Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:02
In April of last year, a
0:04
huge leak of classified documents began
0:06
making headlines. Top secret documents
0:08
about the war in Ukraine have appeared
0:10
on social media. Investigations
0:13
are underway into the leak of
0:15
classified Pentagon documents. The worst leak
0:17
of U.S. national security intelligence in
0:19
many years. The source of
0:21
the leak was a young Air
0:24
National Guardsman named Jack Texera. In
0:26
March, he pled guilty to sharing
0:28
intelligence secrets on Discord, the popular
0:30
chat platform. He kept posting
0:32
and posting and posting. He's
0:34
working in this highly sensitive facility
0:37
and then he goes home and
0:39
hops onto Discord and
0:41
it's a racist, paranoid, anti-Semitic
0:43
free-for-all. Washington Post reporters Shane
0:45
Harris and Sam Oakford have been covering
0:47
the story since the start. And
0:50
they collaborated with Frontline on the
0:52
documentary, The Discord Leaks. We
0:54
were talking to the people who did know who was
0:56
leaking it. I spoke to
0:58
them about their reporting and the latest developments
1:01
in the story, along with
1:03
our director, Tom Jennings. I'm
1:06
Renee Aronson-Roth, editor-in-chief and executive
1:08
producer of Frontline. And
1:10
this is the Frontline Dispatch. The
1:23
Frontline Dispatch is made possible by
1:25
the Abrams Foundation, committed to excellence
1:27
in journalism, and by the Frontline
1:29
Journalism Fund, with major support from
1:32
John and Joanne Hagler. Support
1:34
for Frontline Dispatch comes from the Massachusetts General
1:37
Hospital Cancer Center, dedicated to providing compassionate
1:39
care and cancer specialists who are experienced
1:41
in the cancer you have. When you
1:43
hear the word cancer, their team is ready.
1:46
Learn more at
1:48
massgeneral.org/cancer. So Shane,
1:50
Sam and Tom, thanks so much for joining me on
1:52
the dispatch. Great to be here. Thanks,
1:55
Renee. So I want to start
1:57
with the leaks in 2022. Shane, as
1:59
a long-time national security reporter. Tell
2:01
me about what it was like then
2:03
and what was in those leaks? Well,
2:07
I think that speaking for
2:09
myself and probably Samfield this way too when
2:11
we first saw the leaks that were coming
2:13
across It
2:15
was pretty amazing to actually see
2:18
these highly classified documents You
2:21
know showing in great detail things about the
2:23
war in Ukraine activities in China, North Korea
2:25
I mean it was immediately clear that we
2:27
had kind of hit a mother lode really
2:30
big intelligence information And
2:33
you don't really come across that all that
2:35
often and certainly not under the circumstances that
2:37
we'd seen it here where it was Being
2:39
shared on the discord platform So
2:42
as a journalist it was actually pretty
2:44
thrilling to come across that information the way
2:46
that we did and Sam
2:48
just your your Understanding the sort of
2:51
gravity of this. What are you thinking?
2:53
Well, my background is, you know, pretty different
2:55
than Shane So I hadn't reported on a
2:57
big intelligence leak before and in some ways
2:59
I think it might have been helpful because
3:01
I was focused initially a lot on where
3:04
it was coming from and didn't have time
3:06
almost to register just how insane it was
3:09
that there were hundreds of documents that Shane
3:11
just described so and then you know then
3:13
we joined up and we appreciated that together
3:16
Before the world knew who Jack was
3:18
Sam you were talking to people who did
3:20
know him What was that kind of tenor
3:22
of the conversation you were hearing about who he
3:25
was? What are some of the first things you heard about?
3:28
We heard from people who knew him on discord and
3:30
they were pretty clear that that he was someone involved
3:32
in some way with the military right, so I remember
3:35
early on we were trying to figure out if he
3:37
was a Contractor someone
3:39
like that Like Snowden who
3:41
might have had access to material that way or if
3:43
he was really, you know We're in fatigues right and
3:46
going somewhere maybe evening this overseas And
3:48
we got the impression that he was someone who was young
3:50
someone who spent a lot of time online But
3:52
was in the military so it ended up kind
3:55
of matching what we ultimately learned about him
3:58
Yeah, and Sam when you're thinking about
4:00
how you talk to them. A lot
4:02
of this was confidential. What
4:05
were the conversations you and Shane were
4:07
having about confidentiality and how you could
4:10
protect people as they were talking to you?
4:13
That was always something we discussed
4:15
immediately at the outset of these
4:17
conversations because they were so sensitive,
4:20
right? I remember early on when
4:22
we were doing this reporting, we expected the
4:24
FBI to show up at any point. You'll
4:26
recall that there was this week, right? Where
4:29
this was in the news, but no one had figured
4:31
out exactly who was leaking it, but we were talking
4:33
to the people who didn't know who was leaking it.
4:36
Shane, you're so experienced in this
4:38
area, but this is so particular. It's younger
4:41
people. Yeah, that was really one
4:43
of the key differences here as opposed to so many
4:46
leaks for national security stories. I reported
4:48
on so many of these kids
4:50
were, they were kids. They were
4:52
under 18. In some cases, we had to get
4:54
parental permission to speak with them. So
4:57
that in and of itself was very different from
4:59
most of the work that I do. But
5:02
what was also, I think, impressed Phil
5:04
Sam and I is the more we
5:06
talked to people who had spent time
5:08
with Jack online, the more we really
5:10
understood that he spent so much of
5:12
his life online and that these relationships
5:14
that he had formed with other young
5:17
people in discord were kind of like
5:19
the foundation of his social life. They
5:21
were his friends, even though many of
5:23
them had never met in person. And
5:25
so we were able to
5:27
really start fleshing out Jack as
5:29
a person and not just as
5:31
this kind of shadowy figure that
5:34
had leaked all of this classified
5:36
information. So Tom, you
5:38
enter in as the filmmaker here. I
5:41
know we had so many conversations, you and I, about
5:43
how do you make something like this
5:45
into a documentary, right? It's very hard
5:47
to do any type of national
5:49
security reporting in our forum, in the documentary
5:51
forum. So talk to me about that and
5:53
that process for you. We
5:56
started out immediately meeting with
5:58
Sam and Shane. getting
6:00
deeply involved in their reporting
6:02
process. And as a
6:04
collective, we early on decided that
6:06
there were two essential strands of
6:09
reporting for the film that we had to
6:11
follow. One was the national
6:13
security realm, the security access. Like what,
6:15
how did Jack do what he did?
6:17
How did he get access to where
6:19
he went? The other side was
6:22
Discord, this forum. And
6:25
speaking just for myself, I knew
6:27
very little about Discord itself. But
6:30
those were the two areas. And we relied
6:32
on Sam very strongly for
6:34
the Discord element and Shane, given
6:38
his background, very much
6:40
for the national security part of it. I
6:42
really put this out to all of you.
6:44
What made the Discord platform a place in
6:46
which this could flourish and these conversations
6:49
could happen in the ultimate leak? Discord
6:53
is a pretty good product, actually. It's something
6:55
that does what it sets out to do.
6:57
It has these, you
7:00
know, what's what are called servers, right? Which
7:02
essentially are housed on a big server that
7:04
Discord owns. It's all different than what all
7:06
school computer people might think of. But
7:09
it gives you an impression that it's that
7:11
it's a kind of a private space, right?
7:14
And that's predominantly the way people experience Discord.
7:16
And you know, you might you might guess
7:18
that it leads to certain behaviors, right? Good
7:20
and bad. It encourages people to have that
7:22
sense of privacy, security, feeling
7:24
that they're talking to their friends. And that's
7:26
that's the marketing that the company uses
7:29
to push it. And in this case, I
7:32
think it gave to Sarah,
7:35
a place where he felt comfortable, you
7:38
know, talking to people at all all
7:40
hours, these kids would describe, you know,
7:42
using video chat, using text chat, basically
7:45
being tethered to this platform in this
7:47
community. And, you know, we
7:49
have to talk about the pandemic here in the
7:51
role that that it played in pushing people on
7:53
to Discord. So that's kind of a setting. That's
7:56
what sets up this story where
7:58
when he ultimately then leaks. Yeah,
8:00
and just to expand upon what Sam said
8:02
about the pandemic, one reason
8:04
that Discord was really a
8:07
lifeline or, you know, a harbor for
8:09
a lot of these kids was because
8:11
they weren't in school, their schools were
8:13
closed, you know, social distancing restrictions, which
8:15
we all remember, kept them from hanging
8:17
out with their local friends, their in
8:19
real life friends. Right. But Discord became
8:21
the gathering point. And I think that
8:23
it really impressed upon us that the
8:25
pandemic was so key to this story
8:28
because it made them all kind of
8:30
collect and concentrate on this
8:32
Discord platform. And they think
8:34
that plus the sort of the nature of
8:36
being online and having a bit
8:38
more anonymity, where you say things you
8:41
might not ordinarily say to people, to
8:43
their face, kind of all snowballed into
8:45
this culture where they
8:47
were, you know, sharing classified documents, they
8:50
were making horrible jokes, they were, you
8:52
know, doing things that I wondered
8:54
often that, you know, if they were in an
8:56
in real life environment, would they think twice about
8:58
the things that they were saying or doing? Yeah,
9:01
I mean, and one of the things that I
9:04
found the most interesting in the reporting that you
9:06
all did is that that line between this sort
9:08
of joking, right, that they think is a joke
9:10
to actual, you know, very
9:12
harmful language that was racist. And
9:14
then there's, of course, the decision to
9:17
share classified documents, right?
9:19
Jack just pled guilty. But what
9:22
do we know about the
9:24
motivation behind sharing his
9:27
motivation? Jack was somebody
9:29
who from a really young age, we found
9:31
in talking to friends, you know, enjoyed demonstrating
9:33
how much he knew about a subject, you
9:35
know, military history or the history of weaponry
9:38
or the specifics of, you know, tanks and
9:40
guns. These were things that he really kind
9:42
of geeked out on. And once
9:45
he's sort of getting access to classified information
9:47
about current events, particularly the war in Ukraine,
9:49
that was a big one, we found that
9:52
he really seemed to want
9:54
to impress these young people with all
9:56
the things that he knew that ordinary
9:58
people did not that he was. wanted to
10:00
show them that he knew things that were
10:02
happening in the secret realm. He had access
10:04
to classified information. And it was kind of
10:07
a flex, I think, for him
10:09
to prove to people
10:11
that he really knew what he was talking about
10:13
when he would expound upon world events as he
10:15
often did. And it's interesting.
10:18
One of the motivations often for people to
10:21
leak is because they want to demonstrate some
10:23
kind of authority or knowledge about a subject,
10:25
but it's often because they want to expose
10:27
what they think is some kind of wrongdoing
10:29
or maybe a misguided policy that they
10:31
don't agree with. I'd never
10:33
encountered somebody who was leaking documents
10:35
essentially to impress a bunch of
10:37
his teenage friends. But
10:40
that really just seemed to be at what was at
10:43
the core of Jack's motivation. A big part of
10:45
it was showing off. Tom,
10:47
so you did a really great
10:49
job, I think, in the film showing this
10:51
culture. How did you get inside that world
10:53
so that we would understand it better? Those
10:55
of us who are not teenagers on Discord?
10:58
Well, it is kind of like an
11:01
alien culture to people our age, really,
11:03
my age. I should speak for myself.
11:05
But there are a lot of
11:08
ways that we got into it. The
11:11
first thing I'd say is that the
11:13
family really shut off. We couldn't get
11:15
access. And so we
11:17
decided fairly early
11:19
on that there was this
11:21
other family that existed online. There were the people
11:24
who Jack shared his world with on
11:26
Discord. And so they kind of became
11:29
our stand-in for the family and a
11:31
way to get inside his head. In
11:33
many ways, I think that they were actually even
11:36
more instrumental and gave us a bigger
11:38
lens, a more focused lens on his
11:41
thinking and his brain. So
11:44
we went about trying to get access to
11:46
those folks, to the people, the
11:48
kids really, the young people who were online
11:51
with Jack. And that became a
11:53
process that was piecemeal.
11:57
It was following threads
11:59
that that really were
12:01
first pulled by Chris
12:03
Degenpoor and Sam and Shane at
12:05
The Post. They really
12:08
kind of found online ways to get
12:10
access to these folks. And
12:12
it was a month-long process, slowly, slowly
12:14
getting into their lives, contacting them first
12:17
anonymously online and then, you know,
12:20
with more direct contacts. And then
12:22
inevitably, what we needed really was
12:24
in-person contacts to put people on
12:27
camera. It was just a
12:29
very long, arduous process that, you know,
12:31
what documentary filmmaking really does pretty well.
12:33
We had the time and the ability
12:35
to do that. The
12:38
journalism behind the Frontline Dispatch is possible
12:40
thanks to the support of you, our
12:42
listeners. Join us in supporting
12:45
journalism that holds our leaders accountable and
12:47
pursues the truth, wherever it may lead,
12:49
by making a gift at frontline.org. Thank
12:51
you. Let's
12:55
talk about the reporting that you did just a
12:57
few weeks ago. You both reported on another
13:01
leak on Discord, allegedly from another
13:03
member of the armed forces, this
13:05
time an Air Force intelligence analyst
13:07
named Jason Gray. You wrote
13:09
that Gray's case bears striking similarities to the
13:11
story that we tell in our
13:13
documentary. So can you both tell me more
13:15
about what you've learned? And Sam, again, I'll
13:17
start with you. Well,
13:20
I think that there's a lot
13:22
of parallels there and you can kind of break them
13:24
down, right? You can talk about the time period. There's
13:27
an overlap here when Gray was,
13:29
you know, on Discord and he's
13:31
into guns in a
13:33
way that maybe is a little bit different than
13:35
the average gun owner is. He was putting what
13:37
appeared to be silencers on his weapons. He was
13:40
posting images on Discord showing him
13:42
with firearms. And that's something that we
13:44
know Jack also did. In fact, we
13:46
obtained video that showed Jack doing this
13:48
and then sharing on Discord. That's
13:50
very vivid. Including a video of him
13:52
saying racist and anti-Semitic things
13:55
before firing a weapon. So just in
13:57
terms of their use of Discord.
14:00
at a certain period when they were
14:02
without a lot of other social avenues.
14:04
That's a starting parallel. Maybe Shane can
14:06
talk about the other ones. Yeah.
14:09
Like Jack, the Stacen Gray person worked
14:11
in an intelligence facility. He had access
14:13
to classified information. What
14:16
we learned was that the
14:18
government was investigating him initially because
14:20
they suspected that he had ties to
14:22
extremist groups and that he was in
14:24
particular either a sympathizer
14:26
or supporter with his group called
14:29
the Boogaloo, which is essentially an
14:31
extremist group that is anticipating a
14:33
second civil war and an anti-government
14:35
group. As they started
14:37
looking into him, what they found on
14:39
his Discord page, according to an FBI
14:41
affidavit, or his Discord account, was it
14:44
looked like he was sharing some kind
14:46
of a classified image or document with
14:48
friends on Discord who were aligned
14:51
with this Boogaloo group. Now,
14:53
what we subsequently learned afterwards is
14:55
that the document in
14:57
question was actually a picture. And
15:00
while they eventually determined that the
15:02
image itself, it's not clear if
15:04
he took it or not, was
15:06
technically not a classified document, it
15:08
is a piece of highly sensitive
15:11
information that this person was sharing
15:13
from the base with
15:15
these other people on Discord.
15:19
The threads that the government sort of pulling
15:21
when they got into this are what ultimately
15:23
led to them finding out that he had
15:25
also been sharing and distributing a huge amount
15:27
of child pornography, which was ultimately a set
15:29
of charges that he pleaded guilty to. So
15:32
it's another one of these ways in which
15:34
once the government kind of went down the
15:36
rabbit hole of his Discord account, they found
15:38
all of these other troubling instances of extremist
15:41
group alignments sharing this highly sensitive
15:43
information with people who shouldn't see
15:45
it. And ultimately, the charges that he
15:47
pleaded guilty to on videos
15:50
that were horribly graphic and exploitative of
15:53
children. So I
15:55
Guess I Have to ask you, Shane, as a
15:57
National Security reporter, Is your work changing? Changing
16:00
the nature of what you. Are
16:03
reporting on mean this is just
16:05
really, you know, Revolutionary Sauce.
16:08
Yeah. I think it is changing a lot and
16:10
me to think that you know him as
16:12
a self imposed a guy never experienced someone
16:14
who is leaking to impress you know his
16:16
teenage friends. but I think that we're we're
16:18
seeing here is. Kind. Of
16:21
many, the way that a lot of these weeks
16:23
are going to go in the future because they're
16:25
just so many people who have access to classified
16:27
information. And as we seen time
16:29
and time again, there really aren't that many
16:31
practical obstacles to keeping them from releasing. It's
16:34
yeah, I can remember a conversation I had
16:36
a number of years ago. With
16:38
somebody who had recently last thou on
16:41
the intelligence agencies to set something at
16:43
the time to me sounded so kind
16:45
of fantastical he said in a one
16:47
of the things that were worried about
16:49
is that. As. Gaming platforms
16:51
become more popular. Foreign intelligence services like
16:53
the Russians are are China's intelligence service
16:56
are going to start scoping out for
16:58
potential leakers and recruits on gaming platforms
17:00
like try and find the person who
17:02
is playing a game not far from
17:04
an essay and Quarter is and maybe
17:06
start talking to them and ask them
17:09
where they work and D C anything
17:11
interesting at work as how the time
17:13
like wow that's that's kind of a
17:15
really going to futuristic scenario like hi
17:17
winter things really will play out that
17:19
way. Well. And Zac Stacy wasn't
17:22
recruited by a foreign intelligence agency, but
17:24
you could absolutely see both how he
17:26
could it's and the ways in which
17:28
kind of like the vector, the behavior
17:31
path and leaking at that official as
17:33
ascribing years ago ultimately came through with
17:35
jacket. Sarah. My I mean
17:38
it's us as you are speaking seen
17:40
as thinking i her be stand the
17:42
spacing keep putting those types history and
17:44
son and that sort of gravity about
17:46
desk So let's talk about described as
17:48
a circuitous critic that a given our
17:50
sound but what what what has he
17:52
been hearing in general the described and
17:54
side of that sort of they sang.
17:57
Turned. If what discord has said. It
18:00
made a point that they can't know. What?
18:02
Are classified material is right, kiss of it's
18:04
It's very nature A, but I think something
18:06
that we got out hopefully in the in
18:09
the documentary and in our reporting is that
18:11
there are certain trade offs they're very open
18:13
about on their platform and map. They.
18:15
Are essentially comfortable with. Effectively
18:18
a little or no are monitoring of
18:20
what happens across was in fact the
18:22
majority of it we look at my
18:25
kind of yeah it's actually taking place.
18:27
It's. It's not the monitor to.by
18:30
and large except for very narrow.
18:32
Ah it seems like see Sam I'm so
18:35
so that's just sitting there at their open
18:37
about and in a didn't really feel that
18:39
that had to change based on this case.
18:43
Yeah. I would see to the scene
18:45
of The Discord. knows that it's platform
18:47
is very attractive to extremist groups you
18:50
know, the Charlottesville Rally and Twenty Seventeen
18:52
for unite, the Right, Organize and Discord.
18:54
The know this as anything beyond. To
18:57
their credit they are. they're trying to
18:59
take steps to to to combat it.
19:01
that's practically speaking as Sam as describes
19:04
the way the system is set up,
19:06
a buffer, a set up in else
19:08
they're not really positions to be able
19:10
to monitor for people sharing. you know,
19:13
racist. Rhetoric for people organizing in this
19:15
way. It's and as they pointed out
19:17
us time and time again. look, it's
19:19
up to the government to tell us
19:21
what's a classified document. We'll know when
19:23
a classified document as amps, but you
19:25
know it's It's pretty clear that the
19:28
company understands that they have these problems
19:30
and you know it's it's kind of.
19:32
You know it's built into their business
19:34
in the sense that this platform is
19:36
attractive, precisely because offers so much privacy
19:38
and virtual and antimony. right?
19:40
So let's not talk about the Airforce
19:43
any Canada ld their. Intensive. How this
19:45
could have happened on and also you know of course
19:47
they released a big report on the and son in
19:49
his mouth. Yeah. The
19:51
Air Force inspector General didn't investigation at
19:53
Odis or national guard base which is
19:55
the base said jack work and he
19:57
worked in an intelligence organization there and.
20:00
The secure facility so called it's called
20:02
a skiff on this report was blistering.
20:04
There's really no other way around it
20:06
on what they documented and and you
20:08
have reported on National Security for twenty
20:11
five years now. I have to agree
20:13
with their findings, was basically a total
20:15
breakdown in the way that's you are
20:17
supposed to secure a classified information the
20:20
rules for handling it. Who gets to
20:22
see it up at the bar at
20:24
at the bottom line of it as
20:26
that Jack had no business given his
20:29
job as a computer. Tech Support Workers
20:31
looking at these classified documents that
20:33
were contained on the computers in
20:35
the networks that he was helping
20:38
to maintain. Its and Will was
20:40
really starting to us I think
20:42
was Will. We learned that he
20:44
had been spotted on different occasions
20:46
looking a classified documents taking notes
20:48
on them. In some cases, all
20:51
things that were just gigantic red
20:53
flags. Yes, And he was never
20:55
pull off the line. He was
20:57
never relieved of his duties. He
20:59
wasn't reprimanded, And the Air Force
21:01
Inspector General essentially points to that. It
21:04
says you know you can almost see
21:06
them sort of like throwing their hands
21:08
up at best and saying why in
21:10
the world was this young man Never
21:12
report adds the commander of the Intelligence
21:14
swing at the base was relieved of
21:16
his command. down, there was other disciplinary
21:18
action, was taken armed. I came away
21:20
from that investigation thinking I don't believe
21:22
for one sack at that these kinds
21:25
of glasses are unique to this one
21:27
base because once people explain it out,
21:29
for instance, why. They didn't report shock
21:31
to security authorities, they said well we
21:33
didn't want to get him in trouble
21:35
or he now the security guys come
21:38
and then it's the whole process. Mister
21:40
A poking around and you know it's
21:42
a really owners think well that's gonna
21:44
be true it any other place they
21:46
suspect. slightly more fun than investigations and
21:49
gangs it out. I doubt that Odis
21:51
is alone and having such ah, lax
21:53
standards are and even yo and men
21:55
many cases. it's a fundamental misunderstanding of
21:58
how you're supposed to handle flat. The
22:00
Buy Cigarettes. Pray that
22:02
the has a lot of graves
22:04
indications And it's time when you
22:06
think about the end of the
22:08
documentary. Rate the question of what's gonna happen
22:10
from. Here on you know, Jack
22:13
pled guilty. What?
22:15
Were you? The story goes from. Here Tom
22:17
Well, just an echo What changes
22:19
said I'd say. There's. Gonna
22:21
be many more similar circumstances that
22:24
are going to happen and I'll
22:26
take this as a one off
22:28
case at all with regards to
22:30
Jack himself. Day.
22:33
He's he's going to be
22:35
sentenced in the coming months.
22:37
eleven years bitter slates. He
22:39
gets in prison and is
22:41
going to be. yeah, I
22:44
think kind of the consulate for
22:46
the military I'm I'm curious myself
22:48
to know what's the rebels are
22:50
there, what has happened in the
22:52
military and this security clearance process
22:55
which I said we sell a
22:57
well indicted in this film and
22:59
in the reporting as being lax.
23:01
I'm I'm very curious know what happens next
23:03
or with the Pentagon and how they go
23:06
about recruiting. I mean, What? Jax.
23:08
Case shows is this huge vulnerability
23:11
at the heart of the intelligence
23:13
apparatus. ah of an insufficient system
23:15
preventing people, and a system that
23:17
build so that people can get
23:19
access to secrets and share them
23:21
with practically from ever they want.
23:23
And I think that is gonna
23:25
be a major challenge for the
23:28
military and intelligence agencies going forwards.
23:30
Ah, Aids relief. Not something that
23:32
they're fundamentally built to address right
23:34
now, so that's gonna be a
23:36
really a big part of the.
23:38
The terrain that I cover ah for
23:41
the next several years I thank My
23:43
As Great Fire for future frontline documentary.
23:45
Say protect think you guys sitting on
23:47
the dispatch. And thought
23:49
thanks and good. Thanks.
23:53
Again to seen Harris Sam Oak for it
23:55
in time Jennings for joining me on the
23:57
dispatch. You can watch the discouraged the sun.
24:00
That line.org Frontlines: You Tube
24:02
Channel and the Pbs at.
24:06
The Front Dispatches produced by
24:08
Emily Pc creator or sound
24:10
engineer is gyms and Three
24:12
A Dude is a director
24:14
of audience Develop Cat and
24:16
Grinder. Is or added
24:18
incentive Introduce three. Q and
24:20
is your senior. Authorities
24:22
out as a senior Editor
24:24
of Investigation into Masses are
24:26
managing. Editor: I'm running errands and.
24:29
Lot better than she's an executive
24:31
producer. Hotline music in this episode
24:33
is buy sell like in Cincinnati.
24:36
The frontline dispatches produce a T V
24:38
Age and. Power by Pure Acts. Thanks
24:41
for listening!
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More