Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
B-R-L-E-E-N.
0:04
At one point last summer, America's
0:06
favorite beer changed. Big
0:09
news in the big business of
0:11
beer tonight. America's top selling beer
0:13
is no longer American. This morning,
0:17
America has a new favorite beer, and
0:19
it's a Mexican import. This.
0:21
OK, Jack, the old king of
0:24
beers has been dethroned. Who is
0:26
the new king? Shocker coming up.
0:28
Modelo Especial is the new top
0:30
selling beer in America. Modelo Especial.
0:33
Like, everybody kind of figured. The
0:35
crisp Bud Light was replaced by the
0:37
fuller bodied and imported Modelo as the
0:40
top selling brew in the country. This
0:42
was owed in part to a customer
0:44
boycott of Bud Light for its campaign
0:47
with trans social media personality Dylan Mulvaney.
0:50
This month I celebrated my Day 365 of womanhood, and
0:53
Bud Light sent me possibly the best
0:55
gift ever, a can with my face
0:57
on it. Check out my Instagram story
0:59
to see. The whole episode was followed
1:01
by a counter backlash when the beer
1:03
company backtracked on its collaboration with the
1:05
star. But for those who've
1:08
been following the US beer market closely,
1:10
it was really only a matter of
1:12
time before Modelo Especial was going to
1:14
take over Bud Light's top spot. So
1:17
if the fiasco had not
1:19
happened, Modelo would have overtaken
1:21
Bud Light eventually, next year,
1:23
the year after. Ina
1:26
Verstul is one of those people closely following
1:28
the industry. She's a journalist in Munich covering
1:30
the business of beer. But
1:33
the boycott, the huge consumer boycott
1:35
just sped things up incredibly. And
1:37
so it happened in the summer, I think
1:39
it was May or June, in monthly
1:42
sales it overtook. And the
1:44
decline of Bud Light
1:46
has continued now into the autumn and
1:48
into the winter. Modelo is
1:50
just keeping up its
1:53
trajectory. So
1:56
the gap will widen unless AB
1:59
Invert. manages to persuade its
2:03
former consumers to return
2:05
to the brand. This
2:09
is The Closer. I'm Amy Keene. That
2:11
Medello knocked Bud Light from its perch is
2:14
about much more than a marketing U-turn. It's
2:16
a story about how the Department of Justice, and
2:19
one lawyer in particular, along
2:21
with a then little-known wine and spirits
2:23
company from upstate New York, threw
2:25
a wrench in a massive beer deal. We'll
2:27
be right back with that story. Hi,
2:34
everyone. It's Amy. Our friends at Harvard Business Review
2:36
have a podcast I think you'll like. It's
2:39
called HBR IdeaCast. Every
2:41
Tuesday, they bring you case studies
2:43
and conversations with the world's best
2:45
business and leadership experts to help
2:47
you manage up, manage a business,
2:50
and manage yourself. Listen
2:52
for free wherever you get your
2:54
podcasts. Just search HBR IdeaCast. It's
2:56
all you need to lead. The
2:59
Closer is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.
3:02
What if comparing car insurance rates was
3:04
as easy as putting on your favorite
3:06
podcast? With Progressive, it
3:08
is. Just visit the Progressive website
3:10
to quote with all the coverages
3:13
you want. You'll see Progressive's direct
3:15
rate, then their tool will provide options
3:17
from other companies so you can compare.
3:20
All you need to do is choose
3:22
the rate and coverage you like. Quote
3:24
today at progressive.com to join the over
3:27
28 million drivers who trust Progressive. Progressive
3:29
Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates, comparison
3:32
rates not available in all states
3:34
or situations. Prices vary
3:36
based on how you buy. Ina
3:39
Verstel has spent much of her career
3:41
studying and writing about beer, both
3:44
the drink itself and the
3:46
economics of the business. And
3:48
my name already gives it away. I'm
3:50
a German national, but I grew up
3:53
in England. Why do you think
3:55
we should understand the business of beer? The
3:58
business of beer is very close. related
4:01
to market conditions, whether
4:03
you operate in a
4:05
monopoly, a duopoly
4:07
or if you have
4:09
an oligopoly. Depending
4:12
on the degree of concentration,
4:14
there's a different level of competition and
4:17
the more concentrated a market becomes,
4:20
the less competition there is. And
4:23
if one of the big players
4:26
raises prices, the competitor,
4:28
the big competitor also follows suit.
4:31
Then prices just go up and
4:33
consumers can't do anything but pay
4:36
for beer through their noses. And
4:38
I've got this very bloistly now because
4:40
I don't object to companies
4:42
making a profit. Let this
4:44
be understood. But still, I mean,
4:46
there is a degree of profitability
4:50
that is not beneficial
4:52
to consumers. For many years
4:54
in the US, there was one beer company
4:56
whose brands had a hold on the market,
4:58
Anheuser-Busch. And
5:01
they were very, very
5:03
clever and skillful operators
5:06
because they had managed to
5:08
hike the market share in
5:10
the US to close to 50% by
5:13
volume without doing any deals.
5:16
So over the decade, the
5:18
Department of Justice was very
5:22
off the old Anheuser-Busch market
5:24
position. But since they didn't do any
5:26
deals, they couldn't stop them from growing. And
5:30
then in 2008, it was taken
5:32
over by a company called Inbev, a company
5:34
that was itself the result of a series
5:36
of other deals. The newly
5:38
formed company went by AB Inbev.
5:41
The Department of Justice kept a
5:44
close eye on what they were doing. So
5:47
when they were taken over, they
5:49
controlled close to 50% of the
5:51
beer market already. And there
5:53
was only one competitor
5:55
at the time called Miller Cause.
5:58
And the two had close
6:00
to 80% of the market. A.B.
6:03
Inbev's most popular label, Bud Light.
6:06
For the great taste that won't fill you up and
6:08
never let you down, make it a Bud Light. Originally,
6:11
I mean that's going back
6:13
decades into the last century. The
6:16
main seller was Budweiser beer. Bud
6:18
Light. Bud Light. Bud
6:22
Light. Bud
6:25
Light. Bud Light. Bud
6:30
Light. But that had fallen out of favour
6:32
with Americans when the big
6:34
brewers launched these what they
6:36
call light beers in the
6:38
US. These beers that have
6:41
fewer calories than regular beers
6:44
like Budweiser. And the marketing
6:46
they also installed
6:49
played to
6:52
the idea of this is an all
6:54
American beer. Conveniently,
6:57
A.B. Inbev held a
6:59
stake in the maker of popular
7:01
imported beers. It's called Grupro Modello
7:03
from Mexico. This is
7:05
the company behind Corona, Modello Especial
7:07
and other brands. The
7:09
trouble was that the old
7:12
Anheuser-Busch had been had over
7:14
a barrel by Grupro Modello
7:16
in the 1990s. Grupro
7:18
Modello had been worried that with the
7:20
creation of NAFTA, the North American Free
7:22
Trade Agreement, Anheuser-Busch would be
7:25
able to flood the Mexican market with
7:27
brands like Budweiser and Bud Light. So
7:30
instead, they decide. We set
7:32
a stake to the old Anheuser-Busch, which
7:35
then would actually become something
7:37
like a non-aggression part. Crucially
7:40
though, for Grupro Modello, this stake
7:42
did not include any management control.
7:45
They were not necessarily in
7:48
the business for the love of beer.
7:50
They were businessmen above
7:53
all. And by 2012,
7:55
Anheuser-Busch was now A.B. Inbev and
7:57
it was looking to change this
7:59
arrangement. A, B, N,
8:01
B so that this is
8:03
no good. This is a very untenable
8:05
situation for us. For one, we
8:08
still have no management, because this is a
8:11
contract they inhabited from the
8:13
ultra-hoza bush. And we
8:15
can't lay our hands on
8:18
the import or export business of
8:21
Corona in the US. So they said,
8:23
okay, we're going to take over a group of a
8:25
deal and we have
8:28
control of Mexico, which was then
8:30
also a very profitable and growing
8:32
beer market. So Modilo in Mexico
8:35
itself was attractive, but they also
8:38
hoped that ultimately they
8:40
would be able to lay their hands on
8:43
the import business. The
8:45
two sides came to an agreement. AB
8:47
InBev would buy out the other half
8:49
of Grupo Modello, the price, $20 billion.
8:54
In corporate news, AB InBev is reportedly in talks to
8:56
buy the rest of Grupo Modello. It doesn't already have
8:58
any of the deals that could be won here. The
9:00
market likes the deal. Bitty Nantheiser Bush shares up almost
9:02
8% at all time
9:05
high. The deal expands what is
9:07
already the world's largest beer maker.
9:09
Beverage distributor. But there was another crucial
9:11
element to this deal. Buying up
9:13
all of Grupo Modello was probably going
9:15
to raise the antitrust alarm at the
9:17
Department of Justice. So AB
9:19
InBev and Grupo Modello concocted a side
9:21
deal. To sell its
9:24
products in the US, Grupo Modello had
9:26
formed a joint venture called Crown Imports.
9:29
And they did so with a wine
9:31
distributor called Constellation Brands. Modello
9:33
would sell its 50%
9:36
stake in the US
9:38
import business, which is called, or
9:40
which was called Crown Imports, to
9:43
Constellation for less
9:45
than $2 billion. The proposed
9:47
side deal gave Constellation Brands control
9:49
of the Grupo Modello beers in
9:51
the US, but with a catch.
9:55
But all they were given was
9:57
a 10-year supply
9:59
contract. And not
10:01
only would that have meant that if
10:04
AB InBev, as the new owner of Modelo,
10:06
had raised supply prices,
10:09
then Constellation
10:11
would have had to raise prices in the US
10:13
too. That side deal
10:15
that AB InBev and Grupo Modelo had
10:17
drawn up included one more important point.
10:21
That AB InBev would be able to buy
10:23
out Constellation at
10:26
the end of this 10-year term. You've
10:28
mentioned a few times now Constellation Brands, and I'd
10:30
love to just take a minute to actually explain
10:33
to listeners what this company was and how it
10:35
fit into the picture. Can you just
10:37
tell us about what the company was,
10:39
what it was known for, what it was like at the
10:41
time in 2012? Constellation
10:44
has a very interesting history.
10:49
It started out as a bulk
10:51
wine company in the 1940s already.
10:55
It was not terribly profitable,
10:59
especially when branded wines
11:01
and domain wines and
11:03
high-end brands were kind of
11:06
emerging in the 70s and 80s. And
11:10
the opportunity that
11:12
arose for them to really diversify away
11:14
from wine was in 1993, and
11:18
they could buy Spartan
11:20
beers from Chicago,
11:23
an importer, which was at the time
11:25
one of the two importers of Corona
11:27
in the US. So
11:30
in 2012, Constellation
11:33
was really at the
11:35
mercy of Modelo and
11:38
Anhoi Tabut, because they did
11:40
the primary deal and what
11:42
would become of them was a secondary
11:45
concern. So
11:47
just to make sure we see, it almost feels
11:49
a bit like a love triangle here of three
11:52
drinks companies, AB InBev
11:54
in 2012 already has
11:56
a stake in Grupo
11:58
Modella, Mexico's Grupo Modella. They
12:00
decide now is the time we have
12:03
to take over entirely, but in order
12:05
to, or as part of this deal,
12:07
they arrange a side
12:09
deal with Constellation Brands who has
12:11
the ability to sell Groupo Modelo
12:14
within the US. As
12:16
part of this deal, AB InBev says to
12:18
Constellation Brands, you will continue selling for 10
12:20
years and then we will get the
12:22
rights to that part of the business. Is that correct?
12:25
Yes, that's correct. And
12:29
at the time when the original deal
12:31
was published, I thought, how
12:33
could Constellation really agree to
12:35
such unfavourable terms?
12:38
I mean, call me suspicious minded.
12:41
My suspicion was at the
12:43
time that Constellation
12:45
hoped or, if
12:48
there were reckless, trusted the
12:50
Department of Justice to step in
12:52
and tear up the proposed agreement
12:55
altogether. And
12:57
in early 2013, that's just what
12:59
the Justice Department did, which took
13:01
AB InBev by surprise. Apparently,
13:05
AB InBev had been persuaded by
13:07
its own legal team, these
13:11
hired legal gangs, as you like
13:13
to put it in America, that
13:15
the deal that they had initially
13:20
submitted would be greenlighted
13:22
by the Department of Justice. And
13:24
I thought, they must be
13:26
mad. How
13:30
could they believe in
13:32
their wildest dreams that
13:34
this deal would go through? There
13:36
was one Department of Justice official leading the
13:38
charge in these beer wars. It
13:40
was a lawyer by the name of Bill Baer. And
13:43
I spoke to Mr. Baer a few weeks ago, and
13:46
I said to him, hello. Since
13:49
the 1990s, I have been
13:52
looking at academic literature on
13:54
the American beer industry. And
13:58
academics for 30 years. years,
14:00
I mean since the 1990s, have
14:03
been saying concentration is
14:05
too high and means
14:07
competition is too low. And
14:10
when they say competition is too low, it's
14:13
to the detriment of consumers. And
14:15
of course, but if you're a group of
14:17
justice people, they would have been
14:20
looking at the proposed transaction and
14:22
would have said,
14:25
no, this is not going to
14:27
fly. And they were fortunate that
14:29
Mr. Baer had just taken over
14:32
the anti-trust division at the Department
14:34
of Justice in 2013. He said,
14:36
this deal is a non-starter, guys.
14:40
There is himself an interesting character in
14:42
this story. For
14:45
one, the financial press has noted his
14:47
own apparent love for beer and
14:50
American beer at that. But Ina, who
14:52
recently spoke to him about this deal,
14:54
says he was much more focused on
14:57
competition in his beloved US beer market
14:59
than anything. He seems
15:01
very sociable and very approachable.
15:03
And he's not talking legalese.
15:06
So he does not mince words. And
15:09
so he's very straight talking, don't tell me.
15:12
I asked him, can you explain
15:14
to me what the meeting was like? And
15:17
he said, the first meeting when they all
15:19
met and he said to me, yeah, it
15:21
was just funny. It
15:23
was a room full of lawyers, probably
15:25
40 lawyers altogether. And they
15:28
were all talking legalese.
15:30
So no drama, no shouting, none
15:32
of the Chile
15:34
and Novella stuff. But it was still
15:36
dramatic because AB InBev's legal team told
15:39
him the deal is good and it's
15:41
sound. It's not to the detriment of
15:43
consumers. And we have made sure of
15:45
this and that and that. And
15:48
Mr. Bear just retorted and said
15:50
this deal is a non-starter and that took
15:53
them aback. What
15:56
Bear wanted for the US beer market was
15:58
an independent third party. A third
16:00
company. And with the
16:03
modellos out of the picture, there
16:05
would have been no third player because if
16:08
the original deal had gone through, consolation
16:11
would have been reduced to
16:13
an importer again. And
16:15
this time as the importer of
16:18
another rough-playing global
16:21
heavyweight called Avian. And
16:24
he said this is not good to consumers.
16:26
And the legal team was taken aback and
16:28
they said, can you please adjourn it for
16:31
a week? And so they met again one
16:33
week later and maybe Inberg had
16:35
brought along its CEO, Hal
16:37
Spritov. And this
16:52
is not good enough. And then they
16:54
challenged him and said, well, if you
16:57
don't want to greenlight
16:59
this deal, sue us then. And
17:02
he said, I will. Trust me.
17:06
Meantime, a big beer battle is brewing. A
17:09
battle over beer is brewing. We
17:11
begin with the beer battle brewing, the Justice
17:13
Department today suing to block the 20
17:16
billion dollar merger between Anheuser-Busch
17:18
Inbev and Mexican brewer, Medello.
17:21
Using company documents to bolster their case,
17:23
Justice Department lawyers say the deal will
17:25
lead to higher prices for popular beers
17:27
like Budweiser and Corona. Bear
17:29
published the DOJ's position in a nearly 300
17:32
page publicly available document.
17:35
It gave you very precise market data.
17:39
The complaint quotes from
17:42
internal communications amongst
17:44
all the big players in the
17:46
industry. So I had never seen
17:48
anything so precise and comprehensive before
17:51
in my life. Here's
17:53
Bill Bear in a recent interview with the Wall
17:55
Street Journal about the deal. We
17:57
said you need Inbev to... completely
18:00
divest any interest in Modelo as
18:03
it relates to the United States.
18:06
They thought I was crazy. Is
18:09
there a line or a section that you
18:11
still remember to this day that really jumped
18:14
out at you as you were reviewing the suit
18:16
published to the web? What
18:19
I found interesting in that
18:21
suit was that they kind
18:23
of admitted the other players
18:26
quoted in that complaint that
18:28
they always followed each other's price
18:30
hikes. Not regularly, not
18:32
always, but often. I think
18:34
the term that appears
18:37
in the complaint is often.
18:39
And I thought, yeah, this is what
18:41
I had noticed too as a
18:43
consumer. They were
18:46
very clued up about what went
18:48
on in the US beer market. The
18:51
lawsuit alleged that the big domestic US
18:53
brands had been following each other's price
18:55
increases for years. That means
18:57
that if one raises prices, the
19:00
other will also raise prices. Meanwhile,
19:02
the imported Modelo brands kept the
19:05
prices steady. This meant that
19:07
over time there wasn't much of a
19:09
price difference between the domestic American beers
19:11
and the imported Modelo beers. So
19:15
basically people will not have to
19:17
look for cheaper options because
19:19
they are all at about
19:21
the same level. So no competition,
19:23
no one is expanding market
19:26
shares because they don't take share away from each
19:28
other. And by making the
19:30
evidence in his lawsuit public, Bear was
19:32
trying to show how the lack of
19:34
competition in the beer business actually affected
19:36
customers. And I asked Mr
19:38
Bear, why did you put this art into the
19:40
public domain? Why did you put all this, I
19:43
mean, I would consider, confidential data
19:46
into this complaint. He said, well, I wanted
19:48
to make AB in their free land. That
19:50
was his word, re-land. And
19:53
I thought, OK, in my terminology, there
19:56
would have been you were
19:58
out to name and shame them. And
20:00
it had the desired effect
20:03
because the Department of Justice already had
20:05
a plan of a settlement.
20:08
A settlement that would change the U.S. beer
20:10
market and create a path
20:13
for an imported label to become
20:15
America's favorite. We'll
20:18
be right back. Hey
20:21
everybody, it's Amy. I want to tell you about
20:23
the Closer Newsletter. It's written by
20:25
our producer and long-time financial journalist Ben
20:27
Walsh. What I love about the newsletter is
20:29
that Ben helps you understand the deals and
20:31
deal makers making headlines right now. He
20:34
explains why they matter and where things are
20:36
headed. So if you want to
20:38
follow Closers in the News and get concise analysis
20:40
of the biggest deal stories delivered
20:43
right to your inbox, sign up for the
20:45
newsletter at thecloser.fm. In
20:51
early 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice had
20:53
set the stage for a showdown in the
20:55
U.S. beer market In
20:57
a long and detailed filing, DOJ lawyer
20:59
Bill Baer laid out his assessment of
21:01
what would happen to U.S. beer customers
21:04
if AB InBev were to fully take
21:06
over Mexico's group of Modelo. They
21:09
knew what they wanted the ultimate
21:11
deal to look like because they wanted
21:14
constellations to
21:16
become independent, economically viable,
21:19
and not at the mercy of
21:22
AB InBev. But that meant that
21:26
constellations needed a brewery
21:28
in Mexico to be
21:30
really independent from any supply contract
21:34
with AB InBev. Constellations
21:36
being Constellations Brands, that company that was
21:38
supposed to have the U.S. import rights
21:40
for group of Modelo products for a
21:43
mere 10 years as part of AB
21:45
InBev's takeover plans. So
21:47
the department said constellations
21:50
must get Modelo's
21:52
swishest brewery in Mexico
21:55
and constellations must be given
21:58
time to AB InBev. exchange
22:00
brewery. It's
22:02
actually setting the up or setting
22:04
the consternation up as an
22:07
independent brewer. Mr.
22:09
Baer managed to actually
22:12
expand the U.S. beer duopoly
22:14
into a oligopoly
22:17
with three powerful players.
22:19
So the DOJ first steps in, I
22:22
think it's January of 2013, and just a few months
22:25
later by April, news breaks I
22:27
think late one Friday that AB
22:29
Inbev have reached an agreement with
22:31
the Department of Justice to let
22:33
their deal through. Anheuser-Busch Inbev is
22:35
closer to putting its $20 billion
22:38
acquisition of Grupo Modelo in the
22:40
can. AB Inbev worked out
22:42
a deal with the government. The
22:44
settlement looked like this.
22:47
The U.S. government would let
22:49
AB Inbev's takeover of Grupo Modelo
22:51
go through, provided the
22:53
company's less Modelo's U.S. business
22:55
to constellations brands. This
22:57
included the licenses of Grupo Modelo's beer
22:59
brands and that brewery in Mexico. So
23:04
the one who had to actually do the
23:06
most agreeing was AB Inbev because
23:08
they saw
23:11
their original proposal threaded,
23:14
saunted pieces. So
23:18
they had to give that brewery
23:20
in Mexico to constellations.
23:23
Constellations were allowed to buy
23:25
out the whole import
23:28
business in perpetuity. And
23:31
they would also obtain the rights
23:33
to the brands in perpetuity. So
23:36
that was far more than the
23:39
original proposal would have awarded
23:42
to constellations. The
23:46
price tag for the settlement is
23:48
the price tag. So Constellations brands
23:50
picks up Grupo Modelo as part
23:52
of the settlement for less than
23:54
$5 billion. That seems an awfully
23:56
small price for Constellations to pay.
24:00
Yeah, and only one leekie because
24:02
they were the only buyer around.
24:05
And if you are the only buyer around, the
24:08
profit multiple that usually
24:10
applies is far lower than
24:12
if there had been a string
24:14
of buyers wanting to buy that
24:18
business. So they got a very
24:21
good deal. A very good
24:23
deal, which instantly made them the third largest
24:25
beer supplier in the country. So
24:28
once the deals finalize, what
24:30
happens with consolation now being such a big
24:32
US beer supplier? How
24:34
does the picture shift with
24:37
the conclusion of the settlement? What
24:39
consolation chose to do was to continue
24:41
with its aggressive pricing. And
24:44
that meant that
24:46
both of the leading
24:48
brands, I mean, the super leader was Corona
24:52
extra at the time, but
24:54
Modello, especially, was already catching
24:56
up nicely. So by keeping those
24:58
prices not low, the
25:01
proper term is by closing the
25:03
price gap between those import brands
25:05
and Bud Light, people
25:07
traded up to Modello because they
25:09
said, OK, I want something nicer,
25:12
something special. And
25:14
it's only a little bit
25:16
more expensive than Bud Light. So that
25:19
pricing strategy alone worked
25:22
in constellations favor. But they
25:24
also did very clever things
25:27
with the brands. Those
25:30
clever things include marketing like
25:32
launching Modello Especial advertising in
25:34
English for the first time. In
25:37
1925, we created a model
25:39
beer, a full flavored Mexican
25:41
lager, appropriately named Modello
25:43
Especial. While
25:46
Corona continued to be an American
25:48
favorite, Modello Especial caught on with
25:50
American customers. Modello
25:55
is another interesting
25:57
packaging because the bottle looks
25:59
really It's
26:02
still wrapped in this gold foil, something
26:06
we in the rest of the
26:08
world would have gotten rid of already
26:10
because it's environmentally so unsound. Sorry, yes.
26:13
Yeah, of course, of course. This is
26:15
the perspective, I'll give you, but I mean, they stuck to it.
26:19
I mean, this is how it was marketed. And
26:22
of course, the gold foil is to represent
26:24
a, this is something better. This
26:26
is something high end. This
26:29
is really brilliant quality because we don't
26:31
stint on the packaging even. So
26:34
the beers are, now I try
26:36
to be polite, inoffensive. I
26:39
mean, they are excellent at
26:41
what they aim to be. They
26:45
are not really beers that are
26:47
in your face. So they
26:50
are very agreeable, easy to
26:52
drink beers that look
26:54
different and
26:56
are called something different. So
27:01
that made them easy to stick
27:03
out both of these beers. I
27:05
think we have to actually acknowledge the
27:07
role Corona has played here too. A
27:10
Corona in palm trees, a
27:14
Corona in calm seas. Because
27:17
Corona led the way or barged
27:19
ahead and Modilo could
27:21
follow. And
27:24
the settlement was signed
27:26
in 2013. The
27:28
Modilo brand was not available in all
27:31
US states. Because
27:34
I mean, this is what the Mexicans had
27:36
done together with Constellation. They
27:39
cautiously pushed this
27:42
brand state by state
27:45
into the country. It
27:48
became desirable by not being
27:50
available in all states initially.
27:53
So that's a very clever strategy. And
27:55
I think what they also did was, they
27:58
did not choose. in
28:01
American imagery for
28:04
the brand. I mean, it's still a
28:06
Mexican brand. I mean, that's as
28:09
Spanish sounding as it is. They
28:12
said, okay, we need to find
28:15
values and an imagery for this
28:17
brand that appeals to everybody that
28:20
all consumers can relate to. And
28:22
that's the fighting spirit. You
28:24
are fine. This is your reward.
28:26
And so by 2023, Medello
28:31
was on course to take over Bud Light as
28:33
the best selling beer in the U.S. before too
28:36
long. Then came Bud
28:38
Light's marketing mishap. The partnership between
28:40
Bud Light and transgender activist Dylan
28:42
Mulvaney is getting a lot of
28:44
backlash. Bud Light's fall comes after the
28:46
company picked transgender influencer Dylan
28:48
Mulvaney to promote Bud Light and created
28:50
a customized Bud Light can for Mulvaney.
28:55
Conservatives called for a boycott of Bud Light.
28:58
Bud Light sales were down more than 24%
29:02
compared to a year ago for the week
29:05
ending June 3rd. Actually, that's been pretty steady
29:07
since his controversy first broke heading sales, turning
29:09
investors. And
29:11
the Mexican import took over sooner than
29:13
expected. So if the fiasco
29:16
had not happened, Medello
29:18
would have overtaken Bud Light eventually,
29:20
next year, the year after. But
29:23
the boycott, the huge consumer boycott
29:26
just sped things up incredibly.
29:29
It's been a little more than 10 years now since
29:32
the settlement was agreed. You'll recall
29:34
the original proposed AB InBev deal included
29:37
getting back the rights to the
29:39
Modella brands in the U.S. after
29:41
10 years. But instead, thanks to
29:43
that settlement, the U.S. beer market
29:45
has been reshaped, and those U.S.
29:47
rights still belong to consolation brands.
29:51
Is there a deal-making lesson in the story
29:54
here somewhere? Uh,
29:57
in the U.S. never underestimate the Department
29:59
of Justice. That's a
30:01
good one. It could
30:03
be an expensive mistake to
30:05
underestimate the department of justice.
30:08
My last question for you, Ina, is a personal one. Completely
30:10
outside of the brands we've discussed today, what beer
30:12
do you like to drink? Always
30:16
a local beer, wherever I am, because
30:18
that's freshest. Freshest? And I guess
30:20
it gives you a sense of the local market.
30:22
That's me. That's
30:27
our episode for this week. But there's much more for my conversation with
30:29
Ina for Brazen Plus subscribers on Apple P The
30:36
closer is a production of Project Brazen
30:39
in partnership with PRX. Our show is
30:41
praised by Isabel Kirby McGowan, Trina
30:43
Menino, and Anna Muto. Van
30:45
Walsh is our reporter, Maran Hell-Gonzalez is
30:47
our project manager, and Lucy Woods is
30:50
head of research. Megan
30:52
Dean is programming manager, and Ryan Ho is
30:54
design lead. Golda
30:56
Arthur is our showrunner, and Bradley Hope
30:58
and Tom Wright are executive producers.
31:01
Our marketing consultant is Maggie Taylor, and
31:03
I'm Amy Keene. Thanks for listening.
31:09
He's still at large, yes. He was the ultimate whale.
31:13
What do you mean by whale? In nightclubs and
31:15
casinos, it's a codename for big spenders. But we
31:17
define whales by three things. They're
31:19
ultra wealthy, powerful, and operate
31:21
under the radar. Understanding
31:23
who these people are will open your eyes.
31:27
With power, you are reaching
31:29
a rhythm that is disconnected. Money.
31:33
Power. Corruption. At Whale
31:35
Hunting, we write the real rich
31:37
list, exposing those who exist
31:40
in the shadows. Whale
31:42
Hunting is a newsletter for people who want to
31:44
know how the world really works. Join
31:47
the hunt. Subscribe
31:49
now at whalehunting.projectbrazen.com.
31:56
From PRX.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More