Podchaser Logo
Home
We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

Released Saturday, 11th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

We're Thinking About AI Adoption Completely Wrong

Saturday, 11th May 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:01

Today on the AI Daily Brief, we're looking

0:03

at a fascinating new study that shows that

0:05

knowledge workers are bringing AI to work

0:07

whether their bosses want them to or not. Before

0:10

that in our headline section, why Apple's

0:13

iPad ad controversy is actually about

0:15

AI anxiety. The AI

0:17

Daily Brief is a daily podcast that video about the

0:19

most important news and discussions in AI. To

0:21

join the discussion, check out the Discord link in the show notes. Welcome

0:25

back to the AI Daily Brief headline edition.

0:27

All the AI headline news you need in

0:29

around five minutes. Today my

0:31

friends is a very slow news day in the

0:33

world of AI. I mean crawling relative to what

0:35

we're used to. Cool thing about that

0:37

is it gives me a chance to go a little bit more

0:40

in depth on a story that I might not have had time

0:42

to that I think is actually really important. But before I get

0:44

into that, I also want to talk about why it's slow right

0:46

now. Matt Wolf, AI YouTuber,

0:48

podcast host, and entrepreneur had a

0:50

great tweet summarizing exactly what's going

0:52

on. TLDR, this is probably the

0:55

calm before the storm. Matt writes,

0:57

for anyone thinking that AI is slow

0:59

right now, keep in mind over the

1:01

next several weeks we have Google IO,

1:03

a rumored open AI product event, Microsoft

1:06

Build, Computex, Cisco Live, and Apple Worldwide

1:08

Developer Conference. These are the events where

1:10

the big announcements are made. Point being,

1:12

if it feels slow, don't worry, it's not gonna for

1:14

long. But because there's a little more

1:16

space, I want to talk about this Apple ad that

1:18

has caused so much controversy this week. If

1:21

you haven't seen it, basically the goal

1:23

of the ad is to show the

1:25

new ultra thin iPad as the recipient

1:27

and the natural inheritor of all human

1:29

creativity. The unfortunate choice they

1:31

made about how to demonstrate that

1:34

was they showed all of these

1:36

different tools of creativity, musical instruments,

1:38

synthesizers, record players, books, basically this

1:40

world of analog creative devices, all

1:43

smashed and crushed down to nothing with the end

1:45

result being of course the tiny little iPad. People

1:49

hated this ad. I

1:51

mean, this really hated it. They

1:53

talked about how angry Steve Jobs would have been

1:55

if he saw this. They talked about how it

1:58

broke Apple's legacy of actually being the computer. company

2:00

for creatives. But I think

2:02

a big part of the reason that the ad

2:04

struck such a nerve was not about Apple or

2:06

creativity in general. It's a very

2:09

specific AI anxiety. Alison

2:11

Morrow from CNN captures this in her piece

2:13

today, Welcome to the AI Dystopia No One

2:15

Asked For courtesy of Silicon Valley. Basically

2:18

the gist of the post is that one

2:20

of the central fears around AI hold aside

2:22

any far flung fears of AI x-risk and

2:25

robots taking over from humans and all that

2:27

sort of stuff. One of the much more

2:29

current and present fears is the destruction of

2:31

creative industries. It's AI

2:33

replacing illustrators, AI replacing writers,

2:36

AI replacing painters, AI replacing

2:38

musicians. This is palpable

2:40

in society right now. It's palpable in

2:42

lawsuits right now. In fact, if I

2:44

were a betting man, I'd bet that

2:46

a bigger portion of people who have

2:48

a negative feeling about AI have a

2:51

negative feeling about AI because of those

2:53

reasons, their concerns around how it impacts

2:55

human creative industries and human creative pursuits

2:57

than fears of Terminator style futures. Along

3:00

comes this Apple ad that

3:02

basically visualizes that exact point.

3:05

It obliterates the entire legacy

3:07

of human analog creativity and

3:09

says, look, here's a tiny

3:11

thin screen. The response was

3:13

so significant that Apple actually issued an

3:15

apology, which is not a normal thing

3:17

that Apple does. Indeed, the New

3:20

York Times writes, Apple doesn't make mistakes often

3:22

and seldom apologizes. But on Thursday, its head

3:24

of advertising said the company had aired in

3:26

making a new iPad commercial that showed an

3:28

industrial compressor flattening tools for art, music and

3:30

creativity. Tormiran, the company's vice president

3:32

of marketing communication, said, creativity is in our

3:34

DNA at Apple and it's incredibly important to

3:36

us to design products that empower creatives all

3:38

over the world. Our goal is always

3:41

to celebrate the myriad of ways users express themselves and

3:43

bring their ideas to life through iPad. We missed the

3:45

mark with this video and we're sorry. In

3:47

addition to the apology, they pulled all paid media spent

3:49

from the ad. It's no longer on TV. It's no

3:52

longer being promoted on the Internet. And

3:54

honestly, for me, the number of people involved

3:56

in making an ad like this is significantly

3:58

more than you might think. The fact

4:00

that none of them noticed that this

4:02

might cause this reaction shows a very

4:04

particular tone deafness that is unfortunately exactly

4:06

what Silicon Valley is being accused of

4:08

when it comes to this next generation

4:10

of AI and other technology, that's

4:13

pretty glaring. Meanwhile, case in

4:15

point, musical artist Cheryl Crow was also

4:17

in the news today, somewhat randomly, demanding

4:19

that lawmakers act now on AI. In

4:21

a column for the Hollywood Reporter, she

4:23

wrote, So

4:52

anyways, big miss for Apple this week. Although that wasn't the only

4:54

place they were in the news, Bloomberg is also reporting that Apple

4:56

is planning to power the development of its AI tools with in-house

4:58

server chips starting as early as this year. We've

5:21

been hearing rumors that the company has been designing

5:23

its own high-end chips for its data centers, and

5:25

it appears that that is happening sooner rather than

5:27

later. writes Bloomberg, Apple's

5:29

plan to use its own chips and process AI

5:31

tasks in the cloud was hatched about three years

5:34

ago, but the company accelerated the timeline after the

5:36

AI craze, fueled by OpenAI's chat GPT and Google's

5:38

Gemini, forced it to move more quickly. The

5:40

first AI server chips will be the M2 Ultra

5:42

Bloomberg writes, which was launched last year as part

5:44

of the Mac Pro and Mac Studio computers, though

5:46

the company is already eyeing future versions based on

5:48

the M4 chip. As we've said before,

5:51

it's going to be a steady drip of

5:53

leaks, I think, between here and WWDC. And

5:55

if you think you are anticipating what Apple's

5:57

going to say, it's Nothing compared to how much

5:59

the market is. What's the know? what Apple's going to

6:01

say? For. Now though, that is going to

6:03

do it for the Ai Daily brief headlines edition

6:05

of next the main episode. And

6:08

the listener of the show I have a

6:10

strong feeling you like to stay up to

6:13

date on all things artificial intelligence, including it's

6:15

impact on the workforce, which is why I

6:17

highly recommend checking out Managing the Future of

6:19

Work. The chart Topping Business Podcast from Harvard

6:22

Business School Hps Professors Bill Courage or Fuller

6:24

talk to business leaders, technologists and policy makers

6:26

grappling with the forces like A I, Globalization

6:29

and demographic shifts that are reshaping the nature

6:31

of work. Recent guess include: I B, M

6:33

C H, our own Nicola Moreau on how

6:35

Big Blue is adopting A I. Morningstar

6:37

C O qu now Kapoor on how he I

6:40

can raise the investment I to. Microsoft.

6:42

Corporate Vice President Your it's material on how

6:44

the tech giant is experimenting. It's way from

6:46

a I assistance to Autonomy Agents and many

6:48

other prominent movers in business and the workforce

6:51

ecosystem. so don't miss out. Follow managing the

6:53

future of work on Apple Podcasts, Spot a

6:55

Fight, or wherever you're listening now. Hello

6:59

Ai friends Today I want to

7:01

tell you about our platform. Super

7:03

intelligent. In short, it's a platform

7:05

for useful, practical, immediately up likable

7:07

ai learning. We. Have nearly four

7:09

hundred video tutorials each of which comes

7:11

with step by step how to use

7:13

and the idea is to get to

7:15

actually using these ai tools we talk

7:17

about everyday in a matter of minutes

7:19

to actually solve problems, create new opportunities,

7:21

and just do really cool things to

7:23

learn more and subscribe. Go to Be

7:25

Super.a I And if you do decide

7:27

to subscribe, use Code Podcast for fifty

7:29

percent off your first month again, it's

7:31

be Super.a I. Will

7:34

come back to the ideally brief one

7:36

of the big topics of conversation around

7:38

artificial. Intelligence right now. Is. If

7:40

and how it is actually useful in the

7:43

workplace. There. Has been this low grade

7:45

conversation constantly ever since the launch of

7:47

Chassis Be T that's basically out a sub

7:49

seem of well yeah, these things are cool,

7:51

but are they actually useful. Oftentimes.

7:54

the contra argument for why they're not

7:56

so useful and just typed up has

7:58

been low rates of adoption in a

8:01

top-down enterprise kind of way. You'll

8:03

often see statistics in the media around how

8:05

CXOs are slow walking a little bit their

8:07

adoption of AI because they're not sure where

8:09

the ROI is happening. Now

8:11

my argument has long been that all

8:14

of these things, all of

8:16

these studies, all of these surveys, all of

8:18

these statements are completely wrongheaded and totally missed

8:20

the mark of how AI adoption is actually

8:23

happening. I believe that AI is

8:25

not being adopted in a top-down sort of

8:27

way where like the cloud and IT manager

8:29

makes a decision about a tool and then

8:31

spreads it to everyone in the company. Instead,

8:33

I believe it's being adopted bottoms up. Individual

8:36

employees are experimenting with tools often in their

8:38

own time and certainly with their own email

8:40

addresses, figuring out what works for them, and

8:42

then slowly and sometimes sneakily bringing it into

8:44

the office, and mostly not telling people for

8:46

fear of being told that they're not allowed

8:48

to use it anymore. What's

8:50

more, I think that the impact of AI

8:53

is not about entire categories of jobs just

8:55

suddenly vanishing from the earth. Instead, I think

8:57

it's all about small but significant wins day

8:59

in, day out where employees either save time

9:01

or do better work in a way that

9:04

is at once tiny but in the aggregate

9:06

huge. In other words, think about it

9:08

like this. If you used to make

9:10

YouTube thumbnails manually and it took you 35 minutes and

9:12

now you make them with AI and it takes you

9:15

five minutes, let's imagine that you do that daily. Well

9:17

that's 30 minutes a day, that's two and a half

9:19

hours a week, that's 10 hours a month, that's 120

9:21

hours a year, which if you're thinking about an average

9:23

40-hour workweek is three weeks of time that you just

9:26

got back. And that's to say nothing

9:28

of potential quality improvements. So I'm

9:30

ranting of course, but this is because this has

9:32

seemed incredibly obvious to me when you actually interact

9:34

with anyone who's using AI at work. It's

9:37

everyone and they're not getting caught up on questions of

9:39

ROI, they're just figuring out how these tools are incredibly

9:41

useful right now and they don't want to give it

9:43

up. This is an enterprise

9:46

technology category that has consumer adoption

9:48

dynamics. Once you have used AI

9:50

to continue this example to make YouTube thumbnails, you

9:52

are absolutely never going back to the way that

9:54

you did it before. Well

9:56

now we have a study that has

9:58

finally started to put some some numbers

10:00

around this thesis. It's a

10:02

report from Microsoft and LinkedIn called the

10:05

2024 Work Trend Index. They

10:07

titled it AI at Work is Here, now

10:09

comes the hard part. Here is

10:11

the big banner headline. The way the Microsoft

10:13

sums it up, employees want AI

10:15

at work and won't wait for companies

10:18

to catch up. Specifically, 75%

10:20

of knowledge workers now use AI

10:22

at work. As we'll get

10:24

into in a minute, they report incredible value

10:26

around it being time saving, boosting their creativity,

10:28

allowing them to focus on their most important

10:30

work. Contrast that with the

10:33

top down boss led AI adoption.

10:35

On the one hand, 79% of leaders

10:37

agree that AI adoption is critical to remain

10:39

competitive, but 59% of them worry

10:42

about quantifying the productivity gains of AI. And

10:45

60% of them say their company lacks a vision or plan to

10:47

implement it. And so they're stuck and they

10:49

don't do anything, or maybe they do just some small

10:51

proof of concepts. The resulting phenomenon is

10:53

something that Microsoft and LinkedIn call BYOAI,

10:57

bring your own AI. In short, 78% of AI users

11:00

are bringing their own tools to work. That

11:03

means they're not using some tool that the enterprise

11:05

has set up for them, they're just using an

11:07

individual tool that works for them. Knowledge workers, in

11:09

other words, are voting with their feet and they're

11:11

saying we are not going to wait for you

11:13

to catch up. We are going to use these

11:15

tools right now. For employers, there

11:17

are huge problems with this. Some of them

11:19

are about the downside. There are real security

11:21

issues when it comes to company data if

11:23

it's being fed into commercial tools. However,

11:26

I think that the biggest miss here is

11:28

the miss on all the benefits that come

11:30

as this distributed network of employees is actually

11:32

figuring out what works. The Vanguard

11:34

kid in the marketing department could be sharing

11:37

what she learned with all the other folks

11:39

over in the accounting department, but instead all

11:41

of that knowledge is remaining trapped, stuck in

11:43

people's heads, not able to actually impact productivity

11:46

more broadly. And it's not just that these

11:48

employees are not really sharing this, it's that

11:50

they're actively avoiding talking about it. 52%

11:54

of people who are using AI at work are reluctant

11:56

to admit using it for their most important tasks. 53%

11:58

of people who use AI AI at work worry

12:01

that using it on important work tasks makes them

12:03

look replaceable. In other words,

12:05

we've created an entire generation of professional

12:07

AI smugglers. It's really

12:09

important to note that the people who

12:11

use these technologies really, really report incredible

12:14

benefits from them. 90%

12:16

of users say that AI helps them save time, 85%

12:18

say that it helps them focus on their most

12:21

important work, 84% say it helps them be more creative, and 83%

12:23

says it helps them enjoy

12:27

their work more. 83%

12:30

of these knowledge workers like

12:33

their jobs more because they're using

12:35

these AI tools. Compare

12:37

that with other studies which find that 68% of

12:39

people, for example, say they struggle with the pace

12:41

and volume of work. Nearly

12:43

half, 46% say they feel burned out.

12:46

It is insane to me that a

12:48

technology that is having such a big

12:51

impact on those challenges isn't being screamed

12:53

from the halls by every boss, manager,

12:55

director, and CEO. The

12:57

good news is I don't think that this is a state that's going

12:59

to last long. In our experience at

13:02

Superintelligent, a significant number of enterprise leaders

13:04

are coming around to the idea that

13:06

the right way to adopt AI is

13:08

in fact bottoms up, to empower their

13:10

employees to experiment, experiment safely,

13:12

but experiment, figure out what works, and

13:14

then share that with their colleagues. I

13:17

think once we break through and normalize this just

13:19

a little bit more, the floodgates are going to

13:21

come open with incredible benefits to follow. Anyways,

13:24

friends, slightly different type of AI Daily Brief

13:26

today. As we discussed in the headline section,

13:28

it's a slightly slow news day, I think because there is

13:30

so much in the way of big events and announcements coming

13:32

up in the next few weeks. But

13:34

I think that this one is really important. I think

13:36

that the study is shining light on something that doesn't

13:38

get talked about enough, and I'm glad it's now out.

13:41

For now, though, that is going to do it for today's AI

13:43

Daily Brief. Until next time, peace.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features