Podchaser Logo
Home
Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Released Wednesday, 14th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Kicking off Yankees spring training with Max Goodman

Wednesday, 14th February 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

We're driven by the search for better, but when it

0:03

comes to hiring, the best way to search for a

0:05

candidate isn't to search at all. Don't

0:07

search, match, with Indeed. Indeed

0:10

is your matching and hiring platform with

0:12

over 350 million global monthly

0:14

visitors according to Indeed data and a

0:17

matching engine that helps you find quality

0:19

candidates fast. Leveraging over 140 from

0:28

your preferences. Join more than 3.5 million

0:31

businesses worldwide that use Indeed to hire

0:33

great talent fast. And listeners of this

0:36

show will get a $75 sponsored job

0:39

credit to get your jobs

0:42

more visibility at indeed.com/bluewire. Just

0:44

go to indeed.com/bluewire right now

0:46

and support our show by

0:48

saying you heard about Indeed

0:51

on this podcast. indeed.com/bluewire,

0:53

terms and conditions

0:55

apply. Need to hire? You

0:58

need Indeed. We

1:01

are breaking down all aspects of Yankee

1:03

baseball. This is the Bronx Pinstripe Show

1:05

with your host, Andrew Rotandi and Scott

1:08

Ryan. Let's

1:10

go. What's

1:17

up everybody? Welcome to the Bronx Pinstripe

1:19

Show. Welcome to baseball season officially. The

1:22

Super Bowl is over. Spring training,

1:24

pitchers and catchers is starting today, Valentine's

1:26

Day. I guess happy Valentine's Day to

1:28

you three months. How you doing Scott?

1:31

Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Happy Valentine's Day. Do

1:33

you celebrate Valentine's Day anymore? What do you

1:36

mean celebrate? Acknowledge

1:38

it. Yeah, I said happy Valentine's Day to

1:40

my wife this week. Did you get a card or a

1:42

gift? Nope. Does she

1:44

do the same to you? You guys, did you guys have

1:46

an understanding that like, you know what, this is one of

1:48

those ones that's no longer. She

1:50

got me a pair of ski socks. Oh,

1:53

well that's nice. Those are not cheap. The

1:55

problem is, here's the problem. Practical.

1:58

Harrison's birthday was this past week. and

2:00

we had all my family in town, we had all of

2:02

the aunt's family over. It

2:04

was a chaotic weekend. Tuesday

2:07

in New Jersey was a snow day. Daycare

2:10

was closed, everything was closed, we got a

2:12

lot of snow. I

2:14

would have tried to go out and buy

2:17

some flowers or get a card yesterday. It's

2:19

yesterday, the day before, you can't say that.

2:22

But that was the day that I had earmarked

2:24

a week ago on when I'm gonna get this

2:26

stuff done. Well that's your problem.

2:28

You can't earmark the day before and be like,

2:30

oh you know what, nothing wrong is gonna happen.

2:32

There's nothing that's gonna deter me from doing it

2:35

on the day before. If you truly were gonna

2:37

do something, you would have already done it. That's

2:39

fair enough. It's also with

2:42

my wife, we got

2:44

Christmas, obviously then her birthday's two

2:46

weeks after Christmas. Yeah. It's

2:49

like Valentine's Day's the next month. There's too many things all over.

2:51

Look, I gotta tell you. Six weeks of the year. I'll

2:53

tell you my thoughts on it. First of all, Valentine's

2:56

Day is for the unmarried.

2:59

That's what it's for, bottom line.

3:01

It's for the unmarried. If you

3:03

get married and you're still really

3:05

acknowledging and putting Valentine's Day, and

3:07

call me the opposite of a romantic,

3:10

but frankly Bevan feels

3:12

the same way, it's a dumb holiday.

3:14

It's a manufactured dumb holiday that has

3:16

put men out for years and years

3:18

and years and years and years. And

3:20

that's made women feel terrible and guilty

3:23

if there's not a significant other on

3:25

a particular day. It's a bad holiday

3:27

for everybody, unless you are in that

3:29

phase of boyfriend, girlfriend, where it's new

3:31

and you're all very happy and spontaneous

3:37

and all that stuff. And frankly, there's

3:39

just not many people who listen to our podcast

3:41

that are probably in that demographic. I was gonna

3:44

say the three women listeners right now are not

3:46

happy with you. But

3:48

it's true. I mean, it does. It makes people feel uncomfortable,

3:50

I think, if you're not, or you have to go out

3:53

and celebrate the fact that you're anti-Valentine's Day. It's

3:55

just a holiday that doesn't need to exist. And

3:58

if we're talking about, if you're in love... And

4:00

if you're happy, you should, you know,

4:02

you should profess that

4:04

love on more than once a year. And

4:07

it happens, like you said, on holidays,

4:09

it happens on, you know, different opportunities

4:12

for you to show your feelings. Doesn't

4:14

have to be on Valentine's Day. I

4:17

will say though, like my mom growing up, I always

4:19

had this like red wire basket in the shape of

4:21

a heart. Every single Valentine's Day, we would

4:23

get that, like a bunch of Hershey Kisses and that thing. And

4:26

I look forward to that, so. And

4:28

Kemp has Valentine's Day for school. And

4:30

he has like Star Wars Valentine's with

4:32

like little glow stick lightsabers, which is

4:34

awesome. And you just give them

4:36

to everybody. So. Yeah, everyone gets Valentine's Day. And

4:38

I make him feel really uncomfortable by asking him,

4:40

if there was only one, who would you give

4:42

it to? And he's, and now

4:44

we're at the point where, and dude,

4:47

you're getting close to this, cause it's, I

4:49

didn't think it was gonna happen to him, but it is.

4:52

Bruh, bruh, yo. It's

4:55

like every other word out of that,

4:57

when they're together, the kid, the boys,

4:59

bruh, bruh, bruh. Wait, wait, hold on.

5:01

I didn't know what you were, he's saying bruh? Yes.

5:05

No. And he said it to me the other day, I was like, Kemp, no.

5:07

You're not, I'm not your bruh. You're not calling me bruh.

5:10

Don't do it. Wow. It's

5:13

happening. And when they're all together, it's like,

5:15

yo, bruh, yo, bruh. It's wild.

5:17

Six. Yup. The

5:20

Valentine's Day for the entire class.

5:22

That's why Leanne was taking Harrison

5:24

to daycare this morning, because she

5:26

got little car Valentine's for his

5:28

entire 19 kid class. Anyway,

5:32

I don't think, it's

5:35

chaos. I pick him up, it's just 19

5:37

three year olds running around. It is absolute

5:40

chaos. That's my nightmare. That's

5:43

my nightmare. 19 Vegas. Vegas

5:46

was cool, man. Vegas,

5:48

it was long. I was there from Monday through

5:50

Saturday, which is entirely too long to be a

5:52

Vegas. Granted, I was doing a lot

5:54

of work, but there was definitely some extracurriculars that

5:57

you get mixed in there because for

5:59

Super Bowl, a lot of parties and

6:01

it's in Vegas. I gotta say Vegas

6:03

turned out, man, they did a really good

6:05

job. It was, it felt together as much

6:07

as of a- I've heard people

6:10

say this should just rotate between New

6:12

Orleans and Vegas from now on. New

6:15

Orleans is next year. Yeah, I

6:17

mean, it was all up and down the strip. Everything was

6:19

kinda contained in there. And because of

6:21

the way Vegas is

6:23

constructed, there are roads around the strip. So

6:26

you can get to places. I thought that

6:28

was gonna be a bigger problem, but it

6:30

really wasn't. The traffic in the middle of

6:32

it, obviously, is a disaster. But if you

6:34

start going around it, it wasn't as bad,

6:36

especially early in the

6:38

mornings and later in the evenings. But yeah, we were at

6:41

the media center on Radio Row and

6:44

just had a great time and turned out, we had a

6:46

lot of really fun guests and it was

6:48

cool. It was a good week. I

6:50

mean, the game itself was kind of a dud in the

6:52

first half, I'd say. And then the second half picked up.

6:56

Yeah, it was a little- It was a good enough

6:58

game for a Super Bowl. It

7:00

was an overall enjoyable watch. All

7:03

right, that's enough bullshit. Let's talk some Yankees now.

7:05

Last week when you were out, we had Andy

7:07

Martino on. It was a really great interview. I

7:10

saw a lot of good insights and a

7:12

lot of good comments and feedback from people.

7:14

So I appreciate the support there. He

7:17

said a few interesting things. One

7:19

thing I noticed, people were like, why

7:22

Andy Martino is just defending Brian Cashman.

7:24

And I didn't take

7:26

it as him defending Brian Cashman at all. He

7:29

wrote a book about the inner workings of

7:31

the Yankees. Cashman's probably gonna be, definitely gonna

7:33

be the centerpiece of that. So he talked

7:35

to so many people in the organization, including

7:37

Brian Cashman himself. He's not defending him. He's

7:39

just telling us how it is from what

7:42

he's learned. I just think

7:45

a lot of people didn't like that. One

7:47

of the things that I saw the biggest negative

7:50

feedback on and I

7:52

wanna get your take on this, Scott, is that Martino

7:55

said Brian Cashman makes every move

7:57

in a vacuum. He's

7:59

never thinking about... the big picture, he's looking

8:01

at, for example, the Juan Soto trade or

8:03

the signing of a relief pitcher or the

8:05

signing of a big free agent, all in

8:08

a vacuum. Is that the right

8:10

decision for the team? Is that

8:12

good or bad for the organization? And then he

8:14

moves on to the next thing. And

8:17

while I said that probably makes

8:20

sense from a long-term

8:22

organizational perspective, because you

8:25

don't want to ever get yourself in a situation

8:27

where you make a move because you made a

8:29

move prior to that that didn't work out. So

8:31

you're like doubling down on things. As

8:34

a general manager of a team,

8:37

there has to be go-for-it

8:40

moments and go-for-it seasons or

8:42

pull back seasons. And so

8:44

you make moves based

8:47

on those decisions and those moves

8:49

can inform other moves. For example,

8:51

when he traded away players at

8:54

the 2016 trade deadline,

8:56

those moves happen because they

8:59

made a decision, we need to

9:01

rebuild, retool a little bit. And

9:03

so he made multiple moves with

9:05

that in mind. Or in

9:09

the 2008-2009 offseason, when he signed

9:11

all of those free agents, he

9:14

made moves based on this is

9:17

our opportunity to add a bunch of

9:19

missing pieces to this roster to quote,

9:21

go-for-it this coming year. So

9:23

the fact that that I think rubbed people the wrong

9:25

way, and I know it rubbed me the wrong way

9:27

because I called this offseason, you have to push all

9:29

your chips into the middle of the table if you're

9:31

trading for Juan Soto. Don't go

9:33

into the season with question marks in

9:36

the rotation or the pitching depth or

9:38

question marks in the infield or anything like that.

9:40

You should try and clean up as many question

9:42

marks as you possibly can. And so I think

9:44

that annoyed some people that

9:48

they think Brian Cashman isn't looking at

9:50

the big picture of things. Well, I'm

9:52

sure a lot of people also agree with that, to be honest. But

9:54

if you go back, if

9:57

you're in that mindset, you're thinking of that, who's

9:59

the... the number

10:01

one acquisition that you think of is

10:03

Stanton, I would assume. Like, that puts

10:05

you in a position now with

10:08

a log jam in a particular position,

10:10

but you're being opportunistic about a guy

10:12

and not looking at like, what's

10:15

the rest of that plan? And to

10:17

his point, I don't know if I would

10:20

position it as he does look at everything

10:22

in a vacuum because like Soto, you got

10:24

to be opportunistic when you

10:26

have the availability to be opportunistic.

10:28

And you could say

10:31

that some of these vacuum

10:33

type moves are reactions

10:35

to what they did

10:38

poorly or planned poorly. So I

10:40

think it's just poor planning in a

10:42

lot of cases rather than moves in

10:44

a vacuum. I think moves in a

10:46

vacuum are reactions to poor planning because

10:48

you have to kind of pivot from

10:51

whatever your strategy and plan was that

10:53

wasn't working. So I don't

10:55

know if I necessarily buy the

10:57

comment where he's in a vacuum, but I mean, I understand

10:59

what he's saying. The sentiment I think is

11:02

real to a point because when

11:05

Stanton signed that's what

11:07

everybody points back to. Like that's when

11:09

you're looking at roster construction and how they

11:11

moved forward with a lot of things. It

11:13

starts with Stanton, you know, coming onto this

11:15

team and the fact that they didn't go

11:17

and sign certain people that may have been

11:19

better fit for what they wanted

11:22

to accomplish in the years forward. So they

11:24

didn't execute said plan, whatever it was on

11:26

that. And then you have these isolated moves

11:29

where you're trying to like catch up and

11:31

be competitive. And this year,

11:33

of course, they had to do it. They had to do something

11:35

this year. So they were opportunistic with

11:37

what was in front of them. And Juan Soto clearly

11:39

was the number one piece

11:41

there. But to his point,

11:44

to Cashbud's credit, he's a good

11:46

fit. He's a good fit for what they need. So

11:48

offense has been an

11:50

issue dating back to, you know, the playoff

11:52

exits. Like offense was the reason why they

11:55

have gone out. So I think

11:58

we're seeing the context of it. The

12:00

context of it was you trade for Soto, but

12:02

Yamamoto was your number one off-season

12:11

free agent target, and that didn't work

12:13

out. So instead you pivot to Marcus

12:15

Stroman, who took a lesser deal and

12:17

lesser money. Instead of

12:20

adding another piece to the rotation,

12:22

either another big free agent or

12:24

a trade for Corbin Burns, something

12:26

like that, giving up prospects, Cashman

12:28

has decided, at least to this point

12:30

in spring training, in the spring, that

12:33

does not make sense for the organization. Don't

12:35

want to commit the financial resources to something

12:38

like Snell, or don't want to

12:40

commit the prospect capital to someone

12:42

like Corbin Burns. And my point

12:44

was, well, you're- They're different

12:46

players. You can't say that they're the same

12:49

though. Yamamoto is- No, I'm not calling them

12:51

the same. My point though is that Brian

12:53

Cashman is not looking at the off-season as

12:55

a go-for-it off-season. So since we have to

12:57

go for it, we have to make this

13:00

trade, and we have to trade, say, Spencer

13:02

Jones and a handful of other players for

13:04

Corbin Burns. Because what he's looking at

13:06

is, yeah, I already made the

13:08

Soto trade, made the Verdugo trade.

13:10

We upgraded our outfield. We brought

13:12

in Stroman to shore up the

13:15

rotation. That's not going

13:17

to impact one way or the other. What else

13:19

we do in the starting rotation in trading for

13:21

a Corbin Burns. And to me, I was like,

13:23

I don't see how that could be possible. Of

13:25

course they're related. Of course you have to look

13:27

at off-seasons based on moves

13:29

you've already made or tried to make to then

13:31

make your next move. And

13:34

so I'm sure Brian Cashman likes to say

13:36

they don't do that, but I feel

13:38

like that's human nature, right? Like

13:40

of course other things are

13:43

going to influence your decision in

13:45

future moves. Yeah,

13:47

no, for sure. And the Corbin Burns move is

13:49

one that we've been, I know you had it

13:52

in your plans. I've been

13:54

an advocate of it ever

13:56

since they

13:58

lost the Yamamoto in understanding that they they do

14:00

have expiring contracts. It makes

14:02

a lot of sense to go and do it. And now you

14:04

have a really big problem in the AO least because Burns is

14:06

on the best team in the AO least at this point. So

14:10

yes, they have to be influenced

14:12

with what's happening in the market

14:14

and what's happening on their roster.

14:16

But I don't know, I

14:19

think that the moves, it's

14:22

hard to say that it's in a vacuum because I don't

14:25

believe that it's in a vacuum. I think there were a

14:27

lot of contributing factors to what he did. And to me,

14:29

when I'm thinking about someone making a decision in a vacuum,

14:31

they're not thinking about anything else. It's just that isolated thing.

14:33

And you can do that with particular players.

14:36

Yamamoto is a different type of player, a

14:38

very different type of player than anybody else

14:40

who's on the market. You can't say that

14:43

because they didn't go after Yamamoto and Snell is still

14:45

there, then they should just do Snell for a longer

14:47

term deal. They're different players.

14:49

You cannot say that 10 years

14:52

of one guy and five years

14:54

of another guy, for that first five years

14:56

is gonna be a similar result. They're

14:59

not the same. So that part I

15:01

disagree with. Yeah, that's why

15:03

I conceded. I think it's probably a

15:06

good thing for the long-term success

15:08

of the organization and long-term sustainable success of

15:10

the organization, which despite the fact that fans

15:12

are not happy with the Yankees, that they

15:14

have not won a World Series or even

15:16

gone to the World Series since 2009, they

15:20

have been a successful organization in

15:22

that time period from just a

15:24

win-loss standpoint and a playoff appearance

15:26

standpoint. And unfortunately,

15:28

management probably views the playoffs. We know they

15:30

definitely view the playoffs as a little bit

15:32

of a luck and crap shoot. And so

15:34

their job is to get the team there.

15:37

And then if the balls bounce the right

15:39

way, then we're gonna win a championship. If

15:41

the balls bounce the wrong way, they're not

15:43

gonna win a championship. I'm not gonna

15:45

go too far down the rabbit hole on that. I

15:47

think that's bullshit, considering you

15:49

have teams who have more success than

15:51

others because of the way their teams

15:54

are constructing the players they have, but

15:56

whatever. To your point about Corbin Burns

15:58

with the Orioles, now a fraud. problem. A

16:01

couple of weeks ago, we talked about the sports

16:04

book, win totals and how the Yankees

16:06

were 93 wins or 92 and a

16:08

half wins and which was four and

16:10

a half or five games better than,

16:12

than Baltimore. Zips

16:14

projections came out

16:17

after the Corbin burns or were updated after

16:19

the Corbin burns trade and they have Baltimore

16:21

at 90 wins. The Yankees and Toronto at

16:24

88 wins Tampa 83 wins,

16:26

which on the faces of it feels

16:28

a little low and Boston at 79 wins,

16:31

which I think feels a little high based on

16:33

how they're off season and their roster is looking.

16:36

But the zip projections use Baltimore as the best

16:38

team in the league. And I think it's, you

16:40

know, Corbin burns, obviously a big factor that he's

16:42

one of the best pitchers in baseball. Yeah.

16:45

And it's, uh, for sure that's more, more

16:47

in line, I think with what we were

16:49

thinking as far as the way that

16:51

it's going to be a lot tighter, the swing

16:53

that, that was, that was there between what 94

16:55

and 86 or 87 was, it was just

16:58

too big. And yeah, I mean,

17:00

Corbin burns is a convenient way to make those

17:02

closer, but they were, they were under, I think

17:04

it was under in the, from the, from the

17:06

jump, but yeah, Corbin burns makes a massive difference

17:08

right now. Makes a massive difference to that team.

17:10

So, you know, the fact that the

17:12

Yankees and then here's the other thing, like I kind

17:14

of wish Cashman made more decisions in a vacuum for

17:17

this year, because this is the year to do that.

17:19

You need to just add pieces to, to add depth.

17:21

That's not a vacuum. That's what we're saying. A vacuum is

17:24

I'm only looking at this deal. What you're

17:26

saying, what I was saying, and then wish also happened

17:28

is no, this is our year. We just have Soto

17:30

might be the last year. It might be the only

17:32

year of Soto, depending on how the, the off season

17:34

goes. Let's do everything in our,

17:36

in our power to possibly win this year.

17:40

Also the judge, you could also add pieces that

17:42

don't make a lot of sense. I guess I'm

17:44

thinking as you can add a piece today that

17:46

doesn't, that makes you better, but

17:49

doesn't make a ton of sense for

17:51

the longterm, which if

17:53

you're looking at a vacuum, it's more for

17:55

just a year, not, not the necessarily. I'm

17:57

not suggesting. and

18:00

stupid money on Blake Snell, right? Like I'm not saying,

18:02

oh, just sign Blake Snell to nine years just because

18:04

you need him for this year, no. But

18:06

what I'm saying is be a little bit more

18:09

aggressive and a little bit more willing to make

18:11

sacrifices in the short term to win

18:13

a championship now. Because

18:16

the judge called- I mean, we've been consistent with this. This

18:19

is the year that they have the opportunity to

18:21

create depth in the starting rotation, which is a

18:23

difficult thing to do in the first place. And

18:26

they do have the opportunity this year

18:28

to do that with Clark Schmitt being that

18:31

fifth swing guy. And

18:36

I think a little bit of uncertainty in the bullpen.

18:38

They do have the opportunity or they had the opportunity

18:40

and they still do, because there

18:42

are still good pitchers on the

18:44

market to create that depth and

18:46

overload the starting rotation, which I

18:49

still think they should do. We're

18:51

driven by the search for better. But when it

18:53

comes to hiring, the best way to search for

18:55

a candidate isn't to search at all. Don't

18:58

search, match with Indeed. Indeed

19:01

is your matching and hiring platform

19:03

with over 350 million global monthly

19:05

visitors, according to Indeed data, and

19:07

a matching engine that helps you

19:09

find quality candidates fast. Leveraging

19:11

over 140 million qualifications and

19:14

preferences every day, Indeed's matching

19:16

engine is constantly learning from

19:19

your preferences. Join more than 3.5

19:22

million businesses worldwide that use Indeed to

19:24

hire great talent fast. And listeners of

19:26

this show will get a $75 sponsored

19:29

job credit to

19:31

get your jobs more visibility

19:33

at indeed.com/blue wire. Just go

19:35

to indeed.com/blue wire right now

19:37

and support our show by

19:39

saying you heard about Indeed

19:41

on this podcast. indeed.com/blue

19:44

wire, terms and conditions

19:46

apply. Need to hire?

19:49

You need Indeed. We've

19:51

got Boone's press conference Wednesday afternoon. We're

19:54

recording this Wednesday morning. I

19:57

don't think anything's gonna be said in

19:59

that press conference. the same from Aaron Boone. Brian Cashman,

20:01

I believe, speak to the media on Thursday. Do you

20:03

think we're going to get anything interesting from that? I

20:08

mean, no,

20:10

nothing. He's

20:12

been more candid, but I don't know what more

20:14

there is to say about going

20:18

into the season beyond that. I want to know

20:20

more about what's available on the

20:22

market and if there's any thoughts there, but they're not

20:24

going to divulge any of that. Another

20:27

thing that I think you'll find interesting from that

20:29

Martino interview, there was a, I

20:32

guess probably among beat writers at that GM

20:35

meetings when, because Martino was in that group

20:38

that was interviewing Cashman, I

20:41

guess there was a conspiracy theory

20:43

among those beat writers that another

20:46

reason why Cashman was so outward,

20:48

emotional, and defensive is to deflect

20:50

from Hal Steinbrenner, who talked on

20:52

Zoom a few hours earlier and

20:54

frankly sounded like a buffoon

20:56

on Zoom talking about Aaron

20:58

Judge thinks we need to bond. Yeah,

21:01

I think that is 100% true. I

21:04

thought of that at the,

21:06

when Aaron, when, and

21:09

I think also you're getting Boone talking about

21:11

things, you're getting Judge being vocal about how

21:13

the team is being constructed or like decisions

21:15

being made behind the scenes. I think a

21:17

lot of that stuff and Hal talking, I

21:19

think a lot of that stuff kind of

21:22

pissed Cashman off. So I think he was

21:24

agitated. He was definitely

21:26

agitated. All right, a couple of news items. So we've

21:28

got Max Goodman coming up on the show. He is

21:30

going to, we're going to talk to him about a

21:33

ton of spring training news items and he's going to

21:35

join our podcast every week during spring training. So I'm

21:37

very excited about that. But first

21:39

I want to talk about Carlos Rodone shaving

21:41

the mustache and the

21:44

man listens finally. I think

21:46

this is a step in the right

21:48

direction for Carlos Rodone. It

21:50

is. It might sound stupid, but

21:53

I really do know that he's not stupid. It's not,

21:55

it's having some self-awareness on how dumb

21:57

you looked and you look in the

21:59

yeah. When you look in the mirror and you think

22:02

everything's okay when you see

22:05

the mustache and then the

22:07

performance with that mustache, then that's what's not

22:09

okay. That's what's not okay. So he did

22:11

the right thing. He got rid of the

22:13

growth that was above his lip and

22:16

he's acknowledging the

22:19

fact that everything

22:21

was bad. Everything was bad and it starts with the

22:23

mustache. So we're going to get rid of it. We're

22:25

going to get if there's some bad

22:27

juju, which there was in the mustache, it's now

22:30

gone. You got

22:32

to clean off the upper lip and

22:34

start with a new fresh face going

22:36

into spring training. The guy's been there

22:38

early, saying all the right

22:40

things. So we'll see. I'm

22:43

not going to get excited about his outward

22:45

talking anymore because I did that too

22:47

early. We

22:49

said last year when he showed up with the mustache, it's

22:52

like if you want to grow a mustache after your 12th

22:54

start of the year and you have a 2.8 ERA, I'm

22:56

all for it. You

22:58

can't do it before you even throw a pitch on

23:01

a regular season game for the Yankees. But

23:04

Radon has been in Tampa since early January.

23:07

He's been working on his throwing program. He talked to

23:09

the media recently,

23:11

said mainly just

23:14

you got to get back to what I was

23:16

in 21, 22. I believe I can do that.

23:18

That's why I'm here so early, blah, blah, blah,

23:20

all of that kind of stuff. Again,

23:23

like you said, let's not

23:25

get overly excited about Radon and

23:27

how he's talking because

23:31

that didn't work out last year. It's

23:34

really going to be, has

23:36

he actually learned from the mistakes that

23:38

he made last year? Not

23:40

talking pitching wise, I'm talking more emotions

23:44

wise. I want him to learn from

23:46

the pitching mistakes. I just want him to learn from the

23:48

pitching mistakes because if he learns from the pitching mistakes, all

23:50

the other things are going to take care of itself. I

23:53

don't care what he does emotionally. If he's pitching well, fix

23:55

the pitching shit. Yeah, but he's when

23:57

he blew off Matt Blake at the end of the

23:59

season. I don't

24:01

even care if you're pitching well, I could give a

24:03

rat's ass what you do I really I don't care

24:05

just pitch well because the rest of the shit will

24:07

take care of itself When you're making that much money

24:09

coming into New York and you have that mustache and

24:11

you're not pitching well Bad is

24:13

bad bad stuff is gonna happen bad reactions are

24:16

gonna happen Your body language is gonna be bad

24:18

and especially if you're a guy that wears emotions

24:20

on your sleeve not gonna be a good thing

24:22

So, you know just fix the one thing that

24:24

anybody cares about and that's pitching just pitch Well,

24:26

if you pitch well, you can that you could

24:28

be you could be the biggest asshole in the

24:31

world. Just pitch. Well, that's it That's all we

24:33

ask After the end

24:35

of the season last year didn't he say

24:37

like I'm gonna go on a beach vacation

24:39

with without my family Yeah, that's yeah being

24:42

like solitary confinement. It was it was solitary confinement.

24:44

Yeah He's gonna take some time away from everybody

24:47

and just figure it out. Maybe that's where the

24:49

must out He's like, you know what? This means

24:51

maybe Maybe when saw the

24:53

eye himself in the mirror I had a buddy

24:55

in college one day who just like came out

24:57

and said he saw demons I'm like, all right,

25:00

then you got to do what you gotta do.

25:02

I guess he was over and thought demons or

25:04

he was any But that's all demons, you know

25:08

One way or another it's he was what he was

25:10

in some some kind of state But he saw demons

25:12

and and it changed his life. So and

25:14

he's now he's the model citizen now. Oh Yeah

25:20

Definitely the model citizen It

25:22

worked out perfectly. It worked out a lot a

25:24

lot of your don't know the earrings left though.

25:26

That's good Your

25:29

buddy his yeah, the earrings left the building

25:31

there were a lot of earrings no longer

25:33

and they've stayed away That's that's like equivalent

25:35

of a mustache shape. Yeah but

25:37

don't also lost some weight and It

25:40

seems to be in much better shape and I

25:42

don't want to say he was out of shape

25:44

last year But he was definitely on the bigger

25:46

side. I think I He

25:48

just comes across as one of those guys that can carry that though

25:50

and be okay with that. I'm not and Maybe

25:53

not maybe it maybe it affected his way. He

25:55

had all those back. He had back problems. And

25:57

so yeah, you know Wait

26:00

be a fact. David Wells had back

26:02

problems. And I'm not saying Carlos Fredone

26:04

is overweight like David

26:06

Wells was overweight. But especially

26:09

as Wells got later in his career,

26:11

his weight, his gut did not help

26:13

his back problems. Usually your

26:15

gut doesn't help back problems if you have back

26:17

problems. Usually it's the center. Gravity

26:20

issues don't help your back. And normally that's you

26:26

know, it can get no, nor does, you

26:28

know, drinking every single day and having gout and all those

26:30

things. So there's a lot of different factors in why your

26:32

back hurts, I think. So for Fredone,

26:38

if he's in better shape, and that

26:40

allows him to throw his two pitches

26:43

in a much better fashion than

26:45

I'm all for it. I think Wells wrote

26:47

a book called like back eggs and beers or

26:50

something like that. There's like back aches, toe aches

26:52

and beers or something like that. Never

26:54

read the book. I'm sure it's a hoot. Anytime

26:57

you have gout, you got to question some lifestyle

26:59

moves, you know, I feel like

27:01

that's one of those issues

27:03

where you're like, you know what? The

27:09

Yankees also claimed infielder Jordan Groschans

27:11

from Miami and DFA'd Matt Crook.

27:13

Matt Crook was you know, potential

27:15

slot in the bullpen. We're going

27:17

to talk to Max Goodman in

27:19

a few minutes about the

27:22

19-month-ending pitchers from the bullpen that can- Spring

27:24

training battles, which is how it doesn't seem

27:27

like there's any spring training battles. And

27:31

so adding an infield depth in this

27:33

move. And they

27:35

also, they've made a lot of these moves

27:37

over the past couple of weeks, just like

27:39

picking up guys off waivers, DFA and guys

27:42

seems to happen every four

27:44

or five days. Sorry, anything else

27:46

you want to touch on before we talk to Max? No,

27:49

let's bring on, bring on Max. All

27:52

right. Well, before we

27:54

do that, I need to tell you,

27:56

you need to hear about delicious two minute meals.

28:00

Now I'm talking restaurant quality food that is delivered

28:02

to you weekly and takes only two minutes to

28:04

heat up. That's Factor, the best ready to eat

28:06

meal service out there. Sometimes

28:08

figuring out what you're going to eat for dinner can

28:10

be stressful because you have no time to grocery shop,

28:12

cook, or you don't want to wait for delivery to

28:14

show up. Factor solves all of

28:17

that. The process is very easy. You go

28:19

on their website, you choose from over 35

28:21

delicious meals each week, highly skilled chefs prepare

28:23

the meals. The food gets delivered to you.

28:25

It's always fresh and never frozen. You

28:27

store it in your refrigerator and then when you're ready to eat

28:29

it, boom, you pop it in the microwave for

28:31

two minutes and you are ready to eat delicious food.

28:34

Factor is affordable. It's less expensive than

28:36

takeout and every meal is dietician approved

28:39

to be nutritious and delicious. Factor can also fit

28:41

to your schedule. You can customize the number of

28:43

meals you get each week or pause your subscription

28:45

if you're going to be out of town. There's

28:48

no prep, no mess, just

28:50

delicious food. Head to factormeals.com/Bronx50

28:53

and use code Bronx50 to get 50% off, half off your

28:58

order at

29:00

factormels.com slash

29:02

B-R-O-N-X-5-0. What

29:06

is that spell, Scott? factormills.com/Bronx50.

29:13

You nailed it. Let's talk to Max. Okay,

29:16

joining us on the podcast now is Max

29:18

Goodman covers the Yankees for New Jersey, AdvancedMedia,

29:21

nj.com and the Star Ledger. Max, welcome to

29:23

the show. Thank you for joining us. Thanks

29:26

for having me, guys. You're all doing well. We

29:28

know you're going to be down in Tampa

29:30

starting for the whole month of March. We'll

29:33

be able to get your take on things from

29:35

the ground level once you're there. Right now, you're

29:38

stuck in the Northeast for

29:40

the next couple weeks. Want to

29:42

get your opinion on the off season and the

29:44

moves that the Yankees have made so far and

29:47

pictures and catches reporting this week. Do

29:49

you think that the off season is complete? I

29:53

think if I had to give them a grade, it would be between a B

29:56

plus and an A minus. I think

29:58

you can't ignore just how much they've been. how much

30:00

better this roster is, but it

30:02

does feel just a little incomplete.

30:05

When you look at the pitching staff, they

30:07

obviously did a couple, you

30:10

know, opportunistic moves to improve the bullpen. And

30:12

I think you can trust Matt

30:14

Blake and company to bring the best out of the

30:17

relievers that they have, the guys they brought in, some

30:20

of the young folks that are unproven right now, but

30:22

the depth and the rotation. When

30:24

you consider the injury concerns dating back

30:26

to last year with Rodin

30:28

Cortez and now Stroman as

30:31

well, that group with Garakol

30:33

has immense upside, top five

30:35

rotation in the league upside,

30:38

but the floor is

30:41

pretty darn low. And I

30:43

think those guys have to prove, everyone except Cole,

30:46

they have to prove that they're able to play a

30:48

full season, that they're able to be effective, consistently

30:50

take the ball every five days and get the

30:52

job done. So who's gonna

30:54

step in when inevitably someone gets hurt in

30:57

that staff? And Clark Schmidt being the number

30:59

five, how's he gonna handle his first year

31:01

after the biggest workload of his big league

31:04

career as well? So is it

31:06

gonna be a Luke Weaver as your number six,

31:08

or are prospects Will Warren,

31:10

Clayton Beter, maybe Chase Hampton gonna

31:12

fill that void? I think

31:14

that one more veteran

31:16

reliable and proven piece maybe would

31:19

have eased the anxiety of the

31:21

fan base a little bit there. But again,

31:23

when you go one of the worst

31:25

outfields in the league to now one of the best with

31:28

Juan Soto and Alex Verdugo, I think

31:30

Trent Grisham is a valuable piece for

31:32

them. You're still relying a little

31:34

bit on the veterans that showed some signs

31:36

of decline last year in terms of the

31:38

offense and the lineup. But on

31:41

paper, I know the game's not played on paper,

31:43

but on paper, this offense can be very, very

31:45

good, the pitching staff too, but you

31:47

gotta stay healthy, gotta prove that last

31:49

year was an anomaly for a lot of these guys. Max,

31:53

I'm glad you brought up, and we're gonna talk

31:55

about some quote position battles. There aren't a ton

31:57

of them this year, but I think.

32:00

something that you said is, you know,

32:02

we just got finished with

32:04

the first part of the show. And this

32:06

has been a consistent thread of our conversations

32:09

through the off season is creating depth in

32:11

the starting rotation. And normally,

32:13

that's a very difficult thing to do. You

32:15

know, when you're trying to get major league talent

32:18

on a roster

32:20

where you only have five slots

32:23

to fill and you don't

32:25

have the ability to add additional

32:27

major league talent to a roster so

32:30

that you can create that depth. The Yankees, though,

32:32

I think are in a position of strength in

32:35

that regard with Clark Schmidt being their number

32:37

five. They do have

32:39

the ability, I believe this year, and they've

32:42

had the ability to create that depth with

32:44

another solid major league pitcher. And I'm not

32:46

even saying like the fact that Luke Weaver

32:48

is a number six, like makes me cringe

32:51

hearing that because that is

32:54

the inevitable thing. Like someone will go down,

32:56

someone will go down. And I feel like

32:58

it's a missed opportunity. And I understand that

33:00

there are still, you know, a couple

33:02

of guys out there that have

33:04

the ability to change this narrative.

33:06

But, you know, creating that depth

33:08

in the starting rotation is such

33:11

an important piece. And the Yankees have the ability

33:14

and they have to win this year. Everybody

33:16

looks at that. There's expiring contracts across the

33:18

board now. And this

33:21

is the year that they're going in. They only have

33:23

one Soto for one year, guaranteed, right? We don't know

33:25

what's going to happen. Create that depth. They have the

33:27

opportunity to do it. And that

33:29

is where I think you're right. I think

33:31

Yankee fans looking around the uncertainty potentially in

33:33

the starting pitching rotation, and frankly, like the

33:36

bullpen, not a lot of big names out there, not

33:38

a lot of proven guys that have shown career stats and doing

33:41

it. And if you needed to

33:43

use a Clark Schmidt in more of a

33:46

swing man role or an opportunity to create

33:48

out of the bullpen by

33:51

adding someone who has a proven

33:53

track record in the starting rotation, I think you got

33:55

to do it. So curious your thoughts

33:57

on that, because to me, that's the biggest glare.

34:00

uh, you know issue with the roster right now Well,

34:03

look you you brought something up that I think is

34:05

going to be a storyline all year And it's the

34:07

fact that this roster has So

34:10

many guys that are on the last year of

34:12

their contracts and obviously soto is a rental but

34:14

glaber torres Clay Holmes,

34:16

Jonathan, lewezaga, verdugo There's

34:19

a significant portion and impact guys

34:21

that May not be

34:23

around next year. At least they're currently not under contract

34:25

to be Um,

34:27

maybe it's misguided for me, but

34:29

i'm not worried In

34:32

terms of the yankees being able to produce in the bullpen

34:34

um They were so good in that

34:36

way last year best bullpen in the league 334 era and

34:41

Their pitching department has proven that they can bring

34:43

the best out of all kinds of

34:45

different arms whether it's uh, The

34:48

ian hamilton's of the world. I think there will be

34:50

some non-roster guy that

34:53

Erupts on the scene this spring and ends up having an

34:55

impact 30 games Uh

34:57

sub four sub three era. I think

34:59

that's a guarantee almost which is the

35:02

biggest strength at this point, right? Yeah

35:06

Victor gonzalez and caleb ferguson might end up

35:08

being really good and and yankees fans might

35:11

not miss monday parlota at all but

35:14

I I agree with you. I think that this They

35:18

did have an all-in mentality. They had a

35:20

huge offer on the table for yamamoto They

35:23

traded a huge portion of their you

35:25

know pitching talent in the farm system

35:27

to get soto As well

35:30

as michael king obviously and they traded some arms

35:32

for um verdugo as well

35:34

So it's not like they didn't try to

35:37

Get the job done in terms of

35:39

going all in right, but like I

35:41

said in my first answer I think there is just

35:43

a little bit of a hole that they could have

35:45

addressed But maybe it just

35:47

comes down to they they really trust

35:50

those young guys that haven't had an

35:52

opportunity yet Whether it's yoandris gomez or

35:54

louise heal Uh those types

35:57

of guys in that next tier as much as

35:59

weaver is the number six as of now

36:01

that could change you know when when

36:03

Boone and Cashman speak on on Wednesday and Thursday

36:05

this week and then who knows Who's hurt who

36:07

knows whether guys they've brought in that have a

36:09

locker that we don't know about yet and The

36:14

farm system continues to replenish and churn out

36:16

quality arms So clearly they trust that talent

36:18

they trust the department to bring the best

36:20

out of those guys And also I think

36:23

the budget was a concern too. I mean

36:25

their their payroll is is

36:27

already estimated I

36:29

know but the luxury tax and it's got

36:31

to be a part of the conversation that

36:33

that it's already a high number They've

36:36

got Soto for whatever it is over 30

36:38

million for this year a lot of big

36:40

contracts that they're committed to So

36:43

these are maybe just the repercussions of other

36:45

decisions in past years So like

36:47

yeah, a big reset button coming next year too as

36:49

far as contracts as well. So if you're

36:51

gonna go go guide

36:53

you sir I Want

36:56

to respond to a couple things you said because I

36:58

think they all tie together I agree with you the

37:01

bullpen like even though there's Question marks

37:03

in the bullpen it seems to always work out

37:05

for them and they always get production You

37:08

said they were the best bullpen in the league

37:10

last year and I think that you know The

37:12

numbers look very good. I think they did have

37:14

the best ERA But first I have

37:16

the first half of the year was a big factor in

37:18

that we looked into these numbers I don't have them off

37:20

the top of my head But I know

37:22

in the second half of the year the bullpen was much less

37:24

productive than it was in the first half and it Was

37:27

probably due to the workload that they

37:29

had because the rotation did not have

37:31

consistency in it beyond Garrett

37:33

Cole and so to your point about the question

37:35

marks beyond Garrett Cole like Yeah,

37:38

the bullpen is probably gonna stand up

37:40

and pretty be pretty damn good through

37:42

call it may June Maybe even July

37:44

of this year But if they are

37:46

relied on for three plus innings every

37:48

single night because the rotation does not

37:50

have consistency In health

37:52

beyond Garrett Cole that in my opinion

37:54

is a huge miss and not adding

37:56

to the rotation depth To

37:58

help your bullpen for the

38:00

whole season. So having said all that, you're

38:03

close to obviously a lot of rumors and

38:05

stuff like that. Do you see something happening

38:07

in spring training last minute? Because

38:09

there's still some big pieces out there on the free

38:11

agent market for pitching. Maybe

38:13

in the last minute trade happens as teams

38:16

start to play some games in spring training,

38:18

maybe injuries happen, who the hell knows what

38:20

happens on March 20th if something could happen?

38:23

Right. Well, I think thinking back to

38:25

when Cashman spoke after the

38:27

Strowman signing and the Strowman signing itself is

38:30

kind of like, this is our

38:32

last effort to pivot after Yamamoto.

38:35

This is who's going to be the big addition in

38:37

the rotation. They're giving him almost 40

38:40

million for two years. That was

38:42

my interpretation of it. But when

38:44

Cashman was asked, are you now

38:47

transitioning your focus away from the starting

38:49

rotation? Not verbatim, but the

38:51

sense that I got is we're always exploring

38:53

options to get better. And

38:55

I don't know if the Yankees

38:57

are going to be willing to give up what

38:59

it'll take to get someone like Adilene Cease or

39:02

Shane Bieber. But the

39:05

way things are right now with the free

39:07

agent market, but also other teams. I mean, there

39:09

are some veteran pieces, not necessarily

39:11

number ones or number twos, but I'm sure

39:13

that there's an opportunity out there for them

39:15

to get a bottom of the rotation guy

39:18

that would, again, like I

39:20

said earlier, ease the anxiety of maybe

39:23

the organization. And again, I feel like they have

39:25

faith in what they have, or at least that's

39:27

what they've been telling us. And Boone will always

39:30

say that, you know, I asked him

39:32

at the pinstripe pride autograph event

39:34

the other weekend, like, how do you replace

39:36

Juan de Peralta on the bullpen? And he was like, guys

39:38

that you're not thinking about right now are going to have

39:41

an impact. So clearly, they know what they have. They made

39:43

some other under the

39:45

radar types of moves like Cody Morris, Cody

39:47

Poteet, those types of guys. I mean, they

39:49

have enough arms. It's just what's the quality?

39:52

What's going to be the effectiveness? Can they

39:54

rely on these guys? Like you said, the

39:56

first half of the season kind

39:59

of set the tone of the year and the

40:01

bullpen was definitely taxed. And when you have Tommy

40:03

Kainley, Jonathan LeWisega, those guys that have injury

40:05

concerns in the past in their careers, you

40:07

can't rely on them to pitch in 70

40:09

games the whole year and be lights out

40:11

the whole time. So I think

40:14

we're all on the same page. I mean, do I think they're

40:16

gonna trade for somebody? I

40:18

wouldn't count on it, but they do have

40:20

a surplus at certain positions. I mean, I

40:22

look at catcher, for instance, I

40:25

don't think Ben Roartvett has an option. And

40:27

it seems like Austin Wells is gonna make

40:29

the big league team, right? So maybe there's an avenue

40:32

there. You

40:34

bring in Luis Terenz as a non-roster guy and

40:36

you've got some other up and coming catchers. It

40:38

doesn't seem like there's a spot for Roartvett.

40:40

But famous last words, right? I mean, people

40:42

are gonna get hurt over these next couple

40:44

of weeks and you need to

40:47

have that. So I think the

40:49

Yankees will be opportunistic. If something comes up

40:51

that they're able to bring in another arm,

40:53

just somebody that's been there before, I

40:56

think they should pounce on it. I just don't know who that's gonna

40:58

be. What about Blake

41:00

Snell? Because there's still rumors. The Yankees maybe are just

41:03

thrown into the Blake Snell rumors because the Yankees seem

41:05

to be thrown into a lot of rumors. But

41:08

he's still out there on the free agent market and

41:11

we're starting spring training now. Yeah,

41:14

it's his offer coming back down to

41:16

earth, back down to the Yankees range

41:18

of feeling comfortable with

41:20

him. Because that's an interesting one

41:22

too. And it's not just a veteran depth guy.

41:24

That's a guy that makes an impact that pushes

41:27

Nestor Cortez into a number five

41:29

role, which

41:33

now we're talking. Now we're talking like strengths

41:35

and depth, both at the same time. And

41:38

to me, that's a huge quality to have.

41:42

Right, a couple weeks ago, my coworker

41:44

Bob Plapish reported that that offer is off

41:46

the table. I'm sure that

41:48

that's gonna be a name that's discussed in

41:51

terms of the reporters that are down

41:53

there asking questions to Garakol.

41:55

Does he wanna have another ace on that

41:57

staff? Cashman, are you done

41:59

addressing? at the top of the rotation.

42:02

I think it'll just come down to the financials

42:04

there and what other teams are able to offer.

42:06

All of the big name free agents that are

42:08

still available are all Scott Boris clients, if I'm

42:10

not mistaken. So, I mean, he has a stronghold

42:13

on the market right now. Are

42:15

any of those guys gonna take a one or

42:17

two year deal to kind of reset? I don't

42:19

think Snell should do that. He just wanna sayong,

42:22

his second of his career. It would be crazy

42:24

if he did, yeah. Right, and is

42:26

there another team that's gonna, you

42:29

know, back up the truck and

42:31

suddenly offer a huge deal to convince

42:34

those guys that they're gonna be a contender, maybe

42:36

one of those wildcard teams. I

42:38

don't know if like the Giants are done now that

42:40

they got Solaire, the Phillies, I don't know. But

42:43

there are teams out there that could certainly use

42:45

a Blake Sneller or a Jordan Montgomery. The

42:48

Yankees are one of them, but I don't know based

42:50

on their activity over these last couple

42:52

of months, if that fits

42:54

their budget. But like you were

42:57

talking about earlier, I mean, you gotta go

42:59

all in, right? So if it's affordable

43:02

with what they deem Snell is

43:04

worth, then maybe

43:06

you just go for it. And you hope that

43:08

he doesn't regress because then it becomes a Rodin

43:11

situation for a scenario and that's not

43:13

what you want. Is Rodin. Yeah,

43:15

it's funny to call Blake Snell another rotation

43:17

question mark. He's a two time Cy Young

43:20

winner, but I feel like even though I

43:23

would welcome adding Snell to the rotation,

43:25

he would still be like a bit

43:27

of a question mark, which is crazy

43:29

to say. I

43:31

know it's happened before. Teams have given

43:33

big long-term contracts to guys, even after

43:35

spring training starts, even after the season

43:37

starts, we saw Craig Kimbrel with

43:40

the Cubs when he signed there. But I just

43:42

feel like if you're gonna sign a pitcher to

43:44

six, seven, eight years, you would have done that

43:46

already in December or January. And

43:48

now that spring training is starting and pitchers

43:51

and catchers are in your camp, I

43:53

would be surprised if that happens. So I'm

43:56

not ruling out a short-term deal for Blake Snell. At

43:59

least one of those options. What was Bora

44:01

calling the Cuddle Pot, something

44:03

pot? Scott Forest will trademark a new

44:06

term for whatever Blake's known for. Some

44:08

type of an option that gives him

44:10

flexibility, whereas if he comes out and

44:13

has another solid year puts up the

44:15

innings, because I think that's probably the biggest question mark with

44:18

him, puts up the innings,

44:20

has the ability to flex that into

44:22

a longer term deal. Wouldn't

44:24

be surprised if that were the case. And if that is the case, the Yankees should

44:26

100% pounce on it. Yeah,

44:29

I mean, maybe it depends on what the

44:31

market is for pitching next offseason too. We

44:33

were looking at that. So we actually pulled

44:35

that real quickly. The

44:38

free agents for next offseason, Corbin Burns,

44:40

obviously, Max Freed, Zach Wheeler, Walker Bueller,

44:42

Shane Bieber, Max Scherzer. Like those

44:44

are going to be the big names, big name

44:46

starting pitchers on the free agent market.

44:48

Yeah. I mean, that's a huge risk for

44:50

him because if he has one of his bad years, then he's not

44:54

going to get anything close to. It's

44:56

like a Harrison Bader situation, right? Where when

44:58

he came over to the Yankees and he

45:01

had that playoff series, we

45:03

were all talking about how much he's going to get in an

45:05

extension and they're going to keep him around for the rest of

45:07

his career. And then you have

45:10

an injury riddled and maybe a poor

45:12

performance and all of a

45:14

sudden you're taking a smaller contract. But then again,

45:16

like look at what Frankie Montas got from the

45:18

Reds, right? Like, I mean, the money's out there.

45:20

Pitching's at a premium right now. You got to

45:22

pay for it, whether they're healthy or not. All

45:26

right. I also want

45:28

to talk about Dominguez because it's just

45:30

me or does he had a schedule?

45:33

Like, yo, he reports he's playing catch.

45:35

He's he's throwing and he's he's looks

45:37

healthy and he's in camp. I

45:40

was not expecting to hear that on February 14th. Yeah,

45:43

I don't I don't know what his

45:46

concrete schedule was. I mean, really all we've

45:48

heard from the Yankees is that he'll be

45:50

back sometime this summer. But I

45:52

think it was always an anticipation that he'd

45:54

be capable of contributing

45:56

in a certain way this spring. I mean, he's

45:58

not going to be. out there, you know,

46:01

throwing to home plate from senior field in a

46:03

grapefruit league game. That would be silly. But

46:05

I could see him taking some at bats. And

46:07

I think that this is valuable time for him,

46:09

right? Because he's still, you know,

46:12

not of legal drinking age. And he

46:14

has eight games of MLB experience

46:16

under his belt. I mean, he has a lot of room

46:18

to develop even with how emphatic

46:21

his debut was. And that's something

46:23

to keep an eye on too. Like the

46:25

Yankees now have this surplus of outfielders in

46:29

a sense, you know, when he's ready to come

46:31

back, you've got to subtract somebody or

46:33

you're just keeping, you know,

46:36

Verdugo in a fourth outfielder spot. And

46:38

Grisham is literally just a defensive

46:40

replacement. And it's not a bad problem to have.

46:43

Because again, I think people will get injured at

46:45

some point. And that's not me being cynical

46:47

that that's that happens to every team. Yeah. So is he back

46:49

before the all

46:53

star break? I don't know. I don't think they're

46:55

going to rush him. I think that would

46:57

be a mistake quite frankly, because

46:59

they do have a quality outfield

47:02

right now. I mean, maybe if, you

47:05

know, knock on wood for the Yankees fans out there,

47:07

if a Soto or a judge goes

47:09

down and misses time and Deminguez is like

47:11

close, maybe you bring him back, but

47:14

it wouldn't be the worst thing for him, I think

47:16

to get, you know, an extended

47:18

stretch in triple A once he's like 90% healthy

47:21

just to get his legs under him and

47:24

get back to facing pitching like that every day.

47:27

But I mean, that's, that's an exciting thing for

47:29

fans to look forward to because if

47:31

his debut is any indication, he's going to

47:34

be around for a long time. And then

47:36

you you you change the conversation

47:39

to okay, the baby bombers stuff didn't

47:41

work out is the

47:43

Deminguez, Volpe, Wells, Chase

47:45

Hampton, those that next wave is

47:47

that going to get it done?

47:50

Because judge and Cole aren't getting

47:52

any younger. And that window is, is starting

47:55

to close in terms of their prime and maybe

47:57

not starting to close. But but

47:59

it's not Yeah, I think that's accurate. I think

48:01

the window is is closer to the end than

48:03

it is the beginning Let's just let's just say

48:06

that on the prime of those guys careers Like

48:08

why you have to win if you're gonna win

48:10

a championship with Cole and judge as your main

48:12

contributors That has to happen very soon. It's not

48:14

gonna happen when they're both 37 years old Right

48:18

that is you've got a Spencer Jones coming too.

48:20

So if you think about it from the outfield

48:22

specifically, I mean do they want I I

48:26

think they want soda to come back. It would be silly

48:29

not to just Totally not

48:31

consider bringing him back if you can fit

48:34

that into your payroll. I mean, he's gonna be a great

48:36

fit Dominican superstar. He's a

48:38

generational talent. We don't even need to discuss

48:40

that. I mean it's obvious but

48:42

I Mean there's now field

48:44

out there where it's judge Jones and Dominguez if

48:46

those two young guys work out the fact that

48:48

they've not been trading them because of

48:51

how highly touted and Their

48:53

potential I mean that's a pretty darn

48:55

good outfield right there But if

48:57

there's a way to keep Soto in that mix to As

49:01

judge gets older I think he's gonna need to

49:03

DH more often and you can't count on Stanton

49:05

to be an outfielder as much as I'm

49:08

sure that we'll hear this spring that he's gonna be, you

49:10

know getting reps out there And that'll be playing on the

49:12

outfield a couple times a week But

49:15

yeah, I mean there are big-picture questions here, too I

49:17

mean, there's a lot to discuss this spring

49:19

which I think is exciting for the

49:22

fan base especially coming off of such

49:24

a disastrous season And

49:27

there is an avenue to them being really successful this

49:29

year. It's just it comes down to so many different

49:31

what ifs The the stand

49:33

piece to you know, you mentioning him as

49:35

a you know Counting on him in

49:37

the after it's hard to count on him and in any

49:39

capacity You don't know what you get, you know, I think

49:42

we've been talking on this show about him If

49:45

you get something from him, okay, then it's gravy

49:47

at this point, but you cannot expect it and

49:49

and you know to the point of the

49:52

Yankees not doing what they

49:54

they they had the opportunity to do

49:56

in the in the starting rotation to date I

49:59

think they did address that in the outfield

50:01

with, you know, we're not going to be rolling,

50:03

you know, the fourth and fifth guys out there

50:05

from triple A on a daily basis. Like, you

50:07

know, when Dominguez does come back, you have Grisham

50:09

as a fourth defensive outfield or a guy that

50:12

can come in and swipe some bags potentially has

50:14

some speed on the base path. Like that to

50:16

me, that's a great role for him. He's not

50:18

the greatest offensive player. He is a, you know,

50:20

a plus defender has tremendous speed. Like I like

50:23

him as a guy off the bench and they'll

50:25

figure out how to rotate four guys in. They

50:28

always, they always do. I'm not, I'm not concerned about

50:30

that, but the fact that they did create that depth on

50:32

the outfield, I think is a really important piece because the

50:34

other thing is, is like, how long do they

50:37

want judge roaming center field? You know, so I

50:39

think that's a, that's a piece having Dominguez come

50:41

back. I got June circled for him in

50:43

my head. But to

50:45

Max's point, they don't need to rush it because of the,

50:47

they don't need to rush in the outfield. And

50:49

if they, if they didn't add, say, Verdugo

50:52

this winter, then it would be

50:54

sort of like, when is Dominguez coming back?

50:56

So we can have, have a, have a

50:58

complete outfield. Now, if guys underperform or guys

51:00

get injured, maybe that conversation will still happen.

51:02

But as it stands right now in the

51:04

middle of February, they can slow play Dominguez,

51:06

which I think at his age and his

51:08

injury, he's coming off of and his in,

51:12

um, inexperience, even in triple

51:14

A, like he's absolutely the right way

51:16

to play his, his rehab. Yeah.

51:19

If they didn't acquire anybody else, it would

51:21

be so much pressure. Right. And

51:23

not only. He treated as the savior

51:25

and that's like, that's such an unfair thing

51:27

to put on a kid coming back from,

51:29

from Tommy John surgery. Yeah. Yeah.

51:32

And we want to play loose coming in with to a, to a

51:34

team that's, that's, you know, has, has a spot for him, um,

51:37

but doesn't need that spot. He needs to be playing loose.

51:40

He's, he's a center fielder, right? And he just

51:42

had major elbow surgery and he's 20, 21

51:44

years old. I mean, that's,

51:47

that's not something you want to rush someone back

51:49

from and risk him

51:52

trying to perform better right

51:54

away. And he does something

51:56

and there's a setback or there are long-term implications of

51:58

that. I mean, you don't want to put that. into

52:00

the universe for the kid because you know everyone's

52:02

rooting for him to fulfill

52:04

the expectations that he has but

52:07

the bottom line with the outfield is you go from IKF

52:10

Jake Bowers, Willie McKinney, Billy

52:14

McKinney, Willie Calhoun and mix that up. Not

52:18

that I like Willie McKinney better. I think it

52:20

improves my point a little bit and now you

52:22

have Verdugo, Soto, Grisham,

52:24

Dominguez coming back. I mean

52:26

it's Everson Pereira, maybe

52:28

he can bounce back from the year

52:30

that he had, the month that he

52:32

had. So the talent is there.

52:34

I wouldn't be surprised if Spencer Jones finishes

52:37

on a similar timeline to Dominguez and he's

52:39

able to contribute by the end of the

52:41

year but I think the Yankees

52:43

should hope that they don't need a Jones

52:46

to come up by the end, right? That they

52:48

can stow him away for another year in the

52:50

minors to have him develop because there's

52:53

no room for a prospect to

52:55

come up because of injuries. They don't need to have

52:57

that youth movement where they give the unconditional playing time

52:59

to guys like they did at the end of last

53:01

year. You hope that everybody's humming at the end of

53:04

the season and I

53:06

think it'll be a wildcard spot because the Orioles are

53:09

seemingly becoming a juggernaut here.

53:11

Anything can happen. That's

53:14

so many months away from now but as

53:16

long as they get into the playoffs, all you

53:18

need these days is a ticket to the dance

53:21

and then anything can happen. That's right.

53:23

Which is their mentality. So maybe unfortunately

53:25

that is their mentality. Kind of pisses

53:27

us off a little bit to be

53:29

honest. All right,

53:31

Max, thank you so much for joining us. We'll talk

53:33

to you next week. I'm sure there'll be actually much

53:35

more to talk about after we hear Boone and Cashman

53:37

speak and any other news items that come over come

53:39

out over the next week. Thanks again. Absolutely,

53:41

guys. Talk to you again soon. Hey

53:46

guys, thanks for listening to the Bronx Pinstrap

53:48

Show. Make sure you find us on iTunes

53:50

and subscribe so you can get all new episodes

53:53

directly onto your phone. If you do like the

53:55

show, we'd love for you to take

53:57

a minute and give us a five-star rating and review

53:59

on iTunes. It really helps us out and

54:01

allows us to create more shows. We're

54:03

on Twitter at Bronx Pen Stripes and the same

54:05

on Facebook. You can always find us there talking

54:07

Yankee baseball. Thanks again guys for

54:09

your support. Really appreciate it and go Yankees.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features