Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:05
Welcome to the Daily Dive Weekend Edition.
0:07
I'm Oscar Ramirez, and every week I explore
0:09
the top stories making waves in the news
0:12
and some that are just playing interesting. I'll
0:14
connect you with the journalists and the people who know the
0:16
story and bring you news without the noise
0:18
so you can make an informed decision. You
0:20
can catch a new episode of The Daily Dive every Monday
0:23
through Friday, and it's ready when you wake up.
0:26
On the weekend edition, I'll be bringing you some of the best
0:28
stories from the week. But
0:32
withholding of recess has long been a punishment
0:34
tactic for teachers when kids misbehavior
0:36
misassignments. Now there's a growing
0:38
momentum to pass laws that protect recess
0:41
time and prohibit schools from taking it away
0:43
to punish kids. Research has shown that
0:45
unstructured free time is important for child
0:47
development as it fosters good social communication
0:50
and coping skills. For more on
0:52
the fight to protect recess, will speak to Jackie
0:54
Mader, early education reporter at
0:56
the Hecken Jury Report. This is a really
0:59
common kindish men. It's been happening for
1:01
a long time in schools. When I was interviewing
1:03
experts, a lot of them said, oh, I
1:05
remember this happening when I was a kid. Um,
1:08
So yeah, we all we all have
1:10
those stories, we remember it happening. But
1:12
there's been a growing understanding of
1:14
both the importance of recess and the benefits
1:17
that come with that, and understanding of the
1:19
importance of free play, especially
1:21
for really young children, and at a time
1:23
when you know they're sitting in schools learning
1:26
more academics than ever before, and
1:29
so this time is really important. And
1:31
then at the same time, pediatricians and
1:33
child development experts they're starting
1:35
to say, this isn't the most appropriate
1:37
punishment. There are other punishments
1:39
that may be more effective, but going a route
1:41
that can be more punitive or even stigmatize
1:44
a child and doesn't really follow a natural
1:46
consequence, right like a child may not be able to
1:48
track. I didn't get my parents to sign this
1:50
form, and now I'm sitting out at recess. So
1:53
it's just not the most appropriate punishment, is
1:55
what child development experts are now saying,
1:57
even though it is common and it has
2:00
been common for a long time, you know, on
2:02
the face of it, and just kind of anecdotally, as I mentioned,
2:04
I do remember this happening to
2:06
me as a kid, right you mess up, it's like, well, now
2:08
you gotta sit down and don't move for
2:11
you know, the half an hour time whatever it is. You
2:13
know, as a kid, yeah, definitely, you feel like that's
2:15
my only free time, I only
2:17
outlet. It's so stressful here,
2:19
and yeah I messed up and whatnot, and but you
2:21
kind of look forward to those moments. So on the
2:23
face of it, yeah, I mean I tend to agree that it is
2:26
a great outlet for the kids and all. But on
2:28
the teacher side of things, I mean, how do they feel, what do
2:31
they do? What are some recommendations for
2:33
other things? When you know they're
2:35
at their limits a lot of times too, they don't know how
2:37
to discipline the kids, right,
2:39
That's a great question, and it's true.
2:42
I mean, teachers need ways to manage their
2:44
classrooms. They need to be able to enforce the rules.
2:46
Kids need to learn. You know, you do have to follow
2:48
rules in school. We're trying to keep everyone safe
2:51
and we're trying to learn. Part of the problem
2:53
that you know, teachers talk to me about
2:55
and schools and administrators
2:57
talked about is there often aren't in a works
3:00
for teachers. So if a teacher has a really challenging
3:03
behavior from a child in their classroom.
3:05
You know, a lot of schools don't have social workers
3:08
or counselors to come in and say, hey,
3:10
we're going to get to the root cause of this issue.
3:12
You know, for some kids, I've talked to plenty
3:14
of family two kids have disabilities, so
3:17
they need more support. And maybe, you
3:19
know, punishing a kid because of a the hater that
3:21
may be due to their disability isn't
3:24
the right way to go. These parents say
3:26
instead they need more support, maybe from
3:28
the special education team. But we know teachers
3:31
are lacking, so there's definitely
3:33
it's a hard time for teachers. And
3:35
I know a lot of teachers are leaving the field and
3:37
many say, I mean, surveys have come out to say classroom
3:40
management is one of the main reasons why teachers
3:42
leave. So you know, two things can be true.
3:44
Teachers need more support, kids
3:46
need more support, and we can,
3:48
you know, come up with some more effectives
3:51
and what experts say or developmentally appropriate
3:54
punishments if your questions some of those
3:56
punishments. Maybe, I mean, I talked to
3:58
a pediatrician who said, in
4:00
general, stigmatizing adults
4:02
is inappropriate. So we don't want to do that for kids,
4:05
especially really young kids, something
4:07
like explaining why we have these
4:09
rules so kids understand why it's important
4:11
offering positive reinforcement, So
4:13
maybe even offering an extra recess,
4:16
right, and kids can work towards earning that, so
4:18
they're not losing the one recess they have, they're
4:20
working towards a reward. And
4:23
I talked to us classroom management expert
4:25
at a teacher training program who said,
4:27
you know, they really teach their teachers to work
4:29
on this kind of positive reinforcement instead
4:31
of negative reinforcement system
4:34
with their students. So there are alternatives.
4:36
The problem is do teachers have the
4:39
time, you know, even the knowledge they may not know
4:41
some of these routes and the support
4:43
to roll out different methods in their classrooms.
4:45
And when you're managing dirty kids or whatever
4:47
the number may be, it's it gets really increasingly
4:50
difficult, you know. And we you know, just hearing
4:52
stories throughout the pandemic and coming
4:55
back to school, right, kids were
4:57
not as developed because they missed
4:59
that time in school and in that settings and heard
5:01
stories about fights breaking out and everything. So
5:04
it's totally tough on that. So so the movement
5:07
now, right, there's lawmakers in a number
5:09
of states, and you know obviously a lot of individual
5:11
school districts too that are looking to
5:14
either pass laws or policies that say, well,
5:16
no, we have to have this recess
5:18
time for kids. You know, you can't use that
5:20
taking it away as a punishment. Yeah,
5:23
that's correct. So right now they are
5:25
about twelve states that limit this
5:28
in some way. Most of them say you can't use
5:30
physical activity as a punishment or
5:32
withholding physical activity at the punishment,
5:34
so that includes recess. Very few
5:36
outrights say you cannot
5:39
take away recess of the punishment. Illinois is
5:41
one of those states that just passed this in one
5:44
and now four other states are considering
5:46
this. Oklahoma, Connecticut, Pennsylvania,
5:48
and Minnesota. They all have bills moving
5:51
through the legislatures right now that would
5:53
specifically ban withholding recess.
5:55
So there is kind of just growing understanding
5:57
of you know, like you mentioned, you know, children
6:00
are behind in their development, that includes social
6:02
development, and there's this a lot of you
6:04
know, mental health concerns for children. So
6:06
this growing understanding that hey, maybe recess
6:09
is something that needs to be protected to help
6:11
with all of this, and the best way to do that
6:13
maybe creating this law, so it's
6:15
not an option. I think a lot of people
6:17
would argue, you know, on the flip side, you also have to
6:19
support teachers with other options. But
6:22
it has been shown that states
6:24
that have laws to protect recess
6:27
time, those schools in those states are more
6:29
likely to have recess time. So there is
6:31
some evidence that laws are kind of
6:33
the way to go if you really want to
6:35
protect recess. Yeah, I mean, it's definitely
6:37
a difficult conversation. As you mentioned, it's
6:39
important for the kids, but the teachers need some
6:41
resources also there. So we'll continue
6:43
to monitor this conversation see what happens with
6:46
it. Jackie Mader, early education
6:48
reporter at the Heckener Report, Thank
6:50
you very much for joining us. Thank
6:52
you so much for having me work.
6:58
They're about eight different types of differ sical people
7:00
that you can deal with. They range anywhere from
7:02
insecure bosses to office snow at alls
7:04
and political operators only looking out for themselves.
7:07
But the worst people to work with are the passive aggressive
7:10
types because it's so common and
7:12
the hardest to pin down. For more on how
7:14
to handle difficult people, will speak to Amy
7:16
Gallo, contributing editor to the Harvard
7:18
Business Review, an author of getting along
7:20
how to work with anyone. One of the more ubiquitous
7:23
too, although all of these I think will sound familiar
7:25
to people. All right, So we've got the insecure
7:27
boss, right, the person they maybe micromanage,
7:30
They distrust you, They try to keep
7:32
you from interacting with other departments
7:34
or senior people. The pessimist.
7:37
I think that's pretty self explanatory. Someone who
7:39
keeps continually shoots down ideas, has
7:41
nothing positive to say. There's
7:43
a flavor of the pessimists called the victim,
7:45
which is you have to distinguish this, of course,
7:48
from someone who truly is a victim of mistreatment.
7:50
But this is someone who plays the victims, feels
7:52
like everyone is out to get them. There's been
7:54
no at all person who just thinks
7:57
that they have all the answers can
7:59
when the lives of meeting proclaim whatever
8:02
they want. There's the tormentor, someone
8:04
who you think will be a mentor, but they end
8:06
up actually being the opposite to undermine
8:08
you. It's familiar with that one. There's
8:11
the biased coworkers, someone who commits microaggressions
8:14
toward you or to others. And then
8:16
there's the political operator, the person
8:18
who's really focused on their
8:20
career, doesn't mind whose heads
8:22
to have to step on to get ahead. Now,
8:25
in some of these right, let's say
8:27
your insecure boss or something, they're
8:29
obviously ahead of you and everything.
8:32
That's an interesting one too. I mean, how do you deal with
8:34
positions of authority that might be hampering
8:37
you at work When the
8:39
difficult person is someone who has
8:41
control over how much money
8:43
you make, what opportunities you get,
8:46
right, it can be risky to try to address
8:48
the behavior, and you can also feel particularly
8:50
trapped. There's some interesting research
8:53
though that shows if you can shift
8:55
the balance of power a little bit, and that
8:57
obviously you're not necessarily going to become their
8:59
bass as right, That's not what they're referring to.
9:01
They're talking about gaining a specific
9:04
area of knowledge or skill
9:06
or developing a relationship inside the organization
9:09
that makes you more valuable to that
9:11
boss. You can then make clear to them
9:13
that they need you and therefore need to treat
9:15
you better. That's one skill or
9:18
one tactics that will that has
9:20
shown in research to work with someone who's
9:22
in power, you know, with the insecure
9:24
boss. Unfortunately, what a lot of the research
9:27
shows, and I don't love giving this advice
9:29
because it's the last thing anyone wants to do, but
9:32
is genuine flattery, right,
9:34
actually paying them well times sincere
9:36
compliments can help a suage
9:39
that ego, right, calm down their ego
9:41
a little bit and position you as an
9:43
ally. It's not, again, not my favorite
9:45
thing to do. I'm sure it's the last thing people
9:47
want to do when they're dealing with this insecure boss.
9:50
But it has been shown to work, and you've heard it all
9:52
over the place, right, sometimes you have to play the game
9:54
and that could be part of it, right, you know, giving
9:57
them a little bit of reassurance and then hopefully
9:59
they can lay off view. Okay, let's
10:01
focus a little bit more on the passive aggressive type.
10:03
As you mentioned, it's probably something that
10:05
most people will encounter. It's
10:08
tough to go through because you know, you
10:10
might be getting some of the work done, but they could
10:12
be talking behind your back and all
10:14
this other stuff. I mean that that's really could be a difficult
10:16
one. And one of the tips that you
10:18
have for that is, first off, don't
10:21
label them as passive aggressive. Don't kind of like
10:23
publicly identify them, because that can make
10:25
it go all ways of wrong. Um,
10:28
you know someone behaving passive aggressively
10:30
and you just say you're being passive aggressive.
10:33
It's just going to escalate things. Most of
10:35
us don't feel that we're
10:37
actually behaving passive aggressively. We might
10:39
think we're being petty, or maybe we're
10:41
thinking, no, I'm not being completely straightforward
10:43
or completely honest with them, but we would
10:46
never say, oh, I'm a passive aggressive person.
10:48
That very few people actually would say that.
10:50
It's like it's like telling an angry
10:52
person calm down. That's
10:55
just not gonna work. No one in the
10:57
history of arguments has ever calmed down by
10:59
being yelled at to gonda And in fact,
11:01
in my personal experience, what I see is telling
11:03
someone their passive aggressive actually makes
11:05
them more passive aggressive, because
11:08
you're escalating the fear. Right,
11:10
most of this behavior is based on fear
11:12
of failure or rejection, or
11:14
fear of conflict or not having
11:17
power, and by putting them
11:19
more on edge, you're intensifying
11:21
those fears, therefore intensifying
11:24
the likelihood that they will act out. And
11:26
instead you kind of suggest, you know, maybe we can call
11:29
attention to what's happening.
11:31
Um, you know, you had an example here. Hey, you said you
11:33
want to help on a project, Well, you're not helping out anymore.
11:36
Help identify what that issue could be and
11:38
then maybe you can work around it. That's
11:40
right, And I think being clear specifically
11:43
about about what behavior or actions
11:46
or lack of action are problematic
11:48
for you naming those now
11:51
you may not get a satisfying response
11:53
because the passive aggressive person is an expert
11:55
dodger. Right. So you might say you
11:57
didn't show up at the meeting even though you said
11:59
you would, and they say, oh, I couldn't
12:01
get to be there because of this, or it wasn't clear you actually
12:04
wanted me there. Right. But even by calling
12:06
out the behavior or action
12:09
or in action that you're you're dissatisfied
12:11
with, you put them on notice that you're
12:13
paying attention and they can't get away
12:15
with that. And it doesn't mean just because they don't
12:17
acknowledge it or apologize or
12:19
avow to be different, doesn't mean they
12:21
won't change. And I think that's something to keep
12:23
in mind. And it could be angry for a reason.
12:25
Right. So you also suggest, you know, find out what
12:28
it is that person cares about, you know, kind of
12:30
getting to the root of Hey, why are you being
12:32
like this? You know, there's this phrase called
12:34
hypothesis testing, right, is that you
12:37
might say, I noticed you didn't show but
12:39
the meeting, even though you really wanted to participate
12:41
in those projects. Could it be that, and
12:43
then you propose something right? Could it be that
12:45
you didn't get the invite? Could it be that you
12:48
weren't sure how you would contribute? And
12:50
just sort of put that out there and say
12:52
what do you think? Or just aft
12:54
and open ended questions. You know what's
12:56
going on. You might presume you
12:58
know why they're doing what's they're doing, but
13:01
you probably don't know. So that gives them room
13:03
to actually say, well, I
13:05
don't feel included. I feel like you only said
13:08
you wanted my help, but you don't really want myself,
13:10
right Like, it gives them a little space to actually
13:13
vent whatever fear or frustration
13:15
is contributing to their path of aggression.
13:18
Well, just a few tips now for handling passive
13:20
aggressive people. I'm sure there's much more in the book.
13:22
Amy Gallo, author of Getting Along,
13:25
How to Work with Anyone and contributing editor
13:27
at the Harvard Business Review, Thank you very much for joining
13:29
us, Thanks for having me after Earlier
13:36
this year, Amazon held an event where they debuted
13:38
some improvements in their text to speech technology
13:41
and had an AI mimic the voice
13:43
of someone's dead grandmother. What's amazing
13:45
is that it's becoming easier to create these artificially
13:48
generated voices to sound like anyone,
13:50
and in this case they only needed about sixty
13:53
seconds of audio rather than sixty
13:55
hours. For more on how it's just the
13:57
beginning for voice cloning, we'll speak to Adam
13:59
Blues, scene contributor to Fast
14:01
Company. Yeah, it's summoning there dead. So
14:04
the idea is that you're able to take
14:06
a very small sample
14:09
of a person's voice and
14:11
then create what they call
14:13
a generalizable synthetic
14:15
voice out of that, meaning you
14:17
can get that voice to read out any
14:20
text you present it with, which
14:23
is pretty amazing. So the demo showed
14:25
us the voice reading a few sentences from
14:27
a book, but in theory um this could
14:29
be applied to a much longer texts
14:31
as well, with a lot of implications
14:33
for commercial applications
14:35
down the road, I think. And the whole point
14:38
of this is that we've been doing this for some time.
14:40
Both Google and Amazon have had
14:43
you know, celebrity voices on their respective
14:45
smart speakers and all that, but those were done with
14:48
hours and hours of the
14:50
actor or celebrity whoever might be
14:52
recording audio. I think, um
14:55
there was a minimum of like sixty hours
14:57
of stuff that they used for like Shack and Melissa
15:00
McCarthy, Samuel Jackson. But now
15:02
the improvement is that they have this kind of generalized
15:05
model and now you just need about a minute
15:07
of audio from the voice that you
15:09
want to clone, so to speak. And to
15:11
be clear, this is an incredibly
15:14
complicated technology with
15:16
a lot of ways of slicing
15:18
and dicing it. So what Amatroon
15:20
demonstrated here is something that
15:23
they call a voice filter. So
15:25
what it's doing is taking a
15:27
synthetic voice that they've already developed,
15:29
sort of a generic voice, and
15:32
then running it through a filter. And
15:34
it's that filter that's been trained on a very
15:37
small sample of a real person's
15:39
voice. And what it really does is as it goes
15:41
through this filter, the words
15:43
are transformed into the voice
15:46
of this new person. And
15:48
what's interesting is in
15:51
this case it changes the sound
15:53
of the voice. So the tone
15:55
of the voice sounds like the person you know.
15:57
But this method doesn't capture there.
16:00
It's called their prosody that the unique way
16:02
that they phrase things. That's a
16:04
different level, which is something
16:06
that researchers are also really
16:08
working a lot on. At that point.
16:11
Once they get that and hit that really right, that's
16:13
going it's gonna start really getting creepy.
16:15
But you know, in some of the experts that you spoke to, you
16:17
know, they're talking about, you know, this evolving
16:20
technology, and you think about speech
16:22
recognition and how easy it is to talk to
16:24
our machines already, and what you really
16:26
want on the other side of that is for that
16:28
machine to talk to you back, and if it could be in
16:30
somebody's voice that you do recognize even
16:32
better. I mean, you know, who knows how people are going
16:34
to use it, if it will improve workflow or
16:37
they just want to reconnect, just hear the voice
16:39
of a past loved one, something like that. But this
16:41
is kind of where that industry seems to be heading.
16:43
Absolutely. So there's a huge demand
16:46
for custom voices
16:48
now across different
16:50
industries in healthcare
16:52
for example, in education,
16:55
and a tech where even
16:57
in sort of you know, the ordering
16:59
boy at the burger king drives
17:02
through. Everyone wants to have a unique
17:04
artificial voice that's talking to their customers.
17:07
So this is driving you know,
17:09
a lot of investment the speech
17:11
market, some project to reach what seven
17:14
billion, and
17:17
every big tech company
17:19
basically has a text to speech
17:22
division that is focused on
17:24
this. And that's because the interface
17:26
to technology, many people
17:28
believe and we see it happening, is moving
17:31
more and more towards things like
17:33
voice and away from interactions
17:35
that are just with our keyboard or the screen
17:38
of our phones. So as
17:40
we're interacting more and more with
17:42
our voices, right, we want to hear
17:45
better, more sort of personalized,
17:47
more human voices that are talking
17:50
back to us. You know, so that original robotic
17:53
theory isn't going to cut it anymore.
17:56
Yeah, I mean this is advancing really fast.
17:58
I mean I just got an email from somebody
18:00
within our company saying, hey, we can provide you lifelike
18:03
synthetic voices for radio production,
18:05
like stock voices for radio production,
18:07
which is so interesting. And you know, so we're talking
18:09
about Google, We're talking about Amazon's Are
18:11
they the top two players in this? What else
18:13
are we looking at? Amazon's
18:16
you know, working on Alexa and they
18:18
did this demo. Google bought
18:20
Deep Minds, you know, a few
18:22
several years ago, and that
18:25
I was an AI organization and through
18:27
deep Mind they developed really some of the core
18:30
neural computing technology that
18:32
underlies text to speech today.
18:34
So they've been a big player in developing
18:37
at tech. Microsoft through
18:39
Azure is heavily investing
18:41
in this, and they recently acquired
18:44
voice company called Nuanced by
18:46
Do in China has done a
18:48
lot of work on voice. So,
18:52
you know, at Apple obviously every every
18:54
everyone's pretty much everybody's into it. Yeah,
18:56
yeah, it's super interesting stuff. As this stuff
18:58
gets really a lot better, the technology
19:00
gets a lot better. I think Amazon said,
19:03
you know, there's no word yet when it's gonna
19:05
debut this for developers or even the public,
19:07
you know, this kind of advanced voice
19:09
cloning stuff, but it's coming, you know, so just keep
19:11
an eye out forward and maybe we'll be talking
19:13
to our machines a lot clearer in the very near
19:16
future. Adam Bluestein, contributor
19:18
at Fast Company, Thank you very much for joining
19:20
us. Thank you so much, appreciate
19:23
it. Don't
19:25
forget to join us on social media at
19:27
Daily Dive Pod on Twitter and Daily
19:29
Dive Podcast on Facebook. Leave
19:32
us a comment, give us a rating, and
19:34
tell us the stories that you're interested in. Follow
19:36
us on I heard radio or subscribe wherever you
19:38
get your podcast. I'm Oscar
19:40
Rameiras and this is the Daily Dive Weekend
19:43
edition.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More