0:01

All right, let's talk about what's going to

0:03

happen in this new year when it comes

0:05

to Democrats trying to boot Donald

0:07

Trump off the ballot in multiple

0:09

states around the country, this including

0:12

Colorado, and the Supreme Court is

0:15

going to have to get involved there as

0:17

well as Maine. This now

0:19

coming from the Associated Press. The

0:21

Colorado Republican Party appealed

0:23

that state Supreme Court decision that

0:26

found former President Donald Trump is

0:28

ineligible for the presidency,

0:31

potential first step to a showdown at the

0:33

nation's highest court over

0:35

the meaning of the one hundred and fifty five

0:38

year old constitutional provision that bans

0:41

from office those who engage

0:43

in insurrection. Now, let's

0:45

talk about the facts here and how egregious

0:48

this abuse of power is in Colorado,

0:50

and why I believe legally

0:52

there's no chance in how this is going to stand.

0:54

Number One, the President has not been charged with

0:56

insurrection or found guilty of insurrection.

0:59

In fact, on.

1:01

January the sixth, the day they claim makes

1:04

him ineligible to be president of

1:06

the United States of America, he told

1:09

people to go and be peaceful.

1:11

That's right, to be peaceful.

1:13

So how can you accuse a man of insurrection

1:15

when he's publicly out there telling people

1:17

to go peacefully to the nation's capital

1:20

and telling people to peacefully

1:23

protest. That's a huge

1:25

problem for the Democrats and

1:28

the Supreme Court.

1:29

They are not idiots. Now, this

1:31

is also.

1:32

About undermining and I want you to understand

1:34

how we got to where we are and

1:36

why Democrats are now doing this

1:39

in places like Colorado in Maine.

1:41

In fact, let me bring you up to speed on Maine

1:43

so you understand what's going on there, and then

1:45

I'm going to explain to you the game plan here for

1:47

Democrats. Maine's Democratic

1:50

secretary of State remove

1:52

former President Donald Trump from the state's presidential

1:55

primary ballot under the

1:57

Constitution's insurrection clause, right,

2:00

cookie cuttering cutting what they did in Colorado,

2:03

becoming the first election official

2:05

to take action unilaterally,

2:08

all right, So she just decided to do it as

2:10

one person, as the US

2:12

Supreme Court is now poys to decide

2:14

whether Trump remains eligible to return

2:16

to the White House.

2:18

Now, let me.

2:18

Explain to you also who Maine's

2:21

Democratic secretary of State is.

2:24

Miss Bellows actually

2:27

tweeted this out back on January

2:30

the fourth, twenty twenty two,

2:32

so almost two years ago to the day. Quote

2:36

the fundamental right of any American

2:38

citizen to vote freely, fairly,

2:41

and to have their vote counted is

2:44

the premise of our democracy.

2:47

The Constitution and the Bill of Rights

2:49

are not values to be compromised

2:52

away.

2:53

Now, why did she tweet that out and believe.

2:56

That then two years ago but abandon

2:59

all of that now?

3:00

It's actually very simple.

3:02

This main Democratic secretary of State

3:05

sees an opportunity to seize power

3:07

and to get rid of a candidate that she is

3:09

afraid is going to win

3:12

not just the primary, but the presidency

3:14

all over again. Why

3:16

did she abandon her values that she claimed

3:19

she believed in back in twenty twenty two

3:22

because she believes that Donald Trump

3:24

is a true threat to

3:26

getting rid of the deep state, getting

3:29

rid of socialists and communists

3:31

within our government, and

3:34

making sure that we have a government that is

3:36

for the people and by the people.

3:38

They don't want that.

3:39

Now, now that you understand

3:41

the premise of these two situations

3:45

a little bit better, let me explain

3:47

to you how we got to where we are now.

3:49

And this is the most important part.

3:52

Number one, I want.

3:53

To take you back to twenty sixteen.

3:56

In twenty sixteen, the Democratic

3:58

Party tried to get rid of Donald Trump before

4:01

election day by putting

4:03

out information that was filled with lies,

4:05

that he was somehow an agent for

4:08

Russia, that he was being controlled

4:10

by Russia, that he was compromised by

4:13

Vladimir Putin. This all

4:15

was because of what they described as the

4:17

Still Dossier. Now, that dossier,

4:19

we know now for a fact, was actually created

4:22

out of thin air. It was created

4:24

and paid for by Hillary Clinton for

4:26

President and the Democratic

4:29

National Committee. We know that both

4:31

of them lied about that dossier

4:34

to the point that they both had to pay fines

4:36

to the federal government for lying about

4:39

that document knowing that it was user generated.

4:41

That is all a fact.

4:43

So what did the Democrats do after they lost

4:45

the election that they couldn't believe that they lost?

4:47

Now, let me also take you back to election

4:50

night twenty sixteen. I was in New York City

4:54

doing TV coverage and I remember

4:56

watching it unfold as I was doing

4:58

Good Morning Britain as a MA and commentator.

5:00

Now, Good Morning Britain, just so you understand, is

5:03

like the Today Show in the UK,

5:06

and I was sitting there on set at Times

5:09

Square.

5:09

We had a Times Square.

5:10

It was the middle of the night, was freezing outside, We had an

5:12

outdoor set and it was I mean absolutely

5:15

freezing on election out of New York City,

5:18

you know, November, and

5:20

I was watching it happen, and I was

5:22

watching the faces of the Liberals that were

5:24

on that panel, just in total

5:26

dismay that Donald Trump could have possibly

5:29

won, and then when he won,

5:32

them having to deal with the reality that Hillary

5:34

Clinton. It was supposed to be a coronation, right,

5:36

It was supposed to be a Hillary

5:38

Clinton come on stage and a building that was,

5:41

you know, a glass building about breaking

5:43

the last ceiling, and she was going to be

5:45

the first female president in the history of this country.

5:48

And it was all about symbolism, and

5:50

it was all a coronation of Hillary

5:52

Clinton. No one in the

5:54

Democratic Party and no one

5:56

working in TV at the time. I was also

5:59

at CNN, was as

6:01

a commentator thought that Donald Trump was going to

6:03

win that election.

6:05

So what did they do after he won?

6:06

They said, Okay, well, the American people

6:09

picked someone we don't like. We're

6:11

going to get rid of him through impeachment

6:13

since we couldn't get rid of him on election day

6:16

with these lies and smears against him.

6:19

So they took the same lies and smears

6:21

the Steele dossier, and they

6:23

took them to Congress.

6:25

And what did the Democrats do?

6:27

They moved to impeach Donald Trump

6:29

off of lies that they knew they created, user

6:31

generated, any accusations

6:34

that they had made out of thin air, accusations

6:37

the FBI had already classified as

6:39

what they described as user generated.

6:42

They had met with Christopher Steele and they said,

6:44

hey, Christopher, we'll give you a million dollars

6:46

if you can corroborate any of the claims

6:49

in this dossier.

6:50

Guess what.

6:51

Christopher Steele didn't get the million

6:53

dollars because he couldn't corroborate any of the claims

6:55

against him. And the reason why was actually

6:58

very simple, because it was made up. And he's

7:00

the one that made up the story with the

7:02

help of others, I'm sure who set around a room

7:04

and said, all right, how do we make sure Donald Trump

7:06

loses? What lies can we tell?

7:09

How do we guarantee Hillary Clinton's the president?

7:12

The Deep State was all in on this, all

7:14

right. Everybody in the Deep State at the highest

7:17

levels were in on this. There was no way they

7:19

were going to let Donald Trump become president. Then

7:21

he wins, So they're like, all right, well, how do we get rid of him?

7:23

Bam, we go out there

7:25

and we impeach him. So then

7:27

they started using the scumbags of Congress,

7:30

the Nancy Pelosi, the Adam Shifts

7:32

and other scumbags in Congress. And what did

7:34

they do. They then impeached

7:36

Donald Trump. Now that didn't work either, So

7:39

then they said, all right, well, we got to lie about him

7:42

again, and we'll

7:44

try to impeach him a second time using January

7:48

sixth insurrection, and that'll end his political

7:50

career and then we never have to worry about him again.

7:53

Fast forward to where we are now January.

7:56

Of twenty twenty four.

8:00

Democrats are still trying to figure out how

8:02

the hell do you get Trump out of office?

8:04

Even though he's out of office now, right, they're still

8:06

trying to figure out how they guarantee victory

8:09

for Joe Biden.

8:11

How do you do it?

8:12

It's pretty simple,

8:15

They said, all right, impeachment

8:17

didn't work. Lying about him before impeachment

8:19

didn't work. Impeaching him a second time didn't

8:21

work. Calling him an insurrectionist didn't work.

8:23

Now we'll just take him off the ballot and

8:26

take away a right of the American people to decide

8:28

who they want to be president of the United States

8:30

of America.

8:31

We'll just do that will unilaterally.

8:34

Just like Main's Democratic Secretary of State, with no

8:36

vote ever taking place. We'll

8:38

just take Donald Trump off

8:40

the ballot, saying no one can vote for

8:42

him. Colorado saying the same

8:45

thing, right, We'll just take him off the ballot

8:47

so that no one has the option to even

8:50

vote for him. That's how we take

8:52

out Donald J.

8:53

Trump.

8:54

For more than ten years, Patriot Mobile

8:56

has been America's only Christian conservative

8:59

wireless provide. They stand

9:01

behind their values and they stand behind

9:03

exceptional service. They're an

9:05

example of putting the cause a head

9:07

of profit, and that is why I

9:10

am proud to.

9:10

Partner with them.

9:11

Starting today, Patriot Mobile is extending

9:14

their Black Friday deal with the Every Friday

9:16

Matters deal, and you

9:18

can get a free smartphone

9:21

when you switch today. Patriot Mobile

9:23

offers dependable nationwide coverage,

9:25

giving you access to all three

9:27

major networks, which means you get

9:29

the same coverage you've been accustomed to without

9:33

funding the radical left. Now,

9:35

when you switch to Patriot Mobile, you're supporting

9:37

free speech, religious freedom, the sanctity

9:40

of life. Are veterans and first responders,

9:42

and more than just that. They are

9:45

actually a one hundred percent US based

9:47

company with customer service teams that

9:50

make switching easy. So you

9:52

can keep your same number you have right now,

9:54

you can keep your existing phone, or

9:56

for a limited time, get a free smartphone

9:59

from Patriot Mobile. Go to Patriot

10:01

Mobile dot com slash ferguson

10:03

or call them nine to seven to two Patriot use

10:06

the promo code Friday seven to six.

10:09

That's Friday seven to six.

10:10

Again, get a free smartphone with promo code

10:12

Friday seven to six. This the limited

10:15

time offer. Join me make the switch today

10:17

at Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson.

10:20

That's Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson

10:22

or nine to seven to two Patriot. Now,

10:25

let's dive into real quick what

10:28

the evidence is to

10:30

take Donald Trump off the ballot,

10:33

because you're supposed to have evidence,

10:35

right, You're supposed to be evidence, and you're

10:37

supposed to show that evidence to say,

10:40

this is why I'm taking him off the ballot. Now

10:42

in Maine, for example, where

10:44

they're unilaterally doing this.

10:47

This this bellows mains Democratic

10:50

Secretary of State who said, in her

10:52

own words, the fundamental rights of any American citizen

10:54

is to vote freely, fairly, and to have their vote

10:56

counted in is the premise of our democracy.

10:59

That's our own way, words two years ago on Twitter.

11:02

Apparently she doesn't believe that anymore. Well,

11:04

do you want to know what she used in

11:06

her investigation to then

11:09

take Donald Trump off the bout?

11:10

Now?

11:10

To be clear, this is the same woman

11:13

that has posted countless pictures with

11:15

her with Joe Biden.

11:18

Grinning from ear to ear, and Barack Obama.

11:20

I mean, this is a hardcore Democratic operative

11:23

who has been around Joe Biden, who's like, hey,

11:26

I'll do your dirty work for you, right, I'm a minion

11:28

of you. Please let me

11:30

take a picture with you, feel some of the power,

11:32

and I'll make sure that your political opponent is

11:35

off the ballot in my state. So

11:38

what did she use to disqualify

11:40

Trump? She used,

11:42

in her own words, in her own

11:44

filing YouTube

11:47

clips. That's

11:49

right, she said, I am

11:51

going to take Donald Trump off the ballot

11:53

in Maine because of some YouTube

11:56

videos that I watched. That is

11:58

her evidence YouTube. I

12:01

want you to listen to CNN. They had a

12:03

discussion about this as it broke right

12:05

that Main's top election official removed

12:07

Trump from the twenty twenty four primary ballot

12:10

cites the Colorado decision calls January

12:13

sixth and insurrection and says it's because of YouTube

12:15

videos. Listen to even what

12:17

CNN's own legal analysts had to say about

12:20

this idea that you can just do this unilaterally

12:23

and say it's because it's something you watched on the internet.

12:25

It was an interesting discussion, an interesting take from

12:27

the main Secretary of State. Here, the

12:30

Fourteenth Amendment, Section three says

12:33

in plain texts that if you shall

12:35

have engaged in insurrection, you

12:37

can't.

12:37

Be in office.

12:39

She takes that to mean that

12:41

if she determines a Donald Trump engage in insurrection,

12:44

he can't be on the main primary ballot.

12:46

Is it that simple? No, it's not that simple.

12:47

So clearly section three of the Fourteenth Amendment

12:50

says, engage in insurrection, you're out.

12:52

We all have that.

12:53

The complicated part of where we are

12:55

going to see this play out in the course is who gets

12:57

to decide and buy what process.

13:00

Now, it's important to know and in the ruling the Secretary

13:02

of State we just heard from says she's basically following

13:05

the same legal reasoning as the Colorado Supreme

13:07

Court did last week, and she says in her ruling,

13:09

if this gets struck down in Colorado,

13:12

we're out of luck too. So she's basing

13:14

it on the same legal argument. Let me sort of lay out

13:16

the arguments both sides, and by the way, it's worth saying, we're

13:18

all theorizing here, we're in legally unknown

13:21

territory. The argument against is,

13:23

first of all, the Fourteenth Amendment, Section

13:25

five says Congress has the authority

13:27

to pass laws to implement this. They did, they

13:29

passed the criminal law. And the argument is that

13:32

means Congress, not the States. But perhaps

13:34

and this is the argument that the main secretary of State

13:36

in Colorado made, the states can do it

13:38

too. If that's true, then

13:41

section two. Question two is

13:44

were the processes? Were these hearings

13:46

fair? Did they comport with due process? And

13:48

I think there's a question there with regard

13:50

to what Maine did because if you look at the hearing,

13:53

and she details us in the

13:55

ruling, they heard from one fact witness,

13:57

a law professor. She based her ruling

13:59

on all lot of documents, but also YouTube

14:02

clips, news reports, things that would

14:04

never pass the bar in normal

14:06

course. She's not a lawyer, by the way, it's a smartly written decision,

14:09

clearly consulted with lawyers. But this is an unelected

14:11

she is chosen by the state legislature, elect

14:14

chosen by the chosen, elected by legilature, but not democratically

14:16

elected.

14:16

Not a knock.

14:17

That's just the way it's set up in Maine.

14:19

And this hearing.

14:20

Look, it doesn't have to be a criminal trial. We don't

14:22

have to have all the protections. But I think the argument

14:25

you'll hear from opponents is one not up

14:27

to the states.

14:27

To do this.

14:27

This is why we have all different decisions from

14:30

all different states, and to the procedures were

14:32

not.

14:32

Up to snuff. The procedures

14:35

were not up to snuff. She's

14:38

citing YouTube videos.

14:39

She unilaterally decides, Okay, I

14:42

watch something on the Internet, and because

14:44

I watch something in the Internet, this is what I believe.

14:47

Right, this is all right, you got it. We're in there.

14:49

We got the Internet. Now.

14:50

The Internet says this, let's roll right.

14:53

The Internet says, this is what we're gonna do. The

14:56

Internet says this is it looks

14:58

great for us.

14:59

We love it. Do it.

15:02

You notice she also says Colorado,

15:05

and this is what they

15:08

do in.

15:08

Third world countries.

15:10

I keep talking about this, and I'll say it again,

15:12

the Democratic Party, for all intents and purposes,

15:14

is dead, died. They're

15:16

communists and socialists who

15:19

are masquerading as Democrats right now. They're

15:22

saying we're Democrats, and they're

15:24

really not Democrats. They're socialists

15:26

and they're communists, and then socialists and communists

15:29

and Marxist regimes. They

15:31

take out their political opponents. That's

15:33

what they do. They take out

15:35

their political opponents, and

15:37

they make sure that they take out their political

15:39

opponents. And when they do, they make sure that the people

15:42

don't get a chance to even vote for their political opponents,

15:44

because they either take them off the ballt or they lock them

15:46

up. A great example of this, and I

15:48

mentioned this a few days ago, but I think it's

15:51

important to go back and visit. There is

15:53

a candidate in Russia right now, and

15:56

that candidate in Russia is an anti

15:58

war candidate. That candidate

16:00

filled out the paperwork to run

16:03

against Vladimir Putin as an anti

16:05

war candate. Between the war with Russia and Ukraine,

16:07

there's a lot of people in Russia that don't like the

16:09

war happening in Ukraine. They don't like that their

16:12

kids are dying at alarming

16:14

numbers, and so there's a very good chance that

16:16

this can would have legs, this candidacy

16:18

would have legs.

16:19

So what they do.

16:20

They kicked her off the ballot, saying she's ineligible

16:23

for the ballot because she filled out

16:25

the paperwork wrong. They said one hundred and fifty

16:27

something different ways. I'm not

16:29

kidding. That's what's now happening.

16:33

So that's Russia.

16:36

You would expect that from Vladimir

16:38

Putin. Why are we doing

16:41

the same damn thing in America. That's

16:43

the question that no one's been able

16:45

to answer so far. That's the question that

16:48

frustrates me. That's the question

16:50

that bothers me. It's a

16:53

simple question, why are we allowing

16:55

the same exact thing to happen in the United States of America?

16:57

And you go back to what she said.

16:58

She said, well, Colorado did

17:00

it, so I want to do it too.

17:04

And if Colorado gets.

17:05

Struck down by the Supreme Court,

17:08

Okay, fine, right, we're

17:10

cool with that.

17:11

Right, if they do it, so be

17:13

it. But we're going to join

17:16

them.

17:17

So Maine is basically admitting,

17:20

Hey, we're pretty much cheerleaders.

17:23

That's what we are.

17:26

We're cheerleaders for this,

17:28

and we're going to cheer like

17:31

we are cheerleaders, and

17:33

this is how we're going to roll. We're

17:36

gonna jump on the bandwagon, and other states

17:38

will jump on the bandwagon as well, and other

17:40

states will cheerlead as well, because

17:42

that is now what we do, is we cheerlead

17:45

when we're when we're advocating for taking

17:47

a former president of the

17:50

United States of America off the ballot. So

17:53

you look at where this is and and go

17:55

back to what I just played from your CNN. He's

17:57

saying it's absurd. You can't you can't

17:59

just qualify a former

18:01

president, by the way, and a president cannet based

18:04

on YouTube clips.

18:04

That doesn't work. You know.

18:07

You look at the Maine secretary of state. She said

18:09

she found Trump guilty of things he wasn't charged

18:11

with, using a lower standard different from

18:13

a trial, which is what was also alluded to

18:15

there. And there

18:18

was another article that came out I said, main secretary

18:20

of state makes legal

18:22

rulings striking Trump from the ballot based

18:24

on YouTube videos. So so everything,

18:27

and let me just read this to you quote Maine

18:29

secretary of State unilaterally

18:32

ruled that former President Donald Trump is

18:34

unqualified to appear on the

18:36

twenty twenty four primary ballot

18:39

despite lacking a law degree

18:41

and substituting YouTube

18:44

videos for due process. Secretary

18:47

of State Bellows, who previously worked as

18:49

the executive director of the main chapter

18:51

of the ACLU but is not an attorney

18:53

and did not attend law school, made

18:56

the legal conclusion in her ruling that

18:59

the declaration on Trump's

19:01

candidate consent for him is false

19:03

because he has not qualified to hold the

19:05

office of president under Section three of

19:07

the fourteenth Amendment. We are living

19:10

now in times that our

19:12

founding fathers would

19:14

be terrified of, because we have people

19:17

like this that have gone rogue and

19:19

decided that American democracy is

19:21

their enemy. It's the enemy of the Democratic

19:24

Party. Make no mistake this

19:26

is They're.

19:27

An enemy of the Democratic Party.

19:30

Let me wrap this up by just

19:33

giving you overall perspective. I

19:35

think the Supreme Court is going to probably knock

19:38

this thing down in Colorado, which

19:40

will then take this off

19:42

the cheerleading squad of all

19:44

the other psychos and these other twenty states

19:47

that want to do this, twenty plus states that want to do

19:49

this. But I also think it's very telling

19:51

about what the future holds. And let me explain to

19:53

you what the future holds. And this may

19:55

be the most important thing that I say today. Democrats

19:59

moved to get rid of Donald Trump by

20:02

impeaching him, and they knew it was a lie when they

20:04

were going to impeach him. That didn't

20:06

work. Then they tried to impeach him again, that

20:09

didn't work. Now they're trying to hold them

20:11

off the ballot. If

20:13

that doesn't work, okay,

20:16

and I believe that that will not work,

20:19

and the Supreme Court's going to do the right thing.

20:22

If that doesn't work, and I believe that

20:26

it won't, then what is next for

20:28

the Democratic Party? The communists,

20:30

the socialists, the Marxists that act like they

20:32

are somehow not Democrats?

20:36

What is next?

20:38

If you think about where they are, and

20:41

you think about where they're going, and

20:43

you think about what they're trying to do, I

20:47

think the next thing they're going to do is probably

20:49

go to pack the Supreme Court

20:53

because this ruling for the Supreme Court

20:56

is going to make them angry. They've

20:58

already gone after the Supreme Court or they're trying

21:00

to delegitimize the Supreme Court.

21:03

We know that.

21:05

And as they're trying to delegitimize

21:09

the Supreme Court. Let's also

21:11

be clear about what

21:13

that means when you say delegitimize

21:16

the Supreme Court.

21:18

When Roe v.

21:18

Wade was coming out that it was going to be

21:20

overturned, what happened. We

21:24

all know the story. They leaked

21:26

it from the Supreme Court. There was

21:29

a quote investigation, but they can never find

21:31

out who leaked it. And one of the smallest, tightest

21:33

knit communities, and

21:37

you're telling me the power of our government

21:39

couldn't figure out who leaked the

21:41

opinion, never

21:43

figured it out, and I have no idea who leaked

21:45

it.

21:45

All covered up.

21:46

We know that they then

21:49

broke laws by intimidating and doxing

21:52

the homes of the Supreme Court justices

21:54

so you know where they live. In fact,

21:57

one guy was driving across the country with

21:59

guns and was found blocks away

22:01

from the house of one of the justices, going to kill that justice,

22:03

because that was their way of over making

22:05

sure that Roe v. Wade was not overturned.

22:08

Remember that, never never forget that

22:11

it was a kill list that Democrats put out

22:13

against the conservative Supreme Court justices.

22:16

It was a kill list.

22:19

So now if the Supreme Court comes out

22:22

and the Supreme Court does the right thing, and

22:24

I believe they will the next

22:26

time Democrats have the chance to

22:29

pack the court. Make no mistake,

22:31

that's exactly what they are going to do.

22:33

They are going to pack the court.

22:36

Now, packing the court, some people

22:39

say, they ask this question, well, what does that actually

22:41

mean?

22:41

What is what is packing the court

22:44

mean? It's a great question.

22:46

It means that you basically

22:48

pick a new number, a new number

22:51

of justices that you think is appropriate,

22:54

and then you pack the court and move the

22:56

number from nine Supreme Court

22:58

justices to whatever you need to then

23:01

have the majority. Now, in

23:03

communists and in socialist countries, they've

23:05

done this over and over again. Every

23:07

time that a new dictator tyrant gets

23:10

in, they just change the number. And

23:13

if they get a Supreme Court that says, for example,

23:15

they can't run for your election because of whatever

23:18

it may be, or term limits or anything, they

23:21

just pack the court with justices

23:23

that are their friends, that will be

23:25

friendly, and then they get the ruling that they need to

23:27

stay in power, or to change the constitution,

23:30

or to abolish the constitution for that matter,

23:32

right to just get rid of everything they want to get

23:34

rid of. That is now what has

23:37

happened within the Democratic

23:39

Party is they realize that there's now one

23:41

thing that's really standing in their way, and that is the Supreme

23:44

Court of the United States of America.

23:46

And now that we know that that's our

23:48

problem.

23:49

From their perspective, as they look at they're saying,

23:51

Okay, we got to get power back.

23:54

Now.

23:54

You remember when Democrats had control the House,

23:56

Senate, in the White House under Barack Obama. Remember

23:58

when they had that super majority,

24:01

when they had that super majority

24:04

where they could do virtually anything they wanted

24:06

to if they could go back in time right now, and Democrats

24:09

that I know that I've talked to in leadership have told

24:11

me this is exactly what they wish they would have done.

24:14

They would have changed the number of Supreme Court

24:16

justices.

24:18

They would have changed the number to

24:21

a number of justice that would have packed the court

24:23

for them. And they will do it. They

24:27

feel confident about doing it. They

24:30

feel like it's the right thing to do. They

24:33

feel like that the Supreme

24:36

Court is illegitimate because it's doing rulings

24:38

that they most importantly disagree

24:41

with. That's why they

24:43

say they want to change it.

24:45

That's why they say they want to do it. Differently.

24:48

That's the core here that you need to

24:50

understand. Democrats

24:52

are going to stop at nothing to destroy this country

24:54

because the Democratic Party is dead. The

24:57

Democratic Party doesn't exist. Now,

25:00

the Democratic Party has died.

25:04

They are now full blown communists,

25:07

socialists, Marxists,

25:10

and they will do now whatever they have

25:12

to do to maximize

25:15

their power and run over anything

25:18

that they need to run over to get it there.

25:21

And part of running over it is getting

25:23

rid of free and fair elections.

25:26

Right they've already declared war on that, banning

25:30

candidates that they don't like or approve of,

25:32

which is exactly what they just did in

25:36

Russia. And then

25:38

they're going to pack a court

25:40

to make sure that the court

25:43

is a court that is always friendly to them. And

25:45

then if it stops being friendly to them, they'll

25:48

just pack the court again, meaning

25:50

they'll expand it, they'll

25:52

make it bigger, and then if

25:55

they need to make it bigger a few years later or

25:57

ten years later or fifteen years later, they'll do

25:59

that too.

26:00

They don't care.

26:03

So celebrate and enjoy when the Supreme Court

26:05

does finally come down. Okay,

26:08

that's going to be a good moment. But

26:11

understand here, what the endgame

26:13

is and how that endgame is going to work for

26:15

them. Understand

26:17

that democracy is under attack. Understand

26:20

that every single state that is

26:22

moving to take it can off the ballot just

26:24

because they're afraid they can't beat him. What

26:26

that means and how I mean

26:29

If you live in Maine, if

26:32

you live in Colorado and

26:34

you actually love America, I

26:37

don't care if you identify as a Democrat.

26:39

I don't know how you can stand by

26:42

and allow these people to do

26:44

what they're.

26:44

Doing and throwing

26:47

away democracy.

26:48

Because if they'll do it for you, and

26:51

this is my warning to democrats,

26:53

if they'll do it for you, they'll

26:55

do it to you down the road when you do

26:57

become a problem. Because the first

26:59

time that you then disagree with power

27:01

and they have seized and you helped them seize

27:04

power, and you look the other way while they seize

27:06

power, then they're going to do

27:08

it to you one day when there's a

27:10

problem and there's something that you need to there's

27:13

a conversation that needs to be had here right

27:15

like they're going to do

27:18

exactly.

27:18

This all right.

27:20

Lastly, please make sure you hit that subscribe

27:23

button or auto download button wherever

27:26

you are listening to this podcast right now

27:28

and take a moment to write us a five

27:30

star review. Many on the left

27:32

have been attacking our podcast, rutting us bad

27:34

reviews on purpose, So if

27:36

you would help us fight back by writting us a

27:38

good review, a five star review, and share

27:41

this podcast with your family and friends on social

27:43

media to help us grow. See you back here

27:45

tomorrow.