Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:01
It's a simple principle. You shouldn't
0:03
pay the highest price in the world for
0:05
drugs that your tax dollars have already helped
0:07
create. We've already begun
0:10
to secure fair pricing clauses and
0:12
contracts for new COVID vaccines, three
0:14
new COVID vaccines. And
0:17
we recently proposed that when a drug company
0:19
prices drugs so high that Americans
0:21
can't afford them, and those drugs
0:23
were created by the American tax dollars,
0:26
the federal government can step in and allow
0:28
other companies to make and sell
0:30
that same drug for less because they did
0:32
it here. This is
0:34
all part of my administration's work to promote
0:37
competition across our economy,
0:39
to lower costs, to raise wages
0:41
and improve care. Last
0:43
week we announced new steps to
0:46
crack down on anti-competitive practices in
0:48
healthcare. And we're going after
0:50
what we call junk fees, like
0:52
junk health insurance plans. Welcome
0:57
to The Daily Wrap Up,
1:00
a concise show dedicated to
1:02
bringing you the most relevant
1:20
independent news as we see it from
1:22
the last 24 hours. Friday,
1:27
December 15th, 2023. Thank
1:30
you for joining me today. We actually recently just
1:32
started broadcasting live onto Instagram today, so hopefully we
1:34
can get some more reach in that regard. But
1:37
thank you for joining me. It's an important discussion today,
1:40
following up on the coverage of the hostages
1:42
in Gaza in general and what's been happening on
1:44
the ground. Today, the IDF
1:46
has admitted to killing three
1:49
hostages in their engagement in
1:51
Gaza. And it's a really interesting part
1:53
of this story that reveals any number of
1:55
things at the very least that their actions
1:57
were. Let's put it this way. It's
2:00
been obviously been possible the entire time
2:03
that their actions indiscriminate bombing and now
2:05
apparently even just kinetic fighting in regard
2:07
to firefighting with guns can accidentally
2:11
take the lives of these hostages and even
2:14
more so when we talk about the
2:16
Hannibal directive as we will more so today
2:18
because there's yet another example of another Apache
2:21
helicopter pilot admitting that yes They did
2:23
fire on civilians or civil places where
2:25
they could be both of those things
2:29
That will find that we should ask the question whether or
2:31
not this might be part of that which
2:33
is a very contentious discussion, but we should add
2:35
the courage and The wherewithal to
2:37
ask these questions and in especially sense
2:39
what we've already seen in this process
2:42
I mean the unbelievable amount of lies that
2:44
have been parroted by corporate media by the
2:46
president of this country They
2:48
come directly from the IDF and the Israeli government
2:50
that have been proven to be lies even by
2:53
her reps by tens of
2:55
Israel By anybody with I
2:57
think two brain cells to rub together seeing as
2:59
how they have been fundamentally Debunked
3:01
from the core from the actual source
3:03
all the way down to how it
3:05
spread throughout the corporate media now today
3:07
we're going to be talking about primarily
3:09
the conversation of the IDF killings and
3:12
the overarching discussion around the hostages and
3:14
How this is very evident in my opinion?
3:16
But based on the evidence that this is
3:19
a problem for Israel the government are predominantly
3:21
I would say the ruling faction right now
3:24
that the people that come back from Gaza have
3:27
a very uncomfortable story a combination of
3:29
it was not what you described it
3:31
as and that we were terrified of
3:33
the IDF bombing as Well as we
3:36
were almost killed while being rescued in the
3:38
kabut of area and other areas like that
3:41
now we're also going to get into the
3:43
larger point today of just propaganda I Mean
3:46
and it's this is I I
3:49
think three or four really good examples today
3:51
to show you Exactly the way I
3:53
described it in the title today that Israel
3:55
Israel's failing propaganda is is
3:57
is reactive and it
3:59
is Predictable and I'll
4:02
show you exactly what I mean Things
4:04
will happen where something somebody will
4:06
get shot or something will be displayed
4:08
and it will make Israel's A progenitor
4:10
look bad and then within either later
4:12
that day or the very next day
4:14
within 24 hours You have the
4:17
same people who will come out and
4:19
make an argument that seems Unconnected to
4:21
the story other than the
4:23
fact that it seems to counteract What was
4:25
stated and proven just with narrative and
4:27
I'll show you what I mean And it's really
4:29
obvious today now I know a lot of
4:32
people are emotionally invested in this discussion and
4:34
I don't even mean in the sense of
4:36
worrying about civilians Because trust me I'm emotionally
4:38
invested anywhere civilians are suffering or people power
4:41
structures are allowing that to happen or even
4:43
worse as we're watching today Telling
4:45
you that it's justified to watch a
4:47
genocide play out. I'm
4:49
not I'm talking about more so the ideological
4:52
investment right where you know the
4:54
the Just
4:56
self-determination of Palestine versus the right of Israel
4:58
They know that this kind of dynamic which
5:01
are valid conversation as we've had plenty on
5:03
this show In
5:05
saying that my point is that we
5:07
need to begin to look at the facts Independent
5:10
of what we believe our side should be
5:12
here what the correct and this is what
5:14
I think is difficult for all of us
5:17
myself included because clearly we I
5:19
believe I know what is correct when it comes
5:21
to let's say the origins of the occupation of
5:24
Palestine and And I can at least at
5:26
the same time Stand back and
5:28
go I could be wrong. There
5:31
could be something that I'm missing. Maybe
5:33
I was missing for maybe I just have a
5:35
bias that I can't get past I don't think
5:37
that's the case, but at least I'm able to
5:39
ask myself those questions now and this is something
5:42
we have to consider that they're That
5:45
is actively abused by the power
5:47
structures to have us lean
5:49
into our political sides our team sport politics
5:51
to allow that to blind
5:53
us to things that are central to the
5:56
agendas of not just the left and the
5:58
right not just Israel or Palestine or one
6:00
government or the other, but the real agenda
6:02
that we see playing out all around us
6:04
that seems to connect when you look through
6:06
certain lenses, like we saw a glimpse of
6:08
that led into the Great Reset and the
6:10
One World Government concept that people
6:13
still think is fake news, which is
6:15
hilarious, even though they're literally talking about
6:17
it and having what's called a world
6:19
government summit. Anyway,
6:24
at the Great Reset, they literally had the headline
6:26
of talking about a One World Government, and it's
6:28
still considered conspiracy theory. Anyway, I digress back to
6:30
the point today, I started
6:32
with the Biden clip there because I wanted to make sure
6:34
that we didn't miss actually
6:37
perfect segue from that main point about the
6:39
medical freedom conversation and how the COVID illusion
6:41
has been used. This is
6:43
Biden, shout out to Texas Lindsay here just to
6:45
get started. If
6:49
you missed it, he says that
6:51
they have three new COVID vaccines coming,
6:54
three new COVID vaccines. Why would that
6:56
make sense to anybody? Even
6:59
if you actually believe everything that's been said, it
7:03
would blow my mind if that's actually still the
7:05
case, somebody who still maintains the day one narrative,
7:07
not even the government maintains that narrative, but
7:10
the argument that three new vaccines would be
7:12
necessary for something that has been proven to
7:14
not even be worse than the flu from
7:16
day one, let alone today. It
7:18
just shows you this is not going away. It's
7:21
alarming. Thank you, Texas Lindsay for
7:24
pointing this out. And on that same point,
7:26
one last point before we start to the
7:28
main topic today, coming from this conversation. This
7:30
is a Freedom of Information Act from defending
7:32
the Republic. It points out,
7:36
you have to cut to the chase. The point is, and by the way,
7:39
this is a lot of source material
7:42
here, which I love. You guys can dive through this
7:44
if you'd like, you can verify this FOIA request itself,
7:46
the specific point, as well as a lot of other
7:48
information from Moderna specifically. But this has to
7:50
do with the concept of spike backs, which
7:52
is the Comernity to Pfizer.
7:55
Spike backs to Moderna is
7:58
the brand name that's used. once the
8:02
EUA version becomes approved, right?
8:04
And we've talked about the illusion of approval. I mean,
8:07
there is a real approval on paper, which
8:09
was weirdly debated, even though you could
8:12
literally see that they had documentation. That
8:14
doesn't mean it's legitimate, you understand, but
8:16
they technically did approve nothing, but
8:19
they did approve. They have the stamp
8:21
and the information and the release and
8:23
the public discussion. The point was Commernity,
8:25
which was the Pfizer version, was
8:28
never made. It was never released,
8:30
it was never given, and the military was lied to
8:32
based on the argument that it was approved, and
8:35
then they got the EUA version. Now, it doesn't matter
8:37
whether they say it's the same difference, because first of
8:39
all, it wasn't. There were very clear differences between them,
8:41
and I proved it on the show, as many of
8:43
us did. But on
8:45
top of that, it's legally
8:47
distinct. That's the main thing they
8:49
said. And the main point
8:51
was the legalities around the EUA versus the
8:54
approved version and whether those lawsuits and liability,
8:56
and this was all a massive illusion. But
8:58
to the point, because
9:00
of this FOIA request, it
9:02
was admitted, Moderna does not have,
9:04
oops, go back to it, Moderna does not have
9:06
a plan to produce any state
9:10
banks, material, as of right
9:12
now. Now, how would that
9:14
make sense to anybody? Then
9:16
the argument was they approved it, and then, well, we
9:18
gotta get rid of the EUA version, which shouldn't
9:20
make sense to anybody, because that's a different
9:23
concept. And they're telling you
9:25
it's approved, but then giving you something which if you were
9:27
to suddenly die, you would not be able to sue. But
9:31
then it turns out they never even intended
9:33
to make those. And now we
9:35
get into the illusion of what the emergency
9:37
use authorization truly was. And by the way,
9:40
let's not forget, it never went away. They
9:42
bent and contorted mental gymnastics and all these
9:44
different arguments, and it really comes down to the
9:46
health and human services part of
9:48
it versus the FDA part of it. The
9:51
main emergency is technically aside, but the
9:53
point is they act like they can maintain it
9:55
for all these different bureaucratic reasons. The reality is
9:57
it's no longer an emergency, never was. But
10:00
they've essentially created this never-ending world where
10:02
they can pump these things out with
10:04
no new safety testing, no real accountability.
10:07
And now we're finding out they knew that,
10:09
never intended to make the supposed approved version
10:11
while they all told you it was approved.
10:15
I find that to be monumentally important. But we
10:17
already told you this, though. Just
10:20
to realize that there's a lot of us that were making this,
10:22
not that we could prove per their
10:24
statements that it was the case. Now
10:26
we've got their own statements thanks to FOIA requests,
10:28
but we already knew this. We
10:30
have been played. Or rather, the ones
10:32
who were played, got played. Thank
10:35
God many of us were able to see this,
10:37
saved as many as we could. But
10:39
the reality is, it's not stopping.
10:42
They're making more. Even though
10:44
the entire platform idea has failed,
10:46
even per Fauci and his sell.com
10:48
study, they admitted, we failed. And
10:51
they just kept going. We will
10:53
follow up on more on this. I could keep
10:55
telling you, we just did another focus on East
10:57
Palestine. But this topic, guys, as
10:59
I keep telling, especially for the new audience, is
11:03
wildly interconnected with every topic you could
11:05
possibly point to. And I don't mean
11:07
that just because we're hyper fixated on
11:10
Israel as a nation. This
11:12
has more to do with the power
11:14
structures that are influencing what we know
11:17
is the larger agenda. And
11:19
that very much includes the Zionist entity of
11:21
Israel. But it also includes the United States. It
11:23
includes most of these Western partners. My point,
11:25
though, is that if you don't
11:28
see yet why this is so important,
11:30
more so than just the civilian casualties,
11:32
which, by the way, is monumental. I
11:34
mean, the genocide and the time frame,
11:36
what we're staring at, as I keep saying, will be
11:38
this will be a talked about for hundreds of years.
11:41
One of the worst examples of genocide in
11:43
a short period of time in such a
11:45
small area and allowed by the world in
11:48
the so-called rules based international order. But
11:51
above beyond that, remember, Israel was the
11:53
supposed Pfizer test lab, as they admitted.
11:55
There's a lot more going on. Vaccines
11:58
were recently given to the people on the ground. I think
12:00
the flooding and the intentional flooding of the seawater
12:02
that I think is causing all the flooding in
12:04
a lot of these places Is going to cause
12:06
more illness like I think this is going to
12:08
be told into something else Even
12:10
if I'm wrong, this is a you
12:12
a monumentally important story Now we're starting off with
12:14
a couple of points that I want you to
12:16
see to carry through the rest of the conversation
12:19
Now first of all, just so you see this from today. This is
12:21
from today IDF mistakenly
12:24
killed three hostages Now
12:27
I we're gonna read through it and I'll show
12:29
you what it's talking about The point is people
12:31
in Gaza who were taken on October 7th or
12:33
another and this is where it gets a little
12:35
fuzzy in Some cases either on October 7th who
12:37
were just in some of these areas
12:40
or on that day from IDF members that
12:42
engaged who were then taken and
12:44
some other variations there in either way we're talking
12:46
about Israelis and people from Israel who were taken
12:49
and This is people
12:51
that we hear people three of them that were killed
12:53
by IDF members today Mistakenly
12:55
killed them they said now
12:57
obviously there's a bunch of points to include there which we'll
12:59
get into more the idea that obviously This means and I
13:01
think somebody else just said this right down here Yeah,
13:05
I mean even Anna here saying nothing they
13:07
targeted accidental I mean the common point is
13:10
that well, this just shows they're being frivolous
13:12
with this just shooting at anybody assuming they're
13:14
Palestinian Right the obvious points is either this
13:16
means in my opinion. They thought they were
13:18
Palestinian, which I believe they're truly just killing
13:20
Palestinians at will That's what
13:22
they've admitted when you listen to them tell
13:24
you themselves and there are many different statements
13:27
and the mass Assassination program that they're using
13:29
and they admit to while they're speaking privately
13:32
to 972 magazine when they say yeah We just take
13:34
down buildings to take down buildings But
13:37
the point is either they thought they were Palestinian or
13:39
this was Hannibal directive I truly
13:41
believe that's part of this and I'll show you what I
13:43
mean These people have been
13:45
a massive inconvenience and a political
13:47
PR disaster every single time they
13:49
come home The real question becomes if
13:51
that was the case Why is it being admitted and
13:54
if it is being admitted is that by action? Is that
13:56
because these people didn't want this to happen and it's I
13:58
mean, I don't believe every IDF member is the
14:00
same as the Zionist entity. That should, I mean,
14:03
nobody should argue that. It doesn't matter what group
14:05
we're talking about, nobody should broad stroke
14:07
any group. That is always ignorant.
14:11
But apparently it's allowed if you do it towards the
14:13
Palestinians today, or just like it was allowed when you
14:15
do it to the Russians. It still kind of is,
14:17
but you know how the narrative shifts moments
14:19
ago was the Syrians or North
14:21
Koreans, you know, it doesn't matter. The point is when
14:23
you're allowed to hate on somebody, it's because the adversary,
14:26
they're adversarial to the power structure, they
14:29
killed three people. We also
14:31
have the example of Nome Dan
14:35
speaking in front of the Israeli
14:37
government on the record saying, I
14:40
want to know if we were given
14:42
up on, we know for
14:44
sure that three people were killed by
14:46
our fire, three hostages. Now they're talking
14:48
about in Gaza, understand, the bombings by
14:50
the IDF. So this is a person
14:53
who still has her father in Gaza.
14:56
She's calling for a ceasefire. She's blaming them for
14:58
the killing. And she's saying that then this
15:00
is just the one clip, but the full article I
15:02
have in here will go through. And she's saying that
15:04
we know you've killed some of these hostages. Now this
15:07
is different. That your three other people, these are not
15:09
the same three we're talking about. So I want you
15:11
to think about this as we go through. How
15:14
many people have actually been killed by the
15:17
indiscriminate, what, 60 days of
15:19
unprecedented bombing in a very
15:22
tightly packed civilian area where
15:24
these people are being held. And we already
15:26
know that Hamas has claimed they've killed many of
15:28
them already. This is only the first
15:30
three they've admitted to, you understand. These
15:33
are Israelis saying you've killed
15:35
hostages before today. Right.
15:38
We also have the freed Israeli
15:40
captives who have come home and
15:42
said openly that they feared the
15:44
IDF bombings more than anything. Now if
15:47
you're new to this show, understand these are not just going
15:50
to be statements I make. I'm going to prove this to
15:52
you with their statements given to Israeli media or
15:54
any number of verifiable source material that
15:57
you can then confirm for yourself. IDF
16:01
bombings they were more afraid of. This
16:05
was actually how long ago? This was on October
16:07
30th. We had the yes
16:09
Hamas was the one that released the video and yes you should
16:11
consider whether they put them to it. But
16:13
now with all the other information it seems like
16:16
it's very accurate. The cause of prisoners on the
16:18
video asked Netanyahu do you want to kill us
16:20
all? Many
16:22
of them reporting permanent hearing damage because of the
16:24
bombings that were being committed. Reporting that
16:26
they were hiding right alongside the
16:29
Hamas elements because
16:32
they were all being bombed together. We
16:37
have the AI mass assassination
16:40
factory admission from
16:42
972 magazine. Admitting
16:44
that this was a... make sure I get it right.
16:50
I was getting it wrong. Habsora.
16:54
Not Hazbarra like the propaganda discussion
16:56
point but it's called Habsora or
16:58
rather the gospel. It
17:01
is an artificial intelligence program that they've
17:03
admitted to using in Gaza. There's
17:06
seven current and former IDF members
17:08
speaking on the record with 7 9 7 2 magazine.
17:11
They're admitting not only do they target
17:13
civilians but that
17:15
they indiscriminately bomb in the area where these
17:18
hostages are held. And
17:20
they say on the record we sometimes just
17:22
take down buildings and take down buildings. Many
17:24
of which could hold hostages just like the
17:26
cars they were shooting on October 7th. Many
17:28
of which probably held hostages. Same point.
17:32
They know what they're doing. All
17:34
this is being admitted to. Now carrying those things
17:36
through today. Let's start off with one point
17:38
from Elon Levy. This person's going
17:40
to be a central point today. Israeli
17:42
government spokesperson for in the October 7th
17:44
war. So he's like the
17:46
October 7th representative right. Now
17:50
he says highlighting a United
17:52
Nations post from two days ago that
17:54
says people seeking safety in overcrowded shelters
17:56
in Gaza are facing the spread of
17:58
infectious diseases. as well as
18:00
inadequate food, water, and basic services. All
18:03
civilians, as much as we
18:05
know, they're actively telling you there is nobody
18:07
innocent in Gaza. I'll
18:12
just include this just because we talked about it yesterday.
18:16
Avigdor Lieberman writing for Times of
18:18
Israel, Innocence in Gaza? Oh,
18:20
don't be naive. This
18:22
was written on the 4th
18:24
of December. So what was
18:26
that again about only bombing Hamas? Let's
18:29
be real, guys. They're telling you openly
18:31
they think everyone there is an enemy.
18:34
Very clearly. Come
18:40
on, there we go. So my point is
18:42
the UN, whatever you think about them, and I'm
18:44
a no supporter of the UN, is simply saying
18:47
all these civilians have no
18:49
food, no water, no basic services. And
18:51
as they're simultaneously flooding underneath with seawater,
18:53
as they've admitted, and the rain, I
18:55
wonder why everything's flooding so incredibly more
18:57
than ever. The point is that this
18:59
is going to cause disease. Well, Elon
19:02
Levy says the only way to
19:04
help desperate people in need, and
19:07
I guess he's talking, you know, he hasn't
19:09
intentionally, I'm sure he means anybody
19:11
desperate. The point is he wants you to think
19:13
he's talking about these civilians. He's
19:15
made it clear as well that he doesn't think that they're
19:17
innocent. But he says just in general
19:19
to help desperate people in need is Hamas's
19:22
surrender. And
19:24
it's mind boggling, he says, that the UN can't bring
19:26
itself the call for that, which by
19:28
the way, they have called for a ceasefire many, many,
19:30
many times, which would then lead to some kind of
19:33
de-emilitarization where it's, but see, that's not what they want.
19:36
See, this is the point I'm trying to make here. Think about what's being said
19:39
here. The only way, he
19:41
says, to help desperate people, which in the
19:43
minds of Israelis, that means the people being
19:45
held captive is for Hamas's immediate surrender. But
19:47
of course, his point is that UN's pointing
19:49
at the civilians, so he means at least you could
19:51
take it for anybody, including his civilians
19:54
in Palestine. So apparently,
19:56
as I've said many times, the only
19:58
option... Either Hamas
20:01
just gives up or
20:03
they keep bombing Which
20:06
by the way their entire population is right
20:08
now going you're trying to kill everybody you're
20:10
killing our families stop bombing ceasefire Just
20:13
briefly tap into Israeli conversations or
20:15
their media. Horet times of Israel.
20:17
It's Ridiculously obvious
20:19
and your media and Biden and the
20:21
rest just don't say that the
20:24
Israeli government is being a Called
20:27
out more than I've ever seen in my life
20:29
by the Israeli population That doesn't mean that there's
20:32
not a obvious part of them that want
20:34
to continue going after the Gaza in particular
20:36
But Hamas specifically or more
20:39
broadly Gaza But Hamas specifically but first
20:41
and foremost before anything else they want
20:43
a ceasefire so their Families
20:45
can come home and what does Israel
20:48
do? Immediately goes back to
20:50
bombing Hamas asks for more discussions
20:53
more Hostage
20:55
exchange they say no Let's
20:58
not forget Israel's war cabinet blocked
21:00
the Mossad chief from restarting these
21:02
hostage dogs He
21:04
brought it up and says let's talk about hostage
21:07
again, right? Isn't that what everybody wants and they
21:09
said no first of all they made
21:11
the argument that well Hamas's leadership isn't cut off and
21:13
cutter which by the way is not I don't believe
21:15
is true if they were cut off at any Point
21:17
they would have been any from the very beginning Nothing
21:19
new has happened that suddenly cut them off The
21:22
point is I don't believe that but even
21:24
if it is why does that mean you still
21:26
you couldn't discuss with them about some kind Of
21:28
leadership the point is they then
21:30
later in the very same article make
21:33
the other argument which is well I don't think
21:35
Hamas seriously wants to make a deal. So we're
21:37
gonna wait So that's the
21:39
actual reason nothing to do with the other But
21:42
the problem is they're lying to you because
21:44
even right now you can still prove Hamas
21:46
has this on the table Vice
21:48
news even talked about this. So did BBC from
21:51
the very first week Hamas has been offering a
21:53
full exchange Israel
21:55
has repeatedly refused until
21:57
they were just recently forced to pause for a few days
22:00
and take some of them back and then as Hamas
22:02
was still offering them, shut it all down. Blame Hamas,
22:04
went right back to bombing. That's
22:07
even what the US government said, guys. I mean, not
22:09
in exactly like that way, but they made the point
22:11
that Israel claimed they made a mistake or they broke
22:13
the deal and went right back to bombing. You
22:16
know, even if you believe that, let's realize that they're
22:18
trying to start it again and they're saying no and
22:21
continuing to bomb where we know hostages are. So
22:25
if Elon, Levy is saying the only way
22:27
for people to come home or these people
22:29
to be helped is for Hamas to surrender,
22:32
that means it's never going to stop because
22:34
Hamas is not going to just surrender for
22:36
nothing. Even if you think
22:38
that they should, like, are you really trying
22:40
to apply a moral argument to what you're
22:42
calling a terrorist organization? Okay, if not that, then
22:44
why would you think they're just going to lay down their
22:46
arms? What do you think Israel is going to do to
22:48
them? They'll kill them. They know
22:50
that. So they're going to fight till the end.
22:53
That's not a support statement. It's just a simple
22:56
static reality. So if we know that if we
22:58
know that Hamas is not going to just give
23:00
up for nothing, then
23:03
they're going, we're going to
23:05
keep bombing no matter what, because the option
23:07
we're giving you is not possible. Unless
23:10
what they want is some other country to step
23:12
in and what start trying to force them in
23:14
their different way. Like, it doesn't make any sense
23:16
is my point. The obvious reality is they're
23:19
going to keep bombing this location until
23:21
every single person is killed or
23:23
they get what they want. And then as a
23:25
byproduct, they'll shuffle through the rubble to find who
23:28
may be left. Guys, that's an obvious reality that
23:30
shows you they do not care about the hostages.
23:33
It just is such
23:36
an obvious reality that it makes me sick
23:38
to think that anybody's trying to defend what
23:40
they're currently doing. The Shapiro's of the world,
23:42
they're acting like, just give up, Hamas. Who
23:44
are you talking to, Ben, when you say
23:46
that? Are you acting like we have Hamas's
23:48
ear? Well, they know you've
23:50
argued they should give up. They've said
23:52
no. Okay, now what? Do we
23:55
just keep saying give up or we'll keep bombing
23:57
forever? Again, it
23:59
simply shows. that they are not going to
24:01
stop until everybody is dead. This is
24:03
what they're being, I mean, admitting to
24:05
you without saying it. Now, Dan
24:07
Cohen put, make sure to include, and I've
24:10
voted this out yesterday, Biden ignored requests for
24:12
invitations to the White House Hanukkah celebration from
24:15
families of Gaza captives in Gaza. This
24:19
is by the way, while they were
24:21
firing tank shells indiscriminately into Gaza homes
24:23
to celebrate Hanukkah, which was a public
24:26
discussion. And they use the tank shells
24:28
that Biden basically illegally sent, circumventing congressional
24:30
approval. The point though, is that
24:32
these are Israelis with families who are holding Gaza,
24:34
who simply wanted to join the Hanukkah celebration. But
24:36
when they wanted to state what they wanted, which
24:38
was called for ceasefire. And they just said, no.
24:41
So is this really about some kind of solidarity thing, or
24:43
is it about selling you on a narrative as
24:45
if the American public can't see through that? And
24:49
again, the dumb bomb argument, which
24:53
is what this article is discussing, which now has been
24:55
put to the state department, US
24:58
Intel details, their widespread use of dumb bombs.
25:00
So how can we pretend that they're, they're
25:03
not trying to kill everybody when it just
25:05
got revealed that what they're doing is bombing
25:08
with things that guarantee that almost
25:11
50% of almost 30,000 air to ground munitions
25:14
used by Israel have been unguided
25:17
with the remainder being precision guided munitions.
25:20
So half the time they're
25:22
bombing with unguided dumb bombs. They're called
25:25
now remind me, correct me if I'm
25:27
wrong. Isn't the
25:29
argument that using unguided rockets, Baha'mash
25:33
is what makes them a war crime. Yeah,
25:35
that is what they said. So it's one
25:38
of those whole, when you do it, it's a crime,
25:40
but when I do it, it's not kind of thing,
25:42
right? When you do it, it's terrorism. When we do
25:44
it, it's counter-terrorism, right? When we use cluster munitions, it's
25:46
because you did first, right? So ultimately
25:48
they're the exact same thing. Is that
25:50
what you're, yeah, that's exactly the point
25:52
is they are bombing indiscriminately. Not just
25:54
because I say that, but by very
25:56
definition of the word where
25:59
they know. their people are
26:01
being held. You
26:04
shouldn't need any more than that. But it says
26:06
unguided munitions due to their lack of precision pose
26:08
a significant threat to civilians. Whoever is over there.
26:10
Again, then take back to this point. Only
26:14
way to help these people is for Hamas
26:16
to immediately surrender. So this is while they
26:18
know they're bombing with these indiscriminate dumb
26:21
bombs that might kill their people.
26:24
This is a way to keep this going. How do
26:26
you not see that as they at least don't care
26:28
about these civilians? The
26:31
high rate of usage of these dumb
26:33
bombs by Israel may be contributing to
26:36
the escalation of the civilian death toll.
26:39
Even Joe Biden accused them of
26:41
indiscriminate bombing now. Which by the
26:43
way does not mean he believes that it means
26:45
meek Joe Biden, genocide Joe as they're now calling
26:47
him, is shuffling over to the other side because
26:50
he's realizing he's lost all the support. Because
26:52
that's what politicians do. They're fair
26:54
weather, everything. But
26:57
the point is the Israeli spokesperson said
26:59
that Israel the military is committed to
27:01
international law and a moral code and
27:03
we do with our best to minimize
27:05
civilian casualties. Blah blah blah.
27:08
We use indiscriminate bombs what we're doing our
27:10
best to not indiscriminately bomb.
27:13
However experts have expressed concern that the high
27:15
rate of unguided munitions undermines
27:17
their claim to that. I mean yeah
27:20
obviously. A former
27:22
explosive ordnance disposal officer has spoken on the
27:24
record to say and this is a he
27:26
is a current senior crisis
27:28
advisor on arms and military operations for Amnesty
27:30
International and he expressed concern over this and
27:33
surprise. The report comes at a sensitive time
27:36
in the relations with the US and Israel. Biden
27:38
has stated that Israel is losing international support.
27:40
Yeah about 57 days too
27:43
late and it's becoming increasingly isolated from international
27:45
international support for
27:48
refusals to call for a ceasefire. Now
27:50
the point is in
27:52
general it's obvious that we can tell they're indiscriminately
27:54
bombing. It's becoming an open secret. Now with the
27:56
hostage overlap that's the kind of point I'm trying
27:58
to set. We've already made it. clear my opinion.
28:01
Genocide, indescribable bombing, in fact intentional targeting
28:03
of civilians, but from the Israeli side
28:05
I'm hoping you're paying attention to realize
28:08
that these hostages almost
28:10
seem like their target. Now
28:12
here is what Orwell shared in regard to the
28:14
State Department, Matt Miller you know clumsily losing
28:16
the control of the narrative as usual, where
28:19
they asked about these dumb bombs. So here's
28:21
his response. That
28:23
have been coming out since the weekend
28:26
about you know US assessments of what
28:28
the Israelis are doing with US
28:31
supplied munitions.
28:37
The State Department clearly has a
28:40
stake in this whole thing as
28:43
part of the rest of the administration and
28:46
I'm still finding it hard
28:49
to understand
28:51
how it is that you guys have not
28:54
at least come to some kind of preliminary
28:56
conclusion as to whether you think these weapons
28:58
are being used in the
29:00
correct way or if there
29:03
are questions about that. So
29:05
it remains the case that we
29:07
just have not made that type of assessment.
29:09
We are monitoring, we are collecting information as
29:12
we do in every conflict around the
29:14
world. We are engaged in conversations with the Israeli
29:16
government about steps that they can take to minimize
29:19
civilian harm but that's not an assessment that we
29:21
have made. Can
29:23
I just ask why not? We're
29:26
not at that point. We are collecting information,
29:28
we are monitoring. At
29:31
what point do you think it would be
29:33
appropriate to make an assessment? So I am
29:35
going to, what I will say is... I
29:37
mean doesn't this just seem pathetic? Oh
29:40
we just haven't done it yet. Like
29:43
okay so in any other sense in any other,
29:45
I mean whether, look at the main point about
29:47
Russia, how they couldn't, they
29:49
were tripping over themselves to be the first
29:52
to call genocide before we had any evidence
29:54
and no investigation. I mean look, his same
29:56
point that they're somehow supposed to be investigating
29:59
every... every bomb that was dropped. Yeah, we're like
30:01
30, 40,000 at this point. We're
30:03
in every bomb, right? Are
30:05
they really pretending that they in real time investigated
30:08
every bomb that Russia dropped? I mean, these
30:10
guys are blatantly lying,
30:13
provable by their own statements compared to
30:15
each other. It's embarrassing. Look
30:17
more than happy to scream genocide when Russia
30:20
sneezes too hard. And I'm not arguing, they're
30:22
not capable of that. My point is that
30:24
this is embarrassing to pretend they're, we
30:27
just haven't got to it yet, is valid at
30:29
all. Obviously by every
30:31
single metric from anybody, I mean, this is
30:33
why we have, well, every metric, it's clear
30:35
it's genocide. But from every person we're listening
30:38
to, from the UN, from international lawyers,
30:40
to human rights lawyers, to NGOs,
30:42
across the board, obviously
30:45
genocide, not by opinion, but by
30:47
static, because you're looking at the metrics
30:49
that are used to decide and they're all
30:51
calling it genocide. You know why? Because
30:54
it's obviously genocide. To
30:56
have, already. Of course they have.
30:59
We have, I think, a responsibility to be
31:01
careful. And I am going to, what I
31:03
will say is. Others
31:05
have already. Of course they
31:07
have. We have, I think,
31:09
a responsibility to be careful and deliberate when
31:11
we make those kind of assessments. And we're not at the point yet
31:14
where we have been able to state
31:16
that with any degree of certainty. Right, so
31:18
his point is they're all clumsy and
31:20
irresponsible. That's his allegation without
31:22
saying it, right? Oh, of course, sure
31:25
they have. That
31:27
was the way he said that, right? The point is if they've
31:29
done it, then it's not accurate. It's only accurate
31:31
when we do it, when we're ready. When we did it
31:33
30 seconds after Russia started, that was
31:35
accurate, because we did it. It's
31:38
just insulting. It's insulting to your intelligence. Reporting
31:45
on the use of dumb bombs in this
31:47
conflict. How does that square
31:49
with the repeated statements we've heard from this
31:51
building that Israel is taking steps to protect
31:53
civilians as they do have the intent to
31:55
protect them? So I'm just not gonna comment
31:57
on how they are using any specific.
32:00
weapon. Obviously the circumstances would...
32:04
Right, because it's not like you can see the
32:06
circumstances in a thousand different ways, in a thousand
32:08
different bombings, right on your TV, and your Twitter
32:10
accounts, and everything else. But yeah, but I guess
32:12
they haven't gotten to that with their assessment. The
32:16
circumstances of how any weapon are used
32:18
would be required to draw any kind
32:20
of definitive judgment. There are different ways
32:22
you can use any number of munitions.
32:24
Now that's not an invalid point. Now
32:27
this exact point is for me, it's
32:29
not about determining whether it's the legal
32:31
term of genocide, because that matters. There
32:33
are metrics and specific things to be
32:35
met. She simply just
32:37
asked about indiscriminate bombing. Like
32:39
think about how ridiculous that is. They're
32:42
using the epitome
32:44
of an indiscriminate bomb. It's called a dumb
32:46
bomb. I just read it to you. And
32:49
she's asking, when they
32:51
use indiscriminate bombs, how
32:54
do you make
32:56
that connect? How do you... what's the word she
32:59
used? How do you rectify that with the allegations
33:01
they're doing everything they can? I'm not gonna dig
33:03
dive into... What do you mean? It
33:07
doesn't matter if it was one of the bombings or every
33:09
single one of them. If they're using a bomb in
33:12
any circumstance, in a civilian area, which
33:14
is this entirety of Gaza is, that's
33:18
indiscriminate. Why are there
33:20
even civilians there? That's indiscriminate. So it's just pathetic
33:22
how these people will try so hard.
33:24
And these are people that are good
33:26
at this job. People like
33:29
Kirby and Matt Miller. I'm not
33:31
saying they're good people, or that I trust that. My point
33:33
is they're good at lying. And even they look stupid when
33:35
they're getting pushed like this, because
33:37
this is obvious. And of course,
33:39
let's not forget that they're telling you this
33:41
is going to go on for
33:43
several months. What's the quote? Several months.
33:47
And of course, Jake Sullivan, looking like he's in some
33:49
kind of hostage movie when he's sitting there being told
33:51
how we're grateful you're supporting our genocide. Like
33:53
he said, I'm thinking, oh my God, I'm gonna end up at the Hague.
33:55
Oh my God, I'm gonna go to jail. Like that's
33:58
the look he has when you're saying this, that my opinion. Obviously
34:01
now the Director
34:03
of electron the intifada has
34:06
reported as we already showed you that even Horrett's
34:09
the record of record the paper
34:11
of record in Israel is discussing
34:15
the Hannibal directive If
34:17
Israel used a controversial procedure and they're discussing the Hannibal
34:19
directive then we need to know about it talk about
34:22
it now And it says it right there Which
34:25
allows the military to endanger a soldier
34:27
to prevent them from being kidnapped now
34:29
by the way They've used
34:31
this with not just soldiers historically, but
34:33
civilians At
34:35
the hostage taking incident in the area on
34:38
October 7th. They question The
34:40
point is we don't need to question here is
34:42
a colonel speaking with Middle
34:44
East I discussing how this was
34:47
what he says what we saw here was a mass
34:49
Hannibal now, of course He could be wrong. He could
34:51
be lying. But that's what they curl with the Israeli
34:53
military stated on the record and
34:56
also we have all the evidence that we've already gone
34:58
over including the Herets report
35:00
in Hebrew only saying yes that the
35:02
helicopters some of the people at the
35:04
festival Right on it's on the record
35:06
guys. We have the helicopter pilots as
35:09
backs Here's one of the new one from Dan
35:11
Cohen We knew that the tanks
35:13
fire on the houses because the IDF
35:15
members said that publicly We have
35:17
the security team at one of the I think with the head
35:19
of the security team at kamosba area reporting
35:22
that they shot civilians We
35:24
have a hostages saying or rather people from
35:26
the festival coming back saying they were that
35:29
they were civilians that were shot And
35:31
now we've got some of the helicopter
35:33
pilots on the record saying that they
35:36
shot at the settlements and killed civilians
35:39
We even have why net news from Israel
35:42
and Israeli platforms saying one-fifth of the troop
35:44
fatalities in Gaza are due to Friendly fire
35:46
or accidents and We
35:49
have Israel admitting to immense amount of
35:51
friendly fire on October 7th. I mean,
35:53
it's just it's un-parallel All
35:56
of this simply showing you that they're capable of
35:58
shooting at their own people including military and
36:00
civilians and this is a
36:03
public directive that even times of Israel and
36:05
Haaretz are openly talking about and The
36:07
record that they did in fact do this
36:09
according to their own people which
36:12
brings us to the point of what's currently happening
36:15
The mistakenly killed three hostages in
36:17
Gaza today now
36:19
with all the stuff that we've already heard and
36:21
all the facts that the idea the members of
36:24
The Israeli citizens who have said that
36:26
they saw people get killed Not
36:29
these three that they say they shot in real
36:31
time But the people that were bombed now my
36:33
point there is to realize this is only the
36:35
ones they've admitted to and As
36:37
we're gonna go through the rest of the
36:39
show you're gonna hear the Representative of Israel
36:41
tell you that they've all been killed by
36:43
Hamas even though their own people say they
36:45
saw them killed by the bombings They're
36:48
being caught in their own lives by their own people
36:50
calling them out All most
36:52
of their propaganda seems interestingly aimed at
36:55
a Western audience So maybe they're just hoping
36:57
that you just don't listen to what their people
36:59
are saying a lot of it ends up being
37:01
in Hebrew IDF
37:03
mistakenly killed three hostages so just so it's
37:05
on the record They definitely killed their own
37:07
people whether by mistake or intentionally, but if
37:09
we know they have been Initiating
37:11
the Hannibal directive. I'm I have the
37:13
general question of whether or not these
37:16
weren't by accident But again,
37:18
the question then comes why they would have admitted
37:20
it or how that ended
37:22
up happening now This article has updated. Let's just look
37:24
what it says now to Click
37:26
the live blog page hundreds March until
37:28
of Eve demanding. Yeah, see here this exact. I'm so
37:31
glad we just did this. Here's the point Everybody
37:34
seems why I should be as as
37:36
specific as possible in my opinion
37:39
Obviously the vast majority of Israel
37:42
is openly calling for ceasefire Just
37:45
like the West by the way, interestingly enough Just
37:47
like the West is and the people
37:49
in pro-israel Western discussions are saying means
37:51
kill all the Jews Right.
37:54
So you've got the Israeli population marching
37:56
through the streets saying ceasefire and
37:58
then you've got people over in the United States calling
38:00
for ceasefire and they go, you hate Jews. So
38:02
are you literally claiming that all of Israeli
38:05
population hate themselves? Think
38:07
about how dumb this is and we're going to
38:09
end with that point today. Now, I'm not, of
38:11
course, I guarantee there's somebody out there who is
38:13
saying free Palestine that secretly hates Jews. People
38:16
are disgusting in some cases. People are racist. Anywhere
38:18
you look in the world, that exists in some
38:20
way. But to simply
38:22
blindly and broad strokes say anybody saying free
38:24
Palestine, anybody saying from river to the sea,
38:26
unless they're Israeli, of course, which happens all
38:28
the time online and is literally in the
38:30
charter for the Likud party. But I forgot,
38:33
they're all racist if they say that, only
38:35
if they're Palestinian. It's
38:37
absurd, guys, and it's not working.
38:39
People aren't falling for it. Hundreds
38:42
march in Tel Aviv demanding a
38:44
hostage deal after they kill three of their
38:47
people in tragic error. So the
38:50
point was right after, before it said,
38:52
we'll learn lessons from mistaken killings, resume
38:54
effort to free other hostages. You see
38:56
how they're framing this? Right?
38:59
So again, the point is we're, the only thing
39:01
we're going to accept is Hamas just
39:03
surrendering. You
39:05
know, it'd be a very interesting quick side note. What
39:08
if that did happen? What if Hamas just all
39:10
of them said we're done? Do you
39:13
really think they would stop what they're doing? It's
39:15
a good question to ask yourself. I think we
39:17
can prove that's not true. I think they would just say, well,
39:20
there's probably more Hamas somewhere or pretend
39:22
that that wasn't true. Who knows? That's
39:24
completely hypothetical in any case. The
39:26
point is they're saying resume effort
39:28
to free other hostages. That's not what they're doing.
39:32
They're going after their agenda, which by the way,
39:34
they're basically stating they want to remove all
39:36
their pushing everybody south. They want to move
39:38
them into the Sinai desert. They've got leak
39:40
plans that say as much open statements. I
39:42
think we're at like 40 different statements from
39:44
officials that are saying ethnic cleansing, genocidal statements
39:46
that you can prove calling
39:49
on Amalek and these different biblical passages
39:51
openly saying there's nobody innocent openly calling
39:53
them all human animals. I mean, it's
39:55
just blatant and
39:59
openly killing. their own people or
40:01
with a lack of concern for them, but then
40:03
after they do blatantly kill them, they go, oh,
40:05
it was an accident. We learned from it already.
40:07
And we're going to go right back to, quote,
40:09
freeing the hostages, which by the
40:11
way, quote, freeing the hostages is what just
40:13
ended up killing three hostages, because that's not what
40:15
they're doing. The
40:17
IDF says during combat in
40:20
Sijaya, the IDF mistakenly identified three
40:22
Israeli hostages as a threat and
40:24
as a result, fired toward them
40:26
and the hostages were killed. Now,
40:29
wouldn't you argue that when you're in a
40:32
situation where you know there are hundreds or
40:34
over a hundred people that are your people
40:36
that you're trying to, that you claim
40:38
your only mission is to rescue. Don't you
40:40
think that might be the forefront of their mind as opposed
40:43
to just firing on people that they see in the street,
40:46
unless they're just firing
40:48
on people they see in the street, which
40:50
by the way, we've proven already. Their
40:53
bodies were transferred to Israeli territory for
40:55
examination where it was confirmed that there
40:57
they were three Israeli hostages and were
40:59
identified. Yotam
41:01
home. They
41:04
say was kidnapped on October 7th. Sameer
41:06
Talaka, who was kidnapped from the October
41:09
7th and the first day the third hostage
41:11
was not supposed to be discussed, but they
41:13
later said it was
41:15
okay. The family did. His name is
41:17
Alon Shamriz, I believe. Now it says
41:20
the IDF began reviewing the incident immediately.
41:22
The IDF emphasizes that this is an
41:24
active combat zone in which ongoing fire fighting
41:26
over the last few days has occurred. Immediate
41:28
lessons from the event have been learned. What
41:31
would that be? Which have
41:33
been passed on to all of us. I
41:36
mean, it just brings hollow. Right? What
41:38
lesson to everybody within what? A couple hours,
41:40
everybody already learned and knows in his body
41:42
the lesson. I mean, it just seems like
41:44
a statement. The idea of expresses deeper more.
41:46
So for the tragic incident and sends the
41:48
family, that's heartfelt condolences, which by the way
41:50
is sad guys, no matter who
41:52
you are, what side you think you're on, these are
41:55
just, well,
41:57
to be clear, anybody
41:59
dying in any of these cases. whether military or not is
42:01
not something anybody should rejoice in. Human
42:03
life matters, guys, and I'm just so tired
42:05
of this game being played from the sides
42:07
and usually the two-party paradigm. But it is
42:09
important to point out that an IDF member
42:13
is a military target. And
42:15
in the sense of what is actually happening,
42:17
which is an occupied territory and the legal
42:20
armed rebellion that is protected
42:23
under the Geneva Conventions, would
42:25
mean that an IDF member is a military target,
42:27
just like they're firing on whatever they say is
42:30
a mass. And by the way, killing many, many,
42:32
many more civilians, which apparently doesn't change the discussion,
42:35
in the sense they're firing or engaging
42:37
with IDF members, that makes it a
42:39
legal target. I'm not rejoicing in the
42:41
death. I'm simply pointing out that that
42:43
is international law, because that you
42:45
don't like the way that sounds doesn't mean it's
42:47
not international law. It's a static reality. The
42:50
IDF says, oh, it's
42:52
any expresses remorse of the incident and
42:55
sends the family's condolences. Our national mission
42:57
is to locate the missing and return all
42:59
the hostages home. Yeah, but
43:01
in the process, what we're doing is indiscriminately bombing
43:03
wherever they may be. So I
43:05
don't know how you could take that at face value. The
43:08
name of the third hostage mistakenly killed was,
43:10
and it says, Alon Shimriz.
43:15
Now here is CBS News talking
43:17
about the three killed. And this gets into other
43:20
discussions too. All this happening at the same time.
43:22
Three, they say they killed. Three bodies, they
43:24
say were returned. And then apparently two
43:26
or three other people. And I'll show you what I
43:29
mean. It's an interesting timing of all this, which makes
43:31
me think that something else happened. Three
43:33
hostages being held by Hamas and
43:35
Gaza were mistakenly killed by friendly fire during
43:38
combat operations, which again, let's not forget, by
43:40
the way, the entire original narrative was that
43:42
this was just wholesale slaughter, murder, everything they
43:44
could do to kill and hurry everybody all
43:46
the time. And that's never been embodied by
43:48
what we see coming back. Right?
43:52
Let's forget. Let's not forget. These were killed by IDF.
43:55
Now, yes, taking civilians
43:58
was a crime, but these were... civilians right
44:02
that has to matter guys the law matters
44:04
during combat operations the dense neighborhood in Gaza
44:06
City where we're fighting has been taking place
44:08
the Israeli military so they mistakenly fired on
44:10
them they said the bodies have
44:13
been returned to Israel identity were confirmed and
44:15
it goes over the same name Samir Talaka
44:17
Yotam Haim and Alan
44:19
Shamir Shamriz the
44:24
idea of emphasizes at the same point they
44:26
military the Benjamin Netanyahu said in this statement
44:28
together with the entire people of Israel I
44:31
bow my head in deep sorrow and mourn the death of
44:33
three other hostages they hate this person guys
44:36
they are screaming with vitriol about this
44:38
person Netanyahu they wanted him removed
44:40
before October 7th this is only made it
44:42
worse and they are protesting outside of his
44:44
home I mean it's
44:46
crazy I mean now even there he's even they've now even
44:49
lost the support of the US government it seems it
44:52
says this is an unbearable tragedy and all of Israel's grieving
44:54
their loss this evening rather blaming you that yahoo and you
44:56
know that bodies of three other hostages
44:58
were recovered this week as well according
45:01
to previous statements from the Israeli military
45:03
and this is a body of Ila
45:05
told on oh yeah
45:08
this is this is a Friday
45:12
French citizen and
45:14
reportedly been attending the music festival and there
45:17
was also Eden Zakaria and Ziv
45:19
Dotto now
45:21
it says here that they have said that
45:23
there is an estimated 137 still being held
45:26
now Hamas has said a long time ago
45:28
that wasn't accurate both of which because they
45:30
have killed many of them or because they
45:32
didn't even have that many so I foresee
45:34
a problem when this comes to that final
45:36
and what were their discrepancy and
45:38
what they expect to come back which seems like
45:40
a set up to fail kind of situation but
45:42
here's I 24 and this is from the 12th
45:46
talking about Eden Zakara and Ziv
45:48
Dotto but interestingly leaving out the
45:52
first one Ila to Lott told
45:54
on oh so
45:57
simply just pointing out and this is where it gets into these are
45:59
also So IDF members saying
46:03
they recovered their bodies, remains were brought back to
46:05
Israel led by IDF units. You know,
46:07
so it's interesting we're not hearing all of this. Now
46:09
the obvious point, guys, is I don't know why we
46:12
wouldn't be at least asking whether it's possible that all
46:14
of these were killed by the bombings. If
46:17
some of them were, then obviously all of them
46:19
could be. I'm not saying I know that
46:21
for sure. Any number of these people could
46:23
have been killed by Hamas. They could have been killed
46:25
by any number of things, including starvation and dying of
46:27
thirst, right? But overall, we have to
46:29
ask these questions and that's not what they're doing. They're now
46:31
dumping all of this and saying Hamas murdered all of them.
46:35
And by the way, let's not forget that
46:37
people, hostages coming back from Gaza said one
46:40
of their biggest fears, this was reported by
46:42
Horetz, was that they would die
46:44
by IDF bombing and
46:46
then be reported as killed by Hamas. It
46:49
seems like that's happening. Now
46:54
the overall point was simply that it
46:56
seems odd that one of them wasn't included in this discussion. And here –
46:58
oh, here's
47:00
actually some more. See, this is interesting. Let me
47:02
read this part here. So
47:05
they identified them, and this is the two of them. It
47:07
says, Eden 27 was abducted from the
47:09
festival while Ziv was taken hostage while
47:12
serving as a logistic supervisor in this
47:14
battalion, which is a military target. Ziv
47:17
Dada was acknowledged as a fallen soldier in
47:19
captivity. Now why was that?
47:23
If his body was only just recovered, why was
47:25
he deemed fallen before? Until
47:27
today he was acknowledged as a fallen soldier.
47:30
Just like they said, that child was killed who later came
47:32
home. Guys, it seems like they're just saying
47:35
whatever works for the narrative. Now you could argue
47:37
they somehow made a mistake, but I'm seeing
47:39
far too many inconsistencies to feel
47:42
like it's all an accident, especially when
47:44
they refuse to say anything about some topics because
47:46
they claim it might be misunderstood. It's
47:48
obvious that this is about controlling narratives in my opinion.
47:53
Now down here it says, in the
47:55
course of operations leading to the recovery
47:57
of the bodies, two IDF reserve duty
47:59
soldiers, Galmir Ighazal, and
48:01
IOMIR Berkowitz were killed in
48:03
action with additional soldiers sustaining
48:05
injuries. So these are
48:07
two other IDF members that were killed in the process of
48:09
all this. And yet we continue
48:11
to not see any real provable evidence about Hamas
48:13
even being killed at all. Other
48:16
than the civilians they trotted out, which we'll get into
48:19
in a second, our national mission is to locate the
48:21
missing and return all the hostages home. We're
48:23
collaborating closely with security agencies utilizing
48:25
all intelligence and operational capabilities to
48:29
safe return of all hostages. Does that include the
48:31
dumb bombs that are indiscriminately bombing? Now
48:35
Eli David adds today, something
48:37
else. Ron
48:39
Sherman and Nick Beiser, he says,
48:41
were kidnapped while being alive and
48:44
well, which is a very
48:46
weird way to say that, almost like he just
48:48
copied and pasted. But today IDF retrieved their dead
48:50
bodies. Hamas executed these hostages in
48:52
cold blood while they were encaptive. Now how did
48:54
he possibly know that? That's not what they're
48:57
saying. So he's just giving you what they're
48:59
supposed to be saying. Hamas is the greatest evil
49:01
since the Nazis. I just, you know, give us this
49:03
game, bring up the Holocaust, talk about Nazis, make sure
49:05
you know they're anti-Semitic, whatever the narrative is. Obviously
49:10
what they've been doing is trying to convince you very aggressively that
49:13
they're either ISIS or Nazis or whatever works for you
49:15
in that moment. None of which
49:17
really makes any sense.
49:19
Now I pointed out, which plenty
49:21
of people, let's be clear, in this
49:24
article you can clearly read the names of the people. I'm
49:26
not suggesting these were the same three people. My point
49:28
was to make this obvious. He's
49:30
saying these two people were
49:33
recovered. I said, was it
49:35
these three bodies? Simply making
49:37
a point. They're just, IDF
49:39
is killing their own hostages, and
49:42
why we would immediately blame Hamas with this if you
49:44
can see that that's happening. Now
49:47
the point in this is to
49:49
ask, well first of all, let's read
49:52
this. This is from the IDF. The
49:54
bodies of these hostages, the two that he just discussed, were
49:56
abducted by Hamas on October 7th. Have
49:59
been recovered. from Gaza during operational activity
50:01
and returned to Israeli territory. So he got
50:04
what the IDF was saying. The
50:06
IDF sends the family's heart full of the same discussion.
50:09
Now obviously the IDF parody says Israeli airstrikes
50:11
is a possible cause of death. I
50:13
agree. Here's where it gets interesting. Here's
50:15
what the Times of Israel says. IDF retrieves the bodies of
50:18
two of these soldiers. This was on the 15th. It's today.
50:20
So it's interesting that we're getting the story about three
50:22
bodies here without any
50:25
overlap to the other bodies here, or three others,
50:27
or then these two here, which all seem to
50:29
happen in the same timeframe. It just feels very
50:31
odd to me the way this was covered. Now
50:34
it says IDF forces operating in Gaza recovered
50:36
the two bodies of
50:38
Nick and Ron Sherman, Nick Beiser,
50:40
Ron Sherman, which both
50:42
military, both IDF. Still
50:45
sad that they were dead. Still sad that their
50:47
lives were cut short. But they were military
50:49
targets. The military says
50:51
it has informed the soldiers' families. Now
50:53
it says Beiser began his service on
50:55
April 30th on October 7th, was taken
50:57
captive near his base in Ires Crossing.
51:00
Beiser was working with the IDF as
51:02
a liaison. Down here it says
51:04
Sherman last spoke to his mother on the 7th.
51:06
He was at an army base when he was
51:08
taken. So
51:10
when he's saying Ron Sherman
51:13
and Nick Beiser were kidnapped while being alive and
51:15
well, do
51:17
you get what he's doing here? He's clearly trying to
51:19
make it seem as if these were just a couple
51:21
of innocent people who were snatched while they were living in alive
51:23
and well. No, they
51:25
were IDF members in military bases that
51:27
were engaged with by a legal resistance.
51:31
That's the legitimate reality
51:33
of the international law in this case. Any
51:37
member of Hamas that went off and killed a
51:39
civilian or did anything else other than the legally
51:41
protected acts were crimes. This
51:44
was not. People
51:47
are going to hate it, that's the case, but that's the reality.
51:50
That's why he didn't say that because this man
51:52
is a liar and he's a propagandist. Now
51:56
here's El Anlevi again. 132
52:00
hostages which is different than what we were just told by
52:03
times of Israel, but it goes on to say
52:06
13 males 19
52:09
females two children 10
52:12
of them age 75 plus Then
52:14
apparently 172 Israelis and 11 foreigners So
52:18
I mean are are these Israelis
52:20
and foreigners somehow like not male or female like
52:23
it's a weird way to state that But
52:25
either way the point is down by three after
52:27
the three bodies rescued The
52:30
three bodies that you killed I don't think that's
52:32
what he's talking about the two other people that
52:34
were IDF members Probably not they're talking about the
52:36
three that they recovered that seem highly likely to
52:38
have been killed by Israeli bombings Which
52:40
they have no evidence to suggest otherwise, but
52:42
it only includes those three Includes
52:45
20 bodies of murdered hostages. See that's where
52:47
everything else is dumped. Why are we only
52:49
hearing this now? 110
52:51
captivity survivors eight bodies repatriated five
52:54
missing persons. I mean That
52:57
doesn't add up to make that simple So I don't know where
52:59
that all that that weird math came from but that doesn't add
53:01
up with everything he says there But here's what he has to
53:03
say Date
53:06
on the hostage crisis Hamas is still
53:08
holding 132
53:11
people hostage since ten seven in
53:13
addition to four hostages from before
53:16
That hostage count has been
53:18
revised down by three since
53:20
yesterday's update in addition
53:22
to recovering the bodies of murdered
53:24
hostages Corporal Nick Beiser and sergeant
53:26
Ron Sherman the IDF also recovered
53:29
the body of dual Israeli French
53:31
national Elia Tlaedano age 28 who
53:34
was abducted from the Nova music festival
53:36
and murdered in Hamas captivity
53:40
Among the remote it's all murder. Now, of course,
53:42
that's one of the possibilities right
53:46
But we need to realize that this is exactly what
53:48
was the worst fear of one of the people
53:50
who's currently back in Israel Knowing
53:53
that they're bombing and in many cases
53:56
already did kill some of these people
53:58
realize again One of the
54:01
people who was home already said
54:03
they witnessed themselves seeing these
54:05
people die due to IDF bombings And
54:08
now they're just saying it was a must That
54:11
this is what we're talking about guys. This is
54:13
an obvious Deception in
54:15
no way does that mean Hamas is not capable? they
54:18
already admitted to this or rather
54:20
accuse them of this because they saw it themselves
54:23
and Don't forget minute
54:25
is people they've been shut away. They've been told they're not allowed to
54:27
speak to the press 15
54:29
of the people from the Nova festival have been Involuntarily
54:33
committed in a mental institution. I Mean
54:37
it's it's staggering remaining
54:40
132 hostages in the Hamas terror dungeons are 113
54:42
males and 19 females There
54:47
are two Hamas terror dungeons.
54:50
I mean, this is my point guys I mean
54:52
you don't need to make this is they make
54:54
this cartoonish This
54:56
is what this is one of the points of
54:58
the reactive points we're gonna get into but that's
55:00
a good one right there So this comes out
55:03
where everyone leaving is saying, you know
55:05
Don't be kidnapped still scary for them to be
55:07
taken. The point is they were treated. Well, that's
55:09
what they said They were fed they were allowed
55:11
to be together and
55:14
they call it a Hamas terror dungeon Probably
55:17
envisioning what they're doing to Palestinians right now because
55:19
that is what's going on as they admit as
55:22
the international community admits as Amity and the Human
55:24
Rights Watch and Beth Selim and all of them
55:26
admit Its
55:28
projection either way that's not to
55:30
say that maybe Hamas Maybe I'll have a
55:32
terror dungeon somewhere certainly not what they were kept in
55:35
or with any other people coming home or saying But
55:37
please you on continue telling us all of the
55:39
things about what everybody tells us didn't happen children
55:43
under 18 the b-bus infants
55:45
and 10 people over 73
55:48
bus infants and 10 there are
55:50
two children under 18 the b-bus in Yeah,
55:52
sorry to make sure he said it fully
55:54
the b-bus family has already been set claimed
55:57
by the mother who has killed captivity to
55:59
have been by
56:01
other people who have come back have stated this. They
56:04
know this, they've heard it, they just don't
56:06
care because the Bebas family have become kind
56:08
of famous because of the red hair. That
56:10
was one of the things they said and so clearly
56:12
they just rather use them for propaganda purposes. It's
56:15
horrifically sad that they were killed by
56:17
IDF bombings. ...and 10 people over
56:20
75. 121 of the hostages are Israelis, another
56:22
11 foreign nationals. ...and
56:28
just repeating the information the same. Now here's the point that I
56:30
said a second ago just in case you didn't believe me. Music
56:33
festival massacre. Survivors.
56:36
Involuntarily committed due to mental
56:38
breakdowns. Yeah, maybe that's what
56:40
happened. Quite frankly I think it's very concerning that
56:42
people who might have something to say are being
56:45
involuntarily committed after they just went through a
56:47
trauma. Else not forget,
56:49
the information that's come out proving that the
56:51
lies they spread about what happened at that
56:54
festival have been exposed by Haaretz themselves. Now
56:57
getting into what they're
57:00
still saying about these people. Here is Hen Mazzegh,
57:02
one of these extreme propagandists
57:04
since October 7th, saying
57:06
this another... Eden, which one
57:08
of the people that they brought back, one of the
57:11
bodies, was buried today. Hamas
57:13
stole her future, abused her and executed her
57:15
in captivity. So now
57:17
we're just adding on narratives about how
57:19
do you know that they were abused? The
57:22
point is this is becoming aggressive. This is
57:25
making my skin crawl. Now
57:28
people are going to attack someone like me for
57:30
simply questioning this. When in
57:32
reality it should make you sick that these
57:34
people are using your family members to achieve
57:37
an end when you know they're
57:39
being lied about. Listen
57:41
to the people who've come home already. They
57:43
already told you what happened to these people. And
57:46
now they're just folding in that they were abused
57:48
as well when everybody else has come back and
57:51
said they were treated well. On top
57:53
of that already blaming Hamas without any evidence to claim
57:56
that. Makes
57:59
me sick. How about the bills not also factor
58:01
this in? These people came
58:03
back because the IDF found them. Is
58:06
it not possible they were also killed by the IDF? It's
58:10
just amazing how much people will blindly take a
58:12
face value a narrative that they are already invested
58:14
in Now
58:16
we already talked about this to begin the
58:18
freed Israeli captives have admitted more fear of
58:20
IDF bombs than Hamas itself Now here's the
58:23
article itself. Let's go through some of these points Of
58:26
course, I lost the highlighting. Let's just kind of find it real quick
58:31
So it says we know for sure as what I was
58:33
telling you and this is the actual tweet itself right here
58:35
We're she speaking on the record. I showed you earlier That
58:39
we know for sure that three people
58:41
were killed by our fire meaning Israel's
58:43
fire three hostages Interesting now
58:46
that we're getting three bodies back. They're claiming we're abused by
58:48
Hamas Now
58:52
it says Dan's this is Dan is this woman here their
58:54
name is Nome Dan her Comments
58:57
appear to confirm a statement
59:00
delivered from captivity in
59:02
Gaza by the 34 year old Israeli
59:04
citizen yard in Bebas Addressing
59:07
Netanyahu, which he doesn't care about She
59:11
said that the Israeli military had
59:13
killed his wife and his
59:15
two children in an airstrike Excuse me. He
59:17
that's the abductee. He said that they had killed his
59:19
wife and the two children I'm sorry.
59:21
I just I just said the wrong person It's
59:23
the part this is in here this I have open right here
59:27
I wish is that the one right there? Let me make sure oh That's
59:31
right, this is the one so we have that that's what I was
59:33
gonna say so this Is
59:35
a good point to make about how the way
59:37
back machine and everything else is being aggressively deleted
59:39
So this was a report coming directly from This
59:44
platform Wait,
59:47
which one was it? No, this was this
59:49
this went out on a plot I think
59:51
was either I 24 or one of those
59:53
platforms where they were speaking publicly now this
59:55
got removed from Twitter Even though and not
59:57
only from Twitter but
1:00:00
both the Wayback Machine backups are also gone.
1:00:04
All that tells me is that something is trying
1:00:06
to remove this from view. You don't remove two
1:00:09
separate Wayback Machines, archived
1:00:12
versions of it, in addition to what was on
1:00:14
Twitter, unless there's something else. That's my personal opinion.
1:00:17
But anyway, the point was, this is all public
1:00:19
information that she
1:00:21
is discussing, so there's not just
1:00:23
one person, but what she's saying
1:00:26
aligns with what the person in
1:00:28
captivity in Gaza said, which
1:00:30
was, he
1:00:33
pleaded for the Prime Minister to negotiate for
1:00:35
the release of their bodies. Remember, I already
1:00:37
told you this, Hamas was trying to send
1:00:39
them back before the ceasefire ended, and
1:00:42
that's what ultimately broke the ceasefire. I
1:00:44
argue they were desperate not to let
1:00:46
this conversation become public. They're still
1:00:48
using the Bebas family as propaganda tools.
1:00:51
It says Bebe's talking to Netanyahu. He
1:00:53
said directly, you destroyed my family. You
1:00:56
killed my wife and my children. Everything in my life, I
1:00:59
am begging you, please bring my wife and children home. Now,
1:01:01
just for the record, for those that are new, we already
1:01:03
talked about this when we first covered this on this show.
1:01:05
So watch this show, you'll see the clip we're talking
1:01:08
about. It's since been removed. I
1:01:10
think that's very telling, this keeps happening. Twitter's
1:01:13
allowing all sorts of grotesque, graphic
1:01:17
bombs and people being exploded, but of course
1:01:19
you can't allow something like this, because that's outside
1:01:21
the Trump service, right? Interesting.
1:01:25
But it goes on to say, free Israeli captains have
1:01:27
also delivered harrowing accounts of the massive Israeli bombings
1:01:29
they endured. Excuse
1:01:32
me, according to a Facebook post by
1:01:34
Israeli television producer, Haggai Levy, from
1:01:37
the reports of the returning abductees, it
1:01:40
is repeated that the most horrifying captivity
1:01:42
in trauma, trauma
1:01:44
they experienced was the IDF bombings. Pardon
1:01:48
me, here is his post from Facebook. And
1:01:52
this is his account, you can check for yourself. It
1:01:56
says reports of the returning hostages coming
1:01:58
back and rising that apparent. the
1:02:00
most horrific prisoner trauma they have
1:02:02
experienced were the IDF bombings.
1:02:05
When they talk about them, they literally shake
1:02:07
in front of them. The
1:02:10
terms are of hell, of death, of an earthquake, of
1:02:12
noise from another planet, which
1:02:14
also caused permanent hearing damage.
1:02:16
This is not Hamas doing this. They
1:02:19
fear of being killed by returnees... The
1:02:23
fear of being killed by returnees was
1:02:25
zero, compared to the fear
1:02:27
of dying in a bomb. Of
1:02:29
course, the very thought that one
1:02:31
who is supposed to save you is the
1:02:34
one who is supposed to kill you is
1:02:36
a trauma-enhancing element. Obviously.
1:02:41
It goes on to say, number two, from
1:02:45
all these testimonies, it is clear that
1:02:48
in many other cases, this fear
1:02:50
did come true, meaning
1:02:52
many of them did die from IDF bombings.
1:02:55
At some point, when all the war propaganda produced
1:02:57
by the IDF spokesperson and his people, and then
1:03:00
that's one of the persons we're talking about here,
1:03:02
people we're talking about, that control almost all media,
1:03:05
it is appropriate to have here a true report about
1:03:07
all the tens of people in this disaster that died
1:03:09
by the IDF. Tens of people.
1:03:13
Seemingly similar amount that we're being told they just
1:03:15
discovered. Kidnapped that
1:03:17
were injured in bombings. Civilians
1:03:19
that were shot on Black Saturday. These
1:03:22
are all IDF killings he's talking about.
1:03:24
Soldiers that fell in German gunfire without
1:03:26
this truth, which is better
1:03:28
than all the sowing of doubts in the counter-propaganda,
1:03:31
no healing process can begin. This is
1:03:33
the person from Israeli media. The
1:03:35
biggest threat floating right now, it says, over the
1:03:38
heads of the kidnapped, is a
1:03:40
military operation to rescue them. Just so
1:03:43
you make sure you understand that. They're saying their biggest
1:03:45
fear while they were there is
1:03:47
the fact that they were being rescued by the
1:03:49
IDF because of the way this was being done.
1:03:52
You can't miss what they're saying. At
1:03:55
best, that means they know they don't care about
1:03:57
them. And yet, wherever you're debating, whether
1:03:59
that's the case, case when they tell you that's
1:04:01
the case or that by stating
1:04:03
this it makes you an anti-semite? I mean
1:04:06
think about how wild this is. The families of
1:04:08
the kidnapped and everyone around them need to scream
1:04:10
and scream and do everything to prevent such
1:04:12
an operation. That's what they're currently
1:04:15
doing and that's what they're saying
1:04:17
they're doing it for. We're doing this for you to
1:04:19
bring your bet when they're going stop what you're doing.
1:04:22
Scream at them stop what they're doing.
1:04:25
His chance of ending up in a mass slaughter
1:04:27
is about a hundred times that of his success
1:04:30
because of the idea. I
1:04:33
will mention only one name here he says Nashlan
1:04:35
and Waxman. The blood
1:04:37
of the victims of such an operation like
1:04:39
the blood of Waxman will be on the
1:04:41
hands of anyone who decides at a military
1:04:43
or political level to gamble on the lives
1:04:45
of the hostages in the name of ego
1:04:48
strategy and principles. I
1:04:52
just crave that this is what the Israeli
1:04:54
population is saying stop
1:04:57
you're killing us stop
1:05:00
your ego is getting in the way.
1:05:02
Military or political anything other
1:05:04
than ceasefire is against what they
1:05:06
want and of course this
1:05:08
gets deleted removed you don't get to see it anymore. Now
1:05:11
let's realize as this image shows
1:05:14
even Biden's own staff is demanding a ceasefire out
1:05:16
front of the White House which is probably one
1:05:19
of the you know straws
1:05:21
broke the camel's back in regard to getting them
1:05:23
to finally admit this was genocide. Or
1:05:27
more specifically call for ceasefire. They haven't even
1:05:29
done that quite frankly. It's really about saying
1:05:32
admitting they're bombing indiscriminately but in
1:05:34
this discussion we went over the rounding
1:05:37
up and executing of civilians at the school which they
1:05:39
then pretended were all a bunch of Hamas members. We
1:05:42
talked about the obvious reality that these people that
1:05:44
they had stripped and put on the ground by
1:05:47
the way who has that has now been
1:05:49
completely proven to be not from tunnels underneath
1:05:51
like Mossad pretended as they even tweeted out
1:05:54
but from the school that is right there but
1:05:57
the doctors and teachers and average civilians.
1:06:00
And everybody's calling this out. People all over
1:06:02
the world are pointing out, that's my friend,
1:06:04
that's a doctor, that's the, these were not
1:06:06
Hamas members. And
1:06:09
it's even been admitted by Israeli
1:06:11
media, walking
1:06:13
it back to 10%. Right at
1:06:15
the beginning it was they're all Hamas. And everyone
1:06:17
that you would expect came out and said, look
1:06:19
at all the Hamas members. And look, you can
1:06:22
tell doctors are there. That means that doctors are
1:06:24
Hamas. Well, no, the lie was
1:06:26
that they're Hamas. And then it got walked back
1:06:28
85% where they said,
1:06:30
whoa, whoa, wait a minute. Only about 10 to
1:06:32
15% are actually affiliated with Hamas, which doesn't even
1:06:34
mean they're Hamas. My point
1:06:37
was well affiliated in the eyes of the Israeli government,
1:06:39
as by the way, we just showed you, nobody there
1:06:41
is innocent, is simply being present in
1:06:43
Gaza or being Palestinian or both. So
1:06:46
obviously it's easy to say they're affiliated.
1:06:49
They're there. But
1:06:51
this was all of them are Hamas, but then oh wait,
1:06:53
only 10%. That's quite the walk
1:06:55
back in one day, right? But
1:06:57
it gets even worse as you
1:06:59
then catch them using fake information.
1:07:02
Where they film this twice. First of
1:07:04
all, the absurdity of pretending that these
1:07:07
people who they already stripped down somehow
1:07:10
have guns to walk out and lay down. How
1:07:13
embarrassing. That's how bad
1:07:15
they are at this apparently. I don't know how they
1:07:17
ever got any propaganda out. But on top of that,
1:07:20
that they get caught filming it twice. As
1:07:22
you can see in this one, he's got a gun
1:07:24
in the other hand. And the video is not flipped. You
1:07:27
can clearly see that it's going this way. In this one,
1:07:29
the gun is in the other hand. Oops. How
1:07:32
embarrassing. And
1:07:35
they deleted the other one, right? This guy gets
1:07:37
caught posting this and then deleting it. Because
1:07:40
they lied. I mean, it's
1:07:43
just so continually blatant. So
1:07:45
the point is we talked about that. Now
1:07:47
really quickly, this is the frustrating thing we keep seeing.
1:07:50
I'm not sure who this person is, but Douglas Mary
1:07:52
here, has
1:07:55
almost 700, almost 800,000 followers. Here's
1:07:58
what he says about these. people. I
1:08:01
didn't even look at what the Sun article says, probably the
1:08:03
same BS. Oh,
1:08:06
okay, just literally citing what he
1:08:08
says. Why are all the fuss
1:08:10
over stripping of Hamas terrorists? Oh,
1:08:13
you mean the doctors and teachers that you pretended for
1:08:15
Hamas? That even the IDF walked back to only 10%
1:08:18
affiliated with Hamas? Like, how embarrassing, guys.
1:08:20
But this is my point. The
1:08:23
lie will circle the world twice before the truth
1:08:25
even gets its boots on to quote Mark
1:08:27
Twain. Paraphrase anyway. So
1:08:30
he simply goes, amazing how the same
1:08:32
people who weren't bothered about Israeli women
1:08:34
being raped, which again, by the way,
1:08:36
has not been proven. It
1:08:39
has not been proven. There
1:08:41
is no provable evidence. They've already used fake
1:08:44
images. They've already been caught lying about where
1:08:46
things happened, then ultimately have zero
1:08:48
forensic evidence, even according to their people.
1:08:51
Has not been proven. I've never maintained that it
1:08:53
didn't happen. But people like
1:08:55
this who state that it has, when you can
1:08:58
prove that they haven't proven it, is
1:09:00
embarrassing, which means they're just going along to
1:09:02
get along, which is probably why he's got
1:09:04
so many followers. The point, though, people
1:09:07
who weren't bothered about the thing that seems to have
1:09:09
not happened or you can't prove happened, furious
1:09:11
about Hamas men, their underwear. Again, see,
1:09:15
it's obvious that he went along with the other narrative
1:09:17
because he's going along with this one, too. Or he's
1:09:19
not smart enough to think beyond what they state is
1:09:21
something without any due diligence. Let's
1:09:23
not forget they've already admitted that's not
1:09:25
true. But then you've got Billboard Chris,
1:09:27
which probably should just stick to COVID-19. Says that's
1:09:30
what do leftists want them to do? It's always
1:09:33
the binary two party paradigm that misses people's minds
1:09:35
up, but march them out in full gear so
1:09:37
they can blow themselves up. Right.
1:09:39
You know, going back to the old terrorist,
1:09:42
you know, suicide bomber unaware
1:09:44
of the real history on where that really comes from.
1:09:46
These guys invited Israel to come and kill them. Oh,
1:09:49
did they? Right. Just stick to COVID, man.
1:09:51
You don't know what you're talking about here. They're
1:09:54
fortunate they're being treated so kindly. Wow.
1:09:56
This is sad, guys.
1:09:59
I mean, it's just. Not only are
1:10:01
these not Hamas terrorists, but to act
1:10:03
like even a member of a terrorist
1:10:05
group should be dehumanized It reveals who
1:10:07
you really are sadly enough But
1:10:11
let's forget let's not forget. They're not what they said they
1:10:13
were and Here
1:10:15
is the same point. So again, let's just be clear
1:10:19
Not only have they again they walk this back, but
1:10:21
it's already been proven Definitively that
1:10:23
they lied about what they were doing they
1:10:25
fake videos about them and Almost
1:10:27
every single one of these people has been identified
1:10:29
as some other element now What they've
1:10:32
tried to do is go all that proves
1:10:34
is that Hamas is everywhere Well, the only
1:10:36
thing out of all of that that hasn't
1:10:38
been proven is that the Hamas you
1:10:40
you're going off what Israel says Even
1:10:44
though we already proved that they've been lying about
1:10:46
many different things as he has her rats has broken
1:10:48
down That's not she include that I
1:10:51
think it's this one right here You Know
1:10:54
nope, that's the other one. Hold
1:10:56
on. I've got it right here But
1:10:59
just for those that especially don't
1:11:01
know that these have been
1:11:03
they've you know broken down even by her rats Include
1:11:08
this year And
1:11:11
this goes over all of it the
1:11:13
mat the Hamas massacre dragged the spread of Trocities
1:11:16
that not all happened in reality. This is the
1:11:18
Hebrew version. It's much more honest and specific than
1:11:21
the one that's in English But it's very clear
1:11:23
40 bed of babies didn't happen
1:11:26
It's a lie not just that it's not proven with a lie
1:11:28
the baby in the oven didn't happen
1:11:30
They've proven that's not true and yet
1:11:33
the guy from Zaka still says it The
1:11:36
guy that keeps fighting as proof of these
1:11:38
things or the rape allegations. He's also saying
1:11:40
which they have not proven Or
1:11:43
or any number of things that's Owen Jones from I
1:11:45
pink the Guardian if I remember correctly Said
1:11:48
he went and saw the screening they showed remember
1:11:50
that actually include that too. I bet There
1:11:56
it is So
1:11:58
here's the video he goes over it. It's
1:12:00
a 25 minute video. Breaking
1:12:03
down what he says, Dilly Hussan breaks it down.
1:12:05
You can watch it for yourself. He says after
1:12:07
watching it, he saw no proof, not
1:12:10
evidence, but no one this case, there's no
1:12:12
evidence of that either. But no proof of
1:12:14
beheaded babies at all. No proof of Hamas
1:12:16
killing children. No proof of rape. No proof
1:12:18
of beheading humans alive. Hamas at and that's
1:12:20
the interesting part. You I've already shown this
1:12:22
as well. Hamas members literally
1:12:24
asking partygoers whether or not they were
1:12:26
soldiers. So
1:12:29
again, and individual like we've seen
1:12:31
in any war conducted by the West
1:12:33
is capable of breaking off and raping
1:12:35
and pillaging and stealing because that happens
1:12:37
in every war, disgustingly enough, which is
1:12:40
why we don't want war as civilians,
1:12:42
the government's do. I wonder why. But
1:12:44
the point is that the core
1:12:46
mandate seems to have been not to,
1:12:49
which seems to be backed up by what generally seems
1:12:51
to continue to happen. Not to say
1:12:53
good or bad, but just acknowledging what we can
1:12:55
prove. The point is, Owen said he saw none
1:12:57
of these things, even though we see people coming
1:13:00
out of that same room going, it proved everything.
1:13:02
I saw rape and I saw it. And they
1:13:04
are doing that. So he was confused
1:13:06
by that. And he said, Okay, well, I didn't see any
1:13:08
of that. So maybe he missed it. He called the UK
1:13:10
journalist, UK journalist goes, I didn't see it either calls an
1:13:12
American journalist, American journalist says I didn't see it either. So
1:13:15
what this proves, guys, is that there
1:13:17
is a systematic lie of deception
1:13:20
going on. People are being
1:13:22
put to lying. People claiming
1:13:24
that they saw a very specific woman with
1:13:27
a very specific setting on the ground at
1:13:29
the festival, which has been proven to have
1:13:31
been from 2022. So people are lying,
1:13:35
guys, which is disgusting.
1:13:38
It's despicable, reprehensible, but
1:13:40
it's happening. And
1:13:42
yet we're getting attacked for simply calling it
1:13:44
out. Now, back to the point. All
1:13:48
the lies about the atrocity propaganda, right? So
1:13:50
my point is, they're lying about this too.
1:13:53
Now, today, or yeah, excuse me
1:13:55
yesterday, they rolled out another one. And
1:13:58
guess what? It also very quickly got caught
1:14:01
for lying. First let's listen to what he
1:14:03
says. Well repeat
1:14:05
its call for remaining Hamas terrorists
1:14:07
to surrender as so many but
1:14:09
not enough have. Quite
1:14:12
frankly I don't think a single member
1:14:14
of Hamas has surrendered. What he's
1:14:16
mentioning is what we just proved to you
1:14:18
was not and even they walked
1:14:20
back to 10%, 15%, even just
1:14:23
only affiliated and
1:14:26
he's still the next day just rolling
1:14:29
it back out. He must know that they walked it
1:14:31
back but doesn't matter you know why because
1:14:33
he probably doesn't think that most Westerners are gonna
1:14:35
see that Heretz article so it's
1:14:37
aimed at you in English because he's
1:14:39
trying to propaganda what propaganda is the
1:14:42
West. Earlier over 70 terrorists
1:14:44
emerged from the Kamal Adwan
1:14:46
Hospital weapon. Okay. Weapons
1:14:49
in hand. So do you realize
1:14:53
what just happened there? Let
1:14:56
me see if I can grab that Mossad tweet real quick. That's
1:15:03
the one I hope so. Yep.
1:15:07
One of them anyway really quickly. Here.
1:15:12
Damn it that's not the one I want actually.
1:15:14
Well you're the point is the Mossad posted this and they
1:15:16
said they crawled out of the tunnel. Let me see if I
1:15:18
can just get that. Yeah
1:15:24
I don't think that's the right one. Well in any case
1:15:27
the point is they claimed they
1:15:29
crawled out of the tunnels and
1:15:32
now he's saying that they came out of the
1:15:34
hospital. Right? Because they got
1:15:36
exposed because people caught them in a lie and they
1:15:38
just adjust it. It's
1:15:41
very reactive. So it's
1:15:43
one of the first points where you see what basically
1:15:45
something gets stated. We prove it's a lie and then
1:15:47
they come out the next day and that the lies
1:15:49
just been altered a little bit.
1:15:52
It's like how strikingly obvious is that?
1:15:55
You can't just pretend it was tunnels and
1:15:57
then the next day say a hospital. Because
1:15:59
that's a lie. But people just don't care,
1:16:01
I guess. Surrounded
1:16:06
the Israeli Defense Forces releasing this
1:16:09
image just minutes ago, those
1:16:11
terrorists were apprehended and transferred to
1:16:13
field interrogators from Israeli military intelligence
1:16:16
and the Shin Bet for further
1:16:18
questioning. We think it
1:16:20
is outrageous that international officials from
1:16:23
the World Health Organization and elsewhere
1:16:25
are yet to condemn or even
1:16:27
express concern about Hamas
1:16:29
converting hospitals in the Gaza Strip
1:16:31
into military bases. A
1:16:58
spectacular failure. They
1:17:01
lied about the tunnel, they faked multiple angles
1:17:03
of the tunnel and they contradicted each
1:17:05
other and then they literally just walked away
1:17:07
from it even though BBC called them out for staging
1:17:10
one of the areas. They're
1:17:12
lying. So the point is
1:17:14
it's amazing to me that they just call back and
1:17:16
go, the UN just won't condemn the thing that they
1:17:18
know we haven't proven as if that's
1:17:20
going to drive them to do it more. It's
1:17:23
almost, it screams desperation. It's
1:17:25
reactive to what happened before. Usually
1:17:28
propaganda is what comes first. They're
1:17:30
reacting to the story and pumping out
1:17:32
press like secondary propaganda. That's
1:17:35
what it looks like to be losing control of the narrative. To
1:17:38
them we say you have not only let us down, you've
1:17:40
not only let Palestinians and the Gaza Strip down, you've
1:17:43
let down the whole world and the
1:17:45
whole architecture of global governance because this
1:17:47
terrorist abuse of hospitals has been happening
1:17:49
under your watch. As well
1:17:52
as the fact that we can prove the Shepa hospital itself,
1:17:54
which actually just brought up accidentally, was
1:17:56
the underground tunnels were built by Israel.
1:18:00
while the hospital was active. Yeah,
1:18:02
so accuse them if that which you are guilty seems
1:18:05
to be a classic tactic here. Or the fact that
1:18:07
you can prove that Israel's used hospitals or mosques or
1:18:09
schools numerous times just since
1:18:11
October 7th. But on top of
1:18:13
that, long before. That's not to say that Hamas hasn't,
1:18:15
but in this case, all I care about is what
1:18:17
we can prove right now. And
1:18:20
on top of that, they have never proven
1:18:22
that. I've made this point
1:18:24
many times. I'll make the human shield point again in
1:18:26
a minute. The UN investigated their allegations and did not
1:18:28
find any evidence to the effect. That doesn't mean they
1:18:31
didn't do it. It just means they did not find
1:18:33
evidence. So at best, it ends up being Israel repeats
1:18:35
the same claim with nothing to back it up. While
1:18:38
we can prove Israel has done it many, many times.
1:18:41
And you continue to cover up
1:18:43
for it and be complicit with
1:18:45
this abuse of protected facilities through
1:18:47
your shameful silence. We call on
1:18:49
all Hamas terrorists in the Gaza
1:18:51
Strip to surrender. It will speed
1:18:54
up the decisive end of this war
1:18:56
if they come out with their hands
1:18:58
above their heads, preferably with a white
1:19:00
flag. Right, right. It'll
1:19:02
speed up the war
1:19:05
process or the assassination that
1:19:07
he was probably gonna say right there, right?
1:19:09
It'll speed up our effort to just annihilate
1:19:11
everybody. Like, are we really gonna pretend if
1:19:14
they accidentally shot three hostages? That
1:19:16
they're gonna not shoot Hamas members? Seems
1:19:21
kind of ridiculous, doesn't it? But as
1:19:23
I simply said, your propaganda is very
1:19:25
reactive. A desperate knee jerk response to
1:19:27
what was exposed the day before. Largely
1:19:29
why so many see through it. Right,
1:19:32
so the point is that they come out and
1:19:34
they get exposed for faking this and
1:19:36
staging the video. So they respond very
1:19:38
quickly by coming out and saying, no,
1:19:40
here's Hamas using the things that we
1:19:43
said they were and the challenge is
1:19:45
what you claimed you exposed yesterday. And
1:19:48
then get caught again. Literally taking
1:19:50
two takes of the same video and doing
1:19:52
this more than once. Like,
1:19:55
think about how embarrassing this is. And basically you
1:19:57
can see the same thing where you've got the
1:19:59
same. Angle on the video and the point is that
1:20:01
they film this more than once the same for four people
1:20:07
Find the same four people going to a different angle
1:20:10
doing the same thing You
1:20:28
So Lord Bebo posted this I believe that's where
1:20:30
the video came from the
1:20:32
quote is how many times well, I
1:20:34
mean, let's just take the most obvious as We
1:20:38
just caught them yesterday the day
1:20:40
before lying about one filming it
1:20:42
twice People in their
1:20:44
underwear somehow producing a gun from
1:20:46
somewhere like it's so blatantly obvious
1:20:50
It's not is it not I mean, it's just as possible that these
1:20:52
people are Average
1:20:55
civilians they pulled out and told to hold guns Which
1:20:58
by the way, we just saw happen so
1:21:01
it's amazing that we can't connect these dots or some people
1:21:03
choose not to and And
1:21:06
here is one of the examples as well a Young
1:21:10
man in this fourth year medical school is
1:21:12
a student name is Naseer Imad
1:21:14
all mad hone Was
1:21:17
a trained volunteer come all on one hospital since the beginning
1:21:19
of the aggression in Gaza then
1:21:21
the Israeli army arrested him and under and
1:21:24
another nurse and forced them to act out this
1:21:26
scene as members of the resistance Surrendering and handing over
1:21:28
their weapons and this is him by
1:21:30
the way I've been talking to numerous people that have pointed
1:21:32
this out. The point is that they
1:21:34
are pretending that this is rather
1:21:36
they're using these people they've kidnapped from these hospitals
1:21:39
as they just told you and marching
1:21:41
them out with guns they provide and Then
1:21:45
which is hilarious. Here's 116. This is the
1:21:47
this is from the 14th Right.
1:21:50
Boom an hour later. Boom Eli David
1:21:52
takes the same image. He goes. Hey meet
1:21:54
Naseer. He's a talented multitasker It's a
1:21:56
physician and a terrorist See
1:21:59
my point That's reactive. We
1:22:02
have no evidence to suggest these people are
1:22:04
Hamas, other than Israel saying so. Or
1:22:07
either no proof. The evidence they would argue is a
1:22:09
video, but of course we've proven that they're lying about
1:22:11
this. They filmed it twice, they've lied about the angle,
1:22:13
they did it yesterday and the day before. So
1:22:16
now basically because they claim they're all
1:22:19
Hamas, that means that anybody who's there with
1:22:21
their other job means you can prove that
1:22:23
Hamas is everywhere. The point is it's embarrassingly
1:22:25
reactive. These people are clearly being
1:22:27
directed in some way, take the same images and
1:22:29
go, boom, no, they're terrorists who surrendered. Even
1:22:33
though they've already walked back to claim from before. And,
1:22:41
let's not forget, we
1:22:44
already showed you, this was on the 12th, that
1:22:46
they've literally, marching these
1:22:48
people out in their underwear when it's probably
1:22:50
freezing outside, using them as human
1:22:52
shields. Which by the way has been reported
1:22:54
by many of them who have been let go. That
1:22:56
they were not only used as human shields, but they
1:22:58
were made to wear certain things and marched into buildings
1:23:00
ahead of them. Which
1:23:03
by the way is something they
1:23:06
do all the time. And let's
1:23:08
not forget, oh actually I'll just show
1:23:10
you this quickly, they already got caught for this. This
1:23:13
was in the West Bank on November 10th,
1:23:16
where they were using a ballastinian as a
1:23:18
human shield. They
1:23:20
just don't care, they know that the people that are going
1:23:22
to blindly defend them are going to say you're a
1:23:25
liar and ignore it. But
1:23:27
they're losing that control. How
1:23:30
crazy obvious is that? Now, here's why I
1:23:32
brought this up. Again Eli David, so they
1:23:34
get caught lying about these
1:23:37
people, they roll out another fake argument
1:23:39
about people surrendering and proclaim they're Hamas.
1:23:41
They get caught using those people as
1:23:43
human shields, the same thing, Eli's Mr.
1:23:45
Next Day reactive propagandist rolls out
1:23:47
with another thing. Palestinian
1:23:49
Authority official says Hamas uses
1:23:51
women and children as human shields. Okay,
1:23:55
as I said the same Palestinian Authority that's been
1:23:57
called out as a tool of Israel. by
1:24:00
Palestine for years first point, which
1:24:02
again, Robert has covered. This
1:24:04
is back, this one was just from July.
1:24:07
Israel's attack on Janine failed. So Tel Aviv
1:24:09
uses the Palestinian Authority to do its dirty
1:24:11
work. Robert's been calling them out for a
1:24:13
very long time. This goes back to 2021. Israel
1:24:15
and the PA are provoking a new war on Gaza.
1:24:18
So just so you understand that, like how dumb it is
1:24:20
to pretend that that means this is another tool of Israel,
1:24:23
just like Hamas was been funded by Israel. But
1:24:26
it says, I wrote, your embarrassingly reactive propaganda
1:24:28
is obvious. This is on the heels of
1:24:30
the IDF caught again, using
1:24:32
human shields. Right,
1:24:35
so first of all, you're gonna blindly take the PA,
1:24:37
right? But then secondly, he was
1:24:39
just pointing out, Eli was, that
1:24:41
the PA was claiming support for
1:24:44
Hamas. You never realize
1:24:46
how dumb this all is and how reactive. So if
1:24:48
you don't think they're a tool of Israel before, now
1:24:51
you probably should. Seeing as how 10 seconds
1:24:53
ago, they were going, will you support them all?
1:24:55
Oh, wait a minute, we don't like them today.
1:24:57
They use human shields, because that seems to meet
1:24:59
some necessary propaganda point. And
1:25:02
then realize that they're just a tool of Israel, that's probably
1:25:04
why it's happening. But does Eli care?
1:25:06
Does Eli care? Well, on
1:25:08
that point, I'll include the
1:25:11
conversation of the open secret of
1:25:13
Israel using human shields. The
1:25:16
open secret. It's a good discussion,
1:25:18
it's a long show, but
1:25:20
I'll also include the, oh, I didn't, I looks like
1:25:22
I didn't have the rumble video
1:25:24
in there. Let
1:25:26
me grab it for you. It's
1:25:30
about 17 minutes long. I just did a
1:25:32
breakdown of just the human shield point. But
1:25:35
then I obviously have this play the beginning of this, the
1:25:37
clip that I played before. 2013,
1:25:39
Palestinian children tortured, used
1:25:43
as shields by Israel per the United
1:25:46
Nations. Reuters, Israeli
1:25:48
soldiers who used Palestinian boy and
1:25:51
nine year olds as human shields
1:25:53
avoid jail. Defense for
1:25:55
children international and international human rights
1:25:57
group. Israel forces use five. Palestinian
1:26:00
children as human shields that's 2023 This
1:26:04
is from 2017 generally human shields since
1:26:06
the beginning of the occupation in 1967
1:26:10
Israeli security forces have repeatedly used
1:26:12
Palestinians in the West Bank and
1:26:14
the Gaza Strip as human shields
1:26:17
Israeli soldiers now Elon
1:26:20
Levy again today After
1:26:24
this after the exposure of them both of
1:26:26
them just Reacting to the fact that we
1:26:28
just caught them using human shields Now
1:26:30
the United Nations comes out and says
1:26:32
schools medical and UN facilities are not
1:26:34
and never should never ever be a
1:26:36
target You know why cuz that's the
1:26:39
actual international law That's why collective punishment was created
1:26:41
in the sense that you should not be able
1:26:43
to say well bad guys are there So let's
1:26:45
just bomb all of them Except
1:26:47
if Israel does it then it's called international law But
1:26:50
it says unfortunately in Gaza they have quite often
1:26:53
become just that Well accept the fact that
1:26:55
you've proven that at all ever other than showing
1:26:57
a bunch of secondary images of guns on the
1:26:59
ground That even the BBC caught you faking But
1:27:02
it says the UN Director-general says
1:27:04
you've heard me many times say this no
1:27:07
place has been spared not even
1:27:09
places that Normally should be protected
1:27:11
by laws of war meaning the UN's telling you
1:27:14
that the you Israel government is not following the
1:27:16
rule of the laws of war but on top
1:27:18
of that That
1:27:21
you can clearly see That
1:27:23
they have been bombing everything including where they stay is
1:27:25
safe including where they tell them to go to get
1:27:27
to a safe place including where they
1:27:29
were before and including the Rafa crossing
1:27:31
where they might be able to leave in general and using
1:27:35
dumb bombs and mass assassination AI programs
1:27:37
and Openly telling you that they're bombing
1:27:39
civilians openly telling you no one is
1:27:41
innocent But let's keep debating whether they
1:27:44
are not only killing Hamas, right? But
1:27:46
I said not even the US government is maintaining
1:27:49
the absurd claim that their presence
1:27:51
let alone merely the allegation Which is all
1:27:54
you have is enough to make it
1:27:56
a lawful target, but you know
1:27:58
this and it's why you keep in session claiming
1:28:00
the opposite because nobody is buying it. Like
1:28:02
ask yourself why they keep saying it. Over
1:28:04
and over and over because everybody else is
1:28:07
challenging it. But they're just
1:28:09
pretending like they're just smug, except, well of course we
1:28:11
know that. No, we don't. Nobody believes you. And
1:28:15
this is what even the Jerusalem Post discussed.
1:28:19
The International Criminal Court puts the burden
1:28:21
on Israel to prove that they're using
1:28:23
human shields. This was on October 31st.
1:28:26
You don't just get to make the allegation and
1:28:28
bomb anything you want. That's what they're doing.
1:28:31
Nobody's backing. Not even the United States government is
1:28:33
backing them anymore. Not really. And
1:28:35
here is Betzalim, an Israeli human rights group making
1:28:37
it clear. I read it on the clip there.
1:28:39
But since the beginning of the occupation, Israeli
1:28:42
security forces have repeatedly used Palestinians in
1:28:44
the West Bank and Gaza Strip as
1:28:46
human shields, ordering them to
1:28:49
perform military tasks that risk their lives.
1:28:52
But we'll just plug our ears and stomp our feet until
1:28:54
we hear something that mentions Hamas, right? Well,
1:28:58
Elon Levy also comes out, reacted, right? So
1:29:00
after all of this information, everything
1:29:02
we're seeing, exposing that they're
1:29:04
hypocrites, exposing that their double standards
1:29:07
are clear, he
1:29:09
says Hamas just fired rockets at Jerusalem, triggering
1:29:12
a red alert siren on the Temple
1:29:14
Mount, including the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Nothing
1:29:17
is sacred for Hamas. OK,
1:29:20
so eluding basically implying
1:29:22
that they aimed at the Al-Aqsa
1:29:24
Mosque, which, by the
1:29:26
way, is the central point to one of their most
1:29:28
obvious prophecies around how this is going to be destroyed
1:29:30
and rebuilt. Interesting that that begins.
1:29:34
First of all, as I said, but
1:29:36
wait, weren't you the one telling
1:29:39
us that they commit war crimes
1:29:41
by firing rockets because those
1:29:43
rockets are unguided? Because they are, by
1:29:45
the way. So how
1:29:47
exactly do they target anything? That's
1:29:50
a mistake he made. And assuming this
1:29:52
even actually happened, that is, let's
1:29:55
not forget that they have used
1:29:57
this many times in the past. They
1:29:59
put on the side of the and they take action. My
1:30:02
point is none the less, I'm not debating ultimately
1:30:04
and what you're looking at there by the way
1:30:06
is Iron Dome shooting into the sky or could
1:30:09
be a rocket but that is just the way
1:30:12
it would look because these rockets lose propulsion after
1:30:14
a while and you don't even you can't even see it in the
1:30:16
sky. So you know how easy
1:30:18
it is for them just to pretend they did something but
1:30:21
my point is why would this happen now? It's
1:30:24
certainly possible that likely the Hamas will
1:30:26
be firing rockets as they're being completely
1:30:28
genocided but knowing that that wouldn't
1:30:30
really do much in fact even knowing that that might
1:30:32
even make do this happen. My real point is
1:30:35
to first of all pretend that they're
1:30:38
aiming in any way let alone at the Al-Aqsa
1:30:40
Mosque nothing is sacred for them but whether or
1:30:42
not this this would be something that they would
1:30:44
abuse and realizing
1:30:47
that if you're
1:30:49
firing unguided bombs or unguided dumb bombs into
1:30:51
there you're into Gaza you're guilty of the
1:30:54
same thing you claim they're guilty of unless
1:30:56
you want to pretend they're aiming at the
1:30:58
Al-Aqsa Mosque so you just ignore that they
1:31:00
don't have that but or they use them.
1:31:04
But the real point we should understand here through
1:31:07
all of the lies is that they have been caught lying
1:31:09
as I've told you about all of it. The
1:31:12
core arguments about what's happening here how
1:31:15
this started who was involved what they did
1:31:17
before it ever started all the things they
1:31:19
claim they saw afterward what they're currently doing
1:31:21
to people in Gaza including the Palestinians and
1:31:24
their own people but as
1:31:26
Rafael Shimanu points out remember when
1:31:28
Israel's own newspaper of record debunked
1:31:30
more than half the claims of
1:31:32
October 7th and this just goes through these
1:31:34
points it's showing you how rats but
1:31:36
it goes through all the things we talked about. These are just
1:31:39
images that are reciting what the Harat article
1:31:41
talked about which I've included for you 40 padded
1:31:43
babies children hung
1:31:45
clothes lines baked in an
1:31:48
oven pregnant and kidnapped eight
1:31:50
babies pregnant oh summit cut open
1:31:52
child executed while hiding us all these
1:31:54
things have been shown to be false
1:31:58
by how rats. On
1:32:00
top of that, we can
1:32:03
prove one of the things they keep
1:32:05
denying. At least in
1:32:07
any sense, like we can with anything we've discussed,
1:32:09
question everything of course. The
1:32:12
Lancet recently came out with a study,
1:32:14
no evidence of inflated mortality reporting from
1:32:16
Gaza. No evidence.
1:32:20
Which I think is important. And of
1:32:22
course, they could be lying, they could be wrong, like
1:32:24
anything else all the time. But
1:32:27
what's interesting is all you get is Israel
1:32:29
going fake news. Sort
1:32:31
of like the COVID discussion, right? When everything
1:32:33
else aligns, your vision, like literally what you
1:32:36
can see, what they're saying
1:32:38
in Gaza, what the members from Israel
1:32:40
who are back home said while they
1:32:42
were there, everything
1:32:45
they're admitting to people offline or to
1:32:47
anonymous articles or just publicly stating the
1:32:49
Hebrew outlets, everything. And now
1:32:51
a Lancet article that goes, yeah, we did our research and
1:32:54
it does add up with what they did. And
1:32:56
they seem to always add up within a close regional
1:32:58
amount to what Israel later says. But
1:33:01
because it shows 20,000 people being killed that
1:33:03
are innocent, they fake news. We won't talk about
1:33:05
it. And no, or do the government that act
1:33:07
like they care. And
1:33:10
sadly enough, as Said Mohammed points out,
1:33:12
Israel's calling it mowing the grass. Westerners
1:33:16
calling it self-defense. Everyone else
1:33:18
just called it genocide. And
1:33:22
as Infra-electronic Adifada points out,
1:33:24
Israeli snipers are killed. This isn't in
1:33:26
specific location, right? In the Gaza hospital.
1:33:28
But this is what's been going on
1:33:30
for numerous people. Even some of the
1:33:32
idea or hostages in the same way
1:33:34
arguing indiscriminate bombing. Israeli
1:33:37
snipers kill everyone who moves. So
1:33:40
very possibly their own hostages in the
1:33:42
same way. And
1:33:46
here's an example of how they're just indiscriminately execute
1:33:48
people, even roll up on them and shoot them
1:33:50
on the ground just to make sure they're dead.
1:33:54
This is from Betz There's
1:34:00
two short-range executions of a
1:34:02
Palestinian In
1:34:04
this area under separate so they shoot him
1:34:06
down This is
1:34:08
a young kid. They roll up on
1:34:11
him Now watch they shoot
1:34:13
him on the ground numerous times You I
1:34:29
mean, that's wild. That's an execution.
1:34:31
That's what that is right there. That's an execution
1:34:36
This is what we're dealing with Jonathan
1:34:39
Cook I wanted to reiterate what he reported
1:34:41
about what ex-ambassador Craig Murray just said Now
1:34:44
this is really important if you didn't hear this before He
1:34:47
said yesterday he attended the session called by Palestine
1:34:49
of the United Nations Over 120
1:34:51
states attended while the formal session
1:34:53
consisted of statements of national position with
1:34:55
few surprises He said he was surprised
1:34:57
he was able to discuss with a large
1:35:00
number of the delegates in the corridors Why
1:35:02
the genocide convention had
1:35:04
not been activated something Sam Hussein? He has been
1:35:06
really ringing that belt trying to get people to pay attention Which
1:35:10
which is triggering a reference to the International Court of
1:35:12
Justice? He says
1:35:14
the answer is now clear to me. It is
1:35:16
not what this is Craig Murray saying this the answer is
1:35:18
now clear It is not that people are
1:35:20
worried that a claim of genocide would not
1:35:23
be successful in the International
1:35:25
Criminal Court It's in fact the
1:35:27
opposite that everyone is quite sure that
1:35:29
it will succeed Meaning
1:35:31
they know what's happening. They know
1:35:33
that people are being murdered in
1:35:35
real time and they just don't want to
1:35:37
be Respectable they don't want to be involved. They don't want
1:35:40
to get the ire the seat draw the ire of Israel
1:35:43
That's disgusting That
1:35:49
video started playing And
1:35:53
it says again
1:35:55
the problem or
1:35:57
rather the quid they're quite sure that it
1:35:59
will succeed he said there is no respectable
1:36:02
argument that this is not genocide. That's the
1:36:04
truth. And they all seem to know
1:36:06
that. Yet they have all of their sycophants
1:36:08
screaming at you the opposite on Twitter. The
1:36:11
problem is that once the ICJ has
1:36:13
determined that this is genocide, it
1:36:16
follows that not only are Netanyahu and
1:36:19
hundreds of senior Israeli officials
1:36:21
and military personalities, are military
1:36:23
personally libel, but
1:36:25
it is absolutely plain and
1:36:28
evidence that genocide go
1:36:30
Biden, SUDAC,
1:36:33
members of their administrations are
1:36:36
criminally liable for complicity, having
1:36:39
provided military support for the genocide.
1:36:42
The International Criminal Court cannot ignore a judgment
1:36:45
of genocide from the International Criminal Court of
1:36:47
Justice and will have no choice but
1:36:49
to issue arrest warrants, which I'm sure they will
1:36:51
disregard. But think about
1:36:53
how interesting and powerful that is. We
1:36:57
have never seen that in our lifetimes, if ever. And
1:37:01
so my point is they're not gonna do that. They're
1:37:04
gonna make sure that doesn't happen because they don't
1:37:06
care about your life. They don't care about your
1:37:08
interests. They care about their power and their interests.
1:37:13
I would love to see an exception. I
1:37:15
always hope that I'm wrong. Just
1:37:18
quite frankly, don't see it. But
1:37:20
we are capable of making that
1:37:22
happen should we want to. The peoples
1:37:24
collectively of the world. But
1:37:27
just to add to this, I saw somebody in
1:37:29
Rumble Chat pointing this out to start. This
1:37:31
is from this 2016. Ex-Abu-Grave
1:37:35
interrogator says
1:37:37
on the record, Israelis trained the
1:37:39
US to use what they
1:37:41
call the Palestinian chair torture
1:37:43
device. So
1:37:46
you need to see, we need to understand how real this
1:37:48
is. What the Zionist
1:37:50
government really is and what they're
1:37:52
capable of and how your government has always
1:37:54
known that. Just like the way they work
1:37:56
with all the rest of the bad people
1:37:58
around the world. The
1:38:01
funding and arming and training of the Al-Qaeda's
1:38:03
and the Al-Nusra's and the ISIS elements that
1:38:05
they literally, provably have created, armed and funded,
1:38:08
just like happened with the Ma'af, because
1:38:11
it works for them, as
1:38:13
we've said many times. These
1:38:15
elements, the Western elements in Israel and the United
1:38:18
States, have for a long time
1:38:20
funded, armed, the
1:38:23
most radical elements of what they claim they're
1:38:25
fighting. Why? Because
1:38:27
the people that are not as crazy as them
1:38:29
don't want to just bend over to what these governments want.
1:38:32
So they go to the crazies. Right?
1:38:35
That's how this works. And
1:38:37
they share torture. Tactics.
1:38:42
Now to finish, I
1:38:45
want to talk about this. I've had this on the back end
1:38:47
for a while. I just want to make sure I just address
1:38:50
this at some point. I've made my comments about it here and
1:38:52
there. But it's so
1:38:54
insulting to the intelligence of anybody
1:38:57
to have people claiming that anything
1:39:00
as simple as free Palestine always
1:39:03
means, one, just the end
1:39:05
of Israel, or as ridiculous as
1:39:07
it gets, kill all the Jews. Because
1:39:10
realize the people that
1:39:12
are saying free Palestine, by and large, as
1:39:15
I said, you could always find an element of what
1:39:17
they said. There's always going to be some crazy out
1:39:19
there. My point is, by and large, if
1:39:21
you listen to what they discuss, if you actually
1:39:23
look at what they've written down by the groups, like the
1:39:26
Jewish Voices for Peace, they want
1:39:28
a two state solution, which implies for
1:39:30
like explicitly that there's
1:39:32
an Israel. They just want
1:39:34
a free Palestine, which is clearly what
1:39:36
some of the people actually don't want. So
1:39:39
it's almost like, in my opinion, it's almost like
1:39:41
a reverse, like they're admitting, like we keep talking
1:39:43
about what they actually secretly feel, which is they
1:39:45
don't ever want a free Palestinian state. I'm
1:39:48
not saying that's what this person feels. I'm talking about the
1:39:50
Israeli government. But my point here
1:39:52
is that this for the podcast, this
1:39:54
girl post this image of a
1:39:57
person that taking off a mask.
1:40:00
free Palestine and beneath it her forehead says kill
1:40:02
the Jews with a Nazi tattoo on her eye.
1:40:04
Like talk about just what a cartoon this is.
1:40:07
And I simply added this. I said it's
1:40:10
amazing that you can suggest such a thing
1:40:12
when those who you are claiming feel this
1:40:14
way explicitly state the opposite. When
1:40:17
we go over to your pals in Ukraine where
1:40:19
they openly say these things, we
1:40:22
get told we don't understand. Well
1:40:24
someone sure doesn't. I just made
1:40:27
this to make a point, right? Or
1:40:29
quite frankly this is another one that I've this this
1:40:31
would make just the same point but might
1:40:33
be a little bit too contentious. A little
1:40:38
bit more on the nose, right? When you can
1:40:40
clearly tell like the Lehi party or the Zionist
1:40:42
party and the Zionist elements twice try to align
1:40:44
themselves with Nazi Germany. Or are currently
1:40:47
and have been for a long time funding the Ozov
1:40:49
movement. Open neo-Nazis and real
1:40:52
Nazis in Ukraine. But let's not
1:40:54
pretend like that's completely contradictory. The
1:40:57
real thing though guys is
1:40:59
that this is broad stroke. It
1:41:02
is ignorant and it's insulting. And
1:41:07
as I let's see what I wrote for myself here. Oh
1:41:11
and I'm actually glad that I remember this. So this is interesting.
1:41:13
Okay so their argument is somebody says free
1:41:16
Palestine therefore means they want to get
1:41:18
rid of Israel or more ridiculously kill all the Jews.
1:41:20
Which they'd say is kind of the same thing. If
1:41:22
you don't want Israel that means the Jews don't. Oh
1:41:25
that's not true. Jews live all over the
1:41:27
world. So you're the only one making about Israel
1:41:29
is only like the point is let's not
1:41:31
forget there's plenty of Orthodox Jews in the world
1:41:33
that argue and is the reality that Zionism
1:41:35
is not Judaism. Zionism is a political party. Zionism
1:41:38
is what gave as
1:41:41
Abi Shalom discusses that the state
1:41:43
of Israel is what first gave
1:41:45
territorial dimensions to the Zionist agenda.
1:41:48
Which as he also discusses the very same
1:41:50
Zionist elements were bombing Iraqi Jews to convince
1:41:52
them to go to Israel under the guise
1:41:54
that it was Muslims that were bombing them.
1:41:56
This is all historical documents and stuff. The
1:41:59
reality being We have
1:42:01
to understand really that the
1:42:04
dynamic has been very muddied over the years that we're talking
1:42:06
about. Well, I mean, I don't have to go as far
1:42:08
back as that. The point is really what we're at today
1:42:11
is it's occupied territory and
1:42:13
they've been fighting for their own self-determination, which has
1:42:15
been suppressed at every turn by the Israeli government,
1:42:17
which we now can prove, saying
1:42:20
that we have to keep funding them off because that will
1:42:22
guarantee they don't get a state or the fact that we
1:42:24
can have now on the record. They
1:42:27
grabbed that to us included, as we just showed yesterday,
1:42:30
one of their people openly stating that
1:42:32
we will never allow a two-state solution
1:42:34
that was not even on the table
1:42:36
right there. See
1:42:40
if that's the one. Yeah,
1:42:43
perfect. This
1:42:45
one here where he says
1:42:48
there will be no Palestinian state. We will
1:42:51
never allow another state to be established. Okay,
1:42:53
and he says very clearly between the Jordan
1:42:55
and the sea because it's okay for him
1:42:57
to say that. It's
1:42:59
okay. The point though, guys, is that that means that they're stating
1:43:01
it publicly now that they will never allow a two-state solution.
1:43:03
You go back further, you find out if you
1:43:05
actually look through the information that Netanyahu was caught
1:43:07
on the record saying that he put poison pills
1:43:09
in these deals to ensure that they wouldn't accept
1:43:11
them and they blame them for not taking it.
1:43:14
Things like that. It's always been there. So
1:43:17
I want to pose this overlap. Again,
1:43:20
they're saying free Palestine means kill
1:43:22
all the Jews. It's
1:43:25
the same as saying free Syria somehow
1:43:27
means kill all the Christians or
1:43:30
more accurately kill the Americans because
1:43:33
Zionism is not Judaism. But the point is
1:43:35
the US government's
1:43:37
occupying Syria, right? So they have every right
1:43:39
to want them out of there. And if
1:43:42
people are calling for a free Syria, like
1:43:44
a free Palestine, why would that then mean
1:43:46
kill all the Americans? It
1:43:48
just simply means by any number of ways to
1:43:50
get there, a free Syria. See
1:43:53
my point? But of course
1:43:55
it's all broad stroke because it's about propaganda and
1:43:57
emotion and manipulation. Now,
1:43:59
another act of... way to look at it since
1:44:01
Israel is illegally occupying the golden heights right
1:44:03
if I say free Syria
1:44:05
or free golden heights does that
1:44:07
then mean kill all the Jews isn't that
1:44:10
the same exact point no
1:44:12
it means free the area they're illegally
1:44:14
occupying simple as that now the
1:44:16
difference is because they argue that what
1:44:18
these people are calling for is the removal
1:44:20
of Israel but again that's not what they're
1:44:23
saying they want a two-state solution
1:44:25
because what they're seeking by and large if you
1:44:27
listen to them is peace that's
1:44:30
what a ceasefire is about all they
1:44:32
do is that dumb image and they go wink wink they
1:44:34
want to kill the Jews that's what anything they're saying
1:44:36
means I mean it's gotten so broad stroke that
1:44:38
they say if you'll see a Palestinian flag
1:44:40
it means you hate the Jews that
1:44:43
is stupid I mean
1:44:45
it's it's intentionally ignorant so
1:44:48
if I say free
1:44:50
Lebanon since Israel's occupying Lebanese
1:44:53
territory does that mean kill all
1:44:55
the Jews obviously
1:44:57
not even more specifically and this I think
1:44:59
is the most important one if I said it let's
1:45:02
say we'll talk about Russia because obviously a
1:45:04
lot of people that are currently supporting what
1:45:06
Israel's doing are also supporting the Ukraine agenda
1:45:09
because that's connected and Israel's currently funding
1:45:11
that agenda I wonder why the point
1:45:14
is if I say free Ukraine right
1:45:17
free Ukraine get the Russians out of there does
1:45:19
that then mean kill all Russians
1:45:22
well the point is in some people's minds it probably does those very
1:45:24
same people I bet you that's something they secretly think
1:45:26
in some cases my point would be why
1:45:29
would you assume that why
1:45:31
would the assumption become I
1:45:34
mean to eradicate all Russia because
1:45:36
we're talking about the illegal occupier removing
1:45:38
that's how they see it understand
1:45:41
in the context of war if it
1:45:43
goes on for another 75 years yeah that'd be an occupation
1:45:46
but we've got to see how this is going to resolve
1:45:48
now if Russia does not pull back from some of
1:45:50
these territories that they have taken and I'm not talking
1:45:53
about Don Bass and Crimea that have voted to be
1:45:55
part of Russia if they don't take they don't
1:45:57
remove themselves from the places that are before
1:45:59
the Ukraine, well you could make the same
1:46:01
argument and maybe we'll end up doing that. That's
1:46:03
an illegal occupation. Now in the same conversation
1:46:06
you could argue that that's for the best interest of the
1:46:08
people, which either way the point
1:46:10
is I would argue it doesn't really matter. It's about the legal
1:46:12
reality of it and if the people want to
1:46:14
vote to be part of Russia, that's different. I
1:46:16
see my point here is the Palestinians do
1:46:19
not want to be occupied by Israel. They
1:46:21
want their own determination. Now at one point
1:46:23
they wanted all of Palestine back, which would
1:46:25
be their right. But they
1:46:27
have long since put that away. So
1:46:29
some of them don't obviously but in the majority
1:46:32
of the conversation and the Palestinian resistance
1:46:34
they have called for some kind of
1:46:36
a free state for themselves. You
1:46:39
know a real state not some illusion
1:46:41
where they have the same reality calling
1:46:43
it something else, but real. Navy,
1:46:46
ports, military, self representation
1:46:49
at all the international bodies, an
1:46:51
actual state that's independent of any
1:46:53
Israeli control, but they will never
1:46:55
allow that as they're now telling
1:46:57
you. Now another point that
1:46:59
I'm not even going to get into as that was an interesting
1:47:01
discussion about Zionism is I was talking about this with
1:47:03
somebody else the other day and it's interesting
1:47:05
that we have a Zionist president in this
1:47:07
country, a Zionist president. Now
1:47:10
they act like that's normal like it's some kind
1:47:12
of a religious over it's not that's a political
1:47:14
party. So that will be the equivalent
1:47:16
of saying Germany has
1:47:19
a US Republican president. Wouldn't
1:47:22
that seem strange when you go doesn't that
1:47:24
mean the US government is controlling Germany? Yeah,
1:47:27
that would probably be what that means.
1:47:29
That's not about Christians controlling Germany. It's
1:47:31
about a government and a political entity
1:47:33
controlling that now. It's not the same
1:47:35
thing. Obviously, it's very different. Zionism is
1:47:37
not like the Republican Party in its
1:47:39
entirety. But the point is we're talking
1:47:41
about a political entity that
1:47:43
has influenced the government of the United States.
1:47:46
They love to make it about hating a certain
1:47:49
person or hurting a certain ethnicity. It's not. It's
1:47:51
about the obvious political influence on
1:47:54
the outcome of your country's policy.
1:47:57
Now why that doesn't matter is beyond me or why
1:47:59
having a member. of Congress show up in
1:48:01
an IDF military uniform shouldn't be the most
1:48:03
alarming thing you ever seen. I
1:48:05
don't, it's because we're being lied to. Now,
1:48:09
that being said, let's
1:48:11
go back and let's finish off today. Again,
1:48:13
making sure you see that point from them telling you there
1:48:15
will never be a Tuesday solution.
1:48:18
Here's Eli David saying the faces of
1:48:20
modern anti-Semitism, which is just so hilarious
1:48:22
to me. I, quite
1:48:25
frankly, in many cases, disdain these people. The
1:48:27
policies they enact, the very woke mindset, like
1:48:29
the trans agenda that they forced on most
1:48:32
of these people are allowed to take place.
1:48:35
I don't agree with almost all of what these people are. But
1:48:38
the point is, it's hilarious to me to
1:48:41
watch as these people act like what
1:48:43
they're saying is somehow not logical. And
1:48:47
typically, this comes from a two-party paradigm perspective.
1:48:49
All of a sudden, the right, who's already
1:48:51
weaponized against the woke mindset, is just all
1:48:53
too happy to come clumsily merging over the
1:48:55
top and act like, well, you just can't
1:48:57
stop laughing at how, and now it's actually already
1:48:59
bled over into the fact that she's somehow a
1:49:01
affirmative action hire and all these
1:49:03
race points. It's just, it's obviously meant to
1:49:06
distract from the fact that
1:49:08
these people are, what they're saying is the
1:49:10
opposite of what they're making it out to be. What's hilarious
1:49:12
to me, they're not, they're
1:49:14
not saying they're anti-Semitic. They're
1:49:17
not saying that they hate Jews. All
1:49:20
they're saying is that what people, when they
1:49:22
say free Palestine, the context
1:49:24
matters. You know, why? Because
1:49:27
it does, because that's a very obvious thing
1:49:29
to say. It's quite frankly juvenile to argue
1:49:31
that you know for sure that anybody, anywhere
1:49:33
in the world who utters those words means
1:49:35
kill Jews. And if you don't condemn that,
1:49:37
then you kill Jews too. Like,
1:49:40
did we really let that happen? This lady,
1:49:42
Stefanik, is one of the most ridiculous people I've
1:49:44
seen in Congress. She's like literally like so emotionally
1:49:46
like shaking while she's, and she doesn't even listen
1:49:48
to the responses half the time. They
1:49:51
respond with a very clear statement that does
1:49:53
answer the question, but because she did not
1:49:55
get the exact binary answer she wanted, she
1:49:57
acts like it did. I ask for yes
1:49:59
or no. Well, they answered, lady, you're just not
1:50:01
smart enough to hear the answer. Or
1:50:03
you have an agenda that can't allow you to see it. But
1:50:07
one of them's resigned. Two
1:50:10
of them are still there. To
1:50:12
make this very clear for those that don't know what's
1:50:14
going on, the point is that they're putting this question
1:50:16
to them. Do you condemn the
1:50:19
calling for the killing of the Jews? And, you
1:50:21
know, in a sense, they're calling for genocide of
1:50:23
Jews. Well, obviously.
1:50:25
I mean, that's a really stupid statement. It's
1:50:28
like saying, do you condemn murder? It's like, well,
1:50:30
there is a law against it. Clearly, it's not
1:50:32
allowed. Clearly, a law is there.
1:50:34
They have these things in place. If
1:50:37
you're threatening violence against people, then clearly.
1:50:40
However, if I come up and I
1:50:42
say it's a beautiful day today, and
1:50:44
then there's a week-long campaign about how wink, wink,
1:50:46
a beautiful day is a new Nazi term, which means
1:50:48
kill all the Jews, which by the way, it is
1:50:50
ridiculous as claiming the OK symbol or any of the
1:50:52
rest of these things always mean what they want it
1:50:54
to mean. Or from
1:50:56
the river to the sea, which by the way,
1:50:58
again, is in the Likud charter. And
1:51:02
I just showed you Eli David making a
1:51:04
statement about how from the river to the sea,
1:51:06
it'll only be Israel. Whether or
1:51:08
not you think that's what it should be, it's the same point.
1:51:11
Palestinians think that's the way it should be in many
1:51:13
cases. It's the same point. All it
1:51:16
means is that what you're claiming, if that's what you want it
1:51:18
to mean in the hyperbolic sense, is
1:51:20
that that means the removal of the other.
1:51:23
Well, in that case, that's exactly what
1:51:26
they're saying. That's
1:51:28
literally on the record what they're saying.
1:51:30
Eli said nothing else. But
1:51:32
the reverse is that's what they're claiming they're
1:51:34
saying when what they're actually saying is a
1:51:36
two-state solution. Only one side is doing that.
1:51:38
Only one side is saying they'll never allow
1:51:40
it. But the side is calling
1:51:42
for an agreement with both to exist is the
1:51:45
one being called racist, is the one being
1:51:47
called anti-Semitic.
1:51:50
Do you see how ridiculous this is? And
1:51:53
these people are getting forced out of the jobs because of
1:51:55
it, which again, I don't really like them anyway, but it's
1:51:57
not right that they're being forced out for this reason. Yeah,
1:52:00
right why it read points out read the
1:52:02
fine print to discover that 45% of these
1:52:04
what they're claiming 2031
1:52:08
anti-semitic incidents they're using to marshal
1:52:10
this whole momentum Were
1:52:13
actually what they call anti-israel
1:52:15
rallies, which by the way is not
1:52:17
the same thing as being against Jews
1:52:19
See that's what another conflation You
1:52:22
can be against the state of Israel
1:52:24
without hating Jews But they don't let
1:52:26
you make that distinction because that's the
1:52:28
whole point about conflating all these things
1:52:31
is to make sure you can't Criticize
1:52:33
the state of Israel or their government
1:52:35
or their policies or their actions, which
1:52:37
break the law You
1:52:39
must just be racist. See
1:52:41
how that works. But here's the better point. They're
1:52:44
not anti-israel rallies They're pro-palestine now,
1:52:46
I guarantee you there's an overlap
1:52:49
there But what you have
1:52:51
to understand is that most of these people
1:52:53
as I'm not saying that because they're telling
1:52:55
you Look at their signs. Look at what
1:52:57
they're calling for. They want a
1:53:00
two-state solution. They want a peaceful resolution
1:53:03
That's not anti anything. That's pro
1:53:05
ceasefire peace But
1:53:08
again, I guarantee there's an overlap but for
1:53:10
them to just broad stroke all of it
1:53:12
not only is just anti-israel, but anti Jew
1:53:14
is What they've used
1:53:16
to marshal all of this and 45% of
1:53:19
what they point that was that I Argue
1:53:21
almost all of them were that And
1:53:24
see they say breaking the center on
1:53:26
extremism as attract hasn't tracked a staggering
1:53:29
2000 anti-semitic incidents and
1:53:32
they're all screaming about it They're lying
1:53:34
to you guys and look at this like it even Twitter broke
1:53:36
this down 905
1:53:38
of these anti-semitic incidents were rallies in support of
1:53:40
Palestine, which is not it's medic Now,
1:53:43
of course, they're gonna say now there's the
1:53:45
left weaponizing and maybe that's what you think
1:53:47
it is Just because the left
1:53:49
or the right uses this and sometimes gets at the
1:53:51
work It's not always me the point this so truth
1:53:54
whoever says it and even if they're using it
1:53:56
for their own agenda Which is dishonest is still
1:53:58
the damn truth There is not your
1:54:01
truth and my truth, there's the truth and there's
1:54:03
lies. Or fallacies, however you
1:54:05
want to look at it. Now,
1:54:07
Alan McLeod also pointed this out back in November.
1:54:10
They pointed this whole thing out. This was mid-press
1:54:12
news, but this was a post from a claim
1:54:14
by the ADL. Saying,
1:54:16
remember, 400% skyrocketing
1:54:19
anti-Semitism! Well,
1:54:21
same thing then. They simply
1:54:24
counted every pro-Palestine as
1:54:26
anti-Semitic. I
1:54:29
mean, you just can't call that honest. It's
1:54:31
insulting. Here's
1:54:35
Avi Lewis, one of many
1:54:37
examples. You know, it shouldn't be missed
1:54:39
on you that Jewish voices for peace
1:54:42
is one of the primary elements in
1:54:44
this conversation. Jewish voices for
1:54:47
peace. And they're being called
1:54:49
secretly wanting to kill all the Jews. Now, they
1:54:51
don't blatantly put those two things next to each
1:54:53
other. But what you'll see if you look
1:54:55
at all of this, in all of these campuses, one
1:54:58
of the prominent elements
1:55:00
in these protests are Jewish voices
1:55:03
for peace. And other actual Jewish
1:55:05
support of back elements, they're protesting
1:55:07
this. They don't have Jewish in their name, but
1:55:09
that's what a lot of these organizations are. Many
1:55:11
of them aren't. Just people in support
1:55:14
of Palestine. My point, though, is
1:55:16
one of those prominent elements are people that
1:55:18
they're calling secretly Jew haters when they're Jewish
1:55:20
voices for peace. Ben
1:55:23
Shapiro called these people trash.
1:55:26
You know, you really start to see what's really going on
1:55:29
when you've got the people who are calling you
1:55:31
a Jew hater, who start to denigrate Jews because
1:55:33
they don't believe in what he's saying. That's
1:55:35
pretty powerful, isn't it? Just
1:55:40
in case. Just
1:55:48
in case somebody wants to pretend that's, you know, like
1:55:50
I'm making something up, because that's a, you know, contentious
1:55:52
statement. He
1:55:55
shows an image of Jewish voices for peace.
1:55:58
It says Jews. call for
1:56:00
ceasefire and they're
1:56:02
peacefully sitting in and having
1:56:04
a protest. Useful
1:56:07
idiots for Hamas, plus these trash
1:56:09
people don't know how to wear their
1:56:11
Jewish garb. What
1:56:14
a horrible person. The idea
1:56:16
that you're going to denigrate your Jewish people
1:56:19
while you're attacking other people for hating on
1:56:21
Jews. You're
1:56:23
just a hypocrite. So
1:56:26
many people have been exposed by all this. Avi
1:56:28
Lewis writes, I'm a Jew and I feel pretty
1:56:30
safe. Which doesn't necessarily mean that
1:56:33
others aren't or undermining that other people feel. I
1:56:35
mean, look, I'm going to, I'm going to prove,
1:56:37
I can promise you, there are
1:56:39
Jews that feel there's a real threat. Why?
1:56:42
Because they're listening to the ADL. They're listening to Ben
1:56:44
Shapiro. They think there's a Jew
1:56:47
hunting element right around the corner because
1:56:49
they're fighting for Palestine, which there
1:56:51
are people that are bad people out there, but
1:56:53
it's nothing that was what was before.
1:56:55
So the point is right now, what
1:56:57
they're using to claim that's happening is
1:57:01
the fact that there are pro Palestinian protests out
1:57:03
front their school. And
1:57:05
because Ben tells them they secretly hate them,
1:57:07
well, they cower in fear. Now
1:57:09
I'm not going to say that because of all this,
1:57:11
there hasn't been an increase to some degree of acts
1:57:14
in both ways. Acts against
1:57:16
Palestinians have skyrocketed. They don't just, they just don't cover that. But
1:57:19
I will, I can promise you that there are
1:57:21
people who are acting in many cases against Jewish
1:57:23
people because they're being manipulated by the very agenda
1:57:25
that we're pointing out. Understand
1:57:29
that Zionism is the biggest contributor to
1:57:31
anti-Semitism out there. They're
1:57:33
the ones creating this dynamic that causes this to
1:57:35
happen. Now here Avi Lewis says, I'm
1:57:37
a Jew and I feel pretty safe. Two things make
1:57:40
me feel unsafe. One the
1:57:42
sadistic unending murder of Palestinian civilians
1:57:44
by Israel supported by US, UK, Canada,
1:57:46
et cetera. Two, the attacks
1:57:48
from other Jews like Ben Shapiro meant
1:57:50
to silence him and everyone, he says.
1:57:53
Those two things stop. He says, I feel 100% safer. Thanks
1:58:00
so many for you for proving. My second
1:58:02
point so overwhelmingly right because so
1:58:04
many people down there call them
1:58:06
affect you for even Sanders. That.
1:58:09
Is point. Now.
1:58:12
Either levy. Same. Thing.
1:58:15
Reactive. Propaganda. First. Of
1:58:17
all eaten points out breaking new Palestinian
1:58:19
public opinion poll which. How
1:58:22
exactly do we think they're getting public opinion
1:58:24
polls? that of Gaza right now? Like think
1:58:26
about that for a second. Big
1:58:28
If if the even have enough energy
1:58:30
and is generators a charger phone has
1:58:32
like like works like they're gonna send
1:58:34
something out on facebook. They're all gonna
1:58:36
respond to are you dropping leaflets where.
1:58:38
The gotta fill it out and put it the mail.
1:58:40
I mean, this is insulting to intelligence first of all,
1:58:43
but. A new Palestinian poll.
1:58:45
says. Seventy two puffs of
1:58:48
percent. Support. What? They
1:58:50
write as the Ten Seven Massacre.
1:58:53
Gay. Sentences. Support for Hamas
1:58:55
triples in the West Bank. Eighty percent
1:58:57
support of the massacre. Support.
1:59:00
For quote, Armed Struggle. Rises.
1:59:02
Ten Point. Ah, and there you see
1:59:04
the life. They
1:59:06
right Massacre. What? This
1:59:09
means just so it's clear and said important
1:59:11
point and with. They. Support
1:59:13
One! Not going to speak to know what
1:59:15
every individual person supports, but when you realize
1:59:17
of the armed struggle, point is what we're
1:59:19
discussing. These. People
1:59:21
who cheered, for example, On
1:59:24
the seventh, In. The streets they highlight.
1:59:27
You. Hear it not was like what I'm not can speak to
1:59:29
what I know they said so maybe they're cheering for bad things.
1:59:32
But. I would argue that most of them are
1:59:34
cheering for their self determination. The fact this is
1:59:36
one of the most. Powerful
1:59:38
moments for them in fighting against
1:59:40
the oppression which again. With a
1:59:43
legally protected act. Not
1:59:45
filling. The. Of civilians or
1:59:48
kidnapping of civilians or rape or murder
1:59:50
of civilians are stealing from civilians. That's
1:59:53
also a crime, just like it is when the
1:59:55
Us government military does it to. The
1:59:57
point is that wouldn't. Probably in your mind.
2:00:00
invalidate all the Iraq war. Now would it?
2:00:02
Even though it's an illegal war, first of all, but points
2:00:04
the same. The reality
2:00:06
is that occupied territories have the right to
2:00:09
armed rebellion or armed struggle, both are used.
2:00:12
And so when Hamas went into illegal settlements, mind
2:00:14
you, which is where they actually went into, that
2:00:17
was a protected act until crimes are committed. And
2:00:19
then those people should be accountable for those crimes.
2:00:22
So when they say support of the
2:00:25
10-7 massacre, they support the killing of
2:00:27
individual people, or did they support the
2:00:29
resistance against an occupation? That
2:00:31
it may not matter to people who have an agenda,
2:00:34
but of course that matters. There's
2:00:36
a very different thing in supporting
2:00:38
the legally protected act for self-determination,
2:00:40
and also then saying you don't
2:00:43
condone when some of them killed
2:00:45
individual civilians. The same
2:00:47
way an American can say, I support the
2:00:49
fundamental reason we're at war over here, but
2:00:51
I don't support how they just killed that
2:00:54
civilian or bombed that civilian area, or X,
2:00:56
Y, and Z that hurt civilians. How
2:00:58
can we not see that? You
2:01:01
can support the action without
2:01:03
endorsing all of the peripheral things that
2:01:05
happen around us. And
2:01:10
then he says, this is
2:01:12
what we're dealing with. The deadliest
2:01:14
and most barbaric massacre of Jews since
2:01:16
the Holocaust, supported by 72%. You see
2:01:18
how we did that? Do
2:01:21
they support killing of Jews, or do they
2:01:23
support the act of rebellion? To
2:01:26
them it's the same thing, or they know better, but they
2:01:28
blend it together. And that's the same
2:01:31
point. If you say Israel did X,
2:01:33
Y, and Z, they go, Ryan thinks Jews did
2:01:35
this. That's not what
2:01:37
I said. In fact, I'm proving to the people
2:01:39
who pay attention that Israel is not the state of
2:01:41
the Jews. Israel is the state of Zionism. Even
2:01:44
using a flag that doesn't technically represent Jews,
2:01:46
it's all about a political entity. And
2:01:50
he publishes it again. Same
2:01:52
thing, same day, by the way, repetitive
2:01:54
propaganda. Daniel says a huge majority of
2:01:56
Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza
2:01:58
say that Hamas The decision to
2:02:00
invade Israel was the correct decision. Ah
2:02:03
well, that's more accurate. He.
2:02:05
Said the public opinion poll was conducted by the
2:02:07
Policy Center. Policy is he so Daniel? even if
2:02:09
he disagrees with this, it leases Honest enough to
2:02:11
frame is the right way. They.
2:02:13
Support. The. Offensive. The.
2:02:17
Act of rebellion which by the way, whether you
2:02:19
like. It or not is a legally protected
2:02:21
act. The. Same way, be
2:02:23
protected. It's Assyrians rose up against
2:02:25
the Us occupation. Or. Iraqis
2:02:27
rose up against the Us occupation or
2:02:29
Afghanis rose up against this Us occupation.
2:02:32
Or you know, on and on and
2:02:34
on. Those would be legally protected as
2:02:36
if they were attacking military targets. I
2:02:38
don't want that the app and I don't
2:02:41
want civilians were rather anybody to be hurt
2:02:43
americans or otherwise. But.
2:02:45
That doesn't change the fact it as a legally protected
2:02:47
act. But. His
2:02:50
recess. Again, it's genuinely scary.
2:02:52
The global denial about Palestinians
2:02:54
extremists and problem. See.
2:02:56
It was projecting is going on like it's
2:02:59
reactive so this information coming out showing in
2:03:01
people support the off of armed struggle which
2:03:03
is what we talk about and he has
2:03:05
to go there. Screen Islam as do extremism
2:03:07
of the Zionism party has never been more
2:03:10
clear. The. Overwhelming majority of
2:03:12
Helsinki in support the Ten Seven
2:03:14
atrocities. He. Hardly.
2:03:17
Now we've gone past as the idea. That it's
2:03:19
just about Jews. Collectively, I know you. going
2:03:22
even further to say they support the horrible
2:03:24
things that happened after the act. Even.
2:03:26
Though we know most of those were lied about
2:03:29
You on and we know that and even your
2:03:31
meat is proven that. This
2:03:33
isn't part of your analysis of future solutions.
2:03:35
We can't take you seriously. Know
2:03:37
maybe you should be involved the conversation you on.
2:03:41
Here. Is the New York Post? It
2:03:44
says Dr. Evil. G
2:03:46
W You Medical School Panel
2:03:49
Defense. Hamas is
2:03:51
right of resistance. Oh
2:03:54
No. What What Terrible people
2:03:56
to defend international law like that? The.
2:03:58
Takeover Of America. University by Islamic
2:04:01
Terror ensues. He is. Is
2:04:03
a sight to behold. What? Is extreme in
2:04:05
a bag of right wing whatever she
2:04:08
sees another Laura Louvers are, as I'm
2:04:10
concerned, My. Point is. That.
2:04:13
Is a right. It doesn't
2:04:15
matter what do you support or not. If you don't
2:04:17
think about the old saying these to sell off your
2:04:19
why get votes a law. It is
2:04:21
the law, might you? Hamas.
2:04:24
Or any Palestinian. Resistance has a
2:04:26
right to armed rebellion. This.
2:04:28
Is the most embarrassing part about all this and
2:04:31
they call Islamic Terror and Susie is. The.
2:04:33
Point is, you're allowed to acknowledge. That
2:04:36
this is a legally protected act and also still
2:04:38
consider what they did to be a crime in
2:04:40
the car and the axis of millions. They'll
2:04:43
just see. The point is, they'll never
2:04:45
allow this kind. Of nuance they will never
2:04:48
you think to go talk. About this the election.
2:04:51
This. Is the controlled conversation? You.
2:04:54
Know why they were so desperate to
2:04:56
keep this for being discussed because it
2:04:58
invalidates what they're doing everywhere. All.
2:05:00
Of their illegal occupations because every time
2:05:02
anybody blinks at them and is glaze
2:05:04
except terrorism. Well. Guess
2:05:07
what? If not, I
2:05:09
mean, obviously or could be care of. My point is that
2:05:11
what they're pointing out or simply. Legally.
2:05:13
Protected Act under international law. And.
2:05:16
They just can't let you know that. So.
2:05:19
You get these people in the pond
2:05:21
in this left right paradigm. Can't think
2:05:23
pass own shoelaces when it comes to
2:05:25
a porous a party. Talking points to
2:05:27
call the doctor evil for literally acknowledging
2:05:29
international law. Of course the image shows
2:05:31
up what they with Hamas never I
2:05:33
guess moving somebody. With. The implication
2:05:35
being that it's later an atrocity happened with you. That's
2:05:38
what she always gets because most of what they show
2:05:40
you where the trough knees were think they lied about.
2:05:43
Either way, a loss or policies
2:05:45
lot of jihad or any Palestinian
2:05:48
literally. Has a right of resistance,
2:05:51
Densify. Said do Piers Morgan. First.
2:05:53
Of all Muhammad a thief says I peers and
2:05:55
your last couple of interview the think you become
2:05:57
too mostly bob just my opinion. He
2:06:00
says, possibly, I get
2:06:02
angry when people try to deny or
2:06:04
justify what happened on October 7th. Okay,
2:06:08
well, if they're trying to deny that
2:06:10
people were hurt or that crimes were committed,
2:06:12
then fair enough. But that's not what he's really talking
2:06:14
about. I simply made
2:06:17
this clear that there is a difference between
2:06:19
the legal reality of any occupied entity, the
2:06:22
UN's always maintained, Palestine's occupied, having the
2:06:24
right to armed rebellion under Geneva conventions,
2:06:26
and then compared to crimes committed around
2:06:29
that illegally protected act, or legally. And
2:06:32
many lies have been told. All
2:06:34
the things they claim, the major atrocities, as
2:06:37
I showed you, have been shown to be
2:06:39
false. Not
2:06:41
questioned, but provably lies. And
2:06:46
yet, we can't engage with this
2:06:48
honestly, or even worse, a
2:06:51
long-term, high, you know, highly
2:06:53
respected, they say, seasoned journalist
2:06:55
doesn't even understand international law.
2:06:59
Or, even worse than that, chooses
2:07:02
to not, because it goes
2:07:04
against what he's supposed to say. I
2:07:06
mean, like, I'll give him some level of credit
2:07:09
for having Norman Pinkleston on to discuss, and what
2:07:11
I argue with a complete decimation of Dershowitz's
2:07:15
same old nonsense. But
2:07:17
either way, how do you not know
2:07:20
this? How do you not understand what the idea
2:07:23
of the difference between those acts and
2:07:25
the original resistance are? It's obvious. And
2:07:29
this is my point about what they're doing on these schools. Right?
2:07:33
Okay. So you have a display of a
2:07:36
Jewish, what is it, a menorah,
2:07:38
right? Yeah, menorah. This
2:07:41
is displayed on the campus. Which, by the
2:07:43
way, I'm pretty sure these religious things are supposed to
2:07:45
be sort of off the, you know, not, like, it's
2:07:48
like putting a cross in the middle of the, I
2:07:50
don't think they would allow that. So it's interesting, right?
2:07:52
But what you see here are
2:07:54
people, clearly in support
2:07:56
of Palestine, who are, because the point
2:07:58
is, guys, the Menorah is put there
2:08:01
in support of
2:08:03
what's going on in Israel during Hanukkah. That's the
2:08:05
point. That's what they did it for. So
2:08:08
this person climbs up and puts a Palestine flag on
2:08:10
it. Now you could argue
2:08:12
that's maybe insensitive, but
2:08:14
to say this, at Yale, so-called
2:08:18
anti-Zionists desecrate a Menorah.
2:08:21
Remind me again why this isn't anti-Semitism.
2:08:24
Why would this be anti-Semitism? No,
2:08:27
certainly it could be. Certainly
2:08:29
you could argue that they do this because they hate Jews. But
2:08:32
you have to at least admit that it
2:08:34
could just be because they're protesting back for
2:08:37
Palestine against Israel.
2:08:41
Now yes, it is a Menorah, but my
2:08:43
point is that this is how Israelis around
2:08:45
the world, mostly outside of Israel for the most
2:08:47
part, have been convinced to think like, like this
2:08:49
is the one and the same. And
2:08:52
we know that was put there for
2:08:54
a protest in regard to raise awareness
2:08:56
or solidarity with what's going on to
2:08:58
people in Gaza, Israelis, and celebrating Hanukkah
2:09:00
at the same time. I
2:09:03
just think it's interesting that we're so quick to broad stroke
2:09:05
these things. Insensitive
2:09:07
maybe. Anti-Semitic? I
2:09:10
mean, come on guys, it's just becoming broad
2:09:13
stroke. And this is what happens every single
2:09:15
time. Russian
2:09:17
salad dressing becomes something that's the
2:09:19
joke that he put out of Forgetter that was. In
2:09:22
the times of fervor and these political
2:09:24
talking points, it's absurd. We see it
2:09:26
every single time. We allow
2:09:28
these ridiculous people like the Lindsey Grahams
2:09:30
and Maxine Waters of the world to
2:09:32
push out hyperbolic nonsense that trickle back
2:09:34
down through the party and all the pundits out there
2:09:37
and you know who they are gobble
2:09:39
it up. Why? Because it gets
2:09:41
them traction. But we always fall into
2:09:43
it every single time. Lastly,
2:09:47
this is how it ends up becoming
2:09:50
real in the sense of how it trickles further. Well
2:09:53
past this conversation. Who's
2:09:55
celebrating? Well first of all, here's Governor
2:09:57
Hochul. Calls for Genesis.
2:10:00
on college campuses right because
2:10:02
that's not what's happening I
2:10:04
have yet to see a single example and by the way
2:10:07
yesterday I just broke down for you I think I
2:10:09
actually might have it right here hold on yeah
2:10:13
this one they
2:10:16
had a bit viral this footage
2:10:19
this has been circulated everywhere
2:10:22
which they claim I've got the other
2:10:24
one too I think where
2:10:28
is that here it is so
2:10:30
this was circulating right where they this this article
2:10:33
or rather this video went around the
2:10:36
Australian Jewish what was it
2:10:38
called it's
2:10:40
the Australian Jewish Association put
2:10:43
this video out and they claimed
2:10:45
that they were chanting gas the Jews
2:10:49
that was used in all around the world
2:10:51
guys this went around every newspaper the
2:10:54
point is it's been investigated to cut
2:10:57
to the chase by video experts who say that
2:10:59
it is not in sync with the video and
2:11:01
the section there's a section that's been edited and
2:11:04
repeated and it very clearly seems to be not
2:11:06
genuine they edited
2:11:08
these things together and of course when they reached out to them
2:11:10
and tried to get more information the
2:11:12
woman asked the phone says why would we tell you where
2:11:14
we got the footage from and
2:11:17
ends up and you call back and they go we're too busy point
2:11:20
is nobody whether it's this magazine or even
2:11:22
corporate media that has tried to follow up
2:11:25
and got evidence nobody's ever given it and
2:11:28
the point is their own team has proven this seems to
2:11:30
be a fake now
2:11:32
why would you do that because you're
2:11:35
desperate to make it seem that these people
2:11:37
who are chanting free Palestine actually
2:11:39
mean that we're being lied to
2:11:41
on such a massive scale on
2:11:43
such a monumental worldwide scale
2:11:46
it's I've never seen this before
2:11:49
and this is how it
2:11:51
ends up becoming real in the sense of what the
2:11:53
government does because of the lie so
2:11:56
free Palestine becomes wink wink they
2:11:58
mean call for genocide against Jews So copy
2:12:00
culture goes perfect, an opportunity to take more
2:12:02
power. Calls for genocide on
2:12:04
our college campuses violates the human rights law.
2:12:08
Which by the way, there are not calls for genocide.
2:12:11
Realize that's not what's happening. And it says
2:12:13
we're prepared to take enforcement action if colleges
2:12:15
and universities are found not in compliance. She's
2:12:18
using this for her own political benefit and
2:12:21
also removing your free speech at the same
2:12:23
time. Now you can't
2:12:25
even come out. And by the way, in
2:12:28
Australia, at that local
2:12:30
campus, they're not even allowed to protest for
2:12:32
Palestine anymore. See how that works? And
2:12:35
she says those celebrating, this is Jen
2:12:37
and Eunice, says those celebrating Governor Hochul's
2:12:40
letter threatening public universities with adverse consequences
2:12:42
if they do not sense her speech
2:12:44
in accordance with her demands should
2:12:46
think again. This action will
2:12:48
have a severe pervasive chilling effect
2:12:51
and is flagrantly unconstitutional. Governor
2:12:53
Hochul threatens to take aggressive enforcement action and refer
2:12:56
title 6 violations to the
2:12:58
feds if schools do not protect students
2:13:00
from, quote, anti-Semitism, hatred and a
2:13:02
hostile environment based on their ethnicity or national
2:13:05
origin. This is
2:13:07
the governor doesn't define those terms. And
2:13:09
that's not surprising. They aren't really
2:13:11
definable. Conservatives have been trying to
2:13:13
combat these sorts of hate speech codes on college campuses
2:13:15
for years and rightly so. Ironically and
2:13:17
hypocritically, many of the same people are
2:13:19
advocating for those hate speech codes for
2:13:21
political reasons. There it is every
2:13:24
single time. The
2:13:27
very people who were screaming, you can't censor
2:13:29
speech, very speech and your woke politics won't
2:13:31
wait a minute. We're now we're on Israel
2:13:33
side. Now we want to censor your speech.
2:13:38
How do you not see how embarrassing that is?
2:13:40
You should be ashamed of yourself. Or
2:13:42
I would argue those people probably don't care because they
2:13:44
already know they're dishonest. The
2:13:48
point is the two party paradigm constantly pulls
2:13:50
people back around. Just like I point out
2:13:52
about saying the second amendment is completely off
2:13:54
limits except wait a minute trans people. We
2:13:56
don't like that. You can't have a
2:13:58
gun. The Republican Party. They
2:14:02
will flip-flop back and forth based on whatever current
2:14:04
policy. We can point out the left doing things
2:14:06
around vaccinations, we can point it out around migrant,
2:14:08
any number of things. These games
2:14:10
are constant. And the only thing we need
2:14:12
to understand is as
2:14:15
long as you play this game and
2:14:17
allow these high-level pundits of Twitter and
2:14:19
everywhere else to continue to manipulate the
2:14:21
way you see the world, it will
2:14:23
continue to be the same. So
2:14:26
use your hatred against each other. They will
2:14:28
use your benign
2:14:30
words against each other so they decide one day
2:14:32
they mean something they don't. All
2:14:35
of this is about controlling your life while
2:14:38
pitting you against each other, whether
2:14:40
that's Jew and Muslim, Christian
2:14:42
and anything else. Left
2:14:44
first right, white first black, divide
2:14:47
and conquer. It's a very classic and basic
2:14:49
concept but yes it does matter. And
2:14:51
you know what? Why not remove your free speech along the way? Thank
2:14:57
you for tuning in guys. It's
2:14:59
just sad how obvious this all is and it's
2:15:02
still going. Now I truly believe
2:15:04
that most people see through this right now but
2:15:07
it's not stopping what they're doing. And
2:15:10
that's been my primary concern from the very
2:15:12
beginning of this is just to save some
2:15:14
lives over there, to stop what is clearly
2:15:16
still building but maybe because
2:15:19
of the pressure we've already applied and the fact that
2:15:21
Biden is meekly falling into the other side that maybe
2:15:23
we'll see some pull here. The
2:15:25
point being that we already know per I think it was
2:15:28
a high level IDF member or it
2:15:30
was a former high level IDF member
2:15:33
that should the US stop funding what
2:15:35
they're doing and stop providing arms, this
2:15:37
will stop damn near immediately. And
2:15:40
they keep going though. Genocide Joe just
2:15:42
keeps pushing forward even though he's now
2:15:44
saying indiscriminate. Explain for
2:15:46
me how they can this whole time
2:15:49
they've been doing everything in their power to
2:15:51
not hit civilians and now somehow they're going
2:15:53
but we need more though. Wait a minute,
2:15:56
stop killing a little bit less. Okay so
2:15:58
if they've done everything they can. can
2:16:01
suddenly they could do more all of a sudden yeah you
2:16:03
lied to us and we know you lied to us and
2:16:05
we know you're trying to cover your butts we get it
2:16:08
still want to put you in jail though
2:16:10
but the reality is people need to see
2:16:12
this and share this and talk about this
2:16:14
get out of the streets talk to people
2:16:16
whatever you think is going to make a
2:16:18
difference i do never i never advocate violence
2:16:20
don't give them what they need to call
2:16:22
you what they want you to look like but
2:16:25
it's on the table for you guys it's easy
2:16:27
to expose share this with people talk about what's
2:16:30
going on have your groups like
2:16:32
have like this is something i think people should do more
2:16:35
everybody out there has a little groups their little
2:16:37
friend groups their communities set up
2:16:39
some kind of a regular meeting a
2:16:42
weekly monthly whatever where you sit down whether
2:16:44
it's my show or or some platform or
2:16:46
some grouping of articles or just whatever's on
2:16:48
your mind sit down every time and have
2:16:50
these talking points discuss them what do you
2:16:53
think about what's going on here here's what
2:16:55
ryan said's going on here what do you
2:16:57
think about that is that real do we
2:16:59
believe that what do you think let's discuss
2:17:01
it let's challenge each other's ideas they're
2:17:04
terrified of that we
2:17:06
need to keep asking questions and keep sharing
2:17:09
this information as often as possible now
2:17:11
our platform is doing our best to do that and
2:17:13
if you'd like to support what we're doing down
2:17:16
below in the links there's all sorts of ways you could support
2:17:18
us as always
2:17:20
the most important thing to me is getting the
2:17:22
information out there clip this up make your own
2:17:24
clips tag me on twitter i'll share them myself
2:17:26
or gab or tag me anywhere you put it
2:17:29
thank you for tuning in today i love you
2:17:31
all as always question everything come
2:17:33
to your own conclusions stay
2:17:36
vigilant anyway welcome to the
2:17:38
state department i think we have some interns in the back
2:17:40
welcome uh good
2:17:43
to see you in this exercise
2:17:45
and transparency and democracy is
2:17:51
that what it is sorry i didn't mean
2:17:53
to Break that line. The
2:18:00
In an abusive Best Us. All
2:18:03
rights can enjoy my life. Reasons for
2:18:05
vacation center.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More