Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
The new documentary feature, 20 Days
0:02
in Maryupol, from Frontline and the
0:05
Associated Press, is now playing
0:07
in select theaters and coming to PBS
0:09
this fall. Last February,
0:12
as we marked a year of the war in Ukraine,
0:15
I hosted an in-person recording of The
0:17
Dispatch at the Boston Public Library
0:19
with director Mrs. Lev Chernov and
0:21
my colleague, producer and editor
0:24
Michelle Meisner. I'm Reni
0:26
Aronson-Roth, editor-in-chief and executive
0:28
producer of Frontline, and this is
0:31
The Frontline Dispatch.
0:37
The Frontline Dispatch is made possible by
0:39
the Abrams Foundation, committed to excellence
0:42
in journalism, and by the Frontline
0:44
Journalism Fund, with major support
0:46
from John and Joanne Hagler.
0:48
Support for Frontline Dispatch comes from the Massachusetts
0:51
General Hospital Cancer Center, dedicated to
0:53
providing compassionate care and cancer specialists
0:55
who are experienced in the cancer you have. When
0:58
you hear the word cancer, their team is ready.
1:00
Learn more at massgeneral.org
1:02
slash cancer.
1:04
We're so pleased to be here at the BPL
1:06
to talk about our documentary, 20 Days
1:09
in Maryupol, that we produced alongside
1:12
the Associated Press. And
1:14
it's extra special because we have with
1:16
us AP reporter Mrs. Lev Chernov,
1:18
who directed and filmed this documentary.
1:21
We're also joined by Michelle Meisner, the
1:23
talented Frontline editor who helped
1:25
turn this reporting into the unforgettable
1:28
documentary that it is, 20 Days
1:30
in Maryupol. It is an unflinching account
1:33
of the Russian siege of the port city
1:35
of Maryupol, which remains to
1:37
this day under Russian occupation.
1:40
Really special, Mrs. Lev, to have you with us
1:43
all the way from Ukraine, for you to be in Boston
1:45
with us today. Thanks for being on The Dispatch. Thank
1:48
you. And why don't I have you take us back to the very moment
1:50
that you and your two colleagues
1:52
made the decision to go into Maryupol?
1:54
Well, the story starts
1:57
actually as the invasion of Russia.
2:00
to Ukraine starts not in 2022, but
2:02
in 2014. My
2:05
story as a journalist working in Donbass
2:08
and in Marupol II starts in 2014. As
2:12
many other documentary photographers
2:14
and videographers, I
2:17
became automatically a war
2:19
photographer, a war videographer because the
2:22
war started in my country, Russia invaded Ukraine.
2:26
And throughout these nine years, part of
2:28
covering other
2:30
wars for AP and Syria,
2:32
Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya,
2:36
I was always coming back to Ukraine
2:39
and I was trying to tell
2:41
the story of Donbass
2:43
people. And through these nine years,
2:45
we've studied well the frontline,
2:49
the dynamics of the war, people
2:52
who were at the front
2:52
lines in the trenches or just
2:55
residents who lived in this
2:57
gray zone, which was always under
3:00
attack. So
3:02
in February,
3:04
the whole beginning of February, we
3:08
could see that something is different and things
3:10
are heating up and Ukraine's
3:13
preparing more and more for this
3:16
upcoming, probable upcoming invasion.
3:19
And on 23rd of
3:22
February in the evening,
3:25
piecing this puzzle together with listening
3:29
to what Russian media is saying, listening
3:31
to what our sources on the frontline are saying,
3:35
we realized that war is
3:37
going to start tomorrow or probably
3:40
very, very soon. So it was late
3:42
evening and we spoke to
3:44
AP editors and we
3:48
left for Marupol because Marupol seemed
3:50
to be one of the crucial
3:52
tactically, symbolically targets
3:55
for Russia at that point, regardless
3:58
of whether it was going to...
3:59
attack the whole country, Russia's
4:02
Donbas, it was a new way to crime
4:04
me. Right, so if you can just tell us, people
4:07
who don't know exactly where Marupol is, help
4:09
us understand why you knew that that was going to be
4:11
such a strategic place
4:13
for Russia as they were coming into Ukraine.
4:16
Yeah, if you look at where the Marupol is placed
4:18
and what is Marupol in
4:20
its core, it's a huge port and
4:25
it's an economic center
4:28
of the whole Donbas region
4:31
and it's strategically
4:34
positioned on the way from
4:36
Russia to Crimea which was
4:38
occupied in 2014. So
4:41
in order to make this
4:43
corridor to Crimea, Russia would
4:45
need it to take it and it was
4:49
just by its placement you could see
4:52
that if the war is the full-scale
4:54
invasion is going to really start then it's
4:56
going to be surrounded. So actually
4:58
we kind of
5:01
sat around the table and we
5:04
had this conversation whether we are
5:06
ready to be surrounded
5:08
and we
5:10
didn't know how long is going to be the siege, we
5:12
didn't know how violent is going
5:14
to be here, we didn't know
5:17
if the city is going to be occupied in the end
5:19
or not but we
5:21
knew that we're going to get surrounded
5:23
at some point and we had to
5:26
make plans to deal with
5:28
that.
5:28
Right, you know a lot
5:30
of times when reporters are calling me from the field
5:33
the conversations are really serious
5:35
about security, the risks you're taking,
5:39
the thought behind going into a really dangerous
5:41
place. So tell me about your conversation
5:44
with your editors at that time.
5:46
Everybody understood
5:48
it and obviously
5:50
it was a lot of discussions and security
5:53
calls and discussions
5:57
about what's the plan for evacuation, what's
5:59
the
5:59
plan for staying. So
6:03
in the end, if you
6:05
have a solid plan of
6:07
your operations and if you have security
6:10
assessment and plans how do you escape
6:13
in case A happens, B happens,
6:15
C happens, then you
6:19
go and you do your work until time
6:22
comes that you just can't. That's
6:24
exactly what happened. But what
6:26
we didn't expect that it's
6:29
not only
6:29
the city is going to get surrounded where that we are going
6:32
to be the last international
6:34
journalists who are going to be reporting
6:37
from the city and therefore our
6:39
names became known.
6:42
We couldn't just get lost in the
6:44
crowd
6:44
anymore. Right, you will just sort of disappear. How did you
6:46
know you were the last international
6:48
journalist and when that happened how
6:51
did that feel and
6:53
tell me about your colleagues too.
6:54
In the beginning of the siege we've
6:56
seen a lot of international press.
7:00
When the circle
7:02
around Maripo was closing there
7:04
were several convoys of journalists
7:07
and diplomats who were leaving the city along
7:10
with the civilians and
7:14
we knew that many journalists have left. However
7:16
we had solid plans on how
7:18
do we what do we do in case we
7:20
get surrounded. So
7:23
we were not that worried again
7:25
because we didn't know that we will
7:28
be the last ones and then
7:30
after a few days of reporting because
7:33
I would every morning I would try to
7:35
or in the evening I would just run out of this
7:37
hospital where we lived and I would open
7:41
the phone, a satellite phone and
7:43
wait until it catches the connection. You
7:45
would have to wait for like 10 minutes to
7:48
sit in there and
7:51
as soon as you get connection you call to the
7:53
editor and you start
7:55
asking questions. What happens to you with
7:58
the other Ukrainian cities and one of
7:59
One of the questions is obviously who else
8:03
is reporting from Marjubal and at
8:05
some point they told
8:08
us no one else is reporting
8:10
from there.
8:10
Tell us about the two people that you were
8:13
with and the roles they played. Evgeny
8:16
Maloletka is a
8:18
still photographer, amazing
8:20
photographer who just got a world
8:23
press photo for
8:25
the devastating image
8:28
of a pregnant Irina
8:31
who later died with her child. She's been carried
8:34
through the rubble by
8:38
rescue workers. We have that moment
8:40
in the film too so you can
8:42
kind of also see how we
8:44
got there to that iconic
8:47
moment, the devastating moment. I
8:51
worked with him for nine
8:53
years basically in Ukraine. We
8:55
are good friends and we trust each other. That's
8:57
what you need when you cover in conflict
9:00
actually. I feel producer of
9:02
us, Lisa Stepanyankov, a young
9:04
Ukrainian journalist. She's
9:07
a part of a generation of this
9:09
amazing young journalist who were
9:12
basically born, forged
9:14
through this war
9:17
as terrible as it is and gave birth
9:19
to the generation of
9:22
young talents.
9:23
So Michelle, try to remember the first
9:25
time I told you about what I was seeing
9:27
coming out of Marjubal and what we might
9:30
do. Well, I remember
9:32
a couple of emails and
9:34
a conversation with you about this
9:37
discussion you'd actually just had with Mr.
9:39
Slov and some of his editors from the Associated
9:42
Press. I think what was
9:44
so remarkable about it,
9:46
one of the things that was remarkable about it is that they had
9:48
just gotten out of the city. I think if
9:50
they escaped from Marjubal on March
9:52
16th, you guys were talking
9:55
days later.
9:56
there
10:00
was an urgency behind doing
10:03
the work, and you said,
10:05
I want you to talk to Ms. Aslav. We
10:08
ended up talking the next day,
10:11
and it was
10:14
like the first of many very long phone
10:16
calls and Zoom calls where you would tell me about everything
10:18
that had just happened, and
10:20
I
10:21
think what I appreciated
10:24
about it was that you
10:25
were already ready to do something with all the footage
10:27
that you were able to get out, and
10:30
you didn't want it to just sit there on a drive anywhere.
10:33
It was important to do something with it, and so
10:35
we worked with the Associated Press to
10:38
get the footage from
10:39
where you were in Ukraine, to London,
10:42
to Boston, and
10:44
our team at Frontline helped
10:46
make sure that that got ingested and translated
10:48
and organized as quickly as possible. So
10:51
much work. A lot of work. It was so much work, you know,
10:53
getting out of Ukraine with the footage, which
10:55
you see in the film, it's just remarkable
10:58
then what happened to get it all the way to Boston
11:01
is really another journey, and thank
11:03
you for reminding me about that because literally
11:06
every hour I would be like, is the footage here? I'm
11:09
texting her.
11:09
Did the footage make it? Did we get it? Did we
11:11
get the drive? Like, is it real? You know, because
11:14
we were in a conversation with you. I knew it
11:16
was gonna be powerful, but it was
11:18
a whole journey to get it all the way to Boston
11:21
where we could start to see more than
11:23
what we had seen in the news. So
11:26
the first time I saw you, Ms. Aslav, you were sitting
11:28
in Ukraine, a different part of Ukraine, and
11:30
you were in a very dark room, and I'll just never
11:32
forget that moment where I said, you
11:35
know, with your editors, you know, do you wanna make
11:37
a documentary? So take me
11:39
to
11:39
the moment where you're thinking to
11:41
yourself, actually, I wanna do something
11:44
longer, deeper documentary
11:46
form. When did you know that that was
11:48
possible? I wouldn't
11:50
say I was planning to do
11:53
documentary in Marjubal when
11:55
I was in Marjubal. I was still
11:57
filming news dispatches.
11:59
At some point I realized that every single
12:02
moment matters, that I have to just record
12:04
everything. That didn't happen immediately.
12:09
After several days I realized
12:12
the scale and how
12:15
much I could miss if
12:17
I just turn off the camera. So
12:20
I decided just not to turn it off
12:22
at all.
12:23
Whenever I can keep it on,
12:25
it will run on until
12:27
I'm out of batteries. That's the problem.
12:30
Longer it runs, less space
12:32
you have on the hard drives later. There
12:35
is no place to charge batteries. So
12:38
you have to compromise whether you
12:40
just keep it rolling or you
12:43
shoot economically. And
12:45
because of that, yes, I missed important
12:47
moments, which I still regret.
12:49
The journalism behind the Frontline Dispatch
12:52
is possible thanks to the support of you, our
12:54
listeners. Join us in supporting
12:57
journalism that holds our leaders accountable
12:59
and pursues the truth, wherever it may lead,
13:01
by making a gift at frontline.org. Thank
13:03
you.
13:05
So
13:08
take me to the moment when you're leaving. Beyond
13:11
what we know in the film, what's going
13:13
through your head as you're leaving?
13:15
Well there is a lot of things to worry.
13:17
First of all, obviously we all feel terrible
13:20
because we just can't
13:22
work anymore. We would really want to,
13:25
but we can't because there is no car
13:27
anymore. We lost it when we were surrounded.
13:32
There is no place to live. There is no place
13:34
to charge batteries. So
13:37
there is this green corridor that might
13:40
be working. And
13:43
we get to Vladimir's car with his family
13:46
and he's driving us out. All
13:49
these stakes,
13:50
all these things are
13:53
going through my mind,
13:55
first of all, if we get caught, which is very
13:57
difficult.
13:59
possible because our faces and our names
14:02
are known. What will happen to his family?
14:06
So we we ask them you know please
14:09
if we get stopped just tell them
14:11
you don't know us we just paid you money and
14:14
you know just tell them and Vladimir is
14:16
trying to shut up. He's like
14:19
nothing's gonna happen okay and
14:21
his wife is praying and she's hugging
14:23
her daughter and it's very cold
14:25
because air is going through these holes from
14:27
from Shrapnel. The Shrapnel whose
14:29
peers stole the car so I didn't
14:32
know how he was even driving in this car
14:35
but it's very cold because air is going through
14:38
and the car stops at every checkpoint and
14:40
these soldiers are you know
14:42
looking at these holes in a
14:44
car and asking stupid questions
14:47
what happened to your car and we
14:49
just hold back not to say well you you
14:52
shelled it with your bombs
14:55
and at
14:57
the same time I
14:59
realize how important it is to to
15:02
get out because of these hard drives
15:04
these hours and hours and hours of footage
15:07
it's not just that only 30 minutes
15:10
are published out of 30 hours is
15:13
also important
15:15
to get original files with timestamps
15:18
and you know full files that
15:21
can be put to specific
15:23
locations specific dates
15:25
so later doesn't
15:28
mean there will be but later if
15:31
there is an investigation or if there
15:33
is a need to double check something
15:36
there's always original file to go
15:38
to and and and see
15:41
obviously there is a worry
15:43
for our own life because
15:47
well later it's
15:50
terrible another
15:53
documentary filmmaker from Lithuania,
15:55
Manta Skiravicius was just killed
15:58
so that could happen to us too. He
16:01
was in Mar-Yubo with us, we didn't see him, but
16:04
he was doing his film. He wasn't reporting,
16:07
but he was doing a film.
16:10
And so that
16:12
too, and then if they catch us, Vladimir
16:15
kept saying that probably they will just put
16:18
us in front of the camera and just tell us to denounce
16:21
all reporting. And
16:24
you probably would be able to resist,
16:27
unfortunately. So all these
16:30
things were going through my mind as we were driving.
16:34
And at the same time I was thinking about my
16:36
daughter, so of course I wanted to
16:38
see my family. That
16:41
was very important for me. It was like a drive
16:44
that carries you forward.
16:46
Wow. Michelle and I talked a lot about
16:49
this, really centering a Ukrainian
16:51
journalist's voice on this and how
16:53
different it was feeling to us watching
16:56
it. How important was that to
16:58
you? Because you've covered so many different wars
17:00
and conflicts beyond your own country's
17:03
conflict.
17:03
It's quite interesting
17:05
that when you work in news, you
17:08
kind of try to remove your identity
17:10
out of your coverage. Right, of course. So the fact
17:12
that you are Ukrainian is actually standing on the
17:14
way of the coverage. You
17:17
have to separate your emotions from
17:20
what you do. And with good editors,
17:22
which I have, you can do
17:24
it. Great. For
17:27
documentary film, it's very different.
17:29
I learned that it's very different.
17:33
Deep down I know
17:36
as a newsmaker, as a person who
17:38
just shoots news, I know that we
17:41
form our understanding
17:43
of the current events of the world
17:45
around us by watching news
17:48
and consuming news, but we as
17:52
a generation form our
17:54
understanding of our past with
17:58
documentary films, with both
17:59
So film is a medium
18:02
which carries meaning
18:04
across time for generations to come. If
18:10
I was to tell the story of Marjupol
18:13
to my daughter or to fellow
18:16
Ukrainians, which was so important to me,
18:18
just to let them know what exactly happened
18:20
there, right? Also for those
18:23
people who've been in Marjupol, people
18:25
who have been in Marjupol and
18:28
coming to see this film,
18:29
some screenings, yesterday's
18:32
screening for example, or screenings
18:34
of the Sundance, there are people who got out
18:36
of Marjupol. They cry, it's
18:38
devastating for them, but they come
18:40
after the film and they say, well,
18:43
thank you, that now we
18:45
know that this will not be forgotten.
18:48
Amazing. Okay, Michelle,
18:50
you're such a gifted editor. There were tons
18:52
of conversations between the
18:54
two of you about what could be
18:56
the voice of the film. So talk about that.
18:59
Mrs. Love really didn't want to make it about himself
19:01
or about journalists. He didn't want it to be
19:04
like a hero's journey, hero's
19:06
journalist story.
19:08
So I think there was some navigating
19:11
how to achieve using his voice
19:15
and using
19:17
your position as a Ukrainian journalist to
19:20
tell the story but still keep it about the people
19:22
of Marjupol because that was so important to him as
19:25
well. And there were even some questions
19:27
that I know the three of us, when we would
19:29
discuss feedback, some people, like
19:31
sometimes a more traditional approach might be to have
19:34
him be on camera or to
19:36
go back in film or to sort of do a more
19:38
conventional storytelling.
19:41
But we really ultimately decided
19:43
we were going to stick with what we had and
19:45
really keep him behind the camera and sort of
19:49
you as you're witnessing these horrific
19:51
events
19:54
have him with you. You're
19:56
kind of standing next to him, right?
19:59
you're seeing it through his eyes rather
20:02
than seeing him view it, which creates
20:04
a different feeling. We would discuss,
20:06
for instance, he thought
20:09
maybe he could he could help, he
20:11
could, he would certainly be a part, he was directing
20:13
it and he would help write it, but maybe
20:16
he didn't have to be the person who was speaking.
20:18
Anyway, so he was trying to find ways to skirt around being
20:20
the voice, but ultimately I
20:23
think it it
20:25
felt like you had to be it, and his voice also
20:27
matches the voice from real-time
20:30
footage from behind the camera, and so that goes together.
20:32
It was your decision to speak in English. Well
20:35
that's true, actually. That's a good point. So
20:37
we have a lot of conversations about
20:39
this behind the scenes. Why
20:41
did you decide to speak in English versus Ukrainian
20:45
or Russian? What was your thinking?
20:47
I think this was one
20:51
of the things that naturally happened. We tried
20:53
to voice some scenes
20:55
in Ukrainian and in English
20:57
as well, and we just realized that
20:59
there is so much happening on the screen, that
21:02
would be much easier for the audience to
21:04
figure out what's happening if I spoke in English.
21:06
I think it was also because, I
21:09
mean, you were not
21:12
only speaking to a Ukrainian audience,
21:14
you were speaking to the
21:15
world. The interesting thing is that
21:18
you hear almost
21:20
everyone who's speaking in Mariupol
21:24
is in Russian,
21:26
and yes,
21:28
so this this attempt to
21:31
sit and have conversation with the
21:34
audience, with
21:36
the whole world about what happened in
21:38
Mariupol. It's like me
21:40
as a Ukrainian trying to tell a wider
21:44
audience, tell the world what happened,
21:46
the stories of these parents
21:48
who lost their children, the stories of these
21:51
people who lost their houses and
21:53
their city. So
21:56
yeah,
21:56
English was, I
21:58
think it was the right choice. So
22:00
we have questions from the audience. So
22:03
Mrs. Oft, the question is, how
22:06
do you maintain your humanity slash
22:08
sanity in a situation
22:10
like a brutal military siege?
22:13
Thank you for that question. It's actually
22:15
much harder to maintain sanity
22:18
after you left the siege than
22:20
during the siege because during
22:22
the life-threatening situations, you
22:25
don't have time to process any traumatic
22:27
events that are happening
22:30
to you. And that
22:32
applies to everyone, not only to journalists,
22:34
but whenever there is silence,
22:38
a moment of silence after it's all over, then
22:41
when things start
22:43
happening in your head, and it
22:46
is incredibly important to keep
22:49
yourself healthy, mentally healthy
22:52
for journalists, especially
22:55
because on that depends,
22:59
an objective reporting. So
23:03
you have to take care of that, speak
23:05
to specialists or to
23:07
your friends. But
23:11
also we are
23:13
in somehow a privileged position that
23:17
we understand the purpose of what we
23:19
do and why we are going
23:21
through these events. We
23:24
have made a choice. And
23:28
we're just
23:29
faithful to that
23:31
choice. But those people whose
23:34
stories we tell, they
23:36
don't know why this
23:38
is happening to them and they don't have
23:41
a choice. And
23:43
for them it's much harder.
23:45
So I'm
23:47
gonna start with you, Michelle, on this question. So
23:49
you've spent a lot of time in this film. You've been with
23:51
a lot of audiences now since it premiered
23:53
at Sundance. What are you hoping that people
23:56
take away from this film?
23:57
I hope that something that someone
23:59
said...
23:59
about the film after having watched
24:02
it rings true for many
24:04
and that is that they won't ever look
24:06
at news the same way again
24:09
and for many reasons I think that that's a really
24:12
valuable idea
24:15
to take away from the story. I think that it
24:18
humanizes the people who are both in
24:21
front of the camera because of the way that Mistslav filmed
24:23
it with like compassion and like refusing
24:26
to look away even when it got hard
24:28
but also very respectfully and compassionately
24:30
and then also the people who are behind
24:33
the camera so him and you know Mistslav
24:36
and Zhenya and Vaslice and the people who are risking
24:38
so much to tell these stories of potential war
24:40
crimes and
24:42
so I hope that people walk away with that. Okay
24:45
Mistslav what do you what are you hoping for?
24:47
The
24:48
biggest hope of
24:51
every journalist
24:54
of that discovery in
24:56
the war is that his
24:58
work somehow will help
25:01
people.
25:01
Looking forward I hope
25:04
it just stays there for
25:06
history again as I said before documentary
25:09
films help further generations
25:11
to form their understanding of what happened
25:13
before and I just spoke
25:17
with my
25:20
grandmother recently
25:22
who lived through Second World War through Holocaust
25:25
and I remember her being
25:28
so furious
25:30
about some people claiming
25:31
that Holocaust never happened
25:34
right and and she
25:36
was like oh but all these
25:39
photos and you know there is
25:41
proof that it happened and I thought
25:43
thank God we make all
25:45
these efforts now to document
25:48
every single potential
25:50
war crime that happened in Buca and
25:52
the frontline has a film about it that
25:55
what happened in Marupol all
25:58
this scene maybe
26:01
lost in the sheer amount of the
26:04
chaos of information that is
26:06
happening around us. But it's going to be
26:09
there to
26:12
remember. And for those who will doubt 50
26:15
years from now, 100 years from now, who will say,
26:18
oh no, no, no, nothing happened to Mariupo,
26:20
everything was fine. Look, it's a
26:23
new city. Well, in 100 years, maybe
26:25
it's going to be a new city. But
26:28
the film is going to be there.
26:29
I appreciate that so much.
26:32
I think deeply about that with our work in
26:34
general, that I'm
26:36
really glad you brought up the conversation with your
26:38
grandmother. And also
26:40
having, you know, my own family
26:42
coming from Odessa, Ukraine, you know,
26:45
and also part of my family that stayed that were
26:47
lost in the Holocaust, you know, they
26:49
would be telling us the same thing. So almost
26:52
thinking about the history that we're documenting
26:54
right now and sharing and how it
26:56
can endure. And I just really appreciate
26:58
that you were there to witness
27:00
it, collect it and just
27:02
the bravery in general. So thank
27:05
you for your contributions to
27:07
really, truly history. And thank
27:09
you, Michelle, for being here and
27:12
for being there all the time, but also just for
27:14
creating this with Mrs. Lab, the two of
27:16
you
27:16
are really remarkable. Thanks to the frontline
27:19
for making this happen. Yeah, we
27:21
appreciate it. And thanks for being on the dispatch and
27:23
being with us at the Boston Public Library. It's
27:26
really been an amazing moment.
27:30
This podcast was produced by Emily Pisa
27:32
Creta. Maria Diocno is
27:34
our director of audience development. Katherine
27:37
Guyvard is our editorial coordinating
27:39
producer. Lauren Bracilio is
27:41
our senior editor. Andrew Metz
27:43
is our managing editor. I'm Rene Aronson-Roth,
27:46
editor-in-chief and executive producer
27:48
of Frontline. Music in this episode
27:51
is by Stellwagen Symphonette. The
27:53
Frontline dispatch is produced at GBH
27:56
and powered by PRX.
28:02
from PRX.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More