0:00

As we sort of, you know,

0:03

ride this all out and we see the changes coming.

0:05

One of the things that I said this very early

0:07

on I'm really tired of you all,

0:09

like, talking about the day as though that this

0:11

super evil elite group

0:13

that we've got no control over,

0:15

like, there's devil incarnate Well,

0:18

I will tell you that you

0:20

can tell that they're human when

0:22

they start getting grilled by

0:25

New Yorker perhaps the same news anchors

0:27

I you know, that we're thinking there were

0:29

heroes and putting them on Thrones to begin with,

0:31

and now they're starting to tear them down.

0:33

There was a great a couple of great examples.

0:36

This is one of them out of the UK.

0:38

Remember, Matt Hancock, we

0:40

talked about how the fact that this guy is a

0:42

shell has been a shell, pushed the imperial

0:45

model, pushed all the draconian measures,

0:47

and was a total Hippocrit and liar

0:50

key in the middle of making sure no one

0:52

could touch each other. Matt Hancock's

0:54

Secret affair with A. Gina Khaledopoulos

0:58

is exposed after office snogs

1:00

while COVID raged on.

1:02

I love that word Snogs. You wanna know what

1:04

snogging looks like? This is what it looks

1:06

like. He this is, I guess, him at

1:08

work or something like that, checking

1:11

to see if anyone sees totally unaware

1:13

that he's got a surveillance camera that is

1:15

the office for something, and he's

1:17

snogging and obviously clearly breaking

1:20

the law here. His own law that he

1:22

had put out there made sure that No

1:24

one could come this close together. And

1:27

certainly not in a workplace. This

1:29

is crazy. Okay. I

1:31

think I've seen enough about the I'm

1:34

I'm thinking about the puke. Alright. So

1:36

somebody finally really went at him

1:38

on this justice. He's trying to get his career back

1:40

together Remember, he kinda resigned. Now

1:42

he's trying to revamp up and say, hey,

1:44

I'm your favorite chill. What do you want me to do

1:46

next? Well, the news in

1:49

England isn't having to take a look at

1:50

in. This is fantastic. We'll find

1:52

it remarkable that you

1:55

got away with doing something

1:57

that most other people weren't

1:59

allowed to

2:00

do. Well, it doesn't feel like I got away with

2:02

it. Susanne, I mean, that's, you know, I I

2:04

of course, I wasn't, you know, the fact

2:06

that it wasn't break of course, it wasn't

2:08

breaking the law because the the

2:10

legal rules weren't in

2:11

place. That's why I wasn't fine.

2:13

But

2:13

there was a ban on gathering in Of course.

2:16

Exactly. I was to say. So that's just

2:18

the explanation for for

2:20

I didn't get away with anything. In

2:22

fact, on the contrary, you know, I've

2:24

teases. Are fine. No. Because what I

2:26

did wasn't against the law

2:29

and that and you're fine for breaking the law, but

2:31

I did break the guidelines and

2:33

I resigned and I took accountability

2:36

for the Was there not a

2:39

ban at the time? On meeting

2:41

indoors. Not people outside of

2:43

your family unless it was reasonably necessary

2:46

for work pubs. These have been confirmed to us

2:48

by Adam Wagner. The

2:50

barrister from Doty Street Chambers, who,

2:52

as we know, keeps the receipts on all the

2:54

legal changes at the time. Yeah.

2:57

Based on what we know says this seems to me

2:59

to have been an illegal gathering.

3:01

No. I didn't break the law and Yeah.

3:04

There were there were fines issued as we all

3:06

know. Why

3:07

didn't you break the law with it? Was it reasonably

3:09

necessary for work purposes? No.

3:13

The guidance was in place at the time

3:15

with the No. You're you're

3:18

pivoting to social distance. I'm sorry.

3:20

I'm not talking about social

3:22

distance. The same guidelines.

3:23

I'm talking And that was the they were the

3:25

guidelines

3:25

that I

3:26

that was have been and you definitely broke those

3:28

because you were definitely not immediately away

3:30

from So So there

3:31

I'm talking about the

3:32

law. England was at stage

3:35

two of COVID restrictions. I'm not sure

3:37

that's the case.

3:37

And I do I am absolutely sure that's

3:40

the case. I

3:40

don't have the dates in front of me. And

3:43

You

3:43

were house secretary at the time. You brought the regulations

3:46

in. Of course. Of course. And I

3:48

don't have the dates in front of

3:49

me. She should have known the law. Of course,

3:51

I do. Of course, absolutely. It happened

3:53

on the sixth of May. We were starting to stage two.

3:55

It was a breach of the law. No. It wasn't a breach

3:57

of the

3:57

law. It was a breach of the guidelines. And I've

3:59

been through that. If the door says

4:02

that no person may participate in

4:04

a gathering which consists of two or more people

4:07

and takes place indoors. The

4:09

only exemption was work purposes

4:12

where it was reasonably

4:14

necessary. You must be arguing it was

4:16

reasonably necessary. Now I'm

4:18

obviously know, that's obviously

4:20

not I wouldn't make that argument.

4:23

But The

4:25

guidelines were in place on social distancing.

4:27

And so was the law? They were the no.

4:29

The law on this on this

4:31

point. I can't remember the exact dates,

4:33

but it was lifted

4:34

in. April, and I I

4:37

Fourteenth of May, that law was

4:39

changed. And we went to stage

4:42

three. There

4:42

were further stages after that.

4:44

Point. And

4:45

when those stages between Stage two and

4:47

Stage three? There was. That was on

4:49

the that was it in April,

4:51

the change came into

4:53

Anyway, I've Look, I've been through this

4:55

endlessly, this point.

4:58

And I've explained

4:59

You've been

4:59

through

5:00

it endlessly, but you don't know what the laws

5:02

I know exactly. III do. And I'm

5:04

explaining You said you don't and you didn't have the

5:06

dates in front of me. But when I gave you the

5:08

dates, you say it didn't it wasn't in existence

5:10

at the time.

5:11

No. That's right. The I the

5:13

guidelines were in place, and

5:16

I accept that I broke the

5:17

guidelines, but I didn't break

5:19

the law. I absolutely

5:22

love every uncomfortable second

5:25

of that. think that should be like journalism

5:27

of the year award. Right? There. I love how

5:29

she just grills him. And then he's like, obviously,

5:32

you've been dealing with this a lot. Like, you've been dealing with

5:34

a lot, but you still don't know what the dates are. Absolutely

5:36

priceless moment. And it

5:38

just shall I mean, these are just as I

5:41

said before, these are not elite geniuses.

5:43

These are just human morons

5:46

as speaking one of the biggest morons out

5:48

there. How about somebody that would like to?

5:50

I don't know. Have us all eating synthetic

5:52

food and blocking the sun to

5:54

make sure it's a little bit breezier on

5:57

Earth here. Of course, I'm talking

5:59

about none other than Bill Gates, and it doesn't

6:01

appear that he's gonna get a free ride

6:04

from the

6:04

media, either this is a recent interview.

6:06

Take a look at this. One of the issues

6:08

that's stopped you is is that of your relationship

6:11

with Jeffrey Epstein. Do you regret

6:13

the relationship that you maintained with him

6:15

against Melinda's advice and

6:17

wishes? Oh, I've said that I'm I mean,

6:19

this is you're going way back in time.

6:21

But yeah. New audience I will say for the,

6:23

you know, over a

6:25

hundred time. Yeah. I shouldn't have had dinner

6:29

with him? Epstein

6:31

had a way of sexually compromising people.

6:34

Is that what Melinda was warning you about?

6:37

No. I mean, it's

6:40

no. I I had dinner with

6:42

him, and that's all.

6:45

And that you regret the relationship,

6:47

the acquaintance.

6:48

That I had dinner with them. Mhmm.

6:50

And and the relationship between the foundation

6:53

and stain which There

6:54

never was any relationship of any

6:56

kind. I love

6:58

it, man. You know, the castles

7:00

are crumbling. These castles on sand are

7:03

crashing down. I mean,

7:05

just think about how outrageous these statements

7:07

are. You know, he shouldn't be up there all

7:09

alone. How about all the politicians that were

7:11

flying around with Epstein? Where are they? They should be being

7:13

grilled too? And how about that list? How about

7:15

the Chilean Maxwell's list? Is

7:17

everyone tired of cover up that's happening

7:19

inside of our own government in our judicial system.

7:22

I am. And I am sure

7:24

that there are others out there. But just think about

7:26

what he's saying. Yeah. I hung with a guy

7:28

a lot. A guy that we know is trafficking

7:31

children as a way to sort of buy

7:33

power in our country

7:35

and everyone has sort of admitted

7:37

to that that talks about it, but

7:39

he was just doing business he was just good

7:41

chef. We're the he liked good restaurants. Toronto

7:44

and Bill, you're digging yourself

7:46

deeper. When we look at all

7:48

these things folks, all I wanna say is

7:50

clearly we're winning, clearly we're moving in the right

7:52

direction. We have a lot of work to do So

7:54

that's personal work now. I really do,

7:56

you know, in order to really

7:58

move the rest of the people that

8:00

are now on the fence. I think it's not

8:02

just about showing them what they should have been afraid

8:04

of, but also showing them, you know,

8:07

what good human beings are

8:09

like. Remind them again people that actually

8:11

get to speak their mind that we

8:13

love to talk about the topics that we do

8:16

when we get garious and refund when

8:18

we do it. We're healthy we

8:21

need to start leading. And

8:23

I know that I'm talking to the right audience

8:25

when I'm talking to you as being a part of that process.

8:28

Let's lead by example. And

8:30

not be following people like Bill Gates

8:32

any longer. In fact, I think

8:34

Bill Gates should probably be behind

8:37

bars.