Podchaser Logo
Home
OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

Released Tuesday, 16th May 2023
 1 person rated this episode
OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

OpenAI CEO to testify at Senate hearing

Tuesday, 16th May 2023
 1 person rated this episode
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

With Instacart, you can get groceries and

0:02

more delivered from over 1,000 stores and 75,000 locations. So

0:06

whether you need a massive haul from a wholesale club,

0:08

everyday essentials from your go-to supermarket,

0:10

or specialty items from your favorite local grocer,

0:13

you can get whatever you need delivered in as fast

0:15

as an hour. You can even shop for pet supplies,

0:17

electronics, and sporting goods in just a few

0:20

clicks. Visit Instacart.com to get free

0:22

delivery on your first three orders. Offer valid for

0:24

a limited time. $10 minimum per order. Additional

0:26

terms apply.

0:28

Tonight, the important days

0:31

ahead in Washington tied to our nation's debt. President

0:34

Biden set to sit down with Speaker McCarthy

0:36

tomorrow as the threat of default

0:39

still hangs in the balance. And Republicans

0:41

continue their investigation into President Biden's

0:43

family. They just need

0:45

to track down their key informant first.

0:48

Then a preview of tomorrow's hearing

0:50

on artificial intelligence. Is Congress

0:52

prepared to regulate this technology

0:55

as the 11th hour gets underway on this

0:57

Monday night?

1:03

Good evening. Once again, I'm Stephanie

1:05

Ruhle. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen

1:07

is sounding the alarm yet again. In

1:10

a letter to the Speaker and top lawmakers,

1:13

she wrote the United States could run out

1:15

of money to pay its bills, quote, if

1:17

Congress has not acted to raise or suspend

1:20

the debt limit by early June and potentially

1:23

as early as June 1st. That means

1:25

Congress has less than three weeks to act

1:27

or risk an unprecedented debt

1:29

default. And Congress, they're only in

1:31

session a fraction of

1:33

those three weeks. Tomorrow, President

1:35

Biden, Speaker McCarthy and congressional

1:37

leaders will hold their second official

1:39

meeting to try to reach an agreement and

1:42

keep our economy from going off the cliff. Teams

1:44

from both the White House and Congress worked throughout

1:47

the weekend on a potential deal. But

1:49

the president and speaker still don't seem

1:51

to be on the same page.

1:54

We just had our secretary say June

1:56

1st we could run out of money. We only

1:59

have so many days. left. So no,

2:01

I don't think we're in a good place. I know we're

2:03

not. I remain optimistic because I'm a

2:05

congenital optimist, but I really

2:08

think there's a desire on their part as well

2:10

as ours to reach agreement. I

2:12

think we'll be able to do it.

2:14

Now for facts eight, let's get some

2:16

context here. Under Donald Trump,

2:18

Congress raised the debt limit twice in 2017

2:21

and 2018. Also tonight, we are keeping an eye on the investigation

2:24

into an attack at

2:29

Virginia Congressman Jerry Connolly's office.

2:31

Police say a man with a metal baseball

2:34

bat entered his district office and

2:36

beat two of his staffers. Both were

2:38

hospitalized and later released, but

2:40

police also say the attacker was looking

2:43

for the congressman. Earlier tonight, he

2:45

spoke about the attack.

2:46

One

2:48

of the staffers who was injured,

2:51

she's an intern and

2:54

today was her first day. So

2:56

imagine your first day in the offices

2:59

that comes in with a baseball bat and beat you. I

3:01

was really mobbed

3:03

on the floor by Republicans and Democrats who

3:06

easily related

3:06

what happened to me today. We don't have the kind

3:08

of security we have up here in the Capitol at

3:11

the district level. Many of our offices

3:13

are in malls or office

3:15

buildings. And so you

3:18

don't have any kind of sophisticated protection

3:22

or security screen. And so

3:25

I think we're going to have to really

3:28

talk about that as Republicans and Democrats up here.

3:31

What are we prepared to

3:32

do and how do we need such a broad challenge?

3:36

Broad challenge indeed. NBC's Ryan Nobles

3:38

has more on the rise in threats to lawmakers

3:41

across Capitol Hill.

3:43

According to Capitol Police, threats against

3:46

members have skyrocketed from just

3:48

over 4,000 in 2017 to almost 10,000 in 2021, the same year as

3:54

the January 6th attack.

3:56

But it's been more than just threats. Within

3:58

just the last year, The husband of House

4:01

Speaker Nancy Pelosi was violently

4:03

attacked at their family home in San Francisco.

4:06

Going back further, in 2017, a

4:08

group of GOP members were targeted by a

4:11

gunman while practicing for the congressional baseball

4:13

game. And in 2011, former Congresswoman

4:15

Gabby Giffords suffered a mass shooting

4:18

that killed several of her staff members.

4:22

With that, let's get smarter with the

4:24

help of our lead-off panel this evening. Peter Baker,

4:26

Chief White House Correspondent for The New York Times. Leanne

4:29

Caldwell, an anchor for Washington Post Live

4:31

and co-author of its morning newsletter, The

4:33

Early 202, and former federal

4:35

prosecutor Glenn Kirschner. Welcome

4:38

to you all. We have got a lot to get to. Peter,

4:41

I want to start with the president because he's supposed

4:43

to leave for the G7 summit on Wednesday.

4:46

Do you think we're going to see any real movement on the

4:48

debt limit before he goes?

4:51

Well, no, a little bit better at four o'clock tomorrow.

4:53

That's of course when he sits down with Kevin McCarthy and the

4:55

other congressional leaders at the White House. And

4:58

I think that, I may have the time wrong, I think, to say

5:00

that, but I think it's in the afternoon. And

5:03

we're going to find out whether they, from

5:05

the mood of music, right? You're not going to have a deal tomorrow.

5:07

I wouldn't expect, nobody should expect there to be a final

5:09

deal three weeks before a deadline. That doesn't happen

5:11

in Washington, but you will see, I think, the

5:14

sense of movement or progress or lack

5:16

thereof, right? We'll see what Kevin McCarthy says

5:18

when he walks out of the White House afterwards

5:20

on the White House driveway, as we did

5:22

last week, when he made very clear that he felt

5:24

he was far apart from President Biden.

5:27

The difference is in tone in the last couple of days.

5:29

Very interesting, very striking. It was fascinating to

5:31

watch the President of the United States give credit to

5:33

Kevin McCarthy for being genuine in his desire

5:35

to reach a deal even as Kevin McCarthy says, we're nowhere near

5:38

one. But this is all part of the kabuki dance

5:40

until you get to the final stage where you really have

5:42

to push through to the final deal

5:44

where you actually write down things on paper, make

5:47

an agreement to do it.

5:48

Leon, if they don't make significant

5:51

progress tomorrow, is there any possibility

5:53

that the President will postpone or

5:56

not go on the trip? I mean, G7

5:58

is obviously super important.

5:59

he's added a stop

6:02

off in Papua New Guinea on the way, really

6:04

interesting, but not nearly

6:06

as interesting or as urgent

6:09

or with all the

6:11

potential downsides if we go into

6:13

default. Yeah, that's

6:15

right. So, Steph, the White House is saying that

6:17

the president intends to still take his trip,

6:20

but I will say House Republicans

6:23

are pressing the president that maybe he shouldn't

6:25

go. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy

6:28

was asked that question tonight, and

6:31

McCarthy said, well, he thinks

6:33

that American presidents should focus

6:35

on American solutions and

6:37

implying that he should perhaps stay

6:40

in town to talk about this

6:42

debt limit. Now, as far as

6:44

the

6:44

status of the negotiations go,

6:47

you

6:47

know, we're kind of at this very familiar

6:50

phase where talks go between the

6:52

White House and congressional leaders

6:54

or between the parties on these big deals.

6:57

You're at the phase where people are just really

6:59

far apart. They're talking about what

7:02

needs to be discussed and trying to get closer

7:04

and closer together. And the problem

7:07

now is this is a normal

7:09

process, but it's a process

7:11

on an expedited timeline because

7:14

of this June 1st

7:17

date where the X date could

7:19

be realized and the United States could

7:21

run out of money to pay its bills. And

7:24

so that's really what the stressor

7:26

is here. People, I'm

7:28

told in the negotiations, are working

7:31

collaboratively and they are doing their

7:34

job, but there are just no breakthroughs

7:36

and there's just no time stuff. All

7:38

right, Glenn, new topic that we need you

7:41

to explain for us. I want to take it slow.

7:44

Special counsel John Durham is now

7:46

slamming the FBI

7:47

over their investigation back

7:51

in 2016 over Trump's campaign and

7:53

its ties to Russia. What do we need to

7:55

know about this whole thing?

7:58

Yeah, when I was reading through it, as much

8:00

of the mega report as I've managed

8:02

to get through, Steph, having worked

8:05

RICO cases and gang investigations

8:07

with the FBI, I was a little

8:09

miffed. It was a little off-putting to see

8:12

a guy like John Durham, who was

8:14

assigned to investigate the investigators,

8:17

which I find problematic.

8:19

If I were assigned an investigation

8:22

as a federal prosecutor, and I diligently

8:24

went about discharging my duties

8:27

only to have somebody swoop in later

8:30

and dislike my conclusion and

8:32

start investigating me, that

8:35

is corrosive to a law enforcement

8:37

institution. But then when I read John

8:39

Durham sort of throwing these criticism

8:42

bombs at the FBI, saying things

8:44

like, and I quote, the FBI's

8:46

work was seriously deficient,

8:49

and the FBI showed, quote, a

8:51

lack of analytical rigor.

8:53

These are some of his conclusions. Mind

8:55

you, Steph, this is a special counsel,

8:58

a federal prosecutor, who spent

9:01

four years and more than $6 million

9:04

of taxpayer money. He decided

9:06

his analysis resulted

9:09

in two prosecutions he thought

9:11

should be brought, and he failed

9:14

spectacularly with across

9:16

the board acquittals, not guilty

9:18

verdicts in both. And as if that's

9:20

not bad enough, one of the jurors

9:22

was interviewed after one of the prosecutions

9:25

and said, and I quote, our time

9:27

could have been better spent, Steph.

9:30

I think that says a lot more about

9:33

John Durham's lack of analytical

9:36

rigor than it says about

9:38

the FBI.

9:39

Peter, the results of an investigation

9:42

in a perfect world should not

9:45

come out with a Republican result

9:47

or a Democratic result. It should just come

9:49

out with the truth. But

9:51

we know that Republicans are interpreting

9:54

this report very differently than

9:57

what Glenn just explained. So tell us their

9:59

take.

10:00

Yeah, their take is, look, this proves,

10:02

at least Trump's take is, this proves that the FBI

10:05

was out to get them all along, that they were willing to cut

10:07

corners, that they were politically biased or at least,

10:10

you know, manipulated by political actors,

10:12

meaning, of course, the Clinton Democrats, and

10:15

that President Trump was unfairly prosecuted.

10:18

Now, what's really interesting is that, of course,

10:21

when Mueller's report came out and

10:23

didn't include any criminal charges

10:25

against the president, even though it had a lot of

10:27

criticism of the way he had handled things,

10:30

the president said, well, this is complete exoneration. What

10:32

John Durham, of course, just put out is a report that's critical

10:34

of the way the FBI handled things, but with no charges, as

10:36

Glenn Kirshner said, the other charges that had been

10:39

brought previously were

10:41

found wanting by a jury. So

10:43

this report, even though it has no, you know, allegations

10:46

of criminal misconduct by the people who were

10:48

investigated, is portrayed

10:50

by the Trump team, of course, as a, you know, big

10:54

time criticism and condemnation

10:57

of the FBI. So it all depends on how your political

11:00

stance is. What's important is, look, you know,

11:02

this investigation, you know,

11:05

went forward and it was part of Bill

11:07

Barr's effort to discredit the

11:10

original investigation, which he felt was flawed

11:12

to begin with. That was the mandate going in. John

11:14

Durham found no

11:16

credible, prosecutable case

11:18

against anybody of any real consequence. And

11:21

so he's managed to give his professional opinion. He's

11:24

a longtime prosecutor. He can give his opinion about

11:26

how he thinks that things were handled, but he didn't

11:28

charge any misconduct.

11:30

Glenn, new legal topic, same

11:33

former president, Georgia. Fulton

11:35

County DA is pushing back against Trump's

11:37

efforts to derail her investigation into

11:40

the 2020 election interference. What's going

11:42

on there?

11:43

So I would urge everybody to read

11:46

at least the first two pages of

11:48

District Attorney Fawny Willis's court filing

11:50

today because it's a 22 page scorched

11:53

earth refutation of everything

11:56

Donald Trump's criminal defense attorneys

11:58

tried to do. down in Georgia.

12:01

You know they filed a remarkable document

12:03

back in March. They fashioned it a motion

12:06

to quash fancy word. Which

12:09

means a motion to throw out

12:11

the grand jury's report that

12:13

we suspect recommended a whole

12:16

bunch of indictments we don't know that yet

12:18

but that's what the reporting is and that's what

12:20

the grand jurors themselves were

12:22

saying when they were permitted to give interviews.

12:24

Trump's team said we want

12:27

Judge McBurney to quash or throw out

12:29

the grand jury report. We wanted expunged

12:32

not really a thing when it comes to

12:34

grand jury reports will set that aside.

12:37

Want they wanted McBurney to suppress

12:39

all evidence for all time against

12:41

Donald Trump. Wanted the judge to

12:44

kick off. The Fulton County

12:46

district attorney's office from all

12:48

investigations and prosecutions of Donald

12:51

Trump and wanted Judge McBurney

12:53

to kick himself. Off the case

12:55

remarkable asks well in 22 pages

12:59

district attorney Fawny Willis just said

13:01

essentially all of their claims

13:04

are unsupported in both

13:06

fact

13:06

and law and they should all be rejected

13:09

without the court even calling

13:11

for a hearing in the case and

13:13

I suspect

13:14

that is what Judge McBurney will do.

13:17

We'll soon find out land. Let's

13:19

turn to this attack on Congressman Connolly's

13:21

office this is only the most recent

13:24

example of lawmakers their staff

13:26

members of their families being targets

13:29

of violence it's happening across the country.

13:31

Is there any push to increase security

13:34

for these lawmakers not just when they're in

13:36

D.C. on the hill.

13:38

So there has been

13:40

a push to increase security for lawmakers

13:42

they got additional funding over the past

13:44

two years after the January six attack

13:47

on the Capitol and after there is a major increase

13:50

and threats against members of Congress.

13:53

And then after Speaker Pelosi's husband

13:56

then Speaker Pelosi's husband was attacked

13:59

in their

13:59

there was again another

14:02

push to do even more.

14:05

These are questions that are gonna come up in

14:08

appropriations bills and funding

14:10

bills. But I will say that there's

14:12

a long running concern among

14:15

members of Congress who many of them have

14:17

been attacked even Steve Scalise

14:20

and a whole, the Republican leader and

14:23

the Republican members of the baseball

14:25

team a few years ago were shot

14:28

at. And so this is something

14:30

that is increasing

14:33

each year. And it is,

14:35

I'm told by members of Congress really

14:38

having a chilling effect on

14:40

people trying to convince new

14:42

people to run for Congress, to run

14:45

for office. A lot of people are saying

14:47

that the risk is just not worth

14:49

it, not only to themselves, but to their families

14:51

as well, Steph. Peter, let's

14:54

head to North Carolina because their Republican

14:56

governor Roy Cooper was on our

14:58

air earlier today talking about abortion

15:00

bans in 2024 and said

15:02

some surprising stuff, watch this.

15:05

One thing we know is that

15:08

women's healthcare is under assault.

15:11

We know that there

15:13

are Republicans across the

15:15

country who want to turn back the

15:18

clock 50 years. Elections

15:20

matter,

15:21

democratic governors matter,

15:24

state legislatures matter

15:27

and I believe you're gonna see a lot of

15:29

people get engaged not only

15:32

in North Carolina, but across the country.

15:36

Roy Cooper is a Democrat, but when

15:38

you think about a state like North Carolina, when

15:40

you think about the deep South, you

15:43

wonder which direction are things going

15:45

in. That governor vetoed a 12 week

15:48

abortion ban that was passed by

15:50

the GOP state legislature. But

15:52

the thing is those Republican lawmakers

15:55

could override his veto. So it

15:57

doesn't really matter the position he's taking. What

15:59

should we do?

15:59

be watching for?

16:02

Well, in his case, it's a fascinating circumstance because

16:04

he only has to convince one Republican

16:06

who voted for this ban

16:08

to change sides in order to uphold his

16:10

veto. So it's possible he could do that.

16:13

That's obviously, you know, ask a lot

16:15

for somebody to switch sides. But the point is, it's very,

16:17

very close there. Comes down

16:19

to one vote. But you're right. He is speaking

16:21

to a larger issue. What Democrats have found

16:23

consistently since the Dobbs decision

16:26

is that if you put abortion on the ballot in

16:28

a direct way, particularly in a constitutional

16:31

amendment or a referendum kind of way, that

16:34

abortion rights have been supported by voters pretty

16:37

consistently, even in red states like Kansas.

16:39

And legislatures that have been trying to put these bans

16:42

on are a little nervous, actually, that

16:44

their efforts may backfire in the

16:46

polls next time. So you're seeing some nervous

16:49

on the part of Republicans who are not sure how far

16:51

they want to go on this. Democrats are

16:53

obviously on the offense. They think it's a winning issue for

16:55

them. We'll see how that

16:57

plays out in the months to come.

16:59

We sure will. Peter Baker, Leanne Caldwell,

17:01

Glenn Kirshner, we had a lot to cover. You made us

17:03

smarter on every single topic. When

17:06

we come back, the chairman of the Oversight

17:08

Committee admits

17:10

Republicans have lost track

17:13

of the key informant in their

17:15

investigation into President Biden's family.

17:17

Former Congressman Max Rose and Tim Miller

17:20

are here on that. And later, the

17:22

CEO of ChatGPT is

17:24

set to testify before Congress

17:27

as lawmakers race to catch up

17:29

with AI. Good luck with that. Jake

17:31

Ward will break down what to expect. The 11th

17:33

hour just getting underway on a Monday night.

17:39

Did you know Instacart delivers more

17:41

than groceries? You can get tech, beauty,

17:43

office supplies, sporting goods and more all

17:46

delivered right to your door in as fast as an hour.

17:48

So whether you're cooking dinner or your phone

17:50

charger is cooked, you can save yourself multiple

17:53

trips by shopping over 1,000 stores in

17:55

the Instacart app. Visit Instacart.com

17:57

to get free delivery on your first three orders.

17:59

offer values for a limited time. $10 minimum

18:02

per order. Additional terms apply.

18:05

You can live out your MasterChef dreams. When

18:08

you find a professional on Angie to tackle

18:10

your dream kitchen remodel, connect

18:13

with skilled professionals to get all your home projects

18:16

done well. Visit Angie.com. You

18:18

can do this when you Angie that.

18:24

As Washington prepares for critical

18:26

debt ceiling talks, the House Oversight Committee

18:29

chair, Jim Comer, went on Fox

18:31

News this weekend, not to talk

18:33

about any of that, but instead to discuss

18:36

his investigation into members of Joe

18:38

Biden's family. Here's how it went.

18:41

You have spoken with whistleblowers. You

18:43

have spoken, you also spoke with

18:46

an informant who gave you all of this information.

18:48

Where is that informant today? Where are these

18:50

whistleblowers?

18:53

Well, unfortunately, we can't

18:55

track down the informant. We're hopeful

18:57

that the informant is still there. The whistleblower

19:00

knows the informant. The whistleblower is very

19:02

credible.

19:03

Hold on a second, Congressman. Did

19:05

you just say that the

19:07

whistleblower or the informant is now

19:09

missing? Well,

19:13

we're hopeful that

19:15

we could find the informant. Now remember, these informants

19:18

are kind of in the spy business,

19:21

so they don't make a habit of

19:24

being seen a lot or being high profile

19:26

or anything like that.

19:28

Let's discuss with former

19:30

Democratic New York Congressman Max Rose

19:33

and Tim Miller, a contributor to the bulwark and former

19:35

communications director for Jeb Bush. Max,

19:38

when you've got Maria Bartiromo

19:41

giving you a say what, you

19:44

got a problem. What is going on here? That

19:46

was one of the craziest things I have ever seen.

19:49

You know, when you can't even track down

19:52

your informant, when you're best-

19:54

Well, he's in the spy business. Yeah,

19:56

when you're best possible. is

20:00

to somehow insinuate that your

20:02

informant has been disappeared or something

20:05

else, you know you really

20:07

aren't on strong footing. But

20:10

let's take a step back and look at the larger

20:12

picture here. The Republican Party during

20:15

the course of the previous election ran

20:17

for the most part, particularly when they were actually

20:20

electorally successful, they were running

20:22

on bread and butter, kitchen

20:25

table issues,

20:26

immigration, inflation. Exactly.

20:28

Then suddenly they

20:31

actually have an opportunity to at least in

20:33

the House show real legislation

20:36

and they're incapable of it because

20:38

they actually have no real solutions,

20:41

they're just capable of fear-mongering, so

20:43

then they go back and they say oh my god we don't

20:45

have any policy solutions, what the hell do

20:47

we do? And

20:48

they chase after ghosts, they

20:51

go after family members, they

20:53

try to actually build out political

20:55

issues where there are none because they want

20:57

to scare the hell out of people and distract

20:59

them from the fact that they actually can't solve

21:02

any of their real problems and

21:04

that was the source, the root, the foundation

21:08

of that incredibly embarrassing interview.

21:10

Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani

21:13

did not make Maria Bartiromo

21:15

raise an eyebrow but Jim Comer's

21:18

investigation and the missing informant

21:21

did.

21:22

What voters are they doing this for,

21:24

Tim? Is this investigation popular?

21:27

Are

21:29

you sure that Maria wasn't raising an eyebrow because

21:31

she was intrigued by the conspiracy?

21:34

She has easily caught up in these sorts of

21:36

things.

21:36

No, she gave him a hold

21:38

on. We have not heard that from her in quite some time.

21:42

That's true. Well, they're

21:44

doing this for the base voters and I have an article in

21:47

the morning, the bull war coming out about this, about

21:49

what Comer is doing as part of an old play

21:52

book that goes back to the Clintons and

21:54

Vince Foster that we saw with

21:56

the Seth Rich conspiracy, which

21:58

is implying that

23:57

when

24:00

he was kissing up to him. Sure. Reading the

24:02

build the wall. When he was reading a children's book

24:04

version of build the wall, when he had his kids

24:06

with little blacks building one. Yes.

24:08

You know that will never go away. So

24:11

here's the thing. Ron DeSantis

24:13

is fundamentally misreading the Republican

24:16

base. They want a fighter. That's

24:18

his version of attacking Donald Trump. Talking

24:21

about a culture of losing. So

24:23

afraid to even mention

24:25

the guy's name. It's embarrassing.

24:28

There's one thing that Ron DeSantis has done

24:30

well thus far in a presidential

24:33

campaign. He doesn't even yet have the courage to officially

24:35

announce. And that is to set

24:37

such low expectations

24:40

for himself that when he acts like a human

24:42

being for 30 seconds or more,

24:44

now the media praises, hey, he might

24:47

have a chance because he can have a normal

24:49

conversation. This is

24:51

the

24:52

incredibly embarrassing.

24:55

The only thing that was more embarrassing was Calmer's

24:57

interview that we just discussed.

24:58

Tim, I don't know if Max is right. We've seen

25:00

Ron DeSantis fight. He's been fighting with Mickey

25:03

Mouse for weeks, if not months at

25:05

this point. What is your take?

25:08

I'm not sure that Mickey Mouse fight is a winner.

25:10

But I think that he is close to

25:12

being close to onto something. Don't make me

25:15

defend Ron DeSantis stuff. But I

25:18

think his best elevator pitch against

25:20

Trump is not only did

25:22

I win in Florida while you lost,

25:25

but I got this stuff, this

25:27

really far right conservative stuff

25:29

done while you failed. You know, you

25:31

didn't build the wall. You didn't stand up to Fauci.

25:34

I did. Now, he hasn't had the

25:36

courage, to Max's point, to actually do that

25:38

to Trump's face yet. Maybe he's capable of that.

25:40

Maybe he's not left to see. But I think this is

25:43

like dipping that first toe into the pool

25:45

of the place that he has to go if he

25:47

wants to have a chance.

25:49

Before I let you go, we talk often about

25:51

the media. We talk about young voters. Vice

25:54

News announced this morning that they are filing

25:57

for bankruptcy. Tim, they were

25:59

the.

27:59

that think what we're finding here is

28:02

that it it's not just a new tool

28:04

right earn media really matters

28:06

the old tried and true stuff really

28:09

really matters for young voters

28:11

but what is also critical is there

28:13

i totally unplugged from

28:15

normal she'll modes

28:18

of t v and you've got to go direct

28:20

to them clearly with digital

28:22

direct to them clearly with other

28:24

forms of social but

28:26

always staying true to the fact

28:28

that in politics just like it's

28:30

always been if you're not for

28:32

real if you're not truthful if you're not

28:35

courageous

28:36

it doesn't matter how you to reach people

28:38

they're going to see right through it a sniffer now

28:41

max or is tim miller thank you both for being here

28:43

we come back congress is getting a

28:45

lesson in a i as

28:48

it i as possible regulations

28:50

and tomorrow the man behind chat

28:53

gvt is in

28:55

the hot seat for a see what

28:57

are these hearings ever result in what

28:59

to expect in the eleventh hour continues

29:10

congress may be gearing up to take

29:12

on artificial intelligence tomorrow

29:14

the maker of chat gp t open

29:16

a i c e o sam altman

29:18

will appear before senate panel

29:21

as number of points out they will turn to

29:23

altman to answer the all important question

29:26

what

29:26

is a i hear didn't discuss

29:28

it all nbc news tech correspondent jake

29:30

ward who has a documentary coming

29:32

out this week on

29:35

all things ai you do not want to miss

29:37

it on peacock joke what are you

29:39

looking for in this hearing because the

29:41

headline is so important they're bringing

29:43

in sort of that need man

29:45

behind charge gpc the guy who understands

29:47

all things ai but in my experience

29:50

these

29:50

hearings will result in anything you

29:54

are you know resume you heard right to bear the

29:56

histories with this kind of turkey ring

29:58

in the past and stuff I'm thinking about, you know, Orrin

30:01

Hatch asking Mark Zuckerberg, Mrs. Zuckerberg, how do

30:03

you make money? And him saying, you know, Senator, we

30:05

sell ads and the whole room busts out laughing.

30:08

You know, those sorts of grandfatherly moments. I

30:10

think we've moved beyond that. We certainly know we

30:12

have regulators like Lena Kahn, the

30:15

chairperson of the FTC, you know, saying

30:17

that we have the power to regulate

30:19

AI using the laws we have now. We have

30:21

a whole new generation of tech literate

30:24

staffers helping senators think this

30:26

stuff through. One of the big questions for

30:28

me, I hope that they will ask Sam

30:30

Altman tomorrow is why is it

30:33

that such a small, rarefied

30:35

number of companies are in charge of AI? Because

30:37

the illusion, Steph, right, is that there's a million

30:39

companies launching. It's a great equalizer,

30:41

this amazing neutral technology. That

30:44

is not true at the moment. Right now, it costs the

30:46

money that only the companies

30:48

like Google and Meta and Microsoft

30:50

have, Meta, which I mean Microsoft, which owns

30:53

OpenAI, only those companies can afford making

30:55

this thing right now. And everybody's basically borrowing

30:58

the large language models, the big foundational models

30:59

that they're creating. And so there's

31:02

that we have to get at, right? Are we really ready to trust

31:04

these companies again with a new transformative

31:06

thing, the way we trust them with search, we trust

31:09

them with social media? And then the second thing is, Mr.

31:11

Altman, what do you believe about the future?

31:13

Because when you get into the conversations he's had on things

31:15

like podcasts, it's pretty interesting

31:17

the vision that these guys tend to have

31:20

at the top of these companies for, you

31:22

know, just how huge

31:24

the societal effect will be, how pervasive

31:27

it will be, and how limited their experience

31:29

is in fighting things

31:29

like racist systems and

31:32

inequality. And so we're really talking

31:34

about, you know, the keys to the kingdom sliding

31:36

to these guys at a time when we really need

31:38

to be asking what they are going to do with those key

31:40

stuff.

31:41

And right now, they're self-regulating.

31:43

And if it doesn't work, and if there's massive

31:46

societal or economic damage,

31:49

these businesses can just tear

31:51

them up and move on and go to their

31:53

mega mansions in Hawaii. Is

31:56

the government prepared to do

31:58

something? Because as you said it...

32:00

There was research, there was social media, and

32:03

the government did nothing, and there's been disastrous

32:05

impacts.

32:09

Well, hopefully by now, senators have gotten

32:11

the message that that lack of regulation behind the

32:13

big search giants and the big social media giants

32:16

have created literally the fuel supply

32:18

for AI. That is why it's

32:21

no coincidence that a company like Meta, a company

32:23

like Google, a company like Microsoft have

32:25

these kinds of models being built. It's because they had this

32:28

unregulated collection of data from all

32:30

of us over the last 20 years. So hopefully they've learned

32:32

something about that. And then there is

32:34

the hope, the goal here,

32:37

that there's some sort

32:38

of understanding that this is going to go far

32:40

beyond just whether we have a job

32:42

in the future. It's going to go far beyond the grappling

32:45

that writers in Hollywood are having right now around,

32:47

will AI do my job in the future? It's going to go

32:49

to things like who gets a job, who

32:51

gets a loan, who gets bail. We

32:54

talked to a lawyer in Baltimore the other day who's regularly

32:57

representing clients, who've been wrongly denied government benefits

32:59

because government agencies are increasingly using off-the-shelf

33:03

AI systems to determine who gets SNAP

33:05

benefits, who gets Section 8 housing, and

33:07

when something goes wrong and a mistake is made, you can't get

33:09

anybody on the phone. I think those stories are starting

33:11

to trickle upstairs into the senators'

33:13

ears, and hopefully they're going to get on

33:16

board with the understanding that we have to regulate

33:18

this in some way in the way that we failed to regulate

33:20

social media and search.

33:22

Well then let's just say right there, hopefully is

33:24

a long shot because of how

33:26

we failed in social media and search.

33:29

However, the European Union is considering

33:31

AI legislation this week. Could

33:34

that provide a model for what we could

33:36

do here?

33:39

I personally think it does.

33:41

I mean, it divides AI into risk

33:44

levels. And what's interesting is that at the highest risk

33:46

levels, it's not just stuff like your medical data

33:49

and military stuff. It's also talking

33:51

about the truth. Are people using

33:53

it to manipulate public opinion? Then

33:56

that's an unacceptable risk level,

33:58

and that would be banned. That sort of thing is a...

33:59

big deal. And I will say, you know, the

34:02

EU is specifically not included

34:05

in the list of 180 countries where Google's

34:07

barred, the answer to chat GPT, is

34:09

being released. The EU is not on a

34:12

list. And so the fact that Google

34:14

recognizes, oh, we're not going to be entirely

34:16

in compliance with

34:18

the GDPR, the big privacy regulation

34:21

in Europe, means they take that seriously

34:23

and these companies don't like to make different products for different

34:26

companies, for different countries. So maybe the

34:28

fact that the EU is moving forward on this could

34:30

conceivably set a law on this. I mean, I will also

34:32

point out, Steph, we talk about, you hear a lot from tech

34:35

leaders that, you know, we're going to fall behind China if

34:37

we somehow regulate ourselves

34:39

out of competitiveness. But even China

34:42

a

34:42

month ago has regulations

34:43

that slap all kinds

34:45

of restrictions on companies, including

34:48

it makes companies liable for what Chinese

34:50

citizens or anybody does with

34:52

the AI built by that company. The fact that

34:54

they're doing that puts them way out in front

34:56

of us on regulation. So this argument that I think

34:58

you're going to hear from Sam Altman and others that somehow

35:01

regulation will slow us down and make us uncompetitive.

35:03

We are not seeing that in the world stage. It's certainly

35:06

not where the EU and China are concerned, Steph. All

35:08

right. Well, our audience right now, much like

35:10

our lawmakers, needs to get more educated

35:13

in the world of AI. And

35:15

thanks to you, they can. The documentary

35:17

will be airing 10.30 p.m.

35:19

on Peacock and YouTube. You don't want

35:21

to miss it. What's the name of it, Jake?

35:25

It's called the power of AI, both

35:27

the power of those companies and the power

35:29

that all of the people who are at the

35:31

tops of those companies are wheeled over

35:33

and over all of us, Steph.

35:35

Exciting, scary, all

35:37

courtesy of Jake Ward. Coming

35:39

up, my one on one with Chassen Buttigieg,

35:42

what he hopes young people can learn from

35:44

his story when the 11th hour continues.

35:53

Republican controlled state legislatures

35:56

are targeting LGBTQ plus

35:58

rights all over the country. According

36:01

to the ACLU, over 400

36:04

anti-LGBTQ bills have been

36:06

introduced just this year. I

36:08

sat down earlier today with Chasen Buttigieg,

36:10

the husband of Transportation Secretary Pete

36:13

Buttigieg, to talk about his new book,

36:15

I Have Something to Tell You, on the challenges

36:17

he faced growing up and how to support

36:20

LGBTQ youth today.

36:23

You are just back from

36:25

being in your hometown of Traverse

36:27

City, a place where it was not so

36:29

easy to grow up you.

36:31

What was it like to go home with

36:34

a book in your hand, a guide to help

36:36

young people just like you? I was

36:38

overwhelmed. I haven't felt nerves like that

36:41

since, you know, community theater plays, because

36:43

it mattered so much to go home and have

36:46

those kinds of conversations at home

36:48

and to meet the young people that were there.

36:51

How do you consider this book? If

36:53

it's not a memoir, it's for

36:55

young... is it a self-help book? I

36:58

think it's a little bit of everything. It's the book I

37:00

wish I would have had in eighth grade. When I was

37:02

growing up in northern Michigan at the time, I thought I was the only

37:04

gay person in the world. I thought something was wrong

37:06

with me. And this is the book that I wish

37:09

he could have read to

37:10

help him understand that there was nothing wrong with

37:12

him. And you know, he was

37:14

great just the way he was. We have come a long

37:17

way since then, but

37:19

the LGBTQ plus community is

37:21

clearly under attack today. Do

37:24

you think it's easier or harder to come

37:26

out in 2023? A

37:28

little bit of both. I think it was getting

37:30

better. I remember growing up and

37:32

everyone kept saying it gets better, it gets better. And it

37:35

did in some ways. Marriage equality didn't

37:37

exist. I never thought I would get to be a dad. But

37:39

because it was getting better, I think some people are now

37:41

focused on making it worse.

37:43

Why is that? Right? Things

37:45

were getting better and now they're worse. What caused

37:48

that? Well, it works

37:50

for the other side. They throw everything

37:52

at the wall. What sticks? Attacking the

37:55

LGBTQ community. Attack some of the most vulnerable kids

37:58

in this country. So imagine growing up in this country. now,

38:00

when you have social media, you have the world at your fingertips

38:02

and you watch people like your governor or

38:04

your representative going into buildings

38:07

in positions of power and doing everything

38:09

they can, all of that platform, all

38:11

of that privilege to attack you,

38:13

a young LGBTQ person. You're

38:16

their number one thing to work on.

38:18

Are you afraid that this book

38:20

could get banned or just

38:22

be inaccessible to young

38:24

people in some of those vulnerable conservative

38:27

communities, the people who maybe need to read this the most?

38:29

Yeah, I'm a dad and I taught

38:31

middle school. So I wrote a completely age

38:34

appropriate book. So if it's banned,

38:36

it's just politics. But I am worried about

38:38

it not being able to get into the hands of the people that need

38:40

it most. I hope folks will request

38:42

that their local library

38:44

carry it. So at least, you

38:46

know, a young person or a family might have

38:48

access to that.

38:50

But it's certainly something that I worry about.

38:52

What if that could change a life? What if it could help

38:54

somebody and they can't get it? I

38:56

want you to stay on the word help because to

38:58

me, this book isn't just for

39:01

kids who are just like you. It's

39:04

also for allies who just want to live

39:06

in a better world. Absolutely. I

39:08

hope teachers and parents will find comfort

39:11

in this book. And this is a season for active

39:13

allyship. That means doing more than posting

39:16

on social media. You have to get off the

39:18

couch and find a way to use your positions

39:20

of power or privilege or money or

39:22

time to help.

39:24

And helping can look like a

39:27

myriad of things for everyone.

39:29

But ask yourself, have I earned

39:31

the title of ally or

39:33

have I just given it to myself? If there

39:36

is one lesson, one anecdote, one story

39:38

in this book that

39:42

if you were an eighth grader, it would have meant

39:44

everything to you, what is it? I

39:47

could have benefited from a 10 second conversation

39:49

with my parents when I was younger. Ten seconds.

39:53

Who said what? Let me down and said, we just want you to know

39:55

that

39:55

you are loved no matter what unconditionally.

39:58

If you're gay, straight, no matter

40:00

what, you will always have a roof over your head

40:02

and you will always have two parents who love you. Imagine

40:05

if I could have heard that

40:07

and then poured myself into everything else that

40:09

young people should be paying attention to, sports,

40:11

academics, but for 18 years, I

40:14

hated myself because I was convinced that

40:16

my parents would hate me and then I would lose everything.

40:19

The number one thing I want young people to take away is

40:21

that there is goodness out here in

40:23

this world.

40:24

People do love you. People are fighting for you.

40:26

Parents sit down and

40:28

have that conversation. Right there. That

40:31

lesson is less to the eighth grader

40:34

and more to the parents, isn't it? It's not

40:36

that your parents didn't love you. They

40:38

obviously do. They were right by your side this

40:40

weekend. Yeah. They didn't

40:42

know to have that conversation. That's the ending

40:44

of that story. I ran away from home

40:46

and my parents called me back

40:48

and people can come around. People

40:51

can learn. People can be loving and accepting

40:53

and they can grow just like my parents.

40:55

And I just want to go back to where we started. To

40:58

go back this weekend and

41:00

be in your hometown, a place

41:03

where as a young person you couldn't find

41:06

your place. How incredible

41:08

does it feel that there's a community

41:11

there welcoming you, lining up to come see

41:13

you speak? The world comes around. I

41:15

promise my parents were there. Some

41:18

friends I made after high school, we weren't

41:20

friends in high school, but we became close friends. The

41:23

kindergarten teacher was there

41:27

to know that your community is there

41:30

and supports you, but especially for a place like

41:32

Northern Michigan that a

41:34

sold out crowd of people

41:37

wanted to have that conversation, wanted to

41:39

hear what you had to say because there are people in

41:41

Northern Michigan and places like Northern Michigan across

41:43

this country who want to make things

41:46

better. You might not see that on

41:48

the news every day,

41:49

but believe me, people come around.

41:52

Does that give you hope that any community, any

41:54

state, any city, any demographic can

41:56

change if they open their hearts and minds?

41:58

Absolutely. on the ground

42:00

doing the hard work. We just have to uplift

42:03

those voices more. Thank you.

42:05

Thank you so much for your time. Congratulations. Thanks

42:07

for having me.

42:10

Coming up, using your platform

42:13

to support others. The special shout

42:15

outs at this year's 34th annual

42:17

GLAAD Awards when the 11th hour continues.

42:22

Did you know Instacart delivers more

42:24

than groceries? You can get tech, beauty,

42:27

office supplies, sporting goods, and more all

42:29

delivered right to your door in as fast as an hour.

42:31

So whether you're cooking dinner or your phone

42:34

charger is cooked, you can save yourself multiple

42:36

trips by shopping over 1000 stores in

42:38

the Instacart app. Visit Instacart.com

42:41

to get free delivery on your first three orders. Offer

42:43

valid for a limited time. $10 minimum per

42:45

order. Additional terms apply.

42:48

You can start your day off right.

42:51

When you find a professional on Angie to get

42:53

your plumbing

42:54

right first. Connect

42:57

with skilled professionals to get all your home projects

42:59

done well. Visit Angie.com. You

43:01

can do this when you Angie that.

43:08

The last thing before we go tonight,

43:11

so GLAAD for GLAAD. The

43:13

Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation

43:16

is the world's largest LGBTQ

43:18

plus media advocacy organization.

43:21

What does that mean? They ensure important

43:23

stories from their community are seen

43:25

and heard. Well, on Saturday night, this

43:28

show, the 11th hour, is grateful

43:30

to have been honored to receive an award from

43:32

GLAAD for outstanding live TV

43:34

journalism segment or special for our

43:36

segment on Spirit Day. It's a

43:38

day in October when Americans wear purple

43:41

to show support for LGBTQ

43:43

youth and take a stand against bullying.

43:46

We highlighted some troubling statistics

43:48

about why this issue is so important

43:51

in an effort to make sure these young people

43:53

know they are not alone. Other outstanding

43:56

journalism awards went

43:58

to the following. The Scripps News. documentary

44:00

series in real life for their segment

44:03

on HIV in the Deep South. ABC

44:05

News for their Soul of a Nation special,

44:08

Pride to be Seen.

44:10

Time Magazine for their article on

44:12

pediatricians who serve trans youth

44:15

facing increasing harassment.

44:17

And the Daily Beast article, Alabama trying

44:19

to raise the legal driving age for trans

44:21

people to 19. President

44:24

and CEO of GLAAD, Sarah Kate Ellis took some time

44:26

to address the increase in laws

44:29

against the community. Watch this.

44:31

There's one thing that extremist

44:34

politicians and activists

44:36

can never ban.

44:38

And that's our joy. We

44:41

are not going to let them, anyone

44:43

tell our stories or villainize who

44:45

we are. When the truth

44:48

is everyone deserves to live a life

44:50

happily ever after. Yes.

44:53

So raise your voices.

45:00

So raise your voices, take

45:03

action with GLAAD, get loud

45:06

and stay proud. And

45:09

we are loud and proud to have the GLAAD

45:11

Awards take us off the air tonight. And

45:14

on that note, I wish you a very good night.

45:16

From all of our colleagues across the networks of NBC

45:18

News, thanks for staying up late. I'll

45:21

see you at the end of tomorrow.

45:27

You can live out your master chef dreams.

45:30

When you find a professional on Angie to tackle

45:33

your dream kitchen remodel, connect

45:36

with skilled professionals to get all your home projects

45:38

done well. Visit Angie.com. You

45:40

can do this

45:41

when you Angie that.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features