0:00

That's the sound of me prepping the grill

0:02

with Reynolds Wrap. And the sound of me

0:04

not doing dishes. And the sound

0:06

of me spending more time outside with

0:08

my family.

0:09

Easy prep, cook and clean.

0:11

Make time with Reynolds Wrap. I

0:13

like the sound of that. This episode is brought

0:15

to you by my friend Rebecca Walser, a financial

0:18

expert who can help you protect your wealth. Book

0:20

your free call with her team by going to friendofdinesh.com.

0:23

That's friendofdinesh.com. Coming

0:25

up, I'll reveal the central role of CISA,

0:28

the Cybersecurity Infrastructure Agency,

0:30

in directing government censorship

0:32

through digital platforms. Representative

0:35

Clay Higgins of Louisiana joins me. We're going

0:37

to talk about the evidence that would form, that

0:39

could form, the basis of multiple

0:42

impeachments. And I'll show how a

0:44

top Biden official was the leading conduit

0:47

of COVID misinformation, even though

0:49

she knew her claims were

0:51

false. Hey, if you're watching on Rumble

0:54

or listening on Apple, Google or Spotify, please

0:56

subscribe to my channel. This is the

0:58

Dinesh D'Souza Show.

1:22

This is the Dinesh D'Souza Podcast. There's

1:28

a new report by the House

1:30

Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization

1:33

of the Federal Government, and it's

1:35

part of the continuing exposure

1:39

of the magnitude of censorship being pushed

1:41

by all the different elements

1:43

of the Biden regime. There's

1:46

a very interesting phrase in this report I

1:48

want to highlight, and it comes out

1:50

of a document by

1:52

the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency,

1:55

which is called CISA, C-I-S-A. And

1:59

it says this. that SISA is using,

2:01

quote, a

2:03

whole of government approach

2:06

to tackling speech. We

2:08

are working with federal partners to mature

2:11

a whole of government approach

2:13

to mitigating risks of MDM.

2:16

MDM is misinformation

2:18

and disinformation. So

2:21

this whole of government approach is that

2:23

we coordinate. We have SISA over

2:25

here. We have the State Department over

2:28

here, Department of Homeland Security. We have

2:30

the FBI, we have the DOJ and

2:33

the White

2:33

House, and we are collectively

2:35

pressuring these digital

2:38

platforms to censor more.

2:42

And this

2:45

is a disturbing development

2:47

because of course it is horrendously

2:50

unconstitutional.

2:52

Congress shall make no law

2:55

restricting freedom of speech or of the

2:57

press. I'm essentially quoting the First

2:59

Amendment. And Congress here refers

3:03

to the entire federal government, including

3:06

the delegated branch, the executive branch,

3:08

which of course is authorized

3:10

by Congress to carry out the laws

3:13

that are passed by Congress. They too

3:15

are forbidden from

3:17

restricting freedom of speech. And yet here they

3:19

clearly are.

3:21

I'm quoting from the testimony now of Michael

3:23

Schellenberger testifying

3:26

before the House. And

3:28

he says, quote, the censorship industrial

3:31

complex combines established

3:33

methods of psychological manipulation,

3:36

some developed by the US military

3:39

during the global war on terror with

3:41

highly sophisticated tools from

3:44

computer science. So

3:46

there's an effort here to really

3:48

control and manipulate the minds

3:51

of the American people. It isn't just a matter of I'm going to

3:54

de-platform you or take down your post.

3:56

It is trying to reshape the

3:58

minds of the American people. American people and

4:01

at the heart of this is this group called SISA.

4:04

This is the this is a group

4:06

that was set up to protect against

4:09

hacking. I mean as the name

4:11

suggests a cybersecurity and infrastructure

4:14

agency. So they're supposed to prevent for example

4:16

efforts to interfere

4:19

in election software, efforts

4:22

to to undermine the technological

4:24

capacity of the

4:26

United States and yet and here

4:29

they are in

4:31

a self-appointed role of regulating

4:33

speech. And they

4:36

know that what they're doing is wrong. Why? Because

4:39

they're trying to do it through the back door. In

4:41

fact, the House has now discovered the GOP House

4:44

that they have gone back on their website and

4:47

taken out terms like disinformation

4:49

and misinformation. They're hiding what they're

4:52

doing and this

4:54

concealment operation is is critical.

4:57

Here is a here's a

5:00

September 26, 2022 email

5:04

from Anneliese Craven. She's an assistant

5:06

US attorney with the Department of Justice and

5:09

she's talking about SISA documents

5:11

that have been demanded under the Freedom of Information

5:13

Act.

5:14

Could we please see a copy of any

5:16

relevant SISA documents that you may plan

5:19

to produce? We're also not sure

5:21

when you receive the records request, but we'd like

5:23

to have an extension of time to review them and

5:25

assess whether we have to file suit to

5:28

protect them from disclosure.

5:30

So here's the DOJ saying to SISA, hey listen,

5:33

you don't have to give up those documents because

5:35

we can file a motion to block it so you

5:37

can continue to do your censorship in private

5:40

without scrutiny by the media or

5:42

by the American people.

5:44

One other thing I want to highlight about

5:46

the censorship industrial complex is

5:49

that the term that keeps being

5:51

used by SISA isn't just misinformation

5:54

or disinformation, but a new term

5:56

and a very telling one, malinformation.

5:59

Now, what is malinformation? Well, the word mal

6:02

generally means bad. Maladroit

6:05

means someone who's clumsy. Maladministration,

6:08

something that's poorly administered. So,

6:11

malinformation here is information that

6:13

is, quote, bad information. But bad, why?

6:15

What's interesting is the way they define malinformation,

6:18

it is, quote, information based

6:21

on fact, but used out of context

6:23

to mislead harm or manipulate. In

6:25

other words, even if you say something

6:28

that's true, this can

6:30

be declared as being misleading

6:32

because where's the context? Dinesh,

6:34

you've made a quotation out of context.

6:37

Now, first of all, all quotations are out of context

6:39

because that's what it means to have a quotation.

6:42

If I quote for more in peace and you say,

6:44

Dinesh, you have to provide the full context, well,

6:46

that means I've got to quote the whole book. So,

6:48

a quotation is by definition something

6:50

lifted out of the book. Now, for some reason,

6:52

it inverts the meaning of

6:55

the paragraph or the meaning

6:57

of what the author is trying to convey. But

6:59

the point here is that they are trying

7:02

to censor accurate information because

7:04

they believe it will have a harmful social

7:06

effect and they get to define what harmful

7:08

is. So, what

7:11

you have here is disguise censorship,

7:13

censorship that is often done by proxy.

7:16

What Saisa does, for example, is they feed

7:18

information to these nonprofits. The

7:20

nonprofits then deposit them into the portals

7:23

of digital platforms. The digital platforms

7:25

engage in the censorship. So, this

7:28

is quite clearly

7:29

coordinated with the government. And

7:31

as I say, it's not just censorship of things

7:33

that are false, but also things that happen to

7:36

be true.

7:39

Mike Lindell has an amazing offer for my listeners

7:41

and viewers on his Giza Elegance

7:44

MyPillows. You'll get a Giza Elegance

7:46

MyPillow for as low as $19.98, regular price $69.98. This

7:51

MyPillow comes in four levels

7:53

of support. You'll also get deep discounts

7:56

on all MyPillow products, MyPillow towels,

7:58

mattress stopper, mice

7:59

and so much more. Go to MyPillow.com

8:02

to get Mike's amazing offer on the Giza

8:05

Elegance MyPillow for as low as $19.98 or call 800-876-0227 and

8:07

use promo

8:12

code Dinesh. The offer comes with a 10-year warranty

8:15

so you know it's gonna last, a 60-day money-back

8:17

guarantee, you have nothing to lose, it's time to

8:19

start getting the quality sleep that

8:21

we not only want but need. Go

8:24

to MyPillow.com or call 800-876-0227, use promo code Dinesh

8:26

to take advantage of Mike's

8:31

special offer on the Giza Elegance MyPillow.

8:33

The number again 800-876-0227. Don't forget to use promo

8:35

code Dinesh. I

8:41

mentioned yesterday about how the

8:43

conflict in Ukraine is routinely

8:46

presented as a clash

8:49

between the liberal values of

8:51

the West and the illiberal

8:54

values of Putin and of

8:56

Russia. Now what are

8:59

these so-called liberal

9:01

values? They are values

9:03

like free elections and democracy,

9:07

they are values like freedom

9:10

of speech, basic civil

9:12

liberties, equal rights under

9:14

the law. So the question becomes are

9:16

these values in fact being celebrated

9:19

in the West? Are they being practiced

9:21

in the West? Are they being practiced in

9:23

Ukraine? Well we know that

9:26

Ukraine cracks down on political dissidents,

9:28

we know that they restrict

9:31

freedom of speech and other basic

9:33

civil liberties and so

9:35

there is a rampant

9:37

illiberalism in Ukraine. I'm

9:39

not even going into the issue of the

9:42

presence of Nazi

9:45

forces as part of Ukraine's

9:47

cherished battalions. But

9:50

the latest development that cements the point

9:52

that Ukraine is hardly a champion

9:55

of liberalism is the cancellation

9:58

of elections. to

10:00

have elections next year, but the president,

10:03

Zelensky, says there won't be

10:05

any elections next year as long

10:07

as martial law remains in force

10:09

due to the ongoing war in the country.

10:12

Now, this is something that Zelensky said in

10:14

a recent interview with The Washington Post. He's going to

10:17

delay, not cancel,

10:19

but indefinitely postpone the

10:22

October elections that were

10:26

were scheduled, and the

10:28

presidential, the October

10:30

elections were parliamentary elections and the

10:32

presidential election early

10:34

next year. Now, it

10:37

should be said that Ukraine is in wartime,

10:40

and in wartime you don't have

10:43

the same liberties that you do in peacetime.

10:45

Now, that is true all over the world. It

10:47

was true in the United States in World War I

10:49

and World War II, although arguably in World

10:52

War I particularly, the restrictions

10:54

against dissent and civil liberties were excessive.

10:57

They're now generally acknowledged to be that way.

10:59

Now, Zelensky in his interview with

11:02

The Washington Post said, quote, that the Ukrainian

11:04

constitution

11:06

prohibits any elections during

11:08

martial law. So, this is

11:10

his justification. We can't have an election

11:12

because read the Ukrainian constitution. It doesn't

11:15

allow elections during a war

11:18

and during martial law. Now,

11:20

if you take a look at the Ukrainian constitution,

11:22

it doesn't say that. What it says

11:24

is that in times of war and

11:27

under martial law, elections

11:30

may be suspended. So,

11:32

what's the distinction? Well, the distinction is that the constitution

11:35

says that you can't have elections, but

11:38

you don't have to have elections. It's in

11:40

a sense that the decision is left up

11:42

to the Ukrainian government and

11:45

the Ukrainian president, which is

11:47

Zelensky. So, the point here is that Zelensky is

11:49

choosing not to have an election, but

11:51

he's trying to make it sound like a kind of inevitability.

11:54

Oh, gee, my hands are tired. The constitution says we

11:56

can't have an election. The constitution says you

11:58

can. The constitution says that

12:00

elections may be suspended, but they don't have

12:02

to be suspended. Now, if it seems like,

12:04

wait a minute, Dinesh, when can you give an example

12:06

where in the middle of a tumultuous

12:09

war, a country had elections? And

12:11

my example would be the United States

12:13

in 1864, in

12:16

the very heart of the Civil War. Abraham

12:19

Lincoln allowed the presidential election

12:21

to proceed on schedule.

12:23

In fact, it's an election that he expected

12:26

to lose. Lincoln was making preparations

12:29

to vacate the White

12:29

House. He thought the Democrats were going to win. It was

12:32

only last minute victories on the part

12:34

of the Union Army, particularly in Georgia,

12:37

that turned the tide of public opinion and

12:39

Lincoln comfortably won the 1864 election. So

12:42

you can have elections. It's just

12:44

that Zelensky is choosing not

12:46

to. And I think all of this adds up to the fact that

12:49

it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to

12:51

talk about Russia being illiberal and

12:54

Ukraine being liberal, when there's

12:56

a kind of deep strain of illiberalism

12:59

in both places.

13:02

If aches

13:02

and pains are your problem, relief factor is

13:04

your solution. Debbie and I started taking relief

13:07

factor a couple of years ago. The difference we've seen

13:09

in our joints, nothing short of amazing. Aches

13:11

and pains are totally gone, thanks to this 100%

13:14

drug-free solution called

13:16

relief factor. How does it work? Relief factor

13:18

supports your body's fight against inflammation.

13:20

That's the source of aches and pains. The

13:23

vast majority of people who try relief factor become

13:25

regular customers. They order more because

13:27

it works for them. Debbie's a true believer.

13:29

She can now do the exercises that for a long

13:31

time she wasn't able to

13:32

do. It's been a game changer for

13:34

her, her aunt, other members of our family,

13:37

Mike here in the studio, and for many

13:39

other people. You too can benefit. Try it for yourself.

13:42

Order the three-week quick start for the discounted

13:44

price of just $19.95. Go

13:46

to relieffactor.com or call

13:49

800-4-RELIEF to

13:51

find out more about this offer. The number again, 800-4-RELIEF,

13:54

or go to relieffactor.com.

13:57

Feel the difference. Guys, I'm really happy

13:59

to welcome.

13:59

a new guest, Congressman Clay Higgins

14:02

from Louisiana's 3rd District. He's

14:05

a member of the House Freedom Caucus. He also serves

14:07

on the House Homeland Security Committee

14:09

and senior member of the House Oversight

14:12

and Accountability Committee. You

14:14

can follow him on Twitter at repClayHiggins.

14:17

His website, clayhiggins.house.gov.

14:22

Clay, welcome to the podcast. Great to have you.

14:24

It seems like every single day there's

14:27

some new revelation

14:30

about the Biden family,

14:32

not just Hunter Biden, but Joe

14:34

Biden and the kind of family

14:36

operation they appear to be running.

14:39

Let me start by asking you, what is the level

14:42

of concern about all this

14:45

on your part and also the part of your colleagues,

14:48

Republican colleagues in the House? Well,

14:52

our concern is primarily

14:55

focused on whether

14:58

or not our executive branch

15:00

is compromised in some way.

15:04

And unfortunately, the deeper

15:07

we go into the investigation, the

15:09

more it appears that's very likely to be

15:11

the case. I mean, Hunter

15:14

Biden and

15:16

his behaviors and his

15:19

struggles in life are of zero

15:22

concern to us congressionally.

15:25

But the fact that

15:26

the Biden family, who we

15:28

now refer to as the Biden crime family,

15:33

have no doubt, according to bank

15:35

records, which are quite reliable

15:39

sources of investigative material,

15:42

according to bank records, the Biden

15:45

family, including Hunter

15:47

and President Biden,

15:50

have been involved in receiving

15:52

large sums of money

15:54

from overseas

15:56

nations

15:58

in exchange for apparently,

16:02

the access to

16:04

the power that

16:07

Joe Biden had as vice president.

16:10

And the concern now is

16:13

whether or not that compromise

16:16

and that behavior, that criminal behavior

16:18

from years ago has

16:21

extended into

16:23

a compromise executive branch

16:25

for the United States of America, a compromise

16:28

president, may I

16:30

add inaugurated president of

16:33

the United States. So we're

16:35

very concerned and asked that

16:38

the evidence we're revealing

16:40

is quite

16:42

legitimately indicative

16:45

of criminal behavior. But

16:48

we're not interested in

16:50

Hunter at all,

16:51

other than by virtue of the fact

16:54

that

16:55

that he was essentially the

16:57

point salesman, shall we say,

17:00

for selling

17:02

access to his dad. And then

17:06

the laundering of payment is

17:09

where the rest of the family members got

17:11

involved, so that they could

17:13

disperse those payments throughout the

17:15

Biden family in

17:18

any effort to conceal that money. That's

17:21

what we're revealing.

17:23

And it's startling to

17:25

observe. It's shocking. Now,

17:27

am I right in understanding that even though

17:30

there's a lot of focus on Gary Shapley

17:32

and the IRS whistleblower and the tax

17:35

element of this, which is that all this money comes

17:37

in, you don't seem to have disclosed or

17:39

paid taxes on it. The real issue

17:41

here isn't just the taxes. It's

17:44

the legitimacy of the transactions in

17:46

the first place, isn't it? In other words,

17:48

it's the idea that Joe Biden

17:50

and the Biden family were selling something.

17:53

And now the question becomes what?

17:56

Right? I notice a lot of mainstream

17:58

media are not covering this.

17:59

But let's just say that they were to cover

18:02

it. Can you think of a legitimate defense

18:04

here? Could they say, you know what? We're not selling

18:07

political influence. We're actually selling,

18:09

I

18:10

don't know, apples, we're selling widgets.

18:13

Did they have anything else to sell? It's

18:15

an important point, Dinesh, because you

18:18

have in any investigation,

18:21

a criminal investigation, you have

18:23

to take on the perspective

18:26

of what we refer to as a reasonable man.

18:29

So any reasonable

18:31

assessment

18:32

of the transactions that the

18:34

Bidens were involved in, they

18:36

were selling something, you're right. And

18:39

the only thing they had to sell in

18:41

these shell businesses that they set up,

18:43

the shells were empty. It's why they're

18:45

called shells. There was nothing there. They were selling

18:48

no, they

18:50

had no product nor service

18:53

to sell. So a reasonable

18:55

man would presume that, and

18:58

the corroborative evidence that we've observed

19:01

from other sources, emails, telephone

19:04

conversations, whistleblower

19:06

testimony, the corroborative

19:09

evidence

19:10

seems to support the

19:13

reasonable conclusion

19:15

that they were selling access to Joe Biden.

19:18

And that's it, I mean, he was a Senator

19:21

for a long time. And if you

19:23

think about the access

19:25

to information and the access

19:28

to stakeholders and very

19:30

powerful men and women across the country,

19:33

and indeed the world that a longstanding

19:36

Senator would have, and then

19:39

look at the power he would have as Vice President

19:41

for eight years, and

19:44

now as Inaugurated President

19:46

of the United States, it's

19:49

quite clear that Joe Biden

19:51

has a tremendous amount of influence

19:54

across

19:55

the world. And it's

19:57

quite clear that Hunter Biden,

20:00

Biden and the rest of the

20:02

Biden crime family had

20:04

nothing else to sell to

20:06

these nation states other

20:08

than access to Joe Biden.

20:11

And why would they want access to

20:13

Joe Biden? Because of his influence. So

20:16

that is specifically, that's influence

20:18

peddling. That is against the

20:20

law.

20:23

And further, it's in

20:26

it endangers the stability

20:29

of the United States of America and the

20:31

integrity of our interactions with

20:34

nation states across the globe

20:36

that rely upon us for the integrity

20:39

of our executive branch. And if our

20:42

executive branch is indeed compromised

20:45

inesh, then Congress must

20:47

act

20:48

and the

20:49

DOJ

20:52

must act. Although we have very

20:54

little confidence in this DOJ. They've

20:57

been involved in concealing some of this

20:59

stuff.

21:00

Let's take a pause when we come back more from Congressman

21:03

Clay Higgins.

21:06

Debbie and I started eating better this year. We've lost

21:08

weight, but foods we can't seem to eat enough

21:11

of and it's a requirement are veggies and

21:13

fiber. Now, what better way to get all

21:15

your fruits and veggies plus fiber than

21:17

with balance of nature. This is

21:19

balance of nature's fiber and spice. It's a proprietary

21:22

blend of 12 spices for digestive

21:24

health. The intense flavors and deep colors

21:26

of spices are the most condensed

21:29

whole food source of phytonutrition available.

21:32

It's recommended to be paired with this to star

21:34

product fruits and veggies in a capsule.

21:36

So easy select the whole health system for

21:39

the best price. Start your journey to better

21:41

health right now. Take advantage of balance of nature's

21:43

great offer. $25 off plus free

21:46

fiber and spice with your first preferred

21:48

order of fruits and veggies

21:49

when you use discount code America.

21:51

The offer can end at any time. So act now. Call

21:54

800-246-8751. That's 800-246-8751. I'll

21:59

go to

21:59

balanceofnature.com. Use

22:02

discount code AMERICA. I'm

22:04

back with Congressman Clay Higgins of Louisiana.

22:07

You can follow him on Twitter, at Rep. Clay Higgins.

22:10

His website, clayhiggins.house.gov. Clay,

22:14

we're talking about the Bidens and the

22:16

Biden crime family, as you mentioned. Now,

22:19

I want to highlight a couple of recently

22:21

disclosed messages from Hunter

22:23

Biden to Chinese entities.

22:26

In the one case, Hunter Biden says, the

22:29

Biden family is top

22:31

of the line. I'm paraphrasing here, not quoting

22:33

exactly, in being able to deliver

22:36

what the chairman wants. Now, I'm assuming

22:38

he's not talking about Chairman Xi, but the

22:40

chairman of this Chinese entity, which is, of course,

22:42

under the control of the

22:45

Chinese government and the Chinese political

22:47

forces. And in the second email,

22:50

Hunter Biden is sort of trying to

22:52

extract money, saying, in

22:54

effect, I'm sitting here with my dad,

22:56

with my father, and you've

22:58

made commitments and you better come through

23:01

on these commitments right now. And

23:03

if not, I will unleash and my father will

23:05

unleash our influence and our vengeance on you.

23:08

I mean, this seems to me to

23:10

be pretty close to a smoking gun, isn't

23:12

it? I mean, Rep. Claudia

23:14

Tenney verified that this text

23:17

was sent when Hunter Biden

23:19

was at the Biden family residence. So

23:21

Joe Biden was present. We don't know for

23:23

a fact independently if he was in the room,

23:26

but he was certainly on the premises.

23:29

So how does one take

23:31

something like this and then sort of nail

23:33

it down by finding out exactly

23:35

whether Joe Biden was there? Because that

23:37

proves he was lying about having nothing to do.

23:40

I don't even know what my son's business

23:42

dealings were. What are the next steps to

23:44

be taken?

23:47

Well, clearly, it's

23:50

a very incriminating piece of evidence,

23:52

but it's one of many.

23:54

And the defense

23:57

that they that they seem to prefer,

23:59

Biden's and

24:01

everyone in the mainstream

24:03

media that attempts to defend

24:06

the indefensible is that,

24:09

well, Hunter Biden, those

24:11

are the rantings

24:13

of a disturbed,

24:16

drug-addicted man. But

24:19

from an investigator's perspective,

24:21

you back up from all of that. You don't get emotionally

24:24

involved in what the source

24:27

of the evidence was.

24:29

You look at what the results are in the corroborative

24:32

evidence. And in this case is

24:34

the old saying, follow the money. So

24:37

the rantings of

24:39

a disturbed and troubled, drug-addicted

24:42

young man that's making stuff

24:45

up and desperately

24:47

trying to seize influence where

24:49

really none existed. If that

24:53

was the case, then where did the millions of dollars

24:55

come from?

24:56

I mean, we know for a fact that a few days

24:58

later, $5 million plus moved. It's

25:03

not like the Chinese guy goes, oh, Hunter Biden

25:05

is obviously on a crack spree. I'll ignore this

25:07

message because he's obviously ranting and raving.

25:10

He's not serious. And his dad isn't sitting

25:12

there. They obviously took it seriously because

25:14

they paid up.

25:16

That's right. And this is what ultimately

25:19

this is what is going to force

25:22

both the mainstream media and that

25:24

faction of our country, who

25:26

seems to just refuse

25:29

the gradually revealed clear

25:31

truth about the Biden crime

25:33

family and the fact that

25:36

the president of the United States, Joe Biden,

25:39

is compromised. And therefore, our entire nation

25:41

is compromised. What's going to gradually

25:44

force people into acceptance

25:47

of that truth is

25:49

the documentation of money transactions.

25:52

The Biden family had at about 150

25:55

known suspicious activity reports.

25:57

reports

26:01

required by law to be generated

26:03

by a bank

26:05

that is federally insured.

26:07

These are reports to the Treasury Department

26:09

if the bank independently observes

26:12

a suspicious transaction

26:14

of money that appears to be indicate

26:17

money laundering or something like that. So

26:20

most Americans will go their whole life including

26:23

small businesses moving large sums

26:25

of money sometimes would oversee

26:28

vendors and contractors and never

26:30

receive a suspicious activity report.

26:33

And so many of us didn't know what a

26:36

suspicious activity report was.

26:38

We didn't know what an SAR was until

26:40

it was revealed to us that the Biden

26:43

family in a short period of time, just

26:46

a few years,

26:46

had received

26:49

that we know of 150 SARs.

26:53

Each of them are

26:56

a significant piece of evidence

26:58

to be observed and compiled

27:02

to put the whole puzzle together. And

27:04

the deeper we look at it,

27:07

Ramesh, the more disturbing it is.

27:09

It seems very clear that Joe

27:12

Biden is a compromised president

27:14

and his family has been involved

27:18

in laundering monies that

27:20

have been delivered to them for years,

27:22

millions and millions and millions of

27:24

dollars through a dozen

27:26

or more

27:28

shell companies that were created

27:30

to hide and launder that money. And

27:32

why was that money paid from countries

27:35

like Romania and Ukraine

27:37

and China?

27:39

The only thing we can see that they were selling

27:42

was access to Joe Biden.

27:45

What, given

27:47

the reluctance of the mainstream media

27:49

to cover the story, is it

27:52

not a fact that the only

27:54

thing that forces them to cover

27:56

it would be an impeachment proceeding

27:58

because there's no to ignore that

28:01

if you're a CBS or ABC or the New

28:03

York Times. Republicans tend

28:05

to be sticklers for let's make sure we've

28:07

kind of dotted every I crossed every

28:09

T before we take that kind of a step.

28:12

What would you say is missing?

28:15

What else has to come out? What more

28:17

needs to be found to convince

28:20

the mainstream of the GOP that

28:22

look, we've crossed the Rubicon here.

28:24

This is the way to get this information out

28:27

to the American people. We

28:29

need to begin

28:29

this proceeding, not just against Merrick

28:32

Garland, but against Joe Biden. Well,

28:37

let me say I'm one of those conservative

28:40

voices that

28:43

advises caution regarding

28:47

attempting across the threshold that was

28:49

established by our founders to be the

28:52

most

28:53

restrictive process that

28:57

we have access to. The impeachment of

28:59

a sitting president of the United States

29:02

was intended by our founders to be almost

29:04

impossible. And the

29:07

threshold that must be crossed is quite

29:09

high or should be quite high. And

29:12

Republicans should be the party of constitutionalist

29:16

principles. And therefore,

29:19

I believe we should look to

29:21

the Oversight Committee

29:23

as we're currently performing

29:27

to deliver a clear, calm,

29:30

judicious

29:31

assessment

29:33

of condemning evidence. And

29:36

this should not be rushed. It

29:38

should not be driven by politics.

29:40

And let me say that I agree

29:44

that Joe Biden

29:46

has committed impeachable acts.

29:49

However, as a committed,

29:52

principled, constitutionalist

29:54

man, I recognize

29:56

that the impeachment of a sitting

29:59

president of the United United States is

30:02

it should be a

30:03

final

30:05

exercise in that reveal.

30:08

I do not think we should use the

30:10

impeachment process through the Judiciary

30:13

Committee to reveal the

30:17

impeachable actions of our president

30:20

when the Oversight Committee is effectively

30:23

doing so. And that should be

30:25

a timeline that unfolds according

30:27

to the investigative process, not

30:30

by dates on a calendar that

30:33

reflect our election cycle. So

30:35

I think we're in the process of both

30:38

revealing the criminal behaviors

30:40

of the of the Biden crime family and

30:42

Joe Biden.

30:45

And I believe we're also in the

30:47

process of approaching November

30:49

of 2024, where we'll

30:51

be rid of Joe Biden anyway. So

30:54

I think if we get to the point of impeachment,

30:56

then our investigation through

30:59

oversight will determine that on its

31:01

own timeline. I don't think I

31:04

don't think we should rush that timeline. I hope

31:06

that respectfully answers your question. It

31:08

certainly does. Thank you, Congressman Higgins. I

31:10

really appreciate it. Good to have you on the podcast.

31:13

Thank you, Dinesh. God bless you, sir.

31:17

The debt

31:18

ceiling crisis has come to a head. The administration

31:20

is doing its best to force more government

31:23

spending. How irresponsible.

31:25

They reached a settlement to get this deal done

31:27

for now, but the national debt continues

31:29

to skyrocket. Now, how are you protecting

31:32

your savings? Times like these are when concerned

31:35

savers like me turn to gold. And

31:37

I, like thousands of similar minded people, buy

31:39

my gold from Birch Gold. Here's the easiest

31:41

way to do it. Birch Gold will help you convert

31:44

an existing IRA of 401k

31:46

into an IRA in gold. You don't pay a penny

31:49

out of pocket. As the BRICS group,

31:51

this is Brazil, Russia, India, China, South

31:53

Africa, band together against the

31:55

dollar, more and more central banks are

31:57

diversifying. You know what they're buying? Gold, fatherhood,

31:59

and wealth.

31:59

their lead. Get started by texting

32:02

Dinesh to 989898. You'll

32:04

get a free information kit on gold. There's no

32:06

obligation, just information.

32:09

Birch Gold has an A-plus rating with the Better Business

32:11

Bureau. Thousands of happy customers. Birch

32:13

Gold can help protect your savings too.

32:16

Get started. You have nothing to lose. Text Dinesh

32:19

to 989898 today.

32:21

I want to talk about COVID lies, not

32:24

lies that are

32:26

spread by misinformed

32:29

activists on the right

32:32

for which there has been now two

32:34

and a half years of censorship on digital

32:37

platforms. I want to talk about COVID

32:39

lies being promoted by the top levels

32:41

of the government. COVID lies promoted

32:43

by people like Rochelle

32:46

Walensky, the CDC director, by

32:49

Fauci. These

32:50

are lies by people who are

32:52

in a position to know better and did

32:54

know better. Now this is very important

32:56

because there's a difference between a lie

33:00

and false information that you unwittingly

33:03

put out. So I saw

33:05

a meme on social media. It referred to an article

33:08

that supposedly wasn't the Atlantic. It looked

33:10

like the font of the Atlantic. I shared the article.

33:12

I then realized, in fact

33:14

someone pointed out in the notes, this article never

33:16

appeared in the Atlantic. Somebody actually made a meme

33:19

of this to make it look like

33:20

the Atlantic. So essentially I was deceived.

33:22

I immediately deleted the post. Why? Because I

33:24

wasn't lying. It looked to me like it

33:27

was an article from the Atlantic. I was commenting

33:29

on it. Once I realized that the article was

33:31

fake, I obviously pulled my post

33:34

down. So that's the distinction between

33:36

a lie and an error that

33:38

is honestly entered into. Now

33:42

when Rochelle Walensky went before the American

33:44

people, in fact she went in

33:48

media reports and

33:51

you can see these videos on social media.

33:53

She said that vaccinated people quote, don't

33:56

carry the virus. They quote,

33:59

don't get sick.

33:59

And she was making two critical points.

34:02

One, that if you take the vaccine, you won't get COVID.

34:05

And if you take the vaccine, you won't

34:07

give anybody else COVID. And

34:10

this was the clear rationale,

34:12

the foundation for harassing

34:14

people, threatening people, firing

34:16

people, removing people from the government,

34:19

removing nurses from hospitals. It said,

34:21

you are so obstinate that you won't take

34:23

a vaccine that is not only good for you,

34:26

but it's also good for you giving. It will

34:29

help you not

34:29

transmit the virus

34:32

to other people. Now,

34:35

more recently, when

34:38

Walensky went before Congress and she was asked about this, she

34:41

defended herself by saying that those

34:43

statements were, quote, true

34:45

at the time. So she said, in effect,

34:47

we didn't know better. We thought it was

34:49

that way. And so that's what we said. That was the

34:51

information available to us at the time. And

34:54

this is

34:54

actually a valid defense. It's

34:55

a valid defense because you cannot be expected

34:58

to know information that only

35:00

comes out later, information that is not

35:03

at the time available to you. So

35:05

this is her defense, and it sounded like a good defense,

35:08

but it turns out that she was misrepresenting

35:10

herself because emails obtained

35:13

through the Freedom of Information Act show

35:15

there's a kind of an email

35:18

exchange going on between Rochelle

35:20

Walensky and former NIH

35:22

Director Francis Collins. And

35:24

what is the subject of these

35:25

emails? Quote,

35:27

breakthrough cases of COVID

35:30

among people who have taken the vaccine.

35:33

So think about this. We're talking now about

35:35

January of 2021, so

35:38

about eight months into COVID. And

35:41

Rochelle Walensky is well aware

35:43

that there are people who've taken the vaccine and

35:45

they're getting COVID. So her statement

35:47

that, quote, vaccinated people

35:49

don't carry the virus, false. Her

35:53

statement that they don't get sick, false. Her

35:55

implication that you can't transmit the virus,

35:57

false.

35:57

And the important part of this is that the virus is not going to be able to transmit

35:59

the virus. point is she knew it was false because

36:02

we now know she was discussing this problem

36:04

with Francis Collins. In fact, in the email

36:07

she even says

36:09

that she is looping Anthony Fauci

36:11

into these conversations so that he too

36:13

is well aware that there are these breakthrough

36:16

cases of COVID. So

36:19

this is really the point. It would not

36:21

be a scandal if you don't know better, if you took

36:23

the best information and said something

36:25

based on that and then later had to revise

36:27

it based upon new information,

36:30

new data and so on. But it's

36:32

quite clear that these people knew better.

36:36

They recognized that they were lying to

36:38

Congress, lying to the American

36:40

people. Even later, like I say, when she was called

36:42

up to defend her statement she defends it by

36:45

another misrepresentation. Well, at the time

36:47

this is what we knew, this is what I thought

36:49

was true at the time. No, even at the time

36:52

you knew that there were these so-called breakthrough

36:55

infections. So all of this has contributed to a

36:57

legitimate, I would say, a valid

37:00

distrust of the health authorities. People

37:03

like Bolenzky, people like Fauci, these

37:05

are the people in the lab

37:06

goats who tell you in a sense, this

37:08

is what the science says, this is what the

37:10

evidence shows and they themselves know

37:12

because they're talking about it behind closed doors,

37:15

they themselves know that what they're saying to you is

37:17

flat-out untrue.

37:22

Guys,

37:22

I'd like to invite you to check out my Locals

37:24

channel. I post a lot of exclusive content

37:27

there, including content that is censored on

37:29

other social media platforms. On

37:31

Locals you get Dinesh Unchained, Dinesh

37:34

Uncensored. You can also interact

37:36

with me directly. I do a weekly Q&A

37:38

every Tuesday live. It's typically 8 p.m.

37:41

Eastern and no topic is

37:43

off-limits. I've also uploaded some very cool

37:45

films to Locals, both documentaries and

37:48

feature films, both my films and also films

37:50

by other independent producers. 2000

37:52

Mules is up there and I'm doing a new film

37:55

this year, very exciting. I'll be giving you

37:57

the inside scoop on Locals if you're

37:59

an annual supporter. you can stream

38:01

and watch all of these films for free,

38:03

including the forthcoming new one. So check

38:05

out my channel. It's free to check it out.

38:08

It's Dinesh.Locals.com. I'd

38:10

love to have you along for this great ride. Again,

38:12

it's Dinesh.Locals.com.

38:15

If you want to see a country that is ruining

38:18

its place in the world, that

38:20

is undermining its own influence,

38:23

that is doing

38:25

harm to its own interests, you

38:28

want to find a country that is injuring

38:31

its allies and helping

38:33

its enemies. Now

38:35

we can see in all kinds of ways that the Biden

38:37

regime is helping our enemies. The

38:40

Biden regime is trying to restore the Iran

38:42

deal, which would help Iran, our

38:45

adversary in the Middle East, our leading adversary.

38:48

Biden has done all kinds of things to help

38:50

China. Now there's some argument

38:52

that he's doing this because China's put a lot of money

38:55

into the back pockets of the Biden family.

38:57

And he's

38:58

a bought off asset of China.

39:00

I wouldn't myself go that far.

39:02

But I would say that he is compromised

39:05

by his dealings with China. So

39:07

this is the helping your enemies

39:09

category. But what about hurting

39:11

your friends? There's a report

39:14

out by Free Beacon. This is

39:16

FreeBeacon.com. Biden administration

39:19

defends controversial move to slash

39:21

Israeli research funding. What

39:24

is this referring to? Turns out that

39:26

the United States has a whole bunch of partnerships

39:29

with Israel. This is research

39:31

projects on all

39:32

kinds of on technology, on medicine

39:34

and so on. And out

39:37

of kind of nowhere, the

39:39

State Department has put out a, quote,

39:41

policy guidance to relevant agencies.

39:44

And they basically say that, quote, bilateral

39:47

scientific and technological cooperation

39:50

with Israel

39:51

is not allowed in

39:54

areas that are disputed. Now, what

39:56

are the disputed areas? Well, basically, it's

39:58

so-called Judea and Samaria. area.

40:00

These are the biblical names. Of

40:03

course, the modern names are East Jerusalem,

40:05

the West Bank, and the Golan Heights. Now

40:07

even though these are sometimes called disputed territories,

40:10

they're not disputed. They were one fair

40:12

and square in battles between

40:15

Israel and the Arabs. Battles, by the

40:17

way, initiated by the Arabs. They tried

40:19

to invade and destroy Israel. Israel turned

40:21

around and pummeled them. These areas came

40:23

under Israeli control. They're now under Israeli

40:26

rule. There are settlements being built in these

40:28

territories. But of course, the United States,

40:30

this is particularly true under Democrats, takes

40:33

the view that those settlements are still disputed.

40:35

They are somehow quote under negotiation.

40:37

There's no real negotiations going

40:40

on. It's not as if Israel is gonna basically go, yeah,

40:42

you can have the West Bank back here. Take back East

40:45

Jerusalem. Here's the Golan Heights, Egypt.

40:48

We took it from you. You can have it back. No,

40:50

these places are not going back. This

40:53

concept of negotiations is a little bit of

40:55

a fiction. True, there is a Palestinian

40:58

problem that Israel has to deal with. But

41:02

in order to ally itself with the Palestinians

41:04

and against Israel, this is the point. By

41:07

and large, any Jewish companies that are

41:09

located in the West Bank or in

41:11

the Golan Heights are now

41:13

off limits for US technological

41:16

and scientific cooperation. Now

41:18

the Israelis are sort of outraged by this

41:21

and so are a number of Republicans.

41:25

Nikki Haley, for example, says that, hey, if this was scientific

41:27

projects in China, Biden would be for it.

41:30

Here's Ted Cruz. The State Department is

41:33

telling the entire US government not to cooperate

41:35

with Jews in Judea and Samaria.

41:37

And Ted Cruz goes on to point

41:40

out that the Biden people actually issued this

41:42

guidance, this policy guidance in secret.

41:44

It was just that someone in the media found

41:46

out about it. Here is Free Beacon reporting

41:49

on it. There's

41:50

little secret

41:52

that the Biden people, because

41:54

they're on the left, do not like the Israeli

41:57

government, particularly the Netanyahu government.

41:59

They are constantly trying to undermine

42:02

the Netanyahu regime. In

42:04

fact, there are

42:07

a number of indications that

42:09

the Biden administration

42:12

has been funding left-wing advocacy

42:14

groups in Israel that are trying to

42:16

overthrow Netanyahu. So talk about intervention

42:19

in another country's democratic

42:21

politics. By the way, this

42:24

was not started by Biden. We know now, flashing

42:26

back to Obama, that Obama hated Netanyahu.

42:29

Obama,

42:29

as part of his anti-colonial philosophy,

42:32

saw Israel as part of Western colonialism.

42:34

There's sort of a colonial outpost

42:36

of the West and the region. So he tried

42:38

to undermine the Netanyahu government

42:42

during his tenure, and Biden

42:44

is now clearly picking up on it. So this is a

42:46

way of slapping your own allies while

42:49

advancing and helping your enemies. And

42:52

this is the way in which the Biden regime

42:55

is weakening America around the world,

42:57

including with our, really, our sole

42:59

reliable ally in the Middle East.

43:04

It

43:04

seems like the Magic Kingdom, Disney,

43:08

has lost its magic, and I,

43:10

for one, am very happy about

43:13

it. Now, the reason that

43:15

Disney has lost its magic is very clear.

43:17

It's that a series of movies,

43:20

one after the other, has been pushing

43:23

one or other aspect of the woke

43:25

agenda, and we can see

43:27

the results at the box office. In fact,

43:30

recently, a movie analyst sat down

43:32

and did the math. He was

43:34

calculating the effect of eight

43:36

Disney movies. And by the way, at least

43:38

half of those movies have

43:40

LGBTQ characters

43:43

or themes. Thor,

43:45

Love and Thunder talked about one of the

43:47

characters, same-sex parents. Strange

43:50

World had Disney's first openly

43:52

gay main character. Lightyear

43:55

had a same-sex kiss, elemental

43:57

as the first, quote, non-binary.

43:59

character. So, Disney

44:02

here has an agenda and the agenda

44:04

as I mentioned before very almost

44:07

the opposite of what Disney used to be.

44:09

Disney used to be kind of

44:11

a company that encouraged imagination,

44:13

fantasy, good and evil, Americana

44:16

and now it's essentially pursuing

44:18

this far-left agenda. And

44:22

look, people don't like it. People don't like it here

44:24

and they don't like it even abroad because

44:26

one of Disney's massive recent bombs

44:29

was the film that was released in China.

44:32

Disney has been making a lot of money in China but

44:34

it's with the latest movie virtually no money.

44:37

The Chinese just don't even want to see it and

44:39

that's because it's the Little Mermaid featuring

44:42

a black lead. Now, some people

44:44

on the left here are all, that's because the Chinese are racist.

44:47

Well, it's not because they're racist. They recognize

44:49

that they're being sold an ideological agenda

44:52

across the board and quite frankly most

44:54

of the world has no interest in this. This is basically

44:57

domestic American politics and domestic

45:00

American race issues, gender issues,

45:03

transgender issues that are being sort

45:05

of thrust on the rest of the world

45:07

and the rest of the world is like leave us alone.

45:10

So, there's a kind of a pushback against it

45:12

but also in America. So, according

45:14

to the map that Walt Disney Company has lost 900

45:17

million dollars at the box

45:20

office over the past 12 months for

45:22

eight of its films. In other words, this is

45:25

not a, sometimes you know when you're releasing films

45:27

you have a hit, a hit, a hit, a bomb,

45:29

a hit, a bomb. So, that

45:32

is expected. No studio scores every

45:34

single time but Disney's revenue

45:36

numbers are a little misleading because sometimes when you

45:38

hear a film made a hundred million dollars at the box

45:41

office you think well the hundred million dollars went to Disney.

45:43

No. Less than 50 million went

45:45

to Disney because the rest of it goes to the theater

45:47

chain. So, if a movie costs a hundred

45:50

million dollars to make and it makes a

45:52

hundred million dollars that movie actually

45:54

loses money. In fact, it takes in less than

45:56

half of what it cost and this is what's

45:58

been happening with Disney.

45:59

Bomb after bomb after bomb

46:02

after bomb and I for one think

46:04

it's great. Now,

46:07

no company can continue like this and

46:09

Disney of course recognizes this. In

46:12

fact, recently the returning

46:15

Disney CEO Bob Aiger announced

46:17

the company is going to cut costs by 5.5 billion.

46:21

It's going to terminate 7,000 jobs. Now,

46:23

obviously feel bad for people who

46:25

are not part of Disney's ideological agenda,

46:28

people who work there. But it does seem

46:30

like a lot of the employees have been pushing

46:32

within Disney for Disney to go this

46:35

route. And so they have got to

46:37

face the consequences of making bad

46:39

movies and running a badly a company

46:41

that is not really serving its customers.

46:44

At some point the axe has to fall on

46:46

the woke department and

46:49

it's already starting to happen. So the

46:51

latest article I see, Disney's

46:53

diversity czar quits after

46:56

massive failure of race swapped

46:58

little mermaid non binary elemental

47:01

movies. And we're talking

47:03

here about this woman,

47:05

La Tundra

47:08

Newton. Disney's

47:11

achieved diversity officer since 2017. Now,

47:14

of course, Disney doesn't want to say, in fact, they

47:16

don't really admit that she's

47:18

been fired. And so they put out

47:21

the usual boilerplate

47:24

because it's just kind of funny. She goes

47:26

that that

47:29

La Tundra has decided to

47:31

leave the Walt Disney Company to pursue

47:34

other endeavors. In other

47:36

words, this is the case where being kicked out the doors

47:38

call. She's decided to leave. Quote,

47:41

La Tundra has led the company's strategic

47:44

diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives,

47:46

including blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I know

47:48

you all join me in thanking La Tundra,

47:50

blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. So this

47:53

is what corporations do. They put out this stuff.

47:55

It's not only isn't meaningless, it's actually

47:58

the opposite of what is actually being

47:59

done. meant. Because think about this. I know you thank

48:02

me in... I know you join me in thanking

48:04

La Tundra. Why would we thank La Tundra

48:07

if its diversity nonsense has caused

48:09

Disney to lose 900 million dollars?

48:11

Thank you La Tundra! You've cost us 900 million

48:13

dollars. You're

48:14

now leaving. We wish you all the best.

48:16

I mean, yeah, this is the kind of thing and,

48:19

you know, when this is when people leave, when people

48:21

die, you're supposed to say nice things about

48:23

them. So I kind of get it. But the rest of us

48:25

who are observing and trying to make sense of all this shouldn't

48:28

really be fooled. By the way, this La

48:30

Tundra character is the same person who

48:32

pioneered the Disney memo

48:36

to the Disney staff in the wake of the death

48:38

of George Floyd where she basically says,

48:40

we've got to be committed, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

48:42

And so that's part of what that accelerated

48:45

Disney's... Disney was already moving in this

48:48

direction

48:48

and but... and

48:50

they aren't alone in being accelerated by the events

48:52

of George Floyd. We saw this sweeping across

48:54

corporate America but Disney for one

48:57

is now having to pay the price.

48:59

Subscribe to the Dinesh D'Souza

49:01

podcast on Apple, Google, and Spotify.

49:04

Or watch on Rumble, YouTube, and

49:07

SalemNow.com.

49:14

When

49:15

I grow up, I want to work for a woke

49:17

company. Like, super woke. When

49:20

I grow up, When I grow up, I want to be hired

49:22

based on what I look like. Rather than my skills.

49:24

I want to be judged by my political

49:27

beliefs. I want to get promoted based on

49:29

my chromosomes. When I grow up, I

49:31

want to be offended by my co-workers and

49:33

walk around the office on eggshells.

49:36

And have my words policed by HR.

49:38

Words like grandfather, peanut

49:41

gallery, longtime nuzzie, no

49:43

can do. When I grow up, I want to

49:45

be

49:45

obsessed with emotional safety and

49:47

do workplace sensitivity training all

49:50

day. When I grow up, I want to

49:52

climb the corporate ladder. Just by following

49:54

the crowd. I want to be a conformist. I

49:56

want to weaponize my pronouns.

49:59

What are pronouns?

50:01

It's time to grow up and get back to

50:03

work. Introducing the number one woke free

50:06

job board in America. RedBalloon.Work.