic return. But again,

30:07

it's just that that frustration from Rangers fans,

30:09

I think it's holding the ball upbringing and

30:11

other players into play. It takes him

30:13

a number of opportunities to score goals as well. He's not

30:15

going to get that at the weekend. So he needs to

30:17

be ruthless in Rangers as a team need to be ruthless

30:19

at the weekend. If they get an opportunity, it needs to

30:22

hit the back of the net. So

30:24

from a Celtic perspective, then put you to

30:26

an opposing side sort of thing you reckon

30:29

the player you'd least

30:31

like to face in that area is

30:33

Lawrence rather than camp. Yeah, because I

30:36

think, I think fitness is the obvious

30:38

thing there that has hindered Tom

30:40

Lawrence. Most of the time he's been at

30:42

Rangers, but I think he's got the quality

30:44

that could possibly hurt. And you

30:47

know, the way he takes that goal at the weekend,

30:49

I don't think there's many in that Rangers team that

30:52

can do that. It's just

30:54

down to fitness. So I think he'd be the one that

30:57

I wouldn't be looking for myself to point

30:59

of view to be on the start now, loving

31:01

the Rangers. Cause as I say, I think he

31:03

can bring a quality if he gets it in

31:05

the final for the shoulder Sunday, you know, he's

31:07

more than capable. Thank you to

31:09

Robert on a one four one nine, five, one, one,

31:12

two, five. Of course you can tweet as well at

31:14

Clyde SSB. Get all your thoughts over it. Thumbs

31:17

up the size of the game. It's very rarely

31:19

we go Tuesday and Wednesday debating who starts the

31:21

match. That's usually a sort of Thursday Friday topic,

31:25

but clearly there is

31:27

a lot of interest heading into

31:29

this weekend. There's the mind games,

31:31

there's the tactical suggestions. And

31:33

as you say, can we,

31:35

people can take what they, what they want because

31:37

it didn't, we didn't get too many

31:39

Rangers fans on Monday or Tuesday delighted

31:42

with the performance of the weekend.

31:44

But there we go. Previous caller was

31:46

pretty chuffed with it and thinks that was a good sign

31:48

of things to come. Listen, there

31:51

is always good in the end up. I think for

31:53

one probably flattered Rangers a little bit. But

31:55

as I say, it's never ever easy. It

31:57

looks on paper, easy to play games. It's

32:00

never easy to play against 10 men and they showed

32:02

that resilience again going one behind Um

32:04

to to go and score four goals. So there

32:07

was positive there I just think there was still

32:09

something missing and I believe looking at the Rangers

32:11

players reactions after the game They thought there was

32:13

something missing in that performance. But again, they've got

32:16

the opportunity in Saturday To rectify

32:18

that and go and put us on a

32:20

really good position To try and put

32:22

pressure on a sale tick still a good time to call

32:24

So pick up that phone if you can whilst I run

32:26

this past you make

32:30

me a winner win your share

32:33

of a million pounds It

32:37

is a double rollover on make me

32:40

a winner the last two calls went

32:42

to five rings Winning this

32:44

competition could be a life-changing moment You do

32:46

need to get on the ball get ready

32:48

to pick up that phone and say the

32:50

right words you could win 90,000

32:53

pounds tomorrow when we make the next call

32:55

only if you're in the draw text Yes

32:57

to six one. Oh two five six or

32:59

two pounds plus your standard network rate You

33:02

can enter a cloud one.com for two

33:04

pounds or call zero three three zero

33:06

eight eight zero four five two three

33:08

The calls are charged at a standard

33:10

rate. It is over 18 only all

33:12

the rules for this network competition Can

33:14

be found online and

33:17

the entries since malcolm one on friday

33:19

have rolled over So if you get

33:21

the call after 3 p.m tomorrow answer

33:23

within five rings say make me a

33:25

winner straight away To win the 90,000

33:27

pounds text. Yes to six one. Oh

33:30

two five The

33:41

build-up continues to busy weekend there's a certain

33:44

Fiction on in glasgow, which seems to be dominating

33:46

the airwaves and the headlines so far But

33:48

if there's anyone else out there that wants to change

33:51

that tune we are here for you. Oh one four

33:53

one nine five one one oh two Five

33:55

david is on the line in carm tine. How's it

33:57

going david? I'm

34:00

so glad to see you guys. Pleasure. What are you

34:02

thinking tonight? So just

34:04

really around, it's been a wee bit of a

34:06

stick given to Phil for the last couple of

34:08

weeks. We all know he wants

34:10

to roast County. We all know

34:12

Rangers no longer have the edge in the tail of the

34:14

spot. If they looked at it from where they

34:17

came in, in November, seven points

34:19

behind. Since then, it's

34:22

no minus they won an all-fung game. So

34:24

I think it's still won the all-fung game. They've

34:27

also got our eye bits where they're always real. But

34:30

to me, Brendan Rodgers isn't getting any stick for

34:32

it. You know, it's all right saying he's

34:34

going to have some fun in the next 10

34:36

days. Everybody that sets

34:38

Rangers, sorry, I probably felt it

34:40

now, have the edge. They've got a home game against

34:42

us. They've got the edge in the goal difference.

34:45

But the fact is, they shouldn't have the edge.

34:47

They should be out of sight. There were seven

34:49

points clear in November. They've also not lost an

34:51

all-fung game. But yeah, here we are. There's three games

34:53

to go. And still pretend so they

34:55

could lose it. So I just don't find Brendan's getting a

34:58

stick for it all. I

35:00

mean, he's not going to get stick right now though, is he? I

35:02

take your point because of the bigger

35:04

picture. But Brendan Rodgers got a lot of stick.

35:06

He got loads of stick on this show. Santa

35:08

Claus was getting it on this show. And Brendan

35:10

Rodgers and the players wouldn't felt it

35:12

looked like they chucked that away. But

35:14

you mentioned seven points in front like

35:17

they were. A Celtic win this weekend. They go six

35:19

points in front, don't they? So I

35:21

think he had stick there. But we're not all

35:23

about fickle. We're all about reactive. Brendan Rodgers is

35:25

not going to get stick right now in the

35:27

week that many people expect them to go six

35:29

points clear with a couple of games to go.

35:33

No, you're saying you expect them to go six points

35:35

clear. Is that your prediction? You think

35:37

Celtic are going to win? No, you're the one

35:39

that said Celtic had the edge. So what I'm

35:41

saying is going this week right now would... I'm

35:45

trying to envisage a scenario where people would

35:47

be giving Brendan Rodgers stick right now. I

35:49

don't really know what you mean. Well,

35:52

the point is that the theory says in all of

35:54

us, and it should be, there

35:56

were seven points clear back in November, the

35:59

vulture beat named... on New Year. They've

36:01

also not lost to Ibrox but yet they still

36:04

not won it. They have the edge

36:06

yes but the race should be over. They should

36:08

already have it won from where they were but

36:10

they've not managed to do that. Now

36:13

they could well manage to do that

36:15

this weekend. They certainly they'll be favourites

36:17

because it's a home game. We accept

36:19

that but the point is all

36:22

season it's really been full come on. It's

36:24

been having the fun because he's in a

36:26

title race that rain does quite frankly should

36:28

never get back into from where we were.

36:31

You know and I understand Celtic will

36:33

probably get to have the fun in the next two

36:35

weeks but let's be honest the pressure is on Phil

36:38

come on to win the title next year and I

36:40

know there's maybe a wee bit of sub pressure to

36:42

win an old fun game where nobody

36:44

wants to see him go the full season route

36:47

either winning obviously Saturday and winning the Cup Final.

36:49

Absolutely no rain this fan wants to see that

36:51

but at the end of the day the pressure

36:53

is on him to win it next season. The

36:56

pressure has always been on orders to win it

36:58

this season and so far he's

37:00

not won it. Did that picture not change

37:02

about when Phil come on did do very

37:04

well as you say and then you know

37:06

Rangers went ahead Rangers went ahead in this

37:08

title race David in front a lot of

37:10

people they then became favourites. That's my point.

37:13

I don't know about favourites but that's my

37:15

point Phil come on had the fun because

37:17

we went ahead. That's what I'm saying so

37:19

if he then can you say that can

37:21

you say that he you know after getting

37:23

himself in front is it

37:25

then all right to turn around a couple weeks late and say

37:27

I just find the pressure's actually on him to win it next

37:30

season. I

37:33

think it is because I find if you take the bigger

37:35

picture it's already if you want to take it in isolation

37:37

you can criticize certain things you should

37:39

never allow us to go screen you should never allow

37:41

that happen. Most of the other results

37:43

to be fair I can rationalize to

37:45

a certain extent you know

37:47

Petorgi, Celtic Park, Toulouse, Scurrains to

37:50

go to. Morreville actually

37:52

did really well against Celtic the

37:54

week before. If you remember

37:56

there's only just one in the, I think it was

37:58

under the time. and I know

38:01

it's finished, never happened. Done the, to be

38:03

fair, and I top

38:05

six side this season. Still,

38:07

I had a good one to go. I know we should

38:09

have won it, but at the end of the day, still

38:11

only just one lead as well, two-one. If

38:15

you take the full carry on with the pics and stuff,

38:18

I'm not saying, you know, you're never happy to swap up

38:20

back and that's the reason there are the salts. But

38:22

the point is, I just

38:25

don't think there's ever been a massive pressure

38:27

on Silicon went to deliver this

38:29

season. I think the pressure's always saying, blending orders

38:31

if he doesn't deliver this season. And I just

38:33

don't think he's getting a rough stick for it.

38:35

If the boot was in the other foot, I

38:37

find the enders would be calling to their minds

38:39

and they'd be sacked in this position right now.

38:42

Maybe not this week, but collectively, I find there'd have

38:44

been a lot of calls that he said, been who,

38:46

to have even let, you know, silt it

38:48

back in if the boot was in the other foot. That's it,

38:50

that's all. Wow. Can

38:54

I have a wave up here? So he should

38:56

decide because... Why? Because the... The

38:58

leg rangers back into it, because he's no one

39:00

in the league yet. Well,

39:02

you have to give Philip Clement

39:04

and Rangers credit there as well.

39:07

David's talking about rationalising results there.

39:10

He would never have said hearts would go to Celtic

39:12

Park and win, but these things happen in the league

39:14

and, yeah, Brendan Rodgers has received a bit of a

39:17

stick throughout the season on the

39:19

back of two really successful seasons on the

39:22

range. His team's

39:24

at time been criticised, the style

39:26

of play, but

39:29

they're three points ahead. Regardless

39:31

of you win it in gold difference, you won

39:33

it by one point, it will get down and

39:35

it'll be the same. If Rangers win it, we'll

39:38

not be here next year quibbling over drop

39:41

points here, there, and everywhere, and we were leading

39:43

it by seven points and then it was... Rangers

39:46

were leading it. It'll be who wins the title.

39:48

And I don't know, I

39:50

think maybe David's a wee bit because he

39:52

keeps referring to fun, I think it's Brendan's

39:54

comments last week after the game,

39:57

but, you know, Philip Clement

39:59

can... still win a treble. For

40:01

Rangers this year you have to credit the

40:03

job he's did when he's come in there to

40:08

suggest that there's a negativity because

40:10

Celtic at three points quilled just now with

40:12

a few games to go and

40:14

a home game and a strong position

40:16

is bizarre. Yeah,

40:18

listen, I can see what David's

40:20

saying that Celtic were

40:23

in such a strong position when Clement came

40:25

in. I think that's created to Clement how

40:27

much he's brought on the players, certainly individuals

40:29

that were there and were written off probably

40:31

from a number of Rangers fans, he's got

40:33

a better player out with him. So that

40:35

shows you the level of his management I

40:37

believe where

40:40

I think that I look at Rangers point

40:43

of view, they flipped it, they were ahead

40:45

and they had the opportunity and then it's

40:47

probably Clement will be looking at the mentality

40:49

of the players that they shouldn't have dropped points when you're

40:51

so close to the end of the season and

40:53

it can happen, I do get it, but

40:55

they shouldn't be dropping points at Ross County

40:57

and at Dundee when you're so close to

41:00

closing in on a title and that's where

41:02

they'll be disappointed, that's where you look at

41:04

the mentality, the strength for squad, all

41:07

these different factors. Again,

41:10

you still look at and Rangers still have an

41:12

opportunity, I keep saying this, they have the opportunity

41:14

to put a huge amount of pressure on the

41:16

Celtic if they beat them

41:18

on Saturday and they

41:21

can still win the title for me. What do you think of

41:23

that Paul and Castle Note? I

41:25

don't know, I wouldn't have said Rangers are at the title

41:27

by any means. I think it's what

41:29

about energies and if Rangers are at the end

41:31

of the league, the energy might be different but

41:34

to be honest, I think we

41:36

were 7 ahead, by no means

41:38

done because the conclusions come at the end of

41:40

May and that's why Celtic fans are, I've got

41:43

the right energy now and we've got all the

41:45

right players back at the right time and the

41:47

energy, somebody says it was like post a call

41:49

though but the way the net is Brendan

41:51

Rodgers because he's done, Peter always says it's a man of

41:54

the end of the last sprint and I

41:56

think to be honest, David just sounds like the

41:58

Rangers fans, it's my winning. with

42:00

next season? How

42:03

do you view the picture as a whole

42:06

then? Because I'm sure you'd have been

42:08

critical of Brendan Rodgers at some point this season. Well,

42:11

then I actually asked him. I went playing at the Yearn

42:13

Award tickets for the 12th. And I said, you know, you

42:15

can ram them that way from the book. A

42:17

Christmas time, and now I'm scrambling to try and get them. Cos

42:21

you'll think it was your plus one, will you not? I don't know.

42:23

I have a question. A year going, don't

42:25

you? Give us that amount of your influence. Yeah,

42:29

I mean, this is where looking

42:32

solely at points gaps is

42:34

just one way of looking at things. And like I

42:36

said to the caller, look, yeah, if the point is,

42:39

well, it was seven points, but now Rangers are back

42:41

in it. It could go back to six this weekend

42:43

now. I don't know if it will. And

42:45

therefore this conversation has to wait until four

42:48

o'clock on Saturday. But say

42:50

it did, then that sort of comeback,

42:52

if you like, that Philippe Clement has

42:54

overseen is wiped out. And that

42:56

doesn't take into account the fact that Rangers got

42:58

their noses in front. And maybe

43:00

it all comes back to what you say, see you in May,

43:02

the same day really care. Nobody really cares at

43:05

the end of, you know, once the

43:07

league's won and lost. Nobody cares. It will just

43:09

get down in the record books as a win

43:11

for whoever. Yes,

43:14

back when David was referring to Celtic having

43:16

a seven point lead, it did look as

43:19

if the league could be over because at

43:21

the time Rangers were a

43:23

mess, quite frankly. The Aberdeen game

43:25

at home that cost Bill

43:27

his job. So Philippe

43:30

Clement came in, not

43:32

only as he steadied the ship, he

43:34

worked it to Rangers were top of the table and leading

43:36

the race. But as

43:38

Cammy suggested there as

43:40

well, then he maybe learned something from his players.

43:43

Those drop points when you're leading, it might

43:45

be a different pressure that the guys, you

43:48

know, they've came up short in those two games.

43:50

And a lot of the Celtic team have

43:53

been over the course before. Brendan's been

43:55

over the course many a time and

43:58

it's all about timing as well. As

44:01

I said, it will not be quibbling over who

44:03

dropped points and where at the end, it will

44:05

just be who wins the league. Thank

44:08

you very much to Paul. 014195

44:11

11025 is always the number to call but particularly

44:13

right now if you want a piece of this.

44:16

Beat the pundit with the Scottish sun. For the

44:18

best football news and opinion online,

44:20

the pro's is not a no-corer

44:23

UK slash football. Come

44:25

on then, beat the pundit time, it's your

44:27

chance to show off your football knowledge and

44:29

win a signed ball.

44:31

So get it over to us right now on 014195 11025 and

44:33

the line's close at seven. Hackle

44:38

the headline. 014195

44:41

11025. Slide one,

44:44

Super Scoreboard. Simon

44:47

Donnelly and Cammy Bell are here. It's the usual

44:49

number if you want to get in touch or

44:51

Twitter as we continue to build up to this

44:53

weekend's action. Of course there are other stories

44:56

out there. What about you airdre partic thistle

44:58

fans? What did you make of the playoffs

45:01

last night? We're going to hear from

45:03

Alex Goggett, chapter signing, a new

45:05

St. Miron contract, St. Miron fans who pleased

45:07

are you with that news. If

45:10

you were listening to our news, you've

45:12

heard that clip from Derek

45:15

McInnis expecting bids for

45:17

David Watson, this summer. Kelly fans, do

45:19

you think he would be best served

45:21

staying put? If he was to

45:23

leave, what type of club could you see

45:26

coming in for him? And then the obvious

45:28

one, the way it goes in

45:30

this country, would you expect Celtic

45:32

or Rangers to be having a wee look at the

45:34

other good players that are right under their nose? So

45:36

let us know all your thoughts there on 014195 11025

45:38

and we played this. Beat

45:43

the Pundit, with the St. Miron contract.

45:45

For the best football news and opinion

45:47

online, St. Miron contract. North corner, UK,

45:50

slash football. Right, beat the

45:52

Pundit time. How's the form? I can't remember from you

45:54

two, have I got a scrap time? That's a horrible

45:56

win last week. Yeah, that was dreadful

45:58

actually. High break, I'll find you. 66%

46:01

for you Cami, which is right. Okay.

46:04

Let's meet tonight's contestant which is Davey.

46:07

How's it going Davey? Not

46:09

bad mate, yourself? Not bad. Are you

46:11

expecting your team Celtic to win at

46:13

the weekend? Yes. I

46:15

will go maybe two

46:18

feet now. And are you expecting

46:20

yourself to win and beat the pundit? What's the

46:22

more chance of happening? I'll just be

46:24

happy and not get a zero. The ball is

46:26

really, really low. Don't mind that.

46:29

The only way is up sort of thing. That's fine. Heads

46:32

will be Simon Donnelly, tails it will be

46:34

Cami Bell. And it

46:36

is tails. It's Cami against Davey in

46:38

Wisher. So what we'll do here is we'll give

46:41

Cami some greatest hits, radio to

46:43

listen to, turn that up nice and loud so

46:45

he can't hear Davey's answers. And it's

46:47

really simple Davey. You've never played before have you? No.

46:49

No, but it's very straightforward as I'm sure you know. 30 seconds,

46:52

you answer as many as you can and if you want to

46:54

pass and move on, fine by me. Okay? Okay.

46:57

Right, let's get stuck in. Your time

47:00

starts now. Which

47:02

English Championship club does Ryan Porteous play for?

47:07

Naughty. Do you score both goals the

47:09

last time Rangers beat Celtic at Celtic Park? Ah,

47:13

T Who

47:23

was the last Scottish player to get a Champions League winners

47:25

medal? Andy

47:28

Robertson. Was Celtic's top scorer this season? Not

47:33

really. Okay, okay, okay. Let's

47:35

bring back Cami. You ready? How

47:38

you doing? Just nervous for you. Okay. You

47:41

ready? Yep. Your time

47:43

starts now. Which English Championship club does Ryan Porteous

47:45

play for? What for? Who scored both

47:47

goals the last time Rangers beat Celtic at Celtic

47:49

Park? Tavenia,

47:54

what was the Airdrie-Partek-Fistol score last night to

47:56

each? In which country was Philippe Klimault managing

47:58

before Rangers beat Celtic Park? Who was the

48:01

last Scottish player to get a Champions League

48:03

winners medal? Pass. Who's

48:06

Celtic's top scorer this season? Keogo.

48:09

Other than Hibbs, who's the

48:11

only club Paul Hanlon has made an appearance

48:13

for? Don't fear him. What

48:17

do you think, Davey? Tight. Tight.

48:20

Tight. Let's find out. Got

48:22

a tricky one, yeah. Ryan

48:24

Porteous plays four. Watford,

48:27

1-0, Cammie Bell. None

48:29

of you got this. Who scored both

48:32

goals the last time Rangers beat Celtic

48:34

at South Park? Connor Goldson. You both

48:36

went to Averland. Connor Goldson. October 2020.

48:39

The third-rate partic score last night was

48:41

2-0. So it was 2-0,

48:43

Cammie Bell. Both

48:45

went Belgium for Philippe Cement, but it

48:47

was France most recently. Morning from Monaco.

48:50

How are you feeling now, Davey? I'm fine.

48:52

I'm fine at the time. I'm fine at the time.

48:55

I'm in the oven. The last

48:57

Scottish player to get a Champions League

48:59

winner's medal was Billy Gilmour. Billy Gilmour.

49:02

He didn't get on in the final, but

49:04

he got a medal. That's my question. Worded

49:06

it carefully. So it's still Tyrell, Cammie. Celtic's

49:09

top score. So you need this, Davey. Don't you, to

49:11

avoid the zero. Which is

49:13

what you said. That was all he was aiming for, was

49:15

to avoid the zero. Who's Celtic's top

49:17

scorer this season? I'm

49:19

afraid it's Keogo. Matt Riley.

49:23

I think he just passed them at

49:25

the weekend. Is that a three? He came

49:27

on, Davey came on, to avoid the zero.

49:29

And he's got the goal. Davey, he takes

49:31

it so far. Davey. I bet they're

49:33

that bad. There's only two now. Three now.

49:36

He got Keogo. Three now. He got

49:38

Keogo. And the Roberts, him was a good

49:40

shout to be fair. So did I. So did I. Paul

49:43

Hanlon. Paul Hanlon's only other

49:45

appearance, two for St. Johnson.

49:48

Okay. There we go. Unlucky,

49:50

Davey. I'll be back, Cammie. Davey, get a

49:52

good three-season under your belt, and we'll see

49:55

you next season, okay? I promise. Good man.

49:57

That was Davey. I love that. specifically

50:00

to not get a zero and he's

50:02

talked himself into it and

50:04

I was stumbling through that to be fair.

50:06

Does that pop my percentage up a wee

50:11

bit? No of course it will. And

50:13

your percentage is volatile, you've played a lot

50:15

less than the likes of Gordon Dale

50:17

who likes to always pump in his

50:19

gums last night. Yeah usual usual. So

50:21

did Qo just pass O'Reilly? He must have. Yep

50:24

with the two goals. The weekend. Must have I. Davey was

50:26

close between them two. Davey was actually unlucky. He's

50:29

went O'Reilly and Andy Robertson. I would have said

50:31

Andy as well if I've got a bit. There's

50:33

only one goal in it for Qo

50:36

here, passed him at the weekend. Oh well. There

50:39

we go. Yeah well isn't it? It's correct.

50:41

I'm not quite sure. I mean try best

50:43

probably to get Davey a point. That's

50:46

all. Just trying to get something on the board

50:48

but it's not happening. It's not happening, tried my

50:50

best. But anyway, back tomorrow with another beat

50:53

to pundit and we'll see what

50:55

Gordon Dale and Mark Wilson can come

50:58

up with. Right what about Jimmy

51:01

who's on the nights with? How's it going Jimmy? How

51:04

you doing guys? Yeah good thanks. What you

51:06

thinking? I was not

51:08

sure of my fellow Rangers fan

51:11

there. David's talking about the criticism

51:13

that Brendan O'Donoughton should get. I

51:15

don't see what he's coming through.

51:18

As a Rangers fan when Michael

51:20

Bay was the manager they were all

51:22

in fear of what was going on. But,

51:27

not really I'll take a cup

51:29

double as

51:31

a success for us and

51:33

then you know I

51:35

don't know where he's coming through guys. I'm

51:38

looking forward to that coming into the season. Just if

51:40

it were Rangers to get the double and

51:43

Celtic win the league. The debate

51:45

about what is a good season

51:47

and what's not. Everybody knows the league's always

51:50

the priority. How could it not be it's

51:52

the same in every country? I

51:54

suppose logic falls if you can't do that you

51:56

might as well win the other two. But that's

51:58

what's going to dominate. As soon

52:00

as Scott Feynman has done, like

52:02

I say, if it went that

52:04

way, but yeah,

52:07

success in failure is not black

52:09

and white, there are

52:11

shades in between. There's no so much

52:14

about success in failure. The

52:16

fact is that when Michael Beale was there, there

52:19

were seven points behind Celtic and what the

52:21

job he's done now has been absolutely remarkable.

52:24

And I'm not saying that, I mean,

52:26

obviously Celtic are favourites to win

52:29

the championship. The

52:32

fact of the matter is that to be

52:34

sitting now with a post- player,

52:56

I mean, for me, it's a good chance

52:58

to bring in his own players next season

53:00

and we'll see what happens. But for

53:03

me, a couple of times it stands

53:05

as a success, but I could have

53:07

been better than we could have probably

53:10

won the table up to

53:12

four games ago when we started to throw away.

53:14

I mean, for the scoring, it comes

53:16

about saying that the brain goes

53:19

to be criticized for being seven points ahead and

53:21

now it's not. For me, it's the

53:23

only means to look at the game as a whole and

53:25

think that we have progressed and that's

53:27

all it comes on. I'll look at

53:29

it as it comes and we'll see what happens the

53:31

next two or three weeks, mate. Yeah.

53:33

And then we were doing the psychological analysis

53:36

this week. Before we get to that Cup

53:38

final, we'll have to say who's won the

53:40

league and what impact does that have? Does

53:42

that give somebody a point to prove or

53:45

has it demoralized the team that won the

53:47

league? So strap yourself in, it's

53:49

going to be a good few weeks. Yeah, an

53:51

amazing few weeks ahead of us. I get Jimmy's

53:53

point and I totally agree. I think Clamones came

53:55

in and done a brilliant job, letting a few

53:58

adorption and if not one. They've

54:00

also won one cup so far, not one

54:02

the other cup. But if you'd offered Rangers

54:04

fans a cup double after that Aberdeen game,

54:07

they would absolutely beat your handoff for it

54:09

because they were in such a low place

54:11

to turn that around so quickly. And again,

54:13

with majority of the same players, yes, there's

54:15

been one or two additions in January that

54:18

have helped, but he's improved so many players

54:21

and they're still in a chance for a travel. At

54:23

the moment, they're still in a chance for the travel.

54:25

The league isn't over. There's a big game on Saturday

54:27

for them. They need to define that victory to put

54:29

the pressure on its Celtic. But

54:32

I think they have. You'll have learnt a

54:34

lot this season for like, come on. I

54:36

think you've learnt a lot about these players

54:38

that when they did get ahead, they didn't

54:40

handle that pressure. They didn't handle that expectation.

54:43

And they probably should have. They were

54:45

in a good enough position to go to Ross County. We

54:47

only seven games left of the season to then

54:49

go on and get a title. And they didn't

54:52

do that. So it's their own doing. But they've

54:54

learnt a lot this season and agree with Jimmy.

54:56

He'll have his own recruitment. That

54:59

will be going through the process and the summer. And

55:01

they'll bring in a number of players. Just a curiosity.

55:03

And I know these clubs are big machines and it's

55:05

supposed to all tick along. I wonder what that looks

55:08

like right now for both. But you're talking about Rangers

55:10

as to the plans that have been put in

55:12

place for next season. And we've got a good one. Yeah. Because

55:14

it still has to be. You

55:16

know, you start to look at it with a clear

55:18

mind. If you're the manager, fans can maybe be swayed.

55:20

Look, if X group of players goes on and wins

55:23

this league, you probably end up thinking they're better

55:26

than you would if they had lost a game.

55:28

But if they lost the league, sorry. But I

55:30

wonder how both sets are progressing with that. It's

55:32

an interesting one. I mean, I think from the

55:34

Rangers point of view, and I think Jimmy speaks

55:37

a lot essentially in terms of the

55:40

success that Rangers have had this season from where they

55:42

were when they lost the

55:44

last manager. But it's

55:46

an interesting one that you're saying that because there

55:49

is quite a few players that have been there for a number

55:51

of years with Rangers. And you would think,

55:54

is maybe Clemente going to look at that and try and freshen it

55:56

and change it? But as you quite rightly say, if they're going

55:58

in well, then that's a good one. and the table

56:01

then it changes your mind a

56:03

little bit when I'm to them. It

56:05

feels a wee bit to me that there's

56:07

a number of players in the building at

56:09

Rangers that have run its course. Yeah, that's

56:11

true. Three managers. Yeah, even if the league's

56:13

won. Yeah, totally. No, I believe that. And

56:16

I think the manager's clever enough to identify

56:18

that as well. He's getting the

56:20

best out of the players. That's all he can control

56:22

at this moment in time is getting the best out

56:24

of the players in the squad that he's got. But

56:26

I firmly believe he'll be looking at the, she's

56:29

trying to mark it. And yeah,

56:32

I think there's a number of players that have just

56:34

had their time at Rangers and maybe just need freshened

56:36

up from both points of view, the player and the

56:38

club. Thank you very much

56:40

to Jimmy in Knightswood. Other parts of Glasgow and

56:43

the West are available. It just so happens that

56:45

Carol is also there. You're not Jimmy's neighbour, are

56:47

you, Carol? No, I don't think so.

56:50

How are you tonight, all good? I'm very

56:52

well thank you, I just can't complain. What are

56:54

you thinking then? Right, I've

56:57

got a theory. Now, it might be

56:59

completely mince, but I'm a

57:01

big Rangers fan, right? I

57:03

know we're getting into lines then and

57:06

I do accept that Celtic are

57:08

the favourites, okay? However,

57:10

seeing Europe, that never bothered us,

57:13

right? We took on the biggest and the best and

57:15

we did well. Now, can

57:17

we not get into our heads?

57:20

It's just another European game. Now,

57:22

says, come on, go into the heads of

57:24

the boys and said, right, forget it, Celtic.

57:28

It's a beat or whatever it

57:31

is, another European. I think

57:33

we would do well because we

57:35

seem to turn it on in Europe and

57:38

if we can create the

57:40

same kind of technical spirit

57:43

and the fight up for the fight, I

57:46

think we might just pull off a

57:48

surprise. I get where Carol's coming from. Rangers

57:50

have a lot of good moments against the

57:53

odds in Europe, Cami. What is in

57:55

that? How can you

57:57

recreate that type of performance?

58:00

It's difficult, I think what Carroll seems

58:02

absolutely right and come on, obviously, this

58:04

is another game, let's not go

58:06

over the top. They need

58:09

to control their emotions, control

58:11

their emotions. Again, there will be

58:13

a lot of emotions going on throughout that because

58:15

they know how big the game is, but they

58:17

can't lose that because, again, refereeing decisions, you've

58:20

got to be aware of these things. But

58:22

it's difficult to create that European field because

58:24

you're playing Celtic and Celtic will approach this

58:26

game differently than they know it's a

58:29

derby match. I think European games start

58:31

a little bit slower in tempo. Listen,

58:34

this game on Saturday will not start with a

58:37

slow tempo. Both teams will be 100mph and Rangers

58:40

just need to weather that storm to start with. They

58:42

started poorly in the last couple of old

58:45

fun games. They need to learn from that. They need

58:47

to stay in the game, keep it tight. And as

58:49

I say, probably looking at

58:51

Rangers' point of view, the longer it's

58:54

close within the game and possibly

58:56

a draw, the

58:59

more that might start creeping in the Celtic

59:01

mind, players' minds, anyways, that a draw does

59:03

them. A draw does them on Saturday and

59:05

Rangers could sneak it and catch them on

59:07

the counterattack or potentially a set piece. You

59:10

wonder if that is part of the

59:12

messaging. You look at the, Rangers

59:14

have gone to Betis in one, they've went to Benfica

59:17

in Drew. I think they need

59:19

a performance like that. I take

59:21

on board what Carl was trying to say. I don't

59:24

think they should treat it like a European game, but

59:26

I think they need a level of performance on a

59:28

par. The Betis game, I'm right

59:30

in saying, it was quite topsy, turvy.

59:32

They were like, backs against

59:34

the ball at times, but they were in the lead.

59:36

And then, you know, before half time, it looked

59:39

as if Betis could open them up

59:41

at will, but then they hung in and they

59:44

get the goal in the second half. I think you

59:46

need a performance like that. I think of that level

59:49

at the weekend to get anything out again. There's

59:52

key players for me for Rangers. Again, Jack Butler,

59:54

being the next goalkeeper, I feel again,

59:57

I just look at them and I think if

59:59

there's a huge performance from him, he can absolutely

1:00:01

flip this game. He's going to have to make

1:00:03

big saves. Celtic will get opportunities. There's no doubt

1:00:05

about that. They're at home, so they'll be the

1:00:08

expectation from the fans, from the manager, that they'll

1:00:10

get chances. But Jack Brooklyn can have a big,

1:00:12

big say in the way this game goes. They

1:00:14

can stop you losing it, but somebody else will need to

1:00:17

make sure you win it. Yeah,

1:00:19

but again, I've seen it before where certainly

1:00:21

Vereenza's goalie is looking closely at Alan McGregor.

1:00:23

He makes big saves in big moments of

1:00:25

the games and it flips it. It almost

1:00:27

puts a little bit

1:00:30

of belief in the rest of the team. Then

1:00:32

they go up the pitch and score an important

1:00:34

goal. We've seen it all before from Rangers. I

1:00:36

firmly believe that Jack Brooklyn's going to

1:00:38

have a huge say in the game. If he

1:00:40

can produce one of his big, big performances then

1:00:42

he could be a key player for Rangers.

1:00:44

How important could he be, Carol? He

1:00:47

can be, but yeah, I agree with you

1:00:49

about that. I wouldn't know that, but Alan

1:00:51

was a penalty specialist. I mean,

1:00:54

he saved the most weirdest penalty kicks

1:00:56

that no day was going to put

1:00:58

a glove on. I have no

1:01:00

season out of the baton yet. So

1:01:02

that, you know, if Celtic get a

1:01:04

penalty, I would be less troubled if

1:01:06

there was Alan McGregor on the sticks.

1:01:09

I'd be more troubled because it's baton. Wow, we've

1:01:12

found a weakness in Jack Brooklyn that we're not happy

1:01:14

about. It doesn't get close enough to penalties. Well,

1:01:17

he'd be there. That would be dominating the

1:01:19

build up, I'm sure. Predictions about who will

1:01:21

or will not get a penalty. And if

1:01:23

there is one given, don't you, or you'll

1:01:25

hear all about it on here. I think

1:01:27

that's an absolute certainty. So thank

1:01:29

you to Carol on

1:01:32

the line. Did you see Jack Brooklyn? A weird

1:01:35

argument with the Rangers fans out in the car

1:01:38

park. Yeah. There's a signing

1:01:40

of autographs or shirts or whatever. Yeah,

1:01:42

and that's why nothing's secret in the... Not

1:01:45

after the game. In the smartphone era. Yeah.

1:01:47

After the game against command. Again, that's why

1:01:49

I think there was a little bit of

1:01:51

frustration from the, the Ranger supporters from

1:01:54

the command of performance. It was just, I feel

1:01:57

like in terms of performance.

1:01:59

Would they be dead? No, I don't think so, but

1:02:02

I think he was making the point. I think he

1:02:04

had somewhere to be. Right. In fact, he was going

1:02:06

to the PFA world that night he was there. I

1:02:08

saw him. It's somewhere to be.

1:02:10

He was making the point that he always stands in

1:02:12

certain things. And he does. You've got to take how

1:02:15

often I listen. I've been

1:02:17

there with my daughter and stuff and a

1:02:19

number of the Rangers players stand there and

1:02:21

listen, they don't deserve any stick. They're doing

1:02:24

the right thing for the fans and and

1:02:26

signing autographs. And Jack Button's one that always

1:02:28

stops and finds stuff. So unless he's been

1:02:30

absolutely phenomenal for Rangers this season, but I think

1:02:33

he's just letting them, the fans know that they're

1:02:35

fully focused on them gaming. And I still think

1:02:37

that he'll be in that dressing room saying that

1:02:39

they absolutely believe in they can go and win

1:02:41

this game. It's going to be a big, big

1:02:43

challenge, but they can definitely do it. Thanks

1:02:46

again to Carol. Hole 141951, 1025. We're

1:02:50

going to hear from Derek McInnis next,

1:02:52

bracing himself for bids for

1:02:54

David Watson. I wonder, Kelly fans, if

1:02:56

you think you've got a realistic chance

1:02:58

of hanging on to him, where

1:03:00

would he be best served playing his football next

1:03:02

season? And the usual way of

1:03:05

the world when there's an impressive Scottish youngster, Celtic

1:03:07

and Rangers fans, is that a direction you would

1:03:09

look in? Let us know right now and we'll

1:03:11

take your calls next. Taking

1:03:14

your calls on this

1:03:16

football, 0141, 951, 1025.

1:03:19

This is Clyde 1

1:03:21

Super Scoreboard. It's

1:03:23

that time of the night where you send the

1:03:25

question in and the pundits try and come up

1:03:28

with the answers between now and the end of

1:03:30

the show. Simon Donnelly and Cammy Bell. I've

1:03:33

got to put this politely. I don't think you're

1:03:35

the greatest duo at the full-time teaser. You say

1:03:37

this every time I'm on. I don't know if

1:03:39

it's... And I say every time he's on and

1:03:42

then you turn out together. So it's like, sometimes,

1:03:44

you know, there's some of your parts and all

1:03:46

that. Let's get the question

1:03:48

up and running. You've got a point. Full-time

1:03:53

teaser with Universal Interiors.

1:03:55

Approved by Tossitrader. Take

1:03:57

off your human fragment in

1:03:59

style. Right, doable

1:04:02

I do think, I have to say. A bit

1:04:04

of a memory test for you, this one, and

1:04:06

I'd like to thank Max Smith for

1:04:08

sending it in. Thank you to Max, he wants you to name,

1:04:10

I don't know if we'll see one this

1:04:12

weekend, but the last 10 players to

1:04:14

score a header in

1:04:17

an old firm game. So who

1:04:19

are the last 10 players to score a

1:04:21

header in an old firm game?

1:04:24

Goldson, yes. Because did you know that

1:04:26

he scored a double the last time

1:04:28

Rangers beat Celtic at Celtic Park? Well

1:04:30

listen, we've been paying attention. As advertised

1:04:32

on beat the pundit corner, Goldson. Headers,

1:04:35

um, chalimogru. Nope, not

1:04:37

going as far back as him. Morellas?

1:04:41

Yes. As a complete guess, you

1:04:43

get down by the tone, save it a bit more

1:04:45

certainty and then it'll be convincing. Headers.

1:04:48

Morellas? Eh... I

1:04:54

can give you some thinking, team. It's not a

1:04:56

terrible start, I've seen worse. Hugo hasn't. Not

1:04:59

a header, no. Didn't think so. My

1:05:01

level went for 10. 10 did you

1:05:03

say? Right, okay. Yeah, there you

1:05:05

go, some morellas. That's funny

1:05:07

cos looking at, I don't think I'd be very

1:05:09

good at this, I'm looking at the list and

1:05:11

like someone obviously like, particularly

1:05:13

strong, heathers of them

1:05:15

all, but it just so happens they go in the right

1:05:18

area, at the right time. And

1:05:20

some might be. Some might

1:05:22

be all, you know, centre half, is that the best chance

1:05:24

of scoring for them? But there are

1:05:26

others, there are others. Catal fickers? No.

1:05:29

Okay, we'll leave it there for now and see what

1:05:31

you're capable of. Thanks to Max again for sending it

1:05:33

in. And if you think you could do that, come

1:05:35

up with the question, put it

1:05:37

to the pundits, try and catch

1:05:40

them out. It's fulltimeatclidewon.com. fulltimeatclidewon.com.

1:05:46

Let's hear a bit from Derek McInnes, shall

1:05:48

we? You can keep your calls coming on

1:05:50

this or anything else, but it is a...

1:05:53

It's fresh stuff today, so be keen to get your

1:05:55

thoughts on what Derek McInnes has had

1:05:57

to say. I think it extends to commandment funds.

1:06:00

and all other fans really who've got a

1:06:02

keen interest in good young players and Scotland,

1:06:04

Derek McKenna says he is expecting offers for

1:06:06

player of the year David Watson this summer,

1:06:08

young player of the year. He thinks it's

1:06:10

only natural after the season he's had. I

1:06:13

think we should expect speculation about David here,

1:06:15

I think that we should expect clubs being

1:06:17

more than aware of him, people in the

1:06:19

radar are bigger clubs than us, you know, that's

1:06:21

the way it goes and we'd

1:06:24

be surprised if it wasn't, you know what I mean? It's like,

1:06:27

but he's been a fantastic story for

1:06:29

us as an academy out of the

1:06:31

old kind of flagship,

1:06:33

really signing for a player for that. But I think

1:06:35

David is one that we would like to hang about

1:06:38

a bit longer as a manager, you want to try

1:06:40

and hold onto your best players for as long as

1:06:42

you can, but we understand the market

1:06:44

and if there is offers

1:06:46

coming from, as I expected,

1:06:48

something we'd have to look at, but we

1:06:50

don't want to lose him. I think he's

1:06:52

accredited, he's held, I think he's

1:06:55

only going to get better. I think

1:06:57

he's in good company with the nominees

1:06:59

around him and to come out and talk, it's fantastic

1:07:01

for him and to win

1:07:03

the, if he can win the sports writers

1:07:05

and he's already won the PFA award, there's

1:07:07

been a lot of top players who have

1:07:09

won that and went on to brilliant careers

1:07:12

and I think he'll win a lot. Come

1:07:15

on, the correspondent, Cammie Bell, give us your thoughts.

1:07:17

The reason for that, by the way, they can

1:07:19

updated version that Derek McInnis alluded to. You've all

1:07:21

heard that he won the PFA

1:07:24

Young Player of the Year award

1:07:27

at the weekend. He has now been shortlisted

1:07:29

for the football writers one. It's

1:07:31

a very similar shortlist actually. The

1:07:33

same David Watson, Lennon Miller, Lyle

1:07:35

Cameron, the only difference on this

1:07:37

one is Conor Barron of Aberdeen.

1:07:40

Yeah, no, he's been fantastic

1:07:43

for Komanuk this season. Again,

1:07:45

he's a real workhorse, real engine

1:07:48

of Komanuk's midfield. He scored a number of

1:07:50

very good goals as well. There was one

1:07:52

against Aberdeen and then he scored that one

1:07:54

against St. Miram where he kind of, I

1:07:56

think it was the fifth one, where he

1:07:58

dribbled from half wheel and and

1:08:00

beat a number of players and finished it. So he's got

1:08:02

that in his locker as well, but I just think he's

1:08:04

work ethic. He breaks up

1:08:07

play really well for Kamanlick. And he's going

1:08:09

to be, I think he definitely will leave

1:08:11

Kamanlick this summer. I know there'll be a

1:08:13

number. Yeah, I think there'll be people looking

1:08:15

at him all season. Just because

1:08:17

he's aged again and the

1:08:19

potential, I probably think the suitors

1:08:22

would be down self to be honest. What

1:08:24

makes you say that? I just feel as if I'm

1:08:28

unsure if Rangers and Celic would be

1:08:31

looking at him at this moment in time. I

1:08:34

don't know why. I've just got a feeling that I

1:08:36

think he'd be more suited to a

1:08:38

sort of championship. That would be stepping stone

1:08:41

to moving on his career. I

1:08:43

just can't really see. I don't know

1:08:45

why. I'm just got a feeling that Rangers

1:08:48

and Celic possibly wouldn't look at him. John's on the

1:08:50

line. What do you think, John? No,

1:08:52

I think he's an old brainer. He'd go for him.

1:08:54

And surely, Gordon, I'd go for a young lady and

1:08:56

mother too. Both of them? Yes, I

1:08:58

would think. As we all know,

1:09:01

Brandon Rodgers is brilliant at bringing kids along. You know what

1:09:03

I mean? It will nurture them. And

1:09:05

I think, obviously, he might not go

1:09:07

the way he tumbled him greater than

1:09:09

the Celtic's first team. But obviously, I

1:09:11

think we're going to lose a tattoo

1:09:13

order in this bit in the coming season. So I

1:09:15

think it's an old brainer for Celic. It's true, I've

1:09:18

not seen hundreds of the young boy player. I've not

1:09:20

seen a lot of minutes of him. But what I've

1:09:22

seen, I'm very pleased with him. He's got some engine.

1:09:25

And he's got an eye for gold. And I

1:09:27

think if he came to Celtic, Brandon Rodgers would

1:09:29

bring him on leaps and bounds. I

1:09:31

always like to think I can stick up for fans of

1:09:33

the so-called we teams. And if you're a Kelly fan or

1:09:37

St. Miron or mother, well, it's the

1:09:39

most annoying thing in the world when

1:09:41

there's this assumption that Celtic and Rangers

1:09:43

can come and pick your best young player.

1:09:45

At the same time, if I remove my

1:09:47

we team bias, if

1:09:49

Celtic and Rangers don't start by looking

1:09:51

at who's good and young under

1:09:54

their nose before they go elsewhere, then they're probably not

1:09:56

doing their job either. So what do

1:09:58

you think? Well, you're not going

1:10:00

to like that. I'm going to say I like the lad at

1:10:02

your place, Linon Miller. Ten million

1:10:04

and we'll talk. Yeah, I thought you might say

1:10:07

that. But I'm like, John, I haven't seen a

1:10:09

lot of young Watson. The thing

1:10:11

that sticks out for me was the lovely goalie

1:10:13

scored up in Putawdre. The

1:10:16

question mark is, at this

1:10:19

young stage of their career, are they

1:10:21

going to go to a Rangers that

1:10:23

are Celtic and play regular? I think

1:10:26

for their development, because these guys are

1:10:28

playing on a regular basis, Bictol Manlark

1:10:30

and Murrow, and as Cami says, maybe

1:10:33

I move between that. Although

1:10:36

you would argue if they would have been

1:10:38

down-sowed and were successful, then they'd maybe go

1:10:40

out of the price market for Celtic Rangers.

1:10:43

Most of the boys' development, I think,

1:10:46

have found themselves in the first teams now playing on

1:10:48

a regular basis. They want

1:10:50

to keep that going. And

1:10:53

at that level, where, as

1:10:55

John's saying, they are to go into Celtic,

1:10:57

would they go into the team and play

1:10:59

a lot of football? I think, but they're

1:11:01

still very young. That would be the difference

1:11:03

this time. You can always reference other players

1:11:05

who've gone. David Watson's 19. But

1:11:08

they're playing first team. London Miller's a good bit younger. Oh, they're 17

1:11:11

on the range, you know. Yeah. The

1:11:14

Watsons score twice at Celtic Park with Cami. How

1:11:17

important can that be when you start attracting

1:11:19

interest? Because I think stylistically, most

1:11:21

people have them as real, all-action,

1:11:24

box-to-box. Energy would be the main attribute.

1:11:26

That's not to say he doesn't have

1:11:28

others, obviously. But to then

1:11:31

go, it's always about goals. You know,

1:11:33

it is. That's what gets the headlines. You

1:11:35

look at the number of goals. David Turnbull

1:11:38

scored for Mullah. That is the bit that

1:11:40

grabs the attention. And he is. He's a

1:11:43

box-to-box player. And that's where it

1:11:45

comes in handy with the engine that he's got. He can get up and

1:11:47

down the pitch. As I see,

1:11:49

he's very good at breaking up players well.

1:11:51

But then you find him in the box

1:11:53

in the opposition half and scoring goals. So

1:11:55

he does have a huge amount of talent.

1:11:58

And I agree with you on this and see if you do. if he

1:12:00

was to go to select, of course he would become a

1:12:02

better player. He's going to train with better players. He's

1:12:04

got a manager who is very good at

1:12:06

coaching players as well. Not saying Derek McInnes

1:12:08

isn't, but I just think training, DnDelt, we

1:12:10

talk quality players. Of course, your levels are

1:12:12

going to get higher and have to get

1:12:14

higher. So I just

1:12:18

don't know if selling Rangers would pay the

1:12:20

fee that command I could looking for, because

1:12:23

it'll be a hefty fee as

1:12:25

well. They'll not be letting this kid go for

1:12:27

free. Billy Bowie's back

1:12:30

to command very well over the

1:12:32

last few years and has a few quid in

1:12:34

his pocket. So it'll have to be the right

1:12:36

fee for him to leave the club. So I'm

1:12:38

just unsure if both clubs would be willing to

1:12:40

pay that fee. I think

1:12:42

he's got a year left. I

1:12:45

don't know if it's much more than that, is it? Double check.

1:12:48

John, you think it's been it's obviously been a

1:12:50

mixed market for Celtic over the years, but you

1:12:52

think, you know, kind of making sure you don't

1:12:54

let any obvious ones at home pass you by

1:12:57

is a good a good way to start. I

1:12:59

think a good thing is to keep them keep

1:13:01

the money in Scotland. I mean, again,

1:13:03

down there, I mean, the type of any country

1:13:06

players as we all know, I think it'd be

1:13:08

good for a selfie to go from. But can

1:13:10

I make another point going on with other subject

1:13:12

there at McInnis? Now, I don't know. I don't

1:13:15

know. Maybe I'm going to blame you very quickly.

1:13:17

Sorry, 2026. She's

1:13:20

got two years. She's after

1:13:22

a decision against Rangers and they come up

1:13:24

with a plan to send off chief at

1:13:26

the time, the Celtic Park. They

1:13:28

make ends with never been off. We know in

1:13:30

the media all the time complain about it, but

1:13:32

the rest of my mind isn't complaining about the

1:13:35

session behind the I-Bruch. I

1:13:38

think he just said, yeah, he said by

1:13:40

the rules, he'd kind of understand, you know, harsh and you're right,

1:13:42

just like everyone said, but he understands that in the rules, that's

1:13:44

always going to be a red card. There's

1:13:47

no getting away from it. And I think that

1:13:49

the McInnis is wise enough that he understands the

1:13:51

rules. It's very harsh on jury. I get that.

1:13:53

But the rules are the rules. So

1:13:56

it's just one that you might want to

1:13:58

come out and complain about. He

1:14:00

still looks a bit silly if he comes on

1:14:02

and starts moaning about it to be honest because

1:14:04

he knows the rules and again he'll be made

1:14:06

well aware of the rules before he's done his

1:14:08

media after the game. He'll be frustrated because it

1:14:10

is a half-thread card but that's what the rules

1:14:13

say, he has to go off the pitch. So

1:14:16

what's the theory, John, that if that had happened, that Ciel

1:14:18

think you... He always complains,

1:14:21

Simon, I know Simon is padre, he's

1:14:23

here next to the line but he

1:14:25

always complains

1:14:27

every decision that goes against him to Celtic is

1:14:29

as if all we get against him, you know

1:14:31

what I mean? I just thought, well, as an

1:14:33

ex-rangers player he seems to mean

1:14:35

that he never opened his mouth about it and

1:14:37

even my wee pal always on top of me

1:14:39

and I'm like, oh, poor Kenimela, Kenimela, I actually thought

1:14:42

it was a half-spacing in the 90s and I

1:14:44

want to expect half-rangers fans because he said that.

1:14:46

But surely the only way we

1:14:48

can make this comparison is if

1:14:51

Celtic have... or if Kilmarnock have had

1:14:53

a handball on the line against Celtic,

1:14:55

fucking random other incidents when they're not

1:14:57

the same, I don't... I'm just talking

1:14:59

about over the years he seems to

1:15:01

always have a grip of Celtic, but

1:15:03

I mean because he's an ex-rangers player

1:15:05

and he's actually had to

1:15:08

go... he's never really complained sorry

1:15:10

and... That's what I'm saying, this is a

1:15:12

different... if there was the same incident and

1:15:15

then he's reacted completely differently to them, I

1:15:17

would understand that gives a bit of weight

1:15:19

to the theory until such time, Simon, I

1:15:21

don't really know... Listen, I think at the

1:15:23

time, and I'll go with Kenimela, I think

1:15:26

it was harsh, but it's the

1:15:28

rule, I think the rules need to

1:15:30

be changed on that subject, it's

1:15:32

one of the ones because at the time it's

1:15:35

one thing, it's because Rangers were finding it increasingly

1:15:38

difficult to get into that game after Kilmarnock taking

1:15:40

the lead and it's a big moment in the

1:15:42

game, but it's the rules

1:15:44

which I don't agree with the handball though. Yeah

1:15:47

and that's... on one hand that's

1:15:50

fine, you're isn't able to say what you want about

1:15:52

it, but I feel like we're doing this a lot

1:15:54

more now, Cami, in that we

1:15:57

can all have issues with it, but we need to almost stop. We

1:16:01

can't get the rules changed, unfortunately. You know

1:16:03

who we would love to, but that's a

1:16:05

conversation for another day. And I

1:16:08

feel like we, not just this

1:16:10

incident, any incident, we keep analysing them at

1:16:12

times through the, against

1:16:15

the criteria that we would like to see, rather

1:16:17

than what it actually is. Yeah,

1:16:19

and that's why I don't think Derek

1:16:21

McInnes has made any comment about it.

1:16:24

He probably has seen somewhere it

1:16:26

feels it's harsh on the boy, because

1:16:28

it is harsh on Joe McInnes. It's

1:16:30

very harsh on him, but the rules

1:16:33

say that if you stop the ball with your hand

1:16:35

going into the back of it. Well, if it's outstretched,

1:16:37

obviously, because there can be other mitigating factors. Yes, yes.

1:16:39

If it hits you maybe above the T-shirt line, I think we've seen some of

1:16:41

them. And we know it's not. He's delivered it.

1:16:44

Again, he's trying to make the tackle right

1:16:46

on the line, so he's out of control of

1:16:48

his body, his arms away from his body, so

1:16:50

we know that. But it's stopped the ball from

1:16:52

going in the back of it. So that's why

1:16:55

he has been sent off. And I just don't

1:16:57

think Derek McInnes would put you still in a

1:16:59

position and make you still look silly by saying

1:17:01

something against the rules. I think internally you'll be

1:17:03

saying to the boy, look, it's really harsh on

1:17:06

you, and there's not a lot you can do

1:17:08

about that. It's just one of them unfortunate situations,

1:17:10

to be honest. 01419511025, that is the number

1:17:12

you need. Or

1:17:17

you can tweet us at ClydeSSB as well,

1:17:19

if you want to get in touch. There's

1:17:21

plenty of time, I would say. Picking along towards

1:17:23

the end of the

1:17:26

show, but still time to get in touch. Let's

1:17:28

bring in Stevie, who's just called actually in court, how

1:17:31

about you, Stevie? Sorry,

1:17:33

how are we doing? Good, what are you thinking? Well,

1:17:36

I'm just thinking, James

1:17:38

Tavernier, the goal that James Tavernier

1:17:40

scored in the commando game was to punch

1:17:43

the hand ball into the net.

1:17:46

So if it's a hand ball before it's went

1:17:48

in, it's an automatic

1:17:50

send-off, and it's a goal-scrolling opportunity.

1:17:53

So why do you see no punish for that? Because

1:17:57

he didn't stop the goal-scoring. scoring

1:18:00

opportunity did he because the ball went in? Aye,

1:18:03

but he said the rest of you could have stopped

1:18:05

and gave a penalty kick but because of an end

1:18:07

they gave the goal so it

1:18:09

should have all caught and gone before an end

1:18:11

in it so

1:18:14

it should have all gone in the box. So

1:18:17

you would rather come on and didn't get the

1:18:19

goal? Well,

1:18:21

because I've seen the penalty kick and James Tabanea

1:18:23

could have been out of the ball and so

1:18:25

I think your mum could have scored the penalty.

1:18:28

I reckon if you gave Komanlick the opportunity I

1:18:30

think they would have taken the goal. But

1:18:36

mind you, obviously he'll get a yellow cap

1:18:38

or something. No, but he shouldn't, that's the

1:18:40

thing because the handball doesn't affect anything, there

1:18:42

is no outcome there, it deflects off his

1:18:44

hand, ends up in the back of the

1:18:46

net, Killy gets her goal, everybody

1:18:48

I assumed in the world would move on.

1:18:51

But maybe not. Well

1:18:53

it's not going in unless it hits his hand. So it's

1:18:55

effecting that we put it in but he would take the

1:18:57

goal. It's an

1:18:59

accidental, I don't think Tarves means to handball

1:19:01

it so I think it's an

1:19:03

accidental handball and it's deflected into

1:19:05

his net and it's unfortunate for him that it's wetting it

1:19:09

back in it but I can't see it being a

1:19:12

penalty in a red card, they just don't get the

1:19:14

logic in that one. Well

1:19:18

I agree to disagree, thank you Stevie, it's a perfect time

1:19:20

to call if you want to join in as well and

1:19:22

how are you two feeling on this

1:19:24

teaser, we're looking for the last 10 players

1:19:26

to score a header in an old firm

1:19:28

game, you've got Morelos and Goldson. Gladly.

1:19:33

Too far back, Steven said that one

1:19:35

on Twitter as well. Griffith? No.

1:19:39

They're all quite recent believe it or not are they? Yeah. Okay.

1:19:42

And the last maybe four

1:19:46

or five, five seasons maybe? Something

1:19:49

along those lines. Edward?

1:19:53

Yes. I've

1:19:55

said that and I literally can't remember the goal. I'm not

1:19:57

sure I can remember that one either. This

1:20:01

was confusing me. But anyway, there

1:20:03

is one I really remember, okay? The

1:20:06

clues I'll give you. It was at

1:20:08

Hamden and he's really, really not known

1:20:10

for his heading. But,

1:20:14

like I say, obviously if you're in the right place at

1:20:16

the right time you can get a particularly good

1:20:18

opportunity from that. Doesn't mean that he

1:20:21

rose above everybody in a crowded 18-yard

1:20:23

box. Hamden? He's

1:20:26

not doing anything for you. Simon? Oh.

1:20:29

It came obviously. Oh,

1:20:32

I'm surprised. I'm going to switch to playing goal because I

1:20:34

still have Julian. No. He's

1:20:36

actually not. For him? He could fit too far back as

1:20:38

well. Must be here. God. Yeah,

1:20:40

I remember that one. I

1:20:43

suppose I'll take play of not...

1:20:46

I'll describe the goal. Corn?

1:20:48

Right, so you're watching it

1:20:50

from the main stand at Hamden. Look

1:20:52

to your left, okay? Yeah. Rangers get

1:20:54

caught in possession. Somebody thinks it's going

1:20:57

to be a free kick. They all

1:20:59

stand still. Maeda chips the ball

1:21:01

in. Jotter. Jotter. Let's

1:21:03

go. Anyway, we'll get back

1:21:05

with the rest of the answers hopefully

1:21:07

next. Number one, first

1:21:09

football in Glasgow on the way.

1:21:12

0141 951 1035, Clyde 1, Super scoreboard. We

1:21:18

are into the final part of tonight's Clyde

1:21:21

1 Super scoreboard with Cammie Bell and Simon

1:21:23

Donnelly. They're trying their best to go through

1:21:25

this full-time teaser. It's a good one that

1:21:27

Max Smith sent in. And as always, thank

1:21:29

you to Universal Interiors, Isco Bride, for helping

1:21:31

us out with the question. Can you name,

1:21:33

and you can play along at home as

1:21:36

many of you are, the last 10 players

1:21:38

to score a header in

1:21:40

an old firm game. So Jotter was

1:21:43

the second most recent. I'll give

1:21:45

you that clue. Edouard, Morelos and

1:21:47

Goldson is all you've got so far.

1:21:50

Tavernier. Yes, he did score a header. Back

1:21:52

post as you would expect. Yep. Roof.

1:21:56

Yes, Kimar Roof, okay. And

1:21:58

John Sutter. is on

1:22:00

there. He was the most recent. Okay, so you've got

1:22:02

two others and all I will tell

1:22:04

you to slightly steer you in the right direction

1:22:07

is that they are both former Rangers

1:22:09

players. Okay, so I'll leave that with

1:22:12

you between now and the end

1:22:14

of the show. It's not all

1:22:16

about Celtic against Rangers on

1:22:18

Saturday. I know many of you think that way,

1:22:20

but it is that time of the season when

1:22:23

prizes are dished out, promotion can be

1:22:26

sealed, relegation. I said it

1:22:28

last night. I love the playoffs, Cammie. What

1:22:30

did you make of your dream against Pardic

1:22:32

Thistle for Fligg? Yeah, very

1:22:34

exciting. And again, it kind

1:22:36

of twisting turns, which I

1:22:39

fully expected two good teams.

1:22:42

I know Pardic beat AirDrie 4-0 quite recently.

1:22:44

And that would have give Pardic a bit

1:22:46

of confidence. But AirDrie have been good all

1:22:49

season. I think that was a little blip,

1:22:51

to be honest. They've

1:22:53

got some good players, very competitive in

1:22:55

all games as well. So yeah,

1:22:58

it's fully set up for that

1:23:00

second leg. And again,

1:23:02

whoever manages to progress is going to have

1:23:04

a hard game against Ray Frovers and the next one as well. Yeah,

1:23:07

all to play for. I think AirDrie are

1:23:10

probably one of the more attractive teams in

1:23:12

that division this season. Played some really nice

1:23:15

football, some good technical players

1:23:17

in that team. And

1:23:19

it set up nicely for how, I

1:23:21

think, is it Friday night? I

1:23:24

watched Pardic go through the

1:23:26

playoffs so brilliantly last year and just fall

1:23:28

at the last, I was going to say,

1:23:30

it was the last 20 odd

1:23:33

minutes of that game. So over the last time,

1:23:35

they're over the last one. They were over the

1:23:37

last time. They were just stumbling on the finishing

1:23:39

line, which was incredible. So there'll be

1:23:42

players in that team that will want to put that

1:23:44

right. But it's set up for a bit

1:23:46

of a ding dong on Friday night. I think the two of them

1:23:48

will go for it. And you cannot

1:23:51

be a good story like Luke McBeth,

1:23:53

Cammy Bell. He was up until

1:23:56

January playing for Glenn Afton. He played

1:23:58

for Isco Bryde. before that. Straight

1:24:02

away even getting a move from Glen

1:24:04

Afton to Partick Thistle is great in

1:24:06

itself before you even go on and

1:24:08

do anything. Never mind score your first

1:24:10

goal by smashing one in from 30

1:24:12

yards and a play off to try

1:24:15

and get towards the Premiership. Unbelievable.

1:24:17

Incredible story and again it's a bit like

1:24:19

the Chris Doolan one coming from the juniors

1:24:21

as well. Yeah, there's a couple, Chris Doolan

1:24:23

and Chris, he has to go and win

1:24:26

for the duel. Again, so

1:24:28

it is that they've got that about

1:24:30

them and especially Dool's been over in

1:24:32

the air sure. Again, he'll keep

1:24:35

a close eye on the juniors. I'm sure

1:24:37

he's got a few contacts in there but

1:24:39

listen it's absolutely brilliant for the boy as

1:24:41

well because it raises his profile so much

1:24:43

and people take interest and it just shows

1:24:45

your teams are still looking at the low

1:24:47

leagues for these gems. And it's not

1:24:49

to say that the job gets massively diminished if

1:24:52

they don't come out on top but it feels

1:24:54

like people are watching just to see if the

1:24:57

injury can progress. We're talking about stories,

1:25:00

Rees-McAib, how young he is, the way he's

1:25:02

got the team playing obviously technically a player

1:25:04

manager as well. If they

1:25:06

could make a real goal these playoffs that's

1:25:08

going to be one of the managerial stories

1:25:10

to come out of Scotland for a long

1:25:12

time. Absolutely and again you

1:25:15

talk about managers of the year and

1:25:17

I'm not a person there's been a

1:25:19

huge amount of high achievers this season

1:25:21

but he's got to be up there

1:25:23

of certainly within people's minds

1:25:25

because again to get every straight up

1:25:27

last year as a player

1:25:29

manager as such a young manager and coach

1:25:32

and then to get them into the playoffs overachieving

1:25:34

not on a huge budget he

1:25:36

speaks really really well. I think he coaches

1:25:38

his team really really well they understand what

1:25:41

they're doing to play some great football and

1:25:43

it's going to be difficult for every to keep

1:25:46

a hold of him on if he keeps going

1:25:48

this way and again what story that would be

1:25:50

if they managed to get into the Premier League

1:25:52

it would be incredible. Yeah I think there was

1:25:54

a bravery in the air to try to play

1:25:56

the game. I think you know

1:25:59

reports I see on the style

1:26:01

and pleasing on the eye. A

1:26:03

lot of good, as I said, a lot on technical

1:26:05

players, but it takes a bravery to go

1:26:07

and try and play and not just

1:26:09

be, you know, one

1:26:12

of many, you know, just trying to get through games,

1:26:14

actually try to make a difference. So it'd be a

1:26:16

fantastic story. He's so young as well. He's playing his

1:26:19

skills. It's not an easy thing. I don't imagine that

1:26:21

to be an easy thing to do as well, you

1:26:23

know, to be playing as well as the pressures of

1:26:25

being a manager and, you know, everything that comes with

1:26:27

that, try to organize your team but also performing. It's

1:26:31

an incredible story. He's still the youngest in

1:26:34

senior football in Britain, yeah? I know he was at one point

1:26:36

when he started one. It's remarkable.

1:26:40

It really is all set up, isn't it? For

1:26:42

an absolute cracker on Friday. Yeah, and again,

1:26:44

it's both teams know what they need to

1:26:46

do is try and get the victory particle

1:26:48

of that little bit of edge because they're

1:26:50

at home, but they're just for your nobodies.

1:26:52

They're absolutely for your nobodies. They've had some

1:26:55

big, big results this season. And

1:26:58

it's going to be an absolute cracker. I really

1:27:00

do think it's two good teams ding-donging it out.

1:27:02

And as I say, they're on to Rafe Rovers,

1:27:04

who's been brilliant this season as well. So another

1:27:07

good week of football ahead of us. Yeah, Rafe

1:27:09

just sitting waiting for the winner of that one.

1:27:11

All the players are quite finely poised. You said

1:27:13

you were at them Barton, who beat Stilling Albee

1:27:15

in 2-1. So again, that's

1:27:17

fairly close. And they were all a bit like

1:27:19

that, weren't they? Very, very close last night. And

1:27:22

when drawers Hamilton. Hamilton, Alba. Yes. Yeah,

1:27:24

yeah. And then Vanessa, a big story as well because we

1:27:26

know obviously financially, they

1:27:29

are struggling anyways within the championship. And if they were

1:27:31

to drop down to league one, that's nil, nil women

1:27:34

throws. If they were to drop down

1:27:36

to league one, it would be huge consequences on the

1:27:38

club and the staff that are there. But yeah, listen,

1:27:40

it was a good night at the Rock last night.

1:27:42

I heard that was one of the questions as well

1:27:44

last night. It was one of the rocks. That's right.

1:27:46

You were heading there as well. It's

1:27:48

starting to get a bit of warmer weather as

1:27:51

well. When you feel like it's nice to sit

1:27:53

and watch football. Some people do that when the

1:27:55

weather gets good. Some people wear flip flops to

1:27:57

their work. Like Simon Donnelly. Then

1:27:59

I'm sure. flip-flops under this desk by the

1:28:01

way how well how well have I done

1:28:03

it's the game of year Gordon to get

1:28:06

to the very eighth of May how well

1:28:08

have I done to get to the end

1:28:10

of the show without mentioning it incredible me

1:28:12

to September I believe a ball this guy

1:28:14

here anyway Shane we will leave it there

1:28:16

can you name the last ten players to

1:28:19

score a header in an old firm game

1:28:21

John Suter jota Tavernier Ruth Edouard Mirellos Goldson

1:28:24

what's he to get who are

1:28:27

the two Rangers runs then you've

1:28:29

one cell pick to get center

1:28:31

backs both from same era that's

1:28:34

gonna Steven Gerrard era so

1:28:38

obviously Goldson is there but it's not him you've got him

1:28:41

who are the others Goldson and come

1:28:43

on you used to roll

1:28:46

off with them absolute mind-blowing not

1:28:48

balligan it wasn't balling nope Goldson

1:28:51

and blonde

1:28:55

here big Swedish guy oh

1:29:00

okay the other one

1:29:02

from that exact same era I think

1:29:04

they showed up when I set my back as well no

1:29:07

the Dillard one play as much yeah

1:29:10

I think the injury problems but

1:29:12

we just could relatively popular at times and

1:29:14

when they played Rangers fans quite like them

1:29:17

quite aggressive maybe a bit

1:29:19

kind of rough round the edges catch

1:29:24

the Celtic ones tough Simon

1:29:27

it was a difficult time

1:29:29

it was that bad season

1:29:31

I think for Celtic

1:29:33

but he was what he would have been one of

1:29:35

the standouts that season so there's only really what David

1:29:38

Turnbull and maybe this guy one or

1:29:40

two others and he scored a

1:29:42

header he was a winger but he did score a

1:29:44

header oh my goodness do you remember him played

1:29:47

against Scotland not that

1:29:50

long ago for Norway Southampton

1:29:57

yeah yeah well you know

1:29:59

see Thanks, you, Cammy. And

1:30:01

Simon, we're back tomorrow with Mark Wilson and

1:30:03

Gordon Diel from Six and Lin is in

1:30:05

for Callum Up next.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features