Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
You're listening to Comedy Central. Welcome
0:11
back again. Our
0:13
guests to night is he has to discuss the inaugural
0:16
Obama Foundation Democracy Forum
0:18
and how he's training the next generation
0:20
of young leaders in the US and around
0:22
the world. Please welcome the forty four President of the
0:24
United States, Barack Obama.
0:40
Oh I
0:43
do do? What's
0:47
he doing? Thank
0:50
you? Thank
0:53
you? Thank
0:55
you? Bok Alma, that's
1:00
love. Um.
1:08
I should have I should I should have brought
1:10
Michelle here. So this
1:16
is this is how I'd like to be greeted when I come
1:18
home. But
1:20
I feel like Michelle's
1:21
star. Mr
1:24
President, Welcome to the Day to Show. It is wonderful
1:26
to see you. Do you miss your name, by the way,
1:29
because everyone calls you Mr. President? But like I feel
1:31
like I would like if people call me like Mr Daly,
1:33
I would miss just being
1:35
called travor do you miss your names? My
1:38
best friends call me Barack? You
1:40
should, Mr President? You
1:43
know, Welcome
1:46
to the show. Um, let's let's start with I
1:48
mean the most present used. The midterms just happened.
1:51
You know, America voted, the House is flipping.
1:53
Democrats have held onto the Senate. Many credit
1:55
you for coming out and pushing
1:58
out, you know, people to vote. I would love to
2:00
know two parts to that. You know. Number one,
2:02
do you do you feel pressure
2:04
whenever you asked to come up? It's like in the movies when
2:07
you know they need that home run and the basis are
2:09
loading, the team's losing and they go, but rock, we need
2:11
you to hit this out of the park. We might lose everything.
2:13
Do you feel the pressure? Does it get to you? And and second
2:16
of all, what does it say about the state of
2:18
the Democratic Party that they always need you to come
2:20
out and do that before election? Look, I
2:23
think that the reason we
2:26
did better than expected can
2:28
be attributed to uh, not
2:30
me or uh
2:33
you know, anything I did, But it has to do with ay.
2:35
We recruited some excellent candidates. Uh
2:38
you look like Good Westmore
2:41
in Maryland, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania.
2:45
You look at our Senate candidates John
2:49
Feederman and Mark Kelly Um.
2:53
They are committed,
2:55
passionate, down to earth. They
2:57
connect with people, um
3:00
and so I come
3:02
in mainly to shine a spotlight on
3:04
them. So that's point number one. And the second thing
3:06
that happened in in this mid
3:09
term, and we've seen it now for three elections.
3:11
So I'm starting to feel pretty
3:13
hopeful that this is a habit. Young
3:16
people are voting and you
3:18
got higher. It
3:23
has been many times remarked how I got
3:25
thumped during mid terms during
3:27
my presidency, and part of it was that
3:29
voting rates were really low. People
3:33
In some sense, I think a lot of Democrats
3:36
felt, all right, Obama's there will be okay.
3:39
And you know, if it turns
3:41
out that McConnell
3:43
and Baynard and others suddenly
3:46
have power, then that greatly
3:49
restricts what a president can do. And I think that lesson
3:51
was learned. Trump comes
3:53
in and suddenly and
3:57
now this one, you've seen young people
3:59
come in and they're typically voting
4:01
at a rate of seventy to thirty,
4:04
sixty to forty Democrat
4:06
to Republican, and that makes a huge
4:09
difference, and so they're but
4:12
enthusiasm, I think is what really drove
4:15
this election. I agree with that in terms
4:17
of the people who actually voted,
4:19
but young people don't seem to be turning out as
4:21
much. You know, so the ones who did vote votes an overwhelmingly
4:24
Democrats. But then the number of young
4:26
votes seems to be dwindling from election
4:28
to election, and many young votes are saying they feel
4:30
disillusioned, They feel like America hasn't
4:32
made away for them, they don't see a future for themselves.
4:35
Well, look, what is always true
4:37
is young people are going to vote at
4:39
slightly lower rates than old
4:42
people like me because maybe
4:44
got better things to do. Michelle
4:46
and I are sitting at home, you know, eating
4:49
dinner, what kind of run out of
4:51
things to say, Well,
4:54
let's go vote young
4:56
people, Millie and Sasha, they're
4:58
out in our ne on all kinds of
5:01
stuff. So, uh
5:03
so, that's always going to be the case that that
5:05
young people voting rates are a little bit
5:07
lower. They are higher now than
5:10
they were in the mid terms when
5:12
I was president, and in
5:15
such a polarized environment one
5:18
to three percent. If they're
5:20
turning out at instead
5:23
of difference, that can make
5:25
an enormous difference. Right when you look
5:27
at that tiny difference, you still
5:29
see the places where, I mean, people
5:32
got into power despite the fact that they deny
5:34
elections. I think Republicans got a hundred and seventy
5:36
election deniers into Congress.
5:38
People who don't believe in the way America's
5:40
running its elections, people who don't believe Joe Biden should
5:42
be president or they you know, they'll be
5:45
vague about the answers. What do you
5:47
what do you think it says about American democracy
5:49
that so many people are getting elected
5:51
to these positions when they seem to dismiss
5:54
the election itself. Well, the interesting
5:56
thing is you notice election deniers don't
5:58
deny their own election. Funny
6:01
how that works, um,
6:06
how many of them actually believe that,
6:09
uh, some of the
6:11
nonsense that that circulates, versus
6:14
those who think it's convenient or it's a way to own
6:17
the Libs, or it's a way to send a message
6:20
um or align themselves with Trump.
6:23
That's hard to say. But what is important
6:25
is that because
6:27
of some really concerted efforts in a lot of important
6:30
states, some of the most egregious,
6:33
prominent, and potentially
6:36
dangerous election deniers,
6:39
they got thumped. They got
6:41
beat and particularly in these
6:43
secretary of States races and in some cases
6:45
governors races, where you
6:47
know, the next presidential election you could have somebody
6:49
who could really do some damage
6:53
there. I think we held the line. Now, what it
6:55
does say, more broadly is the fact
6:57
that, uh, not just here in
6:59
the United States, but around the world, the
7:01
fundamental precepts of democracy are
7:04
being challenged. Um, we're
7:06
not having arguments about policy,
7:09
but we're having arguments about the
7:13
the rules of the game, which previously
7:17
we all agreed to. Right, there was
7:19
a notion that all
7:21
right, we run elections, whoever gets the most votes
7:23
actually wins. The loser concedes, goes
7:25
back and tries to do better next time. Um.
7:28
And what we've seen now for
7:31
a whole host of reasons, is
7:34
a creeping sense that,
7:37
um, if the outcomes not what we want,
7:40
then we can do whatever we want and say whatever
7:42
we want in order for us to
7:44
win. And that is
7:47
profoundly dangerous. And as I said, it's it's not
7:49
unique to the United States, but when
7:51
it happens in the United States, it sends
7:53
a signal all around the world that
7:57
weakens democracy. And and that's
7:59
why think us getting our house in order is
8:01
so important when when you look at the discourse
8:04
in the country's well and and around the world. But
8:06
again, I think you're correct in that America as
8:08
a leader in what's happening right now,
8:10
the discourse has become so toxic. You
8:13
you were in every single
8:15
state, you were meeting with people all the way
8:17
from Iowa, you know, through to California,
8:20
where wherever you you were meeting people on the ground, they
8:22
were listening to you. There was
8:24
an openness even though people had
8:26
different political affiliations. It seems
8:29
like that has eroded over time. And
8:31
I wonder what you make of that. Where
8:33
where do you think it's coming from? Do you think of social media? Think
8:35
do you think it's the tenor of politicians in the capital.
8:38
Two things. The biggest change that's taken
8:41
place when I ran for let's say
8:43
US Senate in Illinois. You go
8:45
down state, that's the South. I mean, it's rural,
8:47
it's conservative. There aren't a lot
8:50
of folks who look like you or
8:52
me. Um and certainly
8:55
there are more Trevors than there are Barracks
8:57
in the variable. But and
9:00
uh so uh
9:04
and I'm driving around, I've I've got
9:06
you know, map for young people
9:08
here that it's this paper thing. You
9:12
can't figure out how to fold it back, but it's
9:14
how you find your way on roads.
9:17
Um and uh.
9:19
But I go into a town and it'd
9:23
be Republican, a
9:25
lot of evangelicals, et
9:28
cetera. But I could
9:30
go to a diner or a VFW hall or
9:33
uh county fair. I
9:36
could go to the local newspaper,
9:39
and the owner there is conservative and he's
9:41
got a bowtie and buzz cut. He's
9:44
kind of skeptical about my ideas. But
9:47
there wasn't the filter that
9:50
had been created by Fox
9:52
News or the
9:55
media infrastructure, the sort
9:57
of right wing conspiracy theory, uh
10:00
ye know, folks. And so
10:03
they came at me with an open mind, and
10:05
I could I could listen to them,
10:07
and they could listen to me, and at the end of
10:09
the day they might say, well, he's a little liberal for our taste,
10:11
but we have something in common. He
10:14
talked about, you know, his
10:16
mom getting sick. I remember my mom
10:18
getting sick. You know, it seems like
10:20
he loves his kids. I love my kids, and there
10:22
was some sense of connection.
10:25
And I think the filter now has become
10:28
so thick. It started
10:30
I think with Fox News and some of the other
10:33
uh uh you know, traditional
10:35
media, and now with
10:38
social media that's gotten turbo charged. If
10:40
you go into those same communities now, they
10:43
have so many preconceptions about
10:46
what somebody like me believes,
10:49
cares about, etcetera, that it's very hard to
10:51
penetrate. So I think that the
10:53
answer is both thinking
10:56
about information flow and media
10:58
and how do how can we breakthrough
11:01
that information bubble that people are in. That
11:04
requires, by the way, progressives
11:07
to get out of their media
11:10
bubble because we've got some preconceptions
11:12
that I think create barriers
11:14
as well. And then working
11:16
a lot more locally, uh,
11:19
because you noticed that when
11:22
you're on the ground doing
11:24
stuff, it's harder to stereotype
11:27
people. And the
11:29
nationalization of our politics
11:31
I think has been damaging. The
11:34
more we can focus on grassroots
11:38
efforts, real
11:40
world rather than just virtual meetings m
11:43
conversations, that's what,
11:46
over time I think can
11:48
can help strengthen democracy. And
11:50
that's part of what you know our
11:52
EMPSIS has been at the at the foundation
11:55
is with young leaders who are working
11:57
on the ground, coming up
12:00
with new ideas to create those connections. Well, I definitely
12:02
want to speak to you about that. I want to speak to about democracy
12:04
worldwide. I want to speak to you about disinformation
12:07
and what we can do to immunize ourselves
12:09
from it. But we gotta take a quick break. We'll
12:11
be right back after this with more from President to us about
12:15
alcome back to the Daily Show. We are still
12:17
here with President Barack Obama chatting
12:19
democracy, disinformation and who
12:22
is better looking between us. I want um,
12:25
let's start. Let's
12:29
you know, the real question is how how will they
12:31
luck when he's sixty if
12:34
you wants
12:40
attractive when they're in the almost
12:46
almost yea almost
12:47
almost. Let's
12:50
run all over. Let's talk about
12:53
plancy, Let's talk about your your your foundation,
12:55
Let's talk about what you're doing. We see you out there, you
12:58
know, we see you talking about democracy. See,
13:00
the world isn't a really interesting place in that.
13:03
You know, a few years ago and I think the world
13:05
was of the world was
13:07
you know, you could say the countries were democratic. Democratic,
13:10
you know, they had they had elections, people
13:12
won those elections, there was an exchange of power,
13:14
etcetera. And now I think seventy
13:17
of the world is living in a state where they
13:19
either ruled where it's a complete you know, autocracy,
13:22
or it isn't a democracy.
13:25
Two things again, One, why
13:27
do you think the world has gotten there? You know, if
13:29
if democracy and freedom on
13:32
things that everybody wishes to have, why
13:34
does it seem like the world is moving away from that? And
13:37
then secondly, what can
13:39
we do or why should we then try get back
13:41
to this democracy? If you look
13:43
at the trend lines, there are a bunch of
13:45
factors. I think globalization,
13:48
the global economy, disrupted
13:51
a lot of traditional societies.
13:54
What do you mean, well,
13:56
Uh, the global
13:59
supply chain eiminates industries, eliminates
14:01
jobs, increases,
14:04
Uh, you know, the wealth
14:06
gap not only between
14:08
countries but within countries. Right. So, and
14:11
then modernity challenges
14:14
people's traditional notions
14:16
of religion and family and general
14:19
roles. And you've got these culture
14:21
clashes. Right, You're in some village
14:23
in Yemen and suddenly your kid has a phone and
14:25
it's looking at the Kardashians and right,
14:29
and and you're so so
14:31
you get this vertigo and what
14:34
happened, what you've seen happen
14:36
I think in a whole bunch of places
14:39
is essentially a pushback,
14:41
a backlash to change that is
14:43
happening too fast, uh
14:45
for their comfort. And when
14:48
people are pushing back against
14:50
change, then they're vulnerable to politicians who
14:53
say, you know what, I can make things
14:55
just like it was back then, when
14:59
you we're
15:02
feeling more important, you had higher status.
15:05
You know, you didn't have people who don't look
15:07
like you suggesting somehow
15:09
that yeah, you're
15:13
doing something wrong. Um,
15:16
that somehow your traditions
15:19
are flawed and and
15:21
that appeal usually also
15:25
involved saying the problems
15:27
you're feeling are somebody else's faults. It's
15:29
those folks there, it's immigrants, it's gays,
15:31
it's hind News,
15:33
it's Muslims, it's
15:36
so forth and so on and
15:39
uh. And that then
15:41
gets turbo charged with the
15:44
information issues that we talked about. Um
15:48
And Look, democracy requires
15:50
by definition, getting along
15:52
with people who don't agree with
15:54
you. Uh. And the
15:57
other thing that happens is these countries have become
16:00
less homogeneous, right. And so you
16:02
just had a um,
16:05
a right wing party
16:09
in Sweden, which
16:11
we always used to Swedes right there,
16:15
so chill and democratic, right, But
16:18
if you've got a whole bunch of immigrants
16:21
coming in, suddenly people start getting
16:23
nervous. And and so part
16:25
of what I think we have to
16:27
do is to stand
16:32
fast on the principles of
16:34
equality and self
16:36
governance and representation and everybody
16:39
gets a seat at the table. But
16:41
I think we have to also find a language and a
16:43
story, a
16:46
way of telling the story about
16:48
how we can get together that does
16:50
not threaten people who are uncomfortable
16:52
with change as much. Um
16:55
And and that's you know, going
16:57
to be different for different countries. But I'll
17:00
give you an example. There's a young leader who we worked
17:02
with from Slovenia,
17:04
she's part of our network, who
17:08
was an advocate
17:10
for doing something about domestic violence. The
17:13
laws of that country didn't have domestic violence.
17:15
There was a real problem. Ran a referendum,
17:18
it got crushed, and we
17:20
worked with her and suggested,
17:22
well, maybe you want to talk to the people who didn't
17:25
vote for it. So she goes out to these
17:27
rural villages with these um
17:30
older, traditional rural, very
17:32
religious, very conservative women and just interviewed
17:34
them and listen to them and talk to them.
17:37
And it's not that they agreed
17:40
with domestic abuse, it's
17:42
that they thought their
17:45
way of life was being challenged. She
17:47
adapted their language, ran the referendum
17:50
again a few years later, and it passed right
17:53
because she adopted the language
17:55
that made them feel as if, Okay,
17:58
this is not so much of a earthquake
18:03
a huge change in how we live, but it's rather
18:05
affirming our best values. And
18:07
I think us finding ways to do that
18:10
in a consistent way will help um.
18:14
But it's hard. Yeah. Look,
18:16
for most of human history, democracy is
18:19
relatively recent vintage.
18:22
It's a blip. Yeah, tribe,
18:26
uh, you know, nation, state,
18:28
race, sect. You know, that's
18:30
typically been how we organize things. And
18:32
it's always easy to say us versus
18:35
them, that that's that's the easy politics.
18:37
What what democracy demands is always
18:40
a little bit more difficult. It also feels
18:42
like, you know when when when you observe it. There
18:45
are two elements that I that I often see is, on
18:47
the one hand, storytelling. As
18:49
you said, it's often
18:52
easier to tell a story of blame. Yes, why
18:54
are things going wrong? It's because of that person. It's
18:56
simple. There's the person. We we we've solved
18:58
it. Why are things going wrong? Well, there's a confluence
19:00
of factors, and you have this and you have the economy. You gotta
19:02
understand the supply to. That's not an answer for many
19:05
people. And when you sell freedom, they got I
19:07
don't. I can't eat freedom. I can't buy
19:09
a house with freedom. I can't, you know. And then
19:11
the second part is what you're talking about,
19:13
you know, the US versus them, the
19:15
who is and who isn't. Sometimes
19:18
I think for many people it feels like it
19:20
feels like the populists come in and
19:23
just do you know, whether it is in
19:25
Brazil, you know, whether it's more so
19:27
narrow, you know, whether it's in America with Trump, whether
19:30
they go they're just gonna do, and whether they
19:32
do or don't actually do it. It feels like they're gonna
19:34
do. But then some people go, oh, but when
19:36
we get the freedom people they
19:38
want to talk and they want to discuss, and it
19:40
seems incremental and it seems like things won't
19:42
change. Is there a
19:44
way to combat that, because it is a feeling a
19:46
lot of the time. Well, yeah,
19:49
Look, if you want to
19:52
be a progressive, pluralists
19:54
tolerant democrat. Uh.
19:56
And I don't mean small D democrat, I
19:59
don't mean Democratic party. Um,
20:01
you know, you can't be a wuss. I
20:05
mean you you you You've got to have
20:09
a story that with some swag, you
20:11
got to be able to sell the
20:13
future and and
20:16
deliver and uh
20:19
and also call out
20:21
the fact that what those folks
20:23
say they're gonna do, they almost never do, right,
20:27
because the truth of the matter is
20:30
is that, Um,
20:32
when you look at we
20:35
we have experiments those
20:38
countries that have the
20:40
ability to harness everyone and
20:43
everybody participates and there's consent and
20:46
people feel like, all right, this is working for us
20:49
versus places that um
20:51
are failed states. You know, the
20:54
track record of democracy is
20:58
is pretty good. But you
21:00
know, we have to be forceful in making
21:02
our argument. And what is true
21:05
is that um
21:07
you know, we can't just talk. We gotta walk
21:10
the walk, which is why you
21:12
know we're having a form in New York. One
21:14
of the topics that we're talking
21:16
about is inclusive capitalism.
21:19
It people are when you think about,
21:22
let's say, here in the United States, there's
21:24
greater appeal of right wing populism
21:28
in a lot of communities, rural
21:30
communities that they're not wrong
21:32
that the economy, the global
21:36
economy has shifted away from them
21:38
to urban centers, even
21:40
in their own states, and so
21:44
the opportunities in Austin,
21:47
Texas are different than in
21:50
a rural community in these Texas
21:52
UM and people notice
21:55
that. So we have to spend
21:57
some time thinking about how are we delivered
22:00
on behalf of people whose
22:02
lives who used to work in a factory,
22:04
who used to uh,
22:06
you know, farm for a living and have
22:09
have dignity and worth and
22:12
stability and security in those
22:14
lives and now suddenly they don't
22:17
feel as if they've got the lottery ticket
22:19
in this in this existing economy, that
22:22
does have to be addressed. And in places
22:24
like Africa, um,
22:27
you know, right now, you
22:29
have let's say,
22:31
China coming in heavy presence
22:34
in a lot of these countries, providing
22:36
a lot of foreign a lot of strings attached,
22:39
a lot of Chinese workers coming into build
22:42
big buildings.
22:45
But if we're not there,
22:48
if we're not helping build that road, if
22:51
we're not there to uh
22:53
build that port, then naturally
22:57
people are going to start thinking, well, maybe that's a that's
22:59
a recipe for bettering
23:01
my life as opposed to you
23:04
know, some flowery language, but it has nothing
23:06
behind it. I wonder,
23:08
though, do you think inclusive
23:11
capitalism is somewhat of a paradox?
23:14
You know, it feels like it feels you think
23:16
it's because it feels it feels like, I mean, capitalism
23:18
is designed to extract as much wealth as
23:20
possible from every single interaction
23:22
that you can look. You
23:24
know, I mentioned yea, Sweden
23:27
and some of the problems they're having because immigration.
23:29
On the other hand, you look at Scandinavian countries. They're
23:31
capitalist countries, but some and
23:33
those work very well. But some people would
23:36
argue that their foundation is more you know, socialists,
23:38
and then they go with it's it's almost like they go with
23:40
with socialists first and then capitalism
23:42
is our undercurrent. Not really you
23:44
know, well, if you go there,
23:48
essentially they people are
23:50
taxed more and they have more common goods.
23:53
But you're still going around at a job and
23:55
you get paid and you know you
23:57
can't. It's not like you're going into the store just happen
24:00
whatever you want walking out, but
24:04
fish, friend, you
24:07
gotta pay for it. Right then the
24:09
guy registers checking and did
24:11
the American profit here today? But the reason I'm
24:13
asking that is because and maybe it's
24:15
the words that fail us sometimes. I often, you
24:17
know, I'll talk to my friends about this. It's interesting that we
24:19
sort of stopped. We went, oh, the socialism,
24:22
there's you know, there's this, there's the communism, this capital
24:24
and then we just stopped, like this is it? This capitalism?
24:26
And that's that I sometimes wonder is there
24:28
not something better? Is there something we could be
24:30
making? Maybe I should
24:32
be is inclusive capitalists. The reason
24:35
I just used let's
24:38
say a Denmark is an example, is
24:41
not because it's gonna work perfectly
24:43
in India, the United States, etcetera. The
24:45
point though, is is they've they've got some blend
24:48
some mix, right, there
24:51
is an advantage in terms of efficiency
24:54
and also freedom to a market
24:56
system. You have a control system.
24:59
You know, some guy in office is deciding how many
25:01
potatoes we're going to grow this year. That usually
25:03
doesn't work. The flip side
25:05
of it is that what we've also
25:07
learned is that if some kind in a
25:09
boardroom is deciding
25:13
I'm gonna ravage the environment
25:15
to do whatever I want, that
25:17
doesn't work either. So we're
25:19
gonna have a blend of some sort. We want
25:22
some collective decision making about
25:25
the social good, and we
25:27
want something that's efficient
25:29
and dynamic and allows us to exercise
25:32
our innovation and freedom.
25:34
And we don't need to worry so much about
25:36
the labels as we do about
25:39
being practical and thinking about
25:41
what's working and what isn't. And this is
25:43
going back to the information issues. This
25:46
is part of why to me,
25:49
one of the biggest challenges of democracy is
25:51
not just the mechanics of elections or
25:54
uh the independent judiciary. Those
25:56
things are all important, but this
25:58
is why this information and media issue
26:01
is so important, because what
26:03
we've seen here in the United States
26:05
and elsewhere is a
26:08
a abandonment of
26:10
a commitment to facts and
26:12
reason and logic and you know,
26:15
stuff that is
26:18
useful, uh and
26:20
and necessary.
26:23
And if we can't have a debate based
26:26
on facts, then we can't get to better
26:30
solutions. Right we start talking
26:33
in slogans and nonsense and there's no
26:35
reality check. We just make
26:37
stuff up. I didn't lose an election.
26:39
You know, there's something broken over there, um
26:42
and and it doesn't and and it's impervious
26:45
defects. So so part of what I
26:47
think, why I've been
26:49
spending a lot of time thinking about this uh disinformation
26:52
issue, is how do we and
26:55
how we teach our kids
26:57
in you know, either
26:59
industry standards or
27:01
and or regulation of these social
27:03
media platforms. How do we get
27:06
back to the point where you can have opinions?
27:09
We all do, but facts
27:12
matter, and and proof
27:14
matters, and and our
27:16
capacity to debate and
27:18
say, you know what, if we do things
27:21
this way, it might work better. And
27:23
then you may disagree, but
27:25
at least we we agree
27:27
to a set of rules whereby we can arrive at
27:30
a better solution. It's possible to
27:32
get to that place when almost to let's just talk about the
27:34
United States, almost half the country says, well,
27:36
what all those rules and why are you even deciding them?
27:38
And why are we having this conversation You
27:41
are not even affect How do you honestly mean,
27:43
how do you get to that place with people we're
27:47
not The interesting thing is, even
27:50
in those places that are just inundated
27:52
with what I considered to be nonsense
27:56
and lies
27:58
and destroy portions, when
28:02
people operate in their own lives,
28:05
they're still operating on facts right on
28:07
their jobs. When
28:09
they're coaching their kids the
28:12
league or their soccer game. In football,
28:15
they don't let the ref just kind of say, you
28:18
know what, this time, we're just gonna
28:20
get five points for the touchdown. It's like
28:22
wait, wait, wait, folks
28:25
on the sidelines saying no, it's
28:27
six points for the touchdown, and then you get the extra point.
28:29
And so we
28:32
abide by all kinds of facts
28:34
in our own lives. It's just this national
28:38
story that is being told where we
28:40
allow lives to be told, and we
28:43
accept them mainly because
28:46
it turns out there when we tell a story about the other side,
28:48
it makes us feel better. It's like, you know, Trevor,
28:51
he's a jackass. You should
28:53
see and
28:56
you're happening to be sitting there and and
28:58
uh and and and so we enjoy
29:01
the performative aspects of
29:04
making stuff up and
29:06
and part of that is because we don't
29:09
think they're consequences to it. Now,
29:11
what we've learned from
29:15
the election of my successor, from the pandemic,
29:18
from the insurrection is actually
29:20
the stories we tell do matter. And
29:23
you know, having some baseline of sticking
29:26
to the truth when
29:28
you're telling stories about
29:31
our country, about policy,
29:33
but also about the other side, that matters.
29:37
Um And and I
29:39
I like to think that part of what happened in this
29:41
election is people said, Okay,
29:44
you know what, some of this stuff is getting a little too
29:46
crazy. It turns out that
29:49
there is a you know, a majority
29:51
of country that does prefer
29:55
normal not crazy. And that's
29:57
and that's is, that's a basis for I've
30:02
to talk to you for hours about this. I know you don't have
30:04
the time. UM it has been
30:06
wonderful having you here, though it's also been wonderful
30:08
seeing you know what what you're getting up to, because after you
30:11
you know, we have the pleasure of interviewing
30:13
at the White House just before you left, and then afterwards,
30:16
I saw you kite surfing, and I,
30:19
uh, I loved it. I loved it. By
30:21
the way, um great technique,
30:23
but I often wonders,
30:26
like, you know, what is Mr President going to do next?
30:28
Where does he go? And you know, you started producing shows
30:30
about issues around the world, and now you've
30:32
got this forum. I wondered if maybe you
30:35
know, you have any tips for me as you
30:37
know, because well because because you I
30:39
mean, you know, I like, we're basically you know, we're guys
30:41
are gonna saying you know, you
30:44
know, I think dumb. I
30:50
think you're gonna have to uh
30:53
really focus on relearning things like
30:55
driving, pressing
30:58
your own elevator button. I
31:01
think was what
31:05
was the last time you heard the drag waters myself?
31:10
Yeah, we have very you you you
31:12
don't like you're very like you
31:14
know. That's like I said, you missed the President forever.
31:18
You have secret Service forever. That's correct, I
31:20
do, and and it, uh,
31:22
I still
31:29
am in a bubble. I thought I thought
31:31
I could escape it quick stories.
31:33
Since we're in New York. I used
31:35
to say, Oh, you know what, once I get out
31:37
of here, I'm gonna just be able to like
31:39
walk through Central Park and that's
31:42
gonna you know, and I'll just put like on a baseball
31:44
cap. And it's gonna be fine and
31:47
yeah. Michelle's all like, yeah, okay,
31:49
good luck with that. And the first time
31:52
I tried it, um,
31:54
I got like half a block and
31:58
then suddenly there was a small and
32:01
their phones and traffic
32:03
stopping and it
32:06
didn't work. So
32:09
um, so uh, you
32:12
know, uh, I guess
32:14
what I would say though, is uh
32:17
that you will be missed here. But
32:20
um
32:22
and uh
32:25
but but but we
32:28
were talking backstage. Uh, you're
32:30
already following. One piece of advice that
32:32
I would have is leave when your poll numbers
32:34
are high. That that's
32:37
how they'll remember you. So I'm
32:40
actually yeah, I'm I'm excited. I'm gonna you know, I'm gonna go
32:42
on the road. Yes, I mean
32:44
I've said this to you before. You know what
32:46
the with it's the White House car spond instead and Georgia
32:48
when you're doing the speed. You're a very funny guy.
32:50
So you want me to open for you? I
32:54
thought I'm showing Chicago. It
32:56
doesn't you know, what's not even open. I wouldn't then
32:58
we could co you know, you can't open
33:00
for me. You you still missed the president. We
33:03
just do like a headlining
33:05
tour. You know what I mean, you
33:08
know what I mean. All
33:12
the good cousin
33:15
of Barack Opoma. Everybody want to cry
33:18
over later than
33:35
The Daily Show with Trevor no Ears editions.
33:37
Subscribe to the Daily Show on YouTube
33:40
for exclusive content, and
33:42
stream full episodes anytime
33:44
on Paramount Plus. This
33:49
has been a Comedy Central podcast
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More