Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:03
This is the illusionist in
0:05
which I, Helen during the year
0:07
twenty twenty two, who brought you a
0:10
surprisingly long history of the name
0:12
Tiffany. The surprisingly short history
0:14
of Fiona, we considered the
0:16
lexicons of offy the vampire slayer
0:18
and golden age detective fiction.
0:21
We met the protest vote more inancerous, and
0:23
there was a quiz all about animal atomologies.
0:26
A trampoluziness bubble street has big
0:28
things. We dug into the terms of rainbow
0:31
washing and clear baiting and bork,
0:33
and we went deep into the multilingual warning
0:35
message in side of Kinder Surprise egg.
0:38
And now, oh, I've been saving
0:41
things up all year 167 now it's time to smash
0:43
open the piggybank to play the
0:45
annual parade of bonus
0:47
bits. These are the interesting
0:49
things this year's interviewees said that I didn't
0:52
include because their episode was
0:54
already too long or on a topic,
0:56
but now, here they are. Content
0:59
note, there are some illusions to body
1:01
talk and there is one category
1:04
a square. There
1:06
are discussions of mental health there's
1:08
a brief reference to parental violence.
1:11
On with the show.
1:20
On the in character episode, Jiangsu
1:22
talked about how Chinese writing systems dealt
1:24
with the challenges of new technologies like
1:27
telegraphy having been designed
1:29
for European writing systems One
1:31
of the things Jinshu mentions in
1:33
her book Kingdom of Characters is
1:35
Nizhu, a writing system used
1:37
only by women in one region of the
1:39
province of Hounan. New shoe, especially
1:42
women's script, and it's developed kind
1:44
of like an informal writing for women
1:47
who otherwise had no access
1:49
to education. In a society, traditional
1:51
society. My favorite thing about
1:54
that script is it's slender.
1:55
It's thinner than what you see
1:57
a character. But these are these
1:59
individual
1:59
markings and there's lot of crisscrossing
2:02
patterns.
2:04
it's because they're used to approximate
2:06
patterns that women see when
2:08
they do embroidery. So
2:09
it's this incredible relationship or
2:12
reflection on their social condition. That's
2:14
reflected back in the very writing system
2:17
that they build for themselves. In
2:19
the encounter episode, Jiangsu talked
2:21
about how Chinese language teams many
2:23
homophones, and how these present
2:25
a lot of difficulty to anyone trying to transcribe
2:28
Chinese into the Roman alphabet. But
2:30
a currently very handy function of homophones
2:33
is that they can be used to say things that
2:35
would otherwise be censored, ingenious,
2:38
Yes.
2:41
It isn't it? There's
2:42
so many dentures in Chinese culture
2:45
and linguistic context. Somebody really is
2:47
impossible to translate, but it's true. Homeowners
2:50
is a fabulous way of saying what you're
2:52
not supposed to say. For
2:54
instance, there's the larger rubric
2:56
for describing these kind
2:58
of internet anti authoritarian, white
3:01
evasive slings is actually
3:03
called which is
3:06
actually a grass mud
3:08
horse.
3:09
Of course. Now, yes.
3:11
But
3:12
those three put together is
3:14
actually to approximate the homophones
3:17
for screw your mother.
3:20
So it's it's not
3:22
coincidental that is used to describe,
3:25
what would you call it, like kind of underground
3:27
use of Chinese characters? Yeah.
3:30
To escape authoritarian control. Incredible.
3:35
Language games almost like instinctive for
3:37
any Chinese speaker. There's this endless workplace
3:39
in in Chinese language is quite remarkable.
3:41
Mirenica, Guizhou and Nai
3:44
Wu appeared on the episode about moving
3:46
away from the term Asberg's
3:48
syndrome, and we discussed the vocabulary around
3:50
autism. I asked her how she
3:52
feels about the term neurodiversity. My
3:55
thoughts on this are evolving.
3:57
Initially, before maybe a
4:00
year
4:00
a couple of years ago, I would have said that.
4:02
It's a term that I love I think is important.
4:04
I do use it quite a bit. NeuroDiversity
4:07
is a is a term that was really meaningful
4:09
to me when I first learned of it. And
4:11
it similarity to biodiversity. And
4:14
I feel like there's a lot of really profound
4:16
concepts within it. But I do understand that
4:18
there's nuances and there's complexities, and
4:21
I have noticed that it's been co opted
4:23
to a lot of people with another code word for autism
4:26
or autism in ADHD. It includes
4:28
so much more than that. Like, neurodiversity is a
4:30
fact of life. No human beings have the same brain.
4:32
And, you know, neurodiversity, overall,
4:35
collectively includes those with more more typical
4:37
presentations or non autistic, non ADHD,
4:39
non dyslexic, you know, what have
4:41
you? You know, Judy Singer created neurodiversity,
4:44
and she has kind of clarified what she
4:46
meant versus what it kind of
4:48
come to mean colloquially.
4:49
Australian sociologist Judy Singer
4:51
came up with the term neurodiversity in
4:53
her thesis published in nineteen ninety eight,
4:56
Judy Singer offered neurodiversity as a
4:58
term for a civil rights movement. Neurodiversity
5:00
is not supposed to be diagnosis is meant to
5:02
be a term to analyze inequality and
5:05
abuse and a term for activism for
5:07
people who are marginalized on grounds of neurology.
5:09
She has also used bio diversity as a
5:11
comparison explaining diversity
5:14
is a measurement of the degree of variability
5:16
of a given very able in a given population
5:19
or place. It is not a characteristic
5:21
of the individuals in that population. And
5:24
I also don't like that neuropathy has come
5:26
to mean this is a buzzword that I can use
5:28
so I can throw it on top of an employment program
5:30
or put some colorful brains or try to get some
5:32
programmers in cases, when people
5:34
are talking about neurodiversity, they expect it to present
5:36
in particular way. It can
5:39
be used for Allusionist,
5:41
even though that's not at all what intended to
5:43
be used for. I've seen neurodiversity
5:46
type of language or affirming language for people
5:48
to describe things that are, you know,
5:50
like segregated work shelters
5:52
and housing and programs. And so it's
5:54
it's very tricky using language
5:56
that's supposed to be laboratory to
5:58
convey a meaning
5:59
that's anything, but that happens an
6:01
awful
6:02
Unfortunately. Yeah.
6:04
And also just these euphemisms
6:06
where -- Yeah. -- it's it's not
6:09
like anything under the surface has changed people
6:11
haven't adjusted their
6:12
language because they have considered
6:14
how accommodations can be made
6:16
for different people's needs. Yeah.
6:18
They're just oh, I'm supposed to say this now. Like,
6:21
you know, it's just it's just a substitution. It's
6:24
not even really a a period on shift for a lot
6:26
of people at 167, and then that's sad.
6:28
Are
6:28
there any other terms you'd like
6:30
people to add to their
6:31
vocabularies for
6:33
talking about what is in? Sure.
6:34
And they might already have the there's the term
6:36
holistic, which means non autistic.
6:39
Years ago when I first heard that author, that just sounds
6:41
so ridiculous. But
6:42
the reason why so I might use holistic
6:44
or non autistic. But what I what I don't want
6:46
people to do people have started to use neurotypical
6:49
to mean non autistic. And that is
6:51
not true. A person might be
6:53
non autistic, but they could have dyscalculia.
6:56
Or they could, whatever, you know. So,
6:58
like, that's not they're not necessarily, quote unquote,
7:00
or a typical. Well, who decided typical
7:03
exactly? Exactly. The committee.
7:05
Exactly.
7:06
So I
7:07
feel like people should be more precise in what they
7:09
mean. And I also for people
7:11
to use descriptive terms as opposed to functioning
7:13
labels, you know, profound autism career
7:15
autism mild autism, high functioning, low
7:17
functioning, anything that's gonna make a person feel bad,
7:19
like, with
7:20
the opposite of high, it's low. Who
7:22
wants to be low? It's just think that
7:24
people should describe things in a way to
7:26
where
7:26
you know what's happening and
7:28
you're not gonna be made to feel any particular
7:30
way elevated or lowered.
7:32
Speaking of neuro, here's
7:34
the words etymology with Tim player who
7:37
appeared on the Coward episode. I've
7:39
just learned the etymology
7:40
of neuro
7:41
that came from the Greek
7:44
nerve but before that was sinu,
7:47
but also sinu as in like a bowstring
7:49
or an instrument string or
7:51
a penis.
7:54
Those seem like quite radically different
7:56
things are bostering in a penis I
7:58
like to think. One hopes
7:59
Timber
8:00
died discussed some other brain ophthalmology,
8:03
like hippo compass. Oh, gosh.
8:05
I love that word. And the brain's quite a tricky
8:07
one because you'll get lots of hypo.
8:09
Like you'll get the hypothalamus. Now
8:12
that, of course, means under, that's
8:14
the other term. And so I've been calling to get the
8:16
hypothalamus it's the hypothalamus, meaning
8:18
under the thalamus. But hippocampus,
8:21
meaning,
8:22
horse is because it looks like
8:26
Seahorse. Right? So we at
8:31
oh, don't look at them. They look absolutely
8:33
terrifying. I've never seen a hippocampus,
8:35
so don't know. Oh my goodness.
8:38
There's that there's there was a real
8:40
David Cronenburg like Element
8:42
to the Oh, no. III guess the hip the
8:44
hippocampus came first. So so much
8:46
of the brain is kind of
8:48
lovely. Because just the
8:50
first time someone took that piece of
8:52
the brain out, they thought, this
8:55
looks a bit like a belt or a girdle.
8:57
I'm gonna name this after that. This looks
8:59
a bit like a seahorse. What I'm gonna call it the
9:01
hippocampus, the amygdala from
9:05
A Migdalena, meaning
9:07
almond.
9:08
I suppose his almond shaped. The Migdalena
9:11
was also the Latin
9:11
for tonsil
9:13
other languages still called tonsils almonds.
9:16
Really?
9:17
Wow. I guess they are like 167 as
9:19
well.
9:20
Yeah. Everything
9:21
looking like almonds. suppose it is
9:23
quite a general shape. Yeah. In
9:25
the episode viewer, Tim Klar and I talked
9:27
about the origins of the terms anxiety,
9:30
angst, cowardice, 167 I
9:32
brought up the etymology of worry. It
9:34
was originally strangle
9:36
or kill by biting the throat.
9:39
Would you kind of have us still like dogs worrying
9:41
cattle? And it was only relatively late
9:43
in the eighteen hundreds that it
9:45
meant to trouble someone or for someone
9:47
to feel troubled? We still have that
9:49
sense of worrying as being a kind of
9:51
knowing or a terrier
9:54
worrying at a rat throat or something
9:57
like that. And it's a lovely metaphor, isn't it?
9:59
Because it
9:59
it speaks so much to what we do when we
10:02
worry, which is to
10:04
nor at a problem over and
10:06
over to try and wear it down. And
10:08
the sense that worrying is an
10:10
active process, that it's
10:12
still a verb Anxiety is a
10:14
state, isn't it? Or
10:16
a diagnosis or a condition? Worrying
10:19
is is active there's also there's
10:22
often built into that this implication that if I just
10:24
worry at this enough, I might solve it.
10:26
I might be able to
10:28
fix the problem. I might be able to find
10:30
a new solution. It's an expression
10:32
of care in some cases. Yes.
10:36
Yes.
10:37
And yet, I think there's also that violence
10:40
tied up in it as well. And I don't mean, I worry about
10:42
my daughter, so I'm not meaning to malign people who
10:44
worry about their children. I worry about all
10:46
the people I love. I worry about the future of
10:48
the world. But there's
10:52
something I think
10:55
destructive about it
10:57
as well. There's something harmful. There's
11:00
something painful. There's something
11:02
bloody. The etymology of
11:04
it implies how I feel about it that it's
11:07
ultimately a
11:10
futile and painful
11:12
and destructive process. Stephanie
11:14
Fu came on the show to talk about complex post
11:17
traumatic stress disorder. This year she
11:19
published a book, what my bones know,
11:21
in which she recounts the experiences she had
11:23
had in being diagnosed and treated for the condition.
11:25
There was one therapist with whom
11:27
Stephanie had a breakthrough. You
11:29
talk about working with therapist where
11:31
after you've had your
11:32
sessions in person, you studied the
11:34
transcripts.
11:35
What was it about seeing the words written down
11:38
that helped you more than
11:39
just speaking with the therapist.
11:42
I was sort of able to dissociate
11:45
Look, I don't think everyone
11:47
could be able to do this, but I'm very used to looking
11:49
at a Google Doc and editing it.
11:51
So being able to have it on
11:53
the page It
11:55
was, like, first of all, I couldn't argue with it.
11:57
Right? I couldn't
11:58
say, like, no, I wasn't
11:59
triggered. Right? Then, no, you're
12:02
misinterpreting it. It's right there. Like,
12:04
I have the recording. I have the transcript.
12:06
I did it. There's no getting around.
12:09
Number two, yeah, I was
12:11
sort of able to shift from,
12:14
oh my god, you're criticizing me mode until,
12:16
like, we are editing this together mode.
12:18
Here we are in front of the script we wanted
12:20
to be the best we And
12:22
let's just like make little notes everywhere.
12:24
And my therapist was also great at just
12:26
making me feel really safe and cared for.
12:29
And he built a really safe environment
12:31
where if there was somewhere in the
12:33
session where I was like, I
12:35
highlighted it I was like, you're being kind of a dick
12:37
here. He'd be like, oh, absolutely. And
12:40
he would do that himself. He would be like, look, I'm
12:42
pushing you way too hard here. Like,
12:44
this is not okay. He was the first to
12:46
criticize himself and really look at his
12:49
own failings 167 conversation. But
12:51
as as well as saying, like, hey, what's
12:54
going on with you here. You're ranting on
12:56
and on about nothing.
12:58
And I would notice it too. I'm like, you
13:00
you can see it on the page, like, Why is there
13:02
half of a page or two pages of me ranting
13:04
about nothing? And then we would scroll
13:07
And right before this long rant,
13:10
I was, like, talking about my mom holding
13:12
a knife to my throat. And
13:14
I was, like, I see.
13:16
He's, like, yeah, you dissociated. In
13:19
order to tell this story you
13:22
disappeared.
13:24
And you just got lost on the way because
13:27
you were dissociated. You weren't in your you weren't really
13:29
conscious of what you were talking about. I
13:31
was like, yeah, that's very real.
13:34
And it it didn't make me feel
13:36
like I was that was my fault.
13:38
You know?
13:40
Like like
13:42
it was a broke in thing to do. It just help me
13:44
understand. I see why I did that. I understand
13:46
it. Like, I can go
13:49
back and engage with that differently next time
13:51
maybe. If I if I start to feel myself
13:53
talking for a long time, just take
13:55
a step back question like hey, might
13:58
I be triggered right now? Maybe
13:59
I need to slow down.
14:02
Coming up, we've got more complicated feelings
14:04
plus little women and
14:07
life hacks. But right now, we're
14:09
just going to take a quick commercial hiatus.
14:12
The
14:12
illusionist is sponsored by NordVPN,
14:15
one of the most trusted VPNs available.
14:17
So even when you can't trust the rest of the internet
14:20
not to track you or shove malware into your
14:22
life or serve you ads with horrible
14:24
photos of fungal toenails, why why
14:26
why I don't want to buy it stop.
14:28
You can trust your VPN, not to be
14:30
up to anything except enabling
14:33
you to have a private time online.
14:35
And if you like, to call an international
14:37
journey without taking a single step.
14:40
You
14:40
can connect to one of
14:41
the fifty nine available countries and see
14:43
how much their
14:44
products and flights cost,
14:46
or enjoy their speedier internet.
14:49
NordVPN is the price of a half
14:51
dozen eggs per month.
14:52
And one account works for six devices,
14:55
so that's one egg per device
14:57
per month. There are a few different plans available
14:59
and illusionist listeners are blessed with discounts
15:01
of more than sixty percent off right
15:04
now.
15:04
Grab your exclusive NordVPN
15:07
deal by going to nordVPN dot
15:09
com to get a huge
15:11
discount of your NordVPN plan,
15:14
and it's completely risk free with Nord's
15:16
thirty day money back guarantee. That's
15:19
N0RDVPN
15:21
dot com
15:22
slash illusionist.
15:25
This episode is sponsored by 167, the
15:27
huge online library of video and audio
15:29
tutorials, lectures, and documentaries. I
15:32
am always up for watching a documentary
15:34
about unusual
15:35
competitive event and
15:37
167 him has supplied. And
15:39
now can't choose
15:40
which to watch first, the kids table
15:42
about children playing in bridge ornaments against
15:45
opponents with an average age of seventy three
15:47
or inspired to ride,
15:49
but cyclists racing four thousand
15:51
two hundred and thirty three miles a across
15:54
the USA or she
15:56
shares following five female competitors
15:59
in a sheep
15:59
sharing contest. Care to
16:02
join me.
16:02
Right now, 167 Dream is offering illusionlessness
16:05
fifty percent of your first three months.
16:07
As in half of when you sign up for your
16:09
first quarterly plan, a fantastic deal.
16:13
Sign up today through my special
16:14
URL to get this offer. Go
16:16
to 167 dream dot com slash
16:18
illusionist. Again, that is W0NDRIUM
16:25
dot com slash illusionist
16:28
167 dream dot com slash Allusionist.
16:32
Okay. Back to the bonus bits.
16:36
In the objectivity
16:38
episode, Lewis Raven Wallace talked
16:40
about what objectivity is supposed to
16:42
mean 167 what it tends to mean in practice.
16:45
And the failings of the concept. When
16:48
you were working in public media,
16:50
were there words or constructions
16:52
that you were supposed to avoid?
16:54
In the interests of so called objectivity.
16:58
Oh, there were so many words and constructions.
17:01
I remember early in my first year
17:04
I refer to
17:06
a source
17:09
as anti gay,
17:11
I would still refer to that source.
17:14
As anti gay. If I were
17:16
asked today, it was like a
17:18
conservative activist of some
17:20
kind who was advocating pretty
17:22
fiercely against queer trans
17:26
children having rights.
17:28
But
17:28
the word anti gay, my editor
17:30
was like,
17:31
That seems biased. It seems like you're expressing
17:34
an opinion about that person's opinions.
17:37
I know. Mind blown. I can't remember now
17:39
what we changed it to, but it was like instead
17:42
of saying an anti gay activist who's like an activist
17:44
who opposes gay marriage
17:47
or something like that. Well, that's
17:49
a lot of woods. So, like, these also these
17:52
clunky, ungraceful ways
17:54
that we try to avoid terminology
17:56
that might seem biased from some
17:59
perspective. So I was
18:01
just very confused by
18:03
that. I think more recently, there have been
18:05
more pronounced and
18:07
prominent
18:08
examples of
18:10
that kind of weird censorship
18:13
like not being able to call Donald Trump
18:15
a racist or not being able to
18:17
call white supremacists activists,
18:20
white supremacists, the
18:23
whole debate over how to for two
18:25
undocumented immigrants is 167. That
18:27
definitely has played out in many newsrooms
18:30
that editors have said, oh,
18:32
well, undocumented is a sort
18:34
of activist terminology. That's
18:36
what they want to be called. But we're
18:38
going to continue to refer
18:39
to them as illegal.
18:41
Which, of course, calling a person
18:43
illegal has a ton of implicit
18:45
bias in it as to what you think about
18:48
that person's actions that they took to
18:50
survive. And undocumented as
18:52
terminology you know,
18:54
proposed to push
18:55
back against that and to reduce the
18:57
amount of bias against undocumented immigrants
19:00
in the way that their 167 the way that
19:02
their stories and reasons for being in
19:04
this country are perceived. Hear
19:05
more about the language used for migration in
19:08
the OA team episode of the show from a few
19:10
years ago. On
19:11
the topic of bias and objectivity or
19:13
impossibility thereof, here's historian
19:16
Charlotte Lydia Riley who appeared
19:18
in the Emergency Episode about the Maligne
19:20
Emergency, the twelve year military
19:23
conflict that Britain refused to call
19:25
a war. There's
19:26
no objective historian. All historians
19:28
are subject even if you're writing about the tudors
19:30
or ancient Greece, there's
19:32
no objective historian. Right? Yeah.
19:35
I think there is often presumption that the recording
19:37
of history is neutral.
19:39
of course, it isn't. And
19:41
the terminology isn't. It's very
19:43
loaded. Absolutely.
19:44
And what's happening now actually
19:46
is that historians like me and and and other
19:48
historians who are being critical of Empire
19:51
say we are being accused of such activity
19:53
against what is assumed to be an objective historical
19:56
record. So we're
19:58
accused of being politically motivated.
19:59
We're accused of being inhoc
20:02
to the values of our time. We're accused
20:04
of being motivated by our own
20:06
beliefs and feelings about Empire, as
20:09
if that wasn't also the case for the people
20:11
who originally wrote these histories, and
20:13
as if that wasn't the case for the people who want to
20:15
defend Empire as well. The people
20:17
who are defensive of the sort
20:19
of very traditional historical
20:22
record about Empire are just as subjective
20:24
as we are. But it's become a way for
20:26
them to really criticize this rewriting. And
20:28
and much more, actually, when it's
20:30
aimed at people of color, and historians
20:33
of color. They are always being told they can't
20:35
possibly be objective about this or they
20:37
are definitely politically motivated or they're motivated
20:39
by their own experiences as if all historians
20:41
weren't. As if everyone wasn't in the same
20:43
boat? Like, it's not just the kind of culture
20:45
wars you think that's coming from ordinary people.
20:48
It's actually government ministers are telling
20:50
people that they're doing the wrong source of his
20:52
Education Secretary set up a conservative conference
20:54
this year and said that people were teaching anti
20:57
British history in schools and universities. Which
20:59
is sort of funny and sort of is probably going
21:01
to get someone killed. It
21:04
seems really terrible. It does really
21:06
feel like this has really happened recently.
21:09
It started my career. It was hard to get anyone interested
21:11
in empowering. I haven't been a historian for that long.
21:15
And it you know, it was difficult to get people to
21:17
say British Empire seriously ought to think about it
21:19
really at all. It was all the second world war
21:22
and the 167 now,
21:24
empire is everywhere, and it is
21:26
something that has become hugely emotionalized.
21:29
And all
21:30
history is political, but this has become a real
21:32
political football.
21:33
it is interesting because I think it was a lot of kind
21:35
of gentle critique of Empire happening for
21:37
quite a long time, and and now it's very
21:39
difficult to get that stuff written down. when
21:42
you have things like the
21:42
history reclaimed project, they kind of fight against
21:44
this idea of sort of political greatness or whatever.
21:47
And -- Mhmm. -- they want people send an examples
21:49
of things like museum exhibits
21:52
and statues and events that they that have
21:54
been
21:57
tempered or had extra description added
21:59
or been
21:59
kind of worked on by
22:01
historic instrument than more critical of imperialism.
22:04
So
22:04
even retain and explain, which
22:06
is supposedly government policy
22:08
on imperialism even that's now coming under criticism.
22:10
They're not actually that keen on the explaining element
22:12
of that. No. Think it'll be
22:14
very hard for them to do
22:15
that and get the other things to hold up. Mhmm.
22:17
That's the trouble with the truth. Yeah. It looks
22:20
bad.
22:20
When it was bad, it is bad. Right? It's
22:22
quite difficult to find yourself constantly labeled anti
22:24
British when actually what you're doing is just
22:27
writing quite banal,
22:28
things that happened. You
22:31
can get labeled anti British
22:32
as a historian. Really for not being particularly
22:35
critical. You actually don't have to be that
22:37
out there.
22:37
To be seen as a kind of anti British activist.
22:40
The fragility.
22:42
Mhmm. It seems also a bit inconsistent.
22:46
That well well, maybe it's because I you've
22:49
got several
22:49
generations of people now who
22:51
were too young to have lived through the times
22:53
when a lot of
22:55
these conflicts were happening -- Mhmm. --
22:57
but also weren't educated about them because,
22:59
like, at school history, we weren't taught about
23:01
anything that recent.
23:03
And then the empire is just like
23:05
this kind of thing where you can have a
23:07
mindset that it's
23:08
sort of in the past.
23:10
Or was gently a good
23:12
thing, and
23:14
then you get quite animated about preserving
23:16
it against criticism and whatnot.
23:18
It is quite strange It's funny to think about
23:20
it in tandem with the second cohort actually because
23:23
a lot of people talk about the second cohort was if they
23:25
were there. And the number of people in
23:27
Britain
23:27
who having direct experience
23:29
in the second world always vanishingly small
23:31
now. Actually, it was such a long time ago.
23:33
But
23:34
because I think
23:36
we kind of got frozen in time as a
23:38
moment that the second world war was kind of a generation
23:41
ago. Yeah. And
23:43
we've continued that feeling that it's about
23:45
a generation ago. Right? So we still talk
23:47
about it as if our grandparents or
23:49
as if people who are grandparents today were
23:51
involved in the war fought in the war. You know, my grandparents did
23:53
fight in the war, and my grandparents are no longer with us.
23:55
We we're getting to the point now, actually, where there's not
23:58
very much actual memory,
23:58
full memory of the war. So
24:01
that's
24:01
something that we think was being very recent. It's not
24:03
very recent. Whereas the Empire is something that
24:05
we think about has happened. happened a long time ago,
24:07
so long ago, why are you jacking up the past? Whereas,
24:09
actually, many of these countries, India
24:12
Pakistan and Bangladesh became independent
24:14
in the late nineteen forties. Most are in
24:16
societies 167 the Caribbean become independent
24:18
in the mid nineteen sixties. Still very
24:20
much within living
24:21
memory. There were still quite a lot of people
24:24
alive in Britain and whose family have history
24:26
within the empire,
24:27
they themselves do or or it's only a
24:29
generation back. And it's interesting, I
24:31
think, the way we talk about the two things that the empire
24:33
is something happened so long ago that if you tried to talk
24:36
about it now, you're distracted 167 the past and the second
24:38
world war is something which apparently happened so recently
24:40
that you can't as a historian ever, criticize
24:43
people's interpretations of it or talk about
24:45
correcting historical record because it
24:47
happened so recently, and
24:49
it is sort of interesting disconnect. And
24:51
it's it's kind
24:52
of soft British patriotism,
24:54
which is completely
24:56
unthinkingly uncritical of imperialism. 167
24:58
remembers Empire as a sort of Victorian aesthetic.
25:01
Yep. Doesn't remember it as a nineteen forties,
25:03
nineteen fifties, nineteen sixties aesthetic.
25:05
Wonder what most people's boundary is
25:07
for news events
25:10
becoming history
25:12
because it's
25:13
sort of theoretically immediately yet.
25:16
It's
25:16
funny because I think from a historian's perspective,
25:18
it's
25:18
to do with
25:20
well, lastly, from a historian's perspective,
25:23
it's to do with the skills and the tools that you
25:25
used think about it.
25:26
It's not to do with distance. It's not to do
25:29
with timing. Historians, I think think
25:31
about history because
25:32
we think about ourselves as people who use particular
25:34
tools and particular skills, and we have particular
25:36
ways engaging with the past. And
25:39
we can do that
25:40
about something that happened last year.
25:43
I guess the theme of this bonus compilation
25:45
is thoughts and feelings. Let
25:48
me move up for textual theme of absolutely
25:50
everything. Therefore, it's not particularly remarkable that
25:52
the next section is about those things
25:54
too. Hannah McGregor appeared on the
25:56
episode's sentiment talking about to
25:58
mentality and literature. And we got
26:00
to talking about Louisa May or Scots noble Little
26:02
Women, wherein the four March sisters
26:04
live with their Saint Lee army, while
26:06
father is waving an army chaplain during
26:09
the American Civil War.
26:11
In the book, it is considered far
26:13
more Integrity
26:14
laced to write what you know
26:16
and with real emotions. But in reality, Louise
26:19
Mayor Court was doing that to make
26:21
money because she much preferred writing swashbuckling
26:24
genre fiction. She sure did. Good
26:26
for her. Yeah. Yeah. It's
26:28
a great example
26:30
of a version of
26:32
a common genre form
26:35
that has endured specifically
26:38
because it was actually really
26:40
messing with the genre at the
26:42
time. This is a constant challenge for literary
26:44
scholars that a lot of the the
26:46
texts that endure are actually the outliers.
26:49
167 that we actually spend very little time
26:51
talking or thinking about books that were
26:53
the mainstream in their historical moment.
26:55
But it was absolutely this
26:58
weirdo Lesbian. Being
27:01
told by her publisher, there's a lot of money
27:03
in girls fiction her
27:05
being like,
27:07
okay, fine. I'm a working
27:09
writer. I'll write some girls fiction,
27:11
hear some girls fiction,
27:13
and also just refusing to
27:15
play the game a little bit. One
27:17
of my favorite bits of that. We have actual
27:20
quotes from her saying that,
27:22
you know, she published the book in two parts. And
27:25
For the second part, everybody wanted
27:27
Joe to end up with Lori because
27:29
that's the conclusion of the sentimental
27:31
arc. And because
27:33
Joe was based on her, she
27:36
was like, no, Joe isn't gonna end up with anybody.
27:39
Joe wants to be a writer and you're gonna be
27:41
a woman and a writer, you can't get married because
27:43
there's no space for your career if you're running
27:45
a household. But her publisher
27:47
was like, no. Joe has to get married.
27:50
Otherwise, people will be wildly dissatisfied.
27:52
And she was like, fun. You want Joe to
27:54
get married? She's gonna marry a weird
27:56
old German guy.
27:58
I'll show you well dissatisfaction.
27:59
It's everyone's marriage in this
28:02
book.
28:02
And Laurie's gonna marry her
28:04
horrible little sister. Yeah.
28:07
Yeah. It's a a real fuck
28:10
you to the expectations. Still feel a bit
28:12
sore
28:12
about how all that turned out, and they're gonna set
28:14
up a boys school. And they're gonna set
28:16
up boys
28:16
school, how empowering. I think it's
28:18
such an interesting example
28:20
of somebody who is so obviously bucking
28:23
against the restrictions. Of
28:25
what they can say in their moment.
28:27
There are these genre expectations being
28:30
forced upon her and there's her
28:32
very the cool desire to write a book
28:34
that will make her money. And then there's
28:37
that attempt to just, you
28:39
know, sneak in something that
28:41
sorta just says
28:43
no to
28:45
all of those expectations. When
28:47
you were describing the tropes
28:49
of
28:49
sentimental fiction of the nineteenth century, The
28:52
other example that I
28:54
thought of
28:54
was what Katie did Mhmm.
28:56
-- where you've got a
28:58
bit
28:58
similar to Joe and little women,
29:01
a sassy, naughty, female
29:04
weed. But
29:05
then
29:06
she is kind of
29:08
fully converted into the sentimental with
29:11
a spinal injury.
29:15
And the council of
29:17
her beatific disabled cousin?
29:19
Yes. Yes. Absolutely. And
29:21
I mean, that is an important part of the sentimental
29:24
education, and a lot of these girls undergo,
29:27
right, that Joe becomes
29:29
better
29:30
because of Beth's
29:31
illness. You
29:32
sort of encounter this this
29:35
perfect paragon of sentimentality who
29:37
has to be dying because there is
29:39
nothing more perfect that a woman
29:41
can do than die. Truly
29:43
the purest the purest way
29:45
for us to exist is to And
29:48
we still see this, you know. Up to
29:50
the present day, like repeated in contemporary
29:52
culture. The dead wife is the perfect
29:54
wife.
29:55
Except in Rebecca. Except
29:57
in Rebecca. That's why Rebecca's
29:59
an interesting
29:59
Gothic. The Gothic, the
30:02
dead wife is a sinister presence.
30:05
In the sentimental, the dead
30:07
wife is the perfect wife.
30:08
There's a really interesting
30:10
trend in scholarship recently
30:12
about sentimental novels
30:14
pointing out that
30:17
while the goal of the sentimental
30:20
narrative is the emotional maturity
30:22
of her heroine, The story
30:24
becomes deeply boring, the second
30:26
she becomes mature, because the
30:28
emotionally mature 167 doesn't do
30:30
anything.
30:31
so we spend a
30:33
lot of time in the childhood. We
30:36
dwell in the childhood because
30:38
that when the narrative is interesting. That's
30:40
when she can actually go out and do things.
30:42
But she's gotta become a army at some
30:44
point. Otherwise,
30:46
she has not sort of reached her
30:49
her conclusion.
30:50
Mommy, old death. Mommy, her
30:52
death. That's
30:53
it. Allusionist.
30:57
it they say in never let me go completed?
31:00
Yes. Yes. Exactly. There's
31:02
two ways that a woman can become completed,
31:05
and that is that she either becomes a army
31:07
or dies.
31:08
Either way, desactualized a
31:11
life lived in
31:12
sacrifice and deference to others. Yes.
31:15
Yes. All of the above.
31:17
Anger, present,
31:18
but contained. Yep. Yeah.
31:20
And within this
31:21
sort of imagination of what is possible
31:24
for women, we then have to
31:26
have, like, institutions insist
31:28
stems that punish or manage women
31:31
who refuse to fit into
31:33
those molds. Right? So we've got
31:35
hatred of the spinster, the suspicion
31:38
of the spinster. We've got the
31:40
long history of institutionalizing women
31:43
for hysteria. Because they refuse
31:46
to fit into these molds. So we've got
31:48
ways of managing all of these
31:50
unruly bodies. That aren't
31:53
willing to either
31:54
die or become a army.
31:57
Jilenta Greenberg and Christian Meinzer talked
31:59
on the self help
31:59
episode about things they've learned from
32:02
living by various self help books on
32:04
their podcast by the book.
32:06
I asked them what they think about the term life
32:08
hack. Which came out of hack
32:10
being used in computing as a solution that
32:12
might be little unorthodox and perhaps crude at
32:14
the usual, but probably quicker. Like
32:17
chains soaring a path directly to the center of
32:19
the hedge maze.
32:20
Lifehack is attributed to technology
32:23
writer, Daniel Rourke, in two thousand and four,
32:25
he meant it to denote the kinds of little bits
32:28
of script that programmers would write to make their
32:30
daily lives easier. Programs to
32:32
help them remember household chores or not 167
32:34
birthdays. Whereas now life
32:36
hack will mean things like turning
32:39
toilet rolls into all kinds of storage or decorative
32:41
items or making mashed potato out
32:43
of crisps, which seems more hassle than
32:45
matching a potato to me.
32:47
And
32:47
a lot of the life hacks are just
32:49
fairly standard tips. So
32:51
why do they get called life hacks?
32:54
I think it's a way get men to
32:56
read self help books And
32:59
and it's also, you know, the language
33:01
of a lot of social media too.
33:03
Just like, oh, we don't
33:04
wanna actually have to work for this, but
33:07
Watch this thirty second TikTok video
33:09
to find a hack for this. There's
33:11
a lot of, you know, let's do it quickly.
33:14
Let's have it sound masculine. When I think
33:16
of a hack, I think of like a machete.
33:18
Mhmm. Yes. Yeah. Hacksaw. Yeah.
33:20
This has gotta be tough. This has gotta be
33:22
quick. This has gotta be violent, and
33:24
it's gonna pay off. That's
33:27
what I think of when I think of hacks. And I
33:29
also think that very rarely
33:32
is a hack life changing. If it's something
33:34
that only is a ten second difference in my life,
33:36
or
33:36
a thirty second thing that I have to do differently,
33:40
I don't usually find that transforms my entire
33:42
life. Yeah.
33:44
Diet. It does feel
33:46
like transformation is
33:48
only thirty seconds of video consumption
33:50
away. Yeah. remains
33:54
just beyond our grasp, shocking,
33:56
I know.
33:57
Also, the life hacks are often just doing
33:59
things in a way you can do things
34:02
-- Right. -- but is new a bet on it. I was gonna say sometimes
34:04
it's just, yeah, how to, like,
34:06
more easily separate the
34:08
egg white from the yolk. That's just, like,
34:10
another way of doing something. And it's just
34:12
a, like, buzzy way of being, like, here's a way
34:14
to do it.
34:15
Here's another technique in the kitchen. Yeah.
34:17
A technique. Thank you.
34:19
Instead, we say, lay that.
34:21
Yeah. I just want the currency of that term
34:23
to fully dwindle. Hopefully
34:26
it is. It's gotta be. Since
34:28
Gilentra and Kristen are mavens of
34:30
concerted self improvement, I asked them
34:32
about New Year's resolutions. Tisch
34:35
the season,
34:36
I've definitely not made any resolutions
34:39
since we've been making by the book
34:41
because living by self help books
34:43
is like making a new resolution every
34:45
time you sort of sign up for 167.
34:47
That's intense. So I've I've sort of let
34:49
myself off
34:50
the hook when it comes to the actual New
34:52
Year's resolution.
34:54
Yeah. III don't
34:56
really need New Year's resolutions. See
34:59
how happy I'm well adjusted. I'm
35:02
good. No. Nothing I'm happy and well adjusted,
35:04
but New Year's resolutions just
35:07
they seem so fraught. And the whole idea
35:09
of New Year, New Year, New Year, like what's bad with
35:11
Old Me. You know? And
35:14
so many people, they just fail at their
35:16
New Year's resolutions. It's just because most
35:18
people aren't clear and specific
35:20
and attainable
35:23
when it comes to their goals.
35:25
And so a lot of them also just
35:27
feel very punitive very few people
35:29
are making resolutions that sound fun. Right.
35:31
Right. Why don't we make resolutions
35:33
that aren't really about
35:34
punishing ourselves that aren't about, like, cutting
35:36
out sugar Yeah. 167 you
35:38
add something? Yeah.
35:40
Like, a goal I came up with was midyear this
35:42
year. I'm like, I'm gonna
35:44
to
35:46
celebrity memoirs while I walk
35:49
just see how many I can get through. See,
35:51
that's my kind of resolution. It's like, it's not
35:54
necessarily at New Year's, and it's like, this
35:56
is a fun thing to do. I'm resolving to do
35:58
something kind of fun this year,
35:59
you know.
36:00
I've made two in
36:02
adult life that really stuck. One
36:04
was to keep a spreadsheet of every
36:06
book I finished, which was to get myself
36:09
reading more. I've been keeping it for
36:11
twelve years, and the other was not to click
36:13
on any daily mail links. And both of
36:15
those have gone great. I love that
36:17
second one. Yeah. Yeah.
36:19
And I love it. Love it. Both
36:22
these resolutions of mine have been going strong for
36:24
more than a decade. The Allusionist
36:26
made at the start of this year was to spend more
36:28
time with illusionist listeners. And I did,
36:30
I set up the Elizabeth Discord and we
36:32
have the live streams
36:34
and the illusionist patrons
36:36
hang out and it's been really lovely,
36:38
in my opinion, ten out of ten years
36:39
outcomes. You you
36:41
would like to join us, you would be ever so welcome.
36:44
Go to the dot org slash
36:46
donate.
36:54
The
36:54
Allusionist is sponsored by Catan,
36:56
the social board game of Strategy and
36:58
luck. With the reconfigurable board
37:00
made of hexagonal tiles so, you never
37:03
played the same game twice. Endless
37:05
variety, which is Fortune it
37:07
because Bob George
37:08
and Susan are trapped at home by a
37:10
blizzard and Melchior says he'll
37:12
bring
37:12
the snowplow around but only if George
37:14
apologizes. And if anything that
37:16
situation makes the blizzard seem warm,
37:18
the WiFi hasn't been working since
37:20
that thing, but unloaded. He says
37:22
it was an accident, but And
37:24
the TV has never recovered from Susan's
37:27
rock star phase. But luckily,
37:29
to pass the time they do have
37:31
the game Catan. Several sets actually,
37:34
George bought versions in German, Japanese
37:36
Finnish, and Bulgaria. That time he and Malkia
37:38
were arguing about who
37:39
could speak the most languages. And they also have
37:41
the frenemies of Catan expansion. It'll
37:44
keep them amused until the Thor. Catan
37:47
is a board game for three to four players, aged
37:49
ten plus, but younger kids complained of
37:51
initial adult guidance. Get catan
37:53
at catan shop dot com slash Listeners
37:57
of this podcast get ten percent off the original
37:59
base game Gatan by using the promo Allusionist
38:02
at checkout, often not good on
38:04
other Qatar titles of merchandise, but is good
38:06
on the original base game Qatar. This
38:10
episode is sponsored by Mint Mobile
38:13
Hey, cell phone users of America, this
38:16
winterfall season, the best deal
38:18
in wireless can only be found at
38:20
mint mobile. Right now, when
38:22
you switch to mint mobile and buy any three
38:24
month plan, you'll get another three
38:26
months for free As the
38:28
first company to sell premium wireless
38:30
service online only, Mint mobile
38:32
lets you
38:33
order and activate from home with e
38:35
sim, while saving tons on
38:37
phone plans starting at just fifteen dollars
38:39
a month. And you can start
38:41
family plan from only two lines,
38:43
which is great
38:44
if say you'd all
38:46
been using Melchior's family plan
38:49
he's cut you off, changed his number
38:51
his name
38:51
just to be saved as old fingerprints 167
38:53
delivery of a number of prosthetic beads and
38:55
eyebrow wigs.
38:57
For a limited time, by any three month
38:59
mint mobile
38:59
plan, they get three more months free
39:02
by going to mint mobile dot com slash
39:04
illusionist. That's mint mobile
39:07
dot com slash
39:07
illusionist. Cut your wireless
39:10
bill to just fifteen box a month at
39:12
mintmobile dot com slash
39:14
Allusionist.
39:16
Thanks
39:21
to you for listening to the show this
39:22
year, and thanks to all of the people who've appeared on
39:24
it. In this episode, you heard again from
39:27
Jingtu. Merenica Guido and Nairoil,
39:29
Tim Clare, Stephanie Fu, Lewis
39:31
Raven Wallace, Charlotte Lidya Riley, Hannah
39:34
MacGregor, Kristin Meinzer, and Jilenta
39:36
Greenberg. I'll link to the episode
39:38
there in earlier this year at the dot
39:40
org slash bonus twenty twenty two.
39:44
Your
39:46
randomly selected word from
39:47
your dictionary today is.
39:52
Washing. That's Washing
39:55
with no g on hand. Washing,
39:57
noun, air nuggets.
39:59
An increase in the angle of incidence for an
40:02
airplane wing towards the
40:03
tip.
40:04
Try using washing in an email today.
40:08
This episode was produced 167 Helen Martin
40:11
Orswick makes the original music for the Here's
40:13
compositions via pale bird music dot
40:15
com and as pale bird on band
40:18
camp. Our
40:19
ad partner is multitude.
40:20
Thanks to Amanda and Carly
40:22
for their work on behalf of the show this year.
40:24
To sponsoring episode in twenty twenty
40:26
three, contact them at multitude dot
40:28
productions slash ads.
40:30
This is the last illusion of episode twenty
40:32
twenty two.
40:33
The show will return with new episodes
40:35
mid January twenty twenty three and in
40:37
the meantime stay in touch by finding show
40:40
on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter.
40:43
And you can hear or read every episode.
40:45
Get links to more information about the topics,
40:48
and donate to the show and join the Allusionist
40:51
And see the fold that you're in peace with
40:53
the randomly selected words of the show's
40:55
forever home. Be Allusionist org.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More