Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
When someone is hurt in a truck
0:04
accident, the one question everyone has is
0:06
why did this terrible collision happen? To
0:09
answer that question takes an experienced team
0:11
of lawyers and experts. Not
0:14
everyone has this type of experience. At
0:16
Colombo Law, we are truck injury
0:19
lawyers. It's what we do every
0:21
day. When someone is hurt
0:23
by a truck, Colombo Law is the law
0:25
firm people call to get answers. Hurt.
0:27
Hurt by a truck? Call. Call Colombo Law. Welcome
0:54
to the Commentary Magazine Daily Podcast Today
0:56
is Thursday, April Twenty Fifth Twenty Twenty
0:58
Four I am John Out where it's
1:00
the editor of Commentary Magazine with me.
1:02
As always Executive Editor: A Greenwald Hi
1:05
Abe her John. Senior. Editor
1:07
sets my now hi Seth. Rogen.
1:09
And Washington Commentary com list and
1:11
Director of Domestic Policy Studies at
1:13
the American Enterprise Institute. Matthew Continetti
1:15
hi Matt I don't I hope
1:18
everybody I listen to me who
1:20
observed had as this and couple
1:22
of sailors. And
1:24
is ready to get back in the
1:26
game. Because if
1:28
you were observing, and in fact
1:30
observing, Rigorously.
1:32
And therefore were treating it as a
1:35
holiday and we're not on social media
1:37
are watching meteor the having anything to
1:39
do with electricity for the most part
1:41
like our own sets. When Dell sets
1:43
when you woke up, level of sports
1:45
do it when you when you woke
1:47
up when you concluded. The.
1:49
Pascual Festivities and the two
1:51
days of holiday and emerged
1:54
last night to see what
1:56
was going on in the
1:58
world. Cow had the. World
2:00
changed, From. Monday
2:02
from Mob. We. Know
2:05
when the Saviors began? On
2:07
Monday night. Myself. Very much
2:09
like when know our. First. Sent
2:11
out the bird and bird came back and know
2:13
said or I. Let's go back in the Arc
2:15
for a few more days and then we'll see
2:18
how the weather is in a few more days.
2:20
Know. How I'd say Came back on line
2:23
two. You know our eyes always the see
2:25
that things had. Somehow everything had worked itself
2:27
out very nicely. And ah, I did Odyssey.
2:29
I went in. I went in thinking there's
2:31
gonna be three more schools. Ah you know,
2:34
by a time I get out of these
2:36
two days three more schools. Convulsed
2:39
by these protests, In and and all the
2:41
mayhem. and it was only like one in
2:43
a house. So. I'm
2:46
in. But yeah, it's a it's
2:48
a. Bit. There are always ah
2:50
I used it when I used to come
2:52
back online after two days or if there
2:54
were a three day or when it was
2:56
next to a job as I used to
2:58
always come back online and play this game
3:00
where I used to say all right. Tell.
3:04
Me what happened and I have to figure
3:06
out people would play this game. The I
3:08
had to figure out what was true in
3:10
what was not true before I had a
3:12
chance to look at the headlines and this
3:14
was during you know answer. During the Trump
3:17
years there were things like I remember coming
3:19
online ones after a holiday or after service
3:21
and and does somebody said or the president
3:23
picked a fight with a quarterback Colin Cap
3:25
or next and I said all I know
3:27
that's that's false that's that's a really good
3:29
with advantage But I grew up where we
3:31
are. Okay so where we are I think
3:34
is that. I'm. Not
3:36
much James, I mean, Except
3:39
that blasphemer except that of
3:41
least at the University of
3:43
Texas an awesome ah states
3:46
the the state officials that
3:48
broke up the. Broke
3:50
up, whatever. Encampment effort
3:52
was being made. Ah,
3:56
hundreds of are there were apparently
3:58
eighty seven or at USC,
4:02
people are, I guess, campus
4:04
presidents. It's now at Princeton this morning.
4:08
The encampment started being constructed.
4:11
Officials are shouting on bull horns
4:14
that they are going to give three warnings and
4:17
they are going to go through and wipe the
4:19
encampments out based on Princeton's own handbook
4:21
about what you are and are not allowed to do
4:23
on campus. So people
4:25
who have, university officials who have
4:28
not seen the encampments are
4:30
trying to nip them in the bud. It
4:33
appears and do everything they can to make sure that
4:35
they are not set up now
4:38
and that everything is now being
4:40
telegraphed and so they are, they
4:42
don't want their campuses to be
4:45
swamped. The professoriate
4:47
apparently does want their campuses to
4:49
be swamped as they are now
4:51
playing roles in the
4:53
encampments. But I guess that can I represent,
4:55
yeah go ahead. Just
4:58
thinking about what's changed and it's sort of met
5:00
away. I think what's changed now is that for
5:03
the time being in the US,
5:06
the story has become the protests not
5:08
the war. That
5:10
has absolutely overtaken any
5:13
discussion about Israel, about
5:15
Gaza. It's
5:17
not about Bibi. We
5:20
are watching, there is
5:23
supposedly a
5:27
ground operation that's going to be forthcoming
5:30
in Rafa. But
5:32
just like with George
5:35
Floyd, the
5:37
story moved right off of the
5:39
actual incident with George Floyd and
5:41
became the movement. And the
5:43
movement is now the story here, not
5:46
Israel. What about
5:48
the counter movement Matt? Because
5:51
we have this very interesting event yesterday,
5:54
speaker of the house Mike Johnson went
5:56
to Columbia to say he stood with
5:59
Jewish students. students and order
6:01
and basically yelled at the protesters
6:04
that they should go back to
6:06
class, which I think is, I
6:10
will say, Johnson is a
6:13
much more interesting and surprising figure than
6:15
I think we expected him to be.
6:18
But the just saying, go back
6:20
to class represents a commonsensical
6:25
American approach to saying, who
6:27
are you? Spoil
6:30
little brats wandering around
6:33
with your drum circles and your charging
6:35
stations and your Vino
6:37
skin products in the supplies
6:39
tent on the Columbia
6:42
campus. Go back to
6:44
class. You're wasting $90,000 of
6:46
your parents' money
6:49
or whatever. So the
6:52
counter protest is
6:55
going to start to get
6:57
very interesting. How Americans are
6:59
reacting to this, which
7:01
there's no polling data on and all
7:04
of that, but the idea
7:06
that conservatives and Republicans can
7:08
make hay with what has
7:10
been going on here, I think
7:12
is starting to catch on and frightening
7:16
liberals and leftists who are now
7:18
talking about how don't blame the
7:20
students. It's all there outside agitators
7:23
who are coming and
7:25
their outside agitation is
7:27
preventing students from expressing
7:29
their free speech rights, which is who
7:33
else use the term outside agitators? George
7:36
Wallace, Lester Maddox, the
7:39
Freedom Riders, they
7:41
were outside agitators. Everything would have
7:43
been just fine in Alabama. J-6
7:47
too, by the way. The January 6th,
7:49
it's Antifa in masks or whatever. Yeah,
7:51
fake. Right. Yeah. Telling the students to
7:53
go back to class raises the question
7:55
of whether the students are enrolled at
7:58
Columbia University. university or
8:01
the other schools where these encampments are
8:03
popping up. And sometimes
8:05
hard to tell whether the students are enrolled because
8:08
A, access to the
8:10
encampment is restricted and
8:12
B, most of the protest
8:16
slash monsters are
8:19
fully masked and wearing
8:21
Hamas-like head coverings. So,
8:24
there's no telling who they are. I
8:27
was struck by Michael Powell's piece in The Atlantic
8:30
the other day. Michael
8:32
Powell, the journalist, went into the
8:34
encampment at Columbia. He
8:36
found exactly one person who was
8:38
authorized slash willing to talk to
8:41
him. And
8:43
he says in the piece, I paraphrase,
8:46
his other encounters with these people
8:49
there were frightening
8:51
and Stalinist. And he's
8:53
a writer for The Atlantic. He said, I
8:55
can understand why the students, the Jewish students
8:57
at Columbia and others
9:00
in the community are so disturbed
9:02
and concerned by what's happening.
9:06
We should also point out that the
9:08
president of Columbia University has given the protesters
9:11
another 48 hours. She
9:13
has extended the deadline for them to
9:16
remove the camp. Ongoing
9:19
negotiations, very similar
9:21
to the Biden's diplomatic process with
9:23
the Islamic Republic of Iran. You
9:26
know, we'll extend the negotiations. Don't
9:31
cross this line. You probably get a line, but we'll
9:33
draw the line here. Another
9:36
24 hours for you. I
9:40
guess, again, I have to sort
9:43
of apologize for on Friday suggesting
9:45
that Manoush Soushik, the president of
9:47
Columbia, had turned a
9:49
corner and had, you know, in
9:51
her bringing the NYPD on
9:56
campus to clear out the encampments and
9:59
arrest some people. that that
10:01
she had put her foot down. Well
10:03
she turned the corner and then another
10:05
corner. Yes and then she was afraid
10:07
of the wall. Yes. Yeah and kept
10:09
going does anybody know where she is?
10:12
I think that she kept walking after she
10:14
came out of there she just kept walking.
10:16
One of the latest communications came in the
10:18
early morning hours. I
10:20
mean this is heated
10:24
crisis level negotiations between her
10:26
and whoever
10:29
the designated leader of the
10:32
protesters is. Yeah. I
10:35
am so
10:39
there was a black comic aspect to all
10:41
this right which is as Abe says so
10:43
now the protests are about the protests and
10:47
though they are chanting anti-Semitic
10:49
slogans and some
10:51
people there and doing all that that
10:53
that this now takes on the
10:56
form of any
10:58
reality show. It's now a reality show
11:01
and it's that people are living inside
11:03
it. It's being done for the TikTok
11:05
for the for the
11:07
TikToks and for the social
11:09
media and to promote this
11:12
some of these ideas but I mean I
11:14
think the people who are behind it are
11:16
the people who are the leaders who are
11:18
negotiating with Manoush Safik and
11:20
of course and I honestly genuinely believe
11:22
I was the first person to point
11:24
this out on social media that the
11:28
mysterious fact that all the calm and
11:30
tense are exactly the same at every
11:32
campus suggesting mass purchasing has
11:34
been done by some central figure
11:37
and there are in fact rules
11:39
and regulations that the encampment leaders
11:42
are promulgating who should talk to
11:44
the media. When are you allowed
11:46
to talk to media? When can
11:49
you go? Where can you
11:51
go get food? How do you
11:53
wash up? Where are the bathrooms? All
11:55
that stuff that there is a much
11:57
more highly organized aspect
11:59
to These things and and the
12:02
spread we know in part
12:04
because or Abigail Anthony who
12:06
reports from National Review and
12:08
as herself they graduate a
12:10
prince since got a hold
12:12
of the encampment. Construction.
12:16
emails, And things bad Princeton
12:18
a couple of days ago before
12:20
they actually started are putting them
12:22
up. so this is not. None
12:24
of this is spontaneous is he
12:26
can I? And that makes sense
12:29
considering it's a pro Hamas information
12:31
operation this being conducted in the
12:33
United States. I also met my
12:35
make the point. We.
12:37
Hear a lot about secessionism
12:39
especially of coming from the
12:41
right. The threats of secessionism
12:43
from the right in a
12:45
break up of when they're
12:47
with the as many crisis
12:50
over it's jurisdiction on the
12:52
Eagle Pass border crossing in
12:54
Texas Earlier the spring people
12:56
were saying oh this is
12:58
you know that flashpoint could
13:00
to Texas new and a
13:02
flout federal law. Will.
13:04
They get away with it. But. The
13:07
strike me that these secessionists.
13:09
On the left are far
13:11
more active. And. On
13:13
the right mean this type of
13:15
tactic that we're going to create
13:18
an autonomous zone where only are
13:20
preferred Law. Is. Valid
13:22
we saw that is in Occupy
13:24
Wall Street but we also sought
13:26
in the summer of Twenty Twenty.
13:29
Or. As with the Atop District
13:31
in Seattle as and then as
13:33
he often shell shocked and saddened
13:35
Portland turning essentially into this weird.
13:38
In a nightly gunfight
13:40
between federal officers and
13:42
these anarchist the Cops
13:44
City protest in Georgia
13:46
Same thing these protesters
13:49
connect come out and
13:51
they say they form
13:53
human chains, not let
13:55
allowing anyone in and
13:57
they're basically carving out
13:59
territory where they are
14:01
the only legal authorities.
14:03
It so insane. And
14:05
it's around us all the time. And
14:08
it's left wing, not right wing. The.
14:11
Occupy Wallstreet, you may remember. Either.
14:15
When Occupy Wall Street ah took over
14:17
as a car park at the you
14:20
know at the southern tip of Manhattan.
14:24
That that that work had been done
14:26
before hands to figure out where the
14:28
see where this encampment should take place
14:30
in that there was a weird. Aspect
14:34
of the legal documents.
14:37
Surrounding. What Zuccotti Park
14:39
was. And it was partially
14:41
private and partially public. And
14:43
that speech because of it's
14:45
parcel public nature or something
14:48
like that Free speech, You
14:50
know. First Amendment rights could
14:52
not be curtailed some set
14:54
so that they had a
14:56
legal argument that they had
14:58
standing. To put up
15:00
these tend to live in the
15:02
some camp month and that ah
15:04
I believe when they was finally
15:06
broken up. That of
15:08
the reason given was essentially sanitary
15:10
that vegas but there was a
15:12
there was a health threat being
15:15
posed by this whatever was five
15:17
six months that in these people
15:19
have been spending in a living
15:21
in this living in this park
15:23
with their free library and hair.
15:26
Many. Government and stuff like that.
15:30
Here. We have the case where
15:32
we have private property as we
15:34
are constantly reminded. By. Columbia.
15:37
It's. Private property and therefore the police
15:39
can't come on campus to break up
15:41
the encampments unless we asked the man
15:43
which is by the way not true.
15:46
If you believe he was urging of empires.
15:50
Didn't ethnic tensions? Yes. Dps rather
15:53
have to stay out unless you
15:55
invite the men. But.
15:57
i mean if there's if they're celanese been
15:59
committed the book police are
16:02
allowed to enter the premises
16:05
and it is the
16:07
refusal of the owners
16:11
of the private property to say, you're
16:14
trespassing, literally get off my
16:17
lawn. I
16:19
mean, as Matt, as you let it
16:21
out there's this, yes, get off my
16:23
lawn, that
16:26
indicates some Rubicon has been
16:28
crossed on university
16:30
campuses that will, by the way, never
16:32
again, you won't be able to
16:35
go back. Well, you never know. Maybe
16:37
Manoush, when the 48-hour deadline comes, she'll say, okay,
16:39
I'll call on the cops once again because I
16:41
can't deal with it. I do want to make
16:43
one other point though. I came across an email
16:45
reported by, I believe, the Free
16:48
Beacon this morning that the Columbia Law students
16:50
have been telling
16:53
their fellow Jewish students. So I think
16:55
it's one group of
16:58
Columbia Law students sending
17:01
some type of email to Jewish students
17:03
who would like law enforcement to come
17:05
and to break up. They came in
17:07
and the presence of police officers on
17:09
Columbia's campus would make these law students
17:11
feel unsafe and therefore,
17:13
the protests must
17:16
continue indefinitely. This
17:18
I think, and we've talked about these issues
17:20
now on the podcast for years, but this
17:22
is the scariest part of all
17:24
of this. It isn't so much the
17:27
Hamas sympathizers on campus. So that's very
17:29
scary for the students. I don't want
17:31
to minimize it. But the longer term
17:33
threat to America posed by the law
17:36
students in these various
17:39
campuses who are going to
17:41
graduate and going to go into
17:43
the legal profession and going to staff Democratic
17:47
administrations for the next generation
17:50
to say such idiocy
17:53
that the presence of police officers would
17:56
make them feel physically unsafe, Such
17:58
topsy-turvy. Logic. And
18:01
for who unusual. And.
18:04
New Psychobabble. Is.
18:06
What? Really? That. Makes me stay
18:08
up late at night. And. They
18:10
also they yielded the started
18:12
early on. One of the
18:14
big things was the the
18:16
Harvard. Law students
18:19
are having her. Ah
18:21
oh and my you axes the
18:23
N Y U lawsuit are having
18:26
her arm invitation to employments I
18:28
guess is how they described it
18:30
at a major law firm after
18:32
graduation Rescinded. And I've got a
18:34
whole discussion going and then. On some
18:37
of these from some law firm,
18:39
some financial firms had sent letters
18:41
a colleges saying. Listen.
18:43
This is not a joke. It's
18:45
asked if. You. Have to get
18:47
this under control. You can't. You know
18:49
you can't send these people to me.
18:52
You know we're We're offering you guys
18:54
jobs and ah and part of this
18:56
is what was explained to them was
18:58
that if you go to work at
19:00
a major law firm, You have
19:02
lots of different clients, lots of
19:04
different types of clients, lots of
19:06
different interesting clients, and you you
19:09
bring with you when you bring
19:11
this sort of idiocy mad as
19:13
you called it, it's more for
19:15
it's a it's a threat to
19:17
eat of the rest of the
19:19
firm's work with who knows who
19:21
they're working with. So they're trying
19:23
to say to these people eggs,
19:26
just wait till you take literally
19:28
please. One step, one step in
19:30
the real world and look. Around
19:32
before you you know what I'll decide
19:34
about. I guess I just want to
19:36
say I'm distinguishing between the in the
19:38
case of N Y U student who
19:40
was pro Hamas pro October seventh and
19:43
then denied employed. That. That's
19:45
necessarily with these Columbia law students are say
19:47
they're just they're say we don't want the
19:49
police officers on the campus because that makes
19:52
us feel physically unsafe best as the more
19:54
kind of. Weird. Progressive.
19:57
or you know zoc guys that You
20:01
know, Hamas is the victim, police
20:04
officers are the real threat, right?
20:07
Everything is topsy turvy and I think those
20:09
types of attorneys
20:11
who aren't like explicitly anti-Semite
20:15
are actually going to get employed. Yeah,
20:17
and also we should say that the... I want to be like
20:19
Abe though. I need to be like Abe though and say it's
20:21
worse than that because there's an aspect to
20:24
this where you listen and you say
20:26
they don't believe this at all. This
20:28
is a form of real world trolling
20:31
that they are once again
20:33
deploying their feeling unsafe argument.
20:37
Their theoretical lack of safety
20:39
with an actual lack of
20:41
safety that actual people on
20:43
the campus are experiencing where,
20:46
you know, this student Jessica
20:48
Schwab goes into the encampments
20:50
and is threatened physically by
20:53
protesters. Like
20:57
that actually happened.
20:59
Sahar Tohak at Yale
21:02
probably inadvertently but was poked in
21:04
the eye by a flagpole
21:07
in the midst
21:09
of being menaced. It's
21:12
not clear that the intent was to poker in
21:14
the eye with the flagpole. These
21:17
are things that are actually happening
21:19
where people are literally unsafe. And
21:22
just as we've been... We spent 10 years
21:25
dealing with the idea of the microaggression, the
21:28
aggression that isn't an aggression. So you dub
21:30
it an aggression by saying that
21:32
it's kind of... It's
21:34
like a kind of nascent aggression if it
21:36
were allowed to bubble into... So when the
21:39
Columbia Law students say this, it's
21:41
a little like when Madi Hassan goes on
21:44
to Twitter to lecture us
21:46
about what antisemitism is and
21:49
how we are being antisemites
21:51
because we attack
21:53
Jewish anti-Zionists. Like,
21:56
okay, does he really believe that? I
21:59
doubt it. just a Stalinist,
22:01
these law students are effectively
22:04
using classic Stalinist reversal, semantic
22:06
infiltration tactics to try to
22:09
turn their argument, your argument
22:11
against yourself. And
22:13
where I am unnerved is the fact that
22:15
the left gets away with
22:18
this. I just want to give you
22:20
an example. Casey Johnson, our very valued
22:22
contributor who writes about campuses,
22:24
is himself a professor at Brooklyn College
22:26
and writes about Title IX and a
22:28
lot of stuff. Said the
22:31
other day, I mean this reminds me of Melissa
22:33
Click. So I was like, oh, Melissa Click. So
22:35
if you don't remember Melissa Click, there
22:37
was, after Ferguson, after the Michael Brand
22:40
incident in Ferguson, Missouri, there were protests
22:42
on the campus of the University of
22:44
Missouri at Columbia, and Melissa
22:46
Click, who was a professor of communication,
22:48
essentially tried to
22:51
call a mob onto a reporter
22:54
for the Daily Missouri, which is the
22:56
paper at the University of Missouri, which
22:58
has a famous journalism school. It said,
23:01
people come help me out here to sort of beat
23:03
up this reporter or
23:05
stop them from going somewhere.
23:09
And she ended up pleading guilty
23:11
to a misdemeanor and having to
23:13
do 30 hours of community service.
23:17
We need some muscle over here, what's
23:19
the famous word. Thank you very much.
23:22
And she was, you know, sentenced to 30 hours
23:24
of community service, and the University of Missouri fired
23:26
her for
23:28
attempting to set
23:31
a mob on a reporter.
23:34
She's a professor of communications. So
23:36
I was like, Melissa Click, what happened to Melissa Click?
23:39
She's got a job as a professor
23:41
on a campus of Gonzaga University. Dr.
23:45
Melissa A. Click's research interests center
23:47
on popular culture, texts, and audience,
23:50
particularly texts and audiences disdained in
23:52
mainstream culture. I don't really need
23:54
to read the rest of this.
24:00
Somehow, their bacon is always pulled
24:02
out of the fire and with Soros
24:06
money and whoever that
24:08
guy, the progressive insurance
24:10
money and the
24:12
people who gave $2 billion to
24:15
ProPublica and all this, hundreds
24:18
of these people, if they don't get
24:20
jobs in administrations or maybe they'll be
24:22
cleansed for five or ten years, they'll
24:24
be setups of NGOs and things like
24:27
that that they will go into and
24:29
then ten years from now, they will
24:31
emerge as people even if
24:33
maybe this makes them a little too
24:35
hot to get clerkships. What
24:40
judge would be insane enough to
24:42
hire somebody who does
24:45
stuff like this? It just strikes me, it would
24:47
be crazy. You don't know, you
24:50
issue a decision that your
24:53
clerk doesn't like and your clerk does
24:56
a sit-in in your office. I mean, I just,
24:59
I'm not joking. It's such
25:01
an interesting point you're making because they get
25:03
away with it because we are so bifurcated.
25:06
There isn't one common culture where
25:08
you would be in trouble for
25:10
doing this. You
25:12
do it, you're in your left
25:14
sphere, you're fine. That's
25:16
where you live. You don't live in this
25:19
larger thing where you have
25:21
to deal with people on the right,
25:23
people on the middle, you are in
25:25
your own complete ecosystem and you can
25:27
travel through it. Right.
25:30
That's true on both sides. So, not to
25:32
both sides, but like the guy who went
25:34
to shoot up Comet
25:37
Pizza on Connecticut
25:41
Avenue when he was tried and
25:43
then he was like, I didn't
25:45
even know it wasn't true. Everything
25:51
that I read, everything that I pay
25:53
attention to said, they were taking these
25:55
kids and they were taking the adrenochrome
25:57
out of their bodies and I genuinely...
26:00
genuinely didn't know that there was a
26:02
counterfactual here that was actually
26:04
the truth. And
26:07
you heard that from some of the J6 defendants
26:09
who said, I live in this world
26:11
in which I didn't
26:14
know that they weren't coming
26:16
for Trump. And
26:19
so there is a... You
26:21
are able now to silo yourself to
26:24
such a degree that,
26:26
yeah, when somebody says, you
26:29
know, you're not allowed to put up a tent
26:31
on campus. If you're not one
26:33
of the organizers who is trying
26:36
to harness law
26:38
in these municipalities or things like
26:40
that to your advantage because your
26:42
purpose is to have a pro-Hamas
26:44
rally or you're... Can
26:46
I just... Yeah, I just want to make a point
26:48
but you just triggered me with your use of the
26:50
word tent. What's with the
26:52
tent? Why
26:55
is it that in the past decade or so,
26:57
tents have become so ubiquitous? I
26:59
crossed the bridge to go into DC. I'm
27:01
greeted with tents. I walk
27:03
down a park in Washington, DC. Tents,
27:07
sometimes on the sidewalk. Tents,
27:09
now all throughout America. These tent cities
27:11
are popping up on the campus. What's
27:14
with the tents? Why is it now in
27:18
the front of so many people's minds that
27:20
they have the right to pull out a
27:22
stupid tent from REI and just live right
27:24
in front of me and don't have to
27:26
care about any of the social consequences? You
27:28
do. I actually have an
27:30
answer, please. Just
27:33
like everything else, it is technology.
27:35
When I was a young, young
27:37
kid at camp, it
27:40
was hell to put up
27:42
a tent. I mean, right. It
27:45
took an hour. Well, that's why they had the... Well, that's
27:47
why they had the... It's now... It's
27:49
now badge. Yeah. You hike
27:51
for a full day first. You hike for a full
27:53
day first and then you had like a five-minute
27:55
thing of how to build it and like two people
27:58
slept in a tent that night. Yeah. Okay,
28:00
so I have to take
28:02
my kid on a school camping trip
28:04
right in 2012
28:09
or 2013 and I'm like I'm not doing that I can't do
28:11
I don't know how to My friends have
28:13
to listen like you don't know what's going
28:15
on in the last like 30 40 years You
28:19
go by this Coleman tent it
28:21
pops up by itself It
28:24
takes it takes two
28:26
minutes to put up a tent Right,
28:29
it's nothing. So the tents
28:31
themselves and then once
28:33
you have it down folding them
28:35
up takes two minutes also the only problem
28:37
with the tents is Putting
28:40
the thing on that makes them a little
28:42
more waterproof and then hammering and having a
28:44
mallet so you can hammer them Into
28:47
the turnt into the ground so that they don't blow
28:49
away It is
28:51
a technology problem Well, whoever invented that
28:53
technology has a lot to answer for
28:59
These kids aren't paying 78 grand a year
29:01
to sit on the ground Matt. Yeah, that's
29:03
right This is a side
29:06
note. So imagine would well we have it
29:08
that we had the Supreme Court here the
29:11
urban camping case While
29:13
we were right. That's right. That's right. Yeah
29:15
to alert our listeners There's a chance by
29:17
the end of June We
29:20
may have the ability to get rid
29:22
of these tents Which is really high
29:24
on my policy priority list on the
29:26
continuity policy party Let's getting rid of
29:28
the tents is like number two you
29:30
paid any attention to this case
29:32
And it's a town in Oregon.
29:35
I think it's Oregon.
29:37
Yeah, Washington that has banned Outdoor
29:41
camping like as banned sleeping on
29:45
Public spaces at night and you
29:47
want to talk about disingenuous Argumentation
29:50
so the liberals on the court or
29:52
particularly Sotomayor and Kagan said
29:56
How can you keep people from sleeping? Everyone
29:59
has to sleep sleep. So
30:01
you have to be able to sleep because everyone has
30:03
to sleep and the
30:06
homeless have to sleep. If you're
30:08
an unhoused person and you
30:10
need to sleep, you have to sleep. Who
30:12
are we to interfere with the biological process
30:14
of sleep to which I say,
30:18
having just spent two days
30:20
at Passover
30:22
Seder's dealing
30:24
with the passages in the
30:26
Haggadah, the book that is
30:28
the sort of the most
30:30
probably the best known Jewish
30:32
text I imagine really to
30:35
most people. There's a
30:37
whole section of Talmudic, the exploration
30:39
of Talmudic logic that
30:41
as you get older and older gets more and more
30:44
and more obscurantist and
30:46
ridiculous. How many plagues
30:48
were there? You know, we all know there were 10
30:50
plagues and then there's a discussion in the Haggadah
30:52
about whether no, no, there were 50 plagues. No, there
30:54
were 250 plagues. Then
30:58
you go, you know, this really, these guys, some
31:00
of these great Talmudic scholars really
31:02
should have like had a job
31:04
because this is thought
31:06
run amok. So this is
31:08
like Talmudic logic run out. You know perfectly
31:11
well why you don't let
31:13
people sleep overnight
31:15
outside. It's called vagrancy
31:18
and it's a human right to sleep. It is
31:20
not a human right to sleep in public and
31:23
to create conditions under which people feel the right
31:26
to take over public spaces. I
31:29
think it's such an interesting
31:32
point because it's not
31:34
only just that they're an eyesore and
31:37
that they're transgressing on
31:40
everyone's lives
31:43
but it says
31:45
something so interesting about who they are
31:47
and how many people feel this way.
31:50
So it speaks to the sense of
31:53
impermanence and drift and
31:55
it's also like the rise
31:57
in squatters everywhere. squatting
32:00
and other people's home and there's
32:02
something like Sort of post-apocalyptic
32:05
about it or sort of post Somebody
32:09
as somebody else pointed out they live 200
32:12
yards away Like
32:15
the on how is there room or
32:17
the on house? But the tent cities
32:19
at Columbia are people who live
32:21
there. You see that building you
32:23
see that window That's my that's
32:26
my they don't even live there
32:28
I'm concerned. I'm live in Queens
32:30
what what we Look
32:32
when they come in what but Matt, where did
32:34
you think I was going? Well, I thought you
32:36
were going with what it says about the imposition
32:40
of One's ego on others
32:43
that is to me right like the
32:45
mark of our age right I feel
32:47
this way and Screw
32:49
you if you feel differently because you
32:52
have to listen to me my sovereign
32:54
self is more important than yours in
32:56
our sense of Equality and our sense
32:58
of what freedom means in
33:00
America today has no
33:04
response, oh, okay, if you
33:06
feel like Just sleeping
33:08
in the sidewalk in front of my house
33:10
What who am I to say that or
33:12
if all of a sudden you feel like
33:14
you are of a different biological sex because
33:16
you Woke up feeling that way in the
33:18
morning of who am I
33:20
to say that we can't you know? Completely
33:22
rejigger the rules of our society in your
33:24
favor. That's where I thought you were going
33:27
but your other point was true, too I
33:29
mean III there is The
33:33
thing about the squatting and the tenting and
33:35
all of that is that this is yet
33:37
again a circumstance in which Despite
33:40
all of our talk about the evils of
33:42
privilege or the left's talk about the evils
33:44
of privilege People can buy
33:47
their way out of Right
33:50
the wealthy do not have to worry
33:52
about people Doing
33:54
this stuff because they can put up a
33:56
gate they can put up a hedgerow they
33:58
can live in a doorman building,
34:00
they can have, they can
34:22
hire lawyers or stuff like that
34:24
to something
34:31
needs to be done because there's
34:33
a squatter in their house. They can't
34:36
afford it. They're living paycheck by paycheck.
34:38
And this is where the limousine liberal
34:40
argument started to come in and really
34:43
bite the left. And
34:46
basically freeze the progress of the left
34:48
in the late 60s and early 70s
34:50
as typified by, of course,
34:53
Tom Wolf's deathless essay, Radical
34:55
Sheik, that you can
34:57
talk this talk, but then you
34:59
you can say no charter schools,
35:01
but then you send your kid
35:04
to a private school and
35:07
consign every other kid who doesn't
35:09
have the resources to a horrible
35:12
public school. And that is
35:14
something that has been a secret
35:18
weapon of
35:21
the anti-left now going
35:23
on 50 years. And
35:25
I think it may re-emerge. When
35:28
I was at the New York Post, we had
35:30
to, that was the opinion
35:33
editor, you know, you'd take perspective photos
35:35
that you had in mind to illustrate
35:37
a story to the photo editor because
35:39
the photo editor of the paper knew
35:42
what every photo going in the paper
35:44
was going to be. So you're just
35:46
making sure you're not doubling up. And
35:49
I remember taking a couple options over
35:51
to illustrate a story about homelessness. And,
35:53
you know, I printed out a picture
35:56
from our, from the post, you know,
35:58
from our backlog saying, showing a
36:01
homeless person being
36:03
roughly removed from,
36:07
you know, near, I
36:09
guess it was Gracie Mansion probably. And
36:12
I brought it to the photo editor and he said, Do you know who
36:14
that is in the photo? You don't
36:16
recognize them? And I said, No, he's
36:19
that that's a post reporter. The
36:21
post had had does this sort of thing
36:24
to catch the limousine liberalism. So what they
36:26
had done was they had said to build
36:28
a blasio. How come every
36:30
time you go on the subway,
36:32
it looks nicer than when I
36:34
go on the subway, let's put
36:36
you know, build a blasio said
36:38
there's a right as a human
36:40
right to sleep like Sotomayor said
36:42
outside. So the post sent a
36:45
homeless, you know, quote unquote, homeless
36:47
person to sleep outside the blasios
36:49
place. And it's how long, right?
36:51
Right. Removed and tossed out, you know,
36:53
like a like what are the shows where
36:55
you see the guy flying through the air?
36:57
Can I find your limousine liberal thing, John?
36:59
Just for us? Because our friend
37:01
David Brooks had it. Interesting.
37:04
And I think revealing a little piece in
37:06
the New York Times this morning entitled Why
37:08
I'm getting more pessimistic about Biden's chances this
37:11
fall. And he gives two
37:13
reasons. And the second reason is he's
37:16
become more pessimistic because of what's happening to
37:18
the youth vote. Many David
37:20
goes on and I quote, I think what we're seeing
37:23
at Columbia and on other elite campuses is a precursor
37:25
to what we're going to see at the Democratic Convention
37:28
in Chicago. He talked about 1968, which
37:30
we of course have referenced several times in the podcast.
37:33
He says if there are similar
37:35
classes in the clashes in Chicago this August,
37:37
the chaos will reinforce Trump's core
37:39
law and order message. He will
37:41
make Biden look weak and hapless, close
37:44
quote, but it also will
37:46
reinforce this idea of limousine liberalism,
37:48
which is prevalent
37:51
kind of in the Biden kind
37:53
of campaign. And if you consider like the
37:55
difference between Trump visiting
37:57
the wake of the killed
38:01
NYPD officer versus Biden's
38:04
gathering in midtown
38:06
Manhattan with Stephen Colbert and
38:08
all these liberals coming being
38:10
heckled by the Palestinian activists.
38:14
There's the general kind of detachment.
38:17
Biden, we should
38:19
say, just yesterday was giving remarks
38:21
where he read
38:23
out the stage instruction pause
38:26
which was kind of a callback
38:28
to George H.W. Bush's reading
38:31
off the teleprompter message, I care.
38:33
On a card. On a card,
38:35
right. He was on his card in his pocket. He
38:38
was at a diner. He went into a diner in
38:40
New Hampshire. And the card said, you know, basically your
38:42
overall message
38:46
is I care. So when
38:49
you go around you're trying to make it clear
38:51
to people that you care and he said message
38:53
I care. And there's also
38:55
the continued, you know, lack of
38:58
a serious response to what's happening on the
39:00
southern border. I was telling a friend just
39:03
last evening, you know, they
39:05
really need to get these human chain people
39:07
at the university campuses and send them to
39:09
the southern border because then we would
39:12
be impenetrable. You know, the
39:14
border crossings would plummet if you just
39:16
put these pro-Hamas barbarians
39:19
in charge of border security. I
39:24
want to stay on this point a
39:26
little longer because the it's not
39:28
just limousine liberalism but it is
39:30
also a question
39:32
of the response to limousine
39:34
liberalism because it's not only
39:36
that they do this and that people know
39:38
it. The question is can it be harnessed, right?
39:40
So the harnessing of
39:44
anti-limousine liberalism
39:48
was a key factor, as I said, in
39:50
the late 60s, early 70s of halting
39:55
the kind of mad on rush of
39:59
leftist politics. in Washington, even
40:01
though Richard Nixon, when
40:03
he became president, still kind
40:06
of drifted in that direction in domestic
40:10
politics. But there was a kind
40:12
of, you know, how many bills
40:14
did Lyndon Johnson pass in 1965 with a 69-seat
40:20
majority in the Senate? A hundred and seventy,
40:22
a hundred and eighty bills were were
40:24
passed that sort of constituted the Great
40:27
Society. Like, there was going to be
40:29
no let up in that thing
40:32
that was happening. And
40:35
Nixon harnessed that you, not really in
40:37
terms of domestic policy, but really in
40:39
terms of how liberals talked
40:41
about the Vietnam War, like the famous,
40:43
most famous, in some
40:46
ways the most effective presidential speech in
40:48
American history, which was the silent majority
40:50
speech delivered in 1969, largely
40:53
written by William Safire, where Nixon
40:55
said, I know there's a
40:57
silent majority in this country who doesn't believe
40:59
in all this nonsense. Like, let me hear
41:01
from you. And the White House got 20
41:05
million telegrams at a
41:07
time when the population of the United States was half what
41:10
it is now. I mean, this was a
41:12
very big moment and the real warning
41:15
sign to Democrats not to go where they were going.
41:17
And then in 72, of course, Nixon
41:19
wins 62% of the vote, having
41:21
won 44% of the vote or something in 1968. It has to be
41:29
harnessed. You have to direct that feeling.
41:32
And Trump is not the best way to
41:35
do that. But I don't know,
41:37
maybe Mike Johnson, not that not that the Speaker of
41:39
the House is going to like have a national profile
41:41
high enough to sort of make
41:44
news. But what Mike Johnson did on
41:46
the Columbia campus is a lodestar for
41:49
Republicans. It is, I am not with them. I
41:52
am with you. I am not with the people
41:54
who are saying that there are, You
41:56
know, there are more than two genders. Do
42:00
you think there were two genders soda
42:02
wise and so does God and so
42:04
does a common sense or whatever. And
42:06
and also so do these at the
42:08
university presidents, right? Because I think the
42:10
lodestar thing works for least the phonic
42:12
to what she's doing in the hearing.
42:14
which is if you're watching all the
42:16
reports of the hearings, even if you
42:18
don't sit and watch on Cspan manouchehr
42:20
seek a sitting there going. No, I
42:22
don't know why we spell soaks with
42:24
an ex. Yeah, I'd we There they
42:27
do. I guess my students don't know
42:29
how to spell. Like. Makes everything that
42:31
she says was agree. I agree
42:33
with you. Congresswoman.
42:35
I agree that is reprehensible. I agree
42:37
with you and I see like that
42:40
was also part of the point was
42:42
to show people like look it's ears
42:44
a bunch of people. Columbia, there's a
42:46
bunch of people on Twitter Scott How
42:48
most people think and a way to
42:50
prove it is a whole The head
42:52
of that university in there as asteroid.
42:54
What is it lightens? You're absolutely right.
42:56
It was. There's a mode and level
42:58
right? So there's a multi level approach,
43:00
but it is. The
43:03
hardest thing of common sense,
43:05
which has a very nicely
43:07
nonideological quality to it. Is
43:10
the point is that we're not the area
43:12
logs where the normal people. They're.
43:14
All crazy over there is the are
43:17
these the people you want to have
43:19
running your country and they're gonna run
43:21
your country because you're president that your
43:24
Bring Us to vote for twenty twenty
43:26
Fourth is saying cause. You
43:29
know, or you know, can't speak
43:31
a coherent sentence. More to the
43:33
point about the at Radio City
43:35
thing, by the way is that
43:38
today I learned. From. Twitter.
43:41
Ah, that. Biden.
43:44
Is going to West Chester
43:46
to the home of Michael
43:48
Douglas, the Academy Award winning
43:50
actor now bizarrely playing Benjamin
43:53
Franklin. Mm Apple's If it
43:55
were it's I'm. I
43:57
liked his lesser kaminsky methods of but I
43:59
mean this. this, that's a very bizarre
44:01
piece of casting. Anyway, Michael
44:03
Douglas's house, and apparently because,
44:05
and I've had this experience
44:07
actually with the presidential motorcade
44:09
in Westchester, because security has
44:11
to close stuff down. School
44:14
is being canceled for 10,000 kids in Westchester
44:17
County today so that
44:20
Biden can go, so the Secret Service can
44:22
close down an entire neighborhood so that Biden
44:24
can go to Michael Douglas's house and
44:27
raise five or ten million dollars. And
44:29
next month, there's going to be a
44:31
big fundraiser in Beverly Hills at Jeffrey
44:33
Katzenberg's house that will raise another 25
44:36
million dollars. And there's Biden being surrounded.
44:38
Who surrounds him? Right?
44:43
Liberal celebrities.
44:47
Does ordinary America
44:49
like liberal celebrities? I don't think
44:51
that they dislike liberal celebrities. This
44:54
is a matter of course, but
44:57
I mean, he's living in this world of unreality
44:59
that is always the problem for
45:01
presidents, is that they don't
45:03
know what's going on in the world because they live in
45:06
this bubble, protected by the Secret
45:08
Service. They only talk to the people who work
45:10
for them, all of that. But
45:12
I mean, this is a very extreme thing.
45:14
Biden doesn't know that people
45:17
don't think. Yeah. They might like
45:19
the president hanging out with
45:21
liberal celebrities when the president is Obama
45:24
and something of a celebrity himself
45:26
and also when prices
45:28
haven't gone up by
45:31
about 19% over the course of
45:33
his first term and when the
45:36
border crisis hadn't
45:38
yet emerged in his first
45:40
term. Sure, hang out
45:43
with the celebrities. That's what
45:45
every Democrat does. The Hollywood
45:47
celebrities part of the Democratic base, but
45:49
it is slightly dangerous when you have
45:52
all of these other aspects of your
45:54
presidency that have gone totally sour and
45:57
when you have this mass movement
45:59
that's high. hostile to civilization
46:03
that's active on America's campuses.
46:05
And your response
46:07
was at best ambivalent
46:11
when asked about it the other day. Well,
46:15
let's talk about that because again, I
46:17
think Biden keeps snatching defeat from the
46:19
jaws of victory.
46:21
He scored an enormous victory
46:23
this week. They
46:25
held for, I mean, a little
46:28
weird parallel to the Inflation Reduction
46:30
Act. Like some presidencies or
46:32
some political organizations would have given up on
46:34
some of the aspects of these foreign aid
46:37
packages at some point because it's like,
46:39
I'm not going to waste my time. We're not getting
46:41
it through. We'll say that the Republicans stank. I'm
46:44
too bored. We have to do other stuff. But
46:47
they kept at the Inflation Reduction Act
46:49
or the green energy, whatever we want
46:51
to call it, and somehow beat Joe
46:53
Manchin down and got the
46:55
bill through. And this is not
46:57
like the Joe Manchin thing. They
47:00
liberated, they and Mike Johnson and Mitch
47:02
McConnell liberated Republicans to vote for the
47:05
aid that they wanted to vote for
47:07
anyway, even though I know a
47:09
slight majority of Republicans in the House
47:12
voted against the aid package packages. But
47:16
it was enough, like 350, 360 Congressmen, House members, and was it 79 senators or
47:18
something like
47:25
that voting for the aid package? But
47:29
he's not taking victory laps. I
47:32
mean, they're doing it. They're sending the aid
47:34
to Ukraine yesterday. They're sending attack homes and
47:36
all sorts of other stuff. And
47:39
they got this $26 billion for
47:41
Israel, which I should mention that
47:43
isn't just for Israel. There's this
47:45
ridiculous bribery money for
47:47
the Palestinians to reward them for starting
47:49
a war against Israel on
47:52
October 7th. Nonetheless, whatever they get. And
47:54
he is not able
47:56
to take a victory lap because he's too afraid of
47:59
these. you know, commie
48:04
terrorist lovers in his own faction
48:07
that he's worried are going to come down around his
48:09
head. Right. The
48:11
narrative around the aid is that
48:13
Ukraine is our ally and
48:16
in a war that they are not
48:19
of their choosing and Israel is our
48:21
ally in a war not of their
48:23
choosing. And we have our allies back.
48:25
Very simple narrative. But you can't say
48:28
that without angering
48:31
people. You can't say that about
48:33
Israel without angering people on the
48:35
left and you can't say that
48:37
on the right without Marjorie Taylor
48:39
Greene, you know, putting in a
48:41
challenge to your speakership or whatever.
48:43
There is this sort of, it's
48:45
funny the way it shook
48:48
out this way, but the underlying
48:50
point is he's afraid to say
48:52
we're helping our allies
48:54
against the enemy because
48:57
he can't say Hamas is the enemy
48:59
and Qatar is the enemy and Iran
49:01
is the enemy because we're giving Iran
49:03
money too. I understand why he
49:06
can't say Qatar is the enemy.
49:08
Our relations with Qatar are very complicated.
49:10
We have asked Qatar to
49:12
do things for, you know,
49:14
there's a lot of back channeling that
49:16
got it. So you can't just turn
49:18
on Qatar. They might release all kinds
49:21
of documents and behind the scenes negotiating
49:23
things to let the world know that
49:25
you were relying on them. They might
49:27
pull funding for you to your university.
49:29
Not being able to say that Hamas
49:31
is our enemy? Like, this is madness
49:33
that has gripped them and they
49:35
are, like I say,
49:37
he is snatching kind of
49:39
like haplessness from
49:42
the jaws of victory. He won this
49:44
huge victory this week
49:47
and he's not taking any victory laps.
49:50
Am I taking crazy pills? Like, I really don't
49:52
understand how we're doing this. You
49:55
take a victory lap, you have to, if
49:57
you make the argument and you, John, you've said this.
50:00
from the beginning, if you make the
50:02
argument for the conflicts, for helping our
50:04
allies win these conflicts, you have to
50:06
do what it takes to
50:08
win the conflict. It
50:13
obligates you to treat them with seriousness that
50:15
you say. And he's not going to do
50:17
that with Ukraine either. We sort of pass
50:19
the point where he's willing to do what
50:21
he's going to do for Ukraine. And Ukraine
50:23
is the safe one with Democrats. He doesn't
50:25
want to write that- He's been around so
50:27
long. He doesn't think foreign policy is what
50:29
motivates voters. Much more
50:31
interested in domestic policy. That's
50:33
why you have this rash of
50:35
new regulations, EPA announcing again
50:38
this morning before we record this that
50:40
the coal business has to end, put
50:43
itself out of business. You
50:45
have stringent environmental regulations. They're going after
50:47
the other part is they're going after
50:49
the fees that airlines put on your
50:51
tickets. That's what he's interested
50:53
in talking about. He's not interested in
50:55
doing ... He's interested in
50:58
helping Israel and Ukraine. He signed the bill
51:00
into law. He did get it through. That
51:02
is a success, but he doesn't want to
51:04
talk about it. And that's
51:06
one reason why he's kind of twisted
51:08
himself into pretzels with
51:10
vis-a-vis Israel, but also one
51:13
reason why Ukraine has not done as well in
51:15
the battlefield over the past year as it might
51:17
have done otherwise. But
51:20
also one of the things about when I said
51:22
that the story has become the protests and not
51:24
the war is
51:26
that this has turned
51:30
Israel ... It's
51:32
turned it from being a foreign policy issue
51:35
into a domestic issue. The issue
51:37
is now rule of law, campuses,
51:41
education, freedom
51:44
of speech. We're
51:47
in a whole new realm now
51:49
in terms of what this
51:51
is about. To
52:01
answer that question takes an experienced team
52:03
of lawyers and experts. Not
52:06
everyone has this type of experience. At
52:08
Colombo Law, we are truck injury
52:10
lawyers. It's what we do every
52:12
day. When someone is hurt
52:15
by a truck, Colombo Law is the law
52:17
firm people call to get answers. Hurt
52:19
by a truck? Call Colombo Law. Let's
52:28
shift gears a little bit and talk about
52:30
Donald Trump's week because
52:33
it's pretty interesting. We've
52:38
noted over the last three weeks that there
52:41
is reason to believe that
52:43
the democratic strategy of trying to tag
52:45
Trump with as many charges
52:48
as possible in the courtroom, we've said, oh,
52:50
this is going to make him stronger. It's
52:52
not making him stronger. It may be, at
52:54
least nationally, it's not making him stronger. As
52:57
the Trump trials and the Trump issues
53:00
have moved to center stage and a lot
53:02
of the media coverage over the last three
53:04
weeks as the
53:06
fraud trial or the
53:09
check hiding scandal, whatever you want to call it,
53:11
has moved to center stage. Biden's
53:13
numbers have gone up. Trump's numbers have
53:16
gone down. There's a fascinating, I think
53:19
it's a Pew poll that has enormous
53:22
numbers of people saying that Biden does
53:24
not have the physical stamina necessary to
53:26
be president or whatever. It's like 66%
53:28
of people say that. But
53:31
59% of people say Trump does
53:33
not have the honesty required to be president.
53:35
Now that's so obviously, if you're
53:37
going to use negative numbers, then Biden
53:39
is doing worse than Trump. But that's not
53:41
a good number. It's not good for people
53:43
to be reminded that Trump is dishonest. You
53:46
can think that he's dishonest without thinking that he's
53:48
a felon. You can
53:50
make it uncomfortable to vote for him. Then
53:53
we have these weird data points like the
53:55
Pennsylvania primary. Nikki Haley
53:57
quit the race six
53:59
weeks. ago or eight weeks, I don't even know
54:01
how long ago, and she got 150,000 votes in the Pennsylvania
54:05
primary, most of them male votes. Now
54:07
that's, you can say when
54:09
the presidential race comes around, there's
54:11
going to be a way lot more Republican
54:14
voters and Trump's numbers
54:16
are going to go way, way up because
54:18
60% more people will vote
54:21
in November as voted
54:23
in this primary. About
54:25
150,000 people who vote no
54:27
against him is not good,
54:29
it's bad, and it's bad in a state
54:31
that he lost by 80,000 votes.
54:36
Maybe those people will come back to him. I
54:39
don't know if they will though, because it's
54:41
a very symbolic thing to vote for Nikki
54:44
Haley in this primary after
54:46
she quit the race. Maybe
54:50
it's so easy to do a mail-in ballot that
54:54
it doesn't mean that by November you'll won't change
54:56
your mind and say you have to vote for
54:58
Biden. Today
55:01
Trump's going to ... The
55:03
argument that Trump should be
55:05
immune from prosecution at the federal level is
55:08
going to be heard at
55:10
the Supreme Court, so that will raise some of that
55:13
again also. We
55:17
do have a race to the bottom
55:19
here between Trump and Biden, like the
55:21
lack of enthusiasm on
55:23
each party's part for ... We
55:27
have 20% of Republicans who seem
55:29
not really to want to vote for Trump. They're
55:33
active Republicans, so they're not the entire party, and we don't
55:36
know if the number
55:39
will be that high, but it's a lot
55:41
of people. We
55:44
hear about Biden's lack of enthusiasm, but we're really not
55:46
talking much about the lack
55:48
of enthusiasm for Trump, which is a real
55:51
thing. Yeah,
55:54
you're right to say that Biden's been
55:56
improving. What's interesting to me is some of these numbers
55:58
is that Biden is running ... ahead of
56:00
his job approval rating. So Biden's
56:03
job approval rating is still pretty
56:05
dismal yet in the head-to-heads against
56:07
Trump. The race
56:09
is essentially tied or it's Biden
56:12
has a narrow lead. Another
56:14
thing to say about it is these
56:18
are national numbers and the
56:20
race in the states is much
56:22
more favorable to Trump continues to be. Now
56:24
of course state polling is
56:27
you know hit or miss and such but just going
56:29
off on what we know even during
56:31
Biden's recent rise in
56:33
the polls places like
56:36
Arizona, Nevada, Michigan, North
56:38
Carolina, Georgia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania,
56:40
the states that will decide the election,
56:43
Trump still has an advantage so that's
56:45
worth noting as well. There's also
56:47
this idea which I'm just
56:49
you know my reading of the New York
56:51
Times today is providing so much material. Stu
56:54
Stevens, the Republican
56:57
kind of I guess former Republican
56:59
operative, well
57:02
he ran Mitt Romney's campaign, been
57:04
around forever, but
57:06
a fierce critic of Trump and
57:08
someone whose criticism of Trump you know
57:10
led to his reevaluation of the purposes
57:13
of the GOP and center-right
57:15
politics more generally. He's
57:17
in the Times today saying every
57:20
day in court improves Trump's chances in November
57:23
and kind of echoing points that I
57:26
think I've made on the podcast which is the
57:29
change in circumstances from
57:32
the mega rallies of 2016 and
57:34
2020 to now the constrained room of
57:39
the courthouse and these kind
57:41
of mini events which show Trump in a
57:43
more personal almost human
57:46
dimension may actually
57:48
help turn out the Trump
57:50
base and win him in
57:52
November. So I think what the
57:56
bottom line should be when we confront this data is
57:59
confusion. And despair. But I mean, I,
58:01
uh, despair, of course, always a, always
58:04
a good approach. Right.
58:08
As you know, but, um, but I do think
58:11
it's really interesting. We
58:13
keep saying this like this is an unprecedented race.
58:15
You have an 82 year old man versus, you
58:17
know, when an eight year old man versus a
58:19
whatever and Trump is 78
58:22
and he's got 91 indictments and, and
58:24
Biden seems senile and all of that.
58:26
But I think the most interesting aspect
58:29
of it is the complete lack of,
58:33
with the exception of like
58:35
the MAGA base, the
58:38
complete lack of enthusiasm for
58:40
the candidates who have served, who
58:42
are running in the race. And
58:45
that's why RFK Jr.
58:47
is standing there as some kind of
58:49
stand in, not just for like lunacy
58:52
and you know, conspiracy theories and anti-vaccine
58:54
and all of that. But
58:57
just like I'm not them, I'm not them.
58:59
So he's been on them person. And now
59:01
there's some evidence in the more recent polls
59:03
that he's starting to hurt Trump a little
59:05
bit more than Biden in the polling. It's
59:07
unclear who he's actually going to
59:09
hurt the most, but it's
59:12
just a very unusual presidential campaign. I think
59:14
that's the bottom line. And it's, you have
59:16
numb, you have the national numbers
59:18
that we got just the other day
59:20
showing the race tied. But you also
59:22
had this recent poll from
59:24
Bloomberg Morning Consult on the same day,
59:28
showing Trump's lead in the States
59:30
is pretty durable. So if
59:32
we have this jump ball
59:34
race, despite
59:37
the electoral college numbers now turning pretty
59:39
favorably in Trump's, like he's a 290
59:41
or something like that, if the election
59:46
were held today. So that would be a
59:48
comfortable, not big
59:50
win. Right. George
59:53
W. Bush won in 20, in 2004 with 286
59:55
electoral votes or something. something
1:00:00
like that. That's the
1:00:02
first one with 271 or whatever it was in 2000, once the
1:00:10
Supreme Court had ruled. So we've
1:00:12
had some very narrow wins
1:00:14
here. But I just think it's
1:00:19
fascinating to note that
1:00:22
we are talking about lack of enthusiasm, which
1:00:24
means what's going to matter is A,
1:00:26
who's better at naked,
1:00:29
raw politics. And right now, though, Trump is
1:00:34
running a very good race, there's
1:00:36
a reason to believe that the Democrats are better at
1:00:39
what they'll do nationally than Republicans. We have
1:00:41
a complete overhaul of the RNC to turn
1:00:44
it into a fundraising arm
1:00:46
for the Trump legal bills and
1:00:49
not for get out the vote efforts. And
1:00:51
the Democrats don't have that problem. They
1:00:56
are good at getting voters out. Right.
1:00:58
And also, I
1:01:01
think the lack of enthusiasm is also
1:01:03
a reminder that the Democrats have two
1:01:05
options in front of them, and one of them doesn't
1:01:07
work. The lack of enthusiasm
1:01:09
for the election shows that people aren't
1:01:11
interested in the narrative that if you
1:01:14
don't vote the right way, this will
1:01:16
be the last election of your lifetime.
1:01:18
And this is the end of democracy
1:01:20
and all that stuff. Whatever people feel
1:01:22
about that, I'm not saying that people
1:01:24
who are saying that don't believe
1:01:26
what they're saying. What I'm saying is
1:01:29
voters don't seem to believe what they're
1:01:31
saying, but they will take arguments on
1:01:33
all sorts of other stuff on the
1:01:36
issue. So the the the you know,
1:01:39
the apocalypse now argument
1:01:41
simply isn't working. Otherwise,
1:01:44
we would not be having extended conversations
1:01:46
about a lack of enthusiasm, how nobody
1:01:48
really feels like voting because nobody by
1:01:51
the way is on the line. And
1:01:53
if they just adjust along those lines,
1:01:55
I think they're ceiling is higher than
1:01:57
it is now. Well, it's important.
1:02:00
I got a note now because as
1:02:02
it happens, as we are recording
1:02:04
this, the GDP numbers
1:02:06
have come in and they're
1:02:08
terrible. The first quarter of 2024 and they
1:02:10
are terrible. They are 1.6% growth. The
1:02:16
expectation of the
1:02:19
world of economists somehow that creates an
1:02:21
expectation was for two and a half
1:02:23
percent. So this is coming in, I
1:02:25
don't know, like 50% lower than economists
1:02:27
expected. So
1:02:32
we have the argument that has
1:02:34
been promulgated over the last couple of months
1:02:36
by very, very passionate,
1:02:39
democratic partisans that the
1:02:42
economy is good and we just need to convince
1:02:44
people that the economy is great. Look at these
1:02:46
numbers. They're great. They're fantastic. By
1:02:49
the way, there are some fantastic numbers. America
1:02:51
is now producing 27% of the
1:02:53
world's either economy or its production or
1:02:55
something like
1:02:59
that, which is the highest number in 40 years.
1:03:02
There are good numbers, but the
1:03:04
economy is growing very, very slowly all of
1:03:06
a sudden. Maybe it grew too fast at
1:03:09
the end of 2023, so the slowdown
1:03:11
is people taking. But
1:03:14
this now raises all kinds of questions. When
1:03:17
you have a bad number in the first quarter of an
1:03:20
election year, that does not go well for you. That
1:03:24
was the George H.W. Bush story in
1:03:26
1992 and the Clinton story and the
1:03:29
Reagan story in
1:03:33
the first quarter of 1980. And
1:03:35
Clinton had this big number in 1996, which
1:03:39
was the kind of predictor of
1:03:41
his runaway victory against
1:03:44
Bob Dole in
1:03:46
November. So Biden's got another
1:03:49
hampering because we've got inflation, we've got
1:03:51
slow growth. The only good
1:03:53
part of this could be that if the economy
1:03:55
is slowing down, the Fed will come under pressure
1:03:57
to lower interest rates.
1:04:00
But of course, then inflation will get worse
1:04:03
and I don't know. Not
1:04:06
good. Not a good number, Bob. Not
1:04:09
good. So
1:04:13
that's where I guess that's where
1:04:15
we'll leave it. I do want
1:04:18
to make a commentary recommend and following Matt.
1:04:21
I don't know when we, as we keep going,
1:04:25
we get to this point now
1:04:27
that we're recommending a tweet but I did
1:04:30
want to recommend a tweet. I'm sorry because-
1:04:32
Did I recommend a tweet? Didn't
1:04:35
you recommend a tweet? Somebody
1:04:37
recommended it. I'm now going to recommend- I think you
1:04:39
did. You recommended it. You
1:04:41
recommended the children, the banana children,
1:04:43
the banana population. The man of
1:04:45
bananas. Yeah. Right, but that was
1:04:48
a video. This is just a tweet. Literally a
1:04:50
tweet. From an unlikely source
1:04:52
of fascinating clever. Monica
1:04:57
Lewinsky. Oh, yes.
1:04:59
Monica Lewinsky last night- She's
1:05:01
waiting. On Twitter, posted
1:05:03
a picture of the White House. I
1:05:06
don't know what
1:05:08
triggered this because it
1:05:10
came out sometime, I think,
1:05:13
you know, like it was like 9.30 at night, last night.
1:05:20
Picture of the White House and she says, you
1:05:22
wouldn't last an hour in the
1:05:24
asylum where they raised me. Going
1:05:32
on there. I don't know but that
1:05:34
is one hell of a tweet. I
1:05:37
don't know what, you know, it's
1:05:39
like if she only had this- You
1:05:43
know, Monica also has a Columbia University
1:05:45
connection. She
1:05:47
studied there after the scandal and in fact,
1:05:49
she was on campus on 9.11.
1:05:54
My friends and I encountered her during that time.
1:05:57
So she somehow tied up in-
1:06:00
Maybe that's what this is tweet is in I
1:06:02
just want to say it's a Taylor Swift reference.
1:06:05
Oh, is that right? Oh Okay,
1:06:09
there's a lyric and I
1:06:14
was I was off. Thank God you're here
1:06:16
Seth This is how popular this meme was
1:06:18
I was offline for two days and I
1:06:20
came back online and I saw The Lewinsky
1:06:22
thing and everybody saying how hilarious it was
1:06:24
and I was off for two days I
1:06:26
didn't know what this was. So this was
1:06:29
a Taylor Swift lyric and so people were
1:06:31
Substituting their own lines you wouldn't
1:06:34
in the asylum where I was in people
1:06:36
would show a picture of their Whatever
1:06:38
they would joke about it, you know their house So
1:06:41
that's that it okay, so you won the medium right?
1:06:46
Of course the person who was raised in
1:06:48
asylum in popular culture was Freddy Krueger from
1:06:50
A Nightmare on Elm Street the
1:06:53
bastard son of 10,000 maniacs You
1:06:57
may recall Freddy
1:06:59
Krueger anyway, so You
1:07:02
wouldn't last an hour in the asylum where Freddy
1:07:04
Krueger was raised. Well, there you go. That's what
1:07:06
I'm saying. So anyway, I I'm
1:07:10
glad to get this lesson in in in as
1:07:14
You are resident Swifty Thank
1:07:17
You Seth You
1:07:20
do have you do have 10
1:07:22
year old daughter so that that you know
1:07:24
that does that does what you squarely in
1:07:27
Taylor territory right now. Anyway,
1:07:29
we will be back Tomorrow
1:07:33
so for Seth Abe and madam
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More