Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:16
Alright.
0:16
Well, we are starting today with hurricane
0:18
Ian in Florida, and they
0:20
they don't call it a disaster for
0:22
nothing. This is not really a weather show
0:25
but there's been a lot of political stuff revolving
0:27
around the hurricane to get everybody up to speed.
0:30
Many trapped in Florida as
0:32
Ian heads towards South Carolina reported
0:35
by the Associated Press. There
0:38
are rescue crews, two point five
0:40
million Florida homes per the
0:42
Associated press without power, two
0:44
point seven million homes without power
0:47
according to other reports. Florida governor
0:49
Rhonda Santos told the news conference. We've
0:51
never seen storm surge of
0:53
this magnitude, it is basically
0:56
a five hundred year flooding
0:59
event. when it comes to
1:01
casualties, hundreds are
1:04
feared dead.
1:05
Now, it
1:06
takes a while to officially get
1:08
those numbers. But we
1:11
now have heard from multiple political leaders
1:13
who are saying, listen, we're being told
1:15
about dozens if not hundreds
1:17
just in our municipality. So
1:20
you start adding that up and unless everybody's
1:22
wrong you're talking about at least hundreds
1:25
dead The Daily Beast
1:27
reporting that as well as millions
1:29
more were into darkness in
1:31
one of the most powerful storms in American
1:33
history. AND THEN AFP
1:37
AND Yahoo News REPORTING FLOODS
1:39
DEVASTATION AFTER HURRICANES, FLORIDA.
1:43
So there's a couple different things I
1:45
think that important to mention here for
1:47
a show like ours. First of all,
1:49
we see a completely different Rhonda
1:51
Santos. that I sort
1:54
of knew existed in the sense that I've
1:56
told you all before. DeSantis is not
1:58
a stupid guy. His incredible
2:01
violent partnership, maybe
2:03
acute partisanship is is a better
2:06
phrase for it, is a sort
2:08
of a calculated decision. I'm not saying he's
2:10
not a right winger, but he can get along with everybody
2:12
when he chooses to. And he has said Joe
2:14
Biden's been good, helping,
2:16
and getting along, and this
2:18
is not the time for pettiness. And it again, it's
2:20
just another reminder that It
2:22
could be like this all the time if people
2:24
just wanted to be more reasonable because that's all it's
2:26
happening. This antigen is just being more reasonable
2:28
in part because he knows that his reelection
2:30
could potentially hinge on is
2:33
he seen as handling the hurricane
2:35
correctly. In addition, you know,
2:37
when COVID started, many of us
2:40
naively and incorrectly thought, this
2:42
will bring the country together. We're all going
2:44
to unite against the virus, and then we did
2:46
many Republicans essentially taking the side
2:48
of the virus, ignoring all
2:51
suggestions and guidelines and recommendations
2:54
and not getting vaccinated, all that different stuff.
2:56
Okay, fine. With the hurricane,
2:58
we're just all going to Now,
3:01
you've got people claiming that the
3:03
hurricane is a hoax. Now, what does it
3:05
mean? What does it mean that it's a hoax? Some
3:07
of them say, well, it was a rain storm,
3:10
but it wasn't really that bad. and
3:12
this was just a way to get the
3:14
hurricane in the media to
3:16
avoid talking about fill
3:19
in the blank. Right? Whatever it is. This was
3:21
a distraction. Some claiming
3:24
that it was a geoengineered
3:27
weather event of some kind. Again,
3:29
for whose benefit, it's like never really
3:31
completely clear. Others
3:33
fixating on the evacuation order
3:36
And are they legal or not and mandatory
3:38
and all these different things? Folks,
3:40
it's a hurricane. Okay. Oh, and actually, I should
3:42
say, some also immediately
3:46
fixating on wanting to blame
3:48
climate change for this particular
3:51
hurricane. And as we've talked about before,
3:53
Climate change is not really about
3:55
any particular hurricane, but
3:58
climate change models would
3:59
predict
4:00
that we would have more extreme events
4:03
and that the events themselves would
4:06
be more extreme. But I
4:08
I we don't need to
4:10
play the game of this particular
4:12
hurricane was caused by climate change
4:14
and the human
4:18
activities on the planet. We don't need to do that.
4:20
The climate change models don't require that.
4:22
So I think that that to the extent that people on
4:24
the left are doing it also doesn't make
4:26
sense. the priority is
4:28
getting power back on,
4:30
reducing fatalities as much
4:32
as possible,
4:35
and starting to get things back together,
4:37
and we will let you know how things are looking
4:40
by Monday. Here's just
4:42
a wild, wild report from
4:44
Vanity Fair's best leaven.
4:47
Donald Trump thought he could sue
4:49
Congress for impeaching him. He
4:51
thought he could sue Congress because
4:54
as legislators, they
4:56
impeached him. Now what's not clear is whether
4:58
he thought he could sue Congress as
5:00
an institution or that he
5:02
could sue the individual members who
5:05
voted to impeach and
5:07
later in the senate to convict. You know, with
5:09
Trump, it's never really clear what he means.
5:11
this entire article is worth reading
5:14
by Beth Levin.
5:16
And the key part is
5:19
actually from Maggie Haberman's
5:21
forthcoming book, Confidence Man,
5:24
which says, when
5:26
the House introduced articles of
5:28
impeachment against Trump, for
5:30
the first time in twenty nineteen,
5:33
Trump reacted with a familiar
5:35
refrain according to the book I'll
5:38
just sue Congress. They
5:40
can't do this to me. Best
5:42
Lebanon adds, it's not
5:44
clear whether Trump responded similarly
5:46
after the second impeachment articles,
5:49
though there's probably a fifty percent chance
5:51
that he did. Listen, this
5:53
would not really be a shock to
5:55
anybody who's been following the, I guess,
5:57
we would call them trials and tribulations of
5:59
Trump. he thought that pulling in
6:01
a special master after the Mar a Lago
6:03
search warrant was gonna be good for him
6:05
and it did not work out out that way.
6:08
he looked directly into the sun
6:10
during that eclipse even though he was told
6:12
not to. I mean, like, at the micro level and the
6:14
macro level, he always believes things that
6:16
aren't true and believe certain things
6:18
would be good for him that that actually are not.
6:21
What's particularly funny
6:23
about Trump thinking he can sue Congress
6:25
is that right now, we talked about this
6:28
yesterday on the bonus show. The
6:30
argument that Trump's lawyers are
6:32
making to get a
6:34
defamation suit against Trump dismissed
6:37
is that the defendant should actually be
6:39
the government and not
6:41
Trump. And so
6:43
you have this extraordinary situation
6:46
where on the and and the point
6:48
is you can't sue the government for
6:50
defamation. So it's
6:52
defamation versus the impeachment.
6:54
But on the one hand, in court,
6:57
Trump's lawyers are arguing You
6:59
can't go after the government for defamation.
7:02
And really, Eugene Carol's
7:04
gripe is with the government and
7:06
not Trump, even though it's Trump who said the things
7:08
that are allegedly defanatory. And
7:10
meanwhile, after and during the impeachment,
7:12
Trump was saying, well, I'll just sue the
7:14
government as if that's something you can
7:16
do over a legislative duty
7:19
that Congress has, which is
7:21
to consider whether a president has done something
7:24
worthy of impeachment. It's all it it's all
7:26
completely scrambled. You all know that.
7:28
And the other theme to this is
7:30
the things that are said
7:32
publicly in the Court of Public
7:34
Opinion by Trump,
7:37
and even sometimes by his lawyers, don't
7:40
translate to what they actually try to
7:42
argue in court. These are two different
7:44
things. And likewise, nobody's
7:46
gonna sue Congress for carrying out an impeachment,
7:48
and of course, it didn't happen. We
7:50
will see what ultimately comes
7:52
of twenty twenty four, but best level in
7:54
sort of raising the alarm here and saying, listen.
7:57
the election stuff was
7:59
not the only wacky dangerous unhinged
8:02
stuff that Donald Trump was thinking at that
8:04
time. Alright. I have more
8:06
to add for you on the
8:08
quest for one point
8:10
five million YouTube subscribers.
8:13
we are dangerously close.
8:15
We are now only looks
8:17
like three thousand one hundred
8:20
and fifty six subscribers away.
8:23
from one point five million.
8:25
And we have a bunch of stuff on the
8:27
calendar. People have been writing in saying
8:29
David, if you can get to the
8:31
one point five million sooner,
8:33
here's what I'm willing to do. And this is just for
8:35
fun. Okay? Everybody relax. It's not like a
8:37
big deal. People are just having a good time. Alright.
8:40
If we get to the one
8:42
point five million by October
8:44
fourth at Sundown, I will
8:46
do the Yam Kapoor fast. I
8:48
never do the Yam Kapoor fast I
8:50
will do it, and I will live
8:52
blog how bad it is to do the
8:54
sunset to sunset fast for Yom Kippur.
8:56
Okay? If we get to
8:58
the one point five million by October fifth.
9:01
I will obtain a
9:03
unicycle and post a
9:05
video of me trying to ride a
9:07
unicycle down the Street, I've never done it. This
9:09
was suggested by Anne from Utah.
9:11
And now I have other things to add.
9:13
If we can get to the one point five million
9:15
by October tenth, Bo,
9:18
will get a bag of mangoes tattooed.
9:20
With some kind of tagline
9:22
from the show, Beau says his wife is a
9:24
tattoo artist in New York City, he already
9:26
has a bunch of tattoos and he's willing
9:28
to get a mango David Pacman
9:30
show related tattoo if we make it to one
9:32
point five million subscribers by October
9:34
tenth. October twelfth,
9:37
Chris is a muralist in
9:39
Atlanta, meaning that he
9:41
paints murals And he
9:43
says if we get to one point
9:45
five million by October twelfth, which is his
9:47
birthday, he will paint a
9:49
David Pacman show mural in
9:51
Atlanta, photograph it and send it
9:53
to us. I think that that would be absolutely
9:55
awesome. Kurt says that if
9:57
we get to the one point five million by
9:59
October
9:59
twenty one, he will
10:00
get a Mount Rushmore tattoo
10:03
on his back except it'll
10:05
be Biden, Obama,
10:07
Clinton, FDR, and
10:09
me, which kinda scares me, but it sounds
10:11
interesting. And then
10:13
Kelsey says that if we make it by
10:15
November fourth, which we really
10:17
should, she will bake
10:19
and decorate a custom
10:22
vegan David Pac winter
10:24
cupcake and send
10:26
pictures. And one will say,
10:28
Obama and another will be Alex Jones or
10:30
whatever. Okay. So she's gonna do custom
10:32
show related cupcakes. if we make it
10:34
by November fourth. So two things.
10:36
One, if you're not subscribed,
10:38
please subscribe, youtube dot com
10:40
slash the David Pacman show the earlier
10:42
we get to the one point five, the
10:45
more of these hijinks that we will be able
10:47
to engage in. And
10:49
then, secondly, if you have something to add
10:51
to the calendar, like, if you wanna say, you know, David,
10:53
if you make it by
10:56
October sixth, I
10:58
will something.
11:01
You can email info at
11:03
david pacman dot com. Alright.
11:05
One really funny other thing
11:07
related YouTube channels and then we're gonna move on to a bunch of
11:09
other things. You may or may not
11:11
know that we launched
11:13
a second or really a third
11:15
YouTube channel recently and
11:17
it is called Pacman Finance.
11:19
Okay? This is not a
11:21
political channel. This is
11:23
a channel in which we do personal
11:25
finance and a little light economics.
11:28
So how do put
11:30
together an asset allocation? Why
11:32
is some inflation good? Why
11:34
you shouldn't try to time the market? All
11:36
these things. So
11:39
funny. Initially, when we launched
11:41
the channel, a bunch of right
11:43
wingers were like, dude, you're a socialist.
11:45
Why are you gonna give financial advice?
11:47
And some of them have tomato one hundred and eighty and
11:49
turned around. I love this. This guy, Tommy
11:51
Boy. Okay? After we
11:53
posted our first video, Hiro,
11:55
this is comical, a complete
11:58
socialist talking about asset
12:00
allocation, laughable
12:02
hypocrisy. Now, of course, I'm not
12:04
a socialist. but he was entitled to his
12:06
opinion. The second video
12:08
we posted, Tommy Boy shows up
12:10
and he says, dude, you're
12:12
really going to keep talking out of both sides of
12:14
your mouth on two channels. Be a capitalist.
12:17
Or be a socialist. Stop trying to pretend
12:19
you can be both. Now, Having a
12:21
budget doesn't exactly make you one or the
12:23
other. But anyway, Tommy Boy is
12:25
entitled to his opinion. And
12:27
then just yesterday, Tommy
12:30
Boy shows up after like our
12:32
sixth video and says,
12:35
Pacmin gives sound conservative financial
12:37
advice on this channel. ignore his
12:39
utter nonsense political advice on the
12:41
other channel and just watch
12:43
this channel. Tommy
12:45
Boy has been
12:46
turned around a hundred and
12:48
eighty degrees by the
12:51
sensible and sound information.
12:53
I remember I'm not giving any individual
12:56
financial advice, but the information on
12:58
the Pacman Finance channel.
13:00
I invite you to check it out, youtube
13:02
dot com slash pacman finance. We've
13:05
got clips going up about all sorts
13:07
of different topics And if you have
13:09
a finance topic you would like me to
13:11
address, not politics folks. Different
13:13
channel, not politics. You can
13:15
email info at david pacman
13:17
dot com and I will do my very
13:19
best to address that. And soon we'll
13:21
be taking some personal finance questions
13:23
for the channel. Lots of exciting things coming
13:25
up. Alright. We have a fantastic
13:27
show. Tonight, it is
13:29
Beto versus Abbott debate
13:31
for Texas Governor. I will be live on
13:33
YouTube, Twitch, and Facebook for that debate. I hope you will
13:35
join me. I don't know exactly what time it is. It must
13:37
be sometime around seven PM. I don't
13:39
know. And I hope to see
13:41
everybody then.
13:45
One of
13:45
our longtime sponsors is Munkpack
13:48
offering low sugar plant
13:50
based keto friendly bars.
13:52
I love these. They are the
13:54
perfect snack for anyone trying to
13:56
eat better. or cutting back on
13:58
sugar and carbs without sacrificing
13:59
taste. Monk pack
14:02
offers granola bars and nuts
14:04
and seed bars, each with only
14:06
one gram of sugar or less, two
14:08
to three net carbs and a hundred
14:10
and fifty calories or less. I'm a big fan
14:13
of the Macadamia white chocolate,
14:15
nut, and seed bar, great
14:17
combination of sweet, salty,
14:20
chewy, and crunchy, and there's
14:22
under one gram of sugar. They come
14:24
in other awesome flavors
14:26
like sea salt dark chocolate,
14:28
coconut cocoa chip, and
14:30
caramel sea salt, Munkpack
14:32
is great. If you're doing keto,
14:34
I don't do keto, but Munkpack
14:36
is just great for anyone who wants
14:38
something delicious on the go without
14:40
the sugar. And my audience gets twenty
14:42
percent off your first order at
14:44
munkpack dot com when you use the
14:46
coupon code packman at
14:48
checkout That's MUNKPACK
14:51
dot com. Get twenty percent
14:53
off with coupon code Pacman.
14:56
The info is in the podcast
14:58
notes. The David
15:00
Pacman show is a viewer and
15:02
listener supported program. It's the audience
15:04
that funds the work that we do
15:06
primarily through the bonus
15:08
show and full show made
15:10
available through the membership program. Oh,
15:12
the bonus show where you wanna make money,
15:14
but everybody else that makes money to find themselves
15:17
as bad I welcome you and
15:19
invite you with peace and love to sign
15:21
up at join pacman dot
15:23
com and you can use the coupon
15:25
code big voting
15:27
twenty two to get a
15:29
discount off of the cost of
15:31
your membership. Let's
15:33
go to the phone You
15:35
can call in on the Friday show
15:37
via discord at david pacman dot
15:39
com slash discord
15:42
extremely extremely important stuff
15:44
to do. Why don't we
15:46
go first to Jason
15:48
from Toronto, Canada Jason,
15:51
welcome. What's on your mind today, my friend?
15:54
Hey, David. How are
15:56
you? I'm doing well. Thank you.
15:58
Just actually go I
15:59
have a couple of questions for you.
16:02
One politics related. Do
16:05
you feel that as major
16:07
news networks are starting to distance themselves
16:09
from Trump and all the legal
16:11
issues he's currently in. Are we seeing the
16:13
slow demise? of him potentially in
16:15
his movement? Or do you feel
16:17
that that's still a little bit of way
16:21
as
16:21
far as as seeing kind
16:23
of the mag movement kind of
16:25
dwindle down. I think we've got a long way to
16:27
go. Right now, it's not
16:29
so much that the TV networks like
16:31
Fox News, for example, are stepping
16:34
away from Trump, but they're
16:36
giving themselves other options In
16:38
other words, they're starting to say, hey, a
16:40
lot of people seem to like DeSantis.
16:42
They're kind of building the
16:44
escape hatch, so to speak. but they
16:46
haven't yet pulled the
16:48
eject button. If if that makes sense,
16:50
that's the analogy I would say.
16:52
However -- Right. I think depending on what happens
16:54
in twenty in November of twenty two in the
16:56
midterms, and depending on what happens in
16:58
terms of the indictments and public opinion
17:00
around Trump's indictments, if indeed he
17:02
gets indicted, then you may start to
17:04
see things change. One interesting thing is if you
17:06
look at predict it, which is betting
17:09
markets, the Sandoz is now in the lead
17:11
as who is expected to get the twenty twenty four
17:13
Republican domination based
17:15
on the betting numbers. If those
17:17
numbers continue to go against Trump's
17:19
favor, you might see an acceleration But
17:21
right now nobody's really abandoned Trump. They're just giving
17:24
themselves other options. Howard Bauchner: Yeah,
17:26
that makes sense.
17:26
And just the other question I
17:28
have for you, as a new father, what are
17:30
you enjoying most about your
17:33
experience? I I'd
17:34
say like the,
17:35
you know, essentially day to day
17:38
development. and just seeing how things change so much from day to
17:40
day and, you know, she's able to do new
17:42
things, and attention span goes up, and
17:44
ability to just, like, kinda
17:46
hang out without flipping out increases.
17:48
And it really is I mean, certainly from
17:50
week to week, it gets very different.
17:53
That's
17:53
awesome. Good to hear. Alright. Things are
17:55
good to hear. Yeah. Things
17:57
are good. The good temperature here is certain
17:59
to drop
17:59
as fall comes in. But
18:02
otherwise, things are right. You I mean, I
18:04
can't I I apologize for this question, but
18:06
there's no way you can get a good bagel in
18:08
Toronto. Right? That's a Montreal thing.
18:10
I mean, you can
18:11
get a good bagel in Toronto. I mean, it's
18:13
less it's less known, but, yeah, there's
18:15
a couple of bagel shops here in the city there pretty
18:18
good. Wow. Montreal
18:20
is known for it? Yeah. Yeah. There's some
18:22
pretty good places here. And smoked salmon
18:24
and everything's available? Yep.
18:26
Incredible for sure. incredible. Wow. And you guys have the Internet
18:28
and running water and everything? Oh,
18:30
yeah. Yeah. That's amazing. We just got cars
18:32
a couple months ago.
18:34
Very good. Alright, my friend. Thank you for the call. That was
18:37
a joke, by the way. Obviously, we we love Toronto.
18:39
Thank you. No offense to that's
18:41
those are just jokes. Everybody relax.
18:43
Alright? Let's go to John from Kentucky.
18:45
John, what's going on?
18:48
Hi there, David. Can you hear me? I can.
18:50
It it It quite literally sounds like
18:52
you're underwater. You're not underwater. Are
18:54
you? I'm not
18:55
right. Oh,
18:56
boy. Did you say you're not underwater
18:59
right now? I'm not underwriting
19:01
right
19:01
this moment. Oh, you know, it sounds all it sounds
19:03
so much better. What did you just change?
19:06
I just went off of my car Bluetooth
19:08
to my handset, beautifully done.
19:10
beautifully done. What's what's on your mind today? Yeah.
19:12
I just had a I had a
19:15
question. I've
19:17
been I'm an Uber driver, and I talk a lot of politics
19:19
in the car, which is a mistake. I gotta
19:21
say. Yeah. But a question
19:23
that's kind of been popping up as a twenty five year
19:25
old left, is it just I
19:27
just What's the point in conservatism
19:31
before? III
19:33
mean, I'm
19:33
not gonna I can't answer that for
19:35
you. That's interesting. So, like, let me
19:37
see if I can understand the situation. You
19:39
drive Uber in Kentucky?
19:42
Yes. And so, are most of your
19:44
passengers right wingers? Well,
19:46
I
19:46
I actually live in Louisville,
19:49
Kentucky, so we're a blue dot in a red
19:51
state. Okay. So I get a good
19:53
mix. of people. So I have a lot of Leftists in the car, I have
19:55
a lot of Liberals, and then a lot
19:57
of the people that I get are Republican.
20:00
Yeah. And I I just
20:02
simply like, one of the things that I've been saying recently,
20:05
I don't know if you've ever watched adventure
20:08
time. No. I don't even know what it is.
20:10
Okay. Venture time is a is a kids
20:12
show. It was really, really good, though.
20:14
There's this there's
20:17
this vampire lady named
20:19
Marceline. And in one of the
20:21
episodes, he's fighting this other guy who's the
20:23
vampire king and they break apart. And
20:25
the vampire king is like, hey, Marceline, you've
20:27
lived over a thousand years. What have you learned?
20:30
And she says something to the
20:32
effect of you know, everybody
20:34
keeps making the same mistakes over and over
20:36
again, and I guess nobody lives long
20:38
enough to see the pattern. Right.
20:41
Well, listen. My thought on that is as follows.
20:43
And I don't wanna interrupt the retelling of
20:46
adventure time episodes, but to here's
20:48
my thought. There's two things going on with conservatism.
20:51
One is the idea of
20:52
let's keep doing things the way
20:55
we've done them before just for the sake
20:57
of continuing to do them the same way
20:59
we've done them before, which for me isn't a
21:01
very good argument necessarily.
21:03
Right. And
21:04
then also, there is a sort of
21:06
contrarianism to conservatism
21:09
when people from typically
21:11
from the left say, hey,
21:13
here's an advancement that we
21:15
have, which will improve things.
21:18
There's like a reflexive contrarian
21:20
as where it's just like, no. No. No. No.
21:22
We're not gonna do that just because
21:24
you want to, we're not going to do it. So
21:26
the I think that those are two important elements
21:28
of it. Hey, one
21:29
hundred percent. And, like, you know, one of the
21:31
things I've been saying a lot in the car is, respectfully,
21:33
I don't have to have lived a
21:35
thousand years to see that the story of human
21:38
history has always been conservatives
21:40
or their historical contemporaries
21:42
fighting against progress. Yeah. And
21:44
then Leftists or their historical contemporaries
21:47
dragging them, kicking in screaming into that
21:49
progress. Correct. So, yeah, I just don't
21:51
see the yeah. It's just frustrating
21:53
living in in red state
21:55
right now. John, what's the
21:57
wackiest Uber driving situation you've
21:59
experienced? Oh,
22:02
honestly, I've had too bad right now. I
22:04
did have one lady get in the car with the
22:07
MAGA hat and the flags and
22:09
the pins and stuff. And we're
22:11
about two minutes into the ride, and she
22:13
just casually says, you know, I just can't stand
22:15
the way the media treats true patriot.
22:19
Right. And so I kinda give it a
22:21
second. I'm like, okay. I'll bite. Who
22:23
are true patriots? And she says,
22:25
well, Matt Gates Alex Jones just to name a
22:27
couple. Yeah. I'm like, oh, okay. Well,
22:29
I don't have to say Alex Jones is
22:31
full of crap. You know, he says that
22:33
in depositions and stuff. But
22:35
Matt Gates, the guy who's currently under investigation
22:37
from the DOJ for child sex trafficking.
22:39
Like, this is the guy who's a true patriot
22:41
to you, really? Have you ever had to kick anyone
22:44
out of the car? I have
22:46
not, but I think that's mostly
22:48
because my demeanor in the car is
22:50
very much if you don't like it,
22:52
you can walk Right. So I think
22:54
that more kind of like that
22:56
keeps people in line a lot of the time. So
22:59
yeah. Well, John, I appreciate the call.
23:01
Stay safe out there. I'll
23:02
try brother. Thank you. Alright. Congratulations on the new child.
23:04
Thank you. There's John from Kentucky with some
23:06
powerful powerful declarations As
23:09
a reminder, if you want the opportunity to
23:12
get on to chat with me and you are
23:14
currently in the Discord waiting
23:16
lobby, your nickname must
23:18
be name and where you're calling
23:20
from. It doesn't even have to be real.
23:22
Like, I don't know where where you really are.
23:25
but it has to be in that format. So people who just
23:27
have, like, single word nicknames and stuff like that, you're
23:29
not gonna get called on just as a
23:31
heads up, so everybody knows and is
23:33
on the same page. Let's go
23:35
to Alex from Seattle. Alex welcome.
23:38
Good morning,
23:39
David. I wanted to ask you
23:41
about a book written by a guest you had on a
23:43
few months ago, Bobby Azarian. Sure. That was
23:46
called the Rumensa reality. Yeah.
23:48
Did you did you read the book? I
23:49
read part of it. Yeah. For
23:52
that one, I read, like, I often
23:54
do introduction, table of
23:56
contents, first chapter, last chapter, and
23:58
some stuff in between. Okay.
23:59
Interesting. I found it to be I want first of all, I
24:02
wanted to thank you for having that guest on having
24:04
that book. I I've in the process of
24:06
reading it, and I've I'm
24:08
reading it slowly because it's a very dense book.
24:10
I'm sure if you read a couple of chapters,
24:12
you probably like, it's it's very
24:14
it's explaining each piece that
24:16
goes, building case for,
24:18
you know, you know,
24:20
why why why do we exist? What
24:22
is life for? I just wanted
24:24
to know if you you if
24:26
in the brief parts that you read, if there was anything you
24:28
found to be either
24:30
disagreeable or if it changed anything about
24:32
how you thought about concepts like
24:34
free will determinism because it goes into a lot
24:36
of that. No. I mean, you know, when I I
24:39
read so much that it's rare
24:41
at this point, that I read
24:43
something
24:43
and it completely upends my
24:46
view. It's just sort of like
24:48
it now averages into
24:50
my views over all
24:53
and just like can slightly tweak
24:55
things. So I don't know that I can say that there
24:57
was any kind of like big one eighty
24:59
that I did as a result of the parts of the book but
25:01
it certainly presented and so did the interview.
25:03
You know, you III think my
25:05
view tends to be
25:07
there is really no one
25:10
source that describes reality
25:12
as far as I'm concerned. What
25:14
I'm looking for are
25:17
thoughtful ideas
25:19
to integrate into my understanding.
25:21
So, no, I can't say I had any
25:23
real one eighties. Okay. Did you
25:25
I mean, is there something you read in the book that made you
25:27
say, wow. I I mean, prior
25:29
to reading the book, I mean, I I really kind
25:31
of believed in the concept of determinism, it seemed
25:34
to make the most sense to me -- Yeah. -- you know, ball
25:36
rolling down a hill, add more complexity,
25:38
you know, start to finish. I I feel like
25:40
that kind of worked. And especially with,
25:42
like, more progressive politics, you can use that
25:44
lens and you can look at the way people's lives exist
25:47
and the problems they ran into and you can use
25:49
that. And the way the book presents it is
25:51
kind of, you know, it
25:53
basically takes things like life and it says,
25:55
instead of it being a thing that just kind of
25:57
magically happened and it's like a miracle, it
25:59
frames it as like it as
26:01
an inevitability based on fundamental laws of
26:04
science. And it continues to build from there.
26:06
And so I found that
26:08
it it really made me rethink. It didn't believe
26:10
in free will again if that kind of makes
26:13
sense because it frames it
26:15
as as know, the concept of free
26:17
will is the ability to imagine possible
26:20
realities and then steer yourself there.
26:22
And, anyway, I just I I
26:24
found it to be a book. I recommended it highly that
26:26
I've as someone who does not consider
26:29
themselves religious, I found it to
26:31
be a thing that explained the
26:33
universal way that kind of gave it a purpose that kind of
26:35
made sense. So and and I was just I was very
26:38
surprised at that because I'm highly
26:40
skeptical similar to your your perspective around
26:42
a lot of things. I was surprised at how much
26:44
I connected with the book and found it to be interesting.
26:46
Well, I appreciate the feedback, Alex. Thank
26:49
you. love to
26:50
have more authors like that on your show.
26:52
We will make it happen.
26:54
Alright. Alright. Thanks, Alex. Take care. Very always
26:56
great to hear that people are getting value.
26:59
from from the the guests on the show.
27:01
That's fantastic. Let's go to
27:03
Willie from Oregon. Willie,
27:05
welcome to the show. What's on your
27:07
mind today? Hey,
27:09
I was just curious if you
27:11
have paid any attention to the truth
27:14
social ads instead of did popping
27:16
up? No. We just did a story
27:18
earlier this week about how the a company that was
27:20
going to invest a hundred and forty
27:22
million to merge with truth social,
27:24
they're they're just completely bailing, and truth
27:26
social is likely gonna fail soon. But what
27:28
where are they running ads?
27:30
Well,
27:31
there was an update to the app.
27:33
And so I did that and all of a sudden notice
27:35
that these ads started popping
27:37
up. Like, after that.
27:39
It looks like Trump's the only
27:41
one paying for ads. Just hand tied by
27:44
them. Okay. There's
27:47
one for you know,
27:47
twenty five hundred free knives and reading
27:49
through that was like, arm yourselves --
27:52
Oh my goodness. -- oh, let me ask you
27:54
this. Pretty dark. Are
27:56
you on when you're on the app, do
27:58
you just look to
27:59
see the wacky stuff that gets
28:02
posted? Are you on there to kinda like
28:04
argue with people or to Troll.
28:06
Like, what's your what do you do on
28:08
the app?
28:09
Oh, could we cuss
28:11
on this or no? No. Please don't.
28:14
Okay.
28:14
Just messing
28:17
with Trump and following the
28:19
the cuckoo there. I see. Have you
28:21
had anybody, like, directly attack you because
28:23
of things you post? Oh,
28:26
yeah.
28:26
I I did that for a little bit.
28:28
You know, I there's not
28:30
much common sense on there. So it's kind
28:32
of pointless to do anything, but just
28:35
like to keep an eye on what that
28:37
guy's up to and
28:39
talking and, like, you know, last night, it
28:41
looked like he he just reposted
28:43
the craziest stuff and it's
28:45
pretty
28:45
scary. Yeah. I like to kinda keep an
28:47
eye on him and see what he's up to, but the
28:50
the you should look at some
28:52
of the ads that have been popping up on there. They're
28:56
very strange. I'll check that out. Very strange. I'll check
28:58
that out. Thanks for bringing in to my
29:00
attention. Yep. Yep. I
29:02
think it's worth looking into it and talking about
29:04
a little bit. Alright. Willy
29:06
for more time. Thank you very very much. Appreciate
29:08
it. Thank you very very much. really,
29:11
really important stuff
29:13
happening on truth and it
29:15
soon should fail completely. Alright?
29:17
Okay. Let's take a very quick break if you're
29:19
holding to talk to me. Keep holding
29:21
because we're going right back to the phones in a
29:23
moment.
29:24
One of our
29:27
sponsors
29:27
is Little Spoon, your one
29:29
stop shop for healthy, easy
29:31
meals, and snacks. for
29:34
your baby toddler or big
29:36
kid
29:36
delivered right to your door. With
29:39
fresh organic baby food
29:41
for every toddler and kids
29:43
meals that even the picky
29:45
eaters will love and the new line of
29:47
healthy smoothies, little
29:49
spoon, as you covered, Little
29:51
spoon makes everything fresh. It's just
29:53
like homemade. It's ready in mere
29:56
moments. All of the recipes are
29:58
delicious. They're nutritionally balanced
30:00
and free of junk. Little Spoon's
30:02
baby food is one hundred percent
30:04
organic and cold pressed
30:06
for every eating stage
30:08
for toddlers and kids. Little
30:11
spoon has the classics mac and cheese,
30:13
but they'll sneak things in like butternut
30:15
squash and carrots. They have more
30:18
adventurous meals, cheesy pufousas
30:20
or chicken pot stickers. They're all
30:22
kit approved packed with
30:24
nutrients and little spoons organic smoothies are
30:26
perfect when you need something quick and
30:28
easy. And the best part is kids meals
30:30
under six dollars and baby food
30:32
and smoothies under three dollars
30:35
each. Plus, you'll get fifty percent off your
30:37
first order when you go to little spoon
30:39
dot com and use the coupon code
30:42
Pacman fifty. That's coupon
30:44
code Pacman five zero.
30:46
To get fifty percent off your first order,
30:48
the info is in the podcast
30:50
notes. Let's stick with the phones by which I
30:53
mean discord david pacman
30:55
dot com slash
30:57
discord extraordinarily.
31:00
powerful phone calls happening today,
31:03
and we don't want to miss a
31:05
minute of it. Let's go
31:07
to Bobby from Jersey,
31:09
Bobby from Jersey. Welcome. What's going
31:11
on?
31:16
Bobby from Jersey, you gotta unmute yourself, Mike. Hello,
31:18
David. Can you hear me? Yes. I can.
31:21
Alright. Is
31:21
there a specific way that you
31:23
go about engaging with conspiracy?
31:25
Depends on
31:26
the specifics, I would say. I
31:28
I mean, depend depends on where
31:31
and with
31:32
whom. Sort of, like, well,
31:34
when I say far
31:36
right conspiracies, like, Q1 on and, like,
31:38
the election results or whatnot. Yeah.
31:41
Like, is there really a way you can, like, debunk
31:43
that? Or I mean, the the problem
31:45
is that a lot of the people that believe this
31:48
stuff aren't actually open
31:50
to thinking of
31:53
thinking critically about it. And so if
31:55
you show them contradictory evidence,
31:57
they say that evidence not reliable
31:59
or has been planted. If
32:01
you show them the absence of
32:03
evidence for what they say, they go
32:05
right because they're covering up
32:08
the evidence for what I believe. So unfortunately with a
32:10
lot of them, there's really no way
32:12
to talk them out of it or even get them
32:14
to reconsider. Yeah.
32:17
That's what I've noticed too. Alright, David.
32:19
Thank you. Alright. Thank you very much.
32:21
There's Bobby from Jersey. Yeah. I mean, unfortunately,
32:24
it's It's depressing is
32:26
the reality. It's depressing. Let's
32:28
go to
32:29
Rahman from
32:32
Minneapolis. Welcome back to the program.
32:34
What's going on? Thank
32:35
you, David. How's your day going
32:37
today? It's going well. Yeah.
32:39
My first question is, how would you compare
32:42
Donald Trump to past Republican leaders
32:44
like Richard Nixon,
32:47
Reagan, Bush, and how and how they
32:49
conducted business in this country and their
32:51
scandals? Well, I think
32:53
that
32:53
Trump has done
32:55
mean, listen,
32:56
compared to most of the people you listed,
32:59
all
32:59
of them. Trump
33:00
has had way more wrongdoing that he's
33:02
engaged in than any of them. I
33:04
think the difference is Trump has had
33:06
the benefits of the right wing
33:09
media machine, including Fox
33:11
News and NewsMax and Right wing media
33:13
and and defenders to
33:15
the death on social media and on
33:17
and on and on. But I think
33:19
that look at the list of all
33:21
the things that Donald Trump has done. Look
33:23
just look at all the criminal investigations that he's
33:25
under right now. So I think that Trump is
33:27
worse in terms of misdeeds. I
33:29
think Trump's dumber than most of them.
33:31
I mean, Nixon was a horrible person, but he
33:33
was quite smart.
33:34
Reagan you
33:36
know, was no genius, but he was
33:38
he was relatively smart. Bush was
33:40
kind of like when it when it started with
33:42
the whole kind of dim But again, Bush
33:44
seems like a mensa member compared
33:47
to Trump. So I I think that Trump is
33:49
also particularly just dumb in
33:51
a very superficial
33:54
way. Yeah. Like,
33:55
what I believe is the light. Like,
33:57
if it with Nixon, he didn't have
33:59
the right way media
33:59
back. Then if he did, I don't think
34:02
he would have been impeached.
34:04
right Right. With me
34:05
and with Reagan, I feel like with Donald Trump,
34:07
he's he's essentially taken every
34:09
he's just taking every bad part of each of each of
34:12
those presidents. Like, with Reagan, he had the
34:14
Iran contra scandal with Nixon
34:16
was water getting with Bush, it
34:18
was it was about lying about
34:20
WMDs and and torturing
34:22
people. Yeah. No. Absolutely. And I
34:24
think you're you're spot
34:26
on that had Nixon
34:26
had the benefit of this right wing media machine that
34:29
was defending everything he said
34:31
all the time constantly It
34:34
is quite possible that public opinion among Republicans
34:36
would not have shifted. Republicans would
34:38
not have gone to Nixon and said, listen, if you
34:40
don't resign, we're gonna have to impeach you. And
34:43
that that it could have actually saved Nixon. And so
34:45
that the really scary thing there is
34:47
more about Trump
34:48
did enough horrible
34:50
things that were
34:52
it not for. Were it not for the
34:55
right wing media apparatus, Trump might have
34:57
had to resign. Trump in the
34:59
seventies might have had to resign and
35:01
that really puts a big spotlight
35:04
for the horrible destructive nature of right wing
35:06
media, and we should not forget that. Howard
35:08
Bauchner:
35:08
Yeah. Second second question
35:10
before I go, this is very quick.
35:13
with with a lot of people with a lot of people going against
35:15
Progressive's, I'm like, Progressive's all they wanna
35:17
do is make people's lives like,
35:20
versus centrist versus right wing versus people
35:22
in the right wing, progressive all
35:24
they wanna do is make people the lives better.
35:28
So why are so many people going against them even though
35:30
the the the only thing that they care about is
35:32
making every everybody on have
35:34
the same eco footing in
35:36
this country. Yeah. No. I I completely agree with your
35:38
perspective, and the counterpoint
35:40
is the right would say, no. No. No.
35:44
Listen. as
35:45
the government, what we want the government doing is
35:47
not making people lives
35:50
better. It's letting
35:52
people live the life they wanna live. And
35:54
if some people don't want a better life, then
35:56
we should allow them to do it. It's
35:59
a nanny
35:59
state that forces
36:01
themselves upon you. That's the way that the right would approach it. Yeah.
36:03
But when when
36:04
Republicans talk about small small
36:08
in state not people's lives. Yeah. There are
36:10
actually lines people who would progress as Of
36:12
course. They act they
36:14
they actually they actually wanna stand up whose lives, they make whose lives better. That's
36:16
all they really wanna do. I agree with you. I
36:18
agree with you completely, but good luck
36:20
convincing a Republican of
36:22
that. Alright.
36:23
alright Alright.
36:24
Rock, one from Minneapolis. Great to hear from you again. Very much appreciated.
36:27
Let's go to Alex from Baltimore. Alex,
36:29
welcome back to the program.
36:33
Hello? Hey, David. Can
36:35
you hear
36:35
me? Yes, I
36:38
can. Alright.
36:38
Real quick, I wanted
36:40
to say, congrats on the baby. It's been a
36:42
little while. How much has your espresso
36:45
budget increased since then? You
36:47
know,
36:47
it really hasn't changed dramatically. I
36:48
have to tell you because, you know, one
36:51
of the things this I I hate
36:53
to admit this, but with my
36:55
particular espresso machine. I am much
36:58
better at getting a double
37:00
shot just right than a single.
37:02
So often what I do and I know it's
37:04
wasteful, but at the end of the day, it's
37:06
just water. Even if I only want a single shot, I'm usually making a
37:08
double and then just dumping the
37:10
second shot that I don't want.
37:12
So all that I've really been doing
37:14
sometimes is
37:16
just having the second shot. So it hasn't really changed
37:18
the budget. Well, lucky you.
37:20
Yeah. Now why should is
37:24
that surprising? Well, just with
37:25
with our child, it was a lot
37:27
rough going to the first few months with sleep,
37:29
so I definitely had
37:32
lots red eyes and extra coffee. That's Don't listen. It's
37:34
rough, but it's like how much coffee am I really
37:36
gonna have, you know? That's fair.
37:38
I'll just play around Alright. I
37:40
mean, I guess a lot is the answer. Who knows?
37:43
Yeah. Fair
37:43
enough. Real question. Yeah. So I had
37:45
I had something about eliminating
37:48
the filibuster, so I'm not
37:50
against it in principle or
37:52
anything. Okay. But I but I
37:55
do wonder, like, and we
37:57
just got rid of it, period, like, for
37:59
example, Trump's first two
37:59
years in office wouldn't they have just been
38:02
able to
38:04
just pass all sorts of crazy horrible stuff? And
38:06
how would we stop
38:08
that without the filibuster? And or
38:10
is that just a risk we
38:13
have to take to get stuff done
38:15
now. Yeah. I unfortunately listen.
38:19
The retrospective stuff I think is fine. It's like, well, listen, if we
38:21
only needed fifty one instead of sixty on this, then it
38:24
might have passed or whatever. The the problem
38:26
is that usually when people talk
38:28
about that, you're going
38:30
backwards only a very narrow amount of
38:32
time and also so what you have to think about
38:34
is imagine that
38:36
the filibuster had been previously done away with, and then think about all the things
38:38
Republicans would have been able to pass when
38:40
they had the opportunity. And also,
38:42
if Democrats did away with the filibuster now,
38:44
think about what that
38:46
would mean for Republicans and what they're willing to do at
38:48
some future point. So I think that's
38:50
all fine. I I really do think the right
38:52
way to think about the filibuster is
38:54
less about what could we
38:56
have done during this narrow window, but
38:58
what might they do? The it should just be
39:01
listen listen.
39:02
added court At its core, are there certain
39:04
things where there should be sixty
39:07
votes in favor, or should
39:09
everything just be fifty one? I actually think
39:11
we need to just be
39:14
honest about how it needs to be organized. Are there things where we should
39:16
have even more support than that? Because they are
39:18
so significant
39:20
and impactful to American
39:22
life. I don't pretend to know the answer,
39:24
but I think the best way to think about
39:26
this is less about we could have done this
39:28
if we had gotten rid of the filibuster in
39:30
January of twenty twenty.
39:32
I don't I don't know. I mean, yes, we can play that
39:34
game, but it really is about does it make
39:36
sense that in this country, you need
39:38
a simple majority or are there certain things where you
39:41
actually should have a sixty percent majority
39:43
or even greater and
39:45
to start with that rather than just the politics of it if that
39:47
makes sense. Yeah. No.
39:50
I
39:50
get that. I would just personally, I
39:52
would say split the difference and make it fifty five.
39:55
that's just my personal take take it
39:58
or leave it. Yeah. I mean, listen, it's
39:59
it's a matter there's no right
40:02
answer. It's like, you could have someone who says,
40:04
you know, I think anything that has to do with
40:06
taxes should have fifty seven votes and
40:08
anything with health health care should have
40:10
fifty five and anything with
40:12
budget should be everybody
40:14
will have a different opinion, and I don't know that there's
40:16
any right or wrong necessarily, but
40:18
fundamentally, that's the philosophical question that this
40:20
is all about. Right.
40:22
I just wanna hear your take. I appreciate
40:24
it. Alright. Alex from Baltimore. Thank
40:26
you very much. Let's go next
40:29
to Jojo from California. Jojo, welcome to
40:31
the show. What's
40:33
on your mind? Joe
40:36
Joe from California,
40:37
what's on
40:40
your mind? Joe
40:43
Joe from California, you're turned to
40:45
speak. You're unmuted. You're on. You
40:48
can
40:50
speak now. Alright.
40:54
Jojo from California, clearly
40:58
having apparently some kind of
41:00
technical issues of various
41:02
kinds. Jojo,
41:04
I'm sorry that we are not going to be
41:06
able to speak, but there is
41:08
some kind technical problem have. Jojo, you're muted yourself. Jojo,
41:10
are you back now?
41:13
No. Alright. Well,
41:15
Jojo has gone. Let's go to
41:17
Chris. Chris, welcome to the program. What's on your
41:20
mind? Thanks,
41:24
commissioner. Chris, you're on the
41:26
program. What's going on? Say what?
41:28
You're live right now.
41:30
Is that
41:31
what I Chris, you're
41:32
live. This is David Ham, and
41:35
welcome.
41:35
Hi. And
41:38
there we go. Chris, you're on
41:39
the air right now, and we can hear you. Go on
41:42
my front. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sitting
41:43
here. Listen. I'm at work right now. My my guy. Yeah. I'm
41:45
talking to you, Chris. Yeah. I'm
41:48
saying I'm at work right now. I can't talk. I was just
41:50
listening in.
41:52
Go. Alright. Okay. And work work's going okay for you?
41:54
Yeah. Yeah. I
41:55
apologize. No. No. No. I
41:58
apologize. What kind of work do
42:00
you do? I'm a
42:01
manager in the beer distributor. Really? Yeah. What's
42:04
going on with
42:04
the beer world these days? effective
42:08
because a lot of IPAs don't coming out. Is it is
42:10
it just an IPA fiasco these days?
42:13
Yeah. Like, right now, I got
42:15
a case in here that's we're a
42:17
hundred and twenty hours to twenty four Oh my goodness. What country
42:19
is that from? No. It's
42:22
a
42:22
it's a
42:23
local bearman. Right
42:26
outside of Philadelphia. Oh my god. I didn't think Billy Billing.
42:28
Sorry. What was that Billy? I
42:30
said, how my boy, Jimmy from
42:32
Billy Billing. I have no idea.
42:35
Yeah. He been playing
42:36
any of his voice over people. We
42:38
haven't been getting any.
42:41
Wow. Yeah.
42:43
i'm sorry Consenting? But
42:44
a really quick look at some picturesque. A pleasure having
42:46
you on. Alright, my friend? Thank you,
42:48
my guy. Alright. There is Chris from
42:52
Pennsylvania. And I think we gotta call it quits when we're
42:54
ahead folks. So we are gonna do it
42:56
for calls for the week
42:59
We will speak to more people next week. We'll take a quick
43:01
break and then get to your emails and many
43:03
more things. Quick break and
43:05
back after this.
43:10
Don't
43:10
forget that the best way to support the David
43:12
Pacman show is by becoming a member
43:14
which gives you access to the daily bonus
43:17
show, the regular show with
43:19
no commercials, you also get access
43:21
to our entire archive of
43:23
every episode dating back
43:25
a really long time. And plenty of other awesome
43:28
membership perks go to join
43:30
pacman dot com and
43:32
use the coupon code better
43:34
twenty one for a
43:36
huge discount, join
43:38
pacman dot com. Alright.
43:39
Let's get into the
43:42
Friday mailbag. Anybody
43:44
can be on the mail
43:46
bag, you simply have to write into info
43:48
at david pacman dot com. We have a whole
43:50
bunch of different types of emails that we
43:52
get. We get policy deep policy
43:56
wonk type emails. We
43:59
get superficial criticisms We get praise and we also get
44:01
trolling and today we're going to start with just a little bit
44:03
of trolling. It's always good just to get a sense of
44:06
the types of things I get. Peter
44:08
wrote in and Peter
44:10
says, you're a political
44:12
hack empty vessel. Are you
44:14
ever going to take that war
44:18
criminals Thalice out of your mouth and your is Y0U
44:21
apostrophe r e, out of
44:23
you are mouth. you
44:26
pro imperialist progressive
44:29
bootlicking peasant brain
44:32
loser. No wonder you
44:34
have a for profit opinion show, not a
44:36
new non for profit
44:38
newscast. You don't do
44:40
news. You
44:42
preach one-sided b s. What's very
44:44
interesting is this is from a left winger.
44:46
This is left wing
44:50
hate mail. They believe I am an imperialist and not
44:52
really a progressive and that
44:54
I just love Joe
44:56
Biden, the
44:58
supposed imperialist war criminal
45:00
and that the fact that
45:02
this is not a nonprofit show
45:06
is
45:06
part of the problem. Now what's funny is he kind agrees with Alex Jones
45:09
in a sense. Oh, the bonus show where you
45:11
wanna make money, but everybody else that makes money
45:13
to fund themselves is bad.
45:16
Yeah. So, yes, my show, like, basically,
45:18
every other YouTube Podcast Show
45:20
is not an
45:22
nonprofit. a lot of people might not
45:24
even realize, to have a nonprofit, you need a
45:26
board, you need I mean, it's it's actually
45:28
quite complicated to be a nonprofit, and
45:30
it doesn't really make sense for a whole bunch
45:33
of different reasons. We considered it at one
45:35
point. These are folks who
45:37
are in the you can never be progressive enough
45:39
category. And that's why I flagged this one. We get a
45:42
lot of right wing hate
45:44
mail, but the left wing hate
45:46
mail is also interesting because
45:48
in theory, Peter is someone
45:49
with whom I probably
45:51
agree ninety five percent
45:53
of the time. maybe even ninety eight
45:55
percent of the time. But is exactly the type of stuff that hurts
45:58
the left. And you really hate to
46:00
see it. hate to see it can't
46:02
control it. It is what it is.
46:04
Vincent wrote in. Vincent, now
46:06
this is right wing hate. Vincent is
46:09
a very anti semitic. Vincent
46:12
says Pacman, why is the
46:14
left woke crowd so dominated
46:18
by Jews?
46:19
Without Jews support,
46:22
the
46:22
left would die on the vine,
46:24
same as true for Wokeism.
46:26
Only the financial and intellectual support
46:29
from Jews allows voyeurism
46:31
and leftism to continue
46:33
their evil existence. Why
46:37
do most Jews support such
46:40
evil? Yikes. So remember,
46:42
you know, a bunch of different things.
46:45
Jewish Americans, much
46:48
like black Americans, are a very
46:50
left wing voting block, one of
46:52
the most left wing voting blocks in
46:54
the country. When it comes
46:57
to wokism, as defined, I
46:59
guess, by Vincent, it's a
47:02
relatively small part of what there is on
47:04
the left. I think it's extremely over represented in in media
47:06
and extremely over represented by right wing
47:08
media. But sometimes when they
47:10
say wokism, you know, I've talked about
47:14
where there can be excesses sometimes on the left. And I say,
47:16
sure. I can talk about this, but these
47:18
aren't like huge deals on the left.
47:22
Sometimes what the right means by Wokeism is we're
47:24
against treating people terribly because
47:26
of their identity. That's considered
47:30
Wokeism. Earlier in the week, we had this clip of this Republican mom
47:32
saying, I don't like all this
47:34
Marxist stuff like
47:36
anti bullying. sometimes
47:38
that's what they mean. They're just really angry that it's
47:40
not okay to criticize people who don't
47:42
look or sound like you anymore. So anyway, pathetic
47:44
stuff, anti semitic stuff for sure, but
47:46
very very common out there. Oh,
47:48
here's a nice nice voice mail about
47:50
my recent interview with Adam Stein. My
47:54
compliments. I was quite impressed with
47:55
your interview of Adam Stene
47:57
of Wisconsin. I really don't know how many
47:59
interviewers could keep such an
48:02
even keel when faced with
48:04
some of the responses Adam had,
48:06
my compliments to you, sir, yeah, I
48:08
get this question a lot like in my personal
48:10
life as well. How do you remain so
48:12
cool with these people? there's two
48:14
parts of it. One is just the
48:16
experience of doing it.
48:17
The
48:19
second is
48:20
a little bit of desensitization. When you've
48:22
heard this crazy stuff for a decade
48:24
and a half, you do
48:26
become somewhat desensitized to
48:29
the level of depravity that is
48:32
exhibited by many of these folks.
48:34
And I don't know that that's a particularly good
48:36
thing because I'm sort of suffering from a
48:38
normalization in a sense. I'm still
48:40
against the things they say,
48:42
but I'm used to hearing them
48:44
when they are very much not normal. So
48:46
something to think about. Ryan
48:48
wrote in about preventing life,
48:50
also the notion from the Adam Steen
48:52
interview. And Ryan says,
48:54
hey, David, The notion
48:56
of preventing life is
48:58
completely absurd. You're possibly
49:00
preventing life with nearly every action you
49:02
take. For example, I didn't get my
49:04
morning coffee today because I was running late.
49:07
Therefore, I didn't happen to run into
49:09
my future wife. Therefore, we didn't go
49:11
on to have children, thereby, preventing a
49:13
life. Any action can be seen as preventing a life. Thanks
49:15
David Ryan from Milwaukee. Yeah, it's
49:17
sort of like It's
49:22
like a chaos theory on right wing
49:24
brain worms. Adam Stein was
49:26
saying not only is he against birth control
49:28
I'm sorry. Not only is he against abortion, he's against birth
49:31
control as well, because you're
49:34
preventing life. very, very
49:36
weird argument. And it didn't make it it's
49:38
he even seemed confused by it quite
49:40
frankly. Carl wrote in. Carl says,
49:43
are you streaming any debates I'm
49:46
in Pittsburgh and would
49:48
love to see you do a stream of
49:50
Federman versus Oz or
49:52
Shapiro versus
49:54
Mastriano. Oh, and a silly name suggestion for the financial show
49:56
Pacman, the financial factman. Okay.
49:58
Yeah. So I have a whole
50:00
bunch of
50:02
different streams. that are scheduled when it comes
50:04
to debates. Tonight,
50:06
we've
50:06
got Abbott versus Beto. next
50:11
week, we have JD Vance versus Tim
50:14
Ryan,
50:14
and then we have
50:16
Mark Kelley versus Blake Masters.
50:20
the week after we've versus Christ, Whitmer
50:23
versus Tudor, Dixon, and
50:25
if it happens, the
50:27
Rafael Warknock versus hertial walker
50:30
debate, although who the hell knows, whether any of those
50:32
debates are gonna happen. Week after that, we've
50:34
got Rubio versus Val Demings. If it
50:36
gets confirmed, Oz
50:38
versus Federman, and then the week
50:40
after that, nothing scheduled
50:42
yet. So there there's there's actually
50:44
close to like a dozen different debates
50:47
that I plan on covering, and I
50:49
hope you'll join me for those.
50:51
Dan
50:51
wrote in, David, sir,
50:53
why doesn't Federman just take
50:55
the Montréal cognitive assessment exam.
50:58
I would love to see Republicans make
51:00
light of the very exam.
51:02
Trump has been bragging about for years. Yeah. We had a
51:04
voice mail call there last week with a similar idea,
51:06
which was basically Trump took
51:08
a dementia stroke brain injury test
51:10
and brags about it like it
51:12
gets him in dementia. if Federman took
51:14
it, who Federman had a stroke. And now there's
51:17
people saying, oh, we can't think,
51:19
whatever. If Federman
51:20
took it and passed it,
51:22
would
51:22
Republicans then be satisfied? And the answer is, of course not. They would all of a
51:25
sudden say it's not sufficient. We It's
51:27
I
51:29
I know. that Hannity and Trump and everybody brags
51:31
about this test, like it's the be all end all of intelligence
51:33
and cognition. But if it was
51:36
what Federman
51:38
said, And by the way, I got an email from a neurologist in our audience
51:40
who said, you know, David, it's not a what if?
51:43
Almost certainly, Federman
51:45
was given that test. that
51:47
assessment because he had a stroke, and it's typical that that's
51:49
what you do. It's not used for what
51:52
Trump used it for. It's
51:53
stunning, stunning
51:55
stuff. Then different
51:56
Dan wrote in about our YouTube thumbnails.
51:58
Now this I want to address in some serious,
52:00
some depth. Dan says those
52:03
YouTube thumbnails that involve a ridiculous facial expression?
52:06
Dude, please don't do that
52:08
anymore. Your content
52:10
is remarkable and consistent
52:12
and on point, you don't
52:14
need that cringy kind of
52:16
mimicry. Much loved, Dan.
52:18
Listen, guys. They're just
52:20
YouTube thumbnails. Okay?
52:22
I get it.
52:23
There's things that there are trends
52:25
on YouTube and other platforms that
52:27
are kind of gimmicky. Okay?
52:29
Sometimes they're even a little
52:31
cringey. But one of the things we do
52:33
is we adapt.
52:34
If we did our titles today,
52:37
are
52:37
dramatically different than what they were a
52:39
decade ago. Okay? The
52:42
conventions and what does well on our
52:44
different platforms change
52:46
over time. Titles
52:47
have changed, our set
52:49
has changed, the audio
52:52
equipment has changed, how the show is produced has
52:54
changed, and yes, thumbnail change and sometimes we test
52:56
thumbnails where I have a goofy look
52:58
on my face. Okay?
53:00
If
53:01
that alone makes you not wanna
53:02
watch or listen to the show
53:05
anymore, then I'm sorry because
53:08
really the content is what what I would
53:10
hope would be most important, but we're
53:12
rolling with the changes. If you don't
53:14
adapt, you die. in our space.
53:16
So listen, if those
53:18
funny faces don't do well, we'll stop
53:20
using them. If they go out
53:22
of style, we'll stop using them. If they hurt us, we'll stop using But just
53:24
testing different things. That's all. Alright?
53:26
Please folks with peace and love
53:30
Barney wrote in about something that is really,
53:32
really important. Barney wrote
53:34
to me and said, America
53:36
is a food desert. David
53:40
Englishman traveling through the USA here
53:42
currently in Chicago. I
53:44
speak to a lot of Europeans on my
53:46
travels and we are shocked that much
53:48
of the US is a food
53:50
desert and that we are all
53:52
completely undernourished and cannot
53:54
follow a typically healthy diet we might
53:56
adhere to in Europe. It's
53:58
impossible to find cheap healthy
53:59
food literally
54:01
anywhere, writes barney. It costs
54:03
seven
54:03
dollars for a salad,
54:05
thirteen for
54:06
a foot long subway, for example.
54:08
I even found it's
54:09
more expensive to buy Florida oranges
54:11
in Florida than it is for me to
54:13
get Spanish oranges in England.
54:15
Yes, I understand inflation's a factor, but this is
54:17
happening everywhere. And despite this,
54:20
groceries and healthy foods in
54:22
particular are
54:24
obscenely expensive. I think
54:25
the reason is you have one national supermarket,
54:26
so there's no competition, and there are
54:29
a general lack of supermarkets compared
54:31
to the UK. So this part
54:33
I don't know, we have more that
54:36
don't we have I mean, there's Trader
54:38
Joe's, there's
54:40
Whole Foods. There's
54:42
well, that's actually interesting.
54:44
Is is Wegmans National? I'm not
54:48
even sure. Maybe Barney's onto something. Maybe we only have, like, two
54:50
national supermarket chains. Like, I
54:52
know, Stop and Shop is just a Northeast
54:54
thing, I
54:56
believe. Yeah. That that may be a problem. Listen,
54:58
Barney is completely correct. And a
55:00
lot of people, you know, when I've traveled
55:04
through the Midwest. Small towns in the
55:06
northeast typically
55:08
have great food and
55:10
plenty of supermarkets, you know,
55:13
upstate New York and Vermont
55:16
and, you know, Maine, these play there
55:18
there's typically no issue. But when I've
55:20
been in, like, Wisconsin. When I've
55:23
been in Northern Indiana, when I've
55:25
been in even Kansas City,
55:27
Missouri is like,
55:27
okay, right in the city, but then it gets a little
55:30
bit rough. it is a major
55:32
problem. And there's multiple problems.
55:34
There's the
55:34
the pricing issue, of course,
55:36
the food
55:37
desert issue where there are
55:39
I mean, even even in New York and Boston,
55:41
there are poorer neighborhoods with a
55:44
dearth of options other than
55:46
chain restaurants. And there's also a lack of education, sadly, as
55:48
to what constitutes a healthy diet. What does
55:50
it mean to eat a healthy diet? Well, I
55:52
don't
55:53
know. I eat I eat chicken and
55:55
vegetables. But what do you mean? Well, yeah, I mean, it's wings
55:57
that I
55:58
fried as well as
56:00
you know mashed potatoes, excluding,
56:02
right, there are fries, whatever. There
56:05
are definitely misunderstandings about
56:07
how a diet should
56:10
established and honestly part of the problem is that that old
56:12
school food pyramid also
56:14
was somewhat inaccurate
56:16
and confusing. So, Barney, you
56:18
have correctly pointed out
56:20
that there's a lot of problems with food
56:22
here in the United States. And
56:24
it's really like
56:26
trying to You're kind of like trying to dig yourself
56:28
out, but as you do it,
56:30
you're digging
56:32
another hole. I don't know
56:33
if it's the right metaphor. Get your
56:35
emails into me info at
56:37
david pacman dot com. Tell me
56:39
your stories of food deserts
56:41
probably worthy of a clip coming up soon. And we
56:44
will see everybody on today's bonus show,
56:46
which you can sign up for at
56:48
join pacman
56:50
dot com Coupon code. Indite.
56:52
That's the coupon code. Everybody knows
56:54
why the coupon code is
56:56
currently Indite. we
56:58
need some indictments. The evidence is there. It's
57:00
time. See you on the bonus show
57:02
or otherwise back here on Monday.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More