Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
Trying to to grab all groceries in one
0:04
trip. Oof, not how
0:06
you would have done that. You know
0:08
sometimes less is more, like when you
0:10
drive less and save with the USAA
0:12
annual mileage discount. U.S.A. at Kidder Quote
0:14
today. Hello
0:19
everyone and
0:21
welcome to
0:24
Talk Nerdy.
0:30
Today is Monday, November 27th, 2023.
0:35
And I'm the host of the show,
0:37
Cara Santa Maria. And as always, before
0:39
we dive into this week's show, I
0:41
do want to thank those of you
0:43
who make Talk Nerdy possible, especially now
0:45
around the holidays when things get tight.
0:47
I really appreciate your kind of unwavering
0:50
support of the show. Remember the model
0:52
of the show is that I do
0:54
not charge for episodes. I periodically sell
0:56
ads to try and make a little bit of money. That
0:59
is not the dominant source
1:02
of the income that offsets the expense of
1:04
making the show. Obviously I have to pay
1:06
an editor. I pay my assistant to do
1:08
a lot of the booking and the back
1:10
end work on the show. And of course
1:12
my own time as well. And so the
1:14
way that we make this possible is through
1:16
that kind of user experience
1:18
model, just like you see here
1:20
in the US at least on
1:22
like NPR and PBS. We
1:25
use Patreon as our platform. And
1:27
if you're interested in pledging your
1:29
support, you can visit patreon.com/ talknerdy.
1:32
And you can pledge on an
1:34
episodic basis as much or as
1:36
little as you like. That offsets
1:39
it so that individuals who can't
1:41
afford to do so still have
1:43
access to every single episode. This
1:46
week's top patrons include Daniel Lang,
1:48
David J.E. Smith, Mary Neva, Brian
1:50
Holden, David Compton, Gabriel F. Jaramillo,
1:53
Joe Wilkinson, Pasquale Gelati, and Ulrika
1:55
Hagman. All right, let's dive
1:57
into the show. to
2:00
chat with Dr. Jane Gregory.
2:03
She is a clinical psychologist
2:05
doing research at the University
2:07
of Oxford on mesophonia and
2:10
we're going to dive into
2:12
what mesophonia is, what her
2:14
own experience is with the
2:16
phenomenon, and of course her
2:18
brand new book which is
2:21
available right now called
2:23
Sounds Like Mesophonia. How
2:25
to Stop Small Noises
2:27
from Causing Extreme
2:29
Reactions. So without
2:31
any further ado, here she is,
2:34
Dr. Jane Gregory. Jane,
2:38
thank you so much for joining me today.
2:40
Thank you for having me today.
2:42
I am excited to
2:44
talk about your new book Sounds
2:46
Like Mesophonia. How to Stop Small
2:48
Noises from Causing Extreme Reactions. And
2:50
you of course are somebody who,
2:52
I mean as a psychologist who
2:54
studies mesophonia, you know it inside
2:56
and out from the sort of
2:58
technical side, but you also
3:00
have a very kind of subjective
3:03
and personal experience with this phenomenon. So
3:05
let's just get into it. Let's just start right
3:07
at the top with like the definition of this
3:09
word because I think a lot of people know
3:11
exactly what we're talking about but they didn't know that this
3:13
is what it's called. Yeah,
3:16
I think that's right. That's
3:18
one of the things that every time I talk about this,
3:20
somebody in the room says, oh
3:23
my goodness, that's exactly
3:25
what I have. Or that's
3:28
why my dad made us eat crisps
3:30
upstairs. Or yeah, why my brother used
3:32
to shout at me at the dinner
3:34
table. So I think a lot of people
3:37
either can relate to the
3:39
experience or can recognize
3:41
somebody in their life who
3:43
maybe experiences it. Right.
3:46
So tell us about like
3:48
maybe the technical or the
3:50
clinical definition because this is
3:53
not listed in the DSM,
3:55
right? But it's clearly an
3:57
understood and established phenomenon. I'm
4:00
not sure if we would go so far as
4:02
to say understood and established quite yet. It's
4:05
something we've heard of. Yeah,
4:07
well, it's a thing that you and I have
4:09
heard of, and some people have heard of, but
4:12
there are still a lot of people who show
4:14
up at the healthcare provider and are told, I
4:16
don't think that's a thing or I've never heard of
4:19
that at all. That sounds like it's just part of
4:21
your anxiety. So actually, there
4:23
are still a lot of people who haven't heard
4:25
of it. And just two years ago, we did
4:28
a survey in the UK asking, in
4:31
a general population sample, how many people were familiar
4:33
with the term, and only
4:35
14% of people heard the term.
4:38
And a similar study was done in the US, and I
4:40
think it was even less. It was maybe 11% in the
4:42
US. And
4:45
I think it's a little bit more well known now
4:47
because there's been a bit more media coverage recently,
4:50
but it's still not very well
4:52
known and not very well understood. Oh
4:55
yeah, that really shows my bias.
4:57
Wow. Yeah, well, that's the thing. I
5:00
just assume that everybody knows what it is.
5:03
And I do a little bit of nerdy comedy,
5:05
and so I do these talks. And
5:08
at the start, it was part of the
5:10
performance, I always say, give us a cheer
5:12
if you've heard of misophonia. And it's been
5:14
so wonderful to see the proportion of the
5:17
audience change in terms of,
5:19
as the awareness of misophonia increases. So
5:21
last night, nearly everyone in the room
5:23
had heard of misophonia, but just a
5:25
few years ago, it was just a
5:27
handful of people. So it is
5:30
getting more well known, but yeah,
5:32
still not common
5:34
lexicon, is that what I heard?
5:39
Absolutely. Well, and speaking of lexicon,
5:41
I'm curious, the term itself, misophonia, where does it
5:43
come from? What are the component parts
5:46
of it from an etymology perspective? It
5:49
was named by this husband
5:51
and wife research team, the
5:53
Jastrobovs, Margaret and Pavel
5:55
Jastrobov, who they basically got a
5:58
linguist to help them come up with a language. the
6:00
term for these people that they'd been seeing
6:02
who had a really specific
6:05
reaction to really specific sounds.
6:08
So they brought together a whole lot of
6:10
root parts of words and
6:13
decided on miso, which is
6:15
hatred, and phonia,
6:17
which is sound. It
6:20
literally translates to hatred of sounds, but
6:22
they have very clearly said since then
6:24
that they didn't intend for it to
6:27
be understood literally. They just wanted
6:29
a catchy word, and apparently
6:32
one of them just also really
6:34
liked miso soup, and so that
6:36
influenced their decision, which I think
6:39
is absolutely adorable. That's
6:41
really funny. And
6:43
so the name itself can
6:45
cause problems because it often gets
6:47
reported as misophonia, hatred of sounds,
6:49
but actually a lot of people
6:51
with misophonia love sounds, and
6:53
the difference between how they feel when they're
6:56
listening to other sounds and how they feel
6:58
when they're listening to specific trigger sounds is
7:01
so vast that that's part of the problem.
7:04
Well, you know, it sort of strikes me.
7:06
I'm about to get a little bit meta, like really, really
7:08
early on the show, but it sort of strikes
7:11
me as the way that
7:13
I often conceptualize kind of
7:15
most, I guess, psychological disorders,
7:18
dysfunction, pathologies. I
7:20
hate all those terms because I'm very existential in
7:22
my view. But I think of
7:24
even the things that we think of as the
7:27
most clinically relevant or
7:29
clinically difficult, like schizophrenia,
7:32
bipolar disorder, kind of these what
7:34
we think of severe mental illnesses.
7:37
When you look at the symptoms,
7:39
it's a spectrum. Everybody
7:41
has had a hallucination at some point in their life. Everybody
7:44
has experienced what it's like to
7:47
struggle with confusion or has experienced
7:49
some amount of sadness or some
7:51
amount of anxiety. And there becomes
7:53
a point where it's clinically relevant
7:55
because it interferes in your
7:57
life in a way that makes it difficult to complete.
8:00
complete your tasks or to find joy
8:02
or whatever the case may be. And
8:05
I don't see misophonia as any
8:07
different. Most everyone I know can
8:09
pinpoint some triggering sound for
8:12
them, but for some people
8:14
it's much more debilitating than
8:16
others. Absolutely. I
8:18
think that's right. Like most people
8:20
can relate to not liking
8:22
a particular sound or having an extreme
8:25
reaction to a particular sound or
8:27
a disproportionate reaction compared to other
8:30
equally annoying sounds. But
8:32
it's interesting that you used schizophrenia and
8:34
bipolar disorder as examples of a continuum
8:36
because those are two disorders that I
8:38
think of as being much more
8:41
categorical. Yeah, the most extreme. And the other
8:43
side like to pick them. Yeah. Because I
8:45
can even pinpoint, usually even with those, I
8:47
can pinpoint some, I don't know, example
8:50
that we can relate to. Yeah.
8:52
Although like if you look at the
8:54
diagnostic criteria for bipolar, like you literally
8:57
have to have had a manic episode
8:59
to meet the criteria and most people
9:01
haven't experienced a manic episode. And
9:04
with misophonia, we're
9:06
not sure yet, like it's obviously on a
9:08
continuum that people can relate to
9:10
the experiences. But also when you
9:12
sort of look at it in a statistical way, it
9:14
kind of clusters in a way that suggests that there
9:16
are distinct categories. And one
9:19
is like a clinical category of
9:21
misophonia and one is more of
9:23
a subclinical category of misophonia. And
9:26
so we think it's sort of at the more extreme end. If
9:28
we're to, in a clinical
9:30
setting, if we're looking to make
9:32
a diagnosis for treatment purposes, we'd
9:35
probably say disorder level misophonia.
9:37
And that is the way we would
9:39
distinguish clinical from subclinical would be about
9:41
the impact that it has. So as you
9:44
were saying, the point where it stops people from living
9:46
their lives, where it causes day to
9:48
day distress and significant
9:50
impacts on their lives.
9:53
And then we've got this much bigger
9:55
category of subclinical misophonia, which I think
9:57
of it more as a phenomenon than
9:59
a disorder, which
10:01
is the phenomenon that your brain
10:04
just processes sounds a little bit differently
10:06
and has trouble filtering out certain sounds
10:08
and maybe over attaches
10:10
meaning to sounds and then can't
10:12
unattach that meaning to sounds. Oh,
10:15
interesting. So, it's a little
10:18
bit beyond or I guess we
10:20
should say there's a little bit more kind of
10:23
a psychological phenomenon than just the classic.
10:25
I think sometimes you hear people say,
10:27
oh, it's like nails on a chalkboard.
10:29
Like that's the go-to, right? It's like
10:31
nails on a chalkboard, but it's deeper
10:33
than that. It's not just a grating
10:35
sound because there are some, I think,
10:37
objectively grating sounds to people, right? Yes,
10:40
absolutely. And nails on a chalkboard is
10:42
a really great example of what we
10:44
call a rough sound. So, the acoustic
10:46
properties of that sound you
10:48
can't ignore and that's a feature
10:50
of the sound and there are some things
10:52
in nature that you're not supposed to ignore.
10:55
So, there's nails on a chalkboard sort of
10:57
sounds a bit like a screeching monkey that
10:59
is designed to get your attention
11:01
or the roar of a lion
11:04
is designed not
11:06
to be ignored. A crying baby is
11:08
designed not to be ignored, designed in
11:10
nature terms. But then we also
11:12
have human-made products that are
11:14
also designed not to be ignored. So,
11:17
alarms, sirens, like
11:19
notification sounds, they're
11:21
meant to be attention-grabbing and some
11:24
of them are meant to be that you don't
11:26
get used to them. So, you're not supposed to
11:28
get used to the sound of a siren.
11:30
So, what happens with misophonia is that other
11:32
sounds that most people, they
11:35
might not like, but they wouldn't
11:37
have an extreme reaction to them. It's like your
11:39
brain treats that sound as if it's a
11:42
siren, as if it's not supposed to be ignored, as
11:44
if it's a sign of danger or
11:46
harm in some way. Yeah.
11:48
So, I'm going to self-diagnose for a second. This
11:50
is so great. Go ahead. So,
11:53
I have two and I... So, it's
11:56
people with misophonia are self-diagnosed. Yeah, yeah.
11:58
It's still relatively unknown. Well,
12:00
and it's funny because when I work
12:02
with clients who are neurodivergent, it's not
12:05
uncommon for there to be some kind
12:07
of sensory things. And I remember working
12:09
with a younger male patient
12:11
and kind of discussing misophonia with him
12:13
and this concept of like the sounds
12:15
that are really difficult
12:17
and, you know, like,
12:20
what do you do when you hear these
12:22
things and how do you work around it?
12:24
And so obviously to normalize the experience, I
12:26
told him about my own and we were sort
12:28
of like laughing about how we had
12:30
some in common and some very different. But
12:33
I have two very specific triggers. They are
12:35
metal utensils in a metal
12:38
pot. I cannot
12:40
be in the room if somebody
12:42
is stirring something in a metal
12:44
pot with a metal spoon. It's so overwhelming to
12:46
me that I have to leave the room. I
12:49
don't vomit. I don't, you know, like, but I
12:51
get the whole hair stand up on the back of
12:53
my neck and like that shutter stance. Like
12:55
I can't help a shutter. And then the other
12:57
is a rake on the sidewalk. Like when somebody's
13:00
going outside and they drag that on the side,
13:02
I cannot stand that sound. And
13:04
if you sort of look at the acoustic properties
13:06
of those two sounds, it's really, really similar.
13:08
There is like literally a grating kind
13:10
of sound to both of those. And
13:13
so when you hear those sounds, what
13:16
do you experience? So
13:19
it's almost like I recoil
13:21
a little. It doesn't make me nauseated.
13:24
I don't feel ill. And
13:27
I don't necessarily have a
13:29
strong emotional reaction. Like it doesn't make
13:31
me angry, but I recoil. So
13:35
I find myself, yeah, I shudder and
13:37
I have to cover my ears or
13:40
get out of the room very quickly. I'm
13:43
very, very aversive. Like I have
13:45
a fight or flight. Well, I just have a flight. A
13:47
flight. Just a flight. Just
13:49
a flight. Yeah. Yeah.
13:53
So that urge to escape the
13:55
sound, I think a lot of people
13:57
with misophonia can relate to that experience.
14:00
feeling like you have to get away
14:02
from the sound. And that's one of
14:04
the things in some of the research
14:06
that I do. So I collaborate with Celia
14:08
Vitaratu, who's at King's College London. She
14:11
is a statistician specializing in
14:13
psychometrics, which is basically for listeners
14:15
when you try to measure concepts
14:17
that can't be directly observed. So you
14:20
might measure symptoms of depression, for
14:22
example, through questionnaires. When you use
14:25
special statistical, very fancy maths to
14:27
see how things cluster together to then
14:31
be able to measure a concept that you
14:33
can't directly observe. So we've worked together to
14:35
create this questionnaire. And within
14:38
that process, we discovered there are these
14:40
five aspects of misophonia that kind of
14:42
work together. And the key one of
14:44
the key ones that you
14:47
can use to sort of distinguish people with
14:49
and without misophonia is this what we call
14:51
an emotional threat, which is this feeling of
14:53
feeling trapped or helpless, like you
14:55
have to get away from the sound like something
14:57
horrible would happen if you
15:00
didn't get away from the sound. Yeah,
15:02
it's so interesting. And I obviously I
15:04
am relatively high functioning and I have
15:06
a lot of coping skills and adaptive
15:08
behaviors. But I if I
15:10
cannot escape because it would not be
15:12
socially acceptable or you know, for whatever
15:14
reason, it doesn't seem like a viable
15:16
option. I'll plug my ears. If I
15:18
can't plug my ears, I have learned to
15:21
do this. It's almost like the Valsalva maneuver
15:23
where you sort of bear down and it
15:25
causes white noise in your head. I
15:27
don't know if you know what I'm talking about. I know
15:29
exactly what you're talking about, but I can't do
15:31
it. So I like people describe it to me,
15:33
but I can't make that I can't create that
15:36
sound in my ears. Interesting. So
15:38
I know that there are people who use that. Yeah,
15:41
I'm glad you've had other research subjects or
15:43
people you've talked to who are like, oh,
15:45
yeah, I basically drown it out inside my
15:47
own head. Yeah. And
15:50
I think that you know, a part of what
15:52
you are saying there about like, if it's
15:54
not socially acceptable to get away, I think
15:56
that's also part of this trapped feeling. And
15:59
sometimes it's. Right now in
16:01
the moment it wouldn't be socially acceptable
16:03
but sometimes it's that those sounds are
16:05
sort of connecting back to Experiences from
16:08
childhood where you couldn't leave the situation
16:10
and so you still feel trapped But
16:13
it's because it's tapping into these memories of like
16:15
sitting at the family dinner table where you would
16:17
be told off if you left The table you'd
16:19
be told off if you got angry at someone
16:21
so you had to suppress your feelings you
16:24
had to stay in the situation you were
16:26
literally trapped there and So
16:29
then when you hear those same sounds as an
16:31
adult it it takes you
16:33
back without not consciously You don't realize that it's
16:35
going back to these specific memories, but sometimes those
16:39
Early experiences from childhood are shaping what
16:41
you feel in the moment because that's
16:43
what you've experienced when you were younger
16:46
That's fascinating. Is that sort of the
16:48
dominant? I guess we could say
16:50
theory as to why misophonia exists or do we
16:52
think that it I mean I'm sure
16:54
it's biopsychosocial and it's you know nature nurture and
16:56
all the things mixed together, but I'm curious What
16:59
are some of those kind of? those
17:02
Explanatory theories of why people develop
17:04
it other than maybe linking to
17:06
an early childhood experience that felt
17:08
quite noxious or dangerous There
17:11
there are quite a few theories We
17:13
really don't have enough
17:15
research yet to be able to really
17:17
strongly Connect with one
17:20
particular theory we know from studies
17:22
of the brain that there's something different happening
17:24
There are different connections happening in the brain and
17:27
people with misophonia Compared to
17:29
people with atmosphonia when they hear these certain
17:31
sounds and those differences are only
17:34
there for these specific kinds of
17:36
sounds these like eating and breathing
17:39
sounds and not for Generally
17:41
a verse sounds so if it was
17:43
just something that everyone finds averse
17:47
the the brain patterns don't aren't different,
17:50
but when You listen
17:52
to the that kind of trigger sound then
17:54
there's a different process happening in the brain
17:56
And there's sort of some hyper connectivity between
18:00
auditory processing, emotion processing, fight
18:02
and flight, like amygdala, kind
18:05
of part of the brain. There's
18:07
one theory that it's also connected to
18:09
the motor area of the brain, which
18:11
one theory is that that's related to
18:13
sort of an
18:15
unconscious mimicking process, almost like you're
18:17
trying to, your body's trying
18:20
to copy what the other person is doing,
18:22
so your jaw starts to
18:24
tense up because it's activating part of
18:26
your jaw and that the theory
18:28
is that that's one of the reasons why it feels
18:30
so intrusive because it's actually activating something
18:32
in your body. And that's just
18:35
a theory at this stage, but as you can see,
18:37
there's quite a wide range. Yeah,
18:42
lots of ideas that I
18:44
guess either are it actively
18:47
being tested or people are trying to
18:49
figure out how to test these kinds of hypotheses
18:51
and some of them may never be testable,
18:53
but it's, you know, I'm curious, is there
18:55
sort of the opposite end of the spectrum? Like
18:57
I was just thinking how nails on a
18:59
chalkboard is a sort of universal phenomenon that
19:01
like most people agree, that's not a pleasant, or
19:04
if somebody's eating, we've all had this experience
19:06
here at the dinner table and somebody squeaks
19:09
their knife across their plate and it's very
19:11
similar to nails on a chalkboard and
19:13
the whole table's like, ah, you know, and
19:15
it makes me wonder, are there people who are
19:17
just like completely immune to it? Like I think
19:20
about like the Alex Honnold's, right? The
19:22
famous rock climber, who's amygdala is like
19:24
very quiet. Yeah, so they
19:26
hear something, they're like, whatever, doesn't bother
19:28
me. Yeah, yeah. So
19:30
I'm sure that there are people at
19:33
that end where the reactivity in the
19:35
brain is just not that
19:37
strong and I'm sure it's all
19:39
on a spectrum. And
19:42
if we think about that idea of it
19:44
not just being the sort
19:46
of emotional reaction to sound, but also the meaning
19:50
placed on the sound. So what you
19:54
believe the sound is, who is making
19:56
the sound, what context they're making it
19:58
in, so the exact same thing. sound,
20:01
like literally the same audio can
20:03
cause a different reaction if the
20:06
person thinks that somebody eating with their mouth
20:08
open compared to if they think that it's
20:10
like a puppy, adorable puppy eating its food.
20:14
And so I've got a friend who
20:17
didn't believe this idea that there
20:20
was anything other than just the reactions.
20:22
There's like, like, this
20:24
is like, this is not interpretation
20:27
is the wrong word, but there's
20:29
another process that's going on there about what
20:32
the sound means. And
20:35
she one day, like
20:38
just felt this instant surge of anger because
20:40
she heard her husband eating really loudly, whipped
20:43
her head around and it was her
20:45
baby eating and the reaction disappeared. And
20:48
she came to me that I could tell what her name is
20:50
just go, you
20:53
see it? It's funny. Like it's
20:55
become a social media phenomenon where
20:57
the same discussed reaction that we
20:59
might have, like you said,
21:01
to watching a movie where somebody's eating
21:03
and talking with their mouth open, but
21:06
on, let's say Instagram or TikTok, it's
21:08
like a puppy eating and they call
21:10
it ASMR. And people are like, this
21:12
is so calming and relaxing. And you're
21:14
like, wow, because it's the same sound.
21:16
Absolutely. And they've done it with different
21:18
sensory stuff as well. So someone was
21:20
telling the other day about a study
21:22
where they gave people a smell and
21:25
one group, they told them it was dirty socks.
21:27
And the other one, they told them that it
21:30
was blue cheese and their
21:32
reaction was completely different to that spell,
21:34
depending on what they were told was
21:37
creating that smell and even
21:39
nails on a chalkboard. I think there's been
21:41
research in that as well where they presented
21:44
the sound. And I can't remember what
21:47
the alternative explanation was for the sound, but
21:49
it did have a less intense reaction when
21:51
you believed that it was something else creating
21:54
the sound. So there is
21:56
an interpretation process happening. And
21:58
there was a really great study. Concordia
22:01
University, Maria
22:03
Nixova did a study where they
22:06
masked the sound and then slowly
22:11
covered the sound from another sound to
22:14
test whether people with high and low
22:16
misophonia would detect the sound at different
22:18
times because the theory was that people with
22:21
misophonia are like, will hear the sound sooner.
22:23
And actually they didn't. It was exactly the
22:25
same. And when
22:28
people with misophonia had the more intense reaction
22:30
to the sound compared to me with atmosphonia,
22:32
it was only once they'd identified what the
22:35
sound was. So it wasn't just the acoustic
22:37
properties of the sound. It was, I know
22:39
what that is and I don't like it.
22:41
And that's when the reaction starts. To
22:45
me, it's just like, it's just another sort of
22:47
tick mark in the column for
22:49
constructivism, just this idea that like,
22:52
yes, there is objective reality, but
22:54
we cannot observe it with the
22:56
sound without our lens. And our
22:58
lens adds so much meaning
23:00
to everything. All of the
23:02
experiences we had, all of our neurological
23:05
functioning, like whether it's something
23:07
really pure, we think of as pure, like
23:09
the flavor of a food or the smell
23:11
of a molecule or the
23:14
literal compression of sound waves and
23:16
our tiny little cells in our
23:18
ears, the little hairs
23:20
being affected by them. We
23:23
put meaning and interpretation on that in
23:25
a major way. Absolutely. And I
23:27
think it sort of gets a bit lost because especially
23:30
like I worked from a CBT perspective and
23:32
often CBT gets talked about, it's like your interpretation
23:34
as if it's this kind of conscious verbal
23:37
thought going through your head. Like, oh, I know what I need
23:39
to make. Yeah. And actually
23:41
what I'm interested in is like what
23:44
it feels like in your body and how
23:46
you interpret what it feels like in your
23:48
body. So if you feel disgusted by it,
23:50
then you might think, oh, that's a disgusting
23:52
thing to do because I feel disgusted. So
23:54
you sort of like the
23:57
internal sensations and the emotions kind of
23:59
come first. And then the thought
24:02
part is actually just a way that you put
24:05
language to the experience that you're having in
24:07
your body. And those experiences that you have in your
24:09
body are entirely shaped by
24:11
your past experiences, your perception of
24:13
the world, what you think
24:15
of other people, what you think of the specific
24:18
person making the sound. Some people will be
24:20
bothered only by one person in their life.
24:22
And any sound that they make drives them
24:24
mad. But when it comes to somebody else,
24:26
it's no problem. Yeah,
24:29
it's so fascinating because, you know, I
24:31
mentioned before, my perspective is deeply existential.
24:33
I use CBT approaches all the time, as
24:35
I think most clinicians do, but
24:37
I don't really conceptualize through a CBT
24:39
lens. But for anybody listening
24:41
who's like globally good, that's fine, just
24:43
fast forward. But for those who
24:45
are like really deeply interested in this, the funny thing
24:48
is I find that it's
24:50
a lot of like different labels for the
24:52
exact same thing in psychology. And for me,
24:54
yeah, I see that as just meaning making.
24:56
What we do in our life is we're
24:59
just constantly trying to make meaning out of
25:01
data inputs. And we have
25:03
all of these data inputs and then we
25:05
have to make meaning from them. And I'm
25:08
super curious, though, you mentioned something before about
25:10
chewing. And I wanted to make
25:12
sure that I brought this up because sometimes
25:14
when you look up even just the definition
25:16
of misophonia, people explicitly list it
25:19
as like an aversive reaction to
25:21
chewing sounds. Why has it gotten
25:23
that weird bias?
25:25
Like misophonia equals I don't
25:28
like chewing sounds because it can be any
25:30
sound, right? It can
25:32
be any sound. Like it can
25:34
be sort of like your brain couldn't attach
25:36
these reactions, this sort
25:38
of meaning to any sound
25:40
given the right circumstances. But
25:44
overwhelmingly, chewing is the
25:46
most frequently reported. And again,
25:48
in that general population study
25:51
and a misophonia sample, like
25:53
the chewing, the reaction,
25:58
they've been endorsed. triggered
26:00
by chewing, you could predict their
26:03
misophonia severity from it. There's like
26:05
some couple statistics that I don't
26:08
massively understand, but it was
26:10
one of the best sounds
26:12
to use to determine whether someone was
26:14
likely to have misophonia or
26:16
not. You
26:19
can have misophonia without having an aversion
26:21
to chewing, but it is overwhelmingly one
26:25
of the most common and one of the
26:27
most intense reactions. It's
26:30
more likely to cause an
26:32
anger or panic response, whereas some
26:34
of the other trigger sounds might
26:36
be more of an irritation or disgust kind of
26:39
response. So the nature of the reaction to chewing
26:41
can be different as well. That's
26:43
fascinating. So I'm curious,
26:45
we talked a little bit about
26:47
the categorical versus dimensional aspects and
26:51
what a spectrum looks like. When you're
26:53
working specifically, maybe not so much in
26:55
a research capacity, but in a clinical
26:58
capacity, when you're actually interested in
27:00
helping people who have misophonia to
27:03
the extent that it is
27:06
impacting their lives negatively, what
27:09
do you notice or what are
27:11
some of the common endorsements? What's
27:13
the experience like for individuals for whom
27:16
they go to a psychologist for
27:18
help? I
27:20
think there are a few things. So
27:25
that variable factor that I
27:27
described before, that emotional threat factor, that's
27:29
the key one that keeps coming up, this
27:31
sense of feeling trapped, feeling
27:33
helpless, feeling like you might panic or
27:35
explode when you're around these sounds. So
27:38
there's a nicely descriptive
27:40
way of responding to sounds. And
27:42
so therefore, sometimes it's
27:45
just that someone has that really strong
27:47
and it starts to get in the
27:49
way of their life, or they have sounds
27:51
around them that cause that reaction
27:55
so frequently that they can't get on with
27:57
living their life. So it might be... They
28:00
live below somebody with very heavy
28:02
feet who stomps all
28:04
day and so they're constantly having
28:07
that trigger response. Another
28:11
aspect of it is, again,
28:14
not just the meaning of the sound itself,
28:16
but the meaning of your reaction. Feeling
28:19
bad about yourself, feeling ashamed or
28:21
embarrassed by your reactions, being
28:23
afraid of what you might do, afraid
28:25
you might snap and hurt somebody or
28:27
say something that you regret being
28:30
afraid of being judged by other people if
28:32
they know that you're reacting this way. The
28:36
alternative is feeling really
28:38
strong feelings towards the person making
28:40
the sound. Feeling like,
28:42
if you're making the sound, that means you don't
28:44
care about me or that you want to harm
28:47
me. In
28:51
some cases, a distorted perception, it
28:53
feels like that, but you know that it's
28:56
not. In other cases, that is exactly what's
28:58
happening. Sometimes people in the
29:00
workplace, for example, say, once I told them
29:02
that I get a strong reaction to this
29:04
sound, they started making the sound deliberately around
29:06
me. Then it becomes a
29:08
bullying problem that is showing
29:11
up through misophonia,
29:14
but there is also this very real problem around
29:16
that in the workplace. I
29:20
have just gone off on having the
29:22
magic. No, it's fascinating. It shows all
29:24
the different aspects. It shows
29:26
the professional, the personal, the
29:29
relational. We
29:34
think of this when we think about diagnostics.
29:36
Is it affecting somebody in school or work?
29:38
Is it affecting them in their romantic relationships,
29:40
in their family, in their social set? It
29:43
seems like for a lot of people who
29:45
really struggle with misophonia, every
29:47
interaction with another human being
29:50
is very loaded and it can
29:52
get really complicated really fast. Their
29:55
life can just get smaller and smaller because
29:57
avoidance is one of the easy things. things
30:00
to do to make the reaction
30:02
go away, then you stop doing things
30:04
that you would like to be doing because
30:07
of the sounds that you might come
30:09
across there. So the point that people
30:11
usually come for help is because it's
30:13
affecting school or work or relationships
30:16
or it's limiting their life in
30:18
some way. And you see
30:20
this kind of, or at least I'm noticing
30:22
a parallel here with obsessive-compulsive disorder where
30:24
even though it's very different in terms of
30:27
the disorder, right, that there's, we're
30:29
not talking about a link between these
30:32
sort of obsessive thought patterns and these
30:35
behaviors, but what often happens, especially with
30:37
obsessive-compulsive with agoraphobia, is that people's lives
30:39
get smaller, is they start avoiding certain
30:42
situations and sometimes it gets so bad
30:44
that they can't leave their homes. Yeah,
30:47
absolutely. And that's one of the things that
30:49
I'm really interested in in terms of how
30:51
we help people with schizophrenia is looking at
30:54
those similarities with
30:56
other conditions and
30:58
obsessive-compulsive disorder is a really good example because one
31:00
of the things that can happen for people with
31:03
misophonia is that they get these violent thoughts and
31:05
images about the person making
31:07
the sound and can have
31:09
a reaction similar to what somebody with OCD
31:11
has when they have an intrusion where they
31:14
feel like, this makes me a terrible person,
31:16
or what if I act on this? What if
31:18
I can't control myself one day? What's wrong with
31:21
me that I'm thinking and feeling this way? And
31:23
so when you're working with
31:25
somebody, if you can find those similarities
31:28
with other conditions, you
31:30
can use some of the strategies
31:32
that we already know work for those
31:35
particular aspects of the condition. You
31:37
know, it's so fascinating because I've been kind of
31:40
thinking in my head this whole time and again,
31:42
this is going to be a little bit sort
31:44
of wonky, but I've had... Gosh, I don't
31:47
even know what episode number I'm on right now
31:49
with Talk Nerdy, but we've been on air for
31:51
almost 10 years, so I'm actually going to scroll
31:54
to my spreadsheet right now to see. So I think
31:56
your episode is episode 400. So
32:00
obviously, I've talked about a lot of different things on the show
32:02
over the years. And I remember
32:04
speaking with Lulu Miller about
32:07
her book, Why Fish Don't Exist,
32:09
which of course was a biography,
32:11
but it was also a real
32:13
grappling with categories and
32:15
with the human need to put things into
32:18
categories and to say, this is related to
32:20
this, but not related to that. And I'm
32:22
fascinated by this concept as well, because on
32:25
the one hand, I can say it's so meaningful and
32:27
so helpful for us to organize the world. And on
32:29
the other hand, you can almost say it's completely arbitrary
32:31
and doesn't matter. But
32:33
I'm so curious from your
32:36
perspective, and obviously if this
32:38
is a professional question that
32:41
you're like, I cannot answer, don't worry about
32:43
it. But if you were to redesign a
32:45
DSM, where would you put this disorder? Would
32:48
you put it with anxiety disorders? Would
32:50
you put it closer to an OCD,
32:52
which used to be thought of
32:55
as anxiety, but now some people argue that it's not?
32:58
Would you put it as a sensory
33:00
integration disorder or like maybe on
33:02
the autism spectrum? Where would you stick
33:05
this? It's
33:07
a great question. And firstly, I
33:09
think I would be reorganizing some
33:11
of those categories anyway. Anyway, yeah,
33:14
exactly. The
33:17
closest I think
33:19
would probably be
33:21
neurodevelopmental conditions. Yeah,
33:23
along with autism,
33:26
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, that
33:29
there's probably for, and especially because there's
33:31
some real consistency in the age of
33:33
onset. So a lot of people say
33:36
that it develops around the age of
33:38
eight or nine, or maybe around 11
33:40
or 12. There's sort of
33:42
these two points where lots of people say it develops
33:44
around that time. And some people it's a bit earlier.
33:46
And some people it's just later in
33:49
life after a certain event. So there
33:51
is examples of sort of transient experiences
33:53
of misophonia. Oh, right. Almost
33:55
like a PTSD reaction. Yeah,
33:57
absolutely. So, It
34:00
could be after an ear infection, suddenly your brain
34:02
is tuning into these sounds and you're like, why
34:05
am I suddenly not able to ignore these sounds
34:07
and then get really frustrated and then it sort
34:10
of builds into more like a misophonia reaction.
34:13
But for most people, they can relate to as
34:16
a kid having a sensitivity
34:18
to these particular sounds, finding it hard to
34:21
tune them out. At some point, it may
34:23
be developed into more of a problem. Sometimes
34:26
that's around a specific transition or
34:28
event in their life or conflict
34:30
or something that was sort of
34:32
unsettling, it might grow. But
34:35
I think that there is probably for
34:37
most people this key element that won't
34:39
change. And so you
34:41
sort of just have to learn how to live
34:44
with the fact that your brain processes sounds a little bit
34:46
differently. But I do think there are lots of
34:48
layers to the problem that I
34:50
would relate, I can relate more to anxiety
34:53
disorders, OCD, where the meaning gets
34:55
placed on the reaction and that's
34:57
something that we can change. And
34:59
if your brain is treating these sounds
35:02
as harmful or threatening in some way,
35:05
then there are
35:07
things that we can do to make
35:09
it so that those sounds feel no
35:11
more harmful than any other annoying sound.
35:14
And so that part of it, I think, can
35:16
change. But I think you'll still be left with
35:18
this part that just doesn't tune out these sounds.
35:21
There's a reason Bowling Green State
35:23
University is ranked number one in
35:25
Ohio for student experience. Our in-demand
35:27
degrees and life design program prepare
35:29
students for their first career and
35:31
their next. With an unparalleled
35:33
support system at a national
35:35
research university, BGSU offers an
35:37
unrivaled experience, all on a
35:39
vibrant campus in one of America's best college
35:42
towns. It's also why Bowling
35:44
Green State University is the number one school
35:46
in the Midwest that students would choose again
35:48
for the fourth year in a row. Prime
35:51
Furniture is Central Ohio's top destination
35:53
for high-quality furniture. Family-owned and operated
35:56
Prime Furniture provides outstanding customer service
35:58
and low prices. Their showrooms
36:00
are fully stocked with a vast selection
36:02
of furniture, appliances, mattresses and home decor.
36:04
Whether your taste are modern, classic, rustic
36:07
or somewhere in between, Prime Furniture has
36:09
it in stock. For prime quality and
36:11
prime prices, choose Prime Furniture. Stop
36:13
by their showroom on Roberts Road in
36:16
Hilliard or visit them online at primefurnitureoh.com.
36:22
So you know, I'm curious when somebody comes to you
36:25
for help, I mean, obviously, therapy is
36:27
never one size fits all and it
36:30
really depends on the individual experience.
36:32
But are you finding that things like
36:35
exposure and response prevention, things like maybe
36:37
even ACT, like acceptance and commitment therapy
36:39
or maybe aspects of DBT, like what
36:42
kinds of approaches are you
36:44
usually taking? Well
36:46
because everyone does have a really different experience,
36:48
at the moment what
36:51
we do is use a lot
36:53
of transdiagnostic techniques. So we look at
36:57
what's the sort of cycle for this particular
36:59
person that we can see is happening.
37:01
So if they happen to spend a lot of
37:04
time ruminating between the sounds, then we'll use an
37:06
intervention for rumination. If they're
37:08
feeling hopeless and like their
37:10
future's going to be miserable
37:13
because of misophonia, then we might use
37:15
some depression type interventions.
37:18
If they're feeling like they're going to get so angry that
37:21
something terrible would happen like a stroke or
37:23
a heart attack or something, then we'll use
37:25
some ideas from panic and sort of interoceptive
37:28
exposure type things. So
37:30
we'll sort of look at what's going on and choose
37:33
things that we know work for
37:36
those particular mechanisms
37:38
and work on kind of the layers around the misophonia.
37:40
So if someone, one of the things that we do
37:42
pretty frequently in our clinic here in Oxford is looking
37:45
at those childhood experiences. So
37:48
there's this technique called emotion bridging where
37:50
you bring a recent example to the surface
37:52
of a strong reaction to the
37:54
sound, get all the emotions back to the surface
37:56
and then you sort of float back to what
37:59
does this remind you of? you of, when's the first time
38:01
you remember feeling this way, any early
38:03
childhood memories that your mind takes you back to
38:06
when you're feeling this. Almost
38:08
always, adults with misophonia,
38:11
it does take them back to a specific
38:13
memory. Then we do memory
38:16
re-scripting, image re-scripting, which
38:18
comes from trauma-focused therapy.
38:24
That's also part of schema therapy
38:26
where basically you work
38:28
out what was missing at the time that means
38:30
that this memory has become frozen in time and
38:33
you update it with what you needed
38:35
at the time, so you meet the needs of that child.
38:37
If what they needed was somebody to
38:40
say, yeah, exactly. It could be
38:42
you didn't know what misophonia was and so
38:44
you thought you were going crazy. We
38:47
talk to the child and say, it's okay,
38:49
there's this thing called misophonia, you're not crazy.
38:52
The people at the table don't understand why you're
38:54
so upset, but that's because they don't know
38:56
about misophonia either. If we
38:58
can do that for that child within
39:00
you, then when you're reacting in the
39:02
current moment, it gets less influenced by
39:05
those early experiences that tell you that
39:07
you're in danger or that you're being
39:09
harmed when you know that's not really
39:11
what's happening. That's another
39:13
key technique that we use
39:16
with most adults with misophonia.
39:21
The only thing that's really misophonia-specific
39:23
are the sound-based exercises that we
39:25
do. That's where it's based
39:28
on that idea that the brain has made
39:31
a connection between this sound and some kind
39:33
of harm or threat or
39:35
danger. What we want to do is
39:37
break that connection. That was
39:39
really similar to OCD, like
39:41
exposure and response prevention. It
39:45
is, but with OCD, we
39:47
don't really do the
39:49
graded exposure thing very often in the UK
39:53
anymore. We would do more behavioral
39:55
experiments where you test out what
39:57
you predict will happen. If
40:03
you stay in the room with the toilet or
40:05
you touch the toilet and don't wash your hands,
40:07
what do you predict will happen? And then we
40:09
test whether that prediction is true, but we don't
40:11
make people just sit there and wait for the
40:13
anxiety to come down. We also know that that
40:15
doesn't really work very well for misophonia because actually
40:17
the opposite can happen and they can become more
40:19
sensitized to the sound. So if they just have
40:22
to sit there and listen to the sound, unless
40:24
you're testing a specific belief about what will happen
40:27
for a lot of people, they will actually just
40:29
get more and more upset, more angry, more disgusted.
40:34
Unless there's a very specific clinical
40:37
reason that the patient agrees with
40:39
to do any kind of graded exposure,
40:42
we don't recommend it. So what we
40:44
do instead is we try and create new experiences with
40:46
sound because what we're trying to do is teach
40:48
the brain that this sound is no more
40:50
harmful than any other annoying sound. So
40:53
if the theory is
40:55
that you feel like it's harmful
40:57
because of your previous experiences with
40:59
that sound, then we create new
41:01
experiences that don't feel harmful or
41:03
dangerous. And that might be doing
41:06
something silly with the sound. It might just
41:08
be being in control of the sound. So
41:10
having a recording and turning the volume up,
41:12
speeding it up, slowing it down, listening to
41:14
it in different ways, making a
41:16
piece of music out of the sound, but
41:18
just doing different things with
41:21
that sound so that the brain gets
41:23
an opportunity to experience that sound in
41:26
a situation where you're in complete control
41:29
and where it's not harmful or
41:32
dangerous in any way. It's
41:34
so funny because I think about
41:36
that specific approach and how almost,
41:38
I don't want to use the word
41:41
natural because it's so loaded, but how almost, I'm
41:43
going to use it anyway, natural it is, that
41:46
so many people do it
41:48
anyway. They already cope
41:50
that. People with, I think, higher
41:53
coping mechanisms already,
41:55
let's say there's a grating
41:58
or frustrating or disgusting. sound.
42:00
They might sing a song over top of
42:02
it or they might utilize that sound and
42:05
turn it into something else in order to
42:07
cope in that moment. Yeah
42:09
and if we sort of distinguish
42:11
between the people who come looking for help and
42:13
the people who are coping to fun with misophonia,
42:15
that's one of the differences is that the
42:18
instinctive strategies can
42:21
be helpful and therefore it's
42:23
not that big of a problem. So in
42:25
the same way... So they may need to
42:27
learn those strategies. Yeah and we often learn
42:29
them naturally but just in the same way
42:31
that somebody with panic
42:34
disorder who has panic attacks, like
42:36
someone else, might one day have
42:38
a racing heart and go, oh my god
42:41
I'm having a heart attack and then they'll go, no you know
42:43
what, it's probably just because I had an extra strong coffee and
42:45
I'm running for the bus. That's probably
42:47
why my heart's racing. So that's
42:49
a really natural process to do as well is to
42:51
kind of update the experience
42:53
with new information that is a better theory
42:56
for what's going on. And
42:58
the problem is that people with panic
43:00
attacks often can't do that. Yeah.
43:02
For any number of reasons. Even if they know
43:05
that, yeah even if they know that, it's sometimes
43:07
not enough for them to not feel those sensations.
43:09
Yeah and they don't have access
43:11
to it in the moment that they're panicking and
43:14
therefore even if
43:16
they know outside of the moment that a panic
43:18
attack is just a panic attack, they're not believing
43:20
it in the moment. In the moment it feels like
43:22
they're dying and so they're going to react as
43:24
if they are dying just in case because what
43:26
if they are? Right. Yeah
43:29
and so in the same way that with panic
43:32
what we would do is we'd say, okay well
43:34
let's create a controlled environment, you're in charge,
43:36
let's get your heart rate up and see
43:38
what happens. Let's see if when your heart
43:40
beats fast, does it explode? Do
43:42
you have a heart attack or is
43:44
it just that that feels scary and
43:47
actually is a really normal
43:49
bodily sensation? And so we're doing the
43:51
same thing with sounds. It's like maybe this sound,
43:54
it might be gross, it might
43:56
be annoying but it's not harming you,
43:58
it just feels like it is. So
44:01
I'm curious maybe to kind of transition a little
44:03
bit to some news you can use. You know,
44:05
I like to do that on the show for
44:07
those who are listening. Obviously, if somebody's listening to
44:09
the show, they're really identifying with this. They're finally
44:12
able to put a label on an experience they've
44:14
had their whole lives and starting to realize maybe
44:16
I should talk to somebody. Obviously
44:18
that's the advice we would give. Talk to somebody,
44:20
you know, try and seek out a
44:23
therapist who can help you with that.
44:25
But if there's somebody who's listening who
44:27
has been utilizing some of their own
44:29
coping mechanisms or kind of like you
44:31
talked about, they're experiencing some of that
44:33
subclinical mesophonia, what are some
44:35
recommendations that you might make that
44:38
individuals could practice
44:40
or could work towards to
44:42
try and lessen the impact a little bit
44:44
or soften the blow a little bit? Like
44:46
the next time I hear a rake on
44:48
a sidewalk, what do you recommend I do? Well,
44:53
I think the first thing is having the
44:55
information that you need. So having a word
44:57
for what you're experiencing, knowing that you're not
45:00
the only person experiencing it, knowing that you're
45:02
not crazy. You know, like I spent most
45:04
of my life thinking I was really uptight
45:06
and controlling because of the way that I
45:08
reacted to sounds. Even though
45:10
I wasn't that way, I mean, I'm a little bit
45:12
uptight normally anyway, but it
45:14
wasn't like I was sort of chronically uptight or
45:16
controlling in any other aspect of my life. But
45:19
because I was when it came to sound, it
45:21
made me feel like that was part of my
45:23
personality. So I think that's
45:25
the first part is just reminding yourself that
45:27
you're not a terrible person. You just
45:29
process sounds differently. And
45:31
I think that alone can be really helpful for a lot of
45:33
people. But one of the reasons
45:35
I wrote the book is because there are
45:37
lots of different things that you can do
45:39
to be sort of curious about your reactions
45:42
to sounds that can then change the way
45:44
your brain relates to those
45:46
sounds. And so that's the
45:48
thing that I would recommend is be
45:50
really curious about sounds. It might just be
45:53
like listen to the sound and label
45:55
all of the different physical or acoustic properties
45:57
that you can hear in the sound. label
46:00
all the feelings that you experience in your body
46:02
when you're listening to the sound. Think about what
46:04
else it could be that could
46:06
make a similar sound. So a sniffing
46:09
sound can sound like a broom
46:11
pushing on a footpath.
46:15
A slurping of tea
46:17
can sound like a drain
46:19
emptying out.
46:22
Or like
46:24
a sniffing sound can also sound like a... Sorry,
46:27
a slurping sound can also sound like velcro ripping or
46:30
a zip opening. So just sort of think
46:32
of what else could be making this sound. And that
46:35
way you're interacting with
46:37
sounds in a
46:39
neutral or non-harmful way. And your
46:41
brain, over time, with repetition, will actually
46:44
start to learn, oh, okay, this is...
46:47
It might still be annoying, but it's
46:49
not harmful. And
46:51
in terms of your question about what you do
46:53
about the break, that's the other thing, is also
46:56
that if you get this really intense reaction to
46:58
sounds and you
47:01
are curious and you experiment with it and you
47:03
still get the same reaction, then just use
47:05
earplugs. Just put headphones on, just leave the
47:07
room. That's okay too. It doesn't
47:09
make you a bad
47:11
person or too sensitive
47:14
or any of that. It's okay
47:16
to need strategies to help you focus, to
47:18
help you relax, to get away from things
47:20
that feel uncomfortable. It's okay
47:22
to want to make yourself more comfortable.
47:25
Yeah. And I would add to that even what
47:27
I try to do is just normalize it. So
47:29
if I am in a group, obviously, if I'm
47:31
in a business meeting and there's a rake on
47:33
the sidewalk outside, it may not be socially acceptable
47:35
for me to get up and get
47:37
out of the room. But maybe I can excuse myself to go to
47:40
the bathroom or something like that. But if I'm with friends or
47:42
with people I trust and I feel safe with,
47:44
I will literally put my fingers in my ears
47:47
and be like, I cannot stand the sound I
47:49
have to go. And it's funny because a lot
47:51
of other people are like, oh, I have things
47:53
like that too. And it does normalize the experience.
47:55
Yeah. And that's one of the things that I
47:57
sort of want people to preserve as well. part
48:00
of the experience of therapy or of reading
48:02
the book is you are allowed to have
48:04
an opinion about a sound. The problem is
48:06
that you have the opinion about the sound.
48:08
You're allowed to think it's disgusting. You're allowed
48:10
to think that people shouldn't eat with their
48:13
mouth open. But all of that is okay.
48:15
And it doesn't make you a terrible person
48:17
because that's just
48:19
individual difference. It's just let's
48:21
not let this stop you from
48:23
being able to do things with people that you
48:26
care about. Let's not let this stop you from
48:28
being able to work and concentrate and just
48:30
use the strategies that you need to be able
48:32
to do those things. And
48:34
that's okay. And I don't think it's
48:36
the same as, you know, we're comparing it
48:38
to OCD before. And what we know with OCD
48:41
through lots of experimental research is that the
48:43
behavior, the compulsion part of OCD
48:46
reinforces the distress. So the more
48:48
you do the behavior, the
48:50
more it fuels the OCD. And I'm not
48:53
convinced that that's the case for misophonia. I think that
48:55
there are a lot of people who just use really
48:58
helpful coping strategies that enable them
49:00
to participate in life. And
49:02
it doesn't necessarily make the problem worse.
49:04
And there may be examples where
49:07
people are doing things that are sort of
49:09
causing problems in relationships, and they might want
49:11
to tweak those things. So I also encourage
49:13
people to be curious about their strategies and
49:15
test them out and experiment with different ones
49:17
so that they feel like they're picking the
49:19
best ones for them. But
49:21
I don't there's no good evidence at
49:24
this stage from the research that says we
49:26
shouldn't be putting in
49:28
earplugs when we want to concentrate,
49:30
that we shouldn't be leaving the room if
49:32
we need a little break from the sound. There's
49:34
nothing that tells us from research that that's a
49:36
bad thing. Yeah,
49:39
yeah, yeah. Oh, that's so helpful. You know,
49:41
I usually at this point
49:43
in the show, I'm closing up and I'm
49:45
realizing that usually in the show, I also
49:47
open with obviously the researcher or the writers
49:49
experience of their own, like, how'd you get
49:51
into this? And I just kind of blew
49:53
past the fact I mentioned that you had
49:55
your own subjective experience of this, but I
49:58
would love to maybe just take a few
50:00
minutes for you to share with us, if
50:02
you're comfortable, like your own experience with misophonia
50:04
and how it affected, obviously, your
50:06
interest in the work. Yeah,
50:09
I think it very heavily affected my
50:11
interest in the work. I
50:13
definitely wouldn't be doing this work if it
50:15
wasn't for my own experience with misophonia. And
50:19
I dedicated the book to myself as a
50:21
teenager. This is basically, when I was sitting
50:23
there writing the book, I was like, what do I wish
50:25
I'd known when I was 15 years old? And
50:28
I used to have to sit in the classroom with, I
50:30
had like a big clunky old Walkman in my
50:32
pocket, and I would feed the headphones
50:35
up through my school uniform and hide the
50:37
earbuds onto my hair so that I could
50:40
have music playing so that I wouldn't get
50:42
distracted by clicking pens and people talking
50:44
and ruffling and making sounds in the classroom.
50:47
So I had these strategies, and I felt
50:49
really, really alone in those strategies. And I
50:51
was literally like shoving the world out with
50:54
those strategies. And
50:57
it wasn't until I was in my 30s
50:59
that I discovered the term misophonia was such
51:02
a relief. I was like, oh my goodness,
51:04
like everything makes sense just knowing
51:06
that that is a phenomenon that
51:08
exists. And I'm
51:10
not crazy. And
51:14
even that idea that it
51:17
might mean there's something I could do about it
51:19
as well. And because I was a clinical psychologist
51:21
and I knew lots of strategies
51:23
from working with other conditions, I started to
51:25
experiment on myself. And that's, again, where this
51:27
all started was I just tried stuff out
51:29
of myself and it helped. And
51:31
so then I started thinking, okay, well, maybe we
51:33
should be helping other people. Yeah.
51:37
And did you like find in
51:40
your movement towards kind of training
51:43
and becoming expert in this area,
51:45
did you find other professionals,
51:47
like other psychologists, other researchers who sort of
51:49
found a similar path? Like, yeah, I got
51:51
into this because I totally have to deal
51:53
with this too. Well, all
51:56
of the, like I was already a
51:58
clinical psychologist when I discovered what misophonia was, and
52:00
so it wasn't like a driving force to
52:02
becoming a therapist or anything. But
52:05
I'm now doing a second doctorate basically
52:07
because I'm retraining in research so that
52:09
I can get back into research so
52:11
that I can understand
52:13
this better and really test
52:15
those mechanisms that could be influencing
52:18
someone's experience of misophonia and what might
52:20
work in terms of treatment. And
52:24
so that pivot back to research
52:26
was, I only did
52:28
that because I wanted to
52:30
know more about misophonia. Yeah,
52:34
it's funny because I feel like I've seen
52:36
something really similar with psychologists
52:39
and neuroscientists who themselves
52:42
have synesthesia and then ultimately
52:45
ended up studying synesthesia. And
52:48
I wonder if there is like some similar
52:50
crossover there as well, but it's just absolutely
52:52
fascinating. I think that this, I was really
52:54
excited when your book came across my desk
52:56
and the opportunity to interview you came up
52:58
because it is such an, to
53:01
me, interesting. I think I might call
53:03
what I deal with misophonia light.
53:06
Again, I definitely can
53:08
identify with the phenomenon, but I do see
53:10
it more as a phenomenon for me and
53:12
less of like a clinically
53:14
kind of relevant thing that I have
53:16
to, that really it
53:18
impacts my life in a negative way. But
53:21
I was just so hopeful
53:23
that individuals listening to
53:26
the show might identify with this. And
53:29
even if they personally don't struggle with it, they
53:31
might know somebody who does and that this would
53:33
raise a little bit of awareness about that. It's
53:35
just, it's fascinating, but it really does come home.
53:37
So I'm super grateful for the work that you do
53:39
and for the fact that you wrote this book
53:42
for a general audience to be able to read
53:44
about it, educate themselves and hopefully
53:46
normalize their experiences a little bit.
53:49
Yeah, absolutely. When
53:51
the book first came out, one of the things
53:53
that I noticed on Amazon was that it was
53:55
one of the most gifted books. We're
54:00
just subtly sending it to anyone who'd
54:03
ever glared at them for eating tortilla
54:06
chips or something. I love that. I
54:09
like that idea that it was just showing up on
54:11
people's doorsteps. Like, who sent this to me? Oh,
54:14
well, I guess it does apply. Oh
54:16
my gosh, that's so funny. Well
54:18
gosh, everybody, the book is Sounds
54:21
Like Misophonia, How to Stop Small
54:23
Noises from Causing Extreme Reactions by
54:25
Dr. Jane Gregory. Jane, thank you
54:27
so much for spending time with
54:29
us today, for educating us, for
54:31
entertaining us, and for helping us
54:33
dig a little bit deeper into
54:35
this pretty common phenomenon. Well,
54:38
thank you for being interested in
54:40
this common phenomenon that somehow people
54:42
still don't know about, and
54:45
yeah, for inviting me on to talk about it. Absolutely.
54:48
And everyone listening, thank you for coming
54:50
back week after week. I'm really
54:52
looking forward to the next time we all get together
54:54
to talk. When
55:00
save on auto insurance for driving
55:02
safe with USAA Safe Pilot, you'll
55:04
feel like a big deal. Even
55:06
a traffic jam. Save up to
55:08
30% to with USAA Safe Pilot.
55:10
USAA, see fire Restrictions apply.
55:15
Okay, round two. Name something
55:17
that's not boring. A
55:19
laundry? A book club? Computer
55:22
astrologers? Huh? Oh,
55:25
sorry. We were looking for Chumba
55:27
Casino. Chumba? That's right.
55:30
chumbacasino.com has over 100 casino-style games.
55:34
Join today and play for free for your chance to
55:36
win some serious prizes. chumbacasino.com.
55:39
No restrictions.
55:42
Restrictions apply. See website for details.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More