Podchaser Logo
Home
Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Released Friday, 22nd February 2019
Good episode? Give it some love!
Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Hate Crime Hoax Exposed

Friday, 22nd February 2019
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:10

You are entering the freedom

0:12

hunt. The

0:15

Jesse Smollett hoax has collapsed.

0:18

He was arrested and arraigned

0:20

today in court. Why did

0:22

the media get this one so wrong?

0:24

And what does it tell us about hate crimes

0:27

that there are now those who are saying

0:29

Smollett might just get off with probation

0:32

at thatt Amore Coming up on the buck Sexton Show.

0:35

This is the buck Sexton

0:37

Show where the mission where mission is

0:39

to decode what really matters with

0:41

actionable intelligence. Make

0:45

no mistake America. You're

0:47

a great American again. The buck Sexton

0:49

Show begins, analysts,

0:53

he's a great guy. Now

0:58

they are looking for two suspect who are apparently

1:00

wearing make America Great Again hats.

1:03

We don't know what happened to Jesse, but what we do know

1:05

is that racism is alive

1:07

and well in this country. There is real evidence

1:10

of people who have done these crimes who cite that the President has

1:12

inspired. Then Senator Corey Booker said,

1:15

the vicious attack when actor Jesse was

1:17

an attempt at modern day lynching a Hollywood

1:20

star who's black and gay and now

1:22

the victim of a heinish crime, not

1:24

of that attack at a star of a TV show, Empire.

1:27

Jesse Smollett from the hit show

1:29

Empire was attacked and beaten early

1:31

this morning in Chicago, and police

1:33

say it could be a hate crime. I'm so shaken by

1:35

the story. I know he walked himself to the hospital.

1:38

Do we know how he is now? Connect the dots.

1:40

This is what happens if you are in a position

1:43

of power and you hate people, and

1:45

this is America. In twenty nineteen, he

1:48

opened up about what he's learned and the

1:50

bigger message he wants the world to hear.

1:52

How can you doubt that? How

1:55

do you not believe that it's the truth. And

1:57

then it became a thing of like, oh,

2:00

it's not necessarily that you don't believe

2:02

that this is the truth. You don't even

2:05

want to see the truth.

2:08

Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. Sorry,

2:11

we had to start out there with just lies

2:14

and falsehoods and more

2:16

lies and more, all of it false,

2:19

all of that stuff that we were being

2:21

told there by the media, some of the

2:24

biggest platforms in the country,

2:26

some of the most self loving

2:29

journals around, big

2:32

big fans of spreading

2:35

this hoax around there. That's

2:37

what they did. Man,

2:40

it is interesting to be right

2:42

here, I am. Let's just do a

2:45

quick count of where we are team

2:47

versus where the mainstream media is Cavanaugh,

2:50

Covington, Smallett.

2:53

Can they point to any conservative

2:55

hoaxes in the last year. I just wanted

2:57

to where's the big conservative hoax? Or we

2:59

were on this show. I was like, well this

3:01

happened, and no, it didn't happen. My bad ah

3:07

was never never brought up.

3:10

Didn't happen? Did it? Yet?

3:12

Here we are, there's so much

3:14

going on here. Oh, we're gonna have

3:16

some fun on this story. So smallt

3:19

was. Smallett

3:22

was arrested taking down a court

3:24

Today, he's out on a hundred thousand

3:27

dollars bail. And

3:30

you had a member

3:32

of the Chicago PD, I believe it was

3:34

Police chief came Eddie Johnson

3:36

came out today and he lets

3:39

Smollett have it play

3:42

eleven

3:44

attempted to gain attention by sending a false

3:47

letter that relied on racial, homophobic,

3:50

and political language. When that didn't

3:52

work, it's let pay thirty five

3:54

hundred dollars to stage this

3:56

attack and drag Chicago's reputation

3:59

through the mud in the process. And why

4:01

this stunt was orchestrated by Smolette

4:04

because he was dissatisfied with his salary,

4:06

so he concocted a story about being attacked

4:09

to put the national spotlight on Chicago

4:12

for something that is both egregious

4:14

and untrue. Is simply shameful.

4:17

I'm also concerned about what

4:19

this means moving forward to hate

4:21

crimes. Of my concern is that hate

4:23

crimes will now publicly be met with a

4:25

level of skepticism that previously

4:27

didn't happen. Now,

4:30

let's just look at some of the details before we go

4:33

too far to the analysis here. Let's do some of the

4:35

details. Smolett.

4:38

I guess that is how we say his name, I've been Smolett

4:40

Smolet. Perhaps if we wouldn't get

4:43

kind of a French vibe there messieurs Smolet.

4:46

But no, it's it's Smolette. He

4:51

has engaged in, according to police, now

4:54

two to hate

4:56

crime hoaxes. One was sending a letter to

4:58

himself with threatening, threatening

5:01

stuff and racial

5:03

slurs, and then

5:06

this even bigger hoax involving

5:10

a three thousand dollars plus

5:13

payment to two brothers

5:15

who were helping him to stage

5:17

in attack. Some details

5:20

that I think you should know about, though. One

5:22

is that Smolette paid

5:24

the brothers with a check.

5:28

That's right, the thirty five hundred dollars

5:30

was paid via check. Now,

5:33

I'm not some arch criminal, Okay,

5:35

I'm not somebody that you know. I

5:37

don't even like getting a speeding ticket. I stay

5:39

inside the law. But I'm telling you this

5:42

much. If I

5:44

were trying to engage in some illegal

5:47

activity of this kind to

5:49

stage some kind of an elaborate hoax, I

5:52

think I'd pay cash. I just

5:55

think that's a better move than

5:57

to leave an obvious financial

6:00

she'll trail to your co conspirators. I'm

6:02

just putting that out there. Probably

6:05

a good move. Also, since

6:08

since we're gonna break down, I'm sorry,

6:10

this is the dumbest hate crime hoax that

6:12

I that I've heard

6:14

of or seen in years. I mean, there's some

6:17

very dumb ones out there, but this one

6:19

is. Wow. Smolette

6:24

is not exactly an

6:26

evil genius. So

6:29

he paid these kys via check.

6:33

I wonder how he's gonna explain that one to the cops I

6:35

saw today, As lawyers say, he's looking forward to clearing

6:37

his name. Yeah,

6:39

how are you gonna do that? Exactly? But

6:42

the two guys that he the two

6:44

brothers that he paid

6:46

to help

6:49

him in this attack, which is also I would

6:51

note, an enormous, an

6:54

enormous mistake. The osund Row brothers,

6:56

Olah and Abel, they

7:00

went into a hardware store and

7:03

bought masks,

7:07

red hats, and rope

7:09

for the quote noose and

7:12

they did this on video.

7:16

I've also heard that they had the

7:18

magazines that they used to cut the letters

7:21

out of to create there. But I'm

7:23

sure there's DNA in it, by the way, I

7:25

mean, if they're showing up on video buying

7:27

this stuff, they probably paid with credit card

7:30

too. I mean, I just these guys. This

7:32

is the most

7:34

bumbling, buffoonish

7:37

hoax hate crime imaginable. And

7:39

yet look how long it took for the media to finally

7:42

turn this around. Look

7:44

how long before they were willing to say, you know what,

7:46

maybe we made some kind of a mistake here,

7:49

maybe there's maybe there's an issue. And

7:52

now they're saying, well that the Democrats

7:54

who were initially jumping in are saying, ah,

7:56

we might have made we might have made a little mistake here.

7:59

We might have Kamala Harris Kirston

8:02

Jilla Brand, who

8:04

I really enjoyed Tucker's monologue

8:07

last not on his show, on Kirston Jill brand Worth

8:09

going back and seeing if you haven't worre Mache's

8:11

just a nasty phony, just

8:13

an out and out phony.

8:16

But Democrats don't mind that kind of stuff. But

8:19

Jilla brand and Harris and Booker,

8:21

they've all come out and sure

8:24

enough after

8:26

saying that this was terrible

8:28

and oh it's Trump's fault and all this stuff, now I'm like,

8:30

yeah, you know, maybe you

8:33

know, maybe we should have waited a little bit, Maybe we should

8:35

wait for the facts. Now, Oh, wait for the facts

8:38

now. Okay, okay,

8:42

that's interesting. Let's

8:44

give you some more facts. Since they want to wait

8:47

for facts, here's the police chief, Eddie

8:49

Johnson, talking about more of the stuff

8:52

that they have. Play eleven. Oh,

8:57

I'm sorry, Play ten. This

9:00

case, in particular involved

9:02

hours of video evidence, which,

9:04

when combined with old fashioned police work,

9:06

uncovered the truth. These

9:09

detectives deserve all the credit

9:11

in the world for carefully analyzing the leads

9:14

and the evidence for weeks before coming

9:16

to their conclusion. I'd

9:18

also like to thank the FBI for

9:20

their helping this investigation. I

9:22

only hope that the truth about

9:24

what happened receives the same amount

9:27

of attention that the Hopes did. I'll

9:30

continue to pray for its troubled

9:32

young man who resorted to both

9:34

drastic and illegal tactics

9:37

to gain attention. We

9:40

know that it won't receive the same amount of attention

9:42

though. We know that

9:44

the multi

9:47

billion dollars news media apparatus

9:49

in this country is going to

9:51

find a way to quickly, as

9:53

quickly as possible, move right

9:56

past this story because their audience

9:58

doesn't want to hear about this. Their

10:00

audience want to be told, hey, crimes

10:03

are rising, Hey crimes

10:05

are rising, And I say, wow,

10:08

where on what time

10:10

frame? What kind of crimes

10:13

attributable to whom? When

10:15

you actually look at the numbers, what you find out, by the

10:18

way, is that the single single

10:20

group that suffers religious group that suffers

10:23

the greatest amount of hate crimes, for example, is anti

10:27

submiticate crimes. But the

10:29

left is not that they don't turn those

10:31

into national news stories. Generally,

10:34

this is a national

10:37

news story, a black gay

10:39

actor attacked by Trump's

10:41

supporters. It couldn't have been more

10:44

perfect. It's it's like this was concocted,

10:47

this whole story by a

10:49

couple of you know, undergrad

10:52

film majors covered with hashtag

10:54

resistance tattoos in some you

10:57

know coffee shop in Los Angeles. I mean,

10:59

this should not have ever even nobody

11:03

should have ever thought that this was a good

11:05

plan and this made any

11:07

sense, and that Jesse Smollett,

11:10

who or Smolette who is an actor,

11:12

couldn't have come up with a more convincing

11:15

story. I don't know, I haven't

11:17

seen him in the show Empire, but you can't

11:19

be a very good actor. I'm just guessing the

11:22

cops thought that this might have been a hoax from the beginning.

11:24

They tried to give him the benefit of the

11:26

doubt. Play

11:28

thirteen here, John Well,

11:32

to be perfectly honest, from the very

11:34

beginning, we had some questions about

11:36

it, but as I said, we gave

11:38

mister Smolett the benefit of the doubt

11:41

all the way up until that forty seventh hour

11:44

of the forty eight hours, we could hold those two individuals

11:46

because we just didn't have the total

11:48

package to support that it was a hoax.

11:51

So when you heard me coming out saying we

11:53

are treating him like a victim, that

11:55

was the truth, because at that time that's

11:58

what he was speaking

12:01

of. Victims. You know who Smilette victimized

12:04

here, not just the millions of Trump supporters

12:06

across the country who knew that

12:09

their reputations collectively

12:11

were being tarnished. You

12:13

know that this was always meant to be a

12:16

judgment on all of us, those who vote

12:18

for Trump, who support Trump, who believe in

12:21

his promise to make America great again. We

12:23

were the bad guys. That's

12:26

what was at the heart of this. But

12:29

the people that really suffered are the people of Chicago,

12:31

with the over a dozen law

12:34

enforcement officers who were

12:36

assigned to this. When

12:38

you have a city that has a terrible

12:40

violence problem and a very

12:43

high unsolved murder rate to

12:46

bring those kinds of police resources, I've

12:48

seen estimates that this might have even cost in terms

12:50

of police man hours, hundreds

12:52

of thousands of dollars, hundreds

12:55

of thousands of dollars spent so

12:57

that this clown Smolette

13:02

could turn himself into

13:04

some kind of cause celeb

13:07

turn himself into not just a celebrity,

13:09

but that rarefied and oh

13:11

so desirable

13:14

on the left, victimized

13:16

celebrity, special

13:19

category, social justice

13:21

approved celebrity.

13:24

Oh what could be more wonderful

13:27

than that? But

13:30

he was upset. He

13:33

was upset with his salary on the show

13:35

and thought if he got more attention, he would

13:37

make more money. So Smolette

13:40

is a narcissist,

13:43

an idiot, and a

13:45

bratt Think

13:47

of how many people rushed to

13:49

his aid to believe him, to

13:51

run interference for him. Think

13:53

of how this became a national news

13:55

story. None

13:58

of the kids who have been shot in chicag I go

14:00

in the last thirty or sixty days, none

14:02

of them have turned into national news stories. Lives

14:05

lost, family shattered. That that doesn't

14:07

get the media's attention. This a

14:10

guy who I also read today,

14:12

created his own wound. I

14:15

mean that little scratch on his face. If

14:17

two guys poured bleach

14:20

on you and put a noose around

14:22

your neck and manage to do that, and

14:24

we're trying to hurt you, I think you'd have more than a tiny

14:26

little scratch on your cheek. I mean it looked like he cut

14:28

himself shaving. Whose

14:33

terrible attack. You know it

14:35

was all a lie. It was all

14:37

a lie. And I know that there are

14:39

other things in the country we should focus on, and we will

14:41

shortly, But today is when the whole thing finally

14:44

came crashing down. So you'll have to excuse

14:46

me if I have a moment here to just say, isn't

14:49

it good to be right? Team?

14:52

You listen to this show. I don't have a I don't

14:54

have a hundred reporters. I don't have

14:56

some huge newsroom at my beck and

14:58

call and everything else. I just read

15:00

and think and analyze and

15:03

bring all of the knowledge and all the assistance

15:06

that I can from all of you who listen into

15:08

that process. And somehow we know. We

15:11

knew this was garbage. That's

15:13

why we kept doing the Jessie Small and updates as

15:15

we went along. Year up, it looks pretty bad.

15:19

So we were right and they were wrong. The fake

15:21

news can't figure it out, but we can. We

15:23

should do a little victory dance, and you know what today

15:25

is victory dance Day. We'll be right back. Can

15:31

we be honest? But to certain

15:34

groups of people, even

15:36

if they were skeptical there, like they said, I

15:38

hope this is not true. Black folks,

15:41

gay folks, people are

15:43

like, oh my god, I hope you

15:45

know why. And you know why black folks,

15:47

gay folks say that because they are real

15:49

victims of well, because there are real victims

15:52

of homophobia and of racism,

15:55

but also because unfortunately we tend

15:57

to all be painted with the same brush when

15:59

one person and does wrong. And

16:01

that's why we always say that when something goes

16:03

wrong, is we hope the person is not black, We

16:06

hope the person is not gay. Yeah, I

16:09

don't agree with a lot of people

16:11

that are out there saying that this,

16:13

this hurts the victims of real hate crimes,

16:15

because real hate crimes are

16:17

crimes, right, great, No

16:20

one, no one hears a story about

16:22

you know, some some bad person

16:25

somewhere who are you know, No one

16:27

hears a story about some bad person who attacks

16:30

you know, a woman because she's you

16:32

know, wearing a her job or because you

16:34

know, and says, well, that can't be true.

16:37

And if it is true, everyone wants the person punished.

16:40

But those are those are real. And look, there are

16:42

a lot of hoaxes out there too that involve things like that. But

16:45

you know, though those are real things. I

16:47

don't. I don't agree with this, This completely

16:51

implausible story that Jesse Smollett,

16:54

you know, fool the media into into

16:56

believing somehow now undermines everybody.

16:59

No, you know, if someone

17:01

says something terrible and racist and punches somebody

17:03

in the face outside of a restaurant

17:05

somewhere. My first reaction is I'm like, oh,

17:07

that's terrible. You know, I wonder did the police get them?

17:09

What happened? When someone says

17:12

that, you know they had two Maga hot

17:14

wearing noose carrying

17:17

you know, this is Maga Country

17:19

yelling guys in Chicago at two o'clock

17:22

in the morning. You know, No, it

17:24

just wasn't incredible. It was

17:26

incredible. Don

17:29

Lemons also he said that he's been texting,

17:32

you know, he's over at CNN. I used to dude, Don show

17:34

a fair amountain then I wised up. It's

17:37

texting frequently with Smolette.

17:40

Doesn't that impact the coverage? I

17:42

mean I always say if someone's a friend,

17:44

not because I'm like the person's my friend, but because

17:46

I want you to know that if there's someone I have to talk about

17:48

here on the show that I have any kind of personal

17:50

relationship with, I think you should at least know that.

17:53

And as you know, I also don't trash my friends.

17:55

I have a rule. I don't trash friends on

17:58

air, but or

18:00

even particularly harshly criticize

18:02

them.

18:05

That said, why is it okay for Don Lemon

18:07

to have a personal relationship with this guy and do stories

18:09

on him night after night on the show. I'm

18:12

just wondering, well, where are the journal is

18:15

John? Is Don Lemon a journalist? Is

18:18

any mean Don Lemon? Is he a journalist?

18:20

Does CNN have a Can they give us an official

18:22

ruling on that? I mean, he's obviously not, but I just want

18:24

to know if CNN is delusional

18:27

enough to think that he is. Eight four four

18:29

nine hundred two eight two five. Let's open up those lines,

18:31

team, tell much to think about this small Lett

18:33

situation. Eight four four nine hundred

18:36

two eight two five eight four four nine hundred

18:38

buck light him up. I

18:42

know, Jesse, I love him. We have to

18:44

understand this is happening for

18:47

a reason. Why all of a sudden do

18:49

we have people unable to study well,

18:51

black, unable to mo alan

18:53

while black, unable to have a picnic while

18:56

black, and being attacked. It's coming

18:58

from the President of the United States, Dog

19:00

Whistlin. Every day he's separating

19:03

and dividing, and he is

19:05

basically embolding those folks.

19:09

This is the problem with the

19:13

approach that the Democrat politicians

19:16

and the media take to these situations where they just say,

19:18

well, we're gonna go all in on what

19:20

we want it to be, what we want to be

19:22

true, and then if we're proven to

19:24

be completely and utterly wrong, which they have been,

19:27

yeah, maybe we'll walk it back a little bit, or we'll

19:29

just move on to something else. And the

19:32

media will say, Okay, maybe we got that wrong,

19:34

but you know, no big

19:36

deal. The problem is that

19:38

there is lasting damage that

19:41

is created from the propagation

19:44

of the lie. There

19:47

you had Maxiine Waters, very well known

19:49

member of Congress. I believe she's on

19:51

the now. She

19:53

might be running the finance

19:57

I ever forget, not not the oversight

19:59

Committe, it's some kind of financial committee.

20:01

I forget what a producer, Mike, we let me know what it is. She's

20:04

a She's on a pretty important committee in Congress now

20:06

because the Democrats obviously control the House. But

20:09

she just went through this whole thing of essentially

20:12

telling any any person listening,

20:15

and I think it would resonate, particularly with Black

20:18

Americans, that

20:21

you know, you can't quote study while black,

20:24

have a picnic while black. All

20:27

these she says all these things, and

20:30

it's reckless for her to say these things because

20:33

it's just not true. What she's

20:35

saying is not true, and Jessie the

20:37

the lie that he told. Even if it were true,

20:39

it wouldn't prove all these things that she says. But

20:43

people will hear Maxi and Waters

20:46

using this incident in

20:49

order to create this

20:51

this storyline about how America

20:53

is still so racist. I mean, the left is so

20:55

invested in making

20:58

Americans believe but we are a uniquely

21:01

and deeply and irredeemably

21:04

racist country that

21:06

there's a desperation to find racism

21:09

all the time. I would just

21:11

note that if we were so racist, it wouldn't

21:13

be so hard to find real instances

21:16

of national news level racism.

21:19

They would not have to make it

21:21

up. And that's why I read do You Last No?

21:24

Earlier this week that string.

21:26

She's the House Financial Services She's the chairman

21:29

of the House Financial Services Committee. Maxie Waters,

21:31

Yeah, that was the one. So

21:35

I read you that string of hoaxes because

21:38

I don't want any of you to think, because you'll

21:40

hear it in the media. Oh hey, crimes are on the rise

21:42

and hoaxes are rare. M Actually

21:44

not true. Why

21:47

would there ever be a hoax of this kind? It's

21:50

so strange, how many hoax burglaries.

21:52

Do you know of how many hoax

21:54

you know? Go down the list where where do the hoaxes

21:56

occur? Usually where there's some political incentive,

21:59

which then to among

22:02

the dumbest questions of all that will

22:04

be asked now and you will see

22:06

people asking this question. I guarantee

22:09

it. Why would he do

22:11

this? Why would JUSSI

22:14

do this? He has he has nothing

22:16

to gain. Where have you heard this before?

22:18

By the way, he

22:20

has nothing. Oh, just like how Christine

22:23

blasi Ford, another fabricator,

22:27

had nothing to gain.

22:31

Hm, she had lots

22:33

to gain. Actually, as we know, Smollett

22:38

clearly thought he had a lot to gain from

22:40

this, and for the first few

22:42

weeks he did national news story sympathetic

22:45

anchors, He sat down with Robin

22:47

Roberts at ABC, and

22:50

you know became he became a trending

22:53

topic on social media. Everybody

22:56

was you know, he had he had future president

22:59

or current presidential candidates jumping

23:03

forward to come to Jesse's

23:06

defense. Everybody

23:09

knows that this can also

23:11

result not just in the elevation of your

23:13

profile, but the acceleration of

23:15

your career and

23:17

the enrichment of

23:19

your bank accounts. Look at Colin Kaepernick.

23:23

Colin Kaepernick was past his prime

23:25

NFL quarterback. The people

23:28

that I know who know football, that I trust, I've talked about

23:30

this many times before, and they're like, the guy, he just wasn't

23:32

that good. And he was

23:34

doing something with his taking of the knee

23:37

and his pig socks for cops.

23:40

He was doing stuff that alienated the

23:42

audience. And guess what, No

23:44

one has a civil right to be a professional

23:46

football player. No one has

23:48

a guarantee that they get to be a multi

23:50

millionaire athlete. It is

23:53

entertainment. If your movies

23:55

stink, you don't get to be in more

23:57

movies. At least you shouldn't be If people

23:59

don't want to watch you on a football field, doesn't

24:01

matter how good you are, you're

24:03

a liability. And Kaepernick wasn't that

24:06

good. Pebel didn't

24:08

want him. Oh

24:10

but then he turned into a social justice

24:12

hero and now he's a major

24:14

Nike figure and there's all these

24:16

campaigns out there for millions and millions

24:19

more dollars because

24:21

of essentially his agitation.

24:25

No policy has changed because of Kaepernick.

24:27

Then nothing, There's been no benefit

24:30

of what Kaepernick has done. Oh, he started

24:33

a conversation on race we have conversations

24:35

on race all the time. I mean, that was one

24:37

of the one of the most insane things of many

24:39

things that Attorney General Eric

24:42

Holder back in the Obama day said was, you know,

24:44

we're cowards when it comes to race. We don't have talks

24:46

about race. The left

24:48

wants to talk about race pretty much all day, all the

24:50

time. If you turn on MSNBC

24:53

or CNN. Other than

24:55

the Russia collusion delusion,

24:57

their favorite thing to talk about is race number

25:01

one. And I was a

25:03

contributor at CNN. I

25:06

knows I come to you, I come

25:08

to you with with

25:11

with stories of abuse

25:13

and gas lighting and all kinds of stuff

25:16

from being over there. But I remember

25:18

when the Black Lives Matter

25:21

movement based on Mike

25:23

Brown and all that that was really

25:25

a that was the biggest news

25:27

story in the country. They were running

25:29

stories on it all the time, and they couldn't

25:32

get enough of it because they thought their audience couldn't get

25:34

enough of it. Meanwhile,

25:36

the fact that Mike Brown attacked a cop and

25:39

got shot after he you

25:41

know, robbed a store a few minutes before.

25:43

I mean, the guy, the guys who the

25:45

guy is a thug is

25:47

apparently know how to say that. That's not they don't like even

25:50

though thugs come from the Thugy

25:52

cult in India, occult based

25:54

on strangulation that some estimates go

25:57

as high as killed in the high

25:59

hundreds of thousands of people. It

26:01

was a religious cult. It's actually the Thugy cult

26:03

in India is the loosely

26:06

the basis for the

26:08

evil cult in Indiana Jones and

26:10

the Temple of Doom Boom,

26:14

Did your mind just explode? But

26:17

the Thugie cult was nineteenth

26:19

century and the British

26:22

authorities were the ones who rooted it out.

26:25

But that's where the term thug comes from. And

26:28

we're not supposed to say thug though, So you could say Mike Brown

26:30

was a hooligan? Is that

26:32

better a ruffian? You

26:36

know, a vandal?

26:39

You know, I don't know. You have to sort of

26:41

pick your your term. That won't all of a sudden be

26:43

oh, you can't use that term. He was treated

26:45

like a martyr of some kind of movement and

26:48

CNN would run these stories night after night after

26:50

night. It was it was they

26:52

were complicit in racial

26:55

Mike producer Mike comes up with a good word

26:57

for him, Well done, Mike, a criminal

27:00

Mike Brown a criminal who

27:02

got shot. Thank you, Mike, well

27:04

played any time. Yeah.

27:06

So they they held this

27:09

up as oh, you know, this, this

27:11

movement and it's going to change police relations.

27:13

This was when you had the first black president

27:15

in office, and yet still we're told, so the

27:17

country is so racist, it's so terrible. And

27:20

I would just say, as I point to these hoaxes,

27:23

if the country's so racist, why

27:27

must they elevate a hoax

27:29

in this way? Why must the left

27:31

do this? If the country were so

27:34

racist and police were so racist

27:36

in particular, why is

27:38

the center of the biggest political

27:40

movement about police violence

27:43

an individual who was

27:46

lawfully shot by an officer defending

27:49

himself. That

27:52

that's that's the that's the person you're going to

27:54

build a movement around. And

27:58

again, the agitation here

28:01

is clear that the purposes of this is not to create

28:03

some kind of harmony. It's to keep people divided.

28:06

It's to keep people angry with

28:08

each other, and it's to feed them these

28:10

narratives of victimology and

28:12

suffering and hatred that

28:15

are very appealing to people. Why

28:17

is Jose Smallett as a victim appealing

28:19

well, because then then he gets

28:22

to get all the sympathy from the media, and he gets

28:24

to tell his story. And you know, why

28:26

would he lie because it benefits him

28:28

to lie. Why do people like to

28:30

hear these stories of victimhood

28:33

because they will translate it into their

28:35

own perceived victimhood.

28:38

Oh, this has been unfair to me, that has been unfairming.

28:40

Here's the truth is. Life is not fair,

28:43

never has been, never will be. Everybody,

28:46

at different times and in different ways, has

28:48

been on the wrong side of an unjust

28:51

situation. But we also,

28:53

all of us, myself included, make

28:57

bad choices, sometimes get

28:59

a little lazy, don't do

29:01

the right thing, don't do what we know

29:04

we should do. Sometimes

29:06

you do enough of that and your

29:08

life trajectory starts to change.

29:11

Sometimes you you start to see, yeah,

29:13

we all make mistakes, right, but you make enough mistakes

29:15

and you've got more

29:18

of a of a macro level

29:20

problem on your hands. Right. You know this is this

29:23

is It's like the difference between binging

29:26

on you know, a dozen donuts and

29:28

eating a dozen donuts every night before you go to sleep

29:30

for about six months. The latter is

29:32

going to actually have an impact in your life. It's not

29:34

going to be very healthy for you, right, you make bad

29:36

decisions. Don't donuts?

29:38

Sounds so good? Right now, I'm really hungry. You

29:42

make bad decisions and you have

29:44

to deal with those decisions. But what if, what

29:48

if I could tell you that there's

29:50

a story, a story

29:52

that I could promote to all of you listening that

29:55

would make you think that, No, it's

29:57

not that you've made any bad decisions, or

29:59

that you would have made better decisions. It's

30:01

not your own lack of discipline,

30:04

or or or just bad

30:06

luck or any of these. No, no no, it's none of that. There

30:09

are bad people out there, Trump

30:12

supporters. There are bad people out

30:14

there who are the cause of

30:17

the disappointments in your life. There are bad people

30:20

out there, the other here, the

30:23

patriarchy, white male

30:25

Christians, Trump supporters, MAGA

30:28

hat wearers, and they

30:30

are the reason for your

30:32

disappointments in life. It's

30:34

not in your hands, it is it is those

30:36

other people that are unfortunately

30:39

individuals like to hear this. It

30:43

frees them from the uncomfortable

30:45

every and I mean this for whoever you are. It's

30:47

always better. You know, whether it's you think you're being victimized

30:49

by you know, your boss at the office,

30:52

or you know your your your social

30:54

life is not what you think it should be because of

30:56

it's it's just like envy, right.

30:59

The politics of envy are so powerful

31:01

because we all see people that are

31:03

spending more money on a yacht than we'll

31:05

make in a lifetime and say, is that guy really

31:07

so much smarter than me? Well,

31:09

when you look at identity politics, and

31:12

you add into those identity politics

31:14

the victimology narrative, and

31:18

you look at and this is at the heart

31:20

of intersectionality. All these different groups are pressing

31:22

each other. It's not that any group should sit

31:24

down and think to itself. First

31:26

of all, do we want to even be judged as a group? Aren't

31:28

we just individuals? Aren't we all just human beings

31:30

with goals, aspirations, hopes,

31:33

loves, desires. Do we have

31:35

to be always thought of as in this group? But even if

31:37

you're going to think about it as a group, isn't

31:41

it more comforting? Isn't it easier

31:45

to be told that whatever's going

31:47

wrong and wrong in your life, it's because you're part

31:49

of this group, and it's because there are other people

31:51

that are holding you down. It's

31:54

a seductive narrative and

31:56

it's at the heart of the

31:58

current obsession with victimhood

32:01

in this country, and

32:03

also understand this victimhood is a means

32:06

of not just achieving

32:10

for oneself a

32:12

kind of immunity and an

32:14

excuse, but also

32:17

claiming victim's status is a way of

32:19

seizing power from those that

32:22

you think should not have it,

32:24

especially people who

32:27

seek to be ethical in their doings. Nobody

32:30

wants to be victimizing somebody else. Guilt

32:33

is a very powerful tool in our politics as

32:36

well. All of this factors in

32:38

to this mess

32:41

that is the Rushi, the

32:43

Jussie Smollett hoax.

32:48

All right, team, we've got a lot more so.

32:50

There's an IRS analyst that

32:53

was the latest deep state clown on the scene.

32:55

We'll talk about what he did. I've got

32:57

some mccave thoughts for you. He's a bad guy.

32:59

Knows rise there and and so so

33:01

much more. Show. Oh, and I

33:04

hate crime against a conservative that

33:07

you'll hear about here. In fact, we'll bring

33:09

you up to speed with the latest on it that you

33:11

probably won't hear anywhere else. Happened in UC

33:14

Berkeley. Somebody got really

33:16

badly beat up because

33:19

he's a conservative. Have you seen that on CNN

33:21

tonight? I don't think so, but don't be watching CNN.

33:23

We'll be right back Kenny

33:28

and Boston, my brother from Boston.

33:30

What's up, Kenny, Hey Buck

33:32

A long time no talk. It's great.

33:35

You make up a good point here with the

33:38

him being stupid, but I'm kind of

33:40

really this is really bothering

33:42

me because I can't think he could be that stupid. Now,

33:44

he wanted to be on camera, You wanted this thing

33:47

to be on camera, but he chose two black dudes

33:49

and he calls them white dudes and report

33:51

wouldn't that have been seen on the camera?

33:53

Why is he It's almost like he wanted

33:55

to be caught where he's deliberately being sloppy

33:59

and um because even now he's

34:01

still denying and vowing

34:04

to fight these charges and exonerate

34:06

his name. And then also

34:08

what about that manager or agent

34:11

that he was on the phone with. I don't hear anything

34:13

good good point about the manager or agent. Was he

34:15

in on it or was it just he got pulled

34:17

into the hoax? Unknowingly right, he might have

34:19

gotten a call from him where he

34:21

did through this whole thing, but you know who really knows.

34:23

But I would say this to you, Kenny, to your theory,

34:26

which which I think is is well thought out.

34:29

What if, though, what if

34:31

Jesse's Smallett is just

34:33

really, really dumb? Just

34:36

just leave leave that open as a possibility,

34:38

leave that opener. What

34:41

if he is in fact? Because you're right, I mean, it's

34:43

so stupid that it's hard to believe he could be

34:45

that stupid. But what if he is, It's

34:48

possible. And as to the pronunciation

34:50

of his name, we always talk about the pronunciation

34:52

of the last me, but what about the first name. It's spelled

34:55

with the You shouldn't he be called juicy? You

34:58

know, I was always thinking, you know not. I'll

35:00

see it's a juicy

35:01

right anyway.

35:03

Yeah, I don't know that joke. That joke

35:05

kills on the South Side. Thanks for calling, Kenny,

35:08

could to talk to you, man? Uh, could

35:10

talk to you? Oh man, it's already

35:13

next hour time. So the

35:16

deep State, it's a thing. What

35:18

have they been up too lately? Well, we

35:21

have somebody who gotten quite a bit of trouble

35:23

or could be in quite a bit of trouble based

35:26

on his desire to

35:29

take down Michael

35:31

Cohen, Trump's lawyer, with

35:34

confidential government information leaked

35:37

to the press. What does

35:39

this tell us about things and also what's

35:41

the latest on the Mullaprobe

35:44

team. Strap in an hour two is gonna rock

35:46

it. He

35:50

has to make a decision. Is he going to be the people's

35:52

lawyer or is he going to be the president's

35:54

lawyer. Clearly, this president regards

35:56

the attorney general as one of his minions. He

35:59

has no respect for the rule of law, in

36:01

fact, utter contempt for judges

36:04

and the judicial process. And he

36:06

has denounced relentlessly

36:09

and unstintingly the FBI and other

36:11

law enforcement absolutely unpressman

36:14

it shattering all the norms. William

36:16

Barr is a professional, at

36:18

least he should be, and he's going to have to

36:20

stand up and speak out for the Department of Justice

36:23

and the rule of law, and that will make

36:25

his ride a pretty wild one. Oh,

36:27

I'm sure denang Dick is really

36:30

gonna sway Bar one

36:32

way or the other with his usual slimy

36:35

antics there the people.

36:37

Will he be the people's lawyer or one of Trump's

36:39

minions. Look, Barr

36:42

is a guy who has done

36:44

this before. Okay, he's been to this rodeo

36:46

before. He was well

36:49

respected then, he is well respected

36:51

now. He obviously can do the job. And

36:53

that's why even the

36:55

lunatics in the Senate on the

36:58

Democrat side could not come up with

37:00

a real rationale to try

37:02

and stop him. So he's

37:04

now the Attorney General, and thankfully,

37:07

it looks like we are heading into the

37:10

end of the Muller nightmare.

37:13

Although it's, as I've said, not going to

37:15

result in an end to investigations

37:17

of Trump. It's not like they're going to just say, Okay,

37:20

you know, well, we're gonna move on to other stuff now.

37:22

Nope, They're gonna keep drilling

37:25

down and drilling down because

37:27

when they can't win the argument, they figure they

37:29

can win just through harassment,

37:33

which is the point

37:35

here, just through harassment.

37:38

So we'll see if the Special Council

37:40

ends next week. I've been telling you that for a while. It looks

37:42

likely a lot of people have reported on it, and

37:45

it would make sense. But in the meantime,

37:48

got some other updates for you. Roger Stone.

37:51

I have to tell you, I kind of like Roger, you

37:53

know, every time I've talked to him, interviewed him. I

37:56

like Roger. I like Carter Page too. Carter

37:58

Page are really really

38:00

nice, friendly, unpretentious

38:03

dude, and Roger Stone

38:05

look He's a character for sure,

38:08

and I bet if you get on the wrong side of him,

38:10

he's not very pleasant. But I kind

38:12

of like Roger Stone. Oh I'm

38:14

a pundit. I'm allowed to like and dislike people. I don't

38:16

have to pretend to be neutral. And it's

38:18

pretty amazing the career

38:21

that he has had in politics,

38:24

stretching back for many, many decades. Well, anyway,

38:26

Roger is whereas

38:29

a political operative. At least Roger is

38:32

not able to speak publicly anymore about

38:34

his case that just came out today. Federal

38:37

Judge Amy Berman restricted

38:41

Stone's ability to speak publicly about his case

38:43

because she says

38:46

Stone posted and then removed a

38:48

photo of the judge on Instagram

38:50

that had crosshairs. Now, Stone said

38:52

it was a Celtic cross but

38:54

had crosshairs behind her

38:57

head. So he

38:59

gave a formal apology, or rather, his lawyers

39:02

wrote up a formal apology for him,

39:05

and I guess we're moving

39:07

past the matter now. But Stone

39:09

is no longer so I'm glad we got an interview

39:12

with him when we could over at Rising. I should have

39:14

had him on radio. I didn't even think about that. But

39:17

Stone is no longer going to be able

39:20

to tell the public what he thinks about

39:22

the trial he faces. I'm gonna tell you this, and I

39:24

spoke to a Democrat lawyer recently

39:26

off the record about

39:29

the like he thinks that Stone.

39:31

He agrees with me because I said, I've read the

39:34

stuff. I think if Stone

39:36

fights this, he won't beat all the

39:38

charges, but he will beat some of them. The

39:41

witness tampering charge is bull.

39:44

It's a bull charge. He

39:46

can beat that. But the ways,

39:48

the way the federal prosecution

39:51

works is if

39:53

even if he beats that charge, but he goes to trial

39:56

and other charges and they get I mean, he's going to prison

39:59

for years in years,

40:01

So is he really going to see Is

40:03

he going to see this all the way

40:05

through? Is he willing to see this all the way

40:07

through? Well,

40:10

we'll have to see. But I do

40:12

think he'll beat you, mark my words, if

40:14

this goes, If this goes all the way, I

40:16

think he'll win on the witness tampering charges, which will

40:18

just show you, even though it means that Roger

40:20

will probably go to prison on the lying under oath

40:23

part of this, it'll show you

40:25

that the Special Castle

40:27

was looking to just crush anybody

40:30

around Trump and that even

40:33

when they had other charges that they could have made,

40:35

that they were trying to do the count of endless

40:37

counts. They were trying to stack the deck against

40:39

him. Then one other thing,

40:41

that's that's in the Muller

40:44

deep state anti Trump

40:46

investigation world. That it's a little

40:48

bit of a rough transition there, but hey, you know

40:50

it's live radio. So federal

40:53

prosecutors have charged

40:55

an analyst with the Internal

40:58

Revenue Service for illegue disclosing

41:01

confidential reports about Michael Cohen's

41:03

bank records. This was

41:06

to show that Cohen was

41:09

trying to profit from his

41:11

access to the Trump White House. Now

41:13

you might say, buck, who really cares about this guy John

41:16

Fridy, IRS

41:18

analyst, Which you

41:20

know, Hey, I'm in Delaware

41:23

as an IRS analyst. Why

41:27

are we talking about this guy? Well, because yet

41:30

again we have a federal bureaucrat,

41:33

another one of these government

41:35

employees who

41:38

was willing, was

41:40

willing to throw his career

41:43

and perhaps his freedom away

41:46

just to get a little pad on the head from

41:48

some journos at the Washington Post

41:50

and the New Yorker. And assuming

41:53

this is true, again, assuming

41:56

that this is true,

42:00

you know, that's that's what I think we all need to

42:02

keep in mind here. It's possible that's not true,

42:04

but it's probably true.

42:07

Why is it that you didn't have this? I

42:10

speak to you often about the mentality in

42:13

the federal government that

42:15

is statist in its inclinations

42:17

and therefore favors Democrats

42:20

and favors the system in general.

42:23

So with all of that, why

42:25

is it that we expect

42:28

that there'll be these kinds of leaks against

42:30

Trump? More deep staters

42:32

that are deciding to take a an

42:35

opportunity to just

42:37

put something out there in the news to take

42:39

down Trump. Look at that that woman who what

42:42

was gosh, she had to vary. Her name

42:44

was like Victory Champion or something, right, what was

42:46

her name? Reality Winner? I

42:48

think it was is that was that

42:50

her name? And look, my name is Buck

42:52

Sexton, I know, but Reality Winners quite

42:55

a name. I

42:57

think she didn't. She get five years in federal

43:00

prison for leaking the classified information

43:04

because she thought that it proved Russia collusion

43:06

or something. I mean, people are hysterical

43:09

inside the government, and they will abuse.

43:11

These hysterical leftists inside the

43:13

government will abuse their sensitive

43:16

and classified access illegally

43:20

as long as it hurts Trump or someone around Trump.

43:23

You just did not have

43:25

this during

43:27

the Obama years. Nobody was risking

43:30

their freedom to try

43:33

to damage Obama in the news cycle

43:35

for a day or two, and nobody in the federal government

43:37

was doing that. They

43:40

just weren't. And of

43:42

course Obama was horrible on leakers, as

43:44

we know. He was the worst abuser

43:47

of the Espionage Act in in American

43:50

history and the most aggressive

43:52

president in dealing with the in going

43:55

after the press probably

43:57

since FDR and Woodrow Wilson,

44:01

so going on a hundred years. But

44:03

the media, you know, they loved Obama. He could do

44:05

no wrong. So they weren't particularly

44:08

they were they were strongly worded letter

44:10

that's not very nice Obama, but they didn't do anything

44:12

serious. They were they certainly weren't opposing the administration

44:15

based on that. But this

44:17

guy who is

44:19

now charged with leaking the

44:22

tax tax information

44:25

about about Michael Cohen, You're

44:27

you're going to see more of this. You We should

44:29

all expect, I fully

44:31

expect that someone is going to leak Trump's

44:34

tax returns at some point. It's just that they're

44:36

waiting to see if the process, if now

44:38

the Democrat Congress can get it. But if if

44:40

they are stymied in this. If

44:42

they're not able to leak Trump's tax returns,

44:45

two things will happen. I think

44:47

I'm making a prediction. I don't know. Somebody

44:50

will just decide from within the IRS, from

44:52

within the government, to violate

44:55

their ethical and legal obligation

44:59

to get Trump's tax returns

45:01

out there. And what

45:03

we will see is a total nothing burger.

45:06

It's gonna make the Mulla

45:08

Report when it comes out look like

45:11

you know, the Godfather series. I mean,

45:13

it's just gonna be so boring.

45:16

There's nothing in Trump's taxes that is

45:18

worth anyone's time. I assure

45:20

you. I

45:22

think he doesn't want to give it out to the public right now,

45:24

just because he doesn't want to, because they keep telling

45:26

him he has to, and that's his Trump's way. But

45:28

you're I think somebody is gonna leak

45:31

from within the IRS. Someone's gonna leak Trump's tax returns,

45:33

that's my and the press is gonna

45:35

say, oh, look at this, we just happen to have the tax

45:37

returns. People are willing to risk

45:40

prison to embarrass this president, and think about that, not

45:42

to expose wrongdoing, to

45:44

embarrass this president or anyone around him.

45:46

That's how Trump's derangement

45:49

syndrome has infected the federal

45:51

bureaucracy. We'll be right back. You

46:08

might be wondering who is getting

46:12

yelled at in this way and where are they're getting yelled at in

46:14

that way? You know what neo

46:18

Nazi was marching through a public square

46:20

somewhere and people started understanding, Oh, it

46:22

wasn't a neo Nazi. It

46:25

was a conservative intellectual of Indian

46:28

parentage and an immigrant to this country

46:31

and a Dartmouth alum who was at Dartmouth

46:33

College. Oh,

46:36

Dartmouth students, it should be

46:38

a shamby of yourself. I mean, these college kids

46:40

are there's such idiots. You know, the conservatives

46:42

don't do the idiotic stuff. They just don't.

46:45

And the numbers don't support this idea that everybody's

46:48

liberal when they're like twenty every No, it's

46:50

not true. It's just that

46:52

there is a greater cultural

46:55

acceptance among leftists

46:58

to act like maniacs because they

47:01

view the other side as immoral. They emotionalize

47:03

all of these topics. They don't think that

47:06

there is a good faith argument to

47:08

be had with the other side. You know that

47:10

that's what's going on here. That's

47:13

what's really happening. They just refuse

47:16

to engage with the other side's ideas,

47:19

and that denish Jasuza is getting heckled

47:21

at his own school. I mean, you know,

47:24

I can't. I can't get into this

47:26

too much detail. But my own college used to

47:28

like to invite me to speak Amherst haven't

47:31

since I've become a conservative in the public eye.

47:34

Nothing crickets, no interest

47:36

in having me come to speak. I was invited at

47:39

least three times, maybe four

47:41

times when I was in the CIA, come

47:43

tell us about foreign policy book, and I did.

47:45

I was happy too, at least once or twice. Now

47:48

though my own school, my own alma

47:51

mater, ashamed of my conservatism,

47:53

no doubt, which is amazing because

47:56

you think about the campus and there must

47:58

be a

48:01

healthy percentage of students who, even if they won't

48:03

tell anybody, are conservative. But they don't get

48:05

to hear their views reflected

48:07

back to them, or they don't even and for the liberal

48:10

students, there's always a part of that feels kind of bad.

48:12

I'm so much better at making liberal arguments

48:14

than liberals are making conservative arguments. They

48:17

don't even know, they're not even exposed to it.

48:20

The one good thing that our team has going for

48:22

us, which is nice, is

48:25

that we have to be able and

48:27

to be a conservative on a campus these days, or

48:29

to be a conservative in media,

48:31

in academia, in law,

48:34

in entertainment. You go down

48:36

the line. If you're going to be conservative

48:38

in any of those areas, you better be

48:41

able to handle yourself and know the issues

48:43

and be able to make the argument, because

48:45

otherwise they're going to chew you up and spit you

48:47

out. Whereas liberals look at AOC,

48:50

look at Okazy Cortez get you get to go

48:52

through life and ignoramus

48:55

with everyone patting you on the head telling you how smart

48:57

you are when you're an idiot. Well, you don't know

48:59

anything, but everybody around you likes

49:01

the things that you say that you've learned to say, that

49:03

you parrot from hearing other people say,

49:06

most of whom, also, by the way, don't know anything.

49:09

And it just becomes this big echo chamber of Oh,

49:11

that's great. Whose streets are streets?

49:13

Let's fix climate change? Social

49:16

justice now, yeah, all that stuff.

49:19

You don't have to even know anything. Oh,

49:22

it's just these things that people say, Oh, you know,

49:24

the dark money in our politics, and

49:26

what are we gonna do about Citizens United. I'm

49:29

always amazed at how people in

49:32

the media, never mind college kids, they'll

49:35

bring up Citizens United and they

49:37

don't know anything about it. I'll say to

49:39

them, So you agree with Citizens United,

49:41

You agree with the idea that a book

49:44

because this is what the government's position. This

49:47

is what the government's position, the Obama administration's

49:49

position was at the time. A book

49:52

should be able to

49:54

be banned, A book

49:57

should be able to be banned in a sixty

49:59

or nine any day window or whatever it was of an election,

50:02

that that doesn't infringe on the First Amendment.

50:04

You think that that's because that was the that was the

50:06

government's position on that. No,

50:09

that's not a good idea. Buck, oh okay, but a

50:11

movie should be able to be banned. But buck

50:13

corporate money from overseas, that's all. They

50:16

don't know what they're talking

50:18

about. They say things about

50:20

big money in politics and say, okay, so yeah,

50:23

you know, the libertarian Koch Brothers give

50:25

money to conservative causes, and there's

50:27

a few others out there that are

50:29

very wealthy who support conservatism. Why

50:32

is that so strange? You know, there's sorrows,

50:34

there's Tom Steyer. There's you know, all

50:36

kinds of billionaires who

50:39

come out and and support

50:41

left wing causes. So what

50:44

is this idea? The left will say things

50:46

like we need to take money out of politics, and

50:49

then you'll say, well, what about all the money you get from X,

50:51

Y and Z sources? What about the money you get from unions?

50:54

From the union, Uh,

50:57

that that doesn't count. That's not bad money, that's good

51:00

money. Oh okay, I'm glad we've established

51:02

that. So a really interesting chart. It's

51:04

actually what got me thinking about all this. And

51:07

it's from some

51:10

kind of a study group I don't know. Unfortunately

51:13

it's cut off here. We've got shared with me today

51:16

though, and it's that forty three

51:18

percent. Sorry, Voters Study Group twenty

51:20

eighteen. I obviously have to give you the source otherwise I'm

51:22

just making up numbers. Voter

51:25

Study Group twenty eighteen. And

51:28

it said that it did a did a big

51:30

poll and says that forty three

51:32

percent of Democrats versus

51:36

seventy percent of Republicans think

51:38

that people should be allowed to express

51:40

unpopular opinions in public, you know, like

51:43

Dnish Dasus at a college campus, even

51:45

those that are deeply offensive. A

51:49

similar proportion of Democrats, by the way,

51:52

openly support speech restrictions,

51:55

so getting close to half

51:57

of Democrats or

52:01

sorry, forty percent of Democrats think

52:04

that there should be speech restrictions,

52:07

and only forty three percent of

52:09

Democrats think that you

52:12

should be able to express unpopular opinions

52:14

in public. These people are authoritarians.

52:17

They because they haven't been exposed

52:19

to those who disagree with them, because

52:22

they just they slam on Fox

52:24

News, they say, the Wall Street journalists, you

52:26

know, garbage, and it's all but the rich plutocrats,

52:29

and you know, every conservative website

52:31

is just conspiracy theories. Because they create

52:33

this false narrative for themselves. They

52:36

never have to challenge any of their assumptions. They

52:38

never have to really know anything,

52:42

which I would think would

52:44

eventually start

52:47

to feel kind of hollow, right, I mean, to just

52:49

surround yourself with people who always agree with

52:51

you. I mean, I work with Libs

52:53

at the Hill, liberals because they're my colleagues.

52:55

I work with liberals at the Hill. I

52:59

have my whole life lived in the bluest

53:01

of blue parts of the country Massachusetts,

53:04

New York, Washington, d C. So

53:08

I've had to deal with liberals all along. I know many of you

53:10

have had the same situation. Even if you

53:12

haven't, you had to deal with it through

53:14

the culture. You've had your assumptions challenge,

53:17

You've seen Christianity being dumped

53:19

on. You've seen Republicans and Trump

53:21

and being treated terribly

53:23

people that are pro life. The

53:26

media thinks you're some kind of troglodyte.

53:28

If your pro life, you know you've dealt

53:30

with all of this. Liberals

53:32

don't have the intellectual resilience

53:35

and honestly, the intellectual dexterity

53:37

and fortitude to handle

53:39

the ideas of the other side, not the same numbers

53:42

that Republicans do. So

53:45

we can take some comfort in that. I guess

53:47

that's a good thing, and I

53:51

do kind of wish in a sense that it would change. I wish

53:53

Democrats would just get with the program a little

53:55

bit here, but I Am not going to hold my breath

53:57

on that one.

54:01

So this video goes viral, the

54:04

mob attacks,

54:07

and you would expect that the mainstream

54:09

media would be responsible

54:11

enough to pause, recognize

54:15

their dealing with a student, investigate

54:19

and make sure that they have the facts

54:22

accurate, that the story

54:24

that they tell is accurate. But

54:27

they didn't pause when it came to Nicholas

54:30

because they wanted to rush out, and they wanted

54:32

to jump into the mob. Give

54:34

the mob a megaphone so

54:36

that they could attack this boy because

54:40

he was white, was Catholic,

54:43

and he was wearing to make America great again.

54:45

Cap think about what this young boy is

54:47

having to deal with at age sixteen, when the

54:49

entire world saw

54:51

him the way the media portrayed him

54:54

as literally the face of evil. It is

54:56

inexcusable, reprehensible conduct

54:58

by the media, and Washington Post

55:00

led the way. Amen.

55:04

Great stuff from the attorney

55:07

for Nicholas Salman, who is going after

55:09

the Washington Post, and I hope he gets a big

55:11

judgment against them. Few reasons why.

55:14

First of all, Washington Post

55:17

is a dumpster fire of liberalism.

55:19

But start we can put

55:21

that aside for the moment. How

55:24

will this ever change unless

55:26

there's accountability. You know, you'll notice

55:28

this is kind of a recurring theme right now. There

55:30

must be accountability for libs, for

55:33

social justice warriors, for

55:36

oh I want to be a victim people, and

55:39

for super aggressive left

55:41

wing maniacs. There must be consequences

55:44

when they break the law, when

55:46

they slander people, when they destroy

55:48

people, when they create a social

55:50

media or real life in person mob

55:53

to go after people. We

55:55

can't let this stuff go. There

55:58

is a an obleegation on

56:01

us to enforce some

56:03

norms of decency,

56:06

some norms of honor

56:09

and integrity in our society. And I'm

56:11

sorry that libs just throw all that stuff

56:13

away and don't really care about it. You know, it's

56:15

whatever gives them the advantage in the

56:17

moment, whatever the political advantage is. But

56:20

we are not going to just sit idly by

56:22

and allow this stuff to happen. All

56:25

right, We're not going to hand our country

56:27

over to a bunch of left wing activists

56:29

who think that they can destroy high

56:32

school kids to make some kind

56:34

of political statement. It

56:37

was disgusting, it was disgraceful,

56:40

and just like what we saw with the Kavanaugh

56:43

hearing, a lot of people who

56:45

were paying attention to what happened with Covington

56:48

Catholic, a lot of them recognized

56:51

that the left wing mob is

56:53

not just something that comes after people like

56:56

me or you know, the people

56:59

at the time of the conservative media

57:02

ecosystem at Fox or you

57:04

know, It's not just people

57:07

like us. It's

57:09

anybody. If you find yourself

57:12

in a circumstance where the left can capitalize

57:15

off the destruction, the

57:17

utter destruction of your reputation,

57:21

your career, your livelihood. They'll

57:24

go for it. Then the social

57:26

media mob, let's it rip. And a lot

57:28

of these journalists, what you see is

57:31

that they think that they can just sort

57:33

of do journalists had on, journalists

57:36

had off. Oh I'm publishing in the Washington

57:38

Post. Oh, I'm just tweeting stuff out on Twitter.

57:40

Sorry, doesn't work that way. Anything

57:43

that you publish under your own

57:45

name, anything you're right under your own name. When you're

57:47

a public person, a journalist, somebody

57:49

who is in the public eye, you must

57:51

be held responsible for. And

57:54

the Washington Post was responsible

57:56

for a smear campaign a bunch of against

57:59

a bunch of high school kids. You

58:01

know, the same media,

58:03

and you know this is just it

58:07

enrages me. The same media that complains about

58:09

how, oh it's Trump has said,

58:11

we're fake news and Trump is so mean to

58:13

us, and why is Trump lay He's what he's

58:15

doing is so dangerous. That

58:17

same media apparatus doesn't

58:20

expect that, or rather isn't willing to

58:23

afford a bunch of high school kids

58:25

not just a benefit of the doubt, but basic journalistic

58:28

standards indecencies. So I hope

58:30

that Sandman and his attorney, his

58:32

attorneys are able to just flip the Washington

58:34

Post upside down and just empty

58:37

out their pockets. I really do.

58:40

I really do. Um there's

58:44

there's more, by the way, because I think there's there's

58:46

more lawsuits according to the Lord, that are going to be filed.

58:50

I even know some of the people that are going to get

58:52

sued, And I understand,

58:55

you know, there there has to be consequences

58:58

to this stuff. You can't just

59:00

go out there. You know, why didn't I jump

59:02

on that? I saw this story, I didn't jump

59:04

on this bandwagon. Didn't seem right to me.

59:07

Something was up, not all the facts,

59:09

too obvious

59:12

that the media had constructed

59:14

this narrative for their own purposes. I

59:16

didn't fall Isn't it interesting? You know, you

59:19

listen to conservative media. If you're listening to this show,

59:21

you listen to a conservative who's got a syndicated

59:23

radio show obviously across the country. But did

59:26

I get Covington Catholic wrong? No?

59:30

I did not. Did I get

59:32

Jesse Smollett wrong? No?

59:35

I did not. Did I get the

59:37

BuzzFeed debacle right before

59:40

Covington Catholic wrong. Mmm, didn't

59:43

buy that one either. Did I get Kavinall

59:45

wrong? No? And I'm not pretending like I'm the only

59:47

one. A lot of my fellow

59:49

conservatives in the media

59:52

saw these things for what they were as well. Not all of

59:54

them were as vocal as I was. But why

59:56

do I keep being right? And the Washington Post

59:58

with its you know, hundreds of millions of

1:00:00

dollars of assets, and the New York Times was

1:00:03

it with its thousand plus

1:00:05

writers and editors and everything else, and C and

1:00:08

N with its you know, it's gold plated

1:00:10

toilet seats. I mean, you know, why

1:00:13

can I figure this stuff out? But they can't?

1:00:16

Does that ever? And when I say I, why

1:00:18

is it that you can figure this stuff out? Too? And

1:00:21

they can't? You knew?

1:00:24

If you didn't know, you wouldn't be listening to the show

1:00:26

because what I said about Smaller would be so offensive,

1:00:29

right, what I was saying about Cavana will be oh,

1:00:31

you know, no, you know, And that's why you listen

1:00:33

to me. But isn't it

1:00:36

isn't it amazing that when you line

1:00:38

up these these inre and don't even

1:00:40

get me started on the Mueller probe and lack

1:00:42

of collusion. I mean, obviously a lot of

1:00:44

US conservatives know that that's total bullcrap.

1:00:48

But why is it that they're allowed to keep

1:00:50

being wrong on these issues and

1:00:52

yet their judgment, in fact, their judgment

1:00:54

is supposed to exceed mine and

1:00:57

yours. They are the smart people

1:00:59

who know all the things, with all the editors

1:01:01

and the fancy you know this, that the other thing

1:01:03

in their offices, but

1:01:06

they keep being wrong and they do

1:01:08

real damage to normal

1:01:10

people. There are hundreds

1:01:12

of lawsuits that are likely be filed Playlip five,

1:01:19

certainly hundreds. The good news

1:01:21

is is that we have two

1:01:23

and a half years to identify and file

1:01:26

lawsuits against the wrongdoers. And

1:01:28

we got a lot of work to do because

1:01:30

the social media and mainstream

1:01:32

mob of bullies was extremely

1:01:35

large in number, and they were very

1:01:37

vocal, and the mainstream media,

1:01:39

like the Washington Post gave

1:01:42

them a megaphone to

1:01:45

go out and to shout to the world

1:01:47

that this young boy had instigated

1:01:50

this event which he did not, had

1:01:53

engaged in behavior swarming around

1:01:55

mister Phillips which he did not, had

1:01:57

blocked mister phillips ability

1:02:00

to leave the scene,

1:02:02

which he did not. He was a child.

1:02:05

He was he was accosted by adults,

1:02:10

accosted by adults, adults who

1:02:13

I would note were acting horribly.

1:02:16

And if you go back and you read that media

1:02:18

coverage, there

1:02:20

was no effort to be honest about this. The

1:02:23

New York Times did a profile of the black

1:02:26

Israelites, had referred

1:02:28

to them as street preachers

1:02:30

or something. I mean, it was a puff piece

1:02:33

on a bunch of adults who

1:02:36

say the most horrific racist,

1:02:39

anti gay, you

1:02:41

know, go go down the line, anti

1:02:43

white. Just these people are.

1:02:46

They're scum. They're

1:02:48

scum people, but

1:02:51

the Times wanted to give them the benefit

1:02:53

of the doubt. I

1:02:55

wish I could just go into the newsrooms in these places

1:02:57

and sit down and be like, who wants to debate this with

1:03:00

me? Who wants to have this conversation? Oh?

1:03:02

You know, we just we just do the

1:03:04

news and in journals, and journalism

1:03:09

is rotten in this country.

1:03:13

Journalism needs to be rooted

1:03:15

out and planted

1:03:18

a new That's

1:03:21

one of the lessons of what we saw with Covington. So

1:03:23

I'm very happy to see that there's going

1:03:25

to be some legal action here. I don't

1:03:28

know if they're

1:03:30

going to be successful. I certainly hope they

1:03:32

will be successful, but

1:03:35

we can't. This is just like the

1:03:37

Jesse smaller thing. You know, we are conservatives,

1:03:40

we have lives, we are we are good,

1:03:42

decent people that try to do the ethical

1:03:44

thing, that like to show mercy and forgiveness,

1:03:47

and but we can't just get slapped in the

1:03:49

face all the time and do nothing. We

1:03:51

can't allow the system

1:03:53

such as it is, to always

1:03:56

undermine and destroy

1:03:59

people like us. I'm

1:04:01

sorry, you know, I'm not saying that

1:04:03

we have some persecution complex and

1:04:05

oh we know, woe is us whatever, But you

1:04:07

see it happening from the media perspective,

1:04:10

it's just reality. They

1:04:13

are trying to destroy their

1:04:15

political opponents however they can. They're trying

1:04:17

to sell a certain kind of narrative

1:04:20

to their largely delusional audience.

1:04:23

Whether it's on Russia collusion, or

1:04:25

Covington or Kavanaugh or you name it.

1:04:27

It's

1:04:29

wrong. And I hope

1:04:31

that there is some justice for Covington

1:04:34

and in that for all the rest of us as

1:04:36

well. A

1:04:44

bunch of let that's right,

1:04:46

just like you're damn Donald Truck. Look

1:04:49

all these dusty crackers with

1:04:52

that racist garbage. One. Look at these dirty

1:04:55

cracks. Look

1:04:58

at these dirty crackers. The

1:05:01

Black Israelites said to the Cummington

1:05:04

High School students, dirty crackers.

1:05:08

Anybody anybody find that offensive? I wanted

1:05:10

to play this before we got into the break. I just got so

1:05:12

caught up in the moment that I skipped over the clip

1:05:16

dirty crackers. They said, that's

1:05:19

remember, the Black Israelites are the

1:05:21

people along with that guy

1:05:23

um from forgetting

1:05:25

his name now, the Native American activist

1:05:28

guy. They were the

1:05:30

ones and all of you're

1:05:32

yelling his name because you remember, and I just blanked

1:05:34

on it for a second, but they were the ones that the

1:05:38

media was siding with against

1:05:40

the kids. You know that there really

1:05:42

is this this deep seated

1:05:45

disdain on the left for

1:05:48

people that fall into certain categories. If

1:05:50

you if you are a white

1:05:53

kid who goes to a Catholic

1:05:55

school, which I assume you have to pay, it's not a public

1:05:58

school. A white kid goes to a Catholic

1:06:00

school who supports Trump, they

1:06:02

think you're the enemy. And there's

1:06:04

no, Oh, we're gonna give them

1:06:06

a little bit of leeway because their kids and no, no

1:06:08

no, because they're just gonna grow up to be big maga

1:06:10

supporters later on, right, so they they

1:06:13

figure might as well take care of them right

1:06:15

now, might as well decide

1:06:18

to ruin their lives as as quickly

1:06:21

as possible. It's

1:06:23

it's a troubling circumstance, to be sure,

1:06:25

by the way. I didn't want to skip over because

1:06:29

obviously this is a major news

1:06:31

story, and in what

1:06:33

we have to find out more

1:06:36

about the facts of the case,

1:06:38

such as they are. But from what

1:06:40

we understand right now, there

1:06:42

was a plot

1:06:45

that was stopped

1:06:48

from a white nationalist who

1:06:51

was trying to just trying to kill a whole

1:06:53

bunch of people. He

1:06:55

was in the I believe in the Coast Guard. Right, Yeah,

1:06:58

here we go. I'm Drea. This is a from

1:07:00

the guy I'm dreaming of a way to kill almost every

1:07:02

last person on earth. According

1:07:05

to this Coastguard lieutenant

1:07:08

and self identified white nationalist, Christopher

1:07:11

Paul Hassan is his name, he

1:07:13

wanted focused violence to establish a white

1:07:15

homeland and said I'm dreaming of a way to kill almost

1:07:17

every last person on earth. The

1:07:20

indictment of him says the defendant intends to murder

1:07:23

innocent civilians on a scale rarely seen

1:07:25

in this country, and they're

1:07:27

holding him on Roman not letting him out, and

1:07:31

he also bought a stash of steroids and narcotics,

1:07:34

apparently to make it easier for him to sustain

1:07:37

wounds, probably bullet wounds when he went

1:07:39

on this spree. There

1:07:42

are evil people of all

1:07:44

kinds of ideologies and backgrounds,

1:07:47

that much is for sure. This is somebody

1:07:50

who, assuming the facts that

1:07:52

we have here are true and so far there's no reason

1:07:54

to believe that they're not, should spend the rest

1:07:56

of his life in prison, no

1:07:59

question. I think

1:08:01

it's it's interesting me also that you know he's somebody who

1:08:03

he stockpiled all these weapons, that went through

1:08:05

all these procedures. I'm wondering what the

1:08:09

how they got him. I didn't see that today. I'm assuming

1:08:11

they probably got an informant near him, but maybe

1:08:13

they had something else that tipped

1:08:15

them off to it. But now

1:08:17

you're going to get into this discussion. As

1:08:20

always, this is where it always goes of. See,

1:08:23

the real threat that we face

1:08:26

is from white nationalist domestic

1:08:28

terrorists, not Islamic radicals.

1:08:30

This is what they always say. And

1:08:33

to this I have to I

1:08:35

have to always take a moment, take a beat, and say, okay,

1:08:37

let's go, let's go over this again. When

1:08:40

a white nationalist decides

1:08:42

to engage in an active mass murder,

1:08:46

he, based on the

1:08:48

history of this and cases

1:08:51

in the past, overwhelmingly is

1:08:53

acting on his own is

1:08:55

acting based on a sense of perceived

1:08:58

you know, heightened grieving, and is

1:09:02

sociopathic or psychopathic. And

1:09:05

it's a terrible event. We should stop them,

1:09:08

and if we can't stop them, we should lock them up,

1:09:10

or more than lock them up as soon as we catch

1:09:13

them. Anybody who does this. But if you're

1:09:15

going to compare and this, I already saw this happening

1:09:17

today. And you know, Corey Booker recently

1:09:19

said, oh, the real threat in this country is

1:09:22

from white nationalist terrorism. The

1:09:25

moment you dig into it and you look at

1:09:27

the numbers for the last twenty years,

1:09:30

it is not even close. How

1:09:33

many more people have been killed in this country

1:09:35

by Islamic radical terrorism

1:09:38

than any other form. It

1:09:40

is not even close. How much more

1:09:42

in terms of resources and security

1:09:44

procedures. And you know we have a TSA not

1:09:47

because of white nationalists. We

1:09:49

all know this. We've

1:09:51

had to dramatically change and have

1:09:54

changed US foreign policy, spent

1:09:57

trillions of dollars overseas trying

1:09:59

to root out Islamic radicalism, and when an

1:10:01

Islamic radical acts in this country,

1:10:03

they do so with a

1:10:07

a belief that

1:10:10

is supported by tens of millions

1:10:12

of people around the world based on the numbers

1:10:14

based on the Pew polling, and is

1:10:16

often supported by entire nation states,

1:10:19

places where there are millionaires

1:10:21

and billionaires. That's right, who will

1:10:23

send money to these kinds of groups, you

1:10:26

know. So it's just in terms

1:10:28

of scale, sophistication and threat, it's not

1:10:31

even close. Was this Coastguard lieutenant

1:10:33

a serious threat, a real problem, and a

1:10:36

just terrible human

1:10:39

being? Yes, all of that is true.

1:10:42

Is a good work by the FBI to take him down,

1:10:44

Absolutely fantastic and they should

1:10:46

be praised for this. Does

1:10:49

this mean that the real threat? If you're

1:10:51

gonna ask me, as a former counter terrorism analyst,

1:10:53

somebody actually did that for a living. It's the real

1:10:55

threat now, white nationalism and not Islamic radicalism.

1:10:58

No, that is fall The numbers

1:11:00

do not support it. Nothing

1:11:03

on a strategic global level supports it.

1:11:05

So let's just understand

1:11:08

what's real here and what's not and keep

1:11:10

things in context. Every

1:11:15

business in every industry needs to

1:11:17

be sure that the people that they're

1:11:19

bringing in are the people they think they are

1:11:21

right. I mean, that's why background checks are so

1:11:24

important. It's also a liability issue. Whoever

1:11:26

you bring in there, you've got to be able to trust and know

1:11:28

that the information they provided you is

1:11:30

correct. That's why Global Verification

1:11:32

Network is the best choice for you

1:11:34

for background investigations and vetting.

1:11:37

They are a dual certified, in fact, the only

1:11:39

dual certified veteran owned and operated

1:11:41

background investigation in vetting company, and

1:11:43

they're headquartered in Chicago with risk mitigation

1:11:46

experts spread across the country. Call

1:11:49

them right now, just tell them what your

1:11:51

needs are, tell them what your business is. They will

1:11:53

tailor a plan for background checks

1:11:55

to your needs. Eight seven seven

1:11:58

six nine five one one seven

1:12:00

nine again eight seven seven six

1:12:02

nine five one one seven nine.

1:12:04

Or if you want to just do it online, go to my

1:12:07

GVN dot com. That's MYGVN

1:12:10

dot com Global Verification Network.

1:12:13

Leave no stone unturned. I

1:12:18

know that the media is going to work overtime

1:12:21

to try and create this image

1:12:24

of Bernie Sanders as this cuddly guy who's

1:12:26

up in Vermont and he just wants to give everybody

1:12:28

to free stuff. And he wants to be friends with everybody.

1:12:30

And no one pays for college, no one

1:12:32

pays for healthcare, no one pays for food.

1:12:36

I understand that that's where they want

1:12:38

to take this. That's going to

1:12:40

be the overwhelming media

1:12:43

effort around this issue, around the issue

1:12:45

of Sanders candidacy. I'm

1:12:47

here to just remind everybody that this

1:12:49

is a guy who, as an adult. I'm

1:12:52

not talking about going back in time and digging

1:12:55

up old tweets or you

1:12:57

know, talking about herebook photos or any

1:13:00

anything like that. This is a guy who, as an

1:13:02

adult and

1:13:04

somebody was already in public life, decided

1:13:09

for the old tweets. I'm in for people that were teenagers

1:13:11

then, which would not Bernie

1:13:13

Sanders would not count in that. In that regard,

1:13:17

Bernie Sanders is somebody who had a very

1:13:19

clear sympathy with

1:13:22

a system that had enslaved hundreds

1:13:25

of millions of people around the world for decades,

1:13:28

and a system that had created that had

1:13:30

been propping up the Soviet Union

1:13:32

and communism a

1:13:34

true mortal threat to the United States

1:13:38

and some of the little satellites

1:13:40

of that Soviet Communist

1:13:43

menace. Bernie Sanders

1:13:45

was quite fond of them. And

1:13:48

we should, we should. You know, this is all fair

1:13:51

game, folks. He was an adult, he spent

1:13:53

time there. This is like when

1:13:56

what's his name of, Deblasio Kasa

1:13:58

Virham, Deblasio Warren

1:14:02

or sorry, Warren Wilhelm build a Blasio, same

1:14:04

guy, and when he went I

1:14:06

think too, I think it was down

1:14:08

to Nicaragua to hang out with the Sandinistas.

1:14:10

I mean, these people who do this stuff, think

1:14:12

about that. Of all the places you go in the

1:14:14

world, Bernie Sanders honeymoons in the Soviet

1:14:17

Unions. That

1:14:19

is an utterly bizarre thing to

1:14:21

do, especially at a time when you

1:14:23

remember the culture. I mean, hey, I saw

1:14:25

Rocky four right, it was very

1:14:27

clear who was on our team who

1:14:30

was on their team. You're gonna go over to Sylviet Union

1:14:32

to come back to the great great transportation

1:14:35

and breadlines are wonderful because you're in

1:14:37

the line and then when you wait for

1:14:39

six seven hours, the stale bread

1:14:41

waiting for you free. This

1:14:44

is disconcerting because

1:14:47

I do think that Bernie is going to be, at

1:14:49

least for a while, their front runner. They

1:14:51

may have to switch somebody else out for Bernie

1:14:54

as Moore comes out about him, and I

1:14:57

do think people keep saying, well, Trump is I'm sorry,

1:14:59

seventy two, who is not seventy seven?

1:15:02

You know, he's even older. He's

1:15:04

even more past

1:15:06

the red line of being able to

1:15:09

carry the presidency based on

1:15:11

energy and the decision

1:15:13

making processes that do take it

1:15:16

out on people. Play

1:15:19

clip sixteen here this is burn. I remember,

1:15:22

for some reason other being very excited when when

1:15:24

Fidel Cashtro made the revolution in Cuba, and I

1:15:26

was a kid, and I remember reading that and it was

1:15:28

just seemed right inappropriate that poor people

1:15:30

were rising up against rather ugly rich

1:15:33

people. And I remember it again very

1:15:35

distinctly, a very distinct feeling. I

1:15:37

was watching the debates, you remember the famous Nixon

1:15:39

Kennedy debates. That was the first time in the presidential

1:15:42

candidates actually debated, and I

1:15:44

was becoming increasingly entrusted in politics. Didn't

1:15:46

know much, but was interesting. I remember sitting in the student lounge

1:15:48

at our dormitory watching the debate, and

1:15:51

at that time we could talk about Cuban.

1:15:53

Now, I was very excited and press play the Cuban

1:15:55

Revolution. We should deal firmly

1:15:57

with Fidel Cashtro and Nixon was playing the role

1:15:59

of hey, you gotta be patient. You

1:16:01

know, you can't do these things. You gotta negotiate. What of

1:16:03

course, what he was upset about is that secretly

1:16:05

they were planning the Bay of Pigs invasion right then.

1:16:08

So he he was the liberal

1:16:11

and Kennedy was playing the conservative. And actually

1:16:13

you know they're When you read novels, people say there's a sick

1:16:15

feeling in yourself. Usually I'm sufficiently

1:16:18

unemotional not to be sick, but actually got off in the

1:16:20

room and almost left the public. You

1:16:23

can't criticize Cuba,

1:16:26

or Bernie might puke on your shoes.

1:16:30

That's that's a that's a conversation

1:16:32

that some of my friends who are Cuban, who

1:16:35

are true refugees by the way, from Cuba,

1:16:38

people who had to flee. I

1:16:40

know people that their families,

1:16:42

lands and property were confiscated,

1:16:47

that they were under

1:16:49

under real threat of torture and imprisonment

1:16:52

and even execution if they

1:16:55

weren't able to get

1:16:57

out of the country. And I wonder what Bernie

1:16:59

would say to those people. Well,

1:17:02

we have some sense of it. In that clip he said, rising

1:17:04

up against the ugly rich people.

1:17:08

Why is it if if we're supposed

1:17:10

to get Sweden, if the Democrats

1:17:13

today, the Occasio

1:17:15

Cortez is the Elizabeth Warrens. If

1:17:17

the left wing socialist Democrats

1:17:19

in America are promising

1:17:22

Denmark for us, why

1:17:24

do they still have a sweet spot for Cuba?

1:17:27

What is it about a country that

1:17:29

imprisons people for their politics,

1:17:32

imprisons and persecutes

1:17:35

homosexuals, has executed

1:17:38

political prisoners by the thousands, stretching

1:17:40

back into the early days of

1:17:43

Chegavara and the

1:17:45

revolution in Cuba? Right,

1:17:48

what is it about Cuba

1:17:50

that still strikes this chord

1:17:52

where there's some degree of fondness

1:17:55

in the hearts of American democratic

1:17:58

socialists. You know, why

1:18:01

is it that the only people who look at Venezuela

1:18:04

and think, WHOA, Let's not get

1:18:06

too involved there. Let's not

1:18:08

even send food to starving

1:18:10

people. I'm not talking about military force. Let's

1:18:13

not even send humanitarian

1:18:15

aid. We should because that

1:18:17

will obviously make the regime look bad. If America

1:18:20

has to feed the people, right, and that's going to help push

1:18:22

this coup along they call it. I mean, the last

1:18:24

election was a farce. Maduro

1:18:27

cheated. We're supposed to believe at

1:18:29

institutions, We're supposed to believe that

1:18:33

you can't cheat and get away with it, at

1:18:35

least in this country. But in Venezuela

1:18:37

they'll say, oh no, that's that's just how

1:18:39

they were doing things there. Maduro he

1:18:41

had to play a little dirty, but he's still the president.

1:18:44

The only people that come to Maduro's

1:18:47

aid in this country are the leftist socialists.

1:18:49

Why you know, I think it's

1:18:51

worth asking these questions. It's

1:18:54

one thing to say I love Sweden, I love

1:18:56

Denmark. I want America to be like those

1:18:59

countries. Right If Bernie wants to be the mayor

1:19:01

of Stockholm and sit

1:19:03

in the White House when he does it, that's that's

1:19:05

one thing. But you'll notice

1:19:08

that when it comes to Nicaragua, when

1:19:10

it comes to what's

1:19:12

happened in Venezuela

1:19:14

and now for decades with

1:19:16

Cuba, the left

1:19:19

in this country has a fondness

1:19:21

for those for those nations. And I

1:19:23

don't mean for the people, I mean for the regimes,

1:19:26

for the governing systems. I'm

1:19:30

sorry, but to be able to go back

1:19:32

and to hear somebody like Bernie Sanders

1:19:35

praising the Soviet Union, openly

1:19:39

longing for the days of Cuba's

1:19:41

revolution against the quote ugly rich

1:19:43

people. Why

1:19:46

why should we think that his mentality has really

1:19:48

changed that much. Because he's old now and a little cookier.

1:19:51

It seems a little a little more like the like

1:19:54

the crazy grandpa that you gotta make

1:19:56

sure it doesn't wander out into the snow in his underwear.

1:19:58

I mean, what is it about

1:20:00

Bernie Sanders? Now, that's

1:20:02

so he's talking about free healthcare, he's talking

1:20:04

about soaking the rich with taxes. What

1:20:07

qualifies as rich? By the way, that's always

1:20:09

a This is like when people say, do

1:20:11

you believe in climate change? And this is a nonsense

1:20:14

question because even if I do, what do we

1:20:16

do about it? And how much climate change?

1:20:19

How much climate change am I supposed to be worried about?

1:20:21

Here? To what degree? When

1:20:23

you say that you're only going to tax the rich, which Occasio

1:20:26

Cortez and Warren and

1:20:29

name a Democrat who's not an establishment

1:20:32

kind of Wall Street Hollywood friendly.

1:20:34

Although Hollywood is actually very behind Bernie

1:20:36

Sanders. There's a lot of big money in Hollywood

1:20:39

that likes Bernie Sanders, but they

1:20:41

all want to tax the rich more

1:20:43

in order to fund these enormously expensive

1:20:46

social programs. And so I do think we should

1:20:48

ask the question. Okay, so given

1:20:51

that reality what

1:20:54

makes somebody rich? Are

1:20:56

we really going to walk around and pretend that somebody who makes twenty

1:20:58

million dollars is the same financial

1:21:01

footage as somebody who makes two hundred thousand dollars.

1:21:05

And how do we pay for all these programs

1:21:07

that they talk about? When if you took

1:21:09

every dollar that is made by

1:21:11

people over ten million

1:21:13

a year in this country, you just seized all of

1:21:15

it, you wouldn't be able to fund the

1:21:18

stuff that these democrats are talking about because

1:21:20

there aren't that many people who make that much money. The

1:21:24

money is in the middle class.

1:21:26

The money is in folks

1:21:29

who are just showing up, doing jobs, paying

1:21:32

their bills, and doing things the right way.

1:21:35

And when I mean the money from a from

1:21:37

a taxation perspective, that's where it

1:21:39

really really moves the needle.

1:21:42

So what they'll try to do, what Sanders is going to

1:21:44

do is one tell us that it's

1:21:46

not fair to point to Venezuela. It's not fair

1:21:48

to point to Cuba and say that's

1:21:51

socialism for you. This is where socialism leads

1:21:53

because look at these European countries. And

1:21:56

he's going to hope that people don't pay attention to

1:21:59

one the the bureaucracy

1:22:01

in those European countries. That would be like trying

1:22:03

to make socialism work in you

1:22:05

know, Rhode Island or Maine. All

1:22:08

right, it's not making it work in a country

1:22:10

of three hundred and twenty million people start

1:22:12

start with that, and

1:22:15

we're talking about countries like Denmark and Sweden.

1:22:17

These are these are the size of a

1:22:20

US state, one

1:22:22

US state, and not even the biggest ones. So

1:22:26

he's hoping that people don't pay attention to

1:22:28

the scope and scale of the projects

1:22:30

that he's really talking about. And

1:22:32

he doesn't want to dig into the fondness

1:22:35

that the left has for all of these socialist

1:22:37

regimes, which just keeps coming up. Right, they

1:22:39

there were New York Times articles praising Venezuela

1:22:41

in twenty twelve. Maybe they're gonna make this whole thing

1:22:44

work. And I

1:22:46

think that in an era when we're told that there's

1:22:48

somebody who might be doing

1:22:50

Russia's interest, right, Trump is he's Putin's

1:22:53

puppet, and all this stuff is Sanders

1:22:55

a communist puppet because

1:22:58

he used to like communism a lot. Now he says

1:23:00

socialism. But if you were

1:23:02

going to get a communist to be the president the United states.

1:23:04

Wouldn't he have to say that he was a democratic socialist

1:23:07

first? I think it's fair

1:23:09

to ask the question. AARP

1:23:13

is a very well known organization

1:23:16

for seniors, but if you dig a little

1:23:18

deeper, you find out that

1:23:21

aarps pretty left wing. They support

1:23:23

things like government run healthcare,

1:23:26

They are not strong on our southern

1:23:28

border. They want higher taxes for the middle

1:23:30

class. You don't want any of that stuff, So how about

1:23:32

you join an organization for seniors that represents

1:23:35

your conservative values and gets

1:23:37

you a lot of great benefits AMAC.

1:23:40

Why do I recommend AMAC? Will? AMAC

1:23:42

will get you the discounts on car insurance,

1:23:44

hotels, roadside assistants, dental plans,

1:23:47

even sell service options, lots

1:23:49

of things to make your life easier and save you money. But

1:23:52

also AMAC supports

1:23:55

conservative policy, fixing

1:23:57

social security, protecting our southern

1:23:59

border, strong military. You need

1:24:01

to check out AMAC. Join right now

1:24:03

at AMAC dot us slash buck.

1:24:06

That's AMAC dot

1:24:08

us slash buck. I

1:24:14

know that everyone's focused on a hoax hate

1:24:16

crime today, but turns out there are in

1:24:18

fact real hate crimes

1:24:20

out there, as you no doubt already no,

1:24:23

but they're not always against individuals

1:24:26

who are in a protected group.

1:24:28

It's not always the intersectional

1:24:30

left that is somehow being attacked.

1:24:33

Sometimes just being a conservative

1:24:35

can get you punched in the face.

1:24:38

We have Benny Johnson with us now. Benny

1:24:40

is the creative director at Turning Point

1:24:43

USA, formerly of The Daily Caller, also

1:24:45

a colleague of mine from the Blaze days. Mister

1:24:48

Johnson, great to have you on. Hey,

1:24:50

thanks, Buck, appreciate it. So you

1:24:53

have this video you've been sharing of, Well,

1:24:55

tell us what happened first, then we'll actually play

1:24:57

the audio. I wish people could see it because it's vicious,

1:24:59

But tell us what happened. Sure.

1:25:02

So Turning Point is a

1:25:05

young conservative engagement

1:25:08

organization, nonprofit.

1:25:10

We make sure that conservatives across

1:25:12

the country and on campuses all over the country

1:25:15

all have opportunity and access to free

1:25:17

market ideas and free market

1:25:20

content. And so one of our one

1:25:22

of our students, member of our organization,

1:25:25

was on the campus of UC Berkeley in

1:25:27

California, a

1:25:29

particularly liberal campus, and

1:25:32

was merely tabling. It's something that

1:25:34

happens normally on a college campus. You share

1:25:37

material and ideas. This is just a

1:25:39

free speech ideas and zone

1:25:42

and a angry leftist of

1:25:44

whom we do not know the identity of just yet and

1:25:46

cannot confirm if they were an

1:25:48

actual student at Berkeley. But an angry leftist

1:25:51

came up and assaulted, committed

1:25:54

a violent act against one of our

1:25:56

students, punched him in the face,

1:26:00

cause quite a bit of damage. Um,

1:26:03

and it's a horrific, horrific

1:26:05

violent act. Now,

1:26:08

Benny, we're gonna play the audio from this play

1:26:10

at John Jesus

1:26:14

Clay what

1:26:30

oh

1:26:33

so a lot of profanity here, because what's happening

1:26:35

is you got the Turning Point USA kid, and you go to

1:26:37

Benny Johnson's Twitter account and you can

1:26:39

see it. He's he's been sharing it. You

1:26:41

got a guy from Turning Point. He's just trying to

1:26:43

get get young conservatives to sign

1:26:46

up, and some considerably larger

1:26:48

dude comes along, clearly and deranged

1:26:51

leftist assaults him and then land's

1:26:53

a really nasty punch right right in the kid's

1:26:55

face. Benny, how's he doing, by the way,

1:26:57

and how's he how's the young man who was attacked reacting

1:27:00

into this? Yeah, it's

1:27:02

it's bad. We're keeping his identity,

1:27:06

is making sure that he is safe right

1:27:08

now. But I've seen photos

1:27:11

of the injury. It's a very very

1:27:13

bad injury. It was a very very bad punch. And

1:27:15

this is again on a college campus. And

1:27:18

the victim here, who's a victim

1:27:20

of a politically inspired hate crime. You have

1:27:22

to call it that. That is exactly what this is. He's

1:27:24

being targeted for his personal beliefs. This

1:27:27

is a hate crime. This victim

1:27:29

was merely saying that he is a conservative

1:27:32

and being a mouthpiece

1:27:35

for some conservative ideas on the campus

1:27:37

of Berkeley. That is all of

1:27:39

the information we know right now. This is not a fight,

1:27:41

This was on instigation. This was not a violent

1:27:44

riot. This was just a young conservative

1:27:47

saying something conservative on a college

1:27:49

campus. And what does he get for it? Pulled

1:27:51

off and punched in the face to

1:27:53

the point of a horrific personal

1:27:56

injury. It's

1:27:58

really bad by Berkeley right

1:28:00

now. Buck is actually asking

1:28:03

for any information to identify

1:28:06

who committed the violent act, they said in

1:28:08

a statement just released now, but they

1:28:10

strongly condemned this. And then

1:28:12

Berkeley is a campus that believes

1:28:15

in commitment in freedom of expression, So

1:28:17

we afford to working with the authorities and

1:28:19

bringing justice to this

1:28:22

hate crime. For this hate

1:28:24

crime against political opinion.

1:28:28

I remember when the coxin on my crew

1:28:30

team in college, who was a very

1:28:32

small guy. Because coxins have to be because

1:28:35

of the weight in the boat. It's important

1:28:37

you get somebody who's and oftentimes it's actually

1:28:39

have female coxin on an all male crew team. But I

1:28:41

remember he got he got debt by

1:28:43

a person he had never talked to and had

1:28:45

never met at a party on campus.

1:28:48

It's a good thing I wasn't there. He was a good friend of

1:28:50

mine and I would have had to take matters into my own hands.

1:28:53

But he got decked out, broke

1:28:55

his glasses, gave him a black guy. And

1:28:57

it's just I bring this up, Benny, because I

1:29:00

cannot. I mean, that's a personal experience. You're

1:29:02

now spreading what happened

1:29:04

here on UC Berkeley. I can't

1:29:06

think of an instance where a conservative student

1:29:09

has walked up to a crazy

1:29:11

lib on campus, which obviously there are tons

1:29:13

of them, and punched one of them in the face. I

1:29:16

can rattle off lots of instances

1:29:18

of people who were punched for being

1:29:20

conservatives. Yes, at

1:29:22

turning point, we are actually producing right

1:29:25

now a long video

1:29:27

that shows the instances of violence, just

1:29:29

the notable instances of violence over the last

1:29:31

two years from the left there

1:29:34

are major instances that made national

1:29:36

news. For instance, the young

1:29:38

Maga hat wearing kid who was just

1:29:40

a teenager at a water burger had

1:29:42

his hat taken soda thrown in his face.

1:29:45

A pro life supporter in Canada

1:29:48

had her phone kicked and herself like kicked

1:29:50

across the face by a

1:29:52

pro choice activist. And then just

1:29:55

dozens and dozens and dozens of Antifa

1:29:58

incidence of Antifa islands

1:30:00

that cause major injury,

1:30:03

major damage to businesses

1:30:06

and to the public sector. And a lot of this

1:30:08

violence is directed at police, a lot

1:30:10

of this violence is directed at at the

1:30:12

authorities. It's it

1:30:15

is absolutely impossible

1:30:17

to make the case that there is

1:30:19

that there's an equitable level of violence

1:30:22

between the right and the left. The left has

1:30:25

an enormous amount of incidence

1:30:27

of violence against innocent

1:30:30

people generally hate crimes because

1:30:32

of political opinion. Benny,

1:30:34

Where can people go to see the work you're doing a turning

1:30:37

point and also to follow up on this story. Yeah,

1:30:40

so I'm going to be I'm going to be on

1:30:42

Twitter very active about this in

1:30:44

the next twenty four hours. Is things develop, we

1:30:47

are going to be looking into pursuing

1:30:49

all actions in order to defend

1:30:53

our campus representative.

1:30:56

And as of right now, what

1:30:58

we're looking at bucks to bring

1:31:00

justice and identify who the person was that

1:31:03

committed hate crime, the committed this

1:31:05

act of hate political hate crime, and

1:31:08

so they can go to Turning Point USA on

1:31:10

social media, maybe go to Benny Johnson on

1:31:12

Twitter. All right, Benny, stay on this one

1:31:15

man, and thank you so much for calling in. Good to talk to you.

1:31:17

Thank you. Buck. Team will be right

1:31:19

back. Such

1:31:24

a bunch of snowflakes in the mainstream

1:31:27

media. I mentioned this yesterday.

1:31:29

Sarah is Gert somebody

1:31:32

whom I know, and in fact, those

1:31:34

of you who used to watch real

1:31:36

News back in the day, we'll remember Sarah

1:31:38

had shorter hair, perhaps

1:31:41

a slightly different personal

1:31:43

style, but she was a not

1:31:46

frequent but she had multiple

1:31:48

appearances on real News. On

1:31:51

the Blaze TV, which was the

1:31:53

best obviously other than Glenn Show

1:31:55

for those of you who are glennback fans, was the best show ever

1:31:58

to be in my opinion, on the

1:32:00

Blaze TV, which was Real News.

1:32:02

That panel turned out to be a young

1:32:04

conservative all star panel, just not everybody

1:32:06

knew it at the time. But we've all gone off to

1:32:08

do bigger things in the media

1:32:11

sphere anyway, Sarah

1:32:13

Sarah Izger is getting

1:32:15

all kinds of heat and hate from

1:32:19

the left because she has worked for Republicans

1:32:22

and now she's in a position

1:32:25

of being an editorial

1:32:28

editorial position in the CNN newsroom

1:32:31

going into twenty twenty, and they are freaking

1:32:34

out. In fact, the DNC bunch

1:32:37

of cry babies over there, they're freaking out.

1:32:40

Two. The Democratic National

1:32:42

Committee has sought and received assurances

1:32:44

from CNN. This is from The Daily Beast today

1:32:47

that the network's new politics editor,

1:32:49

Sarah Izger, will not be

1:32:52

involved in the debates that the channel hosts

1:32:54

and moderates for the Democratic Party. The

1:32:56

assurances were provided after the Committee express

1:32:58

reservations to CNN

1:33:00

over Iger's history in Republican

1:33:03

politics, and after officials at

1:33:05

the committee raised concerns over her

1:33:07

alleged connections to a now

1:33:09

retracted Fox News story on the

1:33:11

debunked Seth Rich conspiracy theory.

1:33:14

Guys, this is pathetic, But

1:33:16

this really shows you who the mainstream media

1:33:18

is. What a bunch of whiny,

1:33:21

delusional cry babies they are.

1:33:24

Oh, I'm sorry, Candy Crowley

1:33:26

is a nonpartisan debate moderator.

1:33:29

Remember or who did

1:33:31

call it a terrorist attack during

1:33:33

the Romney Obama debate, remember that, or

1:33:36

mister Robin who did call it a

1:33:39

terror You know? Nope, sorry,

1:33:41

Candy, he did not. Obama

1:33:43

did not call it terrorist attack. But you know, fake

1:33:46

Tapper, what about him? Guy

1:33:48

worked for a Democrat congressional

1:33:52

aspirant and even worse than my view,

1:33:54

was part of the organization that became

1:33:56

the Brady Campaign to end gun violence.

1:33:58

That's right for an anti group. Oh

1:34:00

yeah, he's so nonpartisan.

1:34:03

George Stephanopolis was a Clinton

1:34:05

White House aide and he's

1:34:08

one of the most revered anchors in mainstream

1:34:10

media. I mean, it's sold. These people

1:34:12

are full of it. That's why they have to hide

1:34:14

their little pampered anchors from

1:34:16

having to have these discussions

1:34:18

in places where they can't control how

1:34:21

much time, who's there, who's showing up

1:34:23

when they go to commercial. They'll

1:34:25

never do it. They will never do it.

1:34:28

The mainstream media knows that there their

1:34:31

days are numbered with at least

1:34:33

the the patina,

1:34:35

the veneer of journalistic

1:34:38

integrity that they've been clinging to for all these

1:34:40

decades. That they know that their their

1:34:42

time I think is coming to an end. And

1:34:46

I read this a very interesting producer

1:34:48

Mike actually flagged it from me, this interview with Barry

1:34:50

Diller. Some of you might know Barry Diller.

1:34:52

He was ahead of I

1:34:54

forget Paramount Studios, I think or one of

1:34:56

the big Hollywood studios then was He's

1:35:00

He's been head of IAC, he was on the

1:35:02

board of the Washington Post. He's a big mover and shaker

1:35:05

in the media world. Help

1:35:07

found Expedia. I think or was involved

1:35:09

early on with Expedia. Anyway, he's

1:35:12

tender. You know, hey, swipe

1:35:14

left, swipe swipe right. You can thank

1:35:16

Barry Diller. He

1:35:18

was just saying how it used to be the

1:35:20

in this interview that the Hollywood studios

1:35:23

were the biggest thing, and the

1:35:26

network television got kind of

1:35:28

bought up by the studios. But it was all part of

1:35:30

this system. Right now, the system has

1:35:32

changed. Now the big kids on the block

1:35:34

are Google, Amazon, Facebook.

1:35:37

Now Silicon Valley has

1:35:40

more control over the content

1:35:42

funnels than anything

1:35:45

than anything else in the whole game. So

1:35:47

this is all shifting. And that's why I'm

1:35:49

trying to tell you early on that the

1:35:52

Netflix is and the Amazons and

1:35:54

the you know, these entities

1:35:56

are going to give the left and even

1:35:59

greater leg up than they've

1:36:01

had in the past, unless we start

1:36:03

to hold them to account for their biases

1:36:05

and also consider, you know, alternative

1:36:08

means of well, alternative

1:36:10

platforms. Quite honestly, you know,

1:36:12

nobody wants to believe this, but you

1:36:15

know, Twitter bands conservatives. It does not

1:36:17

ban liberals unless they're making

1:36:19

death threats, and even then it rarely

1:36:21

bans them. Nobody believes

1:36:23

it, but it's true anyway

1:36:26

that the DNC is

1:36:28

so scared, like a bunch

1:36:30

of little shivering snowflakes,

1:36:32

that they can have Sarah Izger go

1:36:34

work at CNN. I mean, I like Sarah.

1:36:37

She's a nice lady. Kind of feel bad

1:36:39

that she's going to be in the lions Den over there

1:36:41

because she's gonna find out real soon not a

1:36:43

good place, not an honest organization.

1:36:46

And there's some good people there, but a

1:36:48

lot of bad people, and the bad

1:36:50

people are the ones running things. Now. The

1:36:58

show ain't over yet, folks, keeping

1:37:03

it real, It's

1:37:06

time for roll call. That's

1:37:20

one of my favorite role call indrows of all the ones

1:37:22

we do. Quick note

1:37:24

for next week. Some

1:37:27

of you are probably familiar with

1:37:30

SEPACK, the Conservative Political Action

1:37:34

Conference. It happens annually

1:37:36

in Washington, d C. Well,

1:37:40

this will be the first year that I

1:37:42

make an appearance at Sepack. I

1:37:45

will be as of now at least

1:37:47

debating the issue of Syria

1:37:50

withdrawal on the main stage at

1:37:52

Sepack eight thirty

1:37:54

am a week from

1:37:56

tomorrow. So that is, let me

1:37:58

get the calendar out here. February

1:38:03

twenty no March

1:38:06

first, March first. Forget about February March

1:38:09

first at eight thirty am at

1:38:11

Sea Pack. So if you're planning on going to Seapack,

1:38:14

if you're in the DC area, definitely look

1:38:16

look out for me on Friday. I might pop into

1:38:19

support some of my buddies who will be giving speeches

1:38:21

as well in those days, and

1:38:23

I think the debate over the Syria situation

1:38:26

will be very interesting. So

1:38:29

if you can show up for that, please do and look

1:38:31

for me at Sea Pack. I want to see some members

1:38:33

of the team, especially

1:38:36

those of you who are Team Buck Campus Squad.

1:38:38

All right now, with that little bit of necessary

1:38:41

self promotion, Joe

1:38:44

Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton.

1:38:46

To get in on this, Joe writes, you

1:38:49

must watch Firebirds Shields

1:38:51

High from Oss. Joe,

1:38:55

Joe, I am not familiar

1:38:57

with this fire John do you know fire

1:39:00

birds. I know not.

1:39:02

I know not the Firebirds, so

1:39:04

i'd have to I don't even I know. It's a car

1:39:07

that I think used to be kind of like a badass American

1:39:09

car driving a firebird.

1:39:12

Yeah,

1:39:14

it's kind of like a is a Firebird kind

1:39:16

of like a poor man's Mustang? Or is a Mustang

1:39:19

kind of like a poor man's Firebird. I don't know. It's

1:39:21

one or the other. And some of

1:39:23

the people that actually know cars in this audience are

1:39:26

are just yelling at the at

1:39:28

the radio right now. They are.

1:39:31

They should be discussed with me that I don't know the difference.

1:39:33

It's it's a fair point, Jim

1:39:35

writes. Role call okay,

1:39:37

Jim, We'll hear. The continuing hate

1:39:39

crime conspiracy continues after

1:39:41

the indictment of Jussie. He

1:39:44

orchestrated the hoax and the regressive

1:39:46

media, the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party

1:39:49

accomplices now take offense at being

1:39:52

outrage that it affects black at

1:39:54

being caught, rather being outraged that it

1:39:56

affects blacks and gays, never

1:39:58

mentioning the hate crime of false accusations

1:40:01

against white people, Trump supporters and

1:40:04

and others. The real enemy here are the liars

1:40:06

in the media, and until we have a constitution

1:40:09

loving network, we won't make real progress. Fox

1:40:11

is not the solution with the boys running the show,

1:40:14

allowing Shep and others to remain.

1:40:19

So you're saying that what

1:40:22

does accomplice not take offense at being caught

1:40:24

being outraged? Never mentioned

1:40:26

the hate crime of false accusations against white

1:40:29

people. I mean, yeah, we've been

1:40:31

talking about the Smallet hoax here all

1:40:33

along. It really is a hate crime against Trump

1:40:35

supporters. The hoax is a

1:40:38

hate crime against Trump supporters. Brian

1:40:41

writes, don't stop your

1:40:43

astute analogies because

1:40:46

a particular dislike a particular listener

1:40:48

dislikes them. Brother, your analogies are ammo

1:40:50

for many of us to win obvious

1:40:53

discussions with our liberal friends. All

1:40:55

right, Brian, I like it. We will

1:40:57

keep some of the analogies going. I'll just try to

1:40:59

keep them at a high

1:41:03

level. So it's important

1:41:05

to keep the analogies good, and

1:41:07

that much I think we can do. Michael

1:41:10

writes, the reason we knew it was a hoax

1:41:12

from the beginning is because we know

1:41:15

how absurd it sounded, and

1:41:17

it sounds over the top absurd. However,

1:41:20

to the left who think hate crimes are on the

1:41:22

rise. It was on a par with the fantasy that

1:41:24

they think is going on in this country. Are

1:41:26

the lives actually delusional or are they

1:41:28

lying about it to gain power? Michael, very

1:41:31

important question. I would

1:41:33

note that the hate crimes are on

1:41:35

the rise is a talking

1:41:37

point that is never able to on

1:41:39

the rise and on what time frame? What

1:41:42

kind of hate crimes? What a degree of hate crime?

1:41:45

Talking about people that say something mean to

1:41:47

somebody in a protected group. Are we talking about an actual

1:41:50

crime? This is

1:41:52

a talking point kind of like walls

1:41:54

don't work that the moment you dig into it, you find

1:41:56

out that's kind of a dumb talking point, isn't

1:41:58

It doesn't really mean anything. Hate

1:42:01

crimes are on the rise in the last thirty

1:42:03

days, in the last year, sixty

1:42:05

years, ten years. I've dug into

1:42:08

hate crimes as listed

1:42:10

by the FBI, and first of all, a lot of

1:42:12

what are considered hate crimes aren't really crimes.

1:42:15

A lot of them, about twenty or thirty

1:42:17

percent, are in

1:42:19

the category of verbal harassment

1:42:22

or some form of vandalism,

1:42:25

which is a crime, but is not something

1:42:27

that usually you

1:42:29

know, it's not the property damage that people are so

1:42:31

upset about. Usually it's the message. So

1:42:34

this thing you hear from people better, well, hate

1:42:36

crimes are on the rise. They said that hate crimes

1:42:38

were on the rise during all of the

1:42:41

Obama administration, that hate crimes

1:42:43

are on the rise. After every

1:42:45

major Islamic terrorist attack in this country.

1:42:47

I keep hearing about a hate crimes are on the rise, and

1:42:50

then I look at the statistics and it

1:42:52

doesn't bear it out. Hate

1:42:54

hoaxes, I would argue,

1:42:56

are definitely on the rise. So

1:43:00

there's that, Lisa

1:43:03

buck in the vein of the transgenders

1:43:06

in sports thing. I still

1:43:08

wonder why the feminist left is forcing us

1:43:10

to choose men over women. Isn't

1:43:13

that completely counterintuitive to their ideology?

1:43:16

Their identity politics will end up destroying

1:43:18

them from the inside once they actually

1:43:20

think about what they are pushing. You

1:43:22

can't have both female empowerment and then let

1:43:24

men compete against them. Shields

1:43:27

higher, Lisa, It's true.

1:43:29

I think that the feminist movement in this country

1:43:31

has gone so far left that it is

1:43:34

willing to sell

1:43:36

out women, which is

1:43:38

an amazing state of affairs.

1:43:40

But that's what's going on here, and what does

1:43:42

it mean to be a woman if a

1:43:45

man can, purely based

1:43:47

on psychology, claim

1:43:49

to be a woman, and everyone, under

1:43:52

pain of social ostracism

1:43:55

and maybe even government sanction, everyone

1:43:57

is now supposed to say, yes, that's a woman.

1:44:00

What does that really mean? What

1:44:03

does that really tell us? The

1:44:05

feminist left has no answers to this, They

1:44:08

just simply don't Steve

1:44:11

Rights, Heybuck love the show as

1:44:13

usual. Steve, the show loves you as

1:44:15

usual. Listening to the podcast from

1:44:18

yesterday, especially on the Navratilova

1:44:21

dismissal from the LGBTQ

1:44:23

community, and just wanted to note that Martine

1:44:26

competed versus Renee Richards,

1:44:28

a transgendered male to female

1:44:30

athlete who was allowed by the New York Supreme

1:44:33

Court to compete in women's tennis played

1:44:35

from nineteen seventy seven to eighty one with

1:44:37

I believe no titles and coach

1:44:40

navratilover to two Wimberland titles after

1:44:42

eighty one. So maybe Martinez

1:44:44

speaks with some confidence on the issue, just

1:44:47

saying shields way high. Well,

1:44:49

thank you, Steve. Now, there

1:44:51

are some sports where brute strength

1:44:54

and speed and physicality are

1:44:57

going to be an enormous advantage.

1:45:00

Tennis, it's an advantage but it's not quite

1:45:02

the advantage that it would be in say, track

1:45:06

and field, boxing,

1:45:08

MMA, football. You

1:45:10

know, you go down the list, basketball

1:45:13

even you know, there's less

1:45:15

physicality in tennis, and so

1:45:18

you have to be at a certain skill level. You

1:45:20

know, you could take the

1:45:22

strongest man in the world, I

1:45:24

mean, actually the strongest man in the world, like the guy

1:45:26

who plays the mountain on Game of Thrones,

1:45:29

and put him on a tennis court and a

1:45:31

decent high school female tennis player. I'm sure

1:45:33

we'll kick his butt, right because but if you

1:45:36

put that same guy in an

1:45:38

MMA ring with any woman in the

1:45:40

world, he's going to win by

1:45:43

a lot and it would be terrible and scary and the

1:45:45

whole thing would be awful. But that's the

1:45:47

difference I think that we need to keep in mind. Not all

1:45:50

sports are the same when it comes to the

1:45:52

strength and speed advantage. Next,

1:45:55

here we have George, who writes buck

1:45:59

so glad to see your smiling, rational,

1:46:01

intelligent mug on the news panels

1:46:04

Shields High. Well, George, thank

1:46:06

you so much. Man. I'm not even sure what panel I was

1:46:08

on Reason Oh, that's right, I was on Fox on Shannon

1:46:11

Bream Show. For those of you who

1:46:13

like to know these things. Shannon Bream is one of the nicest

1:46:15

people you'll ever meet. I don't really mean that, and

1:46:18

I know that she probably is not going to hear

1:46:20

this show, So this isn't I'm not kissing up. I

1:46:22

just I like to tell you who's nice and who's

1:46:24

mean in media, so that when you can make these choices,

1:46:27

when you're flipping through the channels, you're like, not only

1:46:29

is a good show, I know this is a nice

1:46:31

person because Buck would never never tell

1:46:33

me otherwise or never you know, lead

1:46:35

me astray on this, Sean,

1:46:38

Right, Buck, I love your tangential history,

1:46:40

deep dives, and movie talk. I

1:46:43

believe it to be beneficial to any audience that invest

1:46:45

time with a talk show host to occasionally get a

1:46:47

personality perspective outside the normal

1:46:49

daily grind. Rush does it too, Oss,

1:46:52

Thank you, Sean. Well, if Rush

1:46:54

does it, the Wayne

1:46:56

Gretzky of radio, the Lebron James

1:46:58

of radio, perhaps to be the Zion.

1:47:01

What's that guy's name he's supposed

1:47:03

to be like the best, like the new Lebron, the

1:47:05

Zion. I can't remember his last name, who

1:47:07

apparently just hurt his foot, but anyway, Yeah,

1:47:09

if Rush does it, what's got to be good. So

1:47:12

I'm glad that you enjoy a little bit of a peek

1:47:14

behind the personal curtain here.

1:47:16

And I really do feel a

1:47:18

sense of connection to everybody who listens

1:47:21

to this show, like we know each other. This is why I

1:47:23

can always tell when people who

1:47:26

are familiar with me, this doesn't happen

1:47:28

like it doesn't happen a lot of months of Oh I

1:47:30

I walk into the mall and everybody says hello.

1:47:33

No, it's not that at all. But people who sometimes watching

1:47:35

a Fox or enough you used to watch enough CNN

1:47:38

that they know who I am. They see me and they're

1:47:40

like, oh, you know, there's that person I've seen on

1:47:42

TV. When I see somebody from Team Buck

1:47:44

and they see me on the street, we got

1:47:46

a handshake, high five, or hug. It's

1:47:49

one of the three. Always, you know, we gotta stop

1:47:51

and talk and chat because it's it's

1:47:53

just a different feeling when you really spend time

1:47:55

with somebody on radio. I

1:47:57

mean, radio is a tribe. Everybody

1:48:00

who listens to this show is, at least

1:48:02

for the time they're listening, I mean, they're they're part

1:48:04

of we are part of a tribe. And

1:48:07

it's fun when you get to see people who

1:48:10

are in that you know are in that mix. I

1:48:13

can always tell. So that's

1:48:15

going to be it for today in the Freedom Hut,

1:48:17

my friends, we do have a fantastic show

1:48:20

plan for you tomorrow. So with that, I

1:48:22

bid you adieu and I wish

1:48:24

you shield tie

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features