Podchaser Logo
Home
How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

Released Monday, 11th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

How Modelo became America’s #1 beer. And it’s not what you might think.

Monday, 11th December 2023
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

B-R-L-E-E-N.

0:04

At one point last summer, America's

0:06

favorite beer changed. Big

0:09

news in the big business of

0:11

beer tonight. America's top selling beer

0:13

is no longer American. This morning,

0:17

America has a new favorite beer, and

0:19

it's a Mexican import. This.

0:21

OK, Jack, the old king of

0:24

beers has been dethroned. Who is

0:26

the new king? Shocker coming up.

0:28

Modelo Especial is the new top

0:30

selling beer in America. Modelo Especial.

0:33

Like, everybody kind of figured. The

0:35

crisp Bud Light was replaced by the

0:37

fuller bodied and imported Modelo as the

0:40

top selling brew in the country. This

0:42

was owed in part to a customer

0:44

boycott of Bud Light for its campaign

0:47

with trans social media personality Dylan Mulvaney.

0:50

This month I celebrated my Day 365 of womanhood, and

0:53

Bud Light sent me possibly the best

0:55

gift ever, a can with my face

0:57

on it. Check out my Instagram story

0:59

to see. The whole episode was followed

1:01

by a counter backlash when the beer

1:03

company backtracked on its collaboration with the

1:05

star. But for those who've

1:08

been following the US beer market closely,

1:10

it was really only a matter of

1:12

time before Modelo Especial was going to

1:14

take over Bud Light's top spot. So

1:17

if the fiasco had not

1:19

happened, Modelo would have overtaken

1:21

Bud Light eventually, next year,

1:23

the year after. Ina

1:26

Verstul is one of those people closely following

1:28

the industry. She's a journalist in Munich covering

1:30

the business of beer. But

1:33

the boycott, the huge consumer boycott

1:35

just sped things up incredibly. And

1:37

so it happened in the summer, I think

1:39

it was May or June, in monthly

1:42

sales it overtook. And the

1:44

decline of Bud Light

1:46

has continued now into the autumn and

1:48

into the winter. Modelo is

1:50

just keeping up its

1:53

trajectory. So

1:56

the gap will widen unless AB

1:59

Invert. manages to persuade its

2:03

former consumers to return

2:05

to the brand. This

2:09

is The Closer. I'm Amy Keene. That

2:11

Medello knocked Bud Light from its perch is

2:14

about much more than a marketing U-turn. It's

2:16

a story about how the Department of Justice, and

2:19

one lawyer in particular, along

2:21

with a then little-known wine and spirits

2:23

company from upstate New York, threw

2:25

a wrench in a massive beer deal. We'll

2:27

be right back with that story. Hi,

2:34

everyone. It's Amy. Our friends at Harvard Business Review

2:36

have a podcast I think you'll like. It's

2:39

called HBR IdeaCast. Every

2:41

Tuesday, they bring you case studies

2:43

and conversations with the world's best

2:45

business and leadership experts to help

2:47

you manage up, manage a business,

2:50

and manage yourself. Listen

2:52

for free wherever you get your

2:54

podcasts. Just search HBR IdeaCast. It's

2:56

all you need to lead. The

2:59

Closer is brought to you by Progressive Insurance.

3:02

What if comparing car insurance rates was

3:04

as easy as putting on your favorite

3:06

podcast? With Progressive, it

3:08

is. Just visit the Progressive website

3:10

to quote with all the coverages

3:13

you want. You'll see Progressive's direct

3:15

rate, then their tool will provide options

3:17

from other companies so you can compare.

3:20

All you need to do is choose

3:22

the rate and coverage you like. Quote

3:24

today at progressive.com to join the over

3:27

28 million drivers who trust Progressive. Progressive

3:29

Casualty Insurance Company and affiliates, comparison

3:32

rates not available in all states

3:34

or situations. Prices vary

3:36

based on how you buy. Ina

3:39

Verstel has spent much of her career

3:41

studying and writing about beer, both

3:44

the drink itself and the

3:46

economics of the business. And

3:48

my name already gives it away. I'm

3:50

a German national, but I grew up

3:53

in England. Why do you think

3:55

we should understand the business of beer? The

3:58

business of beer is very close. related

4:01

to market conditions, whether

4:03

you operate in a

4:05

monopoly, a duopoly

4:07

or if you have

4:09

an oligopoly. Depending

4:12

on the degree of concentration,

4:14

there's a different level of competition and

4:17

the more concentrated a market becomes,

4:20

the less competition there is. And

4:23

if one of the big players

4:26

raises prices, the competitor,

4:28

the big competitor also follows suit.

4:31

Then prices just go up and

4:33

consumers can't do anything but pay

4:36

for beer through their noses. And

4:38

I've got this very bloistly now because

4:40

I don't object to companies

4:42

making a profit. Let this

4:44

be understood. But still, I mean,

4:46

there is a degree of profitability

4:50

that is not beneficial

4:52

to consumers. For many years

4:54

in the US, there was one beer company

4:56

whose brands had a hold on the market,

4:58

Anheuser-Busch. And

5:01

they were very, very

5:03

clever and skillful operators

5:06

because they had managed to

5:08

hike the market share in

5:10

the US to close to 50% by

5:13

volume without doing any deals.

5:16

So over the decade, the

5:18

Department of Justice was very

5:22

off the old Anheuser-Busch market

5:24

position. But since they didn't do any

5:26

deals, they couldn't stop them from growing. And

5:30

then in 2008, it was taken

5:32

over by a company called Inbev, a company

5:34

that was itself the result of a series

5:36

of other deals. The newly

5:38

formed company went by AB Inbev.

5:41

The Department of Justice kept a

5:44

close eye on what they were doing. So

5:47

when they were taken over, they

5:49

controlled close to 50% of the

5:51

beer market already. And there

5:53

was only one competitor

5:55

at the time called Miller Cause.

5:58

And the two had close

6:00

to 80% of the market. A.B.

6:03

Inbev's most popular label, Bud Light.

6:06

For the great taste that won't fill you up and

6:08

never let you down, make it a Bud Light. Originally,

6:11

I mean that's going back

6:13

decades into the last century. The

6:16

main seller was Budweiser beer. Bud

6:18

Light. Bud Light. Bud

6:22

Light. Bud

6:25

Light. Bud Light. Bud

6:30

Light. But that had fallen out of favour

6:32

with Americans when the big

6:34

brewers launched these what they

6:36

call light beers in the

6:38

US. These beers that have

6:41

fewer calories than regular beers

6:44

like Budweiser. And the marketing

6:46

they also installed

6:49

played to

6:52

the idea of this is an all

6:54

American beer. Conveniently,

6:57

A.B. Inbev held a

6:59

stake in the maker of popular

7:01

imported beers. It's called Grupro Modello

7:03

from Mexico. This is

7:05

the company behind Corona, Modello Especial

7:07

and other brands. The

7:09

trouble was that the old

7:12

Anheuser-Busch had been had over

7:14

a barrel by Grupro Modello

7:16

in the 1990s. Grupro

7:18

Modello had been worried that with the

7:20

creation of NAFTA, the North American Free

7:22

Trade Agreement, Anheuser-Busch would be

7:25

able to flood the Mexican market with

7:27

brands like Budweiser and Bud Light. So

7:30

instead, they decide. We set

7:32

a stake to the old Anheuser-Busch, which

7:35

then would actually become something

7:37

like a non-aggression part. Crucially

7:40

though, for Grupro Modello, this stake

7:42

did not include any management control.

7:45

They were not necessarily in

7:48

the business for the love of beer.

7:50

They were businessmen above

7:53

all. And by 2012,

7:55

Anheuser-Busch was now A.B. Inbev and

7:57

it was looking to change this

7:59

arrangement. A, B, N,

8:01

B so that this is

8:03

no good. This is a very untenable

8:05

situation for us. For one, we

8:08

still have no management, because this is a

8:11

contract they inhabited from the

8:13

ultra-hoza bush. And we

8:15

can't lay our hands on

8:18

the import or export business of

8:21

Corona in the US. So they said,

8:23

okay, we're going to take over a group of a

8:25

deal and we have

8:28

control of Mexico, which was then

8:30

also a very profitable and growing

8:32

beer market. So Modilo in Mexico

8:35

itself was attractive, but they also

8:38

hoped that ultimately they

8:40

would be able to lay their hands on

8:43

the import business. The

8:45

two sides came to an agreement. AB

8:47

InBev would buy out the other half

8:49

of Grupo Modello, the price, $20 billion.

8:54

In corporate news, AB InBev is reportedly in talks to

8:56

buy the rest of Grupo Modello. It doesn't already have

8:58

any of the deals that could be won here. The

9:00

market likes the deal. Bitty Nantheiser Bush shares up almost

9:02

8% at all time

9:05

high. The deal expands what is

9:07

already the world's largest beer maker.

9:09

Beverage distributor. But there was another crucial

9:11

element to this deal. Buying up

9:13

all of Grupo Modello was probably going

9:15

to raise the antitrust alarm at the

9:17

Department of Justice. So AB

9:19

InBev and Grupo Modello concocted a side

9:21

deal. To sell its

9:24

products in the US, Grupo Modello had

9:26

formed a joint venture called Crown Imports.

9:29

And they did so with a wine

9:31

distributor called Constellation Brands. Modello

9:33

would sell its 50%

9:36

stake in the US

9:38

import business, which is called, or

9:40

which was called Crown Imports, to

9:43

Constellation for less

9:45

than $2 billion. The proposed

9:47

side deal gave Constellation Brands control

9:49

of the Grupo Modello beers in

9:51

the US, but with a catch.

9:55

But all they were given was

9:57

a 10-year supply

9:59

contract. And not

10:01

only would that have meant that if

10:04

AB InBev, as the new owner of Modelo,

10:06

had raised supply prices,

10:09

then Constellation

10:11

would have had to raise prices in the US

10:13

too. That side deal

10:15

that AB InBev and Grupo Modelo had

10:17

drawn up included one more important point.

10:21

That AB InBev would be able to buy

10:23

out Constellation at

10:26

the end of this 10-year term. You've

10:28

mentioned a few times now Constellation Brands, and I'd

10:30

love to just take a minute to actually explain

10:33

to listeners what this company was and how it

10:35

fit into the picture. Can you just

10:37

tell us about what the company was,

10:39

what it was known for, what it was like at the

10:41

time in 2012? Constellation

10:44

has a very interesting history.

10:49

It started out as a bulk

10:51

wine company in the 1940s already.

10:55

It was not terribly profitable,

10:59

especially when branded wines

11:01

and domain wines and

11:03

high-end brands were kind of

11:06

emerging in the 70s and 80s. And

11:10

the opportunity that

11:12

arose for them to really diversify away

11:14

from wine was in 1993, and

11:18

they could buy Spartan

11:20

beers from Chicago,

11:23

an importer, which was at the time

11:25

one of the two importers of Corona

11:27

in the US. So

11:30

in 2012, Constellation

11:33

was really at the

11:35

mercy of Modelo and

11:38

Anhoi Tabut, because they did

11:40

the primary deal and what

11:42

would become of them was a secondary

11:45

concern. So

11:47

just to make sure we see, it almost feels

11:49

a bit like a love triangle here of three

11:52

drinks companies, AB InBev

11:54

in 2012 already has

11:56

a stake in Grupo

11:58

Modella, Mexico's Grupo Modella. They

12:00

decide now is the time we have

12:03

to take over entirely, but in order

12:05

to, or as part of this deal,

12:07

they arrange a side

12:09

deal with Constellation Brands who has

12:11

the ability to sell Groupo Modelo

12:14

within the US. As

12:16

part of this deal, AB InBev says to

12:18

Constellation Brands, you will continue selling for 10

12:20

years and then we will get the

12:22

rights to that part of the business. Is that correct?

12:25

Yes, that's correct. And

12:29

at the time when the original deal

12:31

was published, I thought, how

12:33

could Constellation really agree to

12:35

such unfavourable terms?

12:38

I mean, call me suspicious minded.

12:41

My suspicion was at the

12:43

time that Constellation

12:45

hoped or, if

12:48

there were reckless, trusted the

12:50

Department of Justice to step in

12:52

and tear up the proposed agreement

12:55

altogether. And

12:57

in early 2013, that's just what

12:59

the Justice Department did, which took

13:01

AB InBev by surprise. Apparently,

13:05

AB InBev had been persuaded by

13:07

its own legal team, these

13:11

hired legal gangs, as you like

13:13

to put it in America, that

13:15

the deal that they had initially

13:20

submitted would be greenlighted

13:22

by the Department of Justice. And

13:24

I thought, they must be

13:26

mad. How

13:30

could they believe in

13:32

their wildest dreams that

13:34

this deal would go through? There

13:36

was one Department of Justice official leading the

13:38

charge in these beer wars. It

13:40

was a lawyer by the name of Bill Baer. And

13:43

I spoke to Mr. Baer a few weeks ago, and

13:46

I said to him, hello. Since

13:49

the 1990s, I have been

13:52

looking at academic literature on

13:54

the American beer industry. And

13:58

academics for 30 years. years,

14:00

I mean since the 1990s, have

14:03

been saying concentration is

14:05

too high and means

14:07

competition is too low. And

14:10

when they say competition is too low, it's

14:13

to the detriment of consumers. And

14:15

of course, but if you're a group of

14:17

justice people, they would have been

14:20

looking at the proposed transaction and

14:22

would have said,

14:25

no, this is not going to

14:27

fly. And they were fortunate that

14:29

Mr. Baer had just taken over

14:32

the anti-trust division at the Department

14:34

of Justice in 2013. He said,

14:36

this deal is a non-starter, guys.

14:40

There is himself an interesting character in

14:42

this story. For

14:45

one, the financial press has noted his

14:47

own apparent love for beer and

14:50

American beer at that. But Ina, who

14:52

recently spoke to him about this deal,

14:54

says he was much more focused on

14:57

competition in his beloved US beer market

14:59

than anything. He seems

15:01

very sociable and very approachable.

15:03

And he's not talking legalese.

15:06

So he does not mince words. And

15:09

so he's very straight talking, don't tell me.

15:12

I asked him, can you explain

15:14

to me what the meeting was like? And

15:17

he said, the first meeting when they all

15:19

met and he said to me, yeah, it

15:21

was just funny. It

15:23

was a room full of lawyers, probably

15:25

40 lawyers altogether. And they

15:28

were all talking legalese.

15:30

So no drama, no shouting, none

15:32

of the Chile

15:34

and Novella stuff. But it was still

15:36

dramatic because AB InBev's legal team told

15:39

him the deal is good and it's

15:41

sound. It's not to the detriment of

15:43

consumers. And we have made sure of

15:45

this and that and that. And

15:48

Mr. Bear just retorted and said

15:50

this deal is a non-starter and that took

15:53

them aback. What

15:56

Bear wanted for the US beer market was

15:58

an independent third party. A third

16:00

company. And with the

16:03

modellos out of the picture, there

16:05

would have been no third player because if

16:08

the original deal had gone through, consolation

16:11

would have been reduced to

16:13

an importer again. And

16:15

this time as the importer of

16:18

another rough-playing global

16:21

heavyweight called Avian. And

16:24

he said this is not good to consumers.

16:26

And the legal team was taken aback and

16:28

they said, can you please adjourn it for

16:31

a week? And so they met again one

16:33

week later and maybe Inberg had

16:35

brought along its CEO, Hal

16:37

Spritov. And this

16:52

is not good enough. And then they

16:54

challenged him and said, well, if you

16:57

don't want to greenlight

16:59

this deal, sue us then. And

17:02

he said, I will. Trust me.

17:06

Meantime, a big beer battle is brewing. A

17:09

battle over beer is brewing. We

17:11

begin with the beer battle brewing, the Justice

17:13

Department today suing to block the 20

17:16

billion dollar merger between Anheuser-Busch

17:18

Inbev and Mexican brewer, Medello.

17:21

Using company documents to bolster their case,

17:23

Justice Department lawyers say the deal will

17:25

lead to higher prices for popular beers

17:27

like Budweiser and Corona. Bear

17:29

published the DOJ's position in a nearly 300

17:32

page publicly available document.

17:35

It gave you very precise market data.

17:39

The complaint quotes from

17:42

internal communications amongst

17:44

all the big players in the

17:46

industry. So I had never seen

17:48

anything so precise and comprehensive before

17:51

in my life. Here's

17:53

Bill Bear in a recent interview with the Wall

17:55

Street Journal about the deal. We

17:57

said you need Inbev to... completely

18:00

divest any interest in Modelo as

18:03

it relates to the United States.

18:06

They thought I was crazy. Is

18:09

there a line or a section that you

18:11

still remember to this day that really jumped

18:14

out at you as you were reviewing the suit

18:16

published to the web? What

18:19

I found interesting in that

18:21

suit was that they kind

18:23

of admitted the other players

18:26

quoted in that complaint that

18:28

they always followed each other's price

18:30

hikes. Not regularly, not

18:32

always, but often. I think

18:34

the term that appears

18:37

in the complaint is often.

18:39

And I thought, yeah, this is what

18:41

I had noticed too as a

18:43

consumer. They were

18:46

very clued up about what went

18:48

on in the US beer market. The

18:51

lawsuit alleged that the big domestic US

18:53

brands had been following each other's price

18:55

increases for years. That means

18:57

that if one raises prices, the

19:00

other will also raise prices. Meanwhile,

19:02

the imported Modelo brands kept the

19:05

prices steady. This meant that

19:07

over time there wasn't much of a

19:09

price difference between the domestic American beers

19:11

and the imported Modelo beers. So

19:15

basically people will not have to

19:17

look for cheaper options because

19:19

they are all at about

19:21

the same level. So no competition,

19:23

no one is expanding market

19:26

shares because they don't take share away from each

19:28

other. And by making the

19:30

evidence in his lawsuit public, Bear was

19:32

trying to show how the lack of

19:34

competition in the beer business actually affected

19:36

customers. And I asked Mr

19:38

Bear, why did you put this art into the

19:40

public domain? Why did you put all this, I

19:43

mean, I would consider, confidential data

19:46

into this complaint. He said, well, I wanted

19:48

to make AB in their free land. That

19:50

was his word, re-land. And

19:53

I thought, OK, in my terminology, there

19:56

would have been you were

19:58

out to name and shame them. And

20:00

it had the desired effect

20:03

because the Department of Justice already had

20:05

a plan of a settlement.

20:08

A settlement that would change the U.S. beer

20:10

market and create a path

20:13

for an imported label to become

20:15

America's favorite. We'll

20:18

be right back. Hey

20:21

everybody, it's Amy. I want to tell you about

20:23

the Closer Newsletter. It's written by

20:25

our producer and long-time financial journalist Ben

20:27

Walsh. What I love about the newsletter is

20:29

that Ben helps you understand the deals and

20:31

deal makers making headlines right now. He

20:34

explains why they matter and where things are

20:36

headed. So if you want to

20:38

follow Closers in the News and get concise analysis

20:40

of the biggest deal stories delivered

20:43

right to your inbox, sign up for the

20:45

newsletter at thecloser.fm. In

20:51

early 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice had

20:53

set the stage for a showdown in the

20:55

U.S. beer market In

20:57

a long and detailed filing, DOJ lawyer

20:59

Bill Baer laid out his assessment of

21:01

what would happen to U.S. beer customers

21:04

if AB InBev were to fully take

21:06

over Mexico's group of Modelo. They

21:09

knew what they wanted the ultimate

21:11

deal to look like because they wanted

21:14

constellations to

21:16

become independent, economically viable,

21:19

and not at the mercy of

21:22

AB InBev. But that meant that

21:26

constellations needed a brewery

21:28

in Mexico to be

21:30

really independent from any supply contract

21:34

with AB InBev. Constellations

21:36

being Constellations Brands, that company that was

21:38

supposed to have the U.S. import rights

21:40

for group of Modelo products for a

21:43

mere 10 years as part of AB

21:45

InBev's takeover plans. So

21:47

the department said constellations

21:50

must get Modelo's

21:52

swishest brewery in Mexico

21:55

and constellations must be given

21:58

time to AB InBev. exchange

22:00

brewery. It's

22:02

actually setting the up or setting

22:04

the consternation up as an

22:07

independent brewer. Mr.

22:09

Baer managed to actually

22:12

expand the U.S. beer duopoly

22:14

into a oligopoly

22:17

with three powerful players.

22:19

So the DOJ first steps in, I

22:22

think it's January of 2013, and just a few months

22:25

later by April, news breaks I

22:27

think late one Friday that AB

22:29

Inbev have reached an agreement with

22:31

the Department of Justice to let

22:33

their deal through. Anheuser-Busch Inbev is

22:35

closer to putting its $20 billion

22:38

acquisition of Grupo Modelo in the

22:40

can. AB Inbev worked out

22:42

a deal with the government. The

22:44

settlement looked like this.

22:47

The U.S. government would let

22:49

AB Inbev's takeover of Grupo Modelo

22:51

go through, provided the

22:53

company's less Modelo's U.S. business

22:55

to constellations brands. This

22:57

included the licenses of Grupo Modelo's beer

22:59

brands and that brewery in Mexico. So

23:04

the one who had to actually do the

23:06

most agreeing was AB Inbev because

23:08

they saw

23:11

their original proposal threaded,

23:14

saunted pieces. So

23:18

they had to give that brewery

23:20

in Mexico to constellations.

23:23

Constellations were allowed to buy

23:25

out the whole import

23:28

business in perpetuity. And

23:31

they would also obtain the rights

23:33

to the brands in perpetuity. So

23:36

that was far more than the

23:39

original proposal would have awarded

23:42

to constellations. The

23:46

price tag for the settlement is

23:48

the price tag. So Constellations brands

23:50

picks up Grupo Modelo as part

23:52

of the settlement for less than

23:54

$5 billion. That seems an awfully

23:56

small price for Constellations to pay.

24:00

Yeah, and only one leekie because

24:02

they were the only buyer around.

24:05

And if you are the only buyer around, the

24:08

profit multiple that usually

24:10

applies is far lower than

24:12

if there had been a string

24:14

of buyers wanting to buy that

24:18

business. So they got a very

24:21

good deal. A very good

24:23

deal, which instantly made them the third largest

24:25

beer supplier in the country. So

24:28

once the deals finalize, what

24:30

happens with consolation now being such a big

24:32

US beer supplier? How

24:34

does the picture shift with

24:37

the conclusion of the settlement? What

24:39

consolation chose to do was to continue

24:41

with its aggressive pricing. And

24:44

that meant that

24:46

both of the leading

24:48

brands, I mean, the super leader was Corona

24:52

extra at the time, but

24:54

Modello, especially, was already catching

24:56

up nicely. So by keeping those

24:58

prices not low, the

25:01

proper term is by closing the

25:03

price gap between those import brands

25:05

and Bud Light, people

25:07

traded up to Modello because they

25:09

said, OK, I want something nicer,

25:12

something special. And

25:14

it's only a little bit

25:16

more expensive than Bud Light. So that

25:19

pricing strategy alone worked

25:22

in constellations favor. But they

25:24

also did very clever things

25:27

with the brands. Those

25:30

clever things include marketing like

25:32

launching Modello Especial advertising in

25:34

English for the first time. In

25:37

1925, we created a model

25:39

beer, a full flavored Mexican

25:41

lager, appropriately named Modello

25:43

Especial. While

25:46

Corona continued to be an American

25:48

favorite, Modello Especial caught on with

25:50

American customers. Modello

25:55

is another interesting

25:57

packaging because the bottle looks

25:59

really It's

26:02

still wrapped in this gold foil, something

26:06

we in the rest of the

26:08

world would have gotten rid of already

26:10

because it's environmentally so unsound. Sorry, yes.

26:13

Yeah, of course, of course. This is

26:15

the perspective, I'll give you, but I mean, they stuck to it.

26:19

I mean, this is how it was marketed. And

26:22

of course, the gold foil is to represent

26:24

a, this is something better. This

26:26

is something high end. This

26:29

is really brilliant quality because we don't

26:31

stint on the packaging even. So

26:34

the beers are, now I try

26:36

to be polite, inoffensive. I

26:39

mean, they are excellent at

26:41

what they aim to be. They

26:45

are not really beers that are

26:47

in your face. So they

26:50

are very agreeable, easy to

26:52

drink beers that look

26:54

different and

26:56

are called something different. So

27:01

that made them easy to stick

27:03

out both of these beers. I

27:05

think we have to actually acknowledge the

27:07

role Corona has played here too. A

27:10

Corona in palm trees, a

27:14

Corona in calm seas. Because

27:17

Corona led the way or barged

27:19

ahead and Modilo could

27:21

follow. And

27:24

the settlement was signed

27:26

in 2013. The

27:28

Modilo brand was not available in all

27:31

US states. Because

27:34

I mean, this is what the Mexicans had

27:36

done together with Constellation. They

27:39

cautiously pushed this

27:42

brand state by state

27:45

into the country. It

27:48

became desirable by not being

27:50

available in all states initially.

27:53

So that's a very clever strategy. And

27:55

I think what they also did was, they

27:58

did not choose. in

28:01

American imagery for

28:04

the brand. I mean, it's still a

28:06

Mexican brand. I mean, that's as

28:09

Spanish sounding as it is. They

28:12

said, okay, we need to find

28:15

values and an imagery for this

28:17

brand that appeals to everybody that

28:20

all consumers can relate to. And

28:22

that's the fighting spirit. You

28:24

are fine. This is your reward.

28:26

And so by 2023, Medello

28:31

was on course to take over Bud Light as

28:33

the best selling beer in the U.S. before too

28:36

long. Then came Bud

28:38

Light's marketing mishap. The partnership between

28:40

Bud Light and transgender activist Dylan

28:42

Mulvaney is getting a lot of

28:44

backlash. Bud Light's fall comes after the

28:46

company picked transgender influencer Dylan

28:48

Mulvaney to promote Bud Light and created

28:50

a customized Bud Light can for Mulvaney.

28:55

Conservatives called for a boycott of Bud Light.

28:58

Bud Light sales were down more than 24%

29:02

compared to a year ago for the week

29:05

ending June 3rd. Actually, that's been pretty steady

29:07

since his controversy first broke heading sales, turning

29:09

investors. And

29:11

the Mexican import took over sooner than

29:13

expected. So if the fiasco

29:16

had not happened, Medello

29:18

would have overtaken Bud Light eventually,

29:20

next year, the year after. But

29:23

the boycott, the huge consumer boycott

29:26

just sped things up incredibly.

29:29

It's been a little more than 10 years now since

29:32

the settlement was agreed. You'll recall

29:34

the original proposed AB InBev deal included

29:37

getting back the rights to the

29:39

Modella brands in the U.S. after

29:41

10 years. But instead, thanks to

29:43

that settlement, the U.S. beer market

29:45

has been reshaped, and those U.S.

29:47

rights still belong to consolation brands.

29:51

Is there a deal-making lesson in the story

29:54

here somewhere? Uh,

29:57

in the U.S. never underestimate the Department

29:59

of Justice. That's a

30:01

good one. It could

30:03

be an expensive mistake to

30:05

underestimate the department of justice.

30:08

My last question for you, Ina, is a personal one. Completely

30:10

outside of the brands we've discussed today, what beer

30:12

do you like to drink? Always

30:16

a local beer, wherever I am, because

30:18

that's freshest. Freshest? And I guess

30:20

it gives you a sense of the local market.

30:22

That's me. That's

30:27

our episode for this week. But there's much more for my conversation with

30:29

Ina for Brazen Plus subscribers on Apple P The

30:36

closer is a production of Project Brazen

30:39

in partnership with PRX. Our show is

30:41

praised by Isabel Kirby McGowan, Trina

30:43

Menino, and Anna Muto. Van

30:45

Walsh is our reporter, Maran Hell-Gonzalez is

30:47

our project manager, and Lucy Woods is

30:50

head of research. Megan

30:52

Dean is programming manager, and Ryan Ho is

30:54

design lead. Golda

30:56

Arthur is our showrunner, and Bradley Hope

30:58

and Tom Wright are executive producers.

31:01

Our marketing consultant is Maggie Taylor, and

31:03

I'm Amy Keene. Thanks for listening.

31:09

He's still at large, yes. He was the ultimate whale.

31:13

What do you mean by whale? In nightclubs and

31:15

casinos, it's a codename for big spenders. But we

31:17

define whales by three things. They're

31:19

ultra wealthy, powerful, and operate

31:21

under the radar. Understanding

31:23

who these people are will open your eyes.

31:27

With power, you are reaching

31:29

a rhythm that is disconnected. Money.

31:33

Power. Corruption. At Whale

31:35

Hunting, we write the real rich

31:37

list, exposing those who exist

31:40

in the shadows. Whale

31:42

Hunting is a newsletter for people who want to

31:44

know how the world really works. Join

31:47

the hunt. Subscribe

31:49

now at whalehunting.projectbrazen.com.

31:56

From PRX.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features