Podchaser Logo
Home
167. Bonus 2022

167. Bonus 2022

Released Saturday, 17th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
167. Bonus 2022

167. Bonus 2022

167. Bonus 2022

167. Bonus 2022

Saturday, 17th December 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:03

This is the illusionist in

0:05

which I, Helen during the year

0:07

twenty twenty two, who brought you a

0:10

surprisingly long history of the name

0:12

Tiffany. The surprisingly short history

0:14

of Fiona, we considered the

0:16

lexicons of offy the vampire slayer

0:18

and golden age detective fiction.

0:21

We met the protest vote more inancerous, and

0:23

there was a quiz all about animal atomologies.

0:26

A trampoluziness bubble street has big

0:28

things. We dug into the terms of rainbow

0:31

washing and clear baiting and bork,

0:33

and we went deep into the multilingual warning

0:35

message in side of Kinder Surprise egg.

0:38

And now, oh, I've been saving

0:41

things up all year 167 now it's time to smash

0:43

open the piggybank to play the

0:45

annual parade of bonus

0:47

bits. These are the interesting

0:49

things this year's interviewees said that I didn't

0:52

include because their episode was

0:54

already too long or on a topic,

0:56

but now, here they are. Content

0:59

note, there are some illusions to body

1:01

talk and there is one category

1:04

a square. There

1:06

are discussions of mental health there's

1:08

a brief reference to parental violence.

1:11

On with the show.

1:20

On the in character episode, Jiangsu

1:22

talked about how Chinese writing systems dealt

1:24

with the challenges of new technologies like

1:27

telegraphy having been designed

1:29

for European writing systems One

1:31

of the things Jinshu mentions in

1:33

her book Kingdom of Characters is

1:35

Nizhu, a writing system used

1:37

only by women in one region of the

1:39

province of Hounan. New shoe, especially

1:42

women's script, and it's developed kind

1:44

of like an informal writing for women

1:47

who otherwise had no access

1:49

to education. In a society, traditional

1:51

society. My favorite thing about

1:54

that script is it's slender.

1:55

It's thinner than what you see

1:57

a character. But these are these

1:59

individual

1:59

markings and there's lot of crisscrossing

2:02

patterns.

2:04

it's because they're used to approximate

2:06

patterns that women see when

2:08

they do embroidery. So

2:09

it's this incredible relationship or

2:12

reflection on their social condition. That's

2:14

reflected back in the very writing system

2:17

that they build for themselves. In

2:19

the encounter episode, Jiangsu talked

2:21

about how Chinese language teams many

2:23

homophones, and how these present

2:25

a lot of difficulty to anyone trying to transcribe

2:28

Chinese into the Roman alphabet. But

2:30

a currently very handy function of homophones

2:33

is that they can be used to say things that

2:35

would otherwise be censored, ingenious,

2:38

Yes.

2:41

It isn't it? There's

2:42

so many dentures in Chinese culture

2:45

and linguistic context. Somebody really is

2:47

impossible to translate, but it's true. Homeowners

2:50

is a fabulous way of saying what you're

2:52

not supposed to say. For

2:54

instance, there's the larger rubric

2:56

for describing these kind

2:58

of internet anti authoritarian, white

3:01

evasive slings is actually

3:03

called which is

3:06

actually a grass mud

3:08

horse.

3:09

Of course. Now, yes.

3:11

But

3:12

those three put together is

3:14

actually to approximate the homophones

3:17

for screw your mother.

3:20

So it's it's not

3:22

coincidental that is used to describe,

3:25

what would you call it, like kind of underground

3:27

use of Chinese characters? Yeah.

3:30

To escape authoritarian control. Incredible.

3:35

Language games almost like instinctive for

3:37

any Chinese speaker. There's this endless workplace

3:39

in in Chinese language is quite remarkable.

3:41

Mirenica, Guizhou and Nai

3:44

Wu appeared on the episode about moving

3:46

away from the term Asberg's

3:48

syndrome, and we discussed the vocabulary around

3:50

autism. I asked her how she

3:52

feels about the term neurodiversity. My

3:55

thoughts on this are evolving.

3:57

Initially, before maybe a

4:00

year

4:00

a couple of years ago, I would have said that.

4:02

It's a term that I love I think is important.

4:04

I do use it quite a bit. NeuroDiversity

4:07

is a is a term that was really meaningful

4:09

to me when I first learned of it. And

4:11

it similarity to biodiversity. And

4:14

I feel like there's a lot of really profound

4:16

concepts within it. But I do understand that

4:18

there's nuances and there's complexities, and

4:21

I have noticed that it's been co opted

4:23

to a lot of people with another code word for autism

4:26

or autism in ADHD. It includes

4:28

so much more than that. Like, neurodiversity is a

4:30

fact of life. No human beings have the same brain.

4:32

And, you know, neurodiversity, overall,

4:35

collectively includes those with more more typical

4:37

presentations or non autistic, non ADHD,

4:39

non dyslexic, you know, what have

4:41

you? You know, Judy Singer created neurodiversity,

4:44

and she has kind of clarified what she

4:46

meant versus what it kind of

4:48

come to mean colloquially.

4:49

Australian sociologist Judy Singer

4:51

came up with the term neurodiversity in

4:53

her thesis published in nineteen ninety eight,

4:56

Judy Singer offered neurodiversity as a

4:58

term for a civil rights movement. Neurodiversity

5:00

is not supposed to be diagnosis is meant to

5:02

be a term to analyze inequality and

5:05

abuse and a term for activism for

5:07

people who are marginalized on grounds of neurology.

5:09

She has also used bio diversity as a

5:11

comparison explaining diversity

5:14

is a measurement of the degree of variability

5:16

of a given very able in a given population

5:19

or place. It is not a characteristic

5:21

of the individuals in that population. And

5:24

I also don't like that neuropathy has come

5:26

to mean this is a buzzword that I can use

5:28

so I can throw it on top of an employment program

5:30

or put some colorful brains or try to get some

5:32

programmers in cases, when people

5:34

are talking about neurodiversity, they expect it to present

5:36

in particular way. It can

5:39

be used for Allusionist,

5:41

even though that's not at all what intended to

5:43

be used for. I've seen neurodiversity

5:46

type of language or affirming language for people

5:48

to describe things that are, you know,

5:50

like segregated work shelters

5:52

and housing and programs. And so it's

5:54

it's very tricky using language

5:56

that's supposed to be laboratory to

5:58

convey a meaning

5:59

that's anything, but that happens an

6:01

awful

6:02

Unfortunately. Yeah.

6:04

And also just these euphemisms

6:06

where -- Yeah. -- it's it's not

6:09

like anything under the surface has changed people

6:11

haven't adjusted their

6:12

language because they have considered

6:14

how accommodations can be made

6:16

for different people's needs. Yeah.

6:18

They're just oh, I'm supposed to say this now. Like,

6:21

you know, it's just it's just a substitution. It's

6:24

not even really a a period on shift for a lot

6:26

of people at 167, and then that's sad.

6:28

Are

6:28

there any other terms you'd like

6:30

people to add to their

6:31

vocabularies for

6:33

talking about what is in? Sure.

6:34

And they might already have the there's the term

6:36

holistic, which means non autistic.

6:39

Years ago when I first heard that author, that just sounds

6:41

so ridiculous. But

6:42

the reason why so I might use holistic

6:44

or non autistic. But what I what I don't want

6:46

people to do people have started to use neurotypical

6:49

to mean non autistic. And that is

6:51

not true. A person might be

6:53

non autistic, but they could have dyscalculia.

6:56

Or they could, whatever, you know. So,

6:58

like, that's not they're not necessarily, quote unquote,

7:00

or a typical. Well, who decided typical

7:03

exactly? Exactly. The committee.

7:05

Exactly.

7:06

So I

7:07

feel like people should be more precise in what they

7:09

mean. And I also for people

7:11

to use descriptive terms as opposed to functioning

7:13

labels, you know, profound autism career

7:15

autism mild autism, high functioning, low

7:17

functioning, anything that's gonna make a person feel bad,

7:19

like, with

7:20

the opposite of high, it's low. Who

7:22

wants to be low? It's just think that

7:24

people should describe things in a way to

7:26

where

7:26

you know what's happening and

7:28

you're not gonna be made to feel any particular

7:30

way elevated or lowered.

7:32

Speaking of neuro, here's

7:34

the words etymology with Tim player who

7:37

appeared on the Coward episode. I've

7:39

just learned the etymology

7:40

of neuro

7:41

that came from the Greek

7:44

nerve but before that was sinu,

7:47

but also sinu as in like a bowstring

7:49

or an instrument string or

7:51

a penis.

7:54

Those seem like quite radically different

7:56

things are bostering in a penis I

7:58

like to think. One hopes

7:59

Timber

8:00

died discussed some other brain ophthalmology,

8:03

like hippo compass. Oh, gosh.

8:05

I love that word. And the brain's quite a tricky

8:07

one because you'll get lots of hypo.

8:09

Like you'll get the hypothalamus. Now

8:12

that, of course, means under, that's

8:14

the other term. And so I've been calling to get the

8:16

hypothalamus it's the hypothalamus, meaning

8:18

under the thalamus. But hippocampus,

8:21

meaning,

8:22

horse is because it looks like

8:26

Seahorse. Right? So we at

8:31

oh, don't look at them. They look absolutely

8:33

terrifying. I've never seen a hippocampus,

8:35

so don't know. Oh my goodness.

8:38

There's that there's there was a real

8:40

David Cronenburg like Element

8:42

to the Oh, no. III guess the hip the

8:44

hippocampus came first. So so much

8:46

of the brain is kind of

8:48

lovely. Because just the

8:50

first time someone took that piece of

8:52

the brain out, they thought, this

8:55

looks a bit like a belt or a girdle.

8:57

I'm gonna name this after that. This looks

8:59

a bit like a seahorse. What I'm gonna call it the

9:01

hippocampus, the amygdala from

9:05

A Migdalena, meaning

9:07

almond.

9:08

I suppose his almond shaped. The Migdalena

9:11

was also the Latin

9:11

for tonsil

9:13

other languages still called tonsils almonds.

9:16

Really?

9:17

Wow. I guess they are like 167 as

9:19

well.

9:20

Yeah. Everything

9:21

looking like almonds. suppose it is

9:23

quite a general shape. Yeah. In

9:25

the episode viewer, Tim Klar and I talked

9:27

about the origins of the terms anxiety,

9:30

angst, cowardice, 167 I

9:32

brought up the etymology of worry. It

9:34

was originally strangle

9:36

or kill by biting the throat.

9:39

Would you kind of have us still like dogs worrying

9:41

cattle? And it was only relatively late

9:43

in the eighteen hundreds that it

9:45

meant to trouble someone or for someone

9:47

to feel troubled? We still have that

9:49

sense of worrying as being a kind of

9:51

knowing or a terrier

9:54

worrying at a rat throat or something

9:57

like that. And it's a lovely metaphor, isn't it?

9:59

Because it

9:59

it speaks so much to what we do when we

10:02

worry, which is to

10:04

nor at a problem over and

10:06

over to try and wear it down. And

10:08

the sense that worrying is an

10:10

active process, that it's

10:12

still a verb Anxiety is a

10:14

state, isn't it? Or

10:16

a diagnosis or a condition? Worrying

10:19

is is active there's also there's

10:22

often built into that this implication that if I just

10:24

worry at this enough, I might solve it.

10:26

I might be able to

10:28

fix the problem. I might be able to find

10:30

a new solution. It's an expression

10:32

of care in some cases. Yes.

10:36

Yes.

10:37

And yet, I think there's also that violence

10:40

tied up in it as well. And I don't mean, I worry about

10:42

my daughter, so I'm not meaning to malign people who

10:44

worry about their children. I worry about all

10:46

the people I love. I worry about the future of

10:48

the world. But there's

10:52

something I think

10:55

destructive about it

10:57

as well. There's something harmful. There's

11:00

something painful. There's something

11:02

bloody. The etymology of

11:04

it implies how I feel about it that it's

11:07

ultimately a

11:10

futile and painful

11:12

and destructive process. Stephanie

11:14

Fu came on the show to talk about complex post

11:17

traumatic stress disorder. This year she

11:19

published a book, what my bones know,

11:21

in which she recounts the experiences she had

11:23

had in being diagnosed and treated for the condition.

11:25

There was one therapist with whom

11:27

Stephanie had a breakthrough. You

11:29

talk about working with therapist where

11:31

after you've had your

11:32

sessions in person, you studied the

11:34

transcripts.

11:35

What was it about seeing the words written down

11:38

that helped you more than

11:39

just speaking with the therapist.

11:42

I was sort of able to dissociate

11:45

Look, I don't think everyone

11:47

could be able to do this, but I'm very used to looking

11:49

at a Google Doc and editing it.

11:51

So being able to have it on

11:53

the page It

11:55

was, like, first of all, I couldn't argue with it.

11:57

Right? I couldn't

11:58

say, like, no, I wasn't

11:59

triggered. Right? Then, no, you're

12:02

misinterpreting it. It's right there. Like,

12:04

I have the recording. I have the transcript.

12:06

I did it. There's no getting around.

12:09

Number two, yeah, I was

12:11

sort of able to shift from,

12:14

oh my god, you're criticizing me mode until,

12:16

like, we are editing this together mode.

12:18

Here we are in front of the script we wanted

12:20

to be the best we And

12:22

let's just like make little notes everywhere.

12:24

And my therapist was also great at just

12:26

making me feel really safe and cared for.

12:29

And he built a really safe environment

12:31

where if there was somewhere in the

12:33

session where I was like, I

12:35

highlighted it I was like, you're being kind of a dick

12:37

here. He'd be like, oh, absolutely. And

12:40

he would do that himself. He would be like, look, I'm

12:42

pushing you way too hard here. Like,

12:44

this is not okay. He was the first to

12:46

criticize himself and really look at his

12:49

own failings 167 conversation. But

12:51

as as well as saying, like, hey, what's

12:54

going on with you here. You're ranting on

12:56

and on about nothing.

12:58

And I would notice it too. I'm like, you

13:00

you can see it on the page, like, Why is there

13:02

half of a page or two pages of me ranting

13:04

about nothing? And then we would scroll

13:07

And right before this long rant,

13:10

I was, like, talking about my mom holding

13:12

a knife to my throat. And

13:14

I was, like, I see.

13:16

He's, like, yeah, you dissociated. In

13:19

order to tell this story you

13:22

disappeared.

13:24

And you just got lost on the way because

13:27

you were dissociated. You weren't in your you weren't really

13:29

conscious of what you were talking about. I

13:31

was like, yeah, that's very real.

13:34

And it it didn't make me feel

13:36

like I was that was my fault.

13:38

You know?

13:40

Like like

13:42

it was a broke in thing to do. It just help me

13:44

understand. I see why I did that. I understand

13:46

it. Like, I can go

13:49

back and engage with that differently next time

13:51

maybe. If I if I start to feel myself

13:53

talking for a long time, just take

13:55

a step back question like hey, might

13:58

I be triggered right now? Maybe

13:59

I need to slow down.

14:02

Coming up, we've got more complicated feelings

14:04

plus little women and

14:07

life hacks. But right now, we're

14:09

just going to take a quick commercial hiatus.

14:12

The

14:12

illusionist is sponsored by NordVPN,

14:15

one of the most trusted VPNs available.

14:17

So even when you can't trust the rest of the internet

14:20

not to track you or shove malware into your

14:22

life or serve you ads with horrible

14:24

photos of fungal toenails, why why

14:26

why I don't want to buy it stop.

14:28

You can trust your VPN, not to be

14:30

up to anything except enabling

14:33

you to have a private time online.

14:35

And if you like, to call an international

14:37

journey without taking a single step.

14:40

You

14:40

can connect to one of

14:41

the fifty nine available countries and see

14:43

how much their

14:44

products and flights cost,

14:46

or enjoy their speedier internet.

14:49

NordVPN is the price of a half

14:51

dozen eggs per month.

14:52

And one account works for six devices,

14:55

so that's one egg per device

14:57

per month. There are a few different plans available

14:59

and illusionist listeners are blessed with discounts

15:01

of more than sixty percent off right

15:04

now.

15:04

Grab your exclusive NordVPN

15:07

deal by going to nordVPN dot

15:09

com to get a huge

15:11

discount of your NordVPN plan,

15:14

and it's completely risk free with Nord's

15:16

thirty day money back guarantee. That's

15:19

N0RDVPN

15:21

dot com

15:22

slash illusionist.

15:25

This episode is sponsored by 167, the

15:27

huge online library of video and audio

15:29

tutorials, lectures, and documentaries. I

15:32

am always up for watching a documentary

15:34

about unusual

15:35

competitive event and

15:37

167 him has supplied. And

15:39

now can't choose

15:40

which to watch first, the kids table

15:42

about children playing in bridge ornaments against

15:45

opponents with an average age of seventy three

15:47

or inspired to ride,

15:49

but cyclists racing four thousand

15:51

two hundred and thirty three miles a across

15:54

the USA or she

15:56

shares following five female competitors

15:59

in a sheep

15:59

sharing contest. Care to

16:02

join me.

16:02

Right now, 167 Dream is offering illusionlessness

16:05

fifty percent of your first three months.

16:07

As in half of when you sign up for your

16:09

first quarterly plan, a fantastic deal.

16:13

Sign up today through my special

16:14

URL to get this offer. Go

16:16

to 167 dream dot com slash

16:18

illusionist. Again, that is W0NDRIUM

16:25

dot com slash illusionist

16:28

167 dream dot com slash Allusionist.

16:32

Okay. Back to the bonus bits.

16:36

In the objectivity

16:38

episode, Lewis Raven Wallace talked

16:40

about what objectivity is supposed to

16:42

mean 167 what it tends to mean in practice.

16:45

And the failings of the concept. When

16:48

you were working in public media,

16:50

were there words or constructions

16:52

that you were supposed to avoid?

16:54

In the interests of so called objectivity.

16:58

Oh, there were so many words and constructions.

17:01

I remember early in my first year

17:04

I refer to

17:06

a source

17:09

as anti gay,

17:11

I would still refer to that source.

17:14

As anti gay. If I were

17:16

asked today, it was like a

17:18

conservative activist of some

17:20

kind who was advocating pretty

17:22

fiercely against queer trans

17:26

children having rights.

17:28

But

17:28

the word anti gay, my editor

17:30

was like,

17:31

That seems biased. It seems like you're expressing

17:34

an opinion about that person's opinions.

17:37

I know. Mind blown. I can't remember now

17:39

what we changed it to, but it was like instead

17:42

of saying an anti gay activist who's like an activist

17:44

who opposes gay marriage

17:47

or something like that. Well, that's

17:49

a lot of woods. So, like, these also these

17:52

clunky, ungraceful ways

17:54

that we try to avoid terminology

17:56

that might seem biased from some

17:59

perspective. So I was

18:01

just very confused by

18:03

that. I think more recently, there have been

18:05

more pronounced and

18:07

prominent

18:08

examples of

18:10

that kind of weird censorship

18:13

like not being able to call Donald Trump

18:15

a racist or not being able to

18:17

call white supremacists activists,

18:20

white supremacists, the

18:23

whole debate over how to for two

18:25

undocumented immigrants is 167. That

18:27

definitely has played out in many newsrooms

18:30

that editors have said, oh,

18:32

well, undocumented is a sort

18:34

of activist terminology. That's

18:36

what they want to be called. But we're

18:38

going to continue to refer

18:39

to them as illegal.

18:41

Which, of course, calling a person

18:43

illegal has a ton of implicit

18:45

bias in it as to what you think about

18:48

that person's actions that they took to

18:50

survive. And undocumented as

18:52

terminology you know,

18:54

proposed to push

18:55

back against that and to reduce the

18:57

amount of bias against undocumented immigrants

19:00

in the way that their 167 the way that

19:02

their stories and reasons for being in

19:04

this country are perceived. Hear

19:05

more about the language used for migration in

19:08

the OA team episode of the show from a few

19:10

years ago. On

19:11

the topic of bias and objectivity or

19:13

impossibility thereof, here's historian

19:16

Charlotte Lydia Riley who appeared

19:18

in the Emergency Episode about the Maligne

19:20

Emergency, the twelve year military

19:23

conflict that Britain refused to call

19:25

a war. There's

19:26

no objective historian. All historians

19:28

are subject even if you're writing about the tudors

19:30

or ancient Greece, there's

19:32

no objective historian. Right? Yeah.

19:35

I think there is often presumption that the recording

19:37

of history is neutral.

19:39

of course, it isn't. And

19:41

the terminology isn't. It's very

19:43

loaded. Absolutely.

19:44

And what's happening now actually

19:46

is that historians like me and and and other

19:48

historians who are being critical of Empire

19:51

say we are being accused of such activity

19:53

against what is assumed to be an objective historical

19:56

record. So we're

19:58

accused of being politically motivated.

19:59

We're accused of being inhoc

20:02

to the values of our time. We're accused

20:04

of being motivated by our own

20:06

beliefs and feelings about Empire, as

20:09

if that wasn't also the case for the people

20:11

who originally wrote these histories, and

20:13

as if that wasn't the case for the people who want to

20:15

defend Empire as well. The people

20:17

who are defensive of the sort

20:19

of very traditional historical

20:22

record about Empire are just as subjective

20:24

as we are. But it's become a way for

20:26

them to really criticize this rewriting. And

20:28

and much more, actually, when it's

20:30

aimed at people of color, and historians

20:33

of color. They are always being told they can't

20:35

possibly be objective about this or they

20:37

are definitely politically motivated or they're motivated

20:39

by their own experiences as if all historians

20:41

weren't. As if everyone wasn't in the same

20:43

boat? Like, it's not just the kind of culture

20:45

wars you think that's coming from ordinary people.

20:48

It's actually government ministers are telling

20:50

people that they're doing the wrong source of his

20:52

Education Secretary set up a conservative conference

20:54

this year and said that people were teaching anti

20:57

British history in schools and universities. Which

20:59

is sort of funny and sort of is probably going

21:01

to get someone killed. It

21:04

seems really terrible. It does really

21:06

feel like this has really happened recently.

21:09

It started my career. It was hard to get anyone interested

21:11

in empowering. I haven't been a historian for that long.

21:15

And it you know, it was difficult to get people to

21:17

say British Empire seriously ought to think about it

21:19

really at all. It was all the second world war

21:22

and the 167 now,

21:24

empire is everywhere, and it is

21:26

something that has become hugely emotionalized.

21:29

And all

21:30

history is political, but this has become a real

21:32

political football.

21:33

it is interesting because I think it was a lot of kind

21:35

of gentle critique of Empire happening for

21:37

quite a long time, and and now it's very

21:39

difficult to get that stuff written down. when

21:42

you have things like the

21:42

history reclaimed project, they kind of fight against

21:44

this idea of sort of political greatness or whatever.

21:47

And -- Mhmm. -- they want people send an examples

21:49

of things like museum exhibits

21:52

and statues and events that they that have

21:54

been

21:57

tempered or had extra description added

21:59

or been

21:59

kind of worked on by

22:01

historic instrument than more critical of imperialism.

22:04

So

22:04

even retain and explain, which

22:06

is supposedly government policy

22:08

on imperialism even that's now coming under criticism.

22:10

They're not actually that keen on the explaining element

22:12

of that. No. Think it'll be

22:14

very hard for them to do

22:15

that and get the other things to hold up. Mhmm.

22:17

That's the trouble with the truth. Yeah. It looks

22:20

bad.

22:20

When it was bad, it is bad. Right? It's

22:22

quite difficult to find yourself constantly labeled anti

22:24

British when actually what you're doing is just

22:27

writing quite banal,

22:28

things that happened. You

22:31

can get labeled anti British

22:32

as a historian. Really for not being particularly

22:35

critical. You actually don't have to be that

22:37

out there.

22:37

To be seen as a kind of anti British activist.

22:40

The fragility.

22:42

Mhmm. It seems also a bit inconsistent.

22:46

That well well, maybe it's because I you've

22:49

got several

22:49

generations of people now who

22:51

were too young to have lived through the times

22:53

when a lot of

22:55

these conflicts were happening -- Mhmm. --

22:57

but also weren't educated about them because,

22:59

like, at school history, we weren't taught about

23:01

anything that recent.

23:03

And then the empire is just like

23:05

this kind of thing where you can have a

23:07

mindset that it's

23:08

sort of in the past.

23:10

Or was gently a good

23:12

thing, and

23:14

then you get quite animated about preserving

23:16

it against criticism and whatnot.

23:18

It is quite strange It's funny to think about

23:20

it in tandem with the second cohort actually because

23:23

a lot of people talk about the second cohort was if they

23:25

were there. And the number of people in

23:27

Britain

23:27

who having direct experience

23:29

in the second world always vanishingly small

23:31

now. Actually, it was such a long time ago.

23:33

But

23:34

because I think

23:36

we kind of got frozen in time as a

23:38

moment that the second world war was kind of a generation

23:41

ago. Yeah. And

23:43

we've continued that feeling that it's about

23:45

a generation ago. Right? So we still talk

23:47

about it as if our grandparents or

23:49

as if people who are grandparents today were

23:51

involved in the war fought in the war. You know, my grandparents did

23:53

fight in the war, and my grandparents are no longer with us.

23:55

We we're getting to the point now, actually, where there's not

23:58

very much actual memory,

23:58

full memory of the war. So

24:01

that's

24:01

something that we think was being very recent. It's not

24:03

very recent. Whereas the Empire is something that

24:05

we think about has happened. happened a long time ago,

24:07

so long ago, why are you jacking up the past? Whereas,

24:09

actually, many of these countries, India

24:12

Pakistan and Bangladesh became independent

24:14

in the late nineteen forties. Most are in

24:16

societies 167 the Caribbean become independent

24:18

in the mid nineteen sixties. Still very

24:20

much within living

24:21

memory. There were still quite a lot of people

24:24

alive in Britain and whose family have history

24:26

within the empire,

24:27

they themselves do or or it's only a

24:29

generation back. And it's interesting, I

24:31

think, the way we talk about the two things that the empire

24:33

is something happened so long ago that if you tried to talk

24:36

about it now, you're distracted 167 the past and the second

24:38

world war is something which apparently happened so recently

24:40

that you can't as a historian ever, criticize

24:43

people's interpretations of it or talk about

24:45

correcting historical record because it

24:47

happened so recently, and

24:49

it is sort of interesting disconnect. And

24:51

it's it's kind

24:52

of soft British patriotism,

24:54

which is completely

24:56

unthinkingly uncritical of imperialism. 167

24:58

remembers Empire as a sort of Victorian aesthetic.

25:01

Yep. Doesn't remember it as a nineteen forties,

25:03

nineteen fifties, nineteen sixties aesthetic.

25:05

Wonder what most people's boundary is

25:07

for news events

25:10

becoming history

25:12

because it's

25:13

sort of theoretically immediately yet.

25:16

It's

25:16

funny because I think from a historian's perspective,

25:18

it's

25:18

to do with

25:20

well, lastly, from a historian's perspective,

25:23

it's to do with the skills and the tools that you

25:25

used think about it.

25:26

It's not to do with distance. It's not to do

25:29

with timing. Historians, I think think

25:31

about history because

25:32

we think about ourselves as people who use particular

25:34

tools and particular skills, and we have particular

25:36

ways engaging with the past. And

25:39

we can do that

25:40

about something that happened last year.

25:43

I guess the theme of this bonus compilation

25:45

is thoughts and feelings. Let

25:48

me move up for textual theme of absolutely

25:50

everything. Therefore, it's not particularly remarkable that

25:52

the next section is about those things

25:54

too. Hannah McGregor appeared on the

25:56

episode's sentiment talking about to

25:58

mentality and literature. And we got

26:00

to talking about Louisa May or Scots noble Little

26:02

Women, wherein the four March sisters

26:04

live with their Saint Lee army, while

26:06

father is waving an army chaplain during

26:09

the American Civil War.

26:11

In the book, it is considered far

26:13

more Integrity

26:14

laced to write what you know

26:16

and with real emotions. But in reality, Louise

26:19

Mayor Court was doing that to make

26:21

money because she much preferred writing swashbuckling

26:24

genre fiction. She sure did. Good

26:26

for her. Yeah. Yeah. It's

26:28

a great example

26:30

of a version of

26:32

a common genre form

26:35

that has endured specifically

26:38

because it was actually really

26:40

messing with the genre at the

26:42

time. This is a constant challenge for literary

26:44

scholars that a lot of the the

26:46

texts that endure are actually the outliers.

26:49

167 that we actually spend very little time

26:51

talking or thinking about books that were

26:53

the mainstream in their historical moment.

26:55

But it was absolutely this

26:58

weirdo Lesbian. Being

27:01

told by her publisher, there's a lot of money

27:03

in girls fiction her

27:05

being like,

27:07

okay, fine. I'm a working

27:09

writer. I'll write some girls fiction,

27:11

hear some girls fiction,

27:13

and also just refusing to

27:15

play the game a little bit. One

27:17

of my favorite bits of that. We have actual

27:20

quotes from her saying that,

27:22

you know, she published the book in two parts. And

27:25

For the second part, everybody wanted

27:27

Joe to end up with Lori because

27:29

that's the conclusion of the sentimental

27:31

arc. And because

27:33

Joe was based on her, she

27:36

was like, no, Joe isn't gonna end up with anybody.

27:39

Joe wants to be a writer and you're gonna be

27:41

a woman and a writer, you can't get married because

27:43

there's no space for your career if you're running

27:45

a household. But her publisher

27:47

was like, no. Joe has to get married.

27:50

Otherwise, people will be wildly dissatisfied.

27:52

And she was like, fun. You want Joe to

27:54

get married? She's gonna marry a weird

27:56

old German guy.

27:58

I'll show you well dissatisfaction.

27:59

It's everyone's marriage in this

28:02

book.

28:02

And Laurie's gonna marry her

28:04

horrible little sister. Yeah.

28:07

Yeah. It's a a real fuck

28:10

you to the expectations. Still feel a bit

28:12

sore

28:12

about how all that turned out, and they're gonna set

28:14

up a boys school. And they're gonna set

28:16

up boys

28:16

school, how empowering. I think it's

28:18

such an interesting example

28:20

of somebody who is so obviously bucking

28:23

against the restrictions. Of

28:25

what they can say in their moment.

28:27

There are these genre expectations being

28:30

forced upon her and there's her

28:32

very the cool desire to write a book

28:34

that will make her money. And then there's

28:37

that attempt to just, you

28:39

know, sneak in something that

28:41

sorta just says

28:43

no to

28:45

all of those expectations. When

28:47

you were describing the tropes

28:49

of

28:49

sentimental fiction of the nineteenth century, The

28:52

other example that I

28:54

thought of

28:54

was what Katie did Mhmm.

28:56

-- where you've got a

28:58

bit

28:58

similar to Joe and little women,

29:01

a sassy, naughty, female

29:04

weed. But

29:05

then

29:06

she is kind of

29:08

fully converted into the sentimental with

29:11

a spinal injury.

29:15

And the council of

29:17

her beatific disabled cousin?

29:19

Yes. Yes. Absolutely. And

29:21

I mean, that is an important part of the sentimental

29:24

education, and a lot of these girls undergo,

29:27

right, that Joe becomes

29:29

better

29:30

because of Beth's

29:31

illness. You

29:32

sort of encounter this this

29:35

perfect paragon of sentimentality who

29:37

has to be dying because there is

29:39

nothing more perfect that a woman

29:41

can do than die. Truly

29:43

the purest the purest way

29:45

for us to exist is to And

29:48

we still see this, you know. Up to

29:50

the present day, like repeated in contemporary

29:52

culture. The dead wife is the perfect

29:54

wife.

29:55

Except in Rebecca. Except

29:57

in Rebecca. That's why Rebecca's

29:59

an interesting

29:59

Gothic. The Gothic, the

30:02

dead wife is a sinister presence.

30:05

In the sentimental, the dead

30:07

wife is the perfect wife.

30:08

There's a really interesting

30:10

trend in scholarship recently

30:12

about sentimental novels

30:14

pointing out that

30:17

while the goal of the sentimental

30:20

narrative is the emotional maturity

30:22

of her heroine, The story

30:24

becomes deeply boring, the second

30:26

she becomes mature, because the

30:28

emotionally mature 167 doesn't do

30:30

anything.

30:31

so we spend a

30:33

lot of time in the childhood. We

30:36

dwell in the childhood because

30:38

that when the narrative is interesting. That's

30:40

when she can actually go out and do things.

30:42

But she's gotta become a army at some

30:44

point. Otherwise,

30:46

she has not sort of reached her

30:49

her conclusion.

30:50

Mommy, old death. Mommy, her

30:52

death. That's

30:53

it. Allusionist.

30:57

it they say in never let me go completed?

31:00

Yes. Yes. Exactly. There's

31:02

two ways that a woman can become completed,

31:05

and that is that she either becomes a army

31:07

or dies.

31:08

Either way, desactualized a

31:11

life lived in

31:12

sacrifice and deference to others. Yes.

31:15

Yes. All of the above.

31:17

Anger, present,

31:18

but contained. Yep. Yeah.

31:20

And within this

31:21

sort of imagination of what is possible

31:24

for women, we then have to

31:26

have, like, institutions insist

31:28

stems that punish or manage women

31:31

who refuse to fit into

31:33

those molds. Right? So we've got

31:35

hatred of the spinster, the suspicion

31:38

of the spinster. We've got the

31:40

long history of institutionalizing women

31:43

for hysteria. Because they refuse

31:46

to fit into these molds. So we've got

31:48

ways of managing all of these

31:50

unruly bodies. That aren't

31:53

willing to either

31:54

die or become a army.

31:57

Jilenta Greenberg and Christian Meinzer talked

31:59

on the self help

31:59

episode about things they've learned from

32:02

living by various self help books on

32:04

their podcast by the book.

32:06

I asked them what they think about the term life

32:08

hack. Which came out of hack

32:10

being used in computing as a solution that

32:12

might be little unorthodox and perhaps crude at

32:14

the usual, but probably quicker. Like

32:17

chains soaring a path directly to the center of

32:19

the hedge maze.

32:20

Lifehack is attributed to technology

32:23

writer, Daniel Rourke, in two thousand and four,

32:25

he meant it to denote the kinds of little bits

32:28

of script that programmers would write to make their

32:30

daily lives easier. Programs to

32:32

help them remember household chores or not 167

32:34

birthdays. Whereas now life

32:36

hack will mean things like turning

32:39

toilet rolls into all kinds of storage or decorative

32:41

items or making mashed potato out

32:43

of crisps, which seems more hassle than

32:45

matching a potato to me.

32:47

And

32:47

a lot of the life hacks are just

32:49

fairly standard tips. So

32:51

why do they get called life hacks?

32:54

I think it's a way get men to

32:56

read self help books And

32:59

and it's also, you know, the language

33:01

of a lot of social media too.

33:03

Just like, oh, we don't

33:04

wanna actually have to work for this, but

33:07

Watch this thirty second TikTok video

33:09

to find a hack for this. There's

33:11

a lot of, you know, let's do it quickly.

33:14

Let's have it sound masculine. When I think

33:16

of a hack, I think of like a machete.

33:18

Mhmm. Yes. Yeah. Hacksaw. Yeah.

33:20

This has gotta be tough. This has gotta be

33:22

quick. This has gotta be violent, and

33:24

it's gonna pay off. That's

33:27

what I think of when I think of hacks. And I

33:29

also think that very rarely

33:32

is a hack life changing. If it's something

33:34

that only is a ten second difference in my life,

33:36

or

33:36

a thirty second thing that I have to do differently,

33:40

I don't usually find that transforms my entire

33:42

life. Yeah.

33:44

Diet. It does feel

33:46

like transformation is

33:48

only thirty seconds of video consumption

33:50

away. Yeah. remains

33:54

just beyond our grasp, shocking,

33:56

I know.

33:57

Also, the life hacks are often just doing

33:59

things in a way you can do things

34:02

-- Right. -- but is new a bet on it. I was gonna say sometimes

34:04

it's just, yeah, how to, like,

34:06

more easily separate the

34:08

egg white from the yolk. That's just, like,

34:10

another way of doing something. And it's just

34:12

a, like, buzzy way of being, like, here's a way

34:14

to do it.

34:15

Here's another technique in the kitchen. Yeah.

34:17

A technique. Thank you.

34:19

Instead, we say, lay that.

34:21

Yeah. I just want the currency of that term

34:23

to fully dwindle. Hopefully

34:26

it is. It's gotta be. Since

34:28

Gilentra and Kristen are mavens of

34:30

concerted self improvement, I asked them

34:32

about New Year's resolutions. Tisch

34:35

the season,

34:36

I've definitely not made any resolutions

34:39

since we've been making by the book

34:41

because living by self help books

34:43

is like making a new resolution every

34:45

time you sort of sign up for 167.

34:47

That's intense. So I've I've sort of let

34:49

myself off

34:50

the hook when it comes to the actual New

34:52

Year's resolution.

34:54

Yeah. III don't

34:56

really need New Year's resolutions. See

34:59

how happy I'm well adjusted. I'm

35:02

good. No. Nothing I'm happy and well adjusted,

35:04

but New Year's resolutions just

35:07

they seem so fraught. And the whole idea

35:09

of New Year, New Year, New Year, like what's bad with

35:11

Old Me. You know? And

35:14

so many people, they just fail at their

35:16

New Year's resolutions. It's just because most

35:18

people aren't clear and specific

35:20

and attainable

35:23

when it comes to their goals.

35:25

And so a lot of them also just

35:27

feel very punitive very few people

35:29

are making resolutions that sound fun. Right.

35:31

Right. Why don't we make resolutions

35:33

that aren't really about

35:34

punishing ourselves that aren't about, like, cutting

35:36

out sugar Yeah. 167 you

35:38

add something? Yeah.

35:40

Like, a goal I came up with was midyear this

35:42

year. I'm like, I'm gonna

35:44

to

35:46

celebrity memoirs while I walk

35:49

just see how many I can get through. See,

35:51

that's my kind of resolution. It's like, it's not

35:54

necessarily at New Year's, and it's like, this

35:56

is a fun thing to do. I'm resolving to do

35:58

something kind of fun this year,

35:59

you know.

36:00

I've made two in

36:02

adult life that really stuck. One

36:04

was to keep a spreadsheet of every

36:06

book I finished, which was to get myself

36:09

reading more. I've been keeping it for

36:11

twelve years, and the other was not to click

36:13

on any daily mail links. And both of

36:15

those have gone great. I love that

36:17

second one. Yeah. Yeah.

36:19

And I love it. Love it. Both

36:22

these resolutions of mine have been going strong for

36:24

more than a decade. The Allusionist

36:26

made at the start of this year was to spend more

36:28

time with illusionist listeners. And I did,

36:30

I set up the Elizabeth Discord and we

36:32

have the live streams

36:34

and the illusionist patrons

36:36

hang out and it's been really lovely,

36:38

in my opinion, ten out of ten years

36:39

outcomes. You you

36:41

would like to join us, you would be ever so welcome.

36:44

Go to the dot org slash

36:46

donate.

36:54

The

36:54

Allusionist is sponsored by Catan,

36:56

the social board game of Strategy and

36:58

luck. With the reconfigurable board

37:00

made of hexagonal tiles so, you never

37:03

played the same game twice. Endless

37:05

variety, which is Fortune it

37:07

because Bob George

37:08

and Susan are trapped at home by a

37:10

blizzard and Melchior says he'll

37:12

bring

37:12

the snowplow around but only if George

37:14

apologizes. And if anything that

37:16

situation makes the blizzard seem warm,

37:18

the WiFi hasn't been working since

37:20

that thing, but unloaded. He says

37:22

it was an accident, but And

37:24

the TV has never recovered from Susan's

37:27

rock star phase. But luckily,

37:29

to pass the time they do have

37:31

the game Catan. Several sets actually,

37:34

George bought versions in German, Japanese

37:36

Finnish, and Bulgaria. That time he and Malkia

37:38

were arguing about who

37:39

could speak the most languages. And they also have

37:41

the frenemies of Catan expansion. It'll

37:44

keep them amused until the Thor. Catan

37:47

is a board game for three to four players, aged

37:49

ten plus, but younger kids complained of

37:51

initial adult guidance. Get catan

37:53

at catan shop dot com slash Listeners

37:57

of this podcast get ten percent off the original

37:59

base game Gatan by using the promo Allusionist

38:02

at checkout, often not good on

38:04

other Qatar titles of merchandise, but is good

38:06

on the original base game Qatar. This

38:10

episode is sponsored by Mint Mobile

38:13

Hey, cell phone users of America, this

38:16

winterfall season, the best deal

38:18

in wireless can only be found at

38:20

mint mobile. Right now, when

38:22

you switch to mint mobile and buy any three

38:24

month plan, you'll get another three

38:26

months for free As the

38:28

first company to sell premium wireless

38:30

service online only, Mint mobile

38:32

lets you

38:33

order and activate from home with e

38:35

sim, while saving tons on

38:37

phone plans starting at just fifteen dollars

38:39

a month. And you can start

38:41

family plan from only two lines,

38:43

which is great

38:44

if say you'd all

38:46

been using Melchior's family plan

38:49

he's cut you off, changed his number

38:51

his name

38:51

just to be saved as old fingerprints 167

38:53

delivery of a number of prosthetic beads and

38:55

eyebrow wigs.

38:57

For a limited time, by any three month

38:59

mint mobile

38:59

plan, they get three more months free

39:02

by going to mint mobile dot com slash

39:04

illusionist. That's mint mobile

39:07

dot com slash

39:07

illusionist. Cut your wireless

39:10

bill to just fifteen box a month at

39:12

mintmobile dot com slash

39:14

Allusionist.

39:16

Thanks

39:21

to you for listening to the show this

39:22

year, and thanks to all of the people who've appeared on

39:24

it. In this episode, you heard again from

39:27

Jingtu. Merenica Guido and Nairoil,

39:29

Tim Clare, Stephanie Fu, Lewis

39:31

Raven Wallace, Charlotte Lidya Riley, Hannah

39:34

MacGregor, Kristin Meinzer, and Jilenta

39:36

Greenberg. I'll link to the episode

39:38

there in earlier this year at the dot

39:40

org slash bonus twenty twenty two.

39:44

Your

39:46

randomly selected word from

39:47

your dictionary today is.

39:52

Washing. That's Washing

39:55

with no g on hand. Washing,

39:57

noun, air nuggets.

39:59

An increase in the angle of incidence for an

40:02

airplane wing towards the

40:03

tip.

40:04

Try using washing in an email today.

40:08

This episode was produced 167 Helen Martin

40:11

Orswick makes the original music for the Here's

40:13

compositions via pale bird music dot

40:15

com and as pale bird on band

40:18

camp. Our

40:19

ad partner is multitude.

40:20

Thanks to Amanda and Carly

40:22

for their work on behalf of the show this year.

40:24

To sponsoring episode in twenty twenty

40:26

three, contact them at multitude dot

40:28

productions slash ads.

40:30

This is the last illusion of episode twenty

40:32

twenty two.

40:33

The show will return with new episodes

40:35

mid January twenty twenty three and in

40:37

the meantime stay in touch by finding show

40:40

on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter.

40:43

And you can hear or read every episode.

40:45

Get links to more information about the topics,

40:48

and donate to the show and join the Allusionist

40:51

And see the fold that you're in peace with

40:53

the randomly selected words of the show's

40:55

forever home. Be Allusionist org.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features