2:00

Congress is deadly serious. The

2:02

Speaker of the House is at the

2:04

center of a building firestorm in the

2:06

Republican Conference. Johnson's leadership

2:08

under scrutiny is one thing,

2:10

his integrity another and it

2:12

is very much under scrutiny.

2:15

If not in fact, now obvious.

2:18

We'll soon see how this firestorm

2:20

resolves and whether we have a

2:22

republic after all. The issue is

2:25

urgent. It seems to me critical.

2:27

Reauthorizing section 702 of

2:30

FISA to preserve the

2:32

corrupt FBI and DOJ's power to

2:35

spy on Americans, on our Congress

2:37

and Senate. If so,

2:39

the federal government is declared war on

2:41

us, the people and

2:43

on our Constitution. This

2:46

appears to be a capitulation by

2:48

Speaker Johnson to extend FISA surveillance

2:51

reauthorization to April of 2025. Among

2:53

others, judiciary

2:56

chairman Jim Jordan is warned that

2:58

he can't support the inclusion

3:01

of FISA and section 702

3:03

in the must pass

3:06

National Defense Authorization Act,

3:08

the so-called NDAA. Congressman

3:10

Andy Biggs is demanding that Johnson

3:12

bring the House Judiciary Bill entitled

3:15

End Warrantless Surveillance to the Floor

3:17

of the House for a Vote.

3:20

This seems to me to be another

3:22

step by Speaker Johnson to

3:24

fashion an alliance with the Marxist Dems,

3:26

the Deep State and the

3:29

Biden regime itself. I

3:31

see this as further weaponization of

3:33

the entire federal government against us,

3:35

the people. This is

3:38

a congressional declaration of war

3:40

against citizens. It is

3:42

shocking to think Congress, while preparing

3:44

to impeach a corrupt president who

3:46

is the puppet of the Marxist Dems and the

3:48

Deep State, could reauthorize the

3:51

very law that's been abused for

3:53

years, particularly to

3:55

subvert Donald Trump's presidency and to

3:57

steal his reelection. This

4:00

is utter madness and it is

4:02

evil holding sway. The

4:04

Marxist-M's persecution of Donald Trump is now

4:07

in its eighth year, and

4:09

President Trump will be back in a

4:11

courtroom in New York Monday, testifying

4:13

in the final day of the trial,

4:16

a trial that's been a circus, a

4:18

fraud committed by the deep state. Our

4:21

guest today is attorney Alina Habba,

4:24

spokeswoman for President Trump and his

4:26

legal team. Alina, the other

4:28

Trump attorneys and President Trump himself

4:30

are all under gag order. It

4:33

is outrageous by any,

4:35

any consideration. Alina,

4:37

thanks for being with us. The President

4:39

has acted with great restraint, with patience,

4:41

with class. I can't say

4:43

the same for the judge, not

4:45

a reasonable man, to say the least.

4:48

How do you feel about where the President's case

4:51

is? Next week it ends.

4:53

How do you feel about the President's defense?

4:56

I think we're in really good shape

4:59

in terms of our fight, in terms

5:01

of the constitutional, the constitutional basis behind

5:03

what we're doing. The

5:06

problem that we have along all fronts

5:09

is that politics have permeated our

5:11

judicial system and, you

5:13

know, there's not really a cure for that. And

5:16

I think that's our biggest hurdle right now. He has

5:18

a campaign that he needs

5:20

to attend and they're

5:22

clearly tying him up intentionally

5:25

so that he isn't out in

5:27

states that he needs to be

5:29

in and that he's sitting in

5:31

court. So outside of the general

5:33

witch hunt election interference issue, legally,

5:36

you know, we've been tackling each

5:38

case methodically. We have great defenses

5:40

on all fronts and

5:42

we'll keep pushing as much as we can. And

5:47

push and push and push. It's

5:50

amazing what these special counsels are

5:52

doing, particularly Jack Smith. I

5:54

refer to him on this show

5:58

as a junk yard. Jackal.

6:00

He is nothing more than

6:02

an activist. He has been

6:04

slapped down by judges in

6:06

these proceedings for

6:09

evidentiary reasons, trying to bring

6:12

evidence for charges that weren't

6:14

made, trying to

6:16

hide evidence from the defense and keep

6:18

it from President Trump. I

6:20

mean, how much more of this

6:22

nonsense? I mean, this is just

6:25

raw ignorance on the part of Jack Smith and

6:27

no one seems to be calling him on it.

6:30

I think that the media is to

6:32

some regard, but I agree with

6:34

you. I think that's a problem that we have

6:36

on a lot of cases that we have here,

6:38

not just Jack Smith, but if you

6:40

look at Fannie, you look at Letitia James, you

6:44

know, I'm currently on trial in New York on

6:46

that. That's that's closing soon. We have

6:48

a lot of that and I'm not,

6:50

you know, these are Soros backed politicians

6:54

wearing lawyer, you

6:57

know, costumes effectively.

7:00

And when the judges aren't stopping them and

7:02

calling them out, like you said, then we

7:04

have problems. The good

7:06

thing is there's so many levels of appeal. The

7:08

problem is that nobody should have to go

7:10

through that. You shouldn't have to keep going

7:12

through hoops and hoops and hoops when you have

7:14

corruption coming out of these

7:17

prosecutors and DAs and

7:19

all of that. That's just wrong. And

7:21

we have to remember special prosecutors ultimately

7:24

report to the AG who

7:26

ultimately reports to the president

7:28

and it's 100 percent a

7:31

politically motivated scenario. I mean,

7:33

just look at the selection of Hunter Biden's

7:36

special, quote unquote, prosecutor. He's a

7:38

guy that's in bed with them, right? So it's

7:41

crazy what I'm seeing. I've never seen anything like it.

7:44

Never seen anything like it. And has been working what,

7:48

five years and it's

7:50

so-called investigation, both FBI

7:52

and IRS. David

7:54

Weiss, I mean, this is a stunning

7:57

moment in history when we look

7:59

at one has happened to the federal, both

8:02

the court system and the prosecutors.

8:05

And then the backdrop, there is January

8:07

6th and the political prisoners of the

8:09

Marxist left in this country, all

8:12

of whom have been overcharged by

8:15

prosecutors, federal prosecutors, nearly all of

8:17

them, nearly all of

8:19

them over sentenced. It is, and

8:22

not one case has yet made it to

8:24

the Supreme Court in nearly three years. Does

8:26

that just stun you? It

8:28

does, actually. I mean, it's something beyond

8:32

what I thought I would see in this country.

8:34

And I honestly do think that America gets it.

8:36

I think, you know, people don't realize I get

8:39

stopped all the time now and they say to

8:41

me, I was not going to vote for Trump.

8:44

I didn't like whatever. But

8:47

now, I think if we don't

8:49

get him in, we're in trouble. And that's something

8:53

I've seen consistently and I hear

8:55

every single day. We've

8:57

taken everything too far. There

8:59

are people that have done no crimes, that

9:02

have been sitting in solitary confinement on

9:04

something that they just can't even

9:06

get due process on. And

9:08

it's unconstitutional. It's frightening.

9:11

But more importantly, it's motivating those

9:14

that were undecided, those that were leaning

9:17

left, but not sure. Even

9:19

those that were right, but not on Team Trump.

9:21

And I've seen that firsthand. And I think the

9:23

poll numbers, if you look at them, speak volumes.

9:26

The world is seeing it. The world

9:29

is seeing it. They've gone too far.

9:31

But the Trump arrangement, Lou, is so

9:33

severe that they can't help

9:35

themselves. And that's

9:37

the truth. Even when it hurts them,

9:39

they can't help themselves. I

9:41

think you're exactly right. And we're going

9:44

to take up more with Alina Hava,

9:46

president's attorney. Stay with us. We'll

9:49

be right back after these quick thoughts. We're

9:57

talking with Alina Hava. Welcome back.

10:00

attorney, and we're talking about what

10:03

has happened to the court system. And

10:05

I don't know how I don't want to put you in

10:07

a difficult position, but I'll just say to

10:09

see what has become of the federal

10:12

judiciary, the federal prosecutors, the

10:14

state of actually the legal profession

10:16

itself right now, I

10:19

really fear for the country. And

10:22

most of all, because of what they're

10:24

doing to one president over the course of

10:27

eight years, which has politically persecuted him through

10:30

lawfare of various sorts and

10:32

kinds, but ultimately

10:34

just raw persecution.

10:37

Your thoughts? It's targeting,

10:39

it's election interference. It's

10:42

not America, and we're running out

10:44

of time to fix it, but that's really

10:46

my thoughts. I really persuade

10:48

anybody who does have a law degree

10:51

to take it

10:53

seriously and not put politics in

10:55

front of it. I'm a

10:57

spokeswoman for a president, but I'm a

11:00

lawyer. And when I'm in court, I have to

11:02

act and abide ethically and by the

11:04

rules that I swore to. That

11:06

has nothing to do with politics. I might

11:08

be politically outside, but you can't do it

11:10

inside. And if I'm able to do that,

11:12

anybody can. And it's a

11:15

demise of our country and our constitution. It's

11:17

a demise of my profession to

11:19

have people unable to

11:22

detach themselves from

11:24

this extreme political

11:27

toxicity right now. And it's sad

11:29

because I always say we used to be

11:31

able to discuss things, have different opinions, but

11:33

nobody was persecuted and prosecuted like this. I

11:35

mean, they're not even attacking him. They attack

11:37

anybody that goes near him in an

11:40

effort to deter people from defending him and

11:44

avoid his Sixth Amendment right. There's a

11:46

lot of issues that are so crazy

11:48

to me. We've got

11:50

somebody getting arrested. I hate to

11:53

bring up Hunter again, but they're trying

11:55

to subpoena DJT on something that Hunter

11:57

did with getting a gun and use

11:59

that. somehow as an opportunity to dig into

12:01

the president. I've never seen a more

12:04

cockamamie thing in my life, but

12:06

that's how political we are. You're

12:08

talking about Abby Lowell, the attorney

12:10

putting forward the very thought of

12:13

it. They've got their dates wrong.

12:16

It is really a sloppy performance

12:18

on the part of an attorney. Abby

12:21

Lowell is considered to be a powerhouse,

12:23

at least in Washington, D.C., when defending

12:27

criminal Democrats. I don't

12:30

know if that's a redundant theory. I'd

12:32

be sanctioned. I'd

12:34

be sanctioned. Ethical violations,

12:37

investigated. That's the

12:39

double standard. I can't tolerate it anymore. You

12:42

don't even have to be the president.

12:44

You could just be representing the president,

12:46

and you sue somebody on a Russia

12:48

hoax, and all of a sudden you

12:50

get sanctioned for even trying to bring

12:53

light to something that we know happened.

12:56

I mean, it's crazy. That's the world we're in.

12:58

And then Abby Lowell can just go haywire, and

13:00

nobody's gonna do anything. There will be no repercussions.

13:04

It's very unfortunate. I wanna

13:06

get your sense, if we can, just broadly. Appealing

13:09

the gag order in federal court,

13:11

appealing the gag order in the

13:14

New York Superior Court, Engaron

13:16

and his case. Your

13:18

thoughts about that, the Letitia James

13:20

role, give us a sense of how

13:23

it all stands right now. Sure.

13:26

Well, currently I do have a gag

13:28

order against myself, our team, and

13:30

the president, to not

13:33

speak about individuals at all that

13:35

are on staff. There

13:40

has been an appeal of that. We

13:43

are appealing the appeal.

13:47

You have to ask for leave, basically,

13:49

to revisit the issue, because the appellate

13:52

division thought it was okay. We

13:54

obviously saw January 6th, gag order. This

13:57

is a new form, in my opinion, of lawfare. First

14:00

Amendment violations. So you take

14:02

a leading candidate, you take a spokeswoman, you take

14:05

his legal team, they're not allowed to object and

14:07

state things on the record and make a record.

14:09

I mean what is more crazy

14:11

than that to have your attorney

14:13

and your spokesperson and a leading

14:16

candidate unable to speak about certain

14:18

issues. So you silence them and

14:21

it's become effectively a new trend among

14:23

these AGs and DA's and judges

14:25

is, oh let's just silence him. But

14:27

if you think about it, there's no jury

14:29

in the Letitia James case. So

14:32

silencing us is really not about

14:34

painting a jury, it's just about

14:36

First Amendment violations, right? It's just

14:38

about silence because we're

14:41

not in the media saying things that a jury might

14:43

hear. We have no jury, we have a judge and

14:46

so that's thrown out the window. So there's

14:48

only one reason this keeps happening and that

14:50

is because of fear, because

14:52

he is doing incredibly well and

14:55

because truth will set you free but if you

14:57

cannot speak your truth, if your lawyers can't speak

14:59

your truth and can't tell the public

15:01

what's actually happening, well effectively

15:03

we're a banana republic and it's like

15:06

being in a dictatorship. You're

15:08

silenced. It's no different than what we see in

15:11

China. They monitor what

15:13

you see and what you can't see and

15:15

your phones and your evidence. It's silencing us

15:17

through the media and through

15:19

the legal system which is supposed to be where we

15:22

get our chance to prove ourselves,

15:24

right? So it's beyond a First

15:26

Amendment violation on all these fronts and all

15:28

these cases but the Letitia James case is

15:30

coming to an end next

15:32

week and you know like I said we

15:34

kind of know how that one's gonna fall

15:37

because we've seen what's happened in that courtroom and

15:39

with that judge and we're kind of

15:41

just you know making our record and we'll take it

15:43

from there. We're talking with Alina Haber. She

15:45

is attorney, representative of the

15:48

president. We're coming right back after these

15:50

messages. Stay with us. We're

15:57

back now talking with Alina Haber and

16:00

And I want to turn to first the idea

16:02

of these gag orders because we

16:05

have seen, whether it's Tanya Chutkin,

16:07

the federal district court judge in

16:09

D.C., whether unfortunately

16:11

you can name almost any judge, whether local,

16:14

state, or federal, that

16:17

they've behaved badly to say the

16:19

very least. There are a couple of exceptions.

16:23

When will we, do you think, get

16:26

any spark of interest from the

16:29

Supreme Court to say to

16:31

the judiciary for over which the Chief

16:33

Justice is responsible, the federal judiciary, that

16:36

this is bad behavior, it's lawfare,

16:38

it's ignorance, and it's time has

16:40

come to end? Do

16:43

you think there's any prospect of that? I

16:46

don't doubt that I will be in front of

16:48

the Supreme Court soon. I

16:50

do not doubt that one of these cases, we

16:53

will go up the chain and we

16:55

will be there. I do

16:57

not doubt that. I have my license to

16:59

be heard in front of the Supreme Court and I intend

17:01

to use it. The end of

17:04

the day, we will not sit

17:06

back. And we are learning from, and

17:09

being seen a great example through the

17:11

President, President Trump, meaning not the sitting

17:13

resident, President Trump has

17:16

shown us resilience and has shown us that

17:18

you have to have faith in the country

17:20

even when you think your faith is wavering.

17:22

You've got to keep fighting and hopefully we

17:24

will get to a tribunal

17:27

that will be able to enforce order

17:30

and law the way we've had in the

17:32

past. The country used to be great in

17:34

that way. I don't have

17:36

a loss of hope because he hasn't lost hope and

17:39

that's why I think he's doing what he's doing. So

17:41

I have no question that it'll happen. I assume it'll

17:43

happen within the next year with

17:46

all these decisions. Unfortunately, the system is, as you know,

17:48

Lou, we have to go up the chain. You

17:50

can't just jump up. We will jump up

17:52

if needed, but we're doing

17:55

things in a respectful manner as we always do

17:57

and going through the legal system and whatever's left

17:59

of it. It seems to me

18:01

that there should be an

18:03

intercession or an

18:05

intervention by the court

18:07

in some fashion to

18:10

prevent election interference

18:12

on its face. That's what this is.

18:14

It's a concerted act. We

18:16

have the evidence in front of us. They

18:18

haven't been exactly subtle about it. Jack Smith

18:21

has been particularly upfront about

18:24

his political motivations as

18:26

well as Judge Chutkin

18:30

and others. It just seems

18:32

there's a basis right now

18:35

for the Chief Justice to act.

18:38

Is there no way in which that

18:40

can be communicated?

18:42

There is. There

18:44

is. And we're working on it. And obviously, I

18:46

can't speak to privileged

18:48

conversations and plans. But all

18:50

I can tell you is if

18:52

there's anything that I can assure the American

18:54

people that are behind Trump is that his

18:56

lawyers are behind you and the

18:59

country. And I can speak for myself. I'm

19:02

very proud of the work that we're doing. And I

19:04

think that these challenging times can either make us or

19:06

break us. And I hope that it'll make our country

19:08

great again. I really do. I

19:11

think that there's not

19:13

anything or any bit of information people

19:15

give us in terms of ideas and

19:17

strategy that we don't take into consideration.

19:19

But we have an incredibly brilliant team

19:21

in many states that we work

19:24

with. We're working hard and we're

19:26

going to help the president straighten this out

19:28

in whatever way we can do. And I

19:30

know I've certain them. So, you know, unfortunately,

19:32

I can't get into much more detail than

19:34

that. But I assure you that if there

19:36

is a claim, we will bring it. If

19:38

there is a way that we can fix it

19:40

through the courts, we will do so. Alina Hamba,

19:42

we thank you for all you're doing for the

19:45

presidents, for the country. And

19:47

I think that the outcome of

19:49

all of this will determine the future

19:51

of this republic and whether we have

19:53

a republic at all. I

19:55

think it's that straightforward. Either president

19:57

in the country prevails. the

20:01

Republic, we finally lose it. Alina

20:03

Hamba, thanks for your message of hope as well.

20:05

We can all use it in these trying times.

20:07

Thanks for all you're doing. God bless you. Thank

20:11

you. God bless you. Thanks. Thanks

20:13

Alina. And best of luck to

20:15

president Trump. Thanks everybody. Tomorrow, our

20:17

guests will be Roger Stone, Republican

20:20

strategist, WABC radio host, advisor to

20:22

president Trump on all the

20:24

madness and the evil that has been

20:26

arrayed against president Trump. Please join us

20:29

tomorrow. Thanks. God bless you and

20:31

may God bless America.