Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Time for a quick break to talk about
0:02
McDonald's. Mornings are for mixing and matching at
0:04
McDonald's. For just $3, mix and match two
0:07
of your favorite breakfast items, including a
0:09
sausage McMuffin. Tonight
0:26
Arizona Supreme Court upholds a one
0:29
hundred and sixty year old abortion
0:31
ban. The impact on women's health
0:33
care in the state and the
0:35
November election then is Corporate America
0:38
in denial? A lot of second
0:40
Trump term they may like deregulation.
0:42
What about Democracy Plus new reporting
0:44
on Jared Kushner as investment fund
0:47
and possible conflicts of interest in
0:49
his father in Law read: takes
0:51
the White House as the eleventh
0:54
hour gets underway on this. Tuesday
0:56
night. Good
1:04
evening. Once again, I'm seventy role
1:06
live from Thirty Rockefeller Center and
1:08
we are now two hundred and
1:10
ten days away from the election.
1:12
Today, Arizona Supreme Court decided to
1:14
take the state back to eighteen
1:17
Sixty Four. It ruled that a
1:19
century and a half old abortion
1:21
law can come back into effect.
1:23
It bans all abortions except ones
1:25
that would say the life of
1:27
the mother, but those rules are
1:29
a little bit hazy. The decision
1:32
comes just one day. After Donald
1:34
Trump proclaimed that the abortion law should
1:36
be up to the states and it
1:38
puts the issue front and center in
1:40
a battleground state that could decide control
1:43
of the Senate and the White House,
1:45
here's my colleague Laura Jarrett with more.
1:48
Tonight, a legal fight over
1:50
abortion, any critical battleground state
1:52
fanning the flames of a
1:54
political fire gaining ground towards
1:57
November Arizona's highest court. Today
1:59
back law. The band's nearly all
2:01
the boar since and carries up to
2:03
five years in prison for doctors who
2:05
perform one, the conservative majority on the
2:07
court reviving, and eighteen Sixty Four loss
2:09
that lay dormant for decades under Roe
2:11
V Wade. Are you kidding me? I'm
2:13
an atheist. Sixty four hours before women
2:15
even have the right to vote, We
2:17
are totally going backwards as he leaves
2:20
your old Arizona resident of men were
2:22
all men are fighting back tears on
2:24
forever. Say that. I
2:26
didn't think that they would say that as I really
2:28
do. They get the state democratic. Attorney General
2:30
on the see won't enforce
2:33
the law. It as one
2:35
of the worst decisions in
2:37
the history of the Arizona
2:39
Supreme Court. No woman or
2:41
doctor will be prosecuted under
2:43
this draconian law. I will
2:45
fight like hell. It does
2:47
give me comfort, I mean
2:49
on reassuring in a time
2:52
of uncertainty. Lawyer Doctor Dave
2:54
real good Read on Rothys
2:56
practice in the state for
2:58
over two decades. I don't
3:00
know. What? The law will be.
3:02
it is so early to know. How
3:04
that's gonna play out a today's
3:06
decision? A win for your side
3:09
it is. The advocacy group Alliance
3:11
Defending Freedom says the existing sixteen
3:13
with law doesn't go far enough
3:15
and even if the state a
3:17
D won't enforce stricter than other
3:20
prosecutors still can. Is our position
3:22
that county attorney's have the authority
3:24
to enforce this law? This leaders
3:26
court fight over abortion only raising
3:29
the political sakes in an election
3:31
year Arizona long a republican strongholds
3:33
now the latest stay on track
3:36
to get a constitutional amendment on
3:38
the November ballot creating a fundamental
3:40
right to abortion is it passes
3:43
the vice president. Also. Home to
3:45
travel to the see for this friday
3:47
looking state. As a state where they're
3:49
passing these abortion bans and the majority
3:52
the legislators to and are men. Yelling
3:54
women want to do with their body. And. a
3:56
kind of can i had it with that while
3:58
the former president and many GOP lawmakers
4:01
continued to avoid talk
4:03
of a national abortion
4:05
ban, instead backing state-level
4:07
restrictions. Some states are taking
4:09
conservative views and some are less than conservative, but
4:11
it's back with the states, it's back with the
4:13
people. Supreme Court has turned it back over to
4:15
voters. We've got to let voters sort through this.
4:21
With that, let's get smarter with the
4:23
help of our lead-off panel this evening,
4:25
NBC Capitol Hill correspondent Ali Vitale. Simone
4:27
Sanders Townsend, co-host of the MSNBC morning
4:30
show The Weeknd. She's also the former
4:32
chief spokesperson for Vice President Harris. And
4:34
Reid Galen joins us, co-founder of the
4:37
Lincoln Project. He has worked on a
4:39
number of GOP campaigns, including John McCain,
4:41
Arnold Schwarzenegger, and George W. Bush. Simone,
4:44
Trump said, leave it up to the
4:46
states. This
4:49
is what that looks like, a
4:51
civil war era law now
4:53
back into effect. How
4:56
poorly thought out was
4:58
this position he put out
5:00
yesterday, especially now? Well,
5:03
I will just say this. I think that
5:06
Donald Trump is doing and saying whatever he
5:08
thinks can get him elected. He has no
5:10
principle. There is no ground for him to
5:12
stand on because the ground shifts and moves
5:14
according to what he thinks will get him
5:16
what he wants. In the statement that he
5:19
put out yesterday in the video and whatnot,
5:21
he talked about you have to do, you
5:23
have to understand what's on people's hearts but
5:25
you, it's about winning. Essentially, he said
5:27
it's about winning. That's what he's focused on. So how
5:29
is this a winning strategy? This is not a
5:32
winning strategy here. This is insane. Women
5:34
in Arizona right now, now there's a 14
5:37
day stay on this decision,
5:39
but in 14 days, you
5:42
can't get an abortion if you need
5:44
one in Arizona. The video that the
5:47
Biden campaign put out this week featured
5:49
Amanda Zorowski. Amanda Zorowski had a miscarriage.
5:51
And because she was having a miscarriage, and
5:53
I'm sorry to be graphic here, but all
5:56
the things in that path, she needed an
5:58
abortion. She could
6:00
not poison its poison. It's rotting in your body.
6:02
And that poison rotted in Amanda Zorowski's body to
6:04
the point where now she and her husband, she
6:06
almost died from sepsis twice, and now she and
6:09
her husband may not be able to have children
6:11
again. That is not only the reality of Amanda
6:13
Zorowski or women in Texas, that is the reality
6:15
of women all across the South. And it will
6:17
be the reality of women all across America if
6:19
Donald Trump is reelected president. But Simone, I close
6:21
my eyes and I think Donald Trump makes this
6:24
argument, and all sorts of people do. They
6:26
say, leave it to the states, right? The small government
6:28
people that say, let the states decide. Yeah, but
6:30
black women, I'm very concerned about this. Let
6:32
the states decide. Let the states decide. But
6:35
is this what the state of
6:37
Arizona wants? A law that
6:39
was put in place at a time
6:41
when slavery was still legal? Before
6:44
Arizona was a state and at a
6:46
time when women could not vote, when
6:48
women were essentially property. Okay, and
6:50
is that what the people in Arizona want today? Well,
6:52
you know what? The people in Arizona can make their
6:54
voices heard at the ballot box. Two of the four
6:56
justices that voted to uphold this
6:59
abortion ban, they are on the ballot for
7:01
reelection. In Arizona, Supreme Court
7:03
justices are appointed by the governor and then
7:05
after a couple years, they are then elected.
7:08
I suggest that the people of Arizona, when they
7:10
go out to check their ballot box, they not
7:12
only check the top of the ticket and down
7:14
ballot for senators and Congress folks
7:16
and their state legislative folks, but they look
7:18
at that ballot amendment that will likely be
7:20
on the ballot in Arizona to protect abortion
7:22
rights. And also take a look at those
7:24
Supreme Court justices because your vote
7:27
can make a difference. Reed, Trump
7:29
is acting like he doesn't want to get
7:31
involved and let's let the states decide, but
7:33
none of this would be happening if
7:35
he did not set the stage for Roe
7:37
to be overturned. He did that. Right.
7:42
Well, let the states decide is what Dobbs
7:44
is, right? That's the Dobbs decision is to
7:46
let states decide. And we've seen how many
7:48
states have decided. Let me just say for
7:50
so many of, you know, if we have
7:52
erstwhile Republicans like myself watching out there, remember,
7:54
this is the thing that we used to
7:56
hate. Unelected judges, so
7:58
to speak. appointed judges legislating
8:01
from the bench. We used
8:03
to hate that. We used to hate the idea
8:05
of the long arm of government coming into our
8:07
homes and telling us what we could and couldn't
8:09
do. And then we should
8:12
just say this for history's sake. It's
8:14
the anniversary of Robert E. Lee surrendering
8:16
to General Ulysses S. Grant. This
8:19
law was passed before that event
8:21
took place. Think about that. Think
8:24
about how long ago this was. So this
8:26
isn't even originalist. This is like pre-original. It's
8:28
just like big bang legal theory at this
8:30
point. Ali, did
8:32
down-ballot Republicans want abortion to be
8:34
this high profile of an issue?
8:39
No. And when Reid makes
8:41
the point about what Republicans are saying
8:44
right now, if Republicans liked this, they
8:46
would be talking about it. Instead,
8:48
in Congress today, I heard a
8:50
lot of Republicans in frontline districts,
8:52
for example, like Congress and Juan Siscomone,
8:54
saying that this was not a good
8:57
ruling and that it was in some
8:59
ways dangerous for women and that he
9:01
preferred the 15-week thing. For a lot
9:03
of these lawmakers, this is a problem
9:05
for them, especially in a swing state
9:08
like Arizona. We all know lawmakers. If
9:10
they liked it, they'd be talking about
9:12
it aggressively. They're trying
9:14
to pick distance between themselves and this. I also
9:16
think that someone who covered Trump back in 2015
9:19
and 2016, I was there when he said
9:22
that women should be punished
9:24
for seeking abortion care. He then had to
9:27
walk that back. But I think what Siscomone
9:29
is saying is right. For Trump, abortion
9:31
as an issue has never been
9:33
a political motivator for him. It's not
9:36
something that he himself seems to have any
9:38
deeply held values on, unlike, for example, the
9:40
person who was his running mate in 2016
9:42
and 2020, Meg Pence. Instead,
9:46
for Trump, abortion is a
9:48
means to a political end and a political
9:50
victory. It's while we're watching his campaign team
9:52
put out the statements that they are saying
9:54
this is a safe issue. Here's the thing
9:56
about making it a state's issue when you
9:58
have a patchwork of rules across the country,
10:00
you're watching the states where abortion
10:02
is accessible. I'm thinking states like
10:04
Colorado, for example, where you're seeing
10:07
an influx of people traveling into
10:09
the state trying to seek care.
10:11
It's why you're going to end
10:13
up seeing later term abortions, which
10:15
are the thing that Republicans are now trying
10:17
to attack Democrats for. Later term abortions, if
10:19
you're talking about up until, as
10:22
Republicans like to say, the moment of birth,
10:24
that doesn't happen. Late term abortions are about
10:26
1% of abortions that
10:28
you have. And those are largely
10:30
done in the case of the
10:32
life of the mother being in
10:34
danger or fetal inviability. That's not
10:36
the question here. When you have
10:38
the patchwork, you're going to see later term
10:41
abortions because people have to travel further. There
10:43
are more barriers to their care. It sort
10:45
of gets towards the reality that Republicans are
10:47
saying they don't want. And again, as a
10:49
political issue, women can vote now. And we've
10:51
seen what they do with that. But
10:54
read this argument that this isn't
10:56
Trump's true views. It's just about
10:59
political victory and political strategy. How
11:01
is this a political victory beyond
11:03
the primaries? The majority of the
11:06
country is vehemently opposed to this.
11:10
Well, and look, I think this is a really
11:12
important point, Stephanie, and the one that Ali just
11:15
made too, is that this is where Trump is
11:17
stuck between a rock and a hard place on
11:19
this issue, which is he tried to weasel out.
11:21
And believe me, yesterday was just weasel words, trying
11:23
to figure out something to say
11:25
that was going to appease enough of his
11:27
evangelical base. But now you've got Kerry Lake,
11:29
right? Not exactly a moderate saying, you know,
11:32
she's against this ruling in Arizona. So you
11:34
know what Ruben Gallego's campaign is going to
11:36
do? They're going to have her saying we
11:38
should go by the 1864 law.
11:41
No, we shouldn't. And now Republicans are flip
11:43
floppers on abortion. And you know who stays
11:45
home when that happens? Christian
11:47
evangelicals, right? This is their issue. It's all they
11:50
care about. It's how they see the rest of
11:52
the world on the way to their weird dominionism.
11:54
And so what I would say is this is
11:56
that for Trump, he has been trying to get
11:59
out of this this thing for weeks, months
12:01
now. But again, how many more videos do
12:03
we have to have of him saying, I
12:05
killed Roe, I killed Roe, I killed Roe,
12:07
I killed Roe. And now here you have
12:09
it, right? We're literally back to the Civil
12:11
War. Simone, this
12:14
is the state of Arizona. How
12:16
much does this issue pull from
12:18
the focus, which is immigration, immigration,
12:20
immigration? Look, I think for any
12:22
of the border states, and now not even just
12:25
the border states, if you live in Chicago, Denver,
12:27
New York, Washington, D.C., places across the country, immigration,
12:30
I think is still top of mind,
12:32
particularly what is happening at the border.
12:34
But I think this is just as equally
12:37
as important. When you poll folks, poll after
12:39
poll, you sit in focus groups, you
12:42
hear people reacting to this kind of
12:44
news, whether we're talking about the Alabama
12:46
IVF ruling or this ruling coming out
12:48
of Arizona, people are
12:50
concerned. They're concerned about their rights and their
12:53
freedoms and what this means for them practically.
12:55
We talk often about the exceptions. You heard
12:57
Donald Trump really leaning on the exceptions the
12:59
other day. Now I want to pause and
13:01
say, Joe Biden has been very clear
13:04
on this issue. Joe Biden is going to protect a
13:06
woman's right to make decisions about her own body. And
13:08
he has said, if a Congress sends him a bill
13:10
to codify Roe into law, he will do that. The
13:13
only way that is happening, if you reelect Joe Biden
13:15
and Kamala Harris, if Democrats hold
13:17
the Senate, okay, and Democrats got to
13:19
take the House. So this is a
13:21
down ballad strategy to protect reproductive
13:23
freedom across the country. But to be
13:26
very clear, these exceptions for life of
13:28
a mother, health of a mother, they're
13:30
really bad, though. But this is it.
13:32
They're really, exactly. They're very vague. And
13:34
who decides who decides that the exception
13:37
matters? Is it the doctor? Because for
13:39
Amanda Zirocki, the doctor wasn't enough
13:41
for Kate Cox. The doctors weren't enough. The
13:43
doctor said these women needed abortions and they
13:45
could not get them because the state said
13:47
they could not. My goodness, I
13:49
want to go back to talking about Carrie
13:51
Lake, obviously Republican there. She
13:53
is now saying that she opposes
13:56
this ruling. But guess
13:58
what? We're just going to turn to the. tape
14:00
because I want to share what she
14:03
said exactly two years ago about
14:05
this very law. Watch this. Obviously,
14:08
I think Roe v. Wade should be overturned
14:10
and I think the Supreme Court, I have a good
14:13
feeling that they're going to do the right thing this time.
14:16
And again, I'll echo what Steve just said. We
14:18
have a great law on the books right now.
14:20
If that happens, we will be a state where
14:23
we will not be taking the lives of
14:25
our unborn anymore. Ali,
14:28
I'm not voicing an opinion here. Why
14:32
would voters take either Kerry Lake
14:35
or Donald Trump at their current
14:37
word on an abortion, a
14:39
life or death issue when they've got a
14:41
track record of changing their stance? And
14:46
look, certainly tagging Republicans as flip-floppers on
14:49
this is going to be a central
14:51
strategy. I think that Wade is right when
14:53
you forecast that that's something that Ruben Diago
14:55
is going to be doing in this Senate
14:57
race. And of course, it's something that the
14:59
Biden campaign has already proven is going to
15:01
continue to tag Donald Trump with. Just the
15:03
fact that they have him on pace
15:06
being able to take credit for overturning
15:08
Roe allows them to do several
15:10
ads of what they already did with
15:13
Amanda's ad this morning, showing women who
15:15
have been negatively impacted by abortion restrictions
15:17
and then tying it directly to Donald
15:19
Trump in his own words. The
15:22
question, though, is better asked when you think
15:24
about what you said, which is, is it
15:26
immigration or is it abortion that voters are
15:28
deciding on in Arizona or across the country?
15:31
And that's when this becomes an issue that it's
15:33
too early to tell if it's going to be
15:35
the decider. That being said, and I've
15:37
said this before and I'll say it again, angry women who
15:39
are full of
15:41
rage tend to channel that into something.
15:44
We have seen it in red states
15:46
across the country like Kentucky and Ohio. And
15:48
I do think that if that's the track
15:50
record that we're seeing, it's a limited set
15:52
of data that we're talking about. But it
15:55
is one that is being consistently borne out
15:57
in the post-Roe era. Biden
16:00
ads and his war chest of
16:02
campaign dollars are going to be
16:04
needed to jog people's memory. Susan
16:07
Glasser writes in The New Yorker
16:09
that this election will come down
16:11
to Trump's amnesia advantage. The fact
16:13
that people so easily seem to
16:15
forget what he did, what he
16:18
said as president, and the impact
16:20
it's having today. How do Democrats
16:22
combat that amnesia? Just
16:24
power through with ads day in and day
16:27
out? Well,
16:29
I think it has to be holistic, but I think that's a part
16:31
of it. And listen, he
16:33
hasn't been better since he left office. He's
16:35
been worse since he left office. And we
16:38
should never forget how he left office or
16:40
almost didn't leave office. So I think the
16:42
rapid response team on the Biden campaign is
16:44
just terrific. They are pushing this stuff out
16:46
all day, every day, especially four years ago,
16:48
the craziness that Trump
16:50
was saying from the briefing room at the
16:52
White House. And so I think that this
16:54
is not just that there's a Trump amnesia
16:56
thing, although they do need everybody to forget,
16:58
frankly, that he was ever president, because he's an
17:01
insider now, right? No matter what you
17:03
want, you're a former president, you're an insider. But I would
17:05
also say this is that people largely
17:07
aren't yet paying attention. Those swing voters
17:09
who are ultimately going to make the
17:11
decision, something like Arizona, they'll pay attention
17:14
to. Trump four years ago, you know,
17:16
will they pay as much attention as
17:18
they should? Not yet. But
17:20
I'll say this, the one thing I've seen, especially
17:22
amongst my Democratic friends, is that they don't tend
17:24
to start acting until they panic. And
17:26
so I would say that panic will be induced sometime
17:28
in the next six to eight weeks, when
17:31
surveys are still close, which they will be. There's
17:34
no question about that. And then what will happen
17:36
is the Biden campaign will turn everything
17:38
on. In July, we're going to have
17:40
Trump's convention. That's going to
17:42
be banana phones crazy, the likes of which none
17:45
of us have yet seen. And it's not going
17:47
to get better between now and November. And so,
17:49
yeah, this is the strategy of
17:51
the Trump campaign, but it's not going to last.
17:54
All right, then. Ali, Simone Reed. Thank you all
17:56
so much. We come back. Sometimes there's
17:58
a lot of things that. CEOs seem
18:00
to like to hear, but have
18:03
they really thought about
18:05
what it would look like if Trump
18:07
regained power? Deregulation doesn't
18:09
mean much if you don't
18:11
have a democracy. And later,
18:13
new reporting putting a microscope on Jared
18:15
Kushner's foreign business dealings. We're going to
18:18
look at the growing conflicts of interest
18:20
and why he says they don't matter.
18:22
The 11th hour just getting underway on
18:24
a Tuesday night. The
18:33
Angie's List you know and trust is
18:35
now Angie, and we're so much more
18:37
than just a list. We still connect
18:39
you with top local pros and show
18:41
you ratings and reviews, but now we
18:43
also let you compare upfront prices on
18:45
hundreds of projects and book a service
18:48
instantly. We can even handle the rest
18:50
of your project from start to finish.
18:52
So remember, Angie's List is now Angie,
18:54
and we're here to get your job
18:56
done right. Get started at
18:58
angie.com. That's A-N-G-I, or
19:00
download the app today. The
19:08
outcome of the 2024 election will
19:10
have wide-ranging consequences, and the business
19:12
sector is preparing for all of
19:14
them. But it's corporate America in denial
19:17
about the dangers of losing our
19:19
democracy and the potential of that
19:21
happening in Donald Trump's second term.
19:24
For more, I want to welcome Rick
19:26
Newman, Yahoo Finance columnist, and Dr. Rachel
19:29
Klinefeld, an advisor at Unite to Protect
19:31
Democracy, an expert on democracy and the
19:33
rule of law globally. Rachel,
19:35
you have studied the impact of populism
19:37
on business. What do we need to
19:40
know? So
19:42
all over the world, business knows that
19:44
left-wing populism is a problem for them.
19:47
Left-wing populists overheat their economies. They
19:49
give away government money to
19:51
win elections, and then they
19:54
spark inflation, and the growth
19:56
crashes. So you get a small uptick, and
19:58
then a big crash, and a lot more.
20:00
volatility. What they don't seem
20:02
to know is that right-wing authoritarians or
20:04
right-wing populists do precisely the same thing.
20:07
The ideology, right
20:09
or left, doesn't really apply to
20:11
populists. Populists care about power. And
20:14
so what we see in modern
20:16
day populism is whether you're talking
20:18
about Venezuela or Nicaragua, or Hungary
20:20
or India, whether it's left or
20:22
right, we see the same set
20:24
of activities, personalization of power, centralization
20:26
of power, and because you've got
20:28
a personalized, centralized power, really
20:31
whimsical decision making that causes
20:33
a lot of volatility, more stock
20:35
market crashes, more risk, and really
20:37
unpredictable behavior. Rick, when I
20:39
talk to Fortune 500 CEOs, they
20:42
talk about Trump being unpredictable,
20:44
they don't like his crazy,
20:46
but they sure do like the tax cuts
20:49
and the deregulation. And when I bring up
20:51
the risk of losing our democracy, they
20:54
seem to think it's not a big
20:56
deal, it's not going to happen, our
20:58
institutions will hold. What are you hearing?
21:01
Yeah, well, yeah, of course, and,
21:03
you know, taxes are going to be a big
21:05
deal during the next presidency, no matter who wins.
21:08
We've got the individual income taxes, it's
21:10
firing, by the way, that's the top
21:12
rate for a lot of these CEOs,
21:15
they know that there's a chance that
21:17
Biden will raise their personal taxes. And
21:19
they do like the deregulation under Trump,
21:21
you know, the counterweight, that stuff is
21:24
they hate Trump's trade wars. I mean,
21:26
they really dislike that and Trump is
21:28
promising more of that. And you know
21:30
what, I think of corporate America
21:33
as basically being amoral. And
21:35
I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
21:37
I mean, corporate America does not
21:40
swing elections in the United States for the most
21:42
part, I mean, they give a lot of money
21:44
to both sides. I mean, if you want to
21:46
hate the corporate sector, just go
21:48
back and you know, there's this watchdog group called
21:50
CRU that has been tracking corporate
21:53
contributions to the so called sedition, sedition
21:56
caucus in the Congress, the
21:58
147 members of Congress. Congress
22:00
who voted not to certify Joe Biden as
22:02
the president in 2021. A
22:06
lot of companies gave money to those members
22:08
of Congress. They stopped for a while and
22:10
then they started giving money to them again.
22:12
And the reason they do that, we all
22:14
know this, is because those members of Congress
22:16
hold key committee posts. They can influence legislation
22:18
that affects these companies. So I think these
22:20
companies are basically amoral. If anything,
22:22
I detect a little bit of more passivity
22:24
this time around. They're just really sitting on
22:26
the fence and they, at the end of
22:28
the day, they want to be on the
22:30
winning side. I mean, Steve Schwarzman, the CEO
22:32
of Blackstone, is a good example. He supported
22:34
Trump in 2020. He gave
22:36
a lot of money and he says he's sitting this
22:38
one out. He's not supporting Trump this
22:40
time around. We heard the same thing from the billionaire.
22:43
In the same interview that he said, he
22:45
just said the same thing. In the same
22:48
interview that Steve Schwarzman said he's sitting this
22:50
one out, he said that our borders are
22:52
wide open. So we'll just take a pause
22:54
on Steve Schwarzman's latest comments. Rachel,
22:56
you're quoted in that New York
22:58
Times analysis of another Trump term
23:01
saying the business community here does
23:03
not understand what is about to
23:05
hit them. What could
23:07
we see? It's amazing. That's right. If
23:10
you're a CEO, your number one job,
23:12
it doesn't even matter what your company
23:14
specializes in is to be a
23:16
risk manager. And the fact that they are
23:19
not assessing this risk is astounding. That's
23:22
exactly right. I think a lot of businesses,
23:24
just as Rick says, they're looking out
23:26
for their own income tax, they're cooperating
23:28
on their personal, they're hoping for some
23:31
deregulation, and they think it's going to be business
23:33
as usual. Because the first
23:35
term was frankly, fairly business as usual other
23:37
than the terrorist uptick
23:39
until Trump's disastrous handling of
23:41
COVID, of course, when everything
23:43
crashed. But what
23:45
they don't understand is that populists, when
23:47
they come back to power like
23:50
Hungary and Orban act
23:52
differently, they're much more confident. They
23:55
have a different group of people behind them.
23:57
And Trump's first term, he had
23:59
all of the normal Republicans who come
24:01
to government every time there's
24:03
another Republican administration, many
24:05
of them very close to business. But
24:08
now, just as what we see overseas,
24:11
when you have populists come back and people
24:13
know how they govern and they know that
24:15
they don't really respect the rule of law,
24:17
people who do respect the rule of law tend to
24:19
not want to serve in those administrations that are worried
24:21
about what might happen to them. And so
24:23
what you get is a very different kind of
24:25
loyalist, people who are willing to
24:27
bend the rules because what these
24:30
populists do, again, looking globally, is
24:32
they tend to bend the rules for themselves. You
24:34
get a lot more crony of them. You get
24:36
a lot more corruption generally within the family, the
24:39
kinds of things Jared Kushner has been doing during
24:41
the first term, get much more flamboyant.
24:44
In a second term, in Hungary under Orban,
24:46
businesses think they're on top of the world
24:48
and then suddenly they're forced to sell to
24:51
a crony or they're forced to sell to
24:53
a family member because the government tweaks the
24:55
regulations, puts a cap on their money
24:57
that they can make by capping prices and
25:00
forces them to take an offer they can't
25:02
refuse. So a second term for populists looks
25:04
a lot different than the first. And I
25:06
think we can probably expect that here. I
25:09
think about all the companies, all the investors who
25:11
never will take Russian money. They don't ever want
25:13
to do business with a country where they can't
25:15
trust the rule of law. And
25:18
of course, Vladimir Putin, the world leader
25:20
of choice for Donald Trump. Rick, before we
25:22
go, I've got to get your
25:24
latest take on Donald Trump's new
25:26
publicly traded company, Truth Social. What's
25:29
your take on where things stand right now? I
25:31
talked to one CEO about this last week
25:33
and he said, it's not a business. You
25:35
can't have $58 million in losses in a
25:37
year and only $4 million in revenue. I
25:39
mean, for a publicly traded company, $4 million
25:42
in revenue is only a little
25:44
bit better than zero. So
25:47
this is a binary bet for people who want to
25:49
buy this stock on whether Donald Trump is going to
25:51
win the presidency. If he does win, DJT,
25:55
as the ticker symbol for this company is known,
25:58
it might have a future if he loses. It's
26:00
toast. And Steph,
26:02
I know you yourself have pointed out that it's
26:04
very hard to do short trading in this stock
26:06
because there aren't enough shares, which means the
26:09
market purchase that would normally be there
26:11
to drive this stock down is not
26:13
there. So we could see a little
26:15
bump in this stock in the foreseeable
26:17
future. But I think as we
26:19
get closer to the election, my best guess is
26:21
this company is going to tank because people are
26:23
just not going to be willing to hold. I
26:25
mean, this is a great phrase I saw on
26:28
a Reddit thread. MAGA
26:30
bag holders. Who wants to
26:32
be the MAGA bag holder
26:34
holding DJT stock long if
26:36
Trump loses? I'm
26:39
not putting my money in it. If viewers want to put
26:41
their money in and bet on a Trump win, so be
26:43
it. Those focusing on this
26:46
company more than anyone, more than Wall Street
26:48
analysts, it's the SEC. Rick, thank
26:50
you for being here, Rachel, as well. When we
26:52
return, Jared Kushner cashing in
26:54
big time on the relationships he built
26:56
while Trump and Jared himself were in
26:59
the White House. We're going to take
27:01
a look at the unusual dependence on
27:03
foreign sources he has and what
27:06
could happen. Not much. The
27:08
Trump to be elected again. The eleventh
27:10
hour continues. Let's
27:19
take a deep breath on this one. Ready? Jared
27:24
Kushner's multi-billion dollar, multi-billion
27:26
dollar, he had no
27:29
experience investing a single dollar
27:31
until after Trump
27:34
left office. But Donald, Jared Kushner's
27:36
multi-billion dollar investment firm could be
27:38
facing serious conflicts of interest if
27:40
his father-in-law retakes the White House.
27:43
The New York Times reports that
27:45
99% of the money placed with
27:47
him by investors has
27:49
come from foreign sources. That includes
27:52
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and United Arab
27:54
Emirates, all of whom he
27:56
worked directly with during his time in
27:58
the Trump White House. My
28:00
friend Tim O'Brien joins me. He's a senior
28:03
executive editor at Bloomberg Opinion and of course
28:05
a Trump biographer. He's also one
28:07
of the only people who has actually
28:09
seen Donald Trump's tax returns. Plus he
28:11
wrote the book, Trump Nation, the art
28:14
of being the Donald. Tim
28:16
Jared Kushner, he now says
28:18
he is confident
28:20
that if Donald Trump is
28:22
reelected, all decisions his father-in-law
28:24
made would be based on
28:27
what is best for the
28:29
country and not family business
28:31
interests. Is he
28:33
laughing at us saying that? Let's start with
28:35
the beginning of the Trump administration when
28:38
his sister went to Asia and
28:40
showed an org chart with her brother's
28:42
face on it and the White House as
28:45
she was pitching real estate business and
28:47
why you should move to the U.S.
28:49
because you could get a visa here
28:51
or the end of the Trump administration
28:54
while Trump was leading into January 6
28:56
when Jared was in the Middle East
28:58
with Steve Mnuchin raising money for their
29:00
next ventures. Is he laughing in our
29:02
face trying to say something like this?
29:06
I think it's even worse than him
29:08
laughing in our face, Steph. I think
29:11
he just assumes that everyone is
29:13
stupid and everyone isn't
29:15
paying attention. And if you
29:17
just pick through a number of
29:19
things, the arc of his own career
29:21
prior to being in the White House and then
29:23
what happened while he was in the White House, it
29:26
just knocks the foundations
29:28
out of this
29:30
ridiculous explanation he gives
29:32
for something that is nothing more
29:35
than influence peddling and raw financial
29:37
conflicts of interest. He
29:39
famously got into Harvard after his father
29:41
made a $2.5 million donation to Harvard.
29:45
He came out of Harvard fully
29:48
armed with consultancy and buzzwords
29:50
about business and being a
29:52
can-do young man, etc., etc.,
29:54
with again having very little
29:56
to show for it other
29:58
than his families. own
30:00
wealth is this enormous cushion that got
30:02
him launched into the world, which by
30:05
the way, is very similar to Donald
30:07
Trump's own trajectory. But here's the problem.
30:09
He buys the New York of... Yeah.
30:12
Here's the problem. He
30:14
is now a very rich man. Since
30:16
he left the Trump White House, he did
30:18
get $2 billion from MBS. So
30:21
we might be stupid. We are paying
30:24
attention, but we might actually be stupid.
30:26
Because if these conflicts of interest that
30:28
he clearly has are
30:30
not illegal, if they're
30:33
merely frowned upon, he's
30:35
going to keep on trucking and laugh his
30:37
way all the way to the bank, which
30:39
he has done over the last three years.
30:43
As did Trump. And the problem with this
30:45
is that we do not have... Even
30:49
if we are fully aware of what's going
30:51
on and it's deeply baked into our consciousness,
30:55
that all they are doing is
30:57
feathering their wallet based on White
30:59
House access or the ability to
31:01
shape national policy. The reason it
31:03
goes on is because the executive
31:05
branch in the US government is
31:07
not subject to a rigorous slate
31:09
of conflict of interest rules, as
31:11
many other parts of the government
31:13
are. By the way, the
31:15
Supreme Court is exempt from a lot of these
31:18
rules and we've seen the problems that emerge there.
31:20
That's one of the lessons we've learned from
31:22
the Trump era in a
31:24
number of ways, is that we don't
31:26
have the structures around this office to
31:29
rein in this kind of behavior. We've seen
31:31
it. We just have to address
31:33
it. Congress needs to address it and
31:36
the regulatory structure needs to address it.
31:39
And until we do, they're going to
31:41
keep doing this. I think what is
31:43
the most aggravating about Jared Kushner is
31:45
this tabulum that comes out of his
31:48
mouth to explain it. In the Time
31:50
Story today, where he acknowledges that the
31:53
business interests he's enjoying now came directly
31:56
out of his experience in the White
31:58
House, he simply, yeah. He's presenting
32:00
it as if it's anodyne and it's just
32:02
a fact of existence, when in fact it's
32:05
a grotesque problem. It's
32:07
a grotesque problem that our current government
32:09
has done almost nothing to solve for.
32:12
During the Trump administration, when we saw all
32:14
of this grotesque business, you and I talked
32:16
about it all the time, right? The
32:19
Biden administration and Democrats said, we need
32:21
to get this man out of the
32:23
White House because we need to change
32:25
the rules so this never happens again.
32:27
The rules were vague because there was
32:29
never someone in office like a Donald
32:31
Trump who would abuse power the way
32:33
he did. Well, he lost and
32:35
then none of the rules were changed. And
32:40
on top of it, we don't call this for
32:42
what it is. It's not an investment by the
32:45
Saudis, it's a bribe. They're
32:47
giving an untested person who has
32:49
absolutely no track record as an
32:52
investor a lush mountain
32:54
of money that he's allowed to
32:56
glean huge fees from. And the only
32:58
reason he's getting that money is his
33:00
proximity to a past president who
33:03
may be a future president. And
33:05
it's a hedge by foreign governments that
33:07
they can influence policy through Jared Kushner.
33:10
Even if we call it what it
33:12
is, guess what? Jared can
33:14
just turn the news off. He can throw
33:16
the newspaper out. There
33:19
are no consequences for this
33:21
behavior. So
33:24
where are the fools here? Well,
33:27
I mean, I think the entire Trump era
33:29
though, Steph, is a lesson in why we
33:31
have to quickly and robustly
33:33
change these rules. And that's not going
33:35
to happen until you get a change
33:37
of a controlling Congress and
33:40
you get people that actually look at
33:42
everything that's happened in the Trump administration
33:44
and every single loophole that he and
33:46
his family members have walked through, including
33:49
Jared Kushner and his former Treasury Secretary,
33:51
Steve Mnuchin. Both of them
33:53
are reaping business out of their proximity to
33:55
the White House. Well, here's what I can
33:57
tell you, Tim. At this very moment... A
34:00
current sitting member of Congress just said to me,
34:03
in my remaining time in Congress,
34:05
I am rolling out big bipartisan
34:07
legislation on influence peddling that would
34:09
address this very thing. So guess
34:11
what? Congress is watching, maybe they're
34:13
listening, maybe something will get done,
34:15
my friend. Thank you so much
34:17
for joining us. Thanks, Steph. When
34:20
we come back, a
34:22
very, very serious conversation. Losing
34:24
a child is never, it's not
34:27
just not easy, it's your
34:29
worst nightmare. Our
34:32
very special next guest opens up after
34:34
the most tragic loss of his daughter. He
34:37
talks about the memories and the grief left
34:39
behind, and a new
34:41
four-legged friend, an unexpected one. We're
34:43
gonna bring a friend to the show when we come back. You
34:49
can start your day off right when
34:52
you find a professional on Angie to get
34:54
your plumbing right first. Connect
34:57
with skilled professionals to get all your
35:00
home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You
35:02
can do this when you Angie that.
35:05
You know David Frum from his political analysis
35:08
in the Atlantic and on this network, but
35:10
right now, he's what
35:12
no one should ever, ever be. A
35:14
grieving father. In February, his
35:17
beautiful daughter, Amanda, excuse me,
35:19
Miranda died suddenly, leaving him,
35:21
as he puts it, with grief, memories,
35:24
and her beloved, Ringo, loyal
35:27
Cavalier King Charles Spaniel. And
35:30
David has written some extraordinary words
35:33
about this devastating time, and
35:35
I'm honored to have him join us right now. David
35:39
is a staff writer for the Atlantic and
35:41
former speech writer for President George W. Bush.
35:44
David, I am so terribly sorry
35:47
for your loss. It's extraordinary to
35:49
me that in this time, you
35:52
decided to share your grief, to
35:54
write about your Miranda with the world.
35:57
Tell us about her and why you've...
36:00
This path. it's amazing. Well.
36:04
I'm I couldn't not. I'm
36:07
about. To his you weeks
36:09
after Miranda died. I woke
36:11
up at four in the morning. I wake up at four in
36:13
the morning. Just what. Every morning the stairs and I had this
36:15
idea in my head about. To write about
36:17
my relationship with her dog Gringo from
36:20
my wife and your own I bought
36:22
for her and twenty eighteen and with
36:24
now inherited and and live with and
36:26
Ringo is I'm a challenging towns beast
36:28
on he's very small essentially what ten
36:30
inches high but he as a will
36:32
alliance and it was a way to
36:34
talk about something. In.
36:36
A way that was trying to be more
36:38
universal I mean is a very personal loss.
36:40
Is a world full of losses. No one
36:42
person's can command the attention of the planets.
36:45
But if you can make your store universal
36:47
and it is, it takes me with as
36:49
big as small as a Cavalier King Charles
36:51
Spaniel than people can absorb it. Share it
36:53
and and maybe the.something and then that. You
36:55
also feel. The
36:57
same way that most mornings now at four
36:59
am. What? Happens an.
37:03
Arm you have a lot of. With
37:06
his last second guessing I'm Miranda was
37:08
diagnosed with a brain tumor and twenty
37:10
attempts and ah the tumor. It was
37:12
very complicated and dangerous tumor. It was
37:15
operated on and the operation seem to
37:17
great success on but it left behind
37:19
a lot of damage to our immune
37:22
systems and she had to take very
37:24
special very delicate care of herself and
37:26
she was someone who advice and she
37:28
was a fashion model. see where I
37:31
went to War zone sashimi she was
37:33
a writer. Seats and she's a risk taker.
37:35
Arms you someone who's a convivial person. She
37:37
didn't want to live like an invalid and
37:39
so I'm couldn't. Do It. She
37:41
moved to Palm Springs and with on beaches for
37:44
the rest of her life. Maybe things could have
37:46
been a little different at least on that day.
37:48
As lesser you wake up at four in the
37:50
morning with his his regret might have been friends.
37:52
I think recovery com experience with people have lost
37:55
somebody. What if you could travel back in time
37:57
and change one thing? Could you make things different?
38:00
And those aren't rational thoughts, but those are the thoughts that crowd
38:02
the brain at four in the morning. Regina
38:04
King lost her son two years
38:06
ago, and she recently described grief
38:09
as love with nowhere to go.
38:12
Is that how you feel? Yeah, it's very
38:16
nice. That is very nice. And
38:19
I would put it another way, it's grief that perseveres,
38:22
grief that doesn't give up. And
38:25
I'm sorry, love that doesn't give up, love
38:27
that perseveres, and love that maybe won't take
38:29
no for an answer, because you
38:32
don't get a reverberation back. I
38:35
think, but it has
38:37
somewhere to go, and I think that's why I
38:40
told the story of this little dog, is
38:43
that love has
38:45
to go somewhere. You can't just put it
38:47
in the ground. You
38:49
can't just spend your life suffering,
38:51
although you will suffer forever. You have
38:54
to find some way to take the
38:56
love that you felt for someone and
38:58
direct it, make things beautiful, care for
39:00
things, care for things that were important
39:02
to her. And nothing was more important
39:04
to her than this difficult, barking dog.
39:07
You could describe him as
39:09
Miranda's last gift to
39:11
you. You said he was her
39:14
very best friend, but he basically
39:16
terrorized everyone else. What
39:19
is it like for you to now be with
39:21
Ringo day in and day out? Well,
39:25
our family joke was that Ringo would always
39:27
bark at me to do things for him.
39:29
And I said to Miranda, this dog
39:32
treats me like an
39:34
assistant. And she said,
39:36
don't flatter yourself. He's a Hollywood
39:38
dog. She lived in Los Angeles. You're not
39:40
his first assistant. You're his second assistant. You're
39:42
assistant number two. And that became my family
39:44
nickname. And so I'm
39:46
living through life as assistant number
39:48
two to this spaniel. What
39:51
I tried to do in the article, and
39:54
the reason it sort of seized me and wouldn't let
39:56
go, I wrote the first draft of the piece in
39:58
about five hours, was We've
40:01
been so surrounded by kindness and
40:04
I wanted to talk back to
40:06
people. One of the things I've heard from so
40:08
many people now who have been in these situations
40:10
and one of the things I'm really struck by
40:13
is how many people who have an intimate loss
40:15
like this describe afterwards a feeling of loneliness because
40:17
grief, if you're not the grieving person,
40:19
grief is very hard to deal with.
40:22
People are so frightened of saying the wrong things. They
40:24
say nothing. They make
40:27
the grieving person, they can treat them like
40:29
something of a pariah. We're very
40:31
thickly embedded in social networks of all kinds. We
40:33
have many good friends. I'm talking to
40:35
you on television. I will hear from people who will be kind
40:38
in almost every case. I think
40:40
of all the many, many people who are alone
40:42
in their grief and I try to give them
40:44
something back by giving them a language. Words
40:46
are my trade. It's not everybody's trade but words
40:48
are what we need. Words are all we have.
40:50
People say there are no words but if there
40:52
are no words, what is there? We have to
40:54
find some kind of word to say
40:57
some kind of something. David,
40:59
you're experiencing every
41:02
parent, every family member's
41:04
worst nightmare and
41:06
I keep thinking you then go back to
41:08
your day job which is
41:10
covering the brutal political cycle that
41:13
we are in. People
41:15
at their worst, attacking
41:17
one another, behaving in the pettiest
41:19
of ways. That
41:21
is our polarized nation right now.
41:24
How difficult is it for you to just
41:27
go back to work? Has your perspective
41:29
changed? What do you want people to
41:31
understand about what's important in this world?
41:35
Well, I haven't quite gone back because after I
41:38
finished this article about this dog, I sort of
41:40
fell silent. I mean, I find it very hard to
41:42
write about anything. I can talk to people. But you're
41:44
even reading the news. I can do a
41:48
little. Not as closely as I should. It's full
41:50
of surprises to me. You
41:53
feel like you're in a different room, in a baffled
41:55
room and that events come to you from a great
41:58
distance. The
42:00
way you pull yourself out of it, and I hope
42:03
I will pull myself out of it, is I remember
42:06
my daughter was a person of
42:08
great fierceness of belief. She had
42:10
strong beliefs, and there are things I know that
42:12
she would want me to stand up for. She
42:15
wasn't a super political person, but
42:17
she believed in the country, she believed in the
42:20
democratic ideal, she cared deeply about Israel
42:22
where she lived and nearly stayed. And
42:27
I know what she would want me to do, so I have to
42:29
find the strength to do that. She
42:31
did believe in dictators. She loved Ringo. David.
42:38
He's less of a dictator, more of a very
42:41
demanding client. Oh, I see. He's a
42:43
diva. David, thank you so, so much
42:45
for being here. Miranda is in our thoughts
42:47
tonight. And I'm so sorry for your loss.
42:49
We'll be right back. We
42:53
are all out of time, so no last thing
42:55
tonight. We get an extra special one
42:57
for you tomorrow, but for now, I
42:59
wish you a very good night. From
43:02
all of our colleagues across the networks of NBC News,
43:04
thanks for staying up late with me. I'll
43:06
see you at the
43:14
end of tonight.
43:17
You can start your day off right when
43:20
you find a professional on Angie to get
43:22
your plumbing right first. Connect
43:25
with skilled professionals to get all your
43:27
home projects done well. Visit angie.com. You
43:29
can do this when you Angie that.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More