Podchaser Logo
Home
Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Released Thursday, 25th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Limousine Liberals for Hamas

Thursday, 25th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:02

When someone is hurt in a truck

0:04

accident, the one question everyone has is

0:06

why did this terrible collision happen? To

0:09

answer that question takes an experienced team

0:11

of lawyers and experts. Not

0:14

everyone has this type of experience. At

0:16

Colombo Law, we are truck injury

0:19

lawyers. It's what we do every

0:21

day. When someone is hurt

0:23

by a truck, Colombo Law is the law

0:25

firm people call to get answers. Hurt.

0:27

Hurt by a truck? Call. Call Colombo Law. Welcome

0:54

to the Commentary Magazine Daily Podcast Today

0:56

is Thursday, April Twenty Fifth Twenty Twenty

0:58

Four I am John Out where it's

1:00

the editor of Commentary Magazine with me.

1:02

As always Executive Editor: A Greenwald Hi

1:05

Abe her John. Senior. Editor

1:07

sets my now hi Seth. Rogen.

1:09

And Washington Commentary com list and

1:11

Director of Domestic Policy Studies at

1:13

the American Enterprise Institute. Matthew Continetti

1:15

hi Matt I don't I hope

1:18

everybody I listen to me who

1:20

observed had as this and couple

1:22

of sailors. And

1:24

is ready to get back in the

1:26

game. Because if

1:28

you were observing, and in fact

1:30

observing, Rigorously.

1:32

And therefore were treating it as a

1:35

holiday and we're not on social media

1:37

are watching meteor the having anything to

1:39

do with electricity for the most part

1:41

like our own sets. When Dell sets

1:43

when you woke up, level of sports

1:45

do it when you when you woke

1:47

up when you concluded. The.

1:49

Pascual Festivities and the two

1:51

days of holiday and emerged

1:54

last night to see what

1:56

was going on in the

1:58

world. Cow had the. World

2:00

changed, From. Monday

2:02

from Mob. We. Know

2:05

when the Saviors began? On

2:07

Monday night. Myself. Very much

2:09

like when know our. First. Sent

2:11

out the bird and bird came back and know

2:13

said or I. Let's go back in the Arc

2:15

for a few more days and then we'll see

2:18

how the weather is in a few more days.

2:20

Know. How I'd say Came back on line

2:23

two. You know our eyes always the see

2:25

that things had. Somehow everything had worked itself

2:27

out very nicely. And ah, I did Odyssey.

2:29

I went in. I went in thinking there's

2:31

gonna be three more schools. Ah you know,

2:34

by a time I get out of these

2:36

two days three more schools. Convulsed

2:39

by these protests, In and and all the

2:41

mayhem. and it was only like one in

2:43

a house. So. I'm

2:46

in. But yeah, it's a it's

2:48

a. Bit. There are always ah

2:50

I used it when I used to come

2:52

back online after two days or if there

2:54

were a three day or when it was

2:56

next to a job as I used to

2:58

always come back online and play this game

3:00

where I used to say all right. Tell.

3:04

Me what happened and I have to figure

3:06

out people would play this game. The I

3:08

had to figure out what was true in

3:10

what was not true before I had a

3:12

chance to look at the headlines and this

3:14

was during you know answer. During the Trump

3:17

years there were things like I remember coming

3:19

online ones after a holiday or after service

3:21

and and does somebody said or the president

3:23

picked a fight with a quarterback Colin Cap

3:25

or next and I said all I know

3:27

that's that's false that's that's a really good

3:29

with advantage But I grew up where we

3:31

are. Okay so where we are I think

3:34

is that. I'm. Not

3:36

much James, I mean, Except

3:39

that blasphemer except that of

3:41

least at the University of

3:43

Texas an awesome ah states

3:46

the the state officials that

3:48

broke up the. Broke

3:50

up, whatever. Encampment effort

3:52

was being made. Ah,

3:56

hundreds of are there were apparently

3:58

eighty seven or at USC,

4:02

people are, I guess, campus

4:04

presidents. It's now at Princeton this morning.

4:08

The encampment started being constructed.

4:11

Officials are shouting on bull horns

4:14

that they are going to give three warnings and

4:17

they are going to go through and wipe the

4:19

encampments out based on Princeton's own handbook

4:21

about what you are and are not allowed to do

4:23

on campus. So people

4:25

who have, university officials who have

4:28

not seen the encampments are

4:30

trying to nip them in the bud. It

4:33

appears and do everything they can to make sure that

4:35

they are not set up now

4:38

and that everything is now being

4:40

telegraphed and so they are, they

4:42

don't want their campuses to be

4:45

swamped. The professoriate

4:47

apparently does want their campuses to

4:49

be swamped as they are now

4:51

playing roles in the

4:53

encampments. But I guess that can I represent,

4:55

yeah go ahead. Just

4:58

thinking about what's changed and it's sort of met

5:00

away. I think what's changed now is that for

5:03

the time being in the US,

5:06

the story has become the protests not

5:08

the war. That

5:10

has absolutely overtaken any

5:13

discussion about Israel, about

5:15

Gaza. It's

5:17

not about Bibi. We

5:20

are watching, there is

5:23

supposedly a

5:27

ground operation that's going to be forthcoming

5:30

in Rafa. But

5:32

just like with George

5:35

Floyd, the

5:37

story moved right off of the

5:39

actual incident with George Floyd and

5:41

became the movement. And the

5:43

movement is now the story here, not

5:46

Israel. What about

5:48

the counter movement Matt? Because

5:51

we have this very interesting event yesterday,

5:54

speaker of the house Mike Johnson went

5:56

to Columbia to say he stood with

5:59

Jewish students. students and order

6:01

and basically yelled at the protesters

6:04

that they should go back to

6:06

class, which I think is, I

6:10

will say, Johnson is a

6:13

much more interesting and surprising figure than

6:15

I think we expected him to be.

6:18

But the just saying, go back

6:20

to class represents a commonsensical

6:25

American approach to saying, who

6:27

are you? Spoil

6:30

little brats wandering around

6:33

with your drum circles and your charging

6:35

stations and your Vino

6:37

skin products in the supplies

6:39

tent on the Columbia

6:42

campus. Go back to

6:44

class. You're wasting $90,000 of

6:46

your parents' money

6:49

or whatever. So the

6:52

counter protest is

6:55

going to start to get

6:57

very interesting. How Americans are

6:59

reacting to this, which

7:01

there's no polling data on and all

7:04

of that, but the idea

7:06

that conservatives and Republicans can

7:08

make hay with what has

7:10

been going on here, I think

7:12

is starting to catch on and frightening

7:16

liberals and leftists who are now

7:18

talking about how don't blame the

7:20

students. It's all there outside agitators

7:23

who are coming and

7:25

their outside agitation is

7:27

preventing students from expressing

7:29

their free speech rights, which is who

7:33

else use the term outside agitators? George

7:36

Wallace, Lester Maddox, the

7:39

Freedom Riders, they

7:41

were outside agitators. Everything would have

7:43

been just fine in Alabama. J-6

7:47

too, by the way. The January 6th,

7:49

it's Antifa in masks or whatever. Yeah,

7:51

fake. Right. Yeah. Telling the students to

7:53

go back to class raises the question

7:55

of whether the students are enrolled at

7:58

Columbia University. university or

8:01

the other schools where these encampments are

8:03

popping up. And sometimes

8:05

hard to tell whether the students are enrolled because

8:08

A, access to the

8:10

encampment is restricted and

8:12

B, most of the protest

8:16

slash monsters are

8:19

fully masked and wearing

8:21

Hamas-like head coverings. So,

8:24

there's no telling who they are. I

8:27

was struck by Michael Powell's piece in The Atlantic

8:30

the other day. Michael

8:32

Powell, the journalist, went into the

8:34

encampment at Columbia. He

8:36

found exactly one person who was

8:38

authorized slash willing to talk to

8:41

him. And

8:43

he says in the piece, I paraphrase,

8:46

his other encounters with these people

8:49

there were frightening

8:51

and Stalinist. And he's

8:53

a writer for The Atlantic. He said, I

8:55

can understand why the students, the Jewish students

8:57

at Columbia and others

9:00

in the community are so disturbed

9:02

and concerned by what's happening.

9:06

We should also point out that the

9:08

president of Columbia University has given the protesters

9:11

another 48 hours. She

9:13

has extended the deadline for them to

9:16

remove the camp. Ongoing

9:19

negotiations, very similar

9:21

to the Biden's diplomatic process with

9:23

the Islamic Republic of Iran. You

9:26

know, we'll extend the negotiations. Don't

9:31

cross this line. You probably get a line, but we'll

9:33

draw the line here. Another

9:36

24 hours for you. I

9:40

guess, again, I have to sort

9:43

of apologize for on Friday suggesting

9:45

that Manoush Soushik, the president of

9:47

Columbia, had turned a

9:49

corner and had, you know, in

9:51

her bringing the NYPD on

9:56

campus to clear out the encampments and

9:59

arrest some people. that that

10:01

she had put her foot down. Well

10:03

she turned the corner and then another

10:05

corner. Yes and then she was afraid

10:07

of the wall. Yes. Yeah and kept

10:09

going does anybody know where she is?

10:12

I think that she kept walking after she

10:14

came out of there she just kept walking.

10:16

One of the latest communications came in the

10:18

early morning hours. I

10:20

mean this is heated

10:24

crisis level negotiations between her

10:26

and whoever

10:29

the designated leader of the

10:32

protesters is. Yeah. I

10:35

am so

10:39

there was a black comic aspect to all

10:41

this right which is as Abe says so

10:43

now the protests are about the protests and

10:47

though they are chanting anti-Semitic

10:49

slogans and some

10:51

people there and doing all that that

10:53

that this now takes on the

10:56

form of any

10:58

reality show. It's now a reality show

11:01

and it's that people are living inside

11:03

it. It's being done for the TikTok

11:05

for the for the

11:07

TikToks and for the social

11:09

media and to promote this

11:12

some of these ideas but I mean I

11:14

think the people who are behind it are

11:16

the people who are the leaders who are

11:18

negotiating with Manoush Safik and

11:20

of course and I honestly genuinely believe

11:22

I was the first person to point

11:24

this out on social media that the

11:28

mysterious fact that all the calm and

11:30

tense are exactly the same at every

11:32

campus suggesting mass purchasing has

11:34

been done by some central figure

11:37

and there are in fact rules

11:39

and regulations that the encampment leaders

11:42

are promulgating who should talk to

11:44

the media. When are you allowed

11:46

to talk to media? When can

11:49

you go? Where can you

11:51

go get food? How do you

11:53

wash up? Where are the bathrooms? All

11:55

that stuff that there is a much

11:57

more highly organized aspect

11:59

to These things and and the

12:02

spread we know in part

12:04

because or Abigail Anthony who

12:06

reports from National Review and

12:08

as herself they graduate a

12:10

prince since got a hold

12:12

of the encampment. Construction.

12:16

emails, And things bad Princeton

12:18

a couple of days ago before

12:20

they actually started are putting them

12:22

up. so this is not. None

12:24

of this is spontaneous is he

12:26

can I? And that makes sense

12:29

considering it's a pro Hamas information

12:31

operation this being conducted in the

12:33

United States. I also met my

12:35

make the point. We.

12:37

Hear a lot about secessionism

12:39

especially of coming from the

12:41

right. The threats of secessionism

12:43

from the right in a

12:45

break up of when they're

12:47

with the as many crisis

12:50

over it's jurisdiction on the

12:52

Eagle Pass border crossing in

12:54

Texas Earlier the spring people

12:56

were saying oh this is

12:58

you know that flashpoint could

13:00

to Texas new and a

13:02

flout federal law. Will.

13:04

They get away with it. But. The

13:07

strike me that these secessionists.

13:09

On the left are far

13:11

more active. And. On

13:13

the right mean this type of

13:15

tactic that we're going to create

13:18

an autonomous zone where only are

13:20

preferred Law. Is. Valid

13:22

we saw that is in Occupy

13:24

Wall Street but we also sought

13:26

in the summer of Twenty Twenty.

13:29

Or. As with the Atop District

13:31

in Seattle as and then as

13:33

he often shell shocked and saddened

13:35

Portland turning essentially into this weird.

13:38

In a nightly gunfight

13:40

between federal officers and

13:42

these anarchist the Cops

13:44

City protest in Georgia

13:46

Same thing these protesters

13:49

connect come out and

13:51

they say they form

13:53

human chains, not let

13:55

allowing anyone in and

13:57

they're basically carving out

13:59

territory where they are

14:01

the only legal authorities.

14:03

It so insane. And

14:05

it's around us all the time. And

14:08

it's left wing, not right wing. The.

14:11

Occupy Wallstreet, you may remember. Either.

14:15

When Occupy Wall Street ah took over

14:17

as a car park at the you

14:20

know at the southern tip of Manhattan.

14:24

That that that work had been done

14:26

before hands to figure out where the

14:28

see where this encampment should take place

14:30

in that there was a weird. Aspect

14:34

of the legal documents.

14:37

Surrounding. What Zuccotti Park

14:39

was. And it was partially

14:41

private and partially public. And

14:43

that speech because of it's

14:45

parcel public nature or something

14:48

like that Free speech, You

14:50

know. First Amendment rights could

14:52

not be curtailed some set

14:54

so that they had a

14:56

legal argument that they had

14:58

standing. To put up

15:00

these tend to live in the

15:02

some camp month and that ah

15:04

I believe when they was finally

15:06

broken up. That of

15:08

the reason given was essentially sanitary

15:10

that vegas but there was a

15:12

there was a health threat being

15:15

posed by this whatever was five

15:17

six months that in these people

15:19

have been spending in a living

15:21

in this living in this park

15:23

with their free library and hair.

15:26

Many. Government and stuff like that.

15:30

Here. We have the case where

15:32

we have private property as we

15:34

are constantly reminded. By. Columbia.

15:37

It's. Private property and therefore the police

15:39

can't come on campus to break up

15:41

the encampments unless we asked the man

15:43

which is by the way not true.

15:46

If you believe he was urging of empires.

15:50

Didn't ethnic tensions? Yes. Dps rather

15:53

have to stay out unless you

15:55

invite the men. But.

15:57

i mean if there's if they're celanese been

15:59

committed the book police are

16:02

allowed to enter the premises

16:05

and it is the

16:07

refusal of the owners

16:11

of the private property to say, you're

16:14

trespassing, literally get off my

16:17

lawn. I

16:19

mean, as Matt, as you let it

16:21

out there's this, yes, get off my

16:23

lawn, that

16:26

indicates some Rubicon has been

16:28

crossed on university

16:30

campuses that will, by the way, never

16:32

again, you won't be able to

16:35

go back. Well, you never know. Maybe

16:37

Manoush, when the 48-hour deadline comes, she'll say, okay,

16:39

I'll call on the cops once again because I

16:41

can't deal with it. I do want to make

16:43

one other point though. I came across an email

16:45

reported by, I believe, the Free

16:48

Beacon this morning that the Columbia Law students

16:50

have been telling

16:53

their fellow Jewish students. So I think

16:55

it's one group of

16:58

Columbia Law students sending

17:01

some type of email to Jewish students

17:03

who would like law enforcement to come

17:05

and to break up. They came in

17:07

and the presence of police officers on

17:09

Columbia's campus would make these law students

17:11

feel unsafe and therefore,

17:13

the protests must

17:16

continue indefinitely. This

17:18

I think, and we've talked about these issues

17:20

now on the podcast for years, but this

17:22

is the scariest part of all

17:24

of this. It isn't so much the

17:27

Hamas sympathizers on campus. So that's very

17:29

scary for the students. I don't want

17:31

to minimize it. But the longer term

17:33

threat to America posed by the law

17:36

students in these various

17:39

campuses who are going to

17:41

graduate and going to go into

17:43

the legal profession and going to staff Democratic

17:47

administrations for the next generation

17:50

to say such idiocy

17:53

that the presence of police officers would

17:56

make them feel physically unsafe, Such

17:58

topsy-turvy. Logic. And

18:01

for who unusual. And.

18:04

New Psychobabble. Is.

18:06

What? Really? That. Makes me stay

18:08

up late at night. And. They

18:10

also they yielded the started

18:12

early on. One of the

18:14

big things was the the

18:16

Harvard. Law students

18:19

are having her. Ah

18:21

oh and my you axes the

18:23

N Y U lawsuit are having

18:26

her arm invitation to employments I

18:28

guess is how they described it

18:30

at a major law firm after

18:32

graduation Rescinded. And I've got a

18:34

whole discussion going and then. On some

18:37

of these from some law firm,

18:39

some financial firms had sent letters

18:41

a colleges saying. Listen.

18:43

This is not a joke. It's

18:45

asked if. You. Have to get

18:47

this under control. You can't. You know

18:49

you can't send these people to me.

18:52

You know we're We're offering you guys

18:54

jobs and ah and part of this

18:56

is what was explained to them was

18:58

that if you go to work at

19:00

a major law firm, You have

19:02

lots of different clients, lots of

19:04

different types of clients, lots of

19:06

different interesting clients, and you you

19:09

bring with you when you bring

19:11

this sort of idiocy mad as

19:13

you called it, it's more for

19:15

it's a it's a threat to

19:17

eat of the rest of the

19:19

firm's work with who knows who

19:21

they're working with. So they're trying

19:23

to say to these people eggs,

19:26

just wait till you take literally

19:28

please. One step, one step in

19:30

the real world and look. Around

19:32

before you you know what I'll decide

19:34

about. I guess I just want to

19:36

say I'm distinguishing between the in the

19:38

case of N Y U student who

19:40

was pro Hamas pro October seventh and

19:43

then denied employed. That. That's

19:45

necessarily with these Columbia law students are say

19:47

they're just they're say we don't want the

19:49

police officers on the campus because that makes

19:52

us feel physically unsafe best as the more

19:54

kind of. Weird. Progressive.

19:57

or you know zoc guys that You

20:01

know, Hamas is the victim, police

20:04

officers are the real threat, right?

20:07

Everything is topsy turvy and I think those

20:09

types of attorneys

20:11

who aren't like explicitly anti-Semite

20:15

are actually going to get employed. Yeah,

20:17

and also we should say that the... I want to be like

20:19

Abe though. I need to be like Abe though and say it's

20:21

worse than that because there's an aspect to

20:24

this where you listen and you say

20:26

they don't believe this at all. This

20:28

is a form of real world trolling

20:31

that they are once again

20:33

deploying their feeling unsafe argument.

20:37

Their theoretical lack of safety

20:39

with an actual lack of

20:41

safety that actual people on

20:43

the campus are experiencing where,

20:46

you know, this student Jessica

20:48

Schwab goes into the encampments

20:50

and is threatened physically by

20:53

protesters. Like

20:57

that actually happened.

20:59

Sahar Tohak at Yale

21:02

probably inadvertently but was poked in

21:04

the eye by a flagpole

21:07

in the midst

21:09

of being menaced. It's

21:12

not clear that the intent was to poker in

21:14

the eye with the flagpole. These

21:17

are things that are actually happening

21:19

where people are literally unsafe. And

21:22

just as we've been... We spent 10 years

21:25

dealing with the idea of the microaggression, the

21:28

aggression that isn't an aggression. So you dub

21:30

it an aggression by saying that

21:32

it's kind of... It's

21:34

like a kind of nascent aggression if it

21:36

were allowed to bubble into... So when the

21:39

Columbia Law students say this, it's

21:41

a little like when Madi Hassan goes on

21:44

to Twitter to lecture us

21:46

about what antisemitism is and

21:49

how we are being antisemites

21:51

because we attack

21:53

Jewish anti-Zionists. Like,

21:56

okay, does he really believe that? I

21:59

doubt it. just a Stalinist,

22:01

these law students are effectively

22:04

using classic Stalinist reversal, semantic

22:06

infiltration tactics to try to

22:09

turn their argument, your argument

22:11

against yourself. And

22:13

where I am unnerved is the fact that

22:15

the left gets away with

22:18

this. I just want to give you

22:20

an example. Casey Johnson, our very valued

22:22

contributor who writes about campuses,

22:24

is himself a professor at Brooklyn College

22:26

and writes about Title IX and a

22:28

lot of stuff. Said the

22:31

other day, I mean this reminds me of Melissa

22:33

Click. So I was like, oh, Melissa Click. So

22:35

if you don't remember Melissa Click, there

22:37

was, after Ferguson, after the Michael Brand

22:40

incident in Ferguson, Missouri, there were protests

22:42

on the campus of the University of

22:44

Missouri at Columbia, and Melissa

22:46

Click, who was a professor of communication,

22:48

essentially tried to

22:51

call a mob onto a reporter

22:54

for the Daily Missouri, which is the

22:56

paper at the University of Missouri, which

22:58

has a famous journalism school. It said,

23:01

people come help me out here to sort of beat

23:03

up this reporter or

23:05

stop them from going somewhere.

23:09

And she ended up pleading guilty

23:11

to a misdemeanor and having to

23:13

do 30 hours of community service.

23:17

We need some muscle over here, what's

23:19

the famous word. Thank you very much.

23:22

And she was, you know, sentenced to 30 hours

23:24

of community service, and the University of Missouri fired

23:26

her for

23:28

attempting to set

23:31

a mob on a reporter.

23:34

She's a professor of communications. So

23:36

I was like, Melissa Click, what happened to Melissa Click?

23:39

She's got a job as a professor

23:41

on a campus of Gonzaga University. Dr.

23:45

Melissa A. Click's research interests center

23:47

on popular culture, texts, and audience,

23:50

particularly texts and audiences disdained in

23:52

mainstream culture. I don't really need

23:54

to read the rest of this.

24:00

Somehow, their bacon is always pulled

24:02

out of the fire and with Soros

24:06

money and whoever that

24:08

guy, the progressive insurance

24:10

money and the

24:12

people who gave $2 billion to

24:15

ProPublica and all this, hundreds

24:18

of these people, if they don't get

24:20

jobs in administrations or maybe they'll be

24:22

cleansed for five or ten years, they'll

24:24

be setups of NGOs and things like

24:27

that that they will go into and

24:29

then ten years from now, they will

24:31

emerge as people even if

24:33

maybe this makes them a little too

24:35

hot to get clerkships. What

24:40

judge would be insane enough to

24:42

hire somebody who does

24:45

stuff like this? It just strikes me, it would

24:47

be crazy. You don't know, you

24:50

issue a decision that your

24:53

clerk doesn't like and your clerk does

24:56

a sit-in in your office. I mean, I just,

24:59

I'm not joking. It's such

25:01

an interesting point you're making because they get

25:03

away with it because we are so bifurcated.

25:06

There isn't one common culture where

25:08

you would be in trouble for

25:10

doing this. You

25:12

do it, you're in your left

25:14

sphere, you're fine. That's

25:16

where you live. You don't live in this

25:19

larger thing where you have

25:21

to deal with people on the right,

25:23

people on the middle, you are in

25:25

your own complete ecosystem and you can

25:27

travel through it. Right.

25:30

That's true on both sides. So, not to

25:32

both sides, but like the guy who went

25:34

to shoot up Comet

25:37

Pizza on Connecticut

25:41

Avenue when he was tried and

25:43

then he was like, I didn't

25:45

even know it wasn't true. Everything

25:51

that I read, everything that I pay

25:53

attention to said, they were taking these

25:55

kids and they were taking the adrenochrome

25:57

out of their bodies and I genuinely...

26:00

genuinely didn't know that there was a

26:02

counterfactual here that was actually

26:04

the truth. And

26:07

you heard that from some of the J6 defendants

26:09

who said, I live in this world

26:11

in which I didn't

26:14

know that they weren't coming

26:16

for Trump. And

26:19

so there is a... You

26:21

are able now to silo yourself to

26:24

such a degree that,

26:26

yeah, when somebody says, you

26:29

know, you're not allowed to put up a tent

26:31

on campus. If you're not one

26:33

of the organizers who is trying

26:36

to harness law

26:38

in these municipalities or things like

26:40

that to your advantage because your

26:42

purpose is to have a pro-Hamas

26:44

rally or you're... Can

26:46

I just... Yeah, I just want to make a point

26:48

but you just triggered me with your use of the

26:50

word tent. What's with the

26:52

tent? Why

26:55

is it that in the past decade or so,

26:57

tents have become so ubiquitous? I

26:59

crossed the bridge to go into DC. I'm

27:01

greeted with tents. I walk

27:03

down a park in Washington, DC. Tents,

27:07

sometimes on the sidewalk. Tents,

27:09

now all throughout America. These tent cities

27:11

are popping up on the campus. What's

27:14

with the tents? Why is it now in

27:18

the front of so many people's minds that

27:20

they have the right to pull out a

27:22

stupid tent from REI and just live right

27:24

in front of me and don't have to

27:26

care about any of the social consequences? You

27:28

do. I actually have an

27:30

answer, please. Just

27:33

like everything else, it is technology.

27:35

When I was a young, young

27:37

kid at camp, it

27:40

was hell to put up

27:42

a tent. I mean, right. It

27:45

took an hour. Well, that's why they had the... Well, that's

27:47

why they had the... It's now... It's

27:49

now badge. Yeah. You hike

27:51

for a full day first. You hike for a full

27:53

day first and then you had like a five-minute

27:55

thing of how to build it and like two people

27:58

slept in a tent that night. Yeah. Okay,

28:00

so I have to take

28:02

my kid on a school camping trip

28:04

right in 2012

28:09

or 2013 and I'm like I'm not doing that I can't do

28:11

I don't know how to My friends have

28:13

to listen like you don't know what's going

28:15

on in the last like 30 40 years You

28:19

go by this Coleman tent it

28:21

pops up by itself It

28:24

takes it takes two

28:26

minutes to put up a tent Right,

28:29

it's nothing. So the tents

28:31

themselves and then once

28:33

you have it down folding them

28:35

up takes two minutes also the only problem

28:37

with the tents is Putting

28:40

the thing on that makes them a little

28:42

more waterproof and then hammering and having a

28:44

mallet so you can hammer them Into

28:47

the turnt into the ground so that they don't blow

28:49

away It is

28:51

a technology problem Well, whoever invented that

28:53

technology has a lot to answer for

28:59

These kids aren't paying 78 grand a year

29:01

to sit on the ground Matt. Yeah, that's

29:03

right This is a side

29:06

note. So imagine would well we have it

29:08

that we had the Supreme Court here the

29:11

urban camping case While

29:13

we were right. That's right. That's right. Yeah

29:15

to alert our listeners There's a chance by

29:17

the end of June We

29:20

may have the ability to get rid

29:22

of these tents Which is really high

29:24

on my policy priority list on the

29:26

continuity policy party Let's getting rid of

29:28

the tents is like number two you

29:30

paid any attention to this case

29:32

And it's a town in Oregon.

29:35

I think it's Oregon.

29:37

Yeah, Washington that has banned Outdoor

29:41

camping like as banned sleeping on

29:45

Public spaces at night and you

29:47

want to talk about disingenuous Argumentation

29:50

so the liberals on the court or

29:52

particularly Sotomayor and Kagan said

29:56

How can you keep people from sleeping? Everyone

29:59

has to sleep sleep. So

30:01

you have to be able to sleep because everyone has

30:03

to sleep and the

30:06

homeless have to sleep. If you're

30:08

an unhoused person and you

30:10

need to sleep, you have to sleep. Who

30:12

are we to interfere with the biological process

30:14

of sleep to which I say,

30:18

having just spent two days

30:20

at Passover

30:22

Seder's dealing

30:24

with the passages in the

30:26

Haggadah, the book that is

30:28

the sort of the most

30:30

probably the best known Jewish

30:32

text I imagine really to

30:35

most people. There's a

30:37

whole section of Talmudic, the exploration

30:39

of Talmudic logic that

30:41

as you get older and older gets more and more

30:44

and more obscurantist and

30:46

ridiculous. How many plagues

30:48

were there? You know, we all know there were 10

30:50

plagues and then there's a discussion in the Haggadah

30:52

about whether no, no, there were 50 plagues. No, there

30:54

were 250 plagues. Then

30:58

you go, you know, this really, these guys, some

31:00

of these great Talmudic scholars really

31:02

should have like had a job

31:04

because this is thought

31:06

run amok. So this is

31:08

like Talmudic logic run out. You know perfectly

31:11

well why you don't let

31:13

people sleep overnight

31:15

outside. It's called vagrancy

31:18

and it's a human right to sleep. It is

31:20

not a human right to sleep in public and

31:23

to create conditions under which people feel the right

31:26

to take over public spaces. I

31:29

think it's such an interesting

31:32

point because it's not

31:34

only just that they're an eyesore and

31:37

that they're transgressing on

31:40

everyone's lives

31:43

but it says

31:45

something so interesting about who they are

31:47

and how many people feel this way.

31:50

So it speaks to the sense of

31:53

impermanence and drift and

31:55

it's also like the rise

31:57

in squatters everywhere. squatting

32:00

and other people's home and there's

32:02

something like Sort of post-apocalyptic

32:05

about it or sort of post Somebody

32:09

as somebody else pointed out they live 200

32:12

yards away Like

32:15

the on how is there room or

32:17

the on house? But the tent cities

32:19

at Columbia are people who live

32:21

there. You see that building you

32:23

see that window That's my that's

32:26

my they don't even live there

32:28

I'm concerned. I'm live in Queens

32:30

what what we Look

32:32

when they come in what but Matt, where did

32:34

you think I was going? Well, I thought you

32:36

were going with what it says about the imposition

32:40

of One's ego on others

32:43

that is to me right like the

32:45

mark of our age right I feel

32:47

this way and Screw

32:49

you if you feel differently because you

32:52

have to listen to me my sovereign

32:54

self is more important than yours in

32:56

our sense of Equality and our sense

32:58

of what freedom means in

33:00

America today has no

33:04

response, oh, okay, if you

33:06

feel like Just sleeping

33:08

in the sidewalk in front of my house

33:10

What who am I to say that or

33:12

if all of a sudden you feel like

33:14

you are of a different biological sex because

33:16

you Woke up feeling that way in the

33:18

morning of who am I

33:20

to say that we can't you know? Completely

33:22

rejigger the rules of our society in your

33:24

favor. That's where I thought you were going

33:27

but your other point was true, too I

33:29

mean III there is The

33:33

thing about the squatting and the tenting and

33:35

all of that is that this is yet

33:37

again a circumstance in which Despite

33:40

all of our talk about the evils of

33:42

privilege or the left's talk about the evils

33:44

of privilege People can buy

33:47

their way out of Right

33:50

the wealthy do not have to worry

33:52

about people Doing

33:54

this stuff because they can put up a

33:56

gate they can put up a hedgerow they

33:58

can live in a doorman building,

34:00

they can have, they can

34:22

hire lawyers or stuff like that

34:24

to something

34:31

needs to be done because there's

34:33

a squatter in their house. They can't

34:36

afford it. They're living paycheck by paycheck.

34:38

And this is where the limousine liberal

34:40

argument started to come in and really

34:43

bite the left. And

34:46

basically freeze the progress of the left

34:48

in the late 60s and early 70s

34:50

as typified by, of course,

34:53

Tom Wolf's deathless essay, Radical

34:55

Sheik, that you can

34:57

talk this talk, but then you

34:59

you can say no charter schools,

35:01

but then you send your kid

35:04

to a private school and

35:07

consign every other kid who doesn't

35:09

have the resources to a horrible

35:12

public school. And that is

35:14

something that has been a secret

35:18

weapon of

35:21

the anti-left now going

35:23

on 50 years. And

35:25

I think it may re-emerge. When

35:28

I was at the New York Post, we had

35:30

to, that was the opinion

35:33

editor, you know, you'd take perspective photos

35:35

that you had in mind to illustrate

35:37

a story to the photo editor because

35:39

the photo editor of the paper knew

35:42

what every photo going in the paper

35:44

was going to be. So you're just

35:46

making sure you're not doubling up. And

35:49

I remember taking a couple options over

35:51

to illustrate a story about homelessness. And,

35:53

you know, I printed out a picture

35:56

from our, from the post, you know,

35:58

from our backlog saying, showing a

36:01

homeless person being

36:03

roughly removed from,

36:07

you know, near, I

36:09

guess it was Gracie Mansion probably. And

36:12

I brought it to the photo editor and he said, Do you know who

36:14

that is in the photo? You don't

36:16

recognize them? And I said, No, he's

36:19

that that's a post reporter. The

36:21

post had had does this sort of thing

36:24

to catch the limousine liberalism. So what they

36:26

had done was they had said to build

36:28

a blasio. How come every

36:30

time you go on the subway,

36:32

it looks nicer than when I

36:34

go on the subway, let's put

36:36

you know, build a blasio said

36:38

there's a right as a human

36:40

right to sleep like Sotomayor said

36:42

outside. So the post sent a

36:45

homeless, you know, quote unquote, homeless

36:47

person to sleep outside the blasios

36:49

place. And it's how long, right?

36:51

Right. Removed and tossed out, you know,

36:53

like a like what are the shows where

36:55

you see the guy flying through the air?

36:57

Can I find your limousine liberal thing, John?

36:59

Just for us? Because our friend

37:01

David Brooks had it. Interesting.

37:04

And I think revealing a little piece in

37:06

the New York Times this morning entitled Why

37:08

I'm getting more pessimistic about Biden's chances this

37:11

fall. And he gives two

37:13

reasons. And the second reason is he's

37:16

become more pessimistic because of what's happening to

37:18

the youth vote. Many David

37:20

goes on and I quote, I think what we're seeing

37:23

at Columbia and on other elite campuses is a precursor

37:25

to what we're going to see at the Democratic Convention

37:28

in Chicago. He talked about 1968, which

37:30

we of course have referenced several times in the podcast.

37:33

He says if there are similar

37:35

classes in the clashes in Chicago this August,

37:37

the chaos will reinforce Trump's core

37:39

law and order message. He will

37:41

make Biden look weak and hapless, close

37:44

quote, but it also will

37:46

reinforce this idea of limousine liberalism,

37:48

which is prevalent

37:51

kind of in the Biden kind

37:53

of campaign. And if you consider like the

37:55

difference between Trump visiting

37:57

the wake of the killed

38:01

NYPD officer versus Biden's

38:04

gathering in midtown

38:06

Manhattan with Stephen Colbert and

38:08

all these liberals coming being

38:10

heckled by the Palestinian activists.

38:14

There's the general kind of detachment.

38:17

Biden, we should

38:19

say, just yesterday was giving remarks

38:21

where he read

38:23

out the stage instruction pause

38:26

which was kind of a callback

38:28

to George H.W. Bush's reading

38:31

off the teleprompter message, I care.

38:33

On a card. On a card,

38:35

right. He was on his card in his pocket. He

38:38

was at a diner. He went into a diner in

38:40

New Hampshire. And the card said, you know, basically your

38:42

overall message

38:46

is I care. So when

38:49

you go around you're trying to make it clear

38:51

to people that you care and he said message

38:53

I care. And there's also

38:55

the continued, you know, lack of

38:58

a serious response to what's happening on the

39:00

southern border. I was telling a friend just

39:03

last evening, you know, they

39:05

really need to get these human chain people

39:07

at the university campuses and send them to

39:09

the southern border because then we would

39:12

be impenetrable. You know, the

39:14

border crossings would plummet if you just

39:16

put these pro-Hamas barbarians

39:19

in charge of border security. I

39:24

want to stay on this point a

39:26

little longer because the it's not

39:28

just limousine liberalism but it is

39:30

also a question

39:32

of the response to limousine

39:34

liberalism because it's not only

39:36

that they do this and that people know

39:38

it. The question is can it be harnessed, right?

39:40

So the harnessing of

39:44

anti-limousine liberalism

39:48

was a key factor, as I said, in

39:50

the late 60s, early 70s of halting

39:55

the kind of mad on rush of

39:59

leftist politics. in Washington, even

40:01

though Richard Nixon, when

40:03

he became president, still kind

40:06

of drifted in that direction in domestic

40:10

politics. But there was a kind

40:12

of, you know, how many bills

40:14

did Lyndon Johnson pass in 1965 with a 69-seat

40:20

majority in the Senate? A hundred and seventy,

40:22

a hundred and eighty bills were were

40:24

passed that sort of constituted the Great

40:27

Society. Like, there was going to be

40:29

no let up in that thing

40:32

that was happening. And

40:35

Nixon harnessed that you, not really in

40:37

terms of domestic policy, but really in

40:39

terms of how liberals talked

40:41

about the Vietnam War, like the famous,

40:43

most famous, in some

40:46

ways the most effective presidential speech in

40:48

American history, which was the silent majority

40:50

speech delivered in 1969, largely

40:53

written by William Safire, where Nixon

40:55

said, I know there's a

40:57

silent majority in this country who doesn't believe

40:59

in all this nonsense. Like, let me hear

41:01

from you. And the White House got 20

41:05

million telegrams at a

41:07

time when the population of the United States was half what

41:10

it is now. I mean, this was a

41:12

very big moment and the real warning

41:15

sign to Democrats not to go where they were going.

41:17

And then in 72, of course, Nixon

41:19

wins 62% of the vote, having

41:21

won 44% of the vote or something in 1968. It has to be

41:29

harnessed. You have to direct that feeling.

41:32

And Trump is not the best way to

41:35

do that. But I don't know,

41:37

maybe Mike Johnson, not that not that the Speaker of

41:39

the House is going to like have a national profile

41:41

high enough to sort of make

41:44

news. But what Mike Johnson did on

41:46

the Columbia campus is a lodestar for

41:49

Republicans. It is, I am not with them. I

41:52

am with you. I am not with the people

41:54

who are saying that there are, You

41:56

know, there are more than two genders. Do

42:00

you think there were two genders soda

42:02

wise and so does God and so

42:04

does a common sense or whatever. And

42:06

and also so do these at the

42:08

university presidents, right? Because I think the

42:10

lodestar thing works for least the phonic

42:12

to what she's doing in the hearing.

42:14

which is if you're watching all the

42:16

reports of the hearings, even if you

42:18

don't sit and watch on Cspan manouchehr

42:20

seek a sitting there going. No, I

42:22

don't know why we spell soaks with

42:24

an ex. Yeah, I'd we There they

42:27

do. I guess my students don't know

42:29

how to spell. Like. Makes everything that

42:31

she says was agree. I agree

42:33

with you. Congresswoman.

42:35

I agree that is reprehensible. I agree

42:37

with you and I see like that

42:40

was also part of the point was

42:42

to show people like look it's ears

42:44

a bunch of people. Columbia, there's a

42:46

bunch of people on Twitter Scott How

42:48

most people think and a way to

42:50

prove it is a whole The head

42:52

of that university in there as asteroid.

42:54

What is it lightens? You're absolutely right.

42:56

It was. There's a mode and level

42:58

right? So there's a multi level approach,

43:00

but it is. The

43:03

hardest thing of common sense,

43:05

which has a very nicely

43:07

nonideological quality to it. Is

43:10

the point is that we're not the area

43:12

logs where the normal people. They're.

43:14

All crazy over there is the are

43:17

these the people you want to have

43:19

running your country and they're gonna run

43:21

your country because you're president that your

43:24

Bring Us to vote for twenty twenty

43:26

Fourth is saying cause. You

43:29

know, or you know, can't speak

43:31

a coherent sentence. More to the

43:33

point about the at Radio City

43:35

thing, by the way is that

43:38

today I learned. From. Twitter.

43:41

Ah, that. Biden.

43:44

Is going to West Chester

43:46

to the home of Michael

43:48

Douglas, the Academy Award winning

43:50

actor now bizarrely playing Benjamin

43:53

Franklin. Mm Apple's If it

43:55

were it's I'm. I

43:57

liked his lesser kaminsky methods of but I

43:59

mean this. this, that's a very bizarre

44:01

piece of casting. Anyway, Michael

44:03

Douglas's house, and apparently because,

44:05

and I've had this experience

44:07

actually with the presidential motorcade

44:09

in Westchester, because security has

44:11

to close stuff down. School

44:14

is being canceled for 10,000 kids in Westchester

44:17

County today so that

44:20

Biden can go, so the Secret Service can

44:22

close down an entire neighborhood so that Biden

44:24

can go to Michael Douglas's house and

44:27

raise five or ten million dollars. And

44:29

next month, there's going to be a

44:31

big fundraiser in Beverly Hills at Jeffrey

44:33

Katzenberg's house that will raise another 25

44:36

million dollars. And there's Biden being surrounded.

44:38

Who surrounds him? Right?

44:43

Liberal celebrities.

44:47

Does ordinary America

44:49

like liberal celebrities? I don't think

44:51

that they dislike liberal celebrities. This

44:54

is a matter of course, but

44:57

I mean, he's living in this world of unreality

44:59

that is always the problem for

45:01

presidents, is that they don't

45:03

know what's going on in the world because they live in

45:06

this bubble, protected by the Secret

45:08

Service. They only talk to the people who work

45:10

for them, all of that. But

45:12

I mean, this is a very extreme thing.

45:14

Biden doesn't know that people

45:17

don't think. Yeah. They might like

45:19

the president hanging out with

45:21

liberal celebrities when the president is Obama

45:24

and something of a celebrity himself

45:26

and also when prices

45:28

haven't gone up by

45:31

about 19% over the course of

45:33

his first term and when the

45:36

border crisis hadn't

45:38

yet emerged in his first

45:40

term. Sure, hang out

45:43

with the celebrities. That's what

45:45

every Democrat does. The Hollywood

45:47

celebrities part of the Democratic base, but

45:49

it is slightly dangerous when you have

45:52

all of these other aspects of your

45:54

presidency that have gone totally sour and

45:57

when you have this mass movement

45:59

that's high. hostile to civilization

46:03

that's active on America's campuses.

46:05

And your response

46:07

was at best ambivalent

46:11

when asked about it the other day. Well,

46:15

let's talk about that because again, I

46:17

think Biden keeps snatching defeat from the

46:19

jaws of victory.

46:21

He scored an enormous victory

46:23

this week. They

46:25

held for, I mean, a little

46:28

weird parallel to the Inflation Reduction

46:30

Act. Like some presidencies or

46:32

some political organizations would have given up on

46:34

some of the aspects of these foreign aid

46:37

packages at some point because it's like,

46:39

I'm not going to waste my time. We're not getting

46:41

it through. We'll say that the Republicans stank. I'm

46:44

too bored. We have to do other stuff. But

46:47

they kept at the Inflation Reduction Act

46:49

or the green energy, whatever we want

46:51

to call it, and somehow beat Joe

46:53

Manchin down and got the

46:55

bill through. And this is not

46:57

like the Joe Manchin thing. They

47:00

liberated, they and Mike Johnson and Mitch

47:02

McConnell liberated Republicans to vote for the

47:05

aid that they wanted to vote for

47:07

anyway, even though I know a

47:09

slight majority of Republicans in the House

47:12

voted against the aid package packages. But

47:16

it was enough, like 350, 360 Congressmen, House members, and was it 79 senators or

47:18

something like

47:25

that voting for the aid package? But

47:29

he's not taking victory laps. I

47:32

mean, they're doing it. They're sending the aid

47:34

to Ukraine yesterday. They're sending attack homes and

47:36

all sorts of other stuff. And

47:39

they got this $26 billion for

47:41

Israel, which I should mention that

47:43

isn't just for Israel. There's this

47:45

ridiculous bribery money for

47:47

the Palestinians to reward them for starting

47:49

a war against Israel on

47:52

October 7th. Nonetheless, whatever they get. And

47:54

he is not able

47:56

to take a victory lap because he's too afraid of

47:59

these. you know, commie

48:04

terrorist lovers in his own faction

48:07

that he's worried are going to come down around his

48:09

head. Right. The

48:11

narrative around the aid is that

48:13

Ukraine is our ally and

48:16

in a war that they are not

48:19

of their choosing and Israel is our

48:21

ally in a war not of their

48:23

choosing. And we have our allies back.

48:25

Very simple narrative. But you can't say

48:28

that without angering

48:31

people. You can't say that about

48:33

Israel without angering people on the

48:35

left and you can't say that

48:37

on the right without Marjorie Taylor

48:39

Greene, you know, putting in a

48:41

challenge to your speakership or whatever.

48:43

There is this sort of, it's

48:45

funny the way it shook

48:48

out this way, but the underlying

48:50

point is he's afraid to say

48:52

we're helping our allies

48:54

against the enemy because

48:57

he can't say Hamas is the enemy

48:59

and Qatar is the enemy and Iran

49:01

is the enemy because we're giving Iran

49:03

money too. I understand why he

49:06

can't say Qatar is the enemy.

49:08

Our relations with Qatar are very complicated.

49:10

We have asked Qatar to

49:12

do things for, you know,

49:14

there's a lot of back channeling that

49:16

got it. So you can't just turn

49:18

on Qatar. They might release all kinds

49:21

of documents and behind the scenes negotiating

49:23

things to let the world know that

49:25

you were relying on them. They might

49:27

pull funding for you to your university.

49:29

Not being able to say that Hamas

49:31

is our enemy? Like, this is madness

49:33

that has gripped them and they

49:35

are, like I say,

49:37

he is snatching kind of

49:39

like haplessness from

49:42

the jaws of victory. He won this

49:44

huge victory this week

49:47

and he's not taking any victory laps.

49:50

Am I taking crazy pills? Like, I really don't

49:52

understand how we're doing this. You

49:55

take a victory lap, you have to, if

49:57

you make the argument and you, John, you've said this.

50:00

from the beginning, if you make the

50:02

argument for the conflicts, for helping our

50:04

allies win these conflicts, you have to

50:06

do what it takes to

50:08

win the conflict. It

50:13

obligates you to treat them with seriousness that

50:15

you say. And he's not going to do

50:17

that with Ukraine either. We sort of pass

50:19

the point where he's willing to do what

50:21

he's going to do for Ukraine. And Ukraine

50:23

is the safe one with Democrats. He doesn't

50:25

want to write that- He's been around so

50:27

long. He doesn't think foreign policy is what

50:29

motivates voters. Much more

50:31

interested in domestic policy. That's

50:33

why you have this rash of

50:35

new regulations, EPA announcing again

50:38

this morning before we record this that

50:40

the coal business has to end, put

50:43

itself out of business. You

50:45

have stringent environmental regulations. They're going after

50:47

the other part is they're going after

50:49

the fees that airlines put on your

50:51

tickets. That's what he's interested

50:53

in talking about. He's not interested in

50:55

doing ... He's interested in

50:58

helping Israel and Ukraine. He signed the bill

51:00

into law. He did get it through. That

51:02

is a success, but he doesn't want to

51:04

talk about it. And that's

51:06

one reason why he's kind of twisted

51:08

himself into pretzels with

51:10

vis-a-vis Israel, but also one

51:13

reason why Ukraine has not done as well in

51:15

the battlefield over the past year as it might

51:17

have done otherwise. But

51:20

also one of the things about when I said

51:22

that the story has become the protests and not

51:24

the war is

51:26

that this has turned

51:30

Israel ... It's

51:32

turned it from being a foreign policy issue

51:35

into a domestic issue. The issue

51:37

is now rule of law, campuses,

51:41

education, freedom

51:44

of speech. We're

51:47

in a whole new realm now

51:49

in terms of what this

51:51

is about. To

52:01

answer that question takes an experienced team

52:03

of lawyers and experts. Not

52:06

everyone has this type of experience. At

52:08

Colombo Law, we are truck injury

52:10

lawyers. It's what we do every

52:12

day. When someone is hurt

52:15

by a truck, Colombo Law is the law

52:17

firm people call to get answers. Hurt

52:19

by a truck? Call Colombo Law. Let's

52:28

shift gears a little bit and talk about

52:30

Donald Trump's week because

52:33

it's pretty interesting. We've

52:38

noted over the last three weeks that there

52:41

is reason to believe that

52:43

the democratic strategy of trying to tag

52:45

Trump with as many charges

52:48

as possible in the courtroom, we've said, oh,

52:50

this is going to make him stronger. It's

52:52

not making him stronger. It may be, at

52:54

least nationally, it's not making him stronger. As

52:57

the Trump trials and the Trump issues

53:00

have moved to center stage and a lot

53:02

of the media coverage over the last three

53:04

weeks as the

53:06

fraud trial or the

53:09

check hiding scandal, whatever you want to call it,

53:11

has moved to center stage. Biden's

53:13

numbers have gone up. Trump's numbers have

53:16

gone down. There's a fascinating, I think

53:19

it's a Pew poll that has enormous

53:22

numbers of people saying that Biden does

53:24

not have the physical stamina necessary to

53:26

be president or whatever. It's like 66%

53:28

of people say that. But

53:31

59% of people say Trump does

53:33

not have the honesty required to be president.

53:35

Now that's so obviously, if you're

53:37

going to use negative numbers, then Biden

53:39

is doing worse than Trump. But that's not

53:41

a good number. It's not good for people

53:43

to be reminded that Trump is dishonest. You

53:46

can think that he's dishonest without thinking that he's

53:48

a felon. You can

53:50

make it uncomfortable to vote for him. Then

53:53

we have these weird data points like the

53:55

Pennsylvania primary. Nikki Haley

53:57

quit the race six

53:59

weeks. ago or eight weeks, I don't even know

54:01

how long ago, and she got 150,000 votes in the Pennsylvania

54:05

primary, most of them male votes. Now

54:07

that's, you can say when

54:09

the presidential race comes around, there's

54:11

going to be a way lot more Republican

54:14

voters and Trump's numbers

54:16

are going to go way, way up because

54:18

60% more people will vote

54:21

in November as voted

54:23

in this primary. About

54:25

150,000 people who vote no

54:27

against him is not good,

54:29

it's bad, and it's bad in a state

54:31

that he lost by 80,000 votes.

54:36

Maybe those people will come back to him. I

54:39

don't know if they will though, because it's

54:41

a very symbolic thing to vote for Nikki

54:44

Haley in this primary after

54:46

she quit the race. Maybe

54:50

it's so easy to do a mail-in ballot that

54:54

it doesn't mean that by November you'll won't change

54:56

your mind and say you have to vote for

54:58

Biden. Today

55:01

Trump's going to ... The

55:03

argument that Trump should be

55:05

immune from prosecution at the federal level is

55:08

going to be heard at

55:10

the Supreme Court, so that will raise some of that

55:13

again also. We

55:17

do have a race to the bottom

55:19

here between Trump and Biden, like the

55:21

lack of enthusiasm on

55:23

each party's part for ... We

55:27

have 20% of Republicans who seem

55:29

not really to want to vote for Trump. They're

55:33

active Republicans, so they're not the entire party, and we don't

55:36

know if the number

55:39

will be that high, but it's a lot

55:41

of people. We

55:44

hear about Biden's lack of enthusiasm, but we're really not

55:46

talking much about the lack

55:48

of enthusiasm for Trump, which is a real

55:51

thing. Yeah,

55:54

you're right to say that Biden's been

55:56

improving. What's interesting to me is some of these numbers

55:58

is that Biden is running ... ahead of

56:00

his job approval rating. So Biden's

56:03

job approval rating is still pretty

56:05

dismal yet in the head-to-heads against

56:07

Trump. The race

56:09

is essentially tied or it's Biden

56:12

has a narrow lead. Another

56:14

thing to say about it is these

56:18

are national numbers and the

56:20

race in the states is much

56:22

more favorable to Trump continues to be. Now

56:24

of course state polling is

56:27

you know hit or miss and such but just going

56:29

off on what we know even during

56:31

Biden's recent rise in

56:33

the polls places like

56:36

Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, North

56:38

Carolina, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,

56:40

the states that will decide the election,

56:43

Trump still has an advantage so that's

56:45

worth noting as well. There's also

56:47

this idea which I'm just

56:49

you know my reading of the New York

56:51

Times today is providing so much material. Stu

56:54

Stevens, the Republican

56:57

kind of I guess former Republican

56:59

operative, well

57:02

he ran Mitt Romney's campaign, been

57:04

around forever, but

57:06

a fierce critic of Trump and

57:08

someone whose criticism of Trump you know

57:10

led to his reevaluation of the purposes

57:13

of the GOP and center-right

57:15

politics more generally. He's

57:17

in the Times today saying every

57:20

day in court improves Trump's chances in November

57:23

and kind of echoing points that I

57:26

think I've made on the podcast which is the

57:29

change in circumstances from

57:32

the mega rallies of 2016 and

57:34

2020 to now the constrained room of

57:39

the courthouse and these kind

57:41

of mini events which show Trump in a

57:43

more personal almost human

57:46

dimension may actually

57:48

help turn out the Trump

57:50

base and win him in

57:52

November. So I think what the

57:56

bottom line should be when we confront this data is

57:59

confusion. And despair. But I mean, I,

58:01

uh, despair, of course, always a, always

58:04

a good approach. Right.

58:08

As you know, but, um, but I do think

58:11

it's really interesting. We

58:13

keep saying this like this is an unprecedented race.

58:15

You have an 82 year old man versus, you

58:17

know, when an eight year old man versus a

58:19

whatever and Trump is 78

58:22

and he's got 91 indictments and, and

58:24

Biden seems senile and all of that.

58:26

But I think the most interesting aspect

58:29

of it is the complete lack of,

58:33

with the exception of like

58:35

the MAGA base, the

58:38

complete lack of enthusiasm for

58:40

the candidates who have served, who

58:42

are running in the race. And

58:45

that's why RFK Jr.

58:47

is standing there as some kind of

58:49

stand in, not just for like lunacy

58:52

and you know, conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine

58:54

and all of that. But

58:57

just like I'm not them, I'm not them.

58:59

So he's been on them person. And now

59:01

there's some evidence in the more recent polls

59:03

that he's starting to hurt Trump a little

59:05

bit more than Biden in the polling. It's

59:07

unclear who he's actually going to

59:09

hurt the most, but it's

59:12

just a very unusual presidential campaign. I think

59:14

that's the bottom line. And it's, you have

59:16

numb, you have the national numbers

59:18

that we got just the other day

59:20

showing the race tied. But you also

59:22

had this recent poll from

59:24

Bloomberg Morning Consult on the same day,

59:28

showing Trump's lead in the States

59:30

is pretty durable. So if

59:32

we have this jump ball

59:34

race, despite

59:37

the electoral college numbers now turning pretty

59:39

favorably in Trump's, like he's a 290

59:41

or something like that, if the election

59:46

were held today. So that would be a

59:48

comfortable, not big

59:50

win. Right. George

59:53

W. Bush won in 20, in 2004 with 286

59:55

electoral votes or something. something

1:00:00

like that. That's the

1:00:02

first one with 271 or whatever it was in 2000, once the

1:00:10

Supreme Court had ruled. So we've

1:00:12

had some very narrow wins

1:00:14

here. But I just think it's

1:00:19

fascinating to note that

1:00:22

we are talking about lack of enthusiasm, which

1:00:24

means what's going to matter is A,

1:00:26

who's better at naked,

1:00:29

raw politics. And right now, though, Trump is

1:00:34

running a very good race, there's

1:00:36

a reason to believe that the Democrats are better at

1:00:39

what they'll do nationally than Republicans. We have

1:00:41

a complete overhaul of the RNC to turn

1:00:44

it into a fundraising arm

1:00:46

for the Trump legal bills and

1:00:49

not for get out the vote efforts. And

1:00:51

the Democrats don't have that problem. They

1:00:56

are good at getting voters out. Right.

1:00:58

And also, I

1:01:01

think the lack of enthusiasm is also

1:01:03

a reminder that the Democrats have two

1:01:05

options in front of them, and one of them doesn't

1:01:07

work. The lack of enthusiasm

1:01:09

for the election shows that people aren't

1:01:11

interested in the narrative that if you

1:01:14

don't vote the right way, this will

1:01:16

be the last election of your lifetime.

1:01:18

And this is the end of democracy

1:01:20

and all that stuff. Whatever people feel

1:01:22

about that, I'm not saying that people

1:01:24

who are saying that don't believe

1:01:26

what they're saying. What I'm saying is

1:01:29

voters don't seem to believe what they're

1:01:31

saying, but they will take arguments on

1:01:33

all sorts of other stuff on the

1:01:36

issue. So the the the you know,

1:01:39

the apocalypse now argument

1:01:41

simply isn't working. Otherwise,

1:01:44

we would not be having extended conversations

1:01:46

about a lack of enthusiasm, how nobody

1:01:48

really feels like voting because nobody by

1:01:51

the way is on the line. And

1:01:53

if they just adjust along those lines,

1:01:55

I think they're ceiling is higher than

1:01:57

it is now. Well, it's important.

1:02:00

I got a note now because as

1:02:02

it happens, as we are recording

1:02:04

this, the GDP numbers

1:02:06

have come in and they're

1:02:08

terrible. The first quarter of 2024 and they

1:02:10

are terrible. They are 1.6% growth. The

1:02:16

expectation of the

1:02:19

world of economists somehow that creates an

1:02:21

expectation was for two and a half

1:02:23

percent. So this is coming in, I

1:02:25

don't know, like 50% lower than economists

1:02:27

expected. So

1:02:32

we have the argument that has

1:02:34

been promulgated over the last couple of months

1:02:36

by very, very passionate,

1:02:39

democratic partisans that the

1:02:42

economy is good and we just need to convince

1:02:44

people that the economy is great. Look at these

1:02:46

numbers. They're great. They're fantastic. By

1:02:49

the way, there are some fantastic numbers. America

1:02:51

is now producing 27% of the

1:02:53

world's either economy or its production or

1:02:55

something like

1:02:59

that, which is the highest number in 40 years.

1:03:02

There are good numbers, but the

1:03:04

economy is growing very, very slowly all of

1:03:06

a sudden. Maybe it grew too fast at

1:03:09

the end of 2023, so the slowdown

1:03:11

is people taking. But

1:03:14

this now raises all kinds of questions. When

1:03:17

you have a bad number in the first quarter of an

1:03:20

election year, that does not go well for you. That

1:03:24

was the George H.W. Bush story in

1:03:26

1992 and the Clinton story and the

1:03:29

Reagan story in

1:03:33

the first quarter of 1980. And

1:03:35

Clinton had this big number in 1996, which

1:03:39

was the kind of predictor of

1:03:41

his runaway victory against

1:03:44

Bob Dole in

1:03:46

November. So Biden's got another

1:03:49

hampering because we've got inflation, we've got

1:03:51

slow growth. The only good

1:03:53

part of this could be that if the economy

1:03:55

is slowing down, the Fed will come under pressure

1:03:57

to lower interest rates.

1:04:00

But of course, then inflation will get worse

1:04:03

and I don't know. Not

1:04:06

good. Not a good number, Bob. Not

1:04:09

good. So

1:04:13

that's where I guess that's where

1:04:15

we'll leave it. I do want

1:04:18

to make a commentary recommend and following Matt.

1:04:21

I don't know when we, as we keep going,

1:04:25

we get to this point now

1:04:27

that we're recommending a tweet but I did

1:04:30

want to recommend a tweet. I'm sorry because-

1:04:32

Did I recommend a tweet? Didn't

1:04:35

you recommend a tweet? Somebody

1:04:37

recommended it. I'm now going to recommend- I think you

1:04:39

did. You recommended it. You

1:04:41

recommended the children, the banana children,

1:04:43

the banana population. The man of

1:04:45

bananas. Yeah. Right, but that was

1:04:48

a video. This is just a tweet. Literally a

1:04:50

tweet. From an unlikely source

1:04:52

of fascinating clever. Monica

1:04:57

Lewinsky. Oh, yes.

1:04:59

Monica Lewinsky last night- She's

1:05:01

waiting. On Twitter, posted

1:05:03

a picture of the White House. I

1:05:06

don't know what

1:05:08

triggered this because it

1:05:10

came out sometime, I think,

1:05:13

you know, like it was like 9.30 at night, last night.

1:05:20

Picture of the White House and she says, you

1:05:22

wouldn't last an hour in the

1:05:24

asylum where they raised me. Going

1:05:32

on there. I don't know but that

1:05:34

is one hell of a tweet. I

1:05:37

don't know what, you know, it's

1:05:39

like if she only had this- You

1:05:43

know, Monica also has a Columbia University

1:05:45

connection. She

1:05:47

studied there after the scandal and in fact,

1:05:49

she was on campus on 9.11.

1:05:54

My friends and I encountered her during that time.

1:05:57

So she somehow tied up in-

1:06:00

Maybe that's what this is tweet is in I

1:06:02

just want to say it's a Taylor Swift reference.

1:06:05

Oh, is that right? Oh Okay,

1:06:09

there's a lyric and I

1:06:14

was I was off. Thank God you're here

1:06:16

Seth This is how popular this meme was

1:06:18

I was offline for two days and I

1:06:20

came back online and I saw The Lewinsky

1:06:22

thing and everybody saying how hilarious it was

1:06:24

and I was off for two days I

1:06:26

didn't know what this was. So this was

1:06:29

a Taylor Swift lyric and so people were

1:06:31

Substituting their own lines you wouldn't

1:06:34

in the asylum where I was in people

1:06:36

would show a picture of their Whatever

1:06:38

they would joke about it, you know their house So

1:06:41

that's that it okay, so you won the medium right?

1:06:46

Of course the person who was raised in

1:06:48

asylum in popular culture was Freddy Krueger from

1:06:50

A Nightmare on Elm Street the

1:06:53

bastard son of 10,000 maniacs You

1:06:57

may recall Freddy

1:06:59

Krueger anyway, so You

1:07:02

wouldn't last an hour in the asylum where Freddy

1:07:04

Krueger was raised. Well, there you go. That's what

1:07:06

I'm saying. So anyway, I I'm

1:07:10

glad to get this lesson in in in as

1:07:14

You are resident Swifty Thank

1:07:17

You Seth You

1:07:20

do have you do have 10

1:07:22

year old daughter so that that you know

1:07:24

that does that does what you squarely in

1:07:27

Taylor territory right now. Anyway,

1:07:29

we will be back Tomorrow

1:07:33

so for Seth Abe and madam

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features