Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
Today on the AI Daily Brief, we're looking
0:03
at a fascinating new study that shows that
0:05
knowledge workers are bringing AI to work
0:07
whether their bosses want them to or not. Before
0:10
that in our headline section, why Apple's
0:13
iPad ad controversy is actually about
0:15
AI anxiety. The AI
0:17
Daily Brief is a daily podcast that video about the
0:19
most important news and discussions in AI. To
0:21
join the discussion, check out the Discord link in the show notes. Welcome
0:25
back to the AI Daily Brief headline edition.
0:27
All the AI headline news you need in
0:29
around five minutes. Today my
0:31
friends is a very slow news day in the
0:33
world of AI. I mean crawling relative to what
0:35
we're used to. Cool thing about that
0:37
is it gives me a chance to go a little bit more
0:40
in depth on a story that I might not have had time
0:42
to that I think is actually really important. But before I get
0:44
into that, I also want to talk about why it's slow right
0:46
now. Matt Wolf, AI YouTuber,
0:48
podcast host, and entrepreneur had a
0:50
great tweet summarizing exactly what's going
0:52
on. TLDR, this is probably the
0:55
calm before the storm. Matt writes,
0:57
for anyone thinking that AI is slow
0:59
right now, keep in mind over the
1:01
next several weeks we have Google IO,
1:03
a rumored open AI product event, Microsoft
1:06
Build, Computex, Cisco Live, and Apple Worldwide
1:08
Developer Conference. These are the events where
1:10
the big announcements are made. Point being,
1:12
if it feels slow, don't worry, it's not gonna for
1:14
long. But because there's a little more
1:16
space, I want to talk about this Apple ad that
1:18
has caused so much controversy this week. If
1:21
you haven't seen it, basically the goal
1:23
of the ad is to show the
1:25
new ultra thin iPad as the recipient
1:27
and the natural inheritor of all human
1:29
creativity. The unfortunate choice they
1:31
made about how to demonstrate that
1:34
was they showed all of these
1:36
different tools of creativity, musical instruments,
1:38
synthesizers, record players, books, basically this
1:40
world of analog creative devices, all
1:43
smashed and crushed down to nothing with the end
1:45
result being of course the tiny little iPad. People
1:49
hated this ad. I
1:51
mean, this really hated it. They
1:53
talked about how angry Steve Jobs would have been
1:55
if he saw this. They talked about how it
1:58
broke Apple's legacy of actually being the computer. company
2:00
for creatives. But I think
2:02
a big part of the reason that the ad
2:04
struck such a nerve was not about Apple or
2:06
creativity in general. It's a very
2:09
specific AI anxiety. Alison
2:11
Morrow from CNN captures this in her piece
2:13
today, Welcome to the AI Dystopia No One
2:15
Asked For courtesy of Silicon Valley. Basically
2:18
the gist of the post is that one
2:20
of the central fears around AI hold aside
2:22
any far flung fears of AI x-risk and
2:25
robots taking over from humans and all that
2:27
sort of stuff. One of the much more
2:29
current and present fears is the destruction of
2:31
creative industries. It's AI
2:33
replacing illustrators, AI replacing writers,
2:36
AI replacing painters, AI replacing
2:38
musicians. This is palpable
2:40
in society right now. It's palpable in
2:42
lawsuits right now. In fact, if I
2:44
were a betting man, I'd bet that
2:46
a bigger portion of people who have
2:48
a negative feeling about AI have a
2:51
negative feeling about AI because of those
2:53
reasons, their concerns around how it impacts
2:55
human creative industries and human creative pursuits
2:57
than fears of Terminator style futures. Along
3:00
comes this Apple ad that
3:02
basically visualizes that exact point.
3:05
It obliterates the entire legacy
3:07
of human analog creativity and
3:09
says, look, here's a tiny
3:11
thin screen. The response was
3:13
so significant that Apple actually issued an
3:15
apology, which is not a normal thing
3:17
that Apple does. Indeed, the New
3:20
York Times writes, Apple doesn't make mistakes often
3:22
and seldom apologizes. But on Thursday, its head
3:24
of advertising said the company had aired in
3:26
making a new iPad commercial that showed an
3:28
industrial compressor flattening tools for art, music and
3:30
creativity. Tormiran, the company's vice president
3:32
of marketing communication, said, creativity is in our
3:34
DNA at Apple and it's incredibly important to
3:36
us to design products that empower creatives all
3:38
over the world. Our goal is always
3:41
to celebrate the myriad of ways users express themselves and
3:43
bring their ideas to life through iPad. We missed the
3:45
mark with this video and we're sorry. In
3:47
addition to the apology, they pulled all paid media spent
3:49
from the ad. It's no longer on TV. It's no
3:52
longer being promoted on the Internet. And
3:54
honestly, for me, the number of people involved
3:56
in making an ad like this is significantly
3:58
more than you might think. The fact
4:00
that none of them noticed that this
4:02
might cause this reaction shows a very
4:04
particular tone deafness that is unfortunately exactly
4:06
what Silicon Valley is being accused of
4:08
when it comes to this next generation
4:10
of AI and other technology, that's
4:13
pretty glaring. Meanwhile, case in
4:15
point, musical artist Cheryl Crow was also
4:17
in the news today, somewhat randomly, demanding
4:19
that lawmakers act now on AI. In
4:21
a column for the Hollywood Reporter, she
4:23
wrote, So
4:52
anyways, big miss for Apple this week. Although that wasn't the only
4:54
place they were in the news, Bloomberg is also reporting that Apple
4:56
is planning to power the development of its AI tools with in-house
4:58
server chips starting as early as this year. We've
5:21
been hearing rumors that the company has been designing
5:23
its own high-end chips for its data centers, and
5:25
it appears that that is happening sooner rather than
5:27
later. writes Bloomberg, Apple's
5:29
plan to use its own chips and process AI
5:31
tasks in the cloud was hatched about three years
5:34
ago, but the company accelerated the timeline after the
5:36
AI craze, fueled by OpenAI's chat GPT and Google's
5:38
Gemini, forced it to move more quickly. The
5:40
first AI server chips will be the M2 Ultra
5:42
Bloomberg writes, which was launched last year as part
5:44
of the Mac Pro and Mac Studio computers, though
5:46
the company is already eyeing future versions based on
5:48
the M4 chip. As we've said before,
5:51
it's going to be a steady drip of
5:53
leaks, I think, between here and WWDC. And
5:55
if you think you are anticipating what Apple's
5:57
going to say, it's Nothing compared to how much
5:59
the market is. What's the know? what Apple's going to
6:01
say? For. Now though, that is going to
6:03
do it for the Ai Daily brief headlines edition
6:05
of next the main episode. And
6:08
the listener of the show I have a
6:10
strong feeling you like to stay up to
6:13
date on all things artificial intelligence, including it's
6:15
impact on the workforce, which is why I
6:17
highly recommend checking out Managing the Future of
6:19
Work. The chart Topping Business Podcast from Harvard
6:22
Business School Hps Professors Bill Courage or Fuller
6:24
talk to business leaders, technologists and policy makers
6:26
grappling with the forces like A I, Globalization
6:29
and demographic shifts that are reshaping the nature
6:31
of work. Recent guess include: I B, M
6:33
C H, our own Nicola Moreau on how
6:35
Big Blue is adopting A I. Morningstar
6:37
C O qu now Kapoor on how he I
6:40
can raise the investment I to. Microsoft.
6:42
Corporate Vice President Your it's material on how
6:44
the tech giant is experimenting. It's way from
6:46
a I assistance to Autonomy Agents and many
6:48
other prominent movers in business and the workforce
6:51
ecosystem. so don't miss out. Follow managing the
6:53
future of work on Apple Podcasts, Spot a
6:55
Fight, or wherever you're listening now. Hello
6:59
Ai friends Today I want to
7:01
tell you about our platform. Super
7:03
intelligent. In short, it's a platform
7:05
for useful, practical, immediately up likable
7:07
ai learning. We. Have nearly four
7:09
hundred video tutorials each of which comes
7:11
with step by step how to use
7:13
and the idea is to get to
7:15
actually using these ai tools we talk
7:17
about everyday in a matter of minutes
7:19
to actually solve problems, create new opportunities,
7:21
and just do really cool things to
7:23
learn more and subscribe. Go to Be
7:25
Super.a I And if you do decide
7:27
to subscribe, use Code Podcast for fifty
7:29
percent off your first month again, it's
7:31
be Super.a I. Will
7:34
come back to the ideally brief one
7:36
of the big topics of conversation around
7:38
artificial. Intelligence right now. Is. If
7:40
and how it is actually useful in the
7:43
workplace. There. Has been this low grade
7:45
conversation constantly ever since the launch of
7:47
Chassis Be T that's basically out a sub
7:49
seem of well yeah, these things are cool,
7:51
but are they actually useful. Oftentimes.
7:54
the contra argument for why they're not
7:56
so useful and just typed up has
7:58
been low rates of adoption in a
8:01
top-down enterprise kind of way. You'll
8:03
often see statistics in the media around how
8:05
CXOs are slow walking a little bit their
8:07
adoption of AI because they're not sure where
8:09
the ROI is happening. Now
8:11
my argument has long been that all
8:14
of these things, all of
8:16
these studies, all of these surveys, all of
8:18
these statements are completely wrongheaded and totally missed
8:20
the mark of how AI adoption is actually
8:23
happening. I believe that AI is
8:25
not being adopted in a top-down sort of
8:27
way where like the cloud and IT manager
8:29
makes a decision about a tool and then
8:31
spreads it to everyone in the company. Instead,
8:33
I believe it's being adopted bottoms up. Individual
8:36
employees are experimenting with tools often in their
8:38
own time and certainly with their own email
8:40
addresses, figuring out what works for them, and
8:42
then slowly and sometimes sneakily bringing it into
8:44
the office, and mostly not telling people for
8:46
fear of being told that they're not allowed
8:48
to use it anymore. What's
8:50
more, I think that the impact of AI
8:53
is not about entire categories of jobs just
8:55
suddenly vanishing from the earth. Instead, I think
8:57
it's all about small but significant wins day
8:59
in, day out where employees either save time
9:01
or do better work in a way that
9:04
is at once tiny but in the aggregate
9:06
huge. In other words, think about it
9:08
like this. If you used to make
9:10
YouTube thumbnails manually and it took you 35 minutes and
9:12
now you make them with AI and it takes you
9:15
five minutes, let's imagine that you do that daily. Well
9:17
that's 30 minutes a day, that's two and a half
9:19
hours a week, that's 10 hours a month, that's 120
9:21
hours a year, which if you're thinking about an average
9:23
40-hour workweek is three weeks of time that you just
9:26
got back. And that's to say nothing
9:28
of potential quality improvements. So I'm
9:30
ranting of course, but this is because this has
9:32
seemed incredibly obvious to me when you actually interact
9:34
with anyone who's using AI at work. It's
9:37
everyone and they're not getting caught up on questions of
9:39
ROI, they're just figuring out how these tools are incredibly
9:41
useful right now and they don't want to give it
9:43
up. This is an enterprise
9:46
technology category that has consumer adoption
9:48
dynamics. Once you have used AI
9:50
to continue this example to make YouTube thumbnails, you
9:52
are absolutely never going back to the way that
9:54
you did it before. Well
9:56
now we have a study that has
9:58
finally started to put some some numbers
10:00
around this thesis. It's a
10:02
report from Microsoft and LinkedIn called the
10:05
2024 Work Trend Index. They
10:07
titled it AI at Work is Here, now
10:09
comes the hard part. Here is
10:11
the big banner headline. The way the Microsoft
10:13
sums it up, employees want AI
10:15
at work and won't wait for companies
10:18
to catch up. Specifically, 75%
10:20
of knowledge workers now use AI
10:22
at work. As we'll get
10:24
into in a minute, they report incredible value
10:26
around it being time saving, boosting their creativity,
10:28
allowing them to focus on their most important
10:30
work. Contrast that with the
10:33
top down boss led AI adoption.
10:35
On the one hand, 79% of leaders
10:37
agree that AI adoption is critical to remain
10:39
competitive, but 59% of them worry
10:42
about quantifying the productivity gains of AI. And
10:45
60% of them say their company lacks a vision or plan to
10:47
implement it. And so they're stuck and they
10:49
don't do anything, or maybe they do just some small
10:51
proof of concepts. The resulting phenomenon is
10:53
something that Microsoft and LinkedIn call BYOAI,
10:57
bring your own AI. In short, 78% of AI users
11:00
are bringing their own tools to work. That
11:03
means they're not using some tool that the enterprise
11:05
has set up for them, they're just using an
11:07
individual tool that works for them. Knowledge workers, in
11:09
other words, are voting with their feet and they're
11:11
saying we are not going to wait for you
11:13
to catch up. We are going to use these
11:15
tools right now. For employers, there
11:17
are huge problems with this. Some of them
11:19
are about the downside. There are real security
11:21
issues when it comes to company data if
11:23
it's being fed into commercial tools. However,
11:26
I think that the biggest miss here is
11:28
the miss on all the benefits that come
11:30
as this distributed network of employees is actually
11:32
figuring out what works. The Vanguard
11:34
kid in the marketing department could be sharing
11:37
what she learned with all the other folks
11:39
over in the accounting department, but instead all
11:41
of that knowledge is remaining trapped, stuck in
11:43
people's heads, not able to actually impact productivity
11:46
more broadly. And it's not just that these
11:48
employees are not really sharing this, it's that
11:50
they're actively avoiding talking about it. 52%
11:54
of people who are using AI at work are reluctant
11:56
to admit using it for their most important tasks. 53%
11:58
of people who use AI AI at work worry
12:01
that using it on important work tasks makes them
12:03
look replaceable. In other words,
12:05
we've created an entire generation of professional
12:07
AI smugglers. It's really
12:09
important to note that the people who
12:11
use these technologies really, really report incredible
12:14
benefits from them. 90%
12:16
of users say that AI helps them save time, 85%
12:18
say that it helps them focus on their most
12:21
important work, 84% say it helps them be more creative, and 83%
12:23
says it helps them enjoy
12:27
their work more. 83%
12:30
of these knowledge workers like
12:33
their jobs more because they're using
12:35
these AI tools. Compare
12:37
that with other studies which find that 68% of
12:39
people, for example, say they struggle with the pace
12:41
and volume of work. Nearly
12:43
half, 46% say they feel burned out.
12:46
It is insane to me that a
12:48
technology that is having such a big
12:51
impact on those challenges isn't being screamed
12:53
from the halls by every boss, manager,
12:55
director, and CEO. The
12:57
good news is I don't think that this is a state that's going
12:59
to last long. In our experience at
13:02
Superintelligent, a significant number of enterprise leaders
13:04
are coming around to the idea that
13:06
the right way to adopt AI is
13:08
in fact bottoms up, to empower their
13:10
employees to experiment, experiment safely,
13:12
but experiment, figure out what works, and
13:14
then share that with their colleagues. I
13:17
think once we break through and normalize this just
13:19
a little bit more, the floodgates are going to
13:21
come open with incredible benefits to follow. Anyways,
13:24
friends, slightly different type of AI Daily Brief
13:26
today. As we discussed in the headline section,
13:28
it's a slightly slow news day, I think because there is
13:30
so much in the way of big events and announcements coming
13:32
up in the next few weeks. But
13:34
I think that this one is really important. I think
13:36
that the study is shining light on something that doesn't
13:38
get talked about enough, and I'm glad it's now out.
13:41
For now, though, that is going to do it for today's AI
13:43
Daily Brief. Until next time, peace.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More