Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
You're listening to The Globalist, first broadcast on 10th
0:02
April 2024 on Monocle Radio, The
0:06
Globalist, in association with UBS.
0:30
Hello, this is The Globalist broadcasting
0:32
to you live from Midori House
0:34
in London. I'm Georgina Godwin. On
0:36
the show ahead, Joe Biden and
0:39
Fumio Kishida are meeting in Washington
0:41
to maintain and strengthen relations between
0:43
Japan and the US. We'll examine
0:45
their agenda. Turkey is
0:47
restricting exports to Israel, but how
0:49
much of this is really about
0:51
Erdogan's domestic agenda? We'll have more
0:53
from Ankara. In Russia, military
0:55
wives and mothers are using their saucepans to
0:57
send a message to the government. But
1:00
will the Kremlin listen to kitchenware? Plus…
1:17
You may not know much about particle
1:19
physics, but you will have heard of
1:21
Higgs-Boson. We'll look back at the life
1:24
of Peter Higgs, who made the scientific
1:26
breakthrough. We'll have a round-up of business
1:28
news, flick through the international papers, and
1:30
lastly, we'll hear who's made the shortlist
1:32
for the highly prestigious International Booker Prize.
1:35
That's all ahead here on The Globalist, live
1:37
from London. First,
1:47
a look at what else is happening in the news. Russia
1:50
and Kazakhstan ordered more than 100,000
1:53
people to evacuate after swiftly
1:55
melting snow swelled mighty rivers beyond
1:57
bursting point in the worst flooding
1:59
ever. in the area for at least 70 years.
2:03
Arizona's top quarters revived a ban
2:05
on nearly all abortions, further
2:07
restricting reproductive rights in a
2:09
state where terminating a pregnancy was already
2:11
barred at 15 weeks of gestation.
2:14
And Vietnam aims to start
2:16
building two high-speed railway lines
2:18
linking its capital Hanoi with
2:20
China before 2030. Do stay
2:22
tuned to Monocle Radio throughout the day for more
2:24
on those stories. Now, Japanese
2:27
Prime Minister Fumio Kishida and US
2:29
President Joe Biden are having a summit
2:31
meeting this week aimed at shoring up
2:33
the alliance between the two countries. Meeting
2:35
in Washington, the two leaders want
2:37
to keep the momentum of the
2:40
bilateral relationship going and forge a
2:42
global partnership, all whilst keeping a
2:44
wary eye on China. Well,
2:46
I'm joined now by Julie Norman, who's the
2:48
co-director of University College London's Centre
2:51
on US Politics and on
2:53
the line from Tokyo by Tomahiko Kanaguchi,
2:55
who's a former special advisor to
2:57
the cabinet of Shinzo Abe. Tomahiko,
3:00
I wonder if we could start with
3:03
you. Kishida outlined his aims before leaving
3:05
Tokyo. What did he say? He said
3:08
the traditional and time-honoured
3:11
alliance relationship between
3:13
the United States and Japan is
3:15
now supposed to serve greater purposes
3:17
of maintaining international order that is
3:20
based on rules
3:23
and he is going to call
3:25
the alliance global partners
3:27
for the future and this
3:29
for the future means
3:31
a wide range of issues. Such
3:34
as? Such as, shouldering
3:39
the responsibilities that have
3:42
been traditionally covered solely
3:44
by the United States.
3:47
I think he's going to call the United States
3:49
a partner with which Japan is willing to
3:51
work for the
3:54
public goods that
3:56
the United States again traditionally has
3:59
Chosen. To show that
4:01
by themselves, knowing and
4:03
being aware that mounting
4:06
challenges make it imperative
4:08
for Japan to work
4:10
more closely. With the
4:12
United States, denies has cannot
4:14
solely alone provide public goods
4:17
to the international community. Subtly
4:19
Norman decide to come see you.
4:21
How would you characterize the relationship
4:23
between Japan and the Us? So.
4:25
We're obviously this is always then a
4:28
strong alliance but what we're seeing now
4:30
is really and major strengthening. You know
4:32
our eyes had been somewhere else. Where
4:34
in the world? But this is really
4:36
a significant development in Asia right now
4:38
to has and Japan sifting in terms
4:40
of it's descent. Spending and terms as
4:42
it's I investments into descends and the
4:44
U S is very interested in that.
4:46
They want this alliance to stay strong
4:48
on defense and security. And of course,
4:50
while you're a lot about economic and
4:52
Dad had cooperation today too. but I
4:54
think defense is really. Going to top the
4:57
agenda and light of growing threats from China
4:59
from North Riyadh to some degree from Russia
5:01
as wow. Still, the To: how's it
5:03
being viewed back in Japan? Whoop Whoop whoop.
5:05
What's the what's what's the idea of the
5:08
summit? Their. These stones have
5:10
been laid price a previously by
5:12
the a late Prime minister Says
5:14
Wahlberg who called Reliance Alliance for
5:16
Alliance of Hope meaning that are
5:19
denied status by must work more
5:21
closely for the betterment of for
5:23
the future of the world So
5:25
it's natural expenses and there has
5:27
been very little deviancy from a
5:30
A between the opposition and the
5:32
A ruling party's when it comes
5:34
to the salient said he points
5:36
and importance to be put on
5:38
the. He was to alliance but
5:40
the challenge for the prime minister is
5:43
it's not going to be necessarily translated
5:45
into the great of popularity. That
5:48
he could enjoy from the domestic
5:50
voters. and i
5:52
wanted to see what this is the
5:55
best possible outcomes so this would be
5:57
some from bidens prospectus not not system
5:59
the relationship with Japan, but also for
6:02
his domestic base? Sure.
6:05
So there's a couple of things in place.
6:07
One I would say it is a big
6:09
deal that this is official state visit, official
6:11
state dinner, a congressional
6:13
address. So in terms of just
6:16
showcasing, I would say, a very
6:18
positive foreign policy relationship, that's very
6:20
helpful for Biden. I would
6:22
say on the economic side, there's
6:24
some more political touchy elements in
6:26
terms of a Japanese
6:28
steel company trying to buy US steel.
6:30
That's politically kind of testy for Biden
6:32
right now. So there's some of those
6:35
conversations that I think will be a
6:37
little bit more on the sidelines than
6:39
the official conversations. But for Biden, they
6:41
do matter. And they're things that other
6:43
Americans, I think, will be looking to,
6:45
especially Republicans and GOP and Biden
6:47
opponents. Tomahiko, I
6:49
wonder how this meeting fits him with
6:51
Kishida's greater foreign policy aims. He's
6:54
been following basically what his
6:57
predecessor has chosen
6:59
to follow, namely to bring
7:02
Japan on the center
7:04
stage of the international community, again,
7:07
being aware that the international
7:10
order, especially in the Indo-Pacific
7:12
area, has been constantly challenged
7:14
by revisionist, authoritarian regimes from
7:17
Russia, North Korea to China. And
7:21
the aims that Kishida is after
7:24
during this summit meeting
7:26
are, once again, pretty much
7:29
the natural extension of
7:31
what he has been doing. So
7:34
let's just pick up on defense, as you've been
7:36
also speaking about. Julie, we
7:38
know that on Thursday, Kishida will join
7:40
Biden and the Philippine President, Ferdinand Marcus
7:42
Jr., to discuss the Chinese coast guard
7:45
aggression in the South and
7:47
the East China Seas. So tell
7:49
us more about that focus on defense. Yeah.
7:52
So again, defense will, I think, play a
7:54
part in the bilateral, as well as
7:56
in this additional meeting with the Philippines.
7:59
And Again, the I Japan has over
8:01
the last several years. Ben increasing
8:03
defense spending, Has restructured
8:06
their security strategy. And
8:08
there's a couple t things the Us
8:10
and Japan will be discussing. Wind is
8:12
just greater an eye coordination. Between
8:14
there are there different troops in Japan,
8:16
the Us has about fifty thousand service
8:19
person's eyes station. They're still be talking
8:21
a lot about new initiatives for and
8:23
defense industry for defense equipment for I'm
8:25
for of arms sales and these kinds
8:28
of things which is a new area
8:30
of conversation for these two countries, on
8:32
and off the possible participation, other security
8:34
partnerships and that certainly include the Philippines
8:37
with both to town and thought the
8:39
Philippines and we some the U S
8:41
perspective on the again being somewhat subject
8:43
to this increasing. Aggressive aggression from
8:45
China from Than Ah You aggression
8:48
and I in in the
8:50
Pacific region and trying to disrupt.
8:52
Deterrence. that and of the day says
8:54
filmmaker speaking about minutes partnerships I mean
8:57
the worst excesses that japan much to
8:59
an Opus that's the by less will
9:01
security. Deposits of Indo Pacific region
9:03
between. Australia, the United Kingdom
9:05
and United States. Dorcas see like
9:07
I will, I will. I wonder
9:09
how likely that isn't were written
9:11
with sits within the Japanese pacifist
9:13
constitution. I think
9:16
it's so become much much
9:18
likelier our but certainly Japan
9:20
is not going to be
9:22
able to provide nuclear powered
9:24
submarine fleet to Australia or
9:26
which are they call pillow
9:28
one but pillar to include
9:30
a lot of initiatives especially
9:32
on the high technology areas
9:34
where Japan could contribute to
9:37
the enhancement of the Royal
9:39
Australian Navy's capacity by extension
9:41
d or overall capacity of
9:43
the naval pause of of
9:45
the. United States, Australia, Japan
9:47
and the United Kingdom which
9:49
has a over the last
9:52
couple of years been a
9:54
very close maybe terribly to
9:56
Japan. My Rights And
9:58
and Tr S and. Few
10:00
questions a given the a
10:02
impending crises The.japan his face
10:05
to daily of coming from
10:07
my China. Most notably there
10:09
is a wider recognition among
10:12
the Japanese populace that more
10:14
to be done more should
10:16
be done to beef up
10:18
to pass defense and deterrence
10:21
capacities. We know
10:23
of course isn't election coming up in the
10:25
United States soon? and of course everything might
10:27
change. How much can the biden administration to
10:29
to make sure that to censor dream is
10:32
that a person's a place now are at
10:34
sleep some. Priests to see like
10:36
yeah, It's a good question I
10:38
think it's one that both to allies
10:41
and adversaries. Are aware of about
10:43
many of the agreement. That or
10:45
perhaps need under the Biden administration
10:47
or may. Not last. At least not
10:49
last. And their time for a mom under
10:51
a new president seen especially under Trump. And
10:54
with that said, ios on the of
10:56
these relationships and especially. The one with
10:58
Japan I do think will be on
11:00
a solid solid alliance even are under
11:02
a potential at Trump presidency. One
11:04
area where the party's do. Agree is
11:07
on being somewhat tough on countering China
11:09
and I think both parties seats bolstering
11:11
this relationship with Japan as part of
11:13
overall a against on. The details may
11:15
differ, but it's idea of seeing Japan
11:18
as a strong ally as a strong
11:20
partners or maybe some the distance side
11:22
is something that I think would continue.
11:25
That summer he says I saw Tokyo
11:27
has ties, keeps trade measures against sign
11:29
and low keys. Clearly Japan doesn't want
11:31
to antagonize it's top trade partner will
11:34
die to see says that. How can
11:36
that be it seems. Whilst keeping the
11:38
status quo. The.
11:40
A Japanese companies are,
11:43
as you say, very
11:45
much concerned. About
11:48
the repercussion. to
11:50
be coming from china in
11:53
response to the retaliatory measures
11:55
taken by the united states
11:58
and japan but silently but
12:00
steadily more and more
12:02
Japanese companies are reshoring
12:04
their operations, divesting
12:07
from China and investing into
12:09
its own country, its own
12:11
homeland country. Remember that
12:14
the Japanese currency is extremely
12:17
cheap and labor,
12:20
cost and everything has become much,
12:22
much more competitive in Japan even
12:24
compared to China. So economically it
12:26
makes a lot of sense to
12:29
move the production basis from
12:32
China to Japan these days. Tomahiko,
12:35
thank you very much indeed. I understand that
12:37
both leaders will be serenaded by Paul Simon
12:39
at an official dinner. Julie
12:42
Norman, Tomahiko Tanaguchi, thank you very
12:44
much indeed. This is The Globalist. UBS has
12:50
over 900 investment analysts from over 100 different
12:52
countries. Over
12:57
900 of the sharpest minds and
12:59
freshest thinkers in the world of finance
13:01
today. To find
13:04
out how we can help you, contact us
13:06
at ubs.com. The
13:10
Globalist It
13:15
is 9.13 in Ankara, 7.13 here in London. Turkey
13:19
has announced its placing export restrictions
13:21
on goods going to Israel until
13:23
such time as a ceasefire is
13:25
declared. As well as calling
13:27
for an immediate ceasefire, Ankara has supported
13:30
steps to try Israel for genocide and
13:32
sent thousands of tons of aid for
13:34
garzons. I'm joined now by
13:36
Victoria Craig, who is a journalist based in
13:38
Ankara. Good morning to you Victoria. These
13:41
trade restrictions came into place yesterday.
13:43
Was there a particular incident
13:45
that prompted them? Good morning.
13:47
There's been several reasons why President
13:50
Erdogan and his government may have
13:53
pursued something like this, sort of a push and a
13:55
pull. I think the one thing that the Turkish Foreign
13:57
Minister cited was that they were not going to be
13:59
able to do that. was that Israel
14:01
denied a request from Turkey to air drop
14:03
aid into Gaza. And you mentioned how much
14:05
Turkey has sent. So this is,
14:07
this has been something that Turkey has been really
14:09
passionate about since, since
14:11
the conflict began back in October. They've
14:13
been really rallying on the side of
14:15
Gazans and Palestinians. And so
14:18
that was what sort of prompted this
14:20
response by Turkey. Turkey's foreign minister vowed
14:22
retaliation in a press conference on Monday
14:24
night and said that there's no excuse
14:26
for Israel to block our attempt to
14:28
airlift aid to starving Gazans. But
14:30
there are also several domestic factors as well.
14:32
There were local elections here in Turkey last
14:35
weekend. And President Erdogan's
14:37
ruling AKP party, the Justice and
14:39
Development Party, lost in many
14:42
provinces. Lots of people here saying
14:44
that they wanted to see more actual action
14:46
on Israel rather
14:48
than just tough talk. So these
14:51
two factors, I think, were probably the biggest in
14:54
sort of pushing Turkey to this response. So
14:56
how much trade has Turkey traditionally done
14:58
with Israel? Well, it's been
15:01
one of both, on both
15:03
sides. Both countries are big trading
15:05
partners with each other. Last year,
15:07
Israel was Turkey's 13th biggest export
15:09
partner. And for Israel, Turkey is
15:11
its fifth largest import partner. So
15:14
since the war began in October, Turkish exports
15:16
to Israel sell by about 30%. But
15:19
it's still a major trade ally. And
15:21
we can't forget that relations between Turkey
15:23
and Israel had been cooling in
15:26
recent months. It was only in September of
15:28
last year that President Erdogan met on the
15:30
sidelines of the UN General Assembly
15:32
in New York City with Prime Minister
15:34
Benjamin Netanyahu. And many had
15:37
called this a major milestone meeting. Tensions
15:39
had been mounting for more than a
15:41
decade over disputes, over policies that pertained
15:44
to Palestinians. And the two leaders
15:46
had then agreed to meet in each other's countries
15:49
when they called soon back then and
15:51
beef up economic links, including in energy.
15:54
But October 7th really put all of that
15:56
on hold and on ice and really ratcheted
15:58
up tensions. putting this thaw
16:00
and relations really on the back burner. So
16:03
what specific goods will now be banned? Well,
16:06
there are 54 goods on the list,
16:09
but there's importantly no details
16:11
by how much Turkey plans
16:13
to restrict any of these
16:15
exports to Israel. But some
16:17
of those exports include steel
16:19
products, cement, granite, construction machinery,
16:21
aviation fuel, things that
16:24
Turkey thinks could be used in
16:26
Israel's war efforts.
16:29
The Foreign Ministry said in a statement when
16:31
it announced those restrictions that the decision, as
16:33
you said, will be in place until Israel
16:35
declares an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and
16:38
allows sufficient and uninterrupted
16:41
humanitarian aid to Gaza. And then President
16:43
Erdogan released a video later in the
16:45
day yesterday, and he said that Turkey
16:47
has shown that we stand by the
16:49
Palestinian people in these difficult times. He
16:51
said Turkey has sent more than 45,000
16:53
tons of aid to the region and
16:55
vowed to continue to support the Palestinians
16:57
until the bloodshed in Gaza stops. So
17:01
we may see a ratcheting up of
17:04
these trade tensions. Israel has, for its part,
17:06
vowed to respond in kind, and it has
17:08
called on U.S. companies to
17:10
stop imports from Turkey to
17:12
try to sort of, I guess,
17:15
further increase the blow to Turkey's economy.
17:17
The Foreign Minister on Ex yesterday said
17:19
that Erdogan is, again, he said, sacrificing
17:21
the economic interests of the people of
17:23
Turkey for his support of Hamas, which
17:25
Turkey doesn't consider to be a terror
17:27
organization like many other countries around the
17:29
world does. Just don't pick that for
17:31
us, because Turkey is
17:34
a NATO member. As
17:36
you say, they don't consider Hamas to
17:38
be a terrorist organization. What's the relationship?
17:41
Well, there are lots of allegations that
17:44
members of Hamas are in Turkey, and
17:46
that President Erdogan isn't making any moves
17:48
to do anything about that. There
17:50
have been many pro-Palestinian
17:52
marches and
17:54
rallies across this
17:57
country. They, of course, not directly
17:59
related to Hamas, but
18:01
it sort of gives you a picture of
18:03
how much people here support the Palestinian cause
18:06
and movement. And like
18:08
I said, with local elections here last
18:10
weekend, many people said that the president
18:12
wasn't doing enough to support Palestinians and
18:14
Gazans particularly. And
18:16
like I said, President Erdogan doesn't consider Hamas
18:19
to be a terror organization. He's called them
18:21
a liberation group. In
18:23
the immediate aftermath of October
18:25
7th, he made allegations that
18:29
Israel was committing a genocide. He's
18:31
called Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
18:34
a murderer. So they
18:36
really stand on two very different sides
18:38
of this issue. And President
18:40
Erdogan, I think, feeling the pressure from
18:43
people here in Turkey to do more
18:45
to actually respond and show more
18:47
support rather than just support of words.
18:50
And so going forward, what will this
18:52
signify for Turkey-Israel relations? Certainly
18:56
no rush in this effort to
18:58
better relations, that's for sure. Like
19:01
I said, President Erdogan has not been
19:04
shy about calling Benjamin Netanyahu, quote-unquote, the
19:06
butcher of Gaza. He
19:08
held what he called the Great Palestine Rally
19:10
last year to sort of drum up support
19:12
for Gazans. Thousands of people attended. But many
19:14
told me that what they really wanted to
19:16
see was more action from Middle Eastern countries
19:19
to help those in Gaza, whether through more
19:21
aid or immigration. And I
19:23
think the other thing, too, is President Erdogan has sort
19:25
of seen this as potentially an opportunity when
19:27
Western support for Israel may be waning. We
19:29
saw yesterday the UK said that it won't
19:32
block arms sales to Israel, but France had
19:34
floated the idea of sanctions to get more
19:36
aid into Gaza. So
19:38
President Erdogan may see this as an opportunity
19:40
to sort of get some of Israel's Western
19:42
allies more on his side. But
19:45
certainly this doesn't seem like an opportunity
19:47
to sort of repair a relationship
19:50
or build any bridges between the two
19:52
countries. But I think the real action
19:54
will be in seeing how much Turkey
19:57
does in fact restrict any of these
19:59
exports to Israel. Israel, because
20:01
like I said, no specific amounts
20:03
had been announced with this announcement
20:05
yesterday. So we'll have to
20:07
wait and see what the trade data actually
20:10
show happens and how much Israel will
20:12
respond with its own trade restrictions. Like I
20:14
said, it's been trying to rally support with
20:16
some of Turkey's allies, NATO allies, to
20:18
restrict its own trade between the two
20:21
countries. But those are really complicated relationships,
20:23
and it's not clear how the U.S.
20:25
will respond to
20:27
that encouragement, I suppose, from Israel as
20:30
well. Victoria, thank you. That's Victoria Craig
20:32
in Ankara, and this is The Globalist.
20:34
That's Turkey
20:46
heading back to the Middle East, because we're
20:48
going to continue now with today's newspapers.
20:50
And joining me down the line from
20:52
Istanbul is Ruth Michaelson, who's a journalist
20:54
and Middle East correspondent. And in fact,
20:56
Ruth, we want to start by looking
20:58
at the latest on the war in
21:00
Gaza. Tell us about
21:02
where we are on ceasefire negotiations.
21:06
Well, the process at the
21:08
moment on ceasefire negotiations is
21:10
not particularly positive. The
21:14
latest news being that Hamas has
21:16
said that they
21:19
are reviewing the latest ceasefire proposal
21:21
that was discussed in
21:24
Cairo, that was presented by mediators
21:26
there before leaving
21:29
Cairo. And
21:31
a senior member of Hamas told The Washington Post
21:33
that talks were on hold. And
21:37
The Washington Post basically
21:40
going through the kind of ups and
21:42
downs that have happened with
21:44
these talks that we've seen
21:46
the Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz
21:49
saying earlier this week that negotiations have reached
21:52
a critical point. But
21:54
Hamas saying that the terms that were presented
21:56
to them on the table in Cairo were
21:58
essentially nothing new. and another
22:01
senior, a spokesman from Hamas, Bassem Naim,
22:03
talking to the New York Times, describing
22:05
the latest proposal as worse than the
22:08
previous ones and saying that many of
22:10
the things that were put on the table in Cairo this
22:12
time were actually not
22:15
as good or they were less than what was
22:17
previously offered. And how are
22:19
the papers covering the fact that there does seem to have
22:21
been a bit of a sea change here from Washington? Well,
22:25
widespread coverage of Joe
22:28
Biden's remarks towards Benjamin Netanyahu.
22:30
We've seen, we've been covering for a
22:32
long time, the kind of increasing public
22:36
pressure from Joe Biden on
22:38
Benjamin Netanyahu in public criticism
22:40
of his trial of government.
22:43
And this seems to have reached the
22:46
latest peak. So
22:48
in an interview with Univision, which has
22:50
been widely quoted, the Guardian, France 24,
22:53
running these comments, saying
22:56
that Benjamin Netanyahu's approach with
22:58
Gaza was a mistake in the words
23:00
of Joe Biden, and
23:02
saying, I don't agree with his approach
23:04
and demanding an immediate ceasefire. And
23:08
I mean, this does mark a significant shift
23:10
from his previous comments. That
23:12
does. I mean, certainly
23:15
if we look at how Biden was
23:17
talking at the beginning of
23:19
the war on Gaza, and
23:22
that in the beginning there was certainly a lot
23:24
more kind of hedged criticisms
23:27
of Netanyahu's choices. But
23:30
now we're seeing a lot more kind of open
23:32
discussion, particularly when
23:34
it comes to the approach to aid. So
23:38
he basically said that
23:41
Israel should let more aid into
23:43
Gaza. And he said
23:45
that he'd spoken to leaders in Saudi Arabia,
23:47
Jordan and Egypt, that they were prepared to move
23:49
food in. And he said
23:52
there's no excuse not to provide for the medical and
23:54
food needs of those people. It should be
23:56
done now. But of course, things
23:58
are about to get much worse. Benjamin Netanyahu
24:00
has said that a date has been set
24:03
for a ground military operation in Rafa. I
24:05
don't think he's actually said when it is,
24:07
but there's been widespread condemnation of this. Absolutely.
24:10
I mean, this has, you
24:13
know, provoked understandably huge concern
24:15
given that there is over
24:18
a million people considered to be in
24:20
the city of Rafa in southern Gaza.
24:23
Netanyahu has said there is a
24:26
date, comments described by Al
24:28
Jazeera as doubling down, saying
24:31
that Israel will proceed with its goal
24:33
of eliminating all of Hamas's brigades, including
24:35
in Rafa, and
24:38
extremely forceful comments from Benjamin Netanyahu,
24:40
literally saying there is no force
24:42
in the world that will stop
24:44
us. Let's
24:46
go to a good news story.
24:49
It's a group of older Swiss women. They've won
24:51
a landmark ruling at the European Court of Human
24:53
Rights. It's declared that the
24:55
Swiss government violated the right to life
24:57
of its citizens by failing to do
24:59
enough about the climate crisis. This really
25:01
is a landmark ruling. Tell
25:04
us more. Yes, been hailed
25:06
by the lawyers, comment
25:08
that this case is a historic ruling. I think
25:10
it certainly does have the power to reverberate
25:14
across Europe. So
25:16
this is a group
25:18
of Swiss senior women,
25:20
average age 73, called
25:23
the Klimasinurinen. And they
25:25
brought this ruling in, brought a case
25:27
to, in the court in Switzerland, saying
25:29
that the country had failed to reduce
25:32
its greenhouse gas emissions fast enough to
25:34
meet its own targets. Switzerland
25:38
didn't respond to this case, and they escalated
25:40
it to the European Court of Human Rights, which
25:43
ruled in their favor. And
25:46
so it's, you know, according to the Washington
25:48
Post, shows how governments can
25:50
potentially be held to account in
25:52
court for climate-related issues and could
25:55
influence similar litigation worldwide. Although
25:57
there were a couple of other cases heard on the same
25:59
day. Portuguese youngsters
26:03
were bringing a case as was the former
26:05
mayor of a French coastal town both of
26:07
those thrown out. Yeah I
26:09
think there was some the impression from
26:11
lawyers that were speaking to the press
26:13
was that they wanted all three cases
26:15
to pass in kind of one big
26:18
sweep to demonstrate the power of this
26:20
kind of climate change legislation
26:23
or legislation to fight against government
26:25
inaction on climate change rather. The
26:28
case brought by these six young people
26:30
in Portugal particularly interesting all born
26:32
between 1999
26:34
and 2012 and they basically argued
26:37
that the existing and future effects of climate
26:39
change particularly looking at the spate of heat
26:42
waves and wildfires that had hit parts
26:45
of Central Europe exposed them to
26:47
harm. The court essentially said
26:49
that because their case was brought against
26:51
every member state that
26:54
is a member of the European Court
26:56
of Human Rights that it was inadmissible and
26:58
threw the case out. Right and of
27:01
course the French mayor I think lost his case
27:03
because he's no longer the mayor of that town. He
27:05
was worried because the town is on the coast
27:07
it's very low lying and of course there's
27:09
a risk of flooding there and well
27:11
people might worry about water in
27:13
France. We're looking at a story now where
27:16
a water charity in Paris has
27:18
very bad news for the upcoming Olympics they've been
27:20
testing the water in the Seine and it's
27:23
not great. Yes
27:25
extremely concerning news for the upcoming
27:28
Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games so
27:30
this water charity the
27:32
surf rider foundation of Europe said a
27:35
shadow looms over the quality of the
27:37
water in the Seine River they found
27:39
alarming levels of bacteria in the river
27:41
including E. coli. They tested
27:43
the water around
27:46
the Alexandre-Troy bridge which
27:49
will be the starting point for
27:51
the Olympic and Paralympic triathlon and
27:53
marathon swimming events the centerpiece of
27:55
the Olympic Games and
27:58
essentially said that there are a these
28:00
alarming levels of bacteria
28:02
and E. coli in the water. Lots
28:06
of mention of the idea that increased
28:08
rainfall might also basically
28:10
counter efforts by the mayor of Paris
28:12
to clean up the River Seine. But
28:15
also lots of statements given
28:17
to the local media by
28:20
the mayor of Paris essentially saying, no, we're doing
28:22
the cleanup operations. Everything will be
28:24
fine in 100 days' time when these
28:27
events start. The
28:29
piece in CBS, for example,
28:31
shows a picture of a
28:33
test event for swimmers diving off the
28:36
bridge into the water that happened last
28:38
year. So potentially some of these athletes
28:40
have already been exposed to whatever's going
28:42
on in the water. So
28:44
any chance that it might have to be cancelled?
28:48
There has been some discussion,
28:50
certainly questions to the
28:52
president of the Paris 2024 Olympics, the
28:56
Tony S. Dange, who
28:58
basically said that the triathlon competition
29:00
could be delayed, the swimming leg
29:03
could be cancelled, and that would
29:05
be due to adverse weather conditions,
29:07
so increased rainfall. But he basically
29:09
said it would only
29:11
have to be probably pushed off by a few
29:13
days and that swimmers are very tough. If you're
29:15
a competitive swimmer, you're used to this sort of
29:18
facing these kinds of difficulties. Let's
29:22
end with this wonderful story from Germany.
29:24
I feel extremely sorry for this man
29:26
who has been fired from a German
29:28
art gallery. Tell us more. Well,
29:31
I mean, it's one way to make sure that your
29:33
work gets into a museum, which is to go in
29:35
there and hang it yourself, especially
29:38
if you are part of the
29:40
technical team at the Munich Art
29:43
Museum, the Pianakatek de Mauderna.
29:46
And so there was a technician
29:49
and, in the words of
29:51
the Guardian aspiring artist, and actually I think
29:53
in the words of the Suddeutsches item, which is
29:55
from Munich, talking about this man's artistic ambitions, and
29:57
apparently, early on, he was a very good person.
30:00
this week, the museum
30:02
said that it had fired a
30:04
member of its technical services team
30:06
who managed to hang his painting
30:08
in the gallery near Andy Warhol
30:11
for an entire day. And
30:14
a spokesman from the Pina Tech told the
30:16
Guardian, the employee considers himself an artist and
30:18
most likely saw his role in the museum's
30:20
installation team as a day job to support
30:23
his true calling. Well, yeah, I've scrolled through
30:25
various links to this and I cannot see
30:27
a picture of his painting. Have you seen?
30:29
Is he any good? Unfortunately
30:31
not. It seems like the museum
30:34
didn't want to give him any more
30:36
publicity by saying that he had a
30:38
painting. But there was also mention in
30:40
Sudoch Wietung that there was another museum in
30:42
Bonn where this happened, where
30:45
the museum did react rather favorably.
30:47
So this is the Kunzhalle in
30:49
Bonn. Somebody came into the
30:51
museum and or a student who smuggled
30:53
one of her own paintings into the
30:56
museum and attached it to the wall
30:58
with double-sided tape, they mentioned. And
31:00
the Kunzhalle said, we think this is funny and
31:02
would like to get to know the artist. So
31:05
get in touch. There will be no
31:07
trouble. How fantastic. Ruth, thank you very
31:09
much indeed. Now here's what else we're
31:11
keeping an eye on today. Russia
31:15
and Kazakhstan ordered more than 100,000 people to be
31:17
evacuated after
31:19
swiftly melting snow swelled mighty rivers
31:21
beyond bursting point in the worst flooding
31:23
in the area for at least 70 years.
31:26
The snow melt is an annual event in
31:29
Russia, but scientists say climate change has made
31:31
flooding more frequent worldwide.
31:33
Arizona's top quarters revived a ban
31:35
on nearly all abortions under a
31:37
law from 1864, half
31:40
a century before statehood and
31:42
women's suffrage, further restricting reproductive
31:44
rights in the state where terminating a
31:46
pregnancy was already barred at 15 weeks
31:48
of gestation. President Joe
31:51
Biden called the Arizona ruling the
31:53
result of the extreme agenda of Republican
31:55
elected officials who are committed to ripping
31:57
away women's freedom. And
32:00
Vietnam aims to start building two
32:02
high-speed railway lines linking its capital
32:05
Hanoi with China before 2030, another
32:08
sign of a recent warming of ties between
32:10
the two communist ruled neighbours. Trade
32:13
between Vietnam and China in the first quarter
32:15
of this year rose 22%, though
32:18
the two countries remain embroiled in
32:20
a years-long maritime dispute in the
32:22
South China Sea. This is
32:24
The Globalist. Stay tuned. Now,
32:34
a movement in Russia formed by the
32:36
wives of soldiers has started a regular
32:38
protest, calling for their husbands to
32:40
be allowed to return home. Joining
32:42
me in the studio now is Stephen Diel,
32:44
who's a Russia analyst and a regular Monocle
32:47
contributor. Stephen, welcome back to the studio. Thank
32:49
you. Tell us about this movement. It's
32:51
called The Way Home, Putdamoi
32:54
in Russian. They have a
32:56
very active Telegram channel, Telegram being the
32:59
social media of choice for many Russians.
33:02
And it started some months ago
33:04
with the idea
33:06
not so much to stop the war, although some
33:09
of them clearly feel that that would be the
33:11
best solution for Russia and Russians, but
33:14
actually to bring home their
33:16
husbands, principally, but also brothers,
33:19
cousins, uncles, fathers,
33:22
who were called up under the mobilization
33:24
announced by President Putin in September 2022
33:28
and have never been given leave. So
33:30
we're talking about more than 18 months now. They've been
33:32
at the front. They
33:35
were not regular soldiers. They
33:37
may have had a little bit of training, but
33:40
none of them have been allowed home. And
33:42
so that's what sparked off this movement. And
33:45
for some months, women have
33:47
been putting on a white headscarf, and
33:49
at 12 o'clock local time going to
33:51
their local memorial to the
33:53
unknown soldier, the main one, of course, in Moscow,
33:55
just under the Kremlin walls. But
33:58
they're across Russia and other cities. and
34:00
laying flowers and that was a form of
34:02
protest. And they've now decided to take this
34:04
one step further. As of last Saturday, and
34:06
they're calling for every Saturday, at five o'clock
34:08
on local time, for people to go out
34:10
on their balconies or if they're at their
34:13
dacha, go in the garden of their dacha
34:15
and bang saucepans. So they're
34:17
calling it the march of
34:19
the empty saucepans. And on
34:21
last Saturday, in at least
34:24
20 cities and areas
34:27
across Russia, women took
34:29
part in this. Some men took part in this as well.
34:31
On the Telegram channel, there are various videos that
34:34
people have sent in. This
34:36
of course is a brave thing to do. It's
34:38
a demonstration, but they're saying, well, you're
34:40
at home. Surely the authorities can't arrest
34:42
you for doing something on your
34:45
own territory. Well, we know the authorities
34:47
can and will do exactly as they like in
34:49
Russia. So why is the Kremlin leaving them alone?
34:52
That's a very good question. My own feeling
34:54
is that they're
34:56
wary of these
34:59
women and they're wary of the numbers of
35:01
them. We're talking thousands. Let's keep it in
35:03
perspective. We're not talking millions of people across
35:05
the country yet, but nevertheless, when
35:08
you've got thousands of women who are
35:10
making a protest, they're perhaps slightly more
35:12
wary of arresting women, particularly on mass,
35:14
than they would be arresting men. And
35:17
there's this feeling that, well,
35:22
how do we blame them
35:24
or say they've committed
35:26
a crime when all they're doing is
35:28
either wearing a white headscarf and putting flowers
35:31
or banging a saucepan? And
35:33
I think that this is a
35:35
reflection of President Putin's biggest
35:37
fear in Russia. His biggest fear, as
35:39
I've said in this studio before, is
35:42
not nuclear war. It's not NATO. It's
35:44
an uprising from below. And when
35:47
you've got women whose husbands haven't returned, maybe
35:49
are never going to return because they've already
35:52
been killed, there's a feeling
35:54
that they've got nothing to lose. And
35:56
these women, as we saw in
35:58
the Afghan war, When a
36:00
lot of mothers protested and started a
36:02
real social movement of soldiers' mothers, when
36:06
they feel that they've lost what's most precious
36:08
to them and they say, what the hell,
36:11
my husband's dead, my son's dead, what else have
36:13
I got to lose? They
36:15
will fight. Russian women have this reputation for
36:18
being incredibly tough and I
36:20
think that is what is preventing
36:22
the Kremlin from really pushing hard
36:24
on them because it
36:26
could then spark out of control and then
36:28
if you get what the Russians call bunt,
36:30
this uprising from below, that's what
36:32
frightens Putin most of all. And
36:35
are these women anti-patriotic? Are they against the
36:37
war? They very much say
36:39
that they are patriotic. You
36:42
do get comments coming back to them on Telegram
36:45
accusing them of being unpatriotic and
36:48
using terms that one wouldn't repeat on the radio.
36:51
But on the whole, they say, no, no,
36:53
we're patriotic. What we're asking for is our
36:55
government to fulfill its obligations. It's
36:58
just not right to call men up
37:00
to the army for whatever reason and
37:02
then not give them any leave. They
37:05
say that the starting point is that
37:08
they're protesting about their loved ones not
37:10
being allowed home at all for leave,
37:12
which is in any circumstance is
37:14
very unusual. I mean, in the Second World War,
37:16
for example, armies were allowed to
37:19
have soldiers go on leave for R&R,
37:22
restaurant recuperation. But
37:25
this is not happening at all. And also, of
37:27
course, we know how brutal the Russian army is
37:29
being to its own people. Soldiers
37:31
who refuse to fight, maybe they've got
37:34
PTSD, they simply cannot go on, are
37:36
being thrown into a pit and
37:38
not fed until they agree to come out and go and
37:40
fight. The Russians have done
37:42
some incredibly dreadful and brutal
37:45
things to Ukrainians in Ukraine and
37:47
torture and mass rape and so
37:49
on. But they're actually very
37:52
cruel to their own people, too. And
37:54
so this is what the women also are saying. Why should
37:56
my husband be thrown into a pit? Because he's been on
37:58
the front line for 18 months. and just
38:00
need a break. We know that Russia's desperately
38:02
short of troops, but what might
38:04
be the other reasons for not allowing them
38:06
leave? Is it because they would bring news
38:08
back from the front lines? I think
38:10
you're absolutely right, Georgina. I think that is
38:13
the worry. The
38:15
Russian authorities have clamped down on any
38:18
information that doesn't put across the official
38:20
view that this is not a war,
38:22
but a special military operation, that the
38:26
Russian army is liberating Russians
38:29
in Ukraine, that they're fighting Nazis in
38:31
Ukraine, they're now fighting NATO in Ukraine,
38:34
all of which is nonsense. The only Nazis
38:36
in Ukraine are Russian soldiers who behaved so
38:38
atrociously. Anything
38:41
that actually brings the message back has
38:44
happened again in Afghanistan. This was one of the
38:46
things that the war in Afghanistan lasted
38:48
nearly 10 years. I
38:51
said this for a long time, and I think
38:53
it's generally accepted now, not just because I said
38:55
it, but that the war in Afghanistan played a
38:58
crucial role in the collapse of the Soviet Union.
39:00
One of the reasons was you had soldiers who'd
39:02
serve up there who were being told they were
39:05
doing their internationalist duty, and then coming back and
39:07
going back to their villages or towns all over
39:09
Russia and saying, hey, they were shooting at us.
39:11
My friend got his arm blown off. When
39:15
the horrors of war do come back, the
39:17
Russians know from their experience from Afghanistan
39:19
that this can have a knock-on effect,
39:21
and it could really cause real trouble
39:24
amongst the Russian population. Stephen Diehl, thank
39:26
you very much indeed. You're with
39:28
Monocle Radio. UBS
39:33
is a global financial services firm
39:36
with over 150 years of heritage.
39:40
Built on the unique dedication of
39:42
our people, we bring fresh thinking
39:44
and perspective to our work. We
39:47
know that it takes a marriage
39:49
of intelligence and heart to create
39:51
lasting value for our clients. It's
39:54
about having the right ideas, of course,
39:56
but also about having one of the
39:58
most accomplished lives. and
40:01
an unrivalled network of global
40:03
obstacles. That's why
40:05
at UBS we pride ourselves
40:07
on thinking smarter, to make a
40:10
real difference. Tune in
40:12
for the Bulletin with UBS every week
40:14
for the latest insights and opinions
40:16
from UBS all around the world.
40:22
The Globalist This
40:27
is The Globalist on Monocle Radio with me,
40:29
Georgina Godwin. It's 7.40pm here in London.
40:32
Peter Higgs, the Nobel Prize winning
40:34
physicist who discovered a new particle known
40:36
as the Higgs boson, has died. He
40:39
was 94. Higgs was awarded the Nobel
40:41
Prize for Physics in 2013 for his work, which
40:45
showed how the boson helped bind the
40:47
universe together. To look back at
40:49
his life and legacy, I am joined now by Dr Chris
40:51
Smith of the Naked Scientists podcast
40:53
and a virologist at Cambridge University.
40:56
Chris, we used to speak to you almost on a
40:58
daily basis back in the good old days of Covid.
41:01
We miss you. Well,
41:03
thank goodness, because that means Covid isn't such
41:06
a problem. But I miss you too. Chris,
41:08
can we start by explaining to the likes of me, who
41:11
are very ignorant on this, the
41:14
particle Higgs boson and why it's
41:16
important? Well,
41:18
Peter Higgs, who was born in Newcastle on time
41:20
94 years ago and died
41:22
on Monday, was a physicist. And
41:25
in the 1960s, he
41:28
was reading various bits of theoretical
41:31
physics, because that was his field,
41:33
theoretical physics. And
41:35
he landed on a course of
41:37
work, which in 1964 led to the
41:39
publication of two papers. Well, he submitted
41:41
for publication, I should say, two papers,
41:43
one of which was rejected. And
41:46
it was rejected because the pair of them were
41:48
literally a matter of lines long and
41:50
a handful of equations. But the
41:53
insight that was there was that they
41:55
explained something that was missing in particle
41:57
physics, which had enjoyed a real explosion.
42:00
in the 50s, 60s, 70s, because
42:02
scientists began to assemble, or got
42:04
close to assembling, what we call
42:06
the standard model. When
42:08
we look at the universe, we
42:10
see that it's made up of particles, and
42:12
those particles are made up themselves of particles
42:14
that are smaller than they are, and
42:16
they're bound together by various forces. And
42:19
there are various ways of arranging all of this
42:21
so that the system works. It's
42:24
effectively like the spice rack in your kitchen
42:26
wall of how you make matter. But
42:29
there was one thing missing, which is that
42:31
this could explain how matter worked, but it
42:34
didn't explain where it got its mass from.
42:36
In other words, when I put some of
42:38
those spices and other things on the weighing
42:40
scales, they register a weight. They've got mass,
42:42
which when it's acted on by gravity, has
42:45
a weight. And what Peter
42:47
Higgs's equations that were presented in those 1964
42:49
papers did was to convey a
42:51
way, a notion that
42:54
you could have a particle, or a series
42:56
of particles, which would create the force field,
42:58
which would pervade the universe. And
43:01
when things that had mass interacted, or
43:03
things, particles that existed, interacted with that
43:05
force field, they would feel that force,
43:07
and that would give them their mass.
43:09
So this was the missing part of
43:12
the explanation for why things weigh something
43:14
when you put them on your weighing
43:16
scales. And initially, people said, well, it's
43:18
just a theory. And many famous scientists
43:21
said that this god particle should
43:23
be called the goddamn particle because it'll
43:25
never be discovered. It's too difficult. And
43:27
even Stephen Hawking said, I'll bet
43:29
another, he bet another scientist $100 that
43:31
it didn't exist. He even said to Peter Higgs
43:33
about 20 years ago, I hope this
43:36
is never discovered because meaning he'd lose his bet, but
43:38
also he just didn't think it was likely to be
43:40
a reality. And Peter Higgs had
43:42
retired a long time before. They
43:44
finally had enough power at the particle
43:47
accelerator in CERN, the Large Hadron Collider,
43:49
which could achieve the sorts of energies
43:51
that you need by colliding protons,
43:53
positive particles together, to
43:55
create the sorts of disruptions in
43:57
these fields and the sorts of
43:59
particles. decays that the theory
44:01
predicted would only be seen if
44:05
the Higgs boson and the field
44:07
that these particles therefore create existed
44:09
and two independent experiments which were
44:11
done completely separate to each other
44:13
at the LHC both kept
44:15
their data separate and brought it together
44:17
on one day and said look we've
44:20
independently both detected to a
44:22
very high level of certainty the
44:24
findings that would agree with what
44:27
Peter Higgs's theory sets out so
44:29
he's probably right and that's when they accepted in 2012 it
44:31
was July the 4th 2012
44:34
the Higgs boson the particle he'd
44:36
seen in as a possibility in
44:38
1964 predicted was
44:40
real and what is his
44:42
legacy how does his work influence the life
44:45
of ordinary people well
44:47
I think the fact we're talking about it is one
44:49
of the most powerful legacies this the fact that we
44:51
understand why things have mass doesn't
44:53
really matter to the average man woman and
44:56
child on the street at any second but
44:58
the fact we're talking about it the fact
45:00
that we're showing that this is what science
45:02
can do it brings us a step further
45:04
along the path of explaining how the universe
45:06
works and ultimately unlocking the power of other
45:08
technologies yet to be discovered or harnessed that's
45:10
the real power of this and I think
45:12
the the legacy is that a he's got
45:14
a particle named after him which will never
45:17
change in the history of humankind going forward which
45:19
is a pretty cool thing to have done he's
45:21
got a Nobel Prize which is another pretty cool
45:23
thing to have done and and and we're talking
45:25
about it and we'll continue to invoke this particle
45:27
in this piece of physics from the 1960s for
45:30
the rest of our lives and the lives of
45:32
our children and so on Dr. Chris Smith
45:34
thank you very much indeed Peter Higgs
45:36
has died at the age right
45:50
let's move over to Australia it's time
45:52
to talk business with the National Business Reporter and
45:55
presenter at ABC News Rachel Papazoni
45:57
he joins us now from Perth
46:00
Rachel, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand
46:02
kept interest rates on hold today. When
46:04
are they tipped to start cutting? Yeah,
46:08
no surprise to market watchers today, Georgina,
46:11
when they held rates at 5.5%. They've
46:14
been at that rate almost a
46:16
year since May last year. The
46:19
expectation is that they'll stay there
46:21
for most of this year as
46:24
well. The NBS forecasting that that
46:26
first rate cut probably not likely
46:28
until November. They expect,
46:30
though, that the bank will then
46:33
continue to cut every meeting through
46:35
2025 to get
46:37
to a terminal rate of 3.75% by a quarter four in 2025. Now,
46:43
New Zealand actually entered the technical
46:46
recession in the last couple
46:48
of weeks. They have inflation still very high at
46:50
4.7%, way off their target of 1% to 3%
46:52
range. Unemployment
46:56
still at 4%. So
46:58
clearly a lot more work to do
47:01
there, even though listeners may recall
47:03
that the Bank of New Zealand
47:05
was one of the first to
47:07
start lifting the official interest rates
47:09
back in Right.
47:12
And of course, they're not the only ones. The Bank
47:14
of Canada is tipped to hold today, though. The European
47:16
Central Bank tomorrow, is this all about waiting to see
47:19
what the US Fed does? It
47:22
really is. We're all sort
47:24
of waiting to see how things
47:26
play out in the US and then
47:28
we'll likely respond to that. So
47:31
the Bank of Canada at 5%, European Central Bank
47:33
at 4%, as you said, unlikely
47:35
to change this week. What
47:37
we'll get overnight, though, is
47:40
the US inflation number. And
47:42
that is going to be the biggest
47:44
marker for what we may see
47:46
the US Fed do when it meets at
47:49
the end of this month and also on
47:51
May 1, third day, two of its meetings.
47:53
At this stage, we're not expecting to see
47:55
any change to interest rates in the US
47:57
at its meeting later this month, but it
47:59
does all the depend on this inflation
48:01
data due out later
48:03
today or overnight my time. We've
48:06
seen inflation in the US very,
48:08
very sticky, in fact, dodging our
48:11
falls month to month, the last few
48:13
months and surprising to the upside.
48:16
The US Fed chair Jerome Powell said last
48:18
week that it was too soon to say
48:20
whether the recent readings represent more than just
48:22
a bump in the sort of inflation
48:26
story. And if it
48:28
overshoots again this month, that has the
48:30
potential to really see the market lose
48:32
some patience. We may have
48:35
to see some action from the
48:37
US Fed. One
48:39
of those big parts, of course, playing into
48:41
inflation globally is oil prices. They continue
48:43
to rise on the back of conflicts
48:47
in the Middle East and in Europe. Reading
48:50
just today, for example, that Mexico
48:52
has announced cuts to its
48:54
exports of oil. Many
48:56
factors playing into one of the biggest drivers of
48:58
inflation at the moment. Now South
49:00
Korea is voting today. How important is
49:03
the cost of living crisis for
49:06
those voters in the election? Just
49:09
as it is for everyone in all
49:12
the countries we've mentioned so far today,
49:14
Georgina, inflation is still high in South
49:16
Korea. It's at 3.1%. The
49:19
interest rate there at 3.5%. Their
49:22
bank meets on Friday, also unlikely
49:24
to change. So 30%
49:26
of voters have already cast
49:29
their ballots in today's election.
49:32
But what we've seen in the lead up to today
49:34
is a lot of coverage of a
49:37
disconnect between our President
49:39
Yoon and everyday Koreans
49:41
who are facing these
49:43
costs of living pressures that so many
49:45
people around the world are familiar with.
49:48
President Yoon is not up for re-election. He's
49:50
into year three of his five-year term.
49:52
But he came in in 2022, vowing
49:55
to cut taxes, ease
49:58
business regulations, and it expand
50:00
family support for Koreans.
50:03
And there's been a lot of discontent
50:05
that a lot of those promises haven't
50:07
been met. So analysts are
50:09
pretty split on how things could fall in
50:12
the election today. So there's still a few
50:14
more hours until polls close in South Korea.
50:16
But for Australia, it's a big trading partner
50:18
for us. So we're keen to see how
50:21
that all plays out. Of course, it's a
50:23
big year of elections with
50:25
the biggest one, of course, the US
50:27
presidential race when voting there occurs in
50:29
November. Mm hmm. Finally, let's
50:31
have a look at EVs, electric vehicles.
50:34
This has led to a record number of car
50:36
carrying ship orders. Tell us more about that. Yeah,
50:40
I guess that just a great
50:42
indication of how interconnected the
50:45
global economy is. So we've seen, of course,
50:47
a boom in EV demand.
50:49
It has pared back a little bit
50:51
and not sort of met expectations in the last
50:53
few months, but still on that
50:56
upward trajectory. And of course, you've
50:58
got to get those electric vehicles from where they're
51:00
made, mostly in China to
51:02
the customer around the world. So China
51:04
has increased its order for
51:07
car carrying vessels. Currently, it has
51:09
33 car carrying
51:11
ships and it's put an order in for 47 more.
51:14
So clearly more than doubling its
51:16
current load. And if
51:19
that does indeed take place by 2028, as
51:22
expected, it'll become the fourth largest
51:25
owner of car carrying vessels. But still
51:27
a long way to go compared to
51:29
Japan. It's the world's largest. It has
51:31
283 car carrying ships. Norway
51:36
has 102. South Korea has 72.
51:38
So China would become
51:41
fourth after that list. And
51:43
a lot of that buying is coming from
51:46
carmakers themselves. For example, if
51:49
a giant BYD is put in order
51:51
for car carrying ships, it exported more
51:53
than 240,000 EVs last year. Expect
51:57
to almost double that to 400. So
52:00
it needs to get those cars from
52:03
China to the customer, as I explained,
52:05
and that happens on ships. I
52:07
was recently in Australia and I
52:10
did see a parking lot full
52:12
of these Chinese-built electric vehicles, but
52:14
they were there in showrooms, not
52:17
for sale. Are there a
52:19
lot of them on the road there? I
52:22
definitely feel that we are starting
52:24
to see a lot more. We
52:27
are seeing a lot more Teslas
52:29
as well, Georgina, but definitely, particularly
52:31
the BYD, Build Your Dream branded
52:33
car. I've seen a lot more
52:35
of them. I actually took one for a test drive
52:37
a couple of months ago because I was interested just
52:40
to see what all the hype
52:42
is about. They drive just
52:44
as smoothly as the Tesla.
52:46
Obviously, at a lower price point,
52:49
they are much more attainable for a
52:51
larger portion of the population.
52:54
Australia's biggest challenge, of course, though,
52:56
isn't going anywhere and that is
52:58
the distance. We need a lot more
53:01
charging stations dotted throughout the
53:03
country to make EV uptake
53:05
really upsurge here in Australia.
53:07
Great. Well, thank you very
53:09
much indeed. That's Rachel Papazoni and this is The
53:11
Globalist on Monocle Radio. And
53:19
finally today, the shortlist for the
53:21
prestigious Literary Award, the International Booker
53:23
Prize has just been announced. In
53:25
all, it spans six languages, six
53:27
countries and three continents. So
53:30
let's go through the shortlist now
53:32
with Ramesh Ganesakara, who is the award-winning
53:34
author and a judge of the International
53:36
Booker, 2024. Ramesh,
53:39
it's lovely to speak to you again. Ramesh, through
53:41
the shortlist and where the authors come from. Hi,
53:44
Georgina. Lovely to be here.
53:47
Thanks for having me. So
53:50
we've got a shortlist that, as you
53:52
say, covers a lot
53:55
of places. It's very buried.
53:57
Nauta River is an Argentinian
53:59
novel. Kyros from Germany,
54:01
the details
54:04
from Sweden, Meta2-10
54:07
from South Korea, you were
54:09
talking about Korea. What
54:12
I'd rather not think about is the Dutch novel
54:15
and Crooked Cloud from Brazil. Mm-hmm.
54:19
A lot of these are from independent
54:21
publishers. I wonder why we
54:23
see independent publishers making the list so
54:26
often. The big houses don't feature nearly
54:28
so much. Yeah,
54:30
it's an interesting one, I guess. And
54:33
I think generally, looking
54:35
at the submissions that we had
54:37
for this prize, there are
54:39
a lot of independent presses. And the reason
54:44
for that I
54:46
really don't know. Other than,
54:49
I guess, there are
54:51
more small presses coming up,
54:53
publishing a book is not as
54:56
technically complicated as it used
54:58
to be ages ago. And
55:01
therefore, people are starting out. And I
55:03
think they're interested in exploring different
55:06
fiction. And taking
55:09
more risks, yeah, than the bigger
55:11
publishing houses. You've been shortlisted for
55:13
the Booker yourself. I think that was 94. What
55:16
difference does this kind of recognition make
55:18
to a writer? I
55:21
think it makes a huge difference.
55:23
I mean, the game,
55:25
if you like, was different back in 94.
55:28
It was a different sort of thing. We
55:30
didn't have long lists. It was just a
55:32
short list. And there
55:34
is a difference between the Booker Prize and
55:36
the International Booker Prize. Of course, the
55:39
prize we're talking about now
55:42
is for translated fiction, whereas
55:44
the Booker Prize is for fiction written in
55:46
English. And translated
55:48
fiction has been growing
55:51
in popularity, in exposure
55:54
over the last few years,
55:56
back in the 90s. it
56:00
would have been much more difficult to
56:02
find, I suppose. Whereas at the moment,
56:04
as I understand it, it's
56:07
the most sort of fastest
56:09
growing area of fiction
56:12
and fiction reading, certainly under
56:15
in certain groups of readers,
56:17
particularly readers under the age, I think of 35.
56:20
So there's a real boom there, I think.
56:23
And the reasons for that are
56:26
interesting to look at really. And
56:30
just finally, what are the
56:32
challenges of judging books from
56:34
such diverse places? Well,
56:37
it's a challenge, but it's also what's really,
56:39
really interesting to me and what drew me
56:41
to it when I was invited to do
56:43
this. I thought it would be great because
56:46
it's a chance to look
56:49
at writing in other languages or
56:51
the cultures, obviously translated
56:53
into English, but it's
56:56
carrying on that conversation that books
56:58
are all about, but in a
57:00
much wider context and across
57:03
cultures. And I
57:05
think for me, it's hugely
57:07
eye-opening. It's great to see what people
57:09
are writing, what fiction
57:12
means in a different language, how
57:14
you open it up. And for
57:16
me as a reader, it's about bringing an
57:19
open mind to it. Ramesh,
57:21
thank you so much. That's
57:23
Ramesh Gunasakara. And if
57:25
you'd like to know more about Ramesh's own work,
57:28
there's a wonderful interview with him in
57:30
our VARF Meet the Writers Archive, which
57:32
you can find on our website. And
57:34
also the winner of the International Booker
57:37
Prize will be announced on the 21st
57:39
of May. And
57:42
that's all for today's programme. Thanks to
57:44
our producers, Sophie Monaghan-Koons, Carlotta Rubella and
57:46
Monica Lillis, our researcher, George
57:49
Ruskin, and our studio manager, Steph
57:51
Chungu. After the headlines, there's
57:53
more music on the way and the briefing
57:55
is live at midday in London. That's with
57:57
me. I'm Georgina Godrion. And I'll
58:00
return... on the globalist at the same time.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More