0:19

Whereas it is pleased Almighty

0:22

God to call to his mercy

0:25

our late Sovereign Lady Queen

0:27

Elizabeth II of blessed

0:30

and glorious memory by

0:32

whose decease the crown

0:34

of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

0:37

and Northern Ireland is solely

0:40

and rightfully come to

0:42

the Prince Charles Philip Arthur

0:45

George. We

0:47

therefore the Lord Spiritual

0:50

and Temporal of this realm and

0:52

members of the House of Commons together

0:55

with other members of her late Majesty's

0:57

Privy Council and representatives

1:00

of the realms and territories,

1:02

aldermen and citizens of London and

1:05

others do now hereby

1:08

with one voice and consent

1:10

of tongue and heart

1:13

publish and proclaim that

1:16

the Prince Charles Philip Arthur

1:18

George is now by

1:21

the death of our late Sovereign of happy

1:23

memory become our

1:25

only lawful and rightful

1:28

Liege Lord Charles III.

1:33

It's hard to be a human being living on

1:35

planet earth in May of 2023 and not be hearing about, reading

1:40

about, or listening to discussions about

1:42

the pending coronation of King Charles.

1:45

Yes, Charles's big day is dominating

1:47

news headlines at the moment and it seems that

1:49

the glitz and glamour of the upcoming coronation

1:51

are infecting people around the globe with

1:53

a case of royal fever. Well,

1:57

maybe not everyone.

1:59

Republic

2:03

states on their website, as we approach

2:05

Charles' coronation, the country

2:07

needs an honest, grown-up debate about

2:10

the monarchy. We need to stop and ask

2:12

ourselves, can't we just choose our

2:14

next head of state?

2:18

We struggle to heat our homes, we have

2:20

to pay for your parade. Thank

2:23

you for coming. The tax payer pays £100 million

2:25

for you for not war. New York

2:28

and Bennett, not working.

2:51

No, not everyone is happy about

2:53

King Charles stepping into his mother's shoes. Or

2:56

diamond-encrusted loafers, or gold-plated

2:59

clodhoppers, or whatever it is that

3:01

monarchs wear to prevent their poor, delicate

3:03

royal feat from touching the earth.

3:06

But while most of the public's attention is falling on

3:08

the obvious issues, the monarchy's

3:10

increasing irrelevance to the 21st century, the

3:13

colossal waste of tax payer resources that

3:15

go towards the upkeep of the world's richest

3:17

family in their multiple palaces,

3:19

the dark history of slavery and other colonial

3:22

abuses for which royals of the past are

3:24

responsible, few are aware

3:26

of just how dark the history of the royal

3:28

family is,

3:29

or just how twisted Charles' vision

3:32

for the future of the United Kingdom,

3:33

and indeed the world, really is. I'm

3:37

James Corbett of The Corbett Report, and today

3:39

we're going to look beyond the headlines and talking points

3:42

so that we can meet King Charles,

3:45

the Great Resetter.

3:59

Royal Watchers, and only know the

4:02

New King of England as that buffoon who spent his entire

4:04

life waiting for his mother to die, the

4:06

first sign of what Charles is really like

4:08

came in a viral video moment captured during

4:10

the typically pompous ceremony in which

4:12

he was proclaimed king.

4:15

There, in the manic, sausage-fingered,

4:18

tooth-gritted flailing of the New King, is

4:20

the perfect encapsulation of Charles Philip

4:23

Arthur George Windsor, aka Charles

4:25

III. His life

4:27

has been an endless series of carefully arranged

4:29

photo opportunities and ribbon-cutting ceremonies

4:32

that serve no actual function other

4:34

than to punctuate the dreary luxury

4:36

of his royal existence.

4:38

But it's in moments such as these where we

4:40

see through the veil of PR and propaganda

4:42

to the real Charles, a man

4:44

who treats his retinue of servants like mere objects,

4:47

only good for slaking his royal desires

4:50

and fulfilling his regal demands.

4:52

And demands there are. His

4:54

Royal Highness's daily demands begin with

4:57

the pressing of his royal shoelaces, and

4:59

the requirement that his royal bath plug

5:01

be placed in precisely the right position,

5:04

and the royal bathtub be exactly half

5:06

full of precisely tepid water. Charles's

5:09

valet must then squeeze precisely one inch

5:11

of toothpaste onto his royal toothbrush, while

5:14

the royal chefs prepare a series of boiled eggs,

5:16

which are numbered according to how long they were boiled,

5:19

so that if the prince felt that number five

5:21

was too runny, he could knock the top off

5:23

number six or seven.

5:24

In fact, wherever

5:26

Charles travels, he not only takes along a

5:28

large contingent of his 124-member

5:31

staff, including his butler, two

5:33

valets, a private secretary, a

5:35

typist, a chef, and a handful of bodyguards.

5:38

He also makes sure to take his own personal

5:41

food supply, consisting solely of

5:43

fresh organic ingredients grown

5:45

on his own organic farm. Yes,

5:48

King Charles is more than happy to put his John

5:50

Hancock on the Genetic Technology Precision

5:53

Breeding Act of 2023,

5:54

which,

5:56

as its supporters will be happy to explain,

5:58

removes barriers to research.

5:59

into new gene editing technology

6:02

by, as its supporters will never explain,

6:05

removing regulatory safeguards from whole

6:07

subclasses of genetically modified organisms

6:10

at the behest of, surprise surprise,

6:12

the GMO industry.

6:14

But don't expect Charles to put these gene-edited

6:17

Frankenfoods anywhere near his lips.

6:20

They're not fit for the royal gullet, don't you know?

6:23

But it's important to understand that this is much worse

6:26

than a spoiled brat being coddled because

6:28

he happens to wear a crown. Charles's

6:31

fit for thee, not for me mentality

6:33

is in fact a manifestation of a particularly

6:36

royal sickness, a steadfast

6:38

belief that he really is superior

6:41

to everyone else. Being

6:43

a royal, he has always considered himself

6:45

to be above the average man. The

6:48

blue blood in his veins is different

6:50

than ours, after all.

7:03

In a sense, the royals aren't wrong

7:05

when they assert that the blood that flows through their veins

7:07

is different than the blood that flows through us commoners

7:10

veins.

7:11

As many know, the royal families of Europe

7:13

do indeed suffer from a genetic blood disorder,

7:16

hemophilia, one of the many defects

7:18

that has resulted from centuries of inbreeding.

7:21

But strangely, they don't see their so-called

7:23

blue blood as a problem. Instead,

7:26

they hew to a twisted belief system, one

7:29

that holds that as a result of their special

7:31

blood, the royals actually deserve

7:34

to rule over their subjects.

7:36

In order to understand this royal worldview,

7:39

we have to go back to the beginning. No,

7:41

not the beginning of Queen Elizabeth's reign in 1952, not

7:43

to the beginning of

7:45

the English branch of the House of Windsor

7:48

to which she belonged, not even to the

7:50

beginning of the monarchical system in England.

7:53

No,

7:54

we have to go back to the beginning of monarchy itself.

7:57

You see, the ancient Egyptians worshipped

7:59

the

7:59

the pharaohs as progeny of the sun god

8:02

Ra. The Japanese were

8:04

told that their imperial family descended from

8:06

the sun goddess Amaterasu and

8:08

the sea god Ryujin. In

8:11

Europe, monarchs claimed that god himself

8:13

had directly granted them a divine right

8:15

to rule over their subjects, and

8:18

in China they called it the Mandate of Heaven. Yes,

8:21

the ancients were taught to believe that their emperors

8:24

were literal gods. The

8:26

European dynasties, meanwhile, flourished for

8:29

centuries under the mass

8:29

delusion that these families were specifically

8:32

selected by god to rule over

8:34

their people. Should it come as

8:36

any surprise that at some point the royals

8:39

started to believe their own propaganda?

8:42

But as these proto-Eugenicists soon

8:44

figured out, if their blood was too precious

8:47

to mingle with the commoners,

8:48

then that blood must be kept in the family.

8:51

And so began centuries of royal

8:53

inbreeding that resulted in the deformities,

8:56

abnormalities, and genetic weirdness that

8:58

today pervades the royal bloodlines, congenital

9:01

hemophilia being just one of the most well-known examples.

9:04

Perhaps the most notable example of intra-family

9:07

marriage leading to genetic ruin is

9:09

that of the Spanish Habsburgs, who after 500

9:12

years of ruling over vast swathes

9:14

of Europe,

9:15

managed to inbreed themselves out of

9:17

existence.

9:19

With this understanding of the proto-Eugenical

9:22

philosophy as our background, we

9:24

can begin to make sense of the millennium-long story

9:26

of the British monarchy. Alfred

9:29

the Great, yada yada yada, Henry

9:31

beheading wives and starting a church, blah

9:33

blah blah, the madness of King George,

9:36

etc etc, Mrs. John Brown,

9:38

and so on and so forth, all the way up

9:40

to Eddie, seven for those keeping

9:42

track at home, and the intrigues that kicked off

9:45

World War I and birthed the modern world.

9:48

You know, that story.

9:49

To finish making sense of that

9:51

history, we just need to add one other

9:53

element to the story. As it turns out,

9:56

the British royal family isn't very

9:58

British at all.

9:59

House of Windsor only became the House

10:02

of Windsor in 1917.

10:04

Before that, it was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.

10:07

But the British public were a bit fired up about the Huns

10:10

because of that whole, you know, World War I

10:12

thing, so Windsor it became. Noting

10:15

the true origins of the House of Windsor is not

10:17

just some cheap anti-Germanic slur, of course.

10:20

It points to something even more fundamental.

10:23

These royals, connected as we remember

10:25

through inbreeding, had much more in

10:27

common with their European brothers and sisters,

10:30

cousins and uncles, but I repeat myself,

10:32

than they did with the populations they were supposedly

10:35

ruling over.

10:36

With that historical background

10:38

in place, we can understand, for example,

10:41

the Windsor's well-documented fondness for the eugenics

10:43

promoting Nazis.

10:44

Where do you think the Nazis got their eugenical beliefs

10:47

from in the first place? Given

10:49

the royal pedigree of the eugenic worldview, it's

10:51

perhaps unsurprising to learn that the pseudoscience

10:53

of eugenics was pioneered by royal

10:55

medal recipient Francis Galton, himself

10:58

hailing from the celebrated and thoroughly

11:00

inbred Darwin-Galton line, which

11:02

boasted many esteemed fellows of the Royal

11:05

Society.

11:06

The overt ties between the Edwardian—eight,

11:10

for those keeping track at home, court—and Hitler's

11:12

eugenics-obsessed regime are well-documented.

11:15

The covert ties are even more intriguing.

11:19

Hmm, that

11:21

gives me an idea for a documentary.

11:23

But it isn't just the home movies showing the future

11:26

queen giving the Nazi salute. Or

11:28

Edward VIII hobnobbing with Hitler,

11:31

or King Charles's lifelong friendship

11:33

with unreformed SS officer and Bilderberg

11:36

co-founder Prince Bernard of the Netherlands,

11:38

or Prince Harry's predilection for Nazi cosplaying.

11:42

More to the heart of the matter is Prince Philip's

11:44

infamous desire to be reincarnated as

11:46

a particularly deadly virus in

11:49

order to contribute to the depopulation

11:51

of the planet. A remark that's

11:53

been checked by Snopes so you know it's

11:55

true.

11:57

What do you see as the biggest challenges in conservation?

12:01

the growing human population. Where

12:06

we are, there's nothing else.

12:08

You see, the royals' blue blood pomposity

12:11

wouldn't be so bad if they simply felt themselves

12:13

superior to the commoners in a what,

12:16

you groom your own stool kind of

12:18

way.

12:19

Sadly, it isn't mere snobbery

12:21

that motivates them,

12:22

and their great desire is not simply to be kept apart

12:24

from the commoners.

12:25

As it turns out, the royal family

12:28

doesn't just feel superior to their subjects. They

12:31

actively dislike them, and constantly

12:33

scheme to subjugate them, rob

12:35

them, impoverish them, and

12:38

mislead them.

12:50

There's something quaint about Redditors seemingly

12:53

discovering for the first time that, far

12:55

from some nice old man who waves to the crowds

12:57

and enjoys tea and crumpets in pretty English gardens,

13:00

King Charles is actually the heir to a fortune

13:03

amassed via the violent subjugation of much of

13:05

the world's population and the plundering

13:07

of their wealth and resources.

13:09

The fact that anyone could be shocked by this historical

13:12

reality speaks to the naivety of

13:14

the masses, who cannot imagine that

13:16

ruthless psychopaths conspire to amass

13:18

more wealth by inflicting suffering

13:20

on the world.

13:22

Just wait until these dear, trusting masses

13:24

learn about the British East India Company, and

13:26

the Opium Wars, and the Bengal Genocide,

13:29

and the Boer concentration camps, and the

13:31

Amritsar Massacre, etc. etc. etc.

13:35

But for a prime example of the profidity

13:37

with which the British monarchy has ruled for

13:39

centuries, and which gave rise to the perfidious

13:42

Albion moniker,

13:44

one need only look at the history of their specialty,

13:47

false flag operations.

13:49

Befitting

13:49

the governing monarchy of a nation that's been

13:52

known for its treachery for centuries, the

13:54

British royals' use of false flag events to gin

13:56

up public support for the persecution of their enemies

13:59

likewise goes back to the end.

13:59

centuries. For one prime example

14:02

of that, we will have to remember, remember

14:04

the 5th of November.

14:06

Outside of Britain, the Gunpowder Plot

14:09

is known only tangentially through cultural

14:11

artifacts, like the references to the plot

14:13

contained in V for Vendetta and the subsequent

14:15

adoption of the guy Fox Mask as the symbol

14:18

of Anonymous. Even in England,

14:20

most will only know the official version of the story,

14:22

the one compiled in the so-called King's

14:25

Book, written by King James I himself. According

14:28

to that official account, On

14:31

the evening of November 4, 1605, Guy

14:34

Fox was discovered with 36 barrels

14:36

of gunpowder

14:36

and a pile of wood and coal in the undercroft

14:39

beneath the House of Lords in Parliament, presumably

14:41

preparing to blow up the building. After

14:44

his apprehension, Fox was brought before

14:46

the King and, cracking under the interrogation,

14:48

eventually led the King's agents to the other conspirators

14:51

in the plot. As it turned

14:53

out, the whole harebrained scheme to blow

14:55

up Parliament as it convened on the 5th of November

14:58

had been hatched by the Jesuits and carried

15:00

out by a ragtag group of crazed provincial

15:02

English Catholics. King James

15:04

then took the sensible precaution of cracking down

15:06

on Catholics in England, thus ensuring

15:08

that Catholic treachery would never again

15:11

threaten the Kingdom.

15:13

Of course, this story, like so much of the history

15:15

written by the winners, is total hogwash.

15:18

Entire books could be written about the plot,

15:20

what we really know about it, and how the official

15:23

version was conjured into existence.

15:25

And at least one book has. It's

15:27

called The Gunpowder Plot, and it was

15:29

written by Hugh Ross Williamson and published

15:31

in 1952.

15:33

Those who are interested in the full story are highly

15:36

encouraged to read Williamson's account.

15:38

Although the full truth of the plot will likely never be

15:40

known,

15:41

buried as it is in a sea of forged documents,

15:43

tampered evidence, and official secrecy, we

15:46

can say with certainty that the official story was

15:48

constructed from torture testimony and forged

15:50

confessions, that the King's spies were

15:52

likely involved at every level of the plot,

15:55

that the band of patsies who were ultimately blamed

15:57

for the whole affair could not possibly have perpetrated

15:59

themselves and, most importantly,

16:02

that it provided King James with the perfect

16:04

excuse to crack down on Catholics in the

16:06

exact manner he desired.

16:09

In other words, Guy Fawkes was likely neither

16:11

the radical Catholic terrorist mastermind that

16:13

the Court of King James made him out to be,

16:15

nor the crusading anti-authoritarian

16:17

hero that V for Vendetta and Anonymous

16:19

pretend him to be, but rather a patsy,

16:22

a dupe or a mole who was used by the monarchy

16:25

as a convenient excuse to enact draconian

16:27

new laws clamping down on the King's opponents.

16:30

Go figure. But the British

16:32

monarchy's false flag hits don't stop there.

16:35

Viewers of my World War I conspiracy documentary

16:37

will already know the central role played by

16:39

King Edward VII and his German-hating

16:41

wife in forging the so-called Triple Entente

16:44

between Britain, France, and Russia

16:46

that paved the way for the Great War against

16:48

the Huns. You'll likely also

16:50

remember World War I conspirator Edward

16:52

Mandel House's own account of his rather

16:55

remarkable conversation with Edward VII's

16:57

successor, King George V, on the morning

16:59

of May 7, 1915.

17:01

As House recounts in his intimate

17:04

papers, the two fell to talking,

17:06

strangely enough, of the probability of Germany

17:08

sinking a transatlantic liner. Even

17:11

more coincidentally, House relates

17:14

that George specifically inquired what

17:16

would happen if the Huns should sink the Lusitania

17:18

with American passengers on board. After

17:21

that very day, the Lusitania was sunk,

17:24

and public opinion in America turned decidedly

17:26

against Germany,

17:28

preparing the way for U.S. entry into the war

17:30

on Britain's side.

17:32

Coincidence, surely. But

17:35

that's ancient history, some would argue. I mean,

17:37

yes, the British were responsible for backing,

17:40

supporting, and enabling the Saudi royal family

17:42

to begin their brutal rule of the Arabian Peninsula.

17:45

And as I documented in False Flags,

17:47

The Secret History of Al-Qaeda,

17:49

British support and collusion with the Muslim Brotherhood,

17:51

and with Wahhabi radicals, gave birth to the

17:54

modern era of false flag terrorism,

17:56

but what does that have to do with King Charles? Good

17:59

question. Maybe some intrepid reporter

18:01

will put the question of the million pound

18:04

donation he received from the Bin Laden family

18:06

to the new king.

18:08

Or maybe they could ask about Princess Diana's

18:10

remarkable clairvoyance in warning

18:12

of her own death at the hands of...

18:15

Name redacted.

18:18

In October 1996, in a letter

18:20

to her butler, Princess Diana expressed

18:23

the fear that she would die in a car crash, and

18:25

it wouldn't be an accident.

18:27

I am sitting here at my desk today in October,

18:30

longing for someone to hug me and encourage

18:32

me to keep strong and hold my head up

18:34

high. This particular

18:37

phase in my life is the most dangerous. X

18:40

is planning an accident in my car.

18:43

Break failure and serious

18:45

head injury.

18:48

Given the royal family's participation in

18:50

false flag events in the past, perhaps

18:53

it's no surprise that World Economic Forum chairman

18:55

Klaus Schwab invited his royal

18:57

highness, the Prince of Wales, to inaugurate

18:59

the Great Reset, the grand

19:02

global attempt to use the generated crisis

19:04

of the scammedemic to completely transform

19:06

the world and institute new paradigms

19:09

of governance and social control.

19:12

We have a golden

19:15

opportunity to seize something

19:17

good from this crisis. Its

19:19

unprecedented shockwaves may well make

19:22

people more receptive to big visions of

19:24

change. And global crises

19:27

like pandemics and

19:29

climate change know no borders and

19:31

highlight just how interdependent we

19:33

are as one people sharing one planet.

19:37

And as we move from rescue to recovery,

19:41

therefore we have a unique but rapidly

19:43

shrinking window of opportunity to learn

19:45

lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable

19:47

path.

19:49

It is an opportunity we have never had before

19:51

and may

19:52

never have again.

19:54

So we must use all the levers we have at our

19:56

disposal,

19:57

knowing that each and every one of us has a vital

19:59

role to play. play.

20:02

Everything I've tried to do and urge over

20:04

the past 50 years has been done with

20:06

our children and grandchildren in mind.

20:08

So I can only encourage

20:11

us all to think big and

20:13

act now.

20:17

Yes, it's no surprise to find the

20:19

royal mouthpiece popping up in the defining

20:21

false flag event of our times, advocating

20:23

a complete re-envisioning of our economy,

20:26

our way of life, and the social contract

20:28

between people and their government on the back

20:30

of the synthetic and constructed crisis.

20:34

But if only his involvement in false

20:36

flag events was the greatest of King

20:39

Charles' worries.

20:52

Oh, if only the new king's greatest

20:54

fault was simply to have been born into

20:56

a eugenic obsessed family.

20:58

If only he were the guiltless benefactor

21:00

of the cheating, swindling, extortion, theft

21:03

and plunder of his forebears.

21:04

If only his worst sin was

21:07

his ridiculous climate hypocrisy, or

21:09

his campaigning for Klaus Schwab's great reset,

21:11

or his attempt to mask cows.

21:14

If only he were a regular, run-of-the-mill

21:17

tyrant,

21:17

a psychopath who got off on torturing and killing

21:20

others.

21:21

Unfortunately for all of us,

21:23

it's much worse than that.

21:28

Reports of Savile's unusual behavior

21:30

in royal circles came about as details

21:33

emerged of a surprise rule for him as

21:35

a counselor for Prince Charles and Princess Diana

21:38

during their marital difficulties, and

21:41

a request from Prince Charles to help

21:43

with the image of Sarah Ferguson.

21:48

The public got a hint of what really goes on

21:50

behind the royal family's closed castle gates

21:53

when the Jimmy Savile scandal first came to light

21:55

a decade ago.

21:56

If you're able to cast your mind back to the innocent

21:59

days of 2012. you might recall

22:01

that, at the time, the existence of

22:03

high-level pedophile rings,

22:04

let alone high-level necrophilic pedophile

22:07

rings, was considered the stuff of total

22:09

conspiracy lunacy.

22:12

You might also recall that the royal family's relationship

22:14

to Savile was certainly problematic to

22:16

use the kids lingo. But given what

22:18

the public then knew, not necessarily more

22:21

problematic than the involvement of any of the other

22:23

people who had cozied up to the monstrous

22:25

pedophile during the course of his career. Sure,

22:28

the Queen had knighted Savile back in 1990, and

22:31

any number of photographs could tell you that he was

22:33

awfully chummy with Charles. Yet,

22:36

perhaps knighthood was to be expected considering

22:38

that he had seemingly dedicated much of his life

22:40

to charity, and had made many high-profile friends

22:43

along the way. In fact,

22:45

the first hard questions about who knew what

22:47

when about Savile were asked of the BBC,

22:51

which certainly did know about the allegations

22:53

many decades before the disgusting abuser

22:55

finally died.

22:58

One of the things which really interested me there was

23:01

your view about Jimmy Savile, and

23:03

your knowledge at the time that

23:06

it was going on. Yeah. Unfortunately,

23:09

I think all of us, what

23:12

we call the peoples, knew what was going

23:14

on

23:15

with the BBC. As bad as we now know

23:17

it was? Yeah, we knew, we

23:20

all knew.

23:23

But over the years the who could have

23:25

known routine used by the Windsor's defenders has become increasingly insupportable.

23:28

First, there was the revelation that Savile was

23:30

so close to the royal family that he was almost made Prince

23:32

Harry's godfather. Then

23:35

came the increasingly damning reports

23:37

on Savile's close personal friendship with Charles, culminating

23:43

in the release last year of letters proving

23:45

that the now King of England regularly sought

23:47

Savile's advice on sensitive political issues. It's not

23:49

just a couple, you know, it's

23:52

not just three or four, there's absolutely no, there's files of it. December

23:54

22nd 1989, I think it was the first time that Savile was in the

23:59

I wonder if you would ever be prepared to meet

24:02

my sister-in-law, the Duchess of York. I

24:05

can't help feeling that it would be extremely helpful

24:07

to her if you could. I feel she could

24:09

do with some of your straightforward common sense.

24:13

54 minutes after they'd taken off

24:15

without warning or distress signal, the

24:17

airliner started to disintegrate over

24:19

Lockerbie.

24:20

January 27, 1989, a month after the Lockerbie disaster. This

24:25

is Jimmy giving PR advice to the Royal Family

24:27

about how to react publicly.

24:31

I suppose that statistically something

24:34

like this has got to happen at some stage

24:36

on a time. It

24:39

only affects the community in a very small way.

24:44

Jimmy

24:44

advises the Queen should be informed

24:46

in advance of any proposed action by family

24:48

members. Jimmy

24:50

suggests they should have a coordinator who is

24:52

a special person with considerable experience

24:54

in such matters. There must be an incident room

24:56

with several independent phone lines, teletext,

24:59

etc. I mean, Jimmy is advising them how

25:01

to do it. What they should do, how they

25:03

should act, what they should say, should they say anything.

25:08

So, Charles says to Jimmy, I attach a copy of

25:10

my memo on disasters, which incorporates

25:12

your points and I showed to my father, and

25:15

he showed it to Her Majesty.

25:18

Jimmy had sent back to Charles a

25:19

five-part manual titled, guidelines

25:23

for members of the Royal Family and their staff. Jimmy

25:26

seems to be a kind of unofficial chief advisor to

25:28

the Prince of Wales.

25:32

And on top of all of that, there's Savile's own

25:34

uncomfortable admission that the knighthood had

25:36

let him off the hook for his past sins.

25:40

Unsurprisingly, the Royal Family has never

25:42

had to respond in any way to public outrage

25:45

about these reports.

25:46

No press tute who wants to keep his job is ever

25:48

going to dare press Charles on the issue, and

25:51

since Savile's crimes were only brought to light after his

25:53

death, the royals could always hide

25:55

behind the plausible deniability that they didn't

25:57

know what Sir Jimmy was up to.

25:59

They didn't even need to launch a formal process

26:02

to strip Savile of his knighthood,

26:03

because as it turns out, the honors automatically

26:06

expire when a person dies.

26:09

But as I say, the Savile scandal blew up in

26:11

the bygone era of a decade ago, when

26:13

the concept of political pedophile rings was still

26:15

in the realm of crazed conspiracy podcasts.

26:18

That all changed, of course, when the Epstein story

26:21

finally broke into the public consciousness in 2019. And

26:25

who just happened to be in the middle of that scandal?

26:29

That's right, Prince Andrew, the brother

26:31

of the current king, and the eighth in line

26:33

to the British throne. A man so

26:36

transparently lecherous that for decades

26:38

the UK tabloids have mockingly referred

26:40

to him as Randy Andy. A man

26:42

who literally had to invent a scientifically

26:44

unknown condition of being unable to

26:46

sweat to try to prove that the allegations

26:49

made against him by Epstein's victims

26:51

were false. I mean,

26:54

yes, there's the photo of him with his

26:56

arm around an underage girl, with

26:58

intelligence handler and convicted sex trafficker

27:00

Golan Maxwell hovering in the background, but

27:03

he doesn't sweat, so it's

27:05

all a lie.

27:07

No one is buying anything that comes

27:09

out of the mouth of his royal lowness,

27:11

Prince Andrew, Duke of Dork. After

27:14

all, you know someone must be a public relations

27:16

mess when even the royal family is compelled to

27:19

revoke his titles and royal patronages

27:21

to keep him out of the spotlight of public scrutiny.

27:24

As we've seen, the royals didn't even dole out that

27:26

form of retroactive punishment to Sir Jimmy.

27:30

As we all know, the public is no longer as

27:32

naive as they were in 2012, and

27:35

sadly, the nightmarish reality of protected

27:37

political pedophile rings is so accepted

27:40

as documented fact that it's no longer

27:42

mocked as conspiracy yarn.

27:44

And to the surprise of no one who is familiar

27:47

with the ignoble history of the royal family, the

27:49

House of Windsor has been implicated

27:51

in two of the highest profile pedophile

27:53

scandals in recent memory. Oh,

27:56

wait, make that three.

27:57

So here's

27:59

a return. question for you. Who

28:02

in the controlled mainstream media do you think will

28:04

ever dare bring up this topic again

28:06

now that Prince Charles is

28:08

officially King Charles?

28:22

Making this video feels like I'm telling

28:24

a child all in one sitting that Santa Claus

28:26

isn't real, the Easter Bunny's a hoax, and

28:28

the Tooth Fairy is just your mom.

28:30

But in reality it's worse than that.

28:32

It's telling fully grown adults that

28:35

Santa Claus isn't real, the Easter Bunny's a

28:37

hoax, and the Tooth Fairy is just their mom, and

28:39

being ridiculed as a fringe loony for doing so.

28:42

This isn't my first attempt at opening eyes on this

28:44

subject either.

28:45

Back in 2015 I made note of the absolute

28:48

madness that took hold of the global media surrounding

28:50

the announcement of the birth of Princess Charlotte writing,

28:53

So who's going so crazy for this royal baby?

28:56

Surely no one who's familiar with the real history

28:58

of the reign of the Windsor's, a reign marked

29:00

by the tens of millions of lives lost

29:02

in the First and Second World Wars in which the

29:05

royal family had a great degree of culpability, close

29:07

collaboration with the Banksters that have brought us to the

29:09

edge of the next Great Depression, the

29:12

formation of the Anglo-American special relationship

29:15

in common cause with like-minded eugenicists

29:17

in America like Teddy Roosevelt, the

29:19

cultivation and protection of pedophiles, of

29:21

whom Jimmy Savile was just the most noticeable

29:23

tip of a very large iceberg, the

29:26

slaying of Diana and any number of other

29:28

atrocities that should make

29:30

this family one of the most reviled in the Commonwealth,

29:33

they claim to rule over,

29:35

and yet the media still lauds their every action,

29:37

sings their praises as a venerable institution

29:40

at the core of British society, dutifully

29:42

acts as the royal PR mouthpiece in

29:45

reporting on their charity work, and marginalizes

29:47

any talk of doing away with the royal family altogether

29:50

as Republican rabble-rousing. Prusaschange.

29:54

And now once again we have one of these royal

29:56

events come along to remind us just how many

29:59

people are still firmly...

29:59

ensconced in Normuland.

30:02

After all the royals have put us through, it's

30:04

flabbergasting that they're still held in

30:06

such high regard.

30:07

It's incomprehensible that this royal eugenicist

30:10

is trotted out to be the face of the Great Reset

30:13

and to lecture the peasants about how they'll have to

30:15

become serfs on the neofutal plantation

30:17

for the sake of Mother Earth.

30:19

But even more disheartening is the fact that there

30:21

are still vast swathes of people who

30:24

believe that this family has been chosen by

30:26

God himself to rule over an entire

30:28

nation, or even a commonwealth.

30:31

Here's to the day when this type of video is completely

30:34

unnecessary, and the placing of a fancy

30:36

hat on some pompous British octogenarians

30:39

head is of no significance

30:41

to anyone whatsoever.

30:42

One can always dream.

31:20

Hello, this is James Corbett of the Corbett Report,

31:22

the writer, director, and presenter of

31:24

the mini documentary slash

31:26

podcast that you just watched or listened to

31:29

on Meet King Charles the Great Resetter.

31:32

I hope you enjoyed the presentation, and if this is your

31:34

first time encountering the Corbett Report,

31:36

I would like you to know that every

31:38

single word that you have just been listening

31:41

to is available in a transcript,

31:43

a hyperlinked transcript, with links back

31:45

to all of the source documents and videos

31:47

and everything else that was contained in

31:50

that documentary. Please go to CorbettReport.com

31:53

slash Charles. For the entire

31:55

hyperlinked transcript of that report, it is

31:57

completely 100%

31:59

freely available. It is a resource. I hope

32:02

you will make use of it. You will also be able

32:04

to find the audio and video downloads

32:06

of this podcast there. And I hope if you found

32:08

this presentation enlightening or useful,

32:11

I hope you will spread it to the Four Winds and get the

32:13

word out to others about this

32:15

information. And if this is your

32:17

first time encountering a corporate report, please check

32:19

out corporatereport.com and the thousands

32:22

and thousands and thousands of hours of

32:24

audio, visual and literary

32:26

material that is available there for your free

32:29

enjoyment. However, if this is not your

32:31

first time encountering the corporate report, I

32:33

would like you to know a couple of things. One, the

32:35

report that you were just watching was in fact

32:38

largely written and composed late

32:40

last year when Queen Elizabeth

32:43

finally expired. I did release

32:45

an editorial as part of my subscriber

32:48

newsletter called The Dark History of the

32:50

Royals. And a lot of this information

32:53

was contained almost word for word in that previous

32:55

report. So if you are a corporate

32:57

report subscriber, you will already know

33:00

some of this material and you'll already be familiar

33:02

with it. You will be months and months ahead of

33:04

the rest of the crowd. And there are a couple

33:07

of different methods of subscribing. First

33:09

of all, if you just want to be updated

33:12

by email for free, whenever

33:14

I post anything to the website or the editorials

33:17

that I write, you can sign up to my substack, corporatereport.substack.com.

33:22

If you want the full newsletter, which

33:24

includes recommended reading and viewing and a subscriber

33:27

discount for material from the New

33:29

World Next Week store, then you can

33:31

become a full paying member of the corporate report

33:33

website, help support this work and make it

33:35

possible in the future. You can do

33:37

that either through substack, corporatereport.substack.com

33:41

or you can subscribe via my website,

33:43

corporatereport.com slash members. And there are

33:45

many different ways

33:46

to become a paid member of the corporate report.

33:49

Your support is necessary to make media

33:51

like this possible. So I hope you will consider

33:53

signing up. If you are a regular corporate report

33:55

viewer, as I say, if this is your first time

33:58

seeing the corporate report, please just explore.

33:59

explorethearchivesatcorporatereport.com.

34:02

Thank you for your time and attention.