Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Looking for great pay and a supportive
0:02
team ready to help deliver what matters,
0:04
join UPS, and a seasonal job
0:06
here could turn into a rewarding career.
0:09
Right now, we're hiring warehouse workers, driver
0:11
helpers, tractor trailer drivers, and personal
0:13
vehicle drivers throughout Greater Columbus, where
0:15
you can earn up to thirty dollars an hour with bonuses
0:18
and mine paid for some roles. Shift
0:20
your life. Shift your world. Shift
0:22
to team UPS today. Apply
0:24
now at UPS jobs dot com slash
0:26
shift make the shift, make a difference.
0:29
If
0:30
you like the indoor daily, you can follow us
0:32
on Apple, Spotify, or wherever
0:34
you get your podcasts. Today
0:37
on the Indo daily is
0:38
Ireland immune from the rise of the
0:40
far right? that I'm going today. I'm
0:44
going to be May making a
0:47
very big announcement on Tuesday,
0:50
November fifteen at
0:52
Mar a Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.
0:55
The
0:55
Sweden Democrat, who have neo
0:58
Nazi roots, have now made
1:00
it into mainstream politics. The
1:02
new Italian prime minister Georgi Ameloni,
1:05
has addressed parliament for the
1:07
first time, her government is credited
1:09
with being the most right wing in the country's
1:11
Republican history Three. Donald
1:13
Trump is tipped to announce his third
1:15
presidential run, and the success
1:18
of the Far East in Italy, Sweden,
1:20
Hungary, and Poland has taken the
1:22
EU both at the level of the
1:24
European Council and the European
1:26
Commission that Brussels has been asleep at
1:28
the wheel. but it can be a complex debate,
1:31
especially as these parties are gaining prominence
1:34
through the ballot box. When you label
1:36
a politician as far
1:38
right or fascist. You are also
1:41
labeling the people who voted for
1:43
her again. And what do you do? who
1:46
play into the very hands of that
1:48
politician. Up to now, Ireland has
1:50
withstood the far right, but are we
1:52
being complacent? I'm
1:55
Kevin Doyle, and today on the indoor daily,
1:57
I speak to John O'Brennan, Professor of
1:59
European Politics at Manute University.
2:02
and Larry Donnelly, Law lecturer at the
2:04
University of Norway, about the rise
2:06
of the far rise in Europe and the situation
2:09
here in Ireland.
2:13
John O'Brien, we often talk about
2:15
the rise of the far race
2:17
in Europe. But what do we mean by
2:20
the far right or even the right of politics
2:22
in the modern era
2:24
to modern incarnation? I think
2:26
there is a distinction to be made
2:28
given between the extreme
2:31
rights and
2:33
sometimes called
2:35
the radical rights and parties
2:38
that are right of center. One
2:40
important test, I think, is whether
2:42
a party
2:43
is accepting of the institutions
2:46
of the state or
2:48
whether they want to overturn those
2:50
institutions' entire And
2:53
I think the true definition of
2:55
an extreme right party is one that
2:58
just cannot tolerate checks
3:00
and balances. amongst the
3:02
institutions of the state. That's
3:04
a really important distinction. I
3:06
prefer the term nativist. because
3:09
there you're talking about ultra nationalist
3:12
parties and their emphasis is on
3:15
ethnicity. defining who
3:17
counts within the country or within
3:19
the nation. Whereas if you're
3:21
talking about the populist rights,
3:23
they tend to be anti elites.
3:26
So they base their kind of philosophy
3:28
on morals rather than
3:30
on ethnicity. But what you're describing
3:32
there is is someone that has a
3:34
very uncomfortable relationship
3:37
with the stage and the arms of stage.
3:39
But what we're seeing in places like Italy
3:41
and Sweden is being run through democracies.
3:44
I think there's a lot of sensation. There's
3:46
a better touch to this. It
3:48
is true. Georgia Maloney is
3:51
the first, not
3:52
just female prime minister, but
3:54
the first far right leader.
3:56
in Europe since nineteen forty
3:58
five. So we can't just
3:59
dismiss that as nothing. But
4:02
on the other hand, if you look at
4:04
the brothers of Italy as a
4:06
party.
4:07
What they've done really is
4:10
to replace the Labour, which will
4:12
be part of the new coalition, but
4:14
the brothers of Italy have kind of displaced
4:17
the LEGO. It's not that the vote
4:19
for the Fire Right has gone up that dramatically
4:22
in Italy. And we should also
4:24
remember that Europe has had
4:26
a far right presence
4:28
in Poland. So stretching
4:31
back many decades.
4:32
The biggest winner of election night
4:34
is Yimmy Atkinson, the leader of the
4:36
anti immigration Sweden Democrats
4:39
party. for the first time, they're
4:41
set to form a coalition with the moderates
4:43
after the center right party agreed to
4:45
cooperate with what was once considered
4:47
a pariah of Swedish politics.
4:49
and
4:49
over time when
4:52
we have elections like the Swedish
4:54
one in September or the Italian
4:57
election that followed we tend to
4:59
get shrieks of, oh my god,
5:01
we're
5:01
heading back to the dark days in the
5:03
nineteen thirties. feed into our
5:05
bible. But
5:06
if you act should we look at the
5:09
way these parties have behaved
5:11
in coalition? There is no
5:13
doubt that they have managed to
5:16
send the center of gravity of politics
5:18
in Europe further to the right of
5:20
the last order century, but
5:22
we haven't seen outright
5:25
fascism of the kind that we saw
5:27
in the
5:27
nineteen thirties. We haven't seen any
5:29
system tip it towards
5:31
that extreme.
5:34
Members of the European Parliament are
5:36
heavily criticizing Hungary's new
5:38
anti LG VTI legislation. The
5:41
low originally aimed at protecting
5:43
children from pedophilia was
5:45
amended, so it also
5:47
prohibits portraying homosexuality to
5:50
under aged people. What we're talking about
5:52
in Sweden and Italy are perhaps
5:55
more well established countries that we consider
5:57
in terms of economy and
5:59
politics and all the rest, but but this type
6:01
of thing has been well established in places
6:03
like Hungary. And I think the EU
6:05
has struggled with that a little bit. For example,
6:08
Victor Orban's party being part
6:10
of the European People's Party
6:12
in other words, sitting alongside our
6:14
own Finnigail. And
6:16
that's a really difficult place
6:18
for a party like Finnigail to sit, is it
6:20
not? You're absolutely right. The European
6:23
People's Party bears enormous responsibility
6:26
for allowing an authoritarian
6:29
regime to develop in Hungary.
6:31
And not only that, it's
6:33
a regime that relies almost
6:36
entirely in terms of investment from
6:38
European subvention. Hangri
6:40
gets about four percent of its GDP
6:42
directly in the form of EU
6:44
grant aid, and there's a lot of
6:46
evidence of corruption around
6:49
Orban's network of authority. So
6:52
both at the level of the European Council
6:54
and the European Commission, Brussels
6:56
has been sleep at the wheel. And
6:58
there should have been a much earlier
7:01
intervention in the case of both
7:03
Hungary and after twenty fifteen
7:05
Poland. because these were
7:08
countries that were now being led
7:10
by authoritarian parties
7:12
that were very deliberately
7:15
trampling on established norms
7:17
and checks and balances in politics.
7:19
European Union has recommended
7:22
suspending seven point five
7:24
billion euros in funds to
7:26
Hungary over corruption allegations. Hungarian
7:30
prime minister, Viktor Orban,
7:32
is accused of mismanaging EU
7:34
funds and dismantling democratic
7:36
institutions. there has been a
7:38
belated effort by the EU to
7:40
tackle the problem. So the EU, for example,
7:43
hasn't yet delivered
7:45
the European COVID recovery money
7:48
to Hungary and Poland. These
7:50
are huge sums of money. In the case of
7:52
Poland, about thirty billion case,
7:55
Hungary, about six and a half, seven billion.
7:57
But the commission has been holding
7:59
out
7:59
because it is trying to
8:01
get those parties to
8:03
change some of the things
8:06
that they have radically
8:08
altered over the last years, especially
8:10
the position of the judiciary
8:12
and criminal justice system. It
8:15
remains to be seen whether the Commission is
8:17
going to continue withholding,
8:19
but
8:19
you certainly have a point when you argued
8:22
that the European Union has been
8:24
part of the problem rather than the solution
8:26
here over many years. I want to bring
8:28
in Larry Donnelly Law Lecture at the University
8:30
of Goa and perhaps more important, Larry
8:33
Bostonian. It
8:35
was Donald Trump far
8:37
right. You know,
8:38
the the the labels of the thing
8:40
that I have a a little bit of
8:42
an issue with tariffs. And I
8:44
would have agreed with just about everything
8:46
John said in his analysis.
8:48
However, he's labelling
8:50
of of Georgia Maloney as
8:52
far right does give me pause.
8:55
Now one can be troubled
8:57
by her roots and indeed the roots
8:59
of her body, but
9:01
we have come to a way if you look at her
9:03
rhetoric around in this campaign. And
9:05
of course, there is the possibility that
9:07
she's a wolf and sheep's
9:09
clothing, But if we look at the rhetoric she's used,
9:11
I mean, they're pretty standard conservative
9:14
talking points. She has conservative points
9:16
of view for instance on abortion, for
9:18
instance, on the traditional family, for
9:20
instance, on curving immigration. One
9:22
can agree or disagree with those points
9:24
of view as they come. But I
9:26
do not think that they are inherently far
9:29
right on the political spectrum.
9:31
I think there's a distinction to be drawn there. And
9:33
one of the things that sort of frustrates me
9:36
in this debate is
9:39
the I suppose to move towards
9:41
labeling individual slice of
9:43
pound. Certainly, I think as John points out,
9:45
someone like Fekola Von, I think he's
9:47
more than earned the far right label at this
9:49
stage. but there is tendency to
9:51
rush to labels. And
9:54
anyone who says, hold on a second, all
9:56
of a sudden becomes this sort
9:58
of advocate for the far right of somebody who's
9:59
asleep at the wheel. And I think
10:02
that, you know, one of the what I'm much more
10:04
interested in is an analysis,
10:06
I suppose, both from within and
10:08
without as to why traditional center and
10:10
center left parties have
10:12
very clearly lost touch
10:14
with a lot of the people who once
10:16
would have four of them. I mean, for
10:18
instance, have they become cold
10:20
houses for traditionalists? Have
10:22
the, I suppose, globalist, free
10:24
trade kind of ideals that they typically
10:26
for Sue, which, well, may have won the audits
10:28
at one level, have they failed the
10:30
people on the ground?
10:33
I'm more interested in that sort
10:35
of analysis when you label
10:37
a politician as
10:39
far right or fascist. The
10:41
reality is, you're not in a way just
10:43
labeling her or him. You are
10:45
also labeling the people who
10:47
voted for her or him. And
10:49
when you do, you play into the
10:51
very hands of that politician in
10:53
the sense that they can say to these
10:55
people who are already agreed, who are
10:57
already angry, they wouldn't have made the choice that
10:59
the ballot that they did, if they weren't
11:01
already agreed and angry. They can say to
11:03
them, look at what the elites say
11:05
about you now. They say you're a
11:07
fascist. They say you're far right. You're
11:09
playing in to their hands. So I think that's
11:11
a mistake and a mood to economics. It
11:13
gives me cause for concern. And we
11:15
saw this very much with Donald
11:17
Trump, you know. And and again, Donald
11:19
Trump, I I wouldn't I would have argued against those
11:21
and said he was far right. I think at
11:23
this stage, I moved my
11:25
position on that. I think January sixth
11:27
played a very big role in that. I think
11:29
especially as John defines far right. I think
11:31
January sixth very much comports with that
11:33
definition.
11:34
ballot is up to congress to confront
11:37
this egregious assault
11:39
on our democracy. And
11:41
after this, we're gonna walk down and
11:43
I'll be there with you. We're gonna
11:45
walk down.
11:48
We're gonna walk down. anyone
11:50
you want, but I think right here, we're gonna
11:52
walk down to the capital.
11:54
But certainly, the very same
11:57
factors that led to the rise of these people
11:59
in Europe.
11:59
those are the very same factors that led to the rise of
12:02
Donald Trump units. But
12:04
John,
12:04
do you want to respond to that?
12:06
Very often, when we
12:08
talk about if I are right,
12:11
we kind of assume that there is
12:13
this ever upward trajectory
12:15
in Europe that the far
12:17
right is on the rise again.
12:20
And
12:20
I'm not
12:21
so sure that that's the case. There
12:23
are as as much as we can point to
12:25
Italy and Sweden, we could
12:27
also, for example, point to Denmark where
12:29
the Danish People's Party
12:31
has lost a huge amount of support
12:34
in recent years. In
12:36
Germany, the alternative for Deutschland
12:38
emerged during the Eurozone
12:40
crisis really made hay
12:42
out of the migration
12:44
issue in twenty fifteen, but
12:46
has lost around substantially in
12:48
recent times. Remember Golden
12:51
Dawn in Greece, parties like
12:53
that, which
12:54
looks like they were going to become
12:56
really important political and
12:58
then faded over time.
13:00
But it's very far from an
13:02
even picture. And as Larry also
13:04
rightly says about the brothers visually,
13:07
although the jury is out, we really
13:09
won't know how they how
13:11
they may be positioned within
13:14
the far right spectrum until we see
13:16
actual decisions emerging from that
13:18
government. But it is true to
13:20
say that Maloney's rhetoric
13:22
has moderated
13:24
over time in exactly the same
13:26
way that marine depends rat
13:28
rate moderated over time in
13:30
France. And that's part of the politics of
13:32
it. I I don't want to go negivist, Larry,
13:35
but you might bring us back to
13:37
what you're seeing here in
13:39
Ireland. We we see a lot of stuff on social
13:41
media that arguments
13:43
around FireEye, but we've never had
13:45
a situation like we have initially
13:47
Sweden where there's been
13:49
any sort of a breakthrough by further to
13:51
the right of central parties at
13:53
making any sort of breakthrough. So is
13:55
there a Is there room for
13:57
them here? I mean, if you look
13:59
at
13:59
their failures, now I would argue their
14:02
object failures at the at the ballot
14:04
box, it's
14:04
hard to see a root for them.
14:06
Now does that mean that we shouldn't be
14:08
vigilant about the potential for them
14:10
to rise No, it doesn't,
14:12
especially when we have a lot of challenges in
14:14
this country, which one would
14:16
think would be amenable to
14:18
somebody on the far right coming
14:20
through. All we have to do is look
14:22
at the housing shortage and the housing
14:24
prices as one potential
14:26
angle there. And again, one of the things
14:28
I've argued in the past about why this
14:30
hasn't come to pass is if you look at
14:32
the far right and again, this distinguishing
14:35
the far right from conservatism. The
14:37
far right, one of the things that, you know, that
14:39
lynchpin has always been to
14:41
play to racial hatred, to play to anti immigrant
14:44
sentiment. The reality is
14:46
because of this country's past,
14:48
I think that the people here
14:51
are inherently resistant
14:53
to that line of thinking. Again, people Irish
14:55
people have immigrated all over the world met
14:57
a lot of resistance at first met a lot of hostility
15:00
and discrimination and have done very
15:02
well. So I think that that inherently
15:04
makes us resistant, does
15:06
it make this country
15:08
immune to it? No, I don't
15:10
think so. But I think so,
15:12
again, I think it's a balance between remaining
15:14
vigilance on that front. But are a lot
15:16
of different realities submitting militate
15:19
against the rise of
15:21
the far right in this country. The
15:23
history of immigration is one big
15:25
one. the electoral system,
15:27
that certainly doesn't help
15:29
candidates on the far right who are
15:31
trying to get involved. So there are a host of
15:33
different reasons. I think we need to be bragge before.
15:35
The other thing I
15:38
just would point out is
15:40
that, you know, in terms of of the rise of
15:42
populism, of talk to us, parties. We know
15:44
now, Ocean Bank is the most popular political
15:46
party in Ireland. And to its
15:48
credit, it never really has played.
15:51
to anti immigrant or any of
15:53
those other sort of sentiments that are bubbling
15:55
out there. There's no question they are bubbling out
15:57
there. But there may be attention at
15:59
some state because if you
16:01
look at people, a lot of shooting bids
16:03
for a vote, and you look at their
16:05
answers to polling on questions around direct
16:07
provision and immigration more generally, They
16:09
tend to skew quite a bit
16:11
to the right and further to the
16:13
right of the centrist, big beasts
16:15
in Irish politics how that
16:18
tension is going to play itself out?
16:20
When should pain this in government
16:22
is going to be very, very interesting.
16:24
Why? Yeah. I
16:26
think champagne would traditionally have
16:28
been more towards a socialist party
16:30
than than than that
16:33
sort of thing. So is it a case,
16:35
Larry, maybe dash, people
16:37
Irish voters in the polls kind of
16:39
reflect this. they have somewhere to go
16:41
if they're angry, Shenvane, have never been
16:43
in power, the
16:46
issues around housing, things like
16:48
that. there is somewhere for angry
16:50
people to go. Is that part of the reason
16:52
maybe why some other parties haven't
16:54
gained traction in the way that they have in in
16:56
European countries? Yeah. I
16:58
think that's true. I think that's a big part
17:00
of it. There's also another
17:02
issue that I think is to the fore here in the
17:04
sense that one of the big ingredients
17:06
that the far right was able to has been able to
17:08
take advantage of is economic
17:10
displacement through the rise of
17:12
technology globalization. I understand this kind of
17:14
unique in the sense that, you know, we've always
17:16
had a small magnitude, a small
17:18
manufacturing sector. And
17:20
if anything, technology and
17:22
globalization have been boons to
17:24
those sectors and have been boons more
17:26
generally to the economy. So
17:28
you know, that again also, I
17:30
think, mutates against it, but that
17:33
tension within shipping will be fascinating
17:35
one. But the Twitter and Facebooks
17:37
and Googles of this world, Larry,
17:39
have been good to our economy. They have
17:41
also been good to those
17:43
whose opinions may not get reported
17:46
in the inverted commas mainstream
17:48
or establishment media, haven't they? And that
17:50
is where we see a lot of the angst
17:53
and the extreme views taking hold even here in
17:55
Ireland. Yeah. There's no question that social
17:57
media is a, you know, a vehicle
17:59
for for those kind of
18:02
messages groups around the world. I think
18:04
perhaps particularly in the United States, but
18:06
also in places like Germany and
18:08
elsewhere use these you know, these sites
18:10
to, I suppose, expand their
18:12
messages and expand their
18:14
audience and grow their memberships So
18:17
that's again going to be one of the
18:19
tricky things is, you know,
18:21
what's what's legitimate to have on
18:23
social media? How do those
18:25
various meetings police? the content that's
18:27
on there. And I suppose that's gonna be an
18:29
ongoing challenger. One of the things that that
18:31
surfaces in that, Kevin, is a real big
18:33
distinction between and again, these are
18:35
mostly American based technology
18:37
companies with social media sites
18:39
and a a view in terms
18:41
of what's acceptable to
18:43
feature on those sites versus what's
18:45
not acceptable. and there different
18:47
perspective on that in the United States because
18:49
of the first amendment versus
18:51
what's acceptable here in Europe. So again,
18:53
social media has been a blessing
18:56
in many respects to the far right. And John, I
18:58
know you're based in Bulgaria at
19:00
the moment. What do you see there?
19:03
And Are
19:04
we kind
19:06
of versus what you see, I suppose, in
19:08
in Eastern Europe versus what we see in Ireland?
19:10
Is are we could we be complacent?
19:12
Could it sleep in here in the way that
19:14
it has in many Eastern European countries.
19:16
Well, I I think, you
19:18
know, Austin, we're
19:21
guilty about thinking about Eastern
19:23
Europe as being a place apart.
19:25
Actually, it isn't in respect of the far
19:27
right, the most popular and
19:29
entrenched far right in
19:31
Europe are actually based in wealthy and
19:34
successful northern and western Europe. I'm
19:36
thinking of the national
19:38
rally in France, which has been
19:40
around for decades. Even
19:42
in countries like Switzerland,
19:44
the Swiss People's Party, again,
19:46
is a very big player in
19:48
politics, and we've mentioned Sweden and
19:50
Denmark and
19:51
elsewhere. In
19:54
Eastern Europe, there is certainly
19:56
a far right presence, but we've
19:58
also seen defeats in recent
19:59
times sport for
20:01
the far right
20:02
parties in Slovenia. In Bulgaria,
20:04
we had a far right party called Attakka,
20:07
which is virtually disappeared. We
20:09
now have another one that just got ten percent of the
20:12
vote in the recent election,
20:13
but they're a long, long
20:15
way from really having traction
20:18
at ballot box. But just to complete
20:20
something that Larry
20:23
said, Kevin, about social
20:26
media. I think a lot of people are terrified at
20:28
the prospect of Elon Musk
20:30
taking over Twitter. And the reason
20:32
for that is he seems to be
20:35
saying, well, anything goes where a free
20:37
speech is concerned. He's threatening
20:39
to hello Donald Trump back on
20:41
to Twitter. People will have
20:43
observed what he's had to say about
20:45
Ukraine and Russia in recent times,
20:47
the allegation that he was almost taking
20:50
instructions from Russia, which hasn't
20:52
been proved, but enough
20:54
evidence in the public domain to suggest
20:56
that Twitter might become a
20:58
a much bigger problem
21:00
for democracy and projects and balances
21:03
when
21:03
if and when Musk takes over the company.
21:05
Mike Hanks to John O'
21:07
Brennan and Larry Donnelly. I'm
21:10
Kevin Doyle, and today's episode of the
21:12
indoor daily was produced by Mary
21:14
Carol with sound by Gavin Hennessy.
21:16
Archive clips were from BBC,
21:18
Channel four, CNN, France twenty four,
21:20
an independent Dahi. If you enjoy
21:22
the indoor daily, don't forget to
21:25
like follow, and leave us a review, and you can find
21:27
more of our award winning journalism at
21:30
Independent Dolly.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More