Podchaser Logo
Home
What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

Released Thursday, 11th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

What Would a Second U.S. Civil War Look Like?

Thursday, 11th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Your brain needs support and New Ali

0:02

brainy Jews are a delightful way to

0:04

take care of your cognitive health. Made

0:07

with scientifically backed ingredients like Thai ginger,

0:09

elephantine and caffeine. briny to support healthy

0:11

brain function and help you find your

0:13

focus, stage show or get energized. Be

0:15

kind to your mind and get these

0:18

new trope of choose at all he.com

0:20

That's olly.com These statements have not been

0:22

evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.

0:24

This product is not intended to diagnose,

0:26

treat, cure or prevent. Any disease,

0:30

I. Met with Alex. Garland director of

0:32

the new Buzzy Film Civil War.

0:35

On the day of the solar eclipse. Irish,

0:37

physically. Eclipse happening right this second? Is

0:39

that weird? Sorry

0:43

to interrupt. Literally a very dark go.

0:46

It is and also people started by Windows on the

0:48

other side of History which is. I. Mean

0:50

it was suddenly become very still, very quiet

0:52

on the streets of New York, right outside

0:55

of the A Twenty Four. Movie Studio offices

0:57

where we were. Meeting. And

0:59

it was eerie. loose fitting, His

1:02

movie is set in a quiet

1:04

war torn American landscape, one where

1:07

Texas and California have gone to

1:09

war against a three term president

1:11

who was disbanded the F B

1:13

I and deemed journalists enemy combatants.

1:16

May be shot. On sight, The

1:18

story starts as that civil war is coming

1:20

to an end. You're. Treated to

1:23

images of burnt out military

1:25

helicopters and mall parking lots,

1:27

interstate highways clogged with abandoned

1:29

cars and you follow a

1:31

group of photo journalist trying

1:33

to capture the final images

1:35

of the war at any

1:37

cost. Now

1:43

Carlin was the writer behind the

1:45

zombie flick twenty eight days later.

1:47

And frankly, I wished. A zombie would

1:49

have appeared in this felt kind of offer

1:51

some relief from what felt. Like an

1:53

all too real scenario. This

1:56

is a movie that ass what could happen. If

1:58

the system of checks and balances, The

2:00

whole, the democracy. Together fall apart,

2:03

And I wanted to know how you

2:05

talk about that without lecturing. Or talking

2:07

down to the people. That you

2:09

want to see it. This is the

2:12

assignments I'm. Audie Cornish. And

2:14

on Today's Show writer and

2:16

director Alex Garland on his

2:18

films. Of all. Our

2:28

true and will come to the assignments. Priests

2:30

are you talking with us versus

2:32

we've talked about your films are

2:34

being a kind of arguments. What

2:37

was the argument that was the germ of this

2:39

one? Argument

2:42

as conversation the outside. But

2:44

yes, you are the Germans.

2:47

This one it was. There

2:49

were two distinct areas for

2:52

their completely co related. One

2:54

of them is a populist

2:57

politics. Division. Populism

3:00

really leads towards extremism. With and

3:02

where were you when you are

3:04

encountering Populism? Oh. Everywhere.

3:06

I mean I have my own

3:08

country in the Uk. It's extremely

3:11

evidence here. It's of isn't across

3:13

Europe. Or

3:15

populism and polarization in the

3:17

to the way they go

3:19

together as and the journey

3:21

their own. I'm Ah, Israel,

3:23

A Asia, South America. It's

3:25

It's not hard to find

3:27

countries that have some kind

3:29

of deep division which is

3:31

represented. In

3:34

politics and in their population. So

3:36

there was that side of it

3:38

which was just putting rule very

3:40

familiar with and has been around

3:42

for quite awhile now or Sli

3:45

and there was another set of

3:47

those which was to do with

3:49

journalism and journalists and wondering why

3:51

journalism had lost the traction that

3:53

it used to have, Why was

3:55

perceived as being an enemy of

3:57

them? White was interested. So

4:00

what had led to that

4:02

situation? Which obviously, stitch, Complex

4:04

picture, but that's a d if the

4:07

question is, where did all come from

4:09

Us Reconfirm. Yeah, there's always a

4:11

dram or something and I know

4:13

for me, storytelling like we haven't.

4:15

Done very many many movies on a shell. And

4:17

one this came out and and. The internet

4:20

kind of went nuts because of what they

4:22

perceived to be like a kind of obvious.

4:24

Allegories: The first thing I thought, well in the

4:27

why is Alex Garland doing it and that was

4:29

the germ of me wanting to talk to You

4:31

mean it was like, wait a second. Why would

4:33

this person. Tackle.

4:36

This, and. After seeing it without

4:38

like irony, right like this is not something

4:40

that's a little bit of a joke or

4:42

a wink. No. No. Partly

4:44

because I. Ah, I take it

4:47

seriously. I don't take it seriously in

4:49

a cell serious way. Of In some

4:51

ways if you would work on something

4:54

for two years, you'd better care about

4:56

it because you're gonna be living with

4:58

it for a long time if fattest

5:00

in the and was longer than two

5:03

years. But also, I don't actually take

5:05

the subject matter lightly with a wink.

5:07

In fact, I have a feeling that

5:10

we partly entered into the situation wherein

5:12

by people being playful with serious stuff.

5:14

What I think. Is the people who.

5:17

Believed. And this was

5:19

politicians but it also included sections

5:21

of the media to they could

5:23

act in a way the didn't

5:26

take. Deposition. Seriously,

5:28

in terms of a requirement to true

5:30

saw to society or two tone or

5:32

to the meaning of words and that

5:34

it was all kind of in a

5:37

way knock about fun and it might

5:39

progress. They career birds wasn't really that

5:41

damaging because they're just a small voice

5:43

in a big canvas. A little bit

5:45

of like this story is really wild

5:48

without underscoring for the audience. The very

5:50

serious nature of some of those. Ideas.

5:53

Yeah so what I'm saying is really

5:55

Wild Sandy Hook Cove whatever it is

5:57

that is the example been used his.

6:00

Is an invention and

6:02

ah ah. I. Get

6:04

it? So kind of. The

6:06

online commentary that known escalated

6:08

into online Prince isn't politicians.

6:10

anybody with a voice. social

6:12

media the that there isn't

6:14

any danger attached to doing

6:16

these things. There's something playful

6:18

about doing these things that

6:21

would absolutely include politicians as

6:23

well. And.

6:27

It's it's a complicated better because.

6:30

Ah, There

6:32

is in some ways an element

6:34

of truth, which is that being

6:36

irreverent has it's own function and

6:39

and different voices in different spaces

6:41

have their own function, but as

6:43

it drifts away from being extremists,

6:46

them becomes mainstream than something else

6:48

says to occur and I felt

6:51

worried. but lots of other people

6:53

feel worried about it's one of

6:55

my one of my general feelings

6:58

about this whole subject matter is

7:00

that I'm of subject. Matter meaning

7:02

polarization as a threat of. Dysfunctional

7:06

Democracy ratings breaking down with

7:08

which leads to authoritarianism eventually

7:10

can lead to fascism in

7:13

fact, and that this was

7:15

it, that there was a

7:17

generalized sense of disquiet and

7:19

the disquiet was not located

7:21

to a political party it

7:24

actually quite shared. It

7:26

would probably probably be shared in

7:29

a sensor a space, but still

7:31

shed. And ah, I could certainly

7:33

see lots of journalists doing good

7:35

work and. Being.

7:38

Straight food and balanced and honest and

7:41

direct by their work having no traction

7:43

in the way. Used to have tracks

7:45

and and so I would think about

7:47

why that was what was going on

7:49

and what? What are those journalists their

7:51

to do? What? Why do we need

7:53

them? What are they protecting us from

7:56

The they're not able to protect us

7:58

from in the same way. Psyllids. Interesting

8:00

about what you're saying. I can

8:02

help people out with a plot

8:04

even if you haven't seen. and

8:06

you have this handful of effectively

8:08

war journalists on American soil. taking

8:10

an odyssey? a trip from New

8:12

York. I'm. To. The

8:14

District of Columbia where they hope to

8:17

get the big scoop. The final scoop.

8:19

This sort of fascists president either stepping

8:21

down, being captured, are doing an interview

8:23

with him as some kind and being

8:25

courageous. Take. Taking a

8:27

personal risk for a story,

8:29

but in choosing. Kind of

8:32

war correspondents. I feel like you picked. A. Certain

8:34

breed. At. That was sort

8:36

of a more time journalists. They

8:38

have experiences that. Can.

8:41

Turn them into risk takers can turn

8:43

them into pro tip. Get right. A

8:45

kind of cynicism who the reason why I'm

8:48

saying this is eating Take small. Town newspaper

8:50

people and turn them into people reporting raid

8:52

what you did as you took people. Who

8:55

we typically see. In

8:57

Glimpses An international reports

9:00

and. You brought them here

9:02

and it made it for a very jarring

9:04

experience raid on for for me as an

9:07

American a made for drawing experience because I'm

9:09

not used to seeing my country through that

9:11

lens run. Are

9:14

also chose them just by always reporters

9:16

which in that way they are likes.

9:18

Some. A work on a small time,

9:20

a small town paper. Innocence. They're recording

9:23

what I see, but they're the sharp

9:25

end of that form of reporting for

9:27

sure. And and yeah, that's baked into

9:29

the story. The really you have a

9:31

journalist through the start of the film

9:33

is were traumatized by things they have

9:35

encountered over the course of their work

9:37

life and is now having to deal

9:39

with that kind of imagery being at

9:42

home and away that she didn't expect

9:44

to saw the she might have been

9:46

warning against innocence. And of imagery

9:48

that as an at the certainly I

9:50

would say the West, but certainly Americans

9:52

were sort of studiously protected from. So

9:55

the main characters play by Chris Sundance.

9:57

He's the sort. Of long time, you

9:59

know, Photo journalist and. There

10:02

were so many visual. References and her

10:04

memory. Two traumas that I recall

10:06

sort of reading about and reporting

10:08

so. Whether that's.

10:12

Necklace. Same rate which is like though the

10:14

way. That anti Apartheid activists would

10:16

execute traders and South Africa

10:18

seeing body is hanging from

10:20

an overpass. Something people may

10:23

think of from the reporting

10:25

of cartels. And Mexico. All

10:27

of these images that she. Has

10:29

lived with as he put. On. Us

10:31

Soil. yeah that's exactly right. Do the

10:33

same references you have for the same

10:36

ones I have and I think part

10:38

of.is it is a sort of and

10:40

to exceptionalism. Point

10:42

which is the nobody's immune. Underneath the

10:44

whole film is a pretty simple idea

10:47

or think which is that the system

10:49

of checks and balances we have which

10:51

is. To parts. Of government

10:53

but also journalists are there to

10:55

guard against something that they're not

10:57

arbitrary, they're there to protect us

10:59

and if you are road them.

11:02

What are you guarding against? The thing

11:04

to you are guarding against might now

11:06

a rise and people do get complacent

11:09

about seeing the and other countries and

11:11

do not believe that they have some

11:13

kind of immunity. They have no immunity.

11:15

Immunity is actually the checks and balances.

11:17

and if in the playful way I

11:20

was talking about earlier, you could call

11:22

it playful. or you could call it

11:24

irresponsible. You erode those things. They.

11:26

Can be serious consequences. One.

11:30

Other point on this that I sound interesting and

11:32

help. It's not a spoiler to talk about pets.

11:35

You have references throughout the

11:37

cel Mai characters will imply

11:39

that their parents or somewhere

11:41

somewhere else people aren't paying

11:43

attention to the fact that

11:45

there. Is a violent Civil

11:47

war going on on American

11:49

soil? A. Or

11:51

offences. Are

11:54

doesn't wear is like a. Pretty.

11:57

Huge civil war going follicles on

11:59

there. I'm sure

12:01

that. We. Just try to say

12:03

I'll. Stay on. With.

12:06

What we see on the news seems like it's

12:08

for the best. To

12:11

let me know if you're training. Them.

12:14

At one point there is a character

12:16

who says well liked that's not happening

12:18

here that's on the news. It is

12:20

depressing as it's like the logical conclusion

12:22

to people constantly telling you that your

12:24

fake news. Or that there's misinformation that

12:26

one day they'll look you in the

12:28

face and not acknowledge. That like tanks rolling

12:31

down the street. Yes

12:33

yes absolutely As and says the thing

12:35

I would spend a lot of time

12:37

thinking about why is the when I

12:39

was younger If the press broke a

12:42

certain kind of story about a certain

12:44

kind of politician andrew tend to look

12:46

the best example be Nixon was codes

12:48

to perfect bit of journalism leading to

12:50

the downfall of a president. or was

12:53

he doing he was lying and he

12:55

was being a crook and he was

12:57

called Alfred A Knopf Ended his career

12:59

and I wonder. Would. That

13:01

happen in the same way Now

13:04

I'm not sure why wouldn't happen.

13:06

In fact I suspect I really

13:08

suspect in my not that say

13:10

in. Arguably has

13:12

happened and it didn't have

13:14

any consequences or the consequences

13:16

are currently. A noble

13:19

or in the when the process of seeing

13:21

it will get played out says. Is no

13:23

political ideology in the cell? Mean you

13:25

don't have. Read without. Ah, tell. Me

13:27

more it when when I mean when I that is

13:29

Nobody comes out and says I'm from a red. State:

13:32

I'm from a blue state. I'm from

13:34

this party. I'm from That party would

13:36

tell me how you think of it

13:38

actually does. That's true, but that in

13:41

itself is not the absence of a

13:43

political ideology. Political ideologies don't have to

13:45

reduce to red vs. Blue, And in

13:47

fact, within the film there is a

13:50

deliberate discussion about that to do with

13:52

Texas and California having joined forces, which

13:54

is there to provoke a question which

13:56

is on what terms as the Civil

13:59

War playing out. I'm why

14:01

are these two allied? What would

14:03

they consider to be more important

14:05

than their political differences, right? In

14:07

this case, it's a president to

14:09

as it stands to a third

14:12

term, disbands. the F B. Attacks

14:15

People are correct. Strikes on Us

14:17

soil without. Say this anything is a

14:19

fascist. Yeah yeah is it isn't as they

14:21

were of the latest. I say it was

14:23

interesting. You picked a couple of precise be

14:26

I did pick precise speeds and that is

14:28

usually to terms in which. The

14:31

conversation in for in the film

14:33

takes place or I hope it

14:35

allows for conversation and interpretation and

14:37

discuss and. I

14:39

think it's more that people say

14:42

the film is not political and

14:44

then I question just what politics

14:46

means as a word. And

14:48

also of people say it's not sufficiently

14:51

left wing enough for is not sufficiently

14:53

right wing enough. One of the things

14:55

I would ask is what do you

14:57

mean by left wing and right wing?

15:00

What is left wing? Right wing actually

15:02

means you what? And also where it

15:04

is, where the their boundaries sit. Where

15:08

does it stop? Being a left wing, right

15:10

wing discussion, it becomes an extremist discussion. all

15:12

like what you need to see for it

15:14

to fall under your. Preconceived. Notions.

15:18

Just because it does, It's not laid out.

15:20

Using all of our

15:23

cultural. And media

15:25

markers only mean it's not political

15:27

are utterly one of the things

15:29

I'm saying is to things have

15:31

been dragged into what is mostly

15:33

left right debate that I'm not

15:35

sure have any real position within

15:37

left wing or right wing politics.

15:39

So I just whenever having that

15:41

conversation I need to know what

15:43

people mean by left wing and

15:45

right Wing. Are they talking about

15:47

ah way taxation gets used to

15:49

they talk about free markets versus

15:51

regulated markets. Are they talking about

15:53

abortion? And I'm. Personally not sure.

15:56

Whether abortion is a left rights

15:58

issue, I can eat. The imagine a

16:00

leftwing person who is anti abortion. Maybe

16:03

because they're a carrier. For example, I

16:05

can't say the same about free markets.

16:07

Or yeah, tell that overlay we have

16:09

a tendency to us. We

16:11

don't have a we have. You know,

16:13

we have an overlay and the question

16:15

is, what are the forces behind those

16:17

overlays? What is being dragged into the

16:19

debate? Who is dragged Me into the

16:21

debate? Why are they dragged me into

16:23

the To debate And how much of

16:25

that is part of polarization? How much

16:27

of that is somebody saying I need

16:29

that constituency votes away? So I'm gonna

16:31

take this position whether I believe it

16:33

or not. For example, Outs

16:37

Carlin is the writer and director

16:39

of Civil War Without Now More

16:41

In A Moment. We.

17:05

J.D. Power ranks sleep number number

17:07

one in customer satisfaction with mattresses

17:10

purchased in store. And now, the

17:12

Queen Sleep Number C4 Smart Bed

17:14

is only $1,499. Save

17:18

$400 for a limited time. Hawaii.

17:23

I'm. Johnny Mosley and Nineteen Eighty Seven.

17:26

My sister in need of vanished

17:28

without a trace. Decades. Later

17:30

thanks to Dna we found her.

17:33

The. That's only the beginning of the story. And.

17:35

She Has a Name is a

17:37

new audio documentary that explores the

17:39

search for redemption, confronting trauma and

17:42

healing in the face of unimaginable

17:44

loss. Subscribe. Now The Truth be

17:46

Told Presents See has a name.

17:49

For. Every revelation brings us closer

17:51

to the truth. This.

17:53

Is the Assignment. I'm Audie Cornish and I'm

17:56

talking with Alex Garland, writer and director of

17:58

the New A Twenty Four Film. The

18:00

War. I. Want to know that

18:02

your relationship with. Illustrations.

18:05

And photography. I

18:08

felt like I was watching a film where

18:10

amidst there are. Moments. Of it

18:12

that are quite literally through viewfinder and

18:14

quite. Literally reference famous

18:17

war photographs. But.

18:20

Also just are beautifully

18:22

composed and. Edges I understand

18:24

your dad was a cartoonists it out

18:26

as got am kind of curious about

18:28

your drawing life when I grew up.

18:32

With him and my mom's cool

18:34

some and during was always around

18:36

he was always during his or

18:38

fascinates know the people drink and

18:40

i grew up around people newspapers

18:43

because he was a political cartoonists

18:45

or and also newspapers don't have

18:47

many cartoonists but I have many

18:49

journalists and I'm so his buddies

18:51

were people who worked on the

18:54

paper and all sorts of different

18:56

capacities they were editors and political

18:58

journalists who for correspondence and a

19:00

bird in terms. Of images I

19:02

i was also are trying to

19:05

do a throwback really to an

19:07

old fashioned kind of journalism about

19:09

reporting in the weights news photographers

19:11

would operate. And in

19:13

some ways the film is about a

19:15

young. News. Photographer who's who

19:17

is an older one is attempting to dissuade

19:20

them in a sense from the past they're

19:22

taking kind of you don't want this life

19:24

kid at is a little bit of the

19:26

town Yeah, because because there's often a conflict

19:28

between the personal price the a journalist might.

19:31

Pay. In relation to

19:33

the worked actually do yes they So he

19:35

talks about the trauma that this character has

19:38

thinking about the things that she seems that

19:40

also seat says at one point which I

19:42

have heard before in terms of justifying the

19:44

worse you do and which chronicled the do

19:47

not intervene at is that we record so

19:49

other people ask yes if that is something

19:51

you heard from someone or something or we

19:53

end up like oh yeah are they are

19:56

all the time or but there's a price

19:58

that the end of it. It pays

20:00

so said he individual journalists. So many

20:02

of those people are traumatised. I'm they're

20:04

doing important work for has an individual.

20:06

they have to live with Some the

20:09

consequences of the last month. the ethics

20:11

of that. That's. Still a conversation

20:13

now and Alice and they should ask

20:15

about it but on balance we we

20:17

do need people doing that. I I

20:20

think in some ways it's ah you

20:22

could compare it to like any are

20:24

surgeon who is may be doing very

20:27

difficult things and being traumatized. If a

20:29

child has been hit by car and

20:31

then they lose that child that must

20:33

have a terrible effect on them but

20:36

we still need some help doing that.

20:38

The net effect is not just a

20:40

they help but we. Need some. It.

20:43

See think they health. Yes, I

20:45

do. I think I am

20:47

a huge believer in the

20:49

importance of unbiased journalism. I

20:52

think the something strange happens

20:54

Journalism has been hugely on

20:56

the mind is partly the

20:58

context of social media. I

21:00

think it's also politicians going

21:02

out of their way to

21:04

undermine journalism and journalists. And

21:06

it's also I've been done

21:09

internally by large organizations, really

21:11

embracing by us and trying

21:13

to hold on to. Advertising

21:15

revenue by making sure they

21:17

keep their audience and there's

21:19

been a net effect for.

21:22

All of these things. It. I don't

21:24

want people to hear this and think that it's

21:26

like academic cel mai sus it does. It's one

21:28

of the most. Visceral. And then it's stunning

21:30

experiences I've ever had. I'm in fact,

21:32

I'm blowing it's I see I'm terribly

21:35

selling for hims, right? Oh yeah, I

21:37

know you're yeah for sure. fear underselling

21:39

in a visit. Yeah, yeah I say.

21:41

It's not that it's a war movie

21:43

that is not on. We

21:46

see so many things blown up. I see The White House.

21:48

Blown Up! How many times in a

21:50

felony? times? And I absolutely

21:52

never felt the way I

21:54

sell watching the attacks on

21:56

monuments in this film on.

21:59

An eye. Don't. Know why that was.

22:02

I think it's because it

22:04

had a sense of real

22:06

danger. And six steaks exactly

22:08

dirt The the the things

22:10

that it's showing are probably

22:12

things you're worried about. One

22:14

of the reasons I made

22:16

this film in the way

22:18

I made it is because

22:20

I don't think. I'd

22:22

rather let me price of this way.

22:24

I do think those concerns are shared

22:26

by lots of different people who may

22:29

disagree about all sorts of things, for

22:31

they agree about that. and not only

22:33

that, I join them and not concern,

22:35

I also am concerned about it. I

22:37

don't think that. That these.

22:39

Things have no consequences. I think they

22:41

do as consequences. So I was speaking

22:44

to that. We.

22:46

Talked about this idea of. The.

22:49

Journalist song, you know? We.

22:52

Record So other people ask that a

22:54

good writers and directors as people who

22:56

dream so that. Other people

22:58

ask i get a player like you

23:00

show us scenarios and we sit in

23:03

the audience and ask ourselves can I

23:05

live in this Could I survive in

23:07

this letter that be lighter, funny Et

23:10

and and also some firms are just

23:12

there to purely entertain and that's okay,

23:14

not this, That's where I am. I

23:16

know you like defending him. many points

23:19

for like this is not a popcorn

23:21

situation know But hopefully what it is

23:23

is a compelling film and it's engaging.

23:26

So it's compelling and it's engaging. And

23:28

then hopefully is thought provoking. but it

23:30

is a kind of visceral experience that

23:33

that leads to yeah, sinking talking, the

23:35

conference and he's a lot of your

23:37

time and I pc you talking with

23:39

us. Is there anything that you wish People

23:41

asked about the sound that they aren't. Know.

23:44

I just wish I was better selling phones.

23:46

I'm hopeless, that's why So, but you're. Hopeless.

23:49

At as I had to tell you something

23:51

as interviewed a lot of directors and. Just

23:53

because you're not doing the razzle dazzle doesn't

23:55

mean. Like the fact that you wanna

23:57

talk about it actually is huge. Thank

24:00

you I It's just not in me

24:02

that Russell Square so lazy. New As a

24:04

writer like want One of the reasons why you're good. To

24:06

interviews Because writers know the story. You're

24:08

not somebody. Who's like adapted the story or

24:11

thought about it a lot or just lived

24:13

with for a long time? Fundamentally, this is

24:15

you. In a lot of ways.

24:17

yeah, but it's also other people.

24:19

My experience of other people is

24:21

always not. Was this allies? There's

24:24

always our laws for most people

24:26

are polite conversation, no. Respect.

24:28

For it, when you meet them one

24:30

on one, you can come from any

24:32

number of different backgrounds, who, worlds, or

24:35

whatever. And this includes a lot of

24:37

traveling all sorts of different places. I'm

24:39

not a supra. you can get our

24:41

country and people are broadly pretty sensitive

24:43

and pretty good natured unless you put

24:45

them in extremists. But and then they're

24:47

willing to shoot and hang their neighbor.

24:50

Then they are willing to shoot knowing

24:52

the neighbor. And that's why it's a

24:54

sort of anti exceptionalism film. Because we're

24:56

all. Open to that question

24:58

is in the film. Is this

25:01

something we should be really thinking

25:03

about guarding against her And the

25:05

answer for probably implicitly as yes,

25:08

But then. Ah

25:10

know, you know I'm gonna shut up on to

25:12

school either. That. Books

25:15

As you read. As a

25:18

kid, I read almost exclusively

25:20

nonfiction. Ah, I see, I

25:22

read history and science and

25:24

journalism. Actually, I'm I remember

25:26

talking to one of the

25:29

creators of the Last, right?

25:31

else? And damn he told me that

25:33

his dad or parent someone gave him bucks

25:35

kid mystery box and they would rip out

25:37

the and like the. To.

25:40

Your own adventure suspended? I never figured out

25:42

and I didn't say this person had trouble

25:44

a third acts, but they might have had

25:46

your phone. Is there an ethics s? And

25:48

so have you know, I'm sure everyone does a see you

25:51

we think about your. Body of work and we try

25:53

and it together. A narrative, right? That's our job.

25:55

As like reviewers are, critics are trying to create

25:57

a story for the audience to say. Here's here's

25:59

why we. This film is interesting and

26:01

I guess the you know I wondered

26:03

for you a over time have you

26:05

heard people say hey the seems to

26:07

be the theme of your work I

26:10

i have a lot and sometimes a

26:12

thing or know what you mean and

26:14

sometimes I think port where did come

26:16

from and are both very broadly I

26:18

would say it's always the same. There

26:20

is some kind of thing going on

26:22

in the world where it could be

26:25

I could be quantum computing, it could

26:27

be politics. it could be people's behavior

26:29

with in marriages. Or whatever happens to

26:31

be and then I just react to

26:33

it. And that's

26:35

all it's ever been. Pretty. Even

26:38

twenty eight days later which is

26:40

a zombie flick cried was really

26:43

that was a consequence of me

26:45

having just been in a country

26:47

that had been destroyed, ready by

26:49

decades of conflicts and just thinking.

26:53

It's like wanting to bring it. Home

26:56

to wake people up. Maybe or

26:58

something even a zombie flick. This

27:00

is a reaction to something. that's

27:03

that's the through line I think.

27:06

Both. Of you And you. Alex

27:08

Garland he's the writer and director.

27:11

As a moving Civil War is

27:13

out in theaters. This

27:22

I'm In is a production of

27:24

Cnn Audio and Cnn Audio has

27:26

been nominated. For a plans of lobby

27:28

Awards. So see. Congrats to all

27:31

of my colleagues Anderson Cooper sign Take

27:33

that said, David Ryan's and the team

27:35

behind the podcast Tug of War also

27:37

want to know that the assignment has

27:39

been nominated. For to awards. This

27:42

interview, talk show and best Health though!

27:44

Thank you so much for that recognition

27:46

And thank you so much to our

27:49

crew and are producers! Here the web

27:51

these are actually awarded by a public

27:53

vote Which means I've got one more

27:55

thing to ask which is the head

27:57

over to the website and vote for

27:59

us that live his vote. Thought

28:02

Webby awards.com. And

28:04

well that that in our episode notes. And

28:12

Morning Hello Reddit a senior producer.

28:15

That martinez. The and

28:17

his allies or text. See

28:19

like Thai is the second is. Reduced.

28:21

The in an audio we got the board

28:23

from Haley. Thomas Alexander theory.

28:26

Robert Matters. John and

28:28

Aura Lenny Steinhardt same as Andrus,

28:30

Sniffles has the roof and least

28:32

an emerald. Special thanks to Katie

28:35

had been I'm Audie Cornish Thank

28:37

you for listening. Quality.

28:44

Sleep is essential. That's why the sleep

28:46

number smart Bed is designed for your

28:48

ever evolving sleep needs so you can

28:50

choose what's right for you whenever you

28:52

like me to bed. It's firmer, softer

28:54

on either side and helps you sleep

28:56

at a comfortable temperature. Sleep number does

28:58

that sleep next level Jd Power Ring

29:00

Sleep number number one in customer satisfaction

29:02

with mattresses. Purchased in store and now.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features