Podchaser Logo
Home
 Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

Released Monday, 14th November 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
 Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

 Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

Trump, Meloni & Orban: Is Ireland immune to the rise of the far right?

Monday, 14th November 2022
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Looking for great pay and a supportive

0:02

team ready to help deliver what matters,

0:04

join UPS, and a seasonal job

0:06

here could turn into a rewarding career.

0:09

Right now, we're hiring warehouse workers, driver

0:11

helpers, tractor trailer drivers, and personal

0:13

vehicle drivers throughout Greater Columbus, where

0:15

you can earn up to thirty dollars an hour with bonuses

0:18

and mine paid for some roles. Shift

0:20

your life. Shift your world. Shift

0:22

to team UPS today. Apply

0:24

now at UPS jobs dot com slash

0:26

shift make the shift, make a difference.

0:29

If

0:30

you like the indoor daily, you can follow us

0:32

on Apple, Spotify, or wherever

0:34

you get your podcasts. Today

0:37

on the Indo daily is

0:38

Ireland immune from the rise of the

0:40

far right? that I'm going today. I'm

0:44

going to be May making a

0:47

very big announcement on Tuesday,

0:50

November fifteen at

0:52

Mar a Lago in Palm Beach, Florida.

0:55

The

0:55

Sweden Democrat, who have neo

0:58

Nazi roots, have now made

1:00

it into mainstream politics. The

1:02

new Italian prime minister Georgi Ameloni,

1:05

has addressed parliament for the

1:07

first time, her government is credited

1:09

with being the most right wing in the country's

1:11

Republican history Three. Donald

1:13

Trump is tipped to announce his third

1:15

presidential run, and the success

1:18

of the Far East in Italy, Sweden,

1:20

Hungary, and Poland has taken the

1:22

EU both at the level of the

1:24

European Council and the European

1:26

Commission that Brussels has been asleep at

1:28

the wheel. but it can be a complex debate,

1:31

especially as these parties are gaining prominence

1:34

through the ballot box. When you label

1:36

a politician as far

1:38

right or fascist. You are also

1:41

labeling the people who voted for

1:43

her again. And what do you do? who

1:46

play into the very hands of that

1:48

politician. Up to now, Ireland has

1:50

withstood the far right, but are we

1:52

being complacent? I'm

1:55

Kevin Doyle, and today on the indoor daily,

1:57

I speak to John O'Brennan, Professor of

1:59

European Politics at Manute University.

2:02

and Larry Donnelly, Law lecturer at the

2:04

University of Norway, about the rise

2:06

of the far rise in Europe and the situation

2:09

here in Ireland.

2:13

John O'Brien, we often talk about

2:15

the rise of the far race

2:17

in Europe. But what do we mean by

2:20

the far right or even the right of politics

2:22

in the modern era

2:24

to modern incarnation? I think

2:26

there is a distinction to be made

2:28

given between the extreme

2:31

rights and

2:33

sometimes called

2:35

the radical rights and parties

2:38

that are right of center. One

2:40

important test, I think, is whether

2:42

a party

2:43

is accepting of the institutions

2:46

of the state or

2:48

whether they want to overturn those

2:50

institutions' entire And

2:53

I think the true definition of

2:55

an extreme right party is one that

2:58

just cannot tolerate checks

3:00

and balances. amongst the

3:02

institutions of the state. That's

3:04

a really important distinction. I

3:06

prefer the term nativist. because

3:09

there you're talking about ultra nationalist

3:12

parties and their emphasis is on

3:15

ethnicity. defining who

3:17

counts within the country or within

3:19

the nation. Whereas if you're

3:21

talking about the populist rights,

3:23

they tend to be anti elites.

3:26

So they base their kind of philosophy

3:28

on morals rather than

3:30

on ethnicity. But what you're describing

3:32

there is is someone that has a

3:34

very uncomfortable relationship

3:37

with the stage and the arms of stage.

3:39

But what we're seeing in places like Italy

3:41

and Sweden is being run through democracies.

3:44

I think there's a lot of sensation. There's

3:46

a better touch to this. It

3:48

is true. Georgia Maloney is

3:51

the first, not

3:52

just female prime minister, but

3:54

the first far right leader.

3:56

in Europe since nineteen forty

3:58

five. So we can't just

3:59

dismiss that as nothing. But

4:02

on the other hand, if you look at

4:04

the brothers of Italy as a

4:06

party.

4:07

What they've done really is

4:10

to replace the Labour, which will

4:12

be part of the new coalition, but

4:14

the brothers of Italy have kind of displaced

4:17

the LEGO. It's not that the vote

4:19

for the Fire Right has gone up that dramatically

4:22

in Italy. And we should also

4:24

remember that Europe has had

4:26

a far right presence

4:28

in Poland. So stretching

4:31

back many decades.

4:32

The biggest winner of election night

4:34

is Yimmy Atkinson, the leader of the

4:36

anti immigration Sweden Democrats

4:39

party. for the first time, they're

4:41

set to form a coalition with the moderates

4:43

after the center right party agreed to

4:45

cooperate with what was once considered

4:47

a pariah of Swedish politics.

4:49

and

4:49

over time when

4:52

we have elections like the Swedish

4:54

one in September or the Italian

4:57

election that followed we tend to

4:59

get shrieks of, oh my god,

5:01

we're

5:01

heading back to the dark days in the

5:03

nineteen thirties. feed into our

5:05

bible. But

5:06

if you act should we look at the

5:09

way these parties have behaved

5:11

in coalition? There is no

5:13

doubt that they have managed to

5:16

send the center of gravity of politics

5:18

in Europe further to the right of

5:20

the last order century, but

5:22

we haven't seen outright

5:25

fascism of the kind that we saw

5:27

in the

5:27

nineteen thirties. We haven't seen any

5:29

system tip it towards

5:31

that extreme.

5:34

Members of the European Parliament are

5:36

heavily criticizing Hungary's new

5:38

anti LG VTI legislation. The

5:41

low originally aimed at protecting

5:43

children from pedophilia was

5:45

amended, so it also

5:47

prohibits portraying homosexuality to

5:50

under aged people. What we're talking about

5:52

in Sweden and Italy are perhaps

5:55

more well established countries that we consider

5:57

in terms of economy and

5:59

politics and all the rest, but but this type

6:01

of thing has been well established in places

6:03

like Hungary. And I think the EU

6:05

has struggled with that a little bit. For example,

6:08

Victor Orban's party being part

6:10

of the European People's Party

6:12

in other words, sitting alongside our

6:14

own Finnigail. And

6:16

that's a really difficult place

6:18

for a party like Finnigail to sit, is it

6:20

not? You're absolutely right. The European

6:23

People's Party bears enormous responsibility

6:26

for allowing an authoritarian

6:29

regime to develop in Hungary.

6:31

And not only that, it's

6:33

a regime that relies almost

6:36

entirely in terms of investment from

6:38

European subvention. Hangri

6:40

gets about four percent of its GDP

6:42

directly in the form of EU

6:44

grant aid, and there's a lot of

6:46

evidence of corruption around

6:49

Orban's network of authority. So

6:52

both at the level of the European Council

6:54

and the European Commission, Brussels

6:56

has been sleep at the wheel. And

6:58

there should have been a much earlier

7:01

intervention in the case of both

7:03

Hungary and after twenty fifteen

7:05

Poland. because these were

7:08

countries that were now being led

7:10

by authoritarian parties

7:12

that were very deliberately

7:15

trampling on established norms

7:17

and checks and balances in politics.

7:19

European Union has recommended

7:22

suspending seven point five

7:24

billion euros in funds to

7:26

Hungary over corruption allegations. Hungarian

7:30

prime minister, Viktor Orban,

7:32

is accused of mismanaging EU

7:34

funds and dismantling democratic

7:36

institutions. there has been a

7:38

belated effort by the EU to

7:40

tackle the problem. So the EU, for example,

7:43

hasn't yet delivered

7:45

the European COVID recovery money

7:48

to Hungary and Poland. These

7:50

are huge sums of money. In the case of

7:52

Poland, about thirty billion case,

7:55

Hungary, about six and a half, seven billion.

7:57

But the commission has been holding

7:59

out

7:59

because it is trying to

8:01

get those parties to

8:03

change some of the things

8:06

that they have radically

8:08

altered over the last years, especially

8:10

the position of the judiciary

8:12

and criminal justice system. It

8:15

remains to be seen whether the Commission is

8:17

going to continue withholding,

8:19

but

8:19

you certainly have a point when you argued

8:22

that the European Union has been

8:24

part of the problem rather than the solution

8:26

here over many years. I want to bring

8:28

in Larry Donnelly Law Lecture at the University

8:30

of Goa and perhaps more important, Larry

8:33

Bostonian. It

8:35

was Donald Trump far

8:37

right. You know,

8:38

the the the labels of the thing

8:40

that I have a a little bit of

8:42

an issue with tariffs. And I

8:44

would have agreed with just about everything

8:46

John said in his analysis.

8:48

However, he's labelling

8:50

of of Georgia Maloney as

8:52

far right does give me pause.

8:55

Now one can be troubled

8:57

by her roots and indeed the roots

8:59

of her body, but

9:01

we have come to a way if you look at her

9:03

rhetoric around in this campaign. And

9:05

of course, there is the possibility that

9:07

she's a wolf and sheep's

9:09

clothing, But if we look at the rhetoric she's used,

9:11

I mean, they're pretty standard conservative

9:14

talking points. She has conservative points

9:16

of view for instance on abortion, for

9:18

instance, on the traditional family, for

9:20

instance, on curving immigration. One

9:22

can agree or disagree with those points

9:24

of view as they come. But I

9:26

do not think that they are inherently far

9:29

right on the political spectrum.

9:31

I think there's a distinction to be drawn there. And

9:33

one of the things that sort of frustrates me

9:36

in this debate is

9:39

the I suppose to move towards

9:41

labeling individual slice of

9:43

pound. Certainly, I think as John points out,

9:45

someone like Fekola Von, I think he's

9:47

more than earned the far right label at this

9:49

stage. but there is tendency to

9:51

rush to labels. And

9:54

anyone who says, hold on a second, all

9:56

of a sudden becomes this sort

9:58

of advocate for the far right of somebody who's

9:59

asleep at the wheel. And I think

10:02

that, you know, one of the what I'm much more

10:04

interested in is an analysis,

10:06

I suppose, both from within and

10:08

without as to why traditional center and

10:10

center left parties have

10:12

very clearly lost touch

10:14

with a lot of the people who once

10:16

would have four of them. I mean, for

10:18

instance, have they become cold

10:20

houses for traditionalists? Have

10:22

the, I suppose, globalist, free

10:24

trade kind of ideals that they typically

10:26

for Sue, which, well, may have won the audits

10:28

at one level, have they failed the

10:30

people on the ground?

10:33

I'm more interested in that sort

10:35

of analysis when you label

10:37

a politician as

10:39

far right or fascist. The

10:41

reality is, you're not in a way just

10:43

labeling her or him. You are

10:45

also labeling the people who

10:47

voted for her or him. And

10:49

when you do, you play into the

10:51

very hands of that politician in

10:53

the sense that they can say to these

10:55

people who are already agreed, who are

10:57

already angry, they wouldn't have made the choice that

10:59

the ballot that they did, if they weren't

11:01

already agreed and angry. They can say to

11:03

them, look at what the elites say

11:05

about you now. They say you're a

11:07

fascist. They say you're far right. You're

11:09

playing in to their hands. So I think that's

11:11

a mistake and a mood to economics. It

11:13

gives me cause for concern. And we

11:15

saw this very much with Donald

11:17

Trump, you know. And and again, Donald

11:19

Trump, I I wouldn't I would have argued against those

11:21

and said he was far right. I think at

11:23

this stage, I moved my

11:25

position on that. I think January sixth

11:27

played a very big role in that. I think

11:29

especially as John defines far right. I think

11:31

January sixth very much comports with that

11:33

definition.

11:34

ballot is up to congress to confront

11:37

this egregious assault

11:39

on our democracy. And

11:41

after this, we're gonna walk down and

11:43

I'll be there with you. We're gonna

11:45

walk down.

11:48

We're gonna walk down. anyone

11:50

you want, but I think right here, we're gonna

11:52

walk down to the capital.

11:54

But certainly, the very same

11:57

factors that led to the rise of these people

11:59

in Europe.

11:59

those are the very same factors that led to the rise of

12:02

Donald Trump units. But

12:04

John,

12:04

do you want to respond to that?

12:06

Very often, when we

12:08

talk about if I are right,

12:11

we kind of assume that there is

12:13

this ever upward trajectory

12:15

in Europe that the far

12:17

right is on the rise again.

12:20

And

12:20

I'm not

12:21

so sure that that's the case. There

12:23

are as as much as we can point to

12:25

Italy and Sweden, we could

12:27

also, for example, point to Denmark where

12:29

the Danish People's Party

12:31

has lost a huge amount of support

12:34

in recent years. In

12:36

Germany, the alternative for Deutschland

12:38

emerged during the Eurozone

12:40

crisis really made hay

12:42

out of the migration

12:44

issue in twenty fifteen, but

12:46

has lost around substantially in

12:48

recent times. Remember Golden

12:51

Dawn in Greece, parties like

12:53

that, which

12:54

looks like they were going to become

12:56

really important political and

12:58

then faded over time.

13:00

But it's very far from an

13:02

even picture. And as Larry also

13:04

rightly says about the brothers visually,

13:07

although the jury is out, we really

13:09

won't know how they how

13:11

they may be positioned within

13:14

the far right spectrum until we see

13:16

actual decisions emerging from that

13:18

government. But it is true to

13:20

say that Maloney's rhetoric

13:22

has moderated

13:24

over time in exactly the same

13:26

way that marine depends rat

13:28

rate moderated over time in

13:30

France. And that's part of the politics of

13:32

it. I I don't want to go negivist, Larry,

13:35

but you might bring us back to

13:37

what you're seeing here in

13:39

Ireland. We we see a lot of stuff on social

13:41

media that arguments

13:43

around FireEye, but we've never had

13:45

a situation like we have initially

13:47

Sweden where there's been

13:49

any sort of a breakthrough by further to

13:51

the right of central parties at

13:53

making any sort of breakthrough. So is

13:55

there a Is there room for

13:57

them here? I mean, if you look

13:59

at

13:59

their failures, now I would argue their

14:02

object failures at the at the ballot

14:04

box, it's

14:04

hard to see a root for them.

14:06

Now does that mean that we shouldn't be

14:08

vigilant about the potential for them

14:10

to rise No, it doesn't,

14:12

especially when we have a lot of challenges in

14:14

this country, which one would

14:16

think would be amenable to

14:18

somebody on the far right coming

14:20

through. All we have to do is look

14:22

at the housing shortage and the housing

14:24

prices as one potential

14:26

angle there. And again, one of the things

14:28

I've argued in the past about why this

14:30

hasn't come to pass is if you look at

14:32

the far right and again, this distinguishing

14:35

the far right from conservatism. The

14:37

far right, one of the things that, you know, that

14:39

lynchpin has always been to

14:41

play to racial hatred, to play to anti immigrant

14:44

sentiment. The reality is

14:46

because of this country's past,

14:48

I think that the people here

14:51

are inherently resistant

14:53

to that line of thinking. Again, people Irish

14:55

people have immigrated all over the world met

14:57

a lot of resistance at first met a lot of hostility

15:00

and discrimination and have done very

15:02

well. So I think that that inherently

15:04

makes us resistant, does

15:06

it make this country

15:08

immune to it? No, I don't

15:10

think so. But I think so,

15:12

again, I think it's a balance between remaining

15:14

vigilance on that front. But are a lot

15:16

of different realities submitting militate

15:19

against the rise of

15:21

the far right in this country. The

15:23

history of immigration is one big

15:25

one. the electoral system,

15:27

that certainly doesn't help

15:29

candidates on the far right who are

15:31

trying to get involved. So there are a host of

15:33

different reasons. I think we need to be bragge before.

15:35

The other thing I

15:38

just would point out is

15:40

that, you know, in terms of of the rise of

15:42

populism, of talk to us, parties. We know

15:44

now, Ocean Bank is the most popular political

15:46

party in Ireland. And to its

15:48

credit, it never really has played.

15:51

to anti immigrant or any of

15:53

those other sort of sentiments that are bubbling

15:55

out there. There's no question they are bubbling out

15:57

there. But there may be attention at

15:59

some state because if you

16:01

look at people, a lot of shooting bids

16:03

for a vote, and you look at their

16:05

answers to polling on questions around direct

16:07

provision and immigration more generally, They

16:09

tend to skew quite a bit

16:11

to the right and further to the

16:13

right of the centrist, big beasts

16:15

in Irish politics how that

16:18

tension is going to play itself out?

16:20

When should pain this in government

16:22

is going to be very, very interesting.

16:24

Why? Yeah. I

16:26

think champagne would traditionally have

16:28

been more towards a socialist party

16:30

than than than that

16:33

sort of thing. So is it a case,

16:35

Larry, maybe dash, people

16:37

Irish voters in the polls kind of

16:39

reflect this. they have somewhere to go

16:41

if they're angry, Shenvane, have never been

16:43

in power, the

16:46

issues around housing, things like

16:48

that. there is somewhere for angry

16:50

people to go. Is that part of the reason

16:52

maybe why some other parties haven't

16:54

gained traction in the way that they have in in

16:56

European countries? Yeah. I

16:58

think that's true. I think that's a big part

17:00

of it. There's also another

17:02

issue that I think is to the fore here in the

17:04

sense that one of the big ingredients

17:06

that the far right was able to has been able to

17:08

take advantage of is economic

17:10

displacement through the rise of

17:12

technology globalization. I understand this kind of

17:14

unique in the sense that, you know, we've always

17:16

had a small magnitude, a small

17:18

manufacturing sector. And

17:20

if anything, technology and

17:22

globalization have been boons to

17:24

those sectors and have been boons more

17:26

generally to the economy. So

17:28

you know, that again also, I

17:30

think, mutates against it, but that

17:33

tension within shipping will be fascinating

17:35

one. But the Twitter and Facebooks

17:37

and Googles of this world, Larry,

17:39

have been good to our economy. They have

17:41

also been good to those

17:43

whose opinions may not get reported

17:46

in the inverted commas mainstream

17:48

or establishment media, haven't they? And that

17:50

is where we see a lot of the angst

17:53

and the extreme views taking hold even here in

17:55

Ireland. Yeah. There's no question that social

17:57

media is a, you know, a vehicle

17:59

for for those kind of

18:02

messages groups around the world. I think

18:04

perhaps particularly in the United States, but

18:06

also in places like Germany and

18:08

elsewhere use these you know, these sites

18:10

to, I suppose, expand their

18:12

messages and expand their

18:14

audience and grow their memberships So

18:17

that's again going to be one of the

18:19

tricky things is, you know,

18:21

what's what's legitimate to have on

18:23

social media? How do those

18:25

various meetings police? the content that's

18:27

on there. And I suppose that's gonna be an

18:29

ongoing challenger. One of the things that that

18:31

surfaces in that, Kevin, is a real big

18:33

distinction between and again, these are

18:35

mostly American based technology

18:37

companies with social media sites

18:39

and a a view in terms

18:41

of what's acceptable to

18:43

feature on those sites versus what's

18:45

not acceptable. and there different

18:47

perspective on that in the United States because

18:49

of the first amendment versus

18:51

what's acceptable here in Europe. So again,

18:53

social media has been a blessing

18:56

in many respects to the far right. And John, I

18:58

know you're based in Bulgaria at

19:00

the moment. What do you see there?

19:03

And Are

19:04

we kind

19:06

of versus what you see, I suppose, in

19:08

in Eastern Europe versus what we see in Ireland?

19:10

Is are we could we be complacent?

19:12

Could it sleep in here in the way that

19:14

it has in many Eastern European countries.

19:16

Well, I I think, you

19:18

know, Austin, we're

19:21

guilty about thinking about Eastern

19:23

Europe as being a place apart.

19:25

Actually, it isn't in respect of the far

19:27

right, the most popular and

19:29

entrenched far right in

19:31

Europe are actually based in wealthy and

19:34

successful northern and western Europe. I'm

19:36

thinking of the national

19:38

rally in France, which has been

19:40

around for decades. Even

19:42

in countries like Switzerland,

19:44

the Swiss People's Party, again,

19:46

is a very big player in

19:48

politics, and we've mentioned Sweden and

19:50

Denmark and

19:51

elsewhere. In

19:54

Eastern Europe, there is certainly

19:56

a far right presence, but we've

19:58

also seen defeats in recent

19:59

times sport for

20:01

the far right

20:02

parties in Slovenia. In Bulgaria,

20:04

we had a far right party called Attakka,

20:07

which is virtually disappeared. We

20:09

now have another one that just got ten percent of the

20:12

vote in the recent election,

20:13

but they're a long, long

20:15

way from really having traction

20:18

at ballot box. But just to complete

20:20

something that Larry

20:23

said, Kevin, about social

20:26

media. I think a lot of people are terrified at

20:28

the prospect of Elon Musk

20:30

taking over Twitter. And the reason

20:32

for that is he seems to be

20:35

saying, well, anything goes where a free

20:37

speech is concerned. He's threatening

20:39

to hello Donald Trump back on

20:41

to Twitter. People will have

20:43

observed what he's had to say about

20:45

Ukraine and Russia in recent times,

20:47

the allegation that he was almost taking

20:50

instructions from Russia, which hasn't

20:52

been proved, but enough

20:54

evidence in the public domain to suggest

20:56

that Twitter might become a

20:58

a much bigger problem

21:00

for democracy and projects and balances

21:03

when

21:03

if and when Musk takes over the company.

21:05

Mike Hanks to John O'

21:07

Brennan and Larry Donnelly. I'm

21:10

Kevin Doyle, and today's episode of the

21:12

indoor daily was produced by Mary

21:14

Carol with sound by Gavin Hennessy.

21:16

Archive clips were from BBC,

21:18

Channel four, CNN, France twenty four,

21:20

an independent Dahi. If you enjoy

21:22

the indoor daily, don't forget to

21:25

like follow, and leave us a review, and you can find

21:27

more of our award winning journalism at

21:30

Independent Dolly.

Rate

Join Podchaser to...

  • Rate podcasts and episodes
  • Follow podcasts and creators
  • Create podcast and episode lists
  • & much more

Episode Tags

Do you host or manage this podcast?
Claim and edit this page to your liking.
,

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features