0:00

Merkle Media

0:08

This was all circulating around the base that

0:11

a giant had been killed but no one was supposed to talk

0:13

about it. I saw

0:16

three long bony fingers

0:19

reach up underneath the door, curl up to

0:21

grab it, and then disappear. When

0:26

he came over to me, dude,

0:29

he slithered over to me. And

0:35

this giant comes out of the cave and they're all frozen.

0:39

And he starts running and firing at this giant. But

0:42

the giant moves, he's got

0:44

a spear in one hand and he's running

0:46

really fast. And spears Dan and holds him

0:49

up like this. Somebody

0:52

else, shoot him in the face, shoot him in the face, they basically

0:54

decapitate him. Got

0:58

closer, got closer, got closer,

1:00

when he got about 15 yards away from me, I

1:02

raised that sword and gave him a blow

1:04

to the head. I feel something

1:06

pulling at my leg. And

1:09

I look over and there are two small,

1:12

gray entities pulling at me. And they're

1:14

literally, I'm getting pulled off the bed.

1:17

I reached my hand into this bush and I touch

1:19

air. Couldn't breathe

1:22

and I couldn't move because I know I'm seeing a

1:24

monster. In 2014,

1:32

the world was left in

1:35

shock when Malaysia Airlines flight

1:37

MH370 mysteriously disappeared.

1:40

Two videos surfaced on the internet claiming

1:42

to reveal the truth. A plane

1:45

soaring through the night sky captured by

1:47

satellite camera. But then

1:49

something incredible happened. Three unidentified

1:52

flying objects circled around the

1:54

plane in a mesmerizing rhythmic

1:56

pattern.

1:57

Suddenly, in the blink of an eye, the impossible was revealed.

2:00

possible occurred, the plane vanishes

2:02

as if it passed through a portal to another

2:05

realm. Today

2:07

we embark on a journey into the heart

2:09

of this mystery. Join

2:12

us as we sit down with citizen journalist Ashton

2:14

Forbes who's here to share groundbreaking

2:16

research and findings. He'll

2:19

reveal why he believes these videos are

2:21

authentic and uncover the astonishing

2:23

truth behind this plane's disappearance.

2:27

What you're about to hear has the potential

2:29

to reshape the entire investigation

2:32

into the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines

2:34

flight MH370. All

2:42

right today we got Ashton Forbes

2:44

on the show. Ashton how are you sir? I'm doing great Tony,

2:46

glad to be here. Man I'm glad you're here. So people

2:51

by now if they hit play on this should

2:53

have a pretty good idea that this is going to be a wild

2:55

one and

2:57

I just want to let people know before we get into this

2:59

conversation how this kind of came about. I

3:02

am I'm not real big on

3:04

Twitter. I don't really do a

3:06

whole lot on Twitter unless I get I tend

3:08

to tweet when I get grumpy about stuff and

3:10

so it's more ragey content that I tweet about

3:13

but every once in a while I fade into

3:15

the Twitter and for whatever reason and

3:18

I saw a notification where a guy

3:20

tagged me in your account and

3:23

I have his handle here it's at frog

3:25

rockets so at frog rockets thank

3:28

you very much for tagging me and

3:30

it took me to your page and this thread about

3:33

your investigation and I

3:36

started looking through this investigation about

3:38

the the Malaysian flight that went missing and now I

3:40

listen I was I was driving tractor trailer

3:42

when this happened and I remember

3:45

listening to Jay Severn who is

3:47

an old political talk radio show

3:49

host and he

3:51

was covering this for days yeah

3:54

I mean a lot of people were and he was talking about

3:56

it he was he was really kind of going outside the

3:58

bounds of the narrative that was being given to him. to us

4:00

and saying things don't make sense here. And

4:03

he would do it in a very smart

4:05

educational way. Also

4:07

jovial though. So it kept your attention. And

4:10

he would talk about this plane going

4:12

missing. And I remember it kind

4:14

of faded from the airwaves and it was really unsettling

4:17

how there was no real answer.

4:20

And as years went on, little

4:24

pieces of information came out. And before I went

4:26

to your profile, I

4:29

vaguely feel like I remember, and maybe we'll get

4:31

into this, but I vaguely feel like

4:33

I remember people posting online

4:35

that they found a piece of a plane. And

4:39

just the headline reading, Life

4:41

We Live These Days, you're reading like, oh, they found

4:43

it, cool, moving on. You know? And

4:46

it wasn't until I came across your stuff,

4:49

and I started seeing rumbles of it a couple

4:51

of weeks ago, maybe in passing somebody

4:53

mentioned about it. I'm just like, huh, why

4:55

are they looking into that? And just keep moving,

4:57

I'm busy. And when he

5:00

tagged us into your account,

5:02

and I saw the thorough research you were doing,

5:05

it took me to the Reddit page. And

5:08

I was like, holy crap, when I saw the video,

5:11

I never saw the video before. When I saw

5:13

that video, how shocking. You're

5:17

talking to a guy who gives

5:20

all credence in the world to the idea

5:22

of other parallel universes,

5:25

parallel dimensions, the idea of portals, things

5:28

zapping, and all this other crazy stuff. And

5:30

I listened to your Twitter

5:32

spaces yesterday,

5:34

the most recent one you did, and you

5:37

were really breaking it down in a very

5:39

educated, scientific manner. I loved

5:42

it. My initial reaction

5:44

when I saw it, I was like, that thing got

5:46

sucked into a parallel universe. You

5:48

know? I was like, what the heck just happened?

5:50

But on the video, it shows

5:52

this plane coming, and then these

5:55

orbs going around it, and all of a sudden,

5:57

zap, it's gone, it's gone.

5:59

I was just like,

6:00

what? And normally,

6:03

I

6:03

would see something like that and I'd be like, okay,

6:06

somebody's faking something, right? But

6:08

then with all your research and the way

6:10

you presented it and the way you talked about

6:12

it, it became clear to me that you don't have

6:15

an agenda outside of just exposing this

6:17

new information. And that's why I was

6:19

like, man, let me hit them up and see what's

6:21

up. And so I just, I think I said something

6:23

on Twitter to you, just, you know, my email, shoot

6:26

me an email, I could talk more freely then. And

6:28

that was what, two days ago? And then we flew

6:30

you here to Knoxville to get you here because I

6:32

want you to have the opportunity

6:36

to share what you've discovered

6:38

from the beginning, how this all

6:40

came on your radar, to where we are today,

6:43

everything in the middle. Now, I know there's gonna be a lot of information

6:45

dumping, but I think that this

6:47

is the opportunity for you to really

6:50

not worry about time limits. You

6:52

don't have to worry about a host feeling like you

6:54

gotta wrap things up. Listen, I told you,

6:57

we can go as long as you need to. Your flight's at 7 p.m.

7:00

today, so we got some time. We're gonna do it,

7:02

we're gonna do the whole thing. Yeah, so with

7:04

that said, I wanna hand it over

7:07

to you and let you kind

7:09

of take it away. How did you

7:11

start looking into this missing

7:13

flight? Is it something that you've always been

7:15

into looking into? Or was there some kind

7:18

of information that came across your path? How

7:20

did this all start for you? And just take us to the progression

7:22

of this investigation? Yeah, so I did

7:24

have past history looking into MH370 in 2014,

7:28

just because I have personally interested

7:30

in what happens with mysterious plane crashes

7:33

from having flown probably several

7:35

million miles in my life.

7:36

And so

7:38

when I had looked into MH370, I

7:40

read all the blogs and everything about

7:42

it. And like you had mentioned, at the end of the

7:45

investigation, nine

7:47

years ago, it was kind of just, oh, we

7:49

don't know what happened with it, right? We're just gonna

7:51

assume that it crashed into the ocean

7:54

and no one saw it and we didn't find it above

7:56

or below water. So even

7:59

before I started this, investigation six weeks ago,

8:01

I was already under the impression that the

8:03

US military knew something about what

8:05

was going on with this plane. We are living

8:07

in a post-9-11 world, essentially

8:10

no way that this rogue 777

8:12

is not being tracked by them. As we've gone through

8:16

the investigation, I think we've proven that they absolutely

8:18

definitively had been tracking MH370, contrary,

8:22

regardless of anything else. My

8:25

only personal goal here

8:27

is to get the truth out. To me, it's not political

8:29

at all. I always have a disclaimer in front of all

8:31

my spaces that I do to say that this

8:33

is not political, this is not misinformation,

8:36

this is not QAnon, this is not alien invasion,

8:38

because these are narratives that you hear out there

8:40

often to try to confuse

8:43

people and try to link things together that aren't.

8:46

I don't want to tell people what to think with respect to these videos.

8:49

As you saw it, it's extremely shocking,

8:51

ontologically shocking to people. It took

8:53

me several weeks to really come to terms

8:56

with what I was seeing in those videos. Before

8:58

I begin to explain how it all happened, I want to say that

9:01

my personal journey with these videos was

9:03

that I looked at it initially and could tell that it had to be at

9:05

least partially real, based on

9:08

having seen the leaked satellite footage from 2019,

9:10

having seen what FLIR data

9:13

videos look like. I knew that this was

9:15

at least partially real. I thought that the orbs in the vortex had

9:17

to have somehow been added in post. I

9:19

couldn't really figure it out. But as the VFX

9:22

editors went in and looked frame by frame,

9:25

they found essentially no obvious

9:27

signs of any type of manipulation. One

9:30

of the biggest points that was found by

9:32

a user named KCIMC is that the

9:35

flash that we see in the video

9:37

accurately illuminates the clouds, both in the

9:39

background and in the foreground. This

9:42

is the part where I went, wow, the whole deal

9:45

is real here. It's not just that. Then

9:48

when I thought about from that perspective, I said, well, this

9:50

has to be non-human intelligence. We're

9:52

talking about orbs that are in a triangle

9:54

pattern in a formation, very similar to what

9:56

UFOology would say is a black triangle. spinning

10:00

around this plane in what is just seemingly

10:02

inhuman ways, right? Now,

10:05

with the ability of retrospect, I

10:07

think that I look at that and what I see is artificial

10:09

intelligence. Because I can't

10:12

imagine three humans or even living organisms

10:14

doing this perfect circular triangle formation

10:16

and being able to maintain it. It seems like

10:19

it will require some higher level of control. So

10:22

after we dug into the investigation, the more

10:25

I dug into it, the more I realized, I don't think this is

10:27

actually non-human intelligence. It's certainly still a narrative

10:30

and a possibility. But there's more evidence

10:32

that lines up that this is somehow our technology.

10:35

US government has reverse engineered this

10:37

and that what we're seeing in this video is an

10:40

operation of sorts. And we'll get into

10:42

that in a little bit, but that's just a little bit of a teaser

10:44

for how my kind of understanding of

10:47

what we see in these videos has evolved over time.

10:49

And my ontological shock has faded as that's

10:52

kind of gone through the evidence. And so that's what

10:54

I hope to deliver to people here today. So

10:57

just jumping into how we got here. So

11:00

around August 8th, these videos were

11:02

posted on the UFOs subreddit.

11:05

It's rare to have a really high quality

11:08

videos get posted on that subreddit. Usually

11:10

it's just a picture of a light or something floating around in

11:12

the sky. This was quite a bit different.

11:14

The first thing people noticed is they had been reposted

11:16

in January of the same year on the same subreddit.

11:19

And they were down go to zero and all the comments

11:21

that about how disrespectful it was to

11:24

post these videos or whatever the situation

11:26

might be. So people were already skeptical

11:28

because the comments seemed a little odd. And

11:31

everybody started to get a lot more attention on these

11:34

videos, including myself. For me, the factor was

11:36

that I remember seeing the thermal video

11:38

in 2014 when I was looking into MH370,

11:41

but never connected it to MH370 and

11:43

just thought it was a random

11:45

hoax video or something like that. It

11:47

wasn't until I saw both videos that

11:50

were both perfectly in sync and a one

11:52

from a satellite that I realized there

11:54

was more to this. So that's

11:56

when the crusade began, not just with me, but

11:58

with all of Reddit, essentially. Now,

12:00

we had thousands of people that were swarming,

12:03

posting every single day about every aspect

12:05

of the videos. There

12:08

were in-depth works done on the turn that

12:10

we see that confirmed that the turn is realistic

12:13

for a 777 that's making that type of

12:15

turn while descending. As

12:18

I mentioned already about the graphics, I had

12:20

like three different testimonials from people with 10 plus

12:23

years of experience that said that this would be extremely

12:25

difficult. One of the other testimonials

12:28

that I found is somebody who worked on Top Gun Maverick,

12:31

who said that, and that movie came out in 2022, that

12:33

these people did a better job than they did, and that

12:36

they would have had, they had a cheat to do some of the stuff

12:38

that they see in these videos. The

12:40

only thing that that person had a problem with is, well, why

12:43

is the drone there since it's so slow? Which

12:45

ends up, I think, being a huge clue. This

12:47

drone cannot catch up to a 777, so

12:50

why is it out there filming? And we'll cover that in

12:52

a second as well. So

12:54

the investigation began. We

12:57

started building the evidence, and I said, okay, I can't let

12:59

any of this stuff disappear, get deleted, whatever. I

13:01

started saving everybody's links that I thought were high

13:03

quality that I could vet and confirm that were

13:05

appropriate. And as

13:08

I started to get enough information, I started realizing we

13:10

can build a story here than fits with

13:12

all of these facts. And we started

13:14

to... I started to build a team, essentially.

13:17

MH370x is what it's called. And

13:20

that team is a group of people who are investigators who

13:22

are looking up old news articles, archives that

13:24

have been deleted about anyone who

13:26

was on the plane, their family members, every

13:29

statement they ever made, all the evidence we

13:31

could possibly find. We found a lot of stuff

13:33

that I think people have just completely forgotten

13:35

with that. So we

13:37

got to this point where we said, we've got all

13:39

this information, but

13:41

how do we prove it? How do we actually

13:44

prove it? And that's where I met my

13:46

satellite expert, Martin. He had

13:48

posted on the subreddit

13:50

a 3D

13:51

graphical interpretation that he created of

13:54

a satellite, USA 229, going

13:56

over what I had presumed to be the smoking gun

13:58

location in the South Indian

13:59

Ocean.

14:01

At this time, we had been using all of the

14:03

available data that was out there from

14:06

the public and from the official narratives

14:08

that said that this plane was a South Indian Ocean, and

14:11

we had actually lined up the satellite coordinates with

14:13

a location in the South Indian Ocean. And

14:16

he made a video that said, yep, this satellite

14:19

was able to look at it right at that point. The

14:21

problem with it was that it was the wrong time. It

14:24

was way too early. It was like 1830 or

14:27

something, and our plane is up in the Nicobar Islands

14:29

at 1840, so it can't possibly

14:31

be all the way in the South Indian Ocean. And

14:34

this is where I had kind of a dilemma.

14:36

Which way do we go with the investigation?

14:38

Do we go with the investigation and following

14:41

the satellite, which we think is the right satellite?

14:44

Or do we go in the direction of following the

14:46

official data that says that this had to have gone into

14:48

the South Indian Ocean? And that's

14:50

where a lot of this starts to unravel,

14:53

essentially. So this investigation

14:55

began on Reddit. It moved

14:57

off of Reddit and became MH370x.

15:01

Part of the reason for that is that it

15:03

actually, this entire discussion got banned

15:05

from that same UFO's subreddit after

15:08

about two weeks,

15:11

I want to say. And the way that happened

15:13

was very suspicious. A

15:15

debunk got posted that claimed

15:18

that they found a shockwave

15:20

VFX that was supposedly

15:23

used in the portal effect. It

15:25

was posted by a one-day-old account. It

15:27

didn't have the karma to even be allowed to post

15:30

on the subreddit. I talked to the moderators.

15:32

They admitted that they gave it manual permission

15:34

to do so. I asked them if they knew who

15:36

the person was that was using the sockpup at the post.

15:39

They would not respond and answer the question. The

15:42

person who claims to have found these videos, there's only one

15:44

person. Their name is Mick West, and they are

15:46

on the Metabunk website. On

15:49

the same day that this was posted to the Reddit by

15:51

the sockpuppet account, Mick West made

15:53

a post on the Metabunk forum saying

15:55

that he had found this VFX from an obscure

15:57

video game in the 90s. Interestingly

16:00

enough, this VFX does not match

16:02

our VFX.

16:05

Not only does it not match, it's the wrong

16:07

color. So most explosions you would see

16:09

in a video game are white, but what we see

16:11

in our event is a dark thermal event.

16:14

So not even the same thing. They

16:16

ended up manipulating it to try to get one

16:18

or two frames to match, and

16:20

even then they don't match. I

16:23

tried to ask them, how many pixels match

16:25

if you think that they look the same? No one would answer

16:27

that question. Interestingly enough,

16:30

they used this, this

16:33

debunk got upvoted to the top of the subreddit

16:36

on UFOs, and it was then used subsequently

16:39

to shut down all conversation. All

16:41

the comments within it, and you can find this if you

16:43

go search for it, basically talk about how

16:46

happy they are to have this debunked and how

16:48

this is finally over. It actually reminds me a lot

16:50

of the Nazca mummy debate that was going

16:52

on in the last few weeks, which I just

16:54

can't understand why people who claim to be for disclosure

16:57

would be trying to tear other people down

16:59

that hard. So the discussion got

17:02

completely banned from the subreddit,

17:04

and at that point, a new subreddit was developed, airliner

17:07

abduction 2014, and that's where

17:09

the migrants from that we're investigating

17:12

went to. Now keep in mind, I had

17:14

not been on Reddit at this time. I'm just following

17:16

along, pulling the data off of it, doing my own investigation.

17:19

And I went on Twitter and I started basically

17:21

posting on Twitter. I made

17:24

my persona, used

17:26

my real name. I began

17:29

to put the facts out there, challenge

17:33

some of the disinformation that was out there, and

17:35

all of this can be seen in my profile. So

17:39

after that was banned, then everybody was on this

17:41

airliner abduction subreddit. The problem with this

17:43

subreddit is infiltrated and overrun

17:46

with these meta bunk account people who are

17:48

out there trying to debunk every aspect

17:50

of it, which I actually have nothing against as long as they're

17:53

doing it in good faith. It turns out the

17:55

debunkers actually proved more aspects

17:57

of these videos than anyone else to be true.

18:00

and the person I just mentioned, KCIMC,

18:02

who proved that the flash accurately illuminates.

18:05

Interesting enough, if you go find his post, he edited

18:08

it at the top to say that he thinks it's

18:10

fake, even though he proved that it's real. That's

18:13

the kind of thing we're essentially dealing with here. When

18:16

I started to notice this, I realized we have to have our own

18:18

community that's going to be separate from

18:20

this. That's where we created the subreddit

18:23

MH370x a few days ago, which has

18:25

already started to blow up. Really,

18:29

what our goal is to solve the mystery. We

18:31

want people who aren't out there trying

18:34

to slow us down and put roadblocks in our

18:36

way. We want people who are out there finding more

18:38

corroborating evidence because it's very

18:40

clear that there's something wrong with the official

18:42

story. That's

18:45

how we got to where we're at right now. We

18:47

have a pretty thriving community right now, both the

18:50

over 2,600 people who have followed me on

18:52

Twitter in the last six weeks where I went from 30 fake

18:55

followers to however many we're at

18:58

now. These are people that believe, not just

19:00

believe in me, but they believe in the evidence and

19:02

the facts. That's always

19:04

been my approach. I don't want people

19:06

to believe me in this. I want people to just look at the

19:08

evidence and find it that it's very

19:11

compelling. That's really

19:13

interesting. When

19:16

I first started looking into this stuff, I

19:18

don't remember where I read it, but I remember you

19:20

saying that they

19:23

messed up releasing a video. I'm

19:27

sure you'll get to it. When

19:29

you say they, are you referring

19:31

to the military releasing the video? To

19:34

me, the question is, why even film this? If

19:37

you're filming this, this is such a huge risk

19:40

because it can potentially leak. That's

19:43

the part where when more I think about it, just

19:45

filming in general seems like a risk, but

19:48

the person that actually went ahead and recorded

19:50

the satellite video and leaked it, they

19:53

didn't use a camera like my camera that

19:55

you see here, the cameras you see there. That

19:57

was not something that was set up. They were using the actual screen

19:59

recording. while they were logged into the

20:01

database. What that means is

20:03

they definitely got caught. So

20:06

it adds a whole layer of intent to this.

20:09

Why are they filming? Why does this

20:11

person decide to leak it? Why

20:13

did they go through all this intent and the way that they leaked

20:15

it, which we can talk about here in a few minutes as well? Because

20:17

I think that that's also extremely compelling when

20:20

you look at the evidence. Carry

20:23

on then. Okay. So let's go ahead and just

20:25

start. I'm going to go through some of the facts about the

20:27

videos. So the first

20:29

video has an archive date

20:31

of March 19th, 2014. This

20:34

is our satellite video and it's posted

20:36

by an account named RegicideAnon. This

20:38

account seems to be one of these UFO accounts that

20:40

just post UFO-type videos. For

20:43

that reason, we don't suspect RegicideAnon of being

20:45

directly involved, but we do believe

20:48

they were given this. Now in the

20:50

description of this video, it says, received

20:52

March 12th, 2014. That's

20:55

four days after Malaysian Airlines disappeared.

20:58

It also says source protected.

21:01

You look at Regicide's other posts, they

21:03

don't say source protected. Most of them say source email,

21:06

submission, things like that.

21:09

If you look at the higher

21:11

quality, there was a higher quality version of the

21:13

same video released by somebody else about a

21:15

month or two later. You see

21:17

in their description, it actually mentions RegicideAnon

21:20

arguing on a forum about the authenticity

21:23

of these videos with other users, which

21:25

gives us the idea that RegicideAnon was

21:27

given this video by somebody who said, this

21:29

is real, I leaked this, you need to

21:32

promote it. And then Regicide went ahead

21:34

and started

21:35

arguing with other people who probably couldn't believe it was

21:37

real either.

21:39

So between March 12th when they received it

21:41

and March 19th when they posted it, presumably

21:44

they were validating it, verifying it, making

21:46

sure that it's legitimate. So

21:48

the video gets released on March 19th. Now

21:52

the thing about the satellite video when we watch

21:54

it is that it's extremely cropped. You're

21:56

only looking at the plane, but we know

21:58

there's a much bigger screen.

21:59

in the background.

22:01

And the way we know that is because there's more

22:03

than one analog at play. You can see the

22:05

mouse moving over the screen. The mouse actually

22:07

moves off into the bottom left of the screen and

22:10

to the top right of the screen, which

22:12

tells me, you know, I've got a double monitor set up

22:14

at home, but it can't do that. So

22:17

if what we're looking at is potentially a much bigger

22:20

view, and then when we're looking at the plane, we're just

22:22

looking at a small window of it. When

22:24

the coordinates move in the video

22:26

of the satellite, they don't move with the mouse

22:29

moving around, which tells us there's another

22:31

analog that's moving the coordinates. I

22:34

went ahead and looked on YouTube

22:36

and found what I think is the actual device.

22:39

It's like a mouse that they use for

22:41

3D satellite video. This mouse

22:44

is theoretically pointed at a point on the ground,

22:46

like in Google Earth, and they

22:48

can move that around. And when they move that around,

22:50

the person who was leaking this was moving it around to keep

22:52

the plane in the window, which they

22:54

had, you know, they wanted to keep it in view

22:57

right there. And the key to this is they cropped

22:59

out the predator drone, the gray eagle. It's

23:02

just out of view in the north of our

23:05

video. There's probably other assets

23:07

that were also cropped out as well. And

23:09

that gives us some intent. Unlikely,

23:11

this person is a spy. If this person is

23:13

a spy, you're just going to release everything, leak everything

23:16

out, right? And you probably don't leak it to the public, you

23:18

leak it to your nation, right?

23:20

To me, this is somebody who's a patriot that

23:23

was probably either filming

23:25

it themselves or heard about it right afterwards

23:28

and had so much guilt or whatever. It felt

23:30

like the world needed to know that

23:32

they went ahead and risked everything to leak it. They knew

23:34

they would get caught by logging into the Citrix

23:37

section, but they knew that that would be the only way to prove

23:39

it. Because if it was just a video camera,

23:41

we would say it was fake or whatever. They

23:43

gave us enough evidence with the coordinates

23:46

in there that we would know that would be the Nicobar

23:48

Islands. The NRL-22 told

23:51

us it was spy satellite footage. Although

23:53

it's not being taken by NRL-22,

23:55

that seems to be a command satellite that hangs out around

23:57

the North Pole. And the idea, if you're on the North

23:59

Pole, you can kind of see everywhere, right?

24:01

So a really good location for a command

24:04

satellite, theoretically.

24:05

Now what happened though? This

24:07

video got out March 19th, 2014. Did anything happen? Did

24:09

it blow up in

24:12

the media? Nothing,

24:13

right?

24:14

So now you're the leaker and you've been leaking

24:16

this super hot footage, right? You're probably afraid

24:19

of getting arrested at any moment.

24:21

So the next thing they do is they leak the thermal from

24:24

the the great eagle and

24:26

they leak that on June 5th, 2014. So

24:29

is that the second video footage then? Okay.

24:31

So that's the one where you see the colorized version that's

24:33

very close up compared to the overhead

24:35

shot that you see. One thing I want

24:37

to point out before I get into that on the satellite

24:39

footage, there's another huge clue in the satellite

24:41

footage. Regicide Anon's leak

24:44

is actually when you look at it, it's two scrunched

24:46

together videos side by side. When

24:49

I first saw that, I thought that's so weird. Why is it like

24:51

that? I thought maybe it's just duplicated,

24:54

right? What we're looking at is

24:56

two different cameras that are banking

24:58

a 3D stereoscopic image. And

25:01

now when it comes to satellites, there's not a

25:03

lot that are like that. There is a set

25:05

of them that there are, the Naval Ocean

25:07

Surveillance Satellites, NAWS satellites. They

25:10

used to come in triplicates, as recently

25:13

as their third generation, which began in the early 2000s, they

25:15

now come in duplicates only. Now,

25:18

if we're trying to find a satellite that

25:20

can do this stereostatic imaging,

25:23

it's going to have to be pretty recent from 2014.

25:26

Because what we see there, I mean, we're looking at video

25:28

of satellite, right? Before that, we didn't even know that

25:30

was possible. We've seen pictures, but video,

25:33

that's quite a bit of an advancement. Interestingly

25:36

enough, Trump's 2019 leak

25:38

of USA 224, which Marco

25:40

Landbroek was the one who reverse engineered

25:42

which satellite that was, went

25:45

up in 2011. When we look at that picture,

25:47

it looks pretty similar to our picture.

25:50

We can tell there's a low Earth orbit satellite

25:52

because coming in at an angle. If

25:54

it's a geostationary satellite, they're so high

25:56

up, it's always looking straight down.

25:59

So we know that we

25:59

lower or satellites that can take these kind

26:02

of pictures.

26:03

Now, with our satellite,

26:05

quite a bit more difficult. How do we figure out which is

26:07

the right one? So if you Google NOS

26:09

though, you'll find out there's only two that

26:12

were sent out between 2010 and 2012 that

26:14

could really be our satellites. I

26:17

believe the other one is USA238.

26:19

We found that USA238 is not anywhere close. USA229

26:22

is the one that's close there. Now,

26:24

not only do we able to prove that it's

26:27

3D stereoscopic and that those are two different

26:29

cameras and that when you put them side by side, you can

26:31

see the parallax effect by flipping it back

26:33

and forth. But my satellite

26:36

expert Martin went ahead and converted it

26:38

to an actual 3D video where you can put the glasses

26:40

on and watch it in actual 3D. So

26:44

that point right there is like, okay, how

26:46

is anyone faking this? This is just so far

26:48

beyond what could be faked at this point.

26:51

So

26:52

that's the situation with the satellite

26:54

footage and why it's so compelling right away and why I think

26:56

the leaker already felt like that absolute

26:59

proof when they leaked the satellite footage. We

27:01

just couldn't believe it. Ontological shock 2014,

27:04

we didn't have what we needed. Let me ask you a question.

27:08

This is a conjecture. You've

27:12

never talked to the leaker. Why

27:15

would somebody risk

27:17

leaking this

27:18

and

27:20

do it the way they did it? Because I don't

27:22

recall exactly

27:25

how other leakers in the past

27:27

have done such things. But the

27:29

idea and even you coming down here

27:32

today, I told you the safest

27:35

way to do this is to dump all the information

27:37

at one time very publicly. It

27:39

doesn't feel like they did it very publicly.

27:42

They almost did it like they wanted it out there, but

27:44

they're trying to remain

27:46

anonymous. It just

27:48

seems like that's a given danger

27:51

zone. So I think there's a really easy answer

27:53

to that, which is the same reason why I haven't been

27:55

put on the media. If you come to the media

27:57

with this and you say that you're... secret

28:00

intel, they're just not gonna run it. They're

28:02

gonna go to the government and get you arrested right away. So

28:05

I think that their idea was, I'm gonna go to some

28:07

anonymous people

28:10

that are unknown in these UFO circles, and I think

28:12

they probably leaked it on a shared forum or

28:14

something like that. And they just hoped

28:16

that that would get out there and then it would raise the national

28:18

attention because it would be undeniable. But

28:20

that's not what happened at all. And I think that that's actually

28:23

evidence that what Grush talks about, sophisticated

28:25

disinformation campaign. Now

28:28

how sophisticated do you think it is or

28:30

whatever, I personally think that it's both extremely

28:33

sophisticated but also extremely silly. The

28:36

cover up in this scenario we're dealing with here is we'll go

28:38

into more of the facts is very surface

28:40

level. Basically assuming no

28:42

one's gonna go look into any of this stuff. Because

28:45

as we've had, everything just unravels. So

28:47

I think to your point, they did that because

28:50

they thought that was the best way to get the information

28:52

out there. Now if you're just a normal person,

28:54

you may say, no, this is making sense, I'm gonna go to CNN

28:56

and what have you, well, I tell you what, go try to

28:58

do that with the next big thing you think and see

29:00

how they treat you. Yeah, yeah, just come to Tony

29:03

Merkel, I'll take care of you. I

29:05

wouldn't trust CNN, Fox News, any of them really.

29:08

No, exactly. No, this is information

29:10

that it takes a unique platform

29:13

and audience to get out. And

29:15

that's what our attempt is here today. Before

29:18

you progress in the storyline

29:20

and the research, evidence and all that stuff, we

29:23

skipped something in the very beginning that I

29:25

knew I was gonna forget if I didn't write it down and I didn't.

29:29

And if you're okay with this, we didn't prep for

29:31

this, so feel free to say I'd rather not. But

29:33

what's your background? Because when

29:36

I'm listening to you talk, as somebody

29:38

who doesn't really know you and the audience doesn't know you, it's

29:40

very apparent that you have a very analytical

29:42

mindset. And I think it has a lot to

29:45

do with what you do in the background, but I want people to understand

29:47

that you're not, I

29:50

don't know, like a psy-op or anything like

29:52

that. So if you could just let people know your

29:54

background before you go into any more information so they understand

29:57

who they're listening to. Yeah, so... I'm

30:00

a normal guy. I have worked in healthcare

30:02

IT my whole life from when I graduated

30:04

until now. Pretty

30:06

much doing the same job. My goal in life

30:08

is just to help people. And

30:11

so I joined healthcare because healthcare system in the United

30:13

States needs a lot of help. And I figured that would be the

30:15

location where I can help the most. So I've worked

30:17

at many hospitals across the entire

30:19

country, probably more than I can count honestly,

30:22

to help develop their electronic medical records

30:25

and improve their systems and processes so

30:27

that patients will get the best possible services. And

30:30

that job does come with a lot of analytical

30:32

understanding, which is you need to understand how

30:34

the system works. And you understand what

30:37

all the nuance of the system.

30:40

And you get a lot of times where people come into you with

30:43

issues that you have to play a game of telephone to

30:45

try to figure out, okay, what's the real problem

30:47

here? Get to that root cause

30:49

of what the real issue is. And that's really

30:51

where I test that analytical skill set.

30:54

I said, that's how I got that, grew that skill

30:56

set for my job. Which I think I

30:59

am applying here. Now I want to keep in mind, I'm not necessarily

31:01

an expert on any particular area related

31:03

to the videos and certainly not one on hyper advanced technology.

31:07

But I can go and find the research, understand

31:09

the research and apply it myself, given

31:12

my limited understanding. Yeah. Yeah.

31:15

Well, it was important for me to get that out there before we got too

31:17

much further. So where do

31:19

we go from here as far as the information goes? Yeah,

31:21

well, I think we'll just keep running through some of the video information, which is

31:23

some of the most compelling. Sure. So

31:26

again, that great Eagle footage was leaked on

31:28

June 5th, 2014, which was two

31:30

to three weeks after the satellite footage

31:32

had been released, widely released. That

31:36

was uploaded a week later by Red Decided None.

31:39

Now keep in mind that something I mentioned earlier

31:41

is that there are higher quality versions

31:43

of these videos that were released later by other people.

31:46

And what this alludes to is the fact that none

31:48

of these are the original source because you

31:50

can't create a higher version from a lower quality

31:53

version of a video. And the

31:55

other version of the satellite doesn't show the stereoscopic

31:57

effect. It looks like they just pulled one of them.

32:00

maybe made it a higher quality or what have you. What

32:02

does that mean stereoscopic? Stereoscopic

32:04

is the effect I'm talking about with the two cameras looking

32:06

down, where it creates a false 3D

32:08

appearance essentially. And that's how we were able to convert

32:11

it to a real 3D appearance, which

32:14

there's a video as well that I have that proves

32:16

that it's stereoscopic, where someone goes through the editing

32:18

tools and shows you all the buttons

32:20

they press to prove that it's a literal stereoscopic

32:22

effect. So

32:24

that's extremely important because this is A,

32:27

highly advanced. Are we talking about Marvel

32:29

Studios here making 3D movies or James

32:31

Cameron making Avatar? And

32:33

we're talking about now the dates that I

32:35

just threw out there, the time range is

32:37

extremely narrow. We're talking between four

32:40

days and 72 days to make a full

32:42

3D model that you can create these

32:45

videos from different perspectives. And

32:48

you need to create three videos. You need to

32:50

create the two that you're seeing from the satellite to create the stereoscopic

32:52

effect. And you have to create the drone one

32:54

as well. To me, that's already makes

32:56

it completely impossible. I've done enough work in my life

32:59

that nothing gets done that quickly, especially not in visual

33:02

effects and stuff that we see in movies. That stuff takes the longest,

33:05

right? And as I pointed out with the Top

33:07

Gun Mavericks scenario, that person

33:09

wishes they could have done what these people did, and

33:11

that was eight years later. And they

33:13

chimed in on this whole situation.

33:16

Was that on a thread? Yeah, that was one of the Reddit comments.

33:19

It's interesting to see how much people throw

33:21

out their own experience and information

33:24

for the public to know and weigh in on these videos.

33:26

And so that's why I saved some of the most compelling ones

33:29

that I saw. Because

33:31

we can look those people up and confirm that their identities

33:33

are real if necessary, but I don't wanna dox

33:35

those type of people. I like to take them at face value,

33:38

especially if what they're saying checks out and

33:40

makes sense, which it seemed to. The

33:43

other thing too is these cameras are made for

33:46

filming these types of events. So

33:49

we don't think that these orbs are even visual

33:51

in the visual spectrum. And part of that

33:53

is because both cameras are filming them

33:55

in IR. The thermal is actually an electro

33:58

IR camera, highly advanced, I believe it's... built

34:00

by Raytheon. And the thermal

34:02

layer was actually added custom over the top.

34:04

I'm almost 100% sure now. The

34:06

reason for that is that it was stripped.

34:10

Someone manually stripped it and you can see more detail

34:12

in the clouds, which makes you think that that's

34:14

not the original version in which it was filmed in.

34:17

So that's a little bit interesting because it then says,

34:19

okay, is the person who leaked it the operator?

34:21

Like what technical experience do you need to know

34:24

to be able to do that? So

34:26

that's kind of one of the clues that we're still looking

34:28

to wrap up. But we've got the broad strokes

34:30

pretty well down at this point. With

34:33

respect to the mission statement

34:35

for these technology, the satellite, the

34:37

drone, they use a

34:40

SIGIN system, which is signals intelligence.

34:42

And this signals intelligence system is essentially a network

34:45

that allows all these devices to create

34:47

a global network to communicate with one another. And

34:50

so this is where you link NRL 22 to USA 229 to our great

34:54

eagle. They're working together, looking

34:56

at the same thing, collecting data from multiple

34:58

positions on it. It

35:00

also matches the mission statement

35:02

for STIBRS, which is the space-based infrared

35:04

system. So what this point of this system

35:07

is, at least publicly, is to track missiles and things

35:09

like that. When you read into it publicly

35:11

online and Google it, you'll find out that it does more

35:13

than that. It also can track planes, boats.

35:16

It provides battlefield awareness and

35:18

intelligence. So that's really important.

35:20

We think about that battle map that we think we're

35:23

seeing on the satellite video, where

35:25

we're seeing it cropped to just a plane. Most likely, that's

35:27

a very large field of view that we're looking

35:30

at there from that satellite. Because the point

35:32

is, someone can log in and say, here's the battle. This

35:34

place goes here. You go here. Fight. Take out this thing.

35:36

Right? So what we're looking

35:39

at is extremely advanced technology,

35:41

especially from 2014, but it may

35:43

be even today as well. And

35:48

I think I already mentioned the highest quality sources.

35:50

There's several of those links that have the higher

35:52

quality sources that make us believe that, okay, they're

35:55

not the original person. But the real smoking

35:57

gun that made these videos real was...

36:00

When someone found out that the

36:02

mouse had a different frame rate in the background,

36:05

they thought, well, this has to prove that it's fake. It

36:08

actually proved that it's 100% authentic. So

36:10

I'm just going to run down this list right here,

36:13

which is that the

36:15

mouse drift that we see could be explained with a jog

36:17

wheel and track ball that does not have the click

36:19

activated. Now, I think we're moving away from that because

36:21

we've actually found the real device that they build

36:24

for these. Then they have 3D glasses

36:26

that you wear and you move this track

36:29

ball mouse thing around. To move the visual

36:31

screen around. It's very cool and I'm probably going to post it on

36:33

Twitter in a couple days. The screen

36:35

capture of the terminal with the resolution

36:38

is running at 30 frames per second. The

36:40

Citrix Remote Terminal session is running

36:42

at a default 24 frames per second.

36:46

Streaming a remote virtual desktop at a different

36:48

resolution in 24 frames per

36:50

second. They're viewing

36:52

the custom video software panning

36:55

around a large area.

36:58

I already mentioned the mouse moving around. They're

37:01

remotely navigating that large resolution

37:03

in six frames per second. So

37:05

what we're seeing is the satellite six frames per

37:07

second. We're seeing the recording 24 frames

37:10

per second with the mouse over it as well

37:12

that's matching the Citrix session. Essentially

37:15

what that says then is that this is actually

37:17

somebody who logged in to the actual database,

37:20

Intel Spy database, did a

37:22

screen recording of whatever they were pulling up and

37:25

cropped it so that we would only see what they

37:27

wanted us to see. So they were trying

37:29

to be careful with what they were releasing.

37:32

I think so and I wonder if it would have had

37:34

an impact on their sentencing. Perhaps

37:36

they wouldn't be sentenced quite as harshly for something

37:39

like this. So you think they're in jail right now? I

37:41

think they're at best in jail. Because

37:43

of this? Yeah, 100%. Having looked

37:46

into it, I think the biggest piece of evidence actually

37:48

came out like two days ago where New York Times

37:50

and an article on a guy who stole spy

37:53

information or satellite information

37:56

for Africa and he's facing the death penalty

37:58

over it. He's facing execution. Potentially

38:00

or life in prison and you think about

38:03

that and you look into what has happened

38:05

for people that illegally leaked spy

38:07

satellite Information and the

38:09

sentences are harsh spy satellites are

38:12

probably the number one most guarded secret

38:14

other than maybe UFOs and whatever else

38:16

is out there Right, but and there's a good

38:19

reason for it because look at what we're looking at here

38:21

now Look at how much we can discern

38:23

just from looking at these videos about

38:26

the technology Like I would even wonder

38:28

this was nine years ago Are

38:30

we to the point now we have enough satellites so they can do

38:32

a remote playback of the entire world anytime

38:34

they want? You know, like we're not that far

38:37

from that and we might already be at that point.

38:39

How do you feel about that? You

38:41

know for me, it's a little bit scary. I definitely go out inside

38:43

every once in a while look up I'm like, okay. They're just watching

38:46

me right now or you know, but You

38:49

know, I think it's technology. It's advancement right? We

38:51

can't just be afraid of it You

38:54

know, I like to have the government leave me alone

38:56

as much as possible but at

38:58

the same time, you know, this is technology that's keeping

39:00

us safe protected and Keep

39:03

in mind if what we see in here is real with this technology

39:06

Then you know, it's it's

39:09

a it's a risk There can be a lot of good they

39:11

can come from this technology like green energy But

39:13

there can be a lot of bad that can come from it as well

39:15

like weapons and war etc And

39:18

we need to be ready for those risks So I think

39:20

the government is doing the right things to protect us But

39:23

at the same time, you know, we have to be careful

39:25

about Rights and privacy

39:27

as well. It's a good. Yeah, absolutely well,

39:31

I Want to ask you this question

39:33

before you keep going? Yeah, you're

39:35

referencing the way this video

39:37

was captured And maybe it's just

39:40

my memory as to what I remember seeing

39:42

But to me when I watched that video

39:45

it it looked like somebody was recording

39:47

it From like a device

39:50

like recording it from their phone on a

39:52

screen. Is that how it was? Nope,

39:54

they're not using a phone and part of the reason I thought

39:57

about that a lot is one of the first questions I dug through right

39:59

they would have had to had some kind of perfect stand

40:01

behind it, but there's just no way and that would

40:03

work. And I think we would have known right away

40:05

as well from the video that it was, you'd

40:07

have the exit data or something like that that would say, oh, it was

40:10

an iPhone 7 that recorded this. But

40:12

again, I think the reason why they didn't do that is either

40:14

A, you can't bring a phone in wherever they recorded

40:17

that from, or B, they

40:19

knew that that would be considered... It wouldn't be authentic enough

40:21

for them to do that. What they're doing for sure is this actual

40:24

screen recording on the computer that they're on.

40:27

Part of the reason why we can tell that is that at the end of the satellite

40:29

video, they scroll the mouse up to the right and

40:31

they close the window and it goes dark. So

40:34

what we're looking at there is not a camera.

40:37

This is the actual mouse winning and closed it.

40:39

Do you have any thoughts on how

40:42

something like this could have gotten out? I

40:45

mean, did they just simply put it on a thumb drive,

40:47

walk out with it? Probably.

40:50

If they were on a laptop logged in through

40:53

the Citrix session, then sure, you

40:55

can do it. You can pull the file

40:57

somehow and get it onto your device.

41:00

Thumb drives are... From working in healthcare IT,

41:03

thumb drives are the number one risk for people because

41:05

there's computers lying around everywhere and all somebody has to

41:07

do is plug a thumb drive into it. And

41:10

so a lot of places that I'll go to actually block off the

41:12

back of the computer so you can't jam anything into

41:14

the USB drives. So

41:16

to me, that would probably be the most likely. It's

41:19

a question I hadn't actually considered though. So thanks for answering

41:21

it or asking it. Yeah, absolutely. That's

41:23

what I'm here for. But yeah, go ahead. So

41:27

some of the other stuff that I had about it is some

41:29

things that we recognize from the videos. There's

41:33

a heat signature in the plane in the bottom

41:35

half of the plane in the cargo hold, which is odd.

41:37

It might be fire. We're not entirely sure.

41:40

We also see either smoke or exhaust

41:42

coming out of the plane in both videos. The

41:44

reason why these are not contrails is the plane is

41:47

not high enough up for contrails. Contrails

41:49

only form high altitude. Based on

41:51

the witness statement, based on the fact that we see the cumulus

41:53

clouds in the satellite video, we

41:55

believe that the altitude is somewhere between 2000 and 10,000 feet. So

41:59

too low. for that. So

42:02

if it's smoke, this plane is not going to last very

42:05

long because it's on fire, planes got

42:07

to get to the ground quickly. But

42:10

that's just something where that's one of those pieces

42:12

of evidence where it kind of depends on what narrative

42:14

you believe, right? Because if you believe a narrative

42:17

of espionage then this plane

42:19

doesn't have a lot longer to get wherever it

42:21

needs to go. If you believe in a scenario

42:23

where there was an emergency encounter, then this

42:27

actually kind of adds up where, okay, were they trying

42:29

to land in the water now because they couldn't land

42:31

a pne.

42:34

The other things we see is the orbs. So

42:36

the orbs, the pattern these orbs do is very

42:38

specific. I

42:40

don't know exactly how to equate it but it looks like sine

42:42

and cosine, you know,

42:46

the wave functions that you see. It looks

42:48

like those wave functions overlapped over the top

42:50

of each other. It's like too perfect

42:52

to really have been done by a human almost. And

42:56

then if you're in the ufology side, there's so much

42:58

stuff that can link these to the orbs that people have been

43:00

seeing in the zeitgeist the last five or six years,

43:03

black triangles, all of the

43:05

above. The orbs, there's

43:07

a really interesting aspect.

43:09

I have one of the videos that we should show with

43:11

respect to this, shows that the trails of

43:14

the orbs are cold, they're dark.

43:17

So not

43:18

just that, the trails of the orbs aren't

43:20

actually trails at all. They're not coming from behind

43:22

the orbs. They're actually in front of

43:24

the orbs and you can watch the

43:26

orbs being pulled towards

43:28

the trails.

43:29

In the 10 second clip that strips the

43:32

thermal layer from it, you can see very

43:34

clearly that as these things are spinning

43:36

around the plane, they're actually being sucked forward

43:38

in the direction of these black trails. And

43:41

the reason why the black trails appear to be behind them is just

43:43

due to the speed on which the everything is

43:45

traveling. That's one of the first

43:47

things where I saw this does not look

43:49

right. This doesn't look human. It certainly

43:52

doesn't look like anything in a hoax or it could just come up

43:54

with off the top of their head. So

43:58

these trails that are in front of the orbs...

43:59

Do

44:00

we have any thoughts as to what

44:03

these trails could be? And I asked

44:05

this question because what you're saying,

44:08

and as somebody who does not have a scientific

44:10

background, but

44:12

has heard a lot of things, I

44:17

can almost see how maybe what

44:19

you're describing is

44:21

what maybe Bob Lazar

44:23

described only caught on video.

44:26

Because Bob says that the way these

44:28

things maneuver is that

44:30

somehow they remove gravity in front of the device

44:33

and it falls into the gravity less space

44:35

and it does it so fast by repetition that

44:38

it is able to do what it does. So

44:41

could that be what's happening in video?

44:44

Only we actually caught it on video? I don't know. So

44:46

that's a great question because I've looked into Bob Lazar

44:48

stuff, I've watched his stuff, and I think the only thing that

44:51

doesn't add up with respect to Bob Lazar's statement

44:54

or around how they operate is that in our video,

44:56

we don't see it turning on its side and kind of

44:58

moving forward like he talks about with the gravity engine. But

45:01

that's, I think, part of the reason why this could be our

45:03

reverse engineer technology because we are seeing

45:05

some of those same elements. We are

45:07

seeing that gravity engine potentially where

45:10

it's being pulled forward along those

45:12

lines. But we don't necessarily,

45:14

I don't think we're talking about crafts in which

45:16

people are in in this case. They look to me

45:18

like they're balls of energy for the most part. And

45:21

I'm not super advanced in science, but

45:24

I did look up a bunch of different scientific stuff

45:26

and try to stay on top of it. And

45:30

I think that what we've got going on here is two major

45:32

advanced technologies. One is superconductivity. And

45:36

superconductivity is essentially allowing things to

45:38

float over magnets, right? Things

45:41

that aren't otherwise magnetized. So

45:43

if you want to think of back to the future hoverboards, hovercars,

45:46

that's what we're talking about. It's not

45:48

gonna be fiction. It's gonna be real pretty

45:50

soon. And so that would help explain the kind of floatiness

45:54

that we see of these orbs simply

45:56

have separated themselves

45:59

from the effect of gravity.

45:59

somehow.

46:01

The other thing that we're seeing, this is hypothesized

46:04

in one of my spaces, is that there could be a laser

46:06

that is creating an electromagnetic force in front

46:09

of the orb that is creating that trail

46:11

that's allowing it to kind of flow

46:13

through it, which would create what you would call a gravity

46:15

engine, essentially. The

46:18

thermal itself, the way and the reason why

46:20

the thermal was colorized, I believe it was with intent

46:22

as well. They wanted us to see the specifics

46:25

of the orbs. It looks like there's a hot

46:27

point on the orb and we think that might

46:29

be where the engine is that's pulling it forward,

46:32

right? And you can watch it kind of spin on

46:34

the axis at that point as these

46:36

orbs do their weird formation and a triangle.

46:41

So

46:42

we can see that part of it, but they also wanted us

46:44

to see that the event is cold. If it was in black

46:46

and white, people would probably argue, oh,

46:48

which way is hot? Which way is cold? They just they flipped

46:51

it or whatever. But when it's in color,

46:53

you can tell that color is the engines of the plane

46:56

very clearly. And

46:57

we can see both the trails are cold. The other

46:59

explanation has been described me is that they might be

47:01

absorbing energy from the surrounding environment,

47:04

which is something that is extremely

47:06

advanced technology as well. And

47:09

then with the actual zap, zap

47:11

is all black, completely black in the thermal.

47:14

And what that tells us is this is a cold event. It's

47:17

not a destructive, it's not an explosion event. The

47:19

best description I've been able to find for that is intermediate

47:22

black hole. And

47:24

essentially, this could be a wormhole. I

47:26

found from looking at science and this is supported

47:28

by theoretical physics, surprisingly enough.

47:31

I had no idea at the time that it would be. And

47:34

so is quantum teleportation. Quantum teleportation

47:36

has actually been proven by the Chinese. So a

47:39

lot of the technology that we see, although it's so

47:41

extremely ontologically shocking from looking at

47:43

these videos, I believe it

47:45

can be 100% explained by science as we know

47:47

it. Maybe not science as we know it and

47:50

can do it right now with the material

47:52

science that we have, but theoretical science.

47:55

So I mean, if that's the case and

47:58

you know not what we can do right now. but theoretical,

48:00

I mean, clearly somebody

48:02

has the ability to do this. So,

48:05

I mean, are we looking at something

48:07

that is a government that's trying

48:09

to, you know, flex itself? Or

48:13

are we talking about, you know, anything from

48:15

that to actual ET? I mean,

48:18

we have military over the last several years

48:20

now coming out, you know, pilots coming out,

48:22

talking about what they've seen and experienced, but

48:25

everything's been a trickle, you know, and we have

48:27

people like David Grush coming out and kind of getting

48:30

the momentum going on on the disclosure,

48:32

maybe more than they're comfortable with. So,

48:35

could it be something where we

48:38

have maybe a lot of

48:41

military encounters with these things that are

48:43

similar to what we see in the video? It's just

48:45

they weren't ready to disclose it yet, and now

48:48

it's being disclosed through people like you.

48:51

It could be. It could be anything, and that's the

48:53

hard part. We can't really nail down exactly what it is. What

48:55

I will say about the David Grush interview with Jesse

48:57

Michaels is that there's actually a specific

49:00

part of it where they talk about this type of

49:02

technology and wormhole and what

49:04

the UFOs might do and why they kind

49:06

of skip around the sky. And

49:08

I thought that that was very interesting because the way David

49:10

Grush describes is an accordion that's kind of getting

49:13

stuck together, and that's how we would think of it as space

49:15

time and cheating space time in this way, right?

49:17

It's either folding space time or you're making a hole

49:19

in it. You're separating yourself from space itself,

49:22

and that's allowing you to move from point A to point B instantaneously.

49:26

So to some degree, it's interesting.

49:28

I don't know what disclosure and the slow acclimation

49:31

process and what the intent behind all these people

49:33

are is, but from what I can see here,

49:36

assuming these videos are real, is they're hiding

49:38

a lot of technology. And I don't

49:40

think they have any plan on letting people know about this anytime

49:42

soon. Part of the reason is that I believe

49:45

they're going to try to divide up the technology amongst the

49:47

elites who owns this, like who owns

49:49

superconductivity, who owns gravity

49:52

engines, who owns fusion

49:54

power when we replace all fossil

49:56

fuels, right? These are the

49:58

types of socioeconomic impact that

49:59

politicians care about.

50:01

People like us on the ground floor, we don't care about that crap.

50:03

We just want to know what the truth is. And that's

50:06

what my intent is here, is to blow that

50:08

all up and just skip right past all the disclosure.

50:10

I respect David Grush highly to

50:12

respect him. And I believe everything he's saying is true. But

50:16

this is a path forward that we can skip past

50:18

it and we can move it forward

50:20

much, much faster. Yeah. I mean,

50:23

because what is caught in this video and what you're

50:25

releasing and... So the video

50:27

has been out publicly for a long time, but

50:30

the analyzation that you guys have been

50:32

doing has never been done. And

50:34

so combining the two and releasing it

50:36

and stuff, it is now shattering

50:40

reality for so many people. I

50:42

mean, there's people like

50:45

me who really go into the

50:47

woo-woo and are like, yeah, I mean,

50:50

let's talk about it all. But then

50:52

there's other people who think it's

50:54

all science fiction and it's impossible.

50:57

And when you're releasing

51:00

a video that's already been out there, but with the analyzation

51:03

and the research behind it, it really

51:05

forces people to look at it and be like, oh,

51:09

so this is real. How do I fit

51:11

that in my paradigm? I

51:13

wonder... So on the good side

51:15

of it, we could suggest that

51:18

maybe the government or whoever

51:20

is slowly releasing information in that direction

51:23

because they don't think people can handle it all at

51:25

one time. You fortunately

51:27

can just do whatever you want. Exactly.

51:31

That's the benefit, right? We don't have to hold

51:33

into whatever this slow disclosure

51:35

process is. And I agree with you. I think that's

51:38

it. When you look at this, it's like, yeah, you

51:40

got to get people used to this. And I think

51:42

that's what's been happening. Nine years

51:44

ago, I wouldn't have said that would have said the same thing. Impossible,

51:47

right? Now in 2023, I have the

51:49

basis to understand that this isn't just impossible.

51:51

This is something that could be possible. So

51:54

I might even have to give them some credit. Maybe that

51:56

slow disclosure process did get us here and

51:58

heck, maybe they even have a plan. for this exact scenario.

52:01

I was just thinking, I wonder

52:03

if they've been waiting for somebody

52:06

to do the big

52:09

step forward that doesn't have government behind

52:11

their name, you know, private citizen,

52:13

not held down by the red

52:15

tape, right? Because there's

52:17

a lot of suspicion behind government people,

52:21

you know, I don't trust the government.

52:24

And so it's the idea that this is a private

52:28

citizen doing this. And maybe that was part of

52:30

the, you're a puppet, man. They're playing you like a puppet.

52:32

It could be. Honestly, I've gone through

52:34

the whole psyop, you know, angle

52:37

10 times over in my mind. I actually asked my

52:39

own parents if I was in the Truman Show and they were playing some

52:41

elaborate prank on me because at that point,

52:43

it started to make more sense than everything else that was going

52:45

on. But ultimately, no, I don't

52:48

think this is a psyop for a couple of reasons. A, I'm

52:50

not that important. But

52:52

also B is that even if you take me out of the equation,

52:54

let's look at what we're looking at the video here, right? This

52:57

is the reason why these videos are so compelling. There's no

53:00

possible excuse for them. If you

53:02

claim that the government made these videos, to what

53:04

intent, the only thing that these videos do is

53:06

implicate them in the loss of MH370. It

53:09

proves that they saw it and lied about it. And

53:12

the idea that like, oh, they're going to try to blame

53:14

space aliens or whatever for it. No one's going to

53:16

believe that looking at this video. No one would. No one does

53:19

already. So and not just that they

53:21

didn't promote the video either. It's been nine years. When

53:23

were they going to do that? And

53:25

this kind of quickly leads into another point, which I was going to say is that

53:27

to make these videos, you would have to have

53:30

classified knowledge of how these videos

53:32

look and are supposed to look, especially the spy satellite

53:35

one, which is essentially impossible.

53:37

So

53:40

it really makes it extremely difficult

53:42

for there to be some type of hoax. It makes it difficult

53:44

for it to be a psyop. But ultimately, I'll be the one

53:46

in the front row waiting for the government to tell us

53:49

what explanation do you want to go with? And I'm going to rip

53:51

it to shreds if it's not factual based. Yeah.

53:55

Do you project that happening where you're going

53:57

to have to sit down before panel

53:59

and answer? your questions? Who knows man.

54:01

I would say at this point anything could happen.

54:04

I've never expected anything like this to happen

54:06

in my whole life. I would have said

54:08

that it's more likely that aliens will come down on their

54:10

ships on my front lawn and introduce themselves

54:12

to me personally rather than

54:15

something like this happened that I would be at the center

54:17

of. So it's so unbelievable

54:19

that I'm just along for the ride at this point, trying

54:22

to bring attention to it and wherever it leads, it

54:24

leads. Yeah. I

54:27

commend you for that. You want some more? Yeah,

54:29

keep going. We'll get some more

54:31

stuff here. Let's see. So one of the big things

54:34

people ask is why is this MH370? This is an airplane.

54:36

It's a 777, but

54:39

why is it MH370? First of all,

54:41

it's the only missing 777. MH370 is the only one. We

54:45

never found a debris field. Now this is really,

54:47

really, really important. And this is part of the reason

54:49

why there were so many conspiracy theories

54:52

about it. Because if you don't find a debris field

54:54

for a 777 crashing into the ocean, it

54:56

just didn't crash into the ocean. There

54:58

would have been parts, bodies, luggage

55:00

everywhere visible from space. We saw the Wagner

55:03

guy's private jet from a satellite

55:05

video in space. So

55:08

this is just simply impossible. That's why

55:11

Florence Duchang thought that somehow it had to be over

55:13

the South China Sea. This is why Jeff Wise

55:15

thought it had to have been flown to Russia. Because

55:17

these are smart people that realize there's something really

55:19

amiss here. And the debris that

55:21

they did tie to the plane, they've actually conclusively

55:24

tied one piece, the flaper on. And

55:26

that piece was to very little

55:28

people who understand this or know this, but the unique

55:31

serial plate was missing on that piece.

55:33

The piece that had the unique serial number on it, and it's

55:35

a plate that was removed. The excuses

55:38

that it fell off in the water or something like that. The

55:41

serial number that they use is a non-unique serial

55:43

number to match it to the plane. So

55:45

to me, this throws the idea that this is definitively

55:48

a piece of MH370 up in the air. Do

55:52

you feel like it is planted then? Well,

55:54

for evidence to just get people to move on.

55:57

For me, it doesn't even need to be planted for the videos

55:59

to be real.

57:59

in that spot for a few minutes. My guess is

58:02

the satellite's moving and is constantly taking a

58:04

video, right? So that you can create

58:06

this 3D battle map that you could go back and pull up the recording

58:08

and watch whatever you need to watch. It's

58:11

also controlled by an AI called Sentient

58:13

that was declassified in 2012, which

58:15

can operationalize the satellites. Now, I don't

58:17

know exactly how capable they are, if they can actually change

58:20

their orbits, slow them down to get better shots

58:22

or what have you. It seems like

58:25

it should be impossible, but they do talk about operationalizing

58:27

them and having a command satellite to make sure that satellites

58:30

don't run into each other as well. So

58:33

this Sentient program is basically taking all the

58:35

assets and it's looking around trying to find, oh, is somebody

58:37

shooting a missile off, whatever, and then point all your assets

58:39

at that location. Presumably what happened

58:41

here is that MH370 goes off track and

58:43

now you have everybody looking at it.

58:46

Or you're already looking at it because you know exactly

58:48

the point where we're going to have the rendezvous point and we want to have all

58:50

the cameras staring at the right spot. This

58:53

is fascinating because the whole

58:55

situation that we're talking about,

58:57

it's

58:58

like

59:00

a perfect storm because I remember when

59:02

it happened and people who were listening

59:05

that maybe you were in middle school when it happened

59:07

or something, I mean, this was a big deal. I mean, everybody

59:10

was talking about it. It was so mysterious. We had

59:12

no idea where this giant plane went to. So many

59:15

theories. People were talking about it possibly

59:17

being a hijacker and them landing

59:19

it on some kind of island or even

59:21

a military base not far from the area.

59:24

We're going to get to that. I know we are. For

59:27

my perspective, the fantastic part about this

59:30

is living through that

59:32

time, especially

59:34

somebody like me, you were living

59:36

through this sense of something's

59:39

off. Something doesn't seem right.

59:42

I know something's not right because nobody

59:44

seems to have answers. The government doesn't know. Nobody

59:46

knows. But it seems like there is

59:48

something that we are missing. There is this other piece. There

59:50

is this even deeper, more

59:53

mysterious thing that we weren't seeing

59:57

that's happening here. That's what

59:59

this video is all about. It's the missing link,

1:00:01

right? It's the muscle piece we didn't have. And it's

1:00:03

the piece that says when you look at it and you see

1:00:05

it, you're just like, that's what I was feeling in

1:00:07

my gut back then. That's the feeling

1:00:10

that I was like, there's something we're missing. And that's what it

1:00:12

is. It's incredible. It is. So

1:00:14

let me throw some more stuff out there. The color

1:00:17

tone that we see of the plane matches

1:00:19

Malaysian Airlines color tone, which is white on top

1:00:21

and gray on the bottom. So the

1:00:23

plane is almost certainly a Malaysian Airlines plane,

1:00:25

which really narrows it down even further. The

1:00:28

satellite coordinates that we have put it in the

1:00:30

path of Malaysian Airlines flight through something by

1:00:32

the official path. So the official path

1:00:35

says it's going to fly out over the Nicobar

1:00:37

islands. And that's where it's going to turn into the South Indian

1:00:39

Ocean. So this

1:00:42

location here where we believe that it

1:00:44

is actually the same location where the official

1:00:46

story says it turns into the South Indian Ocean, which

1:00:49

to me is quite a big coincidence. Now,

1:00:52

I think

1:00:54

I already mentioned a couple of these. Let me see. One of

1:00:56

the other things is that

1:00:59

we have the US military, quote

1:01:01

unquote, confirms SIBRS provided data to

1:01:03

the intelligence community to help solve

1:01:05

the mystery of MH370.

1:01:08

Now that makes no sense to me. In what way did

1:01:10

the US military use SIBRS, the system

1:01:12

I was just talking about that creates the battlefield intelligence,

1:01:15

how did they solve MH370? The official

1:01:18

search found nothing. So to

1:01:20

what and what ends did they do that? I think that somebody

1:01:22

should follow up and I'm not going to name the person who quoted

1:01:25

that, but somebody should follow up with the military on

1:01:27

that and figure out what exactly they mean when

1:01:29

they said they solved the mystery of MH370, especially now

1:01:31

that we've shown with

1:01:33

all these satellites they had around there. And even

1:01:35

if USA 229 was not the one that somehow

1:01:37

took it despite being in the exact right spot, their exact

1:01:39

right time with the exact right payload, it was

1:01:42

still staring at MH370. It's going directly

1:01:44

over MH370's flight path. So essentially

1:01:47

no chance that it did not detect it. So

1:01:49

we know the US military definitely saw it. Now,

1:01:53

not just that. Why did this plane not crash

1:01:55

into the ocean? There's even more evidence than crashing

1:01:57

the ocean, a ton of it. The SOSA

1:01:59

system. Which was recently declassified.

1:02:02

This is the one that heard the Navy, the

1:02:04

Titan sub pop when they were going to the Titanic.

1:02:07

The Navy heard it pop immediately. They

1:02:10

didn't tell anybody for five days while every

1:02:12

single national TV station had oxygen counters

1:02:14

running on their thing. And then five days later after we found

1:02:17

out it popped, they tell us, oh yeah, we heard that five days ago at the moment. It

1:02:19

happened using our social system that detects these types

1:02:21

of things. Makes you wonder why they let the whole

1:02:24

story go on like that for five days. And

1:02:26

I think it's a really good one to compare to MH370, right?

1:02:28

Because it shows us what they're

1:02:30

willing to do with information. Either not tell

1:02:33

us or tell us as appropriate, right?

1:02:36

That's not even the only system. There's two other

1:02:39

systems that should have also caught it. There's a JORN

1:02:41

system, which is essentially the same equivalent system

1:02:43

by Indonesia. That should have also

1:02:45

caught it if it ran into, it crashed into the ocean.

1:02:48

Diego Garcia should have both been able

1:02:50

to track it by radar and potentially

1:02:53

also be able to detect any type of impact

1:02:55

event also. So at least three different

1:02:58

locations that should have been able to track any type of impact. Not

1:03:01

just that. The family

1:03:03

cell phones were still able to be ringing

1:03:05

and proven on Chinese television

1:03:07

for up to four days after the event. Okay,

1:03:10

so what do you mean

1:03:12

by on Chinese television? Were

1:03:15

they calling on live TV,

1:03:17

the phone numbers? And we're trying to pull the video

1:03:19

right now that I can post to Twitter later today because

1:03:22

that, if you look into it, extremely

1:03:24

overlooked piece of evidence. The debunks

1:03:27

of it seem to be, well,

1:03:28

experts say this is possible. Bullshit.

1:03:32

I have never called somebody when their phone was off

1:03:34

that it rang. Never once in my entire life.

1:03:37

And if your phone goes into the sea water, it's

1:03:39

not going to last very long at all. It's actually

1:03:41

impossible for those phones to be ringing if they're at the bottom

1:03:43

of the ocean. So, and a lot

1:03:45

of people pointed this out. You know, if you go

1:03:47

look back at it. That's the interesting part about the whole

1:03:49

investigation is that all these puzzle

1:03:52

pieces have been out there, right? It's just nobody

1:03:54

could take them and put them together in a cohesive,

1:03:56

comprehensive story before today. But

1:03:59

when you do, you start to realize that, all these puzzle pieces actually

1:04:01

do make sense and form a cohesive pattern. So

1:04:05

that's really interesting is that not just that, but

1:04:07

we also found a testimony from somebody who posted

1:04:09

back in 2014 and asked for the DSP

1:04:11

detection, which is like the explosion detection

1:04:14

or whatever. He was given one for a different

1:04:16

plane in 1984, but he was ignored for MH370. So

1:04:21

they definitely know that something happened. The

1:04:23

plane definitely, definitely did not crash into the

1:04:26

ocean. There's no evidence that it did. It's

1:04:28

also a really large shipping line between

1:04:31

Africa and Australia. There was no witnesses.

1:04:33

Nobody saw a plane crash. Nobody saw any debris

1:04:36

field bodies, calls for help, anything

1:04:38

like that. There's just nothing that

1:04:41

indicates the plane went to South Indian Ocean, except

1:04:44

for those pings. Now, interestingly

1:04:46

enough, I decided, you know what, I'm

1:04:48

going to go look at the official ping data. It turns

1:04:50

out it's an Excel spreadsheet with a number

1:04:52

of tabs on it. And if you

1:04:54

go to the SU log tab in there, which seems

1:04:56

to be the tab that they're using

1:04:58

to determine what happened with this

1:05:01

plane, the plane takes

1:05:03

off at 1630 and all the data from 1630 all the way up to 1840 looks legit.

1:05:05

Every single

1:05:09

minute has dozens of rows completely

1:05:12

filled out. Looks like you would expect

1:05:14

a very complicated Excel document to look like.

1:05:17

You get to 1840 and it gets very anomalous

1:05:19

very quickly. All of a

1:05:21

sudden, a lot of the 1839, 1840 data either has

1:05:24

no values, zero values

1:05:26

going down it, just repeated. And

1:05:28

then it gets to 1940 and everything from 1940 to 2345 hours

1:05:30

of information is 10

1:05:35

rows. It fits on one half of the Excel

1:05:38

spread window that you can just take together.

1:05:41

Not just that, there appears to be a pattern shift.

1:05:44

The channels just shift back and forth between 10 and 4

1:05:46

for all those 5 hours with

1:05:49

only 5 rows of data. To me,

1:05:51

as somebody who's worked a lot of Excel data and

1:05:54

spreadsheets in my day, something is off

1:05:56

right there. Now, I don't know if you want to say, okay,

1:05:58

that's when it turned into the South Indian Ocean.

1:07:51

down

1:08:00

the roof thinking sometimes and you

1:08:02

just brought up the other dimension aspect.

1:08:05

And just a thought,

1:08:09

say that there is this

1:08:11

kind of teleportation

1:08:13

into another realm, like I say a parallel

1:08:15

universe that's here on Earth, which

1:08:18

I think David Grush

1:08:21

kind of alluded to in some of his disclosures,

1:08:24

the idea that these things

1:08:26

are here. I forget how

1:08:29

he said it, but I remember when I was listening to it,

1:08:31

I was like, yeah, what he's talking

1:08:33

about sounds like parallel

1:08:36

universe. Is it possible, and

1:08:38

this is something that is just a thought out loud, I

1:08:41

do not expect you to have an answer to this, but

1:08:44

is it possible that if somebody

1:08:46

were to be teleported, transported to

1:08:48

another parallel universe

1:08:50

that is here, just a different dimension

1:08:53

that's here, could their

1:08:55

phone still ring? That's a good question.

1:08:58

And we're going to talk probably a little bit more about that when

1:09:00

we maybe look at some of the pictures of

1:09:02

the people on Diego Garcia that look very similar

1:09:04

to some of the crew that were on board the plane. Because

1:09:07

one part about that I wonder is like, okay,

1:09:10

if you teleport someone, will it teleport them to another dimension?

1:09:12

Will the same person even come back? What

1:09:14

if it's like a bizarro version

1:09:16

of yourself, for example? Have you seen

1:09:18

the TV show Manifest? No, I haven't. Everybody

1:09:20

asks me that though. I didn't think about it until just now. Does

1:09:24

it? Because that was funny. It does actually happen. The very first

1:09:27

episode, it's about this plane

1:09:30

of people and they set up the narrative of people's lives

1:09:32

and you see everybody's different lives. Everybody

1:09:34

just got to phone my wife, I'm mad, and this lady over here,

1:09:36

she's dealing with her kid. But they

1:09:39

hit like a thunderstorm or something and just gone.

1:09:42

And then I think it was like a year or two later,

1:09:44

it just reappears and they

1:09:48

start rolling out this idea that when these people came

1:09:50

back, they're different. They

1:09:53

look like they're the same person, but they

1:09:55

have these different abilities and it starts

1:09:57

coming out to this idea that they're not

1:09:59

the same. same people and

1:10:02

predictive programming. I'm telling you, man,

1:10:04

I wonder when that was put out. I

1:10:08

just remember binging it on Netflix. I should probably go revisit

1:10:10

it now. Yeah, I may have to check it out now that you said that.

1:10:12

I didn't know about that particular detail. That's pretty interesting.

1:10:16

Let's talk about the flight path real quick, because I think this is

1:10:18

really interesting. With

1:10:21

respect to the flight path, the first thing that's interesting that happens

1:10:24

is that 30 minutes before takeoff, the plane

1:10:26

stops connecting to one of the two satellites

1:10:28

that it's within range of. So it's within range

1:10:30

of an IOR satellite, which is to the west,

1:10:32

over the Indian Ocean, and a POR

1:10:34

satellite, which is over southeast Asia. Now,

1:10:38

the reason why this is important is that if you have two

1:10:40

different pings, you can use the Doppler

1:10:42

effect, or you can triangulate whatever, I'm trying to say the

1:10:44

wrong thing, but you can tell where the plane is based

1:10:46

on those different pings from the different satellites in the relative

1:10:49

distance. You can triangulate the position,

1:10:51

I think is the right way to point to say it. So

1:10:53

the fact that it stops pinging to one of them, 30 minutes before

1:10:56

takeoff, kind of shows that there might

1:10:58

be some intent, operational

1:11:00

intent to make the plane dark, right,

1:11:02

or harder to find. This

1:11:05

was tried to explain to me by Victor of the Independent

1:11:08

Group is the plane being blocked by a building.

1:11:10

Now, I've flown enough planes to know that's nonsense.

1:11:13

I've never been in a plane, that plane was blocked by

1:11:15

a building from a satellite view before. Not

1:11:17

to mention once the plane starts to go to takeoff, it's perfectly

1:11:19

gonna be in view. So it makes no

1:11:22

sense that it doesn't ping back to this POR

1:11:24

satellite, especially because that

1:11:27

happened 30 minutes before takeoff, plane

1:11:29

takes off at 1630 UTC, and

1:11:31

it's flying northeast towards Beijing for

1:11:34

about 45, 50 minutes. During

1:11:37

this point, it never once pings back to POR,

1:11:39

despite that it's going towards POR and

1:11:41

away from IOR.

1:11:44

It actually never pings POR for the rest of the flight.

1:11:47

So this is one of the

1:11:49

things that makes it harder to track. And this is where we had

1:11:51

to figure out, okay, is it going north or is it going south

1:11:53

along the arc? Because all we know

1:11:55

is the distance from the satellite. We don't have

1:11:58

any other information about... exactly

1:12:00

which way it went. Now

1:12:03

at 1719, that's when the pilot

1:12:05

or co-pilot says, good night, Malaysian

1:12:08

Airlines flight 370. And

1:12:10

that's the last communication we get from the plane. 64 seconds

1:12:14

later, 1721 UTC, the entire plane goes dark. It

1:12:18

drops off of a primary radar and it can

1:12:21

only be seen by secondary radar from Malaysia.

1:12:24

The official narrative says that this is the part where the

1:12:26

pilot somehow does this. From

1:12:28

the investigation that I've done and reading and listening

1:12:30

to Jeff Wise, who did a podcast

1:12:32

just the other day about this, completely impossible.

1:12:36

They would have to take out multiple electronic systems to be able

1:12:38

to do this. It's not even clear if the pilot would have the

1:12:41

technical know-how to even be able to do that.

1:12:44

They can turn off the transponder.

1:12:46

But the way these ELT transponders work

1:12:48

is those are not the things that are tracking the plane. Those

1:12:50

go off when the plane's gonna crash. Surprisingly

1:12:53

enough, none of the four redundant

1:12:55

transponders went off on this plane either, which

1:12:58

is another indication that it didn't crash into the South

1:13:00

Indian Ocean. But with respect

1:13:02

to the pilot turning it dark, there's almost no way

1:13:04

that could be possible. More likely

1:13:06

we're dealing with some type of electromagnetic interference

1:13:09

event. So either a

1:13:12

few scenarios, let's start

1:13:14

with the most WUFO encounter

1:13:16

scenario that causes an electromagnetic interference

1:13:19

effect that jams the plane but doesn't

1:13:21

take out the engines. And

1:13:23

this could explain the weird radar, the

1:13:25

altitude changes that Malaysia reports

1:13:28

seeing that the plane can't technically do. It's

1:13:30

because it's being jammed. It could have been jammed

1:13:33

by device that somebody

1:13:35

who's hijacking the plane had on board the plane.

1:13:38

It could be operated on the plane that we're working with

1:13:41

or against the pilot to make

1:13:44

the plane go dark as well. And lastly,

1:13:47

it could also be AWACS, which

1:13:49

are the American radar planes

1:13:51

that we have that can actually

1:13:53

jam planes. And one

1:13:56

of the earlier conspiracies was that they use these AWACS

1:13:58

to actually control the plane and hide.

1:13:59

take it over, pack it.

1:14:01

This was dismissed as being not possible,

1:14:04

but right now I'm in the camp where I'm not sure if it is possible

1:14:06

or not possible, especially when I'm dealing

1:14:09

with looking at black holes. So I

1:14:11

feel like if we can make black holes, we can probably pretty easily

1:14:13

remote pack an airplane. I think it's a safe bet.

1:14:17

Yeah. So this event happens, right?

1:14:19

So no matter what you think here of this event, the

1:14:21

next thing that happens is the plane turns around and

1:14:23

goes directly to Penang-Langkawi

1:14:25

International Airport, which is the closest airport

1:14:27

that can accommodate a 777 in an emergency.

1:14:31

Keep in mind that Malaysia is not a first world country

1:14:34

and it's also like two in the morning

1:14:36

or something like that by the time this plane gets across

1:14:39

Malaysia and gets Penang. So the airport's

1:14:41

not even technically open for commercial traffic at that

1:14:43

point. It could probably take it in an emergency situation,

1:14:46

but is it safe to land if you can't

1:14:48

communicate or whatever? Not entirely

1:14:50

sure. Whatever reason, the plane

1:14:52

doesn't land there. The co-pilot's

1:14:55

cell phone pings down in

1:14:57

the base down below when they get over the

1:15:00

base there, which leads us to think that they were trying

1:15:02

to make contact in some way. We don't have proof,

1:15:04

but that seems to be what it indicates. And this is one of

1:15:06

the last pieces of direct

1:15:09

evidence that we have for intent on board this

1:15:11

plane. After it

1:15:13

gets over Penang, it flies out to the Straits of Malacca.

1:15:16

And the last radar location is at 1822. So around 1800, it's

1:15:18

at Penang. 1822, it's off in the water now, and

1:15:23

it just gets out of range of Malaysian

1:15:26

radar.

1:15:27

At 1825, the computer systems come

1:15:29

back on in

1:15:31

the plane, which is pretty odd to me.

1:15:33

It's like, oh, you just got out of radar range and now

1:15:35

the computer systems turn back on. And

1:15:38

this is the part where it's pretty close now to

1:15:40

the Nicobar Islands. We got another 15 minutes

1:15:43

and now we're going to be at the Nicobar Islands location.

1:15:46

So we believe that it flew from the last radar location

1:15:48

to our Nicobar Islands location. This is consistent

1:15:50

with the official flight path is as well. And

1:15:53

this is where our witness comes into play. I had

1:15:55

no idea that there would be a witness that is this

1:15:58

credible, that literally. saw

1:16:00

the plane fly right over her. She

1:16:02

was in the spot going from India

1:16:06

to Phuket in Thailand. She

1:16:08

was right in the Strait of Malacca and

1:16:10

she sees a uniform orange glowing plane

1:16:13

coming from the east right where our plane will

1:16:15

be coming, flies up and north around

1:16:17

her doing a counter clockwise rotation just

1:16:19

like we see in the videos. She

1:16:21

says that it seems so low that she

1:16:23

was afraid it was going to crash into the water. Just

1:16:26

like remember we're looking at the videos that the plane is low,

1:16:28

it's descending and it's turning. She

1:16:30

also says that she sees black smoke coming from the

1:16:33

plane. Keep in mind it's pitch

1:16:35

black. The moon is set, the

1:16:37

sun is set. There is no light whatsoever.

1:16:40

So she's seeing a uniform orange glowing

1:16:42

plane. She doesn't mention anything about orbs just

1:16:45

seeing this plane which is interesting

1:16:47

because our cameras are filming in infrared.

1:16:50

So we've actually wondered for several weeks

1:16:53

are these orbs even visible to the

1:16:55

human eye, the naked human eye. I'm

1:16:58

fairly confident now that they are not. But

1:17:01

that is something that we want to solidify

1:17:03

and find out because that can have huge

1:17:05

implications on UFOology and

1:17:08

any other supernatural stuff. That

1:17:11

could lend credence to the idea of ghosts and whatever

1:17:14

other stuff as well. So

1:17:16

the witness sees the plane. She

1:17:18

gets freaked out by what she sees. She's

1:17:20

afraid to report it. Not sure if she even should.

1:17:23

She's not even sure if she saw what she saw

1:17:26

which is so odd to me because if I see MH370

1:17:30

and I see it fly to the South Indian Ocean, I'm

1:17:32

about to be famous. I'm always super excited.

1:17:34

I'm going to help solve this mystery. But

1:17:37

her reaction was more of how do I

1:17:39

explain what I saw and how

1:17:41

do I explain it with these

1:17:44

experts who are telling me that it went to the

1:17:46

South Indian Ocean. So

1:17:49

I think that there's more to the story with our witness.

1:17:52

And I want to report something for the first time here

1:17:54

on your show which is that we have made contact

1:17:56

with the witness.

1:17:58

Kate T. has a great

1:17:59

agreed to work with MH370x

1:18:02

to help solve the mystery for us. And this is extremely

1:18:05

exciting news for us, because she

1:18:07

may be a firsthand witness that saw

1:18:09

this plane disappear out of thin air. And

1:18:12

if so, she can corroborate the events of

1:18:14

the video and all of our facts to date. And

1:18:18

I've been privy to see some of the communication

1:18:20

between you and her. And I

1:18:23

don't know if you said it like this, but it was

1:18:25

generally, you were like, I know

1:18:27

you saw the plane disappear. I'm

1:18:30

talking. And so, but I think it's

1:18:32

good the way you addressed her, I think is good

1:18:34

because you ripped the band-aid off. Listen,

1:18:37

I don't want you feeling you're crazy. We're investigating

1:18:39

this. You don't

1:18:41

even have to be like, you don't even have to hear

1:18:44

us say we'll believe you, because you've seen

1:18:46

the video, you know the angle we're going with.

1:18:48

And there's a reason why you're here. She didn't

1:18:51

have to reveal herself to you. There's

1:18:53

no need for it, especially if she's

1:18:55

been in hiding and what

1:18:57

you're doing is so far

1:19:00

off of what she saw that she would

1:19:02

never come out and talk to you about it because

1:19:04

you're wrong. It's not what she saw. The

1:19:07

fact is she took it on her own volition to

1:19:09

respond to you and make contact

1:19:11

and exchange emails. So to

1:19:14

me, without her, because this

1:19:16

just happened this morning and you

1:19:18

were already here in Tennessee. And

1:19:21

to me, it says that you're on

1:19:23

the right track. She's concurring

1:19:25

that just by communicating

1:19:28

with you. And I really

1:19:30

hope she communicates

1:19:33

in detail with you what she

1:19:35

saw, because as far

1:19:38

as we know, she's what, the only human witness

1:19:40

to the event. Absolutely. And she can

1:19:42

probably corroborate a lot of the stuff we've seen, maybe even

1:19:44

explain some of the stuff that we're not sure about. And

1:19:48

I think that that will go extremely long way and it's

1:19:50

going to be very compelling. Now, if she told

1:19:52

somebody beforehand, before this,

1:19:54

that she saw the plane disappear, then we have

1:19:56

absolute proof. And if she

1:19:58

was just too afraid, to do so, well there's still

1:20:01

extremely credible evidence. But

1:20:04

either way, this is gonna add a lot of

1:20:06

weight and a lot of credibility to the investigation.

1:20:09

How do you know she is the

1:20:11

one you've been looking for? She's a witness

1:20:13

to the event. How can you confirm that she's

1:20:15

not just somebody who saw the Reddit thread, saw

1:20:17

Twitter, and is like, ha, let me play games with

1:20:19

these guys because I'm bored. No, I'm 100% sure. We

1:20:23

found her on Twitter right away. She

1:20:25

has followed me as of today as well. That was kind

1:20:27

of the first indication that this is really

1:20:30

her. I had sent her a couple messages,

1:20:33

kind of like you said, respectfully, being

1:20:35

like, hey, don't let this blow

1:20:37

your mind when you see it here, but we are

1:20:40

investigating this and we want your input. And

1:20:43

then we also reached out to her on the side. We

1:20:45

found another contact information for her. So

1:20:48

yeah, we're 100% sure that we are

1:20:50

talking to the right person at this point. And

1:20:53

was her story well known? How did

1:20:55

you know to even look for her? That's

1:20:58

the crazy part. I had known there

1:21:00

was witnesses, at least six witnesses

1:21:02

of various degrees, and I found most of them

1:21:04

to not be credible. When we realized

1:21:06

that the Southern location in the South Indian Ocean

1:21:09

was incorrect, what we were able to do is we were

1:21:11

able to look at the satellite, the shift

1:21:13

in the satellite coordinates, and we were able to realize

1:21:15

that there's only one possible capability. The

1:21:18

plane has to be flying South into the East. And

1:21:20

what this means is that it cannot be the Southern location.

1:21:23

It just doesn't fit with the flight path and

1:21:25

it didn't fit with what we were seeing in the movement. If there

1:21:27

was a negative sign, this plane would have to

1:21:29

be going North into the East. Now,

1:21:32

what we see in both videos is the plane is turning

1:21:34

left. So if you are going North

1:21:37

and you turn left, you're going North West.

1:21:40

If you're going South and you turn left, you're going

1:21:42

South East. Since we know from the coordinates,

1:21:44

the plane is going in South, the video

1:21:47

is actually moving South into the East, regardless of what

1:21:49

we see, that's just from the coordinate shifts.

1:21:52

We know that this has to be the Northern location, the

1:21:54

Nicobar Islands, the plane is going South

1:21:56

into the East in our video. So

1:21:58

once we realize that, the whole investigation

1:22:01

changed. We realized this southeast Indian

1:22:03

Ocean where you could find no evidence for anything happening down

1:22:05

there was just bunk and

1:22:08

everything started to line up at this Nicobar Islands

1:22:10

location. I started looking for witnesses, found

1:22:12

KT right away, found that she had multiple blogs

1:22:15

where she talked about it and a forum. Everything

1:22:17

is well, well documented. And

1:22:20

so even without her involvement, the amount of evidence

1:22:22

that she was able to provide to corroborate the events is

1:22:25

significant. But with her involvement,

1:22:27

now we have a direct witness who might be willing to testify

1:22:29

and really just nail this thing down. It's

1:22:33

crazy. It's unbelievable. I never expected

1:22:35

any of this. When we found

1:22:37

the Northern location, I never expected we'd find that. We also

1:22:39

found an intercepted SOS call that was only

1:22:42

reported in Chinese Times and newspapers

1:22:45

that claims that the Chinese intercepted

1:22:47

a message from a Taiwan Intel

1:22:49

facility at 2.43am, which

1:22:53

if you convert that to Malaysian time is 1843,

1:22:55

which is right around our time we're talking about, that

1:22:58

claims to be from Malaysian Airlines flight 370 that

1:23:00

says they were having an emergency event, the

1:23:03

plane was disintegrating and they were going to attempt

1:23:05

an emergency landing in the water. And

1:23:07

I just go, wow. Even if that's

1:23:10

not somehow true, it happens to line up with

1:23:12

KT's witness testimony almost perfectly.

1:23:15

And it also adds another element, which

1:23:17

is, do we really think that there was

1:23:19

no communication from the pilot? That

1:23:22

part does have to be manual. Unless

1:23:25

they're, you know, that the jamming can somehow take out the communications,

1:23:28

but otherwise it just has to be the pilots just not communicating

1:23:31

with anybody. Or here's another option.

1:23:33

Maybe they were communicating, but it's just simply

1:23:35

been censored. They were communicating with the US

1:23:37

government. It's considered classified intelligence,

1:23:40

and therefore it was never leaked. So

1:23:43

I think that's a plausible possibility

1:23:45

as well.

1:23:46

Yeah.

1:23:47

I wonder, I'm just sitting

1:23:50

here wondering what the purpose

1:23:52

of all this was. I mean,

1:23:54

this is not just a minor

1:23:57

event. I mean, there were, how

1:23:59

many people were on this flight? 239 or something around

1:24:02

there, 229. Okay. So let's just say 229. A

1:24:07

lot of people. 229 individuals that

1:24:09

go missing. So like,

1:24:13

this is not a small

1:24:15

event. This is something that

1:24:17

impacts hundreds of people directly

1:24:21

that you know are going to be talking about it.

1:24:23

So was this something that was accidentally

1:24:25

done? Was it done on purpose? There's

1:24:28

just so many questions in my mind. Like if

1:24:31

we want to say that this was done terrestrial,

1:24:34

you know, like you can go down the ET

1:24:36

route where you know it was out of our control and we're

1:24:39

just trying to cover it up because we don't tell people that aliens exist.

1:24:41

But if like we're going down the terrestrial

1:24:44

route of you know, this is technology

1:24:46

that is secret technology. Why? Why

1:24:48

did this happen?

1:24:50

And it's just, it's mind boggling

1:24:52

to me. Yeah, I think the big question that we talk about

1:24:55

a lot of my spaces is if you have

1:24:57

this type of technology, why are you doing this?

1:24:59

Right? Isn't there an easier way? It doesn't have as much risk,

1:25:01

right? But maybe that comes back to the government

1:25:03

side of it too. Government does a lot of stupid stuff, right?

1:25:06

That doesn't really well thought out. So

1:25:08

it's like, you know, in their minds, they were thinking, hey,

1:25:10

we're going to record this with two things, two

1:25:12

cameras for intelligence purposes. And

1:25:15

they were short sighted enough to think that nobody would

1:25:17

ever leak this because man, if you're

1:25:19

some 20 something person who's been lied

1:25:21

to your whole life, right? And you believe everything the media

1:25:23

tells you, and then you see this, and

1:25:26

you know that this is going to change the world. I could

1:25:28

see that being motivation enough to think that I'm going to go ahead

1:25:30

and leak this and change the world. Kind of like I'm

1:25:32

doing right now, making it popular, right?

1:25:35

You know, I can also say that, you know, the

1:25:38

regimented training, I

1:25:40

guess, that you go through in the

1:25:42

military, you

1:25:44

can call brainwashing, you know, like, if

1:25:47

you're a soldier, you go through

1:25:49

boot camp, you go through all this training where maybe

1:25:52

the government feels so strong and comfortable

1:25:55

and that their training

1:25:58

takes hold in people that they don't really worry about. a

1:26:00

whole lot about somebody being

1:26:02

a dissident, you know? And if you're somebody

1:26:04

who's, say, 20 years old, you're two

1:26:06

years in the military, and you've

1:26:09

just been disenfranchised because everything you thought

1:26:11

you believed in is just out the window, and

1:26:14

you're just keeping it quiet, and all of a sudden,

1:26:16

here's your opportunity to be like, you

1:26:18

know what, this is my big middle finger to the people

1:26:20

who lied to me my whole life. I mean, to me,

1:26:22

that's the most plausible scenario for everything.

1:26:25

And I think you actually open up to another idea, which is that there's

1:26:27

a lot of people that know about this that are just keeping

1:26:29

it quiet somehow because of perhaps that military

1:26:32

oath, right? And maybe in their minds, they rationalize

1:26:34

that, oh, I'm one of the elite few that knows the truth,

1:26:37

right? And nobody else is gonna get to know that

1:26:39

truth versus other people would say, I

1:26:41

don't wanna be the only one who knows this, humanity should know

1:26:43

this information. And that's kind

1:26:45

of what my view is. And I might even

1:26:47

let this go because looking at this, man, the implications

1:26:50

of this are intense, right? But

1:26:52

I won't because what we're looking at here is MH370, and

1:26:56

that needs to be accounted for. So

1:26:59

if they hadn't had all the orbs and stuff, I think that nobody

1:27:01

would have any problem with this video if there was no orbs and

1:27:04

vortex, right? Everyone would have no problem

1:27:06

with any of these videos, no one would be saying anything about how they're

1:27:08

fake, right? That's the part that

1:27:10

throws people off, that people have

1:27:12

a hard time believing because it comes with a

1:27:14

lot of excess baggage. And we just talk about

1:27:16

what that baggage is, is that we've

1:27:19

been beginning to lie to by people that we trust,

1:27:21

media people that we trust, our entire lives

1:27:24

about topics that they wanna influence us on,

1:27:26

whether it be Malaysian Airlines 370 or

1:27:29

any other topic that they find that

1:27:31

they wanna control people on, right? And

1:27:33

I think that's where, we're

1:27:35

gonna break down some of those myths here in

1:27:38

addition to the debris one that we already broke down.

1:27:40

We'll also break down the pilot suicide myth here, and

1:27:42

you'll begin to see how easy it

1:27:45

is for the media to lie with partial

1:27:47

truths. And what

1:27:49

I would tell people with respect to these videos

1:27:51

is we know these videos are true now. We

1:27:53

have enough evidence for it. My

1:27:56

game plan is let's watch and see who lies about

1:27:58

them. Let's watch and see what... they say.

1:28:01

Let's sit in waiting and just let

1:28:03

them say whatever they want to say about it and

1:28:05

then we will release our trap and see

1:28:08

how it all plays out. Yeah.

1:28:11

Because this could be our chance to break down that whole disinformation campaign.

1:28:13

Absolutely. I mean, you have all the cards,

1:28:16

you have all the information. Before

1:28:19

you go into that line

1:28:21

of thinking as you were talking about breaking down

1:28:23

the myths and stuff, I do want to ask you this because

1:28:26

it keeps going in my head and I forget again. Do

1:28:29

we know, was there anybody important

1:28:31

on that plane that might

1:28:34

be such an emergency situation

1:28:36

as like, alright, pull out the secret

1:28:39

weapon. We need to get this plane disappeared because

1:28:41

this person on this plane is going here to do something that

1:28:43

we just can't let happen. Yeah.

1:28:46

I think there's two kind of conspiracy theories

1:28:48

along that line. One is the patents.

1:28:52

There's a nano tech patent, I believe

1:28:54

that four of the five holders were

1:28:56

on the plane and then it's going to revert to the, I

1:28:58

think it ends up reverting to like free scale itself,

1:29:01

I can't remember. And then that ends up being owned

1:29:03

by the Rothschild. So there's one idea

1:29:05

there that it could be about money and control

1:29:07

of the company, which I actually get a little

1:29:10

bit more credence because yesterday I was on a podcast

1:29:12

talking to somebody who worked at the company when this happened,

1:29:15

at FreeScale semiconductors.

1:29:17

And he said it was a big deal about how all

1:29:19

these top guys disappeared

1:29:21

and they ended up selling the company right after that too,

1:29:24

which is pretty odd. But the bigger thing

1:29:26

is those people that disappeared. There was 20 semiconductor

1:29:29

scientists that were from that FreeScale

1:29:31

semiconductor company that were on board this plane.

1:29:34

And if you think about what we're seeing

1:29:36

in totality here and what the motive

1:29:38

for this might be, one

1:29:40

of the only possible motives, because I don't think

1:29:42

that money is a big enough motive for this type

1:29:45

of risk is intellectual property. So

1:29:48

what if now that we know about LK99 and that

1:29:51

we're on the precipice of superconductivity discovery

1:29:53

now, what if it had already been discovered more

1:29:56

than 10 years ago? And what if what we're seeing

1:29:58

here is a shadow war between

1:30:00

US and China for control of the

1:30:02

very technology that we see in use in the videos.

1:30:06

And the reason why that's so compelling is that whoever controls

1:30:08

this type of technology simply controls the entire

1:30:11

world and has military supremacy over the world. One

1:30:14

funny example that I like to give that somebody

1:30:16

on a space mentioned is warp nukes. So

1:30:18

just take every other technology out. Just what we

1:30:21

see is teleportation of warps. If

1:30:23

you could warp a nuke onto somebody, you

1:30:25

have absolute control over them entirely,

1:30:28

right? And

1:30:30

so we don't even need any more advanced technology. Just being able

1:30:32

to warp something already gives you full control,

1:30:35

right? But to me, I think that's the thing.

1:30:37

And really then the question is how far advanced

1:30:40

is the military beyond the public's

1:30:42

knowledge? I think a lot of people argue they're like

1:30:44

a generation ahead. Yeah. And if

1:30:46

that's true, then this makes a lot of sense

1:30:48

that this could be actually our technology.

1:30:51

I was thinking this is thousands of years more advanced.

1:30:54

But the more I dug into it, the more I grounded

1:30:56

it in the science. I don't think it's thousands

1:30:58

of years more advanced anymore. Now, I think it's just decades

1:31:01

more advanced.

1:31:03

I always bring this up when this kind of stuff comes up on

1:31:05

the show. This was years ago

1:31:07

when I was still a truck driver. I did a delivery

1:31:09

to a casket place. And the guy who owned

1:31:12

it was an engineer in our

1:31:14

military back in the sixties. And he said

1:31:16

the envy that we have today that

1:31:18

we're using, he said they were developing

1:31:20

that in the sixties. And so it's just that example

1:31:22

of, we have always

1:31:25

been the last ones to know about the

1:31:27

technology, the tablets. There's

1:31:30

another guy that I'm working on getting on the show who

1:31:33

has seen human and

1:31:35

weapons smuggling involving

1:31:37

UFOs. He's a former

1:31:39

military. And it's just

1:31:41

really... There's a lot of tech out there that they're hiding,

1:31:44

right? And they're using it. There's tons. And

1:31:46

he said that when this happened, the people

1:31:48

he witnessed doing this, they

1:31:52

were using technology, the tablets and stuff that

1:31:54

were not in existence yet. And so it just

1:31:58

makes sense that they're going to have this... best

1:32:00

of the best always. So yeah,

1:32:02

I mean, it's not a stretch of my imagination at all. Yeah.

1:32:06

So let's talk real quick about the pilot

1:32:09

suicide myth. Because I think that's

1:32:11

one of the easier ones to break down, which is that

1:32:13

everybody stands up for Pilate Zahari.

1:32:15

His wife, the officials, everybody

1:32:18

he worked with as a pilot, he

1:32:20

had 18,000 hours and he was also

1:32:22

a trainer. Everybody he trained loved

1:32:24

him. There's no indication of suicidal

1:32:27

intent anywhere throughout the flight path. I

1:32:29

mean, if you're going to crash a plane, you're just going to crash a plane,

1:32:31

he would crash in the South China Sea right away. From

1:32:34

what we saw with UA 93

1:32:37

on 9-11, if someone was going to try

1:32:39

to take over the plane and people fight back, that plane

1:32:41

is going to crash pretty much immediately as well. He

1:32:45

had a huge custom simulator. He made

1:32:47

his own giant simulator. Dude loved

1:32:50

flying and loved video games, at least

1:32:52

flying simulator video games.

1:32:55

One of the things that we used against him was this route

1:32:57

that they claimed was similar to the

1:32:59

route that the South Indian Ocean. Well,

1:33:02

first of all, I don't think the South Indian Ocean thing even

1:33:04

happened. So that kind of throws that

1:33:06

part out. But even if it did, for example,

1:33:09

the route that they claimed similar actually looks

1:33:11

like it's a route MH 150 to Jeddah

1:33:14

that goes from Kuala Lumpur to the Northwest,

1:33:17

like over the Straits of Malacca. And then

1:33:19

theoretically what's happened is maybe he got bored halfway

1:33:21

and just decided I'm going to the South, the

1:33:24

middle of Antarctica or whatever, South Pole

1:33:26

or something like that. Not really sure exactly

1:33:29

what he decided there, but they really

1:33:31

reframe some of the FBI's

1:33:34

findings on his simulator data to make it seem

1:33:36

like this was some type of planned route. But when you dig into

1:33:38

it and look at it, it looks more of just like he

1:33:41

was already planning to fly that MH 150 route on February 4th, 2014. And

1:33:43

I believe I

1:33:46

read that that got switched so that he was flying

1:33:49

MH 370 instead. So there's

1:33:51

a very plausible reason for why that route might

1:33:53

be in there. What there isn't a very plausible

1:33:55

reason for is why he had Diego Garcia

1:33:58

in his sim.

1:33:59

That is an airport that's not open to commercial.

1:34:02

So maybe he just wanted to have some fun and land in a place

1:34:04

virtually that he wouldn't be able to land in real life.

1:34:07

But given the situation that we're

1:34:09

going to talk about in a little bit, it's a little odd that he had

1:34:11

that in his simulator, especially considering

1:34:13

that is the number one suspected location

1:34:15

in an espionage scenario for where this plane went.

1:34:20

In addition to that, I already

1:34:23

mentioned that it's impossible to disconnect all four

1:34:25

electronic generators and APU simultaneously

1:34:27

within 64 seconds, which is all the timeframe

1:34:30

between that last communication and when the plane

1:34:32

went dark. So the idea that this was one

1:34:34

person that pulled this off and made the plane go dark just

1:34:36

impossible. Now, maybe the pilot was involved.

1:34:39

I don't want to vilify him that way, but it couldn't

1:34:41

have done it by himself. The

1:34:44

other things is the one of the things I find most ridiculous

1:34:46

is the idea that he flew over Penang to say

1:34:48

goodbye to his hometown. That is just

1:34:51

an absolute fiction. That's just total, total

1:34:53

nonsense. He's flying to Penang either

1:34:55

because it's an emergency situation or he's using

1:34:57

it as a waypoint so you can

1:35:00

figure out where you're going when you're in the sky. He's

1:35:02

definitely not flying over Penang in a suicide

1:35:04

scenario to say, oh, I miss my old

1:35:06

town while 200 passengers

1:35:09

are potentially trying to crash the door down behind

1:35:11

them.

1:35:12

But that's another piece

1:35:14

too.

1:35:15

This idea that, okay, well, he depressurized

1:35:18

the plane. First of all, I still haven't known he's explained

1:35:20

to me how the pilot can depressurize the plane. And

1:35:23

even if they did, I talked to some pilots, it would be a very

1:35:25

slow process. It's not going to just knock

1:35:27

everybody out instantaneously. The oxygen

1:35:30

is not going to stop. In fact, the masks are going to drop down.

1:35:32

Now, I don't know if those masks actually work. I hope to never have

1:35:34

to find out, but let's just presume that they

1:35:37

do and those masks work. If they

1:35:39

do, there's no way this pilot is going to be able to keep control

1:35:41

of the plane with 200 passengers coming

1:35:43

to knock it down. If it's me on board that plane, I'm getting

1:35:45

that door down pretty damn quick no matter how

1:35:47

strong they think it is.

1:35:51

And then any emergency scenario that might happen,

1:35:53

like what happened at 1721, if there's

1:35:56

a fire depressurization,

1:35:58

this plane is not lasting.

1:35:59

seen seven hours to fly through the South

1:36:02

Indian Ocean.

1:36:03

So it really eliminates this idea

1:36:05

that this plane was on some joyride

1:36:08

where the pilot had knocked everybody out and decided, I'm just

1:36:10

gonna fly this till it runs out of gas and

1:36:12

then slowly land it somewhere where it leaves no

1:36:14

debris. There's just no evidence for it whatsoever.

1:36:18

So given all of that and probably

1:36:20

other stuff that I haven't even reported on here, it

1:36:22

makes essentially no sense that the pilot

1:36:24

would have suicided this plane in any way.

1:36:27

And people want to equate him to some Islamic terrorists.

1:36:29

He was not. That's just racism, frankly.

1:36:31

And I think that one of the

1:36:33

big things too is that when we think about hijacking

1:36:35

scenarios, especially Americans, we always think about 9-11,

1:36:38

right? And we think that it's people with box

1:36:40

cutters and taking over a plane. But we

1:36:42

never really think about what would an espionage

1:36:45

hijacking situation look like. One that's really

1:36:47

planned out, right? And that's where I

1:36:49

think if you think about that, the

1:36:51

MH370 scenario starts to make a lot more sense.

1:36:54

Yeah, I mean, I've never really heard the

1:36:57

idea that the pilot was on

1:36:59

a suicide mission. But

1:37:02

judging by what you shared here, it doesn't seem

1:37:04

like that would be the case. A couple other pieces

1:37:07

that I didn't really mention about the debris. I think

1:37:09

I addressed some of the main points of the flapper on not

1:37:11

having that unique serial number, but there was actually a

1:37:14

plane that's a Mark 9M MRK

1:37:16

that was scrapped in 2013 bought by G.A. Telesis.

1:37:20

Scrapped like 20 years before it should have been

1:37:22

scrapped. There's an exact copy of

1:37:24

9M MRO, which is flight MH370. So

1:37:26

there is definitely the capability

1:37:29

where parts from a different identical plane

1:37:31

were put into the water to match

1:37:34

our plane. I'm not saying that's necessarily

1:37:36

what happened, just saying that it certainly is

1:37:39

possible. As I said, the tiny

1:37:41

amount of debris that we have found isn't inconsistent

1:37:43

with our events. And then if we do get the teleportation

1:37:46

being a thing, then the debris isn't

1:37:48

a problem at all anymore with respect to that. Now

1:37:51

I wanted to talk about some other pertinent information.

1:37:54

I think I may have talked a little

1:37:56

bit about this, but there were two fake passengers that were

1:37:58

on board the plane

1:37:59

that were...

1:37:59

Iranian nationals that were using fake

1:38:02

passports stolen passports that

1:38:04

they had changed their appearance. They were traveling

1:38:06

together It spent what

1:38:08

seems to be tens of thousands of dollars for the passports

1:38:10

and the tickets to

1:38:12

fly from mullet from Kuala

1:38:15

Lumpur to Beijing The

1:38:17

story behind these guys is they were supposedly

1:38:20

refugees that were trying to get to Amsterdam

1:38:23

Now this story doesn't make a lot of sense to me because you're

1:38:25

in Kuala Lumpur and there's a direct flight to Amsterdam

1:38:28

from Kuala Lumpur and you're using a fake

1:38:30

passport where you've changed your identity and

1:38:32

you have to go through customs and security and every

1:38:34

single Time you do you have chance of getting caught. Why

1:38:37

are you flying to Beijing to another

1:38:39

country? Should I get to Amsterdam? Makes

1:38:42

no sense whatsoever. I don't believe that it could even

1:38:44

possibly be the cheapest route, which is like one

1:38:47

idea I've heard floated out there

1:38:50

To me in any hijacking scenario These

1:38:52

people should have been the number one suspects

1:38:54

and not been dismissed like they were within like two

1:38:56

days There was actually an article

1:38:59

where you can find it where the real person with

1:39:01

their real passport was there with you

1:39:03

know On TV with the news showing his

1:39:06

password going I wasn't on that plane that

1:39:08

prove that there these people were really on the plane with his

1:39:10

fake passport There was also a third

1:39:12

person who bypassed security in a green

1:39:14

jacket who theoretically could have been

1:39:16

on the plane as well But there's no confirmation or

1:39:19

proof of that Keep in mind

1:39:21

this plane is mostly filled with Chinese

1:39:23

nationals probably like 70% of the people

1:39:25

are Chinese And

1:39:27

not just Chinese, but Chinese nationals About 20%

1:39:31

of them are Malaysian about 11 were Indonesian

1:39:34

And then there was a few Australians that were

1:39:36

probably of Chinese descent as well as many Australians

1:39:38

are and then in terms of Western People

1:39:41

just a handful more than likely So

1:39:44

if in a future scenario you have to you

1:39:46

know quiet a bunch of people out You really

1:39:48

only have to deal with a couple nations and then a few individuals

1:39:51

that are in West that could be a risk to you In Western

1:39:53

media and just want to point that out I

1:39:57

already talked about the Trump leak as

1:39:59

well, but I I think that's a really important one to look

1:40:01

at. And I would strongly suggest that people go look at

1:40:03

that leak because you can see a lot of

1:40:05

the similarities to our satellite footage.

1:40:08

The big difference is in the Trump leak, there's

1:40:11

a huge shadow. So you can like use basically

1:40:14

it's a sundial essentially

1:40:16

and you can figure out exactly the time of the day based

1:40:18

on that and where it was, which made

1:40:20

it very easy for the people who were deducing that to figure

1:40:23

out the satellite that made it. For us, we have no shadows

1:40:25

in our videos. We don't even have any identifiable landmarks.

1:40:28

So we had to reverse kind of figure

1:40:31

out what the situation was in a much more

1:40:33

difficult way than they did for that satellite.

1:40:38

Now, teleportation

1:40:40

real quick. So people may wonder why

1:40:43

is this teleportation? And before I talk about

1:40:45

that, I just wanna point out that there was actually a pre

1:40:47

debunk that's already out there that

1:40:50

says, why is this not teleportation

1:40:53

or whatever that happened to MH370? Which

1:40:55

is crazy to me, because I didn't know anybody who was

1:40:57

suggesting the plane had been teleported, not

1:41:00

even myself until a couple of weeks ago. And

1:41:02

then I saw that debunk even like when I was starting

1:41:04

this and I'm like, that is very odd. Like who's

1:41:07

even suggesting that? Now

1:41:09

I am suggesting it. And the reason is A,

1:41:12

the plane disappears from space time entirely as

1:41:14

we see. If this was some type of cloaking

1:41:16

technology, even if they were able to cloak

1:41:19

all the electromagnetic signatures, that

1:41:21

exhaust that we see behind the plane would still show

1:41:23

up. We would just see the exhaust moving forward,

1:41:26

which we don't. So it can't be some

1:41:28

type of advanced cloaking, spoofing,

1:41:30

thing like that. We thought through that. I

1:41:33

initially thought it was an annihilation event, de-atomization,

1:41:36

however you wanna call it, vaporization.

1:41:38

The problem with vaporization is there's no vapor left behind. If

1:41:41

people vape, you see the vape come out. So there's none of

1:41:43

that. It's just gone.

1:41:46

So the problem with it being

1:41:48

de-atomized is that E equals MC squared,

1:41:51

one of the most basic concepts from physics

1:41:53

and Einstein. And essentially what that means is

1:41:55

that every bit of matter has a ton of potential

1:41:58

energy within it, the speed of layer.

1:44:00

travel forward in time, as we've seen from

1:44:02

Interstellar and time dilation,

1:44:04

which is a real thing that has been really measured.

1:44:08

And the idea behind it is, if I were

1:44:10

to boil it down simply, the faster

1:44:12

that you travel closer to the speed of light, the

1:44:15

more everything slows down for you relative

1:44:17

to everything else around you. And that essentially

1:44:20

means that time slows down for you, but it's

1:44:22

going fast for everyone else. So

1:44:25

what that can cause is that you show up then in the

1:44:27

future, right? And I don't

1:44:29

know exactly how that equation works, but what

1:44:31

I guess is it's probably proportionate to the distance

1:44:33

that you travel. So if you're traveling

1:44:36

a very slow, like very minor distance,

1:44:38

then I'm guessing the time dilation effect is very

1:44:40

small. But if you're going across the universe,

1:44:42

then presumably you're going to show up 50,000 years

1:44:45

in the advance, in the future, whatever, right?

1:44:48

And everybody you would have ever known is gone. That's

1:44:52

how relativity seems to work in actuality.

1:44:55

So the plane could have shown up theoretically in

1:44:57

the future, and I think that's a really fun idea. I

1:44:59

don't necessarily think it's going to show up nine to 10

1:45:01

years in the future, but it could have shown up

1:45:03

like five minutes in the future, an

1:45:05

hour in the future. Those are the kind of scientific

1:45:08

concepts I would like to know a lot more about because I think

1:45:10

they could explain all of what we see.

1:45:12

Can you imagine though? I mean, like you

1:45:15

said, nine, 10 years, but can you imagine just play

1:45:18

the imagine game with me. You're

1:45:21

breaking this information, right? And

1:45:23

you're sharing this. Even

1:45:26

a year from now, six months from now, a few weeks

1:45:28

from now, all of a sudden the plane reappears

1:45:30

where it disappeared. And

1:45:33

they're like, yeah, we did a lot of this. Just

1:45:36

trust us. It was crazy. There's a

1:45:38

lot of stuff going on, but we came out over here. I mean, not

1:45:41

if it did reappear though, let's just say whether

1:45:43

it's five minutes or 20 years,

1:45:46

would it have to reappear

1:45:48

at the same place? That's the

1:45:50

hard part too. So we've been actually trying to figure that

1:45:52

out. You can see from the video, it's turning

1:45:55

and landing. So one of our first assumptions

1:45:57

is the orientation of the plane

1:45:59

matters.

1:46:00

Is that going to determine somehow the direction of travel?

1:46:03

It might not even go forward. It might go backwards

1:46:06

from that location too. Honestly, we are

1:46:08

just speculating. We have no idea. But

1:46:10

there has to be some way to determine

1:46:13

where it's going, when it's going, when it's going

1:46:15

to show up. Right now, it's

1:46:17

all just essentially speculative, which is fun. It's

1:46:19

fun to think about.

1:46:21

But yeah, with no way to know for sure. In

1:46:23

the video, after the plane disappears,

1:46:25

were the orbs gone as well? Yeah. The

1:46:28

orbs disappear as well. It's really stupid. On the

1:46:30

first podcast I mentioned, I said that

1:46:32

when you go through a door, does the doorway disappear? And

1:46:35

they thought, well, okay, yeah. Okay,

1:46:37

sure. You got me on that. But really, is that necessary?

1:46:40

If the orbs are somehow

1:46:42

acting as either inducing the portal or

1:46:45

potentially as a barrier, it would make

1:46:47

sense for them to disappear if it's

1:46:49

being teleportation. Actually, that's the thing I

1:46:51

wanted to talk about next, which is the science behind

1:46:53

this. I thought that

1:46:56

wormholes and teleportation were just a thing of science

1:46:58

fiction. And then I went and Googled it

1:47:00

and I found that there were actually a number of articles,

1:47:03

not articles, but scientific

1:47:06

papers talking about humanly traversable

1:47:08

wormholes. And that's why I wrote a piece

1:47:10

called Traversable Wormholes because all three

1:47:13

papers essentially said you don't

1:47:15

need exotic material to create a wormhole. We

1:47:17

always thought you would need antimatter, which

1:47:19

is something that we couldn't create and may not. We

1:47:21

believe that it's real, but we don't have it physically

1:47:23

available to us right now. So

1:47:26

the paper says you don't need that. Then

1:47:29

the paper says you can potentially hold the wormhole open

1:47:31

long enough for a human to be able to traverse through it

1:47:34

and the gravitational force that they feel would

1:47:36

not kill them, which is very interesting.

1:47:39

It might be strong, you might feel a jerk, but

1:47:41

it's not going to kill you, right? It's not going to smash you to bits.

1:47:44

The third paper says you might be able to create

1:47:46

a shell, a very thin shell, not necessarily

1:47:48

matter, but like an energy

1:47:50

shell or some type of shell, a round object

1:47:53

that you want to allow it to humanely

1:47:55

traverse through the wormhole. And

1:47:58

that's the part where I went, oh wow. Okay,