0:01

Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up,

0:03

a concise show dedicated to bringing

0:05

you the most relevant, independent

0:26

news as we see it from the

0:28

last 24 hours. Monday,

0:34

December 11, 2023. Thank

0:36

you for joining me today. It's going to

0:38

be a quick show and I know that

0:40

for a matter of fact, quick for Last

0:42

American Vagabond anyway, I'm going to be on

0:44

with Misty in less than an hour or

0:46

so, about 4pm central time. I

0:48

want to make sure to get something out today just because I

0:51

wasn't... We had the pirate stream episode yesterday,

0:53

which was a really great conversation. I hope that you all

0:55

tuned in. I always

0:57

loved the dynamic. We clearly don't agree on

0:59

everything and I value that more

1:01

than anything. I hope you guys will check out our...

1:03

It was episode 22 yesterday. Today

1:06

I wanted to get to something since we haven't gotten to a

1:08

Daily Wrap Up in the last few days and I wanted to

1:11

cover at least a couple of these topics. So we got about

1:13

50 minutes. So get this shirt

1:15

out, jump in, get ready. We're going to talk about

1:17

a couple of important things. In regard

1:19

to primarily... Well, actually, we're going to start with

1:21

the... I forgot I moved this to the start

1:23

of the show to make sure I didn't omit

1:25

it by the end. In regard

1:27

to the Chinese cyber attack, which I only

1:30

put that in quotes because of how skeptical

1:32

I am due to

1:34

a lot of things like the CTI lead conversation,

1:37

not in any way to suggest that China's not

1:39

capable of that or that they would... It's

1:42

just as likely in my mind that China is

1:44

responsible. But it comes down to

1:47

the matter of why and what's the end game.

1:49

My point, the reason I said I wouldn't doubt

1:51

that they would is because there's a

1:53

lot of reasons that would make sense, especially with

1:56

the shifting political field, rather

1:58

the geopolitical field. field in regards

2:00

to how the US government is losing influence around

2:03

the world. And you could argue

2:05

that China might see an opening there, but it

2:07

comes down to whether you think this is in

2:09

their best interest. And I think from like an

2:11

empirical standpoint, empire

2:13

standpoint, but not for the

2:15

people. I never see governments acting in their people's interest.

2:17

I just think that's quite naive in my opinion. But

2:20

I think what we can see is that it also,

2:23

well, I want to wait to get into the conversation, but

2:26

it doesn't seem likely to me

2:28

now, let's put it this way. It

2:30

seems far more likely in my opinion that

2:32

this is the government using a real threat,

2:34

but in order to push you into a

2:37

certain direction. That's what would be my assessment.

2:39

But again, it's one of those for you

2:41

to decide based on the evidence, but coming

2:43

off the heels of Whitney's conversation around the

2:45

CTI league and the really concerning, like, so

2:47

interesting how we do it, but Whitney and

2:49

I have these conversations. She puts out this

2:52

amazing work and it almost always ends up

2:54

kind of trickling out after that where these

2:56

things play, you know, cyber attack, Iran goes

2:58

after a hospital, China attacks

3:00

our pipeline infrastructure. And all

3:03

it really does is continue to justify

3:05

the actions they already said that we need.

3:07

And that will include the great reset type overlaps

3:09

of digital IDs and kind of, you know, all

3:11

the measures they will argue will make sure

3:13

they can keep you safe. We're going

3:15

to start with that. We're going to talk about the

3:19

development around the, well,

3:21

I guess more specifically the

3:23

Hamas ISIS overlap around the

3:25

Gaza Israel conflict discussion and

3:27

how interesting it is. The

3:30

specifically Mossad idea of Israeli influence

3:32

overlap connection with ISIS in particular

3:34

and how that then relates to

3:36

Hamas and what that means for

3:38

the bigger picture around creating

3:41

the divide, which then in a sense, I

3:44

would argue completely and obviously prove they don't want

3:46

a two state solution. And then how that affects

3:49

the larger conversation around what this really means,

3:51

what are they trying to accomplish if they're

3:53

getting rid of Hamas, they can find peace

3:55

with the Palestinians. How does that make sense if

3:57

it's been clear that they've never. wanted

4:00

a two-state solution and in fact have gone out of

4:02

their way to stop that, going so far as arming

4:04

the very people they pretend they're fighting to make sure

4:06

it doesn't happen. Those are facts,

4:08

by the way, not disputable. But

4:11

does that mean that the Palestinians want a

4:13

two-state solution? Well, you can disagree with that.

4:15

I think largely the resistance elements and Palestinians

4:18

in general have, which is

4:23

in a way a loss. I mean,

4:25

you're talking about people that are fighting

4:27

for their right, their rightful territory and

4:29

accepting less in order to seek peace.

4:32

Very different dynamic, but we'll get into that

4:34

as well. We're going to talk about the

4:36

building settlements, which is my point on how

4:38

that leads in. And how I already begin

4:40

to see the outlines of turning the conquered

4:43

area in Gaza, or rather occupied and

4:45

reoccupied area in Gaza. I mean, that's

4:47

not even accurate, seeing as how it's

4:49

never not been occupied post, you

4:52

know, 75 years ago, but that

4:54

they pulled back, allowed it to become

4:56

this open-air prison and now essentially redeployed

4:59

people to the ground. And

5:01

we're already seeing areas, which I argue, my

5:03

opinion, that this is being set up just

5:05

to fast-track

5:07

settlements. And that is in

5:09

every possible way illegal. And it's everything we

5:11

said was happening, that we were told we

5:13

were conspiracy theorists. In fact, that we hated

5:15

Jews because we pointed this out. And

5:18

we're going to look at it happening. Then

5:20

we're going to talk about more fake news, which I think is

5:22

very important to go over. And if we have time, we're going

5:24

to get into some conversation around the

5:26

rape allegations that just continue to resurface.

5:28

And as I told you, it's

5:31

the same way the last time. No new

5:33

evidence has come up. We're talking about the

5:35

New Yorker now engaging with another person who

5:37

already was talking to other outlets about what

5:39

they think they've seen and what they're reporting.

5:42

And that then becomes more evidence to

5:44

the story. It's, you

5:46

know, like I said before, damn them for

5:49

making me continue to have to go through

5:51

this story and do some talk about something

5:53

like this. It is such a sensitive topic.

5:55

The reality remains. There

5:58

is no provable evidence rape occurred. It does

6:00

not mean it did not occur. It means there is

6:02

no provable evidence. And if you are the kind of

6:04

person that would argue it happened without provable evidence, which

6:06

there is not, no matter what you

6:09

claim, provable evidence in regard to forensic

6:11

evidence that proves something happened, which

6:14

is even Israel's main, the level of their,

6:17

the forensic teams admitted this to times

6:19

of Israel, that they did not have the evidence because

6:21

they time window lapsed, which

6:23

means they could not, even if they wanted to bring it to

6:25

a court of law. So

6:28

it becomes subjective. You could argue it happened,

6:30

but you can't claim that it's on,

6:32

that everybody else has to then go

6:34

along with that narrative when it

6:36

is about reporting about investigation, about

6:39

criminal accountability, not just opinions

6:41

and narratives and discussion points, but

6:43

provable accountability coming to the level

6:45

of court and legal accountability. And

6:48

the idea that they're trying to force people to

6:50

admit that this has happened without the evidence is,

6:52

I mean, I just don't even know how that

6:54

makes sense to anybody unless you have an agenda.

6:56

And we're going to talk about

6:58

that if we have time, as well

7:01

as a larger point to kind of

7:03

follow up on the, what's the right

7:05

word for it? Mass arrests of innocent people

7:07

that they're now using to claim they got

7:09

a big Hamas win. Weird how we've been

7:11

going where are all the Hamas members? And

7:13

then in like a three day period, they

7:16

round up all these people and go, there

7:18

they are. There weren't you asking for them?

7:20

There they all are. Turns out most of

7:22

them, I argue all of them were not

7:24

Hamas, but now it's being reported

7:26

by times of Israel by her reps that

7:29

the vast majority, almost 90% were not Hamas. But

7:33

my point is none of them were Hamas. And this

7:35

is the game that's being played. So now

7:37

it's almost like a way

7:39

to trick you into admitting they did get

7:42

some Hamas. None of this has been proven

7:44

and it's about affiliated with Hamas, which to

7:46

them means being a Palestinian. So

7:48

let's start with one thing

7:50

I just wanted to point out that I thought was interesting today.

7:53

It looks like, well, by the way, Rumbles down. If

7:56

you guys are wondering why Rumbles not rumble is down,

7:58

apparently across the board. And it's so. funny how

8:00

weirdly aggressively defensive people are about these

8:02

things and that always shows you something

8:04

like when you just go oh Twitter

8:06

is bad or whatever you have an

8:08

opinion about it people will take that

8:10

to like personally Twitter is

8:12

fighting for free speech and you don't know you're talking about like

8:15

whoa can't I just dislike

8:17

the platform it's because there's an agenda

8:19

around it as we know very

8:21

clearly and the same thing with most of these

8:23

platforms. Rumble I've been saying from the

8:26

very beginning I don't know why people I know

8:28

why because it's a partisan two-party illusion game Rumble

8:31

has every single choke point that YouTube

8:33

does so if the argument is

8:35

that YouTube is just going along with advertisers or

8:37

pressure from the outside well then ask yourself why

8:40

those same people who also comply that a pressure

8:42

and have already on Rumble haven't done

8:44

so. Doesn't make any sense that

8:46

it's either about censoring things they don't want you to

8:48

talk about which means they would do it there too

8:50

or it's about advertisers and not liking the

8:53

content so they would do it there too there's no

8:55

reason it wouldn't be happening to both Amazon

8:57

cloud services everything BlackRock and Vanguard to

8:59

the top two investors in in Rumble

9:02

and I might as well just grab that since people don't seem

9:04

to believe that which interesting what's funny with

9:06

this claim is

9:08

that when I show people

9:11

this and they go that's not true and

9:13

then I show them the link and they go oh well that

9:15

doesn't mean anything it's like wait is it not true or does

9:17

it not mean anything because you can't it's funny how that game

9:19

is played but as you can see here on the screen under

9:22

Rumble Inc you'll find Vanguard

9:25

and BlackRock under to the top two holders

9:27

now yes that's not something that you could

9:29

argue Rumble chooses but it certainly matters my

9:33

point is there's a lot of weird stuff happening today

9:35

Rumble being down one of them oh my

9:38

point in saying that was that I believe people

9:40

are arguing and I've heard this in a lot

9:42

of different group discussion just completely speculative that there's

9:44

a funding issue or rather like a data issue

9:46

that then gets claimed that it's we're under attack

9:48

because we're all about free speech except you've already

9:50

censored people on that platform including Nick Vantes by

9:52

the way who not claiming I support his work

9:54

but he's been censored on that platform and I've

9:56

had and so is slow news day had videos

9:59

removed and the monitor Anyway, the point is

10:01

that there's all sorts of stuff happening right now.

10:03

Twitter, interestingly today, all day today, weirdly right before

10:06

I went live, it seemed to go away. But

10:08

I had this thing... Oh, I

10:11

do. You're right. Thank you so many pointing that out. Have

10:13

the wrong logo. There

10:18

we go. But

10:21

then I was on all day today and

10:24

all of a sudden I was getting this

10:26

local rate limited notification from Twitter. Which

10:29

is very frustrating by the way because I don't

10:31

believe that's supposed to happen with a Blue Check

10:33

account. But I get... I weirdly dance in this

10:35

limbo between being in it and not. As you

10:37

guys... I just haven't talked about it in a

10:39

long time because there's so many more important things

10:41

going on than my engagement with Twitter. But it

10:43

still happens. I think right now it's like I

10:45

have a Blue Check account on my phone most

10:48

of the time. But then on laptop I don't. Like

10:50

for instance, you can edit it on my phone but

10:52

I can't edit when it comes to my laptop. I

10:54

can get access to X, Y, and Z over here

10:56

but not over there. Hilarious. Anyway, I

10:58

think we're all in these weird little

11:00

captions and areas and said, Quaran, Twitter,

11:02

you know. I've said it before.

11:04

I'm convinced this is some massive social engineering

11:06

kind of observational experiment to see if they

11:09

can corral us into extremism. And I swear

11:11

that's what's happening. In any case, I want

11:13

to point out this local rate limit thing

11:15

and all these weird... It seems like it'd

11:17

be like a multiple platform thing. Thought

11:20

that was interesting. Now,

11:23

quickly just to point this out so I don't want to

11:25

get missed. You guys have known this since 2020. Why?

11:29

Because we've talked about it since 2020. And

11:31

so have other people even before that. But

11:33

just in case you were still wondering if

11:35

it had been definitive, we showed you definitively

11:38

with peer-reviewed science going back long

11:40

before COVID-19 Illusion Land and well

11:42

into it that they were, you

11:45

remember, not statistically significant in reducing

11:48

transmission, which was always the place.

11:50

That's always the reality around masking.

11:53

Always has been, always will be,

11:55

because it's the obvious reality based

11:57

on some pretty basic understand things.

12:00

you know, like the size of the kind of thing we're dealing with

12:02

and whether that can be, you know, you get it. We talked about

12:04

it at length. The point was though, in the

12:06

beginning, they pushed the cloth mask. CDC

12:09

literally had their mask page titled cloth

12:11

mask. The link still says cloth mask, even

12:13

though they turned it into just a mask page,

12:16

which we now know, which I showed you in 2020

12:18

was dangerous. Per

12:22

the peer-reviewed science from 2015 that

12:24

said cloth masks increase your risk

12:26

of infection. Funny how they went

12:28

to that only and said, this is the one you

12:30

should use. It's almost like they wanted everybody to get

12:32

sick. It's almost like you should

12:35

realize everything they chose was the thing

12:37

that maximized your problem. Almost like it

12:39

was intentional, almost. But

12:41

my point is that the cloth masks were

12:43

probably, as even they then said, Lena Nguyen

12:45

and Gotlib almost simultaneously on two different platforms.

12:47

Fox and CNN came out and said, wait

12:49

a minute, cloth masks don't work.

12:51

Use N95s. And everyone said, okay, or

12:54

people that were stupid enough to follow along without thinking about it,

12:56

because you should have been like, wait a minute. Well,

12:59

all the time out, wasting all my time

13:01

of ad-libbing about this topic. I should get into

13:03

the main, see, I forget that we've only got

13:05

limited time. Point is N95s

13:08

also don't work in regard

13:11

to reducing risk of statistically

13:13

significant reduction in transmission in

13:15

regard to COVID-19 flu or

13:17

whatever you want to say

13:19

we're dealing with. And

13:21

a new study Kevin Bass points out finds

13:23

the same damn thing. The

13:25

best evidence shows no effects of

13:28

N95s on respiratory viral infections in

13:30

general, even among health care

13:32

workers who know how to wear them properly

13:35

and get specially fitted ones. Imagine

13:37

Mr. Karen, huh? Soccer mom thinking she's stopping

13:39

this with a lanyard

13:41

or rather a crochet face

13:43

mask. It's just so sad how willingly

13:46

people will fall into these kind of

13:48

manipulations. Not only are you

13:50

not working, but you're hurting yourself. Now this

13:53

is important as well. And I'll play just a little

13:55

part of this in regard to New Zealand blanket

13:58

liability indemnity for every. single

14:00

product. Actually, you know

14:02

what, I'll say this for the show since

14:04

we have limited time, but I'll play, I

14:06

will remember to play this, this is important.

14:08

It's just him just acknowledging this, calling it

14:10

out. The point is it's not just indemnity

14:12

for one product from before because of an

14:14

emergency. The Moderna factory being built in New Zealand

14:17

is now going or excuse me, in Australia is

14:19

now going to be giving

14:22

indemnity to every single product

14:24

they produce. It's flushed out

14:26

right in this conversation. Just

14:29

needs to show up, we need to understand this

14:31

is like the liability for children that became the

14:34

liability for everybody, then it became liability for everybody

14:36

for COVID-19 shots. And now the point is

14:38

you drift into this area where now where you

14:40

just can't do anything. Why?

14:42

Because vaccines are so important. So

14:44

you can't sue them if they do something wrong. Yes. We're

14:48

being lied to, we're being led by maniacs.

14:51

Now on that point, think about that in the context

14:53

of what Whitney and I just discussed in regard to

14:55

the CTI league and her work going long back before

14:57

this conversation. She's been, she talked, we heard I talked

14:59

about this in 2020, even before and

15:02

her work on this goes even before that. The

15:05

cyber threat intelligence league and its impending false flag.

15:07

Now the quick and the long and short of

15:09

it is they are predicting

15:11

that we are going to be focused on

15:13

some kind of massive cyber polygon like they've

15:15

been telling us, right? Well, the

15:17

CTI league is led and many of the groups with

15:19

which you know, Whitney, I talked about a lot overlapping

15:23

in the United States specifically when it comes

15:25

to intelligence, national security, many of the people

15:27

to head to these groups are former

15:29

or rather there's no such thing as

15:32

former CIA. Same thing. No such thing

15:34

as former unit 8200, Mossad. These are

15:36

intelligence entities from Israel who are leading

15:38

things inside this country. If

15:41

that doesn't worry you, you're a maniac.

15:44

It should matter if it's an Israeli, a

15:46

British person, a German person. It's

15:48

a foreign entity who is

15:51

in charge of things that makes,

15:53

that dictate national security imperative things.

15:56

It's the same thing we've talked

15:58

about for any. Person just so

16:00

it's clear by the way why again Limited

16:04

limited time the bottom line is that this is a

16:06

person who has spent his entire career Trying

16:08

to get the United States to go to war with Iran who

16:10

is now in charge of this National

16:13

security and twined concept that is allowing people to

16:15

have this kind of access They're the ones telling

16:17

you this is coming you're gonna have a cyber

16:19

attack. It's gonna be a big deal It's gonna

16:21

because they want your whatever the narrative was before

16:23

they hate your freedom some ridiculous variation

16:25

of that Well,

16:28

we already saw this which kind of went and kind of

16:30

came and well, this is just one of those many that

16:32

have followed Iranian attacks on

16:34

hospital. Actually, I think this is I meant to grab the other

16:36

one quickly to make the point the more recent one Iran

16:39

was doing something and everyone kind of went like well,

16:41

we're focused elsewhere. So now today we

16:44

have Massive Chinese China cyber

16:46

attack inversion is employing this out. He

16:48

says now it's where you go Now

16:51

this is where you go read and watch

16:53

cyber polygon and other related Preparatory

16:56

scenarios that they've done in the past

16:58

few years to see how they will

17:00

use this narrative for another Manufactured cyber

17:02

pandemic to install more draconian totalitarian measures

17:04

on the populace Don't forget the Biden

17:06

admin and the FCC passed their new

17:08

internet control policy a month ago Which

17:10

everyone has largely forgotten about right?

17:14

On top of that the point is that we already

17:16

have all of these mechanisms in place To

17:18

as WikiLeaks has shown us for a very

17:20

long time to initiate these things with the

17:22

illusion that it's coming from somewhere else Literally

17:25

able to leave the digital footprint of

17:27

whoever they want. That's WikiLeaks exposed that

17:30

Everything is on the table and they keep telling

17:32

you it's coming. It's coming. It's coming and then

17:34

you know what it happens Now could that mean

17:36

that it just happened? Sure, but we

17:38

immediately should ask is this not just them

17:40

Doing what they need to do to get

17:42

us where they want us to be China's

17:46

cyber army is invading critical

17:48

invading critical US services power grid

17:51

ports pipelines water utilities Isn't that all

17:53

the stuff they want to tell you

17:55

they're trying to reimagine? Which

17:57

would mean they need to kind of break it down to rebuild it

17:59

and the This is the perfect excuse they need? Sure.

18:02

Maybe that sounds like conspiracy theory to some people,

18:04

or just sounds like the way governments operate if

18:06

you're intelligent. Chuck Costello

18:09

of course comes in with the hot news that this is

18:11

true no matter what because I was told by Fox News.

18:14

Of course, he says it right down here, their intel on

18:16

China is never wrong. If

18:19

you're following along and listening to

18:21

somebody intently that claims that any

18:23

intel from our government is never

18:25

wrong, come on guys,

18:27

start questioning who you're listening to. They

18:30

were warning America months ago. Right,

18:32

because that's usually how it goes, right? CCP

18:35

Joe is compromised. Probably

18:39

some of the CCP Trump or you know,

18:41

whatever you want to call the absurd, absurd

18:43

naivety of claiming that these, like the idea

18:45

that these governments are actively like one guy's

18:47

the good, like to argue that the right

18:49

wing is like the side going to save

18:51

you and all this. I

18:53

don't even think he believes that if he does,

18:56

we're talking, I mean, it doesn't matter. The point

18:58

is you should be asking whether or not this

19:00

is everything. If you

19:02

are being set up, not

19:04

by CCP Joe, not by China,

19:06

but by the US government or

19:09

by somebody else controlling the US government, right?

19:12

The idea that this is going to be just exactly what

19:14

they always told you it was is frustrating. And I said,

19:16

as he said, they're China initiates

19:19

massive cyber attack. Like let's just say that's

19:21

what you think it is. Ask

19:23

yourself why somebody would watch what Fox

19:25

reports and then just state that online

19:27

without knowing anything else. Who

19:29

believes what the corporate media reports with

19:31

no further due diligence? I

19:34

said, did they? Is that what Fox told you? Have

19:36

you even considered that this may be something else entirely?

19:38

Or would that upset the two party illusion managers? So

19:41

I think what's important guys is we're going to begin to

19:44

see this going into the election. Anything

19:46

likely to get you away from the absolute catastrophe that

19:49

is what they've allowed to happen in Gaza. Because remember,

19:51

the US government could pull the plug on the funding

19:53

of this weapons and everything else. And it was stopped

19:55

tomorrow. That's been admitted by Intel

19:57

people Intel people from intelligence inside Israel.

20:00

The bombs, everything they're using, it would

20:03

be tomorrow or when they ran out

20:05

of what they would need. This happened,

20:07

I think it was 2003 with Lebanon. I think it was Reagan. Basically,

20:10

it just was like, that's a Holocaust. Stop. And

20:12

they ultimately stopped. Of course,

20:14

you're allowed to call, use these words then. Anyway,

20:17

the point is that we need to be

20:19

on guard for what this may be. Do

20:21

not fall into the trap of blindly assuming

20:23

whatever these completely false flag managers will continue

20:25

to tell you is their adversaries' actions. Certainly

20:28

could be. Well,

20:32

with about 20-something minutes left, I'd like to try to just

20:34

get this out as quick as possible. The

20:36

point is, we're at a point now

20:39

where we've gotten over 1,800 – well, it depends on

20:41

who you're listening to. This is a – you

20:45

can't even just about to say this makes me

20:47

sick – a conservative estimate of what's really going

20:50

on. 17,700 civilians killed in Gaza, over 7,000 children.

20:52

I think it was something 70-plus amount women and

20:54

children. That's

20:57

coming from the UN. That's coming from even the corporate

20:59

media at this point, which as always does not mean

21:02

that means it's true. It simply

21:04

means that's mass adoption of the very people that

21:06

were always the ones shouting you down. We're in

21:08

this weird dynamic now where you could

21:10

look at the people who they used to call conspiracy theorists and

21:12

they're telling you, yes, this is what's happening. And you can look

21:14

at the corporate media and they're going, yeah, yeah, that's what's happening.

21:17

And then you've got people that go, well, we're not going to believe any

21:19

of it because that means we're like – sometimes

21:21

you just got to acknowledge that there's a different

21:23

dynamic going on than just if they say it,

21:25

therefore it isn't true. Or if they don't say

21:28

it, therefore it is true. That's almost never anymore

21:30

the reality. But 18,000 civilians is what

21:32

we're talking about, guys. As

21:36

Unra points out, the United Nations Policy and Refugee

21:38

Agency, our staff in Gaza take their children to

21:41

work so they know that they're safe or they

21:43

can die together. 133

21:46

different United Nations colleagues. Now, of course, because Israel

21:49

just says the UN is now Hamas, apparently we

21:51

just go, oh, okay, so that doesn't matter anymore.

21:54

But I'll tell you what, if Iran does anything

21:56

to one of those UN people, oh, my God,

21:58

the whole world would be – turned on its

22:00

head, but because Israel says Hamas is

22:02

U.N. over here, we just go whatever, we'll

22:04

ignore that. But you

22:07

know, when they go, but U.N., why aren't you calling this thing

22:09

out over here? Which just happened, by

22:11

the way. So that means

22:13

Israel is asking Hamas to do something about

22:15

what's happening over here? No, it's because

22:17

they're just lying to you about everything all the time

22:19

and using what they want when they want. Everything

22:22

means nothing, nothing means anything. But I'll tell you,

22:24

they'll happily throw the U.N. Iran should they do

22:26

anything they don't like. And

22:28

when they're continuing to use things like these, you want

22:30

it. Anyway, everything

22:33

they do is completely hypocritical, just like

22:35

the U.S. government. They don't have anything

22:37

that they care about enough to lie

22:39

to you in the

22:41

sense of the illusion that they want,

22:43

what they are, the integrity aspect. They're

22:45

not fighting for freedom and human

22:47

rights and women's rights and LGBTQ

22:49

rights. They're using these things, which

22:51

should make those people insulted that

22:53

they're being used to do the

22:55

exact opposite around the world. A

22:58

hundred and thirty three U.N. colleagues killed

23:00

most of them with their families. Now, think

23:02

about how grotesque it is for people like

23:04

the Eli Davids and Ben Shapiro's of the

23:06

world to act like this is justified

23:09

because it fits their narrative. Because

23:12

oh, no, we can't pretend that the U.N.

23:14

has said things we don't agree with. Therefore,

23:16

let's just broad stroke the whole thing

23:18

as Hamas and allow their families

23:21

to be bombed alongside them.

23:25

This is never going to go away for these people if

23:27

we like we need to make sure this never

23:29

goes away. I don't

23:31

mean the sense that like they

23:33

need to realize like a very

23:35

wise situation now where she made

23:37

a point to highlight this individual

23:39

who Israel just assassinated, which is

23:41

literally what happened. That

23:44

should never be off of her shoulders. This

23:47

is just it makes me really disgusted that

23:49

we're in a situation where people pretending to

23:52

be good people fighting for what's right are

23:54

allowing this to happen. Whatever you think is

23:56

the reality of the situation. He

24:00

points out that Francis for Dr. Professor Francis

24:02

Boyle Who's represented Bosnia

24:04

at the ICJ? against

24:06

Israel in regard to the Geneva of the

24:09

genocide convention calls on and Antonio

24:11

Gutierrez and the other UN officials to start using

24:14

the genocide word calls

24:16

on UN General Assembly General Assembly to

24:18

suspend Israel admit, Palestine as a full

24:20

member and set up an international criminal

24:23

tribunal Which

24:26

of course is exactly what guarding dark points out

24:28

Well, no wonder they want to get rid of

24:30

the word genocide. What a weird timing, right? I

24:32

mean, it's this has got to be one of the

24:35

most transparent kind of propaganda efforts and very

24:37

different Like what I said during COVID I think

24:39

was one of the most obvious Criminal

24:41

activities it's been they're losing control

24:44

every information war right now But this

24:47

not just has been the most obvious. This has

24:49

been one of the most clumsy Ham

24:51

fisted kind of collapsing in and

24:53

upon itself propaganda efforts I've ever

24:56

seen very reactive and very

24:58

in your face like jarring people

25:00

out of the Slump

25:03

the propaganda slumber they've been in their entire

25:06

lives All of a

25:08

sudden they go let's start calling for the genocide convention

25:10

Hey, let's stop using the word genocide like almost like

25:12

a knee-jerk reaction going right to the Wall Street Journal

25:14

Hey make this article you see what I'm saying? Like

25:16

it's very obvious This is literally what

25:19

the writing is it time to retire the word genocide?

25:22

Why well because it's become a political

25:24

flashpoint So what it's

25:26

a word with a meaning like this

25:28

is desperate cover up damage

25:30

control And as

25:32

if you're just gonna go, okay snap your fingers

25:34

and we no longer use the word Okay, like

25:37

we're all just gonna start doing that like that's this

25:39

is the kind of hubris they have like they can just

25:42

Just go no more genocide word

25:45

the world is gonna go. Okay, we'll

25:47

never use it again hardly Everybody will

25:49

still use it because we're not children Now

25:52

Scott Horton points out something very important and

25:54

this actually count this old-fashioned start with what

25:57

Eddie says here the Zionists

25:59

claim that Hamas will never accept

26:01

peace, which is more so about Palestinians.

26:04

On December

26:07

1st, 2003, Yamed

26:09

Yassin, leader, founder of Hamas, or at

26:11

least again, the presentation of this expressed

26:13

interest in a long-term truce in exchange

26:15

for Israel withdrawing from the land it

26:17

seized after 1967. Now, that

26:19

is the line we're talking about, right? The

26:22

idea of going back to original Palestinian

26:24

territory post 75 years ago, that's just

26:26

a point. And even in Palestinians' minds,

26:28

that's not feasible because people

26:31

with compassion realize that there are

26:33

Israelis that were born there today and families that

26:35

grew up there that have no part in any

26:37

of this, that just are born into an area.

26:39

They don't have any choice. So the

26:42

point is that they are accepting the kind of

26:44

thing, oh, here's the West Bank, here's Gaza, and

26:46

obviously going back to 1967 lines

26:49

and saying two-state solution. The point is, if

26:51

you really look into this, it's

26:54

never been an honest situation. As

26:56

I think Dave Smith discussed in his recent debate, if

26:58

you want to call it that, that they're on the

27:00

record that Niahoo rather leaked out, but that there were

27:02

so many poison pills, and he's talking about one of

27:05

these discussions, one of the most prominent, that they had

27:07

put inside of this deal that they knew that it

27:09

would not be accepted. Of course, then when Palestine turns

27:11

it down, they go, see, they don't want peace, knowing

27:14

they were sabotaging it. But you don't need to look

27:16

further than to realize that they were

27:18

funding Hamas for the purpose of maintaining

27:20

the excuse to never accept a

27:22

two-state solution. It's always been there

27:24

that they never, and that's my point, that if

27:27

you listen to what they say in public or

27:29

to the media, in Israel, usually in

27:31

Hebrew, they're saying, we will never

27:33

allow a two-state solution. Now they're just

27:35

saying it to anybody who'll listen. That's

27:38

always been the case. But he's saying

27:41

at this time, in 2003, he expressed

27:43

a desire for that. Three months later,

27:45

Israel assassinated him with a Hellfire

27:47

missile, just like many of the Israeli Jews

27:49

that were killed during the festival and everything

27:51

else by the IDF. Other leaders

27:53

reiterated the sentiment and pinned a 10-year line

27:55

to it. Zionists say

27:58

Palestinians elected Hamas. They

28:00

don't want peace. The election was 2006. Hamas

28:02

won with 44% of the

28:04

vote. It was a plurality, not a majority. They

28:06

won a... as he just said there, Fatah won

28:08

41%. Based on exit polls, 83% of Palestinians wanted

28:11

peace. And

28:14

for Hamas to end its call for the end

28:16

of Israel. You see how these important contextual points

28:18

get ignored? You'll be forgiven for

28:20

caring about context as it seems that the

28:22

entire push right now from Israel leaves sycophants

28:24

for Zionism are that... or rather it's actually

28:26

the other way around. What's funny is the

28:29

word context is being used in a very

28:31

manipulative way right now. Acting like context doesn't

28:33

matter or rather that it does only when

28:35

you want it to. The point is context

28:37

obviously matters at the point that I'm making.

28:40

Right? You don't just get to go, you can't say

28:42

this phrase except, scientists can. From

28:44

the river to the sea, you're a terrorist except we can

28:46

say it and it's okay. Context obviously matters. Now

28:48

if I get a time I'll make a point

28:51

about that. I've been meaning to make a general

28:53

point about that absurd Harvard discussion. Which I'm all

28:56

the first one to point out the woke

28:58

mindset. The overwhelming

29:00

thing that's happening in all colleges. But

29:02

the point is that the idea of

29:04

kind of just muscling in the argument

29:06

that anybody saying this is genocide. Therefore

29:08

do you condemn all the genocide happening?

29:11

It's a trick statement and you know that. The

29:13

point is saying the things you're claiming are

29:15

genocide are not genocide. So it's

29:17

a trap of a statement and then when they refuse

29:19

to answer the trap of a statement you go, we got

29:21

you. It's just dumb two-party

29:23

politics. It happens every single time. Those people

29:25

are, if you want to get into the

29:28

conversation of trans information or what they're teaching

29:30

schools, they're horrible people. I'm not defending the

29:32

people in these colleges for the most part.

29:34

The point is in this dynamic it's

29:36

obviously being manipulated. But the point

29:39

was 83% wanted peace. Israel

29:43

responded with brutality and destruction. Their isolation

29:45

and punishment of Hamas led to Hamas

29:47

seizing total control of Gaza. Which by

29:49

the way remember they were secretly keeping this going.

29:52

And there's a lot of links in here if you want to

29:54

check this out. Now he points that he tags this. Watch

29:58

he tagged this and said Zionists hate the problem. When

30:00

Palestinian showed 80% support, they

30:03

blockaded them and sought to bomb them and torture

30:05

the notion out of them. Now this one says, Scott

30:09

Horton writes, if you have the heart to bear witness,

30:11

replace the missing T in this

30:13

URL and to watch Biden and

30:16

Netanyahu murder a little girl, which

30:18

is disgusting. The point is there's a

30:20

lot of graphic things happening right now. This

30:22

is Sheikh Ahmed Yasin, this person writes, found of the

30:24

Hamas movement, see what he says about Jews and Americans.

30:27

Israel killed him with a missile while he

30:29

was on a wheelchair. And

30:32

he just simply says, the IDF killed former

30:34

Israeli divide and conquer sock puppet Yasin two

30:36

months after he said he was sick of

30:38

fighting and wanted to sign off on a

30:40

two state solution. This just getting the point

30:42

that they do not want this from a

30:44

Zionist perspective. It's a tool to keep people

30:46

where they want them. And

30:49

just again, in case you haven't seen this, and this is from her rats. This

30:52

was posted in 2019. Oh, no, excuse me. This was

30:54

this was a statement for 2019 posted

30:56

two days after October 7. Again,

30:59

just making it very clear from her rats quoting

31:02

Netanyahu. Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of

31:04

a Palestinian state, you know, the thing that Biden

31:06

tells you he wants, he does not.

31:09

If that's not clear, anybody wants

31:11

to thwart the thing he claims he

31:13

wants needs to support funding and transferring

31:15

money to Hamas. And he says

31:18

this is part of our strategy to isolate the

31:20

Palestinians in Gaza from the West Bank. That's

31:22

not like somebody who honestly wants this, but

31:24

the bad guys won't let him. I mean,

31:27

it's just this stupidly obvious. I'll include this

31:29

Swiss policy research article on why Israel created

31:31

Hamas. It's an important. It's a good breakdown.

31:33

It's good information in there. Now,

31:36

Salomon Ahmed points out. And this is

31:38

just a video that you might have seen. I

31:40

think this is reasonably this has to do with

31:43

Gaza and ISIS elements. Simply, this

31:45

is the main point is really just the sentiment,

31:47

but saying that what

31:49

we will do, what we did there, we will do in Gaza with the

31:51

permission of Allah. Gaza will see blood.

31:54

Our point has been that from before Hamas and ISIS

31:56

are not on the same side. You know why? Because

31:58

ISIS. is aligned with

32:00

the West. Oh

32:03

my God, what a contentious state. It shouldn't be.

32:05

It's very easy to prove. And so we have,

32:07

we've done this with many different things. Oh,

32:10

if this even comes up, give

32:13

that loads for me. And

32:20

swans documentary games, Corvitz three-part

32:22

documentary or many other easily,

32:24

easily provable documents show you

32:27

these are proxy enemies or

32:30

proxy armies, enemies to us. They're

32:33

used by your governments. That doesn't mean every single part

32:35

of it, just like Hamas or anything else. It's

32:37

a nebulous concept of people

32:40

and how they feel. But the

32:42

ultimate leadership and talking about the

32:44

Mahoujadeen to Al Qaeda, to ISIS,

32:46

to, I'll tie it to

32:48

your all show them the Hamas to the things

32:50

we're talking about, or excuse me, but the, well,

32:52

the original aspects of it, not necessarily that it's

32:54

become. Like it's the same thing you can talk about. The

32:57

idea that Saudi Arabia admitted that ISIS elements,

33:01

they've ultimately lost control of them throughout the Middle

33:03

East, but that's still, it still

33:05

proves that, or you could still prove that

33:07

they were funded and created and used, flown

33:10

around armed, given medical treatment by the West

33:12

Israel in that case. So

33:14

in this point, what he's making is ISIS attacks them

33:17

off in this video, ISIS said the following about them,

33:19

basically they will see blood. So

33:21

why does that make sense? Well, it makes

33:23

sense when you realize that Israel in

33:25

particular is an acute, is a central

33:28

part in what these things are. So

33:31

just like I point out, when all of a

33:33

sudden you see the ISIS elements in the Middle

33:35

East are attacking the enemies of the

33:37

United States and Israel, right when this all starts, well,

33:39

what do you know? Same kind of thing. And

33:42

here's just to put a fine point on it, written

33:44

by Whitney Webb in 2017. Israeli

33:47

website claims ISIS commander revealed as

33:50

Mossad agent. This

33:53

is according to the report from Israeli website, two

33:55

of them, Libyan security forces arrested an

33:57

ISIS commander in the city of Benghazi.

34:00

Only to find out soon after that the man they

34:02

had captured was Ephraim

34:05

Benjamin. Also known

34:07

as an agent of Masad, the Israeli

34:09

intelligence service. Benjamin, who was known in

34:11

Libya as Abu Hops, had

34:13

begun work in Libya after 2011 NATO-led

34:15

invasion of Libya. Of course! That ousted

34:18

Gaddafi. You know, that Clinton was a

34:20

part of. So

34:23

what do you think about that? Let's look

34:25

at the website. Oh, what do you know? It's no longer

34:27

there. Oops. Come on, button. Gun.

34:33

It's almost like these things are being removed, but lucky for

34:35

you, we found it on the way back machine. Hey,

34:37

Masad, agent. And this isn't Israeli platform,

34:39

guys. You can look it up for yourself. Who

34:42

was in, Ammarim was arrested at an ISIS

34:44

center in Libya, which is, this is not just some

34:46

fringe thing. This is pretty widely reported. Point

34:48

just deleted now. But

34:50

the reality is, guys, that there's a lot of evidence

34:52

to show you, and again, we've gone over this extensively

34:54

over the years. ISIS being flown

34:57

via helicopter, or ISIS elements being in

34:59

Al-Tompf, or in the middle of the

35:01

Yemen area controlled by Saudi Arabia. I

35:03

mean, it's literally slapping you in the

35:05

face everywhere you look. Or how about

35:07

the fact that they're war on terror by their

35:10

own admission only grew the problem. Maybe that's because

35:12

they weren't actually at war with those

35:14

people. The

35:16

point is that this is an, an, a Masad agent

35:18

who's caught leading an element of ISIS. Or

35:21

even as Jimmy Dorr just talked about

35:23

on his show, the classic concept of

35:25

the real name of the intelligence, or

35:27

the Israeli secret intelligence services,

35:30

which is actually what they call the Masad or the overlaps,

35:32

which just so happens to be the acronym for ISIS. You

35:35

could say that's just a coincidence, but the point is

35:37

it's obvious there's more to this. And

35:41

one more point. This is from a recent one from

35:44

yesterday. Even

35:46

the New York Times buying

35:48

quiet inside the Israeli plan

35:51

that propped up Hamas. Now, of

35:53

course, what they claim, and you could believe, you

35:55

could read it this way if you want, that

35:57

Netanyahu gambled that a strong Hamas, but not too.

36:00

strong would keep the peace. That's the part

36:02

that I disagree with and reduce pressure for

36:04

a Palestinian state. Look at that. The fact

36:06

that they're even reporting that, that provably that

36:09

he was funding the very people that just

36:11

murdered Israelis in order to stop the

36:13

thing he claims he wants. See

36:15

my point guys, they've lost control of this. Now I

36:17

do understand that the sentiment that this is, you

36:20

know, controlled release and yes we should be on

36:22

guard for that. That's just as

36:24

light now it's 50-50 in my mind. But

36:26

that doesn't mean we should ignore the information

36:28

coming out. Take advantage of that because

36:30

this is true. Or you

36:33

may if you disagree with that then yeah then disagree with that. But

36:35

my point is that if you see this as

36:38

the reality but are cautious to talk about it because

36:40

you feel that it's a trap somehow, you know,

36:42

it's we have to acknowledge the truth but just be

36:44

on guard for how this might be, you know, the idea for

36:46

instance that this is supposed to be like the showing the

36:49

West turning on Israel and creating some

36:51

kind of World War end, certainly possible.

36:54

But still acknowledge that this is the reality

36:57

of Israel and the reality that people hopefully

36:59

inside the elements of the government have some

37:01

kind of accountability. But all it

37:03

simply says is for years the Qatari

37:05

government has been sending millions of dollars

37:08

to Gaza Strip. Look let's not forget

37:10

Qatar is the one mediating the discussions

37:12

between Hamas and Israel. Netanyahu

37:14

openly stated he will not go

37:16

after Qatar during this even though

37:19

the leaders have bases in central

37:21

Qatar. How do

37:23

you not read into that? That's obviously like well

37:25

you were only going after the so if you're

37:27

pretending this is about eliminating Hamas and

37:30

he's allowing the leadership to see

37:32

some safely say an area with

37:34

a government that's mediating conversations it's

37:37

clearly not about eliminating them it's about

37:39

killing as many Palestinians as possible while

37:41

maintaining their divisive elements they can use

37:43

whenever they want. Money

37:46

that helped prop up the mosque government there inside

37:48

of Qatar. Benjamin Netanyahu of

37:50

Israel not only tolerated those payments

37:52

he encouraged them. It's

37:54

exactly what we've been telling you the whole time. And

37:58

here I'll include the link here to James Corbin. Now we've

38:00

got about 10 minutes or so. I

38:03

want to include this. This is important. Danielle

38:07

Modos just pointed out a photo of what

38:09

used to be the Shijaya heavily populated residential

38:11

neighborhood in Gaza. Now I want you to

38:13

look at this picture. What you're

38:17

seeing, by the way, look

38:19

at just like to the horizon, the absolute

38:21

decimation. There's not a single building you can

38:23

see. Those were buildings behind there. It's all

38:25

broken. It's all bombed. Just

38:28

carpet bombed, all of which, by

38:30

the way, could have been full of the very same

38:32

hostages they claim they're trying to keep safe. By

38:35

the way, which pretty much every one of

38:37

Israel is now screaming about. I

38:39

shouldn't be so hyperbolic, but a lot of people in Israel. My

38:42

point, though, this is

38:44

not what you do when

38:47

you're trying to go after Hamas. Bringing

38:49

in construction. And, I mean,

38:52

yes, they use militarized bulldozers. My point is

38:54

that you can see that they're leveling this

38:57

ground. Of course

38:59

you could argue it's about some kind of military

39:01

objective and moving out. Sure, certainly possible. I would

39:03

argue that this is not that. But

39:06

I said, this is how I see this. Well,

39:10

the kind of joke I put. I said, because obviously it's

39:12

of paramount importance in the fight against only Hamas, which

39:14

obviously not what's happening, to level the

39:17

homes of Palestinians readying it for the

39:19

Israeli settlements. This is

39:21

just common sense in the fight against only

39:23

Hamas. Totally not about displacement and resettlement. Only

39:25

about Hamas. Guys,

39:28

it's just strikingly obvious to me. Again,

39:31

I don't even have to convince anybody. Their plans

39:33

have made this clear. The New York Times have

39:35

covered those plans. It's out there. And yet we

39:37

still pretend because Fox and CNN and Biden tell

39:39

you that that's just how it's going. Oh, they're

39:41

pinpoint targeting Hamas. They're going to get it done.

39:43

It's fighting for freedom. They're literally

39:45

ethnically cleansing. They're literally committing genocide. They

39:47

are literally driving people into a corner

39:49

and continue to bomb them in that corner. And

39:52

now they're beginning to level the ground and

39:54

they're planting flags. I mean, my God, it

39:56

couldn't be more obvious. This

40:00

is what Eli David shared the other day. Leveled

40:02

area in the middle of a town square with an Israeli flag

40:04

right in the middle because they're going to let him come back,

40:06

right? Here's

40:10

the point they made earlier. Now my point

40:12

in this discussion is to make it obvious to you

40:14

that what they're trying to do is not just move

40:16

some bad guys out of the way. They're trying to

40:18

move everybody they see as bad guys out of the

40:20

way, which in time, which means all Paulist in this.

40:24

They have explicitly said anybody pushing back

40:26

on that today is just a liar

40:29

or not that smart because they're telling

40:31

you that. But as I

40:33

said, well, first of all, Eli David posted this picture today. Literally

40:37

says from the river to the sea.

40:39

That's the flag you're going to see

40:41

with an Israeli flag covering all of the

40:43

Gaza Strip. Think about that.

40:46

Think about how ridiculous that is. As I

40:48

said, if this were a Palestinian saying this

40:50

according to Elon Musk, it would be quote

40:52

promoting genocide. But since it's a

40:54

lunatic on Twitter who's called for genocide of

40:56

Palestinians numerous times, which he literally has,

40:59

it's all good. What

41:01

insultingly obvious double standard and I'm

41:03

not calling for censorship. You know,

41:05

I David has every right to be as as ridiculous

41:07

as he wants every day on this platform. The

41:09

point is that that is being censored if

41:12

a Palestinian says it or if I were

41:14

to simply literally right from the river to

41:16

the sea and showing a

41:18

Palestinian flag. That's the flag you're going to see

41:20

that will be called genocide. You know it.

41:23

I'm somebody should try it. The probably get their account bleed.

41:27

But he absolutely can do it. And

41:30

here he is making this clear

41:32

that when they say that what they mean is

41:35

we're going to keep bombing this area until we

41:37

get rid of everybody there, including all the hostages

41:39

by the way. So he says

41:41

priceless Israel ambassador to UN trolls

41:43

the secretary general. Right because

41:45

that's normal policy of governments right law decorum

41:47

and respect just troll the United body that

41:49

you use against other people all the time.

41:52

Right these people just have no respect for

41:54

anything. But it's after Gutierrez said he will

41:56

not give up until a ceasefire is reached.

42:00

Said Israel will not give up until Hamas is annihilated

42:02

see the point so ceasefire means everybody

42:04

stops Not stopping until

42:06

the moss is annihilated means only they

42:09

keep going until everybody's gone That's

42:11

really what this means guys because they're like every

42:13

time they say well they move them over here

42:15

now We got a bomb there are they proving

42:17

Hamas is there no they're saying we did this

42:19

area now We're gonna do that area until everything

42:21

is completely gone And then look

42:23

back and say are there any people left we can

42:25

possibly save The point is

42:28

so your so your point is that that only

42:30

one of them cares about the Israelis held in

42:32

Gaza interesting tactic Why don't you think it's important

42:34

to bring the hostages home? Are you anti-semitic? Of

42:37

course because you know throwing that that simple Game

42:40

back in their face you just must

42:42

be a racist because that's the only argument you can have

42:45

but the point is that the United States was

42:48

the only only group

42:51

to veto the ceasefire

42:54

They vetoed the ceasefire everybody else

42:56

even the UK just said present they vetoed

42:59

it Because they

43:01

want this to continue they want to continue the

43:03

absolute mass genocide of an entire people

43:06

which human rights groups around the world Genocide

43:09

scholars you had human rights lawyers all of

43:11

them say the same thing, but doesn't matter

43:13

because Israel disagrees Because

43:16

how often do you listen to the party committing the genocide

43:18

when you decide whether or not a genocide right? Classic

43:21

but realize that this all shows you that they don't care

43:23

about people on the ground But the

43:26

interesting point is even though they cease

43:28

the beat of the ceasefire Rana points out Basically

43:31

says Egypt and Mur and Tanya

43:34

have invoked UN resolution

43:37

377 uniting for peace to address Gaza genocide

43:40

Basically, it means if they basically make it

43:42

quick if one of these five

43:44

permanent members vetoes this and you know Continues

43:46

to stop the group will which there shouldn't

43:49

be people that can veto the group will

43:51

quite frankly The point is that

43:53

they can initiate this resolution which means that

43:55

they then have a responsibility to act to

43:57

maintain their national peace Basically calling out the

43:59

group as if they're deliberately main, which

44:01

we know is what's happening. As it says,

44:04

the U.S. can't veto this. So it's

44:06

going to go back around. They can vote, but now

44:08

it can't be vetoed. So we'll see what happens. This

44:11

will show you the true colors. Israel's

44:13

government puts this out back to the people that

44:15

they're killing, right now, by the way, in

44:18

Gaza. Tonight, as we celebrate the fourth night

44:20

of Hanukkah, it says yesterday, we ask

44:22

that you light the four candles for the Bebas

44:24

family who is currently being held. You know

44:27

how disgusting that is? Israel knows these people

44:29

are dead. And I say that

44:31

with a heavy heart because it's disgusting that this even happened. It's

44:34

disgusting they were kidnapped by Hamas. It's disgusting that Israel

44:36

doesn't care about them. Film yourselves

44:38

lighting these menorahs. The point is, as I

44:40

said, sadly, they were killed by Israeli airstrikes. And you already

44:42

know this. Since you refuse

44:44

to accept their bodies when Hamas offered for

44:46

them, which was one of the reasons

44:48

they argued this whole ceasefire broke up, or

44:50

why it did and pretended something else happened, because

44:52

I don't think they wanted that to be discussed. Even

44:56

released Israelis are right now admitting this, by the

44:58

way. They've already been killed by the IDF

45:00

in discriminant bombing. This is

45:04

Noam Dan, who is right now saying,

45:06

or was, in front of Israel's government, I want

45:08

you to know if you've given up on us,

45:11

or what was it right here? It says, what

45:14

she said is we know for sure in this quote, that

45:16

three people were killed by our fire,

45:18

three hostages. What's

45:22

interesting about that, yeah, it's right there. What's

45:25

interesting about that

45:28

is that they know, they know that they were killed, and

45:30

yet they're still trying to use their memory to act

45:33

like they're still alive. So when

45:35

they later get admitted to be killed, they're going to blame

45:37

it on Hamas, even though we know this was their bombings.

45:39

Eli David doing the same thing. This

45:41

baby still held hostage, and nope, he knows they're

45:43

dead too. How disgusting is that? They

45:45

don't care about these people. Here is

45:47

another person admitting on the record

45:50

that they watched the IDF kill

45:52

people. Adi Dagan,

45:54

who is one of the 14 Israeli captives, apparently killed by

45:56

the Israeli military in a house in Kebuth, Barion, October 7th.

46:00

wife, Hana Stagen is the only survivor.

46:02

She has finally broken her silence to

46:04

give her account of that day. This

46:07

is in subtitles, so you

46:09

can see in general. She says

46:11

she heard the screaming of children,

46:13

help, please help. Please, I'm

46:15

begging, please come here, help me. These are

46:17

the children. She said, never forget the children's

46:19

screams. How they scream

46:21

for help. The barrages again and

46:24

again, barrages. This is the tanks firing on

46:26

the houses they were in. And what they

46:28

said is even the terrorists alongside them were

46:30

hiding next to them. The

46:32

forces who shot the missiles toward the house and

46:35

barrages again and again. They admit

46:37

this is the IDF killing people

46:39

indiscriminately. That is the Hannibal directive.

46:41

Now I'm going to have to take off right now, guys, but

46:43

I just want to point out, as I said, after

46:46

being forced to admit not only that most

46:48

of their major claims made by

46:50

the IDF were spectacular, were specifically

46:52

fake, but also being

46:54

caught numerous times, staging scenes, deleting claims,

46:56

even by the mainstream media, why does

46:58

anybody take these gun reveals at face

47:00

value? All I'm saying is we

47:02

can prove they lied about this stuff. We can prove

47:04

according to even her ass. They lied about the baby

47:07

in the oven. They lied about the woman's thumb being

47:09

cut open. They lied about the 40 vated babies. Even

47:11

this article discusses the lack of evidence around the rape

47:13

allegations, which again, they're pushing out

47:15

with this new article. How am I sexual

47:17

violence? Well, you don't know that New Yorker,

47:19

you're repeating what IDF says they've seen. And all

47:21

of that has yet to be proven according

47:23

to anybody in a field that actually

47:26

called journalists are calling them out

47:28

going, where's the evidence? The

47:30

problem is we have a lot of this stuff. I

47:35

was going to show you this, for example, I just think it's

47:37

more propaganda. They're pushing out. Israel is going,

47:39

Oh, look at this guy drove out to his partner to propose

47:42

to him. It's in English, directed

47:44

at a Western audience. You know why? Because they

47:46

want you to think it's something that you're fighting

47:48

for. But as Kim Iverson rightly points out gays

47:51

can't even legally marry in Israel. And if they're

47:53

two different religions, they also can't marry. So you

47:55

guys are liars. They're just trying to

47:58

convince, emotionally manipulate. idea

48:00

forces giving a newborn puppy nutrients and water

48:02

to rescue him. Sure.

48:04

I guess it could be possible. What

48:07

a pathetic attempt to manufacture public support. I

48:09

agree. My point is only London pointing this

48:11

out makes me think the bottom line is

48:13

we've watched them destroy and bomb buildings full

48:15

of animals and people. We've watched them leave

48:17

babies to rot inside of their houses. We've

48:19

watched them not treat animals. I mean, there's

48:21

a million examples. So this does not ring

48:23

true for me. And as Aviva

48:25

Klumpus points out, scrawled in the wall of a

48:28

Hebrew school in San Francisco, showed in the riots,

48:30

the classes to see a message, kill Jews. It

48:33

says free Gaza, kill Jews. And

48:35

says, Allah Akbar. Well, as Kim says,

48:37

this happened at a Hebrew school where all the kids are

48:39

Jewish, meaning a Jewish kid wrote this on the wall. So

48:42

you could spread around for shock. How about the fact that

48:44

it's also misspelled, that there is no

48:46

such thing as Allah Akbar is all who it's

48:48

filled with a U. Anybody knowing that

48:50

and meaning this in a way that would know that

48:52

more of this kind of manipulation is going to start

48:54

to happen. Now here, I don't know whether this is

48:57

the case or not, but we are seeing

48:59

this Eli David says it makes me very

49:01

skeptical. Jewish man assaulted New York city whilst

49:03

the attacker yelled, you dirty Jew. Well, certainly

49:05

there are racist. There are people that don't

49:07

like Jews. People don't like black people. They

49:09

want white people. They're all racist. The

49:11

point is that because this one man does

49:13

this, does this somehow mean that everybody chanting

49:15

from the river to the sea or free

49:17

Palestine are all killing Jews

49:19

in Harvard? No, you

49:21

guys are shamelessly trying to conflate these

49:24

things because you're desperate. And

49:26

here's another gun reveal. Here's some still pick

49:28

pictures of line guns lined up. Can you

49:30

disapprove everything to you? Now

49:33

I'll get to the other parts soon. I

49:35

got to rush off guys. So I'm not going to miss

49:37

the other interview, but tune in with Misty. I believe it's

49:39

going to be live on TNT radio. Thank you all for

49:41

tuning in today. I will most likely be getting to a

49:43

show the day after tomorrow. Try to tomorrow if I can,

49:46

but thank you for continuing to support this platform guys. I

49:48

love you all. Bottom of my heart. Question

49:52

everything. Come to your own conclusions. Stay

49:54

vigilant.