Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
We know our new method.
0:03
Of attack. Stat
0:10
that. That
0:13
meant a new perfect. Be greedy and
0:15
welcome back to another exciting instalment of
0:17
the Fifth Column podcast. This is your
0:19
weekly rhetorical sort of news. I can.
0:21
We couldn't make it in the casually
0:23
ourselves. I'm coming onstream still here in
0:26
New York. I'm with Michael Moynahan and
0:28
Don Lemon. Nice. Yeah, yeah, I'm I'm
0:30
dumb. Eminent Welsh know you're not the
0:32
I will never be that were It
0:34
shoots well. and you also never be
0:36
that terrible at interviewing. I. Can
0:38
I go the he's that veteran the
0:40
Mm. Maybe add a lurid middle of
0:43
unlimited eleven or Cnn? yeah, but he
0:45
as for why eight million dollars and
0:47
seven cyber drugs and some air roller
0:49
skates? Reason I heard dismays Yeah, I
0:51
mean he I just we. I mean,
0:53
I would ask for those things as
0:55
well. So. I suppose we
0:57
are good. Have voted for a similar
0:59
appetite yeah, but I mean you can't
1:02
phone for and that essentially. but is
1:04
there. There is kind of a disconnect
1:06
between what he believes he's worth is
1:08
actually for a it's like it's like
1:10
when I see things on Ebay that
1:12
are priced higher than they are on
1:14
Amazon. Get a good investment. That's.
1:16
Not, you don't have any idea what that's worth
1:19
do. And that's Don Lemon talking about thing about
1:21
himself because I watch them an interview. And.
1:23
I am. I'm
1:25
always willing. I'm happy and want
1:28
to. Have because you know
1:30
as I'm I'm going to be heterodox is
1:32
So I want to say the opposite thing.
1:34
And been ago, he's a great interview. He
1:36
absolutely isn't the worst interview or it's It's
1:39
almost like he's A. he didn't do the
1:41
homework, He he's stuttering through things, he's dropping
1:43
all these things and in it you know
1:45
in front of do on on, tell everyone
1:47
who's interviewing. Deleted. Know that.
1:50
I mean, it's Don Lemon.
1:52
Everyone knows Don Lemon. We're
1:54
all paying. It's the A
1:56
Lemon, right? He was interviewing Elon
1:58
Musk. Yes, That area is
2:01
really bad. Very brief career.
2:04
Working. For or my own we're didn't
2:06
even actually mouse the I were to go
2:08
shading the deal he earns us to produce
2:10
a show yeah would are distributed on exit
2:13
very uncool The suspect our national as as
2:15
the I was like do you remember when
2:17
that happens yeah I sent a text you
2:20
guys I was like oh my god that's
2:22
a such a stupid get move from Elon
2:24
musk yeah jumped to fire to first time
2:26
and time for the interview aired as the
2:29
as it it was a bad as the
2:31
amount as easy as were very very survivor
2:33
in your. Criticism of a lot. So
2:35
I'm as as somebody who likes to
2:37
change their mind and do mayocoba on
2:40
your eye popping off as actually I
2:42
agree with you on masks this is
2:44
that your new boss and you're like
2:46
why are you such a racist and
2:48
like when work assists Here's where arm
2:51
that the he doesn't even get a
2:53
half a half culpa our house Something
2:55
Nothing you don't Hired Mother fuckin The
2:57
first place was as like like when
2:59
Ben Shapiro eventually fires Candace Iowans I'm
3:02
not him stand up and a plot.
3:04
I want to say what the fuck were you doing?
3:06
Did you see the thing that someone pointed out that
3:08
she was liking. As sweet as
3:10
to find someone in a it's still
3:13
I get it wrong, doesn't want I
3:15
can his own to sue me so
3:17
see a couple things. Recently was one
3:19
that she said i'm in a bet.
3:22
My. Reputation. As.
3:24
A girl you don't have a specific
3:26
and pass on this story. yeah that
3:28
Emanuel Mack crowns wife is actually a
3:30
man. He says Mrs. and now as
3:32
the yeah there's some conspiracy theory and
3:34
I think the people have been taken
3:36
to court This to women. like
3:39
one of them is like a farmer who
3:41
suffer just this weird couple a conspiracy women
3:43
in france who have been person is conspiracy
3:45
theory that i may microns wife who is
3:48
getting sixty five years older than his his
3:50
and song trump was like remember they're digging
3:52
holes out in the white house garden oh
3:55
that's receives that matter like how you can't
3:57
batty yeah yeah yeah it turns out he's
3:59
gay She asked Cam at
4:02
someone, why her hero so entrapment
4:04
again. But yeah, she's like,
4:07
it's clearly a man. And she's like, let me just
4:09
break this down for 60 seconds. And I'm like, zoink,
4:12
next, please. But
4:14
someone pointed out that she liked
4:17
a tweet that
4:20
somebody responding to Rabbi Schmooley,
4:23
who I've met a few times and is a
4:25
bit much. He's a bit of a handful.
4:28
This is the guy, there was a video going around.
4:31
Oh, him supposedly saying the N word.
4:33
Yeah. I don't know if that's true.
4:35
I saw some hard R. Yeah, hard R. Like
4:37
a racist R. The exact
4:39
phrase, Jew hating nigger. Oh
4:41
yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Maybe
4:44
he said, are you hating? Maybe
4:46
you misheard it, but not the last bit. You
4:48
didn't hear it. Yeah, I don't know if that's
4:50
authentic. It was hard for me
4:52
to tell what was going on there. Cause
4:54
it's like a snippet of audio and then
4:56
it cuts off. Someone could basically suggest that it
4:59
was a, I think the post suggested it was
5:01
a Twitter spaces that he said this in
5:03
and then quickly like disconnected it, which is
5:05
just kind of insane. It's very hard to imagine
5:07
that someone would actually do that, but. I
5:10
mean, Rabbi Schmooley, maybe he referred to her in a tweet
5:13
as the arch anti-semite Candace
5:18
Owens, inciting her Jew hatred,
5:20
blah, blah, blah. That's not concise. So inciting
5:22
her Jew hating followers to threaten to murder
5:24
Jews, et cetera. So somebody
5:28
responds to this. It says
5:30
February 20th, rabbi, are
5:32
you drunk on Christian blood again?
5:34
Oh, a classic blood libel. What?
5:37
I mean, a literal blood libel. Wait,
5:39
she liked that? She liked that tweet.
5:41
No way. Sometimes her fingers just like
5:43
you can't. No, in her
5:45
defense, I've pocket blocked people.
5:48
I've done all kinds of things
5:50
unwittingly that way. So it's
5:52
possible that this happened in her pocket. It would
5:54
be really ironic that it happened in her pocket
5:56
on a tweet about her being an anti-semite. It
5:58
would be. It would be. Yeah,
6:03
it's pretty amazing. It's not outside of
6:05
the realm of possibility. No, it's not.
6:07
No, no, it's not. What was so
6:09
bad about the Don Lemon interview? So
6:11
with Elon Musk, because you guys are
6:13
yammering about it in the thread, in
6:15
the never ending thread. And
6:18
I didn't want to care because
6:20
the obsession with Elon Musk, I
6:22
saw it. You know what? I'm going to
6:24
intersperse an observation here about
6:27
Instagram. It's been fucking
6:29
ruined. Instagram is my place to
6:31
post inexplicable photos, usually,
6:33
of my nine-year-old. And
6:35
that's fine. And now
6:37
when you look at other people's Instagram,
6:40
they show threads. Threads? I don't have that,
6:42
because I guess because I never signed up.
6:44
I signed up, but then I immediately unsigned
6:46
up because
6:49
it was terrible. And so every time, one of
6:51
the last ones I saw was
6:54
from Jeff Jarvis, the professor.
6:56
He's the best. And
6:58
he was like, what was the
7:00
thread that he came up with, like
7:03
the banality of Elon, or
7:05
something along those lines? That's the
7:07
book title that I want. I don't want to actually write the book,
7:10
but that's what I want to do. The
7:12
obsession with Elon Musk as a quasi-Nazi
7:16
hate figure is so stupid,
7:19
as is holding him up as
7:21
a free speech champion. I don't think he's a
7:23
free speech champion. He's just Elon Musk. He's a
7:26
weird fucking dude. And he's erratic about
7:28
a lot of different things. And also amazing
7:30
in a lot of important ways. And he
7:32
fucking puts the biggest rocket into
7:34
space ever last week. That's awesome.
7:37
And Tesla. I
7:39
mean, whatever. I don't like do that stuff. He
7:42
asked him the Tesla Roadster in
7:44
a very weird digression. Yeah. But he
7:46
also did ask him things that were
7:50
really uncool. Edward
7:53
Snowden, actually,
7:56
from what I saw of the interview, Edward
7:58
Snowden really encapsulated what I was doing. I
8:00
thought about it. It was actually a really good tweet thread from Edward
8:02
Snowden. He said, look, I've been
8:04
in the controversial interview seat, what Don
8:06
Lemon came after Elon Musk with felt
8:08
like malice. Elon, in clear
8:10
discomfort, opens up in good faith about his
8:12
intensely private struggles. And that's the thing that
8:14
when they're talking about ketamine, I think. Lemon
8:17
picks precisely that moment to begin emptying
8:20
an entire drawer of knives. That's
8:22
a dick move, sure, but it's Lemon's right. It
8:25
comes with the territory of being a partisan football
8:27
and Musk should have expected it. The real loss
8:29
is that it's a huge waste of an interview
8:31
because Lemon exudes zero curiosity or
8:33
interest in anything beyond posturing. Exactly right
8:35
from what I saw. And
8:37
it was, there's a funny bit where Elon
8:40
says, you want censorship
8:42
so bad, you can taste it. Or
8:44
I can taste something like that. But he, Don
8:47
Lemon is unprepared for somebody who
8:49
is very calm, doesn't
8:52
really need this interview. You
8:55
get people there like where their political lives are, they're
8:57
online, their businesses are online. He's just a billionaire, he's
8:59
the richest man, second richest man in the world, depending
9:01
on the day. And he just doesn't
9:03
give a fuck. And so when he comes
9:06
after him with the DEI stuff, which is one of
9:08
my favorite things, when he says, he
9:11
just make a very simple point. He's like, I just don't think that
9:13
you should hire somebody and lower it
9:15
or change the qualifications based on race. And
9:18
Don Lemon is like, why do you hate black
9:20
people? It's very, very astonishing
9:22
moment to watch if somebody kind
9:25
of collapsed like Lemon does. It's
9:28
just the way he handles that
9:30
particular section is like, oh,
9:32
you came in here with this idea that if
9:34
you believe these things, you are probably a racist.
9:37
And when it goes beyond that, you have nothing to
9:39
say. And then when he says the
9:41
posturing, that was the thing if you are
9:44
a subscriber to this podcast and listen to the one
9:46
that we released today. I
9:48
mentioned in that that
9:50
Tucker Carlson said the right thing and
9:54
it doesn't apply to him. He
9:56
mistakenly got something right talking about the Putin interview, as
9:59
he said like, you know. All these interviews come and
10:01
it's all about them. That is true. Unfortunately
10:03
Tucker did a very, very bad interview
10:06
that I think is worthless in almost every way. And I
10:08
think he's a fool. And I think the
10:10
whole thing was foolish. But that thing that he did describe does
10:12
happen. And that's what you saw with Don Lemon. You
10:15
saw him basically going through the
10:17
posturing, like, well, you couldn't actually, and it was,
10:19
none of it was about enlightening. It
10:21
was about trying to get the moments
10:23
for the clips. I mean,
10:25
you live on CNN for
10:28
many years and you live on Mediaite
10:30
as like, that's the tribune
10:32
for people like him. A clip
10:34
of him like destroying somebody or getting in
10:36
some, some fisticuffs with somebody. And none of
10:38
it, he just got, he kind of got
10:40
pummeled by Musk in a way
10:42
that wasn't really a pummeling. It was just a
10:44
calm response of like, no, I never said that.
10:46
Like, what are you talking about? And they're all
10:49
very basic points. But I think what I saw,
10:51
I didn't see the whole thing, but
10:53
I thought Musk handled it pretty well. And I'm not somebody who's a
10:55
fan of his. Generally not a fan of
10:57
his. I think he's like, Matt Taibbi
11:01
said the other day that he was full
11:03
of shit on free speech. And
11:05
I think there's something to that. But in this
11:08
interview, I was like on
11:10
his side and I wanted to be on Don
11:12
Lemon's side just to be the heterodox. Ism? The
11:17
heterodox. Hamazaba. Doing
11:20
a great job. Camille, what did
11:22
you like about the interview? Well, the moment
11:24
that stood out to me was when they
11:26
were talking about free speech. And at some
11:28
point, Elon says, when we take content down,
11:30
we will take down things that are illegal.
11:32
What is a child pornography thing? If it's
11:34
legal, then we leave it there. And he
11:36
said, well, what about all of these racist
11:38
memes? Well, is it illegal? He
11:41
says, no, but it's bad. And
11:43
it's been up there for a long time. And all
11:45
of the Christ Church shooter and various other shooters, they
11:47
were radicalized by social media. So don't you feel an
11:49
obligation to take it down? And
11:52
this is when he starts to talk about how much you
11:54
love censorship. But at some point he says, but
11:58
there's child porn on there. Isn't
12:00
that a form of moderation and censorship? And
12:02
he said, that's fun. He said, that's illegal.
12:05
That's illegal. I
12:07
just said that if it's
12:09
illegal, it has to come down.
12:11
But I don't understand. And he
12:13
was completely mystified by this distinction
12:15
between legal and illegal. I mean,
12:17
that mystification is underlined to a
12:19
lot of the kind of confusion
12:21
and people talking past each other
12:24
in journalistic debates right
12:26
now and political debates too, right?
12:28
Like literally at the Supreme Court even
12:31
today when they were talking about
12:33
Murthy versus Missouri. And
12:35
I was doing my lunchtime watching CNN
12:37
for five minutes and watching the way
12:39
they were describing this case. And
12:42
to remind everyone, this is the case that
12:45
the states brought against the Biden
12:47
administration for being acting
12:49
in a censorious way, especially
12:52
on like Facebook and social media
12:54
companies having to do mostly with
12:56
COVID alleged misinformation, but sometimes
12:58
also with things having to do with like
13:00
the election and like if you're an election
13:02
denier or whatever. And
13:05
which they absolutely did. I
13:07
mean, they brow beat
13:09
social media companies to
13:12
not just like police their own courts
13:15
in a way or their own users, but
13:17
also they said, these are the 12 people
13:19
you need to do, like do
13:22
better with like kicking off your platforms. The
13:24
dirty dozen, they literally called them at some
13:26
point. So this came up
13:29
on the Supreme Court just today and
13:31
seeing people talk about it just as
13:35
when the lower court came up with
13:37
a pretty strong injunction against the Biden
13:39
White House about it, there
13:42
is a bafflement actually from the
13:44
journalistic side. Like the White
13:46
House is just trying to prevent
13:48
the spread of misinformation and
13:51
these courts are like handcuffing them.
13:54
I don't even like get what I don't
13:56
get it. And the other side is trying
13:58
to make the point of. that's
14:00
the government pressuring private
14:03
actors to censor people.
14:05
Yeah, but we like this particular government.
14:07
And also they're doing it for the
14:09
right reasons. It's, uh, but
14:12
that's such a fundamental departure from
14:15
the conceptions of free speech that
14:17
you would see within the journalism
14:19
industry when I was young, which
14:21
I guess was a long time ago. Maybe that's
14:23
the problem here. Um, like,
14:26
it would be inconceivable, and
14:28
yet now it's kind of a minority
14:30
position when you look at it. And then
14:33
interestingly in the Supreme Court, which has otherwise
14:35
been super strong in
14:37
favor of the First Amendment
14:39
and expanding and butt-tressing its
14:43
strength over the last 20 years, 15,
14:45
20 years you would say, um, I'm
14:47
not sure. I mean, reading the
14:49
coverage of this from
14:52
Jacob Solomon, other people, uh,
14:54
Ilya Shapiro, who I think wrote an abacus
14:56
brief for the Manhattan Institute by
14:58
it, kind of seems like the Supreme Court's
15:00
a little bit skeptical of
15:03
the Fifth Circuit, I think it is, uh,
15:05
injunction against the White House and they're look-
15:07
and they're not going to, um, spread it.
15:09
It's a complicated case because it all lies
15:12
on the question of are
15:15
they really threatening you or are they just
15:17
like breathing really hard while they're
15:20
suggesting that maybe you should look out
15:22
at what your users are saying. But
15:24
the reaction to it and the climate from which a
15:26
lot of this sprang, um, stems
15:29
from that sort of journalistic idea that there
15:31
is a truth and that since
15:33
there's bad people doing the mistruths, we got to do
15:35
something about that. Yes, 100%. And that's what you see
15:37
in this interview and you see the hangover for the
15:39
amount of time that he was at CNN. And
15:42
the CNN, that really kicks off in 2015-16 and the Trump stuff
15:45
and they're like, this is a funny joke and
15:47
you see that with Morning Joe. They have Mon
15:49
all the time and then they're like, oh God,
15:51
we created this joke. It's part of this sort
15:53
of self-flagellation too that we are responsible assigning themselves
15:56
far more responsibility because it actually
15:58
makes them feel good. like
16:01
potent and you know the people that vote for
16:03
Donald Trump that I met in the middle of
16:05
the country have never ever turned on MSNBC and
16:08
wouldn't ever turn on MSNBC and it wasn't them
16:10
and CNN But you know you have
16:12
this thing where he's like, you know, but you have to do
16:14
something about this There's things that aren't true and he's
16:17
the type of guy who seems quite dim
16:19
actually in that interview But he
16:21
seems a little too dim to understand that
16:23
there is not a Binary of
16:25
things that everyone knows are true and everyone
16:27
knows aren't true and the nuances of
16:29
some of those things too when it comes to like vaccine
16:32
misinformation, which was the stuff that
16:35
or I should say COVID misinformation Which
16:38
was the stuff that people after the Donald Trump stuff.
16:40
That's what they were really running with, right? So it's
16:43
2021, you know Joe Biden's president now and
16:45
then it's like, okay This is the
16:47
next thing we have to attack because Donald Trump's no longer in
16:50
office We're gonna ignore him for a little bit as a short
16:52
period of time. We did ignore him and
16:54
that was fun and then
16:56
you have this thing about vaccine
16:58
hesitancy of it was was it
17:00
was it a Wuhan
17:04
lab thing was it a wet market? Was
17:06
it a bat? Was it a dingo? And
17:09
you couldn't ask those questions, etc But there was the presumption
17:12
in all that time and it's not even to get into
17:14
what was right and what was wrong But there was a
17:16
perception at the time that there were things that were right
17:18
and there were wrong despite the fact that right very early
17:20
In a disease that nobody had this is
17:22
brand new and everyone knew the answers to
17:25
this at in This is the kind of
17:27
attitude you see him bring to mosque and
17:29
say well, these things are influencing people Because
17:32
there were no school shootings. There were no there
17:34
were no neo-nazis There was
17:36
no racism before social media and he's
17:38
like with social media is the thing that's but
17:41
you know look one of the
17:43
things that the sections that I saw that really
17:46
Bothered me and the reason it
17:48
bothered me is because I do this for a living and
17:50
I interview people for a living
17:52
and I'm doing this on Wednesday and The
17:55
way I'm going about this to people that I'm
17:57
sitting down with and I have to it's a
17:59
little harder two people and how you
18:01
think they're gonna react to certain things and what's gonna bring
18:03
them out and what's gonna pull them out of it in
18:05
knowing what they believe about certain issues, right? And putting
18:08
them against each other, not for good
18:10
clips, but just to get a good conversation going.
18:12
And so you're just kind of looking at it
18:14
that way. And then you see, when you see
18:16
people doing bad interviews, it's not that
18:18
they're kind of ambling blindly, aimlessly
18:22
through an interview. I always know what they're trying to
18:24
do, right? Cause it's a very easy thing to think
18:26
if you've done this one time, it's not like some
18:28
super power, everybody who's ever interviewed somebody knows this. There's
18:31
a point at which he starts talking to him about
18:33
ketamine. And-
18:35
You aren't talking to- To Don Lemon.
18:38
And Don Lemon- Well, Don asked him about that. Asked
18:40
him about it. And he said something about like, do
18:42
you have a prescription? And he said, he
18:46
says kind of private to ask somebody about their medical
18:49
prescriptions they take. And then
18:51
he pauses and then he says, all right, well, I'm gonna
18:53
answer this anyway. And Don
18:55
Lemon responds in a series of really
18:59
awful and
19:01
uncomfortable ways. But you see that he's
19:03
trying to be Barbara Walters. He's
19:05
trying to say, so what is that like? But
19:07
he's doing it in the most intrusive,
19:10
awful way, which- I'm gonna get a gotcha out of
19:12
this rather than I'm gonna draw you out. But it's
19:14
gonna draw you up, I'm gonna get the emo part,
19:16
but then you see the CNN thing that's part of
19:18
his brain. It's been kind of poisoned
19:20
by being at that network for so long. And then
19:22
he tries to take the knife out
19:25
and he says, well, is that good for your investors? Like
19:28
you're on drugs. It's like, no, no. Really?
19:30
Yeah. And I will say
19:32
this is that ketamine is
19:37
very promising when it comes to the treatment
19:40
of depression. It's a gateway
19:42
drug to happiness. And
19:44
that's what Elon Musk who's, I
19:47
answered was very, he
19:49
didn't wanna be forthcoming. He was forthcoming. And it
19:51
was actually a pretty interesting answer. But there's a
19:54
doctor at Yale who is like one of the
19:56
big guys in the ketamine kind of
19:58
at Yale Medical School. and it
20:00
doesn't sort of the aerosolization
20:03
of ketamine in an inhaler, but
20:06
I think Eli Lilly, or one of these big pharma
20:08
companies I've done, because it's been really effective. And
20:10
it's especially effective for people who have extreme
20:15
depression in like, you might
20:17
kill yourself the next day. You get into
20:19
that point. If you get ketamine drips, all
20:21
the data suggests that it pulls you out
20:24
of it pretty quickly. And it takes
20:26
about three months, you have to re-up it. I've
20:29
been very interested in it myself. You
20:31
can get it off-label treatment
20:33
in New York City at a number of places.
20:35
They advertise very publicly. There's doctors that do it.
20:38
And to conflate this, like he's on
20:41
drugs, and aren't
20:43
you gonna tank your company? What do your
20:46
investors think? Like, you smoked a joint with
20:49
Joe Rogan, and he said, I had one puff. It
20:53
was a play acting, we had one puff, whatever. It's
20:55
like, I'm not on drugs. And this
20:57
whole thing is like, it's a mixture of that. I'm trying
20:59
to be Barbara Walters. And it's
21:01
not like, well, what are you depressed about? Let's
21:03
talk about that. It was a point
21:05
where he became the cable news guy again in
21:08
trying to get that little clip where he
21:10
was like, aren't you gonna destroy your company
21:12
by taking a drug that you take for
21:14
depression? It's just a cheap trick. I mean,
21:17
not that however Elon Musk or anyone
21:19
else runs their company is by definition
21:22
the greatest way. And that their
21:24
consideration of investors is
21:27
the greatest way to consider investors. I'm just kind
21:29
of guessing that Don Lemons, understanding
21:32
of the role between a CEO
21:35
and the investors of a company might
21:37
be, in this case, a little bit
21:39
less than Elon Musk's. It's a weird,
21:42
like, I finally caught you. You've
21:44
never thought about this until I just brought
21:47
it up. Like, if you
21:49
are in any kind of publicly traded company,
21:51
you are constantly thinking about these
21:54
fucking SEC requirements and
21:56
all of the things that you're presenting to
21:58
investors. It is an obsession. with
22:00
yours, it's a very weird
22:02
thing to come off like that. There's a,
22:04
in some of the poll, kind
22:07
of poll quotes, poll sections of the
22:09
interview that Washington Post had
22:12
the five takeaways from Don
22:14
Lemon's piece of garbage interview. One
22:17
of them was, there's
22:19
Musk depressive episodes, but the
22:22
first one, of course, is Musk
22:24
resists responsibility for hate
22:27
speech on X. Yeah. He
22:30
resisted taking responsibility, and
22:32
he's like, there's like five billion posts a
22:34
day. Yeah. And he has a conversation
22:36
about it, like it depends on, you know, if
22:39
a tree falls in the forest stuff. I think I was playing that
22:41
when you were, right? Yeah. Like somebody tweets
22:43
something and no one means it. Yeah, that's
22:45
like, it's hard to police all that stuff.
22:47
There's never any sympathy because it has the
22:49
wrong politics. And they don't like what
22:51
he's done with it, so they all went to threads. Yeah,
22:55
with the great Mark Zuckerberg
22:57
company is better. But
23:00
it's like this constant thing,
23:02
like you have to be responsible
23:04
for everything that's set on this platform, which
23:07
I think had this platform existed in 1996, 97,
23:09
98, I
23:12
mean, you and I were in the early stages of the internet, we
23:15
would ever be praising it and saying, it's incredible,
23:17
like you can get your ideas out. Everybody
23:19
has a Gutenberg press, do you remember that with
23:21
blogs? Like it's incredible. It was a democratization. Now
23:23
it's like, this is bad. I mean, even Elon's
23:27
explanation of how Community Notes works, which
23:29
is hardly perfect by any stretch of
23:31
the imagination. Pretty good. But when he
23:34
explains that the difference between
23:36
a traditional news network
23:38
like CNN, like running a
23:41
story that turns out to be fucking false
23:43
and wrong, they don't say
23:45
anything about it for a day or so, maybe there's
23:47
a correction, but almost no one hears about the correction.
23:49
And Elon, as he explains with
23:52
Community Notes, if you've interacted
23:54
with a post, and then a
23:56
day later, a Community Note shows up, you're supposed to
23:58
get a notification about it. it in
24:01
the system. It's kind of a big deal. And
24:03
as the post continues to exist, the community note
24:05
is right there attached to it, and you have
24:07
an opportunity to see it. And the way that
24:10
the algorithm works, and I haven't seen
24:12
it, so I don't know, but the explanation, and
24:14
as I understand it, is in
24:16
order for the note to be officially
24:19
attached to a tweet, the
24:21
reviewers, the people who are in the pool
24:24
of community notes reviewers, like you
24:26
actually need to get people who
24:28
would generally disagree to agree that,
24:30
oh, this post is legitimate. It
24:34
has sufficient context for it
24:36
to get through. I mean, that's
24:38
kind of a big deal. It's pretty great. Not
24:40
a bad innovation at all. And also, Elon Musk
24:42
has been on the wrong side of community notes.
24:45
He sure may, Elon. As
24:47
he pointed out. At the end of this interview, I'll
24:49
make some claims, you'll make some claims, and what
24:51
will end up happening is people will comment, and
24:54
on community notes, they'll give you some indication of
24:56
whether or not it's right. And
24:58
they should all publish a cult book
25:01
because getting things. Well, it depends. It
25:03
means that you're a monster. Yeah.
25:08
I do think that I didn't see the
25:10
whole interview. Lemon's questions and his
25:12
bafflement at the conversation about free speech is what
25:14
people should pay attention to. They want to just
25:16
because I think it does show what happens. So
25:19
you're suggesting people should watch this. Yeah, for sure.
25:22
Is that okay? Can we do that? I think we can still
25:24
do that. I didn't like it. I didn't like it,
25:26
but I think you should watch it. Where?
25:29
This is a shocking gossip. Wait, who do
25:31
I call about what is the appropriate amount
25:33
of dislike of this interview? I thought that
25:35
they have the electrodes attached to you. We'll
25:38
find out if this is okay. Yeah. We'll
25:41
see. We'll see what happens. We'll see if
25:43
all the good people tell us that we're
25:45
bad. But
25:47
there was a bit, I saw that when he said
25:49
some typically musk stupid
25:51
things. And countering
25:55
stupidity with stupidity when Don Lemon
25:58
says, you know, you should become like a... this
26:00
hive of right-wing conspiracy theory,
26:02
because without
26:05
X, God knows when it just would stop. People
26:07
would just go walk outside and breathe and be like,
26:09
that was a stupid idea. But
26:12
he said, and Musk responds by saying,
26:14
well before it was just the domain
26:17
of only the far left. And it's like, that's not
26:19
true at all. Were you on it before? That's not
26:21
true at all. That's total bullshit. So he does that
26:23
too. So not just Don Lemon, but Don Lemon's job
26:25
is to be an interviewer. Elon Musk
26:27
is to be a slightly weird,
26:29
autistic. Slightly. Yeah,
26:31
slightly. Also
26:34
brilliant business owner. Super accomplished. He
26:36
is the one who should not ask questions, know how to
26:38
handle an interview, and be prepared for it. He might be
26:40
the best entrepreneur
26:42
of our time. I think
26:44
I don't know the- Very arguably. Who
26:47
else is in the conversation? Jeff
26:49
Bezos and Amazon. Yeah. Yeah,
26:51
and I- And one trick pony. I'm
26:53
just kidding. Elon is running multiple companies.
26:56
No, I mean the extraordinary things that-
26:58
Kyle Dunnegan, we should just drop the
27:00
Kyle Dunnegan rap. Oh
27:02
yeah. That's why I'm good. Yeah, that's
27:05
very cool. So I will always give
27:07
him a tremendous amount of grace because
27:09
I'm grateful for my Model
27:11
S, and I'm also grateful for
27:13
the SpaceX situation, and hope to
27:16
run on a rocket ship. And
27:18
then the forthcoming Roadster is going
27:20
to be $200,000. So
27:22
it's a bit out of my reach. Apparently, Jetsons life.
27:24
I mean apparently, that part of the interview
27:26
was interesting to me. I'm glad that Don
27:28
Lemon kept asking questions about that. But wait,
27:30
does it have wings? Yeah. It
27:32
sounds like a Jetsons. And he was like,
27:34
maybe. It was hilarious. I'm gonna literally just,
27:36
does it fly? And he's like, I don't
27:39
know, we'll see. Okay, cool. I
27:41
mean, I'm excited. Yeah, I am too, but I
27:43
can't afford it, but I'm excited. I'm bouncing in
27:45
my chair right now. Yeah, I get it. What's
27:47
the over-under of Camille being in
27:49
the first 500 people to get that car?
27:52
Sue at 200K? Me,
27:54
my wife is not gonna make that. I
27:56
think I've got a better shot at getting
27:59
the Cybertruck. Yeah. than the Roadster. Rusty
28:01
and... Who knows? It probably won't be available
28:03
for another two years. At that time, maybe
28:05
it'll be fine. I can't, no, no, I
28:07
mean, I would love that. I would feel
28:09
bad, like test driving, and I can't afford
28:12
half of my life. I used to
28:14
have a job where they didn't make me work and paid me a
28:16
ton of money. And that's just
28:18
what happened. Now, like, my daughter is
28:20
like really desperate to, this
28:23
is, it's great when you have like a girl that grows up in
28:25
New York, but she is a mass hole
28:27
in her bones, and she knows
28:29
that the Bruins are playing the
28:31
Rangers in Boston on Thursday, and she's
28:33
on spring break, and she's like, Poppy,
28:36
did you get tickets yet? And she texted me this morning. I
28:38
was working, and she was like, did you get tickets for the Ranger
28:40
game yet? And I'm like, it's the
28:43
Rangers. I looked, the tickets are like $500 a
28:45
piece. And I,
28:47
no, I, wait, are they two good tickets,
28:50
R-Phonedo, or just tickets? Well, you can get tickets, I'm
28:52
not gonna put my daughter up in the nosebleeds.
28:54
Yeah, you're pretty good. Particularly in Boston, this is
28:57
like, people are like, fuck you! It's
28:59
not good for us. So
29:01
if you have any listeners that have Bruins season
29:03
tickets, huh, shoot me a line, I'll pay
29:06
for it, I'll pay it. I'll pay a
29:08
face value. He had a Vision Pro. What,
29:10
I mean, you can like sit on the, whatever
29:13
it is, line, I don't know. Have you sat
29:15
on Steph Curry's lap like you always wanted to?
29:17
Yeah, I've never wanted to do that. Yes, he
29:19
really. That is wrong. That is not true. I'm
29:21
not even a Steph Curry fan. I'm
29:23
not really, I think he ruined the game of beauty.
29:25
I'm trying to get your homophobia to come out. I
29:28
do not have any homophobia anymore.
29:31
Anymore. Jamaican. But
29:33
that part of me is dead
29:35
now. I love this. But
29:38
if you are Jamaican, you have to
29:40
say any more. That is not believable
29:42
on the right side. I know. I've
29:45
been candid about my journey on
29:47
this podcast. Have you heard that? Did you
29:49
make a national anthem? Push
29:52
them up, you boy, you be see me! Because
29:55
we know he can't swim, Jamaican! do
30:00
it we can do it Jamaica I
30:04
mean the Bob sled but swimming no it's not man in
30:06
Japan like all right fine whatever
30:19
you say an Aman about it why
30:21
no man not I did I want
30:24
to do anything in which
30:28
we replaced Don Lemon in that interview
30:30
like a very grumpy Jamaican man
30:36
which terms that are
30:40
really offensive in other cultures and what you
30:42
don't mean anything to you it doesn't feel
30:44
wrong at all and there's I remember there's
30:46
a word about the boy shouldn't be offensive
30:48
but he is a great old description
30:51
of the situation yeah I can you translate my
30:53
teeth yeah but um but yeah
30:58
boy yeah yes it would be what
31:00
the British would call bum boy if
31:03
it's yeah in England oh
31:05
that was a yeah yeah not anymore not
31:07
anymore it's a different country now yeah
31:13
you prefer the old ways you guys
31:15
colonialism they love the terminology now
31:21
there's a word in the Swedish that I said one
31:23
time and we have a
31:25
lot of sweetness news and
31:29
I said it's just like in the
31:31
kind of conversation like knowing that it was
31:33
offensive and people just look at me like
31:35
what the fuck did you say and I
31:37
was like oh really is that bad make
31:39
air bowling no no no that's the thing
31:42
no great when
31:44
you say it I want to make sure that the
31:46
you know that the it's
31:52
you know that compound word there
31:54
the first word that's nigga is
31:57
is is Negro
31:59
that's what it is actually means. It's not that
32:01
hard. Or is this
32:03
supposed to be better? Well, no,
32:05
but they still changed it because
32:07
it was a small chocolate
32:10
ball with coconut flakes
32:12
on it and it was literally
32:14
called Negro balls. I
32:17
swear to God, they still called it that. I'm not joking.
32:19
When I moved to Sweden, they still called it that. I
32:21
think it was Stuerkat
32:24
on this. People in Stockholm would know that
32:26
place. Like an old kind of bakery with
32:28
a conditore where you get coffee and stuff.
32:30
And they had it and I was like, arched an
32:32
eyebrow and I was like, is that? And they're like,
32:34
yeah. But then they changed it. They just
32:37
called them chocolat balls. These chocolate balls now.
32:40
So is there a relationship
32:42
between this delicacy and
32:45
Chef on South Park with the whole chocolate
32:47
salty balls thing? I wonder. I wonder. It's
32:49
very similar. Yeah, it's very similar. But that's
32:51
literally what... It would be shocking to discover
32:54
that today. I can still
32:56
remember the first time I heard Isaac Hayes sing.
32:58
Oh, yeah. Stuck on my chocolate salty balls. That's
33:00
right. Put them in your mouth. Yeah. That's
33:03
amazing. I wanted to do... We
33:05
lived in a very different time. That
33:08
was cute. We absolutely did. One of the
33:11
things I used... When I went to Sweden
33:13
initially, I wanted to
33:15
make a coffee table book of everything in
33:17
the country that was racist, but nobody really understood.
33:21
And I think they figured it out later. Because they
33:23
were literally doing Black Lives Matter, like taking the
33:25
name Swedish Soccer Games. And I was like, guys,
33:27
what are you doing? I
33:30
appreciate that you want to be part of this.
33:32
But now they went way too far. But my
33:34
favorite was there was chocolate
33:37
covered puffed rice called
33:40
Shinapufa, Chinese puffs. And
33:42
the picture on it was a guy in literally
33:45
a swooping hat. Oh, no. With
33:47
his... Like the eyes. It was just like... He
33:49
was actually pulling his eyes. Yeah. Oh,
33:52
the packaging. And like,
33:54
this is pre what people
33:56
call woke, unfortunately, but pre this time by
33:58
a lot. And it's me and
34:01
I was like, dude, you guys gotta fucking change this
34:03
stuff. This is bad, like
34:05
what are you doing? And then all the
34:07
Turkish Delight stuff is also just like people
34:09
on magic carpets. I'm like, God, you guys
34:12
don't see anyone up here. And now
34:14
they want to make a vision. You're all wearing face paint. This
34:16
is the best part. We ever bring back to you, I
34:19
bought a thing for you in Joanna back
34:21
in those days that
34:23
was a French, old-timey, some
34:26
kind of lemon or fruit squeezer that
34:29
was just incredibly, explicitly racist.
34:31
Yes. Yeah, you did
34:33
have that. Yes, that's right. And I just wanted
34:35
to share this to you and you can't see
34:38
this because we're on a video podcast. Yes. That
34:41
headline in Sankar Gondar literally
34:43
means that. Oh no. But
34:46
that headline. The package is very happy.
34:48
The package is yellow. The headline says
34:50
that is the end, it's the end
34:52
of that logo image on CinePuffer. They
34:54
stopped it. CinePuffer and the gun. Yeah,
34:56
and that is from. A happy little.
34:59
Definitely, definitely happy. And
35:01
yeah, end of the picture
35:03
and that was in 2011. So
35:06
I guess they caught up. So
35:08
CinePuffer is now still
35:10
called Chinese Puffs but it just has a hat
35:12
on it. Literally just a hat now.
35:14
Just nobody in the hat. So
35:17
there you go. It's just a hat. That's
35:20
funny. I mean, is that better? Maybe
35:22
a little. Maybe, maybe a little. I don't know
35:25
if the first one's that bad anyway. But I
35:27
remember that when I saw in Mexico, the
35:30
first time I was in Mexico, the
35:32
number of times I saw logos of
35:35
people sleeping under sombreros. Totally serious. I
35:37
have photos of it. And I was like, wait,
35:39
this is in Mexico. This shit is racist. I'm like,
35:41
oh no, this is Mexico. You guys can, this is,
35:43
you're talking about yourself. So that's fun. Are they selling
35:45
it back to gringos? It's like a. No, this is
35:47
not a place where you sell anything except for cocaine
35:49
back to gringos. That
35:52
kind of neighborhood. That kind of
35:54
neighborhood. What did I talk about? Did
35:56
you know that Master P makes a whole line
35:58
of boots? And there's
36:01
a bunch of like snoop related Snoop
36:06
snoop mama oatmeal or something like that.
36:08
It's like a whole replacement of the
36:11
no Yeah, is it is
36:13
it no limit foods or something? I
36:15
don't exactly know probably something like that He was
36:18
on the professional path, but you could find it.
36:20
He would find played in the preseason. Yeah Charlotte
36:25
Hornets, I think I
36:27
think it was like a fat point card Yeah,
36:30
he was like a bit. Yeah, Uncle P's
36:32
Louisiana season pancake mix. So
36:34
if you don't have Bruins tickets for
36:36
Thursday Can
36:38
you send me some pancake mix? The greatest
36:40
thing is there's a picture of like older
36:43
master P on glasses. Oh man. Yeah And
36:46
you know, I think he came out with
36:48
that stuff at the time that like on
36:50
Jemima was getting canceled Yeah, his response. Oh
36:53
shit. It is because yeah, it's that and
36:55
the rice. Yeah, so it's the white uncle
37:00
With uncle P and it's fine. Yeah, nah
37:02
nah nah hoodie
37:04
hoops, mmm What
37:08
we put Camille's face Cell
37:11
anything interesting, whatever you write.
37:13
It'd have to be a food product. You sell
37:15
water to a fish. Mm-hmm I
37:17
mean, it doesn't have to be a food product. It's not to
37:19
be a food I
37:21
mean, I know something luxurious. Would you make sneakers
37:24
if you became really like what I make
37:26
me do like would you say like? No,
37:29
but not not like you're Chinese Design
37:36
aspects. Yeah, I would just just make me more
37:38
of those. Yeah. Well, that's what Kanye I just
37:40
want 700 He's not like
37:42
at the drafting which is actually big very
37:44
hard for me. Like when I see the
37:46
correspondence now with What's
37:48
his name? Myla Milo an opla
37:50
like working at easy. Yeah, she makes me
37:53
feel a little weird Milo
37:55
granted all the shoes that I'm buying our
37:57
old shoes granted
38:00
nothing to do with it. Yeah. You
38:02
should be doing some arbitrage if you're not,
38:04
like just stocking up on the shit that
38:06
is really cheap now because Kanye West is
38:09
a super anti-Semite. Wait till the very good
38:11
people. Not
38:14
impacted the price in the market. Wait
38:17
till the very good people on the
38:19
internet and on Twitter and probably on threads find
38:22
out that I did a piece with Milo
38:24
Yiannopoulos. I platformed Milo Yiannopoulos on it. It
38:27
was great. It was one of my favorite pieces that
38:29
I did because he's
38:32
always playing for the camera, obviously, and the whole thing
38:34
was just the ... But when
38:36
you know what he's about to do all
38:38
the time, because that was one of the things
38:40
where you watched ... You interviewed him when he was staying
38:43
in that hotel paid for by the Mercers just
38:45
before that bus stop. I went to
38:47
his house and he paid for it by the
38:49
Mercers. He had bottles of champagne all over the
38:51
place. He was blowing their money. Dude, we went
38:53
to the Trump Doral lunch. Yes,
38:55
I remember. I was
38:57
like, I have to pay for all of my stuff. Then
39:02
the bill ... I was a confession, a journalist, a confession.
39:04
The bill came and I was like, yes,
39:07
all right. I
39:10
cannot disaggregate the 78 drinks that I
39:12
had. Then
39:14
at the end of it, we went out onto the patio
39:17
and did the interview. I
39:21
was very punchy because I'd had a couple drinks and
39:23
I went in really hard on
39:25
them. It
39:28
was hilarious because I'll give
39:30
him credit in one aspect. This
39:32
is the aspect of performance, that
39:34
when you know it's performance, is you go
39:36
in really hard on somebody and just really
39:39
... It did not go well for
39:41
him, I have to say. In every
39:43
interview he did, everything was just a cakewalk
39:45
for him because he would say the same
39:47
thing and the people who were interviewing him
39:49
thought ... This is a big mistake.
39:51
Sorry, I'll be boring about interviews again. This is a
39:53
big mistake interviewers make and this is Don Lemon who
39:55
is doing a version of this, is that
39:58
when you know that your audience ... and
40:00
you yourself think that you are the moral
40:02
superior, that we'll get you through,
40:04
and it won't, right? And you're
40:07
like, I mean, come on, Milo, you said
40:09
this. And everyone asked him, in every
40:11
interview, the exact same thing, they
40:13
referenced the same quotes, and he had a
40:16
response for everyone, and he was so used to it. And
40:19
I asked him something that he had posted
40:21
on his Facebook page six hours before, and
40:24
he was like, I'm sorry, what? And
40:26
I was like, yeah, it
40:28
was something about, he didn't care
40:30
about dead Syrian children. It was really bad. And
40:33
I will give him credit in the sense
40:35
that he crumbled, and then afterwards, this
40:37
is the type of thing where somebody just walks out,
40:40
either throws a drink at you, or just says, fuck you, pack
40:43
your stuff up, whatever, which
40:45
is easier in this case, because you're in public, and they don't have
40:47
to kick you out of their house. But he
40:51
texted me 20 minutes
40:53
later, and he was like, do you wanna go out
40:55
to the Fontainebleau tonight in Miami? And I was like,
40:58
you know, I don't. I actually
41:00
don't wanna do that with you, so I didn't do that,
41:02
but yeah. I
41:05
mean, actually, Matt, there are some deals. I'm about to
41:07
buy a new pair of 700s right now. What
41:10
are you, 700s? I
41:12
mean, there's the ones I'm wearing right now.
41:15
He's just buying, Kanye. I
41:17
love the fact that we did a podcast last
41:19
night, we were just so full of venom, that
41:22
today it was just like, do we, we're
41:24
like just talking about sneakers, and weird
41:26
shit, I mean, we're fine. Everything's
41:29
fine. I mean, that's important. I
41:32
don't know why you're saying this when
41:34
democracy is under way. I have a
41:36
very close friend of mine who, I
41:40
think both of you know, who sent me
41:42
a long email today in that
41:44
kind of vein. Yeah, well, I
41:46
can't know which candidate is support, because
41:50
at this point, both candidates have assured me
41:53
that whoever wins, if it's
41:55
not them, democracy ends. Both
41:58
Donald Trump and, Joe
42:00
Biden have assured me that that's the case. And
42:02
it's funny. You had to like rack your brain for Joe Biden for a
42:04
second. I did. Yeah, yeah. He's
42:06
just like Joe Biden. Everyone does
42:08
it. Everyone loses. Wait, what is his name
42:10
again? Yeah, the guy who... No, he fell
42:13
off the stage before he came in here.
42:17
Walked into the band. Walked
42:19
into the tuba player. You know
42:21
the thing. Come on, man. Uncle
42:23
Pete. Uncle Pete's pancake mix. You
42:25
know, it was
42:27
about that and about Trump and
42:30
democracy and you should
42:32
be and aren't you worried. And
42:34
this is something... Because of the bloodbath. That's why...
42:36
No, no, no, it actually wasn't. No, it was about something else.
42:38
And it was about another mutual friend of ours who I thought
42:40
like, oh, he got a little off the rails. He
42:43
was like, no, I actually agree with him more than you
42:45
would think. And I know what you're saying. And he was
42:47
very nice and said, I know what you're saying. But
42:49
you know, you should realize that this... And he laid out
42:52
this case, which I thought actually was the... I'll send it
42:54
to you guys, but maybe I shouldn't, if you still get
42:56
mad about that. But it was one of the best cases
42:59
that I'm like, oh yeah, I guess I see what he's
43:01
saying. In my... What
43:03
is the... Well, my response to him, which
43:06
I haven't written yet because he sent me a very
43:08
long email and it's
43:10
always been that the
43:12
desire of Donald Trump
43:15
is there. I agree with you. I
43:17
mean, he wants dark desire. The dark
43:19
desire to turn this
43:21
country into something in his totally insane
43:23
vision of what a country like America
43:25
should look like is true. I
43:28
think that that is what people are right about
43:30
that. That's for sure. I mean, he said to
43:32
himself, you can't deny it. I just have always made the
43:34
argument that the institutions
43:36
are more robust than
43:39
people give them credit for. I mean, this is
43:41
a very rough version of it. I've laid
43:43
out the case. Less robust by that. But
43:45
what do you mean by that? Less robust
43:47
by dark desires. Because is it just a
43:49
matter of not having a respect for the
43:51
various restrictions? I'll give you an example. An
43:54
example of this that came
43:57
in Donald Trump's interview on
43:59
Sunday. Yeah on Fox News. Yeah
44:01
hard with Howard Kurtz. It was a very
44:03
strange interview. Very strange. Yeah, but
44:06
Kurtz Who
44:08
pushed back a fair amount like he did a
44:10
decent job. Yeah, there was some points. Yeah, just
44:13
point of me Yeah, but so he
44:15
says Tik Tok. Mm-hmm
44:18
Donald Trump has changed his mind on Tik Tok and
44:21
he says, you know Is this because you have a donor and
44:23
you know, you talked to the guys from the Club for Growth
44:25
and that guy Invest in ByteDance, which
44:28
is the honor of Tik Tok. It's
44:30
a Jeff. Yes in what his response
44:32
was Was very
44:34
telling and I was thinking about it
44:36
only because of the email that my friend sent me and
44:39
he he immediately said he's Like well if
44:42
we're gonna ban that I think before This
44:44
is much worse is we banned Facebook and like
44:46
oh my no, no, no, no, no, no No,
44:48
do the same thing to face. That's not what
44:50
this is about Yeah, reviewing that
44:52
your instincts on this are to get
44:55
rid of a political enemy Yeah, they
44:57
have propaganda on this platform That
45:00
is contrary to what you think a media
45:02
company should be putting out there because it's
45:04
negative towards you And so
45:06
therefore Facebook is actually worse than that front
45:08
It's like no, this is about it being
45:10
a Chinese company in China being
45:12
a dictatorship in them controlling Mark
45:15
Zuckerberg was in California. Yeah, right.
45:17
He's American. What are you
45:19
weird? He's very weird But
45:22
not a chai-kam not a chai-kam
45:24
in the fact that that was
45:26
his response Was I can
45:28
think of other things and Kurtz goes on The
45:31
person doesn't doesn't ask doesn't follow up on this.
45:33
No, he does not it doesn't say wait a
45:35
minute What do you mean do the same? He
45:37
had a half a sentence where
45:40
he was like something about the Chinese government
45:42
but he did ask him when
45:44
you said they should take the licenses
45:46
away from two Broadcast
45:49
organizations that don't have licenses. Yeah,
45:51
which is MSNBC and CNN. Yeah
45:54
He goes off on this like very
45:57
weird, you know digress
46:00
about X, Y, and Z doesn't make
46:02
any sense. But it is true that
46:04
he's like, they should, we should
46:06
shut them down because they're telling us. And
46:09
there's a very famous quote that is not famous at
46:11
all, by the way, I just realized because this shows
46:13
my age. There was a
46:16
woman who was the
46:18
official censor for
46:20
the Santa Nista government in Nicaragua.
46:22
Yes, a famous quote. No, and
46:25
her name I believe was Nelba
46:27
Blandon. I think that was her name. And
46:30
she- She married the very wise, at
46:32
least strange. Yeah. It's a new
46:34
book coming out. And
46:36
Nelba Blandon said, when asked by a
46:39
reporter, why you shut
46:42
down La Prensa, which was the opposition newspaper.
46:45
And Nelba Blandon said, well,
46:47
they were saying that we suppress free
46:50
speech and we couldn't allow them to
46:52
say that. And it's like the most
46:54
perfect quote ever. And it is the
46:56
instinct that you get from Hugo Chavez type people. They
46:59
took away the TV license of RCTV
47:01
in Venezuela because they, well, we didn't,
47:03
and literally people on the far left
47:06
who defended Chavez said he didn't shut
47:08
them down. They just didn't get a
47:10
new license. And that's the instinct that
47:12
he has, which is amazingly dangerous. This
47:15
is the shit that makes me so upset about
47:18
the ridiculous bloodbath,
47:21
freak out. There
47:24
are so many things that Donald Trump
47:26
actually says, even when he
47:28
says them in ways that are barely
47:31
articulate, that he actually
47:33
says and believes that are worth highlighting
47:36
and deconstructing and
47:38
freaking the fuck out about. When
47:41
he says something that you probably shouldn't freak
47:43
out about, he just uses a particular word
47:46
in context appropriately.
47:49
And you pretend, masquerade
47:52
as though he is actually suggesting
47:54
that there will be widespread political
47:56
violence and murder if
47:59
he's not elected president. And maybe he'll suggest
48:01
that next week, but he
48:03
didn't do it in that particular
48:05
speech. And they're actually tripling down a lot.
48:07
They're literally tripling down a crazy- Normalizing
48:10
from the Brookings Institute. There are two
48:12
things that we're seeing, right? One
48:14
group of people who say, well, look, we shouldn't give
48:16
him the benefit of the doubt. It's at least plausible.
48:18
It's possible, anyways, that he could have meant it in
48:20
the most nefarious way possible. And then
48:23
there are the other people who are like, no, no, he definitely means it. And
48:25
the evidence to support that is, did you see January
48:28
6th? Yeah, but that's- Yes. And
48:31
that is also, it's exactly what
48:33
you're saying. I mean, because it's like,
48:35
yes, he does other things that are
48:37
terrible. Focus on those. And
48:39
stop. And I read on the
48:42
paying, wethefifth.subspect.com episode that we released
48:44
today, I read Jonah Goldberg's tweet
48:47
when he's like, you're really undermining
48:49
the case of people like Jonah
48:51
who really loathed Donald Trump and
48:53
worked very hard to, you know, rest the
48:56
Republican Party from his greasy hands. And
48:59
he says, you know, look, people start not
49:01
believing anything that you say. And it's a very similar
49:03
thing with the COVID stuff. It's like, don't wear a
49:05
mask, wear a mask, we're just trying to, you know,
49:08
it's like, people are going to stop believing you. And you see that,
49:10
I saw a poll the other day about, you
49:12
know, trust in the medical establishment of being
49:14
at an all time low. And
49:16
it's no wonder why. Makes sense. And it's like
49:18
the media saying these things, well, yeah,
49:20
I mean, he didn't, maybe didn't say it directly, but
49:23
we know what he means. It's like, well, I don't
49:25
know what he means because he
49:27
didn't say that. I'm not, I
49:29
can't define what Donald Trump means
49:31
when he talks about cars, Chinese
49:33
cars getting 100% tariffs on them.
49:36
He probably said 75,000 things
49:38
that were dumber, crazier, and more
49:41
offensive to the idea of American
49:43
democracy in that speech. But
49:45
instead, bloodbath is a
49:48
great poll quote, isn't it? That's the
49:50
easy to go with that one. I
49:52
mean, everyone's hunting adjectives and policing adjectives.
49:54
They'll police it if you don't respond
49:57
to something with a pro. level
50:00
of if you don't like call out a lie
50:02
and say that's a lie you mean you mean
50:05
you're saying that some people some person sets
50:07
a level of disagreement with something and
50:10
if you don't meet that they get
50:12
mad at you if you're insufficiently denunciatory
50:14
yeah yeah yeah it's a real goddamn
50:17
problem for certain people who
50:19
have like smaller and smaller audiences it's very
50:21
strange it's hard to figure that out did
50:23
you see Jen Psaki talking about the the
50:25
bloodbath yeah I did yeah yeah well she
50:27
heard she says well yeah I mean the
50:29
Trump campaign is saying you have to look at
50:31
the full context he was talking about auto the auto industry but
50:34
no let's look at the real yeah yeah
50:36
yeah yeah in the real full context in 1962 wow
50:38
I mean you could go back to like the the
50:44
Mesozoic age that's the real
50:46
full context the formation of
50:49
the earth yeah during this
50:51
period the universe is development
50:53
I mean I want
50:55
people to work back from
50:59
people who are like legitimately and
51:01
I and I think legitimately not
51:04
just like from their own point of view but like
51:06
I agree with them like worried
51:09
about the prospect of another
51:11
Trump presidency and what it would
51:14
do to the liberal institutions of America I
51:16
think it would be bad it'd be deleterious
51:18
it would like extend this long bad era
51:20
right so what I want those people to
51:22
do is to act as if they were
51:24
fucking serious about it and if you were
51:26
fucking serious about it you wouldn't police
51:30
adjectives you'd work backwards from power
51:32
right so like take the media
51:34
for example for example right he
51:37
has said several times over the years
51:39
including when he was first running for
51:41
president Oh Saturday Night
51:44
Live did this joke about about me
51:46
that's terrible they should have their we
51:48
should do a fairness doctrine like have
51:50
their like license revoked and stuff and
51:52
it was like are you fucking
51:55
kidding me what are you doing but we knew
51:57
back then in 2016 and even in
52:01
late Trump presidency, you're not gonna be able
52:03
to get away with that because the people
52:05
that you appointed, I mean, Ajit Pai worked
52:07
for Donald Trump. Correct. That wasn't
52:09
gonna happen. It's not gonna happen. Under him. Yeah.
52:12
Which he made clear to him, and he also made clear
52:14
on this podcast in different ways, and
52:17
other people did as well. Well, who works
52:19
for Donald Trump next time around? And also,
52:21
what has been late- By
52:23
the way, it was, sorry to interrupt, but that
52:25
was in the email that I got. Yeah. A
52:28
very funny bit. Think of the next
52:31
people who are going to
52:33
be staffing the administration. That's a super important point.
52:35
That's something that I have to contend with. I
52:37
think that's a really important point. And also, it's
52:39
important to contend with what has Joe
52:42
Biden done with personalized
52:44
executive power and
52:47
antitrust, right? Donald Trump
52:49
wants to, and did actually in his
52:52
presidency, beef up antitrust
52:54
to go after the people he doesn't like. Correct.
52:58
He doesn't like them personally, necessarily.
53:00
He just like, do we really
53:02
need Nippon Steel and US Steel
53:04
to merge? Yeah. At some
53:06
point, there is a little bit of a what's the
53:09
fucking difference? There is a difference. If you're using it
53:11
as your personal weapon or
53:13
retribution for someone who insulted you,
53:15
I think that is a material
53:17
difference than if you just have
53:19
a super bad protectionist,
53:21
mercantilist policy idea. But
53:24
both are bad. Both are bad. You are giving
53:27
that person of that seat power
53:29
and legitimacy for the next person.
53:31
You are handing the baton to
53:33
the next person and the baton
53:35
is bigger. It can beat
53:37
more ass, right? And there has never
53:39
been throughout the entire Trump era. Never,
53:42
never, not even once. People
53:44
looking at it and saying, hmm, it's
53:47
really bad when a bad person has all that
53:49
power. Maybe we should
53:51
start thinking about not having so
53:54
much power concentrated. It's never come
53:56
up for creepy libertarians.
54:00
that people would say, and I had people tell me
54:02
this, during the first
54:04
Trump administration, that
54:06
what people said in Capitol Hill about Donald Trump
54:09
on camera, you know, on the
54:12
House floor, in front of him, to
54:14
people in the White House, and what they said privately were totally
54:16
different. And that's a
54:19
cowardice that you would expect from
54:21
shitty politicians. It does in some
54:23
way offer a ray of hope that these
54:26
people actually don't believe this, and
54:29
it's not much of a hope. It's a very, very thin
54:31
read to say that all they
54:33
care about is power, and if the
54:35
wind changes a little bit. But that is also hopeful
54:37
in some ways, that if the wind changes, they're not
54:39
gonna be so committed to this, but at the same
54:41
time- We'll never forgive those motherfuckers, by the way. Of
54:43
course not, no. And none of them have a
54:46
backbone or have any principles, and I have
54:49
gone on more rants in this
54:51
podcast about politicians having absolutely zero
54:53
principle about this stuff. But,
54:55
you know, it is kind of interesting
54:58
that when you see Donald Trump knows
55:00
this, and if he becomes
55:03
president again, and it's looking at the moment
55:05
that that's a pretty high possibility, that
55:08
Harry Enten, I think I sent you a screenshot of
55:10
him, Harry's very, very, fine Harry Enten's bet,
55:13
and Harry's brilliant on CNN,
55:15
talking about the Hispanic vote going
55:18
wildly towards Trump, and just a huge
55:20
20 point difference between exit polls
55:22
and current polls now, and
55:25
that being in very important states like Nevada
55:27
and Arizona. But, you
55:29
know, Trump knows that he gets one more
55:31
shot, and I know that if you talk to
55:33
the really hyperventilating people, it's like, no,
55:35
no, he's gonna never leave. It's like, that's not gonna happen.
55:37
I'm sorry, it's not gonna happen. And I will put my
55:40
money on it right now, and we'll
55:42
come back in four years, in five years, whatever,
55:44
and I will be right, and I'm very confident
55:46
in that for a variety of reasons. But
55:49
what he's actually interested in is
55:51
keeping the party in his image when people, when
55:54
he's no longer there for people to be afraid
55:56
of him. And that's why you see
55:58
very small things like Laura Trump. is
56:00
now, what, co-chair? Not
56:02
a small thing. Not a small
56:04
thing. All the money that Republicans
56:07
raise goes to Trump's legal
56:09
fans. Local races go through a
56:11
Trump family member now. And
56:13
it went through people who were sick of fans
56:16
of Trump before. But that can move, right? And
56:18
particularly when he's off the scene. If he dies,
56:20
if he has one more, and also he's gonna
56:22
do three more turns, he's like, dude, he's also
56:25
gonna be 87, so. He's
56:28
not getting better. And
56:31
so you have this thing of like,
56:33
you know, entrenching power,
56:37
that I think that there's a possibility, a very
56:39
real possibility, that the Republican
56:41
Party can boomerang back in some way. Well, no,
56:43
no, it's forever. It's like, well, no. There
56:46
was a neocon period that lasted an
56:48
amount of time that everyone who wrote books about this said it was
56:50
gonna last forever. Literally, that this
56:53
is it. It's been taken over by
56:55
neocons. That's it. You can fuck
56:57
up big time like Iraq,
57:00
and even I would say to a lesser degree Afghanistan,
57:02
which had less resonance in that way. And
57:05
people don't like you anymore, right? You
57:07
have the, you know, Taftian Republicans,
57:09
the kind of isolationist Republicans, that 1937, 38,
57:12
39, and
57:14
then on the day after Pearl Harbor, the
57:17
day after, literally the day after, was the
57:19
dissolution of the America First Committee. It
57:22
ended itself the following day. And that ended.
57:24
And they have all these periods of different
57:26
types of Republican parties. So I don't think
57:28
it's gonna last forever, but he's trying to
57:31
make sure that it does. One
57:33
thing about the Howard Kurtz interview, and when
57:35
people talk about the bloodbath,
57:39
why are you focusing on this when there's other things
57:41
to focus on that have the same word? Right
57:44
in the root. And I'm gonna read you what Howard Kurtz
57:46
said. Why do you use words like vermin and
57:49
poisoning of the blood? The press,
57:51
as you know, immediately reacts to that by saying, well, that's
57:53
the kind of language that Hitler and Mussolini used. Trump's
57:56
response. Because our country
57:58
is being poisoned. There's
58:00
nothing ambiguous about that. There's
58:02
no debate we can have over and over and over,
58:04
but what those words mean, that's bad
58:07
stuff right there. Very obviously because our
58:09
country is being poisoned. It's not. It's
58:12
not being poisoned. There's enormous amounts
58:14
of problems that are happening because
58:16
of the problems at the border. And we've
58:18
talked about them, and I think that maybe even
58:20
alienated some real, I have
58:22
anyway, rock-ribbed libertarian open borders types.
58:25
And I apologize for that, but
58:27
my baggage has moved a little bit on this. But
58:30
that kind of language, because our country
58:32
is being poisoned, you don't
58:34
need to invent shit for Donald Trump. So
58:37
keep to the stuff like that. Yeah, and
58:39
also tether it to stuff that he has
58:41
latitude or would have latitude as president. President
58:43
has a lot of latitude
58:45
on trade deals. He
58:47
wants 100% tariff on cars
58:51
from red China. Yeah, bill
58:53
in Mexico. And like 10%. Yeah, exactly, yeah. Universal
58:56
10% tariff everywhere. It's
58:58
insane. It's a horrible idea. Like
59:01
in an impoverishing idea. Both parties
59:03
love it. And he also
59:05
is, as a president, you
59:08
have a lot of latitude in immigration policy. And some of
59:10
it you might like, depending on where you're at. Some
59:13
of it is going to be draconian. And if
59:15
it was up to him, and remember in his
59:17
first administration, he really did try a Muslim ban.
59:20
It was thrown out in the courts. It
59:23
was modified, became seven countries that were predominantly
59:25
Muslim or whatever. But
59:28
the attempt was there from
59:30
the beginning. One has to
59:32
accept that he did say that it would
59:34
only be in place until he could figure
59:36
out what's going on. What's going on? And
59:38
also like give that motherfucking credit. Give
59:42
that motherfucking credit. How
59:45
many times have everyone
59:47
used that phrase? We
59:50
need to like stop Peter Suderman until we can find out
59:52
what's going on. I
59:55
at least think that on a daily basis. No,
59:58
it's genius. these turns
1:00:00
of, what's, what is the Joe Biden turn of
1:00:02
phrase besides come on man? No, I mean, come
1:00:04
on man. I mean, it's good. Yeah,
1:00:07
but he's got, he's got, I'm not kidding
1:00:09
around. He's got, I mean, he doesn't have
1:00:11
a you'd be in jail, which is possibly
1:00:13
one of the greatest moments in debate. That's
1:00:15
pretty good. And people need to separate the
1:00:17
art from the artist and realize that
1:00:19
regardless of what he is, that
1:00:22
was a fucking, wrong
1:00:25
and Donald Trump. Yeah, wrong is
1:00:28
also really, really good. I might've used
1:00:30
that recently. The thing that people
1:00:33
don't connect because I think we've had this
1:00:35
conversation before of the complications that come with,
1:00:38
I think I've touched on this maybe on Megan
1:00:40
McCain's podcast when I was on it recently, the
1:00:42
complications that people have when dealing with economic policy.
1:00:45
And it's very, very tough to figure this
1:00:47
stuff out. And that's why when you're young,
1:00:49
that radical socialist policies seem to
1:00:51
just make everybody be equal, just
1:00:54
share everything. And no one person can make that much. And
1:00:56
it's like, oh, that makes sense. And it doesn't make any
1:00:58
sense. But the thing that the
1:01:00
average person is not connecting here is that
1:01:02
when you go on and everyone's talking about
1:01:04
blood sucking, fucking blood baths and
1:01:06
vermin and like reacting to the language and
1:01:09
they should react to the ones that are
1:01:11
real and not the ones that aren't real, is
1:01:13
that what is a 100%
1:01:15
tariff, 10%
1:01:18
tariff, 15% tariff on anything? It's
1:01:20
inflationary. What is the argument
1:01:22
that Donald Trump is making about the economy
1:01:24
that we have out of control inflation? And
1:01:27
you are in the next breath saying,
1:01:30
well, I need to do things that will
1:01:32
be wildly inflationary, increase the tax of goods
1:01:34
for poor people across the country. Maybe
1:01:37
talk about that, that'd be substantial, but
1:01:40
it's not gonna get you the mediate hit. It's not
1:01:42
gonna have Jen Psaki breathing heavily
1:01:44
and saying, oh my God, how horrible it
1:01:46
is. Yeah, the reason he's gonna win this
1:01:48
election now is that we know he's horrible
1:01:51
and nobody fucking cares. I
1:01:53
don't know why they don't care, but they don't fucking
1:01:55
care. That's when you are diagnosing
1:01:57
something just in a clinical kind of
1:01:59
way. is like I just can tell you, I don't
1:02:02
know why, I don't know how to make them
1:02:04
care, but if you keep telling them, it's not
1:02:06
gonna work, because it never has, they don't care.
1:02:08
I'm still on record as it was on Megan
1:02:10
Kelly last time, and we're going on again, I
1:02:12
think next week. Next week, right? Should be a
1:02:14
bloodbath. Oh, great, yeah. I
1:02:17
hope it's all about a trans-fony Willis. I
1:02:19
don't think that he's gonna win, I would
1:02:21
still bet. My bet is that I wish
1:02:24
he probably would just bet. I
1:02:26
mean, I don't engage in those wagers.
1:02:30
I do, yeah. I'll let you guys do it, I will hold the,
1:02:35
I will put the Bruins tickets that will no longer
1:02:37
be good, because the person will give them to me,
1:02:39
or I'll buy them from him, and I'll go to
1:02:41
the game on Thursday, and I will put that on,
1:02:43
yeah, I will bet that. I'll
1:02:45
put the Stubbs autograph by Brad Marsh on the
1:02:47
table. That's fair enough. Or Bobby Orr. But you
1:02:49
still don't think he'll win. It's,
1:02:52
I don't have a lot of confidence in
1:02:55
it, but I think that there's a ceiling on his
1:02:57
attraction to the American people,
1:03:01
and that he's like,
1:03:04
actually the Laura Trump situation is bad
1:03:06
for him, or it
1:03:08
indicates a badness. There's gonna be
1:03:10
such a spending mismatch. Just the challenges that
1:03:12
the RNC is having. I mean, just, they
1:03:15
have a huge challenge on raising money. Yeah.
1:03:18
He can look really great in a
1:03:20
Republican primary, he can squash the competition.
1:03:22
He did, absolutely did. He has full
1:03:25
control over the party. There's no question
1:03:27
about that. It's very impressive to take
1:03:29
over a party. And at
1:03:31
the same time, he has not
1:03:33
shown in a
1:03:35
really, really long time, basically since election day in
1:03:38
2016, that
1:03:40
he can get even a plurality of
1:03:43
independents and people who are not Republican
1:03:45
party members. And
1:03:47
he's been polling better than them, better
1:03:49
than Joe Biden among independents for a
1:03:51
good while now, including in all the
1:03:54
swing states. Yeah. So there's all
1:03:56
that. I still think that there is that, I
1:03:59
think it's more of a... right? That
1:04:02
the reality hasn't sunk in, that
1:04:05
he's going to be the nominee and that changes
1:04:07
the dynamic of things. And
1:04:09
then just this wild card, I mean he's,
1:04:12
what was it, $462 million he's
1:04:14
got to cop up by like Tuesday. Yeah,
1:04:16
and they're gonna start seizing his assets. Some
1:04:18
of that will be down to his benefit
1:04:21
because it'll seem like people are coming after
1:04:23
him unfairly, which they are. There's no question
1:04:25
of, I think, that the
1:04:27
legal system in certain places are
1:04:29
coming after him unfairly and disproportionately.
1:04:33
Some of it also is just going to be
1:04:35
deleterious to his campaign, the functioning of it. Why
1:04:38
do you think people don't care about that? About
1:04:40
what? About the situation? The
1:04:43
fact that we have
1:04:45
reams of evidence that
1:04:48
when you do stuff like this happens,
1:04:50
and I know the response would be,
1:04:52
well it should happen because it's real
1:04:54
and he should be prosecuted, blah blah
1:04:57
blah, but that these people want to
1:04:59
see Donald Trump just erased from the political
1:05:01
scene. I wouldn't be
1:05:03
upset about that either, but they've been
1:05:06
trying to take shortcuts forever to do this
1:05:08
and every time it blows up in their
1:05:10
face and they keep on pushing it and
1:05:12
they cannot separate two things. That if you
1:05:14
are on this podcast saying, as
1:05:16
Matt just said, they're going after him
1:05:19
and I think it's partially unfair
1:05:21
that the people who are desperate
1:05:23
to get rid of him, the sort of
1:05:26
anti, the real dug-in
1:05:28
anti-Trump people would be so upset by
1:05:30
that because they can't separate the
1:05:33
fact that he's a shitty person and
1:05:36
bad for the country politically, I think. And
1:05:39
I can hold a separate thought in my head that I
1:05:42
don't think that Leticia
1:05:45
James is doing the
1:05:47
right thing here and doing it for the right reasons and
1:05:49
I think it's slightly unfair. And like
1:05:51
85 million dollars to Eugene Carroll seems like a
1:05:53
lot. It seems like a lot. It seems like
1:05:55
a lot, particularly when you actually not many people
1:05:58
follow the internet to that case. And
1:06:01
the reason was that
1:06:03
there was no Lewinsky type stuff. There
1:06:10
was no like you remember the dress, the
1:06:12
stain, and the cigar, and all this stuff.
1:06:15
It was just like she didn't really remember
1:06:17
this, that, and the other. And it just
1:06:19
didn't strike a lot of people as plausible.
1:06:22
And I just most people... Or maybe
1:06:24
not plausible, but like, you
1:06:26
know, open and shut provable.
1:06:29
Exactly, exactly. Yeah, exactly. And
1:06:31
I don't know what happened, but
1:06:34
when I paid attention to it, I was
1:06:36
like, it doesn't strike me that this is
1:06:38
a slam dunk in any way. And
1:06:41
you know, it was also imagine if
1:06:43
the case was against Barack Obama
1:06:45
and it was ginned up at
1:06:47
a Glenn Beck dinner party.
1:06:50
You know, I mean, that's what happened. I
1:06:53
was, you know, literally she was
1:06:55
drafted into this after
1:06:57
telling a story, I suppose. But it was that
1:06:59
it was, you know, you can, it's public record
1:07:01
that it was George Conway and
1:07:03
Molly John Fast house or something similar
1:07:05
to that. So look it up. Don't trust
1:07:08
me on that. But, and I'm not
1:07:10
saying that that's only doesn't change whether that's true or not.
1:07:12
But I think if the situation was Glenn
1:07:15
Beck's dinner party in the
1:07:17
real anti-Obama types and somebody was
1:07:19
there and yeah, I
1:07:21
think they'd be a little more skeptical. Can we
1:07:24
go back to the Trump won't
1:07:26
win thing? That's not
1:07:28
like declaration, it's just my suspicion. If I
1:07:30
had to bet, that's it. But
1:07:32
Moynihan, you sent a message
1:07:34
earlier to our text thread. It was Harry
1:07:37
Enten, like looking through the maps.
1:07:40
Yeah. In particular pointing to Arizona
1:07:42
and Nevada and the fact that Trump is
1:07:44
ahead in both of these states at
1:07:46
the moment. There's a state that, you know, Biden
1:07:48
in 2020, like just barely even out a win
1:07:50
there. Like between those states and
1:07:53
various other battleground states where Trump
1:07:55
is doing better than anticipated. He
1:07:58
also points out. Wisconsin,
1:08:00
Michigan, and his, and
1:08:03
go watch it, because
1:08:05
I don't want to screw up what Harry said, but he
1:08:08
basically said that Biden would have
1:08:11
to win like all
1:08:14
of them, three, and he's just getting crushed or
1:08:16
not doing well in almost all
1:08:18
of them now, and he would have to
1:08:20
run cables. Yeah, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin. Yeah,
1:08:22
Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and whoever
1:08:25
the other host was, you know, when Harry's
1:08:27
standing in front of the big screen. And
1:08:30
by the way, I have to say, for
1:08:32
America's political culture, the big screen people we
1:08:34
have are fucking great. They're good. Harry
1:08:37
Enten is so good. He's good, John King
1:08:39
is good. John King is good. Especially when
1:08:41
he's drunk. And yeah, when Bin Laden is
1:08:43
killed, and he's like, he's a god.
1:08:47
I know them, but respect my king. And
1:08:49
for some reason, people don't really know about
1:08:51
this, when Bin Laden was killed in 2011,
1:08:53
I think, 11. I
1:08:57
think so, and he was out with his
1:09:00
then wife, who's Dana Bash, and was called
1:09:02
back to, and that's his end.
1:09:04
It's a big deal. Absolutely juiced, and it's
1:09:06
the best. He's an Irish guy from Dorchester,
1:09:08
Mass. It's the best. But a lot of
1:09:10
respect for him, and Steve Kornacki, too. But
1:09:13
his, what Harry
1:09:16
says there. You say Steve Kornacki, too.
1:09:18
Yeah, Steve Kornacki's best top pyramid. Yeah,
1:09:21
everyone who looks at this podcast knows that
1:09:23
we revere the Steve Kornacki. Frequent
1:09:26
guest and our friend. But
1:09:30
what Harry says during that, he says, and
1:09:32
this is the exact quote, he
1:09:34
says it's game over. If the map
1:09:36
stays what it is now, it's game over button. There's
1:09:38
no way he can win. Yeah, for me, it's just
1:09:40
like, it's that if. It's if, yeah, it is where
1:09:42
we are now. It's a lot of things to happen.
1:09:45
No, I mean, it's so early. It's so early, especially
1:09:47
for these two. And we
1:09:49
have the, you know. But this isn't Dukakis, is what I'm
1:09:51
saying. Yeah. I
1:09:53
mean, on one hand, there is, Biden
1:09:56
is historically unpopular. We've never seen it.
1:09:59
Never have seen. And people think, oh,
1:10:01
he's just as unpopular as Donald Trump
1:10:03
was. He's not. At
1:10:05
this stage in Trump's presidency, there's a material
1:10:07
difference between the two. It's a problem. And
1:10:10
it's funny because the delusions that you got
1:10:12
from the pro-Trump people during the Trump administration,
1:10:14
they were so bad at it. And
1:10:17
they were like the conservative C-listers of DC
1:10:19
that came out of like, who are these
1:10:21
like, oh, I once I saw that guy
1:10:23
once at some leadership institute conference or whatever
1:10:26
you happen to walk by. And
1:10:29
when you have the opposite
1:10:32
of that with Biden, they're
1:10:34
more sophisticated at it, but they're just as bad
1:10:36
in the sense that all of
1:10:39
the argument about this is that he has
1:10:41
historically low approval ratings. So
1:10:43
what is wrong? What's the matter with
1:10:45
Kansas? How do they not realize
1:10:47
that everything is great? And who is
1:10:49
lying to them and tricking
1:10:52
them into thinking that things aren't great,
1:10:54
which is that false consciousness stuff does
1:10:56
not play well with the American people.
1:10:59
And it also ends up being like
1:11:01
this really weird circular firing squad, brow
1:11:03
beating the media. Like you
1:11:05
are using the wrong adjectives to describe
1:11:07
Trump, you're platforming him and you
1:11:10
are not like. This is James Comey and
1:11:12
Hillary all over again. Emphasizing the stakes at
1:11:14
every moment in every dispute and like weighing
1:11:17
it. And we're going to see a lot
1:11:19
of that. And that's is alienating
1:11:22
people. I mean, you asked
1:11:24
me earlier, like, why doesn't the bad
1:11:26
Trump stuff stick to Trump?
1:11:30
And it is the ultimate, I
1:11:32
think, question of
1:11:34
his role in
1:11:36
American political life and popularity,
1:11:39
which is that he
1:11:41
is this, this kind
1:11:43
of totem, something that people use
1:11:46
to get back at
1:11:48
an elite that they hate. Correct.
1:11:51
And so when the elite responds by saying
1:11:53
you should hate him more, like, cool, that
1:11:56
proves my point. And we're in
1:11:58
that loop. I think if your
1:12:01
parents tell you not to smoke, you start to smoke. It
1:12:05
explains you. They
1:12:08
tell me to smoke and I was like, that's good.
1:12:11
Smart. Can you give
1:12:13
us some fucking Camelites? No, no,
1:12:15
no, no. LS MFT,
1:12:17
Lucky Strike means fine tobacco. My
1:12:19
dad smoked so so it was Lucky Strikes. Did he send you to
1:12:22
the corn store to get some? Correct. And
1:12:26
guess what I picked up when I was there? My
1:12:28
own package. Yeah.
1:12:31
I mean, stop the media. Stop telling
1:12:33
your kids not to smoke. Stop telling them everyone.
1:12:36
You got to have a confidence
1:12:38
filter in them cigarettes. Stop
1:12:40
believing that the new adjective, you're going to find
1:12:42
it. You're going to find it. It's going to
1:12:44
be like, the new case, the new adjective. Unobtainium.
1:12:46
If you're going to get it, it's really going
1:12:48
to fucking work this time. You would
1:12:51
say that as a hetero, a rock sex
1:12:53
skit. I don't remember the word. What did
1:12:55
you wear? I've never used. Hack
1:12:57
ox, homo-docks. I don't know.
1:13:01
No, it's, they are in
1:13:04
that loop and they are gearing
1:13:06
themselves up for another season. This
1:13:08
would be like the third or fourth political season
1:13:10
of doing that. Yeah. And
1:13:13
you're not persuading people. I
1:13:15
don't think. If people were to
1:13:17
say like, okay, you know,
1:13:20
there's been a thing in the past couple of days because
1:13:22
I don't, I don't still quite understand
1:13:24
why people go through like one transcript in front
1:13:26
of them. What did they say here? If
1:13:29
you were to go back into the archive of
1:13:31
this podcast, you could probably string
1:13:33
things together to make us the most anti-Trump podcast
1:13:37
ever invented and one that is defending
1:13:39
Trump all the time. Mostly Camille just
1:13:41
saying MAGA. Yeah. Yeah.
1:13:45
But you're saying that if you wanted to sum it
1:13:47
up, I would
1:13:49
say, and I say this for all three
1:13:51
of us, I think it's probably just, you know, all three of
1:13:53
us kind of have this instinct is
1:13:56
what, and I think this is exactly where
1:13:58
I stand now. Is it the modern? the modern Republican
1:14:01
party and the modern conservative movement
1:14:04
is a disgrace. And
1:14:06
the media is a disgrace too. And
1:14:08
those in, in, in, because of the disgracefulness
1:14:11
of the modern Republican party, it
1:14:13
has made that disgraceful media a thousand times worse. A
1:14:16
thousand times worse. I mean, I lived
1:14:18
through this at a place that
1:14:20
had no credibility and squandered whatever credibility
1:14:22
it had very quickly. Which won the
1:14:24
daily piece or the No, not that.
1:14:28
Did I work? I don't remember that one. The last one you
1:14:30
said I'm not familiar with. Yeah. But it
1:14:32
was like, you know, as I said, one time
1:14:35
this podcast said you would never have known for
1:14:37
the year, first year of Joe Biden's presidency that
1:14:39
he was president. It was
1:14:41
all about QAnon and all about
1:14:44
MAGA and all about Proud for
1:14:46
MAGA. It was Ultra MAGA. But it was
1:14:48
like they couldn't get on. That's not, it
1:14:50
was Ultra MAGA, probably. My
1:14:52
name is Ultra MAGA. I love Ultra
1:14:55
MAGA. I was just like, so
1:14:57
we'll say MAGA, but just say Ultra, like that's
1:14:59
great. Like, yes. And then say
1:15:01
that it wants to like cut social
1:15:03
security. Yeah, exactly. Now I'm talking about
1:15:05
Ultra Super MAGA to transform a Republican
1:15:07
party as a conversion. How
1:15:10
many Yeezys has he bought tonight?
1:15:12
Seven. Yeah. Just
1:15:14
cleaning up. You suggested that I make
1:15:16
this investment. And it does. Nobody said
1:15:18
that. Matt did.
1:15:21
Matt did. Why don't
1:15:23
you use some arbitrage in the market
1:15:26
You're right, Matt. I mean, Matt is another
1:15:28
white man trying to back up
1:15:30
the black man. But
1:15:35
the QAnon shit, it's
1:15:37
just so easy. The
1:15:39
villains are so easy. There's no moral challenge to
1:15:41
it at all. Do you remember? You didn't talk
1:15:43
about that anymore. When was the last time you
1:15:46
heard anything about QAnon? Well, that's just because, yeah.
1:15:48
That's just because, that's it. They
1:15:52
were hardly alone. They were hardly alone. But
1:15:54
I mean, they were the worst. Do you
1:15:56
remember? It was an ascendant cult.
1:15:59
Like it was gonna. take over America. We found Q. You remember that?
1:16:01
And it was some Asian kid. Seriously. Ian
1:16:08
Miles Chon? Yes.
1:16:12
No, we don't call him by that name. We call
1:16:14
him the black people fighting
1:16:16
Twitter again. That's all he does. What
1:16:19
is QAnon, the viral pro-Trump conspiracy theory? This is
1:16:21
in the New York Times. It was viral because
1:16:23
they kept on making it go viral. It's literally-
1:16:26
Like Kevin Roos. But it's hilarious. Wasn't Kevin on
1:16:28
the podcast? He was. He was, yeah. Kevin Crews?
1:16:30
I wonder if he would admit that. Carter-
1:16:34
Connor Crews. No, he-
1:16:36
that thing was really funny because when
1:16:39
the QAnon people- when
1:16:42
the vice-a-b-d-be like, do you know how crazy these people are?
1:16:44
They think JFK Jr. is coming back in
1:16:46
Dallas and I'm like, oh, is that what they
1:16:48
said? Let me see. That's what they said. Yeah,
1:16:50
okay, great. Do you know what that tells me?
1:16:52
Is it literally no one
1:16:54
believes? That there's a core group of
1:16:56
mentally ill people that you are focusing
1:16:58
on- And Roger Stone. Well,
1:17:01
Roger Stone doesn't believe anything. That's a mean asset.
1:17:03
Yeah, and Roger Stone. Yeah. And
1:17:05
that is like you're focusing on- there
1:17:07
was a podcast
1:17:09
I heard a long time ago, an
1:17:11
Australian podcast, and it was this woman whose mother,
1:17:13
Australian mother, this shows you how it has nothing
1:17:15
to do with the fucking media in America. All
1:17:18
these people in Europe, there
1:17:21
was a QAnon movement in Germany, and
1:17:23
this woman's Australian mother got super into
1:17:25
QAnon and you're hearing this podcast, it
1:17:27
was pretty interesting, and it's like, oh,
1:17:29
wow, your mother's descending late in life
1:17:31
into mental illness. And this
1:17:33
is what she glommed onto. And
1:17:36
it's just probably from a fucking
1:17:38
MSNBC article. She was like, QAnon,
1:17:40
that sounds interesting. What's that? So
1:17:42
you're saying MSNBC was amplifying the
1:17:45
whole QAnon podcast? I don't think that's
1:17:47
the verb that he used. I think, yeah.
1:17:49
I would say that that was
1:17:51
probably right. It was amplification. Yeah, I don't want to
1:17:53
use that because it's already been used and I'm a
1:17:56
hadorRoxist. Right. I'm just
1:17:58
heterodos. HadorRoxist. And
1:18:01
I like just the only opposite of every issue. I
1:18:03
don't have any believe It
1:18:16
just all comes back in one hand Not
1:18:21
that there's anything wrong with no no
1:18:23
no pride we we got we got
1:18:25
like three Because these
1:18:27
emails from sub-stag and somebody subscribed
1:18:30
Mm-hmm, and it says like where
1:18:32
they came from hmm It's a they click through
1:18:34
from a recommendation from you've seen this in
1:18:36
the last bunch. We're from Andrew Sullivan. Oh,
1:18:39
yeah So you just really
1:18:41
shot us out about man, correct? Yes. Yeah,
1:18:43
I think Andrew would be very proud of
1:18:45
me for saying darling
1:18:47
I do too You've
1:18:50
been back on since the like the
1:18:52
tide pools episode
1:18:56
His podcast twice since then I think
1:18:58
we need no Fun
1:19:03
gasps, I don't give a shit what he says
1:19:05
or what you think of him He's just a
1:19:07
fun guest who loves playing along and and who
1:19:10
don't look at me when you say what you
1:19:12
think of it I love and I don't look
1:19:14
at you said so I didn't Know
1:19:17
we didn't like Yeah,
1:19:22
okay, I know you're Jamaican mother-in-law Well,
1:19:25
no don't talk about it to my mama I'm
1:19:40
working on her. Yeah, I got on is she voting for
1:19:42
Trump? Who knows
1:19:45
day to day one doesn't know I saw it
1:19:47
Harry and he after he had the Hispanics
1:19:49
He had black voters to throw my money and
1:19:52
yes She
1:19:57
Yeah, does she self-identify come here
1:20:00
As my mom. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
1:20:04
That's right. I'm Camille's mother. She's
1:20:06
never cared about that. We're Camille's. We identify as
1:20:08
Camille's co-podcasters. Yeah. Is
1:20:11
there anything else that happened in the world or something? Keep it to
1:20:13
the tight 130. No, you know.
1:20:17
Probably fine. Are we good? I
1:20:19
got a flight out in the morning and then I'll be
1:20:21
back next week, which is crazy. Isn't it better when you're
1:20:24
here, Camille? It's fun when I'm here. Do you want
1:20:26
to reflect on that? But you know what? Abstinence
1:20:29
makes the heart grow fonder. Is that what this
1:20:31
expression is? I think it is. I
1:20:33
don't think. That's what my wife told me. Yeah.
1:20:36
Yeah. Yeah. That's for all
1:20:38
the women who won't fuck me. Sorry.
1:20:44
Sorry if your kids are listening. I'm
1:20:46
getting it. No. If your
1:20:48
kids are listening, did you say I be getting it? I do. I
1:20:50
think I do. That's what we do. I say
1:20:52
that too. And it's one of the reasons I don't get
1:20:54
it. No, that's not true at all. I'm doing great. Yeah.
1:20:58
I'm cleaning up. I'm cleaning up, but
1:21:00
it's great. And I'm in my prime, which is the best
1:21:02
part. You're in your prime and you've been with the same
1:21:04
women since you were 15? Yeah. Sixteen.
1:21:08
Sixteen. You stayed at three different hotels
1:21:10
while you were here? Yeah. Yeah,
1:21:12
it's a little weird. Yeah. It
1:21:14
was mostly in the same first three hours when
1:21:16
I got here. It's as if you showed up
1:21:18
to a place and it got soiled and
1:21:20
then you showed up to a new place.
1:21:24
No, I had a series of weird situations.
1:21:26
You know how badly? I want to say
1:21:28
something to be honest with you and I
1:21:30
want all of your listeners to, if you've
1:21:33
made it this far, use your imagination. Yeah.
1:21:36
Matt just said, you know, he's there for
1:21:38
anything else to leave. Yeah. And
1:21:40
in my head, I had a scenario that
1:21:42
I almost blurted out and I realized that I
1:21:45
cannot do a Chinese
1:21:47
accent and say, you get
1:21:49
out of here in a
1:21:52
Chinese accent from all the places you've been
1:21:54
on Canal Street in the past couple of
1:21:56
days. You cannot sleep
1:21:58
here in a Chinese accent. and just
1:22:00
use the AI to do it. I'm
1:22:04
gonna have Moynihan racist Chinese AI.
1:22:07
Well, yeah, I mean, you can just use my voice
1:22:10
and have Chad GPT destroy
1:22:12
my life. My
1:22:14
usual place was sold out, so I tried a
1:22:16
different place. Sold out? A chain
1:22:18
of hotels. Of Robin Cook joints,
1:22:21
just like so crazy. There
1:22:23
were new forms of life growing in the
1:22:25
shower, and then I got
1:22:28
to the other one, and it was
1:22:30
teeming with grain flies. Wow. It's
1:22:32
just unbelievable crazy. The
1:22:35
guy shows up to my room from downstairs
1:22:37
to take a look at the situation. He
1:22:39
has gloves and a pesticide bottle his hands.
1:22:41
Like, you want me to spray it? And I was like, no,
1:22:43
no, no, no, let me spray these. This isn't gonna work. Maybe
1:22:45
if he's dead, I won't stay here. Go
1:22:49
to places that were oriented around like $79 a
1:22:51
day. Come
1:22:55
stay down here, dugs. The
1:22:57
last time. The last
1:22:59
time. Doug's Road Motel. Wake up, daughter. Doug's
1:23:02
Road Kill. The
1:23:04
last time we had a podcast that Matt
1:23:06
wasn't on was because he was like, ha,
1:23:09
ha, ha, ha, Barstow,
1:23:12
what, what the fuck is he? That's
1:23:15
$79 free parking. Yeah. He's
1:23:18
gonna be half a biscuit of the morning. It's
1:23:21
the owner of the time's free fuel. Curve
1:23:23
your own. We
1:23:26
have internet. One
1:23:28
internet connection that everyone shares. The
1:23:31
one thing I love about LA, and
1:23:33
there's a lot of things I love about LA, there's a lot of
1:23:35
crappy things, but a lot of things I love about LA. If you
1:23:38
get off, I guess it's the 10 or the 405, and
1:23:41
you get on to Sepulveda, that
1:23:44
long stretch of Sepulveda, which I guess
1:23:46
goes towards, goes north, I
1:23:48
guess, towards the reason I was, it has
1:23:50
all these old motels, and it comes with
1:23:53
all the original signs. It's
1:23:55
so crazy, it's like a movie set, and it's so
1:23:57
awesome, and the greatest thing about it is
1:23:59
it's still. People
1:24:03
have the signs free HBO, which I was
1:24:05
like, that was a thing that people would
1:24:07
be like, I'm really tired, but
1:24:10
which one has HBO? We've got beds.
1:24:12
Yeah, it was like, every time
1:24:15
they said which one has home
1:24:17
boss office. So I
1:24:19
can watch Not Necessarily the News. You're
1:24:23
not necessarily the news? The
1:24:25
original Jon Stewart, I guess, right?
1:24:28
Oh, man. Not Necessarily the
1:24:30
News. All right. Okay. All
1:24:33
right. That was fun. Yeah, well, it's
1:24:35
been a good week so far. It's been a good week so far. Knocked a couple
1:24:37
out real fast, didn't we? Yeah. You know, and
1:24:39
they're not all about the same subject. No. I
1:24:42
was also going to make a joke about you
1:24:44
going back. It's uncomfortable not to be doing the
1:24:46
equivalent of 40,000 words about one topic. Weird.
1:24:51
About you going to the hotel and knocking a
1:24:53
couple out? Yeah,
1:24:56
that's not what happened. Careful
1:25:00
for the flies. Yeah. Yeah. I'm
1:25:03
fine now. I'm good now. And
1:25:06
fuck y'all. All right. Okay. Bye.
1:25:25
Bye.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More