Podchaser Logo
Home
9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

Released Friday, 30th September 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

9/30/22: Hurricane Ian Devastation, Trump Wanted to Sue Congress

Friday, 30th September 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:16

Alright.

0:16

Well, we are starting today with hurricane

0:18

Ian in Florida, and they

0:20

they don't call it a disaster for

0:22

nothing. This is not really a weather show

0:25

but there's been a lot of political stuff revolving

0:27

around the hurricane to get everybody up to speed.

0:30

Many trapped in Florida as

0:32

Ian heads towards South Carolina reported

0:35

by the Associated Press. There

0:38

are rescue crews, two point five

0:40

million Florida homes per the

0:42

Associated press without power, two

0:44

point seven million homes without power

0:47

according to other reports. Florida governor

0:49

Rhonda Santos told the news conference. We've

0:51

never seen storm surge of

0:53

this magnitude, it is basically

0:56

a five hundred year flooding

0:59

event. when it comes to

1:01

casualties, hundreds are

1:04

feared dead.

1:05

Now, it

1:06

takes a while to officially get

1:08

those numbers. But we

1:11

now have heard from multiple political leaders

1:13

who are saying, listen, we're being told

1:15

about dozens if not hundreds

1:17

just in our municipality. So

1:20

you start adding that up and unless everybody's

1:22

wrong you're talking about at least hundreds

1:25

dead The Daily Beast

1:27

reporting that as well as millions

1:29

more were into darkness in

1:31

one of the most powerful storms in American

1:33

history. AND THEN AFP

1:37

AND Yahoo News REPORTING FLOODS

1:39

DEVASTATION AFTER HURRICANES, FLORIDA.

1:43

So there's a couple different things I

1:45

think that important to mention here for

1:47

a show like ours. First of all,

1:49

we see a completely different Rhonda

1:51

Santos. that I sort

1:54

of knew existed in the sense that I've

1:56

told you all before. DeSantis is not

1:58

a stupid guy. His incredible

2:01

violent partnership, maybe

2:03

acute partisanship is is a better

2:06

phrase for it, is a sort

2:08

of a calculated decision. I'm not saying he's

2:10

not a right winger, but he can get along with everybody

2:12

when he chooses to. And he has said Joe

2:14

Biden's been good, helping,

2:16

and getting along, and this

2:18

is not the time for pettiness. And it again, it's

2:20

just another reminder that It

2:22

could be like this all the time if people

2:24

just wanted to be more reasonable because that's all it's

2:26

happening. This antigen is just being more reasonable

2:28

in part because he knows that his reelection

2:30

could potentially hinge on is

2:33

he seen as handling the hurricane

2:35

correctly. In addition, you know,

2:37

when COVID started, many of us

2:40

naively and incorrectly thought, this

2:42

will bring the country together. We're all going

2:44

to unite against the virus, and then we did

2:46

many Republicans essentially taking the side

2:48

of the virus, ignoring all

2:51

suggestions and guidelines and recommendations

2:54

and not getting vaccinated, all that different stuff.

2:56

Okay, fine. With the hurricane,

2:58

we're just all going to Now,

3:01

you've got people claiming that the

3:03

hurricane is a hoax. Now, what does it

3:05

mean? What does it mean that it's a hoax? Some

3:07

of them say, well, it was a rain storm,

3:10

but it wasn't really that bad. and

3:12

this was just a way to get the

3:14

hurricane in the media to

3:16

avoid talking about fill

3:19

in the blank. Right? Whatever it is. This was

3:21

a distraction. Some claiming

3:24

that it was a geoengineered

3:27

weather event of some kind. Again,

3:29

for whose benefit, it's like never really

3:31

completely clear. Others

3:33

fixating on the evacuation order

3:36

And are they legal or not and mandatory

3:38

and all these different things? Folks,

3:40

it's a hurricane. Okay. Oh, and actually, I should

3:42

say, some also immediately

3:46

fixating on wanting to blame

3:48

climate change for this particular

3:51

hurricane. And as we've talked about before,

3:53

Climate change is not really about

3:55

any particular hurricane, but

3:58

climate change models would

3:59

predict

4:00

that we would have more extreme events

4:03

and that the events themselves would

4:06

be more extreme. But I

4:08

I we don't need to

4:10

play the game of this particular

4:12

hurricane was caused by climate change

4:14

and the human

4:18

activities on the planet. We don't need to do that.

4:20

The climate change models don't require that.

4:22

So I think that that to the extent that people on

4:24

the left are doing it also doesn't make

4:26

sense. the priority is

4:28

getting power back on,

4:30

reducing fatalities as much

4:32

as possible,

4:35

and starting to get things back together,

4:37

and we will let you know how things are looking

4:40

by Monday. Here's just

4:42

a wild, wild report from

4:44

Vanity Fair's best leaven.

4:47

Donald Trump thought he could sue

4:49

Congress for impeaching him. He

4:51

thought he could sue Congress because

4:54

as legislators, they

4:56

impeached him. Now what's not clear is whether

4:58

he thought he could sue Congress as

5:00

an institution or that he

5:02

could sue the individual members who

5:05

voted to impeach and

5:07

later in the senate to convict. You know, with

5:09

Trump, it's never really clear what he means.

5:11

this entire article is worth reading

5:14

by Beth Levin.

5:16

And the key part is

5:19

actually from Maggie Haberman's

5:21

forthcoming book, Confidence Man,

5:24

which says, when

5:26

the House introduced articles of

5:28

impeachment against Trump, for

5:30

the first time in twenty nineteen,

5:33

Trump reacted with a familiar

5:35

refrain according to the book I'll

5:38

just sue Congress. They

5:40

can't do this to me. Best

5:42

Lebanon adds, it's not

5:44

clear whether Trump responded similarly

5:46

after the second impeachment articles,

5:49

though there's probably a fifty percent chance

5:51

that he did. Listen, this

5:53

would not really be a shock to

5:55

anybody who's been following the, I guess,

5:57

we would call them trials and tribulations of

5:59

Trump. he thought that pulling in

6:01

a special master after the Mar a Lago

6:03

search warrant was gonna be good for him

6:05

and it did not work out out that way.

6:08

he looked directly into the sun

6:10

during that eclipse even though he was told

6:12

not to. I mean, like, at the micro level and the

6:14

macro level, he always believes things that

6:16

aren't true and believe certain things

6:18

would be good for him that that actually are not.

6:21

What's particularly funny

6:23

about Trump thinking he can sue Congress

6:25

is that right now, we talked about this

6:28

yesterday on the bonus show. The

6:30

argument that Trump's lawyers are

6:32

making to get a

6:34

defamation suit against Trump dismissed

6:37

is that the defendant should actually be

6:39

the government and not

6:41

Trump. And so

6:43

you have this extraordinary situation

6:46

where on the and and the point

6:48

is you can't sue the government for

6:50

defamation. So it's

6:52

defamation versus the impeachment.

6:54

But on the one hand, in court,

6:57

Trump's lawyers are arguing You

6:59

can't go after the government for defamation.

7:02

And really, Eugene Carol's

7:04

gripe is with the government and

7:06

not Trump, even though it's Trump who said the things

7:08

that are allegedly defanatory. And

7:10

meanwhile, after and during the impeachment,

7:12

Trump was saying, well, I'll just sue the

7:14

government as if that's something you can

7:16

do over a legislative duty

7:19

that Congress has, which is

7:21

to consider whether a president has done something

7:24

worthy of impeachment. It's all it it's all

7:26

completely scrambled. You all know that.

7:28

And the other theme to this is

7:30

the things that are said

7:32

publicly in the Court of Public

7:34

Opinion by Trump,

7:37

and even sometimes by his lawyers, don't

7:40

translate to what they actually try to

7:42

argue in court. These are two different

7:44

things. And likewise, nobody's

7:46

gonna sue Congress for carrying out an impeachment,

7:48

and of course, it didn't happen. We

7:50

will see what ultimately comes

7:52

of twenty twenty four, but best level in

7:54

sort of raising the alarm here and saying, listen.

7:57

the election stuff was

7:59

not the only wacky dangerous unhinged

8:02

stuff that Donald Trump was thinking at that

8:04

time. Alright. I have more

8:06

to add for you on the

8:08

quest for one point

8:10

five million YouTube subscribers.

8:13

we are dangerously close.

8:15

We are now only looks

8:17

like three thousand one hundred

8:20

and fifty six subscribers away.

8:23

from one point five million.

8:25

And we have a bunch of stuff on the

8:27

calendar. People have been writing in saying

8:29

David, if you can get to the

8:31

one point five million sooner,

8:33

here's what I'm willing to do. And this is just for

8:35

fun. Okay? Everybody relax. It's not like a

8:37

big deal. People are just having a good time. Alright.

8:40

If we get to the one

8:42

point five million by October

8:44

fourth at Sundown, I will

8:46

do the Yam Kapoor fast. I

8:48

never do the Yam Kapoor fast I

8:50

will do it, and I will live

8:52

blog how bad it is to do the

8:54

sunset to sunset fast for Yom Kippur.

8:56

Okay? If we get to

8:58

the one point five million by October fifth.

9:01

I will obtain a

9:03

unicycle and post a

9:05

video of me trying to ride a

9:07

unicycle down the Street, I've never done it. This

9:09

was suggested by Anne from Utah.

9:11

And now I have other things to add.

9:13

If we can get to the one point five million

9:15

by October tenth, Bo,

9:18

will get a bag of mangoes tattooed.

9:20

With some kind of tagline

9:22

from the show, Beau says his wife is a

9:24

tattoo artist in New York City, he already

9:26

has a bunch of tattoos and he's willing

9:28

to get a mango David Pacman

9:30

show related tattoo if we make it to one

9:32

point five million subscribers by October

9:34

tenth. October twelfth,

9:37

Chris is a muralist in

9:39

Atlanta, meaning that he

9:41

paints murals And he

9:43

says if we get to one point

9:45

five million by October twelfth, which is his

9:47

birthday, he will paint a

9:49

David Pacman show mural in

9:51

Atlanta, photograph it and send it

9:53

to us. I think that that would be absolutely

9:55

awesome. Kurt says that if

9:57

we get to the one point five million by

9:59

October

9:59

twenty one, he will

10:00

get a Mount Rushmore tattoo

10:03

on his back except it'll

10:05

be Biden, Obama,

10:07

Clinton, FDR, and

10:09

me, which kinda scares me, but it sounds

10:11

interesting. And then

10:13

Kelsey says that if we make it by

10:15

November fourth, which we really

10:17

should, she will bake

10:19

and decorate a custom

10:22

vegan David Pac winter

10:24

cupcake and send

10:26

pictures. And one will say,

10:28

Obama and another will be Alex Jones or

10:30

whatever. Okay. So she's gonna do custom

10:32

show related cupcakes. if we make it

10:34

by November fourth. So two things.

10:36

One, if you're not subscribed,

10:38

please subscribe, youtube dot com

10:40

slash the David Pacman show the earlier

10:42

we get to the one point five, the

10:45

more of these hijinks that we will be able

10:47

to engage in. And

10:49

then, secondly, if you have something to add

10:51

to the calendar, like, if you wanna say, you know, David,

10:53

if you make it by

10:56

October sixth, I

10:58

will something.

11:01

You can email info at

11:03

david pacman dot com. Alright.

11:05

One really funny other thing

11:07

related YouTube channels and then we're gonna move on to a bunch of

11:09

other things. You may or may not

11:11

know that we launched

11:13

a second or really a third

11:15

YouTube channel recently and

11:17

it is called Pacman Finance.

11:19

Okay? This is not a

11:21

political channel. This is

11:23

a channel in which we do personal

11:25

finance and a little light economics.

11:28

So how do put

11:30

together an asset allocation? Why

11:32

is some inflation good? Why

11:34

you shouldn't try to time the market? All

11:36

these things. So

11:39

funny. Initially, when we launched

11:41

the channel, a bunch of right

11:43

wingers were like, dude, you're a socialist.

11:45

Why are you gonna give financial advice?

11:47

And some of them have tomato one hundred and eighty and

11:49

turned around. I love this. This guy, Tommy

11:51

Boy. Okay? After we

11:53

posted our first video, Hiro,

11:55

this is comical, a complete

11:58

socialist talking about asset

12:00

allocation, laughable

12:02

hypocrisy. Now, of course, I'm not

12:04

a socialist. but he was entitled to his

12:06

opinion. The second video

12:08

we posted, Tommy Boy shows up

12:10

and he says, dude, you're

12:12

really going to keep talking out of both sides of

12:14

your mouth on two channels. Be a capitalist.

12:17

Or be a socialist. Stop trying to pretend

12:19

you can be both. Now, Having a

12:21

budget doesn't exactly make you one or the

12:23

other. But anyway, Tommy Boy is

12:25

entitled to his opinion. And

12:27

then just yesterday, Tommy

12:30

Boy shows up after like our

12:32

sixth video and says,

12:35

Pacmin gives sound conservative financial

12:37

advice on this channel. ignore his

12:39

utter nonsense political advice on the

12:41

other channel and just watch

12:43

this channel. Tommy

12:45

Boy has been

12:46

turned around a hundred and

12:48

eighty degrees by the

12:51

sensible and sound information.

12:53

I remember I'm not giving any individual

12:56

financial advice, but the information on

12:58

the Pacman Finance channel.

13:00

I invite you to check it out, youtube

13:02

dot com slash pacman finance. We've

13:05

got clips going up about all sorts

13:07

of different topics And if you have

13:09

a finance topic you would like me to

13:11

address, not politics folks. Different

13:13

channel, not politics. You can

13:15

email info at david pacman

13:17

dot com and I will do my very

13:19

best to address that. And soon we'll

13:21

be taking some personal finance questions

13:23

for the channel. Lots of exciting things coming

13:25

up. Alright. We have a fantastic

13:27

show. Tonight, it is

13:29

Beto versus Abbott debate

13:31

for Texas Governor. I will be live on

13:33

YouTube, Twitch, and Facebook for that debate. I hope you will

13:35

join me. I don't know exactly what time it is. It must

13:37

be sometime around seven PM. I don't

13:39

know. And I hope to see

13:41

everybody then.

13:45

One of

13:45

our longtime sponsors is Munkpack

13:48

offering low sugar plant

13:50

based keto friendly bars.

13:52

I love these. They are the

13:54

perfect snack for anyone trying to

13:56

eat better. or cutting back on

13:58

sugar and carbs without sacrificing

13:59

taste. Monk pack

14:02

offers granola bars and nuts

14:04

and seed bars, each with only

14:06

one gram of sugar or less, two

14:08

to three net carbs and a hundred

14:10

and fifty calories or less. I'm a big fan

14:13

of the Macadamia white chocolate,

14:15

nut, and seed bar, great

14:17

combination of sweet, salty,

14:20

chewy, and crunchy, and there's

14:22

under one gram of sugar. They come

14:24

in other awesome flavors

14:26

like sea salt dark chocolate,

14:28

coconut cocoa chip, and

14:30

caramel sea salt, Munkpack

14:32

is great. If you're doing keto,

14:34

I don't do keto, but Munkpack

14:36

is just great for anyone who wants

14:38

something delicious on the go without

14:40

the sugar. And my audience gets twenty

14:42

percent off your first order at

14:44

munkpack dot com when you use the

14:46

coupon code packman at

14:48

checkout That's MUNKPACK

14:51

dot com. Get twenty percent

14:53

off with coupon code Pacman.

14:56

The info is in the podcast

14:58

notes. The David

15:00

Pacman show is a viewer and

15:02

listener supported program. It's the audience

15:04

that funds the work that we do

15:06

primarily through the bonus

15:08

show and full show made

15:10

available through the membership program. Oh,

15:12

the bonus show where you wanna make money,

15:14

but everybody else that makes money to find themselves

15:17

as bad I welcome you and

15:19

invite you with peace and love to sign

15:21

up at join pacman dot

15:23

com and you can use the coupon

15:25

code big voting

15:27

twenty two to get a

15:29

discount off of the cost of

15:31

your membership. Let's

15:33

go to the phone You

15:35

can call in on the Friday show

15:37

via discord at david pacman dot

15:39

com slash discord

15:42

extremely extremely important stuff

15:44

to do. Why don't we

15:46

go first to Jason

15:48

from Toronto, Canada Jason,

15:51

welcome. What's on your mind today, my friend?

15:54

Hey, David. How are

15:56

you? I'm doing well. Thank you.

15:58

Just actually go I

15:59

have a couple of questions for you.

16:02

One politics related. Do

16:05

you feel that as major

16:07

news networks are starting to distance themselves

16:09

from Trump and all the legal

16:11

issues he's currently in. Are we seeing the

16:13

slow demise? of him potentially in

16:15

his movement? Or do you feel

16:17

that that's still a little bit of way

16:21

as

16:21

far as as seeing kind

16:23

of the mag movement kind of

16:25

dwindle down. I think we've got a long way to

16:27

go. Right now, it's not

16:29

so much that the TV networks like

16:31

Fox News, for example, are stepping

16:34

away from Trump, but they're

16:36

giving themselves other options In

16:38

other words, they're starting to say, hey, a

16:40

lot of people seem to like DeSantis.

16:42

They're kind of building the

16:44

escape hatch, so to speak. but they

16:46

haven't yet pulled the

16:48

eject button. If if that makes sense,

16:50

that's the analogy I would say.

16:52

However -- Right. I think depending on what happens

16:54

in twenty in November of twenty two in the

16:56

midterms, and depending on what happens in

16:58

terms of the indictments and public opinion

17:00

around Trump's indictments, if indeed he

17:02

gets indicted, then you may start to

17:04

see things change. One interesting thing is if you

17:06

look at predict it, which is betting

17:09

markets, the Sandoz is now in the lead

17:11

as who is expected to get the twenty twenty four

17:13

Republican domination based

17:15

on the betting numbers. If those

17:17

numbers continue to go against Trump's

17:19

favor, you might see an acceleration But

17:21

right now nobody's really abandoned Trump. They're just giving

17:24

themselves other options. Howard Bauchner: Yeah,

17:26

that makes sense.

17:26

And just the other question I

17:28

have for you, as a new father, what are

17:30

you enjoying most about your

17:33

experience? I I'd

17:34

say like the,

17:35

you know, essentially day to day

17:38

development. and just seeing how things change so much from day to

17:40

day and, you know, she's able to do new

17:42

things, and attention span goes up, and

17:44

ability to just, like, kinda

17:46

hang out without flipping out increases.

17:48

And it really is I mean, certainly from

17:50

week to week, it gets very different.

17:53

That's

17:53

awesome. Good to hear. Alright. Things are

17:55

good to hear. Yeah. Things

17:57

are good. The good temperature here is certain

17:59

to drop

17:59

as fall comes in. But

18:02

otherwise, things are right. You I mean, I

18:04

can't I I apologize for this question, but

18:06

there's no way you can get a good bagel in

18:08

Toronto. Right? That's a Montreal thing.

18:10

I mean, you can

18:11

get a good bagel in Toronto. I mean, it's

18:13

less it's less known, but, yeah, there's

18:15

a couple of bagel shops here in the city there pretty

18:18

good. Wow. Montreal

18:20

is known for it? Yeah. Yeah. There's some

18:22

pretty good places here. And smoked salmon

18:24

and everything's available? Yep.

18:26

Incredible for sure. incredible. Wow. And you guys have the Internet

18:28

and running water and everything? Oh,

18:30

yeah. Yeah. That's amazing. We just got cars

18:32

a couple months ago.

18:34

Very good. Alright, my friend. Thank you for the call. That was

18:37

a joke, by the way. Obviously, we we love Toronto.

18:39

Thank you. No offense to that's

18:41

those are just jokes. Everybody relax.

18:43

Alright? Let's go to John from Kentucky.

18:45

John, what's going on?

18:48

Hi there, David. Can you hear me? I can.

18:50

It it It quite literally sounds like

18:52

you're underwater. You're not underwater. Are

18:54

you? I'm not

18:55

right. Oh,

18:56

boy. Did you say you're not underwater

18:59

right now? I'm not underwriting

19:01

right

19:01

this moment. Oh, you know, it sounds all it sounds

19:03

so much better. What did you just change?

19:06

I just went off of my car Bluetooth

19:08

to my handset, beautifully done.

19:10

beautifully done. What's what's on your mind today? Yeah.

19:12

I just had a I had a

19:15

question. I've

19:17

been I'm an Uber driver, and I talk a lot of politics

19:19

in the car, which is a mistake. I gotta

19:21

say. Yeah. But a question

19:23

that's kind of been popping up as a twenty five year

19:25

old left, is it just I

19:27

just What's the point in conservatism

19:31

before? III

19:33

mean, I'm

19:33

not gonna I can't answer that for

19:35

you. That's interesting. So, like, let me

19:37

see if I can understand the situation. You

19:39

drive Uber in Kentucky?

19:42

Yes. And so, are most of your

19:44

passengers right wingers? Well,

19:46

I

19:46

I actually live in Louisville,

19:49

Kentucky, so we're a blue dot in a red

19:51

state. Okay. So I get a good

19:53

mix. of people. So I have a lot of Leftists in the car, I have

19:55

a lot of Liberals, and then a lot

19:57

of the people that I get are Republican.

20:00

Yeah. And I I just

20:02

simply like, one of the things that I've been saying recently,

20:05

I don't know if you've ever watched adventure

20:08

time. No. I don't even know what it is.

20:10

Okay. Venture time is a is a kids

20:12

show. It was really, really good, though.

20:14

There's this there's

20:17

this vampire lady named

20:19

Marceline. And in one of the

20:21

episodes, he's fighting this other guy who's the

20:23

vampire king and they break apart. And

20:25

the vampire king is like, hey, Marceline, you've

20:27

lived over a thousand years. What have you learned?

20:30

And she says something to the

20:32

effect of you know, everybody

20:34

keeps making the same mistakes over and over

20:36

again, and I guess nobody lives long

20:38

enough to see the pattern. Right.

20:41

Well, listen. My thought on that is as follows.

20:43

And I don't wanna interrupt the retelling of

20:46

adventure time episodes, but to here's

20:48

my thought. There's two things going on with conservatism.

20:51

One is the idea of

20:52

let's keep doing things the way

20:55

we've done them before just for the sake

20:57

of continuing to do them the same way

20:59

we've done them before, which for me isn't a

21:01

very good argument necessarily.

21:03

Right. And

21:04

then also, there is a sort of

21:06

contrarianism to conservatism

21:09

when people from typically

21:11

from the left say, hey,

21:13

here's an advancement that we

21:15

have, which will improve things.

21:18

There's like a reflexive contrarian

21:20

as where it's just like, no. No. No. No.

21:22

We're not gonna do that just because

21:24

you want to, we're not going to do it. So

21:26

the I think that those are two important elements

21:28

of it. Hey, one

21:29

hundred percent. And, like, you know, one of the

21:31

things I've been saying a lot in the car is, respectfully,

21:33

I don't have to have lived a

21:35

thousand years to see that the story of human

21:38

history has always been conservatives

21:40

or their historical contemporaries

21:42

fighting against progress. Yeah. And

21:44

then Leftists or their historical contemporaries

21:47

dragging them, kicking in screaming into that

21:49

progress. Correct. So, yeah, I just don't

21:51

see the yeah. It's just frustrating

21:53

living in in red state

21:55

right now. John, what's the

21:57

wackiest Uber driving situation you've

21:59

experienced? Oh,

22:02

honestly, I've had too bad right now. I

22:04

did have one lady get in the car with the

22:07

MAGA hat and the flags and

22:09

the pins and stuff. And we're

22:11

about two minutes into the ride, and she

22:13

just casually says, you know, I just can't stand

22:15

the way the media treats true patriot.

22:19

Right. And so I kinda give it a

22:21

second. I'm like, okay. I'll bite. Who

22:23

are true patriots? And she says,

22:25

well, Matt Gates Alex Jones just to name a

22:27

couple. Yeah. I'm like, oh, okay. Well,

22:29

I don't have to say Alex Jones is

22:31

full of crap. You know, he says that

22:33

in depositions and stuff. But

22:35

Matt Gates, the guy who's currently under investigation

22:37

from the DOJ for child sex trafficking.

22:39

Like, this is the guy who's a true patriot

22:41

to you, really? Have you ever had to kick anyone

22:44

out of the car? I have

22:46

not, but I think that's mostly

22:48

because my demeanor in the car is

22:50

very much if you don't like it,

22:52

you can walk Right. So I think

22:54

that more kind of like that

22:56

keeps people in line a lot of the time. So

22:59

yeah. Well, John, I appreciate the call.

23:01

Stay safe out there. I'll

23:02

try brother. Thank you. Alright. Congratulations on the new child.

23:04

Thank you. There's John from Kentucky with some

23:06

powerful powerful declarations As

23:09

a reminder, if you want the opportunity to

23:12

get on to chat with me and you are

23:14

currently in the Discord waiting

23:16

lobby, your nickname must

23:18

be name and where you're calling

23:20

from. It doesn't even have to be real.

23:22

Like, I don't know where where you really are.

23:25

but it has to be in that format. So people who just

23:27

have, like, single word nicknames and stuff like that, you're

23:29

not gonna get called on just as a

23:31

heads up, so everybody knows and is

23:33

on the same page. Let's go

23:35

to Alex from Seattle. Alex welcome.

23:38

Good morning,

23:39

David. I wanted to ask you

23:41

about a book written by a guest you had on a

23:43

few months ago, Bobby Azarian. Sure. That was

23:46

called the Rumensa reality. Yeah.

23:48

Did you did you read the book? I

23:49

read part of it. Yeah. For

23:52

that one, I read, like, I often

23:54

do introduction, table of

23:56

contents, first chapter, last chapter, and

23:58

some stuff in between. Okay.

23:59

Interesting. I found it to be I want first of all, I

24:02

wanted to thank you for having that guest on having

24:04

that book. I I've in the process of

24:06

reading it, and I've I'm

24:08

reading it slowly because it's a very dense book.

24:10

I'm sure if you read a couple of chapters,

24:12

you probably like, it's it's very

24:14

it's explaining each piece that

24:16

goes, building case for,

24:18

you know, you know,

24:20

why why why do we exist? What

24:22

is life for? I just wanted

24:24

to know if you you if

24:26

in the brief parts that you read, if there was anything you

24:28

found to be either

24:30

disagreeable or if it changed anything about

24:32

how you thought about concepts like

24:34

free will determinism because it goes into a lot

24:36

of that. No. I mean, you know, when I I

24:39

read so much that it's rare

24:41

at this point, that I read

24:43

something

24:43

and it completely upends my

24:46

view. It's just sort of like

24:48

it now averages into

24:50

my views over all

24:53

and just like can slightly tweak

24:55

things. So I don't know that I can say that there

24:57

was any kind of like big one eighty

24:59

that I did as a result of the parts of the book but

25:01

it certainly presented and so did the interview.

25:03

You know, you III think my

25:05

view tends to be

25:07

there is really no one

25:10

source that describes reality

25:12

as far as I'm concerned. What

25:14

I'm looking for are

25:17

thoughtful ideas

25:19

to integrate into my understanding.

25:21

So, no, I can't say I had any

25:23

real one eighties. Okay. Did you

25:25

I mean, is there something you read in the book that made you

25:27

say, wow. I I mean, prior

25:29

to reading the book, I mean, I I really kind

25:31

of believed in the concept of determinism, it seemed

25:34

to make the most sense to me -- Yeah. -- you know, ball

25:36

rolling down a hill, add more complexity,

25:38

you know, start to finish. I I feel like

25:40

that kind of worked. And especially with,

25:42

like, more progressive politics, you can use that

25:44

lens and you can look at the way people's lives exist

25:47

and the problems they ran into and you can use

25:49

that. And the way the book presents it is

25:51

kind of, you know, it

25:53

basically takes things like life and it says,

25:55

instead of it being a thing that just kind of

25:57

magically happened and it's like a miracle, it

25:59

frames it as like it as

26:01

an inevitability based on fundamental laws of

26:04

science. And it continues to build from there.

26:06

And so I found that

26:08

it it really made me rethink. It didn't believe

26:10

in free will again if that kind of makes

26:13

sense because it frames it

26:15

as as know, the concept of free

26:17

will is the ability to imagine possible

26:20

realities and then steer yourself there.

26:22

And, anyway, I just I I

26:24

found it to be a book. I recommended it highly that

26:26

I've as someone who does not consider

26:29

themselves religious, I found it to

26:31

be a thing that explained the

26:33

universal way that kind of gave it a purpose that kind of

26:35

made sense. So and and I was just I was very

26:38

surprised at that because I'm highly

26:40

skeptical similar to your your perspective around

26:42

a lot of things. I was surprised at how much

26:44

I connected with the book and found it to be interesting.

26:46

Well, I appreciate the feedback, Alex. Thank

26:49

you. love to

26:50

have more authors like that on your show.

26:52

We will make it happen.

26:54

Alright. Alright. Thanks, Alex. Take care. Very always

26:56

great to hear that people are getting value.

26:59

from from the the guests on the show.

27:01

That's fantastic. Let's go to

27:03

Willie from Oregon. Willie,

27:05

welcome to the show. What's on your

27:07

mind today? Hey,

27:09

I was just curious if you

27:11

have paid any attention to the truth

27:14

social ads instead of did popping

27:16

up? No. We just did a story

27:18

earlier this week about how the a company that was

27:20

going to invest a hundred and forty

27:22

million to merge with truth social,

27:24

they're they're just completely bailing, and truth

27:26

social is likely gonna fail soon. But what

27:28

where are they running ads?

27:30

Well,

27:31

there was an update to the app.

27:33

And so I did that and all of a sudden notice

27:35

that these ads started popping

27:37

up. Like, after that.

27:39

It looks like Trump's the only

27:41

one paying for ads. Just hand tied by

27:44

them. Okay. There's

27:47

one for you know,

27:47

twenty five hundred free knives and reading

27:49

through that was like, arm yourselves --

27:52

Oh my goodness. -- oh, let me ask you

27:54

this. Pretty dark. Are

27:56

you on when you're on the app, do

27:58

you just look to

27:59

see the wacky stuff that gets

28:02

posted? Are you on there to kinda like

28:04

argue with people or to Troll.

28:06

Like, what's your what do you do on

28:08

the app?

28:09

Oh, could we cuss

28:11

on this or no? No. Please don't.

28:14

Okay.

28:14

Just messing

28:17

with Trump and following the

28:19

the cuckoo there. I see. Have you

28:21

had anybody, like, directly attack you because

28:23

of things you post? Oh,

28:26

yeah.

28:26

I I did that for a little bit.

28:28

You know, I there's not

28:30

much common sense on there. So it's kind

28:32

of pointless to do anything, but just

28:35

like to keep an eye on what that

28:37

guy's up to and

28:39

talking and, like, you know, last night, it

28:41

looked like he he just reposted

28:43

the craziest stuff and it's

28:45

pretty

28:45

scary. Yeah. I like to kinda keep an

28:47

eye on him and see what he's up to, but the

28:50

the you should look at some

28:52

of the ads that have been popping up on there. They're

28:56

very strange. I'll check that out. Very strange. I'll check

28:58

that out. Thanks for bringing in to my

29:00

attention. Yep. Yep. I

29:02

think it's worth looking into it and talking about

29:04

a little bit. Alright. Willy

29:06

for more time. Thank you very very much. Appreciate

29:08

it. Thank you very very much. really,

29:11

really important stuff

29:13

happening on truth and it

29:15

soon should fail completely. Alright?

29:17

Okay. Let's take a very quick break if you're

29:19

holding to talk to me. Keep holding

29:21

because we're going right back to the phones in a

29:23

moment.

29:24

One of our

29:27

sponsors

29:27

is Little Spoon, your one

29:29

stop shop for healthy, easy

29:31

meals, and snacks. for

29:34

your baby toddler or big

29:36

kid

29:36

delivered right to your door. With

29:39

fresh organic baby food

29:41

for every toddler and kids

29:43

meals that even the picky

29:45

eaters will love and the new line of

29:47

healthy smoothies, little

29:49

spoon, as you covered, Little

29:51

spoon makes everything fresh. It's just

29:53

like homemade. It's ready in mere

29:56

moments. All of the recipes are

29:58

delicious. They're nutritionally balanced

30:00

and free of junk. Little Spoon's

30:02

baby food is one hundred percent

30:04

organic and cold pressed

30:06

for every eating stage

30:08

for toddlers and kids. Little

30:11

spoon has the classics mac and cheese,

30:13

but they'll sneak things in like butternut

30:15

squash and carrots. They have more

30:18

adventurous meals, cheesy pufousas

30:20

or chicken pot stickers. They're all

30:22

kit approved packed with

30:24

nutrients and little spoons organic smoothies are

30:26

perfect when you need something quick and

30:28

easy. And the best part is kids meals

30:30

under six dollars and baby food

30:32

and smoothies under three dollars

30:35

each. Plus, you'll get fifty percent off your

30:37

first order when you go to little spoon

30:39

dot com and use the coupon code

30:42

Pacman fifty. That's coupon

30:44

code Pacman five zero.

30:46

To get fifty percent off your first order,

30:48

the info is in the podcast

30:50

notes. Let's stick with the phones by which I

30:53

mean discord david pacman

30:55

dot com slash

30:57

discord extraordinarily.

31:00

powerful phone calls happening today,

31:03

and we don't want to miss a

31:05

minute of it. Let's go

31:07

to Bobby from Jersey,

31:09

Bobby from Jersey. Welcome. What's going

31:11

on?

31:16

Bobby from Jersey, you gotta unmute yourself, Mike. Hello,

31:18

David. Can you hear me? Yes. I can.

31:21

Alright. Is

31:21

there a specific way that you

31:23

go about engaging with conspiracy?

31:25

Depends on

31:26

the specifics, I would say. I

31:28

I mean, depend depends on where

31:31

and with

31:32

whom. Sort of, like, well,

31:34

when I say far

31:36

right conspiracies, like, Q1 on and, like,

31:38

the election results or whatnot. Yeah.

31:41

Like, is there really a way you can, like, debunk

31:43

that? Or I mean, the the problem

31:45

is that a lot of the people that believe this

31:48

stuff aren't actually open

31:50

to thinking of

31:53

thinking critically about it. And so if

31:55

you show them contradictory evidence,

31:57

they say that evidence not reliable

31:59

or has been planted. If

32:01

you show them the absence of

32:03

evidence for what they say, they go

32:05

right because they're covering up

32:08

the evidence for what I believe. So unfortunately with a

32:10

lot of them, there's really no way

32:12

to talk them out of it or even get them

32:14

to reconsider. Yeah.

32:17

That's what I've noticed too. Alright, David.

32:19

Thank you. Alright. Thank you very much.

32:21

There's Bobby from Jersey. Yeah. I mean, unfortunately,

32:24

it's It's depressing is

32:26

the reality. It's depressing. Let's

32:28

go to

32:29

Rahman from

32:32

Minneapolis. Welcome back to the program.

32:34

What's going on? Thank

32:35

you, David. How's your day going

32:37

today? It's going well. Yeah.

32:39

My first question is, how would you compare

32:42

Donald Trump to past Republican leaders

32:44

like Richard Nixon,

32:47

Reagan, Bush, and how and how they

32:49

conducted business in this country and their

32:51

scandals? Well, I think

32:53

that

32:53

Trump has done

32:55

mean, listen,

32:56

compared to most of the people you listed,

32:59

all

32:59

of them. Trump

33:00

has had way more wrongdoing that he's

33:02

engaged in than any of them. I

33:04

think the difference is Trump has had

33:06

the benefits of the right wing

33:09

media machine, including Fox

33:11

News and NewsMax and Right wing media

33:13

and and defenders to

33:15

the death on social media and on

33:17

and on and on. But I think

33:19

that look at the list of all

33:21

the things that Donald Trump has done. Look

33:23

just look at all the criminal investigations that he's

33:25

under right now. So I think that Trump is

33:27

worse in terms of misdeeds. I

33:29

think Trump's dumber than most of them.

33:31

I mean, Nixon was a horrible person, but he

33:33

was quite smart.

33:34

Reagan you

33:36

know, was no genius, but he was

33:38

he was relatively smart. Bush was

33:40

kind of like when it when it started with

33:42

the whole kind of dim But again, Bush

33:44

seems like a mensa member compared

33:47

to Trump. So I I think that Trump is

33:49

also particularly just dumb in

33:51

a very superficial

33:54

way. Yeah. Like,

33:55

what I believe is the light. Like,

33:57

if it with Nixon, he didn't have

33:59

the right way media

33:59

back. Then if he did, I don't think

34:02

he would have been impeached.

34:04

right Right. With me

34:05

and with Reagan, I feel like with Donald Trump,

34:07

he's he's essentially taken every

34:09

he's just taking every bad part of each of each of

34:12

those presidents. Like, with Reagan, he had the

34:14

Iran contra scandal with Nixon

34:16

was water getting with Bush, it

34:18

was it was about lying about

34:20

WMDs and and torturing

34:22

people. Yeah. No. Absolutely. And I

34:24

think you're you're spot

34:26

on that had Nixon

34:26

had the benefit of this right wing media machine that

34:29

was defending everything he said

34:31

all the time constantly It

34:34

is quite possible that public opinion among Republicans

34:36

would not have shifted. Republicans would

34:38

not have gone to Nixon and said, listen, if you

34:40

don't resign, we're gonna have to impeach you. And

34:43

that that it could have actually saved Nixon. And so

34:45

that the really scary thing there is

34:47

more about Trump

34:48

did enough horrible

34:50

things that were

34:52

it not for. Were it not for the

34:55

right wing media apparatus, Trump might have

34:57

had to resign. Trump in the

34:59

seventies might have had to resign and

35:01

that really puts a big spotlight

35:04

for the horrible destructive nature of right wing

35:06

media, and we should not forget that. Howard

35:08

Bauchner:

35:08

Yeah. Second second question

35:10

before I go, this is very quick.

35:13

with with a lot of people with a lot of people going against

35:15

Progressive's, I'm like, Progressive's all they wanna

35:17

do is make people's lives like,

35:20

versus centrist versus right wing versus people

35:22

in the right wing, progressive all

35:24

they wanna do is make people the lives better.

35:28

So why are so many people going against them even though

35:30

the the the only thing that they care about is

35:32

making every everybody on have

35:34

the same eco footing in

35:36

this country. Yeah. No. I I completely agree with your

35:38

perspective, and the counterpoint

35:40

is the right would say, no. No. No.

35:44

Listen. as

35:45

the government, what we want the government doing is

35:47

not making people lives

35:50

better. It's letting

35:52

people live the life they wanna live. And

35:54

if some people don't want a better life, then

35:56

we should allow them to do it. It's

35:59

a nanny

35:59

state that forces

36:01

themselves upon you. That's the way that the right would approach it. Yeah.

36:03

But when when

36:04

Republicans talk about small small

36:08

in state not people's lives. Yeah. There are

36:10

actually lines people who would progress as Of

36:12

course. They act they

36:14

they actually they actually wanna stand up whose lives, they make whose lives better. That's

36:16

all they really wanna do. I agree with you. I

36:18

agree with you completely, but good luck

36:20

convincing a Republican of

36:22

that. Alright.

36:23

alright Alright.

36:24

Rock, one from Minneapolis. Great to hear from you again. Very much appreciated.

36:27

Let's go to Alex from Baltimore. Alex,

36:29

welcome back to the program.

36:33

Hello? Hey, David. Can

36:35

you hear

36:35

me? Yes, I

36:38

can. Alright.

36:38

Real quick, I wanted

36:40

to say, congrats on the baby. It's been a

36:42

little while. How much has your espresso

36:45

budget increased since then? You

36:47

know,

36:47

it really hasn't changed dramatically. I

36:48

have to tell you because, you know, one

36:51

of the things this I I hate

36:53

to admit this, but with my

36:55

particular espresso machine. I am much

36:58

better at getting a double

37:00

shot just right than a single.

37:02

So often what I do and I know it's

37:04

wasteful, but at the end of the day, it's

37:06

just water. Even if I only want a single shot, I'm usually making a

37:08

double and then just dumping the

37:10

second shot that I don't want.

37:12

So all that I've really been doing

37:14

sometimes is

37:16

just having the second shot. So it hasn't really changed

37:18

the budget. Well, lucky you.

37:20

Yeah. Now why should is

37:24

that surprising? Well, just with

37:25

with our child, it was a lot

37:27

rough going to the first few months with sleep,

37:29

so I definitely had

37:32

lots red eyes and extra coffee. That's Don't listen. It's

37:34

rough, but it's like how much coffee am I really

37:36

gonna have, you know? That's fair.

37:38

I'll just play around Alright. I

37:40

mean, I guess a lot is the answer. Who knows?

37:43

Yeah. Fair

37:43

enough. Real question. Yeah. So I had

37:45

I had something about eliminating

37:48

the filibuster, so I'm not

37:50

against it in principle or

37:52

anything. Okay. But I but I

37:55

do wonder, like, and we

37:57

just got rid of it, period, like, for

37:59

example, Trump's first two

37:59

years in office wouldn't they have just been

38:02

able to

38:04

just pass all sorts of crazy horrible stuff? And

38:06

how would we stop

38:08

that without the filibuster? And or

38:10

is that just a risk we

38:13

have to take to get stuff done

38:15

now. Yeah. I unfortunately listen.

38:19

The retrospective stuff I think is fine. It's like, well, listen, if we

38:21

only needed fifty one instead of sixty on this, then it

38:24

might have passed or whatever. The the problem

38:26

is that usually when people talk

38:28

about that, you're going

38:30

backwards only a very narrow amount of

38:32

time and also so what you have to think about

38:34

is imagine that

38:36

the filibuster had been previously done away with, and then think about all the things

38:38

Republicans would have been able to pass when

38:40

they had the opportunity. And also,

38:42

if Democrats did away with the filibuster now,

38:44

think about what that

38:46

would mean for Republicans and what they're willing to do at

38:48

some future point. So I think that's

38:50

all fine. I I really do think the right

38:52

way to think about the filibuster is

38:54

less about what could we

38:56

have done during this narrow window, but

38:58

what might they do? The it should just be

39:01

listen listen.

39:02

added court At its core, are there certain

39:04

things where there should be sixty

39:07

votes in favor, or should

39:09

everything just be fifty one? I actually think

39:11

we need to just be

39:14

honest about how it needs to be organized. Are there things where we should

39:16

have even more support than that? Because they are

39:18

so significant

39:20

and impactful to American

39:22

life. I don't pretend to know the answer,

39:24

but I think the best way to think about

39:26

this is less about we could have done this

39:28

if we had gotten rid of the filibuster in

39:30

January of twenty twenty.

39:32

I don't I don't know. I mean, yes, we can play that

39:34

game, but it really is about does it make

39:36

sense that in this country, you need

39:38

a simple majority or are there certain things where you

39:41

actually should have a sixty percent majority

39:43

or even greater and

39:45

to start with that rather than just the politics of it if that

39:47

makes sense. Yeah. No.

39:50

I

39:50

get that. I would just personally, I

39:52

would say split the difference and make it fifty five.

39:55

that's just my personal take take it

39:58

or leave it. Yeah. I mean, listen, it's

39:59

it's a matter there's no right

40:02

answer. It's like, you could have someone who says,

40:04

you know, I think anything that has to do with

40:06

taxes should have fifty seven votes and

40:08

anything with health health care should have

40:10

fifty five and anything with

40:12

budget should be everybody

40:14

will have a different opinion, and I don't know that there's

40:16

any right or wrong necessarily, but

40:18

fundamentally, that's the philosophical question that this

40:20

is all about. Right.

40:22

I just wanna hear your take. I appreciate

40:24

it. Alright. Alex from Baltimore. Thank

40:26

you very much. Let's go next

40:29

to Jojo from California. Jojo, welcome to

40:31

the show. What's

40:33

on your mind? Joe

40:36

Joe from California,

40:37

what's on

40:40

your mind? Joe

40:43

Joe from California, you're turned to

40:45

speak. You're unmuted. You're on. You

40:48

can

40:50

speak now. Alright.

40:54

Jojo from California, clearly

40:58

having apparently some kind of

41:00

technical issues of various

41:02

kinds. Jojo,

41:04

I'm sorry that we are not going to be

41:06

able to speak, but there is

41:08

some kind technical problem have. Jojo, you're muted yourself. Jojo,

41:10

are you back now?

41:13

No. Alright. Well,

41:15

Jojo has gone. Let's go to

41:17

Chris. Chris, welcome to the program. What's on your

41:20

mind? Thanks,

41:24

commissioner. Chris, you're on the

41:26

program. What's going on? Say what?

41:28

You're live right now.

41:30

Is that

41:31

what I Chris, you're

41:32

live. This is David Ham, and

41:35

welcome.

41:35

Hi. And

41:38

there we go. Chris, you're on

41:39

the air right now, and we can hear you. Go on

41:42

my front. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sitting

41:43

here. Listen. I'm at work right now. My my guy. Yeah. I'm

41:45

talking to you, Chris. Yeah. I'm

41:48

saying I'm at work right now. I can't talk. I was just

41:50

listening in.

41:52

Go. Alright. Okay. And work work's going okay for you?

41:54

Yeah. Yeah. I

41:55

apologize. No. No. No. I

41:58

apologize. What kind of work do

42:00

you do? I'm a

42:01

manager in the beer distributor. Really? Yeah. What's

42:04

going on with

42:04

the beer world these days? effective

42:08

because a lot of IPAs don't coming out. Is it is

42:10

it just an IPA fiasco these days?

42:13

Yeah. Like, right now, I got

42:15

a case in here that's we're a

42:17

hundred and twenty hours to twenty four Oh my goodness. What country

42:19

is that from? No. It's

42:22

a

42:22

it's a

42:23

local bearman. Right

42:26

outside of Philadelphia. Oh my god. I didn't think Billy Billing.

42:28

Sorry. What was that Billy? I

42:30

said, how my boy, Jimmy from

42:32

Billy Billing. I have no idea.

42:35

Yeah. He been playing

42:36

any of his voice over people. We

42:38

haven't been getting any.

42:41

Wow. Yeah.

42:43

i'm sorry Consenting? But

42:44

a really quick look at some picturesque. A pleasure having

42:46

you on. Alright, my friend? Thank you,

42:48

my guy. Alright. There is Chris from

42:52

Pennsylvania. And I think we gotta call it quits when we're

42:54

ahead folks. So we are gonna do it

42:56

for calls for the week

42:59

We will speak to more people next week. We'll take a quick

43:01

break and then get to your emails and many

43:03

more things. Quick break and

43:05

back after this.

43:10

Don't

43:10

forget that the best way to support the David

43:12

Pacman show is by becoming a member

43:14

which gives you access to the daily bonus

43:17

show, the regular show with

43:19

no commercials, you also get access

43:21

to our entire archive of

43:23

every episode dating back

43:25

a really long time. And plenty of other awesome

43:28

membership perks go to join

43:30

pacman dot com and

43:32

use the coupon code better

43:34

twenty one for a

43:36

huge discount, join

43:38

pacman dot com. Alright.

43:39

Let's get into the

43:42

Friday mailbag. Anybody

43:44

can be on the mail

43:46

bag, you simply have to write into info

43:48

at david pacman dot com. We have a whole

43:50

bunch of different types of emails that we

43:52

get. We get policy deep policy

43:56

wonk type emails. We

43:59

get superficial criticisms We get praise and we also get

44:01

trolling and today we're going to start with just a little bit

44:03

of trolling. It's always good just to get a sense of

44:06

the types of things I get. Peter

44:08

wrote in and Peter

44:10

says, you're a political

44:12

hack empty vessel. Are you

44:14

ever going to take that war

44:18

criminals Thalice out of your mouth and your is Y0U

44:21

apostrophe r e, out of

44:23

you are mouth. you

44:26

pro imperialist progressive

44:29

bootlicking peasant brain

44:32

loser. No wonder you

44:34

have a for profit opinion show, not a

44:36

new non for profit

44:38

newscast. You don't do

44:40

news. You

44:42

preach one-sided b s. What's very

44:44

interesting is this is from a left winger.

44:46

This is left wing

44:50

hate mail. They believe I am an imperialist and not

44:52

really a progressive and that

44:54

I just love Joe

44:56

Biden, the

44:58

supposed imperialist war criminal

45:00

and that the fact that

45:02

this is not a nonprofit show

45:06

is

45:06

part of the problem. Now what's funny is he kind agrees with Alex Jones

45:09

in a sense. Oh, the bonus show where you

45:11

wanna make money, but everybody else that makes money

45:13

to fund themselves is bad.

45:16

Yeah. So, yes, my show, like, basically,

45:18

every other YouTube Podcast Show

45:20

is not an

45:22

nonprofit. a lot of people might not

45:24

even realize, to have a nonprofit, you need a

45:26

board, you need I mean, it's it's actually

45:28

quite complicated to be a nonprofit, and

45:30

it doesn't really make sense for a whole bunch

45:33

of different reasons. We considered it at one

45:35

point. These are folks who

45:37

are in the you can never be progressive enough

45:39

category. And that's why I flagged this one. We get a

45:42

lot of right wing hate

45:44

mail, but the left wing hate

45:46

mail is also interesting because

45:48

in theory, Peter is someone

45:49

with whom I probably

45:51

agree ninety five percent

45:53

of the time. maybe even ninety eight

45:55

percent of the time. But is exactly the type of stuff that hurts

45:58

the left. And you really hate to

46:00

see it. hate to see it can't

46:02

control it. It is what it is.

46:04

Vincent wrote in. Vincent, now

46:06

this is right wing hate. Vincent is

46:09

a very anti semitic. Vincent

46:12

says Pacman, why is the

46:14

left woke crowd so dominated

46:18

by Jews?

46:19

Without Jews support,

46:22

the

46:22

left would die on the vine,

46:24

same as true for Wokeism.

46:26

Only the financial and intellectual support

46:29

from Jews allows voyeurism

46:31

and leftism to continue

46:33

their evil existence. Why

46:37

do most Jews support such

46:40

evil? Yikes. So remember,

46:42

you know, a bunch of different things.

46:45

Jewish Americans, much

46:48

like black Americans, are a very

46:50

left wing voting block, one of

46:52

the most left wing voting blocks in

46:54

the country. When it comes

46:57

to wokism, as defined, I

46:59

guess, by Vincent, it's a

47:02

relatively small part of what there is on

47:04

the left. I think it's extremely over represented in in media

47:06

and extremely over represented by right wing

47:08

media. But sometimes when they

47:10

say wokism, you know, I've talked about

47:14

where there can be excesses sometimes on the left. And I say,

47:16

sure. I can talk about this, but these

47:18

aren't like huge deals on the left.

47:22

Sometimes what the right means by Wokeism is we're

47:24

against treating people terribly because

47:26

of their identity. That's considered

47:30

Wokeism. Earlier in the week, we had this clip of this Republican mom

47:32

saying, I don't like all this

47:34

Marxist stuff like

47:36

anti bullying. sometimes

47:38

that's what they mean. They're just really angry that it's

47:40

not okay to criticize people who don't

47:42

look or sound like you anymore. So anyway, pathetic

47:44

stuff, anti semitic stuff for sure, but

47:46

very very common out there. Oh,

47:48

here's a nice nice voice mail about

47:50

my recent interview with Adam Stein. My

47:54

compliments. I was quite impressed with

47:55

your interview of Adam Stene

47:57

of Wisconsin. I really don't know how many

47:59

interviewers could keep such an

48:02

even keel when faced with

48:04

some of the responses Adam had,

48:06

my compliments to you, sir, yeah, I

48:08

get this question a lot like in my personal

48:10

life as well. How do you remain so

48:12

cool with these people? there's two

48:14

parts of it. One is just the

48:16

experience of doing it.

48:17

The

48:19

second is

48:20

a little bit of desensitization. When you've

48:22

heard this crazy stuff for a decade

48:24

and a half, you do

48:26

become somewhat desensitized to

48:29

the level of depravity that is

48:32

exhibited by many of these folks.

48:34

And I don't know that that's a particularly good

48:36

thing because I'm sort of suffering from a

48:38

normalization in a sense. I'm still

48:40

against the things they say,

48:42

but I'm used to hearing them

48:44

when they are very much not normal. So

48:46

something to think about. Ryan

48:48

wrote in about preventing life,

48:50

also the notion from the Adam Steen

48:52

interview. And Ryan says,

48:54

hey, David, The notion

48:56

of preventing life is

48:58

completely absurd. You're possibly

49:00

preventing life with nearly every action you

49:02

take. For example, I didn't get my

49:04

morning coffee today because I was running late.

49:07

Therefore, I didn't happen to run into

49:09

my future wife. Therefore, we didn't go

49:11

on to have children, thereby, preventing a

49:13

life. Any action can be seen as preventing a life. Thanks

49:15

David Ryan from Milwaukee. Yeah, it's

49:17

sort of like It's

49:22

like a chaos theory on right wing

49:24

brain worms. Adam Stein was

49:26

saying not only is he against birth control

49:28

I'm sorry. Not only is he against abortion, he's against birth

49:31

control as well, because you're

49:34

preventing life. very, very

49:36

weird argument. And it didn't make it it's

49:38

he even seemed confused by it quite

49:40

frankly. Carl wrote in. Carl says,

49:43

are you streaming any debates I'm

49:46

in Pittsburgh and would

49:48

love to see you do a stream of

49:50

Federman versus Oz or

49:52

Shapiro versus

49:54

Mastriano. Oh, and a silly name suggestion for the financial show

49:56

Pacman, the financial factman. Okay.

49:58

Yeah. So I have a whole

50:00

bunch of

50:02

different streams. that are scheduled when it comes

50:04

to debates. Tonight,

50:06

we've

50:06

got Abbott versus Beto. next

50:11

week, we have JD Vance versus Tim

50:14

Ryan,

50:14

and then we have

50:16

Mark Kelley versus Blake Masters.

50:20

the week after we've versus Christ, Whitmer

50:23

versus Tudor, Dixon, and

50:25

if it happens, the

50:27

Rafael Warknock versus hertial walker

50:30

debate, although who the hell knows, whether any of those

50:32

debates are gonna happen. Week after that, we've

50:34

got Rubio versus Val Demings. If it

50:36

gets confirmed, Oz

50:38

versus Federman, and then the week

50:40

after that, nothing scheduled

50:42

yet. So there there's there's actually

50:44

close to like a dozen different debates

50:47

that I plan on covering, and I

50:49

hope you'll join me for those.

50:51

Dan

50:51

wrote in, David, sir,

50:53

why doesn't Federman just take

50:55

the Montréal cognitive assessment exam.

50:58

I would love to see Republicans make

51:00

light of the very exam.

51:02

Trump has been bragging about for years. Yeah. We had a

51:04

voice mail call there last week with a similar idea,

51:06

which was basically Trump took

51:08

a dementia stroke brain injury test

51:10

and brags about it like it

51:12

gets him in dementia. if Federman took

51:14

it, who Federman had a stroke. And now there's

51:17

people saying, oh, we can't think,

51:19

whatever. If Federman

51:20

took it and passed it,

51:22

would

51:22

Republicans then be satisfied? And the answer is, of course not. They would all of a

51:25

sudden say it's not sufficient. We It's

51:27

I

51:29

I know. that Hannity and Trump and everybody brags

51:31

about this test, like it's the be all end all of intelligence

51:33

and cognition. But if it was

51:36

what Federman

51:38

said, And by the way, I got an email from a neurologist in our audience

51:40

who said, you know, David, it's not a what if?

51:43

Almost certainly, Federman

51:45

was given that test. that

51:47

assessment because he had a stroke, and it's typical that that's

51:49

what you do. It's not used for what

51:52

Trump used it for. It's

51:53

stunning, stunning

51:55

stuff. Then different

51:56

Dan wrote in about our YouTube thumbnails.

51:58

Now this I want to address in some serious,

52:00

some depth. Dan says those

52:03

YouTube thumbnails that involve a ridiculous facial expression?

52:06

Dude, please don't do that

52:08

anymore. Your content

52:10

is remarkable and consistent

52:12

and on point, you don't

52:14

need that cringy kind of

52:16

mimicry. Much loved, Dan.

52:18

Listen, guys. They're just

52:20

YouTube thumbnails. Okay?

52:22

I get it.

52:23

There's things that there are trends

52:25

on YouTube and other platforms that

52:27

are kind of gimmicky. Okay?

52:29

Sometimes they're even a little

52:31

cringey. But one of the things we do

52:33

is we adapt.

52:34

If we did our titles today,

52:37

are

52:37

dramatically different than what they were a

52:39

decade ago. Okay? The

52:42

conventions and what does well on our

52:44

different platforms change

52:46

over time. Titles

52:47

have changed, our set

52:49

has changed, the audio

52:52

equipment has changed, how the show is produced has

52:54

changed, and yes, thumbnail change and sometimes we test

52:56

thumbnails where I have a goofy look

52:58

on my face. Okay?

53:00

If

53:01

that alone makes you not wanna

53:02

watch or listen to the show

53:05

anymore, then I'm sorry because

53:08

really the content is what what I would

53:10

hope would be most important, but we're

53:12

rolling with the changes. If you don't

53:14

adapt, you die. in our space.

53:16

So listen, if those

53:18

funny faces don't do well, we'll stop

53:20

using them. If they go out

53:22

of style, we'll stop using them. If they hurt us, we'll stop using But just

53:24

testing different things. That's all. Alright?

53:26

Please folks with peace and love

53:30

Barney wrote in about something that is really,

53:32

really important. Barney wrote

53:34

to me and said, America

53:36

is a food desert. David

53:40

Englishman traveling through the USA here

53:42

currently in Chicago. I

53:44

speak to a lot of Europeans on my

53:46

travels and we are shocked that much

53:48

of the US is a food

53:50

desert and that we are all

53:52

completely undernourished and cannot

53:54

follow a typically healthy diet we might

53:56

adhere to in Europe. It's

53:58

impossible to find cheap healthy

53:59

food literally

54:01

anywhere, writes barney. It costs

54:03

seven

54:03

dollars for a salad,

54:05

thirteen for

54:06

a foot long subway, for example.

54:08

I even found it's

54:09

more expensive to buy Florida oranges

54:11

in Florida than it is for me to

54:13

get Spanish oranges in England.

54:15

Yes, I understand inflation's a factor, but this is

54:17

happening everywhere. And despite this,

54:20

groceries and healthy foods in

54:22

particular are

54:24

obscenely expensive. I think

54:25

the reason is you have one national supermarket,

54:26

so there's no competition, and there are

54:29

a general lack of supermarkets compared

54:31

to the UK. So this part

54:33

I don't know, we have more that

54:36

don't we have I mean, there's Trader

54:38

Joe's, there's

54:40

Whole Foods. There's

54:42

well, that's actually interesting.

54:44

Is is Wegmans National? I'm not

54:48

even sure. Maybe Barney's onto something. Maybe we only have, like, two

54:50

national supermarket chains. Like, I

54:52

know, Stop and Shop is just a Northeast

54:54

thing, I

54:56

believe. Yeah. That that may be a problem. Listen,

54:58

Barney is completely correct. And a

55:00

lot of people, you know, when I've traveled

55:04

through the Midwest. Small towns in the

55:06

northeast typically

55:08

have great food and

55:10

plenty of supermarkets, you know,

55:13

upstate New York and Vermont

55:16

and, you know, Maine, these play there

55:18

there's typically no issue. But when I've

55:20

been in, like, Wisconsin. When I've

55:23

been in Northern Indiana, when I've

55:25

been in even Kansas City,

55:27

Missouri is like,

55:27

okay, right in the city, but then it gets a little

55:30

bit rough. it is a major

55:32

problem. And there's multiple problems.

55:34

There's the

55:34

the pricing issue, of course,

55:36

the food

55:37

desert issue where there are

55:39

I mean, even even in New York and Boston,

55:41

there are poorer neighborhoods with a

55:44

dearth of options other than

55:46

chain restaurants. And there's also a lack of education, sadly, as

55:48

to what constitutes a healthy diet. What does

55:50

it mean to eat a healthy diet? Well, I

55:52

don't

55:53

know. I eat I eat chicken and

55:55

vegetables. But what do you mean? Well, yeah, I mean, it's wings

55:57

that I

55:58

fried as well as

56:00

you know mashed potatoes, excluding,

56:02

right, there are fries, whatever. There

56:05

are definitely misunderstandings about

56:07

how a diet should

56:10

established and honestly part of the problem is that that old

56:12

school food pyramid also

56:14

was somewhat inaccurate

56:16

and confusing. So, Barney, you

56:18

have correctly pointed out

56:20

that there's a lot of problems with food

56:22

here in the United States. And

56:24

it's really like

56:26

trying to You're kind of like trying to dig yourself

56:28

out, but as you do it,

56:30

you're digging

56:32

another hole. I don't know

56:33

if it's the right metaphor. Get your

56:35

emails into me info at

56:37

david pacman dot com. Tell me

56:39

your stories of food deserts

56:41

probably worthy of a clip coming up soon. And we

56:44

will see everybody on today's bonus show,

56:46

which you can sign up for at

56:48

join pacman

56:50

dot com Coupon code. Indite.

56:52

That's the coupon code. Everybody knows

56:54

why the coupon code is

56:56

currently Indite. we

56:58

need some indictments. The evidence is there. It's

57:00

time. See you on the bonus show

57:02

or otherwise back here on Monday.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features