Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
net zero, carbon emissions, zero
0:02
racial wealth gap, zero poverty
0:05
those are ambitious goals
0:07
and to help reached the world needs to take
0:09
action together cities, committed
0:11
1 trillion dollars in sustainable finance
0:14
by 2030 to facilitate innovative
0:16
solutions like renewable energy and
0:18
clean technology and provide access
0:20
to essential services like education
0:22
health care and affordable housing there are
0:24
also helping close the racial wealth gap
0:27
and increase economic mobility in
0:29
the us it takes everything to
0:31
reach europe for the love of making
0:33
a difference
0:42
how do we live in
0:44
us and dick
0:50
i'm sure nilly and i'm your host for
0:52
box conversations
1:03
i ask myself a version of this question
1:05
all the time like , else
1:07
i want to be as authentic
1:10
as i can be to the problem
1:12
is that authenticity is that big
1:15
fuzzy word and a sort of thing
1:17
you hear thing self help be ted
1:20
talks about how to be your true
1:23
self to be ourselves
1:25
to confidently be ourselves and to dream
1:27
the dreams come with
1:28
the your most authentic cel always
1:31
follow my inner insane the
1:33
myself
1:36
i don't find that stuff fair use i
1:39
never have
1:41
but the instinct to live a more authentic
1:44
life the choose our values
1:46
and lived them honestly that's important
1:49
and worth thinking for
1:52
though i was delighted to come across a new
1:54
book called how to be authentic by
1:56
the philosopher and writer sky cleary
1:59
what i
1:59
love about this book is that it's really
2:02
a study of existentialism and
2:04
it's practical significance today
2:07
existential isn't was the school
2:09
of thought that arose in postwar europe
2:12
and it emphasized human
2:14
freedom and our responsibility
2:16
to create ourselves every day
2:18
through the choices we make
2:21
clear , wrestles with this question
2:24
of authenticity through the eyes of
2:26
simone de beauvoir one of the
2:28
great twentieth century philosophers
2:30
and a remarkable woman who was very
2:32
much ahead of her time time
2:35
in the book cleary uses her own
2:37
life and relationships to explore
2:39
how to put was ideas into
2:41
practice into , cleary
2:44
onto the show to talk about
2:46
was philosophy of freedom and
2:48
authenticity and how it can help us
2:50
navigate the challenges of love
2:52
and marriage and parenthood without
2:55
sacrificing all the things that
2:57
make life purposeful in the first
3:04
cleary welcome to the show
3:07
shine thank you for having me
3:10
authenticity is such a loaded
3:13
the ambiguous term
3:15
the and
3:16
you seem to think we're confused about
3:18
what it means or what
3:20
it ought to me so i wanted
3:22
to start there
3:24
what does it mean for
3:26
you
3:27
the be authentic
3:29
the coming authentic for
3:32
some and of why is creating
3:34
your own essence so
3:37
often we hear authenticity as
3:39
you a process of finding yourself and
3:41
and being yourself whereas
3:44
this perspective this about
3:46
not about not yourself because there is
3:49
no
3:49
awesome song or fixed
3:52
print weekend yourself that you need to uncover
3:55
but rather authenticity
3:57
is authenticity process of creating
3:59
the
4:01
though it's about exercising your freedom
4:03
and understanding what's
4:06
eating
4:06
then on current shoes and
4:08
looking for ways he might be able to push back
4:11
against your choices and shaping
4:13
your existence
4:14
and what's important also here is
4:16
an ocean
4:18
to city being a process so
4:20
it's a continuous process of of self
4:22
creation and and self renewal
4:24
let's be real here
4:26
most people are faking this
4:28
right you think it's actually quite rare to
4:30
confront someone or meet someone who's truly
4:33
living an authentic
4:35
life in that way
4:37
how do we know that really like
4:39
at the he caught know whether someone
4:41
is creating themselves
4:43
in authentic ways it's partly it's
4:46
an individual process of reflecting
4:49
on the choices were making
4:51
and assessing the pressures around
4:53
us and understanding is these
4:56
choices that were making are truly
4:59
, result of our free choice but
5:01
also that's really hard to judge
5:04
whether someone else is doing that
5:06
but your height sit there is
5:08
a lot of and is superficial
5:11
notions of often
5:12
the city
5:14
you know it's a bus lead like
5:16
leadership or so
5:17
yeah
5:18
and one of the reasons i started
5:20
to look into this was this mantra
5:22
just your of and i'm like okay what
5:25
does that mean what is your true self
5:27
you know how do you find it what does that
5:29
even look like and suits you be yourself
5:32
through authenticity is
5:35
definitely a sort of an introspective process
5:37
but also an extra especially
5:39
if process as as engaging
5:41
in the wow
5:43
you think of authenticity as a poetic
5:45
quest to the the phrase from your but
5:48
the very existential
5:50
most idea that we
5:52
don't discover ourselves we make ourselves
5:55
why do you think it's so important
5:58
to remember our
6:00
identity is insects
6:02
that were always in this state of
6:04
are coming
6:06
into horror as existential
6:08
philosophy is that existence
6:10
precedes essence so
6:12
the idea there is that we exist
6:15
best were thrown into the world
6:17
and then we
6:19
create truly become and so authenticity
6:23
is what happens when we are
6:25
able to actively currencies
6:28
our freedom were always
6:30
always are always growing are
6:32
ways stretching beyond
6:34
the stats of our existence and wanting
6:36
to do that is what makes us human
6:39
when we talk about a painting it's like okay
6:41
there's a fix seem like a static
6:43
object that we can refer to it's
6:45
but when it comes to humans
6:48
we're not like a ping scene because
6:50
were always growing and and becoming more
6:52
than we are where
6:54
the some of our past actions we
6:56
are also the choices that when
6:58
making in the presence and were
7:01
also erin and sons
7:03
and goals went we are how
7:05
we stretch ourselves in
7:06
the future molson look like
7:09
when we refuse to make ourselves
7:11
in that way when we
7:13
run away from our responsibility
7:15
to choose
7:18
who and what we are you mean is that
7:20
word someone like beauvoir and other
7:22
existential us would call living
7:25
in bad faith where we
7:27
just kind of step into
7:29
roles that have been sighted
7:32
for us and we just embraced him as
7:34
though there are own in order
7:36
to not have to take on this
7:39
person of , deciding
7:41
for ourselves who we are because that's really scary
7:44
i think for a lot of people
7:46
that's of people order
7:47
the a scary but it's also
7:50
excited and exhilarate
7:52
yeah
7:53
yeah you're absolutely right about the
7:55
nuts and of leaning into
7:57
awesome
7:58
the and seizing offering
7:59
that you and escape from
8:02
being a sense determining
8:05
subject he is bad faith
8:07
which is pretty much the same as in author
8:09
the city
8:10
and the risk is that is where
8:13
not exercising our freedom
8:15
that returning see i
8:18
see the objects that you know just
8:20
boeing with the flow where being pushed
8:22
around by society or
8:25
pushed around by what everyone
8:27
else once for us the was
8:29
like to be human is too
8:32
french lungs that given
8:34
nice to transcend learn the facts about
8:36
live
8:37
is there an obvious example for you have
8:39
someone living in bad faith
8:41
in the i'm thinking of the famous example from
8:43
sartre where he's he's talking about
8:46
the waiter right is like sitting like sitting cafe
8:49
the deserving a waiter and he notices
8:52
that this guy is performing
8:54
this role he's speaking and
8:56
behaving and engaging in
8:59
the way the thinks he's supposed
9:01
to his ceiling or always
9:03
performing always role in
9:06
that sense it's a kind of bad says
9:09
the some other example that comes to mind pre of
9:11
just someone demonstrating
9:13
this kind of bad faith or someone running
9:16
away from discuss
9:18
imperative to be authentic
9:20
yeah i mean that lots of examples
9:23
of yeah i'm hesitant to put myself out and
9:25
that i disagree that in the book
9:27
do and i'll do it to door
9:29
and in fact this
9:32
anecdote is really one of the reasons
9:35
during me to exist eleven and
9:37
then exploring authenticity
9:40
i was feeling was lot of pressure
9:42
from society to be
9:44
a good girlfriend a good daughter
9:46
and good employees and i was
9:48
doing all the things that
9:51
things thought i was supposed to do doing
9:53
other things that things thought was supposed to make me it's
9:55
a good successful person i
9:58
was miserable
9:59
he
10:01
discovered existential philosophy especially simone
10:03
de beauvoir and realize that
10:06
wow okay i'm nuts reflecting
10:09
on my choices i'm not
10:12
seizing my freedom to
10:14
create the sort of person that i want
10:16
to become so i was in bad faith and
10:18
that bad faith was faith was was
10:20
of ignorance
10:21
yeah
10:21
what i also loved about simone de beauvoir
10:23
philosophy was that she had no played
10:26
stats
10:26
a person exists
10:28
the restrictions that stop
10:30
people from
10:32
doing authenticity and
10:34
it's important
10:35
the acknowledged on say we can to say oh if
10:37
someone's not exercising their freedom
10:39
then that's bad and
10:41
note we need to look at the situation
10:44
look at the context that they're operating yeah
10:46
in the book he talk a lot about
10:48
how we sleep our
10:51
freedom often by throwing
10:53
ourselves into these archetype all roles
10:55
and you're getting at that here right mother father
10:58
husband wife employees and
11:01
, think i understand the deeper point one
11:04
can be a mother or father and still live
11:06
in authentic lives but what happens
11:09
is we slide into these
11:11
roles and adopt a model given to
11:13
us by our culture or our society
11:16
but i guess i wonder what else
11:18
are we supposed to how do we embrace
11:20
our freedom and not fall into these pre programmed
11:23
roles i think we probably need models
11:25
we probably need guidance we probably need
11:28
the blueprints expecting people
11:31
to truly fashion themselves maybe
11:33
asking too much even
11:35
if that's a noble aspiration
11:38
anything
11:40
wonder what it's really important about authenticity
11:43
is holding ourselves in question
11:46
and thinking about are you
11:48
just sliding along rails
11:50
you just blindly plodding three
11:52
life fulfilling those roles
11:55
and it absolutely is difficult
11:58
to push back against also
12:00
acknowledge that you know a lot of people do
12:02
find fulfillment in
12:05
certain , like of of mother
12:07
wife husband husband
12:09
if you're only defining yourself
12:12
as a glass as an
12:14
attachment to maybe someone else
12:17
and not acknowledging the freedom
12:19
to
12:20
change in the future your freedom to
12:23
pursue your own goals if you're only pursuing
12:25
goal for everybody else is telling you
12:28
you can that's
12:30
possibly an indicator of bad thing maybe
12:33
myself back into the feel i should
12:35
get married i didn't have a child
12:38
ends of lot of slade
12:41
thought that they were authentic
12:43
possibilities for doing those things
12:45
as long as you live
12:47
a diversified nice and
12:49
don't like zip same yourself into
12:51
those roles and allow these and
12:54
ideals chew
12:55
the
13:08
the most interesting parts of queries
13:10
book or about our desire
13:13
for freedom collides with the
13:15
demands of love and relationships
13:28
no one likes filing expense reports employees
13:31
he keeping track of wadded up receipts
13:33
and their bosses dread the monthly spread
13:36
cheating of those scraps of paper that's
13:38
why people are turning to ramp ramp
13:40
is a corporate card and financial software
13:42
suite designed to help you save time
13:45
and put money back in your pocket here's
13:47
how it works ram kids teens a clear
13:49
look at company spending you can use
13:51
it to build budgets automate expense
13:53
reporting an issue cards to every
13:55
employ with different limits and restrictions
13:58
the software automatically collect receipts and
14:00
categorizes expenses in real time
14:02
which means less work for everybody plus
14:05
it's so easy to use that you can get started
14:07
in less than fifteen minutes whether you have
14:09
five employees or five thousand
14:12
right now you can get two hundred and fifty dollars
14:14
when you join rent good a ramp dot com
14:16
slash box ramp dot com slash
14:18
box or a m p dot
14:20
com slash
14:24
if you've been looking to stay engaged follow
14:26
local politics or just remember who
14:29
your representatives are keep up with moxie
14:32
moxie , easy way to get news
14:34
updates on important legislation and
14:36
voting it it in one sleek
14:38
and easy to use platform they
14:41
pull news can hundreds of outlets like ncr
14:43
see stance and voice of america stories
14:46
are collected from a diverse set of sources
14:48
you can follow along by topic or just hop
14:50
on to see the most recent headlines american
14:53
residents recent easily access important
14:55
election info track of legislation
14:57
as it winds its way from voting to inaccurate
15:00
get personalized ballot info including
15:02
candidates ballot info along with the voting
15:05
option locations and more you
15:07
can track your representatives at the national
15:09
state and local level and see where their funding
15:12
comes from know which laws your
15:14
representatives sponsored and how they vote
15:16
plus moxie consolidates all
15:18
the ways you can contact the politicians representing
15:20
you in one easy to access
15:22
place get moxie free for
15:25
thirty days or use promo code maxing
15:27
o'clock that m o x y
15:30
b o x to get moxie
15:32
premium for ninety days and search
15:34
emo x y in the app stores
15:36
or visit the website at emo excellent
15:39
like dot l a b
15:50
why is probably best
15:52
known as the first philosopher to mainstream
15:55
this distinction oh really
15:57
unpack this distinction but
16:00
the insects
16:01
and gender why did she think
16:03
that distinction mattered and what did it
16:05
have to do what are notions
16:07
of freedom and authenticity
16:10
so what's interesting is that
16:12
technically but why didn't use the word gender
16:15
in the second sex but
16:17
split you're talking about his her t
16:19
idea that one isn't born
16:21
but rather a com a woman
16:24
yeah i'm how this is usually taken
16:26
to mean is that sex
16:29
is biological facts
16:31
gender for lack of lack better word better word
16:33
coming over
16:34
then he is socially
16:36
and culturally constructed and
16:38
the issue there is that
16:40
though so precedence to
16:43
, a socially acceptable
16:45
version of a woman or socially acceptable
16:47
version of a man our that usually
16:49
manifests is what way towards
16:51
becoming a woman or
16:53
woman becoming a man isn't
16:56
the rebels are now free choice as bad
16:59
as skyn it's about doing what we tells
17:01
doing what expected it as doing
17:04
what's rewarded not doing
17:06
lots punished for example
17:08
goals are often rewarded
17:11
for being the and obedient
17:13
whereas blaze are expected
17:15
to be strong and associates and
17:19
often we the in china rise
17:21
those six ways of thing the
17:24
problem is it these
17:27
the district ways of being hurt our
17:29
freedom and prevent us from expressing
17:31
ourselves in or
17:33
he cries
17:34
can we be authentic while still performing
17:37
are inherited gender roles in the
17:39
way you're describing or did beauvoir believed
17:41
you believe that authentic freedom
17:44
demands we throw off these
17:46
conventions
17:48
well to heart was interested
17:50
in getting rid of all
17:52
oppression so if
17:54
your performance of gender
17:57
is a result of being
17:59
afraid
17:59
to express yourself
18:02
or
18:02
the play and that's a problem
18:04
the why acknowledge those pressures and
18:07
she thought that you know it's really hard to
18:09
judge the choices
18:10
the people making which shouldn't judge
18:12
the choices people make
18:14
the her idea was that everybody
18:17
would be excellent
18:18
current freedom and we'd
18:20
all be able to teach ourselves into the
18:22
future i mean this as utopian
18:24
but you know her project
18:27
was getting rid of domination
18:29
and oppression so that we do have
18:31
more flexibility about
18:34
expressing ourselves
18:35
why did poof was think and
18:37
i'm quoting you here that being
18:39
in love for a woman
18:42
the always rest tipping into a state
18:44
of fear pressure and
18:46
obligation
18:47
you're riding in the second sex in the nineteen
18:50
forties and size and
18:52
he backed and things were different though as fuel
18:54
women in the workforce women had
18:57
spieler rights than they do now
18:59
in in some realms women weren't
19:01
allowed to establish credit they
19:03
weren't allowed to own property there
19:05
was no such thing as no fault divorce yet
19:08
and , have lost all these factors
19:10
as pushing women
19:13
in sue the confirm magic
19:15
trajectory of falling in love
19:17
finding the one getting married and living
19:19
happily ever after now
19:21
the problem with love is that
19:23
she saw love as saw love
19:26
to stability glove as
19:28
a means to marriage where
19:30
women
19:31
the be financially secure and
19:33
enjoying that we're not appreciating
19:35
love in itself love is
19:37
a means to another and
19:40
imagined authentic love
19:42
the be found
19:43
on the reciprocal the ignition of
19:46
to freedom
19:47
to one another
19:49
as individuals acknowledging
19:52
that each person has their own goals
19:55
and celebrating love
19:57
as something that doesn't necessarily
19:59
have to the to financial
20:01
stability so she wanted to free
20:03
love from the sun is
20:06
confines and to do that she
20:08
thought that's men and women
20:10
the needed to be free
20:12
you choose who they fall in
20:14
love with and free to leave
20:16
the romantic relationship
20:19
in ways that they choose
20:21
what does she think we owe are lovers
20:24
did you think we owe them anything
20:26
the iowa our mothers respects
20:28
we owe our mothers intersubjectivity
20:31
which is a term that
20:34
is she used to
20:36
describe that we acknowledge
20:38
that were subjects for ourselves and
20:40
other people or objects to us but
20:42
, other people as subjects and themselves
20:45
and were objects to them them
20:47
what this means is that we need
20:49
to acknowledge that
20:51
other people's lives are
20:54
as real and rich as
20:56
mine and that a choices a and
20:59
that's intersubjectivity
21:01
it's not just what we own mother's but
21:03
what we owe everyone that's the
21:06
key to ethical relationships
21:08
bubble one that's what love
21:10
is also based on
21:12
there's this question of levin sacrifice
21:14
that i kept thinking about read the book
21:16
and i really wanted to dig into a little bit
21:18
here to love
21:21
someone to truly love someone
21:23
i think is to surrender
21:25
some part of yourself to
21:27
care as much about another
21:29
person as you care about yourself
21:32
and maybe think that's wrong how
21:34
might that conflict
21:36
with this desire to
21:39
live in authentically surreal life
21:41
there's a conflict
21:43
i'm interested he misled he he's
21:45
surrender there you
21:47
decide to yeah that's you
21:49
know what it's you love someone
21:51
you need to give something of yourself
21:54
and i think that's not
21:56
where was coming from you know
21:59
and space and me on a
22:01
soulmate where you're lacking
22:03
in something and you find your other half and
22:05
together your fulfilled you
22:07
i blame plato and symposium say
22:10
that air stuff and either side
22:13
and you would jump at the time anyway
22:16
gonna fight night loves not like that because it's not
22:18
low
22:18
the weekend the completed and
22:21
you gotta be really careful if
22:23
you're surrendering yourself if what
22:25
you mean by surrender is
22:27
being vulnerable
22:29
absolutely being vulnerable
22:31
stink outta ten to another taking
22:34
a risk with another percent been
22:36
absolutely that's vital but he said
22:38
slide compromising yourself
22:40
or letting go of parts
22:43
of your
22:43
the existence or you're being
22:45
are important to you and
22:47
that's where it enters into problematic territory
22:50
and equip whole experience that probably
22:53
on both sides of it but the weekend to impose
22:55
our own expectations
22:57
on are lovers and
23:00
that is a failure to recognize their
23:02
freedom and their authenticity
23:05
why that is
23:07
one problem that you run into
23:09
with relationships is that
23:11
they so often become a desire to possess
23:14
another person and really to control
23:16
them
23:17
not for their sake but for our sake
23:19
the role they play
23:22
in our own identity in our own
23:24
life and when that happens
23:26
we get jealousy the get
23:29
resentment
23:31
and that on some level has
23:33
to lead to a clash of
23:35
mr obama says
23:37
love is renunciation of
23:39
all possession and all confusion
23:42
it affected your sharing sounds
23:44
send me a lot like jean paul sartre
23:47
perspective switches that
23:49
were always caught in that this
23:51
vicious cycle and domination
23:53
and possession and submission and we're always
23:56
trying to merge
23:58
with another person and
24:00
why she says that's
24:03
one of the projects as authentic
24:05
loving is to overcome that
24:07
desire to console the other person
24:09
to challenge acts
24:12
impulses towards jealousy
24:14
and seat thought that this problem
24:16
was wanting to wanting com
24:18
whole with the other or become one and
24:21
she's like know what we need
24:23
to do for loving authentically
24:25
is to act now
24:26
lance the other in
24:28
our have enough to acknowledge
24:30
the old clarity and to find
24:32
joy in the difference between us
24:35
it's a beautiful idea i think he
24:37
gets hard and practice and bourgeois
24:39
as you write about she had this i
24:41
guess kinda weird relationship with
24:44
sean paul sartre the in the famous french philosopher
24:46
who just mentioned you know and where ,
24:48
two of them agreed to be each
24:50
other's main lover but
24:52
they weren't monogamous they hooked up with other people but
24:54
they were always kind of committed to kind of staying kind each
24:56
other's orbits was like orbits non marriage
24:59
a non what we would call today i
25:01
guess and open relationships
25:04
did that work out
25:05
for her did she feel free
25:08
in that are did that become complicated
25:11
he always insisted that
25:13
the relationship was freely chosen
25:16
but it doesn't mean it was without it challenges
25:19
i agree to be prime to one another
25:22
but they would have contingent
25:24
of secondary lovers and
25:26
, lot of those other mothers were
25:28
hurt through their relationships
25:30
with was knowledge that a hurt people
25:33
and felt remorse in a way that a national
25:35
stature didn't think we
25:37
need to also look at
25:39
how they live their relationship so
25:42
you can live together they gave
25:44
each other a lot of space they had
25:46
this relationship of
25:48
hence companionship and
25:50
internecine that also
25:52
giving each other their freedom and
25:55
you know they were
25:57
the internet for their entire lives
25:59
and
25:59
the been very together in paris is month on
26:02
the cemetery
26:03
hundred eighty writing a book you say marriage
26:05
is a situation that necessarily
26:08
creates a tension between being for
26:10
others and being for oneself coming
26:13
authentic calls for a balance between
26:15
them both
26:16
there's no easy way to live in that tension
26:19
there will be moments where if something has to
26:21
give like sometimes
26:22
it really is zero some or my just
26:25
the wrong
26:27
about that
26:28
you're not wrong it is absolutely
26:30
always attention and there's
26:33
wave anxiety inherent
26:35
in relationship
26:37
yes or sometimes we think about
26:39
looking to stay as oh it's just it's
26:41
been for myself whereas before
26:44
like know it's our
26:46
coexistence with other people means
26:48
that were always in relationship
26:51
with others unless you coffin be a hermit
26:53
and then you're in relationship with nature in the wild
26:56
costs to live in society
26:58
is too fast
27:00
enough
27:01
they don't is concerned
27:02
constantly saying they out is pursuing
27:05
our projects and our goals and
27:08
bumping into other people who are
27:10
trying to do the same as well
27:12
and you're right in a marriage is
27:14
a culmination of a really
27:17
intense height of tension
27:19
between being for yourself and being for others
27:22
and the was concern was
27:24
that yeah in marriage quite
27:26
often be cleansed as such a
27:28
big ten cents austin it's
27:31
the woman who slides ensued
27:33
been for others and it's a man who slides
27:35
and said being forced himself and
27:37
so women often take that secondary
27:40
positions and of her quotes is it
27:42
is said marriage diminishes man
27:45
the and true that will make
27:47
always destroys a woman because
27:50
marriage is a very old institution
27:53
and there's so many very
27:55
strong role that we
27:57
all fully
27:57
we fight into and in fact
27:59
performance pretty much against marriage
28:02
know why she didn't marry herself up and
28:04
say she said she thought marriage
28:07
is the biggest first of all because
28:09
it was you know structure that have created
28:11
by man for men and encourage
28:14
women to and if submit
28:18
i wonder what you think
28:19
she wouldn't said about marriage today
28:22
the she writing and inedible twentieth
28:24
century and france the
28:27
world is very different
28:29
today certainly still so
28:31
hide in a bazillion different ways
28:33
but it is the a friend then
28:35
can i mean there's even a character and one of her plays
28:38
that says at the unquote all commitment
28:41
is a prison i don't
28:43
have that the your view i'm gonna be careful to
28:45
not conflate what was thought
28:48
with what you think that
28:51
seems not to me are certainly seems heavy
28:54
handed i don't know what you think about
28:56
that you think that our our commitment is a prison
28:58
idea
28:58
not i didn't think that all commitment
29:01
is a prison were defined by
29:03
our commitments me by defined by how
29:05
we launch ourselves into the world
29:08
and in an odi blah was extremely
29:10
skeptical of marriage as you point out
29:13
she any in the second sex she
29:15
does i acknowledge possibilities
29:18
for
29:18
authentic marriage and she says the
29:20
ideal would be that each human
29:23
being perfectly self sufficient
29:26
be attached to another by the free
29:28
consent of bell love alone
29:30
though was she saying is that
29:32
sure you can
29:34
hunter ensue union
29:36
it's it's between free and consenting
29:39
adults and acknowledge
29:42
the and you already have a relationship
29:44
and not for back
29:46
so hide ensued the traditional
29:49
ideas of marriage where women
29:51
are sort of pushed to do most of the house lack
29:54
in men take on the career
29:56
and women take a backseat when children
29:58
arrive in this
29:59
oh marriage was so heavy
30:03
with his baggage as tradition
30:05
that there wasn't there wasn't of hype
30:07
for it but it doesn't mean she said away
30:09
could never beat
30:11
hancock do you think it still loaded down
30:13
in the same way sir do you think per analysis
30:15
would be fundamentally different if
30:17
she were to make it today
30:19
things are changing and i mean it's easier
30:22
to get divorced it's like we have no fault
30:24
divorce now i mean it's so easy to get
30:26
the hate that it is to get divorced but
30:28
i still find myself sometimes sliding
30:31
and see you know traditional roles
30:33
and i catch myself and it's catch struggle
30:35
and it's takes it lot of reflecting
30:37
on it takes a lot of talking
30:39
with my partner and teaching my son
30:42
that's you know it's not my job to clean up
30:44
after innocent my job to do always the hundred
30:46
and it's and this is where that
30:48
becomes important as what sort of role
30:50
model and we're setting for our children
30:53
and army reinforcing these gender
30:55
stereotypes so yeah i think
30:57
it's a lot better and especially since more
30:59
women are working now and
31:02
women are accessing better korea's
31:04
even know the still a dos
31:06
of women in leadership in politics
31:09
and organizations but you know there
31:11
are some improvements for shot
31:13
you mention becoming a parent now i'm
31:15
a new parent of a sign that just turned three
31:18
years old about a month ago and
31:21
the book you talk about the experience of having
31:23
a child and becoming apparent as
31:26
or may have my thoughts on this do you think the demands
31:28
of parenting supplied
31:30
with the demands are conflict with the demands
31:33
of living and authentic and free
31:35
hi
31:37
master conflates and
31:39
often having children dance
31:41
and foods
31:43
encoding faction all encompassing
31:45
endeavor an impact in
31:47
the second sex improvised chapter
31:49
on motherhood she spends the first
31:51
ten pages defending
31:53
contraception and abortion
31:56
because she thought into the choice into bring
31:58
a new human into the way
31:59
yeah it's huge decision
32:02
and it's a huge commitment and
32:04
to be
32:05
forced into that against your will
32:07
is a travesty against
32:10
humanity and she realized
32:12
that often child rearing
32:14
often still full of cinema that there and
32:16
were saying this in the statistics that
32:18
women are still doing the bulk as
32:21
a child care and shows
32:34
okay after one last break
32:37
we talk about how big was philosophy
32:39
influenced her own friendships and
32:42
, we can learn from that stick with
32:44
us
32:54
net zero carbon emissions the
32:57
euro racial wealth gap zero
32:59
poverty those are ambitious goals
33:01
and to help reached him the world needs to take
33:04
action together cities
33:06
committed one trillion dollars and sustainable
33:08
finance by twenty thirty to facilitate
33:11
innovative solutions like renewable energy
33:13
and clean technology that
33:15
, will help provide access to essential
33:17
services like education healthcare
33:20
and affordable housing there are also helping
33:22
close the racial wealth gap and increase
33:24
economic mobility in the u s s
33:27
that's just a just having
33:29
ambitious goals is what helps the world make
33:31
meaningful progress and it's going
33:33
to take all of us working together to
33:35
make sure we continue to move in the right direction
33:38
because to address these worldwide problems
33:40
it's going to take worldwide action
33:43
it takes everything to reach zero for
33:45
the love of making for the for the love
33:47
of progress learn more at city dot
33:50
com slash e f g
33:58
brain fog anxiety the person
34:00
that according to social media you can cure
34:03
all of them by eating yogurt unsurprisingly
34:06
social media isn't exactly right
34:08
but there is some really excited
34:10
the new science showing that what you
34:12
can affect your mental health that what's going on
34:14
in your gut literally changes your brain
34:16
chemistry and that's exactly
34:18
what we're getting to the bottom of on this week's
34:20
episode of gastropub the podcast the looks
34:22
at food through the lens of science and history
34:25
i'm nikolaj where they and i'm cynthia graber
34:27
and this
34:27
there we go deep to sort out the science
34:29
from the social
34:30
media hype it's a story that involve some
34:32
very sad nice and a cutting
34:34
edge us military experiment but it's
34:36
also news we can all use would
34:38
should you be eating to combat anxiety
34:41
depression and more follow gastropub
34:44
and
34:44
subscribe where ever you get your podcasts
34:57
the thing the balkans and the gestern at
34:59
in this conversation is that romantic love
35:01
is authentic when it is based
35:03
on this appreciation for enter
35:08
your friendships my opponent number or something
35:10
or
35:11
though it was a book that came out
35:13
just recently called the inseparable
35:15
it was simone de beauvoir novel that
35:17
she didn't publish during her lifetime
35:19
she wrote about his friendship with
35:22
her best childhood friends with
35:24
as with look like
35:25
yeah and it's really story
35:28
of authentic friendship
35:30
and creating an into subject
35:32
the relations and
35:34
while we're
35:36
really taken read
35:37
that and they were best
35:39
friends at school of size as i had
35:42
other commitments and simone de
35:44
beauvoir really was struggling
35:46
with that this friendship is an
35:48
equal like it's not equal in terms of the
35:51
feelings people are putting into it
35:53
then
35:54
what she preferred it was
35:57
it's authentic friendship
35:59
has to be
35:59
based on feelings that afraid
36:02
though if a lot started to
36:05
try and manipulate zaza or
36:07
to seduce her into having a more
36:09
indepth relationships in she would
36:11
as and of disk
36:12
keep this in for subjectivity
36:16
why respected zaza
36:18
as way of being in the world and
36:21
stars are respectable cosplay
36:23
of being in the world and stay created
36:26
this the into subjective
36:28
relationship where they should
36:30
the very intimate secrets and
36:33
for example gaza confided in beauvoir
36:35
that she'd slice to split open with
36:37
an axe to get out of obligation
36:40
and would mix white wine with her coffee
36:43
in the morning just to get through the day so
36:45
dismissive really insane
36:47
that kind of friendship and
36:49
one lasted twelve years until
36:52
does untied and hoover
36:54
credits this relationship with
36:57
firing her philosophy of friendship
37:00
and seem authentic friendship
37:02
as respect for one another freedom
37:05
and spin vulnerable with one
37:07
another and sharing
37:09
confident says but also having
37:11
that's really that's friendship based on respect
37:14
i mean this is something i do love
37:16
about who bought me listeners of the show will
37:18
now at the deep affection for camo
37:21
i wrote my dissertation on camo
37:23
and i've done a couple of episodes about
37:25
can be on this very show and
37:28
i think can move was a better artist
37:31
then beauvoir but i think but was a better philosopher
37:33
then cameo but they both
37:36
share i think the same interests me can move
37:38
always rejected the existential flavor but
37:41
provided , of lump them under it anyway
37:43
and with from good justification
37:46
but one thing they both share and it's really
37:48
comes through in your final chapter and rebellion
37:50
which is really about politics and the responsibilities
37:52
we have to engage as they both
37:54
really thought seriously about
37:57
what we owe other people and they both
37:59
believe that to choose life to value
38:01
your own freedom is at the same time to
38:03
value everyone else that
38:06
entails commitments and responsibilities
38:08
not just yourself but to other people and
38:10
living in this tension were you trying to pursue
38:13
your own individual projects and be authentic
38:15
see yourself but you're also embedded
38:17
in this world where you are dependent on other
38:19
people other people depending on you
38:22
and you have responsibilities to that
38:24
extent outside of yourself it's just really homered
38:26
it's really hard and a word
38:28
that why used a lot
38:30
was ambiguity i think that's right we
38:33
are living in this tension we're we're trying to be true
38:35
to ourselves other
38:38
human beings and does not
38:40
blueprint that you it's just while
38:43
yet to get up every day and day and and act
38:45
as best you can and sometimes you
38:47
choose wisely and sometimes you'll choose
38:49
for labor you can get up the next
38:52
day and intuit again
38:54
yeah and a full the was failure is a fact
38:56
of life but that's not an excuse
38:58
not to act naturally
39:00
games
39:01
and you see where the
39:03
opinion that we all make mistakes
39:06
that related no mistake
39:08
big enough but you can't get up the next day
39:10
and change and take your
39:12
life into a new direction and accept
39:14
your responsibilities but
39:17
, you know her concern waste
39:19
rebellion was i think
39:21
as cheap as or that news
39:23
and if she was
39:26
really concerned place
39:28
so that we live on and she said
39:30
we must put a brake on the machinery
39:32
of our rather than go on wailing
39:34
it's wheel
39:36
if were just going along with
39:38
the flow doing that was supposed to do
39:40
maintaining the status quo in the
39:42
midst of oppression and
39:44
injustices then that's
39:46
on us were escaping our
39:49
responsibility for shaping
39:51
that conditions of our lives she
39:53
has justice can never be created with
39:56
injustice and so it's all
39:58
about responsibilities
39:59
you push back against
40:02
atrocities in the wild
40:04
that leads me to this
40:06
relationship between authenticity and and
40:08
happiness or desire for individual
40:10
happiness and our responsibilities
40:13
to the people around us if
40:15
we're trying to live an authentic life
40:17
happiness the right goal it
40:20
seems to me that if we take happiness
40:23
as the primary aim them were likely
40:25
to give ourselves over to diversions
40:28
and see pleasures and i guess i
40:30
wouldn't say that say makes an authentic
40:32
life and possible but i would say
40:34
that it undermines
40:35
yeah definitely
40:38
i don't think happiness is something we can pursue
40:40
directly an attitude both laugh and
40:43
, is another thing she shares in common with
40:45
can move as in the search for happiness
40:47
yet most of her writing does focus
40:49
on freedom freedom
40:52
theme of happiness that keeps coming back
40:54
and she says in her memoir in a sheets
40:57
i had always been concerned with spain
40:59
happy but she discovered that's
41:02
when not like empty vessels that can
41:04
be filled with oh the next act
41:06
or the next he nice new technology
41:09
is is gonna fulfill us and them
41:11
will be happy rather she
41:13
saw
41:14
happiness as
41:16
i kind of flourishing that comes
41:19
from living in harmony with
41:21
the world and is
41:24
a side effect of being authentic
41:26
a side effect of transcending
41:28
and pursuing goals that we choose
41:31
but of course as you rightly mentions
41:34
you know how many is never many given
41:36
how many is always many challenge and
41:39
how do we create harmony mrs we've
41:42
been talking about here with were
41:44
trying to pursue our goals and other
41:46
people are trying to do the saints then of course
41:48
we gonna crash into each other but
41:51
blast says that it's
41:53
important to embrace that kind
41:55
of ambiguity embrace the tension
41:57
embrace the sodas crashes
41:59
as long as people aren't
42:02
actively trying to a process
42:04
and if we can sort of
42:07
knowledge these tensions as a part
42:09
of life then she's
42:11
like that should be a source of joy it
42:13
can be in an assist from seeing
42:16
other people as threats to
42:18
seeing them as actually
42:20
the context of our freedom the context of
42:22
our goals and aspect
42:25
of our existence that we can work with
42:27
will push against she was of the pew
42:29
let's try and create friendships and work
42:31
with one another
42:32
there are you write a book that for
42:34
revoir happiness
42:36
doesn't fall from heaven we have to try to construct
42:38
our own
42:39
happiness and what's so interesting about
42:42
her is that she lived her life as a kind of experiment
42:44
in this regard her life was
42:47
a practical test of her philosophy
42:49
she really loved it was only tried the limits do
42:51
you think the she was happy and fulfilled in the
42:53
end
42:54
that's hard for me to judge about
42:56
is she said my philosophy must
42:58
be from wife and she said that very
43:01
early on and from
43:03
her memoirs
43:04
there were
43:06
many happy times in her life
43:08
but they're also sad times
43:10
and i think let her memoir
43:12
so us is that may be a good
43:14
life is one net isn't
43:17
just focused and happiness that one
43:19
that recognizes that there
43:21
are tragedies and sadnesses
43:24
in life as well and it's a matter
43:26
of working through those and
43:29
concrete happiness she thought
43:31
would come from
43:33
the responsible taking responsibility
43:35
exercising our freedom
43:38
but also enabling
43:40
others to do the same
43:42
the you issue something of a warning
43:44
in a book i think and it relates to this question
43:46
of happiness he said that we shouldn't be
43:48
too and i putting new here but
43:51
he said it recently too dependent on others
43:53
to define our worth and are value
43:55
in the world what happens when
43:57
we do that
43:59
then we become
43:59
the holding to other people's views
44:02
of us he becomes pushed
44:04
around by whatever people
44:06
one for us
44:07
you know that for losing game
44:09
because of the people have their own projects
44:12
and aunts or uncles and they're so many different
44:15
things they want for themselves and so would
44:17
just and i see this on social media
44:20
if were just trying to be beholden to
44:22
what everybody else months and get those
44:24
lights were going to be
44:25
how an insane any different directions
44:28
and
44:29
the thing about social media is that quite
44:31
often people are trying to present his
44:34
cohesive image of themselves
44:36
that stovall says that what we're doing
44:38
okay not in social media but if
44:40
were trying to present this image of ourselves
44:42
thin we're forgetting that were
44:45
fragmented being
44:47
what happens when we do that when we become
44:49
dependent in that way on other people's
44:52
views of us is we become
44:54
almost like objects in need of external
44:57
validation and you can never be really
44:59
free or even authentic and that
45:01
way and and the new right
45:03
this in the park and it's something
45:05
i've experienced the my own life i guess it's what people
45:08
would call
45:09
the past
45:10
syndrome can we speak for me here you know but i
45:12
had this thing where i've i've speak and
45:14
write and i share my opinions and ideas
45:16
and people consume those ideas and
45:18
as a kind of vulnerability and that and i'm constantly
45:21
worried about being judged stupid
45:24
things things are things i get wrong
45:27
or just stepping on myself
45:29
one way or the other and not being
45:31
as clever as i wanted the are smart
45:33
sharp as i wanted the and living
45:35
that way or fearing
45:38
that then me and and
45:40
anyone else who shares that from
45:42
actually just
45:44
in comfortable my own skin being free
45:46
to kind of
45:47
the now experience life as it is not
45:49
be cowed by
45:50
anxiety about the consequences sunsets
45:54
and i'd do it gets out what you're getting at diana
45:56
you only bring this up because you bring it up in the
45:58
balkans i don't know any
45:59
you have an anathema to here
46:02
the first one of the things that why
46:05
was deeply concerned about that
46:07
years so we need others and other people
46:10
are the context of our existence
46:12
and and we need others we
46:14
need them to understands
46:17
our existence in the world
46:19
but the problem is that we shouldn't be
46:22
defending ourselves through the gaze of
46:24
the other to such an extent that
46:27
you lose ourselves
46:28
and
46:29
why encourages us to be
46:32
comfortable with are ambiguous
46:34
existence and be comfortable
46:37
with the idea that
46:39
the coming sure we are
46:41
is the creative adventure
46:44
and one of the things that really inspires me
46:46
about prove why is she
46:49
is
46:50
challenging us to become
46:52
then you and poets about lives were
46:55
in
46:55
or eating our to transcend
46:58
the buried with stance and to
47:00
try and you know acknowledge our
47:02
engaging with other people but not
47:04
to the extent that we figure out who we
47:06
are
47:07
when we can
47:10
exercise our freedom and
47:12
and or and ourselves and authentic ways
47:14
stance is she thought that we were really
47:16
get to the truth of what it means her
47:19
to be human
47:21
there any other
47:22
examples are lessons from boof was
47:24
life a come to mind as
47:27
we can apply today that can
47:29
be a practical guide for us today
47:31
and our pursuit of of an
47:34
authentic existence
47:36
first of all be the poet of
47:38
your own wife acknowledged that
47:40
you're complex very fragmented
47:43
being and always
47:46
have the possibility of
47:49
changing your life and one of my favorite
47:51
quotes from but why is she says
47:54
don't gamble in the future at now without
47:56
delay and i love that
47:58
urgency season on pro life
48:01
and , challenging us
48:03
to say okay just because with done
48:05
something the past or just because maybe
48:07
we've got ourselves into some kind of that doesn't
48:09
mean we can't push ourselves
48:12
ensue new direction
48:14
it was seeking thing with each
48:16
the you accepts responsibility
48:19
and that means
48:20
they're having a responsibility to become
48:23
lucid about your life becoming
48:26
lucid about the choices you're making
48:28
and the world you're shaking around you
48:31
and the law says immobile or inaction
48:33
will always be upon us every
48:36
refusal is refusal choice every silent
48:38
the ball
48:40
read or what we do
48:42
whether we act or don't act they're
48:44
both
48:44
and i said
48:47
i would be to focus on building
48:49
into subjective relationship and
48:52
acknowledging that we can only become
48:54
are censored in collaboration with
48:56
other people
48:58
the other people reflects parts of
49:00
our being back to us we'll
49:02
learn about our existence true
49:05
our interactions with them yeah
49:07
you know
49:08
if i could add anything to that and and maybe a connects
49:11
a little bit to this idea of ambiguity but something
49:13
that kept jumping up to me was this notion of not
49:15
being attached to outcomes tiny
49:17
fixed outcome not being attached to any fixed
49:20
version of your self that we
49:22
are evolving messy creatures
49:25
constantly creating
49:27
ourselves and that it you become attached
49:30
to a story of yourself or version of yourself
49:32
your life will become about defending and protecting that
49:35
annual you will miss the opportunity to
49:37
become something else to grow
49:39
into something else and that is a kind
49:41
of
49:42
had face that is a kind of inauthentic
49:44
lifestyle
49:46
i think everyone would do well to resist
49:48
and i think of our and you in the spot to
49:50
good job of making that case
49:53
the roster
49:54
you
49:55
the book is had to be authentic simone
49:58
de beauvoir and the quest
49:59
for for filming sky cleary
50:02
thanks so much for coming in today
50:14
box conversations
50:17
is produced by eric jenny gus
50:20
are , is amy just dusk
50:23
dusk boy mixed and mastered this
50:25
mastered or theme music
50:27
was dreamed up by the mysterious craig master
50:29
cylinder and am fall
50:31
is or deputy is director
50:35
your feedback really helps so
50:37
if you have ideas for future gas
50:40
topics or really any thoughts at all
50:42
sentence of box conversations sentence
50:44
box dot and
50:46
if you'd like to this episode please
50:49
share it with your friends rate and review that's
50:51
enough really helps and
50:53
join us thursday brand new episode
50:55
of past conversation
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More