Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:04
Hello everyone
0:08
and welcome to the Filmcast,
0:10
a podcast about movies. I'm
0:23
David Chen and yeah I'm into Dune,
0:25
Dune 2 screenings of this movie this
0:28
week. Joining me today is David
0:30
your heart-o-war. Check out my new book, The
0:32
Ben and Jesrit Voice for Parents. Go to
0:34
bed! Don't touch that. And
0:37
Jeff Kanata. In the
0:39
words of the Emperor, there's so
0:41
many dunes. I
0:46
hate you Jeff. Those
0:49
are of course all vague and oblique references to the
0:51
fact. Blackis, so
0:53
many dunes. How
0:56
many dunes are
0:58
on this crazy planet? That's
1:03
a lot of dunes. I
1:07
don't think the Emperor would really be saying
1:09
that though. I think the Emperor would know
1:11
how many dunes there are. That's the issue.
1:13
What do you... Tell me, what do you...
1:15
about these dunes? There's
1:18
so many. Also
1:22
apparently very repetitive. This
1:25
Emperor... I count
1:27
them one, two, three dunes. It
1:36
doesn't get funnier the more you do it. It
1:39
really does. For me it does. But the fact
1:41
that it doesn't get funnier is what is funny
1:43
about it. Alright.
1:52
Those are of course all vague and
1:54
oblique references to the fact that today on
1:56
the podcast we're going to be reviewing Dune
1:58
Part 2. We got... filmmaker Vincenzo
2:00
Natale joining us. Wow. Wow. That
2:03
conversation. Yes. Um, that's really cool.
2:05
It's very cool. I agree. Also,
2:07
it's great that Jeff is acting
2:09
surprised about that because
2:12
we already recorded that segment. But
2:14
this movie, this podcast magic, folks,
2:16
is, um, yeah, at this moment
2:18
in time, you don't know that
2:20
we've already recorded that. And so,
2:22
uh, it's amazing. It's amazing. Anyway,
2:25
uh, today on the podcast, got, uh,
2:27
one big monumental piece of film news
2:29
that we want to discuss and then
2:31
some, what we've been watching lots to
2:33
discuss there before we get to weekly
2:36
plugs. And then our conversation about doing
2:38
to, uh, find more episodes of this
2:40
podcast at the filmcast.com email us at
2:42
slash [email protected]. And I
2:44
want to point out we're posting regular video
2:46
clips on our Instagram channel at instagram.com at
2:49
the filmcast pod, also youtube.com/at the
2:51
filmcast pod. Uh, be sure
2:53
to find us on those channels. And
2:55
also we're on tiktok at film, uh, at
2:57
the filmcast. Check us out there
3:00
and, uh, see us talking about all the
3:02
stuff that you hear us talking about right
3:04
here on the filmcast. Of course, patreon.com/film podcast,
3:07
a film podcast where you can sign up
3:09
for ad free episodes and
3:11
exclusive after dark on this last week's episode of
3:13
the after dark. We
3:15
discussed dune part one. Also,
3:17
uh, next week we're going
3:19
to be discussing David Lynch's dune. And also
3:22
if you're a patron at any tier, you
3:24
are, you got to hear our dune to review just
3:27
a little bit early. Uh, we
3:29
try to do that whenever we have a chance to
3:31
do that. So, uh, yes, patreon.com size film podcasts. It's
3:33
where all the cool kids are and where all the
3:35
cool benefits are. Uh, thanks to everyone who
3:37
makes this podcast possible quick
3:40
correction from last week's episode of the podcast.
3:43
We talked about driveway dolls last week, a movie
3:45
that all of us really liked all of us
3:47
had a great time with. Yeah. Uh,
3:49
and we referred to the main
3:51
actress, uh, one of the main
3:53
actresses in that movie, uh, but,
3:55
uh, mispronounced her name, Margaret quality is
3:58
the name of the actress. Marker
4:00
quality kept saying quailie. That's my
4:02
bad quality rhymes with Wally. A
4:04
few people wrote in about that I've always thought quailie too.
4:07
So yeah, it's me. Sorry about that.
4:09
But yeah, Margaret quality. Thanks for the corrections We
4:11
always try to be accurate with our pronunciation and
4:13
facts but anyway, you
4:16
know, we have a text thread between the three
4:18
of us and We
4:22
don't text each other all the time but whenever
4:24
something notable happens We'll throw each other a text
4:26
and Jeff you sent the text this week with
4:29
some very exciting news And I think you
4:31
know and I will say in general
4:35
Jeff Kanata does not necessarily originate the
4:37
movie news You know like yeah, just
4:39
cuz there's very little in the movie
4:42
news that really gets Jeff's
4:44
blood pumping But this is monumental. I save
4:46
it. Yeah, yes, it matters to me the
4:49
most So What
4:51
was this piece of film news that you saw this
4:53
week that you needed to share with us? I shared
4:55
it and I said we have to talk about this
4:57
on the show and now we're talking about and I
4:59
agree 100% that we have to talk about it.
5:01
Okay, so incredible news incredible
5:04
news one of my favorite movies
5:06
as a kid movie franchises and He's
5:09
getting remade and
5:12
that franchise is Naked Gun. Mm-hmm.
5:14
Mm-hmm And the news this
5:16
week is that Naked Gun remake is is
5:18
a go with
5:20
Liam Neeson in the
5:22
Leslie Nielsen role
5:25
the main character and it's
5:27
gonna be Directed by some
5:29
very funny people who make very funny
5:32
movies Whose
5:34
names I not have in front of you right now Let's
5:38
make a lonely island guys. You're referring to Akiva
5:40
Shafer. Yeah, thank you I was I just wanted
5:42
to go to Eva Goldsmith and I knew that
5:44
was wrong It's
5:47
gonna be directed by Akiva Shafer
5:49
super talented director. Yeah and like
5:51
kind of the Lonely Island persuasion
5:54
That's the exact combination. I want to hear
5:57
you're talking about Naked Gun. Yeah. Yeah The
6:00
most recent thing he directed was the Chip and
6:03
Dale Rescue Rangers movie, which I think is brilliant
6:05
Yeah, pop star pop star never stop never stop
6:07
and still one of the funniest movies I've ever
6:09
seen really that ship and dale's movie is Brilliant.
6:13
It is so subversive and weird
6:15
and funny and smart and
6:18
I am just a very confident
6:21
that The spirit
6:23
of naked gun will carry forward and
6:25
I think Liam Neeson is a pretty
6:27
inspired choice here. Mm-hmm You
6:30
know even from the Lego movies, you know
6:32
where he played Sort
6:34
of absurd new faced cop that
6:36
would yeah Yeah,
6:39
he has his happy voice is so
6:42
weird. Yeah strange
6:44
there was another movie where he I Can't
6:47
remember what movie it is. But he's like I sent you guys
6:49
a clip of Ted There's
6:53
one movie where he is sitting in
6:55
a room and he just doesn't understand I Think
6:58
you're thinking of he did a cameo on extras
7:00
the Ricky Gervais Either
7:03
way his deadpan and that's what you need right
7:05
you need. Yes for naked gun You
7:08
have to have somebody that is funny but
7:10
is doing it completely straight Mm-hmm, and
7:13
I think Liam Neeson is is is
7:15
a brilliant brilliant choice for this. I
7:18
Completely agree. I'm super psyched about
7:21
this movie Leslie
7:23
Nielsen the RIP I'm
7:25
gonna say this I love those naked gun movies. I
7:27
watch them so many times. I love them. Love them
7:29
Yeah, I know what first two I forget
7:31
about the third one 30. You don't know Yeah,
7:35
the the third naked gun movie is called
7:37
naked gun 33
7:40
and a third and a third. Yes the final insult And
7:44
that is that was just a very confusing
7:46
title still is according to the Wikipedia page
7:48
Absolutely 33 and a
7:50
third in the title is a reference to the
7:52
number of revolutions per minute at which LP phonographs
7:54
records play And the film was originally
7:56
going to be titled the naked gun 33 and a third
7:58
just for the record, but
8:01
was changed after the studio felt the audiences would not
8:03
get the joke. But then end quote,
8:05
but then they just still titled it. Nicki Gunn 33
8:07
and a third. So
8:11
now the third 33, there's more threes.
8:13
There's more threes in the title. Well, there's more
8:15
threes in the title. And I always took it
8:17
as that's how you divide three
8:21
into 100. You know, so like,
8:23
I don't know, it's like the remainder of
8:25
the infinite three that goes on forever. Three, three,
8:28
three, three, three, three, three, three. Why? Why not
8:30
just make it three though? Because it's goofy and
8:32
silly and we will affect on what's two and
8:34
a half, right? Yeah, 33 and a third. Yeah.
8:36
Okay, that's true. I forgot about the
8:38
two and a half. The trend. Yeah. But yeah,
8:41
I love those movies. I mean, I, one
8:44
of the movies I think is excellent that not enough people have
8:46
seen is the 1984 film top
8:48
secret. The
8:50
sucker directed by Jim Eber
8:52
and David Zucker and Jerry Zucker. And, and
8:55
what's remarkable about the airplane and those
8:57
movies is often
8:59
they would build a set just
9:02
for one joke, right? They would
9:04
build an entire set or have
9:06
an entire actor or character just
9:08
for one joke. And we
9:10
just don't really see that too much anymore, because it's
9:13
expensive to build sets and they do it with CG
9:15
or and, and just comedies in general aren't doing very
9:17
well in theaters. And so they don't make too many
9:19
of these movies. Here's what I hope for
9:21
this movie is that it's not rated R. I,
9:25
because those movies were beloved to me as
9:27
a kid and I would
9:30
watch them to the point of memorizing them. Yeah.
9:32
And I want that for my
9:34
kids. Like I want, I think, you know,
9:36
my kid seven, maybe a little young, but
9:38
at a certain point I want there to
9:41
be a naked gun type, goofy,
9:44
absurd, brilliantly
9:46
funny movie for him to obsess about.
9:49
And his sister as well. I, I,
9:52
I'm very excited about this. Indeed.
9:55
Indeed. I feel the
9:57
same way. Do any fond memories of the naked gun? Is this, is
9:59
this something you're resonates with you as much as I
10:02
don't know why but yeah I certainly watch those
10:04
movies a lot as a kid I think they
10:06
were just on repeat for a while and
10:08
you know we had very limited content guys we didn't know I have
10:11
unlimited streaming to go to
10:13
the video store was a trek for
10:15
some reason these things kept playing on the channels
10:17
I had and they were hilarious yeah yeah
10:20
I will say there were a lot of jokes
10:22
I didn't understand when I was happy yes and
10:24
then when you get older it's like wow beaver
10:26
yeah thank you I just had it stuffed
10:28
yesterday and you want
10:31
your kids to be into this job interesting interesting
10:33
well I but that stuff goes
10:35
over here like if they do you know
10:37
I blame the joke like what is nice
10:39
beaver me dad no you don't need to
10:41
be ridiculous that she then out of frame
10:43
pulls down a stuffed beaver like as a
10:45
kid that's enough of gristy exactly yeah it's
10:47
just like oh that's weird that's weird and
10:49
random very weird that's beavers yeah I
10:52
don't think there's another layer to
10:54
that rag you don't think oh
10:57
he's complimenting her taxidermy hilarious yes yes
10:59
I would love to just see the
11:01
lonely island guys kind of do this
11:04
style of movie though like top secret
11:06
is so good that's the one with
11:08
the underwater fight right just like
11:10
things things we had never seen before I believe
11:13
that's the one hmm but
11:16
yeah they would build sets they would do
11:18
crazy elaborate things just for one joke yeah
11:20
let's bring that back huge elaborately choreographed dance
11:22
dance sequence just for like one visual gag
11:25
and if there's anyone who kind of knows the
11:27
spirit of that I do think it's looks
11:30
like a Kiva shaper and so I'm top
11:32
figure but we had go look this up
11:34
if you don't remember this but there was
11:37
an underwater bar fight which I think is
11:39
one of the most like elaborately produced things
11:41
it is funny but it's also like
11:43
people have to hold their breath for
11:45
that whole like action sequence
11:47
that's just wild you know that that's one of
11:50
my favorite movies of that ill that like not
11:52
very many people have seen but it's still widely
11:54
available you can go buy it right now strongly
11:56
recommend top-secret Jeff we're gonna say I
11:58
was gonna say that I
12:01
may be able to come up with another example if I can
12:03
give him some time, but just off the
12:05
top of my head, one of the reasons I think this
12:08
is a great talent project
12:10
pairing is that it feels like
12:16
Pop Star Never Stop Never Stop In
12:19
is the closest we've had
12:21
to a naked gun type movie in
12:23
the long time. Right, where they write
12:25
songs that were just like one joke,
12:27
elaborate song with dance sequence for just
12:29
one joke. But even like
12:31
that title just feels like a naked gun title. Do
12:35
you guys ever watch the police squad on which the naked one
12:37
is the base? Of course. I
12:40
never really caught those. They were never really available. I
12:42
watch the movies. Low budget
12:44
versions of the same thing. There's
12:49
like a shootout in police squad where they're
12:51
like two inches from each other and they're
12:53
both behind cover. So funny.
12:57
Good stuff. So Naked Gun Remake
12:59
with Liam Neeson coming out on July 18th, 2025.
13:03
So not too long to wait. Also Paramount
13:05
announced other titles coming out. One big one
13:08
is the follow up to Teenage Mutant Ninja
13:10
Turtles Mutant Mayhem October of 2026. So
13:13
that should be fun as well. I do want
13:15
to say it is good to see Neeson just like
13:18
do Liam Neeson. Do something
13:20
a little different. You know he's
13:22
been doing his like Take N' Ask action movies for
13:24
so long and I feel like maybe even he's getting
13:26
a little bored with them. So yeah, this is cool.
13:29
I mean, to be fair, I don't think he's going to really play a
13:31
different character. I think he will be dead then. He's not, but it will
13:33
be dead then. Yeah, he's going to leave Pope fun at it. I
13:36
think of his Ted clip all the time. I don't
13:38
know if you guys saw him in, I think it
13:40
was the final of the last season of Atlanta, but
13:42
that thing where he had a cameo and he sort
13:44
of like joked about his own stupid thing about
13:47
his own racist thoughts when he was younger.
13:50
It's a whole thing, but he can make fun of himself,
13:52
which is kind of key to all this. Indeed.
13:55
Anyway, that's just one piece of film we
13:57
wanted to mention right off the top of the show. Let's
14:00
take a quick break for a sponsor, we'll be back with
14:02
more and what we'll be watching right after this. Anyway,
14:30
a lot of us spend our time wishing we
14:32
had more time. The
14:34
question is, time for what? If
14:37
time was unlimited, how would you use it? I
14:40
have a friend who says, it's not that
14:42
you didn't have time to do it, it's
14:44
that it wasn't important enough for you to
14:46
do. The best way to
14:49
squeeze that thing, that special thing that
14:51
you would do if you had more
14:53
time into your schedule, is
14:56
to know what it is, to know what's
14:58
important to you and then make it
15:00
a priority. Therapy can help
15:02
you find what matters to you, so
15:04
you can do more of it, so you can
15:06
prioritize it. I certainly have
15:09
benefited from this kind of inward
15:11
looking, but I can't do it
15:13
by myself. It's helpful
15:15
to have a professional,
15:18
someone who can help
15:20
you find those things about
15:22
yourself, do that work. So
15:24
you can understand what you're
15:26
striving for. If you're thinking
15:29
of starting therapy, give BetterHelp a try.
15:31
It's entirely online, designed to
15:34
be convenient, flexible and suited
15:36
to your schedule. Just fill
15:38
out a brief questionnaire and get matched
15:40
with a licensed therapist. You can switch
15:42
therapists at any time for no additional
15:44
charge. Learn to make
15:47
time for what makes you happy
15:49
with BetterHelp. Visit betterhelp.com/Filmcast
15:52
today to get
15:54
10% off your
15:56
first month. That's BetterHelp, H-E-L-P. dot
16:00
com slash F I L M
16:02
C A S T. All
16:05
right, David, your hardware. What did you want to this week?
16:08
This week, guys, I watched a show
16:10
where an outsider is transported
16:13
to a whole new environment is
16:15
shown the ways of a different
16:17
class of people who use cool
16:19
ass weapons, uh, you know, uh,
16:22
cool swords. And there's a lot
16:24
of political intrigue involved guys. Uh,
16:27
but enough about dune two. Let's
16:30
talk about Shogun. Boom goes the
16:32
dynamite. Love it, Devin. Great. Shogun's very
16:34
good. Yes. Uh,
16:37
Shogun, the new series on Hulu FX based
16:39
off of the novel by James Clavell. Uh,
16:42
it debuted this week, first two episodes. This
16:45
show effing rocks. Absolutely.
16:48
It is really, really good. Uh, it
16:50
is the most excited I've been about
16:52
a television show since Game of Thrones.
16:54
Basically. It's basically, it is basically the
16:56
game of Thrones formula, but, uh, so
16:58
this, this is, it
17:00
is an adaptation of the book. There was a mini
17:02
series before, right? I remember that whole thing like happening
17:04
back in the day. Um, but
17:06
this one's co-created by Justin Marks, who's a writer.
17:08
One of your favorites, I believe. One of my
17:10
favorites. He did counterpart, loved
17:13
counterpart. Uh, also like got
17:15
a story credit on Top Gun Maverick. Like I
17:17
just loved him as a TV writer. Also the
17:19
writer of Street Fighter of the Legend of Chun-Li.
17:22
So we all contain multitudes.
17:24
Okay. Um, but yeah, this
17:26
thing, this thing is just like, it is
17:28
a big adaptation of the book. It is
17:31
filled with political intrigue. It is like
17:33
a, just a gorgeous
17:36
like star turn for Hiryuki Sonata.
17:39
Um, if you like Game of Thrones, if you
17:41
like that sort of, uh, that sort of thing
17:43
of like, there's a big story going on. There's
17:45
so many elements, um, being told here. There's a
17:47
lot of characters to keep track of, but
17:50
it's all told in a very, like, I
17:53
think specific and a very, uh, very
17:55
intriguing way. I freaking love the show,
17:57
but I'm also kind of a. I
17:59
Feel like I'm a Mark for
18:01
it. because I am interested in Japanese
18:03
history, it's something I've studied quite a
18:06
bit. I'm I think this is just
18:08
like with combines a lotta things I
18:10
like a lot. It's sudden very specific
18:13
era where Japanese were. Japan was like
18:15
not quite opened up. but having your
18:17
special relationship with a Portuguese traders
18:19
in the Catholic church. There's religious
18:21
intrigue. here. there's political intrigue. there's cool.
18:24
Sword fights is really interesting characters.
18:26
I feel like this is just like
18:28
fantastic tell a person feels. Like I'm
18:30
Sometimes you want to show right and
18:32
feels like a full meal such as
18:34
a snack your like your feasting and
18:36
everything going on here swap produced it's
18:39
well written. else includes the and lawyer
18:41
see that. As. A writer so
18:43
that's very cool. I remember her from
18:45
her critic days. I'm just awesome stuff
18:47
I cannot recommend that are highly. I.
18:50
Completely agree. Ah, everything's of interest
18:53
as you have. These
18:55
these Japanese actors are so freakin' bad
18:57
ass and know that they speak in
19:00
Japanese you know like it is mostly
19:02
a deputy so much your yeah the
19:04
show is mostly in Japanese mostly true
19:06
to life. The way they deal with
19:09
translation is very interesting on the know
19:11
like they are people are doing translations
19:13
or and like the way in which
19:16
people are translating is safe by who
19:18
the character is. Oftentimes the show looks
19:20
amazing, the visual effects are amazing but
19:22
also the or sumptuous but also. Just
19:26
the sets and the the lighting
19:28
of the lighting vr the costumes
19:30
were are just. They. All
19:33
feel very intricate. Very
19:35
meticulous. very authentic and.
19:38
It's just. That. the best
19:40
of what prestige t v can be
19:42
in my but i think fx was
19:44
trying to make this for like a
19:46
decade yeah in in some fashion so
19:48
like this is a long gestating project
19:50
but it is well worth it when
19:52
did this book at adapted in the
19:54
eighties yes yes yes there is a
19:56
mini series in the eighties yeah yeah
19:59
in nineteen eighty I believe so and
20:01
I remember yeah, it was a big thing then and
20:03
I was kind of worried about like Are we just
20:06
gonna do this all over again? It's gonna be last
20:08
samurai, but you know what? I like the last samurai.
20:10
So yeah I don't and
20:12
to be fair. I think it's One
20:14
of the big differences is like a lot of the Japanese one
20:16
of the differences read this and like the last samurai is I
20:18
think Like there is so much attention
20:21
dedicated to the Japanese characters and
20:24
their inner lives their interiority their
20:26
motivations So even
20:28
if it does end up being a little
20:30
bit There's a very prominent
20:32
white character. Yeah kind of like a motivating factor,
20:34
but also he's a political pawn Yeah, not like
20:36
the lead character of the story. Yeah, so I'm
20:39
really curious like how that's all gonna play I
20:41
don't I haven't read the book. I don't know.
20:43
I haven't watched the series. So I'm very curious
20:46
How this the show might change the
20:48
book or the series and
20:50
what decisions it'll make but I strongly
20:52
recommend you watch Shogun Yeah on Hulu
20:54
FX To Ted and
20:56
Obu Asano who plays the character here and
20:58
to why who's been a bunch of TV shows
21:01
I really enjoyed like just a phenomenal cast and
21:03
I have never seen Cosmo Jarvis before who
21:06
plays Don't be
21:08
on yeah. Yeah, he he is just
21:10
kind of a Like
21:12
a little mongrel of a person like just
21:14
like he's very animalistic in terms of like,
21:17
oh, I'm a strange person in this land
21:19
And I don't belong here. I
21:21
think he's just very fun and intriguing to
21:24
watch too. So yeah It's also
21:26
good Agreed, that's Shogun
21:28
on Hulu and FX or as
21:30
the voiceover guy says Shogun. Yes
21:34
Jeff Kanata your What
21:36
have you bought this week? Well, I finally got around
21:38
to seeing a movie that many people have recommended I
21:40
think it was on one of your top ten list
21:42
last year. It was on my honorable mentions. It almost
21:44
made my top ten Our
21:47
friends friend of the show Dennis Ied
21:50
who I spent some time with and I'll get to
21:52
why that is I suggested
21:54
it. Oh, okay. So when you see how it is,
21:56
I see how it is. I listen. Okay. Yeah, there's
21:58
certain people in your life that you just respect their
22:00
opinions. You know what I'm saying? I see how
22:02
it is. Yep. Okay. Yep. Anyway,
22:04
I think it was one hit. I think it was in his like top
22:07
three of the year. Anyway,
22:09
it's a movie called Blackberry. And
22:11
so I finally got around to watching it
22:13
sitting down and watching it. And
22:16
I agree with him and
22:18
no one else that is good. Excellent.
22:21
Really just twisting, twisting that knife. Anyway,
22:24
it's very fun. It's a
22:27
very fun movie. I think the thing
22:29
I liked most about Blackberry, and maybe
22:31
you had even mentioned this when you
22:33
talked about it, David, is how constrained
22:35
it feels. It really
22:39
does feel like a pressure cooker kind of
22:41
a movie, even though it's dealing
22:43
with multiple years and sort of
22:45
big corporations and
22:48
it still feels almost like a play. It still
22:50
feels the kinds of things that
22:52
I'm very drawn to, which is, you know, people in a
22:54
room, dialogue, whip smart dialogue,
22:56
kind of intense scenes
22:59
between actors. And I really
23:02
enjoyed it. I thought it was
23:04
really interesting, even though,
23:07
you know, subsequently kind of googling
23:09
a bit and realizing how much liberty
23:12
it takes with the joke.
23:14
It's still a real
23:17
good entertainment. I think it's unfortunate
23:19
how a lot of these things will just be taken
23:21
as gospel by many people that
23:23
see them as like, this is how
23:25
it went down, you know? What did
23:27
you think about Glenn Harrington, Jeff? Yeah,
23:29
Glenn Harrington. I really liked him. It's
23:32
kind of phenomenal. I have
23:34
a weird bugaboo about the
23:38
like shaving your head to look
23:41
bald thing. I don't think it ever really
23:43
works. It doesn't actually look like you're bald
23:45
ever. I'm going to just go out there
23:47
and say one of the things I didn't
23:50
like about Blackberry is I didn't believe any
23:52
character actually had the hair that they had
23:54
in that. Agree. Jay Barichel. Or
23:57
the other guy, even though he got the headband. Nobody's
23:59
hair. Yeah, nobody cares. Nobody's
24:01
convincing in that movie, unfortunately. But
24:03
it's easily overlooked. I thought
24:07
Glenn Howard's performance was
24:09
quite strong, even
24:12
if it too seems to have very
24:14
little connection
24:18
with reality. But that's okay,
24:20
because it was an entertaining
24:22
movie and I'm such a
24:25
creature of the 90s that I
24:27
loved just sort of being back there. Like
24:29
just the Dot
24:32
Matrix fanfold banner that's
24:34
in this movie is
24:37
like, oh my god, I haven't thought about that. I
24:39
remember printing out banners like that that
24:42
would print out horizontally across multiple
24:44
fanfolded. I remember doing that for
24:46
like my parents for their birthday
24:48
because I was a computer nerd and I could
24:52
print out things on the computer. And
24:54
it was all just at ANSI characters
24:57
or ASCII characters that were, oh
24:59
man, very funny. So just
25:01
that like texture of it, they
25:03
felt like they really nailed that. Although,
25:07
one huge thing that stuck out
25:09
like a sore thumb, there's a moment where one
25:11
of the guys goes, you need to get John
25:13
Carmack. He works at ID. How
25:17
did that get through the final edit? It
25:20
feels like everybody was really familiar with the 90s
25:22
and all the 90s references. How do we not
25:24
know that the company was id? It
25:27
could be one of those things where it's like you've never actually heard
25:29
it said it aloud. Maybe the character. Maybe
25:31
the character. We didn't know, Jeff. You guys
25:34
have watched the movie. That character's wearing doom
25:36
shirts. Yeah, that character. There
25:38
were no podcasts back then. It was
25:40
very hard to hear people voicing
25:42
anything about these companies. I
25:45
have so many mispronunciations. I don't know, Jeff. I
25:47
watched the movie podcast and until recently I said
25:49
A24 instead of A24. You
25:52
know, it happened. It happens. I
25:54
guess. I guess. I feel like that character
25:56
would know. I feel like that character would
25:58
know. I love
26:00
this movie because I think it's
26:03
Shakespearean in the plot. The
26:05
plot is these guys build one
26:07
of the most successful smartphone question
26:10
mark companies in the world, one of the
26:12
most successful cellular device companies in the world,
26:14
and then are felled
26:18
because they don't see the
26:20
future coming. That's a very... That's
26:23
a very... Innovator's dilemma. Yeah, it's a very tragic... Innovator's
26:25
dilemma, a very tragic idea, and I thought it was
26:27
brought to life really well in the movie. I
26:29
think it's actually about something, unlike some of the other movies.
26:32
I agree. It was... The
26:38
journey, the good fellas esque
26:40
rise and fall story is
26:42
very satisfying and
26:45
fun to ride, and you
26:47
see them all hoisted on their hubris. It's
26:51
hoisted on their hubris. Their
26:54
own petards as well. Their
26:57
hubris and petards in equal measure. Yeah, they were hoisted
26:59
by a number of things, it turns out. Anyway,
27:05
anything else about Blackberry? Which is now in
27:07
Hulu, by the way, we should say. It
27:09
is now in Hulu. Yeah,
27:13
I really, really dug it. I had a great time with it.
27:15
I don't know if it would have made my top 10 of
27:17
the year either, but certainly a movie
27:19
that I think is well worth watching. We've
27:22
talked so many times on the show about
27:24
this glut of these types of movies, specifically
27:27
about this subject matter of technology
27:29
startups that go wrong. It just
27:32
seems like there's so many in
27:34
the last few years. This
27:36
is top tier.
27:38
Yeah, the best. Maybe
27:40
even the only one you need to watch. Agreed. Agreed.
27:44
There's like the WeWork one and the... There are
27:46
so many of them. Yeah. Okay.
27:48
Anyway, that's Blackberry. It's streaming right
27:51
now in Hulu. I had
27:53
a chance to watch The
27:55
Raid, which is the Gareth
27:57
Evans action thriller set in...
28:01
Indonesia and this
28:03
movie is one of my favorite movies of
28:05
all time and there is a recently released
28:08
4k disc that
28:10
just came out. And
28:13
the note I know I normally wouldn't necessarily bring
28:15
this up but the 4k disc
28:19
contains a completely like
28:22
redone version of the color grading
28:24
of the film. And
28:26
I love the raid
28:28
but I think the original
28:31
home video release we got kinda sucked.
28:34
It was a rough movie at the
28:36
time in general. It looked very muddy,
28:38
it looked very grey and kind
28:42
of an ugly looking movie on
28:44
home video. And the
28:47
action was still there and a lot of the filmmaking was still there
28:49
but I was just like wow this looks... I wonder
28:51
if this is like how it was actually shot and they just
28:53
were like this is the way it's gonna be. But
28:57
Gareth Evans went back and did a redone version
28:59
of the color. It
29:01
now looks great. It's
29:03
almost like watching a different movie in my opinion. I
29:06
posted about this on my Instagram. People ask me like is it worth getting
29:08
the 4k? 100%
29:11
it is and certainly if you have not seen the
29:13
movie it's like a really
29:15
great little action thriller that I
29:17
would strongly recommend. The
29:22
Raid Redemption and the Raid 2 are
29:24
just some of my all timers in terms
29:26
of... I think the Raid 2 is better
29:28
than the original in my opinion. They're both
29:30
good. I think I will say this about
29:32
the Raid 2. The Raid 2, Barandol also
29:34
known as the Raid Retaliation. Love
29:37
that movie as well. The Raid 1 is 90 minutes long. The Raid
29:39
2 is like two and a half hours long. The
29:42
Raid 2 is fat. The Raid 1
29:44
is lean and clean. What I'm gonna
29:46
say about Raid 1 is I
29:49
think some of the budget limitations are very obvious
29:51
in the Raid 1. It
29:53
looks like they're reusing a lot of sets. It
29:56
looks like they don't have that many sets. The building that
29:58
they're in... Is
30:00
like from the outside feel cg like I
30:02
never get a really good sense of the
30:04
geography of the place Because
30:07
I think they're kind of just cobbling together
30:09
the the locations they can whereas the raid
30:11
too You know
30:13
There is a wide variety of sets and there is
30:15
a wide variety of locations And some
30:17
of the stuff looks like it's shot on location
30:20
and it just is like a much better from
30:22
a production value perspective But it's not
30:24
as lean and mean as the first one, you
30:26
know, the first one is just 90 minutes of
30:28
pure adrenaline And I love the
30:30
raid too as well. But uh, and and and the
30:32
raid too has Probably
30:34
like one of the all-time greatest Closing
30:37
fight sequences i've ever seen. Oh,
30:39
yeah Uh, there's a one-on-one fight
30:41
sequences that close out. That movie is just
30:43
absolutely incredible But it's one of many
30:46
that are amazing in that movie. Yes. Yes but
30:49
the raid Uh redemption or
30:51
the raid one Is
30:53
now been remastered into 4k disc Uh,
30:56
it's unfortunate. It's not like that easy to
30:58
find, you know, best buys like shifting
31:01
away from making selling dvbs
31:03
and blu-rays and stuff and so like
31:05
walmart and target and Amazon,
31:07
I guess the only place you can find this but Uh,
31:09
it is worth seeking this one out if you're a
31:11
big a fan of the raid as I was Um,
31:14
so that's the raid 4k remaster On
31:18
4k uhd. It's one thing i've been watching
31:20
this week All right, davindra you
31:22
want to mention one other thing, right? Yeah, one other
31:24
thing I want to mention audiobook
31:27
and i've been trying to spend a little
31:29
more time exploring audiobooks just because Listen
31:32
podcast are just getting old and sometimes you just
31:34
hear the same people blathering the same garbage every
31:36
week Oh my god, we've had enough. I was
31:39
just about to tell you to shut up actually.
31:41
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Um, I know the feeling Listen
31:43
listeners like yeah, i'm right there with you Uh,
31:46
the thing about audiobooks is like I i've
31:48
had a hard time doing like novels and
31:50
things like that in fiction But
31:52
hey, there's all sorts of other things. Um,
31:54
there are biographies. There are different types of
31:57
books that work really well Uh in
31:59
audiobooks for me So I want to recommend The
32:01
Creative Act, A Way of
32:03
Being, the audiobook by Rick Rubin,
32:05
read by Rick Rubin, the famed
32:08
music producer, co-founder of Desk Jam. Not
32:11
somebody I've like thought about
32:14
a lot, but I have like,
32:16
I've seen like some of his thinking just like
32:18
shared around Twitter and whatnot. In terms of like
32:21
this guy is just like a really thoughtful
32:23
human being when it comes to creativity. And I
32:25
have to actually say both for you, Jeff
32:29
and Dave, like, I think you should check this out.
32:32
I have it. I've read it. It's on
32:34
my shelf. So in the big stuff.
32:36
Like he is coming at the art
32:38
of creativity with an almost like Buddhist
32:40
leaning, like it's very, very chill. He
32:44
kind of breaks down like things that have worked
32:46
for him, but also life philosophies
32:48
when it comes to work or dealing with creative
32:50
projects. I think the thing is fantastic. It's
32:53
a really short for an audiobook.
32:55
It's not very long, it's like five hours, five hours
32:57
and 45 minutes, but it's a really chill listen. I
32:59
also want to shout it out because Spotify,
33:02
if you have Spotify premium, you
33:04
have a decent chunk of audiobook
33:06
minutes every month. I think
33:08
it's like 15 hours or something. So
33:10
I listened to it that way. Didn't have to pay anything
33:13
extra, but it is
33:15
so good. And I started to hit my limit on
33:17
Spotify that I've just, I'm going to do the audible
33:19
thing. I'm going to see how that works this time.
33:21
I think this is a really well read book. He
33:24
reads it himself. He has a very chill voice and
33:26
anybody doing creative work or work where you
33:28
just have to, I think any
33:31
sort of work, you know, creativity can be all sorts of
33:33
things. It's not about making a work of art, but if
33:35
you're just doing a work project or something, I
33:37
think he has a lot of advice in terms of
33:39
coming up with ideas, collaborating with other people and just
33:41
like getting your ideas over the finish line. It's
33:44
super useful. So yeah. And did you like the
33:46
book, Dave? Yes, I think it's very good. It's
33:48
very profound. Yeah. It's also something I
33:50
think you would like. It sounds right in my
33:53
alley. I'm going to check this out. It's the Creative
33:55
Act by Rick Rubin. It's something Davinder has been consuming
33:57
this week. All right, Jeff Kanata, bring us
33:59
home. Well, I wanted to
34:01
mention the fact that I did go
34:03
to Vegas last weekend Danish
34:05
and I met up there and went to
34:08
see you two at the sphere now was
34:10
was this at least in part? Because
34:13
of my discussing it on the podcast or it have
34:15
no relation to that. I don't recall you Okay,
34:22
okay Raved
34:24
about it and it inspired me to spend
34:27
way more than I should have To
34:29
get myself there and see I think it
34:32
was one of the final weekends that yeah,
34:34
I think like this week Yeah
34:36
is the final week that they're doing it.
34:38
So you got to see one of the
34:40
final instances. Yeah So Jeff I raved about
34:42
it here on the film cast. I recommended it Was
34:46
my recommendation on point? here's
34:49
what I'll say I think this is a Show
34:53
that is intention
34:57
between two two
34:59
states one is a
35:02
you two concert in
35:04
a really cool venue and
35:06
the other is an Audio
35:09
visual showcase that has
35:11
you two as a background track. Mm-hmm,
35:14
right and it's it battling between
35:16
those two things
35:22
And first of all, it's
35:24
an incredible experience. I mean it is Absolutely.
35:27
There's nothing like it Nothing
35:30
like it. Yeah, I know I'm a huge
35:32
VR proponent bought
35:35
the Apple vision Pro and have
35:37
other VR headsets. I love big screens that
35:40
I go I want to have these
35:42
kinds of transport of experiences There
35:45
is nothing to compare
35:47
to seeing Something inside
35:49
the sphere in Las Vegas It
35:51
is there's just nothing like it the
35:54
scale of the screen that surrounds you
35:56
is It's
36:00
just incomparable. There's nothing to compare it
36:02
to. It's just a wild thing that
36:05
I kept marveling that we as human
36:07
beings even just built this thing. It's
36:11
mind boggling. But
36:15
I will say it didn't
36:19
the YouTube concert didn't take advantage of it
36:22
as much as I thought it was going
36:24
to. There are large sections
36:26
of the show where you're just watching a
36:28
concert. It's
36:30
like 30 30% I would say around that.
36:33
Yeah, yeah, and and. I
36:36
mean, that's cool. I like you too. I had a good time, but
36:40
it also happens to be and I think
36:42
proves itself to be. Among
36:45
the coolest concert venues
36:47
just as a concert venue, not
36:49
as a audio visual experience, but
36:52
just as a concert venue. But
36:54
there is no bad seat in the
36:56
house because they do this stuff where
36:58
they're they're shooting the members of
37:00
the band live with
37:02
cameras and then projecting them.
37:06
On a size and scale on this spherical screen
37:08
that is that just makes it. You know, I'm
37:10
sure everybody listening has had the experience of going
37:13
to a live concert venue that is very large
37:15
and inevitably there'll be a screen somewhere that will
37:17
show you a close up of the singer or
37:19
the drummer or the guitarist or whatever it is.
37:22
And you'll a lot of the show based
37:25
on your seats. You'll be looking at that screen. There
37:28
is no screen that
37:30
is more effective at showing you what the
37:32
band is doing than the sphere.
37:35
It's just you. It
37:37
feels like you're standing right next to
37:39
them. They're blown up at such a
37:41
astronomical size. And the
37:43
things that they do with that is really really
37:45
cool. So just as a concert venue. It's really
37:48
cool. I
37:50
do. I will say, you know, Bono has
37:52
gotten to the point where he's just like
37:54
speak singing most of the time. You know,
37:56
yeah, the music part of this is I
37:58
literally said this. When we talked and
38:00
I think you kind of gave me
38:03
a hard time about it. I was like the
38:05
music component is not the most compelling part. Oh,
38:08
I agree. And and what I didn't suspect
38:10
I feel like there was some pushback from
38:12
you to. To
38:14
go full bore into the visual
38:18
place because like we said
38:20
there's so much of the show where they're just not
38:23
attempting to do anything with the screens they're just
38:25
showing you the band to play. And
38:28
but when when they do
38:30
lean into that when it becomes oh,
38:32
I'm just listening to the background music
38:34
of you two while I'm experiencing the
38:36
most. Overwhelming
38:39
visuals I have ever seen
38:42
that is really worth
38:44
the price of admission which again not a small
38:46
price. But I
38:49
was gobsmacked when they did this really cool thing
38:51
I guess I can spoil a little of it
38:53
because there's no way to. No one's ever going
38:55
to see it again so
38:57
if you're one of the final people that's going to see it
39:00
skip this after this weekend no one's going to
39:02
see it anymore like this is going to be
39:04
a good vision pro experience by the way like.
39:06
You think you think that's smart like if you
39:08
just like put that 180 degree camera like right
39:10
in the center like you get the you get
39:12
the scope of it maybe I can see that
39:14
happening they said when we were there. And
39:17
by the way dennis is like this you see this every time
39:19
so maybe i'll ask you David said to you when we were
39:21
there he's like I just want you to know this is the
39:23
one we're recording. For posterity
39:27
sure they did not say that I
39:29
was at the one so when you hear
39:31
the guy go that's me. That's me. That's
39:36
funny. But
39:40
where was I going oh so those
39:42
spoil everything just the way the show
39:45
begins I thought was masterful
39:47
in that you you enter
39:49
the venue and they
39:51
have. A
39:54
texture on the screen yeah all
39:56
around you that looks shitty.
40:00
It looks bad. And
40:02
to the point where it's like, oh, this kind of
40:04
looks low-res and awful. And I got to the point
40:07
where I was like, oh, I
40:10
get it. It's all around you and that's neat, but
40:12
it's like, it's not a
40:14
mate. I mean, it looks... Well, I think you're
40:16
not... Like, basically,
40:19
on screen is a thing that makes
40:21
it look like the sphere is made
40:23
out of like big concrete slabs, basically.
40:26
Like big stones. And so you look around
40:28
and you're like, oh, I'm inside this big
40:31
concrete stone sphere. Yes,
40:34
but they don't look great. It
40:36
doesn't look good. It looks kind of low-res. I will say
40:38
many of the people I was with were convinced about it.
40:40
That was... Convinced that it was actual
40:43
stones. Or that it was some real material. So...
40:45
So you went with idiots. I'm kidding. Just
40:48
kidding. No, I thought it looked
40:50
bad. I thought it looked like low... Yeah,
40:52
sure. Like the screens themselves weren't very
40:55
high quality. But then you
40:57
two comes on and it bursts
40:59
through that and you see
41:01
the crispest, most beautiful... Yeah. I
41:04
think it's like 16K or something like
41:06
that. It's
41:09
like super high-res. But
41:12
I loved the swerve at the beginning of like,
41:14
oh, this doesn't look... I don't
41:16
know. Maybe I'm reading into it too much. But
41:18
I felt like they were intentionally making it look
41:21
underwhelming and then revealed it to
41:23
be the most spectacular,
41:27
high-density, vivid image I've ever
41:29
seen. To the point where
41:32
there are sequences where they're like, convince
41:35
you there's water surrounding the stage.
41:38
Yeah. It's amazing. Amazing.
41:41
I recorded a video review
41:43
of this where you can see a lot of the stuff that
41:45
Jeff is subscribing. So if you go to my YouTube channel, all
41:49
the stuff Jeff mentioned, you can see in the
41:51
video that I made of my experience this year.
41:54
But yes, I agree with
41:56
you about the reveal, Jeff. It is really spectacular.
42:00
And it's you feel like you're never gonna see anything
42:02
like this again really right like and
42:04
I've never seen it before Like there's nothing
42:06
to compare it to yeah. Yeah, it's hard
42:08
to even express what it's like because yeah,
42:10
yeah, it doesn't feel
42:12
like you're looking at There's
42:16
there's a sequence where they like extend
42:19
the your view into
42:21
like a desert and then there's a flag
42:23
that's there running and the flag catches on
42:26
fire and It looks
42:28
like that's the reality you're
42:30
staring it looks photorealistic. Yeah. Yes Yeah,
42:33
and the way they do it with the the
42:35
sight lines it looks like it's extending out
42:38
It's just seamless and amazing and I
42:42
mean totally totally transportive. I just wish
42:44
more total time of
42:46
the show was spent Doing
42:48
yeah, yeah, you know and because
42:51
you to again you two is fine But
42:53
Bono is you know Bono is just like
42:55
phoning it in a little yeah you know
42:57
and I like you too
42:59
and that came out, you know humming the songs but I Can
43:05
only imagine the next people that are gonna be in there are the
43:07
Grateful Dead or whatever they're calling them So dead in
43:09
company, I think they call themselves And
43:11
I just I I suspect they will
43:14
be less precious about their performance and
43:16
more willing to just go
43:18
nuts with the visuals So
43:21
who knows what that shows like but yeah, I'm
43:23
really cuz there's gonna be more artists now that
43:26
are gonna be Using
43:29
the sphere like fish right and
43:31
and I think You
43:34
too spent like as far as I can understand
43:36
like over a year working on their show and
43:38
so I'm curious How an
43:40
artist is gonna come in do four shows at
43:42
the sphere and then leave like how will an
43:44
artist that does just a few? Shows take advantage
43:46
of the sphere. I'm really curious. The
43:48
only thing I can imagine is that they'll have Like
43:51
any concert venue, yeah, like lighting packages.
43:54
Yeah, some kind of standardized. Yeah You
43:57
can use the the butterflies and we'll use
44:01
the trees and what it's like in
44:03
what section you want to use what thing I can't imagine
44:05
they'll be able to do bespoke things for
44:07
every artist but maybe they will. I'm
44:10
really curious about
44:14
how it's all gonna work it's a brand
44:16
new format basically you know it's a brand
44:18
new format. It's not I mean
44:20
hopefully these things will there'll be more of them
44:22
like I would love them to there to be
44:25
a you know a sphere in you
44:27
know Iowa or whatever just like put them have
44:30
this be a thing where people
44:33
could tour you know but
44:35
as it stands now like we're saying like YouTube did
44:37
this and then it's just gone
44:40
there's no use for
44:42
it anymore yeah it's wild anyway
44:45
I'm glad you got to see it Jeff it's I am just you
44:47
like something you did dissuade me
44:49
from staying an extra day to see
44:51
the film in there and Danish
44:54
saw it and he said it was even more impressive
44:56
so okay well I wish I'd done that
44:58
so you know I still have some what
45:01
the lesson so you ever listen
45:03
today yeah yeah Wow Wow sorry
45:06
for trying to save you hundreds of
45:08
dollars okay anyway that's you two
45:12
at the sphere if you are one of the last to catch it
45:14
hope you have a great time all
45:16
right let's take one more break for a
45:19
sponsor we'll be back with more right after
45:21
this let's do a
45:23
few weekly plugs before we get to our review of
45:25
doing part two weekly
45:33
plugs the part of show each week where we
45:35
plug something else we've been making I want to
45:37
plug the decoding TV podcast where
45:39
we have switched to a new weekly format that
45:43
anyone can tune into at any time
45:45
this week we had Jesse Earl on
45:47
the show to discuss constellation the new
45:49
Apple TV plus sci-fi series
45:52
so check that out decoding TV
45:54
wherever your podcast can be downloaded
45:56
given your hardware give us a weekly plug sure two
45:59
quick things the latest up to the Engadget podcast,
46:01
we talk about the reported death of the Apple car
46:03
and kind of what that project could have been. And
46:06
my co-host, Herlin Lo, and I, we
46:08
also talk about what's happening at Engadget.
46:10
I mentioned that we were going through
46:12
some layoffs, a whole editorial restructuring. I'm
46:14
still here, she's still there, a whole bunch
46:16
of us are. So check that out if
46:18
you're interested in hearing what's going on at
46:21
Engadget. I also just wrote a piece up
46:23
for our 20th anniversary series called
46:26
Streaming Video Changed the Internet Forever.
46:28
I think everybody listening will probably
46:30
get a kick out of that. So I
46:32
kind of look back to the very first
46:34
thing I did to watch a video online,
46:36
which was, I believe, the
46:38
Mortal Kombat trailer in
46:40
1995. I remember specifically
46:43
entering a very long URL and it taking
46:46
forever and looking like garbage. But
46:48
that was it. And now look at us.
46:50
We got the internet video everywhere. It's amazing.
46:52
So yeah, go check out that piece. All
46:55
right, Jeff Canava. You know,
46:58
I've been doing some work lately
47:00
on Best Summed Up, the film
47:03
limerick quiz book that got
47:05
funded through Unbound and will
47:07
be hopefully happening this year.
47:09
I've been
47:11
going through and doing a revision pass
47:14
on every limerick that
47:16
I've ever done on this show. So I've
47:18
been rereading them and kind of rewriting
47:20
some of them a bit and trying to improve them
47:22
for the book. And one of
47:25
the things I've noticed is I've gotten
47:27
a lot better at this hundreds of limericks later. I'm
47:30
a little better, I think, at writing them, which
47:33
is good news for you because I'll sell
47:35
you one right now and you can take
47:38
advantage of all that accumulated skill from
47:40
writing hundreds of limericks over at cameo.com/Jeff
47:42
Canava. You can get your own limerick
47:45
written by me. I would
47:47
say I might be in the top
47:49
1% of all people who have ever written
47:52
limericks in the world, not for skill,
47:54
but just in sheer number of limericks. I
47:56
would guess there are fewer. There were about 1%
47:58
of the people. in the world that
48:01
have written as many limericks, just. The
48:04
number of them that I have, I could
48:06
be wrong, but it seems right, feels right.
48:09
Anyway, leverage all that experience for
48:11
your own joy at
48:13
cameo.com/Jeff Conato, where you can get your
48:15
own limerick written by me, delivered by
48:17
me for you for any occasion. Boy,
48:20
they're fun. Five star reviews all over the
48:22
place. You can read up, see how people
48:24
have enjoyed them. cameo.com/Jeff Conato. patreon.com/film
48:28
podcast where you can get ad free episodes
48:30
and exclusive after darks of this podcast. We
48:32
never want anyone to donate if it in
48:34
any way causes a financial hardship. If you
48:36
want to support us for free, it's very
48:38
easy to leave a star rating on Apple
48:41
podcasts or share our
48:43
videos or post them on Instagram, on YouTube,
48:45
on TikTok, post them online and
48:47
spread the word about the film cast. We
48:49
appreciate everyone who makes this podcast possible. Let's
48:52
get to our view of Dune Part two. This
48:59
world is beyond cruelty. They've
49:04
been fighting the Harkonnen for decades. My
49:07
family's been fighting them for centuries. They
49:11
were massacred alongside
49:13
my father. My
49:15
father didn't believe in rebellion.
49:19
We believe in famine.
49:22
And we fight beside you. Welcome
49:27
to the film cast review of Dune
49:29
Part two. I'm going to read
49:31
the plot summary from the Internet. Paul Atreides unites
49:33
with Chani and the Freeman. Sorry. And
49:35
the Fremen, while seeking revenge against the conspirators
49:37
who destroyed his family, facing a choice between
49:39
the love of his life and the fate
49:41
of the universe. He must prevent a terrible
49:44
future only he can foresee. End quote. Joining
49:46
us for this conversation about Dune Part two.
49:49
One of my favorite people working
49:52
in Hollywood right now. You've seen
49:54
his movies like Cube and Splice.
49:56
He's also worked on television shows
49:58
like Hannibal. the peripheral. He
50:01
also has a new graphic novel out
50:03
right now called Tech,
50:05
I believe, right? Vincenzo Natali,
50:07
welcome to the film cast.
50:10
This is so lovely to be back. Welcome
50:12
back. Welcome back. Vincenzo,
50:14
tell us about this graphic novel,
50:16
Tech. I'm glad you chose to
50:19
focus on an extremely narrow subject
50:21
matter for your first graphic novel.
50:24
Yes. Well, why not
50:26
start slogging some swag, right? Tech.
50:31
Nice. It's a graphic
50:33
novel that I wrote and illustrated. And,
50:36
you know, it's just an expression
50:38
of my frustration as
50:40
a failed comic book artist. And
50:42
what can I tell you? I mean,
50:47
it's it's got a board by William Gibson, who
50:49
is a Wow, somebody I'm a great fan
50:52
of and have stolen from
50:54
liberally. So yes,
50:56
please seek it out. It's on Amazon
50:58
and all the usual places that you
51:00
find graphic novels and books. All
51:03
right. Well, Dune Part Two,
51:06
one of the biggest movie events of the year.
51:08
Vincenzo Natali, why don't you tell us briefly about
51:10
your relationship with the Dune franchise and what your
51:12
thoughts were on Dune Part One. And then we'd
51:15
love to hear overall, what you thought of Dune
51:17
Part Two, which you just watched last night. So
51:19
you could be here on the film cast today,
51:21
right? Yeah, I'm still processing
51:23
it a little bit. But well,
51:26
I'm of a certain vintage. So
51:29
I saw David Lynch's Dune
51:31
in the theater. Wow. Way
51:33
back when, which was
51:35
probably one of the most disappointing experiences I've
51:37
ever had in the cinema in my life.
51:40
Wow. Really, if
51:42
you were to put yourself back at that time,
51:44
it really was expected to
51:46
be the next big film
51:48
event. And I had
51:51
at the age of 10 seen The Elephant
51:54
Man, which really profoundly affected
51:56
me. And then not
51:58
long, well, a number of years
52:01
after that discovered a racer head, which
52:03
also affected me profoundly, not understanding or knowing
52:05
that it was the same director. And
52:07
then when I connected those two dots, I
52:09
was a full David Lynch fan. So
52:12
the prospect of Dune became very exciting to
52:15
me. And I believe
52:17
I read the book in
52:19
advance of seeing the film, which
52:23
was the last time I read a Dune book. But
52:28
which I enjoyed. And but
52:31
the movie was just, it's,
52:34
it's actually aged much better. But in
52:36
the moment, if you had been with
52:38
me at the time, when I walked out of the theater, I was angry,
52:41
like angry in the way that you can
52:43
only be when an artist that you dearly
52:46
love disappoints you. We know that feeling. Yeah,
52:48
we will have that. So. But I, you
52:50
know, there
52:54
is a resonance to
52:56
the movie, which of course, partly comes from the
52:58
book. And I think, you
53:00
know, I've returned to it over the years. And
53:02
I, and actually, especially after seeing
53:05
the Villeneuve first Dune film, I started
53:08
to appreciate that movie, because
53:10
actually, they're kind of quite similar. They're
53:12
more similar than you might expect. And you
53:14
begin to realize, actually,
53:16
how much David
53:19
Lynch got right in that adaptation.
53:21
And there's just, you know,
53:23
so much lore associated with the making of that film. And
53:25
then of course, there's the books themselves and how they've infiltrated
53:28
the popular consciousness. And,
53:31
you know, the genre in general, which
53:33
is in a very deep way,
53:35
I mean, starting with Star Wars
53:38
is obviously deeply indebted to Dune.
53:42
And I think it's interesting, you know,
53:46
seeing part two, thinking
53:48
about Star Wars and thinking about the prequels
53:50
and how even the prequels probably
53:53
owe a debt to Dune. So, you know, it
53:57
is this massive cultural, artifact
54:00
of science fiction that That's
54:05
why it's good to have a podcast because there's a lot
54:07
to talk about in dissect and And
54:10
yeah, that's in that is well,
54:12
you know brief history for me with it.
54:15
So you're not I'm not a Yeah,
54:18
I did the other book. I don't I
54:20
don't have a passion For
54:23
the Frank Herbert novels like some
54:25
people obviously do so, what
54:27
were your overall thoughts on doing to what was your
54:29
big reaction? coming out of Dune 2 Everyone
54:38
is saying that right now, so I feel like I
54:40
don't have anything to contribute but you
54:43
know the first part I liked
54:45
very much but I was
54:47
cognizant of the fact that It's
54:50
only part of the top. It's very hard to
54:52
do just half a book because it does feel
54:54
incomplete and And and so
54:56
I think the second film benefits from
54:59
being able to finish the
55:01
novel and kind of you know You're you're kind
55:03
of past all the exposition and all the hard
55:06
work that you have to do as a reader or as a viewer To
55:09
get to that point and now you kind of get to ride the
55:11
worm And
55:16
I'm I love Denis Villeneuve's
55:18
work everything he's done. I think
55:20
he's quite brilliant and
55:22
and I feel like His
55:25
approach to science fiction and this movie
55:28
is is what the genre needs
55:30
now I mean above and beyond it is an
55:32
experience as a movie it I think
55:34
in a broader sense I think it's important. I
55:37
mean really You
55:39
know say what you will about Hollywood, and it's really
55:41
not been a great time This
55:44
film could not have been made in the past like
55:46
20 and obviously when David Lynch did it 40 years
55:48
ago. I think That is
55:51
on the positive side of the spectrum
55:53
where our The medium
55:56
has evolved to like we can a
55:58
movie of that sophisticated of and
56:00
in of that cost and scope in
56:03
the realm of science fiction can now be made and
56:05
treated with great seriousness that
56:07
it deserves And
56:10
I don't think there was the cultural environment for that
56:12
even 20 years ago certainly
56:14
not 40 years ago when David Lynch did
56:17
his doing I don't think even
56:19
though that was a big-budget movie, I
56:21
think part of the reason the film didn't work out is because You
56:24
know the producers didn't understand it. But
56:27
now I think because
56:29
of where Denis Villeneuve is in
56:31
his career and and Then but
56:33
also I think where the culture and the culture of
56:35
Hollywood is that right now that scene can exist? So
56:37
that's great. I think it's
56:39
a really heartening experience Sorry,
56:42
I'm getting you want eating up all the air here.
56:44
No worries. No worries. Don't worry. We have plenty of
56:46
time We have plenty time. Yeah here. Let's pause for
56:48
a moment and let's hear from the vendor
56:50
hardware. What was your reaction to watching Dune
56:52
2? You
56:55
know, it's pretty good I'm
56:59
I'm right there with you been said that like my thinking
57:01
was like around Star Wars at this point because I've also
57:03
been like I've liked a lot of the
57:05
TV shows, but I've also been like just kind of sad about
57:07
how empty some of it
57:09
has started to feel and has started to feel like made
57:11
for TV sci-fi and it feels like that's a Watering
57:14
down of like what we loved about the scope
57:16
and the epicness of Star Wars watching
57:19
this movie It
57:21
just feels like Villeneuve is like right like he
57:23
had this all in his head He's just like
57:25
ready to go right where for where we left
57:27
off in the first movie and this
57:29
movie is just so big Like
57:32
it there's just so much going on. It is
57:34
a wild ride all the way through It does
57:36
feel like the second half of a book. So
57:38
yeah, we're straight into action. We're straight into like
57:40
really Whole new
57:42
characters who are all of a sudden very important like
57:44
Florence P is character but just feel
57:46
like there's so much going on and It
57:49
kind of reminds me. I saw this Right
57:52
before I can't in between I was
57:54
rewatching doing one like in between all this But watching
57:56
this and then going back to dude and one just
57:58
feels like oh, wow. He did actually have a
58:01
lot of this just in his head at
58:03
that point. So the sheer scope of this
58:05
thing, the way it feels so immersive and
58:07
lived in and real, just like the
58:09
first movie, I think it's incredible. Also, this may
58:11
just be an experience like a few people have,
58:13
but I saw this thing in an AMC Dolby
58:16
cinema. And these things are unique because
58:19
this is filmed in IMAX, so IMAX is like
58:21
the best possible way to see it. But that's
58:23
where my press screening was. And they have dual
58:26
laser Dolby vision protectors, they have
58:28
Atmos sound, and they also have transducers in
58:30
the seat, which rumble the seats. And I'm
58:32
not usually a fan of that, but by
58:35
the time Paul was like riding the sandworm, which
58:37
is in the trailer, we know it's gonna happen,
58:40
everything was shaking. My whole body was shaking,
58:42
like this whole experience was like, it felt
58:44
like the most immerses thing I've ever seen.
58:46
I went to like, ran out to go
58:48
use the bathroom and like a quiet part,
58:50
and like my body was just vibing. It's
58:52
like when you go to- If you have
58:54
a kidney stone, go do some- Come right
58:57
out. Get right out. But
58:59
like when you get a really good massage, and
59:01
just like for the rest of the day, you're
59:03
just like, oh, my body is just like moving
59:05
with all of this. Like my body was in
59:07
June, it was in Arrakis, even like leaving the
59:09
theater. That's a good thing about that theater experience,
59:11
but I think that's all part and
59:13
parcel, like the sound design, the music,
59:15
everything, like immerses you and puts you
59:17
in this world. This movie is
59:19
almost three hours long. And I was like, I
59:22
need more. I could have sat there for two hours more, you
59:24
know, to be in this. So yeah, I fricking loved it. Yeah.
59:28
Jeff Kanata, I'm so curious, what did you
59:30
think of Dune Part Two? Well,
59:33
Dave, I guess you could
59:35
say what I thought about Dune Part Two
59:37
is best summed up in the form
59:40
of a limerick. You know, I'm
59:42
not sure if Vincenzo is familiar with this. I
59:45
am. I am. I think you
59:47
guys. I am. Oh, good. Well, it's not
59:49
something I would want to put you through,
59:51
but Dave, Dave is a
59:53
monster, and he requires a limerick every
59:55
episode, or he has told us all
59:57
that he will walk. Listen,
1:00:00
I wouldn't do it. When
1:00:02
guests come here, I'm embarrassed for
1:00:04
him, really? But here's
1:00:06
my limerick for Dune Part Two. There's
1:00:10
so many beautiful things that
1:00:12
Villeneuve's artistry brings. And
1:00:15
this generation gets an
1:00:17
adaptation as perfect as Lord
1:00:19
of the Rings. Wow. All
1:00:22
right. I do think this is
1:00:25
comparable on the scale of
1:00:28
genre adaptation, of classic
1:00:31
fulfillment of what you
1:00:33
might want as a fan of
1:00:35
a literary work, as Peter Jackson's
1:00:37
Lord of the Rings was. I
1:00:40
don't think the first Dune
1:00:42
movie, Part One, feels as
1:00:45
satisfying as Fellowship of the Ring, for example, but
1:00:47
we talked about that last time. We're talking about
1:00:49
the sequel to sequel. Does,
1:00:51
to me, hit all the notes
1:00:53
I want. It is interesting to see how it
1:00:58
really tries to reckon with something
1:01:00
that is as outdated
1:01:05
as the Dune novel is, written in
1:01:07
the 60s, I think. A
1:01:09
lot of this movie's changes to
1:01:11
the text are an attempt
1:01:13
to kind of reckon
1:01:16
with a lot of
1:01:18
positions it takes that I think we've
1:01:20
progressed past. And I
1:01:23
think it's really interesting to see how it does
1:01:25
that. And a lot of, I
1:01:27
think, the things that Dune,
1:01:31
as a literary work, inspired.
1:01:33
We've already talked about Star Wars and I
1:01:37
mean, so much of genre
1:01:39
storytelling has been inspired
1:01:42
by Dune. I'm on
1:01:44
my book club show. We're talking
1:01:46
about the Malazan Books of the Fallen by
1:01:49
Steven Erickson. And he has been very explicit
1:01:51
that Dune is the major influence.
1:01:53
And there's so much that
1:01:56
has influenced it. And so to have that
1:02:01
body of references
1:02:03
all in our heads, all the things
1:02:05
that we've seen that were inspired by
1:02:07
this thing, and then to come in
1:02:10
and make a new version of the thing, the
1:02:14
danger is that it will
1:02:16
feel like a retread. Like
1:02:20
it is mining ground that we have already
1:02:22
seen over and over. I think villainous- I
1:02:24
would say an example of that is like
1:02:26
the John Carter movie. I don't know if
1:02:29
you remember that, but that's a property that
1:02:31
inspired so many things. And then the movie
1:02:33
comes out and it feels like- Tired and
1:02:35
stale and it's like, oh, another one
1:02:37
of these. It's like, no, it was the first of these.
1:02:41
So yeah, I think that's a
1:02:43
real challenge with Dune because you
1:02:45
have these tropes that are so
1:02:47
well-worn. This
1:02:50
chosen one, all that stuff,
1:02:54
secret magic powers and ancestry
1:02:58
that is revealed and all that stuff.
1:03:01
And I think it's villainous
1:03:06
skill and ability to
1:03:08
sort of dazzle with the way
1:03:10
that the story is presented and
1:03:12
the visuals of it that
1:03:14
masks a lot of that. But I think the
1:03:18
script does a lot of heavy
1:03:20
lifting too to kind of put emphasis on
1:03:22
other things and acknowledge
1:03:24
that we
1:03:26
have a different perspective on some of that stuff now. And
1:03:29
so a lot of the changes, and we'll get to that
1:03:31
in spoilers, but a lot of the changes, I think, are
1:03:33
really interesting in how the voice
1:03:35
of doubt is put into this movie where
1:03:37
I don't think it really existed in the
1:03:40
novel to my recollection. But
1:03:43
I think just the pure spectacle of
1:03:45
this is worth seeing it alone. Just
1:03:48
the visual and auditory experience of being
1:03:50
inside this movie. We've already talked about
1:03:52
how it shakes your
1:03:54
bones and dazzles your eyes. That
1:03:58
is enough to justify the price. of
1:04:00
admission, but I do think this sequel
1:04:04
fulfills the story
1:04:06
in a way that the first didn't for
1:04:08
me, and it really is so satisfying, those
1:04:11
big beats, those big action moments, it
1:04:13
is a very, I
1:04:16
think, crowd-pleasing movie as well. There are
1:04:19
moments of thrilling,
1:04:22
thrilling action and thrilling,
1:04:25
you know, payoffs
1:04:29
of things that have been set up in that first
1:04:32
movie. So I absolutely
1:04:34
loved it as well, and I
1:04:37
think it is interesting because it is
1:04:39
a clunky story in a lot of ways,
1:04:41
I think, to modern audiences, but I didn't
1:04:44
feel like it was clunky. I feel like
1:04:46
it really rectified that in a lot of
1:04:49
smart ways, and the performances are
1:04:51
awesome, the sound is amazing, I love the score,
1:04:53
I just had a great time with Dune Part
1:04:55
2. Yeah, I agree
1:04:57
with most of everything you guys
1:05:00
have said, specifically what Jeff
1:05:02
Kanata said at the end, this is a movie you
1:05:04
need to go see in a theater. Yep. It
1:05:07
honestly reminds me- IMAX if you can. Yeah, yeah,
1:05:09
in one of the, in IMAX if you can,
1:05:11
and ideally in one of the, I think, 30
1:05:14
screens in the world that have true IMAX.
1:05:19
You know, Jeff Kanata, we talked
1:05:21
last year about Oppenheimer and how
1:05:23
that was a massive movie event.
1:05:25
I remember at my local IMAX
1:05:27
theater, which has true IMAX, when
1:05:30
I went to go see Oppenheimer, that was
1:05:32
the 22nd screening in a row that
1:05:35
was sold out of Oppenheimer, right? Yeah.
1:05:37
And people really- people who journeyed, they,
1:05:39
you know, days off, they traveled to
1:05:42
like go see Oppenheimer and IMAX. See
1:05:44
giant people in a room talking. Right,
1:05:46
and that's the thing is like, yes,
1:05:49
that movie is visually very
1:05:51
interesting, but it's not
1:05:53
an action movie, you know, it didn't
1:05:55
feel like it really took full advantage
1:05:58
of the- Scale. The audio- visual
1:06:00
scale that you can have. I'm not saying
1:06:03
that it didn't take advantage of it at
1:06:05
all. Obviously, seeing, I'm being
1:06:07
100% serious here, seeing
1:06:10
Killian Murphy's face three
1:06:12
stories tall, that
1:06:14
does change the experience of watching Oppo Haimer
1:06:16
in a way that makes it more compelling.
1:06:18
So no sarcasm there. I'm
1:06:20
100% earnest. But this
1:06:23
is the IMAX experience I think we
1:06:25
think of when we think of an
1:06:27
IMAX experience. Devindra mentioned
1:06:30
the scale and I just
1:06:33
want to talk a little bit about that. There's so
1:06:35
many times when you see like human figures and
1:06:38
in the background is either endless dunes
1:06:41
of sand, waves of sand, or
1:06:43
these massive hulking machines. And
1:06:46
you just get a sense of like, oh how tiny
1:06:49
these people are and how small
1:06:51
they are in this huge world
1:06:53
that's been created. You know,
1:06:55
a person riding a sandworm, this is in the
1:06:58
trailer, right? It's like, you just see how insignificant
1:07:00
and small people are, but then how big the
1:07:03
scale of the objects and the settings that
1:07:05
this movie is thinking in. And you also
1:07:07
feel like that as an audience member. Like
1:07:09
it's fun to feel like a little ant
1:07:11
sometimes. And if you see a big screen,
1:07:14
you feel like I'm freaking tiny. It's cower
1:07:16
in awe of what I'm witnessing.
1:07:18
It is an audio-visual spectacle
1:07:21
for the ages. You know,
1:07:23
as we're recording this, we don't know how well the
1:07:26
movie is going to do. But
1:07:28
I hope that it does, by
1:07:30
all accounts, it's gonna do better than the
1:07:32
first movie. I think that's awesome. I think
1:07:34
it's gonna be great for theatrical film going.
1:07:37
I think it's gonna be, it's gonna inspire
1:07:39
a whole generation of artists this movie, these
1:07:41
first two movies of the Dune franchise. So
1:07:45
overall, it's like, if
1:07:47
not a home run, at the very
1:07:50
least a triple, like it's really compelling
1:07:52
stuff and why we go to movies.
1:07:54
It's like a new sci-fi classic, really
1:07:56
enjoyed the movie. Having
1:07:59
said all that... I
1:08:03
do think that this movie buckles
1:08:05
under the weight of trying
1:08:08
to do a little bit too much stuff. The
1:08:10
first movie felt so elegant in all the
1:08:12
stuff that it excluded from the movie. Like,
1:08:15
we don't need an explanation for how spice
1:08:17
works, and we don't need an explanation for
1:08:19
how space travel works and all this other
1:08:21
stuff. And this movie feels
1:08:23
like it's buckling under the weight
1:08:26
of all the new characters that it's
1:08:28
trying to include. Most
1:08:32
of the characters from the first movie, spoiler
1:08:34
for the first movie, died. And so there's
1:08:36
a whole new cast of characters that's introduced,
1:08:38
all new ideas here. The movie's two
1:08:40
hours and 45 minutes long. I'm going to say I don't
1:08:42
think it was long enough. I think we needed a whole
1:08:44
other hour to really learn
1:08:46
more about these characters. If
1:08:49
only there was a book you could read. Indeed. But
1:08:53
I think at the end of
1:08:55
the day, there's big character moments where
1:08:57
I think to myself, oh, I'm supposed to
1:08:59
feel this way about what this character is going
1:09:02
through at this time, when I just don't feel
1:09:04
like I have the build-up that's necessary for
1:09:06
that payoff to happen. So
1:09:08
I'm a little bit mixed on the
1:09:11
plot and the storyteller. And
1:09:14
then, of course, right after that, Denis
1:09:16
Villeneuve gives an interview where he says, I don't think
1:09:19
dialogue is that important in movies. And I'm like, oh,
1:09:21
this makes complete sense. And
1:09:24
that sums up why the movie
1:09:27
is both amazing and also, in
1:09:29
some respects, not great. Because
1:09:31
visually, it's one of the best things I've
1:09:33
seen in my whole entire life. But
1:09:36
from a dialogue storytelling perspective, it's a little bit
1:09:38
rough around the edges. So those are my
1:09:40
thoughts. I kind of fall to him, like it's
1:09:42
the thing. Like I do think sometimes we
1:09:45
are so plot heavy, right? Or
1:09:48
we're so like plot observant that I feel
1:09:50
like a lot of storytelling is
1:09:52
about feeling and emotion. I think what he is doing
1:09:54
is painting a broad,
1:09:56
epic picture at times. And that
1:09:59
does mean a lot of the character level moments may kind
1:10:01
of miss at times, but I don't know. It
1:10:03
just kind of worked for me. The question I
1:10:05
have for all of you though, is what did
1:10:07
you think of Christopher Walken? Because I feel like
1:10:10
he may be the, I love
1:10:12
the man. I love him so much, but
1:10:14
I feel like as, you know, the emperor of
1:10:16
what, the galaxy at this point, or he's amazing.
1:10:19
I felt he was a little too distracting because he's
1:10:22
bringing the Christopher Walken to me, but did he not
1:10:24
distract you guys? I didn't have an issue with that.
1:10:26
I think it was more just like he has probably,
1:10:28
I don't know, 20 lines in the whole movie, you
1:10:30
know? Sure. Sure. And so it's kind
1:10:32
of falls into the thing I said about, about
1:10:34
like not having enough time with these characters. I
1:10:36
think of all these, like, Oscar Isaac in the
1:10:39
first movie who was not in it for very
1:10:41
long, but I think makes a huge impact. Yeah.
1:10:43
And the thing is like, if
1:10:45
Walken himself is not distracting, would somebody have
1:10:47
done better in that show? I
1:10:49
think I see what you're talking about. Like he's not one of the
1:10:51
most memorable parts of the movie for me. But
1:10:53
all that said, Vincenzo Natal, let's go back to you. I'm
1:10:56
curious if you have any reaction to anything we've said so
1:10:58
far about Dune Part 2 or yeah. I
1:11:03
heartily agree with everything. As
1:11:06
a filmmaker, I would and
1:11:09
as someone who's kind of, you know, not on
1:11:11
the level of, nearly the level of Dune, but
1:11:14
who's dipped his toes into these kinds of things.
1:11:18
I want to draw attention to one
1:11:20
of the things I really like about Dune's
1:11:23
approach to world building or his approach
1:11:25
to science fiction. Probably everything he does.
1:11:28
In particular, science fiction, he
1:11:30
does a kind of minimalist
1:11:33
maximism. Maximalism.
1:11:35
Yeah. Maximalism. And
1:11:39
there's a temptation in doing science fiction to
1:11:41
like crowd the frame with a lot of
1:11:43
stuff. And he's
1:11:45
not afraid of simplicity and
1:11:48
emptiness. Yeah. In terms of the visual
1:11:50
design. And a lot of negative space.
1:11:53
A lot of negative space. A lot of
1:11:56
graphical kind of set design and
1:11:58
composition that is. really sophisticated
1:12:01
and elegant. And you know, you see that
1:12:03
in Blade Runner, you see it in the
1:12:05
Arrival, and you really see it
1:12:08
in this part of Dune. I mean, I
1:12:10
love Getty Prime. Like, I just wanted to stay on
1:12:12
Getty Prime. I could have spent another hour there. It
1:12:14
was great. Awesome
1:12:19
observation. And I think it's a really good
1:12:21
point. I love that this
1:12:23
world is sort of devoid of screens. You
1:12:26
know, there's no screens in this world. Or
1:12:29
if there are screens, they're like analog screens. You know, they're
1:12:31
like, yeah, we can't get to they look like they're from
1:12:33
the 80s. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
1:12:35
It's a it's a really
1:12:38
cool art
1:12:40
directed movie, you know,
1:12:42
that everything feels really
1:12:45
thought through, but also doesn't
1:12:48
look like any other sci fi thing
1:12:50
I've ever seen, you know, they found
1:12:52
new a new
1:12:55
place to go with it, which is really cool.
1:12:57
Which is very difficult to do, by the way,
1:12:59
because so much has already done so well. And
1:13:01
I also feel like
1:13:05
with this one, maybe
1:13:07
because of the story he was telling, but also
1:13:09
probably because the first one was a
1:13:11
success, he was allowed to be a little more
1:13:14
eccentric. I think that there was a very
1:13:16
cruel thing that Alexander
1:13:19
Yatarosky said about the
1:13:21
first part of Doon, or at least the trailer for the
1:13:24
first part of Doon. And for anyone
1:13:26
who doesn't know, Yatarosky was supposed to direct Doon
1:13:28
very famously. Yeah, there's a whole documentary about that,
1:13:30
which is, by the way, one of my favorite
1:13:32
documentaries, period, but especially
1:13:34
about the making of a movie that I
1:13:36
highly recommend called Yatarosky Doon. Anyway,
1:13:39
when he said it's industrial filmmaking,
1:13:44
which I think was unfair, but I do
1:13:46
see his point in that when
1:13:48
he was approaching Doon, he was coming at it such
1:13:50
a creative way, like
1:13:52
so I think from what I could discern,
1:13:55
you know, untethered from the
1:13:58
book, like trying to take it further
1:14:00
and somewhere else and inject his
1:14:02
own imagination into it. Whereas
1:14:04
when we got the first part of Dune, it
1:14:07
was magnificent, but it was very much within
1:14:09
the boundaries of what's
1:14:11
expected. You know, it didn't try
1:14:13
anything terribly daring in terms
1:14:15
of how it approached the material. It just
1:14:17
did it really, really well. This
1:14:20
one, I felt like he was flexing
1:14:22
a little bit and Vilniv
1:14:24
was flexing a little bit and allowing himself
1:14:26
to, you know, use
1:14:28
his imagination and show us things that we
1:14:30
haven't seen before. So I really that was
1:14:32
thrilling for me. But
1:14:35
before I get the spoilers, Vincenzo, I am
1:14:37
wondering if there's anything other than the use
1:14:39
of negative space and composition, is there anything
1:14:41
else that you as a filmmaker thought to
1:14:43
yourself, wow, that must have been difficult to
1:14:45
do, you know, in this movie
1:14:47
that everything I
1:14:49
mean, the other thing I appreciate and I'm
1:14:51
sorry, I'm going to knock
1:14:53
James Cameron a little bit and some
1:14:56
other directors of his generation, okay, I
1:14:58
have the highest respect for him, by
1:15:00
the way. And I even enjoyed Avatar
1:15:02
2, but I
1:15:08
really prefer being in a real
1:15:10
environment. I don't as
1:15:12
beautiful as Avatar 2 is. And I tried
1:15:14
watching that movie, not because of the
1:15:16
movie, but I cried for the animators. Because
1:15:19
I could see how much how painful, like
1:15:22
how many hours, how much work went into
1:15:24
it. So I don't want to denigrate it,
1:15:26
but give me a real
1:15:28
desert. And I feel like this movie, just
1:15:31
as you guys were saying, feels
1:15:33
lived in. Like, I feel like I'm in a real world.
1:15:35
It feels for all of its, you
1:15:37
know, eccentric, wild image,
1:15:39
it actually feels kind of
1:15:41
anthropological and real. And I believe
1:15:43
this play, partially because, you know,
1:15:46
it is just as
1:15:48
the Dune books do, it's sort of riffing off of conflict
1:15:51
in the Middle East and a lot of things that are real. So
1:15:55
I appreciate that.
1:15:57
Like, I love the fact that he goes to
1:15:59
a real location. And that when there
1:16:01
are visual effects, they
1:16:03
don't look like visual effects to me. And that's
1:16:06
where, to answer your question, that's where I'm like,
1:16:08
I don't know. I don't know
1:16:10
how he did the anti-gravity stuff. Doesn't look like wires
1:16:12
to me. Yeah. But also doesn't
1:16:14
look like these are digital people. So
1:16:16
I don't know. I think it's really
1:16:19
impressive. Right. And
1:16:21
as a filmmaker, often when you're watching stuff, you
1:16:23
could probably think, oh, like, this is the
1:16:25
kind of camera and lens he uses. Like
1:16:28
for this movie, you're watching stuff. You don't even know
1:16:30
how it was achieved. Right. And that's
1:16:32
the magic of a Dune party. I thought it
1:16:34
was lovely. And I'm very, that's like
1:16:36
my piccadillo. Like when I see visual effects
1:16:38
that don't look good
1:16:40
to me, it ruins everything for me. I
1:16:43
have a hard time seeing past that. There
1:16:45
is not a moment in this, honestly,
1:16:48
not a moment where I
1:16:50
felt, I really thought, I think it was D.
1:16:53
Negge who did the main vendor for
1:16:55
it. I don't know. I thought
1:16:57
like a lot of this must be models. Like it doesn't
1:16:59
look, you know, before
1:17:02
the movie, they had
1:17:04
a trailer for, sorry,
1:17:06
Kong and Godzilla. Kong,
1:17:08
V Godzilla or something. Kong X Godzilla.
1:17:10
Yeah. By
1:17:13
the way, it looks fun. Like I'm not
1:17:15
knocking at movies. Godzilla X Kong, the new
1:17:17
empire is the name. Right. It's,
1:17:20
you know, again, I won't knock it.
1:17:23
It looks like it's fun. If I were a kid, I'd
1:17:25
love it. But it's totally
1:17:27
digital. Like there's nothing, there's
1:17:30
nothing in that looks and then
1:17:32
partially intentional, probably stylized, but
1:17:34
Dune, it really is. It
1:17:37
looks like they built those things. Yeah. However
1:17:39
they did it. Like it looks like a physical thing, not
1:17:41
something in the hard drives from a kid. Even the sandworms.
1:17:44
Yeah. Yeah. I
1:17:46
think, you know, in our Dune part one after
1:17:48
dark, I talked about how I think
1:17:51
Denis Villeneuve is one of the directors that
1:17:53
is best able to combine
1:17:56
practical and CG. And he
1:17:58
knows, you know, where to go. practical
1:18:00
and where to go CG and there's all these little
1:18:02
details that just sell it and that you might not
1:18:04
even notice Do in part one
1:18:06
when they're first flying into a raucous the city
1:18:10
On the in the ornithopters right and
1:18:12
you see this whole city unfold and it looks like
1:18:14
maybe they built a miniature whatever And as they're flying
1:18:16
as the ornithopters are flying in first of all the
1:18:18
camera Simulates what
1:18:20
a camera would be like if you're actually like
1:18:22
flying in a helicopter But then out of
1:18:25
the city There's like random buildings that have this little steam
1:18:27
coming out of them And it's just like just a little
1:18:29
touch you might not even notice it But it kind of sells
1:18:31
it as a real place and
1:18:34
that's true of so many things in this movie
1:18:36
as well Where it's not like big
1:18:38
flashy like hey where this is a real physical. It's like
1:18:40
just like kind of like oh, yeah, there would be steam
1:18:42
coming out of some or smoke coming out of some things
1:18:44
or whatever, you know, and I
1:18:47
think he's just able to nail those little details
1:18:50
that make it feel real. So Anyway,
1:18:53
any other thoughts before we get to spoilers a lot more discuss
1:18:55
you though. I just want to say that Yeah,
1:18:58
Javier Bardem is the coolest MF or
1:19:00
whoever walked the earth Accent
1:19:06
to I
1:19:09
just love that like He's
1:19:11
kind of goofy in this movie. Mm-hmm, and
1:19:14
he can't not be cool Like this impossible for
1:19:16
him not to be I mean no country for
1:19:18
old men put him in the worst haircut Then
1:19:20
any human has ever had he's still the
1:19:23
coolest MF or ever walked the earth like
1:19:25
that dude just exudes cool No,
1:19:27
I just wanted again again. I want
1:19:29
my leads for maybe dr. Doom. It's
1:19:32
a perfect awesome Butler by the way
1:19:35
I think great as fate wrap like it I Don't
1:19:39
know who's the next person whose voice he will
1:19:41
steal But right now he's still still
1:19:43
scars guards voice like oh, I'm your offspring. I will
1:19:46
just do your voice Never
1:19:48
seen anyone do really a Stellan scars
1:19:50
guard impression before right? Yeah,
1:19:53
he's in like I don't think Dave, but
1:19:55
he's even tried right like oh no, so
1:19:58
he just he's a shot on movie and
1:20:00
then it was like oh I could have been doing this the
1:20:02
whole time. Also
1:20:06
well we will talk about some of this but David T. Simms
1:20:09
movie I think is kind of hilarious because he is just like
1:20:11
he is like a little worm after a
1:20:13
certain point like he's just constantly constantly failing
1:20:16
but yeah spoilers. Alright let's get let's get
1:20:18
the spoilers for Dune part 2 starting right
1:20:20
now. Alright
1:20:23
let's talk about spoilers for Dune part
1:20:25
2. I mean right off the bat
1:20:27
we got
1:20:47
to say one of the most impressive parts of this
1:20:50
movie I think is like for
1:20:52
me the first hour
1:20:54
and 15 minutes of this movie were awesome.
1:20:56
I mean it's it's the part of the
1:20:58
movie that we've seen many times in movies
1:21:01
like Avatar or you know Dances with
1:21:03
Wolves or whatever it's like it's the
1:21:05
white dude integrating with the society that
1:21:07
he's trying to be part of but it
1:21:10
is really thrilling he's he's learning their ways and
1:21:12
then of course it culminates with him riding the
1:21:14
sand worm and that whole sequence
1:21:17
was incredible. That is the thing that
1:21:19
basically the the seat transducers were just
1:21:21
like going off fire for like 30
1:21:24
minutes I was like riding that worm
1:21:26
with him. It's true and even in
1:21:28
the Lymax that I saw with the
1:21:31
sound was rumbling that sequence is
1:21:34
incredible. We've
1:21:36
seen people riding a sand
1:21:38
worm in Dune part 1 we
1:21:40
saw what's her name Leah Kynes I think
1:21:42
tried to ride a sand worm it didn't
1:21:45
work out that maybe kept really yanking out
1:21:47
the sandworming from her right she was getting
1:21:49
ready she's getting ready to
1:21:51
ride. Doing a lot of sandworm edging
1:21:53
in Dune part 1. Then
1:21:55
we see somebody off in the distance riding a
1:21:57
sandworm. And
1:22:00
then Dune Part 2 happens and it's like,
1:22:02
okay, they're finally gonna show it happening. Yes.
1:22:07
And I'm like, how are they gonna
1:22:09
do this in a way that actually adds something
1:22:11
to what we know about the same worm? Oh,
1:22:13
it doesn't look super silly. Like the idea of
1:22:15
writing a worm, you know, a desert worm. Inherently
1:22:18
a little silly. Somehow he made
1:22:21
it work. Yeah. And the way, you know, I'll throw
1:22:23
out a few tools, cinematic tools that they use to
1:22:25
do this. First of all, we talked in the first
1:22:27
part of the review about how, you know, it shows
1:22:29
him tiny guy standing on this
1:22:31
massive, you know, sand dune. And then like
1:22:33
this massive sand word off of the distance.
1:22:36
Everyone has great Spielberg-esque reactions of, yeah, oh
1:22:38
my God, not that big. That's too big.
1:22:41
The running parallel. Right. Oh, such a great
1:22:43
shot. Cool. And then so then he gets
1:22:45
on and he tries to jump on and
1:22:47
it's like just chaos. Like you can't see
1:22:50
anything at all. It's just sand everywhere. He can't see
1:22:52
anything. He finally gets on and
1:22:54
there is texture to this sandworm thing. Like
1:22:56
he has hooks on and you see where
1:22:58
the hook goes into the sandworm and it
1:23:00
pulls up and you see like little holes
1:23:02
on the side of the worm. All
1:23:05
these little details just sell it. The
1:23:07
only thing that's funny about that to me
1:23:10
is that later when mom's palanquin is on
1:23:12
that, I'm like, did they go through that
1:23:14
to get mom and the team on there?
1:23:16
Like Uber on Arrakis. I'm
1:23:19
going to call it sandworm. I've been skating
1:23:21
Ubers before, but that's... But
1:23:26
anyway, that's probably one of the biggest highlights
1:23:28
of the movie. Yeah, so good. Riding the
1:23:31
sand, all the sandworm stuff. Dude, there's so
1:23:33
many highlights in the movie. All of the
1:23:35
sort of rebels
1:23:38
against the empire, terrorist,
1:23:41
you know, destruction of
1:23:43
the... Like
1:23:46
the temple, you know, all the
1:23:49
mining equipment. Oh,
1:23:52
yeah, that part was... But the best scene
1:23:54
from the first movie and the best scene
1:23:57
from this movie both had to do with
1:23:59
spice mining. It's like when
1:24:03
Chani takes the bazooka or whatever. Shoots
1:24:06
the dude and he goes flying across
1:24:08
the screen. Incredible. And just the methodology,
1:24:10
their tactics on
1:24:16
how they take down
1:24:18
these things and
1:24:21
the orthocopter has a shield. So it has
1:24:23
a shield as well. So they can't have
1:24:25
the shield up when they're shooting. So you
1:24:27
gotta take that down. And the lasers do
1:24:29
the things from way far away and all
1:24:31
just in just. One
1:24:34
of my favorite touches from the movie is when
1:24:37
she launches the surface to
1:24:39
air missile or whatever, or whatever
1:24:42
it's called, RPG, whatever it's called. And then it
1:24:44
hits the thing. And then you see her booking
1:24:46
it, she's just running. And there's
1:24:49
complete silence. It just is silence
1:24:51
and you hear her like the steps and
1:24:53
you hear her breathing heavily. And then boom,
1:24:55
it hits the ground and massive explosion behind
1:24:57
her. And that's kind of negative
1:25:00
space. The audio version has been gentle. He
1:25:03
knows like there's silence. He does it twice. He
1:25:07
does it when Josh Brolin is walking, Rogaso does
1:25:09
it, thank you. Yeah. He
1:25:11
can't resist. But it's great. It's great. So
1:25:14
bad. The first sequence too where they go
1:25:16
underneath the thing as it crumples across the.
1:25:19
Just thrilling. And you really see
1:25:21
that, you know, that gritty,
1:25:26
they're overwhelming odds, but they got
1:25:29
that, you know, that ability
1:25:31
to be the thorn in the side
1:25:33
of the giant, you know, they're David
1:25:35
versus Goliath. It's so good. Yeah.
1:25:38
So good. I
1:25:40
am curious like how some of these other
1:25:42
sort of plot elements worked
1:25:44
for you because for me, I was
1:25:46
so engrossed in this whole
1:25:49
Paul journey. And then the
1:25:51
movie just kind of grinds to a halt to like
1:25:53
introduce Fade Routh out for me. Fade Routh a very
1:25:55
compelling guy and like all this stuff fighting in the
1:25:58
Coliseum and stuff. I Do love. Her
1:26:01
for excuse like reaction to
1:26:04
that they'd mathis he psychotic
1:26:06
A waste he says is
1:26:08
that's everything yeah everything about
1:26:10
this do yeah l but.
1:26:13
And then we kind of get wrapped up in
1:26:15
oldest and of more Game of Thrones us this
1:26:17
of which is like a definitely a buddy sick
1:26:19
com between him and her at the day but
1:26:22
he says character Davis' to keep sucking up and
1:26:24
feed Ruff exhorts buddy come on I'm going to
1:26:26
take over because you're you're miss you. Can he
1:26:28
be can find this guy? Yeah The Dave what
1:26:30
he is the felt a little bit like a
1:26:33
missed opportunity to be. yeah say because there's something
1:26:35
really compelling about. As. A
1:26:37
bad ass guy like they battista. Who.
1:26:39
Can't Succeed week he trying to keeps
1:26:41
failing and is v something really tragic
1:26:43
to that and I feel like when
1:26:46
that character eventually is killed. Isis.
1:26:48
Feel like oh like that that sad
1:26:50
that he died. but it's like yes,
1:26:52
as bad as said. You know. Gurney.
1:26:56
Halleck finally gets his revenge for the horrifying
1:26:58
massacre we saw the first movie, but It's
1:27:00
A Cell. So quick and perfunctory to me
1:27:03
and that the it's kind of. Kind
1:27:06
of. Is emblematic of
1:27:08
them the flaws us on the heels of wouldn't
1:27:10
have think like a hundred the day but he
1:27:12
cigar to rhyming. I can agree I would have
1:27:14
listened more but he says in every that I
1:27:16
will i will never seen as but he said
1:27:18
but he's also talked about Villeneuve as being the
1:27:20
first director whose like know you're good at this
1:27:22
you are a good actor and that made him
1:27:24
feel so great in a in blade runner cause
1:27:26
but these a habit Amazing opening sequence of agree.
1:27:29
Could. Have had more. I could have handled more
1:27:31
of a lot of thing them as maybe
1:27:33
that's kind of the way the way it is.
1:27:35
We should talk about how weird it is that
1:27:37
you know they're talking to paul sister while
1:27:39
sees in the womb that whole that whole
1:27:41
thing how they even sell it like early
1:27:43
on your just like oh this is a
1:27:45
sort of it's have a baby in the womb
1:27:48
oh yes is pregnant. That's.
1:27:50
A character now that the characters the
1:27:52
speaking through the mother. that is weird
1:27:54
since the wild yeah me as way
1:27:56
weirder in the book am Sam. That.
1:28:00
Because she is like born in
1:28:02
the timeline that's covered in the movie
1:28:04
in the book. No, boy. She's
1:28:06
like toddler who knows everything. Very
1:28:09
odd. But before
1:28:12
you get off the Batista thing, I love
1:28:14
that sequence where he's all, you
1:28:16
know, Sturm and Drong, fiery, gonna
1:28:18
bring hell down on them, gets
1:28:20
there and then they all attack and he's like,
1:28:23
well, let's get out of here. Let's get everybody
1:28:25
out of here. And he gets saved by like
1:28:27
the skin of his, like he gets saved because
1:28:29
one of his underlings like manages to save his
1:28:32
ass. Like being a dude the size and you
1:28:34
know, intensity of him like scared out
1:28:37
of his wits was very cool. It's
1:28:40
inherently, that's an inherently interesting thing to
1:28:42
watch. So I agree with you there. But
1:28:45
anyway, the
1:28:47
Florence Pugh stuff, you know, it was another thing where I'm
1:28:50
like, I feel like I don't really know this character. By
1:28:53
the end of the movie, she, there's
1:28:55
this really amazing, I thought
1:28:57
the ending was actually quite compelling the last
1:28:59
like 20 minutes or so, where
1:29:03
she kind of, Paul
1:29:05
talks in the first movie about how he's
1:29:07
going to marry the Emperor's daughter and bring,
1:29:10
you know,
1:29:13
triumph over the other houses
1:29:15
and bring paradise to Arrakis. That's kind of
1:29:17
what my sense is of what his goal
1:29:19
is. But it will require a lot of
1:29:21
dead bodies on the way. And
1:29:24
Florence Pugh kind of interjects at the end. Like, hey, you know,
1:29:26
I will go peace. I will be
1:29:28
your bride peacefully if you just spare my father.
1:29:31
But it's like, I just I don't have any
1:29:33
access to that character's interiority. I don't think I
1:29:35
mean, because we're all in Paul and Paul spends
1:29:37
most of the movie being like, I don't want
1:29:39
to do this. I don't want I'm
1:29:42
rejecting these visions that I'm seeing because billions of
1:29:44
people will die. I think
1:29:46
it's a really interesting conflict for a character like
1:29:48
him. It's sort of like if Anakin Skywalker had
1:29:50
the premonitions of like what he would become, what
1:29:52
he would end up choosing to do. That's
1:29:55
kind of where we're at here. Yeah. Yeah.
1:29:58
I agree. Yeah, I
1:30:00
would have liked to see. Listen, more Florence P.
1:30:02
More everybody. Make this like a thing that I'm
1:30:05
just sitting in the theater for six hours for
1:30:07
it, please. Well, I think the character of Chani
1:30:09
is very interesting. Zendaya's character in the movie is
1:30:12
I think one of the biggest
1:30:15
changes to the text. And
1:30:18
I think really kind of reveals our
1:30:20
modern sensibilities, which is like, hey,
1:30:23
the chosen one getting all
1:30:25
the power, or maybe
1:30:27
it's not a great thing. Maybe everybody
1:30:29
falling in line and deciding this guy
1:30:31
is going to waltz into our society
1:30:34
and be the greatest one of us
1:30:36
ever. Not such a good idea. None of that's
1:30:39
in the book. She's
1:30:41
on Team Waddib
1:30:45
wholeheartedly in the novels. And I think that's
1:30:47
a really strong choice for
1:30:50
a modern film to do to have that voice
1:30:52
of doubt of like, is everybody
1:30:54
seeing this? Let's not do this. This is
1:30:56
weird, but also she loves him to
1:30:59
you. So it's like, I don't like the
1:31:01
guy, but let's be careful here. I got
1:31:04
to say their relationship was the emotional
1:31:06
core of the movie for me. And it did work.
1:31:09
There is this amazing, I mean, I got to say, you
1:31:11
know, for Paul to make the moves he made, I don't
1:31:13
think he didn't soften
1:31:15
the ground for any of those decisions. The very
1:31:18
end of the movie, he gave her a heads
1:31:20
up. I will love you as long as I
1:31:22
breathe. And then he literally turns around and he's
1:31:24
like, all right, Emperor's daughter, we're getting married. And
1:31:27
then she's just, there's a shock on her
1:31:29
face. That's really well done. Vincenta,
1:31:34
what do you think of the central Paul
1:31:37
Chani relationship in Dune Part Two? Well,
1:31:41
you brought up a lot of things that were very interesting to me.
1:31:43
Yeah, I hit the
1:31:45
ball in succession. So I liked
1:31:47
it. But
1:31:50
if I have a
1:31:52
bone to pick with a movie, it's in
1:31:54
this film, and Maybe something I
1:31:56
missed, but I wasn't quite charting his.
1:32:00
Didn't like idea vote on like you
1:32:02
are think of inter I wanted more
1:32:05
the video as a more to more
1:32:07
tying run the up to follow that.
1:32:09
Thought. Process because he joe clearly.
1:32:12
Not wanting to go down that road and in
1:32:14
somewhere and I missed it. Maybe it's there. But.
1:32:17
I it went past me them because he. Decided.
1:32:20
To go for it. All said, he's
1:32:22
out there with like a big hassle
1:32:24
or whatever it is. he's angry, like
1:32:26
he's another thing I was in his.
1:32:30
I don't know how we got there I did.
1:32:32
He got something that was missing in action pulled
1:32:34
out of the film the I think it happens
1:32:36
around the time when he drinks the sand worm
1:32:38
blue juice. That's where the says with this is
1:32:41
is like read do your thing get a full
1:32:43
you just the man rent says it's kind of
1:32:45
a plot see a little bit I think but
1:32:47
I do think it's really cool how they show
1:32:50
the sandworms booties being extracted as a whole. amazing
1:32:52
that with it for hims with the end of
1:32:54
the shallow water microphone the thing or another that's
1:32:56
another one of those of like. How.
1:32:58
Much of that Cg is us is
1:33:01
a puppet. you know, like So cool.
1:33:03
Yeah, yeah. and there's a rule t
1:33:05
to the movie that I appreciate. Like
1:33:07
I think that. Would. The hope
1:33:09
always was for dune in all of it's.
1:33:12
So. Much can television incarnations is will this is
1:33:14
going to be. Star. Wars for adults like
1:33:16
this is going to be. You. Know your
1:33:18
adult space opera as opposed to your
1:33:21
kitty space opera. And. And I
1:33:23
do feel like it fulfills that promise
1:33:25
because there's There are shades of grey
1:33:27
and there is a kind of. Brutality.
1:33:31
That feels. Real. You
1:33:34
know that isn't sugar coated and into the
1:33:36
from and. The. Killed That isn't fair
1:33:38
enough. I feel sorry for the worm
1:33:40
as soon as he does Ruin whatever
1:33:43
the priestess river does, it is it
1:33:45
out delighted like he feels no compassion
1:33:47
for the fourth. What so effortless sucking
1:33:49
as you thought of drowning it and
1:33:51
waters. As and I
1:33:53
like that because it feels authentic. Yeah
1:33:56
I was right when you mentioned as or
1:33:58
it respective is like. Pretty.
1:34:00
Dark, dark, several other. they're just using everybody
1:34:03
as pawns. Their plan a long game every
1:34:05
it. it's very cruel. As you said I
1:34:07
think that I was working for use by
1:34:09
the whole plan to below could we be
1:34:11
the another pawn? Just the case is Paul
1:34:14
thing about how laid out live we we
1:34:16
took it out were so they gone too
1:34:18
far. fried food Rosa in the movie there
1:34:20
wasn't Meant is that I now understand would
1:34:22
accept that as a system for yeah they
1:34:24
put up for the gone to bar and
1:34:27
that's why you come to find yourself. Why
1:34:29
didn't. I
1:34:33
whenever I want to bring up the worm sequence
1:34:35
by the way the baby were him that was
1:34:37
very vincenzo sequence like I had some advice vibes
1:34:40
there consent like oh I was ten when really
1:34:42
wish you would think of this massive misses any
1:34:44
of this is a tv show Yeah since I
1:34:46
would have directed as the baby worm sequence. You
1:34:49
To Be A Citizen to direct the Baby Worms sequence of
1:34:51
I Sell It For the Baby Boomer. While
1:34:55
lying in the movie. Oh. Wow,
1:34:57
that's the Cassie related most. I
1:34:59
was elated. or ssssss missile cruisers
1:35:01
a sneaky of it as a
1:35:03
surrounded and his wife. Wants
1:35:06
to swim? Ah but I guess it's the
1:35:09
I think there's some of their. Like
1:35:13
there's a little bit of Paul missing and I have
1:35:15
an some you know. I liked him as he saw
1:35:17
me a lot. But a our
1:35:19
know how other people feel that this
1:35:22
I do find him to be a
1:35:24
bit affected. Like. That whole whispers
1:35:26
like is crisp. And
1:35:28
I feel. I.
1:35:30
Don't. Find. Him.
1:35:34
Terribly. Prismatic. Be honest I said, I
1:35:36
don't know. I think it's a hard part to
1:35:38
play. Think Paul is very. Not
1:35:41
terribly nuanced as a character as
1:35:43
a. Just
1:35:45
as the nature of the character, But.
1:35:47
At that I would love to like seen
1:35:50
a little more of. His. Journey
1:35:52
carved into the. Story.
1:35:54
And it it felt sometimes that
1:35:56
calls note see. What?
1:35:59
You know? where we. From one place to another with
1:36:01
him. I'll. Just say that he typically
1:36:03
tell me really pleasantly surprised me in
1:36:05
this film so I have opposite reaction
1:36:07
were maybe pro before going into this
1:36:10
movie I wouldn't have believed that similar
1:36:12
shall make a get up in front
1:36:14
of say five thousand people and give
1:36:16
a really rousing citizen or and get
1:36:18
everyone on board to follow him as
1:36:20
a leader. Amber I thought he'd
1:36:22
not that one out of park I the
1:36:24
idling I got themselves. I got some shills
1:36:27
in that scene and. And. Of course,
1:36:29
there's also like. A darker aspect that
1:36:31
seen you know that becomes clear by the
1:36:33
end of the film pay the Smell like
1:36:35
a really sells the Be Gloria facism to
1:36:37
you. Doesn't mean you're probably going to die
1:36:39
for for whatever my galactic misses his but
1:36:42
you're going to feel could be exciting. As
1:36:45
far as a preventive a party,
1:36:47
he really felt it. I
1:36:50
don't even know if I described as fast as may.
1:36:52
I think it's more like of a lazy as it
1:36:54
is as they put have been like a holy war.
1:36:56
The religious it is zealotry of it merited like that
1:36:59
mean that that's a big part. Yeah yeah I don't
1:37:01
know that the same as a it feels like a
1:37:03
different thing than fascism the little bit but as a
1:37:05
different flavor. It's it's
1:37:07
still could. being controlled by power and
1:37:10
using that power to to kill billions
1:37:12
seen as fast as it after you
1:37:14
win the holy war with Syria has
1:37:17
her. Yes, that's correct. Of
1:37:20
but anyway I loved the choreography of
1:37:22
that fine all us storming of the
1:37:24
emperor's teamer who who hum although bad
1:37:26
attitudes like okay here we go with
1:37:28
go an alias as you nothing you
1:37:30
never see you here he's offering any
1:37:33
they have. Some whoa
1:37:35
officials in one day but in the ropes.
1:37:37
And then he just took his really
1:37:39
ignore the emperor he wanted out and
1:37:41
murderers hurt murders the baron and is
1:37:43
like okay so i can for a
1:37:45
football. i had never seen it
1:37:47
played quite like that and i thought that
1:37:49
was has a neat way of handling it's
1:37:52
a great way to not have pursued an
1:37:54
intricate action sequences well i think it would
1:37:56
it's a sales jobs potency of what's happening
1:37:58
like there There was, these
1:38:00
are the coolest dudes the Emperor has to fight
1:38:02
and there was no problem at all.
1:38:05
Not, you don't hear the fight, you
1:38:07
don't see it, like they're so powerful.
1:38:10
These guys are just, they just walked right through.
1:38:12
Yeah, so cool. Yeah, I do think that- And
1:38:14
that Emperor is such a non-threat that they can
1:38:16
just ignore him. Yeah, it's
1:38:19
the coolest. Yeah. NBD,
1:38:21
NBD, NBD Emperor. Yeah, but I
1:38:23
do think that, you know, to Vincenzo's point, I do
1:38:25
think like Paul's motivations at the end were a little
1:38:27
bit, like he finds out he's a Harkonnen and
1:38:30
it's like, what is the impact of that? And then he kills his
1:38:33
grandfather and then he kills his
1:38:35
cousin, I want to say at the end. And
1:38:37
it's like, what is his reaction to any of those things? I don't
1:38:39
feel like I really get where his
1:38:41
head- He's a little like spice frenzied at that
1:38:43
point or like frenzied by like the thing, the
1:38:46
blue thing that he drank, because his eyes got
1:38:48
super blue. So how much of that is
1:38:50
him and how much of that is like the
1:38:53
prophecy kind of propelling him forward too?
1:38:55
I don't know. I think I think of the
1:38:57
fact that both this movie and the last movie
1:39:00
have some of the most large
1:39:02
scale fight sequences, sequences, action scenes
1:39:04
ever. And both movies choose
1:39:06
to end with Paul in a one-on-one
1:39:08
fight. Love it. More, that's cool. I'm
1:39:12
curious, they're both good fights. You know, I think
1:39:14
they're both like, they both have
1:39:16
compelling things about them. But
1:39:18
I just think it's an interesting choice. Vincenzo, you know, what
1:39:22
are your thoughts on that? You haven't really made action movies
1:39:24
per se, as far as I can recall. But
1:39:27
I'm curious like how you, what you think about the
1:39:29
idea of like ending with something small after having done
1:39:31
so many big things. Well, I think the
1:39:33
first thing you said early on was, you
1:39:36
know, Dennyville knew so good with scale.
1:39:38
Yeah. So part of scale is knowing
1:39:41
when to go big and wide. You
1:39:44
have a wide perspective and show the little person next
1:39:46
to the giant worm. And then the other part
1:39:48
of scale is to like, know when to be very intimate. And
1:39:52
I think one of the big problems with action
1:39:55
movies or superhero movies these days is they just
1:39:57
stay in this scale. It's
1:39:59
so... massive that you
1:40:02
stop relating to it. And
1:40:06
what he does very effectively, and I do think
1:40:08
it's from the book, is with that last fight,
1:40:10
it's a mano-mano knife fight. And you
1:40:13
feel that much more than you would
1:40:16
when an army is being crushed by a
1:40:18
sandworm. Like it's so visceral and intimate. So
1:40:22
yeah, I think he handles all
1:40:24
that kind of thing beautifully. I
1:40:29
think it's important. I think that's one of
1:40:31
the big lessons with these epics is that
1:40:33
there has to be some kind of balance
1:40:36
where you pay
1:40:39
homage to the size of what you're dealing
1:40:42
with, the awesomeness of what you're dealing with,
1:40:44
and yet somehow contextualize it on this very
1:40:46
human level. So
1:40:51
Danny Villeneuve has said that if this movie
1:40:53
works out, he's going to make a Dune
1:40:55
Part 3, and that will be the final
1:40:57
film of the franchise. The
1:40:59
next six books in one movie. Is
1:41:03
that true? I thought it was just going to be Dune Messiah,
1:41:05
right? I was joking. Totally joking. But
1:41:08
yeah, I guess as we... I
1:41:11
don't want to speculate on the plot of that movie because
1:41:13
a lot of people haven't read the book, and I
1:41:15
don't want to spoil it for them. But
1:41:17
I guess I'm curious where this movie leaves
1:41:19
you emotionally, because here's the thing, Jeff,
1:41:22
you could argue the same thing
1:41:24
that you argued about the first movie, which is...
1:41:26
I don't agree. I don't agree with that. This movie
1:41:28
does leave on a bit of a cliffhanger. Let's put
1:41:30
it that way. It does leave like, hey,
1:41:33
some massive thing is about to start, and
1:41:35
then the movie just ends. But Jeff,
1:41:37
go ahead. What was your reaction to the end of this? I think
1:41:40
for me, the end of the
1:41:42
first movie is literally an
1:41:44
ellipsis. It's dot, dot, dot. And
1:41:48
the end of this one is
1:41:51
there's another chapter to this story. I
1:41:53
think there's a distinction between those two.
1:41:55
I think this has a climax. a
1:42:00
conclusion, a new place that everyone has arrived. I
1:42:02
mean, you could argue that people are in a
1:42:04
new place in the end of the first film,
1:42:07
but the place is a question
1:42:09
mark. And the question mark
1:42:11
here, I think, comes as
1:42:15
you are with a lot of stories like,
1:42:17
well, what comes next, rather than how
1:42:20
does this end? I think the first
1:42:22
movie is how does this thing end?
1:42:24
We know what happened. I
1:42:27
feel like our main antagonists
1:42:29
have been vanquished. Our hero has
1:42:31
achieved something. There is
1:42:33
more to tell, but not in the same way at
1:42:35
the end of the first film, where it literally is
1:42:37
nothing has been resolved. Yeah. Yeah. We have to get
1:42:39
a conclusion to a story, which I think is kind
1:42:41
of key about this one. But I do agree. I'm
1:42:44
kind of left the same way. I'm like, more
1:42:46
Dune. More Dune, please. Now I
1:42:48
need more Dune. And it would suck if
1:42:50
the third one never got made
1:42:53
after watching this. It would. I think it
1:42:55
would. But, Jens, if any thoughts on where
1:42:57
this one ends? No, I mean, it's the
1:42:59
end of the book. It's everything as it
1:43:02
should be. But I think that unlike the
1:43:04
David Lynch one, you see where it
1:43:07
is a little more Star Wars-y actually, and that the good
1:43:09
guys win. It actually rains on Arrakis, which is just a
1:43:12
fact of bad thing, because that would kill
1:43:14
all the sandworms. But it's supposed
1:43:16
to make us feel good.
1:43:18
This movie ends with Paul,
1:43:21
from as far as I'm concerned, making a wrong
1:43:23
choice. Like he's going down a bad road.
1:43:25
Yeah. He betrayed
1:43:28
his one true love for
1:43:31
this goal, which could
1:43:33
be for the betterment. But first,
1:43:35
it feels a little bit like, you know,
1:43:38
his ego or the desire to
1:43:40
become a messiah is eclipsing his better
1:43:42
nature. It does feel incomplete to me.
1:43:45
If we don't get the third part, oh, you
1:43:47
can't. No, no, it's not done. No,
1:43:49
it feels like Empire Strikes Back or
1:43:51
something. Like it feels like we're in
1:43:53
the end of Act Two, not the end of
1:43:55
even though it's the end of the first technically
1:43:59
speaking. Check it out, go ahead. Well,
1:44:02
I was just going to echo
1:44:06
what Vicinzo said about it being
1:44:08
sort of the adult Star Wars. I
1:44:11
remember reading Dune as a young person, you know,
1:44:13
I don't know, 13, 14 when I was super
1:44:17
into sci-fi, I was reading Asimov and
1:44:20
Heinlein and Arthur C. Clarke. And
1:44:24
I was absolutely in love with Star Wars
1:44:26
and I didn't enjoy
1:44:28
Dune because it didn't scratch
1:44:30
that little kid fantasy. It
1:44:33
was this darker subversion
1:44:35
of that idea. And
1:44:39
so I never, it was never among my favorite books.
1:44:41
As I get, I didn't read further into the
1:44:43
series. I was like, Oh, this is, this feels
1:44:45
icky. But I love
1:44:47
that, you
1:44:50
know, as an adult, I'm able to appreciate that.
1:44:52
But also that the films are embracing
1:44:54
that about it, right? They're not trying
1:44:56
to turn it into, kind
1:44:59
of as Lynch did, you know, trying to turn it
1:45:01
into a more commercial idea. Yeah. I
1:45:04
do want to say it's kind of baller just to
1:45:06
be like, Hey, Anya, Taylor, Joy's in our movie a
1:45:08
little bit. For like eight seconds. For like eight
1:45:10
seconds. But again, honestly, like Shani was kind
1:45:13
of like similar in the first one too.
1:45:15
Like it was mostly visions and she wasn't
1:45:17
actually featured until the end. But
1:45:19
this is just like, who else can
1:45:21
do that? Some Marvel shit. What that is.
1:45:23
Marvel stuff. But it is very much like,
1:45:25
well, it's character you've never met before. Also
1:45:28
you're talking to her as a baby in
1:45:30
the womb. That is weird. It
1:45:33
has like clearly has her own goals
1:45:36
and machinations involved too. Like this baby
1:45:38
seems devious. I
1:45:40
just think that's fascinating. Like, but he can just
1:45:42
do that. Cause it seems like it breaks the
1:45:44
rules of a lot of movie, you know, storytelling.
1:45:47
In the book, she's the one
1:45:49
that kills the Baron. Not him.
1:45:51
Interesting. Interesting. Yeah. Later.
1:45:54
All right. So wrap it up
1:45:56
there. Before we go, Vincenzo Natale,
1:45:59
tell people. where they can
1:46:01
find more of your work on the internet or elsewhere this
1:46:03
week. I think I
1:46:05
met Vincenzo underscore Natali on, I refuse
1:46:07
to call X on Twitter, at Vincenzo
1:46:11
underscore Natali and then I'm
1:46:13
on Instagram at, forgive
1:46:15
me, Vincenzo Polis. Love
1:46:18
it. I probably could not even sell.
1:46:21
And be sure to check
1:46:23
out Vincenzo's graphic novel PEC,
1:46:25
which is out and available for purchase.
1:46:29
Vincenzo, thanks so much for chatting with us today. Oh,
1:46:31
it's such a pleasure guys. So great to see you.
1:46:33
And also at the end of the day,
1:46:35
it is extremely impressive
1:46:37
that Denis Villeneuve made a movie.
1:46:40
So, congrats. Congrats.
1:46:44
Alright, let's get to the end
1:46:46
of this episode of the podcast. You can find
1:46:48
more episodes of the show at the filmcast.com. Email
1:46:50
us at slash filmcast.com. Let us know what you
1:46:52
thought. Our music comes from Tim
1:46:54
McEwen who wrote our theme song. He's
1:46:56
from the midnight. Our spoiler bumper in
1:46:58
Weekly Plugs music comes from Noah Ross
1:47:00
who also edited this episode. Video assistance
1:47:02
provided by Kurt Mega. patreon.com/film
1:47:05
podcast where you can support the show,
1:47:07
get ad-free episodes and exclusive after dark.
1:47:09
Reminder, we discussed Dune part one in
1:47:13
last week's after dark and also on this week's after
1:47:15
dark we'll be taking a look at David Lynch's Dune. So
1:47:18
be sure to tune in for all of that.
1:47:20
Next week on the podcast, it's
1:47:23
going to be Promised Land, the
1:47:25
new Mads Mikkelsen movie that's out
1:47:27
available on video on demand. So check
1:47:31
that out. I've heard great things. I literally have no idea what this
1:47:33
movie is about. Except that it's
1:47:35
apparently really good. So that's
1:47:37
Promised Land, a thriller that's out on video on demand.
1:47:40
Check it out. It's gonna be the main review for
1:47:43
the filmcast next week. So
1:47:45
yeah, thanks so much for listening. Thanks for your support at
1:47:48
Patreon and until next week we will
1:47:50
see you later. Goodbye. You
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More