0:02

Get ready to hear the truth about America

0:05

on a show that's not immune to the

0:07

facts. With your

0:08

host, Dan Bongino.

0:11

Stack show today Democrats are commies.

0:16

That's it's a breaking

0:18

news. What kinda? Usually

0:20

they like to lighten the load a little bit, call

0:22

themselves Democratic socialist or some

0:24

other kind of euphemism for straight up hardcore

0:27

commies. Yesterday's Twitter file hearings

0:29

up on Capitol Hill, folks straight up commies.

0:32

Straight up commies. Out your sources,

0:34

please, to the media.

0:37

That'd be just unbelievable. This

0:40

all happened yesterday. I got that We

0:42

got questions for Dan. Someone asked

0:44

the question. He said we got about two three

0:46

hundred and the same question about Tucker in the

0:48

January sixth videos. Okay.

0:50

We'll get to that. That'll be coming later they ask

0:52

me anything section of the show. We got

0:54

a lot to talk about Fauci, one on Neil Kabuto

0:57

yesterday, and have you Joe, have

0:59

you ever seen a human being? I'm

1:01

so arrogant and so unwilling

1:04

to admit that he did something wrong.

1:06

Oh, his I love the way he admits he

1:08

did something right. I'm not perfect. Okay. It's tonnological.

1:11

Nobody is That's not that's not that's

1:13

not admitting you did something. Okay?

1:16

Apply some of those cuts later, loaded Friday

1:18

show. Today show by express

1:20

VPN. Profiling, surveillance, data

1:22

harvesting. There are a lot of things not to like about

1:24

the tech giants. 1966 can you do about

1:27

it when you rely on so many of their products?

1:29

Well, the good news is you have options and you don't have to

1:31

be a billionaire to take a stand. For less

1:33

than seven dollars a month, you can join me and

1:35

fight back against Big Tech by using Express

1:37

VPN. How do you think Big Tech companies

1:39

make all their money anyway? Well, they track your searches,

1:42

video history, and everything you click on. They

1:44

can sell that personal data. Do you know that?

1:47

Express VPN helps you anonymize much

1:49

of your online presence. By hiding

1:51

your IP address. That's why I use

1:53

express VPN and have for a while on all my devices

1:55

to make it much more difficult for them, to

1:57

exploit my data for their profits. I

1:59

just tap one button on my phone or computer

2:01

to turn it on. That's all it takes to keep people

2:04

out of my business. You don't like big tech

2:06

tracking you and selling your personal data for

2:08

profit, time to fight back. Visit

2:10

express VPN dot com Bongino

2:13

right now to get three extra

2:15

months free from express VPN. That's

2:17

express VPN dot com Bongino,

2:19

B0NGIN0, express VPN

2:21

dot com slash

2:22

bongino. Joe is a big fry Friday

2:24

for me. I'll tell you why in a second. So

2:26

if you would, sir. It's Friday,

2:31

Conrad.

2:33

Man. Yeah. Alright. Sasha,

2:35

get that Soviet national anthem ready, buddy. We

2:37

may need that moment. Times

2:38

today. So it is thank

2:40

you for your patience. With me over the last month

2:42

to all these little medical mini dramas, so

2:45

big deal. But I've been through a lot,

2:47

like, not a victim of crying

2:49

or whining. They were all optional surgeries.

2:51

I wasn't dying of a heart

2:53

attack, like people who were in real health crises.

2:55

But

2:56

I've been through lot these last three weeks tried to

2:58

miss his little work as possible. And

3:01

I I say he's Friday because finally

3:03

gonna get out with Paula tonight for the first time

3:05

in a while. Get to hang out with some friends

3:07

and relax, and I feel I feel almost

3:09

like a hundred percent, like ninety eight

3:11

percent, which is as good as it gets. So

3:13

thanks for hanging in there with me. I just wanted to

3:15

throw that out there. So

3:18

Matt Tyeibe, who is an actual journalist,

3:20

was up on Capitol Hill yesterday, testifying about

3:23

Twitter and the FBI working together like

3:25

communist to sensor Americans. The hearing

3:27

was glorious. Michael Schellenberger was

3:29

up there 1966. special note,

3:31

I've got the exclusive with Matt Taibi

3:33

on my show, unfiltered, on Fox,

3:36

tomorrow night, nine PM, I am ecstatic.

3:39

About interviewing him. He's not even a conservator,

3:41

but he's an actual journalist. So check

3:43

that out. Don't miss that set your DVI got Anna

3:45

Paulina Luna on too. Fantastic

3:47

congresswoman about how Biden hires

3:50

everybody based on diversity, equity, and

3:52

inclusion principles, and it keeps screwing everything

3:54

up. It's gonna be glorious.

3:56

They'll miss that. So the mask came off completely

3:59

yesterday, and it was awesome to watch. The

4:01

commies, Joe, showed themselves as

4:03

straight up commies. They're not trying to pretend

4:05

anymore. They're not throwing out

4:07

talking points like we're Democratic socialist.

4:10

We wanna be more like Sweden. No. No.

4:12

Right now they're like, we wanna be more like

4:14

We we wanted more like Stalin. They're

4:17

not even kidding. No wonder what

4:19

anyone that comes here. The

4:22

gun. He Mister

4:25

Can you put her put her in the plate again, Joe? Please.

4:28

He's not paying attention. 1966 more time.

4:33

Thank you. You may not get my salute from Gates.

4:35

Where's your respect, dude? Yeah. Where's

4:37

the respect? It's right. Come on, man. We're talking about straight

4:39

up economies here. They couldn't stop themselves yesterday

4:42

at the hearing. So right before the hearing, journalist

4:44

Matt Tiede released another batch of the Twitter

4:46

files. Again, showing how the

4:48

FBI 1966 DHS and

4:50

other agencies quote, often came

4:52

with spreadsheets of hundreds of thousands

4:55

of account names for Joe review.

4:57

Kinda like the mob asks you to review. So,

4:59

hey, can you review who you're paying

5:01

for your sanitation? Well, it's not

5:03

you guys in the mob. That'd be a real shame

5:05

if we burned your place down. So

5:08

Taipe releases this whole thing

5:09

yesterday.

5:10

Look at all these emails. This is amazing. Elvis

5:12

Chan, assistant special agent in

5:14

charge. Please see the below list

5:16

of Twitter accounts. You may wanna do

5:18

something about that just like the

5:21

mob. It's it's right there folks.

5:23

You can read Taipei's emails. Here's

5:25

another one. At Twitter, responding back.

5:27

The FBI, San Francisco Emergency Operation

5:30

Center sent us the attached report

5:32

of two hundred and seven tweets that

5:35

may be in violation of our policies.

5:37

It's interesting. It's not Twitter saying that.

5:39

It's the FBI's That

5:41

it goes on and on. Folks is no

5:43

doubt. Listen. If you're an Imbasil

5:46

a moron tune out now, I don't want you on my show.

5:49

Also, if you're a conservative, if you don't like the tone

5:51

of the show, I get that too. But this isn't

5:53

the QC Time show. I'm not dicking

5:55

around. I'm not screwing around with these people.

5:57

1966 you understand we're dealing with straight

5:59

up communists and enemies of the United States,

6:02

freedom 1966 liberty, you handle them differently.

6:04

Okay? You call them out,

6:06

In in the harshest possible terms, you don't

6:08

play q c time. You people aren't interested

6:10

in q c time. We're dealing with straight

6:13

up communist. There is no doubt.

6:15

Listen to me lips because you can shut your

6:17

mouth if your opinion is worthless otherwise.

6:19

I have the evidence you have nothing. It

6:21

is now clearest day. That

6:25

the United States government was weaponized,

6:28

the FBI DHS and elsewhere,

6:30

to censor content on social media

6:32

platforms. That is not in dispute. You

6:35

can humiliate yourself your kids

6:37

and your grandparents and your neighbors by

6:39

lying in front of the cameras and present 1966

6:42

presenting another alternate look while

6:44

kinda shiny red object story, that's

6:47

on you and your legacy going

6:49

forward when everybody laughs in your face.

6:52

It's not in dispute anymore. The

6:55

government was involved in a clear

6:57

violation of the first amendment through the FBI

6:59

and DHS to censor people, period.

7:02

Now I want you to watch. This

7:04

guy is rapidly working his way

7:07

up, even possibly surpassing Adam

7:09

Schiff. As one of the dumbest members of

7:11

congress. And if you've ever seen an example

7:13

of a stupid, smart person, it

7:15

is this guy who bought his way into congress,

7:18

Dan Goldman. Now, if

7:20

you're laughing already, you're probably laughing,

7:22

Joe, you I don't know if you recognize this guy or not.

7:24

This guy was one of the lead

7:26

PP hoaxers. He he was

7:29

a lawyer working with

7:31

Adam Schiff and others. This nobody

7:33

pushed the PP tape hoax against Trump

7:36

more than this idiot. Now, you think,

7:38

again, he'd be humiliated and relegated

7:40

to the scrap heap of pseudo comedians

7:43

who tried to do something with their logic.

7:45

Know, you think it's funny he pushed the PPOs.

7:47

No. No. He got elected to congress. Why

7:49

his democrats are morons they love morons?

7:52

This got a law degree. He's one of the dumbest

7:54

people you've ever seen. Watch this idiot

7:56

yesterday at the hearing. So

7:58

that's the hearing about Twitter, censoring content.

8:01

this goofball, who is it

8:03

could not be watching faceplant in

8:05

epic and epic fashion in front of everyone.

8:08

Here's the lesson from this. Don't ever

8:10

ask a question in the congressional hearing

8:13

that you don't know the answer to. He asked

8:15

Jim Jordan, you don't have evidence of

8:17

a tweet that they asked to take

8:19

down. This is you just making this

8:21

stuff

8:21

up. Watch this guy get totally

8:24

wrecked and humiliated. This was

8:26

like big joker smile the whole time.

8:28

Check this out. Twitter. Twitter.

8:31

And even with Twitter, You

8:33

cannot find actual evidence

8:36

of any direct government

8:38

censorship of any lawful

8:41

speech. And when I say lawful, I

8:44

mean non criminal speech

8:46

because plenty of give you lunch is

8:48

non

8:49

criminal. I'll give you 1966 gentleman's time to expire.

8:51

I'd and Emma's consent to enter into the record

8:53

the following email from Clark

8:55

Humphrey, executive office

8:57

of the presidency White House office, January

9:00

twenty third twenty twenty 1966, that's

9:03

the Biden administration, four thirty nine

9:05

AM. Hey folks,

9:08

this goes to Twitter,

9:11

hey, folks, wanted to use the term mister mister he

9:13

used they used term mister mister Goldman just used.

9:16

1966 to flag the below

9:18

tweet, and I'm wondering if we can get moving

9:20

on the process for having it removed

9:24

ASAP. That is

9:26

Could you read the below tweet? And

9:29

then if we can keep an eye out for tweets

9:31

that fall in this same genre genre,

9:33

that would be

9:34

great. This is a tweet on the very

9:36

issue. Thomas Can you

9:38

ask me about For the fullness of the record, can you

9:41

read the because I've seen this. Can you read

9:43

the tweet that it's referencing?

9:46

It's good. The judges

9:48

ruled we haven't done it in a while. You're a moron.

9:51

The verdict is in. Yes. It's unanimous.

9:54

You're an embersill. A

9:56

complete clown got humiliated. In

9:59

these molar hearings and other hearings,

10:01

just AAA jerk too. I mean, just an

10:04

an absolute tool. I

10:07

love when these people get wrecked. Here,

10:09

Dan, oh, just a quick lesson. Don't

10:12

ask questions, you don't know the answer

10:14

to. By the way, the tweet 1966 question was

10:16

a tweet from RFK, RFK

10:18

Junior

10:19

about, hey, the death of Hank Aaron,

10:22

which is Goldman implying that's illegal? If

10:24

he

10:25

has, he's even bigger moron than I thought.

10:27

Just wrecked

10:29

completely. And you know

10:30

what? Here's the gray part about this. Goldman

10:32

was like celebrated on a Goldman

10:35

calling out here. Dude, he got wrecked.

10:37

He looks like a he looks like a kindergarten level

10:40

IQ idiot.

10:43

Right. I got him like, that guy really

10:45

pisses me off. I'm sorry. He did one

10:47

more thing too, which was hilarious. He He

10:49

tries to call out Matt Taibi about the

10:51

Mueller indictments. Taibi

10:53

just completely annihilates him. He's

10:55

like, do you agree with the indictment? Taibi, he's like, I don't

10:58

know. I wasn't on the grand jury. He's like, I'm not asking.

11:00

I'm asking if you agree with them. He goes, why would I agree

11:02

or disagree their charges? They're not proof.

11:04

As if he's got a Joe, he's lecturing

11:06

a lawyer about an indictment versus

11:09

a conviction. What?

11:11

The same case he's referring to, by the way, the

11:13

Russians the the Russian,

11:16

you know, the the the people they were trying

11:18

to convict this up, they threatened to show up at

11:20

court they dropped the case. That's how weak the case

11:22

was. Goldman doesn't even know that because he's an idiot.

11:25

So, they're so eager here to advance

11:27

communism 1966 speech suppression in the United

11:29

States. He's communist, Goldman, and others.

11:32

That they're attacking sources now. Here's

11:35

the delicate from the Virgin Islands.

11:38

You know, we do have freedom of the press. That's is

11:40

that in the constitution? I just

11:42

left something like that. Yap on that. Oh, it is.

11:45

It is in the first men. So freedom of the press.

11:47

I'm just checking if they have constitution protections.

11:49

So Matt Taebi is a journalist. 1966 he has

11:51

sources on the Twitter files. Here are the new

11:54

communist Democrats, the commies,

11:56

straight up commies who are defending, censoring

11:58

content on Twitter, now demanding that

12:00

once their censorship was exposed, that

12:02

the constitution protected media expose

12:05

their sources

12:06

here. Take a look. Who gave you access to

12:08

these emails? It

12:10

was the individual that gave you permission

12:13

to access the

12:14

emails. Well,

12:14

the attribution from my story is sources

12:16

of Twitter, and that's what I'm gonna refer to.

12:18

Okay. Did mister Must

12:21

contact you and mister Taibi? Again,

12:23

the attribution from my story is sources at

12:25

Twitter.

12:25

Mister Shellingberger, did mister Must contact

12:27

you? Actually, no.

12:30

I was brought in by my friend, Barry Weiss,

12:32

and so this story has been lot of misinformation.

12:35

Mister Weiss, disciliation 1966 Mister Taibi,

12:38

miss Weiss. Thank you. Mister Taibi,

12:40

have you had conversations with Elon Musk?

12:42

I

12:43

have.

12:43

Okay. Mister Tybee, did

12:45

mister Musk place any conditions

12:47

on the

12:47

heels of the But the general idea for a second?

12:50

As long as my time is not

12:51

used. Are you trying to get journalists?

12:53

No. I'm not choices. I'm not.

12:55

I am asking, like, no. Well She's

12:57

literally asking about the

12:59

sources. Are you asking about the sources,

13:01

Jim Jordan? No. No. I'm not. Huge.

13:03

Do you understand again how

13:06

dumb you have to be to be a liberal to fall for that

13:08

she just didn't? Folks,

13:10

listen. This is not some kind of funny

13:13

comical segment. Let me expose how dumb they

13:15

are. This is a warning. This

13:17

is a cautionary tale. This is not a

13:19

joke. I may use some humor and sarcasm,

13:21

but this is not a joke. You are

13:24

dealing with a party now the democrats that

13:26

are straight up communist. There's no

13:28

mask There's over ten to be socialist

13:30

democrats. They are straight up

13:33

communist right out of the playbook. Sensor

13:35

content, defend it, attack

13:38

the source, expose journalists

13:40

who expose government mouth seasons.

13:43

It's hilarious too. She doesn't even know who Barrie

13:45

Weiss is. She thinks it's a dude.

13:48

Barry Weiss, mister Weiss,

13:51

she's a woman. Well, in their their

13:53

their democrats, they don't know what a woman is. So in

13:55

their defense, doesn't really matter. Now,

13:59

here she is, again, insisting. This

14:02

is hilarious lying. Insisting that

14:04

somehow, She didn't try to get

14:06

the source even though she just asked him the

14:08

source of his

14:08

information. Check this out. I think the general lady

14:11

for you. I think this is interesting. First, the the

14:13

FTC is asking for your background. now

14:15

they the ranking member of the committee on the

14:17

weaponization, the government is asking for

14:19

your sources.

14:21

I never asked them for their sources. Yes.

14:23

I did not

14:24

ask for soil. It's just astonishing.

14:27

You just

14:27

heard it. These people act

14:29

like this is not being video and digitally

14:32

recorded. And

14:34

then when she gets called out for being

14:36

a straight up comie,

14:38

she denies it because

14:40

she realizes a man that may not look good.

14:44

I I don't even know what to tell you folks. Just

14:46

watch the freaking video yourself.

14:49

This is who we're dealing with on the left.

14:52

Right. Right. It's like Lucy. Lucy loves

14:54

to eat paper. And in the papers on

14:56

the floor, there's no one in the house when I come home other

14:58

than Lucy. And she looks at you like

15:00

Turns your head away like, wasn't me? It was other

15:02

kids. There were no other kids here.

15:04

It was you. It

15:07

gets even better. So this

15:09

this embassy from the delegate from

15:11

the Virgin Islands, even though Barry Weiss is a

15:13

woman. Here's Sylvia

15:15

Garcia, another hapless Democrat,

15:18

They wanna sensor and regulate big tech.

15:20

Joe, I'm just gonna throw this out there. You're

15:22

gonna sensor and regulate big tech

15:25

and cost millions of jobs. Do

15:27

you just think you should maybe

15:29

know what the companies you're gonna regulate

15:32

do first? I'm just gonna Baby

15:34

sorta? That'd be a good idea. I think it'd be a good

15:37

idea. Very good

15:37

idea. I think there's a small company

15:40

out there, tiny called sub

15:42

stack. Yeah. Only

15:44

has millions of people who read

15:46

1966, and it's where journalists go for freedom.

15:48

We have the same thing at

15:49

locals, by the way. But that's not the

15:51

point here. Here's Sylvia

15:53

Garcia.

15:54

And here's just a little hint for miss Garcia. Who

15:56

seasons she's not a stupid she's not a

15:58

stupid smart person. She's just playing up stupid.

16:02

If you don't know something, you don't

16:04

have to advertise to the world that you're

16:06

an

16:06

idiot. They wanna regulate sub

16:08

stack and they don't even know what it is. Take

16:10

a listen. You yourself posted on

16:12

your your, I guess,

16:14

it's kinda like a web page don't quite

16:16

understand what SubStack is, but

16:20

She's mad that the

16:22

guy posted on sub stack,

16:24

Ivy and Sheldon Burger. And

16:26

yet, you don't have to tell us you don't know what it

16:28

is. You can I'm just giving you some advice

16:30

even though you're a Democrat. You don't have to

16:32

highlight that you're an idiot. You can keep that quiet.

16:35

It's okay.

16:38

It gets better. This year I got a lot to get through.

16:40

This year gets better. Final

16:42

one here. Here's Debbie Wassaman

16:44

Schultz, the laughingstock of Florida,

16:47

a woman who's been involved knee deep

16:49

in so many political scandals. How

16:51

she doesn't just pull the George Santos and

16:53

just kinda dial it back 1966, like,

16:55

just say quiet for a while, right,

16:58

is beyond me. Here's Debbie

17:00

Waserman Schultz. Again, if my

17:02

time, rude, obnoxious, absolute

17:05

buffoon. Knee deep in a

17:07

thousand different scandals. Here

17:10

she is here making the dumbest point of

17:12

the day by far. Because

17:14

journalist Matt Tyebe exposed the

17:17

Twitter scandal. And therefore, was

17:19

the first time people heard about it went

17:21

to his sub and Twitter to follow

17:23

him. Debbie Wasserman

17:26

Schultz, she thinks that's evidence of a

17:28

huge scandal, that people seek out

17:30

the truth that meet

17:31

it. It's so great. That is

17:33

nuts. Why would they do that? You're listening to

17:35

this idiot. You violated your

17:37

own standard 1966 you appear

17:39

to have benefited from it. Before the release

17:42

of emails in of the emails, in

17:44

August of last year, you had six hundred

17:46

sixty one thousand Twitter followers. After

17:48

the Twitter files, your followers doubled

17:51

1966 now it's three times what it was last

17:53

August. I imagine your SubStack

17:55

leadership, which is a subscription, increased

17:57

significantly because of the work that you did for

17:59

Elon Musk. Oh my gosh. That's

18:02

a that you actually said that

18:04

out loud? That's evidence

18:06

of what? You're not

18:08

challenging any of the information Tayebi

18:11

put out. You're simply claiming that more

18:13

people wanted to see it? It's

18:16

weird because, you know, she doesn't seem to say anything

18:18

about the New York Times. Axios

18:20

Trump era pushes New York Times to

18:23

new heights. Where more

18:25

people subscribed during the Trump era

18:27

because that's what they wanted. PPHoke

18:30

stuff The difference with diabetes,

18:33

conservatives actually wanna hear the truth about

18:35

Twitter. Ladies and

18:37

gentlemen, these people are hopeless. They're

18:39

just absolute buffoons.

18:42

Buffoons. You're dealing with straight up communist,

18:46

commies, straight up communist. They're

18:48

not hiding anymore. Speaking

18:52

of commies, Biden came

18:54

out yesterday 1966 again just

18:56

advertising house. This is, again, not a

18:58

stupid smart person. Biden is this

19:00

is just a straight up stupid person like

19:02

Sylvia Garcia. Wait to hear about

19:04

his budget and tax

19:05

plan. You got a savings account?

19:08

Oh, boy, you better start taking precautions

19:10

right now. We

19:11

get to my sponsor first, buy gold 1966 get a

19:13

free safe to store it in. I'm qualifying

19:16

purchases from Birch Gold Group now through March

19:18

thirty one. They'll ship a free safe.

19:20

Directly to your door, just text Dan

19:22

to ninety eight ninety eight ninety eight to get your

19:25

free information kit on gold and to claim eligibility

19:27

for your free safe. Defense

19:29

keep raising rates because it's the only tool they have to keep

19:31

inflation under control it's not working.

19:34

You've seen the impact on the stock market hedge

19:36

inflation today by owning gold like I

19:38

do. I've been a multiple time customer

19:40

of Berge Gold. With physical gold and silver and

19:42

you're safe, or do an IRA in precious

19:44

metals, we can hold real gold and silver in a tax

19:46

sheltered retirement account. I buy gold

19:48

from Birch Gold to protect my family. You can trust

19:51

them too. They have an a plus rating

19:53

with a better business bureau on thousands of satisfied

19:55

customers. So text Dan, DAN,

19:58

to 989898 for your free information

20:00

kit on golden claim eligibility for your

20:02

free home saved by March thirty first on qualifying

20:05

purchases. Again, text

20:07

Dan to ninety eight, ninety eight, ninety

20:09

eight, to birch gold group. A great company.

20:12

Text in to 989898. Your free

20:14

information kit today, past performance on a guarantee

20:16

future results. Message and data rates

20:18

apply. Thanks, Birch Gold. So

20:21

before we get to that, I wanna get the Fauci. Almost

20:23

skipped over the Fauci section. This is a critical

20:25

here. So Fauci's back. In

20:28

another hearing, we covered the other day, doctor

20:30

Anthony Fauci was exposed by the former

20:32

head of the CDC, doctor Robert Redfield,

20:35

as a buffoness clown constantly

20:37

misleading people. And it's interesting

20:40

Fauci was exposed for keeping

20:42

doctor Redfield off of a critical phone

20:44

call when a bunch of people on the phone

20:46

decided they were gonna go with a natural origin

20:48

theory for COVID despite the fact that

20:50

it was fake. 1966 that they all on

20:52

the call at least suspected it was

20:54

a labelling, costing us valuable

20:57

time getting to the bottom of COVID. These

20:59

people may have been responsible. For

21:02

the proliferation of COVID, which

21:05

led to the deaths of millions of people. Folks,

21:08

I gotta tell you, I don't know what

21:10

criminal statutes would be involved, and

21:12

I am not for weaponizing the government even

21:14

against my political enemies 1966 absolutely not

21:17

for it when there's no crime. However,

21:19

I gotta tell you, if you covered

21:21

up a lab lead, the cover for the Chinese

21:24

Communist Party, and let this thing

21:26

spread and promoted misinformation, While

21:28

they wiped out evidence, then

21:31

there is no question to my mind that obstruction

21:33

of justice charges should be coming near with

21:35

zero. To

21:38

Fauci's back, felt

21:40

the need to defend himself against Robert Redfield,

21:43

and he's upset that Redfield exposed

21:46

him. Now, I want you to keep in mind, it

21:48

was a call early on in the pandemic that

21:50

Robert Redfield, there's no disputing this

21:52

fact was kept off that call. Redfield

21:55

says it was because he believed it was a lab leak and

21:57

they didn't want to hear it. Fauci's

21:59

defense here to Neil Cavuto yesterday is

22:01

trade up hilarious. Fauci,

22:04

who was a big shot within the NIH,

22:06

and his boss Francis Collins. Fauci's

22:09

excuses were 1966 Jodacole.

22:12

You're the freaking head of the NIAD,

22:15

and your boss was the head of the National Institute

22:17

of Health. You didn't think

22:19

it was important that the head of the CDC

22:22

centers for disease control fellows?

22:26

Should be on a call about a disease

22:28

that's not in control? You didn't think that was

22:30

important? I know nothing. I

22:34

know you I know that's what he's I understand.

22:36

Absolutely that. However, you

22:39

don't think it's a big deal that wasn't there

22:41

he didn't push for it? And you just 1966 on

22:43

the call anyway. His excuses, exactly

22:46

that. I don't know nothing. These other people

22:48

decided it would be on the call. This guy is so

22:50

Pathetic. This sniveling little weasel.

22:52

He is so pathetic. Listen to

22:54

this. But let me ask you about what doctor

22:57

Robert Redfield is charging that

22:59

you've frozen

23:00

out. That you didn't want him there, you didn't

23:02

want him at these meetings, and that was

23:04

deliberate. You

23:07

know, Neil, I really feel badly about that

23:09

because I know Bob a long time. He

23:12

is totally and unequivocally incorrect.

23:15

In what he's saying that I excluded

23:18

him. I had nothing to do with

23:20

who would be on that call. That coal

23:23

was organized by a group of evolutionary

23:25

virologist in order to

23:27

discuss the possibility that this

23:29

might actually be a virus

23:32

that was actually engineered. So

23:34

I didn't put anybody on the list of

23:36

that call nor did I take anybody

23:38

else. So it's really unfortunate that

23:41

in a public setting like the hearing

23:44

that doctor Redfield made that absolutely

23:46

incorrect

23:47

statement, the other thing he said to

23:49

interesting answer. Who would he say? No. But

23:51

then, Neil, did you

23:52

decide to be an acquisitive or did these other coronavirus?

23:56

Neil, I just said it. I didn't

23:58

have anything to do about the decision who

24:00

would be on the call. The evolutionary

24:03

virologist, doctor Eddie

24:06

Holmes, Now, Christian Anderson,

24:08

all of the others there 1966, they made the

24:10

decision who's on the call. I didn't add

24:12

anybody to the

24:13

call. So

24:14

you wouldn't like to distract anybody

24:16

from the You didn't know You

24:18

know, really, have you ever seen

24:20

a more sniveling weasel in this guy?

24:22

He was an upper

24:25

level, multi decade

24:27

long, high ranking official the public

24:29

health infrastructure in the United States.

24:31

Him and his boss were on a call

24:34

that the head of the CDC was not

24:36

on. He's given no reason

24:38

why he wasn't on 1966. the best

24:40

he can do is her. Nothing to do with her.

24:43

I mean, just think about this for a second for

24:45

all the liberal morons who watch the 1966.

24:48

are already defending this little sniveling

24:50

weasel. Imagine

24:53

doing a call during the draft for the NFL.

24:55

Right? 1966 you don't like the general

24:57

manager? General manager, the guy

24:59

who basically makes a decision. So you get

25:01

on a call about a trade and you're like,

25:04

I don't know. I don't know what happened. The GM was in

25:06

the bathroom, a trade you want, and he doesn't. I just made

25:08

the trade. He wasn't there. I don't know. Do you think he'd get trouble

25:10

for that? Not fauci.

25:12

Not with the Libs. Because Librials are

25:14

are dipwads. They're idiots. They believe

25:16

everything this guy told them because they're

25:18

stupid. They're just dumb

25:20

people. I

25:22

don't know why they're to call. I need

25:24

to control it. Why don't

25:29

Neil should have held into account here. That's

25:31

a question I would ask. So doctor Fauci, just to be

25:33

clear, You did this call anyway

25:35

without the head of the CDC. You

25:38

didn't draw a line in the sand and say, no,

25:40

we need him here. It was a good

25:42

control. That's the best you can do.

25:45

Here's this sniveling weasel again. It just

25:48

straight up again, misdirection, lies,

25:50

misinformation suggesting

25:52

he didn't push lockdowns, which is hilariously

25:55

stupid. Take a look. Do you regret

25:58

particularly the last 1966, the shutdown,

26:00

the sweeping

26:01

shutdown, that some said made

26:03

things worse. No, III

26:05

don't, Neil. And in fact,

26:07

I think we need to make sure that your

26:09

listeners

26:10

understand, I didn't

26:12

shut down anything. I

26:14

recommended to the president

26:16

that we shut the country down. And

26:19

the only way to do that is by

26:21

draconian means of essentially shutting

26:23

down a

26:23

country. We know that we

26:25

can do that if we shut

26:27

down. Well, I think one of

26:29

the things you really need to do to the

26:32

extent that you

26:34

can shut down

26:36

temporarily the country

26:38

I think is important. Well, if I

26:40

knew at the time that

26:44

shutting down would have such a dramatic effect

26:47

on controlling the spread.

26:50

Obviously, we would have shut down earlier.

26:52

There are those who say you shut down

26:54

you dis destructive things by

26:56

disrupting the economy. And others

26:58

say, well, if you save so many

27:00

in fact by shutting down. Why

27:02

didn't you shut down two weeks earlier?

27:05

But I don't regret saying that the only

27:07

way we could have really stopped the explosion

27:09

of infection was by essentially

27:13

I wanna say shutting down. I mean,

27:15

essentially having the physical separation

27:18

and the kinds of recommendations that

27:21

we've made. You've been a bad tip, Justin

27:23

Hart from Twitter for that glorious video.

27:26

Compilation. And by the way that goes on, we had it.

27:28

Ricky, we had to cut that short. Well, Joe, you cut that. We had

27:30

to cut thirty seconds as more of that. Yeah. As

27:32

you go on forever.

27:37

Just like the pathetic hack

27:39

delegate from the Virgin Islands, Where'd

27:41

you get the information from? I'm not asking for him

27:43

expose his sources, Fauci. didn't

27:45

demand lockdowns, and videos him demanding

27:48

lockdowns, talking about lockdowns. Is

27:50

that dumb liberals argue? I can put the

27:52

evidence in your

27:53

face, but I can't make you drink it.

27:55

Yeah. Let me get

27:57

this

27:58

one last Fauci video. Still

28:00

pushing the absurd theory of

28:02

the wet market. He they he doesn't

28:04

kind of in AQC way and why are you gonna

28:06

see fauci more and more because he can never get out of

28:08

the media spotlight. He has nothing else. Hey,

28:10

Skye, have anyone ever had Napoleon syndrome?

28:13

It's Fauci? He needs to

28:15

be in front of the camera. It defines his entire

28:17

life. Fauci

28:20

does push he pushes this natural

28:23

origin bat soup theory, which is an insane

28:25

conspiracy theory, but he does it this way.

28:27

Because he doesn't wanna say it directly anymore

28:29

because he knows it's foolish. He

28:31

keeps saying, well, China went in and wiped out

28:33

all the animals in wet market. In other words,

28:36

Joe, hint hint. That's probably

28:38

where the animal was and we're never gonna

28:40

find it. Ladies and gentlemen, that's

28:42

the single dumbest thing I've ever heard.

28:44

You're suggesting to me that China again

28:47

had evidence of origins of this thing

28:49

being natural from a wet market, which

28:51

would have absolved them a responsibility, and

28:53

they wiped it out to promote

28:56

the lab lead theory they're running away from

28:58

Only Fauci gets away with this stupidity

29:00

in the media. Take a listen. 1966 the Chinese

29:03

did, as soon as the outbreak, occurred,

29:06

they completely cleaned out the

29:09

wet market of animals that

29:11

should not have been there to begin

29:13

with because it was well known that

29:15

SARS 1966 jumped

29:17

from an animal species to

29:20

a human in a wet market setting.

29:23

So 1966 their lesion, if anything,

29:25

thing is that if in fact there

29:27

were wild animals which photographic

29:29

evidence from one of the investigative

29:32

shows that they were there and they should

29:34

not had been there. So if there's

29:36

anything that the Chinese are covering up,

29:38

they're covering up the fact that they

29:40

violated their own rules about getting

29:43

wild animals from the forest

29:45

or whatever putting it into contact

29:47

with

29:47

humans, that was the real problem.

29:50

I just want you to understand because this is

29:52

what we do. We like to dig deeper. We

29:54

can make fun of the stuff all we want, but that's not

29:56

the purpose of the show. You wish just a tool.

30:00

Understand what Fauci's doing. You're gonna hear

30:02

him tell the story over and over. What he's suggesting

30:04

is that the evidence was wiped out in the wet market.

30:08

It could it to deflect from the fact that he's

30:10

been hiding the lab lead theory the entire time.

30:14

Read the signs. They were everywhere with this guy. And

30:16

keep in mind, this was all about from the start

30:19

attacking Donald Trump as everything in DC

30:21

is because Donald Trump said it'd likely lead

30:23

from a lab. Alright. I got Biden coming

30:25

up. want you to see the

30:27

obscene thing he just proposed

30:30

1966 all the b s he proposed

30:32

to basically your future. If

30:34

this thing he proposed passes, you

30:36

can forget it. Close your business

30:38

tomorrow. It'll be over. Bokes,

30:41

Breakout Nutrition. Breakout Nutrition

30:44

dot com slash

30:46

Dan. That's where you go. Pickup Field

30:48

Agreens. What is Field Agreens? Field of

30:50

Greens is it's a supplement

30:52

I'm very proud of because I had a role in

30:54

creating it. I know the

30:56

the head of this company really well, but a cast nutritionist's

30:58

name is Miles. a couple years ago,

31:00

I was having this issue. Me and Paula were really

31:02

busy. I was running for office. And I am an

31:05

avid firm believer in healthy

31:07

wholesome fruits and vegetables, colors. Arnges,

31:11

the color carrots, those phytopigments, and

31:13

blueberries, and blackberries, and strawberries.

31:16

The problem is didn't have enough time to prepare

31:18

them and I was always out on the road you know, I got

31:20

tired of eating, tried fruit all the time, so it was Florida's

31:23

true story. made me thirsty. So

31:25

I said miles, you gotta go find a way

31:27

to take the healthiest, wholesome fruits and vegetables.

31:29

Ground them up into a powder. Make it taste

31:31

good so I can just throw it in water and run.

31:34

Now with the genesis of now

31:36

one of their most successful products, it's

31:39

exploding in sales, field degrees.

31:41

Pick it up today. It's a science backed formula,

31:44

specific fruits and vegetables you're not gonna

31:46

find in any other product. Proper nutrition

31:48

can reboot your metabolism and help you burn

31:50

calories faster and lose weight in a healthier

31:52

way. Sometimes, you don't get to eat

31:55

as healthy as you should. You need so a little bit of insurance

31:57

through fruits and vegetables. Vegetables. That's where

31:59

field of greens comes in. But the best proof

32:01

will be at your next checkup when I bet your doctor

32:03

says, whatever you're doing, it's working. Keep it up.

32:06

Let me get you started today with fifteen percent

32:08

off. Just gave Guy a couple of jars

32:10

of it yesterday. Visit brickhouse nutrition

32:13

dot com slash 1966 use promo code

32:15

Dan. As promo code Dan,

32:17

DAN at brickhouse nutrition dot com

32:19

slash pick up your field of greens today.

32:22

Get started, Email me

32:24

in a couple months, you're gonna think. Field

32:26

the greens, lemon lime, wild berry, flavors

32:29

are delicious, promo code Dan

32:31

brickhouse nutrition dot com slash Dan.

32:33

Promo code then. Check it out today. Okay.

32:36

Biden put out his budget yesterday, ladies

32:38

and gentlemen. And it has a

32:40

small but not unlikely,

32:43

but not insignificant chance of passing.

32:46

And I wanna tell you it is again

32:48

a straight of the theme of Today show,

32:50

there's straight up communists now.

32:52

They're not hiding it anymore. They're

32:54

about confiscating assets. They're not

32:56

about creating wealth or freedom or prosperity.

32:59

They are straight up commies now. He

33:01

proposed a budget with

33:04

a massive six point

33:06

eight trillion dollars of

33:08

spending. Folks double

33:11

what we spent just fifteen years

33:13

ago. Six point eight

33:15

trillion dollars of spending.

33:19

How much in new taxes? Couple

33:21

of bucks here and there? Five trillion 1966

33:24

new taxes. Good

33:26

luck with that. Now here

33:28

he is, of course, Biden because he's a lying,

33:30

disgusting, just just

33:33

horrible, genuinely awful, corrupt

33:35

human being. Here he is in a tweet

33:37

talking again about fairytale economics

33:40

that don't exist to push through his communist

33:42

budget. Straight up communist confiscation of

33:44

assets. He says 1966 I grew up, trickled

33:47

down economics didn't work for my family.

33:49

He ran to rebuild the backbone of the

33:51

country, middle class. He's about to screw

33:53

the middle class hard. Trickled

33:57

down economics. He sights

33:59

it didn't work for him. 1966 is

34:01

trickle down economics? Well,

34:03

I'm gonna let Thomas Sowell answer for you to cut

34:05

reviews quite a bit. Trickle

34:07

bound economics isn't nothing. It doesn't

34:09

exist. There's no such thing. Oh, no, no,

34:11

my liberal professor told me it's when

34:13

you let the rich keep their money and the

34:15

benefits trickle down. Trickle

34:18

down to who? I thought you let the

34:20

rich keep their money. So why would anything trickle

34:22

down? Oh, it doesn't trickle down. The rich just

34:25

don't give it. Oh, they don't. Is that an economic

34:27

theory? Because the rich actually paid forty

34:29

two percent of their money to taxes, which

34:32

then, weirdly enough, does

34:35

trickle down through the millions and

34:37

millions and millions of dollars of benefits

34:39

that go, so it's kinda weird. It's like you're making

34:41

this talking point up about trickle down economics.

34:43

Because the imagery is

34:45

bad. Jacquled down. It's not a

34:47

thing. It doesn't exist.

34:49

It's a talking point. Here's Thomas

34:51

Sowell addressing just

34:52

that. President Obama in December

34:54

of last year, the market will take care of everything

34:56

they tell us jobs and prosperity will eventually

34:59

trickle down. To everyone else in

35:01

April of this year. During the bush years, the wealthy

35:03

got wealthier, but prosperity sure

35:05

didn't trickle down. In July,

35:07

this past summer, Barack Obama, We've

35:10

tried it their way. It didn't work. We were told

35:12

that prosperity would start at the top

35:14

then trickle

35:16

down, close quote, Where does this

35:18

trickled where does this phrase trickle down come

35:20

from? Oh, I don't know. It was as far back

35:23

as as the as the first as

35:25

the Roseville administration. There

35:28

is absolute it it is an incredible thing.

35:30

It's there is a non existent

35:32

theory that is constantly being attacked.

35:35

Some years ago, in my newspaper column, I

35:37

challenged anybody to cite any

35:39

economist outside of an insane asylum.

35:42

Who had ever made that argument. Nobody

35:44

ever ever ever came up with a single

35:46

person. So

35:47

when Barack Obama says in this past July,

35:49

quote, we were told that

35:51

prosperity

35:52

-- who told him.

35:53

nobody told him. Nobody No economist has

35:55

ever held. No no politicians ever said it. I

35:57

don't know if anybody who's ever said it. In fact,

35:59

when I put this out tonight, 1966 when I went out naturally

36:02

send the clicky to column. Various

36:05

people wrote me and said, well, so and so

36:07

said that, so and so said it. But find

36:09

me the prayers new senate. I don't wanna

36:11

hear how a said and b said,

36:13

find me b and show me where he said it.

36:16

And that was years ago, not

36:18

one example has been

36:19

offered. Bokes, I can't say it enough.

36:21

I hate to keep beating this up. There is no such

36:23

thing as trickle down economics.

36:25

It is simply a series of words Democrats

36:28

put together. To make you believe

36:30

there's some econometric plan

36:32

of trickle down. There's no such thing

36:34

it doesn't exist. Adiants

36:37

use it. Therefore, Joe Biden.

36:39

Now Joe Biden is a talking point machine because

36:41

he's a very dumb human being. He doesn't even understand

36:44

basic economic. 1966 puts

36:46

a focus group tested talking point in front of

36:48

him. Just say trickle 1966. Say fair share.

36:50

And this dance repeats it. He's just a

36:52

machine. It's all he does. They plug in

36:55

a little code he repeats this. He repeated

36:57

well because his brain doesn't work. This guy's

36:59

a rotting bag of oatmeal who just moves

37:01

from talking point to talking point. He was

37:03

yesterday trying to sell his five trillion

37:06

new taxes. I can't I can't believe

37:08

he's gonna actually run on

37:09

this, by the way. As if fair share

37:11

thing. He's gotta throw that talking point in there

37:13

here, check this out. So my plan is to make

37:15

sure the corporations begin to pay their fair

37:17

share. It used to be

37:19

thirty five

37:20

percent. We cut it down to twenty

37:22

one percent. I

37:24

think we should be paying twenty eight percent. It's

37:26

gonna be real fighting up. We should be paying more

37:28

than twenty one percent. Let

37:30

me clear under my plan. I made this

37:32

commitment 1966 I ran. I haven't broken it

37:34

yet. I never will. No

37:36

one making less than

37:38

four hundred thousand dollars. We'll

37:41

see a penny in federal taxes go

37:43

up, not a single penny. Now why

37:45

do I do it four hundred thousand? Because I doubt anybody

37:47

here makes four hundred thousand. I

37:49

did it to make the case that I'm not

37:51

going after. Anything

37:54

remotely and even ordinary folks

37:56

because they're paying their

37:57

share. This is a fascinating clip

37:59

for so many reasons. I I could

38:02

I could do an entire hour podcast

38:04

on justice clip. How

38:06

many false statements, misdirection, how

38:08

much garbage nonsense is in this one

38:10

clip. I'm serious. I could do an hour on this.

38:13

But in the interest of time, he

38:16

says I'm gonna bump the corporate

38:18

tax up. Of course, Liberals cheer heads.

38:20

Get those corporations. Don't you work for

38:22

1966? Oh, sorry. I didn't think of that. From

38:25

twenty one to twenty eight percent. But

38:28

he says at the same time amazingly, but it's

38:30

not gonna hide taxes on anyone making more than four

38:32

hundred thousand dollars a year. I'm gonna ask you guys a trick question.

38:34

This is hard. I'm gonna see which one he gets at first.

38:37

Joe, where do corporations get their money?

38:40

Stockholders?

38:43

E? Customers?

38:45

Yeah. At customer.

38:48

Yeah. Kinda. You're not wrong,

38:50

Joe. Stockholders you. Right? Let's say stockholders

38:53

too, which is gonna come up in a second too.

38:55

But you're both correct. Stockholders,

38:58

ancient funds, and customers.

39:01

They'll get it from Mars, they'll get it

39:03

from corporate fairy

39:05

tale characters in a book. They get them from customers,

39:08

stockholders. So when

39:10

you start taxing the stockholders on unrealized

39:13

gains in their stock, you not only destroy the company,

39:15

but you destroy the stockholder too. 1966

39:17

the corporation's tax load goes up it

39:19

has to stay in business, where does it get its money

39:21

from? That's right. Gets

39:23

his money from customers. Which is you.

39:27

It's not gonna admit 1966. And I want you to pick

39:29

up on something else you said at the end. I 1966 if

39:31

any of you caught it. He

39:33

actually discloses the fact that he's proposing

39:36

this massive tax hike

39:38

on our businesses in America. That's

39:41

you. Because he

39:43

just doesn't want to tax people who are

39:45

there, not because he's basing it on any science

39:47

or anything like that.

39:48

Here's Van Holland, by the way. Chris Van Holland,

39:50

a another ridiculous human being,

39:52

a Democrat senator from

39:55

Maryland Joe knows well. He was on Brett

39:57

Beria, so he was hilarious by the way. Brett Beria

39:59

asked him about the unrealized capital gains tax,

40:01

which we're gonna get to in a second. But here's

40:03

Van Holland again repeating the

40:05

fair share talking point because keep in

40:07

mind, they have nothing else. Check this out. What

40:09

the president is saying, is

40:12

we 1966 to ask the folks who have

40:14

done super well just

40:16

to pay a little bit more of their fair share. We

40:19

want those funds to help make every family

40:21

successful,

40:23

not just the folks who are already doing

40:25

very well. The fair

40:27

share. Guys, again, it's

40:29

just like so the knee

40:32

the stupidity is just knee deep. 1966

40:34

to share you this hilarious video. This is what

40:36

happens when you ask a moron like Van

40:38

Holland. What the fair share is?

40:40

By the way, There'll be a rebuttal

40:43

about this on my Fox show

40:45

tomorrow. We're bringing it back two

40:47

weeks in a row. What

40:49

exactly is the fair ship? Watch

40:51

John Stossle ask Al Sharpton, another

40:54

liberal moron. What exactly the fair

40:56

share 1966, and watch him completely melt

40:58

down then try to avoid the question, check

41:00

this out. The rich do not

41:02

pay their share.

41:03

That's a widespread belief. But do the politicians

41:06

even know how much of the income tax

41:08

burden the rich pay

41:09

now? The top one percent in this

41:11

country pays very much less than

41:13

ten percent. Very much less

41:15

than five percent. So what's

41:17

fair? The top one percent should pay

41:20

Ten percent of America's income

41:22

taxes? Twenty percent. They

41:24

should pay somewhere around fifteen percent.

41:26

They don't pay five

41:27

percent. Anybody could

41:29

see that as unequal and unfair.

41:31

So they should pay fifteen percent,

41:34

he says, and the richest one percent now

41:36

pay less than ten percent. Then he said

41:38

less than five percent. But that's

41:40

so silly because, and I that most of

41:42

you don't know this, the IRS says that

41:44

richest one percent of taxpayers already

41:46

pay thirty four

41:47

percent, twice what Sharpton

41:49

wanted them to pay. The Reverend barely

41:52

reacted when I told him. They're

41:54

already paying thirty four percent.

41:56

No. I think that if you deal with

41:58

the quality

42:00

of their lives, he

42:01

quickly changed the subject

42:03

1966 he never

42:04

would have met how far off he was.

42:06

Again, not even a stupid smart person.

42:08

That's just a stupid person right there.

42:10

Here's the hilarious part about that whole thing.

42:13

The rich were paying thirty four percent, the top

42:15

one percent back then. All

42:17

the arguments about how they're not paying their fair

42:19

share, they pay forty two percent

42:22

now. I'll get to that in a

42:24

second. I also have a this

42:26

Colin Kaepernick video, which is disgusting, and

42:28

I got questions for Dan Moted Show. Still

42:30

more to go. Our next sponsor though

42:33

is, let's see, get refunds dot com.

42:35

If you own a small business, you know the value

42:37

of time. Innovation refunds does too. That's

42:39

why they made it easy no matter how busy you

42:41

are to apply for the employee retention credit

42:43

or ERC. Go to get refund

42:45

stock common to get started in less than eight minutes

42:47

to see if your business qualifies for ERC assistance.

42:50

Your business may be eligible for a payroll tax refund

42:52

of up to twenty six thousand dollars per employee

42:54

kept on payroll during. Over nineteen.

42:57

Innovation refunds has already helped clients claim

42:59

over three billion dollars in payroll tax refunds

43:01

through the ERC, and they may be able to help your business

43:03

too. There's no upfront charge

43:05

either. They don't pay they they

43:07

they don't get paid until your business gets a

43:09

trade fund. Many businesses believe they won't

43:11

qualify based off incomplete or outdated information

43:14

don't let this opportunity pass you by because

43:16

this payroll tax refund is only available

43:18

for limited amount of time. So go

43:20

to getrefunds dot com Let's

43:23

get refunds dot com. Thanks. Get refunds

43:25

dot com. I just wanna

43:27

point out in the interest of time again that

43:29

I'll sharpen some more on top one percent

43:31

of earners now pay even more than thirty third

43:33

thirty four percent. They pay forty two percent

43:35

of their income despite the fact that they only

43:37

earn twenty two percent of the income. and

43:40

by the way, the bottom fifty percent earn ten percent

43:42

of income and pay two percent. So

43:44

you could keep it up with the fair share nonsense

43:46

but it just makes you look like an idiot to people who actually

43:49

know what they're talking about. But again, the dumb people

43:51

will go right line. Your first share sounds good

43:53

to me. Why by the way, why don't he see the

43:55

gory

43:55

details? Of this fiasco?

43:59

He

43:59

wants to hike the corporate tax rate.

44:01

Here's the corporate

44:03

tax revenue after Donald Trump cut the corporate

44:05

tax rate. It started take effect in twenty

44:07

eighteen. So, yeah, there was a slight dip.

44:09

And then look what happened. Two hundred and thirty

44:12

billion, two twelve, three seventy two,

44:14

three ninety five, four fifty six. It's

44:16

weird. It's almost like when you cut taxes, businesses

44:18

start to grow. Grow at a really high

44:21

rate. And what do they wind up doing? They wind up

44:23

paying more taxes. It's so weird. So

44:25

it's almost like Joe Biden's lying about businesses

44:27

not paying their fair share. Here's

44:29

a New York post coverage of Biden's

44:31

ridiculous five trillion dollar hack attacks

44:34

I budget, excessive Biden budget plan

44:36

would cause the national debt to hit fifty one

44:38

trillion by twenty thirty three. That's not even

44:40

a real number. It's not even what does

44:42

fifty one trillion even mean? It's not even

44:44

real. That'd be our national debt under the

44:46

Biden plan. He's a big deficit cutter there, folks.

44:49

Wanna see some more of the low lights in Biden's

44:51

budget plan? Here's a list of some of the

44:53

personal tax hikes. Here's

44:55

one of them. A tax hike under

44:57

Biden's budget calls for a combined federal

44:59

tax rate of forty five percent.

45:02

It's the highest since nineteen eighty six. How do you

45:04

feel about this as federal? Feel good about

45:06

that. Forty five cents out of every dollar you

45:08

make going to the g. About capital

45:10

gains taxes. You want to invest in a

45:12

in a stock or something? He wants your

45:14

capital gains tax rate to be forty percent.

45:16

Now want you to think about that. I want

45:19

you to think how much do I have to

45:21

earn after inflation because it's not

45:23

indexed? For my stock to be worth something

45:25

if I gotta give four out of every ten dollars

45:27

of the proceeds to the government. The answer is

45:29

a whole lot, a whole lot. You

45:32

spoke about the corporate tax rate going up,

45:35

is another gem. This is a classic.

45:37

He wants to tax unrealized gains

45:40

too. Unrealized gains. Meaning

45:42

you bought a stock and you've been holding it?

45:44

Well, you're gonna pay a tax on. How can I pay

45:46

a tax on it? I didn't cash it in. I don't know.

45:48

It's Joe Biden. But what if the stock

45:50

loses value after I pay the tax

45:53

on it? That's your problem. Sorry.

45:57

A more quick thing before we get to questions.

46:01

Imagine being this guy's parents, the

46:03

guy who put the SOx

46:06

on the NFL depicting COPS

46:08

as pigs Colin Kaepernick. Remember this said,

46:10

sorry episode? A guy who nearly

46:12

destroyed the NFL. On his

46:14

knees disrespecting this country. Get off your

46:16

knees. Your pathetic little slab.

46:19

Get off your knees. You

46:21

think

46:21

cops are pigs?

46:23

That'd be the first ones protecting your sari

46:25

ass. Here's Colin

46:27

Kaepernick. This discussion goes to show you what a degenerate

46:30

loser this guy is. His

46:32

adopted parents who took him in and gave him this

46:34

unbelievable life. He's got a big contract

46:36

with Nike. He was an NFL quarterback. Let's

46:39

take a shot out of it. Apply their bunch of races.

46:42

That's what kind of loser this guy

46:43

is. Take a look at this. His journey,

46:45

embracing his blackness, despite

46:47

resistance from many, including his

46:49

white adoptive parents. I

46:51

know my parents love me, but there were

46:54

still very problematic things that I

46:56

went through. I think it was important to

46:59

show that, no, this can happen in

47:01

your own home and how we move forward

47:03

collectively. While addressing

47:05

the racism that is being perpetuated.

47:07

There you go. What a gem. What a

47:10

nice guy. Let's adopt

47:12

this young man

47:14

get them into the NFL and everything. Let's

47:16

take a shot at them, play their races.

47:19

Complete life loser.

47:21

Alright. Slide four. Questions for Dan.

47:25

Hey, Dan at pink conservative. Tell Paul,

47:27

hello, and thanks for what you do. I will.

47:29

What's going on with Tucker? Why did he not show

47:31

more the January sixth videos last

47:34

night? Folks, I

47:36

I don't know the tucker. Like

47:38

I said, we're on the same floor. I should say,

47:40

I don't know them. I know them. But I don't know

47:42

what they do. My I'm

47:45

guessing here. And I'm I'm telling you, I'm guessing,

47:47

I'm basing this on no inside information at

47:49

all, is that there are forty one thousand

47:51

hours of video to go through. So, of course,

47:54

you're gonna release stuff that's the most damning

47:56

on the first night. The footage

47:58

of Sick Nick being alive despite the fact

48:00

we told he was killed there the footage

48:03

of of the 1966 on

48:05

Xiamen walking around. The

48:07

footage of a lot of the people,

48:09

not all, but a lot of people milling around and

48:11

not ride many many were.

48:13

But I'm assuming that's what they're doing and they're

48:15

waiting for some other stuff. Did they have other stuff?

48:17

I don't know. I don't know. They

48:20

haven't told me. But my guess is

48:22

that with all those hours of footage, you gotta

48:24

make sure you get it right. So

48:26

that's my guess. Hey, Dan. At

48:28

Adam Aelitz, I'd love to read your new book

48:31

but I'm too restless to sit down and read an entire

48:33

book. Will it be available on audio?

48:35

It will. I will read it. This

48:38

audiobook, ladies and gentlemen, gonna be a little

48:40

different than audiobooks in the

48:41

past. I've read audiobooks in

48:43

the past. You guys know how they work. You

48:45

get little iPad you just read

48:47

the book 1966 slip the 1966. we're

48:49

not gonna do that. Now, what are you gonna

48:51

do? I'm gonna read the book, then

48:54

I'm gonna just gonna go off script

48:56

and editorialize when I think things are interesting.

48:58

Can it be more like a podcast than an audiobook?

49:01

So so you 1966

49:03

you should do is buy a book,

49:05

read the book, and then listen to the audiobook, 1966

49:07

tell me what you like better. It's gonna be

49:09

fun. At my

49:11

dog one. Hey Dan, why are the demos so bent

49:13

on controlling our lives? Because that's

49:15

the whole ethos of totalitarianism and tyranny.

49:18

Freedom says zero sum game. Your money,

49:20

your kids, your health care, you can't make those choices

49:22

yourself. They have to make them for you. They think you're too

49:24

stupid. If you read the

49:26

Thomas Sowell's book, vision of the anointed, you'll figure

49:28

that out. They're all the

49:31

control is their guiding bloat

49:33

star. That's it. Holly

49:36

j Wiley. Hey, Dan. Do you do martial

49:38

arts? I've spoken about it often. Yes.

49:40

Which one do you prefer? Well, listen, there's

49:42

a lot of good martial arts wrestling,

49:45

boxing, tie boxing. There

49:47

are even even, you know, Crav maga

49:49

does some good work If if you had to,

49:51

yet a gun to your ad nation, you have to pick one

49:54

and only 1966, it's by far

49:56

Brazilian jujitsu. I've

49:58

been involved in it my entire life. It's

50:00

why my elbow looks like this. But

50:02

it's amazing. It's basically teaching

50:05

people how to fight on the ground, which is where most fights

50:07

go. At Dan e m,

50:09

hey Dan, which do you prefer to train Virginia

50:11

jitsu? Guy or no guy? Oh, this is

50:13

he. No guy. I hate guy training.

50:16

I hate it. can't stand it. I just

50:18

don't think it's realistic for me here in

50:20

in Florida. Nobody wears clothes down

50:22

here in Florida. I don't mean clothes. I mean

50:24

like heavy clothes where you know replicate

50:26

a guy So I train

50:29

ninety percent no gee, ten percent

50:31

gee at best. Add

50:34

great full brews. Hey, Dan, how do you measure

50:36

your sleep? I'm older in mid sixties. don't

50:38

need much deep sleep. No. You

50:40

you do. But I usually am in the fifty

50:42

to seventy minutes day range. How

50:45

have you increased your deep sleep? I measure it

50:47

with this order ring. Matter of fact, it's interesting.

50:49

I just got a new one yesterday. This is the Heritage

50:51

Stealth three. Which I like

50:54

my old woman is getting beaten up a little bit from

50:56

from lifting with it. That's how

50:58

I measure my deep sleep. Fifty to seventy

51:00

minutes is about probably what I get

51:02

every night, but you do need a lot of it.

51:04

The more you can get, the better up to a point.

51:07

Have I increased my deep sleep a few

51:09

tricks? Blackouts everywhere. There's

51:11

blackouts in my room. Blackout shades.

51:14

Ear plugs. You may not be able to do that

51:16

if you have young kids. I put ear plugs

51:18

in. Also, I

51:20

try to eat a little bit of carbohydrate

51:23

at night before I go to sleep to keep my quarters

51:25

all

51:25

down. About a quarter or half of a

51:27

banana, brush my teeth, go to

51:29

bed. And I try to get to sleep

51:32

before nine o'clock. It sounds crazy, but it

51:34

works for

51:34

me, and my deep sleep's gone through the roof. And so

51:36

I feel so good today. At

51:38

canine handler one, they did after they leave office

51:41

as the president get to keep the same secret service

51:43

detail that protected him and they pick a new one to

51:45

go with him. If he chooses to keep a

51:47

secret service detail. The answer is, kind

51:49

of sort of. No. The president's

51:52

detail stays with the president. So

51:54

when I was on president Bush's detail

51:56

and president Obama 1966, I tell

51:58

the story all the time. One day I showed up and

52:00

president Bush walked out of the 1966

52:02

three days later, when I went back to work, it was

52:04

president Obama. It was no change for me at all.

52:07

There are some guys, however.

52:10

At the upper level of the presidential protection

52:12

division who grow very friendly with the president,

52:15

it's not uncommon when they become a former

52:17

president for them to ask for some of

52:19

those people to come with them. Doesn't happen

52:21

often, but the Secret Service has no obligation to

52:23

say yes and sometimes they don't. Sometimes they

52:25

say no. Hey, Dan. At

52:27

Myles Forest, when will your new studio be

52:29

open for visitors? Guy, did you see the

52:31

studio? We

52:33

gave you the key. Come on. Get over there, man.

52:36

She

52:36

gave you the wrong key. Oh, no. She

52:38

wants to be Mike Miles Forest

52:41

wants to come to Florida and watch the show. So

52:43

the studio is bought, purchased, we

52:45

closed on it. My guess

52:47

is it'll be open maybe

52:50

around the end of the year. I

52:52

don't know. It may be optimistic. It was

52:54

a burger king before. So it's gonna

52:56

require a lot of work, a lot. Like,

52:58

there's a ton of issues at this

53:01

place. We have to really tighten up. And

53:03

then if you're gonna have people there, there's

53:05

very strict rules. If you're gonna have people on exits

53:07

and things like that. It's not as simple as just like

53:09

everybody just show up. So but

53:11

we'll announce that. PJH

53:14

jim. Hey, Dan. Do you ever carry the three fifty

53:16

seven cigarette? What are your thoughts on it? Yeah.

53:19

That was our secret service

53:20

round. I love that round.

53:21

Here's my problem with the three fifty seven

53:24

sigma. Is

53:26

the the it's really just a bottleneck

53:28

forty. And you wind up losing round

53:30

capability round capability

53:32

because it's a big round. I

53:35

found the difference between that and a really

53:37

good nine millimeter round. When

53:40

you look at gel tests, we did a secret service

53:42

to be so minimal, that it's just

53:44

not worth it for me to lose a round or two

53:46

in a magazine. So it's a great

53:49

round. I love it. And my my

53:51

if it had nothing to do if it was space

53:53

for space and they were equal size, my

53:55

favorite route. But they're

53:57

not. So I carry

53:59

nine millimeter

54:00

now. That's what I

54:01

care. I

54:02

have miles from that's it?

54:04

Oh, it's gonna say miles get two questions in

54:06

there. Folks, thanks again for tuning Please don't

54:08

miss my Fox show. Monologue,

54:11

tomorrow, fox, unfiltered nine o'clock,

54:13

Saturday night. What's the police state look like?

54:15

I'm gonna produce the evidence for the whole country and

54:17

some new stuff we didn't include in the podcast. I

54:19

get Anna Paulina Luna on the diversity

54:21

hires just blowing it in the Biden administration

54:24

1966 an exclusive with Matt Taibi, who

54:26

is brutally brutally. Taken

54:29

down or tried to be taken down at that hearing.

54:31

Thanks a lot for tuning in. Thanks for picking up

54:34

my new book, The Gift of Failure. I appreciate it.

54:36

Please subscribe to the podcast on Apple

54:38

spotify 1966 rumble. It's free. Rumble

54:40

dot com slash bunge, you know. We really appreciate

54:42

it. I'll see you back here. On Monday.

54:45

Good day, sir.

54:46

You just heard Dan Bongino.