Podchaser Logo
Home
#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

Released Tuesday, 19th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

#447 - Sour Lemon and the Blood Libels

Tuesday, 19th March 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

We know our new method.

0:03

Of attack. Stat

0:10

that. That

0:13

meant a new perfect. Be greedy and

0:15

welcome back to another exciting instalment of

0:17

the Fifth Column podcast. This is your

0:19

weekly rhetorical sort of news. I can.

0:21

We couldn't make it in the casually

0:23

ourselves. I'm coming onstream still here in

0:26

New York. I'm with Michael Moynahan and

0:28

Don Lemon. Nice. Yeah, yeah, I'm I'm

0:30

dumb. Eminent Welsh know you're not the

0:32

I will never be that were It

0:34

shoots well. and you also never be

0:36

that terrible at interviewing. I. Can

0:38

I go the he's that veteran the

0:40

Mm. Maybe add a lurid middle of

0:43

unlimited eleven or Cnn? yeah, but he

0:45

as for why eight million dollars and

0:47

seven cyber drugs and some air roller

0:49

skates? Reason I heard dismays Yeah, I

0:51

mean he I just we. I mean,

0:53

I would ask for those things as

0:55

well. So. I suppose we

0:57

are good. Have voted for a similar

0:59

appetite yeah, but I mean you can't

1:02

phone for and that essentially. but is

1:04

there. There is kind of a disconnect

1:06

between what he believes he's worth is

1:08

actually for a it's like it's like

1:10

when I see things on Ebay that

1:12

are priced higher than they are on

1:14

Amazon. Get a good investment. That's.

1:16

Not, you don't have any idea what that's worth

1:19

do. And that's Don Lemon talking about thing about

1:21

himself because I watch them an interview. And.

1:23

I am. I'm

1:25

always willing. I'm happy and want

1:28

to. Have because you know

1:30

as I'm I'm going to be heterodox is

1:32

So I want to say the opposite thing.

1:34

And been ago, he's a great interview. He

1:36

absolutely isn't the worst interview or it's It's

1:39

almost like he's A. he didn't do the

1:41

homework, He he's stuttering through things, he's dropping

1:43

all these things and in it you know

1:45

in front of do on on, tell everyone

1:47

who's interviewing. Deleted. Know that.

1:50

I mean, it's Don Lemon.

1:52

Everyone knows Don Lemon. We're

1:54

all paying. It's the A

1:56

Lemon, right? He was interviewing Elon

1:58

Musk. Yes, That area is

2:01

really bad. Very brief career.

2:04

Working. For or my own we're didn't

2:06

even actually mouse the I were to go

2:08

shading the deal he earns us to produce

2:10

a show yeah would are distributed on exit

2:13

very uncool The suspect our national as as

2:15

the I was like do you remember when

2:17

that happens yeah I sent a text you

2:20

guys I was like oh my god that's

2:22

a such a stupid get move from Elon

2:24

musk yeah jumped to fire to first time

2:26

and time for the interview aired as the

2:29

as it it was a bad as the

2:31

amount as easy as were very very survivor

2:33

in your. Criticism of a lot. So

2:35

I'm as as somebody who likes to

2:37

change their mind and do mayocoba on

2:40

your eye popping off as actually I

2:42

agree with you on masks this is

2:44

that your new boss and you're like

2:46

why are you such a racist and

2:48

like when work assists Here's where arm

2:51

that the he doesn't even get a

2:53

half a half culpa our house Something

2:55

Nothing you don't Hired Mother fuckin The

2:57

first place was as like like when

2:59

Ben Shapiro eventually fires Candace Iowans I'm

3:02

not him stand up and a plot.

3:04

I want to say what the fuck were you doing?

3:06

Did you see the thing that someone pointed out that

3:08

she was liking. As sweet as

3:10

to find someone in a it's still

3:13

I get it wrong, doesn't want I

3:15

can his own to sue me so

3:17

see a couple things. Recently was one

3:19

that she said i'm in a bet.

3:22

My. Reputation. As.

3:24

A girl you don't have a specific

3:26

and pass on this story. yeah that

3:28

Emanuel Mack crowns wife is actually a

3:30

man. He says Mrs. and now as

3:32

the yeah there's some conspiracy theory and

3:34

I think the people have been taken

3:36

to court This to women. like

3:39

one of them is like a farmer who

3:41

suffer just this weird couple a conspiracy women

3:43

in france who have been person is conspiracy

3:45

theory that i may microns wife who is

3:48

getting sixty five years older than his his

3:50

and song trump was like remember they're digging

3:52

holes out in the white house garden oh

3:55

that's receives that matter like how you can't

3:57

batty yeah yeah yeah it turns out he's

3:59

gay She asked Cam at

4:02

someone, why her hero so entrapment

4:04

again. But yeah, she's like,

4:07

it's clearly a man. And she's like, let me just

4:09

break this down for 60 seconds. And I'm like, zoink,

4:12

next, please. But

4:14

someone pointed out that she liked

4:17

a tweet that

4:20

somebody responding to Rabbi Schmooley,

4:23

who I've met a few times and is a

4:25

bit much. He's a bit of a handful.

4:28

This is the guy, there was a video going around.

4:31

Oh, him supposedly saying the N word.

4:33

Yeah. I don't know if that's true.

4:35

I saw some hard R. Yeah, hard R. Like

4:37

a racist R. The exact

4:39

phrase, Jew hating nigger. Oh

4:41

yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe

4:44

he said, are you hating? Maybe

4:46

you misheard it, but not the last bit. You

4:48

didn't hear it. Yeah, I don't know if that's

4:50

authentic. It was hard for me

4:52

to tell what was going on there. Cause

4:54

it's like a snippet of audio and then

4:56

it cuts off. Someone could basically suggest that it

4:59

was a, I think the post suggested it was

5:01

a Twitter spaces that he said this in

5:03

and then quickly like disconnected it, which is

5:05

just kind of insane. It's very hard to imagine

5:07

that someone would actually do that, but. I

5:10

mean, Rabbi Schmooley, maybe he referred to her in a tweet

5:13

as the arch anti-semite Candace

5:18

Owens, inciting her Jew hatred,

5:20

blah, blah, blah. That's not concise. So inciting

5:22

her Jew hating followers to threaten to murder

5:24

Jews, et cetera. So somebody

5:28

responds to this. It says

5:30

February 20th, rabbi, are

5:32

you drunk on Christian blood again?

5:34

Oh, a classic blood libel. What?

5:37

I mean, a literal blood libel. Wait,

5:39

she liked that? She liked that tweet.

5:41

No way. Sometimes her fingers just like

5:43

you can't. No, in her

5:45

defense, I've pocket blocked people.

5:48

I've done all kinds of things

5:50

unwittingly that way. So it's

5:52

possible that this happened in her pocket. It would

5:54

be really ironic that it happened in her pocket

5:56

on a tweet about her being an anti-semite. It

5:58

would be. It would be. Yeah,

6:03

it's pretty amazing. It's not outside of

6:05

the realm of possibility. No, it's not.

6:07

No, no, it's not. What was so

6:09

bad about the Don Lemon interview? So

6:11

with Elon Musk, because you guys are

6:13

yammering about it in the thread, in

6:15

the never ending thread. And

6:18

I didn't want to care because

6:20

the obsession with Elon Musk, I

6:22

saw it. You know what? I'm going to

6:24

intersperse an observation here about

6:27

Instagram. It's been fucking

6:29

ruined. Instagram is my place to

6:31

post inexplicable photos, usually,

6:33

of my nine-year-old. And

6:35

that's fine. And now

6:37

when you look at other people's Instagram,

6:40

they show threads. Threads? I don't have that,

6:42

because I guess because I never signed up.

6:44

I signed up, but then I immediately unsigned

6:46

up because

6:49

it was terrible. And so every time, one of

6:51

the last ones I saw was

6:54

from Jeff Jarvis, the professor.

6:56

He's the best. And

6:58

he was like, what was the

7:00

thread that he came up with, like

7:03

the banality of Elon, or

7:05

something along those lines? That's the

7:07

book title that I want. I don't want to actually write the book,

7:10

but that's what I want to do. The

7:12

obsession with Elon Musk as a quasi-Nazi

7:16

hate figure is so stupid,

7:19

as is holding him up as

7:21

a free speech champion. I don't think he's a

7:23

free speech champion. He's just Elon Musk. He's a

7:26

weird fucking dude. And he's erratic about

7:28

a lot of different things. And also amazing

7:30

in a lot of important ways. And he

7:32

fucking puts the biggest rocket into

7:34

space ever last week. That's awesome.

7:37

And Tesla. I

7:39

mean, whatever. I don't like do that stuff. He

7:42

asked him the Tesla Roadster in

7:44

a very weird digression. Yeah. But he

7:46

also did ask him things that were

7:50

really uncool. Edward

7:53

Snowden, actually,

7:56

from what I saw of the interview, Edward

7:58

Snowden really encapsulated what I was doing. I

8:00

thought about it. It was actually a really good tweet thread from Edward

8:02

Snowden. He said, look, I've been

8:04

in the controversial interview seat, what Don

8:06

Lemon came after Elon Musk with felt

8:08

like malice. Elon, in clear

8:10

discomfort, opens up in good faith about his

8:12

intensely private struggles. And that's the thing that

8:14

when they're talking about ketamine, I think. Lemon

8:17

picks precisely that moment to begin emptying

8:20

an entire drawer of knives. That's

8:22

a dick move, sure, but it's Lemon's right. It

8:25

comes with the territory of being a partisan football

8:27

and Musk should have expected it. The real loss

8:29

is that it's a huge waste of an interview

8:31

because Lemon exudes zero curiosity or

8:33

interest in anything beyond posturing. Exactly right

8:35

from what I saw. And

8:37

it was, there's a funny bit where Elon

8:40

says, you want censorship

8:42

so bad, you can taste it. Or

8:44

I can taste something like that. But he, Don

8:47

Lemon is unprepared for somebody who

8:49

is very calm, doesn't

8:52

really need this interview. You

8:55

get people there like where their political lives are, they're

8:57

online, their businesses are online. He's just a billionaire, he's

8:59

the richest man, second richest man in the world, depending

9:01

on the day. And he just doesn't

9:03

give a fuck. And so when he comes

9:06

after him with the DEI stuff, which is one of

9:08

my favorite things, when he says, he

9:11

just make a very simple point. He's like, I just don't think that

9:13

you should hire somebody and lower it

9:15

or change the qualifications based on race. And

9:18

Don Lemon is like, why do you hate black

9:20

people? It's very, very astonishing

9:22

moment to watch if somebody kind

9:25

of collapsed like Lemon does. It's

9:28

just the way he handles that

9:30

particular section is like, oh,

9:32

you came in here with this idea that if

9:34

you believe these things, you are probably a racist.

9:37

And when it goes beyond that, you have nothing to

9:39

say. And then when he says the

9:41

posturing, that was the thing if you are

9:44

a subscriber to this podcast and listen to the one

9:46

that we released today. I

9:48

mentioned in that that

9:50

Tucker Carlson said the right thing and

9:54

it doesn't apply to him. He

9:56

mistakenly got something right talking about the Putin interview, as

9:59

he said like, you know. All these interviews come and

10:01

it's all about them. That is true. Unfortunately

10:03

Tucker did a very, very bad interview

10:06

that I think is worthless in almost every way. And I

10:08

think he's a fool. And I think the

10:10

whole thing was foolish. But that thing that he did describe does

10:12

happen. And that's what you saw with Don Lemon. You

10:15

saw him basically going through the

10:17

posturing, like, well, you couldn't actually, and it was,

10:19

none of it was about enlightening. It

10:21

was about trying to get the moments

10:23

for the clips. I mean,

10:25

you live on CNN for

10:28

many years and you live on Mediaite

10:30

as like, that's the tribune

10:32

for people like him. A clip

10:34

of him like destroying somebody or getting in

10:36

some, some fisticuffs with somebody. And none of

10:38

it, he just got, he kind of got

10:40

pummeled by Musk in a way

10:42

that wasn't really a pummeling. It was just a

10:44

calm response of like, no, I never said that.

10:46

Like, what are you talking about? And they're all

10:49

very basic points. But I think what I saw,

10:51

I didn't see the whole thing, but

10:53

I thought Musk handled it pretty well. And I'm not somebody who's a

10:55

fan of his. Generally not a fan of

10:57

his. I think he's like, Matt Taibbi

11:01

said the other day that he was full

11:03

of shit on free speech. And

11:05

I think there's something to that. But in this

11:08

interview, I was like on

11:10

his side and I wanted to be on Don

11:12

Lemon's side just to be the heterodox. Ism? The

11:17

heterodox. Hamazaba. Doing

11:20

a great job. Camille, what did

11:22

you like about the interview? Well, the moment

11:24

that stood out to me was when they

11:26

were talking about free speech. And at some

11:28

point, Elon says, when we take content down,

11:30

we will take down things that are illegal.

11:32

What is a child pornography thing? If it's

11:34

legal, then we leave it there. And he

11:36

said, well, what about all of these racist

11:38

memes? Well, is it illegal? He

11:41

says, no, but it's bad. And

11:43

it's been up there for a long time. And all

11:45

of the Christ Church shooter and various other shooters, they

11:47

were radicalized by social media. So don't you feel an

11:49

obligation to take it down? And

11:52

this is when he starts to talk about how much you

11:54

love censorship. But at some point he says, but

11:58

there's child porn on there. Isn't

12:00

that a form of moderation and censorship? And

12:02

he said, that's fun. He said, that's illegal.

12:05

That's illegal. I

12:07

just said that if it's

12:09

illegal, it has to come down.

12:11

But I don't understand. And he

12:13

was completely mystified by this distinction

12:15

between legal and illegal. I mean,

12:17

that mystification is underlined to a

12:19

lot of the kind of confusion

12:21

and people talking past each other

12:24

in journalistic debates right

12:26

now and political debates too, right?

12:28

Like literally at the Supreme Court even

12:31

today when they were talking about

12:33

Murthy versus Missouri. And

12:35

I was doing my lunchtime watching CNN

12:37

for five minutes and watching the way

12:39

they were describing this case. And

12:42

to remind everyone, this is the case that

12:45

the states brought against the Biden

12:47

administration for being acting

12:49

in a censorious way, especially

12:52

on like Facebook and social media

12:54

companies having to do mostly with

12:56

COVID alleged misinformation, but sometimes

12:58

also with things having to do with like

13:00

the election and like if you're an election

13:02

denier or whatever. And

13:05

which they absolutely did. I

13:07

mean, they brow beat

13:09

social media companies to

13:12

not just like police their own courts

13:15

in a way or their own users, but

13:17

also they said, these are the 12 people

13:19

you need to do, like do

13:22

better with like kicking off your platforms. The

13:24

dirty dozen, they literally called them at some

13:26

point. So this came up

13:29

on the Supreme Court just today and

13:31

seeing people talk about it just as

13:35

when the lower court came up with

13:37

a pretty strong injunction against the Biden

13:39

White House about it, there

13:42

is a bafflement actually from the

13:44

journalistic side. Like the White

13:46

House is just trying to prevent

13:48

the spread of misinformation and

13:51

these courts are like handcuffing them.

13:54

I don't even like get what I don't

13:56

get it. And the other side is trying

13:58

to make the point of. that's

14:00

the government pressuring private

14:03

actors to censor people.

14:05

Yeah, but we like this particular government.

14:07

And also they're doing it for the

14:09

right reasons. It's, uh, but

14:12

that's such a fundamental departure from

14:15

the conceptions of free speech that

14:17

you would see within the journalism

14:19

industry when I was young, which

14:21

I guess was a long time ago. Maybe that's

14:23

the problem here. Um, like,

14:26

it would be inconceivable, and

14:28

yet now it's kind of a minority

14:30

position when you look at it. And then

14:33

interestingly in the Supreme Court, which has otherwise

14:35

been super strong in

14:37

favor of the First Amendment

14:39

and expanding and butt-tressing its

14:43

strength over the last 20 years, 15,

14:45

20 years you would say, um, I'm

14:47

not sure. I mean, reading the

14:49

coverage of this from

14:52

Jacob Solomon, other people, uh,

14:54

Ilya Shapiro, who I think wrote an abacus

14:56

brief for the Manhattan Institute by

14:58

it, kind of seems like the Supreme Court's

15:00

a little bit skeptical of

15:03

the Fifth Circuit, I think it is, uh,

15:05

injunction against the White House and they're look-

15:07

and they're not going to, um, spread it.

15:09

It's a complicated case because it all lies

15:12

on the question of are

15:15

they really threatening you or are they just

15:17

like breathing really hard while they're

15:20

suggesting that maybe you should look out

15:22

at what your users are saying. But

15:24

the reaction to it and the climate from which a

15:26

lot of this sprang, um, stems

15:29

from that sort of journalistic idea that there

15:31

is a truth and that since

15:33

there's bad people doing the mistruths, we got to do

15:35

something about that. Yes, 100%. And that's what you see

15:37

in this interview and you see the hangover for the

15:39

amount of time that he was at CNN. And

15:42

the CNN, that really kicks off in 2015-16 and the Trump stuff

15:45

and they're like, this is a funny joke and

15:47

you see that with Morning Joe. They have Mon

15:49

all the time and then they're like, oh God,

15:51

we created this joke. It's part of this sort

15:53

of self-flagellation too that we are responsible assigning themselves

15:56

far more responsibility because it actually

15:58

makes them feel good. like

16:01

potent and you know the people that vote for

16:03

Donald Trump that I met in the middle of

16:05

the country have never ever turned on MSNBC and

16:08

wouldn't ever turn on MSNBC and it wasn't them

16:10

and CNN But you know you have

16:12

this thing where he's like, you know, but you have to do

16:14

something about this There's things that aren't true and he's

16:17

the type of guy who seems quite dim

16:19

actually in that interview But he

16:21

seems a little too dim to understand that

16:23

there is not a Binary of

16:25

things that everyone knows are true and everyone

16:27

knows aren't true and the nuances of

16:29

some of those things too when it comes to like vaccine

16:32

misinformation, which was the stuff that

16:35

or I should say COVID misinformation Which

16:38

was the stuff that people after the Donald Trump stuff.

16:40

That's what they were really running with, right? So it's

16:43

2021, you know Joe Biden's president now and

16:45

then it's like, okay This is the

16:47

next thing we have to attack because Donald Trump's no longer in

16:50

office We're gonna ignore him for a little bit as a short

16:52

period of time. We did ignore him and

16:54

that was fun and then

16:56

you have this thing about vaccine

16:58

hesitancy of it was was it

17:00

was it a Wuhan

17:04

lab thing was it a wet market? Was

17:06

it a bat? Was it a dingo? And

17:09

you couldn't ask those questions, etc But there was the presumption

17:12

in all that time and it's not even to get into

17:14

what was right and what was wrong But there was a

17:16

perception at the time that there were things that were right

17:18

and there were wrong despite the fact that right very early

17:20

In a disease that nobody had this is

17:22

brand new and everyone knew the answers to

17:25

this at in This is the kind of

17:27

attitude you see him bring to mosque and

17:29

say well, these things are influencing people Because

17:32

there were no school shootings. There were no there

17:34

were no neo-nazis There was

17:36

no racism before social media and he's

17:38

like with social media is the thing that's but

17:41

you know look one of the

17:43

things that the sections that I saw that really

17:46

Bothered me and the reason it

17:48

bothered me is because I do this for a living and

17:50

I interview people for a living

17:52

and I'm doing this on Wednesday and The

17:55

way I'm going about this to people that I'm

17:57

sitting down with and I have to it's a

17:59

little harder two people and how you

18:01

think they're gonna react to certain things and what's gonna bring

18:03

them out and what's gonna pull them out of it in

18:05

knowing what they believe about certain issues, right? And putting

18:08

them against each other, not for good

18:10

clips, but just to get a good conversation going.

18:12

And so you're just kind of looking at it

18:14

that way. And then you see, when you see

18:16

people doing bad interviews, it's not that

18:18

they're kind of ambling blindly, aimlessly

18:22

through an interview. I always know what they're trying to

18:24

do, right? Cause it's a very easy thing to think

18:26

if you've done this one time, it's not like some

18:28

super power, everybody who's ever interviewed somebody knows this. There's

18:31

a point at which he starts talking to him about

18:33

ketamine. And-

18:35

You aren't talking to- To Don Lemon.

18:38

And Don Lemon- Well, Don asked him about that. Asked

18:40

him about it. And he said something about like, do

18:42

you have a prescription? And he said, he

18:46

says kind of private to ask somebody about their medical

18:49

prescriptions they take. And then

18:51

he pauses and then he says, all right, well, I'm gonna

18:53

answer this anyway. And Don

18:55

Lemon responds in a series of really

18:59

awful and

19:01

uncomfortable ways. But you see that he's

19:03

trying to be Barbara Walters. He's

19:05

trying to say, so what is that like? But

19:07

he's doing it in the most intrusive,

19:10

awful way, which- I'm gonna get a gotcha out of

19:12

this rather than I'm gonna draw you out. But it's

19:14

gonna draw you up, I'm gonna get the emo part,

19:16

but then you see the CNN thing that's part of

19:18

his brain. It's been kind of poisoned

19:20

by being at that network for so long. And then

19:22

he tries to take the knife out

19:25

and he says, well, is that good for your investors? Like

19:28

you're on drugs. It's like, no, no. Really?

19:30

Yeah. And I will say

19:32

this is that ketamine is

19:37

very promising when it comes to the treatment

19:40

of depression. It's a gateway

19:42

drug to happiness. And

19:44

that's what Elon Musk who's, I

19:47

answered was very, he

19:49

didn't wanna be forthcoming. He was forthcoming. And it

19:51

was actually a pretty interesting answer. But there's a

19:54

doctor at Yale who is like one of the

19:56

big guys in the ketamine kind of

19:58

at Yale Medical School. and it

20:00

doesn't sort of the aerosolization

20:03

of ketamine in an inhaler, but

20:06

I think Eli Lilly, or one of these big pharma

20:08

companies I've done, because it's been really effective. And

20:10

it's especially effective for people who have extreme

20:15

depression in like, you might

20:17

kill yourself the next day. You get into

20:19

that point. If you get ketamine drips, all

20:21

the data suggests that it pulls you out

20:24

of it pretty quickly. And it takes

20:26

about three months, you have to re-up it. I've

20:29

been very interested in it myself. You

20:31

can get it off-label treatment

20:33

in New York City at a number of places.

20:35

They advertise very publicly. There's doctors that do it.

20:38

And to conflate this, like he's on

20:41

drugs, and aren't

20:43

you gonna tank your company? What do your

20:46

investors think? Like, you smoked a joint with

20:49

Joe Rogan, and he said, I had one puff. It

20:53

was a play acting, we had one puff, whatever. It's

20:55

like, I'm not on drugs. And this

20:57

whole thing is like, it's a mixture of that. I'm trying

20:59

to be Barbara Walters. And it's

21:01

not like, well, what are you depressed about? Let's

21:03

talk about that. It was a point

21:05

where he became the cable news guy again in

21:08

trying to get that little clip where he

21:10

was like, aren't you gonna destroy your company

21:12

by taking a drug that you take for

21:14

depression? It's just a cheap trick. I mean,

21:17

not that however Elon Musk or anyone

21:19

else runs their company is by definition

21:22

the greatest way. And that their

21:24

consideration of investors is

21:27

the greatest way to consider investors. I'm just kind

21:29

of guessing that Don Lemons, understanding

21:32

of the role between a CEO

21:35

and the investors of a company might

21:37

be, in this case, a little bit

21:39

less than Elon Musk's. It's a weird,

21:42

like, I finally caught you. You've

21:44

never thought about this until I just brought

21:47

it up. Like, if you

21:49

are in any kind of publicly traded company,

21:51

you are constantly thinking about these

21:54

fucking SEC requirements and

21:56

all of the things that you're presenting to

21:58

investors. It is an obsession. with

22:00

yours, it's a very weird

22:02

thing to come off like that. There's a,

22:04

in some of the poll, kind

22:07

of poll quotes, poll sections of the

22:09

interview that Washington Post had

22:12

the five takeaways from Don

22:14

Lemon's piece of garbage interview. One

22:17

of them was, there's

22:19

Musk depressive episodes, but the

22:22

first one, of course, is Musk

22:24

resists responsibility for hate

22:27

speech on X. Yeah. He

22:30

resisted taking responsibility, and

22:32

he's like, there's like five billion posts a

22:34

day. Yeah. And he has a conversation

22:36

about it, like it depends on, you know, if

22:39

a tree falls in the forest stuff. I think I was playing that

22:41

when you were, right? Yeah. Like somebody tweets

22:43

something and no one means it. Yeah, that's

22:45

like, it's hard to police all that stuff.

22:47

There's never any sympathy because it has the

22:49

wrong politics. And they don't like what

22:51

he's done with it, so they all went to threads. Yeah,

22:55

with the great Mark Zuckerberg

22:57

company is better. But

23:00

it's like this constant thing,

23:02

like you have to be responsible

23:04

for everything that's set on this platform, which

23:07

I think had this platform existed in 1996, 97,

23:09

98, I

23:12

mean, you and I were in the early stages of the internet, we

23:15

would ever be praising it and saying, it's incredible,

23:17

like you can get your ideas out. Everybody

23:19

has a Gutenberg press, do you remember that with

23:21

blogs? Like it's incredible. It was a democratization. Now

23:23

it's like, this is bad. I mean, even Elon's

23:27

explanation of how Community Notes works, which

23:29

is hardly perfect by any stretch of

23:31

the imagination. Pretty good. But when he

23:34

explains that the difference between

23:36

a traditional news network

23:38

like CNN, like running a

23:41

story that turns out to be fucking false

23:43

and wrong, they don't say

23:45

anything about it for a day or so, maybe there's

23:47

a correction, but almost no one hears about the correction.

23:49

And Elon, as he explains with

23:52

Community Notes, if you've interacted

23:54

with a post, and then a

23:56

day later, a Community Note shows up, you're supposed to

23:58

get a notification about it. it in

24:01

the system. It's kind of a big deal. And

24:03

as the post continues to exist, the community note

24:05

is right there attached to it, and you have

24:07

an opportunity to see it. And the way that

24:10

the algorithm works, and I haven't seen

24:12

it, so I don't know, but the explanation, and

24:14

as I understand it, is in

24:16

order for the note to be officially

24:19

attached to a tweet, the

24:21

reviewers, the people who are in the pool

24:24

of community notes reviewers, like you

24:26

actually need to get people who

24:28

would generally disagree to agree that,

24:30

oh, this post is legitimate. It

24:34

has sufficient context for it

24:36

to get through. I mean, that's

24:38

kind of a big deal. It's pretty great. Not

24:40

a bad innovation at all. And also, Elon Musk

24:42

has been on the wrong side of community notes.

24:45

He sure may, Elon. As

24:47

he pointed out. At the end of this interview, I'll

24:49

make some claims, you'll make some claims, and what

24:51

will end up happening is people will comment, and

24:54

on community notes, they'll give you some indication of

24:56

whether or not it's right. And

24:58

they should all publish a cult book

25:01

because getting things. Well, it depends. It

25:03

means that you're a monster. Yeah.

25:08

I do think that I didn't see the

25:10

whole interview. Lemon's questions and his

25:12

bafflement at the conversation about free speech is what

25:14

people should pay attention to. They want to just

25:16

because I think it does show what happens. So

25:19

you're suggesting people should watch this. Yeah, for sure.

25:22

Is that okay? Can we do that? I think we can still

25:24

do that. I didn't like it. I didn't like it,

25:26

but I think you should watch it. Where?

25:29

This is a shocking gossip. Wait, who do

25:31

I call about what is the appropriate amount

25:33

of dislike of this interview? I thought that

25:35

they have the electrodes attached to you. We'll

25:38

find out if this is okay. Yeah. We'll

25:41

see. We'll see what happens. We'll see if

25:43

all the good people tell us that we're

25:45

bad. But

25:47

there was a bit, I saw that when he said

25:49

some typically musk stupid

25:51

things. And countering

25:55

stupidity with stupidity when Don Lemon

25:58

says, you know, you should become like a... this

26:00

hive of right-wing conspiracy theory,

26:02

because without

26:05

X, God knows when it just would stop. People

26:07

would just go walk outside and breathe and be like,

26:09

that was a stupid idea. But

26:12

he said, and Musk responds by saying,

26:14

well before it was just the domain

26:17

of only the far left. And it's like, that's not

26:19

true at all. Were you on it before? That's not

26:21

true at all. That's total bullshit. So he does that

26:23

too. So not just Don Lemon, but Don Lemon's job

26:25

is to be an interviewer. Elon Musk

26:27

is to be a slightly weird,

26:29

autistic. Slightly. Yeah,

26:31

slightly. Also

26:34

brilliant business owner. Super accomplished. He

26:36

is the one who should not ask questions, know how to

26:38

handle an interview, and be prepared for it. He might be

26:40

the best entrepreneur

26:42

of our time. I think

26:44

I don't know the- Very arguably. Who

26:47

else is in the conversation? Jeff

26:49

Bezos and Amazon. Yeah. Yeah,

26:51

and I- And one trick pony. I'm

26:53

just kidding. Elon is running multiple companies.

26:56

No, I mean the extraordinary things that-

26:58

Kyle Dunnegan, we should just drop the

27:00

Kyle Dunnegan rap. Oh

27:02

yeah. That's why I'm good. Yeah, that's

27:05

very cool. So I will always give

27:07

him a tremendous amount of grace because

27:09

I'm grateful for my Model

27:11

S, and I'm also grateful for

27:13

the SpaceX situation, and hope to

27:16

run on a rocket ship. And

27:18

then the forthcoming Roadster is going

27:20

to be $200,000. So

27:22

it's a bit out of my reach. Apparently, Jetsons life.

27:24

I mean apparently, that part of the interview

27:26

was interesting to me. I'm glad that Don

27:28

Lemon kept asking questions about that. But wait,

27:30

does it have wings? Yeah. It

27:32

sounds like a Jetsons. And he was like,

27:34

maybe. It was hilarious. I'm gonna literally just,

27:36

does it fly? And he's like, I don't

27:39

know, we'll see. Okay, cool. I

27:41

mean, I'm excited. Yeah, I am too, but I

27:43

can't afford it, but I'm excited. I'm bouncing in

27:45

my chair right now. Yeah, I get it. What's

27:47

the over-under of Camille being in

27:49

the first 500 people to get that car?

27:52

Sue at 200K? Me,

27:54

my wife is not gonna make that. I

27:56

think I've got a better shot at getting

27:59

the Cybertruck. Yeah. than the Roadster. Rusty

28:01

and... Who knows? It probably won't be available

28:03

for another two years. At that time, maybe

28:05

it'll be fine. I can't, no, no, I

28:07

mean, I would love that. I would feel

28:09

bad, like test driving, and I can't afford

28:12

half of my life. I used to

28:14

have a job where they didn't make me work and paid me a

28:16

ton of money. And that's just

28:18

what happened. Now, like, my daughter is

28:20

like really desperate to, this

28:23

is, it's great when you have like a girl that grows up in

28:25

New York, but she is a mass hole

28:27

in her bones, and she knows

28:29

that the Bruins are playing the

28:31

Rangers in Boston on Thursday, and she's

28:33

on spring break, and she's like, Poppy,

28:36

did you get tickets yet? And she texted me this morning. I

28:38

was working, and she was like, did you get tickets for the Ranger

28:40

game yet? And I'm like, it's the

28:43

Rangers. I looked, the tickets are like $500 a

28:45

piece. And I,

28:47

no, I, wait, are they two good tickets,

28:50

R-Phonedo, or just tickets? Well, you can get tickets, I'm

28:52

not gonna put my daughter up in the nosebleeds.

28:54

Yeah, you're pretty good. Particularly in Boston, this is

28:57

like, people are like, fuck you! It's

28:59

not good for us. So

29:01

if you have any listeners that have Bruins season

29:03

tickets, huh, shoot me a line, I'll pay

29:06

for it, I'll pay it. I'll pay a

29:08

face value. He had a Vision Pro. What,

29:10

I mean, you can like sit on the, whatever

29:13

it is, line, I don't know. Have you sat

29:15

on Steph Curry's lap like you always wanted to?

29:17

Yeah, I've never wanted to do that. Yes, he

29:19

really. That is wrong. That is not true. I'm

29:21

not even a Steph Curry fan. I'm

29:23

not really, I think he ruined the game of beauty.

29:25

I'm trying to get your homophobia to come out. I

29:28

do not have any homophobia anymore.

29:31

Anymore. Jamaican. But

29:33

that part of me is dead

29:35

now. I love this. But

29:38

if you are Jamaican, you have to

29:40

say any more. That is not believable

29:42

on the right side. I know. I've

29:45

been candid about my journey on

29:47

this podcast. Have you heard that? Did you

29:49

make a national anthem? Push

29:52

them up, you boy, you be see me! Because

29:55

we know he can't swim, Jamaican! do

30:00

it we can do it Jamaica I

30:04

mean the Bob sled but swimming no it's not man in

30:06

Japan like all right fine whatever

30:19

you say an Aman about it why

30:21

no man not I did I want

30:24

to do anything in which

30:28

we replaced Don Lemon in that interview

30:30

like a very grumpy Jamaican man

30:36

which terms that are

30:40

really offensive in other cultures and what you

30:42

don't mean anything to you it doesn't feel

30:44

wrong at all and there's I remember there's

30:46

a word about the boy shouldn't be offensive

30:48

but he is a great old description

30:51

of the situation yeah I can you translate my

30:53

teeth yeah but um but yeah

30:58

boy yeah yes it would be what

31:00

the British would call bum boy if

31:03

it's yeah in England oh

31:05

that was a yeah yeah not anymore not

31:07

anymore it's a different country now yeah

31:13

you prefer the old ways you guys

31:15

colonialism they love the terminology now

31:21

there's a word in the Swedish that I said one

31:23

time and we have a

31:25

lot of sweetness news and

31:29

I said it's just like in the

31:31

kind of conversation like knowing that it was

31:33

offensive and people just look at me like

31:35

what the fuck did you say and I

31:37

was like oh really is that bad make

31:39

air bowling no no no that's the thing

31:42

no great when

31:44

you say it I want to make sure that the

31:46

you know that the it's

31:52

you know that compound word there

31:54

the first word that's nigga is

31:57

is is Negro

31:59

that's what it is actually means. It's not that

32:01

hard. Or is this

32:03

supposed to be better? Well, no,

32:05

but they still changed it because

32:07

it was a small chocolate

32:10

ball with coconut flakes

32:12

on it and it was literally

32:14

called Negro balls. I

32:17

swear to God, they still called it that. I'm not joking.

32:19

When I moved to Sweden, they still called it that. I

32:21

think it was Stuerkat

32:24

on this. People in Stockholm would know that

32:26

place. Like an old kind of bakery with

32:28

a conditore where you get coffee and stuff.

32:30

And they had it and I was like, arched an

32:32

eyebrow and I was like, is that? And they're like,

32:34

yeah. But then they changed it. They just

32:37

called them chocolat balls. These chocolate balls now.

32:40

So is there a relationship

32:42

between this delicacy and

32:45

Chef on South Park with the whole chocolate

32:47

salty balls thing? I wonder. I wonder. It's

32:49

very similar. Yeah, it's very similar. But that's

32:51

literally what... It would be shocking to discover

32:54

that today. I can still

32:56

remember the first time I heard Isaac Hayes sing.

32:58

Oh, yeah. Stuck on my chocolate salty balls. That's

33:00

right. Put them in your mouth. Yeah. That's

33:03

amazing. I wanted to do... We

33:05

lived in a very different time. That

33:08

was cute. We absolutely did. One of the

33:11

things I used... When I went to Sweden

33:13

initially, I wanted to

33:15

make a coffee table book of everything in

33:17

the country that was racist, but nobody really understood.

33:21

And I think they figured it out later. Because they

33:23

were literally doing Black Lives Matter, like taking the

33:25

name Swedish Soccer Games. And I was like, guys,

33:27

what are you doing? I

33:30

appreciate that you want to be part of this.

33:32

But now they went way too far. But my

33:34

favorite was there was chocolate

33:37

covered puffed rice called

33:40

Shinapufa, Chinese puffs. And

33:42

the picture on it was a guy in literally

33:45

a swooping hat. Oh, no. With

33:47

his... Like the eyes. It was just like... He

33:49

was actually pulling his eyes. Yeah. Oh,

33:52

the packaging. And like,

33:54

this is pre what people

33:56

call woke, unfortunately, but pre this time by

33:58

a lot. And it's me and

34:01

I was like, dude, you guys gotta fucking change this

34:03

stuff. This is bad, like

34:05

what are you doing? And then all the

34:07

Turkish Delight stuff is also just like people

34:09

on magic carpets. I'm like, God, you guys

34:12

don't see anyone up here. And now

34:14

they want to make a vision. You're all wearing face paint. This

34:16

is the best part. We ever bring back to you, I

34:19

bought a thing for you in Joanna back

34:21

in those days that

34:23

was a French, old-timey, some

34:26

kind of lemon or fruit squeezer that

34:29

was just incredibly, explicitly racist.

34:31

Yes. Yeah, you did

34:33

have that. Yes, that's right. And I just wanted

34:35

to share this to you and you can't see

34:38

this because we're on a video podcast. Yes. That

34:41

headline in Sankar Gondar literally

34:43

means that. Oh no. But

34:46

that headline. The package is very happy.

34:48

The package is yellow. The headline says

34:50

that is the end, it's the end

34:52

of that logo image on CinePuffer. They

34:54

stopped it. CinePuffer and the gun. Yeah,

34:56

and that is from. A happy little.

34:59

Definitely, definitely happy. And

35:01

yeah, end of the picture

35:03

and that was in 2011. So

35:06

I guess they caught up. So

35:08

CinePuffer is now still

35:10

called Chinese Puffs but it just has a hat

35:12

on it. Literally just a hat now.

35:14

Just nobody in the hat. So

35:17

there you go. It's just a hat. That's

35:20

funny. I mean, is that better? Maybe

35:22

a little. Maybe, maybe a little. I don't know

35:25

if the first one's that bad anyway. But I

35:27

remember that when I saw in Mexico, the

35:30

first time I was in Mexico, the

35:32

number of times I saw logos of

35:35

people sleeping under sombreros. Totally serious. I

35:37

have photos of it. And I was like, wait,

35:39

this is in Mexico. This shit is racist. I'm like,

35:41

oh no, this is Mexico. You guys can, this is,

35:43

you're talking about yourself. So that's fun. Are they selling

35:45

it back to gringos? It's like a. No, this is

35:47

not a place where you sell anything except for cocaine

35:49

back to gringos. That

35:52

kind of neighborhood. That kind of

35:54

neighborhood. What did I talk about? Did

35:56

you know that Master P makes a whole line

35:58

of boots? And there's

36:01

a bunch of like snoop related Snoop

36:06

snoop mama oatmeal or something like that.

36:08

It's like a whole replacement of the

36:11

no Yeah, is it is

36:13

it no limit foods or something? I

36:15

don't exactly know probably something like that He was

36:18

on the professional path, but you could find it.

36:20

He would find played in the preseason. Yeah Charlotte

36:25

Hornets, I think I

36:27

think it was like a fat point card Yeah,

36:30

he was like a bit. Yeah, Uncle P's

36:32

Louisiana season pancake mix. So

36:34

if you don't have Bruins tickets for

36:36

Thursday Can

36:38

you send me some pancake mix? The greatest

36:40

thing is there's a picture of like older

36:43

master P on glasses. Oh man. Yeah And

36:46

you know, I think he came out with

36:48

that stuff at the time that like on

36:50

Jemima was getting canceled Yeah, his response. Oh

36:53

shit. It is because yeah, it's that and

36:55

the rice. Yeah, so it's the white uncle

37:00

With uncle P and it's fine. Yeah, nah

37:02

nah nah hoodie

37:04

hoops, mmm What

37:08

we put Camille's face Cell

37:11

anything interesting, whatever you write.

37:13

It'd have to be a food product. You sell

37:15

water to a fish. Mm-hmm I

37:17

mean, it doesn't have to be a food product. It's not to

37:19

be a food I

37:21

mean, I know something luxurious. Would you make sneakers

37:24

if you became really like what I make

37:26

me do like would you say like? No,

37:29

but not not like you're Chinese Design

37:36

aspects. Yeah, I would just just make me more

37:38

of those. Yeah. Well, that's what Kanye I just

37:40

want 700 He's not like

37:42

at the drafting which is actually big very

37:44

hard for me. Like when I see the

37:46

correspondence now with What's

37:48

his name? Myla Milo an opla

37:50

like working at easy. Yeah, she makes me

37:53

feel a little weird Milo

37:55

granted all the shoes that I'm buying our

37:57

old shoes granted

38:00

nothing to do with it. Yeah. You

38:02

should be doing some arbitrage if you're not,

38:04

like just stocking up on the shit that

38:06

is really cheap now because Kanye West is

38:09

a super anti-Semite. Wait till the very good

38:11

people. Not

38:14

impacted the price in the market. Wait

38:17

till the very good people on the

38:19

internet and on Twitter and probably on threads find

38:22

out that I did a piece with Milo

38:24

Yiannopoulos. I platformed Milo Yiannopoulos on it. It

38:27

was great. It was one of my favorite pieces that

38:29

I did because he's

38:32

always playing for the camera, obviously, and the whole thing

38:34

was just the ... But when

38:36

you know what he's about to do all

38:38

the time, because that was one of the things

38:40

where you watched ... You interviewed him when he was staying

38:43

in that hotel paid for by the Mercers just

38:45

before that bus stop. I went to

38:47

his house and he paid for it by the

38:49

Mercers. He had bottles of champagne all over the

38:51

place. He was blowing their money. Dude, we went

38:53

to the Trump Doral lunch. Yes,

38:55

I remember. I was

38:57

like, I have to pay for all of my stuff. Then

39:02

the bill ... I was a confession, a journalist, a confession.

39:04

The bill came and I was like, yes,

39:07

all right. I

39:10

cannot disaggregate the 78 drinks that I

39:12

had. Then

39:14

at the end of it, we went out onto the patio

39:17

and did the interview. I

39:21

was very punchy because I'd had a couple drinks and

39:23

I went in really hard on

39:25

them. It

39:28

was hilarious because I'll give

39:30

him credit in one aspect. This

39:32

is the aspect of performance, that

39:34

when you know it's performance, is you go

39:36

in really hard on somebody and just really

39:39

... It did not go well for

39:41

him, I have to say. In every

39:43

interview he did, everything was just a cakewalk

39:45

for him because he would say the same

39:47

thing and the people who were interviewing him

39:49

thought ... This is a big mistake.

39:51

Sorry, I'll be boring about interviews again. This is a

39:53

big mistake interviewers make and this is Don Lemon who

39:55

is doing a version of this, is that

39:58

when you know that your audience ... and

40:00

you yourself think that you are the moral

40:02

superior, that we'll get you through,

40:04

and it won't, right? And you're

40:07

like, I mean, come on, Milo, you said

40:09

this. And everyone asked him, in every

40:11

interview, the exact same thing, they

40:13

referenced the same quotes, and he had a

40:16

response for everyone, and he was so used to it. And

40:19

I asked him something that he had posted

40:21

on his Facebook page six hours before, and

40:24

he was like, I'm sorry, what? And

40:26

I was like, yeah, it

40:28

was something about, he didn't care

40:30

about dead Syrian children. It was really bad. And

40:33

I will give him credit in the sense

40:35

that he crumbled, and then afterwards, this

40:37

is the type of thing where somebody just walks out,

40:40

either throws a drink at you, or just says, fuck you, pack

40:43

your stuff up, whatever, which

40:45

is easier in this case, because you're in public, and they don't have

40:47

to kick you out of their house. But he

40:51

texted me 20 minutes

40:53

later, and he was like, do you wanna go out

40:55

to the Fontainebleau tonight in Miami? And I was like,

40:58

you know, I don't. I actually

41:00

don't wanna do that with you, so I didn't do that,

41:02

but yeah. I

41:05

mean, actually, Matt, there are some deals. I'm about to

41:07

buy a new pair of 700s right now. What

41:10

are you, 700s? I

41:12

mean, there's the ones I'm wearing right now.

41:15

He's just buying, Kanye. I

41:17

love the fact that we did a podcast last

41:19

night, we were just so full of venom, that

41:22

today it was just like, do we, we're

41:24

like just talking about sneakers, and weird

41:26

shit, I mean, we're fine. Everything's

41:29

fine. I mean, that's important. I

41:32

don't know why you're saying this when

41:34

democracy is under way. I have a

41:36

very close friend of mine who, I

41:40

think both of you know, who sent me

41:42

a long email today in that

41:44

kind of vein. Yeah, well, I

41:46

can't know which candidate is support, because

41:50

at this point, both candidates have assured me

41:53

that whoever wins, if it's

41:55

not them, democracy ends. Both

41:58

Donald Trump and, Joe

42:00

Biden have assured me that that's the case. And

42:02

it's funny. You had to like rack your brain for Joe Biden for a

42:04

second. I did. Yeah, yeah. He's

42:06

just like Joe Biden. Everyone does

42:08

it. Everyone loses. Wait, what is his name

42:10

again? Yeah, the guy who... No, he fell

42:13

off the stage before he came in here.

42:17

Walked into the band. Walked

42:19

into the tuba player. You know

42:21

the thing. Come on, man. Uncle

42:23

Pete. Uncle Pete's pancake mix. You

42:25

know, it was

42:27

about that and about Trump and

42:30

democracy and you should

42:32

be and aren't you worried. And

42:34

this is something... Because of the bloodbath. That's why...

42:36

No, no, no, it actually wasn't. No, it was about something else.

42:38

And it was about another mutual friend of ours who I thought

42:40

like, oh, he got a little off the rails. He

42:43

was like, no, I actually agree with him more than you

42:45

would think. And I know what you're saying. And he was

42:47

very nice and said, I know what you're saying. But

42:49

you know, you should realize that this... And he laid out

42:52

this case, which I thought actually was the... I'll send it

42:54

to you guys, but maybe I shouldn't, if you still get

42:56

mad about that. But it was one of the best cases

42:59

that I'm like, oh yeah, I guess I see what he's

43:01

saying. In my... What

43:03

is the... Well, my response to him, which

43:06

I haven't written yet because he sent me a very

43:08

long email and it's

43:10

always been that the

43:12

desire of Donald Trump

43:15

is there. I agree with you. I

43:17

mean, he wants dark desire. The dark

43:19

desire to turn this

43:21

country into something in his totally insane

43:23

vision of what a country like America

43:25

should look like is true. I

43:28

think that that is what people are right about

43:30

that. That's for sure. I mean, he said to

43:32

himself, you can't deny it. I just have always made the

43:34

argument that the institutions

43:36

are more robust than

43:39

people give them credit for. I mean, this is

43:41

a very rough version of it. I've laid

43:43

out the case. Less robust by that. But

43:45

what do you mean by that? Less robust

43:47

by dark desires. Because is it just a

43:49

matter of not having a respect for the

43:51

various restrictions? I'll give you an example. An

43:54

example of this that came

43:57

in Donald Trump's interview on

43:59

Sunday. Yeah on Fox News. Yeah

44:01

hard with Howard Kurtz. It was a very

44:03

strange interview. Very strange. Yeah, but

44:06

Kurtz Who

44:08

pushed back a fair amount like he did a

44:10

decent job. Yeah, there was some points. Yeah, just

44:13

point of me Yeah, but so he

44:15

says Tik Tok. Mm-hmm

44:18

Donald Trump has changed his mind on Tik Tok and

44:21

he says, you know Is this because you have a donor and

44:23

you know, you talked to the guys from the Club for Growth

44:25

and that guy Invest in ByteDance, which

44:28

is the honor of Tik Tok. It's

44:30

a Jeff. Yes in what his response

44:32

was Was very

44:34

telling and I was thinking about it

44:36

only because of the email that my friend sent me and

44:39

he he immediately said he's Like well if

44:42

we're gonna ban that I think before This

44:44

is much worse is we banned Facebook and like

44:46

oh my no, no, no, no, no, no No,

44:48

do the same thing to face. That's not what

44:50

this is about Yeah, reviewing that

44:52

your instincts on this are to get

44:55

rid of a political enemy Yeah, they

44:57

have propaganda on this platform That

45:00

is contrary to what you think a media

45:02

company should be putting out there because it's

45:04

negative towards you And so

45:06

therefore Facebook is actually worse than that front

45:08

It's like no, this is about it being

45:10

a Chinese company in China being

45:12

a dictatorship in them controlling Mark

45:15

Zuckerberg was in California. Yeah, right.

45:17

He's American. What are you

45:19

weird? He's very weird But

45:22

not a chai-kam not a chai-kam

45:24

in the fact that that was

45:26

his response Was I can

45:28

think of other things and Kurtz goes on The

45:31

person doesn't doesn't ask doesn't follow up on this.

45:33

No, he does not it doesn't say wait a

45:35

minute What do you mean do the same? He

45:37

had a half a sentence where

45:40

he was like something about the Chinese government

45:42

but he did ask him when

45:44

you said they should take the licenses

45:46

away from two Broadcast

45:49

organizations that don't have licenses. Yeah,

45:51

which is MSNBC and CNN. Yeah

45:54

He goes off on this like very

45:57

weird, you know digress

46:00

about X, Y, and Z doesn't make

46:02

any sense. But it is true that

46:04

he's like, they should, we should

46:06

shut them down because they're telling us. And

46:09

there's a very famous quote that is not famous at

46:11

all, by the way, I just realized because this shows

46:13

my age. There was a

46:16

woman who was the

46:18

official censor for

46:20

the Santa Nista government in Nicaragua.

46:22

Yes, a famous quote. No, and

46:25

her name I believe was Nelba

46:27

Blandon. I think that was her name. And

46:30

she- She married the very wise, at

46:32

least strange. Yeah. It's a new

46:34

book coming out. And

46:36

Nelba Blandon said, when asked by a

46:39

reporter, why you shut

46:42

down La Prensa, which was the opposition newspaper.

46:45

And Nelba Blandon said, well,

46:47

they were saying that we suppress free

46:50

speech and we couldn't allow them to

46:52

say that. And it's like the most

46:54

perfect quote ever. And it is the

46:56

instinct that you get from Hugo Chavez type people. They

46:59

took away the TV license of RCTV

47:01

in Venezuela because they, well, we didn't,

47:03

and literally people on the far left

47:06

who defended Chavez said he didn't shut

47:08

them down. They just didn't get a

47:10

new license. And that's the instinct that

47:12

he has, which is amazingly dangerous. This

47:15

is the shit that makes me so upset about

47:18

the ridiculous bloodbath,

47:21

freak out. There

47:24

are so many things that Donald Trump

47:26

actually says, even when he

47:28

says them in ways that are barely

47:31

articulate, that he actually

47:33

says and believes that are worth highlighting

47:36

and deconstructing and

47:38

freaking the fuck out about. When

47:41

he says something that you probably shouldn't freak

47:43

out about, he just uses a particular word

47:46

in context appropriately.

47:49

And you pretend, masquerade

47:52

as though he is actually suggesting

47:54

that there will be widespread political

47:56

violence and murder if

47:59

he's not elected president. And maybe he'll suggest

48:01

that next week, but he

48:03

didn't do it in that particular

48:05

speech. And they're actually tripling down a lot.

48:07

They're literally tripling down a crazy- Normalizing

48:10

from the Brookings Institute. There are two

48:12

things that we're seeing, right? One

48:14

group of people who say, well, look, we shouldn't give

48:16

him the benefit of the doubt. It's at least plausible.

48:18

It's possible, anyways, that he could have meant it in

48:20

the most nefarious way possible. And then

48:23

there are the other people who are like, no, no, he definitely means it. And

48:25

the evidence to support that is, did you see January

48:28

6th? Yeah, but that's- Yes. And

48:31

that is also, it's exactly what

48:33

you're saying. I mean, because it's like,

48:35

yes, he does other things that are

48:37

terrible. Focus on those. And

48:39

stop. And I read on the

48:42

paying, wethefifth.subspect.com episode that we released

48:44

today, I read Jonah Goldberg's tweet

48:47

when he's like, you're really undermining

48:49

the case of people like Jonah

48:51

who really loathed Donald Trump and

48:53

worked very hard to, you know, rest the

48:56

Republican Party from his greasy hands. And

48:59

he says, you know, look, people start not

49:01

believing anything that you say. And it's a very similar

49:03

thing with the COVID stuff. It's like, don't wear a

49:05

mask, wear a mask, we're just trying to, you know,

49:08

it's like, people are going to stop believing you. And you see that,

49:10

I saw a poll the other day about, you

49:12

know, trust in the medical establishment of being

49:14

at an all time low. And

49:16

it's no wonder why. Makes sense. And it's like

49:18

the media saying these things, well, yeah,

49:20

I mean, he didn't, maybe didn't say it directly, but

49:23

we know what he means. It's like, well, I don't

49:25

know what he means because he

49:27

didn't say that. I'm not, I

49:29

can't define what Donald Trump means

49:31

when he talks about cars, Chinese

49:33

cars getting 100% tariffs on them.

49:36

He probably said 75,000 things

49:38

that were dumber, crazier, and more

49:41

offensive to the idea of American

49:43

democracy in that speech. But

49:45

instead, bloodbath is a

49:48

great poll quote, isn't it? That's the

49:50

easy to go with that one. I

49:52

mean, everyone's hunting adjectives and policing adjectives.

49:54

They'll police it if you don't respond

49:57

to something with a pro. level

50:00

of if you don't like call out a lie

50:02

and say that's a lie you mean you mean

50:05

you're saying that some people some person sets

50:07

a level of disagreement with something and

50:10

if you don't meet that they get

50:12

mad at you if you're insufficiently denunciatory

50:14

yeah yeah yeah it's a real goddamn

50:17

problem for certain people who

50:19

have like smaller and smaller audiences it's very

50:21

strange it's hard to figure that out did

50:23

you see Jen Psaki talking about the the

50:25

bloodbath yeah I did yeah yeah well she

50:27

heard she says well yeah I mean the

50:29

Trump campaign is saying you have to look at

50:31

the full context he was talking about auto the auto industry but

50:34

no let's look at the real yeah yeah

50:36

yeah yeah in the real full context in 1962 wow

50:38

I mean you could go back to like the the

50:44

Mesozoic age that's the real

50:46

full context the formation of

50:49

the earth yeah during this

50:51

period the universe is development

50:53

I mean I want

50:55

people to work back from

50:59

people who are like legitimately and

51:01

I and I think legitimately not

51:04

just like from their own point of view but like

51:06

I agree with them like worried

51:09

about the prospect of another

51:11

Trump presidency and what it would

51:14

do to the liberal institutions of America I

51:16

think it would be bad it'd be deleterious

51:18

it would like extend this long bad era

51:20

right so what I want those people to

51:22

do is to act as if they were

51:24

fucking serious about it and if you were

51:26

fucking serious about it you wouldn't police

51:30

adjectives you'd work backwards from power

51:32

right so like take the media

51:34

for example for example right he

51:37

has said several times over the years

51:39

including when he was first running for

51:41

president Oh Saturday Night

51:44

Live did this joke about about me

51:46

that's terrible they should have their we

51:48

should do a fairness doctrine like have

51:50

their like license revoked and stuff and

51:52

it was like are you fucking

51:55

kidding me what are you doing but we knew

51:57

back then in 2016 and even in

52:01

late Trump presidency, you're not gonna be able

52:03

to get away with that because the people

52:05

that you appointed, I mean, Ajit Pai worked

52:07

for Donald Trump. Correct. That wasn't

52:09

gonna happen. It's not gonna happen. Under him. Yeah.

52:12

Which he made clear to him, and he also made clear

52:14

on this podcast in different ways, and

52:17

other people did as well. Well, who works

52:19

for Donald Trump next time around? And also,

52:21

what has been late- By

52:23

the way, it was, sorry to interrupt, but that

52:25

was in the email that I got. Yeah. A

52:28

very funny bit. Think of the next

52:31

people who are going to

52:33

be staffing the administration. That's a super important point.

52:35

That's something that I have to contend with. I

52:37

think that's a really important point. And also, it's

52:39

important to contend with what has Joe

52:42

Biden done with personalized

52:44

executive power and

52:47

antitrust, right? Donald Trump

52:49

wants to, and did actually in his

52:52

presidency, beef up antitrust

52:54

to go after the people he doesn't like. Correct.

52:58

He doesn't like them personally, necessarily.

53:00

He just like, do we really

53:02

need Nippon Steel and US Steel

53:04

to merge? Yeah. At some

53:06

point, there is a little bit of a what's the

53:09

fucking difference? There is a difference. If you're using it

53:11

as your personal weapon or

53:13

retribution for someone who insulted you,

53:15

I think that is a material

53:17

difference than if you just have

53:19

a super bad protectionist,

53:21

mercantilist policy idea. But

53:24

both are bad. Both are bad. You are giving

53:27

that person of that seat power

53:29

and legitimacy for the next person.

53:31

You are handing the baton to

53:33

the next person and the baton

53:35

is bigger. It can beat

53:37

more ass, right? And there has never

53:39

been throughout the entire Trump era. Never,

53:42

never, not even once. People

53:44

looking at it and saying, hmm, it's

53:47

really bad when a bad person has all that

53:49

power. Maybe we should

53:51

start thinking about not having so

53:54

much power concentrated. It's never come

53:56

up for creepy libertarians.

54:00

that people would say, and I had people tell me

54:02

this, during the first

54:04

Trump administration, that

54:06

what people said in Capitol Hill about Donald Trump

54:09

on camera, you know, on the

54:12

House floor, in front of him, to

54:14

people in the White House, and what they said privately were totally

54:16

different. And that's a

54:19

cowardice that you would expect from

54:21

shitty politicians. It does in some

54:23

way offer a ray of hope that these

54:26

people actually don't believe this, and

54:29

it's not much of a hope. It's a very, very thin

54:31

read to say that all they

54:33

care about is power, and if the

54:35

wind changes a little bit. But that is also hopeful

54:37

in some ways, that if the wind changes, they're not

54:39

gonna be so committed to this, but at the same

54:41

time- We'll never forgive those motherfuckers, by the way. Of

54:43

course not, no. And none of them have a

54:46

backbone or have any principles, and I have

54:49

gone on more rants in this

54:51

podcast about politicians having absolutely zero

54:53

principle about this stuff. But,

54:55

you know, it is kind of interesting

54:58

that when you see Donald Trump knows

55:00

this, and if he becomes

55:03

president again, and it's looking at the moment

55:05

that that's a pretty high possibility, that

55:08

Harry Enten, I think I sent you a screenshot of

55:10

him, Harry's very, very, fine Harry Enten's bet,

55:13

and Harry's brilliant on CNN,

55:15

talking about the Hispanic vote going

55:18

wildly towards Trump, and just a huge

55:20

20 point difference between exit polls

55:22

and current polls now, and

55:25

that being in very important states like Nevada

55:27

and Arizona. But, you

55:29

know, Trump knows that he gets one more

55:31

shot, and I know that if you talk to

55:33

the really hyperventilating people, it's like, no,

55:35

no, he's gonna never leave. It's like, that's not gonna happen.

55:37

I'm sorry, it's not gonna happen. And I will put my

55:40

money on it right now, and we'll

55:42

come back in four years, in five years, whatever,

55:44

and I will be right, and I'm very confident

55:46

in that for a variety of reasons. But

55:49

what he's actually interested in is

55:51

keeping the party in his image when people, when

55:54

he's no longer there for people to be afraid

55:56

of him. And that's why you see

55:58

very small things like Laura Trump. is

56:00

now, what, co-chair? Not

56:02

a small thing. Not a small

56:04

thing. All the money that Republicans

56:07

raise goes to Trump's legal

56:09

fans. Local races go through a

56:11

Trump family member now. And

56:13

it went through people who were sick of fans

56:16

of Trump before. But that can move, right? And

56:18

particularly when he's off the scene. If he dies,

56:20

if he has one more, and also he's gonna

56:22

do three more turns, he's like, dude, he's also

56:25

gonna be 87, so. He's

56:28

not getting better. And

56:31

so you have this thing of like,

56:33

you know, entrenching power,

56:37

that I think that there's a possibility, a very

56:39

real possibility, that the Republican

56:41

Party can boomerang back in some way. Well, no,

56:43

no, it's forever. It's like, well, no. There

56:46

was a neocon period that lasted an

56:48

amount of time that everyone who wrote books about this said it was

56:50

gonna last forever. Literally, that this

56:53

is it. It's been taken over by

56:55

neocons. That's it. You can fuck

56:57

up big time like Iraq,

57:00

and even I would say to a lesser degree Afghanistan,

57:02

which had less resonance in that way. And

57:05

people don't like you anymore, right? You

57:07

have the, you know, Taftian Republicans,

57:09

the kind of isolationist Republicans, that 1937, 38,

57:12

39, and

57:14

then on the day after Pearl Harbor, the

57:17

day after, literally the day after, was the

57:19

dissolution of the America First Committee. It

57:22

ended itself the following day. And that ended.

57:24

And they have all these periods of different

57:26

types of Republican parties. So I don't think

57:28

it's gonna last forever, but he's trying to

57:31

make sure that it does. One

57:33

thing about the Howard Kurtz interview, and when

57:35

people talk about the bloodbath,

57:39

why are you focusing on this when there's other things

57:41

to focus on that have the same word? Right

57:44

in the root. And I'm gonna read you what Howard Kurtz

57:46

said. Why do you use words like vermin and

57:49

poisoning of the blood? The press,

57:51

as you know, immediately reacts to that by saying, well, that's

57:53

the kind of language that Hitler and Mussolini used. Trump's

57:56

response. Because our country

57:58

is being poisoned. There's

58:00

nothing ambiguous about that. There's

58:02

no debate we can have over and over and over,

58:04

but what those words mean, that's bad

58:07

stuff right there. Very obviously because our

58:09

country is being poisoned. It's not. It's

58:12

not being poisoned. There's enormous amounts

58:14

of problems that are happening because

58:16

of the problems at the border. And we've

58:18

talked about them, and I think that maybe even

58:20

alienated some real, I have

58:22

anyway, rock-ribbed libertarian open borders types.

58:25

And I apologize for that, but

58:27

my baggage has moved a little bit on this. But

58:30

that kind of language, because our country

58:32

is being poisoned, you don't

58:34

need to invent shit for Donald Trump. So

58:37

keep to the stuff like that. Yeah, and

58:39

also tether it to stuff that he has

58:41

latitude or would have latitude as president. President

58:43

has a lot of latitude

58:45

on trade deals. He

58:47

wants 100% tariff on cars

58:51

from red China. Yeah, bill

58:53

in Mexico. And like 10%. Yeah, exactly, yeah. Universal

58:56

10% tariff everywhere. It's

58:58

insane. It's a horrible idea. Like

59:01

in an impoverishing idea. Both parties

59:03

love it. And he also

59:05

is, as a president, you

59:08

have a lot of latitude in immigration policy. And some of

59:10

it you might like, depending on where you're at. Some

59:13

of it is going to be draconian. And if

59:15

it was up to him, and remember in his

59:17

first administration, he really did try a Muslim ban.

59:20

It was thrown out in the courts. It

59:23

was modified, became seven countries that were predominantly

59:25

Muslim or whatever. But

59:28

the attempt was there from

59:30

the beginning. One has to

59:32

accept that he did say that it would

59:34

only be in place until he could figure

59:36

out what's going on. What's going on? And

59:38

also like give that motherfucking credit. Give

59:42

that motherfucking credit. How

59:45

many times have everyone

59:47

used that phrase? We

59:50

need to like stop Peter Suderman until we can find out

59:52

what's going on. I

59:55

at least think that on a daily basis. No,

59:58

it's genius. these turns

1:00:00

of, what's, what is the Joe Biden turn of

1:00:02

phrase besides come on man? No, I mean, come

1:00:04

on man. I mean, it's good. Yeah,

1:00:07

but he's got, he's got, I'm not kidding

1:00:09

around. He's got, I mean, he doesn't have

1:00:11

a you'd be in jail, which is possibly

1:00:13

one of the greatest moments in debate. That's

1:00:15

pretty good. And people need to separate the

1:00:17

art from the artist and realize that

1:00:19

regardless of what he is, that

1:00:22

was a fucking, wrong

1:00:25

and Donald Trump. Yeah, wrong is

1:00:28

also really, really good. I might've used

1:00:30

that recently. The thing that people

1:00:33

don't connect because I think we've had this

1:00:35

conversation before of the complications that come with,

1:00:38

I think I've touched on this maybe on Megan

1:00:40

McCain's podcast when I was on it recently, the

1:00:42

complications that people have when dealing with economic policy.

1:00:45

And it's very, very tough to figure this

1:00:47

stuff out. And that's why when you're young,

1:00:49

that radical socialist policies seem to

1:00:51

just make everybody be equal, just

1:00:54

share everything. And no one person can make that much. And

1:00:56

it's like, oh, that makes sense. And it doesn't make any

1:00:58

sense. But the thing that the

1:01:00

average person is not connecting here is that

1:01:02

when you go on and everyone's talking about

1:01:04

blood sucking, fucking blood baths and

1:01:06

vermin and like reacting to the language and

1:01:09

they should react to the ones that are

1:01:11

real and not the ones that aren't real, is

1:01:13

that what is a 100%

1:01:15

tariff, 10%

1:01:18

tariff, 15% tariff on anything? It's

1:01:20

inflationary. What is the argument

1:01:22

that Donald Trump is making about the economy

1:01:24

that we have out of control inflation? And

1:01:27

you are in the next breath saying,

1:01:30

well, I need to do things that will

1:01:32

be wildly inflationary, increase the tax of goods

1:01:34

for poor people across the country. Maybe

1:01:37

talk about that, that'd be substantial, but

1:01:40

it's not gonna get you the mediate hit. It's not

1:01:42

gonna have Jen Psaki breathing heavily

1:01:44

and saying, oh my God, how horrible it

1:01:46

is. Yeah, the reason he's gonna win this

1:01:48

election now is that we know he's horrible

1:01:51

and nobody fucking cares. I

1:01:53

don't know why they don't care, but they don't fucking

1:01:55

care. That's when you are diagnosing

1:01:57

something just in a clinical kind of

1:01:59

way. is like I just can tell you, I don't

1:02:02

know why, I don't know how to make them

1:02:04

care, but if you keep telling them, it's not

1:02:06

gonna work, because it never has, they don't care.

1:02:08

I'm still on record as it was on Megan

1:02:10

Kelly last time, and we're going on again, I

1:02:12

think next week. Next week, right? Should be a

1:02:14

bloodbath. Oh, great, yeah. I

1:02:17

hope it's all about a trans-fony Willis. I

1:02:19

don't think that he's gonna win, I would

1:02:21

still bet. My bet is that I wish

1:02:24

he probably would just bet. I

1:02:26

mean, I don't engage in those wagers.

1:02:30

I do, yeah. I'll let you guys do it, I will hold the,

1:02:35

I will put the Bruins tickets that will no longer

1:02:37

be good, because the person will give them to me,

1:02:39

or I'll buy them from him, and I'll go to

1:02:41

the game on Thursday, and I will put that on,

1:02:43

yeah, I will bet that. I'll

1:02:45

put the Stubbs autograph by Brad Marsh on the

1:02:47

table. That's fair enough. Or Bobby Orr. But you

1:02:49

still don't think he'll win. It's,

1:02:52

I don't have a lot of confidence in

1:02:55

it, but I think that there's a ceiling on his

1:02:57

attraction to the American people,

1:03:01

and that he's like,

1:03:04

actually the Laura Trump situation is bad

1:03:06

for him, or it

1:03:08

indicates a badness. There's gonna be

1:03:10

such a spending mismatch. Just the challenges that

1:03:12

the RNC is having. I mean, just, they

1:03:15

have a huge challenge on raising money. Yeah.

1:03:18

He can look really great in a

1:03:20

Republican primary, he can squash the competition.

1:03:22

He did, absolutely did. He has full

1:03:25

control over the party. There's no question

1:03:27

about that. It's very impressive to take

1:03:29

over a party. And at

1:03:31

the same time, he has not

1:03:33

shown in a

1:03:35

really, really long time, basically since election day in

1:03:38

2016, that

1:03:40

he can get even a plurality of

1:03:43

independents and people who are not Republican

1:03:45

party members. And

1:03:47

he's been polling better than them, better

1:03:49

than Joe Biden among independents for a

1:03:51

good while now, including in all the

1:03:54

swing states. Yeah. So there's all

1:03:56

that. I still think that there is that, I

1:03:59

think it's more of a... right? That

1:04:02

the reality hasn't sunk in, that

1:04:05

he's going to be the nominee and that changes

1:04:07

the dynamic of things. And

1:04:09

then just this wild card, I mean he's,

1:04:12

what was it, $462 million he's

1:04:14

got to cop up by like Tuesday. Yeah,

1:04:16

and they're gonna start seizing his assets. Some

1:04:18

of that will be down to his benefit

1:04:21

because it'll seem like people are coming after

1:04:23

him unfairly, which they are. There's no question

1:04:25

of, I think, that the

1:04:27

legal system in certain places are

1:04:29

coming after him unfairly and disproportionately.

1:04:33

Some of it also is just going to be

1:04:35

deleterious to his campaign, the functioning of it. Why

1:04:38

do you think people don't care about that? About

1:04:40

what? About the situation? The

1:04:43

fact that we have

1:04:45

reams of evidence that

1:04:48

when you do stuff like this happens,

1:04:50

and I know the response would be,

1:04:52

well it should happen because it's real

1:04:54

and he should be prosecuted, blah blah

1:04:57

blah, but that these people want to

1:04:59

see Donald Trump just erased from the political

1:05:01

scene. I wouldn't be

1:05:03

upset about that either, but they've been

1:05:06

trying to take shortcuts forever to do this

1:05:08

and every time it blows up in their

1:05:10

face and they keep on pushing it and

1:05:12

they cannot separate two things. That if you

1:05:14

are on this podcast saying, as

1:05:16

Matt just said, they're going after him

1:05:19

and I think it's partially unfair

1:05:21

that the people who are desperate

1:05:23

to get rid of him, the sort of

1:05:26

anti, the real dug-in

1:05:28

anti-Trump people would be so upset by

1:05:30

that because they can't separate the

1:05:33

fact that he's a shitty person and

1:05:36

bad for the country politically, I think. And

1:05:39

I can hold a separate thought in my head that I

1:05:42

don't think that Leticia

1:05:45

James is doing the

1:05:47

right thing here and doing it for the right reasons and

1:05:49

I think it's slightly unfair. And like

1:05:51

85 million dollars to Eugene Carroll seems like a

1:05:53

lot. It seems like a lot. It seems like

1:05:55

a lot, particularly when you actually not many people

1:05:58

follow the internet to that case. And

1:06:01

the reason was that

1:06:03

there was no Lewinsky type stuff. There

1:06:10

was no like you remember the dress, the

1:06:12

stain, and the cigar, and all this stuff.

1:06:15

It was just like she didn't really remember

1:06:17

this, that, and the other. And it just

1:06:19

didn't strike a lot of people as plausible.

1:06:22

And I just most people... Or maybe

1:06:24

not plausible, but like, you

1:06:26

know, open and shut provable.

1:06:29

Exactly, exactly. Yeah, exactly. And

1:06:31

I don't know what happened, but

1:06:34

when I paid attention to it, I was

1:06:36

like, it doesn't strike me that this is

1:06:38

a slam dunk in any way. And

1:06:41

you know, it was also imagine if

1:06:43

the case was against Barack Obama

1:06:45

and it was ginned up at

1:06:47

a Glenn Beck dinner party.

1:06:50

You know, I mean, that's what happened. I

1:06:53

was, you know, literally she was

1:06:55

drafted into this after

1:06:57

telling a story, I suppose. But it was that

1:06:59

it was, you know, you can, it's public record

1:07:01

that it was George Conway and

1:07:03

Molly John Fast house or something similar

1:07:05

to that. So look it up. Don't trust

1:07:08

me on that. But, and I'm not

1:07:10

saying that that's only doesn't change whether that's true or not.

1:07:12

But I think if the situation was Glenn

1:07:15

Beck's dinner party in the

1:07:17

real anti-Obama types and somebody was

1:07:19

there and yeah, I

1:07:21

think they'd be a little more skeptical. Can we

1:07:24

go back to the Trump won't

1:07:26

win thing? That's not

1:07:28

like declaration, it's just my suspicion. If I

1:07:30

had to bet, that's it. But

1:07:32

Moynihan, you sent a message

1:07:34

earlier to our text thread. It was Harry

1:07:37

Enten, like looking through the maps.

1:07:40

Yeah. In particular pointing to Arizona

1:07:42

and Nevada and the fact that Trump is

1:07:44

ahead in both of these states at

1:07:46

the moment. There's a state that, you know, Biden

1:07:48

in 2020, like just barely even out a win

1:07:50

there. Like between those states and

1:07:53

various other battleground states where Trump

1:07:55

is doing better than anticipated. He

1:07:58

also points out. Wisconsin,

1:08:00

Michigan, and his, and

1:08:03

go watch it, because

1:08:05

I don't want to screw up what Harry said, but he

1:08:08

basically said that Biden would have

1:08:11

to win like all

1:08:14

of them, three, and he's just getting crushed or

1:08:16

not doing well in almost all

1:08:18

of them now, and he would have to

1:08:20

run cables. Yeah, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. Yeah,

1:08:22

Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and whoever

1:08:25

the other host was, you know, when Harry's

1:08:27

standing in front of the big screen. And

1:08:30

by the way, I have to say, for

1:08:32

America's political culture, the big screen people we

1:08:34

have are fucking great. They're good. Harry

1:08:37

Enten is so good. He's good, John King

1:08:39

is good. John King is good. Especially when

1:08:41

he's drunk. And yeah, when Bin Laden is

1:08:43

killed, and he's like, he's a god.

1:08:47

I know them, but respect my king. And

1:08:49

for some reason, people don't really know about

1:08:51

this, when Bin Laden was killed in 2011,

1:08:53

I think, 11. I

1:08:57

think so, and he was out with his

1:09:00

then wife, who's Dana Bash, and was called

1:09:02

back to, and that's his end.

1:09:04

It's a big deal. Absolutely juiced, and it's

1:09:06

the best. He's an Irish guy from Dorchester,

1:09:08

Mass. It's the best. But a lot of

1:09:10

respect for him, and Steve Kornacki, too. But

1:09:13

his, what Harry

1:09:16

says there. You say Steve Kornacki, too.

1:09:18

Yeah, Steve Kornacki's best top pyramid. Yeah,

1:09:21

everyone who looks at this podcast knows that

1:09:23

we revere the Steve Kornacki. Frequent

1:09:26

guest and our friend. But

1:09:30

what Harry says during that, he says, and

1:09:32

this is the exact quote, he

1:09:34

says it's game over. If the map

1:09:36

stays what it is now, it's game over button. There's

1:09:38

no way he can win. Yeah, for me, it's just

1:09:40

like, it's that if. It's if, yeah, it is where

1:09:42

we are now. It's a lot of things to happen.

1:09:45

No, I mean, it's so early. It's so early, especially

1:09:47

for these two. And we

1:09:49

have the, you know. But this isn't Dukakis, is what I'm

1:09:51

saying. Yeah. I

1:09:53

mean, on one hand, there is, Biden

1:09:56

is historically unpopular. We've never seen it.

1:09:59

Never have seen. And people think, oh,

1:10:01

he's just as unpopular as Donald Trump

1:10:03

was. He's not. At

1:10:05

this stage in Trump's presidency, there's a material

1:10:07

difference between the two. It's a problem. And

1:10:10

it's funny because the delusions that you got

1:10:12

from the pro-Trump people during the Trump administration,

1:10:14

they were so bad at it. And

1:10:17

they were like the conservative C-listers of DC

1:10:19

that came out of like, who are these

1:10:21

like, oh, I once I saw that guy

1:10:23

once at some leadership institute conference or whatever

1:10:26

you happen to walk by. And

1:10:29

when you have the opposite

1:10:32

of that with Biden, they're

1:10:34

more sophisticated at it, but they're just as bad

1:10:36

in the sense that all of

1:10:39

the argument about this is that he has

1:10:41

historically low approval ratings. So

1:10:43

what is wrong? What's the matter with

1:10:45

Kansas? How do they not realize

1:10:47

that everything is great? And who is

1:10:49

lying to them and tricking

1:10:52

them into thinking that things aren't great,

1:10:54

which is that false consciousness stuff does

1:10:56

not play well with the American people.

1:10:59

And it also ends up being like

1:11:01

this really weird circular firing squad, brow

1:11:03

beating the media. Like you

1:11:05

are using the wrong adjectives to describe

1:11:07

Trump, you're platforming him and you

1:11:10

are not like. This is James Comey and

1:11:12

Hillary all over again. Emphasizing the stakes at

1:11:14

every moment in every dispute and like weighing

1:11:17

it. And we're going to see a lot

1:11:19

of that. And that's is alienating

1:11:22

people. I mean, you asked

1:11:24

me earlier, like, why doesn't the bad

1:11:26

Trump stuff stick to Trump?

1:11:30

And it is the ultimate, I

1:11:32

think, question of

1:11:34

his role in

1:11:36

American political life and popularity,

1:11:39

which is that he

1:11:41

is this, this kind

1:11:43

of totem, something that people use

1:11:46

to get back at

1:11:48

an elite that they hate. Correct.

1:11:51

And so when the elite responds by saying

1:11:53

you should hate him more, like, cool, that

1:11:56

proves my point. And we're in

1:11:58

that loop. I think if your

1:12:01

parents tell you not to smoke, you start to smoke. It

1:12:05

explains you. They

1:12:08

tell me to smoke and I was like, that's good.

1:12:11

Smart. Can you give

1:12:13

us some fucking Camelites? No, no,

1:12:15

no, no. LS MFT,

1:12:17

Lucky Strike means fine tobacco. My

1:12:19

dad smoked so so it was Lucky Strikes. Did he send you to

1:12:22

the corn store to get some? Correct. And

1:12:26

guess what I picked up when I was there? My

1:12:28

own package. Yeah.

1:12:31

I mean, stop the media. Stop telling

1:12:33

your kids not to smoke. Stop telling them everyone.

1:12:36

You got to have a confidence

1:12:38

filter in them cigarettes. Stop

1:12:40

believing that the new adjective, you're going to find

1:12:42

it. You're going to find it. It's going to

1:12:44

be like, the new case, the new adjective. Unobtainium.

1:12:46

If you're going to get it, it's really going

1:12:48

to fucking work this time. You would

1:12:51

say that as a hetero, a rock sex

1:12:53

skit. I don't remember the word. What did

1:12:55

you wear? I've never used. Hack

1:12:57

ox, homo-docks. I don't know.

1:13:01

No, it's, they are in

1:13:04

that loop and they are gearing

1:13:06

themselves up for another season. This

1:13:08

would be like the third or fourth political season

1:13:10

of doing that. Yeah. And

1:13:13

you're not persuading people. I

1:13:15

don't think. If people were to

1:13:17

say like, okay, you know,

1:13:20

there's been a thing in the past couple of days because

1:13:22

I don't, I don't still quite understand

1:13:24

why people go through like one transcript in front

1:13:26

of them. What did they say here? If

1:13:29

you were to go back into the archive of

1:13:31

this podcast, you could probably string

1:13:33

things together to make us the most anti-Trump podcast

1:13:37

ever invented and one that is defending

1:13:39

Trump all the time. Mostly Camille just

1:13:41

saying MAGA. Yeah. Yeah.

1:13:45

But you're saying that if you wanted to sum it

1:13:47

up, I would

1:13:49

say, and I say this for all three

1:13:51

of us, I think it's probably just, you know, all three of

1:13:53

us kind of have this instinct is

1:13:56

what, and I think this is exactly where

1:13:58

I stand now. Is it the modern? the modern Republican

1:14:01

party and the modern conservative movement

1:14:04

is a disgrace. And

1:14:06

the media is a disgrace too. And

1:14:08

those in, in, in, because of the disgracefulness

1:14:11

of the modern Republican party, it

1:14:13

has made that disgraceful media a thousand times worse. A

1:14:16

thousand times worse. I mean, I lived

1:14:18

through this at a place that

1:14:20

had no credibility and squandered whatever credibility

1:14:22

it had very quickly. Which won the

1:14:24

daily piece or the No, not that.

1:14:28

Did I work? I don't remember that one. The last one you

1:14:30

said I'm not familiar with. Yeah. But it

1:14:32

was like, you know, as I said, one time

1:14:35

this podcast said you would never have known for

1:14:37

the year, first year of Joe Biden's presidency that

1:14:39

he was president. It was

1:14:41

all about QAnon and all about

1:14:44

MAGA and all about Proud for

1:14:46

MAGA. It was Ultra MAGA. But it was

1:14:48

like they couldn't get on. That's not, it

1:14:50

was Ultra MAGA, probably. My

1:14:52

name is Ultra MAGA. I love Ultra

1:14:55

MAGA. I was just like, so

1:14:57

we'll say MAGA, but just say Ultra, like that's

1:14:59

great. Like, yes. And then say

1:15:01

that it wants to like cut social

1:15:03

security. Yeah, exactly. Now I'm talking about

1:15:05

Ultra Super MAGA to transform a Republican

1:15:07

party as a conversion. How

1:15:10

many Yeezys has he bought tonight?

1:15:12

Seven. Yeah. Just

1:15:14

cleaning up. You suggested that I make

1:15:16

this investment. And it does. Nobody said

1:15:18

that. Matt did.

1:15:21

Matt did. Why don't

1:15:23

you use some arbitrage in the market

1:15:26

You're right, Matt. I mean, Matt is another

1:15:28

white man trying to back up

1:15:30

the black man. But

1:15:35

the QAnon shit, it's

1:15:37

just so easy. The

1:15:39

villains are so easy. There's no moral challenge to

1:15:41

it at all. Do you remember? You didn't talk

1:15:43

about that anymore. When was the last time you

1:15:46

heard anything about QAnon? Well, that's just because, yeah.

1:15:48

That's just because, that's it. They

1:15:52

were hardly alone. They were hardly alone. But

1:15:54

I mean, they were the worst. Do you

1:15:56

remember? It was an ascendant cult.

1:15:59

Like it was gonna. take over America. We found Q. You remember that?

1:16:01

And it was some Asian kid. Seriously. Ian

1:16:08

Miles Chon? Yes.

1:16:12

No, we don't call him by that name. We call

1:16:14

him the black people fighting

1:16:16

Twitter again. That's all he does. What

1:16:19

is QAnon, the viral pro-Trump conspiracy theory? This is

1:16:21

in the New York Times. It was viral because

1:16:23

they kept on making it go viral. It's literally-

1:16:26

Like Kevin Roos. But it's hilarious. Wasn't Kevin on

1:16:28

the podcast? He was. He was, yeah. Kevin Crews?

1:16:30

I wonder if he would admit that. Carter-

1:16:34

Connor Crews. No, he-

1:16:36

that thing was really funny because when

1:16:39

the QAnon people- when

1:16:42

the vice-a-b-d-be like, do you know how crazy these people are?

1:16:44

They think JFK Jr. is coming back in

1:16:46

Dallas and I'm like, oh, is that what they

1:16:48

said? Let me see. That's what they said. Yeah,

1:16:50

okay, great. Do you know what that tells me?

1:16:52

Is it literally no one

1:16:54

believes? That there's a core group of

1:16:56

mentally ill people that you are focusing

1:16:58

on- And Roger Stone. Well,

1:17:01

Roger Stone doesn't believe anything. That's a mean asset.

1:17:03

Yeah, and Roger Stone. Yeah. And

1:17:05

that is like you're focusing on- there

1:17:07

was a podcast

1:17:09

I heard a long time ago, an

1:17:11

Australian podcast, and it was this woman whose mother,

1:17:13

Australian mother, this shows you how it has nothing

1:17:15

to do with the fucking media in America. All

1:17:18

these people in Europe, there

1:17:21

was a QAnon movement in Germany, and

1:17:23

this woman's Australian mother got super into

1:17:25

QAnon and you're hearing this podcast, it

1:17:27

was pretty interesting, and it's like, oh,

1:17:29

wow, your mother's descending late in life

1:17:31

into mental illness. And this

1:17:33

is what she glommed onto. And

1:17:36

it's just probably from a fucking

1:17:38

MSNBC article. She was like, QAnon,

1:17:40

that sounds interesting. What's that? So

1:17:42

you're saying MSNBC was amplifying the

1:17:45

whole QAnon podcast? I don't think that's

1:17:47

the verb that he used. I think, yeah.

1:17:49

I would say that that was

1:17:51

probably right. It was amplification. Yeah, I don't want to

1:17:53

use that because it's already been used and I'm a

1:17:56

hadorRoxist. Right. I'm just

1:17:58

heterodos. HadorRoxist. And

1:18:01

I like just the only opposite of every issue. I

1:18:03

don't have any believe It

1:18:16

just all comes back in one hand Not

1:18:21

that there's anything wrong with no no

1:18:23

no pride we we got we got

1:18:25

like three Because these

1:18:27

emails from sub-stag and somebody subscribed

1:18:30

Mm-hmm, and it says like where

1:18:32

they came from hmm It's a they click through

1:18:34

from a recommendation from you've seen this in

1:18:36

the last bunch. We're from Andrew Sullivan. Oh,

1:18:39

yeah So you just really

1:18:41

shot us out about man, correct? Yes. Yeah,

1:18:43

I think Andrew would be very proud of

1:18:45

me for saying darling

1:18:47

I do too You've

1:18:50

been back on since the like the

1:18:52

tide pools episode

1:18:56

His podcast twice since then I think

1:18:58

we need no Fun

1:19:03

gasps, I don't give a shit what he says

1:19:05

or what you think of him He's just a

1:19:07

fun guest who loves playing along and and who

1:19:10

don't look at me when you say what you

1:19:12

think of it I love and I don't look

1:19:14

at you said so I didn't Know

1:19:17

we didn't like Yeah,

1:19:22

okay, I know you're Jamaican mother-in-law Well,

1:19:25

no don't talk about it to my mama I'm

1:19:40

working on her. Yeah, I got on is she voting for

1:19:42

Trump? Who knows

1:19:45

day to day one doesn't know I saw it

1:19:47

Harry and he after he had the Hispanics

1:19:49

He had black voters to throw my money and

1:19:52

yes She

1:19:57

Yeah, does she self-identify come here

1:20:00

As my mom. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.

1:20:04

That's right. I'm Camille's mother. She's

1:20:06

never cared about that. We're Camille's. We identify as

1:20:08

Camille's co-podcasters. Yeah. Is

1:20:11

there anything else that happened in the world or something? Keep it to

1:20:13

the tight 130. No, you know.

1:20:17

Probably fine. Are we good? I

1:20:19

got a flight out in the morning and then I'll be

1:20:21

back next week, which is crazy. Isn't it better when you're

1:20:24

here, Camille? It's fun when I'm here. Do you want

1:20:26

to reflect on that? But you know what? Abstinence

1:20:29

makes the heart grow fonder. Is that what this

1:20:31

expression is? I think it is. I

1:20:33

don't think. That's what my wife told me. Yeah.

1:20:36

Yeah. Yeah. That's for all

1:20:38

the women who won't fuck me. Sorry.

1:20:44

Sorry if your kids are listening. I'm

1:20:46

getting it. No. If your

1:20:48

kids are listening, did you say I be getting it? I do. I

1:20:50

think I do. That's what we do. I say

1:20:52

that too. And it's one of the reasons I don't get

1:20:54

it. No, that's not true at all. I'm doing great. Yeah.

1:20:58

I'm cleaning up. I'm cleaning up, but

1:21:00

it's great. And I'm in my prime, which is the best

1:21:02

part. You're in your prime and you've been with the same

1:21:04

women since you were 15? Yeah. Sixteen.

1:21:08

Sixteen. You stayed at three different hotels

1:21:10

while you were here? Yeah. Yeah,

1:21:12

it's a little weird. Yeah. It

1:21:14

was mostly in the same first three hours when

1:21:16

I got here. It's as if you showed up

1:21:18

to a place and it got soiled and

1:21:20

then you showed up to a new place.

1:21:24

No, I had a series of weird situations.

1:21:26

You know how badly? I want to say

1:21:28

something to be honest with you and I

1:21:30

want all of your listeners to, if you've

1:21:33

made it this far, use your imagination. Yeah.

1:21:36

Matt just said, you know, he's there for

1:21:38

anything else to leave. Yeah. And

1:21:40

in my head, I had a scenario that

1:21:42

I almost blurted out and I realized that I

1:21:45

cannot do a Chinese

1:21:47

accent and say, you get

1:21:49

out of here in a

1:21:52

Chinese accent from all the places you've been

1:21:54

on Canal Street in the past couple of

1:21:56

days. You cannot sleep

1:21:58

here in a Chinese accent. and just

1:22:00

use the AI to do it. I'm

1:22:04

gonna have Moynihan racist Chinese AI.

1:22:07

Well, yeah, I mean, you can just use my voice

1:22:10

and have Chad GPT destroy

1:22:12

my life. My

1:22:14

usual place was sold out, so I tried a

1:22:16

different place. Sold out? A chain

1:22:18

of hotels. Of Robin Cook joints,

1:22:21

just like so crazy. There

1:22:23

were new forms of life growing in the

1:22:25

shower, and then I got

1:22:28

to the other one, and it was

1:22:30

teeming with grain flies. Wow. It's

1:22:32

just unbelievable crazy. The

1:22:35

guy shows up to my room from downstairs

1:22:37

to take a look at the situation. He

1:22:39

has gloves and a pesticide bottle his hands.

1:22:41

Like, you want me to spray it? And I was like, no,

1:22:43

no, no, no, let me spray these. This isn't gonna work. Maybe

1:22:45

if he's dead, I won't stay here. Go

1:22:49

to places that were oriented around like $79 a

1:22:51

day. Come

1:22:55

stay down here, dugs. The

1:22:57

last time. The last

1:22:59

time. Doug's Road Motel. Wake up, daughter. Doug's

1:23:02

Road Kill. The

1:23:04

last time we had a podcast that Matt

1:23:06

wasn't on was because he was like, ha,

1:23:09

ha, ha, ha, Barstow,

1:23:12

what, what the fuck is he? That's

1:23:15

$79 free parking. Yeah. He's

1:23:18

gonna be half a biscuit of the morning. It's

1:23:21

the owner of the time's free fuel. Curve

1:23:23

your own. We

1:23:26

have internet. One

1:23:28

internet connection that everyone shares. The

1:23:31

one thing I love about LA, and

1:23:33

there's a lot of things I love about LA, there's a lot of

1:23:35

crappy things, but a lot of things I love about LA. If you

1:23:38

get off, I guess it's the 10 or the 405, and

1:23:41

you get on to Sepulveda, that

1:23:44

long stretch of Sepulveda, which I guess

1:23:46

goes towards, goes north, I

1:23:48

guess, towards the reason I was, it has

1:23:50

all these old motels, and it comes with

1:23:53

all the original signs. It's

1:23:55

so crazy, it's like a movie set, and it's so

1:23:57

awesome, and the greatest thing about it is

1:23:59

it's still. People

1:24:03

have the signs free HBO, which I was

1:24:05

like, that was a thing that people would

1:24:07

be like, I'm really tired, but

1:24:10

which one has HBO? We've got beds.

1:24:12

Yeah, it was like, every time

1:24:15

they said which one has home

1:24:17

boss office. So I

1:24:19

can watch Not Necessarily the News. You're

1:24:23

not necessarily the news? The

1:24:25

original Jon Stewart, I guess, right?

1:24:28

Oh, man. Not Necessarily the

1:24:30

News. All right. Okay. All

1:24:33

right. That was fun. Yeah, well, it's

1:24:35

been a good week so far. It's been a good week so far. Knocked a couple

1:24:37

out real fast, didn't we? Yeah. You know, and

1:24:39

they're not all about the same subject. No. I

1:24:42

was also going to make a joke about you

1:24:44

going back. It's uncomfortable not to be doing the

1:24:46

equivalent of 40,000 words about one topic. Weird.

1:24:51

About you going to the hotel and knocking a

1:24:53

couple out? Yeah,

1:24:56

that's not what happened. Careful

1:25:00

for the flies. Yeah. Yeah. I'm

1:25:03

fine now. I'm good now. And

1:25:06

fuck y'all. All right. Okay. Bye.

1:25:25

Bye.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features