Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
We're driven by the search for better, but when it
0:03
comes to hiring, the best way to search for a
0:05
candidate isn't to search at all. Don't
0:07
search, match, with Indeed. Indeed
0:10
is your matching and hiring platform with
0:12
over 350 million global monthly
0:14
visitors according to Indeed data and a
0:17
matching engine that helps you find quality
0:19
candidates fast. Leveraging over 140 from
0:28
your preferences. Join more than 3.5 million
0:31
businesses worldwide that use Indeed to hire
0:33
great talent fast. And listeners of this
0:36
show will get a $75 sponsored job
0:39
credit to get your jobs
0:42
more visibility at indeed.com/bluewire. Just
0:44
go to indeed.com/bluewire right now
0:46
and support our show by
0:48
saying you heard about Indeed
0:51
on this podcast. indeed.com/bluewire,
0:53
terms and conditions
0:55
apply. Need to hire? You
0:58
need Indeed. We
1:01
are breaking down all aspects of Yankee
1:03
baseball. This is the Bronx Pinstripe Show
1:05
with your host, Andrew Rotandi and Scott
1:08
Ryan. Let's
1:10
go. What's
1:17
up everybody? Welcome to the Bronx Pinstripe
1:19
Show. Welcome to baseball season officially. The
1:22
Super Bowl is over. Spring training,
1:24
pitchers and catchers is starting today, Valentine's
1:26
Day. I guess happy Valentine's Day to
1:28
you three months. How you doing Scott?
1:31
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Happy Valentine's Day. Do
1:33
you celebrate Valentine's Day anymore? What do you
1:36
mean celebrate? Acknowledge
1:38
it. Yeah, I said happy Valentine's Day to
1:40
my wife this week. Did you get a card or a
1:42
gift? Nope. Does she
1:44
do the same to you? You guys, did you guys have
1:46
an understanding that like, you know what, this is one of
1:48
those ones that's no longer. She
1:50
got me a pair of ski socks. Oh,
1:53
well that's nice. Those are not cheap. The
1:55
problem is, here's the problem. Practical.
1:58
Harrison's birthday was this past week. and
2:00
we had all my family in town, we had all of
2:02
the aunt's family over. It
2:04
was a chaotic weekend. Tuesday
2:07
in New Jersey was a snow day. Daycare
2:10
was closed, everything was closed, we got a
2:12
lot of snow. I
2:14
would have tried to go out and buy
2:17
some flowers or get a card yesterday. It's
2:19
yesterday, the day before, you can't say that.
2:22
But that was the day that I had earmarked
2:24
a week ago on when I'm gonna get this
2:26
stuff done. Well that's your problem.
2:28
You can't earmark the day before and be like,
2:30
oh you know what, nothing wrong is gonna happen.
2:32
There's nothing that's gonna deter me from doing it
2:35
on the day before. If you truly were gonna
2:37
do something, you would have already done it. That's
2:39
fair enough. It's also with
2:42
my wife, we got
2:44
Christmas, obviously then her birthday's two
2:46
weeks after Christmas. Yeah. It's
2:49
like Valentine's Day's the next month. There's too many things all over.
2:51
Look, I gotta tell you. Six weeks of the year. I'll
2:53
tell you my thoughts on it. First of all, Valentine's
2:56
Day is for the unmarried.
2:59
That's what it's for, bottom line.
3:01
It's for the unmarried. If you
3:03
get married and you're still really
3:05
acknowledging and putting Valentine's Day, and
3:07
call me the opposite of a romantic,
3:10
but frankly Bevan feels
3:12
the same way, it's a dumb holiday.
3:14
It's a manufactured dumb holiday that has
3:16
put men out for years and years
3:18
and years and years and years. And
3:20
that's made women feel terrible and guilty
3:23
if there's not a significant other on
3:25
a particular day. It's a bad holiday
3:27
for everybody, unless you are in that
3:29
phase of boyfriend, girlfriend, where it's new
3:31
and you're all very happy and spontaneous
3:37
and all that stuff. And frankly, there's
3:39
just not many people who listen to our podcast
3:41
that are probably in that demographic. I was gonna
3:44
say the three women listeners right now are not
3:46
happy with you. But
3:48
it's true. I mean, it does. It makes people feel uncomfortable,
3:50
I think, if you're not, or you have to go out
3:53
and celebrate the fact that you're anti-Valentine's Day. It's
3:55
just a holiday that doesn't need to exist. And
3:58
if we're talking about, if you're in love... And
4:00
if you're happy, you should, you know,
4:02
you should profess that
4:04
love on more than once a year. And
4:07
it happens, like you said, on holidays,
4:09
it happens on, you know, different opportunities
4:12
for you to show your feelings. Doesn't
4:14
have to be on Valentine's Day. I
4:17
will say though, like my mom growing up, I always
4:19
had this like red wire basket in the shape of
4:21
a heart. Every single Valentine's Day, we would
4:23
get that, like a bunch of Hershey Kisses and that thing. And
4:26
I look forward to that, so. And
4:28
Kemp has Valentine's Day for school. And
4:30
he has like Star Wars Valentine's with
4:32
like little glow stick lightsabers, which is
4:34
awesome. And you just give them
4:36
to everybody. So. Yeah, everyone gets Valentine's Day. And
4:38
I make him feel really uncomfortable by asking him,
4:40
if there was only one, who would you give
4:42
it to? And he's, and now
4:44
we're at the point where, and dude,
4:47
you're getting close to this, cause it's, I
4:49
didn't think it was gonna happen to him, but it is.
4:52
Bruh, bruh, yo. It's
4:55
like every other word out of that,
4:57
when they're together, the kid, the boys,
4:59
bruh, bruh, bruh. Wait, wait, hold on.
5:01
I didn't know what you were, he's saying bruh? Yes.
5:05
No. And he said it to me the other day, I was like, Kemp, no.
5:07
You're not, I'm not your bruh. You're not calling me bruh.
5:10
Don't do it. Wow. It's
5:13
happening. And when they're all together, it's like,
5:15
yo, bruh, yo, bruh. It's wild.
5:17
Six. Yup. The
5:20
Valentine's Day for the entire class.
5:22
That's why Leanne was taking Harrison
5:24
to daycare this morning, because she
5:26
got little car Valentine's for his
5:28
entire 19 kid class. Anyway,
5:32
I don't think, it's
5:35
chaos. I pick him up, it's just 19
5:37
three year olds running around. It is absolute
5:40
chaos. That's my nightmare. That's
5:43
my nightmare. 19 Vegas. Vegas
5:46
was cool, man. Vegas,
5:48
it was long. I was there from Monday through
5:50
Saturday, which is entirely too long to be a
5:52
Vegas. Granted, I was doing a lot
5:54
of work, but there was definitely some extracurriculars that
5:57
you get mixed in there because for
5:59
Super Bowl, a lot of parties and
6:01
it's in Vegas. I gotta say Vegas
6:03
turned out, man, they did a really good
6:05
job. It was, it felt together as much
6:07
as of a- I've heard people
6:10
say this should just rotate between New
6:12
Orleans and Vegas from now on. New
6:15
Orleans is next year. Yeah, I
6:17
mean, it was all up and down the strip. Everything was
6:19
kinda contained in there. And because of
6:21
the way Vegas is
6:23
constructed, there are roads around the strip. So
6:26
you can get to places. I thought that
6:28
was gonna be a bigger problem, but it
6:30
really wasn't. The traffic in the middle of
6:32
it, obviously, is a disaster. But if you
6:34
start going around it, it wasn't as bad,
6:36
especially early in the
6:38
mornings and later in the evenings. But yeah, we were at
6:41
the media center on Radio Row and
6:44
just had a great time and turned out, we had a
6:46
lot of really fun guests and it was
6:48
cool. It was a good week. I
6:50
mean, the game itself was kind of a dud in the
6:52
first half, I'd say. And then the second half picked up.
6:56
Yeah, it was a little- It was a good enough
6:58
game for a Super Bowl. It
7:00
was an overall enjoyable watch. All
7:03
right, that's enough bullshit. Let's talk some Yankees now.
7:05
Last week when you were out, we had Andy
7:07
Martino on. It was a really great interview. I
7:10
saw a lot of good insights and a
7:12
lot of good comments and feedback from people.
7:14
So I appreciate the support there. He
7:17
said a few interesting things. One
7:19
thing I noticed, people were like, why
7:22
Andy Martino is just defending Brian Cashman.
7:24
And I didn't take
7:26
it as him defending Brian Cashman at all. He
7:29
wrote a book about the inner workings of
7:31
the Yankees. Cashman's probably gonna be, definitely gonna
7:33
be the centerpiece of that. So he talked
7:35
to so many people in the organization, including
7:37
Brian Cashman himself. He's not defending him. He's
7:39
just telling us how it is from what
7:42
he's learned. I just think
7:45
a lot of people didn't like that. One
7:47
of the things that I saw the biggest negative
7:50
feedback on and I
7:52
wanna get your take on this, Scott, is that Martino
7:55
said Brian Cashman makes every move
7:57
in a vacuum. He's
7:59
never thinking about... the big picture, he's looking
8:01
at, for example, the Juan Soto trade or
8:03
the signing of a relief pitcher or the
8:05
signing of a big free agent, all in
8:08
a vacuum. Is that the right
8:10
decision for the team? Is that
8:12
good or bad for the organization? And then he
8:14
moves on to the next thing. And
8:17
while I said that probably makes
8:20
sense from a long-term
8:22
organizational perspective, because you
8:25
don't want to ever get yourself in a situation
8:27
where you make a move because you made a
8:29
move prior to that that didn't work out. So
8:31
you're like doubling down on things. As
8:34
a general manager of a team,
8:37
there has to be go-for-it
8:40
moments and go-for-it seasons or
8:42
pull back seasons. And so
8:44
you make moves based
8:47
on those decisions and those moves
8:49
can inform other moves. For example,
8:51
when he traded away players at
8:54
the 2016 trade deadline,
8:56
those moves happen because they
8:59
made a decision, we need to
9:01
rebuild, retool a little bit. And
9:03
so he made multiple moves with
9:05
that in mind. Or in
9:09
the 2008-2009 offseason, when he signed
9:11
all of those free agents, he
9:14
made moves based on this is
9:17
our opportunity to add a bunch of
9:19
missing pieces to this roster to quote,
9:21
go-for-it this coming year. So
9:23
the fact that that I think rubbed people the wrong
9:25
way, and I know it rubbed me the wrong way
9:27
because I called this offseason, you have to push all
9:29
your chips into the middle of the table if you're
9:31
trading for Juan Soto. Don't go
9:33
into the season with question marks in
9:36
the rotation or the pitching depth or
9:38
question marks in the infield or anything like that.
9:40
You should try and clean up as many question
9:42
marks as you possibly can. And so I think
9:44
that annoyed some people that
9:48
they think Brian Cashman isn't looking at
9:50
the big picture of things. Well, I'm
9:52
sure a lot of people also agree with that, to be honest. But
9:54
if you go back, if
9:57
you're in that mindset, you're thinking of that, who's
9:59
the... the number
10:01
one acquisition that you think of is
10:03
Stanton, I would assume. Like, that puts
10:05
you in a position now with
10:08
a log jam in a particular position,
10:10
but you're being opportunistic about a guy
10:12
and not looking at like, what's
10:15
the rest of that plan? And to
10:17
his point, I don't know if I would
10:20
position it as he does look at everything
10:22
in a vacuum because like Soto, you got
10:24
to be opportunistic when you
10:26
have the availability to be opportunistic.
10:28
And you could say
10:31
that some of these vacuum
10:33
type moves are reactions
10:35
to what they did
10:38
poorly or planned poorly. So I
10:40
think it's just poor planning in a
10:42
lot of cases rather than moves in
10:44
a vacuum. I think moves in a
10:46
vacuum are reactions to poor planning because
10:48
you have to kind of pivot from
10:51
whatever your strategy and plan was that
10:53
wasn't working. So I don't
10:55
know if I necessarily buy the
10:57
comment where he's in a vacuum, but I mean, I understand
10:59
what he's saying. The sentiment I think is
11:02
real to a point because when
11:05
Stanton signed that's what
11:07
everybody points back to. Like that's when
11:09
you're looking at roster construction and how they
11:11
moved forward with a lot of things. It
11:13
starts with Stanton, you know, coming onto this
11:15
team and the fact that they didn't go
11:17
and sign certain people that may have been
11:19
better fit for what they wanted
11:22
to accomplish in the years forward. So they
11:24
didn't execute said plan, whatever it was on
11:26
that. And then you have these isolated moves
11:29
where you're trying to like catch up and
11:31
be competitive. And this year,
11:33
of course, they had to do it. They had to do something
11:35
this year. So they were opportunistic with
11:37
what was in front of them. And Juan Soto clearly
11:39
was the number one piece
11:41
there. But to his point,
11:44
to Cashbud's credit, he's a good
11:46
fit. He's a good fit for what they need. So
11:48
offense has been an
11:50
issue dating back to, you know, the playoff
11:52
exits. Like offense was the reason why they
11:55
have gone out. So I think
11:58
we're seeing the context of it. The
12:00
context of it was you trade for Soto, but
12:02
Yamamoto was your number one off-season
12:11
free agent target, and that didn't work
12:13
out. So instead you pivot to Marcus
12:15
Stroman, who took a lesser deal and
12:17
lesser money. Instead of
12:20
adding another piece to the rotation,
12:22
either another big free agent or
12:24
a trade for Corbin Burns, something
12:26
like that, giving up prospects, Cashman
12:28
has decided, at least to this point
12:30
in spring training, in the spring, that
12:33
does not make sense for the organization. Don't
12:35
want to commit the financial resources to something
12:38
like Snell, or don't want to
12:40
commit the prospect capital to someone
12:42
like Corbin Burns. And my point
12:44
was, well, you're- They're different
12:46
players. You can't say that they're the same
12:49
though. Yamamoto is- No, I'm not calling them
12:51
the same. My point though is that Brian
12:53
Cashman is not looking at the off-season as
12:55
a go-for-it off-season. So since we have to
12:57
go for it, we have to make this
13:00
trade, and we have to trade, say, Spencer
13:02
Jones and a handful of other players for
13:04
Corbin Burns. Because what he's looking at
13:06
is, yeah, I already made the
13:08
Soto trade, made the Verdugo trade.
13:10
We upgraded our outfield. We brought
13:12
in Stroman to shore up the
13:15
rotation. That's not going
13:17
to impact one way or the other. What else
13:19
we do in the starting rotation in trading for
13:21
a Corbin Burns. And to me, I was like,
13:23
I don't see how that could be possible. Of
13:25
course they're related. Of course you have to look
13:27
at off-seasons based on moves
13:29
you've already made or tried to make to then
13:31
make your next move. And
13:34
so I'm sure Brian Cashman likes to say
13:36
they don't do that, but I feel
13:38
like that's human nature, right? Like
13:40
of course other things are
13:43
going to influence your decision in
13:45
future moves. Yeah,
13:47
no, for sure. And the Corbin Burns move is
13:49
one that we've been, I know you had it
13:52
in your plans. I've been
13:54
an advocate of it ever
13:56
since they
13:58
lost the Yamamoto in understanding that they they do
14:00
have expiring contracts. It makes
14:02
a lot of sense to go and do it. And now you
14:04
have a really big problem in the AO least because Burns is
14:06
on the best team in the AO least at this point. So
14:10
yes, they have to be influenced
14:12
with what's happening in the market
14:14
and what's happening on their roster.
14:16
But I don't know, I
14:19
think that the moves, it's
14:22
hard to say that it's in a vacuum because I don't
14:25
believe that it's in a vacuum. I think there were a
14:27
lot of contributing factors to what he did. And to me,
14:29
when I'm thinking about someone making a decision in a vacuum,
14:31
they're not thinking about anything else. It's just that isolated thing.
14:33
And you can do that with particular players.
14:36
Yamamoto is a different type of player, a
14:38
very different type of player than anybody else
14:40
who's on the market. You can't say that
14:43
because they didn't go after Yamamoto and Snell is still
14:45
there, then they should just do Snell for a longer
14:47
term deal. They're different players.
14:49
You cannot say that 10 years
14:52
of one guy and five years
14:54
of another guy, for that first five years
14:56
is gonna be a similar result. They're
14:59
not the same. So that part I
15:01
disagree with. Yeah, that's why
15:03
I conceded. I think it's probably a
15:06
good thing for the long-term success
15:08
of the organization and long-term sustainable success of
15:10
the organization, which despite the fact that fans
15:12
are not happy with the Yankees, that they
15:14
have not won a World Series or even
15:16
gone to the World Series since 2009, they
15:20
have been a successful organization in
15:22
that time period from just a
15:24
win-loss standpoint and a playoff appearance
15:26
standpoint. And unfortunately,
15:28
management probably views the playoffs. We know they
15:30
definitely view the playoffs as a little bit
15:32
of a luck and crap shoot. And so
15:34
their job is to get the team there.
15:37
And then if the balls bounce the right
15:39
way, then we're gonna win a championship. If
15:41
the balls bounce the wrong way, they're not
15:43
gonna win a championship. I'm not gonna
15:45
go too far down the rabbit hole on that. I
15:47
think that's bullshit, considering you
15:49
have teams who have more success than
15:51
others because of the way their teams
15:54
are constructing the players they have, but
15:56
whatever. To your point about Corbin Burns
15:58
with the Orioles, now a fraud. problem. A
16:01
couple of weeks ago, we talked about the sports
16:04
book, win totals and how the Yankees
16:06
were 93 wins or 92 and a
16:08
half wins and which was four and
16:10
a half or five games better than,
16:12
than Baltimore. Zips
16:14
projections came out
16:17
after the Corbin burns or were updated after
16:19
the Corbin burns trade and they have Baltimore
16:21
at 90 wins. The Yankees and Toronto at
16:24
88 wins Tampa 83 wins,
16:26
which on the faces of it feels
16:28
a little low and Boston at 79 wins,
16:31
which I think feels a little high based on
16:33
how they're off season and their roster is looking.
16:36
But the zip projections use Baltimore as the best
16:38
team in the league. And I think it's, you
16:40
know, Corbin burns, obviously a big factor that he's
16:42
one of the best pitchers in baseball. Yeah.
16:45
And it's, uh, for sure that's more, more
16:47
in line, I think with what we were
16:49
thinking as far as the way that
16:51
it's going to be a lot tighter, the swing
16:53
that, that was, that was there between what 94
16:55
and 86 or 87 was, it was just
16:58
too big. And yeah, I mean,
17:00
Corbin burns is a convenient way to make those
17:02
closer, but they were, they were under, I think
17:04
it was under in the, from the, from the
17:06
jump, but yeah, Corbin burns makes a massive difference
17:08
right now. Makes a massive difference to that team.
17:10
So, you know, the fact that the
17:12
Yankees and then here's the other thing, like I kind
17:14
of wish Cashman made more decisions in a vacuum for
17:17
this year, because this is the year to do that.
17:19
You need to just add pieces to, to add depth.
17:21
That's not a vacuum. That's what we're saying. A vacuum is
17:24
I'm only looking at this deal. What you're
17:26
saying, what I was saying, and then wish also happened
17:28
is no, this is our year. We just have Soto
17:30
might be the last year. It might be the only
17:32
year of Soto, depending on how the, the off season
17:34
goes. Let's do everything in our,
17:36
in our power to possibly win this year.
17:40
Also the judge, you could also add pieces that
17:42
don't make a lot of sense. I guess I'm
17:44
thinking as you can add a piece today that
17:46
doesn't, that makes you better, but
17:49
doesn't make a ton of sense for
17:51
the longterm, which if
17:53
you're looking at a vacuum, it's more for
17:55
just a year, not, not the necessarily. I'm
17:57
not suggesting. and
18:00
stupid money on Blake Snell, right? Like I'm not saying,
18:02
oh, just sign Blake Snell to nine years just because
18:04
you need him for this year, no. But
18:06
what I'm saying is be a little bit more
18:09
aggressive and a little bit more willing to make
18:11
sacrifices in the short term to win
18:13
a championship now. Because
18:16
the judge called- I mean, we've been consistent with this. This
18:19
is the year that they have the opportunity to
18:21
create depth in the starting rotation, which is a
18:23
difficult thing to do in the first place. And
18:26
they do have the opportunity this year
18:28
to do that with Clark Schmitt being that
18:31
fifth swing guy. And
18:36
I think a little bit of uncertainty in the bullpen.
18:38
They do have the opportunity or they had the opportunity
18:40
and they still do, because there
18:42
are still good pitchers on the
18:44
market to create that depth and
18:46
overload the starting rotation, which I
18:49
still think they should do. We're
18:51
driven by the search for better. But when it
18:53
comes to hiring, the best way to search for
18:55
a candidate isn't to search at all. Don't
18:58
search, match with Indeed. Indeed
19:01
is your matching and hiring platform
19:03
with over 350 million global monthly
19:05
visitors, according to Indeed data, and
19:07
a matching engine that helps you
19:09
find quality candidates fast. Leveraging
19:11
over 140 million qualifications and
19:14
preferences every day, Indeed's matching
19:16
engine is constantly learning from
19:19
your preferences. Join more than 3.5
19:22
million businesses worldwide that use Indeed to
19:24
hire great talent fast. And listeners of
19:26
this show will get a $75 sponsored
19:29
job credit to
19:31
get your jobs more visibility
19:33
at indeed.com/blue wire. Just go
19:35
to indeed.com/blue wire right now
19:37
and support our show by
19:39
saying you heard about Indeed
19:41
on this podcast. indeed.com/blue
19:44
wire, terms and conditions
19:46
apply. Need to hire?
19:49
You need Indeed. We've
19:51
got Boone's press conference Wednesday afternoon. We're
19:54
recording this Wednesday morning. I
19:57
don't think anything's gonna be said in
19:59
that press conference. the same from Aaron Boone. Brian Cashman,
20:01
I believe, speak to the media on Thursday. Do you
20:03
think we're going to get anything interesting from that? I
20:08
mean, no,
20:10
nothing. He's
20:12
been more candid, but I don't know what more
20:14
there is to say about going
20:18
into the season beyond that. I want to know
20:20
more about what's available on the
20:22
market and if there's any thoughts there, but they're not
20:24
going to divulge any of that. Another
20:27
thing that I think you'll find interesting from that
20:29
Martino interview, there was a, I
20:32
guess probably among beat writers at that GM
20:35
meetings when, because Martino was in that group
20:38
that was interviewing Cashman, I
20:41
guess there was a conspiracy theory
20:43
among those beat writers that another
20:46
reason why Cashman was so outward,
20:48
emotional, and defensive is to deflect
20:50
from Hal Steinbrenner, who talked on
20:52
Zoom a few hours earlier and
20:54
frankly sounded like a buffoon
20:56
on Zoom talking about Aaron
20:58
Judge thinks we need to bond. Yeah,
21:01
I think that is 100% true. I
21:04
thought of that at the,
21:06
when Aaron, when, and
21:09
I think also you're getting Boone talking about
21:11
things, you're getting Judge being vocal about how
21:13
the team is being constructed or like decisions
21:15
being made behind the scenes. I think a
21:17
lot of that stuff and Hal talking, I
21:19
think a lot of that stuff kind of
21:22
pissed Cashman off. So I think he was
21:24
agitated. He was definitely
21:26
agitated. All right, a couple of news items. So we've
21:28
got Max Goodman coming up on the show. He is
21:30
going to, we're going to talk to him about a
21:33
ton of spring training news items and he's going to
21:35
join our podcast every week during spring training. So I'm
21:37
very excited about that. But first
21:39
I want to talk about Carlos Rodone shaving
21:41
the mustache and the
21:44
man listens finally. I think
21:46
this is a step in the right
21:48
direction for Carlos Rodone. It
21:50
is. It might sound stupid, but
21:53
I really do know that he's not stupid. It's not,
21:55
it's having some self-awareness on how dumb
21:57
you looked and you look in the
21:59
yeah. When you look in the mirror and you think
22:02
everything's okay when you see
22:05
the mustache and then the
22:07
performance with that mustache, then that's what's not
22:09
okay. That's what's not okay. So he did
22:11
the right thing. He got rid of the
22:13
growth that was above his lip and
22:16
he's acknowledging the
22:19
fact that everything
22:21
was bad. Everything was bad and it starts with the
22:23
mustache. So we're going to get rid of it. We're
22:25
going to get if there's some bad
22:27
juju, which there was in the mustache, it's now
22:30
gone. You got
22:32
to clean off the upper lip and
22:34
start with a new fresh face going
22:36
into spring training. The guy's been there
22:38
early, saying all the right
22:40
things. So we'll see. I'm
22:43
not going to get excited about his outward
22:45
talking anymore because I did that too
22:47
early. We
22:49
said last year when he showed up with the mustache, it's
22:52
like if you want to grow a mustache after your 12th
22:54
start of the year and you have a 2.8 ERA, I'm
22:56
all for it. You
22:58
can't do it before you even throw a pitch on
23:01
a regular season game for the Yankees. But
23:04
Radon has been in Tampa since early January.
23:07
He's been working on his throwing program. He talked to
23:09
the media recently,
23:11
said mainly just
23:14
you got to get back to what I was
23:16
in 21, 22. I believe I can do that.
23:18
That's why I'm here so early, blah, blah, blah,
23:20
all of that kind of stuff. Again,
23:23
like you said, let's not
23:25
get overly excited about Radon and
23:27
how he's talking because
23:31
that didn't work out last year. It's
23:34
really going to be, has
23:36
he actually learned from the mistakes that
23:38
he made last year? Not
23:40
talking pitching wise, I'm talking more emotions
23:44
wise. I want him to learn from
23:46
the pitching mistakes. I just want him to learn from the
23:48
pitching mistakes because if he learns from the pitching mistakes, all
23:50
the other things are going to take care of itself. I
23:53
don't care what he does emotionally. If he's pitching well, fix
23:55
the pitching shit. Yeah, but he's when
23:57
he blew off Matt Blake at the end of the
23:59
season. I don't
24:01
even care if you're pitching well, I could give a
24:03
rat's ass what you do I really I don't care
24:05
just pitch well because the rest of the shit will
24:07
take care of itself When you're making that much money
24:09
coming into New York and you have that mustache and
24:11
you're not pitching well Bad is
24:13
bad bad stuff is gonna happen bad reactions are
24:16
gonna happen Your body language is gonna be bad
24:18
and especially if you're a guy that wears emotions
24:20
on your sleeve not gonna be a good thing
24:22
So, you know just fix the one thing that
24:24
anybody cares about and that's pitching just pitch Well,
24:26
if you pitch well, you can that you could
24:28
be you could be the biggest asshole in the
24:31
world. Just pitch. Well, that's it That's all we
24:33
ask After the end
24:35
of the season last year didn't he say
24:37
like I'm gonna go on a beach vacation
24:39
with without my family Yeah, that's yeah being
24:42
like solitary confinement. It was it was solitary confinement.
24:44
Yeah He's gonna take some time away from everybody
24:47
and just figure it out. Maybe that's where the
24:49
must out He's like, you know what? This means
24:51
maybe Maybe when saw the
24:53
eye himself in the mirror I had a buddy
24:55
in college one day who just like came out
24:57
and said he saw demons I'm like, all right,
25:00
then you got to do what you gotta do.
25:02
I guess he was over and thought demons or
25:04
he was any But that's all demons, you know
25:08
One way or another it's he was what he was
25:10
in some some kind of state But he saw demons
25:12
and and it changed his life. So and
25:14
he's now he's the model citizen now. Oh Yeah
25:20
Definitely the model citizen It
25:22
worked out perfectly. It worked out a lot a
25:24
lot of your don't know the earrings left though.
25:26
That's good Your
25:29
buddy his yeah, the earrings left the building
25:31
there were a lot of earrings no longer
25:33
and they've stayed away That's that's like equivalent
25:35
of a mustache shape. Yeah but
25:37
don't also lost some weight and It
25:40
seems to be in much better shape and I
25:42
don't want to say he was out of shape
25:44
last year But he was definitely on the bigger
25:46
side. I think I He
25:48
just comes across as one of those guys that can carry that though
25:50
and be okay with that. I'm not and Maybe
25:53
not maybe it maybe it affected his way. He
25:55
had all those back. He had back problems. And
25:57
so yeah, you know Wait
26:00
be a fact. David Wells had back
26:02
problems. And I'm not saying Carlos Fredone
26:04
is overweight like David
26:06
Wells was overweight. But especially
26:09
as Wells got later in his career,
26:11
his weight, his gut did not help
26:13
his back problems. Usually your
26:15
gut doesn't help back problems if you have back
26:17
problems. Usually it's the center. Gravity
26:20
issues don't help your back. And normally that's you
26:26
know, it can get no, nor does, you
26:28
know, drinking every single day and having gout and all those
26:30
things. So there's a lot of different factors in why your
26:32
back hurts, I think. So for Fredone,
26:38
if he's in better shape, and that
26:40
allows him to throw his two pitches
26:43
in a much better fashion than
26:45
I'm all for it. I think Wells wrote
26:47
a book called like back eggs and beers or
26:50
something like that. There's like back aches, toe aches
26:52
and beers or something like that. Never
26:54
read the book. I'm sure it's a hoot. Anytime
26:57
you have gout, you got to question some lifestyle
26:59
moves, you know, I feel like
27:01
that's one of those issues
27:03
where you're like, you know what? The
27:09
Yankees also claimed infielder Jordan Groschans
27:11
from Miami and DFA'd Matt Crook.
27:13
Matt Crook was you know, potential
27:15
slot in the bullpen. We're going
27:17
to talk to Max Goodman in
27:19
a few minutes about the
27:22
19-month-ending pitchers from the bullpen that can- Spring
27:24
training battles, which is how it doesn't seem
27:27
like there's any spring training battles. And
27:31
so adding an infield depth in this
27:33
move. And they
27:35
also, they've made a lot of these moves
27:37
over the past couple of weeks, just like
27:39
picking up guys off waivers, DFA and guys
27:42
seems to happen every four
27:44
or five days. Sorry, anything else
27:46
you want to touch on before we talk to Max? No,
27:49
let's bring on, bring on Max. All
27:52
right. Well, before we
27:54
do that, I need to tell you,
27:56
you need to hear about delicious two minute meals.
28:00
Now I'm talking restaurant quality food that is delivered
28:02
to you weekly and takes only two minutes to
28:04
heat up. That's Factor, the best ready to eat
28:06
meal service out there. Sometimes
28:08
figuring out what you're going to eat for dinner can
28:10
be stressful because you have no time to grocery shop,
28:12
cook, or you don't want to wait for delivery to
28:14
show up. Factor solves all of
28:17
that. The process is very easy. You go
28:19
on their website, you choose from over 35
28:21
delicious meals each week, highly skilled chefs prepare
28:23
the meals. The food gets delivered to you.
28:25
It's always fresh and never frozen. You
28:27
store it in your refrigerator and then when you're ready to eat
28:29
it, boom, you pop it in the microwave for
28:31
two minutes and you are ready to eat delicious food.
28:34
Factor is affordable. It's less expensive than
28:36
takeout and every meal is dietician approved
28:39
to be nutritious and delicious. Factor can also fit
28:41
to your schedule. You can customize the number of
28:43
meals you get each week or pause your subscription
28:45
if you're going to be out of town. There's
28:48
no prep, no mess, just
28:50
delicious food. Head to factormeals.com/Bronx50
28:53
and use code Bronx50 to get 50% off, half off your
28:58
order at
29:00
factormels.com slash
29:02
B-R-O-N-X-5-0. What
29:06
is that spell, Scott? factormills.com/Bronx50.
29:13
You nailed it. Let's talk to Max. Okay,
29:16
joining us on the podcast now is Max
29:18
Goodman covers the Yankees for New Jersey, AdvancedMedia,
29:21
nj.com and the Star Ledger. Max, welcome to
29:23
the show. Thank you for joining us. Thanks
29:26
for having me, guys. You're all doing well. We
29:28
know you're going to be down in Tampa
29:30
starting for the whole month of March. We'll
29:33
be able to get your take on things from
29:35
the ground level once you're there. Right now, you're
29:38
stuck in the Northeast for
29:40
the next couple weeks. Want to
29:42
get your opinion on the off season and the
29:44
moves that the Yankees have made so far and
29:47
pictures and catches reporting this week. Do
29:49
you think that the off season is complete? I
29:53
think if I had to give them a grade, it would be between a B
29:56
plus and an A minus. I think
29:58
you can't ignore just how much they've been. how much
30:00
better this roster is, but it
30:02
does feel just a little incomplete.
30:05
When you look at the pitching staff, they
30:07
obviously did a couple, you
30:10
know, opportunistic moves to improve the bullpen. And
30:12
I think you can trust Matt
30:14
Blake and company to bring the best out of the
30:17
relievers that they have, the guys they brought in, some
30:20
of the young folks that are unproven right now, but
30:22
the depth and the rotation. When
30:24
you consider the injury concerns dating back
30:26
to last year with Rodin
30:28
Cortez and now Stroman as
30:31
well, that group with Garakol
30:33
has immense upside, top five
30:35
rotation in the league upside,
30:38
but the floor is
30:41
pretty darn low. And I
30:43
think those guys have to prove, everyone except Cole,
30:46
they have to prove that they're able to play a
30:48
full season, that they're able to be effective, consistently
30:50
take the ball every five days and get the
30:52
job done. So who's gonna
30:54
step in when inevitably someone gets hurt in
30:57
that staff? And Clark Schmidt being the number
30:59
five, how's he gonna handle his first year
31:01
after the biggest workload of his big league
31:04
career as well? So is it
31:06
gonna be a Luke Weaver as your number six,
31:08
or are prospects Will Warren,
31:10
Clayton Beter, maybe Chase Hampton gonna
31:12
fill that void? I think
31:14
that one more veteran
31:16
reliable and proven piece maybe would
31:19
have eased the anxiety of the
31:21
fan base a little bit there. But again,
31:23
when you go one of the worst
31:25
outfields in the league to now one of the best with
31:28
Juan Soto and Alex Verdugo, I think
31:30
Trent Grisham is a valuable piece for
31:32
them. You're still relying a little
31:34
bit on the veterans that showed some signs
31:36
of decline last year in terms of the
31:38
offense and the lineup. But on
31:41
paper, I know the game's not played on paper,
31:43
but on paper, this offense can be very, very
31:45
good, the pitching staff too, but you
31:47
gotta stay healthy, gotta prove that last
31:49
year was an anomaly for a lot of these guys. Max,
31:53
I'm glad you brought up, and we're gonna talk
31:55
about some quote position battles. There aren't a ton
31:57
of them this year, but I think.
32:00
something that you said is, you know,
32:02
we just got finished with
32:04
the first part of the show. And this
32:06
has been a consistent thread of our conversations
32:09
through the off season is creating depth in
32:11
the starting rotation. And normally,
32:13
that's a very difficult thing to do. You
32:15
know, when you're trying to get major league talent
32:18
on a roster
32:20
where you only have five slots
32:23
to fill and you don't
32:25
have the ability to add additional
32:27
major league talent to a roster so
32:30
that you can create that depth. The Yankees, though,
32:32
I think are in a position of strength in
32:35
that regard with Clark Schmidt being their number
32:37
five. They do have
32:39
the ability, I believe this year, and they've
32:42
had the ability to create that depth with
32:44
another solid major league pitcher. And I'm not
32:46
even saying like the fact that Luke Weaver
32:48
is a number six, like makes me cringe
32:51
hearing that because that is
32:54
the inevitable thing. Like someone will go down,
32:56
someone will go down. And I feel like
32:58
it's a missed opportunity. And I understand that
33:00
there are still, you know, a couple
33:02
of guys out there that have
33:04
the ability to change this narrative.
33:06
But, you know, creating that depth
33:08
in the starting rotation is such
33:11
an important piece. And the Yankees have the ability
33:14
and they have to win this year. Everybody
33:16
looks at that. There's expiring contracts across the
33:18
board now. And this
33:21
is the year that they're going in. They only have
33:23
one Soto for one year, guaranteed, right? We don't know
33:25
what's going to happen. Create that depth. They have the
33:27
opportunity to do it. And that
33:29
is where I think you're right. I think
33:31
Yankee fans looking around the uncertainty potentially in
33:33
the starting pitching rotation, and frankly, like the
33:36
bullpen, not a lot of big names out there, not
33:38
a lot of proven guys that have shown career stats and doing
33:41
it. And if you needed to
33:43
use a Clark Schmidt in more of a
33:46
swing man role or an opportunity to create
33:48
out of the bullpen by
33:51
adding someone who has a proven
33:53
track record in the starting rotation, I think you got
33:55
to do it. So curious your thoughts
33:57
on that, because to me, that's the biggest glare.
34:00
uh, you know issue with the roster right now Well,
34:03
look you you brought something up that I think is
34:05
going to be a storyline all year And it's the
34:07
fact that this roster has So
34:10
many guys that are on the last year of
34:12
their contracts and obviously soto is a rental but
34:14
glaber torres Clay Holmes,
34:16
Jonathan, lewezaga, verdugo There's
34:19
a significant portion and impact guys
34:21
that May not be
34:23
around next year. At least they're currently not under contract
34:25
to be Um,
34:27
maybe it's misguided for me, but
34:29
i'm not worried In
34:32
terms of the yankees being able to produce in the bullpen
34:34
um They were so good in that
34:36
way last year best bullpen in the league 334 era and
34:41
Their pitching department has proven that they can bring
34:43
the best out of all kinds of
34:45
different arms whether it's uh, The
34:48
ian hamilton's of the world. I think there will be
34:50
some non-roster guy that
34:53
Erupts on the scene this spring and ends up having an
34:55
impact 30 games Uh
34:57
sub four sub three era. I think
34:59
that's a guarantee almost which is the
35:02
biggest strength at this point, right? Yeah
35:06
Victor gonzalez and caleb ferguson might end up
35:08
being really good and and yankees fans might
35:11
not miss monday parlota at all but
35:14
I I agree with you. I think that this They
35:18
did have an all-in mentality. They had a
35:20
huge offer on the table for yamamoto They
35:23
traded a huge portion of their you
35:25
know pitching talent in the farm system
35:27
to get soto As well
35:30
as michael king obviously and they traded some arms
35:32
for um verdugo as well
35:34
So it's not like they didn't try to
35:37
Get the job done in terms of
35:39
going all in right, but like I
35:41
said in my first answer I think there is just
35:43
a little bit of a hole that they could have
35:45
addressed But maybe it just
35:47
comes down to they they really trust
35:50
those young guys that haven't had an
35:52
opportunity yet Whether it's yoandris gomez or
35:54
louise heal Uh those types
35:57
of guys in that next tier as much as
35:59
weaver is the number six as of now
36:01
that could change you know when when
36:03
Boone and Cashman speak on on Wednesday and Thursday
36:05
this week and then who knows Who's hurt who
36:07
knows whether guys they've brought in that have a
36:09
locker that we don't know about yet and The
36:14
farm system continues to replenish and churn out
36:16
quality arms So clearly they trust that talent
36:18
they trust the department to bring the best
36:20
out of those guys And also I think
36:23
the budget was a concern too. I mean
36:25
their their payroll is is
36:27
already estimated I
36:29
know but the luxury tax and it's got
36:31
to be a part of the conversation that
36:33
that it's already a high number They've
36:36
got Soto for whatever it is over 30
36:38
million for this year a lot of big
36:40
contracts that they're committed to So
36:43
these are maybe just the repercussions of other
36:45
decisions in past years So like
36:47
yeah, a big reset button coming next year too as
36:49
far as contracts as well. So if you're
36:51
gonna go go guide
36:53
you sir I Want
36:56
to respond to a couple things you said because I
36:58
think they all tie together I agree with you the
37:01
bullpen like even though there's Question marks
37:03
in the bullpen it seems to always work out
37:05
for them and they always get production You
37:08
said they were the best bullpen in the league
37:10
last year and I think that you know The
37:12
numbers look very good. I think they did have
37:14
the best ERA But first I have
37:16
the first half of the year was a big factor in
37:18
that we looked into these numbers I don't have them off
37:20
the top of my head But I know
37:22
in the second half of the year the bullpen was much less
37:24
productive than it was in the first half and it Was
37:27
probably due to the workload that they
37:29
had because the rotation did not have
37:31
consistency in it beyond Garrett
37:33
Cole and so to your point about the question
37:35
marks beyond Garrett Cole like Yeah,
37:38
the bullpen is probably gonna stand up
37:40
and pretty be pretty damn good through
37:42
call it may June Maybe even July
37:44
of this year But if they are
37:46
relied on for three plus innings every
37:48
single night because the rotation does not
37:50
have consistency In health
37:52
beyond Garrett Cole that in my opinion
37:54
is a huge miss and not adding
37:56
to the rotation depth To
37:58
help your bullpen for the
38:00
whole season. So having said all that, you're
38:03
close to obviously a lot of rumors and
38:05
stuff like that. Do you see something happening
38:07
in spring training last minute? Because
38:09
there's still some big pieces out there on the free
38:11
agent market for pitching. Maybe
38:13
in the last minute trade happens as teams
38:16
start to play some games in spring training,
38:18
maybe injuries happen, who the hell knows what
38:20
happens on March 20th if something could happen?
38:23
Right. Well, I think thinking back to
38:25
when Cashman spoke after the
38:27
Strowman signing and the Strowman signing itself is
38:30
kind of like, this is our
38:32
last effort to pivot after Yamamoto.
38:35
This is who's going to be the big addition in
38:37
the rotation. They're giving him almost 40
38:40
million for two years. That was
38:42
my interpretation of it. But when
38:44
Cashman was asked, are you now
38:47
transitioning your focus away from the starting
38:49
rotation? Not verbatim, but the
38:51
sense that I got is we're always exploring
38:53
options to get better. And
38:55
I don't know if the Yankees
38:57
are going to be willing to give up what
38:59
it'll take to get someone like Adilene Cease or
39:02
Shane Bieber. But the
39:05
way things are right now with the free
39:07
agent market, but also other teams. I mean, there
39:09
are some veteran pieces, not necessarily
39:11
number ones or number twos, but I'm sure
39:13
that there's an opportunity out there for them
39:15
to get a bottom of the rotation guy
39:18
that would, again, like I
39:20
said earlier, ease the anxiety of maybe
39:23
the organization. And again, I feel like they have
39:25
faith in what they have, or at least that's
39:27
what they've been telling us. And Boone will always
39:30
say that, you know, I asked him
39:32
at the pinstripe pride autograph event
39:34
the other weekend, like, how do you replace
39:36
Juan de Peralta on the bullpen? And he was like, guys
39:38
that you're not thinking about right now are going to have
39:41
an impact. So clearly, they know what they have. They made
39:43
some other under the
39:45
radar types of moves like Cody Morris, Cody
39:47
Poteet, those types of guys. I mean, they
39:49
have enough arms. It's just what's the quality?
39:52
What's going to be the effectiveness? Can they
39:54
rely on these guys? Like you said, the
39:56
first half of the season kind
39:59
of set the tone of the year and the
40:01
bullpen was definitely taxed. And when you have Tommy
40:03
Kainley, Jonathan LeWisega, those guys that have injury
40:05
concerns in the past in their careers, you
40:07
can't rely on them to pitch in 70
40:09
games the whole year and be lights out
40:11
the whole time. So I think
40:14
we're all on the same page. I mean, do I think they're
40:16
gonna trade for somebody? I
40:18
wouldn't count on it, but they do have
40:20
a surplus at certain positions. I mean, I
40:22
look at catcher, for instance, I
40:25
don't think Ben Roartvett has an option. And
40:27
it seems like Austin Wells is gonna make
40:29
the big league team, right? So maybe there's an avenue
40:32
there. You
40:34
bring in Luis Terenz as a non-roster guy and
40:36
you've got some other up and coming catchers. It
40:38
doesn't seem like there's a spot for Roartvett.
40:40
But famous last words, right? I mean, people
40:42
are gonna get hurt over these next couple
40:44
of weeks and you need to
40:47
have that. So I think the
40:49
Yankees will be opportunistic. If something comes up
40:51
that they're able to bring in another arm,
40:53
just somebody that's been there before, I
40:56
think they should pounce on it. I just don't know who that's gonna
40:58
be. What about Blake
41:00
Snell? Because there's still rumors. The Yankees maybe are just
41:03
thrown into the Blake Snell rumors because the Yankees seem
41:05
to be thrown into a lot of rumors. But
41:08
he's still out there on the free agent market and
41:11
we're starting spring training now. Yeah,
41:14
it's his offer coming back down to
41:16
earth, back down to the Yankees range
41:18
of feeling comfortable with
41:20
him. Because that's an interesting one
41:22
too. And it's not just a veteran depth guy.
41:24
That's a guy that makes an impact that pushes
41:27
Nestor Cortez into a number five
41:29
role, which
41:33
now we're talking. Now we're talking like strengths
41:35
and depth, both at the same time. And
41:38
to me, that's a huge quality to have.
41:42
Right, a couple weeks ago, my coworker
41:44
Bob Plapish reported that that offer is off
41:46
the table. I'm sure that
41:48
that's gonna be a name that's discussed in
41:51
terms of the reporters that are down
41:53
there asking questions to Garakol.
41:55
Does he wanna have another ace on that
41:57
staff? Cashman, are you done
41:59
addressing? at the top of the rotation.
42:02
I think it'll just come down to the financials
42:04
there and what other teams are able to offer.
42:06
All of the big name free agents that are
42:08
still available are all Scott Boris clients, if I'm
42:10
not mistaken. So, I mean, he has a stronghold
42:13
on the market right now. Are
42:15
any of those guys gonna take a one or
42:17
two year deal to kind of reset? I don't
42:19
think Snell should do that. He just wanna sayong,
42:22
his second of his career. It would be crazy
42:24
if he did, yeah. Right, and is
42:26
there another team that's gonna, you
42:29
know, back up the truck and
42:31
suddenly offer a huge deal to convince
42:34
those guys that they're gonna be a contender, maybe
42:36
one of those wildcard teams. I
42:38
don't know if like the Giants are done now that
42:40
they got Solaire, the Phillies, I don't know. But
42:43
there are teams out there that could certainly use
42:45
a Blake Sneller or a Jordan Montgomery. The
42:48
Yankees are one of them, but I don't know based
42:50
on their activity over these last couple
42:52
of months, if that fits
42:54
their budget. But like you were
42:57
talking about earlier, I mean, you gotta go
42:59
all in, right? So if it's affordable
43:02
with what they deem Snell is
43:04
worth, then maybe
43:06
you just go for it. And you hope that
43:08
he doesn't regress because then it becomes a Rodin
43:11
situation for a scenario and that's not
43:13
what you want. Is Rodin. Yeah,
43:15
it's funny to call Blake Snell another rotation
43:17
question mark. He's a two time Cy Young
43:20
winner, but I feel like even though I
43:23
would welcome adding Snell to the rotation,
43:25
he would still be like a bit
43:27
of a question mark, which is crazy
43:29
to say. I
43:31
know it's happened before. Teams have given
43:33
big long-term contracts to guys, even after
43:35
spring training starts, even after the season
43:37
starts, we saw Craig Kimbrel with
43:40
the Cubs when he signed there. But I just
43:42
feel like if you're gonna sign a pitcher to
43:44
six, seven, eight years, you would have done that
43:46
already in December or January. And
43:48
now that spring training is starting and pitchers
43:51
and catchers are in your camp, I
43:53
would be surprised if that happens. So I'm
43:56
not ruling out a short-term deal for Blake Snell. At
43:59
least one of those options. What was Bora
44:01
calling the Cuddle Pot, something
44:03
pot? Scott Forest will trademark a new
44:06
term for whatever Blake's known for. Some
44:08
type of an option that gives him
44:10
flexibility, whereas if he comes out and
44:13
has another solid year puts up the
44:15
innings, because I think that's probably the biggest question mark with
44:18
him, puts up the innings,
44:20
has the ability to flex that into
44:22
a longer term deal. Wouldn't
44:24
be surprised if that were the case. And if that is the case, the Yankees should
44:26
100% pounce on it. Yeah,
44:29
I mean, maybe it depends on what the
44:31
market is for pitching next offseason too. We
44:33
were looking at that. So we actually pulled
44:35
that real quickly. The
44:38
free agents for next offseason, Corbin Burns,
44:40
obviously, Max Freed, Zach Wheeler, Walker Bueller,
44:42
Shane Bieber, Max Scherzer. Like those
44:44
are going to be the big names, big name
44:46
starting pitchers on the free agent market.
44:48
Yeah. I mean, that's a huge risk for
44:50
him because if he has one of his bad years, then he's not
44:54
going to get anything close to. It's
44:56
like a Harrison Bader situation, right? Where when
44:58
he came over to the Yankees and he
45:01
had that playoff series, we
45:03
were all talking about how much he's going to get in an
45:05
extension and they're going to keep him around for the rest of
45:07
his career. And then you have
45:10
an injury riddled and maybe a poor
45:12
performance and all of a
45:14
sudden you're taking a smaller contract. But then again,
45:16
like look at what Frankie Montas got from the
45:18
Reds, right? Like, I mean, the money's out there.
45:20
Pitching's at a premium right now. You got to
45:22
pay for it, whether they're healthy or not. All
45:26
right. I also want
45:28
to talk about Dominguez because it's just
45:30
me or does he had a schedule?
45:33
Like, yo, he reports he's playing catch.
45:35
He's he's throwing and he's he's looks
45:37
healthy and he's in camp. I
45:40
was not expecting to hear that on February 14th. Yeah,
45:43
I don't I don't know what his
45:46
concrete schedule was. I mean, really all we've
45:48
heard from the Yankees is that he'll be
45:50
back sometime this summer. But I
45:52
think it was always an anticipation that he'd
45:54
be capable of contributing
45:56
in a certain way this spring. I mean, he's
45:58
not going to be. out there, you know,
46:01
throwing to home plate from senior field in a
46:03
grapefruit league game. That would be silly. But
46:05
I could see him taking some at bats. And
46:07
I think that this is valuable time for him,
46:09
right? Because he's still, you know,
46:12
not of legal drinking age. And he
46:14
has eight games of MLB experience
46:16
under his belt. I mean, he has a lot of room
46:18
to develop even with how emphatic
46:21
his debut was. And that's something
46:23
to keep an eye on too. Like the
46:25
Yankees now have this surplus of outfielders in
46:29
a sense, you know, when he's ready to come
46:31
back, you've got to subtract somebody or
46:33
you're just keeping, you know,
46:36
Verdugo in a fourth outfielder spot. And
46:38
Grisham is literally just a defensive
46:40
replacement. And it's not a bad problem to have.
46:43
Because again, I think people will get injured at
46:45
some point. And that's not me being cynical
46:47
that that's that happens to every team. Yeah. So is he back
46:49
before the all
46:53
star break? I don't know. I don't think they're
46:55
going to rush him. I think that would
46:57
be a mistake quite frankly, because
46:59
they do have a quality outfield
47:02
right now. I mean, maybe if, you
47:05
know, knock on wood for the Yankees fans out there,
47:07
if a Soto or a judge goes
47:09
down and misses time and Deminguez is like
47:11
close, maybe you bring him back, but
47:14
it wouldn't be the worst thing for him, I think
47:16
to get, you know, an extended
47:18
stretch in triple A once he's like 90% healthy
47:21
just to get his legs under him and
47:24
get back to facing pitching like that every day.
47:27
But I mean, that's, that's an exciting thing for
47:29
fans to look forward to because if
47:31
his debut is any indication, he's going to
47:34
be around for a long time. And then
47:36
you you you change the conversation
47:39
to okay, the baby bombers stuff didn't
47:41
work out is the
47:43
Deminguez, Volpe, Wells, Chase
47:45
Hampton, those that next wave is
47:47
that going to get it done?
47:50
Because judge and Cole aren't getting
47:52
any younger. And that window is, is starting
47:55
to close in terms of their prime and maybe
47:57
not starting to close. But but
47:59
it's not Yeah, I think that's accurate. I think
48:01
the window is is closer to the end than
48:03
it is the beginning Let's just let's just say
48:06
that on the prime of those guys careers Like
48:08
why you have to win if you're gonna win
48:10
a championship with Cole and judge as your main
48:12
contributors That has to happen very soon. It's not
48:14
gonna happen when they're both 37 years old Right
48:18
that is you've got a Spencer Jones coming too.
48:20
So if you think about it from the outfield
48:22
specifically, I mean do they want I I
48:26
think they want soda to come back. It would be silly
48:29
not to just Totally not
48:31
consider bringing him back if you can fit
48:34
that into your payroll. I mean, he's gonna be a great
48:36
fit Dominican superstar. He's a
48:38
generational talent. We don't even need to discuss
48:40
that. I mean it's obvious but
48:42
I Mean there's now field
48:44
out there where it's judge Jones and Dominguez if
48:46
those two young guys work out the fact that
48:48
they've not been trading them because of
48:51
how highly touted and Their
48:53
potential I mean that's a pretty darn
48:55
good outfield right there But if
48:57
there's a way to keep Soto in that mix to As
49:01
judge gets older I think he's gonna need to
49:03
DH more often and you can't count on Stanton
49:05
to be an outfielder as much as I'm
49:08
sure that we'll hear this spring that he's gonna be, you
49:10
know getting reps out there And that'll be playing on the
49:12
outfield a couple times a week But
49:15
yeah, I mean there are big-picture questions here, too I
49:17
mean, there's a lot to discuss this spring
49:19
which I think is exciting for the
49:22
fan base especially coming off of such
49:24
a disastrous season And
49:27
there is an avenue to them being really successful this
49:29
year. It's just it comes down to so many different
49:31
what ifs The the stand
49:33
piece to you know, you mentioning him as
49:35
a you know Counting on him in
49:37
the after it's hard to count on him and in any
49:39
capacity You don't know what you get, you know, I think
49:42
we've been talking on this show about him If
49:45
you get something from him, okay, then it's gravy
49:47
at this point, but you cannot expect it and
49:49
and you know to the point of the
49:52
Yankees not doing what they
49:54
they they had the opportunity to do
49:56
in the in the starting rotation to date I
49:59
think they did address that in the outfield
50:01
with, you know, we're not going to be rolling,
50:03
you know, the fourth and fifth guys out there
50:05
from triple A on a daily basis. Like, you
50:07
know, when Dominguez does come back, you have Grisham
50:09
as a fourth defensive outfield or a guy that
50:12
can come in and swipe some bags potentially has
50:14
some speed on the base path. Like that to
50:16
me, that's a great role for him. He's not
50:18
the greatest offensive player. He is a, you know,
50:20
a plus defender has tremendous speed. Like I like
50:23
him as a guy off the bench and they'll
50:25
figure out how to rotate four guys in. They
50:28
always, they always do. I'm not, I'm not concerned about
50:30
that, but the fact that they did create that depth on
50:32
the outfield, I think is a really important piece because the
50:34
other thing is, is like, how long do they
50:37
want judge roaming center field? You know, so I
50:39
think that's a, that's a piece having Dominguez come
50:41
back. I got June circled for him in
50:43
my head. But to
50:45
Max's point, they don't need to rush it because of the,
50:47
they don't need to rush in the outfield. And
50:49
if they, if they didn't add, say, Verdugo
50:52
this winter, then it would be
50:54
sort of like, when is Dominguez coming back?
50:56
So we can have, have a, have a
50:58
complete outfield. Now, if guys underperform or guys
51:00
get injured, maybe that conversation will still happen.
51:02
But as it stands right now in the
51:04
middle of February, they can slow play Dominguez,
51:06
which I think at his age and his
51:08
injury, he's coming off of and his in,
51:12
um, inexperience, even in triple
51:14
A, like he's absolutely the right way
51:16
to play his, his rehab. Yeah.
51:19
If they didn't acquire anybody else, it would
51:21
be so much pressure. Right. And
51:23
not only. He treated as the savior
51:25
and that's like, that's such an unfair thing
51:27
to put on a kid coming back from,
51:29
from Tommy John surgery. Yeah. Yeah.
51:32
And we want to play loose coming in with to a, to a
51:34
team that's, that's, you know, has, has a spot for him, um,
51:37
but doesn't need that spot. He needs to be playing loose.
51:40
He's, he's a center fielder, right? And he just
51:42
had major elbow surgery and he's 20, 21
51:44
years old. I mean, that's,
51:47
that's not something you want to rush someone back
51:49
from and risk him
51:52
trying to perform better right
51:54
away. And he does something
51:56
and there's a setback or there are long-term implications of
51:58
that. I mean, you don't want to put that. into
52:00
the universe for the kid because you know everyone's
52:02
rooting for him to fulfill
52:04
the expectations that he has but
52:07
the bottom line with the outfield is you go from IKF
52:10
Jake Bowers, Willie McKinney, Billy
52:14
McKinney, Willie Calhoun and mix that up. Not
52:18
that I like Willie McKinney better. I think it
52:20
improves my point a little bit and now you
52:22
have Verdugo, Soto, Grisham,
52:24
Dominguez coming back. I mean
52:26
it's Everson Pereira, maybe
52:28
he can bounce back from the year
52:30
that he had, the month that he
52:32
had. So the talent is there.
52:34
I wouldn't be surprised if Spencer Jones finishes
52:37
on a similar timeline to Dominguez and he's
52:39
able to contribute by the end of the
52:41
year but I think the Yankees
52:43
should hope that they don't need a Jones
52:46
to come up by the end, right? That they
52:48
can stow him away for another year in the
52:50
minors to have him develop because there's
52:53
no room for a prospect to
52:55
come up because of injuries. They don't need to have
52:57
that youth movement where they give the unconditional playing time
52:59
to guys like they did at the end of last
53:01
year. You hope that everybody's humming at the end of
53:04
the season and I
53:06
think it'll be a wildcard spot because the Orioles are
53:09
seemingly becoming a juggernaut here.
53:11
Anything can happen. That's
53:14
so many months away from now but as
53:16
long as they get into the playoffs, all you
53:18
need these days is a ticket to the dance
53:21
and then anything can happen. That's right.
53:23
Which is their mentality. So maybe unfortunately
53:25
that is their mentality. Kind of pisses
53:27
us off a little bit to be
53:29
honest. All right,
53:31
Max, thank you so much for joining us. We'll talk
53:33
to you next week. I'm sure there'll be actually much
53:35
more to talk about after we hear Boone and Cashman
53:37
speak and any other news items that come over come
53:39
out over the next week. Thanks again. Absolutely,
53:41
guys. Talk to you again soon. Hey
53:46
guys, thanks for listening to the Bronx Pinstrap
53:48
Show. Make sure you find us on iTunes
53:50
and subscribe so you can get all new episodes
53:53
directly onto your phone. If you do like the
53:55
show, we'd love for you to take
53:57
a minute and give us a five-star rating and review
53:59
on iTunes. It really helps us out and
54:01
allows us to create more shows. We're
54:03
on Twitter at Bronx Pen Stripes and the same
54:05
on Facebook. You can always find us there talking
54:07
Yankee baseball. Thanks again guys for
54:09
your support. Really appreciate it and go Yankees.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More