0:00

We should be having a public dialogue and it

0:02

should be something that rises to the level of

0:04

legislation. We should not allow the National Institutes of

0:07

Health or the Department of

0:09

Defense to allocate funding to amplify

0:11

these agents so that

0:13

allegedly we can study them in the

0:15

case that they fall into the hands

0:17

of bad people. Because the evidence has

0:19

shown us that the

0:21

bad people who actually have unleashed

0:23

these pathogens since 1991 and

0:27

by the way if you go to miscellaneous memorandum

0:29

7 and other documents we can go back to

0:32

the 1950s. The bad people

0:34

who unleash these things on the

0:36

population are us. It

0:39

is the US who's doing it. Welcome

0:56

to The Daily Wrap Up. A

1:04

concise show dedicated to bringing you the

1:06

most relevant independent news as we see

1:09

it from the last 24 hours. Sunday

1:15

November 26, 2023. Thank you for joining me today. I

1:19

have a great show planned for you. Open

1:21

with a clip from our David Martin interview

1:23

because I have a section I'm going to

1:26

start with today that I think is not

1:28

just about the COVID-19 illusion, not

1:30

even just about vaccinations or injections

1:32

but a larger perspective on how

1:35

and really in my opinion does kind

1:37

of overlap with the conversation of war

1:39

or what takes place during warfare. More

1:43

of the kind of surreptitious side, peripheral

1:45

concepts of what governments do while nobody's

1:47

paying attention. I

1:49

think it all overlaps. We're definitely going

1:51

to talk about some follow-ups on the

1:54

discussion of occupied Palestine. Some developments in

1:56

regard to in particular IDF members admitting

1:58

to being in the area. I don't

2:01

know if it's inadvertently or how why

2:03

this is being Played by

2:05

Channel 12 in Israel But

2:07

openly stating that they were directed to

2:09

shoot at places that they that basically

2:11

it says To

2:13

add they say you know tells them to shoot and

2:15

they ask are there civilians and the answer is we

2:18

don't know shoot anyway Something to that nature and we'll

2:20

get into it I mean, this is directly from their

2:22

mouth not that you need to know this because it's

2:24

already been confirmed about four times over But

2:27

it's just interesting that still being denied and

2:29

how that changes the entire story. It's a very

2:31

important conversation We're going to talk about that.

2:33

We're going to go over some

2:35

more developments in regard to foreign

2:38

policy kind of around the larger conversation and

2:40

what is also developing in that regard some

2:42

more fake news and

2:44

some of the most Embarrassing

2:47

versions of the things we've seen done before

2:50

kind of Resurfacing and I'll

2:52

have some thoughts on why that is I

2:54

think that's important more violations at least as

2:56

I see it of the ceasefire that

2:58

I think are really just some either Parts

3:00

that were intentionally left out or you know

3:02

It the conversation around the West Bank and

3:04

how that includes even though it wasn't discussed

3:06

We're talking about Gaza and the war on

3:08

Gaza But interestingly enough as there

3:10

are still actions being taken against the West Bank

3:13

which Continues to show you that

3:15

this was a war on Palestine if this

3:17

was a ceasefire with Hamas Then why are

3:19

they still bombing attacking killing people in the

3:21

West Bank? Isn't that

3:23

interesting? See she kind of changes the whole dynamic there,

3:25

but we're also going to get into some

3:29

more discussions around the Palestinian

3:31

prisoners and there's a great article from

3:34

The intercept entitled Israel's insidious narrative about

3:37

Palestinian prisoners That's been completely blindly towed

3:39

by all the people you might expect

3:41

telling you every single person coming out

3:43

of there is an Terrorist

3:45

and we're going to get into the reality of

3:47

the situation and what these people actually

3:49

are and what Israel's entire system is

3:52

set up to Create

3:54

in your eyes and

3:56

of course, I'm upsetting things to

3:58

understand the full picture of what's continuing to

4:01

happen that's been ongoing for 75 years. But

4:03

we're going to start today. We'll really just

4:05

to give you a quick, give you the link

4:07

to the David Martin interview, which

4:10

I definitely think is important to listen to since we started

4:12

with that clip. One

4:14

second. Let me, looks like I

4:17

might have lost my, I get really, oh no, that's

4:19

why. Sorry, I was adjusting the screen

4:21

for a second. It looked like it was a lot center,

4:24

but David Martin interview, the COVID illusion and

4:26

the criminal world health organization driving. And in

4:28

case you'd like to watch that full interview,

4:30

very important interview. This one was

4:32

one of my favorites, to be quite honest, the

4:34

entire thing, because he's very analytical. He's very, you

4:36

know, makes the main

4:38

point that I keep trying to make. It's not necessarily

4:40

about, it's always about what's

4:43

correct, the facts and what we can prove,

4:45

but more so trying to use their information,

4:47

whether true or not, what they've stated and

4:49

repeated to hold

4:51

them accountable. And also wake people up to

4:54

what, even if their lies are, even if

4:56

what they're saying is false or not, that

4:58

they've later contradicted what they said then, whether

5:00

or not it's true. If

5:02

that makes sense. And it's really interesting to

5:04

see their evolving narrative and how

5:06

often what they say contradicts what they previously

5:08

said, not with new information, not with new

5:10

studies, just because it suits their agenda. And

5:12

so we had a really great conversation. He

5:14

always brings it back to the patents and

5:16

the information and how important this is. And

5:19

shockingly, how obvious it is that they're responsible

5:21

in many different ways. And yet nobody, even

5:23

the ones that are aware of that are

5:25

doing anything about it. Sort of like right

5:27

now with the genocide convention

5:30

and why nobody wants to initiate this,

5:32

as Sam Hussein, he continues to point out. Only

5:36

one state needs to initiate this process. So then

5:38

the Hague can begin, basically, the charges could eventually

5:40

be brought against people involved, not to say they're

5:43

even going to submit to that, but

5:45

all these people, all these governments around the

5:47

world saying genocide, not doing anything to initiate

5:50

a process to hold them accountable for it. That

5:52

seems deliberate to me. In any case, back to

5:54

this opening point, opening segment I want to get into, and

5:56

it's a good chunk of it. I think it's important. So

5:59

the... The point being, as the quote we played,

6:01

that it's us,

6:04

as he says, and he means for the average

6:06

person to think of it, but it's the government

6:08

of this country and the Western powers that are

6:10

responsible, as his point was specifically for releasing the

6:12

very things they then blame on other people. You

6:14

can disagree with him if you want. The

6:17

point, though, is to get into a bigger

6:21

conversation about that, whether it's about

6:23

pathogens, whether you think viruses

6:25

are just or not, or bacteria, if you

6:27

want to look at it that way, or

6:29

however you're just releasing something that is used,

6:31

experimentation on the average person for their benefit

6:33

in no way for your safety. We're

6:36

going to start with a clip from Ben Swaney released today. My

6:38

brother actually sent me this today. Flashback

6:41

to 1995, when Bill

6:43

Clinton apologized to the survivors and families of

6:45

those who have been unknowingly subjected to over

6:47

4,000 government-sponsored medical

6:50

experiments. As

6:52

Ben writes, still think your government has your health

6:54

and well-being in mind? That's really naive to pretend

6:56

like, no, that was a different time. It's really

6:59

not. Many of the same people

7:01

are literally still making decisions in this government. We

7:03

have to realize that this is not something different.

7:05

In fact, it's only provably gotten worse

7:07

today than it ever was, especially after

7:09

coming out of the COVID-19 ongoing illusion,

7:12

mind you. Now really,

7:14

I want you to think about this. This

7:16

opening segment is going to be focused around

7:18

experimentation, largely leaning in the direction of biological

7:20

entities or concepts. Think about

7:22

this in the bigger picture, both in

7:25

this very specific point about whether something

7:27

may be happening to people. Let's just

7:29

make it specifically to Palestinian detainees and

7:32

what Israel may be doing to them in there. There's

7:34

a point that actually stands out about that. There's

7:36

a detainee that's claimed that they were gassing them

7:38

with something while they were in there. Now,

7:40

of course, people may say it's because they were trying to

7:43

tear gas or whatever, but we've talked about this many times

7:45

over the years. Proveably, even international

7:47

organizations have called this out. Whatever

7:50

they use in that is not tear gas. People have

7:52

seizures. People can die from whatever they use. Some kind

7:54

of chemical weapon. This has been talked about many times.

7:57

But overall, my point is to wonder what else may be

7:59

happening. happening in this regard and whether these may

8:02

tie in with larger conversations or even the idea

8:04

of what's happening right now in Gaza, how there's

8:06

this building problem with the illnesses that are developing

8:08

because of what they are doing and what they're

8:10

not allowing to happen. All

8:12

of that can tie into some bigger conversation. Now

8:15

is that just negligence? Is that vitriol? Is that

8:17

hate? Or is it experimentation?

8:20

I'm more leaning towards the former but ultimately it

8:22

kind of opens the conversation to what else might

8:24

be being done around this. What's going on in

8:26

Ukraine right now? We're not even looking over there,

8:28

most people in the world. So

8:30

what are the Azov movement doing now? They've been

8:33

involved in all sorts of, the bio labs in

8:35

Ukraine and all sorts of stuff that this ties

8:37

over with and what their real objectives are. And

8:39

let's not forget going all the way back to

8:41

the Nazi conversation, which we now know the Lehigh

8:43

party, the Ergon party, Zionist origins

8:46

directly tied into that multiple times

8:48

tried to align themselves with the Nazi

8:50

organization. So it shouldn't be questioning

8:52

whether or not they're capable of the same kind

8:54

of experimentation, the same kind of manipulation as we

8:56

saw. And we understand the line with that, forget

9:01

the name exactly, but the origins of

9:03

the horrifying experimentation, the human experimentation, or

9:05

even Dr. Ishii from Japan with the

9:07

biological experimentation, all this stuff stems back

9:09

to these people, these

9:12

governments, these controlling entities. And

9:14

as Dave Martin said, it's us. It's always

9:17

been these people. So let's listen to

9:19

Bill Clinton acting like this is something that's in

9:21

our past, but as we know for sure it

9:23

wasn't even just from the COVID-19 illusion. The

9:26

government sponsored experiments did take place

9:29

at hospitals, universities, and military bases

9:32

around our nation. And they still do without

9:34

your knowledge. The goal was

9:36

to understand the effects of radiation exposure

9:39

on the human body, largely for

9:41

military purposes, not for safety, but

9:43

for attacks, for aggression.

9:47

While most of the tests were ethical by

9:49

any standards, some were

9:51

unethical, not only by today's standards,

9:53

but by the standards of

9:56

the time in which they were conducted.

9:59

They failed both both the test of our

10:01

national values and the test of humanity. In

10:04

one experience, scientists experiment, scientists

10:07

injected plutonium into 18 patients

10:11

without their knowledge. In

10:13

another, doctors exposed indigent cancer

10:16

patients to excessive doses

10:18

of radiation. Now mind you,

10:20

the vast majority, if not

10:22

all, of what he's mentioning

10:24

are government-sponsored experimentation. That's what we're

10:26

talking about, not some random doctor that was found

10:28

out because he's a maniacal mania. That's how we

10:30

all get framed. You

10:33

watched a Lifetime movie that night and it's about

10:35

that one mean doctor. That's always how they want

10:37

you thinking about it. Very rarely is that what's

10:39

going on. It's almost always stemming from some higher-level

10:42

activity. That's not

10:44

my opinion. That's just looking through history.

10:46

A treatment from which it is virtually

10:48

impossible that they could ever benefit. The

10:52

report also demonstrates that these and other

10:54

experiments were carried out on

10:56

precisely those citizens who count

10:58

most on the government for its

11:00

help, the destitute and the

11:03

gravely ill. Exactly. Almost

11:05

always. Whether that's a eugenics mindset or

11:07

just knowing that they have the least amount of

11:10

resources to be able to potentially marshal anything against

11:12

you, whether it's in a public sphere or a

11:14

court of law, always.

11:17

Does that sound like an entity? Always

11:20

the same point. They don't care about you. But

11:22

the dispossessed were not alone. Others

11:25

of the military, precisely those on

11:27

whom we and our government count most,

11:30

they were also test subjects. What

11:32

a perfect picture. You've got the

11:34

people with the least amount

11:36

of influence and ability to push back and

11:39

then people that aren't exciting their life away

11:41

more so than any other citizen. They already

11:43

see you as theirs, as Derek just wrote,

11:45

our children or the way the government sees

11:47

your children as our children. But

11:49

military, it's one step further. They believe they own

11:51

all of us but more so specifically the right

11:53

to them, at least while they're in their service

11:56

and more so afterward or to

11:58

a degree afterward. that

12:00

we've seen this going back to swine flu, the many

12:02

different times that experimented on these people without their knowledge,

12:04

and then just pushed it out in the past as

12:06

something that was, you know, we're just trying to do

12:08

what's right potentially for your benefit, right? The

12:10

point is we can look back and know that

12:13

it had no bearing on anything, nothing

12:15

about it was about helping people. It was

12:17

about trying to figure out one, whether they

12:19

were susceptible from a defense perspective, that's not

12:22

about your safety, or being able

12:24

to use this against other people. Informed

12:26

consent means your doctor tells you the risk

12:28

of the treatment you were about to undergo.

12:31

In too many cases, informed consent

12:34

was withheld. All of them, Americans

12:36

were kept in the dark about the effects of what was

12:39

being done to them. The deception

12:41

extended beyond the test subjects themselves

12:44

to encompass their families and the American people

12:46

as a whole. For these

12:48

experiments were kept secret. And

12:51

they were shrouded not for a compelling reason

12:53

of national security, but for the

12:55

simple fear of embarrassment. And

12:58

that was wrong. Oh,

13:00

was that what it was? They were just worried that we're gonna

13:02

get red cheeks and feel embarrassed, little sheepish,

13:05

hardly. They were worried they were gonna go

13:07

to prison, right? And that's exactly, even now, even

13:09

in the admission, you can't be honest about

13:11

the reality, right? You really

13:13

worried about being embarrassed in front of the community

13:16

for murdering people or for testing things, for

13:18

spraying biological agents over the San Francisco

13:20

Bay. Oops, we just were worried being

13:22

embarrassed. It's egregious and

13:25

it's never stopped because they already

13:27

know how this works. Oh,

13:29

well, you trot somebody, yeah, let Trump go out. No,

13:31

whoops, we made a mistake, right?

13:34

We will do better next time. And

13:36

everybody just, I mean, not everybody, but the ones that

13:38

were shoved in front of your face

13:40

on the nightly news that act like they're the ones

13:42

that matter will tell you, we

13:45

accept your apology. We'll do

13:47

better next time. No, that's just the fourth

13:49

branch, guys. This has never stopped. And we've

13:51

shown you this many times. This

13:53

is an article originally from the Free

13:55

Thought Project. US armies admitted that it

13:57

secretly conducted at least 230... 39

14:00

germ warfare tests in locations

14:02

across the country targeting unsuspecting

14:04

Americans. That's just the army

14:08

239 times Here's

14:10

the report by the way If you want to read it for

14:13

yourself directly from you know If it means more to you to

14:15

come from something like the Washington Post I don't know why it

14:17

would today, but I guarantee somebody was going that

14:19

can't be true. Oh look there. It is a Washington

14:21

Post Still people do it today

14:23

even people in this audience. I know somehow

14:25

means more when it comes to the Washington Post it shouldn't

14:29

Long as you can prove it for

14:31

yourself the army conducted 239 secret

14:33

open-air germ warfare tests on Americans

14:35

this from 19. This is And

14:40

we've covered this in the past already kind of using

14:42

that same point bring it into a kovat 19 timeframe

14:44

in Coronavirus we trust I

14:46

entitled this medical surveillance state for a government that's

14:49

experimented on you 239 times. You know so we

14:51

can prove This

14:55

is no understand if you read these articles This is

14:58

about things like like the one we all know about

15:00

operation sea spray It's because it's been admitted to even

15:02

though most people still the app Most

15:04

people don't know it, but people that do know about

15:06

these things are aware of operation sea spray It's

15:09

that where they sprayed in San Francisco Bay. It

15:11

was a jury was a Biological

15:13

agent they were arguing this

15:15

they wanted to know how susceptible people were what

15:17

do you mean how susceptible they were? As Deceptible

15:21

as a person can be to a biological agent.

15:23

They're very aware They were not confused about how

15:26

biological agents affect people So what was the logic

15:28

of spraying it into the San Francisco Bay because they

15:30

wanted to see if it hurt you they wanted to

15:32

see What that agent did to you so they

15:34

could use on other people? But then

15:36

told you it was for your safety now. We

15:38

know you're susceptible to violence yet. They knew that already Somehow

15:41

that floated though, and we nobody

15:44

was countable just people died. I think one or

15:46

two people died when that happened Now

15:49

here just so we understand that

15:51

in the context of your government has never stopped

15:53

experimenting on you you are there Just like look

15:55

look at what Israel did Pfizer's

15:58

lab And then literally

16:01

on the record as if nothing nothing matters

16:03

made it very clear that we did this

16:05

because we wanted to know what would happen.

16:09

Right we have a multifaceted group here what happened what

16:11

happens if you have diabetes what happens you have that

16:13

he said that on the record. That's

16:15

why it was Pfizer's lab because everyone got Pfizer and

16:18

they sure as hell took the data. Israelis

16:20

are outraged about that you

16:23

know you don't hear that in the United States but they're

16:25

they screamed about that that's why they're just

16:27

before October 7th they were ready to put Netanyahu

16:29

in jail and I mean that literally. But

16:33

experimentations everywhere now what about

16:35

something as as seemingly

16:37

benign to most people that is

16:39

literally ubiquitous in our world that

16:41

is very dangerous. That

16:44

maybe started as an experiment but now is

16:46

maybe just a byproduct maybe just to keep

16:48

you docile. How

16:50

are you gonna look at all these things have been proven

16:52

with peer-reviewed science but they're still called fake news which is

16:54

insert absurd. For right. There's

16:57

written about this a lot here is a person discussing

16:59

the first doctor who tried to warn you about the

17:02

floor I do with their own who it by the

17:04

way you'll hear about this the next 10 so years

17:06

as they quietly walk this back because it's too late

17:08

all the information has come out the lawsuit is there

17:10

all these different groups of exposing this it's been. Almost

17:13

a decade now they've been trying to keep this from

17:15

your view you'll hear it whether

17:17

you chose to listen to Derek's work and understand

17:19

that it's already been exposed or wait 10 years

17:21

or so for the corporate media to say they

17:24

discovered it later after it started too late up

17:26

to you the point is it is hurting you

17:28

it's lowering your children's IQ it's causing all sorts

17:30

of their it's causing

17:32

effects that we won't even get into on the show because

17:34

it'll derail the conversation but things that you won't want to.

17:37

You don't want to hear especially if you've been drinking

17:40

water from the tap your entire life but the point

17:42

is a doctor tried to warn you about this a

17:44

well respected doctor. It

17:47

was a long time ago and he got

17:49

attacked derided. Disregarded

17:52

he was the first physician to

17:54

warn of the dangers of allergic

17:56

fatal allergic reaction to panicillin a

17:58

wall bought war. was on the

18:01

first position to warn of the dangers of

18:03

emphysema from smoking. He saw in his own

18:06

surgery in his practice in

18:08

Detroit, Michigan that

18:11

people were coming in with these

18:13

ailments, unexplained ailments, whether it

18:15

was back pain or gastric distress,

18:18

muscle fatigue, headaches,

18:21

and he figured out that it was low-dose

18:23

fluoride, that as with a lot of drugs

18:26

or chemicals, there's a small subset of people

18:28

who are uniquely allergic to the chemical

18:30

and Wal-Baut realized that it was fluoride

18:32

and he performed a whole

18:34

series of double-blind experiments. Now

18:37

realize he's not even getting into the full

18:39

picture that is now being exposed today, even

18:41

though none of the corporate media is talking

18:43

about it. I'll show you the

18:45

links to look at after we're done with this clip. This

18:48

is just talking about like an extreme reaction. Understand

18:50

it is being proven and has been

18:52

proven. I mean, it's like looking up

18:54

things about COVID-19 vaccine side effects. You'll

18:56

find 47 peer-reviewed studies, but you won't

18:58

be told about it. In

19:00

this case, it's everywhere. You can look this up. It's been

19:03

going on for decades where people have been proving with peer-reviewed

19:05

science that it undeniably lowers

19:07

URIQ, affects all sorts of health issues.

19:09

I mean, it's not just dental fluorosis.

19:11

I mean, it's ridiculous to lies about

19:13

this topic, especially if this because this

19:15

is simply a byproduct that has been

19:17

used because they

19:20

want to profit from some kind of byproduct. I

19:22

forget the exact process it comes from, but

19:24

ultimately not only has it been forced

19:27

into your life so they could benefit from something they would

19:29

otherwise have to pay to get rid of, which is the

19:31

reality, now that you pay for them to put it in

19:33

your water, it's

19:35

been shown to have all sorts of interesting

19:38

other effects too. In regard to like there's

19:40

conversations about the Nazis experimentation believing that it

19:42

actually was mind control and all these different

19:44

things, but you can very clearly prove that

19:46

it has detrimental effects in particular with children.

19:49

Roundly been shown. Where

19:52

people were given some fluoridated water

19:54

without knowing it and the symptoms

19:56

recurred and very

19:59

quickly, Walbach name rather than

20:01

being seen as this giant

20:03

of public health committed to

20:06

safeguarding public health. Somebody

20:08

who warned us about penicillin or

20:11

tobacco suddenly George Walpole

20:14

becomes this marginal fringe

20:16

figure who is

20:19

criticized for his opposition to fluoride.

20:21

One of the earlier examples of how that

20:23

works, right, were they early you know

20:26

they I think long before that they realized this but

20:28

how easy it was to simply go you know and

20:30

somebody who had standing in the community. Somebody

20:32

who was and also it also is a

20:34

demonstration of how quickly that community will eat

20:37

its own the moment they're told that person

20:39

broke rank, right. I mean but he

20:41

came out and he's somebody that people trust and he

20:43

had information he's already broke different stories. Oh

20:46

you can't go foul of the fluoride

20:48

people. Suddenly you're a pariah and at

20:51

bald suit. And that's something

20:53

that takes place again and again

20:55

and again. Speaking out as a

20:57

doctor or a dentist against fluoride

21:00

is the third rail. It's

21:02

it's fatal to your career. We

21:05

don't know George Walpole's name because he was

21:07

smeared by the public health service for his

21:09

opposition to fluoride. Yes he was. Another

21:12

person you'll see the relevance of this in

21:14

the second. The person who invented I forget

21:17

the name that he just used but basically a

21:19

pulp press to make paper but for hemp. Designed

21:22

a specific machine that would make hemp into

21:24

paper in a very fast you

21:26

know basically the the equivalent of the the

21:28

I forget the name of the machine but

21:30

you know that turns pulp into paper. That

21:33

we I don't know his name on top of my head

21:35

but it's a commonly known name because he's famous because he

21:37

made that machine. The point is the person that created one

21:39

that would revolutionize you know for

21:41

those that understand how much better hemp

21:44

is in so many different regards and how much

21:46

less you need to grow and how fast it

21:48

grows compared to trees and blah blah blah. The

21:50

point is that person isn't known because

21:52

of the what happened regarding hemp and it was

21:54

turned into the conflation of marijuana and so on.

21:56

The point is there's a lot of these kind

21:58

of things. Now this is Derek's

22:00

work on the fluoride trial. He's still going to be following up

22:02

on this, but there's been a lot of great work he's been

22:05

covering. This has been going on for a very long time. And

22:08

the National Toxicology Program, the

22:10

United States NTP, has

22:12

been trying to get this to your foot in front of

22:14

you for years. And

22:17

every time they say the report is done, and by the way,

22:19

it's been leaked. The report shows you

22:21

what we're talking about. This is a government funded

22:23

investigation, and it's calling you. It says it's hurting

22:25

you. It

22:29

does not have any beneficial effects. It's

22:31

hurting your children's IQ. It has all sorts of problems.

22:33

And you know what they've done? Rachel

22:35

Levine in particular is one of the people that stepped up and said, don't

22:38

let that go out. They

22:40

want another review. Four,

22:42

five, six review. They're

22:44

trying to keep this from your view. They know this.

22:47

Even the judge is getting irritated with this. The

22:49

point is eventually this will come out. They'll probably

22:51

try to still downplay it. But

22:53

eventually, my point is this will end up

22:56

becoming common knowledge. You know

22:58

it now because you're paying attention. Derek

23:01

also covered a recent article, yet another study

23:03

links lower sperm count with pesticides. All

23:06

these things you can prove for so long. And

23:08

he gets into endocrine disrupting chemicals, glyphosate, all of

23:10

this stuff. He drenched in

23:12

these horrible things that are hurting you. Kind

23:15

of endocrine disrupting chemicals to the transgender conversation, or

23:17

any number of cancers. They know this. The

23:21

average person doesn't. Same reason. This stuff

23:23

is out there. People in the

23:25

know are very aware. They just realized, just like

23:27

they just told you, PFAS being one of these,

23:29

forever chemicals. Well, they go, well,

23:31

now that you're becoming aware that PFAS are so

23:33

bad and yet they're literally everywhere, we're gonna finally

23:35

give you the excuse that, well, we need it

23:38

because everything we do in the military produces PFAS.

23:42

And, you know, the military is needed to keep you safe. So

23:44

don't worry, you're gonna die from cancer when you're 35, but you'll

23:46

be safe, quote, from the military. Unless we kill you too, or

23:49

other things we do blow back on you. But,

23:51

you know, safety... I

23:54

mean, my God, it's ridiculous, guys. This is stuff that you should know.

23:57

Most of you do. The average American doesn't

23:59

seem to... understand this step just yet. How

24:01

alarmingly bad this is. Glyphosate is in your

24:03

clothes right now. It's in the air you're

24:05

breathing, it's in the water you're drinking. I'm

24:07

not making that up. I could

24:09

go, I do this all the time, I'm not gonna waste time to

24:12

go through today because I want to keep going. The point though, this

24:15

stuff's everywhere. Danger.

24:17

They're testing on you. Half of this stuff is in fact

24:19

just to see what happens or completely through negligence because

24:22

they don't care if it hurts you as long as

24:24

they get what they want. I'm not talking

24:26

about just the US government mind you. Now Aussie

24:28

17 points out in regard to the COVID-19 part

24:30

of this, definitely part

24:32

of the experimentation we're talking about. Philippines

24:34

launches an investigation into the excess deaths.

24:36

Isn't it amazing that so few countries

24:39

have cared to even look into why

24:41

they've got unprecedented excess deaths? How

24:43

obvious is that? You know

24:45

sort of obvious like Israel funding Nazis

24:47

in Ukraine, you know, or committing open

24:49

genocide and calling it freedom. You know

24:52

it's that stupid. They've lost control. The

24:54

reality is that they have excess death almost acutely

24:57

aligned with the massive amount of injections in these

24:59

countries and most of them are acting like they

25:01

don't even care about it. Well

25:03

when when pushed to it they go, we're baffled.

25:05

We're so alarmed but look at this. Let's talk

25:07

about that. Let's worry about your healthcare and

25:09

this over here. You know they don't care about it. Well,

25:13

Philippines is launching an investigation. By comparison

25:15

they saw 66,000 plus

25:18

COVID deaths from 2020 to 2023.

25:20

You know how much they've had

25:23

in just 2021 alone excess

25:25

not COVID related? 2,600 I'm assuming 262,000. 262,000

25:27

excess death

25:32

not COVID related just in

25:34

one year. One

25:37

year. 67,000

25:41

excess deaths just COVID

25:43

related. Oh

25:47

wait this says after that 2022 oh this is no excuse me that is 67.

25:49

I thought they

25:51

were rounding up right there. That's for the next 2022. Still above it. But

25:54

I point is in the year that they are all supposed

25:56

to have injections. That was the year of safety we're

25:58

told. They're investigating.

26:01

People are gonna start to find this stuff out. I

26:03

don't know what they're gonna try to do to stop this from happening,

26:05

but I'll tell you right now that this stuff is already out. You

26:08

know that, they know that. They're just trying to keep

26:10

this front up until something else happens. Robin

26:13

Minati points out something else you already know as

26:15

well. Masks increase the risk

26:17

of infection. Well, gee, breaking

26:19

news. Not from Robin, Robin's doing

26:21

great work. My point is, you heard

26:23

this in 2020 from me. In

26:26

2020, that was one of the first

26:28

things I was, the hill I was

26:31

dying on earlier, masks aren't statistically significant

26:33

in reducing transmission. Oh, and then a 2015

26:35

study showed you that

26:37

it increased your risk of infection, in particular

26:39

cloth masks. Oh, that's right, the masks they

26:42

were telling you are the only ones you should

26:44

be using. These things are so

26:46

obvious. So here's another study.

26:48

Norwegian researchers find masks linked with increased risk

26:50

of COVID, the very thing they told you

26:53

to use. But you know all this.

26:56

The editor of Epoch Times points out

26:59

Pfizer has now filed a lawsuit against

27:01

Poland. This is how crazy it's getting.

27:03

You know why? Because they don't wanna buy the garbage

27:05

injections anymore. They

27:08

don't want any more of your death sentence juice. That's what they're talking

27:10

about. Nope, we don't want it. Oh, but

27:12

guess what? You've got a contract. We

27:14

all saw this coming. These years

27:16

long contracts, what these guys got muscled into.

27:19

Now they're realizing, maybe they didn't know, maybe they

27:21

didn't care. I don't know what the reasoning is,

27:23

but the point is now they're going, nope, we

27:25

don't want it. Now one, that clearly shows you

27:27

that everyone, everywhere knows these things are deadly. Everyone.

27:31

Now they're all just trying to play the right game to

27:33

make sure they don't get held accountable. Or that they, you

27:35

know how, this is a game of accountability at this point.

27:38

A spokesperson for Poland's health ministry told

27:40

local news that over a year of

27:42

negotiations failed to yield a compromise of

27:45

over tens of millions of doses. Now

27:47

why would they have tried to get that, why

27:49

would they have signed a contract for that many

27:51

doses in the beginning when we were told

27:53

two doses? Because they were

27:56

always planning on, they knew from

27:58

day one, this would not be over. And

28:01

now we're finding that out too. Remember they we in

28:03

many different courts and in here. I

28:06

think it was Australia being one of them Renek

28:08

and the rest of them they admitted it was

28:10

never even the European Union just put

28:13

a clip out It was never ever

28:15

supposed to stop transmission or even infection

28:19

So how would so it was gonna stop save

28:22

your grandma they said that right in the beginning they

28:24

knew they were lying We

28:27

all see this So

28:30

Pfizer has now filed a lawsuit against them

28:32

you have to buy our dangerous injections That's

28:35

again why Pfizer was so desperate to make

28:37

these contracts even remember they were putting up

28:39

They were forcing to put up things like

28:41

their own military bases and different assets For

28:44

if they that's what's gonna happen here essentially They're

28:47

gonna take them to court and try to basically

28:49

take things from Poland for them not buying 10

28:51

million doses You know, it's money depth as

28:54

it says right here Pfizer civil suit filed

28:56

early this year in Belgium Demands they got

28:58

they pay roughly 1.5 billion dollars 1.5

29:04

billion from Poland that's not gonna go over well That

29:07

Polish authorities said last year. They no longer

29:09

want last year. They said this So

29:12

it's this is incredible guys. The point is

29:14

that this is obviously showing you that things

29:17

have shifted dramatically So

29:19

we'll see what happens but in the process what is

29:21

pulling put out Right

29:23

because now Poland is gonna have a very clear interest in

29:26

showing you why they don't want them Otherwise,

29:28

they're gonna be on the hook for 1.5

29:30

billion dollars, which that's means they could collapse

29:32

countries Some of them the

29:34

point is that they are gonna now I think be

29:38

Incentivized to be like well here. This is why

29:40

they're deadly or Prove that they can

29:42

show that they violated something right through fraud if

29:44

you can prove that they knew these things and

29:47

didn't tell them Well, that would get them out

29:49

of the contract. Well, let's see what

29:51

happens Now

29:53

dr. SEMA Holter also points out some really good

29:55

news He was covering this in general about the

29:57

WHO and I'm keeping track of this stuff in

30:00

You know, especially even though I'm focused on what's going

30:02

on in Palestine I will keep you informed

30:04

if I see anything big like this happening now This is

30:06

still in the process December 1st seems to be the kind

30:08

of central point, but he was saying in New

30:10

Zealand He was basically in this

30:12

New Zealand trying to get informed people and

30:14

and and you know Get them on the

30:17

right track in regard to both the WHO but

30:19

also just the dangers of injections That's

30:21

the way he had a clip. I think I think I

30:23

forgot to download that Wasn't

30:26

from the day necessarily, but he had a great clip where he

30:28

basically said If

30:30

you said no to the injection you're on

30:32

the right side of history Coming from

30:34

a sema holtra one of the most respected cardiologists

30:36

in the world. That is a huge statement and

30:39

we know that Take some courage

30:41

for him to say that but then this is the point he

30:43

says we did it This is

30:45

from yesterday. New Zealand has

30:47

apparently rejected the WHO amendments before the

30:49

first He says don't underestimate the

30:51

power of your speech and the ability to persuade

30:54

people Through dialogue and courageous

30:56

compassion good for him Hundred

30:58

percent of grade, but that's just one we need

31:00

a lot of the countries to stand up Malcolm

31:04

Roberts also points out an

31:06

interesting development. It's a good and a bad

31:08

apparently It's his emerging industries was

31:10

the topic in the recent Senate

31:12

estimates attended by agri agri futures

31:15

company An organization set up by

31:17

the Australian government to help fund

31:19

research and development in our rural

31:21

industries He said he's pleased

31:23

that agri futures is active in hemp research

31:25

and investigating in grants and trials including one

31:27

of the Northern Territory He

31:29

said he visited successful hemp farms in Queensland

31:31

earlier this year I was curious how they

31:34

had looked into these trials and whether it

31:36

and in Australia I said

31:38

although agri futures claims its

31:40

operations are free from political bias. He

31:42

said they're tied to United Nations sustainability goals

31:45

Interesting way he tied this in because arguably that

31:47

seems pretty clear That means that hemp is not

31:50

in the future Partches the

31:52

UN perspective which by the way is

31:54

one of the most sustainable things you

31:56

could possibly grow if not

31:58

the most sustainable thing Do some

32:00

research. It's not that hard to understand He

32:02

said and the versatility the utility of

32:04

this how many different things that can

32:07

bait not only benefit But make a

32:09

product that is better longer lasting more

32:11

durable than what's currently being used I

32:14

mean it goes off forever paper hemp Creek medicines

32:17

I've done you guys know I haven't talked about this in depth

32:20

in a long time, but it's very important That's

32:22

what that was the origin does the basis for the last American

32:24

bag of mom when it started Cannabis

32:27

law reform and understanding what the reality

32:29

is well He's saying essentially is you

32:31

know they've got some investment here But

32:33

they're also completely tied in with the

32:35

sustainable goals which do not incentivize that

32:37

direction He says that levy levy they

32:40

paid Levies

32:42

paid the company agri futures are also

32:44

being spent on carbon farming as

32:46

he puts it for carbon trading Which is a

32:48

contrived market bug farming is another

32:51

that agri futures is promoting Why

32:54

obviously because of the UN sustainable goals it

32:56

involves growing bugs and intensive urban facilities

32:58

Which is not supporting the farmers in the

33:00

regions unlike hemp? Agri

33:03

futures bias toward these policies is doing is

33:05

putting people out of jobs Taking

33:08

regional jobs and shoving them close to the cities

33:10

and in politic is political no matter how you

33:12

characterize it I swear this guy sees it man.

33:14

I 'm very skeptical always

33:16

will be about any politician, but I Everything

33:19

he seems to put out I pretty much agree with And

33:23

it says one of the purposes is the UN

33:25

sustainable development goals is to allow the globalists to

33:27

get control of agriculture and food This

33:29

is coming from straight from his account or excuse me. This is

33:31

Malcolm Roberts I apologize Renek is one of the other ones doing

33:33

a great job in this regard But

33:36

he says centralizing people into urban

33:38

landscapes agri future is excitement about turning

33:40

crickets into dog food He's just another

33:42

step towards that future and

33:44

as John rightly points out in the chat

33:46

I hope everybody knows that hemp is definitely

33:48

not marijuana now. It's cannabis not

33:50

marijuana It is in the G is part of the

33:52

Canada family. Most people don't even know that there's

33:54

more than just there's there's hemp there is There

33:57

is sativa. There is indica and there's even ruteralis

34:00

Most people don't even know that. There's a different look it

34:02

up. People don't even know that it's another strain, but the

34:04

point is or rather genius,

34:06

I think What I

34:09

think is important about this is one that

34:11

they have the ability we as a people

34:13

of the society of human race Have

34:15

the ability to grow things that would in fact Solve

34:19

these problems in immediately I've written about

34:21

this so many times in regard to

34:23

how hemp alone could literally change the

34:25

world The point is that by argument

34:27

growing bugs in special certain facilities It's

34:30

not going if you were to grow massive fields

34:32

of hemp you could not only feed everybody part

34:34

you could I mean I

34:36

can go up on this forever I want you to

34:39

do in this regard is to look into this for

34:41

yourself and I've got more information I can Include

34:44

this one's just called the hemp deception. I wrote

34:46

these a long time ago every post to them

34:48

a few times I think this one was probably

34:50

originally written. Oh, I didn't actually write

34:52

it in there But I definitely wasn't written in 2018,

34:54

but it was reposted The

34:56

hemp deception the stolen future of the American

34:58

people and it goes into the history

35:00

and and you know military budgets And what it's used

35:03

for why this is important and blah blah blah, but

35:05

I hope you will go take the time to read this And

35:08

I've included some others This one

35:10

is simply just called the war on drugs or

35:12

war on freedom one nation's perception slash deception of

35:14

cannabis again This one was originally written. I think

35:16

in 2016 But

35:19

I you know and again, I haven't read these in

35:21

a while I wrote these a long time ago So

35:23

maybe I'm having different perspectives likely today, but overall I

35:25

still stand by the work here This

35:28

one is an important one the top 10 marijuana myth that

35:30

no one should believe They go through

35:32

Importance on all source cited information

35:35

I think most people are generally aware of how

35:37

dumb this conversation has been the whole briefer madness

35:40

level that some people are still at in the

35:42

government even Mostly Republicans

35:44

were to be enough and just like

35:46

ridiculous like from 1970 mindset like really

35:48

stupid And you know people like Alex Bern

35:51

Will still maintain this is like almost dangerous

35:53

drug and it should be illegal and it's

35:55

just like it's mind-blowingly stupid Mind-numbingly

35:58

stupid. Anyway, this is a great image

36:00

to show you the, you know,

36:03

animal bedding that says nutritional supplements,

36:05

essential oils, medicines, foods, paper products,

36:07

molded plastics, textiles, body care products,

36:09

instruction, animal feed. I mean, it'll

36:12

make a better product in so many different ways. My

36:14

point is that that's what's interesting about what he's pointing

36:17

out here. From sublime

36:19

hemp to ridiculous crickets. Some

36:22

place in the world, they still understand. Now,

36:26

overall, before I go into the next part, they'll

36:28

still tie in. I just want us to

36:30

think about the different things we're dealing with

36:32

today, whether it's experimentation, which we're still kind

36:34

of talking about, but also the idea that

36:36

they will actively take you in directions that

36:38

are in their benefit that are explicitly not

36:41

in your interest. And many

36:43

of these are just to see how this works or

36:45

how it applies or, you know, experimentation is a good

36:47

word for overall how these things work. Now,

36:50

Simon, thank you for sharing this. You shared this

36:52

Defense One article right here.

36:54

This is called, info threats demand a

36:56

cultural shift new Pentagon

36:58

strategy says. And this

37:00

kind of goes into the idea of the

37:02

surveillance side of this. Now,

37:05

we're going to talk about how

37:07

they're now applying this or

37:09

rather already did during COVID-19. Info

37:12

threats. Now, what does that mean?

37:15

I think we all understand that means things like this

37:17

right here. That they'll claim

37:19

is somehow influenced by bad guys, you know,

37:21

Iran or Russia or China somehow. I

37:24

don't I'm unknowingly being influenced by their

37:26

talking points, which

37:28

is just absurd. I mean, it certainly happens in somebody's,

37:30

I mean, more likely the government more than anybody else.

37:34

But the idea that this even by the way, even if

37:36

that was the case, even if you're out there

37:38

knowingly or unknowingly regurgitating points from some

37:40

other countries standing for it is still

37:42

your absolute right with free speech. And

37:44

every other thing we pretend allows your

37:46

freedom to express these thoughts.

37:50

So now what they're trying to tell you, and this

37:52

was published in the 20th, is that they need to

37:54

a cultural shift. I think this is just to catch

37:56

the certain group mindset. All

37:59

the right. really saying is we need

38:01

to adapt to the new world where information is

38:03

key. But who really believe that they don't already

38:05

do that or know that. It's

38:07

a strategy for operating in the

38:09

information environment, outlines how the Pentagon

38:11

plans to better collect, process and

38:14

share data to counteract adversaries, weaponization

38:16

of the internet and emerging technologies.

38:18

Right. So as they're currently living

38:20

through one of the most embarrassing

38:22

breakdowns in the control of information

38:25

with specifically Palestine, but COVID-19 and the rest

38:27

of it, they're going, well, we need to

38:30

re-imagine how we

38:32

control how you talk and speak and think and act,

38:35

like that's what they're saying. Their adversaries

38:37

are you. It says

38:39

the DOD must embrace a cultural

38:41

shift wherein information is a

38:44

foundational element of all military

38:46

strategies. So are we really

38:48

to pretend that that's not currently the,

38:50

what are they from? Are they existing

38:53

from some like 1800 mindset where information

38:55

doesn't matter, even then? I mean, is

38:57

there any point in history where information

38:59

was not wildly relevant to military

39:01

strategy? It is the only thing that

39:03

ultimately matters. Strategy is

39:06

not action. So this is

39:08

just, this falls flat. This is

39:10

them simply trying to conjure up some narrative to explain while

39:12

they're going to, you know, we're going to change things on

39:14

you right now. We're going to watch you

39:16

more. We're going to censor you more. We're going to, you

39:18

know, everything. This is the

39:20

department of defense telling you they're going to

39:23

now shift into making information more important in

39:25

their actions. It's just,

39:27

we should laugh at a dumb that is and

39:29

where the consistent integration of informational and physical power

39:31

becomes the norm. Yeah. Like

39:33

they're not already doing that. All this is, in my

39:36

opinion, is either stating this.

39:38

So you feel that what happens next is somehow because of

39:40

what they're telling you it is, or that

39:42

there's something very alarming around the corner here, you

39:45

know, something very brisk, very like, you

39:47

know, the internet suddenly shifts and we can't access

39:49

it without logging in and via in, uh, verifying

39:51

our identity, right? We all know that's there at

39:53

least trying to make that happen. That's what I

39:56

think this is about something like that. Now

39:58

it says, oh, and this was It's just

40:00

a document from July. They only just told you

40:02

about this change ensures DoD

40:05

capacity capability to Positively affect

40:07

the drivers of human and automated

40:09

system behaviors, right? So

40:11

they need to control how you act pretty simple

40:14

shaping environment operational environments and reinforcing the

40:16

strength and credibility of the United States

40:19

Okay, so that's all it's about Right

40:22

because all we care about is Reinforcing

40:25

the strength and credibility of the United

40:27

States. Okay. Well, that's I guess Kind

40:30

of a naive Statement assuming

40:32

that those things are all in line together,

40:34

right? Let me ask you this what

40:37

happens if the truth and strengthening

40:39

their credibility are At

40:41

odds with each other Right.

40:43

What happens if the US government is the one

40:45

lying or the US government is the one that

40:47

just murdered people and Their job is

40:50

to reinforce the strength the credibility of the United States

40:52

Well their job then is to lie about those things

40:54

to show you a lie about those things Right.

40:57

So this is the kind of naive mindset that aligns

40:59

with all that. The US is only fighting for freedom

41:01

We're only out there doing good things for good people

41:03

all the time and fighting for your rights Does

41:06

anybody believe that even them? So

41:09

the idea is that this is what there it's

41:11

just like the Hasbro discussion from yesterday or the

41:13

day before This is the same thing. They're

41:15

gonna control your perception about how

41:17

strong strong incredible We are even

41:19

if that's not true The

41:22

shift reflects the and by the way the

41:24

government not the people of the America

41:26

of the United States Those are two

41:28

different things the shift reflects an increasing

41:30

use of online platforms and emerging technologies

41:32

as like, of course, China Russia Iran

41:35

and North Korea nobody else which are

41:37

using their informational capabilities to deny information

41:39

accessibility and propagate malign influence misinformation

41:42

disinformation propaganda and deception

41:44

activities to influence and disrupt world

41:46

order Only them

41:48

though, right because totally not also Israel

41:50

United States and you know, Britain and France

41:53

and Spain No, totally not when

41:55

they do it. It's freedom, right

41:57

when they other countries do the exact same thing

41:59

as terrorism It's sort of

42:01

like that clip we just heard. When we

42:03

do it, it's terrorism. It's counter-terrorism. When they

42:05

do it, it's terrorism. But they're doing

42:07

the exact same thing. Now

42:10

since the DOD's new approach will allow

42:12

the department to refine its abilities to

42:14

campaign in and through the information environment

42:16

across all domains in a global context.

42:19

Hmm, okay, so they're being very blunt and

42:21

clear about it. We want to be able

42:23

to manipulate and control the thoughts and the

42:25

actions through the information space everywhere in the

42:27

world. Is that legal? Well,

42:30

then you wonder why places in the world don't want to

42:33

allow their social media apps. The same reason the US wants

42:35

to do it in reverse, because they all do it. No,

42:37

government is not trying to do this. But

42:40

as Americans, from an American perspective, we should care.

42:43

As they try to present themselves as the better one,

42:45

the more altruistic one, the one fighting for freedom, then

42:48

we should demand that to them, because

42:50

that's not who they are. And

42:53

interestingly enough, it says, using

42:55

the electromagnetic spectrum to

42:58

enable achievement of enduring strategic outcomes.

43:00

I feel like there's more to that. It

43:03

feels very weighted. You know,

43:05

5G, that's electromagnetic spectrum. I

43:08

argue that phrasing could imply

43:10

direct energy weapons. Either

43:14

way, it's a very strange statement, using

43:16

the electromagnetic spectrum to enable

43:18

achievement of enduring strategic outcomes.

43:21

So that feels weighted. I feel like that's

43:23

going to be relevant as we go forward,

43:25

more so than it already is. The strategy

43:28

highlights, quote, four lines of effort to enable

43:30

the department to fully integrate and modernize operations

43:32

in the information environment. Also

43:34

kind of seems like they're admitting that they've fell behind,

43:37

including new approaches to people and organizations,

43:39

programs, policies, and governance and partnerships. In

43:41

the July 5th letter, a company, the

43:44

document, Defense Secretary Lloyd

43:46

Austin, said the DOD will

43:48

focus on a renewed commitment to innovation,

43:50

especially in the ways that the department

43:52

acquires and employs cutting edge capabilities. Oh,

43:54

you mean so you're going to start taking off some of the things you've

43:57

stored on shelves for four years that you don't let anybody see or use?

44:00

Right you understand I think John Rappaport's been really

44:02

pushing this lately in a good way That

44:05

the US government has acts they passed where

44:07

they are allowed to just shell very important

44:09

technologies that would revolutionize your life because it

44:12

hinders something they want or something that something

44:14

I don't want to be used that There's

44:18

I mean think of like if you guys remember the

44:20

movie the Indiana Jones I think the first one that

44:23

are the the Crusaders the the

44:25

the ark the Ark

44:27

the arm of the Ark where at the very end it

44:30

shows that when the government goes don't worry We'll take care

44:32

of it It shows the guy just taking the the Ark

44:35

of the covenant and just placing this thing on a shelf

44:37

in the middle of a gigantic warehouse

44:39

where everything in there is that

44:41

important and they just put it there stamp

44:44

it walk away, right? That's what we're talking

44:46

about There's so many

44:48

things that will benefit people or the

44:50

world that inventors have created They get stolen

44:53

from them as well as cures Right

44:55

medical treatments things that they don't want to be

44:57

used because either they don't want to help you

45:00

or they don't want to solve That problem to

45:02

now or yet or just technological

45:04

advancements like with Nikola Tesla that they

45:06

can't profit from they can't monetize And

45:08

so they put it on the shelf

45:11

Maybe now they're gonna go. Oh look what we just discovered

45:14

and make sure they can charge you for

45:16

it Remember like solar panels for example, you know

45:18

They only became mainstream once they basically routed it

45:20

back through the system where you have to pay

45:22

for it On November

45:25

17 Pentagon press release said the new strategy will

45:27

also improve its ability to plan Resource

45:29

and apply informational power toward integrated

45:31

deterrence campaigning and

45:34

building enduring advantage Tenants

45:36

it noted that align with the 2022 national defense It's

45:40

all war focused guys It's always on a war

45:42

footing Congress and federal agencies have

45:44

highlighted foreign malign influence operations in

45:46

recent years such as The

45:49

thing that we know didn't happen Russia's interference in

45:51

2016 They just keep

45:53

dumping that same statement sort of like a sod

45:55

chemical attacks, right? They

45:58

know Ukraine bombed

46:00

the train station right come

46:03

on bombs all the hospital all fake all lies

46:05

we've all proven those things to be the exact

46:08

opposite but yay they just keep saying it that's

46:10

how it works okay

46:12

so that's important here's the actual report if you'd like

46:15

to go through it it'll be in the show notes here

46:17

is a report from yesterday that

46:19

makes this very very obvious and

46:21

how this has already been going on ministers

46:24

accused of a cover accused of

46:26

a cover-up as it is revealed

46:28

shadowy army unit did spy on

46:30

British critics of COVID lockdown policies

46:32

not like you don't already know

46:34

this but let me

46:37

show you why this is important ministers

46:39

were accused of a cover-up last night

46:41

after it revealed that soldiers did

46:43

secretly spy on critics of the

46:45

government's response to COVID they

46:48

lied about it they still lie about it the

46:50

release of new documents contradict official

46:52

assertions that a shadow army unit

46:54

had only been monitoring foreign powers

46:56

see same thing no no

46:58

it's Russia China bad guys that's it that's it

47:01

well it's not just it the

47:03

mail on Sunday revealed this is this

47:05

is the UK right this one's the

47:07

US the point is it's never what

47:09

they tell you they're always lying the

47:11

mail on Sunday revealed earlier this year

47:13

that military operatives in the UK quote

47:15

information warfare brigade same thing

47:18

we're part of a sinister scheme

47:20

to keep a close eye on politicians

47:23

high-profile journalists this

47:26

is authoritarianism this is a despotic

47:28

regime you're literally

47:31

spying on journalists and

47:33

politicians and hope and if they go afoul of the

47:35

narrative you do something to them now

47:37

we maybe we're not at the level of assassination or

47:41

indefinite detention if real

47:43

is but the point is if

47:45

we're obviously and I just think we're at

47:47

a time where these governments have realized they can't they

47:50

they need to always pretend like they're the good guy

47:52

because they can get away with the stuff right up

47:54

to that line it

47:56

says we're a part of a sinister scheme to keep a

47:58

close eye on them who raised Just people

48:00

that raised doubts about the response they

48:03

compiled dossiers on public figures which include

48:05

people like us Such as

48:07

ex-minister David David Davis who questioned

48:09

the modeling behind the death poles which

48:11

we now know were Completely

48:14

false. We even know that people like

48:16

Neil Ferguson used his own opinions framed

48:18

as fact Remember 3.6

48:21

death rate they proved it was less than the

48:23

flu from the beginning the Ionitis group proved this

48:27

0.008 for people under 19 I

48:30

believe I'll stop my head But it was very very

48:32

low for the vast majority for 92% of

48:35

the population it was less than the

48:37

flu dramatically From the beginning

48:39

and it's only gotten less if it's even actually

48:41

there and not just some other thing We've been

48:43

dealing with the whole time the point is that

48:45

they were spying on him because he exposed that

48:47

not because he was wrong and

48:49

the mail on Sunday And

48:52

the mail on Sunday columnist Peter Hitchens they

48:54

spied on him and reported their dissenting views

48:57

back to number 10 the government Documents

48:59

obtained by the Civil Liberties

49:01

Group Big Brother Watch revealed

49:03

the government cells included the

49:05

Minister of Defense's 77th Brigade

49:07

which deploys non-lethal engagement and

49:10

legitimate non-military levers as

49:12

a means to adapt behaviors of every adversary So

49:14

you guys they deployed their own government and

49:16

their information warfare Live

49:18

in real world action against

49:21

general journalists and politicians Non-lethal

49:25

engagement and legitimate non-military levers. So these

49:27

are people are acting against I mean

49:29

that's almost treasonous in a way Think

49:34

of how crazy that is that that's good you think that's

49:36

not happening now from Israel the United States

49:38

Everyone trying to maintain and losing the

49:40

control of the information around Israel and

49:42

Gaza They're drowning in

49:44

their lives right now Because

49:47

we see through this When the reports

49:49

appeared this back to the story from the

49:51

UK Ben Wallace then the Defense Secretary told

49:53

the Commons the unit unearthed information on extremist

49:56

Alliances based outside the UK and that

49:59

its role was to monitor or counter

50:01

opinion. Right, so they were clear about that.

50:04

We're doing this to influence and change what

50:06

you were saying, but they always pretended it was

50:08

because Russia, bad guys, and they damn well knew

50:10

they were doing it to you. The

50:13

new information shows the 7th and 7th

50:15

grade did produce reports on those who

50:17

questioned government decision making, even

50:19

compiled notes on BBC's question time.

50:23

Soldiers who filed newspaper articles and tweets

50:25

made by politicians regarding number 10's rejection

50:28

of the international ventilator scheme in March

50:30

2020 under the label disinformation, which could

50:32

have a negative effect on the UK's

50:34

reputation. But it wasn't

50:36

disinformation. Obtained after months-long

50:39

freedom of information battle with the Cabinet,

50:42

Cabinet office, the documents appeared to

50:44

show personnel from the information warfare

50:46

unit dedicated time to managing the

50:49

government's reputation rather than tackling foreign

50:51

threats. Right, so their entire big

50:53

narrative about protecting you from bad

50:55

guys was false. They

50:57

were actually worried about maintaining the reputation of

50:59

the government. So imagine if

51:01

somebody actually did try to do negative things from

51:03

outside. They probably did. They don't even care. At

51:07

the very least, they care more about influencing your perception

51:09

of them than they do about protecting you from whatever

51:12

they claim they were protecting you from. Such

51:15

as analyzing the response to fines for

51:17

breaching lockdown on social media. Very

51:19

important stuff, mind you. Obviously,

51:21

I'm being facetious. Silky

51:24

Carlo, director of Brig

51:26

Brother Watch last night, said, quote, The

51:28

MOD's claims that the information warfare unit's

51:30

secretive work was focused solely

51:32

on overseas threats are now ironically

51:35

clearly disinformation, acting as a cover-up

51:37

for their political surveillance. Not

51:39

only did they lie, all these are crimes,

51:42

by the way, in order to spy on

51:44

you, they were the ones committing disinformation

51:46

or acting or spreading

51:48

disinformation in order to stop you

51:51

from spreading what they claim was disinformation, even though what

51:53

you were saying was true. Like, it's

51:56

just ridiculous. Most of

51:58

them know what they're doing. Free

52:00

press and free speech are the foundations of

52:02

any democracy, this person says, yet journalists and

52:04

politicians appear to be treated like the enemy

52:07

within. Glad you're finally

52:09

paying attention. That's always been how they see

52:11

you. Unless you're going along with them.

52:14

A journalist that doesn't be told is an ally. Journalists

52:17

that are actually journalists are seen as the

52:19

enemy. A government spokesperson said, quote, online

52:22

disinformation is a serious threat to the

52:24

UK, which is why during the pandemic

52:26

we brought together expertise from across the government to

52:28

monitor disinformation. So instead of

52:30

admitting, they just triple down. And

52:33

are you surprised by that? These

52:35

units use publicly available data, including material shared on

52:38

social media. So you're basically going, yeah, we did

52:40

it, but you put it out there. So it's

52:42

your fault. So you don't

52:44

care that tax dollars were used

52:46

to spy inwardly with a group

52:48

that was promoted to look outward.

52:50

You don't even comment on that. These

52:53

are people that believe they are completely acting with

52:55

impunity. They

52:58

do not believe they will see accountability. Quote,

53:01

they did not target individuals or take any action

53:03

that could impact anyone's ability to discuss or debate

53:05

issues freely. Yeah, but they

53:07

censored people. They focused and spied

53:09

on your people instead

53:12

of the foreign powers with

53:14

tax dollars paid to do so. And

53:17

did this in a very surreptitious way that is,

53:19

I mean, this is, it's amazing that they can't even

53:21

just go, yeah, you got to, of course, they'll never

53:23

do that. So

53:26

keeping this in mind, realize that this is happening

53:28

right now in all

53:30

of these information spheres. So let's go

53:32

to foreign policy in general in regard

53:35

to other aspects of, I

53:37

guess, the Zionist war on

53:39

the Middle East with US support, Kavoor

53:42

Kalmasyan reports. And this is from today.

53:45

Israel just bombed the Damascus

53:47

International Airport. I

53:50

mean, it's just amazing how often this happens and

53:52

nobody cares. It's not amazing. It's just now it's

53:54

becoming painfully obvious to most people.

53:56

What would be the

53:59

worst? reaction of the quote civilized

54:01

world if Syria retaliates and bombs the

54:04

Tel Aviv airport Claims

54:06

they targeted American arms cargo right cuz the

54:08

whole point is they're going oh, we're bombing

54:10

Iran cargo Which by the way Iran is

54:12

allowed to deal with Syria The

54:15

US does not have the ability just arbitrarily

54:17

dick to you're now terrorists therefore everything you

54:19

do is terrorist activity If

54:22

they can do that so can anybody else So

54:25

I can't rush to say America you're all terrorists and therefore

54:27

everything you do it We would

54:29

go no that's outrageous. Well. It's outrageous in reverse

54:31

the only difference is people are blinded by their own

54:34

perceptions These people

54:36

are other I mean it's every one of these governments are out

54:38

there trying to do the same things What

54:40

about the other argument? What about

54:42

the fact everything is happening right now is the God to

54:45

say well they they attacked us. We have a right to

54:47

self-defense Okay, well then

54:49

doesn't Syria have the right to bomb

54:51

back They

54:53

bombed the civilian area right is it the argument

54:55

that Syria Israel's using them as human shields again

54:57

We bomb the back. I mean obviously that's really

55:00

stupid But think about

55:02

how alarming it is that that is actually

55:04

the standing argument that has been defended for

55:06

almost 50 plus days As

55:10

he says rules based order my ass Nobody

55:13

seems to you will not hear about this in the

55:15

corporate media. They barely even they don't even talk about

55:18

this stuff There's no legal

55:20

justification Iran being there does not give them

55:22

the right to bomb a civilian airport Especially

55:24

since it's an ally of Syria, and they are allowed

55:26

to be present Doesn't

55:30

matter though Anti-war

55:32

points out they strike the host I mean that

55:34

the air of the the airport Which

55:37

again by the way just like everything else these are supposed to

55:39

be Depends on I mean I

55:41

get airport can kind of straddle the lines, but

55:43

ultimately civilian airport is supposed to be protected location

55:47

The strikes came just hours after the

55:49

airport resumed service for the first

55:51

time since guess what Israel bombed

55:53

it in October Do you think

55:55

that's an accident you think it's because Iran just

55:57

happened to coincidentally be there right? No It's

56:00

because they don't want the airport working the same

56:02

thing. They're doing everywhere else bombing hospitals and schools.

56:04

You're trying to stop infrastructure You're trying to

56:06

punish these locations. You're trying to hinder what

56:08

they can do Illegally

56:11

mind you but of course the people

56:13

that's resigned the supporters none of it matters because they're

56:15

all Muslim bad guy Arabs Whatever, you

56:17

know some clumsy bigoted statement. That means nothing that

56:19

they'll keep pushing The

56:23

one another point is important in this larger picture even

56:25

I haven't gotten into this yet I

56:27

want to point something out Lord Bebo points out that the

56:29

Houthis have hijacked another ship in the Red Sea now I

56:31

don't know if that's exactly what's happened The Central

56:34

Park fuel tanker as it's called decile

56:36

is owned and managed by UK based

56:38

Israel link company allegedly belonging to an

56:40

Israeli businessman It

56:42

entered the Red Sea today. This was on the

56:44

26th and it was hijacked Now

56:47

apparently there's a network. There have been reports of three

56:49

of them Now

56:51

this is being widely reported as the

56:53

Houthis Yemen have taken these which seems

56:55

like a likely reality But

56:58

let me show you something that's being reported In

57:02

from today in the Times Express,

57:04

excuse me US

57:07

Navy engaged after UK owner tank the tanker

57:09

seized off the coast of Yemen now It

57:11

says right here the Israel linked ship was

57:14

boarded by an unknown source Private

57:17

security firms announced it says the boarding

57:19

took place offshore from Yemeni port Aiden

57:21

with another vessel in the area Porting

57:23

quote an approach by eight persons on

57:26

two skips Where emails

57:28

are uniforms that arguably that I would I

57:30

would argue that Yemen might would skips don't

57:32

seem to make sense But certainly possible it

57:35

is not immediately clear who is behind the attack.

57:37

Okay, so if this was a clear attack like,

57:39

you know I guess

57:42

Especially what that's all right. Who knows what if this

57:44

is being used as a military vessel, which I don't

57:47

believe it is You could argue this

57:49

would be involved in the ongoing What's

57:52

becoming a world war which already seems to be rolling

57:54

out that way But my

57:56

what it seems to be a civilian tanker, which

57:58

would arguably mean it's off limits But

58:01

then we have to realize that they continue to do the same

58:03

thing. The US seizes Iran vessels and they do it nonstop. But

58:05

the point would be if we want to try to engage in

58:07

a legal way and point out the bad guys do it, it

58:09

doesn't mean you do it back. That's what the

58:12

US and Israel do every time. Oh, they use

58:14

cluster munitions? We don't prove that though. We'll just give you

58:16

some then. So you're just as bad as

58:18

they are and you didn't even prove they actually use them. Doesn't

58:21

make you the good guy when you're doing the same things. The

58:24

point though, I want

58:26

to make it clear that I don't think it would... If

58:28

Yemen is seizing tankers and these are

58:30

just because there is really like, you

58:32

know, Israeli businessmen own them. I

58:35

don't agree with that. That's a crime. The

58:37

same way I would argue that Israel and the

58:39

US do the same things to Iranian ships. They're

58:41

just Iranian linked. It's ridiculous. But the reason I'm

58:43

saying that is because I don't know if this...

58:45

Well, first of all, because that's the truth, but

58:48

I don't know if these actually are being taken

58:50

by Yemen. Right? Isn't

58:52

it just as possible that we're seeing this being done

58:54

by the Mossad or CIA in order to make it

58:56

appear as if this is some... You know, I don't

58:58

know. All I'm saying is we should question this before

59:01

we just go with the

59:03

narrative that they took these. I think we

59:05

need to make sure that's the case. But

59:08

it's highly likely that Yemen would do

59:10

this because the arguments are that they're

59:12

supporting the ongoing genocide against... You know,

59:15

they're supporting Palestinians. And

59:18

if these are Israeli tankers, they see that as some, I

59:20

guess, an action. Or maybe they're being used in the

59:22

war effort. Maybe these are not businessmen

59:24

tankers. They're actually shipping weapons or who knows.

59:26

So we don't know all the information

59:29

just yet. And nowhere in the corporate media articles are you

59:31

going to find this. Another

59:33

report in regard to the larger picture of Syria,

59:35

Iraq, and so on. It says recent attacks on

59:37

US military bases in Iraq and Syria have pushed

59:39

the number of operations against US military

59:42

assets in the Middle East to 73 since

59:44

October 7th. An

59:47

attack on Thursday morning saw resistance factions

59:49

launch suicide drones at US targets located

59:51

in the Ain Al-Assad and Ibril air

59:53

bases in Iraq. You know, all the

59:56

illegal occupation areas. A barrage of

59:58

rockets also targeted the US occupation bases. in

1:00:00

the Al Omar oil fields where they're currently in

1:00:03

still occupying and stealing oil from Syria Which

1:00:05

perceived an attack on the US occupation green

1:00:07

village base in Syria? CNN said it attacks

1:00:09

mark at least 73 operations against US forces

1:00:12

in the region Between the

1:00:14

17th and 24th in support of

1:00:16

the Palestinian resistance in Gaza these factions in

1:00:18

Iraq and Syria have launched a series of continuous

1:00:20

attacks on US military assets Now

1:00:23

that this could be groups. I guess

1:00:25

argue that it I would say that's

1:00:27

probably the that highly likely reality But

1:00:30

there's also the dynamic of what US has

1:00:32

been doing there and bombing them For

1:00:35

other reasons long before the 7th, which they've been

1:00:37

going back and forth about so the PMU in

1:00:39

general Katya has below different groups

1:00:41

that on the ground do very clearly have

1:00:43

reason to bomb the US occupation whether or

1:00:45

not what was going On October in Gaza,

1:00:48

but I do agree. This is driving the

1:00:50

action, but I want to point this out again for

1:00:53

obvious reasons Nobody

1:00:55

should want anybody to be hurt whether military or

1:00:58

otherwise We need to understand

1:01:00

the facts and if you want to be factual

1:01:02

and unemotional The reality

1:01:04

is the US is the illegal occupier period.

1:01:07

So when they are continuing to attack They're

1:01:10

doing so with legal international

1:01:12

law protection per the Geneva

1:01:14

Convention. They have the right to arms struggle They're

1:01:17

gonna continue to frame this as some ongoing onslaught

1:01:19

of terrorist attacks. That's what they're doing everywhere Is

1:01:22

that true it is the

1:01:24

obvious reality that what they're doing is protected

1:01:26

under international law Because the

1:01:28

United States is the illegal occupier in

1:01:30

all of these locations per the United

1:01:33

Nations for international law the obvious reality

1:01:37

Now this is an important Tweet

1:01:39

actually from Brittany Ramos to borrow so I'm not familiar

1:01:41

with but she says at 22 Here's

1:01:44

a picture of her for the podcast

1:01:46

both in her military uniform, but

1:01:48

also next to Debbie washerman Schultz

1:01:51

Her name just it's gross

1:01:53

coming out of your mouth But at 22 she

1:01:55

wrote she writes about to deploy to our global

1:01:58

war on terror. She puts in quotes I

1:02:00

was I was your guest to the State of

1:02:02

the Union. She's Debbie Washman Schultz I

1:02:05

believe I was being sent to save lives and

1:02:07

terrorism. I trusted it admired you I

1:02:10

came home knowing I only added to the

1:02:12

violence and people like you sent me to kill and

1:02:15

die for lies guys, if you really

1:02:17

do your research I I

1:02:19

know very few people that leave

1:02:22

their service and don't

1:02:24

have some kind of sentiment like this Now

1:02:28

she's tweet linking to Debbie Schultz's

1:02:30

tweets here It

1:02:32

says I'm deeply heartened by this initial agreement that is

1:02:34

expected to result in the release of children till the

1:02:37

21st To

1:02:39

be clear this brings a flood of relief for some but

1:02:41

must be the beginning of return of all hostage by Hamas

1:02:43

Obama the point is this However,

1:02:45

Israel can it must continue to eliminate terrorist capabilities

1:02:47

in Gaza to prevent Hamas from ever perpetrating their

1:02:49

you know This is the group that they've been

1:02:52

funding and propping up for a long time now

1:02:54

that she doesn't know where doesn't care about Because

1:02:57

she does she's one of the worst manipulators and

1:02:59

she's bad at it quite frankly, but she says

1:03:01

I'm also thankful Biden

1:03:04

did not heed calls for an

1:03:06

immediate ceasefire weeks ago Your

1:03:09

hope you're thankful that she they were able to

1:03:11

kill 15,000 people got it as

1:03:13

Israel could not have achieved this breakthrough Really

1:03:16

what's the breakthrough exactly a

1:03:19

unilateral ceasefire only serves Hamas terrorists who broke

1:03:21

a ceasefire on October 7th No, they did

1:03:23

not and vowed to do so again. Here's

1:03:25

the point Well, I'll

1:03:27

just I'll read what she says because it's

1:03:30

the point that I'm gonna get to anyway. She

1:03:32

says I'm 34 now 12

1:03:34

years later and I risked my own terror at

1:03:36

my military prison to tell the truth about these

1:03:38

wars But you're still peddling the same lies Tweeting

1:03:40

to essentially celebrate the scale of death and

1:03:43

destruction. You can't possibly fathom from

1:03:45

your cushy office I

1:03:47

wonder why and shows her Pro-israel

1:03:49

funding coming from the you know different a

1:03:51

pack groups and different things like that the

1:03:53

lobbying The points out

1:03:55

you're operating all as if our

1:03:58

own numbers don't show that

1:04:00

terrorism increased in every

1:04:02

single place we did military counter-terrorism

1:04:05

operations for the past 20 years.

1:04:07

Because again, point made

1:04:09

earlier, terrorism

1:04:11

operations. They just call it

1:04:13

counter-terrorism because they claimed they're fighting

1:04:15

terrorism. But what are they doing?

1:04:17

Going out there and committing terrorist acts. Listen

1:04:21

to somebody who knows who did it who was there. Every

1:04:24

single place we did counter-terrorism, they see an

1:04:26

increase in the thing they claimed they're trying

1:04:28

to stop. For the past 20 years, which

1:04:30

makes you either evil or grossly incompetent, she

1:04:33

says. Talking to Schwartz

1:04:35

or Debbie Washington Schultz. This

1:04:38

deal was offered weeks ago, as we

1:04:40

should know, and rejected by

1:04:42

Israel. If Biden

1:04:45

was pushing for ceasefire and diplomacy

1:04:47

instead of discouraging the entire U.S.

1:04:49

government from even saying the

1:04:51

word de-escalation, as we know, the

1:04:53

only difference would be hostages home sooner

1:04:55

and thousands of innocent lives saved. This

1:04:58

is basic, provable reality. Everybody's

1:05:02

now been forced to admit, as

1:05:04

even he did. And the Guardian, the Times

1:05:06

of Israel, everybody. He rejected and

1:05:09

now has been forced to accept the offer he

1:05:11

denied from day one. Right.

1:05:13

So Schwartz is over here saying, or

1:05:15

Schultz, thankfully he did this

1:05:17

because he couldn't have achieved this breakthrough. Well, no,

1:05:19

you're lying and you know you're lying. The

1:05:22

only breakthrough was the murder of 15,000 people,

1:05:25

6,000 plus

1:05:28

children. That's the only breakthrough.

1:05:30

He could have accepted the exact same deal from

1:05:32

the very beginning. She

1:05:34

knows that. She's a horrible person. She

1:05:37

writes, even if you don't believe these

1:05:39

empirically proven points to express gratitude that

1:05:41

a ceasefire wasn't pushed sooner is to

1:05:44

celebrate the killing of thousands of

1:05:46

civilians, thousands of children guilty of

1:05:48

nothing but being born from Palestinians.

1:05:50

Disgusting. She

1:05:52

says we need a ceasefire now. It's

1:05:55

only the only path that saves Palestinians and

1:05:57

Israeli lives. Good

1:06:00

for her. Yeah.

1:06:04

Arnaud Batran points out what Debbie Washington-Schultz

1:06:06

is celebrating. The latest Gaza

1:06:08

numbers from Swiss-based Euromed Human Rights Monitor

1:06:10

that reveal the unbelievable scale of the

1:06:13

atrocity. 8,176 children

1:06:15

killed. 4,112

1:06:18

women. 61%

1:06:22

of those killed were women

1:06:24

and children. 61%.

1:06:26

This is per from today. 92%

1:06:31

of those killed are civilians. But

1:06:36

they're aiming for Hamas, we're told, right? 18,460

1:06:41

people out of 20,031. 1,730,000

1:06:45

people displaced more than 80% of the entire population

1:06:51

in just 49 days. Which

1:06:53

by the way means that 167 children killed every day

1:06:55

on average. 7

1:06:59

every hour, 1 every 8 minutes. Think

1:07:05

about that. We've been live for

1:07:07

an hour? That means 7 children just got killed.

1:07:10

Now, arguably meaning on the continuing of

1:07:13

their bombing campaigns. But you know

1:07:15

what? It's probably not that far fetched knowing that

1:07:17

they're buried, people can't help them, people are starving.

1:07:20

Over the 49 day period, 167 every day. I

1:07:24

can't even believe that we can pretend like that

1:07:26

makes sense. 377 civilians killed every day

1:07:28

on average. That's

1:07:31

almost 16 civilians every hour.

1:07:35

He says, I don't think this has many parallels in

1:07:37

post World War II history. Here's

1:07:40

the graphic. So

1:07:43

you can break this down. Gosh,

1:07:45

it makes me sick. And of course,

1:07:47

you know what they do because of that? Right?

1:07:50

The government stands up and says, no more. We can't

1:07:53

align with atrocities like this. We can't

1:07:55

support genocide. Of course not. They say,

1:07:57

we'll give you whatever you need. Moves

1:08:00

or moves to lift nearly every restriction

1:08:02

on Israel's access to weapons stockpile, right?

1:08:06

16 18 thousand dead do whatever they need

1:08:09

give them whatever they need because What

1:08:13

rules based in national order There's

1:08:17

no explaining this They

1:08:19

have found this there. I

1:08:22

think they know they can't come back from this Now

1:08:26

Here's a few more lies that we want to go over to

1:08:28

show you how egregious this is and how

1:08:31

obviously lost they are Yeah,

1:08:33

they went this route straight up

1:08:35

9-11 passport level. This is how dumb this is Mr.

1:08:38

Eli David Clearly showing I mean

1:08:40

guy I've never the one to like even

1:08:43

insinuate to somebody about being paid, right? I just

1:08:45

think that's a dangerous thing to do but I'll

1:08:47

tell you right now how in the world people

1:08:49

like this I mean you can read the comments

1:08:51

and these aren't just from people that are against him

1:08:53

Like these are people that follow him that are supporters

1:08:55

of him that are going you're what you've lost your

1:08:58

mind People that were

1:09:00

aware of the kovat lie who are now going this

1:09:02

guy was trying to tell truth or a kovat. He

1:09:05

says breaking Israel military

1:09:07

found the vest of a

1:09:09

Hamas terrorist Apparently after after

1:09:11

40 days and still just resting there. Apparently

1:09:14

next to his UNRWA in identification

1:09:16

badge Because

1:09:18

see they're so desperate to hide the fact

1:09:21

that they've killed over a hundred union United

1:09:23

Nations workers And that's what's turned

1:09:25

the support from these groups that are you almost historically

1:09:29

Unparalleled lockstep with whatever they need

1:09:32

that the worst they'd ever say is we

1:09:34

call for de-escalation on both sides as Israel's

1:09:36

murdering people Now they're going

1:09:38

this is unparalleled. This is genocide

1:09:42

So they go UN you're racist you're terrorists

1:09:44

Which by the way, I don't support the United

1:09:46

Nations at all because I don't think it's a

1:09:49

just body I think it's been completely co-opted But

1:09:51

that does not mean that there's not individual moving

1:09:53

parts that have obviously Agency to be able to

1:09:55

point this out or at the very least they

1:09:57

realize as a controlled entity that they can't do

1:09:59

this because they'll lose just like Israel

1:10:01

is. Either way, however you view this,

1:10:04

to pretend, based

1:10:07

on a random shot, who knows from

1:10:09

where, when, what it is, that you could just go,

1:10:11

look, we caught him! We

1:10:13

found a badge! I

1:10:15

mean, it's just obscenely stupid. I

1:10:18

mean, it's not only insulting, I mean, let's do this really

1:10:20

quickly, by the way. Look

1:10:24

at the reverse image

1:10:26

and see if it pops up. I forgot to do this,

1:10:28

actually. Ah, come on. Everything

1:10:32

glitching out on me. Oh

1:10:37

my God. What

1:10:39

is happening? Jesus.

1:10:44

All these things

1:10:46

just don't work for me anymore. All

1:10:50

right, no matches, which usually suggests it's new. But,

1:10:54

you know, you can just look at the bottom for yourself. I

1:10:56

mean, it's, you know, somebody goes, where, what about the passport? As

1:10:59

I simply said, and, you know,

1:11:01

tagging Antonio Gutierrez. Like, think about the

1:11:03

absurdity, like the pure stupidity,

1:11:05

to think that you can tag him. What is

1:11:07

he going to do? Go, oh, well, there's proof.

1:11:11

I see a picture. Which

1:11:13

I should do, actually. Hold

1:11:17

on. Remember this? I

1:11:24

just responded by saying, you just got Twitter filed. Because,

1:11:28

you know, how dumb it is to think that this image proves anything. Like, even

1:11:31

if this was a completely reputable

1:11:33

entity, you'd still go, okay, well,

1:11:35

I can't just pretend that proves, I have to

1:11:37

see, where'd you get it? Where

1:11:39

did this all come from? It's just

1:11:41

silly. My point is, can people really be this

1:11:43

stupid? I bet they found his passport inside the all-shepa too,

1:11:46

with a special Hamas cover on it. They are reaching,

1:11:48

guys, in a really embarrassing way. By

1:12:03

the way, we

1:12:05

should keep track of this to investigate

1:12:08

this in general. Or just to

1:12:10

be completely objective. Are we really

1:12:12

going to pretend that they wouldn't just make this for

1:12:14

him? The point is,

1:12:16

the United Nations is not claiming that.

1:12:19

Now, of course they could lie. Of course they could. But

1:12:22

what you're stuck with is an entity, the IDF,

1:12:24

the Israeli intelligence apparatus, that

1:12:26

has been embarrassingly caught. I mean, 15

1:12:29

times really, really bad stuff.

1:12:32

Things that we should all laugh about

1:12:34

if it wasn't so egregiously bad what was going on.

1:12:38

So they could easily make this up, lie

1:12:40

about it, alter it, make these things. Okay. Or

1:12:42

it could be real. But then you've got the United Nations over

1:12:44

here, who is not in this context shown to

1:12:47

be lying about anything. They

1:12:49

say that. You're a liar. You're racist. But

1:12:51

there's no evidence they've made anything up. And in fact,

1:12:53

most of what they've stated, you can verify for yourself.

1:12:57

So they're going, that's not true. We

1:13:00

don't work with Hamas. None

1:13:02

of our people work with Hamas. So

1:13:04

what are we left to do? You trust Eli David,

1:13:07

even though he's been saying things that are like laughably

1:13:09

stupid? But

1:13:11

the objective thing to do is, it's a

1:13:13

picture that you post that I can't verify. Therefore

1:13:15

it means nothing until we can prove it. But

1:13:18

going back to the other points, I have an additional point

1:13:20

to this to show you what else they're doing, so desperately

1:13:23

trying to cover everything up. One point

1:13:25

from the Wikipedia page that literally said that

1:13:27

Israel built the tunnels under there and the

1:13:29

operating room in 1983 under Al-Shifa until they

1:13:31

then quickly deleted it. And now it says,

1:13:34

oh, it's a basement for the 90s. You

1:13:37

mean the basement that you found it wasn't a command center.

1:13:39

So you had to rapidly change this. So it looked like

1:13:41

you found what was supposed to be there. How embarrassing. Nobody

1:13:43

falls for this. And

1:13:45

of course, Yihoob Barak, former prime

1:13:47

minister Epstein Buddy says

1:13:49

on the record, they built it

1:13:52

in the 80s. And even

1:13:54

CNN goes, did you misspeak? Super

1:13:56

baffled by it. And he says no. OK.

1:14:00

Here's another point to this. This

1:14:02

is from Orwell You

1:14:05

know from the chat Orwell friend of the show actually

1:14:07

works well with us and it gives us all sorts

1:14:09

of important information I mean basically

1:14:12

a part of he left Israel official

1:14:14

Nef Tully Bennett discusses teaching teams how

1:14:16

to edit Wikipedia to control the conversation.

1:14:19

Thank you Orwell this I

1:14:23

Mean it's not that hard to after my

1:14:25

drum people This is that people edit Wikipedia all

1:14:27

the time, but this is just making sure you understand

1:14:29

This is something they do not because they're trying to

1:14:31

get the truth You know, we

1:14:34

want to make sure Wikipedia has the best truth

1:14:36

information, right? No, it's because they state very clearly

1:14:38

they want to control your perception of what's important

1:14:40

to them Azbar What's

1:14:47

it yes in conjunction with my

1:14:49

Israel has arranged a Instruction

1:14:52

day for wiki editors the

1:14:54

goal of the day is to Teach

1:14:58

people how to edit in Wikipedia, which

1:15:01

is the number one source of information

1:15:04

today in the world I was

1:15:06

with example if someone searches the Gaza flotilla,

1:15:09

we want to be there We want to

1:15:11

be good the guys who influence what is

1:15:13

written there how it's written and to ensure

1:15:15

that it's balanced and Zionist

1:15:18

in the nature Balanced

1:15:22

but Zionist in nature so not balanced at

1:15:24

all then completely one-sided got it Like

1:15:26

think about do you think that there's just Wikipedia parties

1:15:28

when they just have groupings come and they inform them

1:15:30

on how to edit? We this is obviously what you

1:15:32

think it is Just it's

1:15:34

just but unbridled. They don't care This

1:15:37

is what we do. We control the information From

1:15:39

a Zionist perspective like this is teaching

1:15:41

them how to control the flow of

1:15:44

information on Wikipedia That's

1:15:46

exactly what we found out before We

1:15:51

as Israelis and as Jews can defend

1:15:54

Israel online on the internet and particularly

1:15:56

in Wikipedia in this case, okay So

1:15:59

if she may be honest maybe She thinks she's doing the right thing,

1:16:01

but is what she believes is the truth

1:16:03

actually what's true or is she being

1:16:05

manipulated by the Zionist? The

1:16:07

point is simply that you can already tell that they have a

1:16:09

very clear like let me just go back to the main point

1:16:13

Right that they already did this Whoever

1:16:16

somebody with the interest of protecting the Zionist agenda

1:16:18

deleted what actually happened changed it You can

1:16:20

prove this again as we who Barack admits

1:16:23

himself So

1:16:25

they're treat their training people how to manipulate

1:16:27

the story Now

1:16:30

this is an important development in

1:16:32

this which I'm not sure was intentional

1:16:35

But what it's state what this is an additional story

1:16:37

to what we've already covered This

1:16:40

is just our first coverage of this in the 27th

1:16:42

or stemmed largely from the gray zone article Evidence

1:16:44

shows Israel killed its own citizens on the 7th

1:16:47

though. If you haven't seen this already guys, this

1:16:49

is not debatable helicopter

1:16:51

pilots security leader

1:16:53

from the kabutzba, Ere Multiple

1:16:55

hostages saying we saw IDF kill hostages.

1:16:58

They shot at people that were not

1:17:00

Hamas We were in time. We were

1:17:02

told to fire on cars that we

1:17:05

didn't know if they held hostages That's

1:17:07

the that's the that's the helicopter pilots

1:17:09

multiple sources speaking to Israeli radio speaking

1:17:12

to her rats on the record and Still

1:17:14

they deny it now. You've got another example

1:17:17

Channel 12 released this clip or a full

1:17:20

this is just a clip from the larger

1:17:22

one where it literally shows These are apparently

1:17:24

young 25 year old girls who are who

1:17:27

have never really driven these tanks before Who

1:17:30

were the ones weirdly chosen to use these

1:17:32

tanks and on the record? They

1:17:34

said are the civilians inside and their commander

1:17:36

said I don't know just

1:17:38

shoot and Yet

1:17:40

we're supposed to pretend like this isn't the most obvious thing in the

1:17:43

world It's

1:17:46

in subtitles for the

1:17:48

podcast we break into the community crash

1:17:50

the gate il

1:17:57

� She

1:18:00

told her friends and tells me Shoot

1:18:02

there, the terrorists are there She

1:18:06

says I asked him Are

1:18:08

there civilians there? He

1:18:11

says I don't know, just shoot People

1:18:18

are still trying to deny this I decided not

1:18:20

to shoot, this is the Israeli community

1:18:26

I'm going to shoot this Israeli I'm

1:18:28

going to fire my team gun at a

1:18:30

house It's

1:18:56

amazing what people will dismiss They

1:19:01

don't want to hear what this sounds like

1:19:04

It's their statements, from their colonel,

1:19:06

their military And the Hannibal directive is a

1:19:08

public reality at this point And

1:19:11

here we have the evidence that people at

1:19:13

the high level Telling them to fire on

1:19:15

these locations They told the helicopter piles

1:19:17

to do so, and they did That's

1:19:22

an obsession of mine They're saying I fired on a

1:19:24

house with a machine gun So when they killed a

1:19:26

hostage, they blame it on Hamas You know they did We're

1:19:30

in a battle inside this area There's also

1:19:32

fire from the field So

1:19:35

we're being told and we're being told And

1:19:37

the community uses fire projectiles and machine guns

1:19:40

Simple Also

1:19:44

in the community They knew

1:19:46

there were people in there, guys Very

1:19:48

complex situation The

1:19:52

terrorists did not fight the tank once the

1:19:54

tank arrived They either ran or died The

1:19:58

tank definitely engaged Sure,

1:22:01

they all just had mental breakdowns or maybe it's because

1:22:03

they were trying to tell you something that we weren't

1:22:05

supposed to hear Like this is what villains look like

1:22:08

You have people that just survived something part

1:22:11

of which was you're firing at them Now

1:22:14

you involuntarily guys that means be

1:22:16

without their permission put them into

1:22:18

a mental institution After

1:22:22

they just survived something that you know, you're telling

1:22:24

us they were attacked by Hamas It was terrible

1:22:27

and you put them in a mental institution guys.

1:22:29

I think this is very obvious I

1:22:31

think it's just like we're gonna get into with

1:22:34

the hostage aspect of it right now because these

1:22:36

people are saying things They don't want the Western

1:22:38

audiences to hear that blew

1:22:41

my mind This is

1:22:43

what villains look like. You don't care about your

1:22:45

people. Hey same as your government right now They

1:22:48

would just as quick put you in sale because you're

1:22:50

saying things. They don't want this is villainy

1:22:56

Talking about some other Ceasefire

1:22:58

violations. We just talked about

1:23:00

this on the 24th Israel already violated the ceasefire

1:23:03

Gareth Porter exposed the al-sheep a lie revealing that

1:23:05

they already actually found a command center on the

1:23:07

14th They just didn't they reported it

1:23:09

it went out in the Jerusalem post But then made

1:23:11

sure nobody else talked about it and then it just

1:23:14

shifted to al-sheep and lied about it Gareth

1:23:16

Porter is somebody that has very clear standing

1:23:18

long-term journalist that has a lot of clout

1:23:21

in the in the area of journalism and He

1:23:24

is breaking this on consortium news and

1:23:26

people don't seem to care They just

1:23:28

demolished this hospital under the guise that they

1:23:31

found things there and we could prove they

1:23:33

brought things in even the BBC caught them

1:23:35

live and Yet,

1:23:37

we just allow them to keep killing people Like

1:23:40

we're still debating what's going on Well

1:23:43

in this is this is an interesting dynamic

1:23:46

Daniela modus points out the occupation forces are

1:23:48

launching airstrikes This is from yesterday late and

1:23:50

yesterday night Targeting

1:23:52

a home in the West Bank airstrikes

1:23:54

in the West Bank Occupation

1:23:58

forces are preventing ambulances from the

1:24:00

casualty this is they're treating this just like gaz at this

1:24:02

point so explain

1:24:04

this for me they're

1:24:07

at they right now have a ceasefire with hamas

1:24:09

that's the point it's not with gaza or

1:24:11

if it is that means they're proving to

1:24:13

you that their fight is with gaza not

1:24:15

hamas right so either

1:24:18

they're bombing the west bank because

1:24:20

they just want to murder people

1:24:23

and that's going to very clearly upset people

1:24:25

that think they're at a ceasefire when

1:24:27

they i guess they're let me think about that you're

1:24:29

in gaza and they're bombing people you

1:24:31

know right over here in the west bank and you're supposed to

1:24:33

they were all were a ceasefire their

1:24:37

argument is they're bombing hamas that's what they say when

1:24:39

they talk about west bank even though that's not the

1:24:41

reality so

1:24:44

either they're violating a ceasefire with hamas right

1:24:46

now by bombing the west bank going for

1:24:48

hamas because that's how dumb that is or

1:24:50

they're admitting that they're they're actually going after

1:24:52

all of palestine you can't have

1:24:54

this both ways is it a violation ceasefire or are they

1:24:56

just going after hamas and or palestine in

1:24:59

general this is a way

1:25:01

of taunting them over there by going we're going to keep murdering

1:25:03

this place but you can't fight because we made a ceasefire with you

1:25:07

this is just ridiculous this

1:25:09

is a villain guys these are bad

1:25:12

people whoever

1:25:14

wherever they are doesn't matter their ethnicity or

1:25:16

where they the point is anybody doing this

1:25:18

is terrible here

1:25:21

is an example they killed four palestinian

1:25:23

boys in the west bank in the

1:25:25

last 24 hours 14

1:25:28

15 16 and 17 that's their ages in

1:25:33

the last 24 hours killed four four teenagers in

1:25:35

the west bank you

1:25:40

just can't not see

1:25:42

this unless you're the u.s government of course then

1:25:44

you just blind your eyes to everything they do

1:25:48

dr ishtar of urak points out dr

1:25:51

behemoth salib and apparently this comes from

1:25:53

their uh their webinar from specifically the

1:25:56

palestinian children's relief fund what

1:25:58

he's saying And this this

1:26:00

was as of today earlier today, so I might have

1:26:02

changed by now, but saying that What

1:26:06

they need the priorities electricity

1:26:08

fuel incubators ventilation machines formula

1:26:11

disposables now

1:26:13

this is at the M-ready

1:26:15

hospital not the sheep hospital that was the different

1:26:17

point there anyway, but the point is just till

1:26:19

now all they're getting is

1:26:21

water That's

1:26:23

it This

1:26:26

this is an insult I Mean

1:26:29

are they getting aid or they just getting water? The

1:26:33

bottom line though is that this is going

1:26:36

to be argued that they did what they were supposed

1:26:38

to by some kind of loophole whatever or just a

1:26:40

lie and That

1:26:43

will end up being some sticking point I'm telling you this

1:26:45

is going to happen at the very least it doesn't even

1:26:47

matter because they're going to go back and Bond them when

1:26:49

this is over anyway But

1:26:52

if they know they're gonna bomb them they're not going to do what

1:26:54

they have to do these people don't matter

1:26:56

to them and On

1:27:00

top and just before we get into the hostage part of this This

1:27:04

is today there. This is Reuters reporting Hamas

1:27:06

seeks to extend the truce With

1:27:09

Israel with some conditions statement with

1:27:11

some conditions per a statement It says Hamas announced in

1:27:13

a statement on Sunday that is seeking to extend the

1:27:16

truce And the point was for

1:27:18

every ten hostages I guess that will extend one

1:27:20

more day, and I think they only allow one

1:27:22

more day anyway something like that It's really really

1:27:24

really silly But Hamas

1:27:27

clearly does not want this to continue

1:27:30

And I would argue they're gonna could try to

1:27:32

stretch that out But it's gonna be quickly

1:27:34

be revealed that Israel doesn't care about that

1:27:36

does not want this to stop And that's what they're saying

1:27:38

am I G and

1:27:41

this by the way is while even Aussie's

1:27:43

the wrong article, but this is from New

1:27:46

York Times updating now apparently they've completed

1:27:48

three of their exchanges so far

1:27:50

A Release

1:27:53

a total of 17 more hostages today

1:27:55

including at one American child

1:28:00

American child the group said it was seeking to extend

1:28:02

the truth which which is slated to continue into Monday

1:28:04

and Just

1:28:06

just as you can update yourself on the

1:28:08

different the hostage exchanges now. Let's talk about

1:28:10

the as The

1:28:13

article put it here Insidious

1:28:15

narrative about Palestinian prisoners and we're going to go over some of

1:28:18

the ones that have been released and some of the lies That

1:28:20

have been stated about them and I'm not gonna play this whole

1:28:22

clip I just want to play the start of it to get

1:28:24

you to make sure you check out this here.

1:28:26

Oh, I actually include this, too the

1:28:30

Show we getting 24th chase by

1:28:32

the way like we said before remember Jason

1:28:34

Jason bassler We have the former former Lee

1:28:36

of the free thought project now working for

1:28:39

TLAB. He's gonna be the one posting these

1:28:41

That's why it says Ryan reviews just

1:28:43

on the TLAB account. So, you know that he's the one posting those

1:28:46

Talking about the box article we covered as

1:28:49

well as the ones after that by the way, which was United Nations

1:28:52

Yeah, Amazon International the point was straight

1:28:54

out of a corporate media article Highlighting

1:28:57

the history that was easily proven about

1:28:59

what goes on to children Injections

1:29:02

civilians and occupied Palestine and

1:29:04

the imprisonment and how they're

1:29:06

treated Here's

1:29:09

the art here's the show from the 24th make sure

1:29:11

I showed you have that in the show notes That's

1:29:14

right. So this says the double

1:29:16

standards of Israel's use of administrative detention

1:29:18

Which means they're arrested without charge for

1:29:20

things as simple as saying the wrong

1:29:22

thing in public or throwing stains Now

1:29:25

I'm gonna get into the actual breadth of the real

1:29:27

picture of who these people are that are being or

1:29:29

that are in the Possibility of being released the 300

1:29:31

or so that were on the table of only 150

1:29:34

are gonna be released or so We're told I've

1:29:36

doubt that ends up being seen to fruition. I don't know why

1:29:38

but I just haven't my doubts But

1:29:42

of course the the Usual suspects

1:29:44

are screaming. They're all terrorists every one of

1:29:47

them are terrorists while focusing on the ones

1:29:49

they can give you examples of where there

1:29:51

was violence in the Interaction without any of

1:29:53

the context about the reality of the ongoing

1:29:55

occupation or what they did to their family

1:29:57

or what they were taking the bottom line

1:30:00

is that this is about framing this

1:30:02

in an insidious way to make it seem

1:30:04

like they're, as you're going to see on Twitter, exchanging

1:30:07

a bunch of infants for a bunch of

1:30:09

terrorists. Even though the vast majority that they're

1:30:11

getting back are infants, and the vast majority

1:30:13

that are being returned are not even remotely

1:30:16

on the level of terrorism, if even criminals.

1:30:19

But of course, that's what you get at a propaganda

1:30:21

lie. But let's play the

1:30:23

starting of this so you can hear this first part of it. And

1:30:26

this is regarding the reality

1:30:30

of the detentions and the treatment to

1:30:32

Palestinians in general. However, 20

1:30:34

seconds. Why Israel imprisoned so many

1:30:36

Palestinians? So understand this. We're getting

1:30:38

into this dynamic where only one

1:30:40

side are terrorists and only one

1:30:42

side are innocent. You

1:30:45

need to understand the reality, which I believe most people are

1:30:47

beginning to see. On October

1:30:49

12th, it says in the West Bank, the

1:30:52

village of Wadi Al-Sikh, Israeli

1:30:54

soldiers and settlers detained three

1:30:56

Palestinians and spent hours abusing

1:30:58

them. The Israeli newspaper,

1:31:00

Huretz, reported that the Israelis stripped the detainees

1:31:03

down to their underwear, blindfolded

1:31:05

them, photographed them, beat them with knives

1:31:07

and an iron pipe, put out cigarettes

1:31:09

on their bodies, and even urinated on

1:31:11

them. One of the

1:31:14

detainees described the experience as Abu Ghraib

1:31:16

with the Israeli military. And

1:31:19

realize these are the settlers that Israel was

1:31:21

given official capacity since October 7th or somewhere

1:31:23

after October 7th. The

1:31:25

Israeli military said it's investigating

1:31:27

the incident, hardly, but

1:31:30

that a horrifying account did not occur

1:31:32

in a vacuum since Hamas

1:31:34

attacked Israel on October 7th, which

1:31:36

now we know there's all sorts of examples they knew it

1:31:39

was coming. They didn't care to stop it and that they

1:31:41

killed their own people after that Hannibal directive. Palestinians

1:31:43

in the West Bank have been victimized

1:31:45

since October 7th and before by

1:31:48

a surge in violence perpetrated

1:31:50

by both Israeli soldiers and

1:31:52

settlers. One of

1:31:54

the major sources of that escalation is

1:31:56

a tool of repression that Israel has

1:31:58

long deployed against the Israeli military. Palestinians

1:32:00

and has used even more aggressively in

1:32:03

recent weeks. It's called

1:32:05

administrative detention, a

1:32:07

practice that allows Israel to jail

1:32:09

Palestinians indefinitely without charge or

1:32:11

trial, which by the way is a

1:32:14

huge portion of what we're dealing with.

1:32:17

So all the people screaming like Ben Shapiro and

1:32:19

the rest, they're all terrorists, are disgusting

1:32:21

people who frankly know this

1:32:23

and don't care. And

1:32:26

while Israel argues that this is

1:32:28

a lawful preventative security measure, allowing it

1:32:30

to target people for a range of

1:32:33

just political activity, including speech,

1:32:36

nonviolent protesting, human

1:32:38

rights groups have deemed Israel's use

1:32:40

of administrative detention a blatant violation

1:32:42

of international law, like so much

1:32:44

out what it does and nobody

1:32:46

seems to care. Even

1:32:48

beyond administrative detention, when

1:32:51

charges are brought against Palestinians in the West Bank,

1:32:54

not Gaza, the West Bank, they

1:32:57

are almost always tried in

1:32:59

military courts that have

1:33:01

a near perfect conviction rate. Roberts

1:33:04

written about this too. Why is

1:33:06

it military? Because they know they're

1:33:08

still on an ongoing occupation. That's why.

1:33:10

And they'll admit it when it suits their interests. By

1:33:13

contrast, it says Israelis are usually tried

1:33:15

in civil court, even if it's

1:33:17

involving Palestinians and attacks therein. Palestinians,

1:33:20

in other words, are sent to a trapdoor

1:33:23

instead of a fair trial. Please

1:33:28

listen to the full clip or watch the full show.

1:33:30

We're going to get a lot more of these coming

1:33:32

out. Jason's going to be breaking down different segments and

1:33:34

different focuses and different articles. He's doing great work here.

1:33:37

But this article, it's just so obvious

1:33:39

and it's a new article. I'm not

1:33:42

saying we should, you know, I shouldn't even need to say

1:33:44

this. You guys know well, but for somebody new, that we

1:33:46

should suddenly trust Vox. Never think

1:33:48

that. Question everything all the time should

1:33:50

be a static reality. The point though

1:33:52

is that even corporate media is highlighting

1:33:54

these obvious realities. It's very

1:33:57

important. Now, Sunny, Singh

1:34:00

points out, reminder, Palestinian

1:34:02

children are tried by military courts

1:34:04

in a language that many do not speak.

1:34:07

Most do not know what they are accused

1:34:09

of, rarely have legal counsel or even a

1:34:11

non-hostile adult beside them. And they are

1:34:13

tried by a hostile occupying power which

1:34:15

has no legal authority. And

1:34:17

Diana Butu points out, of the list of

1:34:19

300 Palestinians to be released, only 150 will

1:34:22

be, there are 270 children

1:34:25

under the age of

1:34:27

18. 230 have never

1:34:29

even been convinced, convicted for,

1:34:33

and really, this, I

1:34:36

argue, is not charged. Same

1:34:38

point, really. Right? I mean, you

1:34:40

could put a charge and just let them linger

1:34:42

in there, but the point is that most of

1:34:44

these administered detention levels are not

1:34:46

even with a charge. They're just holding them in

1:34:48

pending situations. Four of these kids

1:34:51

are under the age of 14. Sam

1:34:55

Usaini points out, and I'm going to read this

1:34:57

directly from his article, Jeremy Scale from The

1:34:59

Intercept, kind of sums up this article right here

1:35:01

quickly, but he says, many of the

1:35:04

Palestinians held without charge by Israel are themselves

1:35:06

effectively hostages. And this is what I've been

1:35:08

saying. This dumb game we play

1:35:10

where it's like Palestinian hostages versus Israeli prisoners,

1:35:13

it's, we should be consistent with this.

1:35:15

They're all playing the same game. And

1:35:18

you can't pretend that what Hamas did is any

1:35:20

different than what Israel continues to do and has

1:35:22

always done. Hamas attack,

1:35:24

any Hamas attack has forced many

1:35:26

to see some of how insidiously

1:35:28

Israel has treated tens of thousands

1:35:30

for decades. Wholeheartedly agree.

1:35:34

Now this is from today. Israel's insidious

1:35:36

narrative about Palestinian prisoners. It

1:35:40

says the narrative surrounding the Palestinian

1:35:42

prisoners being released during this temporary

1:35:44

ceasefire is both insidious and dishonest.

1:35:46

Interior minister, Iqmar Ben Gavir,

1:35:49

he's one of the most extreme people in

1:35:51

this cabinet, have banned Palestinians from celebrating their

1:35:53

release. We'll get into that. Quote,

1:35:55

my instructions are clear. He said there are to

1:35:57

be no expressions of joy. That's

1:36:00

an actual quote. Do

1:36:02

you realize how deranged these people are? Do you

1:36:05

think that you can do that? No

1:36:07

expressions of joy to the families

1:36:09

receiving their children back? Realize

1:36:11

these are some of these children are 18 because

1:36:13

they were arrested five years ago. Right,

1:36:17

the point is that there are a lot of these people are

1:36:19

children The one

1:36:21

that says is under 14, the point is some of these are

1:36:23

held for years. So if we

1:36:25

are seeing them released now and they look like they're teenagers,

1:36:27

they were younger when they were taken. No

1:36:30

expressions of joy? He

1:36:32

says quote expressions of joy are

1:36:34

equivalent to backing terrorism. Victory

1:36:37

celebrations give backing to those

1:36:39

human scum for those Nazis.

1:36:42

You'll remember this as we get into the real people

1:36:44

we're talking about here. Kids

1:36:46

that said the wrong thing in front of

1:36:49

an IDF member and spent five years in

1:36:51

prison for no charge. This

1:36:53

is not a joke easily proven. A

1:36:56

child that throws a stone at an occupying

1:36:58

force ends up in prison with no

1:37:00

charge for years. To them these

1:37:02

are human scum. Are we

1:37:05

talking about Hamas here? No, they're talking about

1:37:07

Palestinians. He told Israeli

1:37:09

police to deploy an iron fist to enforce

1:37:11

this edict. Right,

1:37:13

so remember the first day this came out we weren't sure if

1:37:15

this was in fact the reality, but it turned out to be

1:37:18

exactly the case. The Netanyahu government

1:37:20

and its supporters have promoted a narrow, oh don't

1:37:22

forget by the way, I forgot that. Even

1:37:24

channel 12 tried to lie about that. Right,

1:37:26

because we had the reports coming out early

1:37:28

and channel 12's article said they were going

1:37:30

to allow these news press concerts like before.

1:37:32

Clearly not. So

1:37:35

typical Israeli media toeing the line. The

1:37:37

Netanyahu government and its supporters have

1:37:40

promoted a narrative that these prisoners

1:37:42

are all hardened terrorists who committed

1:37:44

violent crimes. This

1:37:47

assertion relies on a farcical, Alice

1:37:49

in Wonderland inspired logic of convicting

1:37:52

them by fiat in public before

1:37:54

any trial. Even the sham trials

1:37:57

to which Palestinians are routinely subjected.

1:38:00

Israel released a list of the names with

1:38:02

alleged crimes they committed and who

1:38:04

is making these allegations a military that

1:38:06

acts as a brutal occupation force against

1:38:08

Palestinians in the West Bank. The

1:38:11

vast majority of the 300 Palestinian

1:38:13

prisoners proposed for release by Israel

1:38:15

are teenage boys. According

1:38:18

to the list, 124 are under the age of 18, including

1:38:21

a 15-year-old girl. Many

1:38:23

of them of the 146 who

1:38:26

are 18 years old turn so in

1:38:28

Israeli prisons. According to the definitions

1:38:30

laid out by the United Nations Convention on the

1:38:32

Rights of a Child, what the Europe just pretended

1:38:34

like they were so proud of and so did

1:38:36

the United States, as they

1:38:38

actively in support what this is and always have,

1:38:41

these Palestinians were children when they were arrested

1:38:44

by Israel. The point is,

1:38:46

the United Nations Convention on the

1:38:48

Rights of a Child, they all act like they're on the same page,

1:38:50

they just have a loophole for why they do it. Oh,

1:38:53

but they're not children because they broke a law, whatever. Sort

1:38:56

of like saying, no, we could bomb the hospital because some

1:38:58

awesome human shield. That's

1:39:00

wrong. Even if you even

1:39:02

even though we've proven you're lying about that, even

1:39:04

if it were true, all of the United Nations,

1:39:07

Rapporteur on human rights, everybody

1:39:10

who has standing in the realm of international

1:39:12

law has stood up and said that's fundamentally

1:39:15

false. So the point

1:39:17

is, regardless of their narrative, they're

1:39:19

arresting children. Most of the times without

1:39:21

the information, without informing the parents and

1:39:23

almost always without even charging them and keeping

1:39:25

them indefinitely or until they decide like this

1:39:27

to use them in a different way. Of

1:39:30

the 300 names Israel proposed for

1:39:33

potential release, 233 of them have not been

1:39:35

convicted of

1:39:38

a crime. They

1:39:40

are categorized simply as under arrest. Now,

1:39:43

that's my point, not being convicted of

1:39:45

a crime, not charged with a crime, just

1:39:48

under arrest. This is this is this

1:39:50

is political prisoners or

1:39:53

are you're punishing them.

1:39:55

And again, that's what Amnesty International argued.

1:39:58

This is about punishment. You

1:40:01

are trying to use this coercively against

1:40:03

them to suppress their rights, their

1:40:05

speech, their beliefs. That comes

1:40:07

from an international human rights organization.

1:40:11

It says, police and prosecutors all over

1:40:13

the world make allegations later proven false

1:40:15

during a fair trial. The

1:40:18

Israeli narrative promotes the fiction that

1:40:20

these Palestinians are in the middle of some

1:40:22

sort of fair judicial proceeding in

1:40:24

which they will eventually be tried in

1:40:26

a fair and impartial process. This

1:40:28

is a complete verifiable farce. Palestinians,

1:40:31

and by the way, there's links through all

1:40:33

of this, Palestinians are not prosecuted in civil

1:40:35

courts. They're tried in military

1:40:38

courts. Even though in reverse,

1:40:40

no matter what the circumstances, the Israelis are tried

1:40:42

in... And that's

1:40:44

the circumstances are that they're going after those

1:40:46

people. But in any kind of

1:40:48

a situation where an

1:40:51

Israeli is involved, they're, I'm thinking

1:40:53

of the word, civil, not civil

1:40:55

courts, not military

1:40:57

courts. And this

1:41:00

is, again, per Emmett's International. The

1:41:02

one-sided way that they apply this to

1:41:04

Palestinians and then people in the same

1:41:07

situation that are Israeli get different treatments.

1:41:09

That's apartheid. That's what that is. Palestinians

1:41:13

are not prosecuted in civil courts, military courts.

1:41:15

They often are denied access to lawyers and

1:41:18

to purported evidence against them. And

1:41:20

are regularly held in isolation

1:41:23

for extreme periods, years,

1:41:25

guys. One of the ones released had

1:41:27

been in isolation for years. You

1:41:29

know what that does to you mentally? And

1:41:32

it says subjected to other forms of abuse.

1:41:34

Don't forget, even Amnesty and other groups have

1:41:36

proven torture to this very day goes on

1:41:39

in Israeli prisons. Torture. Israel

1:41:42

is the only developed country in the world, that's

1:41:44

in quotes, that routinely tries

1:41:46

children in military courts. And

1:41:48

its system has been repeatedly criticized and

1:41:51

denounced by major international human rights organizations

1:41:53

and institutions. But that doesn't matter, apparently,

1:41:55

if it's about Israel. Because they're all

1:41:58

racist. when

1:42:00

they say things you like you support them. So

1:42:02

you support racist? No, too bad. Don't

1:42:04

look at it, don't, you know, contradictions

1:42:07

everywhere. Don't look at it in that light, only in this

1:42:09

light. If, as

1:42:11

Israel alleges, these people have committed

1:42:13

violent crimes, particularly against civilians, then

1:42:16

Israel should give them full rights to due

1:42:18

process, right? Democracy, to see

1:42:21

the alleged evidence against them and they should be tried

1:42:24

in civilian

1:42:27

courts with the same

1:42:29

rights afforded Israeli defendants. That

1:42:32

would also mean allowing Palestinians who

1:42:35

do commit acts of political violence, particularly

1:42:37

against the military forces of a

1:42:39

violent occupation, to, you

1:42:41

know, raise the context and legality of the

1:42:44

Israeli occupation as part of defense, but see

1:42:46

they'll never allow that. The

1:42:49

point being, it's an occupation, therefore

1:42:51

your political act is

1:42:54

armed rebellion. You

1:42:56

see, but they can't allow that because that then

1:42:58

means that they're a legal occupation. Israel is asking

1:43:01

the world to believe that these 300 people are

1:43:03

all dangerous terrorists. Excuse

1:43:05

me. Yet has built a

1:43:07

kangaroo military court system for Palestinians that

1:43:09

magically churns out a nearly 100% conviction

1:43:12

rate. All of them from a

1:43:14

country that constantly promotes itself as

1:43:17

the only democracy in the Middle East,

1:43:19

which is hardly the reality. Palestinians

1:43:21

on this list are from the occupied

1:43:23

West Bank and have lived their entire

1:43:25

lives under an apartheid regime. Palestinians

1:43:29

taken by Israel, including some

1:43:31