Podchaser Logo
Home
Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Released Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Prime Minister Kishida’s visit to the US and the International Booker Prize 2024

Wednesday, 10th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

You're listening to The Globalist, first broadcast on 10th

0:02

April 2024 on Monocle Radio, The

0:06

Globalist, in association with UBS.

0:30

Hello, this is The Globalist broadcasting

0:32

to you live from Midori House

0:34

in London. I'm Georgina Godwin. On

0:36

the show ahead, Joe Biden and

0:39

Fumio Kishida are meeting in Washington

0:41

to maintain and strengthen relations between

0:43

Japan and the US. We'll examine

0:45

their agenda. Turkey is

0:47

restricting exports to Israel, but how

0:49

much of this is really about

0:51

Erdogan's domestic agenda? We'll have more

0:53

from Ankara. In Russia, military

0:55

wives and mothers are using their saucepans to

0:57

send a message to the government. But

1:00

will the Kremlin listen to kitchenware? Plus…

1:17

You may not know much about particle

1:19

physics, but you will have heard of

1:21

Higgs-Boson. We'll look back at the life

1:24

of Peter Higgs, who made the scientific

1:26

breakthrough. We'll have a round-up of business

1:28

news, flick through the international papers, and

1:30

lastly, we'll hear who's made the shortlist

1:32

for the highly prestigious International Booker Prize.

1:35

That's all ahead here on The Globalist, live

1:37

from London. First,

1:47

a look at what else is happening in the news. Russia

1:50

and Kazakhstan ordered more than 100,000

1:53

people to evacuate after swiftly

1:55

melting snow swelled mighty rivers beyond

1:57

bursting point in the worst flooding

1:59

ever. in the area for at least 70 years.

2:03

Arizona's top quarters revived a ban

2:05

on nearly all abortions, further

2:07

restricting reproductive rights in a

2:09

state where terminating a pregnancy was already

2:11

barred at 15 weeks of gestation.

2:14

And Vietnam aims to start

2:16

building two high-speed railway lines

2:18

linking its capital Hanoi with

2:20

China before 2030. Do stay

2:22

tuned to Monocle Radio throughout the day for more

2:24

on those stories. Now, Japanese

2:27

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and US

2:29

President Joe Biden are having a summit

2:31

meeting this week aimed at shoring up

2:33

the alliance between the two countries. Meeting

2:35

in Washington, the two leaders want

2:37

to keep the momentum of the

2:40

bilateral relationship going and forge a

2:42

global partnership, all whilst keeping a

2:44

wary eye on China. Well,

2:46

I'm joined now by Julie Norman, who's the

2:48

co-director of University College London's Centre

2:51

on US Politics and on

2:53

the line from Tokyo by Tomahiko Kanaguchi,

2:55

who's a former special advisor to

2:57

the cabinet of Shinzo Abe. Tomahiko,

3:00

I wonder if we could start with

3:03

you. Kishida outlined his aims before leaving

3:05

Tokyo. What did he say? He said

3:08

the traditional and time-honoured

3:11

alliance relationship between

3:13

the United States and Japan is

3:15

now supposed to serve greater purposes

3:17

of maintaining international order that is

3:20

based on rules

3:23

and he is going to call

3:25

the alliance global partners

3:27

for the future and this

3:29

for the future means

3:31

a wide range of issues. Such

3:34

as? Such as, shouldering

3:39

the responsibilities that have

3:42

been traditionally covered solely

3:44

by the United States.

3:47

I think he's going to call the United States

3:49

a partner with which Japan is willing to

3:51

work for the

3:54

public goods that

3:56

the United States again traditionally has

3:59

Chosen. To show that

4:01

by themselves, knowing and

4:03

being aware that mounting

4:06

challenges make it imperative

4:08

for Japan to work

4:10

more closely. With the

4:12

United States, denies has cannot

4:14

solely alone provide public goods

4:17

to the international community. Subtly

4:19

Norman decide to come see you.

4:21

How would you characterize the relationship

4:23

between Japan and the Us? So.

4:25

We're obviously this is always then a

4:28

strong alliance but what we're seeing now

4:30

is really and major strengthening. You know

4:32

our eyes had been somewhere else. Where

4:34

in the world? But this is really

4:36

a significant development in Asia right now

4:38

to has and Japan sifting in terms

4:40

of it's descent. Spending and terms as

4:42

it's I investments into descends and the

4:44

U S is very interested in that.

4:46

They want this alliance to stay strong

4:48

on defense and security. And of course,

4:50

while you're a lot about economic and

4:52

Dad had cooperation today too. but I

4:54

think defense is really. Going to top the

4:57

agenda and light of growing threats from China

4:59

from North Riyadh to some degree from Russia

5:01

as wow. Still, the To: how's it

5:03

being viewed back in Japan? Whoop Whoop whoop.

5:05

What's the what's what's the idea of the

5:08

summit? Their. These stones have

5:10

been laid price a previously by

5:12

the a late Prime minister Says

5:14

Wahlberg who called Reliance Alliance for

5:16

Alliance of Hope meaning that are

5:19

denied status by must work more

5:21

closely for the betterment of for

5:23

the future of the world So

5:25

it's natural expenses and there has

5:27

been very little deviancy from a

5:30

A between the opposition and the

5:32

A ruling party's when it comes

5:34

to the salient said he points

5:36

and importance to be put on

5:38

the. He was to alliance but

5:40

the challenge for the prime minister is

5:43

it's not going to be necessarily translated

5:45

into the great of popularity. That

5:48

he could enjoy from the domestic

5:50

voters. and i

5:52

wanted to see what this is the

5:55

best possible outcomes so this would be

5:57

some from bidens prospectus not not system

5:59

the relationship with Japan, but also for

6:02

his domestic base? Sure.

6:05

So there's a couple of things in place.

6:07

One I would say it is a big

6:09

deal that this is official state visit, official

6:11

state dinner, a congressional

6:13

address. So in terms of just

6:16

showcasing, I would say, a very

6:18

positive foreign policy relationship, that's very

6:20

helpful for Biden. I would

6:22

say on the economic side, there's

6:24

some more political touchy elements in

6:26

terms of a Japanese

6:28

steel company trying to buy US steel.

6:30

That's politically kind of testy for Biden

6:32

right now. So there's some of those

6:35

conversations that I think will be a

6:37

little bit more on the sidelines than

6:39

the official conversations. But for Biden, they

6:41

do matter. And they're things that other

6:43

Americans, I think, will be looking to,

6:45

especially Republicans and GOP and Biden

6:47

opponents. Tomahiko, I

6:49

wonder how this meeting fits him with

6:51

Kishida's greater foreign policy aims. He's

6:54

been following basically what his

6:57

predecessor has chosen

6:59

to follow, namely to bring

7:02

Japan on the center

7:04

stage of the international community, again,

7:07

being aware that the international

7:10

order, especially in the Indo-Pacific

7:12

area, has been constantly challenged

7:14

by revisionist, authoritarian regimes from

7:17

Russia, North Korea to China. And

7:21

the aims that Kishida is after

7:24

during this summit meeting

7:26

are, once again, pretty much

7:29

the natural extension of

7:31

what he has been doing. So

7:34

let's just pick up on defense, as you've been

7:36

also speaking about. Julie, we

7:38

know that on Thursday, Kishida will join

7:40

Biden and the Philippine President, Ferdinand Marcus

7:42

Jr., to discuss the Chinese coast guard

7:45

aggression in the South and

7:47

the East China Seas. So tell

7:49

us more about that focus on defense. Yeah.

7:52

So again, defense will, I think, play a

7:54

part in the bilateral, as well as

7:56

in this additional meeting with the Philippines.

7:59

And Again, the I Japan has over

8:01

the last several years. Ben increasing

8:03

defense spending, Has restructured

8:06

their security strategy. And

8:08

there's a couple t things the Us

8:10

and Japan will be discussing. Wind is

8:12

just greater an eye coordination. Between

8:14

there are there different troops in Japan,

8:16

the Us has about fifty thousand service

8:19

person's eyes station. They're still be talking

8:21

a lot about new initiatives for and

8:23

defense industry for defense equipment for I'm

8:25

for of arms sales and these kinds

8:28

of things which is a new area

8:30

of conversation for these two countries, on

8:32

and off the possible participation, other security

8:34

partnerships and that certainly include the Philippines

8:37

with both to town and thought the

8:39

Philippines and we some the U S

8:41

perspective on the again being somewhat subject

8:43

to this increasing. Aggressive aggression from

8:45

China from Than Ah You aggression

8:48

and I in in the

8:50

Pacific region and trying to disrupt.

8:52

Deterrence. that and of the day says

8:54

filmmaker speaking about minutes partnerships I mean

8:57

the worst excesses that japan much to

8:59

an Opus that's the by less will

9:01

security. Deposits of Indo Pacific region

9:03

between. Australia, the United Kingdom

9:05

and United States. Dorcas see like

9:07

I will, I will. I wonder

9:09

how likely that isn't were written

9:11

with sits within the Japanese pacifist

9:13

constitution. I think

9:16

it's so become much much

9:18

likelier our but certainly Japan

9:20

is not going to be

9:22

able to provide nuclear powered

9:24

submarine fleet to Australia or

9:26

which are they call pillow

9:28

one but pillar to include

9:30

a lot of initiatives especially

9:32

on the high technology areas

9:34

where Japan could contribute to

9:37

the enhancement of the Royal

9:39

Australian Navy's capacity by extension

9:41

d or overall capacity of

9:43

the naval pause of of

9:45

the. United States, Australia, Japan

9:47

and the United Kingdom which

9:49

has a over the last

9:52

couple of years been a

9:54

very close maybe terribly to

9:56

Japan. My Rights And

9:58

and Tr S and. Few

10:00

questions a given the a

10:02

impending crises The.japan his face

10:05

to daily of coming from

10:07

my China. Most notably there

10:09

is a wider recognition among

10:12

the Japanese populace that more

10:14

to be done more should

10:16

be done to beef up

10:18

to pass defense and deterrence

10:21

capacities. We know

10:23

of course isn't election coming up in the

10:25

United States soon? and of course everything might

10:27

change. How much can the biden administration to

10:29

to make sure that to censor dream is

10:32

that a person's a place now are at

10:34

sleep some. Priests to see like

10:36

yeah, It's a good question I

10:38

think it's one that both to allies

10:41

and adversaries. Are aware of about

10:43

many of the agreement. That or

10:45

perhaps need under the Biden administration

10:47

or may. Not last. At least not

10:49

last. And their time for a mom under

10:51

a new president seen especially under Trump. And

10:54

with that said, ios on the of

10:56

these relationships and especially. The one with

10:58

Japan I do think will be on

11:00

a solid solid alliance even are under

11:02

a potential at Trump presidency. One

11:04

area where the party's do. Agree is

11:07

on being somewhat tough on countering China

11:09

and I think both parties seats bolstering

11:11

this relationship with Japan as part of

11:13

overall a against on. The details may

11:15

differ, but it's idea of seeing Japan

11:18

as a strong ally as a strong

11:20

partners or maybe some the distance side

11:22

is something that I think would continue.

11:25

That summer he says I saw Tokyo

11:27

has ties, keeps trade measures against sign

11:29

and low keys. Clearly Japan doesn't want

11:31

to antagonize it's top trade partner will

11:34

die to see says that. How can

11:36

that be it seems. Whilst keeping the

11:38

status quo. The.

11:40

A Japanese companies are,

11:43

as you say, very

11:45

much concerned. About

11:48

the repercussion. to

11:50

be coming from china in

11:53

response to the retaliatory measures

11:55

taken by the united states

11:58

and japan but silently but

12:00

steadily more and more

12:02

Japanese companies are reshoring

12:04

their operations, divesting

12:07

from China and investing into

12:09

its own country, its own

12:11

homeland country. Remember that

12:14

the Japanese currency is extremely

12:17

cheap and labor,

12:20

cost and everything has become much,

12:22

much more competitive in Japan even

12:24

compared to China. So economically it

12:26

makes a lot of sense to

12:29

move the production basis from

12:32

China to Japan these days. Tomahiko,

12:35

thank you very much indeed. I understand that

12:37

both leaders will be serenaded by Paul Simon

12:39

at an official dinner. Julie

12:42

Norman, Tomahiko Tanaguchi, thank you very

12:44

much indeed. This is The Globalist. UBS has

12:50

over 900 investment analysts from over 100 different

12:52

countries. Over

12:57

900 of the sharpest minds and

12:59

freshest thinkers in the world of finance

13:01

today. To find

13:04

out how we can help you, contact us

13:06

at ubs.com. The

13:10

Globalist It

13:15

is 9.13 in Ankara, 7.13 here in London. Turkey

13:19

has announced its placing export restrictions

13:21

on goods going to Israel until

13:23

such time as a ceasefire is

13:25

declared. As well as calling

13:27

for an immediate ceasefire, Ankara has supported

13:30

steps to try Israel for genocide and

13:32

sent thousands of tons of aid for

13:34

garzons. I'm joined now by

13:36

Victoria Craig, who is a journalist based in

13:38

Ankara. Good morning to you Victoria. These

13:41

trade restrictions came into place yesterday.

13:43

Was there a particular incident

13:45

that prompted them? Good morning.

13:47

There's been several reasons why President

13:50

Erdogan and his government may have

13:53

pursued something like this, sort of a push and a

13:55

pull. I think the one thing that the Turkish Foreign

13:57

Minister cited was that they were not going to be

13:59

able to do that. was that Israel

14:01

denied a request from Turkey to air drop

14:03

aid into Gaza. And you mentioned how much

14:05

Turkey has sent. So this is,

14:07

this has been something that Turkey has been really

14:09

passionate about since, since

14:11

the conflict began back in October. They've

14:13

been really rallying on the side of

14:15

Gazans and Palestinians. And so

14:18

that was what sort of prompted this

14:20

response by Turkey. Turkey's foreign minister vowed

14:22

retaliation in a press conference on Monday

14:24

night and said that there's no excuse

14:26

for Israel to block our attempt to

14:28

airlift aid to starving Gazans. But

14:30

there are also several domestic factors as well.

14:32

There were local elections here in Turkey last

14:35

weekend. And President Erdogan's

14:37

ruling AKP party, the Justice and

14:39

Development Party, lost in many

14:42

provinces. Lots of people here saying

14:44

that they wanted to see more actual action

14:46

on Israel rather

14:48

than just tough talk. So these

14:51

two factors, I think, were probably the biggest in

14:54

sort of pushing Turkey to this response. So

14:56

how much trade has Turkey traditionally done

14:58

with Israel? Well, it's been

15:01

one of both, on both

15:03

sides. Both countries are big trading

15:05

partners with each other. Last year,

15:07

Israel was Turkey's 13th biggest export

15:09

partner. And for Israel, Turkey is

15:11

its fifth largest import partner. So

15:14

since the war began in October, Turkish exports

15:16

to Israel sell by about 30%. But

15:19

it's still a major trade ally. And

15:21

we can't forget that relations between Turkey

15:23

and Israel had been cooling in

15:26

recent months. It was only in September of

15:28

last year that President Erdogan met on the

15:30

sidelines of the UN General Assembly

15:32

in New York City with Prime Minister

15:34

Benjamin Netanyahu. And many had

15:37

called this a major milestone meeting. Tensions

15:39

had been mounting for more than a

15:41

decade over disputes, over policies that pertained

15:44

to Palestinians. And the two leaders

15:46

had then agreed to meet in each other's countries

15:49

when they called soon back then and

15:51

beef up economic links, including in energy.

15:54

But October 7th really put all of that

15:56

on hold and on ice and really ratcheted

15:58

up tensions. putting this thaw

16:00

and relations really on the back burner. So

16:03

what specific goods will now be banned? Well,

16:06

there are 54 goods on the list,

16:09

but there's importantly no details

16:11

by how much Turkey plans

16:13

to restrict any of these

16:15

exports to Israel. But some

16:17

of those exports include steel

16:19

products, cement, granite, construction machinery,

16:21

aviation fuel, things that

16:24

Turkey thinks could be used in

16:26

Israel's war efforts.

16:29

The Foreign Ministry said in a statement when

16:31

it announced those restrictions that the decision, as

16:33

you said, will be in place until Israel

16:35

declares an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and

16:38

allows sufficient and uninterrupted

16:41

humanitarian aid to Gaza. And then President

16:43

Erdogan released a video later in the

16:45

day yesterday, and he said that Turkey

16:47

has shown that we stand by the

16:49

Palestinian people in these difficult times. He

16:51

said Turkey has sent more than 45,000

16:53

tons of aid to the region and

16:55

vowed to continue to support the Palestinians

16:57

until the bloodshed in Gaza stops. So

17:01

we may see a ratcheting up of

17:04

these trade tensions. Israel has, for its part,

17:06

vowed to respond in kind, and it has

17:08

called on U.S. companies to

17:10

stop imports from Turkey to

17:12

try to sort of, I guess,

17:15

further increase the blow to Turkey's economy.

17:17

The Foreign Minister on Ex yesterday said

17:19

that Erdogan is, again, he said, sacrificing

17:21

the economic interests of the people of

17:23

Turkey for his support of Hamas, which

17:25

Turkey doesn't consider to be a terror

17:27

organization like many other countries around the

17:29

world does. Just don't pick that for

17:31

us, because Turkey is

17:34

a NATO member. As

17:36

you say, they don't consider Hamas to

17:38

be a terrorist organization. What's the relationship?

17:41

Well, there are lots of allegations that

17:44

members of Hamas are in Turkey, and

17:46

that President Erdogan isn't making any moves

17:48

to do anything about that. There

17:50

have been many pro-Palestinian

17:52

marches and

17:54

rallies across this

17:57

country. They, of course, not directly

17:59

related to Hamas, but

18:01

it sort of gives you a picture of

18:03

how much people here support the Palestinian cause

18:06

and movement. And like

18:08

I said, with local elections here last

18:10

weekend, many people said that the president

18:12

wasn't doing enough to support Palestinians and

18:14

Gazans particularly. And

18:16

like I said, President Erdogan doesn't consider Hamas

18:19

to be a terror organization. He's called them

18:21

a liberation group. In

18:23

the immediate aftermath of October

18:25

7th, he made allegations that

18:29

Israel was committing a genocide. He's

18:31

called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

18:34

a murderer. So they

18:36

really stand on two very different sides

18:38

of this issue. And President

18:40

Erdogan, I think, feeling the pressure from

18:43

people here in Turkey to do more

18:45

to actually respond and show more

18:47

support rather than just support of words.

18:50

And so going forward, what will this

18:52

signify for Turkey-Israel relations? Certainly

18:56

no rush in this effort to

18:58

better relations, that's for sure. Like

19:01

I said, President Erdogan has not been

19:04

shy about calling Benjamin Netanyahu, quote-unquote, the

19:06

butcher of Gaza. He

19:08

held what he called the Great Palestine Rally

19:10

last year to sort of drum up support

19:12

for Gazans. Thousands of people attended. But many

19:14

told me that what they really wanted to

19:16

see was more action from Middle Eastern countries

19:19

to help those in Gaza, whether through more

19:21

aid or immigration. And I

19:23

think the other thing, too, is President Erdogan has sort

19:25

of seen this as potentially an opportunity when

19:27

Western support for Israel may be waning. We

19:29

saw yesterday the UK said that it won't

19:32

block arms sales to Israel, but France had

19:34

floated the idea of sanctions to get more

19:36

aid into Gaza. So

19:38

President Erdogan may see this as an opportunity

19:40

to sort of get some of Israel's Western

19:42

allies more on his side. But

19:45

certainly this doesn't seem like an opportunity

19:47

to sort of repair a relationship

19:50

or build any bridges between the two

19:52

countries. But I think the real action

19:54

will be in seeing how much Turkey

19:57

does in fact restrict any of these

19:59

exports to Israel. Israel, because

20:01

like I said, no specific amounts

20:03

had been announced with this announcement

20:05

yesterday. So we'll have to

20:07

wait and see what the trade data actually

20:10

show happens and how much Israel will

20:12

respond with its own trade restrictions. Like I

20:14

said, it's been trying to rally support with

20:16

some of Turkey's allies, NATO allies, to

20:18

restrict its own trade between the two

20:21

countries. But those are really complicated relationships,

20:23

and it's not clear how the U.S.

20:25

will respond to

20:27

that encouragement, I suppose, from Israel as

20:30

well. Victoria, thank you. That's Victoria Craig

20:32

in Ankara, and this is The Globalist.

20:34

That's Turkey

20:46

heading back to the Middle East, because we're

20:48

going to continue now with today's newspapers.

20:50

And joining me down the line from

20:52

Istanbul is Ruth Michaelson, who's a journalist

20:54

and Middle East correspondent. And in fact,

20:56

Ruth, we want to start by looking

20:58

at the latest on the war in

21:00

Gaza. Tell us about

21:02

where we are on ceasefire negotiations.

21:06

Well, the process at the

21:08

moment on ceasefire negotiations is

21:10

not particularly positive. The

21:14

latest news being that Hamas has

21:16

said that they

21:19

are reviewing the latest ceasefire proposal

21:21

that was discussed in

21:24

Cairo, that was presented by mediators

21:26

there before leaving

21:29

Cairo. And

21:31

a senior member of Hamas told The Washington Post

21:33

that talks were on hold. And

21:37

The Washington Post basically

21:40

going through the kind of ups and

21:42

downs that have happened with

21:44

these talks that we've seen

21:46

the Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz

21:49

saying earlier this week that negotiations have reached

21:52

a critical point. But

21:54

Hamas saying that the terms that were presented

21:56

to them on the table in Cairo were

21:58

essentially nothing new. and another

22:01

senior, a spokesman from Hamas, Bassem Naim,

22:03

talking to the New York Times, describing

22:05

the latest proposal as worse than the

22:08

previous ones and saying that many of

22:10

the things that were put on the table in Cairo this

22:12

time were actually not

22:15

as good or they were less than what was

22:17

previously offered. And how are

22:19

the papers covering the fact that there does seem to have

22:21

been a bit of a sea change here from Washington? Well,

22:25

widespread coverage of Joe

22:28

Biden's remarks towards Benjamin Netanyahu.

22:30

We've seen, we've been covering for a

22:32

long time, the kind of increasing public

22:36

pressure from Joe Biden on

22:38

Benjamin Netanyahu in public criticism

22:40

of his trial of government.

22:43

And this seems to have reached the

22:46

latest peak. So

22:48

in an interview with Univision, which has

22:50

been widely quoted, the Guardian, France 24,

22:53

running these comments, saying

22:56

that Benjamin Netanyahu's approach with

22:58

Gaza was a mistake in the words

23:00

of Joe Biden, and

23:02

saying, I don't agree with his approach

23:04

and demanding an immediate ceasefire. And

23:08

I mean, this does mark a significant shift

23:10

from his previous comments. That

23:12

does. I mean, certainly

23:15

if we look at how Biden was

23:17

talking at the beginning of

23:19

the war on Gaza, and

23:22

that in the beginning there was certainly a lot

23:24

more kind of hedged criticisms

23:27

of Netanyahu's choices. But

23:30

now we're seeing a lot more kind of open

23:32

discussion, particularly when

23:34

it comes to the approach to aid. So

23:38

he basically said that

23:41

Israel should let more aid into

23:43

Gaza. And he said

23:45

that he'd spoken to leaders in Saudi Arabia,

23:47

Jordan and Egypt, that they were prepared to move

23:49

food in. And he said

23:52

there's no excuse not to provide for the medical and

23:54

food needs of those people. It should be

23:56

done now. But of course, things

23:58

are about to get much worse. Benjamin Netanyahu

24:00

has said that a date has been set

24:03

for a ground military operation in Rafa. I

24:05

don't think he's actually said when it is,

24:07

but there's been widespread condemnation of this. Absolutely.

24:10

I mean, this has, you

24:13

know, provoked understandably huge concern

24:15

given that there is over

24:18

a million people considered to be in

24:20

the city of Rafa in southern Gaza.

24:23

Netanyahu has said there is a

24:26

date, comments described by Al

24:28

Jazeera as doubling down, saying

24:31

that Israel will proceed with its goal

24:33

of eliminating all of Hamas's brigades, including

24:35

in Rafa, and

24:38

extremely forceful comments from Benjamin Netanyahu,

24:40

literally saying there is no force

24:42

in the world that will stop

24:44

us. Let's

24:46

go to a good news story.

24:49

It's a group of older Swiss women. They've won

24:51

a landmark ruling at the European Court of Human

24:53

Rights. It's declared that the

24:55

Swiss government violated the right to life

24:57

of its citizens by failing to do

24:59

enough about the climate crisis. This really

25:01

is a landmark ruling. Tell

25:04

us more. Yes, been hailed

25:06

by the lawyers, comment

25:08

that this case is a historic ruling. I think

25:10

it certainly does have the power to reverberate

25:14

across Europe. So

25:16

this is a group

25:18

of Swiss senior women,

25:20

average age 73, called

25:23

the Klimasinurinen. And they

25:25

brought this ruling in, brought a case

25:27

to, in the court in Switzerland, saying

25:29

that the country had failed to reduce

25:32

its greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to

25:34

meet its own targets. Switzerland

25:38

didn't respond to this case, and they escalated

25:40

it to the European Court of Human Rights, which

25:43

ruled in their favor. And

25:46

so it's, you know, according to the Washington

25:48

Post, shows how governments can

25:50

potentially be held to account in

25:52

court for climate-related issues and could

25:55

influence similar litigation worldwide. Although

25:57

there were a couple of other cases heard on the same

25:59

day. Portuguese youngsters

26:03

were bringing a case as was the former

26:05

mayor of a French coastal town both of

26:07

those thrown out. Yeah I

26:09

think there was some the impression from

26:11

lawyers that were speaking to the press

26:13

was that they wanted all three cases

26:15

to pass in kind of one big

26:18

sweep to demonstrate the power of this

26:20

kind of climate change legislation

26:23

or legislation to fight against government

26:25

inaction on climate change rather. The

26:28

case brought by these six young people

26:30

in Portugal particularly interesting all born

26:32

between 1999

26:34

and 2012 and they basically argued

26:37

that the existing and future effects of climate

26:39

change particularly looking at the spate of heat

26:42

waves and wildfires that had hit parts

26:45

of Central Europe exposed them to

26:47

harm. The court essentially said

26:49

that because their case was brought against

26:51

every member state that

26:54

is a member of the European Court

26:56

of Human Rights that it was inadmissible and

26:58

threw the case out. Right and of

27:01

course the French mayor I think lost his case

27:03

because he's no longer the mayor of that town. He

27:05

was worried because the town is on the coast

27:07

it's very low lying and of course there's

27:09

a risk of flooding there and well

27:11

people might worry about water in

27:13

France. We're looking at a story now where

27:16

a water charity in Paris has

27:18

very bad news for the upcoming Olympics they've been

27:20

testing the water in the Seine and it's

27:23

not great. Yes

27:25

extremely concerning news for the upcoming

27:28

Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games so

27:30

this water charity the

27:32

surf rider foundation of Europe said a

27:35

shadow looms over the quality of the

27:37

water in the Seine River they found

27:39

alarming levels of bacteria in the river

27:41

including E. coli. They tested

27:43

the water around

27:46

the Alexandre-Troy bridge which

27:49

will be the starting point for

27:51

the Olympic and Paralympic triathlon and

27:53

marathon swimming events the centerpiece of

27:55

the Olympic Games and

27:58

essentially said that there are a these

28:00

alarming levels of bacteria

28:02

and E. coli in the water. Lots

28:06

of mention of the idea that increased

28:08

rainfall might also basically

28:10

counter efforts by the mayor of Paris

28:12

to clean up the River Seine. But

28:15

also lots of statements given

28:17

to the local media by

28:20

the mayor of Paris essentially saying, no, we're doing

28:22

the cleanup operations. Everything will be

28:24

fine in 100 days' time when these

28:27

events start. The

28:29

piece in CBS, for example,

28:31

shows a picture of a

28:33

test event for swimmers diving off the

28:36

bridge into the water that happened last

28:38

year. So potentially some of these athletes

28:40

have already been exposed to whatever's going

28:42

on in the water. So

28:44

any chance that it might have to be cancelled?

28:48

There has been some discussion,

28:50

certainly questions to the

28:52

president of the Paris 2024 Olympics, the

28:56

Tony S. Dange, who

28:58

basically said that the triathlon competition

29:00

could be delayed, the swimming leg

29:03

could be cancelled, and that would

29:05

be due to adverse weather conditions,

29:07

so increased rainfall. But he basically

29:09

said it would only

29:11

have to be probably pushed off by a few

29:13

days and that swimmers are very tough. If you're

29:15

a competitive swimmer, you're used to this sort of

29:18

facing these kinds of difficulties. Let's

29:22

end with this wonderful story from Germany.

29:24

I feel extremely sorry for this man

29:26

who has been fired from a German

29:28

art gallery. Tell us more. Well,

29:31

I mean, it's one way to make sure that your

29:33

work gets into a museum, which is to go in

29:35

there and hang it yourself, especially

29:38

if you are part of the

29:40

technical team at the Munich Art

29:43

Museum, the Pianakatek de Mauderna.

29:46

And so there was a technician

29:49

and, in the words of

29:51

the Guardian aspiring artist, and actually I think

29:53

in the words of the Suddeutsches item, which is

29:55

from Munich, talking about this man's artistic ambitions, and

29:57

apparently, early on, he was a very good person.

30:00

this week, the museum

30:02

said that it had fired a

30:04

member of its technical services team

30:06

who managed to hang his painting

30:08

in the gallery near Andy Warhol

30:11

for an entire day. And

30:14

a spokesman from the Pina Tech told the

30:16

Guardian, the employee considers himself an artist and

30:18

most likely saw his role in the museum's

30:20

installation team as a day job to support

30:23

his true calling. Well, yeah, I've scrolled through

30:25

various links to this and I cannot see

30:27

a picture of his painting. Have you seen?

30:29

Is he any good? Unfortunately

30:31

not. It seems like the museum

30:34

didn't want to give him any more

30:36

publicity by saying that he had a

30:38

painting. But there was also mention in

30:40

Sudoch Wietung that there was another museum in

30:42

Bonn where this happened, where

30:45

the museum did react rather favorably.

30:47

So this is the Kunzhalle in

30:49

Bonn. Somebody came into the

30:51

museum and or a student who smuggled

30:53

one of her own paintings into the

30:56

museum and attached it to the wall

30:58

with double-sided tape, they mentioned. And

31:00

the Kunzhalle said, we think this is funny and

31:02

would like to get to know the artist. So

31:05

get in touch. There will be no

31:07

trouble. How fantastic. Ruth, thank you very

31:09

much indeed. Now here's what else we're

31:11

keeping an eye on today. Russia

31:15

and Kazakhstan ordered more than 100,000 people to be

31:17

evacuated after

31:19

swiftly melting snow swelled mighty rivers

31:21

beyond bursting point in the worst flooding

31:23

in the area for at least 70 years.

31:26

The snow melt is an annual event in

31:29

Russia, but scientists say climate change has made

31:31

flooding more frequent worldwide.

31:33

Arizona's top quarters revived a ban

31:35

on nearly all abortions under a

31:37

law from 1864, half

31:40

a century before statehood and

31:42

women's suffrage, further restricting reproductive

31:44

rights in the state where terminating a

31:46

pregnancy was already barred at 15 weeks

31:48

of gestation. President Joe

31:51

Biden called the Arizona ruling the

31:53

result of the extreme agenda of Republican

31:55

elected officials who are committed to ripping

31:57

away women's freedom. And

32:00

Vietnam aims to start building two

32:02

high-speed railway lines linking its capital

32:05

Hanoi with China before 2030, another

32:08

sign of a recent warming of ties between

32:10

the two communist ruled neighbours. Trade

32:13

between Vietnam and China in the first quarter

32:15

of this year rose 22%, though

32:18

the two countries remain embroiled in

32:20

a years-long maritime dispute in the

32:22

South China Sea. This is

32:24

The Globalist. Stay tuned. Now,

32:34

a movement in Russia formed by the

32:36

wives of soldiers has started a regular

32:38

protest, calling for their husbands to

32:40

be allowed to return home. Joining

32:42

me in the studio now is Stephen Diel,

32:44

who's a Russia analyst and a regular Monocle

32:47

contributor. Stephen, welcome back to the studio. Thank

32:49

you. Tell us about this movement. It's

32:51

called The Way Home, Putdamoi

32:54

in Russian. They have a

32:56

very active Telegram channel, Telegram being the

32:59

social media of choice for many Russians.

33:02

And it started some months ago

33:04

with the idea

33:06

not so much to stop the war, although some

33:09

of them clearly feel that that would be the

33:11

best solution for Russia and Russians, but

33:14

actually to bring home their

33:16

husbands, principally, but also brothers,

33:19

cousins, uncles, fathers,

33:22

who were called up under the mobilization

33:24

announced by President Putin in September 2022

33:28

and have never been given leave. So

33:30

we're talking about more than 18 months now. They've been

33:32

at the front. They

33:35

were not regular soldiers. They

33:37

may have had a little bit of training, but

33:40

none of them have been allowed home. And

33:42

so that's what sparked off this movement. And

33:45

for some months, women have

33:47

been putting on a white headscarf, and

33:49

at 12 o'clock local time going to

33:51

their local memorial to the

33:53

unknown soldier, the main one, of course, in Moscow,

33:55

just under the Kremlin walls. But

33:58

they're across Russia and other cities. and

34:00

laying flowers and that was a form of

34:02

protest. And they've now decided to take this

34:04

one step further. As of last Saturday, and

34:06

they're calling for every Saturday, at five o'clock

34:08

on local time, for people to go out

34:10

on their balconies or if they're at their

34:13

dacha, go in the garden of their dacha

34:15

and bang saucepans. So they're

34:17

calling it the march of

34:19

the empty saucepans. And on

34:21

last Saturday, in at least

34:24

20 cities and areas

34:27

across Russia, women took

34:29

part in this. Some men took part in this as well.

34:31

On the Telegram channel, there are various videos that

34:34

people have sent in. This

34:36

of course is a brave thing to do. It's

34:38

a demonstration, but they're saying, well, you're

34:40

at home. Surely the authorities can't arrest

34:42

you for doing something on your

34:45

own territory. Well, we know the authorities

34:47

can and will do exactly as they like in

34:49

Russia. So why is the Kremlin leaving them alone?

34:52

That's a very good question. My own feeling

34:54

is that they're

34:56

wary of these

34:59

women and they're wary of the numbers of

35:01

them. We're talking thousands. Let's keep it in

35:03

perspective. We're not talking millions of people across

35:05

the country yet, but nevertheless, when

35:08

you've got thousands of women who are

35:10

making a protest, they're perhaps slightly more

35:12

wary of arresting women, particularly on mass,

35:14

than they would be arresting men. And

35:17

there's this feeling that, well,

35:22

how do we blame them

35:24

or say they've committed

35:26

a crime when all they're doing is

35:28

either wearing a white headscarf and putting flowers

35:31

or banging a saucepan? And

35:33

I think that this is a

35:35

reflection of President Putin's biggest

35:37

fear in Russia. His biggest fear, as

35:39

I've said in this studio before, is

35:42

not nuclear war. It's not NATO. It's

35:44

an uprising from below. And when

35:47

you've got women whose husbands haven't returned, maybe

35:49

are never going to return because they've already

35:52

been killed, there's a feeling

35:54

that they've got nothing to lose. And

35:56

these women, as we saw in

35:58

the Afghan war, When a

36:00

lot of mothers protested and started a

36:02

real social movement of soldiers' mothers, when

36:06

they feel that they've lost what's most precious

36:08

to them and they say, what the hell,

36:11

my husband's dead, my son's dead, what else have

36:13

I got to lose? They

36:15

will fight. Russian women have this reputation for

36:18

being incredibly tough and I

36:20

think that is what is preventing

36:22

the Kremlin from really pushing hard

36:24

on them because it

36:26

could then spark out of control and then

36:28

if you get what the Russians call bunt,

36:30

this uprising from below, that's what

36:32

frightens Putin most of all. And

36:35

are these women anti-patriotic? Are they against the

36:37

war? They very much say

36:39

that they are patriotic. You

36:42

do get comments coming back to them on Telegram

36:45

accusing them of being unpatriotic and

36:48

using terms that one wouldn't repeat on the radio.

36:51

But on the whole, they say, no, no,

36:53

we're patriotic. What we're asking for is our

36:55

government to fulfill its obligations. It's

36:58

just not right to call men up

37:00

to the army for whatever reason and

37:02

then not give them any leave. They

37:05

say that the starting point is that

37:08

they're protesting about their loved ones not

37:10

being allowed home at all for leave,

37:12

which is in any circumstance is

37:14

very unusual. I mean, in the Second World War,

37:16

for example, armies were allowed to

37:19

have soldiers go on leave for R&R,

37:22

restaurant recuperation. But

37:25

this is not happening at all. And also, of

37:27

course, we know how brutal the Russian army is

37:29

being to its own people. Soldiers

37:31

who refuse to fight, maybe they've got

37:34

PTSD, they simply cannot go on, are

37:36

being thrown into a pit and

37:38

not fed until they agree to come out and go and

37:40

fight. The Russians have done

37:42

some incredibly dreadful and brutal

37:45

things to Ukrainians in Ukraine and

37:47

torture and mass rape and so

37:49

on. But they're actually very

37:52

cruel to their own people, too. And

37:54

so this is what the women also are saying. Why should

37:56

my husband be thrown into a pit? Because he's been on

37:58

the front line for 18 months. and just

38:00

need a break. We know that Russia's desperately

38:02

short of troops, but what might

38:04

be the other reasons for not allowing them

38:06

leave? Is it because they would bring news

38:08

back from the front lines? I think

38:10

you're absolutely right, Georgina. I think that is

38:13

the worry. The

38:15

Russian authorities have clamped down on any

38:18

information that doesn't put across the official

38:20

view that this is not a war,

38:22

but a special military operation, that the

38:26

Russian army is liberating Russians

38:29

in Ukraine, that they're fighting Nazis in

38:31

Ukraine, they're now fighting NATO in Ukraine,

38:34

all of which is nonsense. The only Nazis

38:36

in Ukraine are Russian soldiers who behaved so

38:38

atrociously. Anything

38:41

that actually brings the message back has

38:44

happened again in Afghanistan. This was one of the

38:46

things that the war in Afghanistan lasted

38:48

nearly 10 years. I

38:51

said this for a long time, and I think

38:53

it's generally accepted now, not just because I said

38:55

it, but that the war in Afghanistan played a

38:58

crucial role in the collapse of the Soviet Union.

39:00

One of the reasons was you had soldiers who'd

39:02

serve up there who were being told they were

39:05

doing their internationalist duty, and then coming back and

39:07

going back to their villages or towns all over

39:09

Russia and saying, hey, they were shooting at us.

39:11

My friend got his arm blown off. When

39:15

the horrors of war do come back, the

39:17

Russians know from their experience from Afghanistan

39:19

that this can have a knock-on effect,

39:21

and it could really cause real trouble

39:24

amongst the Russian population. Stephen Diehl, thank

39:26

you very much indeed. You're with

39:28

Monocle Radio. UBS

39:33

is a global financial services firm

39:36

with over 150 years of heritage.

39:40

Built on the unique dedication of

39:42

our people, we bring fresh thinking

39:44

and perspective to our work. We

39:47

know that it takes a marriage

39:49

of intelligence and heart to create

39:51

lasting value for our clients. It's

39:54

about having the right ideas, of course,

39:56

but also about having one of the

39:58

most accomplished lives. and

40:01

an unrivalled network of global

40:03

obstacles. That's why

40:05

at UBS we pride ourselves

40:07

on thinking smarter, to make a

40:10

real difference. Tune in

40:12

for the Bulletin with UBS every week

40:14

for the latest insights and opinions

40:16

from UBS all around the world.

40:22

The Globalist This

40:27

is The Globalist on Monocle Radio with me,

40:29

Georgina Godwin. It's 7.40pm here in London.

40:32

Peter Higgs, the Nobel Prize winning

40:34

physicist who discovered a new particle known

40:36

as the Higgs boson, has died. He

40:39

was 94. Higgs was awarded the Nobel

40:41

Prize for Physics in 2013 for his work, which

40:45

showed how the boson helped bind the

40:47

universe together. To look back at

40:49

his life and legacy, I am joined now by Dr Chris

40:51

Smith of the Naked Scientists podcast

40:53

and a virologist at Cambridge University.

40:56

Chris, we used to speak to you almost on a

40:58

daily basis back in the good old days of Covid.

41:01

We miss you. Well,

41:03

thank goodness, because that means Covid isn't such

41:06

a problem. But I miss you too. Chris,

41:08

can we start by explaining to the likes of me, who

41:11

are very ignorant on this, the

41:14

particle Higgs boson and why it's

41:16

important? Well,

41:18

Peter Higgs, who was born in Newcastle on time

41:20

94 years ago and died

41:22

on Monday, was a physicist. And

41:25

in the 1960s, he

41:28

was reading various bits of theoretical

41:31

physics, because that was his field,

41:33

theoretical physics. And

41:35

he landed on a course of

41:37

work, which in 1964 led to the

41:39

publication of two papers. Well, he submitted

41:41

for publication, I should say, two papers,

41:43

one of which was rejected. And

41:46

it was rejected because the pair of them were

41:48

literally a matter of lines long and

41:50

a handful of equations. But the

41:53

insight that was there was that they

41:55

explained something that was missing in particle

41:57

physics, which had enjoyed a real explosion.

42:00

in the 50s, 60s, 70s, because

42:02

scientists began to assemble, or got

42:04

close to assembling, what we call

42:06

the standard model. When

42:08

we look at the universe, we

42:10

see that it's made up of particles, and

42:12

those particles are made up themselves of particles

42:14

that are smaller than they are, and

42:16

they're bound together by various forces. And

42:19

there are various ways of arranging all of this

42:21

so that the system works. It's

42:24

effectively like the spice rack in your kitchen

42:26

wall of how you make matter. But

42:29

there was one thing missing, which is that

42:31

this could explain how matter worked, but it

42:34

didn't explain where it got its mass from.

42:36

In other words, when I put some of

42:38

those spices and other things on the weighing

42:40

scales, they register a weight. They've got mass,

42:42

which when it's acted on by gravity, has

42:45

a weight. And what Peter

42:47

Higgs's equations that were presented in those 1964

42:49

papers did was to convey a

42:51

way, a notion that

42:54

you could have a particle, or a series

42:56

of particles, which would create the force field,

42:58

which would pervade the universe. And

43:01

when things that had mass interacted, or

43:03

things, particles that existed, interacted with that

43:05

force field, they would feel that force,

43:07

and that would give them their mass.

43:09

So this was the missing part of

43:12

the explanation for why things weigh something

43:14

when you put them on your weighing

43:16

scales. And initially, people said, well, it's

43:18

just a theory. And many famous scientists

43:21

said that this god particle should

43:23

be called the goddamn particle because it'll

43:25

never be discovered. It's too difficult. And

43:27

even Stephen Hawking said, I'll bet

43:29

another, he bet another scientist $100 that

43:31

it didn't exist. He even said to Peter Higgs

43:33

about 20 years ago, I hope this

43:36

is never discovered because meaning he'd lose his bet, but

43:38

also he just didn't think it was likely to be

43:40

a reality. And Peter Higgs had

43:42

retired a long time before. They

43:44

finally had enough power at the particle

43:47

accelerator in CERN, the Large Hadron Collider,

43:49

which could achieve the sorts of energies

43:51

that you need by colliding protons,

43:53

positive particles together, to

43:55

create the sorts of disruptions in

43:57

these fields and the sorts of

43:59

particles. decays that the theory

44:01

predicted would only be seen if

44:05

the Higgs boson and the field

44:07

that these particles therefore create existed

44:09

and two independent experiments which were

44:11

done completely separate to each other

44:13

at the LHC both kept

44:15

their data separate and brought it together

44:17

on one day and said look we've

44:20

independently both detected to a

44:22

very high level of certainty the

44:24

findings that would agree with what

44:27

Peter Higgs's theory sets out so

44:29

he's probably right and that's when they accepted in 2012 it

44:31

was July the 4th 2012

44:34

the Higgs boson the particle he'd

44:36

seen in as a possibility in

44:38

1964 predicted was

44:40

real and what is his

44:42

legacy how does his work influence the life

44:45

of ordinary people well

44:47

I think the fact we're talking about it is one

44:49

of the most powerful legacies this the fact that we

44:51

understand why things have mass doesn't

44:53

really matter to the average man woman and

44:56

child on the street at any second but

44:58

the fact we're talking about it the fact

45:00

that we're showing that this is what science

45:02

can do it brings us a step further

45:04

along the path of explaining how the universe

45:06

works and ultimately unlocking the power of other

45:08

technologies yet to be discovered or harnessed that's

45:10

the real power of this and I think

45:12

the the legacy is that a he's got

45:14

a particle named after him which will never

45:17

change in the history of humankind going forward which

45:19

is a pretty cool thing to have done he's

45:21

got a Nobel Prize which is another pretty cool

45:23

thing to have done and and and we're talking

45:25

about it and we'll continue to invoke this particle

45:27

in this piece of physics from the 1960s for

45:30

the rest of our lives and the lives of

45:32

our children and so on Dr. Chris Smith

45:34

thank you very much indeed Peter Higgs

45:36

has died at the age right

45:50

let's move over to Australia it's time

45:52

to talk business with the National Business Reporter and

45:55

presenter at ABC News Rachel Papazoni

45:57

he joins us now from Perth

46:00

Rachel, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand

46:02

kept interest rates on hold today. When

46:04

are they tipped to start cutting? Yeah,

46:08

no surprise to market watchers today, Georgina,

46:11

when they held rates at 5.5%. They've

46:14

been at that rate almost a

46:16

year since May last year. The

46:19

expectation is that they'll stay there

46:21

for most of this year as

46:24

well. The NBS forecasting that that

46:26

first rate cut probably not likely

46:28

until November. They expect,

46:30

though, that the bank will then

46:33

continue to cut every meeting through

46:35

2025 to get

46:37

to a terminal rate of 3.75% by a quarter four in 2025. Now,

46:43

New Zealand actually entered the technical

46:46

recession in the last couple

46:48

of weeks. They have inflation still very high at

46:50

4.7%, way off their target of 1% to 3%

46:52

range. Unemployment

46:56

still at 4%. So

46:58

clearly a lot more work to do

47:01

there, even though listeners may recall

47:03

that the Bank of New Zealand

47:05

was one of the first to

47:07

start lifting the official interest rates

47:09

back in Right.

47:12

And of course, they're not the only ones. The Bank

47:14

of Canada is tipped to hold today, though. The European

47:16

Central Bank tomorrow, is this all about waiting to see

47:19

what the US Fed does? It

47:22

really is. We're all sort

47:24

of waiting to see how things

47:26

play out in the US and then

47:28

we'll likely respond to that. So

47:31

the Bank of Canada at 5%, European Central Bank

47:33

at 4%, as you said, unlikely

47:35

to change this week. What

47:37

we'll get overnight, though, is

47:40

the US inflation number. And

47:42

that is going to be the biggest

47:44

marker for what we may see

47:46

the US Fed do when it meets at

47:49

the end of this month and also on

47:51

May 1, third day, two of its meetings.

47:53

At this stage, we're not expecting to see

47:55

any change to interest rates in the US

47:57

at its meeting later this month, but it

47:59

does all the depend on this inflation

48:01

data due out later

48:03

today or overnight my time. We've

48:06

seen inflation in the US very,

48:08

very sticky, in fact, dodging our

48:11

falls month to month, the last few

48:13

months and surprising to the upside.

48:16

The US Fed chair Jerome Powell said last

48:18

week that it was too soon to say

48:20

whether the recent readings represent more than just

48:22

a bump in the sort of inflation

48:26

story. And if it

48:28

overshoots again this month, that has the

48:30

potential to really see the market lose

48:32

some patience. We may have

48:35

to see some action from the

48:37

US Fed. One

48:39

of those big parts, of course, playing into

48:41

inflation globally is oil prices. They continue

48:43

to rise on the back of conflicts

48:47

in the Middle East and in Europe. Reading

48:50

just today, for example, that Mexico

48:52

has announced cuts to its

48:54

exports of oil. Many

48:56

factors playing into one of the biggest drivers of

48:58

inflation at the moment. Now South

49:00

Korea is voting today. How important is

49:03

the cost of living crisis for

49:06

those voters in the election? Just

49:09

as it is for everyone in all

49:12

the countries we've mentioned so far today,

49:14

Georgina, inflation is still high in South

49:16

Korea. It's at 3.1%. The

49:19

interest rate there at 3.5%. Their

49:22

bank meets on Friday, also unlikely

49:24

to change. So 30%

49:26

of voters have already cast

49:29

their ballots in today's election.

49:32

But what we've seen in the lead up to today

49:34

is a lot of coverage of a

49:37

disconnect between our President

49:39

Yoon and everyday Koreans

49:41

who are facing these

49:43

costs of living pressures that so many

49:45

people around the world are familiar with.

49:48

President Yoon is not up for re-election. He's

49:50

into year three of his five-year term.

49:52

But he came in in 2022, vowing

49:55

to cut taxes, ease

49:58

business regulations, and it expand

50:00

family support for Koreans.

50:03

And there's been a lot of discontent

50:05

that a lot of those promises haven't

50:07

been met. So analysts are

50:09

pretty split on how things could fall in

50:12

the election today. So there's still a few

50:14

more hours until polls close in South Korea.

50:16

But for Australia, it's a big trading partner

50:18

for us. So we're keen to see how

50:21

that all plays out. Of course, it's a

50:23

big year of elections with

50:25

the biggest one, of course, the US

50:27

presidential race when voting there occurs in

50:29

November. Mm hmm. Finally, let's

50:31

have a look at EVs, electric vehicles.

50:34

This has led to a record number of car

50:36

carrying ship orders. Tell us more about that. Yeah,

50:40

I guess that just a great

50:42

indication of how interconnected the

50:45

global economy is. So we've seen, of course,

50:47

a boom in EV demand.

50:49

It has pared back a little bit

50:51

and not sort of met expectations in the last

50:53

few months, but still on that

50:56

upward trajectory. And of course, you've

50:58

got to get those electric vehicles from where they're

51:00

made, mostly in China to

51:02

the customer around the world. So China

51:04

has increased its order for

51:07

car carrying vessels. Currently, it has

51:09

33 car carrying

51:11

ships and it's put an order in for 47 more.

51:14

So clearly more than doubling its

51:16

current load. And if

51:19

that does indeed take place by 2028, as

51:22

expected, it'll become the fourth largest

51:25

owner of car carrying vessels. But still

51:27

a long way to go compared to

51:29

Japan. It's the world's largest. It has

51:31

283 car carrying ships. Norway

51:36

has 102. South Korea has 72.

51:38

So China would become

51:41

fourth after that list. And

51:43

a lot of that buying is coming from

51:46

carmakers themselves. For example, if

51:49

a giant BYD is put in order

51:51

for car carrying ships, it exported more

51:53

than 240,000 EVs last year. Expect

51:57

to almost double that to 400. So

52:00

it needs to get those cars from

52:03

China to the customer, as I explained,

52:05

and that happens on ships. I

52:07

was recently in Australia and I

52:10

did see a parking lot full

52:12

of these Chinese-built electric vehicles, but

52:14

they were there in showrooms, not

52:17

for sale. Are there a

52:19

lot of them on the road there? I

52:22

definitely feel that we are starting

52:24

to see a lot more. We

52:27

are seeing a lot more Teslas

52:29

as well, Georgina, but definitely, particularly

52:31

the BYD, Build Your Dream branded

52:33

car. I've seen a lot more

52:35

of them. I actually took one for a test drive

52:37

a couple of months ago because I was interested just

52:40

to see what all the hype

52:42

is about. They drive just

52:44

as smoothly as the Tesla.

52:46

Obviously, at a lower price point,

52:49

they are much more attainable for a

52:51

larger portion of the population.

52:54

Australia's biggest challenge, of course, though,

52:56

isn't going anywhere and that is

52:58

the distance. We need a lot more

53:01

charging stations dotted throughout the

53:03

country to make EV uptake

53:05

really upsurge here in Australia.

53:07

Great. Well, thank you very

53:09

much indeed. That's Rachel Papazoni and this is The

53:11

Globalist on Monocle Radio. And

53:19

finally today, the shortlist for the

53:21

prestigious Literary Award, the International Booker

53:23

Prize has just been announced. In

53:25

all, it spans six languages, six

53:27

countries and three continents. So

53:30

let's go through the shortlist now

53:32

with Ramesh Ganesakara, who is the award-winning

53:34

author and a judge of the International

53:36

Booker, 2024. Ramesh,

53:39

it's lovely to speak to you again. Ramesh, through

53:41

the shortlist and where the authors come from. Hi,

53:44

Georgina. Lovely to be here.

53:47

Thanks for having me. So

53:50

we've got a shortlist that, as you

53:52

say, covers a lot

53:55

of places. It's very buried.

53:57

Nauta River is an Argentinian

53:59

novel. Kyros from Germany,

54:01

the details

54:04

from Sweden, Meta2-10

54:07

from South Korea, you were

54:09

talking about Korea. What

54:12

I'd rather not think about is the Dutch novel

54:15

and Crooked Cloud from Brazil. Mm-hmm.

54:19

A lot of these are from independent

54:21

publishers. I wonder why we

54:23

see independent publishers making the list so

54:26

often. The big houses don't feature nearly

54:28

so much. Yeah,

54:30

it's an interesting one, I guess. And

54:33

I think generally, looking

54:35

at the submissions that we had

54:37

for this prize, there are

54:39

a lot of independent presses. And the reason

54:44

for that I

54:46

really don't know. Other than,

54:49

I guess, there are

54:51

more small presses coming up,

54:53

publishing a book is not as

54:56

technically complicated as it used

54:58

to be ages ago. And

55:01

therefore, people are starting out. And I

55:03

think they're interested in exploring different

55:06

fiction. And taking

55:09

more risks, yeah, than the bigger

55:11

publishing houses. You've been shortlisted for

55:13

the Booker yourself. I think that was 94. What

55:16

difference does this kind of recognition make

55:18

to a writer? I

55:21

think it makes a huge difference.

55:23

I mean, the game,

55:25

if you like, was different back in 94.

55:28

It was a different sort of thing. We

55:30

didn't have long lists. It was just a

55:32

short list. And there

55:34

is a difference between the Booker Prize and

55:36

the International Booker Prize. Of course, the

55:39

prize we're talking about now

55:42

is for translated fiction, whereas

55:44

the Booker Prize is for fiction written in

55:46

English. And translated

55:48

fiction has been growing

55:51

in popularity, in exposure

55:54

over the last few years,

55:56

back in the 90s. it

56:00

would have been much more difficult to

56:02

find, I suppose. Whereas at the moment,

56:04

as I understand it, it's

56:07

the most sort of fastest

56:09

growing area of fiction

56:12

and fiction reading, certainly under

56:15

in certain groups of readers,

56:17

particularly readers under the age, I think of 35.

56:20

So there's a real boom there, I think.

56:23

And the reasons for that are

56:26

interesting to look at really. And

56:30

just finally, what are the

56:32

challenges of judging books from

56:34

such diverse places? Well,

56:37

it's a challenge, but it's also what's really,

56:39

really interesting to me and what drew me

56:41

to it when I was invited to do

56:43

this. I thought it would be great because

56:46

it's a chance to look

56:49

at writing in other languages or

56:51

the cultures, obviously translated

56:53

into English, but it's

56:56

carrying on that conversation that books

56:58

are all about, but in a

57:00

much wider context and across

57:03

cultures. And I

57:05

think for me, it's hugely

57:07

eye-opening. It's great to see what people

57:09

are writing, what fiction

57:12

means in a different language, how

57:14

you open it up. And for

57:16

me as a reader, it's about bringing an

57:19

open mind to it. Ramesh,

57:21

thank you so much. That's

57:23

Ramesh Gunasakara. And if

57:25

you'd like to know more about Ramesh's own work,

57:28

there's a wonderful interview with him in

57:30

our VARF Meet the Writers Archive, which

57:32

you can find on our website. And

57:34

also the winner of the International Booker

57:37

Prize will be announced on the 21st

57:39

of May. And

57:42

that's all for today's programme. Thanks to

57:44

our producers, Sophie Monaghan-Koons, Carlotta Rubella and

57:46

Monica Lillis, our researcher, George

57:49

Ruskin, and our studio manager, Steph

57:51

Chungu. After the headlines, there's

57:53

more music on the way and the briefing

57:55

is live at midday in London. That's with

57:57

me. I'm Georgina Godrion. And I'll

58:00

return... on the globalist at the same time.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features