0:00

Welcome to today's edition of The

0:02

Rush Limboughs Show podcast.

0:04

Yeah, I just I was just sitting here thinking. I

0:06

actually I've been thinking over the weekend. Actually I think

0:09

all the time. But one of the things

0:11

I've been thinking is that it has been a long time.

0:13

I cannot remember, ladies

0:16

and gentlemen, the last

0:18

time Joe Biden spoke

0:21

and we heard the roar of a crowd. I

0:23

don't remember a single time

0:26

where Joe Biden spoke, made a comment

0:29

and there was raucous applause.

0:32

I don't remember it. I

0:34

mean, there's barely any golf clapping

0:38

because most of the people assembled at Biden

0:41

events are the media, and they're accordoned off in a

0:43

little white circle's drawn there

0:45

by chalk lines. But

0:47

just it's striking. It just all adds up. Where

0:50

is the Evans. We had a big piece on this on Thursday.

0:52

I even talked about it with the President on Friday.

0:54

Where is the evidence that Biden's

0:57

gonna win? In this huge lance light? Anyway,

0:59

folks, great to have you here with us as

1:01

we kick off a brand new week broadcast

1:05

excellence here on the EIB network. Our telephone

1:07

number if you want to be on the program is eight hundred two

1:09

eight two eight eight two. As always,

1:12

the email address l rushbo at

1:15

eib net dot us. So

1:18

I have been watching the

1:20

hearings or the nomination of

1:23

Amy Coney Barrett to

1:25

the Supreme Court, and

1:29

the initial reaction that you have

1:32

is that if they had anything on

1:35

this nominee, and we know they don't because

1:37

they they

1:39

fast tracked her through three years ago

1:44

for her current or current job

1:46

on the appellate bench,

1:49

if if they hit anything, they

1:52

would be doing things entirely differently,

1:56

not the only kind of fireworks

1:58

we had at her previous hearings, or

2:01

when Diane Feinstein, who

2:04

I think it's only fair to mention

2:06

as Jewish, said to

2:08

the very Catholic Amy Coney

2:10

Barrett, the dogma lives

2:13

loudly in you. The

2:16

dogma lives loudly

2:18

in you. Which everybody

2:20

took it for what it was. It was an

2:23

assault on Amy Coney

2:25

Barrett's religion and how two

2:28

Democrats and the American Left. It's entirely

2:30

unacceptable because

2:32

it features reverence

2:35

for God, it features reverence

2:37

for life, and that's just that's

2:40

just unacceptable. But beyond that, zero

2:44

NATA. But before you start getting all

2:46

confident in everything. You

2:49

know. I know you're saying they could be trashing her record

2:51

right now, and they're not maybe

2:54

doing all kinds of destructive

2:57

things that they're not doing.

3:00

Instead of talking about anything and everything

3:02

but her and her qualifications,

3:04

they are really ripping into Trump. They

3:07

are taking the occasion of these hearings to

3:09

just trash Trump and

3:12

virtually everything about Trump,

3:14

from his existence to the

3:16

fact that COVID didn't kill him. Well, they

3:18

didn't do that. Saturday Night Live, Dude, did

3:21

you hear about that? Saturday Night Live

3:23

actually wished that Trump

3:25

would have died. Yeah,

3:29

I think it was their show open on Saturday.

3:32

Democrats have not done that yet. They're kind

3:34

of just skating around. But I want to remind you of

3:36

something, folks. This is exactly how

3:38

the Kavanaugh stuff started. Kavanaugh

3:42

had been vetted before

3:44

for a similar seat at

3:48

Pellet Court seat, and he had been

3:50

confirmed, and there was nothing new

3:52

to learn about the guy. There was literally nothing

3:54

new, and on the

3:57

verge of the vote. Why

4:01

Diane Feinstein, who's

4:03

able to spot Catholic dogma

4:06

living loudly in people, brought

4:09

the entire proceedings to a screeching HOMEBA,

4:11

say wait a minute, I found something here. And

4:14

what it was was a letter from

4:17

a woman who appeared scared

4:20

to death. Her

4:23

name was a listen

4:28

to me now, Christine

4:30

baldsey Ford. Is it Christine?

4:33

Was that her first name? Look at we've

4:35

already forgotten her first name. We know as balsey

4:37

Ford. Anyway, Diane

4:39

Feinstein had this letter's letter actually sent to

4:41

ballsy Ford's congressional representative

4:43

who had been given it to. Feinstein

4:46

had both in California, and she read

4:48

this letter and it was filled with allegations

4:51

of the horrible, horrible

4:54

sexual abuse and

4:56

mistreatment if

4:59

Kavanaugh had dished out to

5:03

ballsy Ford. And

5:05

so everything came to a screeching halt. We

5:08

had to have a start, a restart,

5:10

a new start to the hearings. Oh my goodness,

5:12

what have we learned here? How did we miss this? We

5:15

didn't know any of this. They saved

5:17

it for the last minute. And

5:20

do not think they are not capable

5:22

of something here. They're

5:26

not gonna, you know, everybody thinks the Thursday,

5:28

they know there's no way they can stop this. There's

5:31

no way. So they're they're just gonna They're gonna

5:34

take the occasion, take the opportunity to rip

5:36

in a Trump, try to score as many points

5:39

against Trump as they can, but eventually

5:41

do what they have to do because they can't stop. That's

5:43

not how they think. They

5:46

don't think there's nothing they can do. In

5:48

fact, you may not know this. A

5:53

Washington, d c. Hotel

5:57

call a feminist hotel is

6:00

honoring Ruth Bader

6:03

Ginsburg with a mural of her

6:05

likeness made with twenty

6:08

thousand tampons. This

6:12

is how they honor their own. From

6:16

demanding free tampons, which

6:18

of course was so it was her name, fluck

6:23

right. From demanding free tampons

6:25

to placing tampons in the men's

6:28

room to wearing

6:30

tampons's ear rings on national

6:32

TV, the left has

6:36

been showing their obsession with tampons.

6:40

Now, if you're a young child and

6:42

you're tuning into the program, I discommitted a

6:44

faux pot. Normally allow

6:46

for a brief moment for audience

6:48

members to tune out if they fear something

6:51

coming up. I warned them, and I

6:53

did not issue the warning. Business it may

6:55

well be that I've got myself a little bit of trouble here.

6:57

So if you're a young child, it doesn't

7:00

know what a tampon is. I would suggest you turn

7:02

the radio off now or

7:05

else go ask your mom. The odds are your mom

7:07

will know, but not guaranteed depends on where

7:09

you are. Not

7:14

up to me to explain

7:16

this. So I'm gonna

7:18

countdown from five and after

7:20

I reach one, if if

7:24

you think this is something you shouldn't hear, then

7:26

you should turn the radio either down or off.

7:28

Do not tune to another station wherever

7:31

you go. It's going to be much worse. A

7:34

right, five four. If you

7:36

don't do this now

7:38

I reach one and you're still affetted, you have been warned.

7:41

You can't complain after that five

7:44

four, three two

7:47

one. A boutique

7:49

hotel in Washington, DC has taken the concept

7:52

of tampon justice to

7:55

a new level. The hotel Zena

7:59

features and an enormous mural of

8:01

a recently deceased Supreme

8:04

Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, composed

8:07

entirely of tampons, twenty thousand

8:09

tampons. I

8:13

mean, is this how they really

8:16

think they're honoring RBG? She

8:19

had her own workout regimen, she had her

8:21

own boxing thing there. She was tough, she

8:24

was and they

8:26

honor Ruth Bader Ginsburg with a mural

8:29

made of twenty thousand

8:32

tampons? And what did what did

8:34

tampons have to do with? With equality

8:38

and feminism?

8:42

Sixty artworks that celebrate women's

8:45

rights, and of course, the RBG mural

8:47

is one of the sixty.

8:50

Installations include a larger than life portrait

8:54

of Ginsburg made from twenty thousand

8:56

tampons and a reception desk built

8:59

out of high heels. It's

9:01

right to go check into this hotel Zena

9:04

and you are going to find yourself

9:06

at a reception desk

9:09

built out of high heels. So

9:14

do you think it honors Ruth? I'm just asking

9:17

do you think it honors Ruth

9:19

Vader Ginsburg to remember her to memorialize

9:22

her with watted up women's

9:27

hygiene? Probably, I'll

9:30

leave it up to you to

9:33

answer the question. Anyway, if this

9:35

will show you what they could possibly have

9:37

in the quiver of

9:40

ammo of arrows, So

9:43

yeah, it may look like if they had anything

9:45

on her, they would be trashing her

9:47

record. They'd be doing that instead of talking

9:49

about anything and everything but her. But

9:52

with Kavanaugh, and it's not guaranteed

9:54

the history will repeat. What with Cavadaugh. It

9:57

was at the last moment when

9:59

everybody he thought we were headed to the vote,

10:02

everybody thought we were nearing me ended

10:04

here came this bombshell, Christine

10:07

ballsy Ford, and you remember,

10:09

it totally turned everything upside

10:11

down, and they started working on Jeff Flake,

10:13

and then they started working on a

10:16

couple of others, and we had a new FBI

10:18

investigation. We had an allegation that

10:21

Kavanaugh ran a rape train at

10:23

a party where Christine ballsy Ford

10:25

was, but she couldn't remember where it

10:27

was. She couldn't remember any of the people at this

10:30

thing. It was obviously and totally a setup.

10:33

And she had her speech patterns

10:36

down patch. She had the valley girl uptick

10:40

at the end of sentences that

10:44

make a person speaking

10:46

in this matter. Seemed very scared and

10:50

traumatized and

10:53

vulnerable. Now Here we had Christine

10:55

ballsy Ford's been teaching out in California.

10:58

What forty years this happened,

11:00

thirty You're plenty of time to

11:03

get over whatever trauma. I

11:06

was so scared. I

11:10

did not want to

11:12

be here today,

11:16

but they

11:19

dragged me in and

11:22

she went on like this, and it was just it

11:25

was obvious and the Republicans had

11:27

no choice. They had no choice but to go along with it.

11:30

The President has tweeted about

11:34

this, and

11:37

let me find it very quickly. He has basically

11:39

suggested. Here it is ten

11:41

o'clock this morning. The President treated

11:44

tweeted, the Republicans are giving the Democrats

11:46

a great deal of time here, which

11:49

is non mandated. The Republicans do not

11:52

have to be giving these Democrats this

11:54

amount of time, this nomination

11:57

to make their self serving statements relative

12:00

to our great new future

12:03

Supreme Court justice personally, Trump

12:05

tweeted, I would pull back. I'd

12:07

go ahead and approver, and now I go for

12:09

stimulus for the people. I

12:12

go ahead and start making a deal by getting myself on the

12:14

right side of that issue and actually do something

12:16

it might make a difference in people's lives.

12:19

That's what Trump thought the Democrats did would be

12:22

they're not going to do anything that improves

12:24

people's lives, if there's anything about

12:28

it that Trump can

12:31

claim any credit for. Okay, now,

12:33

folks, I know that

12:35

you know that I

12:37

am not a big time

12:40

social media guy.

12:42

I have steadfastly opposed

12:45

it in a number of ways,

12:48

and I have not used social

12:50

media as most people do We've got

12:52

Twitter pages and we've got

12:54

Facebook pages. We use them primarily

12:57

as promotional vehicles for

13:00

ash Limbaugh dot Com, the Rush Limbaugh

13:02

Radio program, and other

13:05

things that we do here. However,

13:09

we have three weeks left in

13:12

this game, if you want

13:15

to refer to it as such, three weeks, and

13:19

we're going to leave everything

13:21

on the field. We're not going

13:24

to go

13:28

at this in a half manner.

13:30

We are that this this is about preserving

13:33

the American way of life. This is

13:36

about It's a real simple

13:38

concept. I think. I think what the selection about

13:40

is real simple. It

13:43

is about a man and

13:46

his supporters who

13:48

think America is good. And

13:51

I don't mean great in the

13:53

sense that, yeah, man, America is

13:55

great. I don't mean it's America is decent.

13:58

America is good. America is

14:00

the good, guys. America

14:03

is the solution to

14:06

the world's problems. America is

14:08

not the problem. America

14:12

is good. It is decent. And

14:16

we are opposed by people

14:19

who are behind assuming Joe

14:21

Biden, who

14:24

very simply do not believe that

14:26

America is good, much

14:29

less great. They just

14:32

don't believe that America is good.

14:35

They believe that America is the

14:37

problem in the world. They

14:39

believe that America is founding,

14:42

is unjust and

14:45

racist, and bigoted

14:48

and homophobic, and all of these things. They

14:51

believe that America is what

14:55

has the is the instrument is the people,

14:57

the population, the nation that

15:00

as destroyed and

15:03

made the world a worse place. This

15:06

is their belief. They thus want

15:08

to gain control of this country to

15:11

implement a policy agenda which

15:13

addresses these grievances. They

15:17

wish to get rid

15:19

of capitalism. They wish

15:22

to get rid of lais

15:24

a fair economics. They

15:26

wish to get rid of personal

15:29

individual liberty and freedom. They

15:31

don't believe in it. They

15:33

believe it's the root cause of

15:36

our problems. They believe that liberty and

15:38

freedom are the primary suspects

15:41

in the lack of equality in

15:46

not just the world, but in America. They

15:48

believe that the United States is

15:50

guilty. They

15:52

want to gain control at the levers of power

15:55

to change this. We

15:57

don't believe any of this. Donald

15:59

Trump doesn't believe any of this. Donald

16:02

Trump believes, and you believe, and I belieated, America

16:05

is great, America is exceptional.

16:07

America is the

16:10

good guys. America

16:13

is the solution of the world's problems. America

16:15

is the repository for freedom. America

16:19

is the repository for equality

16:21

and decency.

16:26

America is where Western

16:28

civilization and the American way of life

16:30

will be preserved while it is under massive

16:33

assault. That's what the selections about.

16:36

It's not about somebody that tweets too

16:38

much, not about somebody who's maybe

16:42

a little vulgar here there or whatever it is.

16:44

It's not about that at all. It

16:47

is about so much

16:49

more than that. And

16:56

so I have decided we have

16:58

gotten rid of have gotten rid

17:00

of yet, but we we're

17:02

just abandoning all the

17:05

previous Twitter and Facebook accounts

17:07

and I have opened a new one. I'll

17:09

come back after the break because I just I gotta take a

17:11

break off. Explain all this when we get back.

17:13

Don't go away, Okay,

17:16

just to make sure the Facebook, the

17:18

new Facebook page not up yet. We

17:20

just got started here with Twitter, and I want to

17:22

give you a new handle, and I we'll tell you what we're

17:24

gonna do with it. We're firing up a new Twitter account

17:26

to be able to tweet

17:29

out the brilliant

17:31

utterances that occur on this program

17:34

in a moment's notice video

17:37

clips. For example, something

17:40

I say on this program that can

17:42

be video clipped in a minute, minute and a half

17:44

whatever or longer.

17:46

We want to be able to jam it back out

17:49

rather than have it part of a

17:51

massive thirty minute monologue and

17:54

transcript. It's just

17:57

a matter of focusing on things

17:59

that we think are poignant and meaningful. Now,

18:01

the new handle is

18:04

at real our Limbo.

18:07

That is the new handle. Any

18:09

other handles that you are using for us

18:12

and Twitter, we haven't broomed

18:15

them yet because we don't want those names

18:17

to be used by others. But

18:19

the only Twitter handle that you should pay

18:21

attention to going forward is

18:24

at real our

18:27

Limbo. And

18:30

this is for these next three weeks,

18:32

folks, We're going to use everything in our disposal

18:34

here. Write that handle down, scrap

18:37

all the other fake ones out there, and be sure

18:39

to follow and look out for new

18:42

wisdom as we post.

18:44

It's it's

18:46

going to be fun. And as I say it's

18:48

it's it's not a

18:50

capitulation. It's taking the availability

18:53

of a weapon

18:56

that we have at our disposal and finding

18:58

a way to use it as effectively as we can.

19:00

Sit tight, We'll be back with much more

19:02

right after this. We

19:04

are keeping a sharp eye on the confirmation

19:07

hearings of Amy Coney Barrett.

19:09

It's basically it's actually

19:11

been kind of boring and

19:14

frustrating for me just to listen to these Democrats

19:16

talk about what a you know, a viral

19:20

scum of human being Donald Trump

19:23

is, and how this woman ought

19:25

not even want to be nominated by him, that she

19:27

had to just throw this nomination away shot

19:30

to pull the nomination herself. Is nomination

19:32

is so much beneath her, she shouldn't

19:34

want to be tainted by

19:36

being nominated by this guy. That

19:40

is the flavor of much

19:43

of what I heard this morning. But I'm just telling

19:45

you that I am, by no means

19:49

rendered complacent, and

19:53

I always say disarmed

19:55

by what I'm seeing today because I know

19:57

these people. I know them like every square inch

19:59

of my glorious naked body, and they

20:01

are not through. Even

20:04

if they think there is no way they can

20:06

stop her. They're going to try to make it such

20:08

that she doesn't want to go through this. They're

20:11

going to unload and

20:13

unleash all kinds

20:16

of things. This

20:19

nomination essentially

20:22

making the Supreme Court six to

20:24

three conservative. This

20:27

destroys their

20:30

plans, It destroys what

20:33

the Supreme Court means to them. The

20:35

woman the nominee is young, She's

20:38

going to be there a

20:41

long time. Donald Trump wins reelection,

20:43

he's going to have many more nominations. If

20:46

he wins reelection. The Republicans are

20:48

probably going to keep the Senate, which

20:51

means it's going to be easier or

20:55

easier to confirm future Trump

20:57

nominations. But

21:00

they have been playing this really coy. They haven't

21:02

been talking about it much. They've kind of acted

21:04

like it's a fate, a complete nothing they can do

21:07

to stop it. But I'm here to tell you

21:10

that it is so much

21:12

more to them than

21:14

this. This is one

21:16

of the worst things that

21:19

could have happened to

21:21

them, to the Democrat Party, to

21:23

their future, to their plans. You

21:27

know, the judiciary, the Supreme Court,

21:29

the circuit courts, the appellate

21:32

courts. These are the locations

21:34

where the Democrats have planted people

21:38

to provide election loss

21:40

insurance. They've

21:43

nominated and confirmed judges

21:45

to these other various

21:49

court levels, the circuit courts, the appellate courts,

21:52

in order to write legislation,

21:55

in order to overwrite bad

21:58

legislation from their and standpoint,

22:01

their point of view. It

22:03

is how they have secured insurance

22:06

against losing elections. This

22:09

throws a wrench into those plans

22:11

like it's well, it's difficult for me to describe

22:16

to you. And there's no fix for this next

22:18

year or a couple of years from now. It's

22:22

going to take longer than that to

22:25

fix it. This is this is literally

22:27

everything to them. I've been amazed that they

22:29

have been as as quiet

22:33

and unhysterical about something

22:35

as they have been about this, because I know the truth

22:37

is that's driving them insane. I

22:42

mean this, take your average Bond villain

22:45

on the verge of taking

22:47

over the world. It's just a

22:49

matter of the sun rising tomorrow. Well,

22:53

the sun's going to rise tomorrow, but everything

22:56

else has gone wrong. They

22:58

can't control It's it's

23:01

a beautiful thing. It is actually

23:04

stunning that of all the people making

23:06

this possible, it's Donald Trump. Now other

23:08

things in the news, Look

23:10

at this. This is townhall dot com. It's a column

23:13

by Bronson Stocking. And

23:15

look at this headline. Oops. The

23:17

World Health Organization now says lockdowns

23:20

are a bad idea that should be avoided.

23:24

Wait what? The

23:29

World Health Organization has changed

23:31

its position on government

23:34

lockdowns as a measure for combating

23:38

the coronavirus, the who now believes

23:40

that lockdowns have unintended

23:42

consequences and that she should be avoided.

23:46

We in the World Health Organization

23:48

do not advocate lockdowns is the primary

23:50

means of control of this virus at

23:52

doctor David Nabarro, the

23:55

organization's Special envoy

23:58

on COVID nineteen, told the American

24:00

Spectator. Doctor Tomorrow

24:02

then cited some of the harmful negative

24:04

consequences of prolonged lockdowns that conservatives

24:08

and President Tump have been warning about. Trump

24:10

had been warning about four months. Doctor

24:13

Nabarro warned it lockdowns just have

24:15

one consequence that you must never ever

24:17

belittle, and that is making poor people

24:20

an awful lot poorer.

24:22

Bingo, you lock

24:24

down the economy, You're locking down people's

24:27

livelihoods. You lock down the economy,

24:29

you're locking down people's jobs.

24:31

You're locking down their opportunity

24:36

for increased enhanced

24:38

economic opportunity. So

24:40

they're now admitting, after all this time,

24:43

they're now admitting what we

24:45

have been saying from the get go. What

24:48

you do is you protect the most vulnerable,

24:50

which would be in a susceptible, which told be

24:52

the seasoned citizen population. Everybody

24:54

else, wash your hands

24:57

take all steps and cautions

25:00

that you believe in and that you want

25:02

to take, but do not lock

25:06

down. Another quote, We in the

25:08

World Health Organization do not advocate

25:10

lockdowns as a primary means of control of the virus.

25:14

They have only one consequence, and that

25:16

is making poor people

25:19

poorer. Why now, why

25:22

is this happening now? I thought Joe

25:24

Biden was going to win the presidency and

25:26

these people were going to be on the verge of

25:29

controlling the world again. I

25:31

thought we're on the verge of getting back

25:33

in that this globalist government that

25:36

the United States was going to lead, that

25:38

it was Joe Biden's victory that was going to

25:40

make all that happen. And now a lot of

25:43

a sudden lockdowns

25:46

are an absolutely bad

25:48

idea.

25:51

What are you going to tell Governor Andrew Kubo,

25:54

What are you gonna tell Governor Gavin Newsom?

25:56

What are you gonna tell Governor Gretchen Widner.

25:58

What are you going to tell that

26:01

idiot mayor out in Portland. What

26:04

are you going to tell the people running the show of Minneapolis

26:07

and in Seattle. They

26:10

are literally destroying their

26:12

states. They are destroying

26:14

their state economies, They are destroying

26:17

the large municipal areas

26:19

in their states. And

26:22

we all know why they did this, to

26:24

put the damper on a nationwide

26:27

economic recovery so as to

26:30

not benefit Donald Trump's presidential

26:32

reelection effort. And

26:35

now they're admitting that what they've done has caused

26:37

economic disaster for their own

26:39

people, economic harm.

26:43

We've been on the right side of this from

26:45

the get go as well. I'm still suspicious about

26:48

this. This doesn't you know why

26:50

now? And again, folks,

26:52

it's a serious question because these people are on the

26:54

verge of believing that Joe Biden's going to win, and

26:56

win big. All of their polls

26:58

are telling them Biden is going to sweep

27:02

to victory and when he does, it's

27:05

a return to globalism. It

27:07

is a it is a return to

27:09

what they have dreamed of, to what the third

27:11

Obama administration run by Hilary what

27:13

it was going to be. R

27:16

on the verge of that. Now they're advocating

27:20

the opposite. Well,

27:23

maybe we can find the answer to the question other

27:25

news stories. I have a story here, this is

27:27

a gallop pole that there's

27:29

all kinds of gallop pole data out there,

27:33

but we may find it necessary to go through some of this stuff

27:36

again. Here's

27:38

the takeaway from this one. A

27:40

majority of Americans view

27:43

President Trump as a strong

27:46

and decisive leader, according

27:48

to a Gallop pole. It was released on Friday.

27:52

A pole asked Americans to weigh in

27:54

on how they ranked Trump and

27:57

Biden on eight different

27:59

characters or traits. The biggest difference

28:02

that Americans have when comparing Biden

28:04

and Trump is how likable they are. More

28:08

Americans feel Biden is likable

28:10

than those who feel that way about Trump. Americans

28:14

say that both politicians are about

28:16

equally as likely to keep their promises.

28:19

What a crock. That is, both

28:24

politicians equally as likely to bring about

28:27

necessary change, management

28:29

government effectively, and display good judgment

28:31

in a crisis. Biden

28:34

scored better than Trump in

28:36

every area, but strength

28:39

and decisiveness, Well, those

28:41

are two pretty important big deals.

28:44

Strength and decisiveness

28:47

during a crisis, during

28:49

a pandemic. Here's

28:53

the results by numbers. Sixty six

28:55

percent say Biden likable, thirty six

28:57

percent say Trump is. However, my friends,

29:00

do you know what I believe Trump's likability

29:02

numbers skyrocketed after Friday. I

29:05

think one of the great things that happened on

29:07

Friday the President appearing on this

29:10

program is his likability numbers,

29:12

no doubt skyrocketed. I

29:15

can't tell you. And by the way, this you

29:18

people that made this observation and I heard about

29:20

it. You made my day.

29:24

My objective and I had many. One

29:27

of the objectives with

29:29

the president's parents Friday was

29:33

to have him seen by

29:35

all of you as I see him every

29:37

time i'm with him. He

29:40

is a likable guy. He's

29:42

a kind of guy

29:44

you would love to have dinner with it, go grab

29:47

a drink where he doesn't drink, but

29:49

you'd like to spend time in that kind of social

29:51

setting. Donald

29:53

Trump is a very likable guy.

29:56

He is very open. He

30:00

is not mean, he is not rude.

30:02

He is funny as he can be. He's

30:07

energetic and engaged and enthused.

30:09

And I had one tweet

30:12

from a woman who

30:15

how to print this tweet out rather than try

30:17

to paraphrase

30:19

it, because man, was it it was really

30:22

nice. In fact, I'll do that. I'll find it and

30:24

i'll quote it back to you in in the meantime, a brief break

30:26

here in the EIB network, and then we'll try to get some phones

30:28

in when we get back. All

30:31

right, it's risky when you start mentioning

30:33

one tweet out of the millions that

30:35

came in, and I, folks, I mean

30:38

to tell you that the response that we

30:40

had from the president's appearance on Friday

30:43

was in the hundreds of thousands, and

30:45

it amplified into the millions. It was just

30:48

over the top. But

30:50

somebody found one as we were

30:53

going through the process,

30:56

and I want to read this to you because

30:58

this met one

31:00

of the objectives that I had in

31:03

having the President appear here on Friday.

31:06

Rush Limbaugh almost made

31:08

me feel like I was

31:10

the one having a conversation with the

31:12

president. He asked

31:14

the questions I would have asked. He made

31:17

many of the same responses I would have made.

31:20

What a wonderful two hours

31:22

I feel heard, meaning

31:25

she thought she would do it, that she thought

31:27

the president hurt her, She felt

31:29

encouraged, and she felt motivated

31:31

just listening to two hours of the president.

31:38

Another follow up tweeter reply tweet,

31:40

Yeah, it seemed at times at President Trump forgot

31:43

he was even on the air. He was just

31:45

having a conversation with a friend. I

31:48

appreciate the candid, transparent

31:50

and genuine president. You know, folks.

31:52

Barack Hussein Obama

31:55

dropped one hundred and fifty million

31:58

dollars worth of ribe

32:00

money on Iran. Donald Trump dropped

32:02

an fbomb on Iran on this

32:05

program on Friday. An

32:08

excellent comparison. Yes,

32:12

both Rush and the President are genuine,

32:14

no pretenses. It's just like having

32:16

a face to face conversation with them.

32:18

Anyway, they were all they

32:22

were really all of fabulous.

32:24

Here is Jason Joplin,

32:27

Missouri, as we started the Phone's great to have you with

32:29

us, sir, Hi well, sir, to

32:31

you what it's an honor to speak with you, longtime listener,

32:33

first time callers. I

32:36

started listening to you, and I

32:38

think it was the first time that you showed

32:40

a picture of Selly Jesse raphio without

32:44

makeup on Oh I remember that. Yes, that was

32:46

the week after I'd been indoctrinated

32:48

into Radio Hall of Fame. Yes,

32:50

sir, well. It started watching the

32:53

confirmation hearings this morning, and it

32:55

seems like the Democrats are their main

32:58

attack on Amy

33:00

Coney Barrett is the Affordable Care

33:02

Act and talking about and they have all these

33:04

anecdotal stories, they have all these pictures of

33:06

different people in different stories, and I

33:09

and tugging at people's heart stream. But

33:11

if I remember hearing from one

33:13

of the original architects of

33:15

the Affordable Care Act, one of the ones

33:17

that helped draw it up, in a speech,

33:20

I don't know if it was at a college campus

33:22

or something, and he was talking about how

33:25

the Affordable Care Act, the way it was

33:28

set up, was it was set up to fail. It was

33:30

it was counting on the ignorance of

33:33

people voting for it, knowing that it would lead

33:35

to a single pair of system. Exactly,

33:39

exactly right. You are brilliant,

33:41

you are shrewd. You have a great memory

33:43

to Jason and Joplin, and

33:45

what Jason said, he heard one of

33:47

the architects of Obamacare admit

33:50

this. Let me very briefly run through what

33:52

what Jason said here, folks, because it's right on the

33:54

money, and it's gonna be tough to believe. It's

33:58

really especially the first African amerr president.

34:00

Why Rush? Why would why would any

34:03

president want to do things like that?

34:05

Would? Why would the president want to

34:07

harm the healthcare

34:09

system of the American people.

34:11

It's a great question, and it's a great

34:14

opportunity if you can answer that question for people

34:16

who could open your eyes. The long

34:18

term objective of Obamacare

34:21

was single payer national

34:26

or socialized medicine. They

34:29

knew that the American

34:31

people were in no way ready

34:34

for this. The American

34:36

people did not want to lose the health insurance

34:38

they have at work. They like it.

34:42

It offers them flexibility. They

34:44

in no way want to shelve it, broom

34:47

it, or get rid of it. So the

34:49

Affordable Care Act Obamacare,

34:52

was designed, over the course

34:55

of years to

34:57

fail. It

34:59

was designed to make a really

35:02

great effort. We're trying hard here, We're trying

35:04

to make sure everybody gets healthcare, affordable

35:07

healthcare, pre existing

35:09

conditions covered, and so forth. But we're

35:12

just having trouble doing it. And the only

35:15

solution, after the

35:18

passage of enough time, with

35:20

so many Americans frustrated, would have been, you

35:22

know what, we've been trying to avoid

35:24

this, but there may be only one way to do this. Let's

35:27

just let the government run everything. Let's

35:29

just do that. That was you're

35:32

exactly right, Jason in Joplin. And

35:37

the architect of this was a guy named Jonathan

35:39

Gruber, and he talked about

35:41

how easy it was going to be to

35:45

make this happen because

35:47

of the relative ignorance, not

35:49

stupidity, although he

35:51

might have meant that too, but he was talking about the relative

35:54

ignorance of the American people. They

35:57

had a seminar, they had a post

35:59

mortem, eating like

36:01

they do after successful

36:04

pieces of legislation, Ted talk, think

36:07

tank talk, Harvard,

36:10

Yale, you name it, where all

36:12

of the people heading and do with it show up for

36:14

a seminar on how

36:16

they did it. And it was at one of these

36:18

where it was admitted that the objective

36:21

here was to attempt it and to

36:23

try it but have it fail. With

36:26

the clamor from the American people being

36:28

for single payer, let's just let's just fix

36:30

this. Is that the government do it all, be done with it. That was

36:32

the objective to abs right. That's what's been

36:35

staved off. That's what Trump has

36:37

stopped. It

36:39

is the fastest three hours in media.

36:41

Now, folks, it makes perfect sense to get rid

36:43

of Obamacare. If

36:46

if the Democrats succeed, you're gonna

36:48

lose the healthcare you have at

36:50

work. Trump's healthcare plan

36:52

will not touch it, it will preserve it. And

36:56

here we are back at it once again, ladies

36:58

and gentlemen, great to be with you. It's Russia. Limbo

37:00

in this the EIB network, the Limbo

37:03

Institute for advanced studies

37:05

of everything that make a difference. There

37:08

are no graduates because there are no degrees.

37:11

Well, there's no degrees because there's no graduates.

37:13

And the reason for all that is learning never stops.

37:16

It's that simple. Want to be on the program.

37:18

Eight hundred two eight two two eight eight two.

37:20

Now, last week there

37:23

were all kinds of stories out there, including

37:25

a Gallop Pole survey which

37:27

went through all the usual rigamarole,

37:30

Biden up by twelve, Biden up

37:32

by eight, Biden up by ten,

37:34

Biden in a landslide

37:36

and met. There was this

37:39

little segment of the Gallop Pole

37:41

where they have been doing since nineteen

37:44

ninety six. They

37:46

ask their respondents who

37:49

they think their neighbors are going to vote

37:51

for. Since nineteen

37:54

ninety six, gallop

37:56

has not been wrong.

38:00

Their respondents

38:02

have predicted the winner of

38:04

the presidential election in

38:07

this aspect of the survey since nineteen ninety

38:09

six. Now, you might think, well,

38:11

that's not that long ago. I know, it's

38:14

you got to divide that by four for

38:17

presidential election races,

38:19

but it's still, you know, it's just

38:22

short of thirty years, twenty four years

38:24

out there. It's it's not insignificant and

38:28

by fifty six percent.

38:30

These people believe that Trump

38:33

is going to win. They

38:35

believe that their neighbors,

38:38

they believe their friends, they

38:40

believe people they don't know are

38:42

going to vote for

38:45

Trump. And this story is

38:47

just out today. This one happens to run

38:51

in the American Spectator by David Ketrone.

38:53

Most of the national polls p

38:55

ten defeat for President Trump in November,

38:59

he says. At the time of this writing,

39:03

Trump is behind Biden by ten points,

39:06

nearly ten points. This lead emboldened

39:09

Biden to tell a group

39:11

of supporters on Saturday that the only

39:13

way he could lose was through polling

39:15

place chicanery.

39:18

So why then, do most Americans

39:20

believe Trump is going to win?

39:23

Survey after survey has

39:28

found that, regardless of which candidate they

39:30

support, a majority of respondents

39:32

predict a Trump victory.

39:35

That's yet another confirmation of this phenomenon,

39:38

and it's available in recent gallopol

39:40

gallipoles, by the way, not the only place where this phenomenon

39:43

exists.

39:46

So now I know that I have

39:48

I've talked about all this

39:50

polling folks, add infinitum.

39:56

Given the unrelenting drumbeat

39:59

that Plugged is leading by one hundred

40:01

and fifty percent, you've got an insurmountable

40:04

lead, and that all hope is lost.

40:09

But I think it's important to keep reminding

40:12

everybody about the underlining

40:14

information in polling, not the top

40:17

line. So

40:19

these questions, are you better off? Who

40:21

do you think will win? Who are

40:23

your neighbors voting for? Who's best on

40:26

the economy? When you ask those questions,

40:28

the answer comes back Trump. Unilaterally.

40:31

When you ask people who

40:33

they're going to vote for, it changes. People for

40:36

some reason, do not want to admit to

40:39

people they don't know that are going to vote for Trump. There's

40:41

fear of doing so. Who's best

40:43

on the economy? Who are your neighbors voting

40:45

for? Who you be better off now than you were? For that

40:48

one, By the way, I talked about

40:50

it with a president on Friday. Stop and think about that. Are

40:53

you better off today than you were four years ago? Four

40:56

years ago is two seventeen.

40:59

That's when Trump took office and we were in the throes

41:02

of an economic quagmire

41:05

bequeathed to us by Barak,

41:08

who's saying Obama.

41:11

The Trump economy took a couple of years to kick in.

41:13

By three years it was smoking.

41:17

But even in that then comes

41:19

the virus and the shutdown of the country

41:22

for how long we'll be shut

41:24

down? In a month or time whatever. The shutdown

41:27

destroyed practically

41:29

every economic gain. And

41:32

yet even after that, people

41:35

still say they're better off

41:37

today than they were four years ago. When I saw

41:39

that, frankly, I didn't believe it.

41:42

That blew me away.

41:45

How can anybody You'll go to New York, for

41:48

example, New York just announced that Broadway

41:51

is not going to open up until July.

41:55

Do you know what that means? You

41:57

can say goodbye to the New York

41:59

rest front industry that serves

42:02

theater goers early

42:04

enough in the afternoon when they go have dinner before

42:06

the production. It's

42:09

the elimination of a veritable

42:12

industry in the number one city

42:14

in the country. You go talk

42:16

to those people, you better off today than you work for you

42:18

and they say, yep, man,

42:22

that mind boggling

42:25

to me. I

42:31

think that the underlying,

42:35

if you will, data

42:38

or evidence that there is all

42:42

kinds of unregistered

42:44

support for Donald Trump is there in droves.

42:49

Let's face it, most of the national polls poor

42:51

ten defeat big

42:53

time for Trump. In November, Trump's

42:58

telling a group of porters Saturday

43:00

the only way he could lose was through the

43:03

chicanery of the polling

43:05

place. Bryan grabbed that video.

43:08

I want to show you all something. We'll have this wall. I'll

43:10

put this at rushlama dot com. At well. There's

43:12

a little video here that I pulled today.

43:15

We're actually over the weekend. I think it's Las Vegas.

43:18

Biden's pulling into town. I'll

43:20

cue you for it. He's pulling

43:22

into town. There's a Mexican rally

43:25

at I think it's some hotel,

43:27

im not sure where, but it's

43:30

a nothing event and there are

43:32

there are very few people. They're cordoned off.

43:35

There is hardly any audio.

43:38

This is go ahead and roll it. This

43:40

is your average Biden event. Vote

43:45

early in the event. Look at this Marianchi

43:48

music. There's nobody

43:51

there, folks. You can see this. Plugs

43:54

is applauding nothing. There's

43:57

the crowd. Look of four people, four

44:01

people, Oh,

44:04

there's some more. There's uh. They

44:06

we can hit their ten pm and they're in white

44:08

circles. So one, two,

44:11

ten, maybe fifteen people at

44:13

the Biden event. Fifteen

44:16

people. Like I said at the top of the show,

44:19

I have never heard a

44:22

crowd roar at a

44:24

Joe Biden event, I've never heard any

44:26

kind of loud applause after remakes a statement.

44:29

I want to show you one more thing. Grab that

44:31

picture of Pat leaky Lahey. This is

44:33

Pat leaky Lahey today and he is

44:37

trying to embarrass Amy Coney

44:39

Barrett. And he holds up

44:42

a constituents picture of one

44:44

of his constituents and a picture

44:46

of Smoky Bear. And this woman is

44:48

apparently very, very worried of

44:50

what Amy Coney Barrett is going to do to

44:52

her healthcare. That's what Pat

44:55

leaky Lahey decided was

44:57

going to be a powerful demo today

45:03

to drum up support against

45:06

Amy Coney Barrett.

45:09

I mean, is that the best thing? That constituent

45:11

with a picture up Smokey Bear,

45:14

She's standing next to a doll, standing

45:16

next to a mascot, trying

45:20

to demonstrate that Amy Coney Barrett

45:22

poor Ten's horror for

45:26

healthcare, reproductive rights and

45:29

uh and all of that. So let's

45:32

see what else do we have here? Caner

45:36

re did that? Um?

45:38

Oh yeah yeah, let me let me

45:40

run through this one more

45:42

time. It will hit the brakes and get back to the phones.

45:46

I know what my reputation is on

45:48

social media I know, I rip it, and I that

45:50

hasn't changed. I think all the

45:52

things about social media I've been critical of

45:55

are still relevant. But

45:58

we got three weeks left here, folks, three

46:01

weeks left to

46:04

preserve the American waylife. That's what I think

46:06

this election is about. We're going to leave everything

46:09

on the field and support a Trump. We're

46:12

going to use as much at our

46:14

disposal as we can. Trump's

46:18

the last man standing as

46:20

a wall between the American

46:22

way of life that we know and a

46:25

radical left agenda that seeks

46:32

basically the destroy this country is founded.

46:35

So we fired up a new Twitter account. We've

46:38

had a bunch of them out there, and we've used them

46:40

for various things. We've never

46:42

used Twitter as most people do. Most

46:46

people use Twitter to post your one hundred and forty character

46:48

thing, you hit send and then you hope you haven't gotten yourself

46:50

in trouble. That's

46:53

not how we've used it. We've used it to cross

46:56

promote between RUSHLMBO dot com

46:59

and other vehicles, and that's primarily

47:01

what's going to continue. But we are going to

47:04

use Twitter and

47:06

this new Twitter account

47:10

as a means of

47:12

furthering the cause. This new

47:15

Twitter account has a new handle, and

47:17

this is the only handle that

47:19

you should use from now on in accessing

47:22

my Twitter account. It is at real

47:24

ur Limbo. At

47:29

real r Limbo. We're going

47:31

to be able to tweet out brilliance

47:33

in a moment's notice, anything that I happen

47:36

to say that we can make a short

47:38

video clip out of and

47:40

post it and get it out there. That's how

47:42

we intend. Do you maybe writing

47:44

some posts, I don't know, but primarily

47:47

it's a way to provide

47:49

instant distribution beyond

47:52

the radio program of things that happen

47:54

on the radio program, because that is

47:57

the objective. So be sure to follow

48:01

and be sure to look out for what you're

48:03

going to revel in as new

48:06

wisdom being posted at

48:08

real our little

48:11

boy, that's a new handle. Quick time out, We'll

48:13

be back. We will continue after this. Hi,

48:16

welcome back. Let's head back to the phones.

48:18

This is Nolan then not you don't

48:21

just Texas. You gotta be going

48:23

there to get there. Welcome sir to the program.

48:25

Great to have you. It's a pleasure to talk

48:27

to my friends. And

48:30

I've got the winning formula for this

48:32

election, all

48:34

right. Tell me the winning formula is

48:37

a take off on what happened

48:39

Nice Friday on your program? What's that? I

48:41

heard a man that I could not believe

48:44

how nice he was, hang

48:46

informative he was. And the

48:48

formula for this election is just tell

48:50

the people the next three weeks everything

48:54

that that man has done, everything

48:56

that he plans to do the next four years.

48:59

And I'm saying, say you, Russia,

49:01

I think the corners turned. I think

49:03

it's all going to be President Trump.

49:05

I'm here on the next three weeks. I'm

49:09

optimistic, buddy. Yeah,

49:11

you know, I think that's the key too. I think

49:13

Trump's record is his

49:16

ace in the hole. Yeah, there's nobody else

49:18

that has that record it is It is his

49:20

alone. And that's

49:22

why I asked him. If you recall how

49:25

I did that. I thought it's very clever the way I did this,

49:27

Nolan, I heard you. I asked the president

49:29

take a break, sir, you even talking a long time. I need

49:31

sixty seconds. I want to read for you what

49:33

somebody has written today about you. And

49:36

then I read that and I went through sixty

49:38

seconds of his record and

49:41

just just to get it out there for

49:44

people to hear it, because I

49:47

have to tell you something. Trump

49:49

is more, has more humility than anybody

49:52

would ever believe. And he

49:54

has no problem extolling the

49:56

virtues of his record. But it is

49:58

something he thinks other people ought to. Yes,

50:01

um, but he does it well when

50:04

when when he does it? And so

50:06

I agree with you, I think, but you're also

50:08

saying they came across likable.

50:10

He came across as somebody you wanted

50:12

to listen to. Right. Yes, I'm sitting

50:15

here in my den, and I

50:17

could talk to the prisident Trump the

50:19

risk to day and next week too, and he's

50:22

so informed in such

50:25

a nice guy. I

50:27

just think we need to talk about all the good

50:29

things he's done. Hey, I think

50:31

he's been probably, for me, the best

50:33

president I've ever voted for, starting

50:36

with thousand an hour. Wow,

50:40

you're going back a ways. Yes,

50:43

if my first twenty one, I got

50:45

to vote for thousand and a half. Well, so I appreciate

50:47

that. So you heard the formula.

50:49

You heard the formula right here on this program

50:52

on Friday. Yes, it's it's a winning

50:54

formula of uhum.

50:57

Rush. I don't think that we need to I

50:59

think we all go for about fifty

51:01

seven or eight percent of the vote. I'm

51:03

gonna tell you what I think about these poles,

51:06

buddy, I think they're on purpose

51:09

to give them a ground to

51:11

stay in court the next three years, trying

51:14

to turn over that election. So

51:16

they setting up for a big win for the

51:20

opponent, and they're setting

51:22

up from from those things. We just need

51:25

to be to hands down and go on with

51:27

America. I'm a whole guy, hear

51:29

that, And look, you know what that's

51:32

that's another great point there needs to be. The

51:37

ps

51:39

would be a huge victory,

51:43

a landslide victory that is slam

51:46

dunk for Trump. That just conveys

51:50

to everybody that this

51:53

is who the American people prefer. You're

51:55

whistling Dixie as you go down the wrong

51:57

road here you think you can sue the guy

52:00

out of office and you can stop him here, stopping

52:02

there. You don't have the American people

52:04

behind you in this effort. Yeah,

52:08

that's a you know, who knows if.

52:12

I'm sure if that could happen. But

52:14

I do have a story about that. In fact, I'm

52:16

a user call as a transition. Thanks you, thank

52:18

you, Nolan's lookye here

52:21

this just in from John Solomon's website

52:23

called Just the News, and the

52:25

headline Chuck Schumer Democrats

52:28

will boycott vote on

52:30

Trump's Supreme Court nominee.

52:33

Schumer vows not to supply a quorum

52:36

for votes on Amy Tony

52:40

Barrett. So here you go,

52:43

he said, we'll talk about when the actual vote

52:46

occurs in committee and on the floor. Democrats

52:48

will not supply the quorum, Schumer

52:50

said in the press conference period. Schumer's

52:53

declaration means that if one

52:56

or fewer Democrats turn up for the

52:58

scheduled to vote on a Ober twenty second

53:00

for Barrett, the Judiciary

53:03

Committee cannot move the nomination to

53:05

the full Senate. The move would likely have no effect

53:07

in the full Senate, where there

53:10

are fifty three Republicans.

53:13

So Schumer has been open

53:15

and honest about one of the ways he's

53:17

going to try to shut this down prevent

53:20

a quorum in the

53:23

committee. Okay, the

53:25

transition from our previous

53:27

caller. There's a guy out there

53:31

by the name of Kevin McCullum. I

53:33

have heard of Kevin McCullough. His

53:37

work reaches people

53:40

like me who do what I do. Kevin

53:44

McCullough is a

53:47

guy who has correctly predicted

53:50

winning election maps since

53:53

two thousand and six. Now I know that's

53:55

really not very far. I mean, that's fourteen

53:58

years ago, big, you're saying,

54:00

And I understand, but

54:03

everybody has to start somewhere. And

54:08

two thousand and six is

54:10

his beginning year. And he just

54:13

posted his prediction map

54:15

for the twenty twenty election.

54:19

And rather than show

54:21

you the graphic, I'm just going to give you the electoral

54:23

college results of it. Kevin

54:26

McCullough is predicting three hundred

54:29

thirty electoral votes for Donald

54:31

Trump and two hundred eight

54:35

for Joe Biden. Biden

54:38

wins Washington, Oregon, California,

54:40

Colorado, Illinois. He

54:43

wins Virginia, Maryland,

54:47

Delaware, New Jersey,

54:49

New York, Massachusetts,

54:53

New Hampshire, Rhode Island,

54:56

Connecticut, Maine,

55:00

and what not New Hampshire, Vermont.

55:04

And that's everything else on this

55:06

map is red. Pennsylvania

55:09

is read, Ohio is read, Florida

55:11

is read, Arizona is read,

55:13

Texas is read, Nevada

55:17

is read, Arizona

55:20

is read. Now. He hasn't

55:22

been wrong since two thousand and six. And

55:25

by the way, have you

55:27

heard people saying, man, this year feels a

55:29

lot like twenty sixteen, meaning

55:33

the Poles all have Hillary

55:35

up X and four

55:37

years later, the Poles all have

55:40

Biden up by what seems

55:42

to be very

55:44

similar numbers and very

55:47

similar percentages. And

55:50

everybody's saying, well, yeah, but I mean

55:53

that's that's coincidence.

55:55

Fact the matter is right, that is

55:58

z yeah. Back

56:00

then that then, Trump didn't have

56:02

a record, didn't have to worry about anything, Nobody

56:05

expected him to win, nobody's guard was

56:07

up. But now, I mean, Rush, even

56:09

you have to admit, even, you have to Russia.

56:12

Trump's got so many more enemies today

56:14

that he had back. He got so many more people

56:16

whined up. I don't know that that's true, but

56:21

an electoral map that looks

56:23

similar to specially electoral vote totals

56:27

got my interest. And

56:30

we're back. By the way, there's a story here Bike

56:32

Buried that that guy I just share with Kevin McCullum,

56:36

the guy who thinks and has

56:38

predicted Trump with three hundred and thirty electoral

56:40

votes Biden with two hundred and eight. He's got a story that

56:43

runs at townhall

56:46

dot com. The headline signs that Trump

56:48

is not gonna win on November third, And

56:51

I looked at so what the hell is this? And

56:54

I think the headline is

56:57

written so that every leftist

56:59

nut case out there will read it

57:02

because it says the exact opposite.

57:06

Let me share with you some of the poll quotes from the

57:08

story signs that Trump

57:10

isn't going to win on November

57:12

third. Now it must

57:14

be acknowledged that President Trump is just not

57:16

capable of winning this November three. Perhaps the

57:18

Democrats have finally found a silver bullet after

57:21

the Russia hawks impeachment FORCET lockdown

57:23

lies all of that. They've

57:25

even floated to twenty fifth Amendment, but

57:28

none of it's worked. Not even Nancy

57:31

Pelosi's prayers for the president's

57:33

health could keep him

57:35

in the hospital from more than three days. And here

57:37

one week after he contracted

57:39

COVID nineteen. No

57:42

one's even discussing him having it because

57:44

he's symptom free and feeling twenty

57:46

years younger. So no, Donald

57:49

J. Trump just doesn't have what it takes

57:51

to just win in November. Because

57:53

he's gonna win in a Trump

57:55

slide. He sets him up, sets

57:59

him up. Trump an't going just we is

58:01

going to wipe them out. To

58:07

be exceedingly clear, writes mister McCullough,

58:09

I don't find any evidence of

58:11

a Biden win outside the media.

58:14

Polls. You know, and this is an excellent observation.

58:16

I've made the observation myself. Where is

58:18

the evidence of Biden energy? Where's the

58:20

evidence that there is a

58:23

massive connection of voters attached

58:25

to Joe Biden. You just don't have it. Well,

58:29

Rush, you didn't go out there much because

58:31

he's part to protect himself from COVID nineteen.

58:33

So exactly my point. But

58:37

if he's not going to go out there, then

58:39

there has to be a reason he has

58:41

gone out there. He has

58:43

done public even nobody shows up at

58:46

them. It is not a big

58:48

deal that Joe Biden's coming to your town.

58:51

It is not a big deal that Joe

58:53

Biden is going to make a speech

58:57

or have a campaign rally

59:00

or event in

59:03

your town. Or

59:06

the pundits and never Trump as a Democrats, they'll

59:09

explain away Biden's every foible when

59:11

he says the voters don't

59:13

deserve to know his view on

59:15

a one hundred and fifty year

59:17

precedent breaking idea

59:20

of randomly packing the Supreme Oh,

59:22

can I tell you about that? For some before I forget this.

59:25

Dick Turbine and a number of

59:27

other Democrats are out saying that

59:30

Joe Biden's not talking about packing the court.

59:32

It's a republican's packing the court. You

59:35

know what they say packing the court. Packing the court

59:38

is filling openings with your people.

59:42

That's not what packing the court. They're they're

59:44

literally trying to make the case that Republicans

59:47

ought to be appointing. Like

59:49

if if Ruth Buzzy

59:51

Ginsburg was a Democrat, then Trump

59:53

should nomitrate it nominate a Democrat. And

59:57

if he doesn't, if he

59:59

nominate a conservative like Amy

1:00:01

Coney Barrett, that he's packing the court. That's not what packing

1:00:04

the court is. They

1:00:06

better not get away with this. That would require

1:00:08

genuine ignorance stupidity on the party

1:00:10

American people. The packing

1:00:13

the court means adding seats

1:00:15

to it that don't exist. Supreme

1:00:19

Court now has nine seats. Democrats

1:00:21

want to add four, making

1:00:24

the Supreme Court a thirteen justice

1:00:28

body. That's

1:00:30

packing the court. They're literally out trying to say

1:00:32

the other They're trying to make the case that packing

1:00:35

the court is simply filling every

1:00:38

opening with someone from your party.

1:00:42

So the never trumpers, the Democrats

1:00:45

explain away Biden's every

1:00:48

foible. When

1:00:50

the Biden Harris bus rolls in and

1:00:52

six people sit in a gym in big

1:00:54

circles drawn on the floor. The

1:00:57

media will ignore the contrast of

1:01:00

forty thousand supporters on

1:01:02

a rainy tarmac in Minnesota.

1:01:07

But this election won't be decided

1:01:09

by the pundits or the

1:01:11

never trumpers, nor

1:01:14

the swamp monsters. The

1:01:17

American people are

1:01:20

the only poll that matters. On

1:01:23

November third, President Trump won't

1:01:25

just win. He's going to break records,

1:01:29

shift turnout patterns, and crush

1:01:31

his way to the biggest reelection victory

1:01:34

since Renault's Magnus

1:01:37

forty nine states in

1:01:40

nineteen eighty. It's what

1:01:43

he thinks. He's got the guts

1:01:45

to put it out there. Here's Mark and Moran,

1:01:47

Pennsylvania. Welcome. Great to have you with us,

1:01:49

sir. Hello the horrible

1:01:52

Dettos rush. Thank you, sir. My

1:01:54

question is in

1:01:57

regard to U

1:02:00

Biden or and

1:02:02

then the whole crew of Democrats in regard

1:02:05

to the Affordable Unaffordable

1:02:07

Care Act. Why is it that the politicians

1:02:10

were able to exempt themselves from

1:02:12

participating in the Affordable

1:02:14

Care Act back when we had to find

1:02:17

out as Biden won't tell us who his

1:02:19

nominees would be sitting Nancy

1:02:22

said West, Well, we have to pass it before we

1:02:24

can tell you what's in it. Yeah,

1:02:27

exactly, exactly, And

1:02:30

now Biden gets away,

1:02:32

was saying, you're not going to tell you who

1:02:36

his judges would be, the

1:02:38

judges on his list to pack the court. Weren't even admitting

1:02:40

going to pack the court until

1:02:43

after he's elected. Think people do have a right to know.

1:02:45

I said, well, you know, Amy Coney Barrett ought to say

1:02:48

to these Democrats, I'm not going to tell you anything

1:02:51

about what you want to know regarding my judicial

1:02:53

philosophy until after you've confirmed

1:02:55

me. How does that sound?

1:02:57

And of course you know they would never go

1:03:00

along with that. But what is

1:03:02

your point about the Unaffordable

1:03:04

Care Act? Did you did you ask me something about

1:03:07

Yeah? I said, didn't they exempt

1:03:09

themselves from having to participate?

1:03:12

Yes, they did, they were passing it. Well,

1:03:14

if it was so great, why did they exempt themselves?

1:03:18

But it's good for the American people? Why did

1:03:20

the politicians the true Well,

1:03:22

there's a lesson the one percenters, But if

1:03:24

it was such a great uh,

1:03:27

you know legal document? Are you obviously

1:03:29

there? You're asking a rhetorical question

1:03:32

because you know you know the answer.

1:03:35

You know the answers point, So damn expensive.

1:03:37

It's far more expensive than the one they have as

1:03:39

members of Congress. Yeah,

1:03:42

so not what's good for us

1:03:44

is good you know for them, they've they've

1:03:47

left us behind. So if

1:03:50

you know, if you stick with that, uh,

1:03:52

they are the true one percenters. We are

1:03:54

the deplorables. And as you're saying,

1:03:57

a butt whoopin's coming in three weeks.

1:03:59

Yeah, I

1:04:02

know. I don't know how to say this other than to just say

1:04:04

it. I

1:04:06

have never believed

1:04:09

that we are cruising for a landslide lass.

1:04:13

I have just never believed

1:04:16

it. It has not computed. It

1:04:18

hasn't made any

1:04:21

sense to me. Now, you

1:04:23

know, it's hard to factor in election

1:04:25

cheating and things that we

1:04:27

know that Democrats

1:04:29

are capable of and have done before. It's hard

1:04:31

to factor all those things in. But

1:04:34

the main reason for me is that the source of the

1:04:36

information has been a bunch of people who aren't

1:04:38

right. Mainstream

1:04:41

media polsters didn't get

1:04:43

anywhere close to accuracy in

1:04:46

twenty sixteen. They

1:04:49

despised Donald Trump. This we know they've

1:04:52

doubled down on taking

1:04:54

him out and eliminating him, and

1:04:57

it don't I just don't see all

1:04:59

the great changes. The closest that you come

1:05:03

and I say you generically, I

1:05:06

think the closest and you won't tell me if

1:05:08

this is not true. The closest

1:05:10

people come to giving up is when

1:05:12

you find yourself succoming to

1:05:15

the onslaught of mainstream

1:05:17

media, when you can no

1:05:20

longer find a

1:05:22

way to resist it, when you start believing

1:05:25

it. A daily

1:05:27

dose of mainstream media, Donald Trump's

1:05:30

this, Donald Trump's at Donald Trump's will retrobate. Donald

1:05:32

Trump always horrible, And maybe

1:05:34

you've had to resist it for so

1:05:37

long that your guard's done. And maybe

1:05:39

one day, two days,

1:05:42

Trump will put out a tweet that you wish

1:05:44

he hadn't put out. It'll cause you to came,

1:05:46

oh my god, the guy is blowing it. I

1:05:48

think it happens that way to

1:05:51

people, rather than what

1:05:54

I would call institutionally. I think it's

1:05:57

something that people experience in a role

1:06:01

fashion that they don't feel

1:06:03

consistently. But when they do

1:06:05

feel that Trump is blowing it, they believe it and

1:06:08

it bothers them anyway, Mark,

1:06:11

I appreciate the call. We've got a brief time

1:06:13

out, will come back and continue. Right

1:06:15

after this. Back

1:06:18

to the phones we go. This is and in Pittsburgh,

1:06:21

A and welcome. Great to have you within us on the

1:06:23

EIB Network. Hello Rush,

1:06:25

Mega dinners and prayers your way. Bud, Hey,

1:06:28

you heard you talked a little bit earlier about the WHO,

1:06:31

and if I heard you correctly, they kind of did a

1:06:33

one eighty on lockdowns. I

1:06:36

have a theory I want to run by you and see if you agree

1:06:38

with it. I believe that the vast majority

1:06:40

of the country doesn't want to hear about walkdowns

1:06:43

anymore. I don't think people favor them.

1:06:45

I'm wondering if the WHO is believing

1:06:48

the polls, thinking Biden's

1:06:50

gonna win. If he does, he

1:06:52

doesn't have to walk the country down, which he says he's

1:06:55

been fought. His followers signs and all walk it down

1:06:57

and see if he has to. Makes

1:06:59

sense. You

1:07:01

wonder if he is believing the poles

1:07:03

thinking Biden's gonna win. If he does, he

1:07:06

doesn't have to lock the country down. So

1:07:08

so you think he doesn't want to lock the country down because

1:07:10

he's gonna win. He only wanted to lock

1:07:12

it down if he thought Trump was gonna win, so it

1:07:14

would be bad for Trump, right,

1:07:17

And the point thing is, I think the country

1:07:19

is Biden has been talking lockdown.

1:07:21

At least he's been hinting of that during

1:07:24

his campaign, that if the science said walk

1:07:26

it down, he'll lock it down. And

1:07:29

obviously Trump has never really been for

1:07:31

lockdowns. He reluctantly did it, I believe

1:07:33

when he did, and as a result

1:07:35

that I think does who is believing

1:07:37

that Biden is going to win and then Biden

1:07:40

doesn't have to lock down the economy

1:07:42

or the country if and when he wins,

1:07:44

and as a result that he could just say he's following

1:07:47

the science. I don't know if

1:07:49

that makes sense to your not What

1:07:52

you're doing is you're you're taking

1:07:54

this story and you're

1:07:56

trying to find a secret in it, and

1:07:59

the secret it is that it

1:08:02

indicates they think, let's

1:08:05

see, if I understand you, they think they

1:08:07

think Biden's gonna win. That's what you think, and

1:08:11

that this releases him from having to lockdown

1:08:14

or lock because I gotta believe his

1:08:17

people are I mean that the polls are showing that

1:08:19

the vast majority of country cannot go doesn't

1:08:22

want to go to another lockdown. I think most people

1:08:24

don't agree with a lockdown. So

1:08:27

as a result of Biden keeps talking lockdown

1:08:29

because he's going to follow the science. He does

1:08:32

then doesn't have to lockdown the country

1:08:34

if he wins, and he'll keep the economy going to a certain

1:08:37

thing because he's got to believe that the economy

1:08:39

is starting to move along now to a

1:08:41

point where it can't be good for Biden, meaning

1:08:43

the election of Biden's got to be good for Trump.

1:08:47

Okay, I'm still not sure.

1:08:49

I get it. I'll have to have

1:08:51

to think about it. You're am I right.

1:08:54

You're looking for a secret in the story that's

1:08:56

trying to tell you who these people think is gonna

1:08:58

win and lose. And you think that because

1:09:01

there is uh the

1:09:03

who says no lockdown, you think that means

1:09:05

they think Biden's gonna win. That's

1:09:08

what I believe. And so this way Biden doesn't have

1:09:10

to come out and talk about lockdowns him or

1:09:12

he'll say he's going to follow the side. Okay,

1:09:14

okay, okay, I just said yes or no.

1:09:17

Um, I don't know. I'll have

1:09:19

to I'll

1:09:22

have to think about

1:09:25

that. The story is this, if you missed

1:09:27

it, The World Health Organization now says lockdowns

1:09:30

are a bad idea that

1:09:32

should be avoided. And

1:09:35

the doctor quoted is

1:09:37

doctor David Nabarro, the

1:09:40

World Health Organization Special envoy

1:09:43

on COVID nineteen, and he's talking to them.

1:09:46

I think it's the American Spectator, and

1:09:50

I don't I don't know that there is any popular

1:09:52

sentiment for locking the country down there. Maybe

1:09:55

the Biden the

1:09:57

Democrats have been talking about it, but

1:10:01

I have missed it. Anyway,

1:10:05

let me let me ponder what you said, and I'll i'll

1:10:08

circle back to it. Kay in rock

1:10:10

Hill, North Carolina. Hello, Hi,

1:10:13

Rush, love your show, so to my kids. Uh,

1:10:17

thank you, thank you very much. Okay,

1:10:19

My question was you were speaking earlier about

1:10:21

the lack of panic publicly

1:10:24

from the Democrats about the Supreme Court

1:10:26

appointee, and then you've read the statement by

1:10:28

Schumer. So what actually

1:10:30

happens if the Democrats do go

1:10:32

ahead in boycott the vote. Can

1:10:35

the Republicans will they have enough people

1:10:37

to go ahead and call for a vote, or

1:10:39

do the Democrats get their stalemate and we're

1:10:41

just stuck. I don't know. I don't think

1:10:43

there's going to be a stalemate. I think there's a way,

1:10:46

there will be a way around it. But off

1:10:49

top of my head, I

1:10:51

don't have an answer for you now. The it's

1:10:54

just what Schumer is announcing as

1:10:57

their strategy right now, I wouldn't believe anything

1:11:00

they're saying. I

1:11:02

think that, But if they do boycott

1:11:05

it, that's kind of that might be the reason for the

1:11:07

calm. They know they've got a way to stop

1:11:09

it. Well, it could be okay, So

1:11:11

two calls in a row thinks we're gonna lose. This

1:11:13

is what I'm having trouble with. I don't think

1:11:16

we're gonna lose. I just think that

1:11:18

having her in place in the Supreme

1:11:20

Court before this mess

1:11:22

starts with the election, because I mean, face

1:11:25

it, with all this change and the voting and

1:11:27

all these massive nailouts, we know there's

1:11:29

going to be fraught. So it's

1:11:31

going to run all the way to the Supreme Court. We

1:11:34

need the Supreme Court full. But

1:11:37

I couldn't agree. I could not agree

1:11:39

more we do. Publicly, they

1:11:41

just seem way too calm. So it

1:11:44

seems like they know, hey, we don't have

1:11:46

to worry about this, We're just not going to vote. Well,

1:11:48

that's why they seem way to a calm, because

1:11:50

I think they've got a bunch of things that they

1:11:52

are they are thinking

1:11:55

of springing this this

1:11:57

one they have announced I'm thinking

1:11:59

of they didn't announce, they didn't announce

1:12:02

Christine ballsey Ford. They just

1:12:04

sprung that one on everybody. This one

1:12:06

they have announced, which gives people

1:12:08

a chance to look

1:12:10

into it and find out what any kind

1:12:13

of a reactive measure

1:12:15

to it would

1:12:17

be. But I would have to I'd

1:12:19

have to call a turtle and find

1:12:22

out what Senate procedure is and

1:12:24

what options he has available

1:12:27

to him. Was it What they're really what Schumer's

1:12:29

talking about doing is denying a quorum,

1:12:32

meaning that we Democrats are not going to show

1:12:34

in committee. They couldn't

1:12:36

pull this off in the full Senate. So

1:12:39

what they're trying to shut this down in committee

1:12:41

by making sure there's not a quorum, meaning there's

1:12:43

not enough members total

1:12:47

both parties members to conduct

1:12:49

official business. Now

1:12:51

I wouldn't if that's if that's their gambit,

1:12:54

I wouldn't blame them at all for trying

1:12:56

this. But I also

1:12:58

wouldn't think that the turtle in the

1:13:01

gang on the Republican

1:13:03

side don't have a response

1:13:05

to it. We'll keep a

1:13:07

sharp eye. I'm

1:13:10

hoping this doesn't go to the Supreme

1:13:12

Court. I know that I know the stories are

1:13:15

filled with basic

1:13:17

horror stories or where this could go, and why

1:13:20

she needs to be confirmed, of why they don't want

1:13:22

her anywhere near the court for

1:13:24

a host of reasons. I'm sorry my

1:13:26

optimism. I just I think everything

1:13:28

these people are doing is going to come back and bite them.

1:13:32

I just do in the long run,

1:13:34

We'll take a break and be back after this. Don't

1:13:37

go away. Well, it

1:13:39

really is the fastest three hours in media.

1:13:41

We are zooming on down the tracks, folks,

1:13:46

and we got a brief break here at the top of

1:13:48

the hour. We'll come back right after it and

1:13:50

continue Russia Limbaugh

1:13:52

Program, Do Not Go

1:13:55

Anywhere. Hi, welcome

1:13:57

back, my friends. It's great to have you

1:13:59

when this on. This the most listen to radio

1:14:01

talk show in the country. Your

1:14:04

guiding light through times of trouble, confusion,

1:14:06

murkiness, oh

1:14:11

yeah, even the good times too. There's all kinds of

1:14:14

rotten stuff going on out there, but we plow

1:14:17

through the murk and

1:14:20

we make it worth the while. The telephone number

1:14:22

if you want to join us eight hundred to eight two eight

1:14:24

eight two, and the

1:14:26

email address Rushboe at eibn

1:14:29

at dot us. There

1:14:31

was a story in The New

1:14:33

York Times on Friday I

1:14:35

didn't see it because I do

1:14:37

not read The New York Times.

1:14:40

That was pointed out to me. The first note

1:14:42

I had about it was from a friend of mine in Israel,

1:14:46

and his note did not say anything

1:14:48

about the story, which is

1:14:51

typical because of anythinks I did see

1:14:53

it. His note was

1:14:56

something along the lines of, well, I see the New York

1:14:58

Times has discovered again

1:15:02

as a leader of the conservative

1:15:04

media and thought apparatus

1:15:07

in America.

1:15:09

I said, well, that's still not enough to

1:15:11

make me want to read it. So

1:15:14

I didn't. I have better things

1:15:16

to do, and why

1:15:18

do I want to read something that is largely

1:15:20

probably going to be wrong about

1:15:23

me. Well, eventually I got around to reading

1:15:25

it, and I don't remember

1:15:27

why. The

1:15:30

title of the piece is talk radio

1:15:33

is turning millions. Now there's folks,

1:15:35

there's an object lesson in this for

1:15:39

me, for everybody, and

1:15:42

in regards to in regards to media.

1:15:47

By the way, Amy Coney Barrett has begun her opening

1:15:49

remarks, I guess she's through. Now. She put her

1:15:51

mask back on, took the mask off for the remarks,

1:15:54

and now I guess her supporting

1:15:56

witnesses are speaking in her behalf.

1:16:00

The headline talk radio turning millions

1:16:02

of Americans into conservatives, like they

1:16:05

just discovered this, And

1:16:08

then the subheadline of the piece the medium

1:16:11

is at the heart of Trumpism.

1:16:15

And so I

1:16:17

read the piece, and

1:16:20

like every piece about

1:16:22

talk radio, it starts off being glaringly

1:16:25

wrong about audience size at

1:16:29

its minimalist. Minimalist,

1:16:31

we have twenty million listens

1:16:34

unduplicated in a week. That's at

1:16:36

the least you

1:16:39

throw our computer model projections

1:16:41

in. Like the computer model projections

1:16:43

projecting the number of COVID cases, our

1:16:46

audience can be upwards of thirty five to

1:16:48

forty million, sometimes as high as

1:16:50

fifty but actual

1:16:54

figures from media

1:16:57

ratings outfits twenty million is

1:17:01

the bare minimum. And yet this story reports

1:17:03

it is fifteen. At least

1:17:06

fifteen million Americans

1:17:08

every week tune into one of the top fifteen

1:17:10

talk radio programs. They are not

1:17:13

monolithically conservative, but they are

1:17:15

overwhelmingly though. Talk

1:17:18

radio's power is rooted

1:17:21

in the sheer volume of content

1:17:24

being produced each week. The typical

1:17:27

major talk radio show, there's

1:17:31

really only one of those, and

1:17:33

it isn't typical, but I

1:17:36

digress. The

1:17:39

typical major talk

1:17:41

radio show is produced every weekday

1:17:44

and runs three hours, So

1:17:46

just the top fifteen shows are

1:17:49

putting out around forty five hours

1:17:51

of content every day, Even

1:17:54

setting aside hundreds of additional local

1:17:56

shows, the dedicated fan can listen

1:17:58

to nothing but conservative

1:18:01

talk radio all day, every

1:18:04

day of the week and never catch

1:18:06

up. Yet

1:18:08

talk radio still somehow manages

1:18:11

to fly below the national

1:18:13

media radar. In

1:18:16

large part that is because media consumption

1:18:19

patterns are segregated by class.

1:18:22

So here we go. If

1:18:24

you visit a carpentry shop

1:18:27

or a factory floor, or

1:18:29

if you hitch a ride with a long haul

1:18:32

truck driver, the odds are

1:18:34

that talk radio is a fixture of

1:18:36

the ural landscape. That means

1:18:38

people that get their media hearing. But

1:18:42

many white collar workers I

1:18:45

eat the smart people, the educated

1:18:47

people, journalists, and so forth. They

1:18:50

struggle to understand the reach of talk

1:18:52

radio because they don't listen to it, and

1:18:55

they don't know anybody who does. Moreover,

1:18:59

any one who wants to make an effort to

1:19:01

understand talk radio runs into a barrier

1:19:04

immediately because

1:19:07

of the ocean of content. One must

1:19:09

listen to it at great length,

1:19:12

a daunting task for anyone not

1:19:14

already sympathetic with

1:19:16

the host's conservative views. The

1:19:20

time commitment suggests the depth

1:19:22

of listener loyalty. Anyway, the

1:19:24

story completely is filled

1:19:26

with cliche after cliche

1:19:29

and incorrect fact after

1:19:32

incorrect fact. Incorrect fact. Number one,

1:19:34

the audience

1:19:36

is fifteen million. In no universe

1:19:39

is this program's audience. That's small. Number

1:19:41

two the idea

1:19:43

that the only people listen to talk radio are hayseed

1:19:45

hicks who

1:19:47

work in carpentry stores or sit in a

1:19:50

cabs a long haul trucks.

1:19:53

But the real educated, the elids,

1:19:55

the people that wear white collars, and maybe

1:19:58

even a time now and then, they

1:20:01

don't listen to it. They don't know anybody who knows. None

1:20:05

of this is true. But here's the point, folks,

1:20:09

one of many points. Not long ago, not

1:20:14

all that many years ago, the

1:20:16

very same New York Times Sunday

1:20:21

magazine ran a cover

1:20:24

story on me and this program.

1:20:26

And it was a long story, and

1:20:29

it was devoted to the power of my talk

1:20:31

show. It was devoted to

1:20:33

the power that I wield

1:20:36

personally. For the most part,

1:20:38

it was actually a favorable piece.

1:20:42

And my point is here that now we are

1:20:44

some years later and not all that many

1:20:50

this story comes as though the previous

1:20:52

story has never been written It's

1:20:55

like The New York Times is not aware

1:20:57

of all the stories they've done on

1:20:59

me or conservative talk

1:21:01

radio in all the years in the

1:21:03

previous thirty two It's

1:21:06

like this story that ran Friday is

1:21:08

the first and nothing

1:21:10

came before it. As

1:21:13

though the subject or

1:21:15

the topic of

1:21:18

the dominance of

1:21:20

talk radio or something just now occurring

1:21:22

to the New York Times. That

1:21:25

right, this guy that Paul Metzko

1:21:27

is the writer, he just now stumbled

1:21:30

into this truth, the

1:21:33

subject of a dominance of

1:21:36

talk radio something it just occurred

1:21:39

to him. Well, it

1:21:41

could well be. There's a generational

1:21:43

change theory out there. This

1:21:46

program has been around thirty two years. That's

1:21:49

easily a generation, and then some that

1:21:52

calculate the generation to be twenty five years. So

1:21:55

it's entirely possible that

1:21:57

there are employees at

1:22:00

the New York Times who

1:22:02

have never listened to this program,

1:22:05

who have never listened to this program

1:22:08

and do not know it exists. They

1:22:11

are millennials, their

1:22:14

recent college graduates or what have you.

1:22:17

They probably have heard of it, but

1:22:21

it's not in their daily diet.

1:22:24

No talk radio is. You know what is

1:22:26

this story? You know what? This story makes a big claim of saying

1:22:29

podcasts. Podcasts,

1:22:32

Yeah, podcast that's a future.

1:22:34

You know why, let's say about podcasts,

1:22:36

folks, I don't want to. I don't want to. I

1:22:38

don't want to be overly

1:22:41

critical here. Podcasts

1:22:45

are the left's attempt at

1:22:47

talk radio because they can't succeed

1:22:49

in it. They

1:22:52

have never The reason there's

1:22:54

no liberal on talk radio is as simple

1:22:57

as why Joe Biden has no bond

1:22:59

with his support orders. They do not have

1:23:01

that relationship with people that support

1:23:03

them. I do. Joe

1:23:07

Biden has no body. These liberals

1:23:10

do not have a personal connection with

1:23:12

anybody in their audience, even

1:23:15

if they're comedians, even if their stand up,

1:23:17

they just don't. They

1:23:20

don't have that kind of relationship I

1:23:23

do. They don't understand that,

1:23:26

they don't even conceive of it.

1:23:29

It's not something that even crosses their path.

1:23:33

But the

1:23:36

podcasts are considered white collar because

1:23:39

it assumes that liberals nominate

1:23:42

podcasts, and so because of

1:23:44

that, podcasts are acceptable. You

1:23:46

see, even

1:23:49

though I ladies and gentlemen,

1:23:51

and the first broadcaster

1:23:54

to podcast my show, and

1:23:57

you know what still

1:23:59

do to this day. The podcast

1:24:02

of every hour of this program is available

1:24:04

l free Bow every day.

1:24:07

Well to subscribers at rushlmbo dot

1:24:09

com

1:24:12

over two hundred thousand paying

1:24:15

subscribers. Your average

1:24:18

leftist podcasts would be lucky

1:24:21

to have twenty five to fifty at

1:24:23

the top end. Would that be close

1:24:25

to being accurate? Or there's not a little

1:24:28

higher than that? When

1:24:30

he gets off the phone, ask him did the question I

1:24:33

just raised? It

1:24:36

is a stark contrast.

1:24:38

So podcasts with

1:24:41

an audience twenty five percent

1:24:43

the size of my podcast and

1:24:46

not even comparable to the size

1:24:48

of the radio talk show are considered much

1:24:52

more intellectually preferable and powerful

1:24:55

and interesting and what have

1:24:57

you. Because that the podcast world

1:25:00

is where leftists who fail

1:25:02

at talk radio go and

1:25:05

tell themselves they matter when

1:25:08

they don't. It is

1:25:10

stunning to watch. There

1:25:14

are a couple exceptions, there are

1:25:16

some really big podcasts, podcasters

1:25:21

heroes, but in general it's

1:25:26

a it's an overhyped medium

1:25:29

that oftentimes does

1:25:31

not have to validate its strength.

1:25:38

So podcasts with subscribers in a twenty

1:25:41

thousand range, they're considered massively

1:25:43

big hits. Now

1:25:45

what this is about, folks, this story,

1:25:48

this is about conservatism.

1:25:51

This is not about radio. It's not

1:25:53

about other media.

1:25:56

The author gives it away when

1:25:58

he winds it to be ending of his story

1:26:00

that there's on Lay one liberal

1:26:03

show in the top fifteen

1:26:05

talk shows. But he's not worried

1:26:08

that you don't find a successful

1:26:10

conservative podcast. Of course,

1:26:12

he doesn't know that mine is in the

1:26:15

roster of successful

1:26:18

podcasts. But stop and

1:26:20

think the New York Times, I mean, over the years, has done

1:26:24

They've asked me to do ads. Little

1:26:26

pinch Shulsburger asked me to do an ad in the

1:26:28

back of a cab in New York Times

1:26:30

Times Square to sell the New

1:26:33

York Times. The Feminazis came along

1:26:35

and shut it down. They humiliated

1:26:37

and made him fully add. They

1:26:40

have done countless stories on this program

1:26:43

the New York Times over the years.

1:26:46

Max Frankel, when he was

1:26:48

the editor of the editorial page. You New York Times

1:26:51

employees might find this passing. Max Frankel

1:26:53

asked me to do a series of op

1:26:55

eds in

1:26:58

the late eighties and early nineties

1:27:01

in the New York Times. Yet

1:27:03

this guy writes about

1:27:05

conservative talk radio as though

1:27:08

he just discovered it. The New

1:27:10

York Times just discovered it, and

1:27:14

wow is it strange? And

1:27:17

wow, it really is conservative

1:27:20

and it has

1:27:23

it has a Fengali like hold

1:27:25

on its audience. That was the

1:27:27

first criticism of this show, that

1:27:30

you people are a bunch of mind number of bots.

1:27:33

You're incapable of thinking for yourself.

1:27:36

Now you don't know what to think and

1:27:39

you don't know how to vote till I come along

1:27:41

and tell you. And here this all is being

1:27:43

recycled for I don't know what

1:27:45

is this a twenty fifth time in

1:27:49

thirty two years you

1:27:52

talk here's the pre

1:27:54

eminent newspaper,

1:27:57

said to be the greatest newspaper in

1:28:00

the world, certainly in the country. And

1:28:02

on the subject of talk radio, it's absolutely clueless.

1:28:06

On the subject of me, It's absolutely

1:28:08

clueless. The object lesson is

1:28:11

if they are going to be this wrong and

1:28:13

this clueless about

1:28:16

an industry, this cruisial because he

1:28:18

makes the point. Without talk radio,

1:28:20

there is no Trump, so you can tell day Javis.

1:28:24

Yeah, the subhead the medium is at the heart

1:28:26

of Trump is m horrible,

1:28:31

absolutely horrible. Trump doesn't

1:28:33

even believe that. By the way, Trump

1:28:36

thinks that Fox News is

1:28:38

at the heart of Trump is him. He doesn't

1:28:40

think talk radio is at the heart of anything he's doing.

1:28:44

You mean, not even after Friday. Damn

1:28:46

straight I'm telling it. Trump believes. Trump's

1:28:48

a TV guy. He hosted

1:28:50

The Apprentice before that, even

1:28:52

all kinds of TV shows. He's not a radio guy.

1:28:57

I think he learned a lot

1:28:59

on Friday about

1:29:02

the reach, the power of the size of

1:29:05

the audience. But he's

1:29:08

a Fox News guy. You can tell

1:29:10

they disappoint him a lot, so he talks

1:29:12

about them. But I just I

1:29:15

sit here in marvel. There have

1:29:17

been that New York timesund the magazine story

1:29:19

was not all that long ago, same

1:29:22

newspaper that's writing a story last Friday

1:29:24

as though they've never heard of me before.

1:29:28

And wow, this is dangerous. You

1:29:31

know, Wow, we got we gotta get a handle,

1:29:33

We gotta keep an eye on this.

1:29:35

This thing is at the heart of Trump is him, and

1:29:37

it's a bunch of dumb people. They're

1:29:39

just a bunch of people

1:29:42

being easily led down the primrose path,

1:29:45

a bunch of people to hang around jewelry

1:29:49

shops and cutting

1:29:52

room floors and in the cabins

1:29:54

of long haul trucks. Can't

1:29:56

have that. So there's the requisite

1:29:59

insult of the class

1:30:03

and the style the education

1:30:05

of people that listen to talk radios is something that's

1:30:07

never changed and the guy

1:30:09

admits that

1:30:12

the journalists writing the stories

1:30:14

about all of this never listen to

1:30:16

it. Let's take a brief break.

1:30:18

We will come back and continue right

1:30:20

after this. Okay,

1:30:23

let's get back to the calls. Back to the

1:30:25

phone's dug in New Carlyle, Ohio.

1:30:27

Welcome, sir, It's great to have you

1:30:29

here today. Hi, mega

1:30:31

dittos and mega prayers Rush, Thank you, sir.

1:30:35

I would just like to say that on

1:30:37

the optimistic side of the house, no

1:30:39

one has left Trump. Everything he had in

1:30:41

twenty sixteen has gone absolutely nowhere.

1:30:44

The media has had no effect. People are gonna

1:30:47

crawl through broken glass for what is your

1:30:49

evidence for this? I mean, I'm not arguing

1:30:51

with you. I just like, no, what is your ever you're

1:30:53

feeling? Your thought? Why? Why do you think

1:30:56

this? Well, he's the same guy who was in twenty

1:30:58

sixteen Billy Bush getting me people stay

1:31:00

away. What's all the smears of the media today going to

1:31:02

make him make him stay away? I mean,

1:31:04

he survived everything that

1:31:07

was stacked in the deck in twenty sixteen. He didn't

1:31:09

scare anybody. Uh

1:31:13

well, no, true, but he

1:31:15

may not be the exact same dude. Now he's

1:31:17

got a record. Now he's got things

1:31:20

that he has said and done. Say on

1:31:22

the virus, things that

1:31:25

he has said and done on the

1:31:27

economy. That's

1:31:31

a big deal. When he ran in twenty

1:31:33

sixteen, he had nothing tied to

1:31:35

him. He could criticize anything.

1:31:37

It didn't have his fingerprints on it. Now

1:31:40

there are a lot of things have his fingerprints on it. Much

1:31:42

of that is good. By the way, he's

1:31:44

got a great achievement record. Oh,

1:31:48

absolutely, absolutely, you

1:31:51

know, I don't I don't think that. Uh,

1:31:54

what's happened since twenty sixteen is

1:31:56

persuaded any moderate or undersided

1:31:59

voter is emery and titha persuading

1:32:01

anybody got to vote Democrat. I don't

1:32:03

see it. Now on the

1:32:05

Republican side of the House, you have the

1:32:07

Blexit movement, which didn't exist in twenty

1:32:10

sixteen. You have the walkaway movement.

1:32:12

I mean, this stuff matters. When you won Pennsylvania,

1:32:15

Michigan, Wisconsin by such

1:32:17

small margins, I mean that stuff matters.

1:32:21

Right, So what do you what do

1:32:23

you say about the oh,

1:32:26

never mind? Uh, well,

1:32:29

I just I find it. I find it fascinating

1:32:31

that you think that

1:32:34

that nobody has and

1:32:36

you think more people have joined him you think he's a Trump

1:32:38

I think that not nobody ain't culture other than ain't

1:32:41

culture nobody. Okay,

1:32:45

yeah, too, shame to shame.

1:32:47

Well, the reason I think, because how many people do you think

1:32:49

voted for Trump in twenty sixteen? Um,

1:32:54

was everybody that voted for him all

1:32:56

in? Were they a total one

1:32:58

hundred percent Trump's porter? Or they

1:33:00

were just voting for here's an outsider, here's

1:33:03

somebody new. This is it refreshing. I haven't

1:33:05

heard anything like this before. I think I'll vote

1:33:07

for this guy. You think every Trump

1:33:09

voter was personally invested in his success,

1:33:14

all of the Trump new voters. And

1:33:16

then you had the Republican Republican

1:33:19

guard, you know, regardless, and then you had the head,

1:33:21

had the never trumpers, and I think a lot of the never trumpers

1:33:23

have gone away. A lot of the never Trumpers

1:33:26

were, oh, he's pretending to be a conservative

1:33:28

and we see what justices? All right, Okay,

1:33:30

well I appreciate it. Another break, We'll

1:33:33

be back. Okay.

1:33:35

We have some SoundBite your Vamy Coney Barrett,

1:33:37

when she got around to making her

1:33:40

opening statement to

1:33:42

the Senate Judiciary Committee. That soundbites

1:33:44

twenty five through twenty eight here,

1:33:46

Mike, and here is the first one.

1:33:48

I also clerked for Justice Scalia,

1:33:51

and like many law students, I

1:33:53

felt like I knew the justice before

1:33:55

I ever met him, because I had

1:33:57

read so many of his colorful, accessible

1:34:00

opinions. More than the style

1:34:02

of his writing, though, it was the content

1:34:05

of Justice Scaliah's reasoning that shaped

1:34:07

me. His judicial philosophy

1:34:10

was straightforward. A judge must

1:34:12

apply the law as it is written,

1:34:14

not as she wishes it were. Sometimes

1:34:18

that approach met reaching results

1:34:20

that he did not like, But as

1:34:22

he put it in one of his best known opinions,

1:34:25

that is what it means to say that

1:34:28

we have a government of laws and not

1:34:30

of men. Justice Scaliah

1:34:32

taught me more than just law. He

1:34:34

was devoted to his family, resolute

1:34:37

and his beliefs, and fearless

1:34:40

of criticism. And as I embarked

1:34:42

on my own legal career, I resolved

1:34:45

to maintain that same perspective.

1:34:47

Now you hear that fearless of criticism.

1:34:50

It's a requirement.

1:34:52

It is a requisite requirement

1:34:56

if you're going to serve as

1:34:59

a conservative, or in this case,

1:35:01

as an originalist in

1:35:04

Washington, DC. You might think,

1:35:07

man, this is kind of dull A

1:35:10

judge must apply the law as it is written,

1:35:12

not as he wishes it were. Yeah, that's absolutely

1:35:15

right. To the left, that's

1:35:17

showing Dracula

1:35:20

a cross made out of garlic. That's

1:35:24

not what justices do. Justices

1:35:26

make up the law. Justices

1:35:30

implement their agenda.

1:35:33

Justices are there in

1:35:35

order to make sure that the leftist

1:35:38

agenda is not stopped

1:35:40

and not silenced in

1:35:44

legislation or in

1:35:48

cases between two litigants

1:35:50

or in legislation. Pure and simple, that's

1:35:53

what liberal judges are

1:35:55

there for. They are

1:35:58

not there to apply the law as

1:36:00

it is written, because remember, and

1:36:03

I'm not for this is a non exaggeration. Applying

1:36:05

the law as is written is to apply

1:36:08

racism, it is

1:36:10

to apply homophobia,

1:36:13

it is to apply bigotry.

1:36:15

Because these are the things the American

1:36:17

left believe where

1:36:20

the cornerstone of American

1:36:22

life during the days of our

1:36:24

founding. And so

1:36:26

a proper judge or justice

1:36:29

is going to take every occasion he or

1:36:32

she can to eliminate

1:36:36

laws of that nature when

1:36:39

cases come before them. Don't

1:36:43

you can sit there and shake

1:36:45

your heads a Russia. I'm

1:36:48

a thousand percent correct about this. It's

1:36:51

what their purpose is and it's why they are

1:36:54

so fearful of Amy

1:36:56

Coney Barrett. Here's the next portion of

1:36:58

her statement. I worked hard as a lawyer

1:37:00

and as a professor. I owed

1:37:02

that to my clients, to my students,

1:37:05

and to myself. But I never

1:37:07

let the law define my identity or

1:37:09

crowd out the rest of my life. A

1:37:12

similar principle applies to the role

1:37:14

of courts. Courts have

1:37:16

a vital responsibility to the rule

1:37:18

of law, which is critical to a free

1:37:20

society. But courts are

1:37:23

not designed to solve every

1:37:25

problem or right every wrong in

1:37:27

our public life. The policy

1:37:29

decisions and value judgments

1:37:31

of government must be made

1:37:34

by the political branches elected

1:37:36

by and accountable to

1:37:38

the people. The public should

1:37:41

not expect courts to do so, and

1:37:43

courts should not try Oh

1:37:46

no, no, no, no, no, mis bar Dad's

1:37:49

not what your role is. Policy

1:37:52

decisions and value judgments of government

1:37:55

must be made by the political branches

1:37:57

elected by an accountable to the people.

1:38:00

Public should not expect courts to

1:38:02

do that. Courts shouldn't try

1:38:05

wrong. Oh, that's exactly

1:38:07

what courts. The courts are to correct

1:38:09

the mistakes made by uninformed

1:38:13

people. They

1:38:15

are to correct mistakes made by

1:38:18

wrong and poor examples

1:38:21

of elected representation. This

1:38:25

woman would be a grand slam home

1:38:27

run and she will be confirmed.

1:38:30

Folks, when there's a when there's a chance

1:38:34

to take advantage of an online gap,

1:38:36

there's a cyber thief focusing on

1:38:38

it. You know what an online gap is. So

1:38:41

many unemployment claims being filed

1:38:44

this year due to the pandemic fraudulent

1:38:46

unemployment claims are up. It

1:38:49

has become the number one spot for fraud

1:38:52

in our nation. Cyber Thieves

1:38:54

use stolen online identities

1:38:56

from databases they've obtained, and

1:38:59

they file state unemployment claims with

1:39:01

that information. If your

1:39:04

identity is involved, you won't

1:39:06

have any idea until the end of

1:39:08

this year when you get a tax

1:39:10

filing of one kind or another. Online

1:39:13

identity theft is the crime of

1:39:17

your information being used without your

1:39:19

permission and without your knowledge, and

1:39:22

it happens in a number of ways. Like the latest

1:39:24

scam. You're left to protect yourself. You do that

1:39:27

with life Luck. LifeLock provides

1:39:29

you with online identity theft protection

1:39:31

or will you become a LifeLock member? For example, Their

1:39:35

computer systems take your information

1:39:37

and constantly compare it

1:39:39

with billions of daily

1:39:42

online transactions. Find out if you're in there.

1:39:45

They're looking for evidence that your

1:39:47

data has been stolen and

1:39:49

is being used by cyber thieves.

1:39:52

And when they spot your information being

1:39:54

mixed up in the wrong ways, they

1:39:57

are quick to alert you. They send

1:39:59

you a tech or an email or a phone call,

1:40:01

however you set it up with them, however you want

1:40:03

to be notified. That's

1:40:05

when you confirm or deny that you've been a victim

1:40:08

of identity thefts. So they find something I think is wrong.

1:40:10

Somebody's opened a bank account your name. They get hold

1:40:12

of you. Did you open a bank account

1:40:14

at the Lion King Bank

1:40:16

account over here in Oshkosh, Nebraska?

1:40:19

No? No, oh good, somebody

1:40:22

did and we got to track them. That's how

1:40:24

this stuff happens. When

1:40:27

they spot your information being mixed up in the wrong

1:40:29

ways, they are quick to alert you. They shut it

1:40:31

down, try to find out who's doing it, and

1:40:33

make sure it doesn't happen again. They've

1:40:36

got a restoration team comes immediately

1:40:39

to your assistance. They don't stop

1:40:42

until they have restored your good name, your credit

1:40:44

rating, and all that. Making sense

1:40:46

of what happened. Sign up today, folks at LifeLock

1:40:49

dot com. Use my name when you

1:40:51

do and you'll save twenty five percent

1:40:53

off your first year. That's LifeLock dot com. Use

1:40:56

my name as the promo

1:40:58

code. Michael and Manville, tex. It's great to have

1:41:00

you, sir. How are you? I'm great, Mega

1:41:02

prayers, Rush. I want to get right to it. I'm

1:41:05

telling your Rush, I've got these Democrats figured

1:41:07

out. We know that Democrats,

1:41:09

we know that George Soros pays

1:41:12

people to show up to vote, to

1:41:14

riot, to protest. Why

1:41:17

would these quote Biden rallies?

1:41:20

Are they not paying people

1:41:22

to show up? They are willing to

1:41:25

let these horrible optics out there

1:41:27

of nobody showing up. It looks terrible.

1:41:30

Yet Biden keeps doing these

1:41:33

events and they're not having

1:41:35

people show up. I'm telling you it's

1:41:37

because they're just running a

1:41:39

cursory campaign. They're going through

1:41:41

the motions to get to the mail

1:41:44

in ballots. They are willing

1:41:46

for these terrible optics. Every time

1:41:48

Biden shows up to be out there

1:41:50

and get on the internet, people are laughing at them.

1:41:53

They don't care. They are telling us

1:41:55

what is coming. They're going to just get

1:41:57

through the campaign, run

1:41:59

the clock out, and then

1:42:02

start counting the mail in ballots,

1:42:04

because there'd be no other reason to

1:42:06

not at least have some

1:42:09

show of support at these events.

1:42:11

They don't care. They're okay with that look being

1:42:14

out there. That should be very telling

1:42:17

for all of us watching this. It's

1:42:19

very concerning. So

1:42:21

you think the fact that there's nobody showing up what a Biden

1:42:23

rally is being done on purpose. Well,

1:42:27

they're not paying people to show up when

1:42:29

we know they easily could rush. They've

1:42:32

done it in the past. They're not even taking

1:42:34

the time to get people to

1:42:36

show up. It's because

1:42:38

they're just running the clock out.

1:42:41

They are just getting to the

1:42:43

mail in ballots. There's

1:42:45

no doubt about it. We know they

1:42:47

pay people to show up to vote,

1:42:50

to riot, to protest. Why aren't

1:42:52

they paying supporters to show

1:42:54

up to show some support for Joe

1:42:56

Biden. They're willing for these terrible

1:42:58

optics to be out there every time

1:43:01

Biden shows up. They don't care. They're

1:43:04

running the clock out because it's all

1:43:06

about getting to the mail in ballots.

1:43:09

Yes, sir, yes, sir, and I'll tell you this rush.

1:43:11

Oh wait a minute, where are the mail in ballots?

1:43:14

Well, that's a great question. I don't

1:43:16

have any good answer to that. I want to hear the Republicans

1:43:19

start talking more about what is the

1:43:21

plan to find where they're

1:43:23

at and how are we going to combat to it,

1:43:25

because they're gonna be fraudulent. Let me tell

1:43:27

you where they are. They're being found in ditches,

1:43:30

They're being found in trash dumpsters,

1:43:33

They're being found in beauty

1:43:35

salon refuse holders.

1:43:38

We need to have a plan for these mail in

1:43:40

ballots. The Democrats are showing us they

1:43:42

don't care about the campaign because

1:43:44

they don't even want people. They're not even

1:43:47

caring enough to pay for people to show up. And

1:43:49

Russia. I'm want to tell you something else about these polls. The

1:43:51

Democrats know Biden's not up double

1:43:53

digits, but that's how many mail

1:43:55

in ballots they know they're going to have, because

1:43:58

at the end of the election, when all the mail in

1:44:00

ballots are counted, they're going to be able to say,

1:44:02

hey, look at these double digit leads

1:44:04

pre election polls. Let me ask you. Let

1:44:07

me ask you this, Michael, is there anything

1:44:09

the Republicans can do to

1:44:11

stop this massive drowning

1:44:14

that we all face of the mail in ballots?

1:44:17

That's a great question. I heard you ask Donald

1:44:19

Trump what he was doing about it, and he said,

1:44:21

while we have some lawyers on the ground, everybody,

1:44:25

this is all hands on deck. Rush,

1:44:27

it's the mail in ballots. They're

1:44:29

running the campaign out. They're running the clock out.

1:44:31

We have to be so vigilant and

1:44:34

prepared. So they're running.

1:44:36

But you mean they're just faking it. They don't care

1:44:38

about the campaign at all. They don't care about the polls. They

1:44:40

care about nothing. They just want to get

1:44:42

the election day where they can then

1:44:44

flood America with the mail

1:44:46

in ballots. Absolutely, that's why.

1:44:49

Look, they're not going to be fooled by these poles.

1:44:51

They were fooled by the polls with Hillary.

1:44:53

That's not happening again. They know

1:44:55

they're not up double digits. These polls

1:44:57

are out there so that when they if

1:45:00

they're not the ballot, if they're not up by

1:45:02

double digits, then they're not winning the

1:45:04

election, especially if we could find the

1:45:06

mail in ballots and Burnham, I

1:45:09

love Hey, I'm in favor of that,

1:45:11

Rush, I love that. If

1:45:14

they're not up, I'm assuming you're talking

1:45:16

about these things is illegal. Absolutely,

1:45:19

These are the Democrats, These

1:45:21

are radicals. These are Sallyinsky

1:45:24

and Knits the ends. Josephather Me, I got

1:45:26

you I hear you man, Okay, So

1:45:28

that's what we need to find where the mail

1:45:30

in ballots are, and

1:45:33

then we need a bunch of matches

1:45:35

and some gasoline.

1:45:40

Hi, welcome back. It's great to have you

1:45:43

here with us, my friends, and our longtime sponsor,

1:45:45

Bolling Branch. They make the softest

1:45:47

and the most comfortable sheets available,

1:45:51

and that's the belief of all of those

1:45:53

that have made this product discovery, meaning

1:45:55

they have learned about this product. That

1:45:58

includes more than a million America, three

1:46:00

former presidents, all customers of

1:46:02

Bowland Branch. They

1:46:07

like the sheets that you'll find when you stay at

1:46:09

a five star hotel if you ever get

1:46:11

the chance. They are that luxurious.

1:46:14

Now, you might have found a set of sheets like these

1:46:17

in a high end retail store for as much

1:46:19

as a thousand dollars. That's how much

1:46:22

they cost in a high end retail

1:46:24

store. But you know what, today,

1:46:27

Bowland Branch makes them available for just a couple

1:46:30

hundred dollars after a promo code

1:46:32

discount. Now, one

1:46:34

way they do that is by selling their products

1:46:36

directly to you instead

1:46:38

of through a big box retail chain.

1:46:42

Nothing against them that Bowling Branch prefers

1:46:44

to build a direct relationship

1:46:47

with you, with their customer. They want to

1:46:49

have a bond per se with you,

1:46:51

and they do that with their own website

1:46:54

and with two of their own retail

1:46:56

stores. They do that their

1:46:58

own website who are their own retail stories.

1:47:01

So you order a set of sheets in Bowling

1:47:03

Branch, not only do you

1:47:05

get to experience their comfort in the luxury, but

1:47:07

you get thirty days

1:47:10

to try these out. You

1:47:13

get a thirty day money back guarantee, and

1:47:16

if it doesn't meet your expectations,

1:47:18

send it back full refund. Thirty days

1:47:20

to try this. That's how confident they are with

1:47:23

their products and what you are

1:47:25

about to experience. If

1:47:27

you're not completely satisfied with your

1:47:29

purchase, just send it back, folks. The return

1:47:32

rates infinitesimal. You need a telescope

1:47:34

to see it online. The website

1:47:36

is Bowling Branch dot com, bo l

1:47:39

l and Branch dot

1:47:41

com. Make sure you use my name

1:47:43

and save fifty

1:47:45

bucks fifty dollars on your

1:47:48

first set of sheets at Bowland

1:47:50

Branch dot com. Okay, Anthony in the

1:47:52

Catskills in New York. It's great to have you, sir,

1:47:54

high thank you make it to make

1:47:56

you prise rush On the Affordable Care

1:47:58

Act onto A. It's

1:48:01

mandatory that you have to show a photo idea

1:48:03

to see a doctor. But the left is always

1:48:05

telling us disenfranchising

1:48:07

people to use it to vote. I think

1:48:09

that should get out to the American people. Most people

1:48:11

don't know that, and I wish you'd give

1:48:13

it to the campaign. Well, let me let me tell you something,

1:48:15

Anthony. People in this audience know it. Yes,

1:48:18

they know. What is one of the things that

1:48:20

we harp on constantly here

1:48:22

about the hypocrisy that

1:48:25

you need an online idea.

1:48:27

You need photo id to basically do anything

1:48:29

in this country, except when it comes to voting. Then

1:48:32

somehow you don't need one. Everybody knows

1:48:34

why this is. So they can get

1:48:37

people voting numerous times, they get people

1:48:39

voting who are not who they say they are. Everybody

1:48:41

knows the game here. It's

1:48:44

just a matter of having an army in place to

1:48:46

stop him. David Cassa Grande

1:48:48

Arizona, You're next, tell us, sir, they

1:48:51

rush rush. I've been a

1:48:53

fan since WRSC and State

1:48:55

College Pennsylvania. I have no idea. How won't

1:48:58

go that way. Well, I'm glad you're out there. I

1:49:00

really appreciate it. Well, my point,

1:49:02

My point with the reason to call is I heard a caller

1:49:04

earlier talk about the World Health Organization

1:49:07

and they're concerned with the outcome of the election.

1:49:10

The first thought I had when I

1:49:12

heard about the World Health Organization

1:49:15

changing their position on

1:49:18

shutting down the economy at center was

1:49:21

not the election, but the fact that

1:49:23

Trump had turned off the financial

1:49:26

spigot. They're no longer getting

1:49:28

the funds, and I think money

1:49:30

talks and the rest of the flows

1:49:33

right right, So you think that they're trying to get back

1:49:35

into good graces of Trump more

1:49:37

or less Trump or the

1:49:39

US administration, whoever wins.

1:49:42

I don't think there'll be a problem with Biden wins,

1:49:44

but well, it's fascinating. It's

1:49:46