0:00

We should be having public dialogue and it

0:02

should be something that arises to the level

0:04

of legislation We should not allow the National

0:06

Institutes of Health or the Department of Defense To

0:09

allocate funding to amplify these

0:11

agents so that allegedly we

0:13

can study them in the case that

0:15

they fall into the hands of bad

0:17

people because the evidence has shown us

0:20

that the bad people who actually

0:23

have unleashed these pathogens since 1991

0:25

and By

0:27

the way, if you go to the miscellaneous memorandum

0:29

7 and other documents we can go back to

0:32

the 1950s The

0:34

bad people who unleash these things on

0:36

the population are us It

0:39

is the US who's doing it Welcome

1:03

to the Daily Wrap Up a concise

1:05

show dedicated to bringing you the most

1:07

relevant Independent news as we see it

1:09

from the last 24 hours Wednesday

1:15

December 27th 2023. Thank you for

1:17

joining me today. I hope

1:19

you all had a fantastic holiday Christmas

1:22

whatever you celebrate out there. I hope you

1:24

spent the time Appreciating

1:26

what you have in your life for

1:29

so many that don't have the moment to

1:31

appreciate those things or have those things to

1:33

appreciate and I hope that we

1:37

Took stock on what's going on in

1:39

the world in light of the Hopefully

1:42

positive moments we shared during our

1:44

you know, mostly for the Western

1:46

world our Christmas holiday Which I

1:48

personally I very much

1:50

love and I personally feel that it whatever

1:53

your religion or whatever you choose to believe

1:55

or celebrate that that season is something when

1:57

people and I think this is just because

1:59

of of how we decided to act and

2:02

speak to something bigger than ourselves, spread

2:06

the cliches, spread joy and

2:08

are more kind to each other. And whether

2:10

that's the truth or not, I think that's

2:12

something worth leaning into. So I

2:14

hope you all had a great Christmas season

2:16

and Christmas with your family. Now

2:19

I of course ended up having too

2:21

much fun, not even in the way you might

2:23

think. I wasn't out there drinking. I don't really

2:25

partake in really anything other than some cannabis, but

2:29

ended up eating normally when I don't. And

2:31

I literally spoke about it on A&Wakeup this

2:33

morning, had like a food hangover. It was

2:35

horrible. It's even been telling you that it's

2:38

because I'm starting today with more of a

2:40

health-minded point in regard to a couple of

2:42

different things. One of which is based on

2:44

appeal, that really alarming thing we discussed from

2:47

Bill Gates, but that it was

2:49

really very important in

2:51

my own kind of dynamic to realize how important that,

2:53

I mean, I've always felt that health and diet are

2:57

paramount, but how much

2:59

that affected me really kind of blew me away.

3:01

And I don't think it was just because of

3:03

a keto carb kind of thing.

3:05

I think it was just because I've gotten

3:07

so good about being healthy in a really

3:09

broad sense. Whole foods, not the place, but

3:11

the actual things of whole foods, more

3:14

natural concepts, and I've felt a lot better for it.

3:17

And just, and I'm not even talking like

3:19

junk food. I'm just talking high sugars and

3:22

heavy. I body said,

3:24

never do that again. And I thought that was very

3:26

interesting. And I do think that most

3:28

Americans, most people in the world, I say

3:31

it from America perspective, because we're classically some

3:33

of the most unhealthy people, have really begun

3:36

putting that above things

3:39

they once hold more important. And I think

3:41

that whether, I think ultimately our health has

3:43

become very important to us. And I think

3:46

that that's something that always should have been

3:48

the case. And I think that we're gonna

3:50

start today with a point about health, predominantly

3:52

around how that's being used against us. And

3:55

it's an interesting kind of double-edged sword, right? Because

3:57

we are definitely caring a lot more about what

3:59

we put in our. bodies and what we discuss

4:01

and what we understand and the

4:03

things we've been lied to about our entire lives.

4:06

And now that is in its own way being used

4:08

to drive us into accepting some new step. And it's

4:10

always how these things tend to work. But

4:13

what's so concerning is the whole digital infrastructure

4:15

around it all and the fear

4:18

that is always used to drive you into some new

4:20

structure just like that. So we're going

4:22

to start with a quick point about the appeal natural

4:26

as they would call it. Just

4:28

what it's basically like a natural film they put over

4:30

your fruit that you're supposed to be able to eat

4:33

that we did a focus on that I wanted to

4:35

start with. Nefarious

4:39

is the word that comes to mind. Secret

4:43

things that are being put on organic

4:45

tags in grocery stores that when you

4:48

remove the organic sticker, it shows oh,

4:50

appeal is used on these fruits. I

4:53

just blew me away. And it definitely something that

4:55

I've seen I looked I saw when I looked

4:57

into it. Then we're going to talk about how

4:59

all of that's being used to drive you into

5:02

this digital infrastructure, which we all I mean, literally

5:04

everybody is aware of because it's not a secret.

5:06

It's openly being told to the population. This is

5:08

what we're going to do. It's for your best

5:10

interest. And I'm going to show you again

5:13

why I think this is so nefarious where

5:15

it obviously is going and how what concerns

5:18

me the most is not

5:20

even just this step, which is very concerning,

5:22

but that this is just the beginning of

5:24

something that I see building that is very

5:27

alarming to me. And it goes

5:29

well beyond the physical. It's

5:31

concerning. And I wanted to make sure we highlighted that

5:33

again. And just kind of taking stock

5:35

coming back. I haven't been as focused

5:37

as I have been over the last couple days

5:39

again, taking time to spend with my family, but

5:42

make sure that we go over a couple of

5:44

these other points, but also go over some broad,

5:46

just following up information of Israel to finish the

5:48

show in regard to the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

5:50

And we'll see how much we get through today.

5:52

If not, we'll follow up with it most likely

5:54

tomorrow, but a lot to follow up on

5:56

what's been going on with the plan seem to be and

5:58

how. alarming this is as

6:01

you see it all come together. To

6:04

see Pfizer testing or

6:06

using an experimental or new

6:09

product for an illness that

6:11

was being discussed

6:13

rising in Gaza, which is something we've

6:16

already talked about. The concerns about what

6:18

that may be, how it could be

6:20

used, and for none other than Pfizer

6:22

of all people. Oh, but

6:24

we forgot, it's Pfizer's lab. Isn't that what they

6:26

told us it was in Israel, but now focused

6:28

on Gaza in particular, and Pfizer

6:30

coming back around to be in this

6:33

conversation with something by the way that

6:35

interestingly overlaps what this drug is designed

6:37

to do with a fungal problem they're

6:39

discussing in Gaza with something

6:42

that we talked about in

6:44

hospitals during COVID-19. They blamed

6:46

on COVID-19 Candida Oros, as

6:49

well as Candida Albacons, I

6:51

always want to say Albatross Albacons, that

6:54

comes from your mask. And those are just

6:56

specifics, there's more to it than that. But I find

6:59

it very fascinating. So let's get into this and go

7:01

through a lot of different information kind of

7:03

touch base again, get back into it. Three days,

7:05

oh my God, that's a whole lifetime in T-Lab

7:07

world, right? So let's start

7:09

off with a important shout out

7:11

to some work that you might not have seen. I really

7:13

hope that you've seen this. Something

7:16

that we've had building for a while now.

7:19

One of the first reasons this, so

7:22

for the podcast, we put out the

7:24

interview, which is just absolutely outstanding. Taylor

7:27

deserves every single ounce of

7:29

credit for this outstanding interview with

7:32

the late Arna Burkhart, pathologist,

7:35

doctor, professor, probably

7:38

one of the most, I

7:40

mean, of all the people that I've seen in this

7:42

conversation who deserves your respect, he's probably one of the

7:44

least known. And it's

7:46

just, it makes me very sad that I did not get

7:48

to meet him because

7:50

he is clearly, was clearly one

7:53

of the most, somebody

7:55

that led his integrity guide

7:58

him and clearly go going against

8:00

the grain to do what he thought was right.

8:02

This doesn't even get into the discussion of how

8:04

he died, which we may end up discussing in

8:06

the near future. Because quite frankly,

8:08

I have a lot of thoughts about it. But ultimately

8:11

what we want to make sure that the focus of

8:13

this was his amazing work. And

8:16

just how important this was. The absolute

8:18

decimation of the narrative around what these

8:20

COVID-19 injections are doing. He

8:22

proved that they're like many others have done

8:24

are killing people without a question. His

8:26

own work, he's one of before he died was

8:29

one of the most respected, well-known pathologists in the

8:31

world. And he was retiring and he came back

8:33

out to do this work. Now

8:36

this was a lot of work. Taylor did

8:38

this herself with multiple cameras and

8:40

ultimately ended up taking a while

8:42

to get it done because it was a

8:44

huge product project. And then the ongoing

8:47

genocide in Gaza started taking place. And

8:51

I made the choice to pull back on this for a minute because

8:53

I did not want to get buried. Which of course

8:55

she was frustrated by him. And rightly so

8:57

because everyone was asking for it. And of

8:59

course there's all the absolute brainless fools out

9:01

there that acted like we were lying about

9:03

it somehow. I guess, which I

9:05

don't know why that would ever happen. Why somebody would

9:07

be dumb enough to pretend they have an interview that

9:10

would never come out which would then prove that you

9:12

lied about it. Seems pretty stupid, but I guess that's

9:14

what stupid people do is think of stupid things. But

9:16

ultimately we had a whole kind of thread of people

9:18

out there acting like she made this up and it

9:21

wasn't happening. But this was his final

9:23

interview before he passed away. And it's very important. And

9:25

again, I definitely think this is

9:27

reigniting a lot of this conversation. It has

9:30

gone far and wide. Entitled

9:32

pathologist on a Burkhardt final interview revealing

9:35

the grave dangers of mRNA vaccines. And

9:37

just on Twitter alone, it right now has

9:39

over 130,000 views

9:42

just on Twitter, which frustrates me

9:44

because I wasn't even advertising the

9:46

Twitter and that was where everyone seemed to go which

9:48

is just the sign of the times, which frustrates me.

9:50

But Rumble, I think I was like 70, 80,000 views. Even

9:54

then I just kind of feel like it's more than that on most

9:56

of these. In any case, it's out there.

9:59

Ever done. by the way from in full wars

10:01

to you name it shared the work and

10:04

surprise surprise they actually well they included the

10:06

link but in the article no no shout

10:08

out to T-Lab of course but that's how

10:10

it works but you know in the

10:12

past you get a lot of this kind of spread of work

10:15

and it doesn't really get the right reach with the

10:17

source material and so on and I do think this

10:19

is getting out there but I think this is as

10:21

viral as things get like James Corvitz talked about that

10:23

we're just in a different time where

10:26

this is around the world and back and this

10:28

is what it looks like when you're surprised suppressed

10:30

in the technocracy of the current day in any

10:32

case make sure you don't miss this very

10:35

important now I wanted to make

10:37

sure we saw this now in this again

10:39

this is the larger conversation around all of this

10:42

and this does not just have to do with

10:44

the mRNA vaccines I mean that's

10:46

what the focus of the interview is about but

10:48

in my mind the point of where this all

10:51

goes is much larger than just the injection for

10:53

COVID-19 this was a test an experiment however you

10:55

want to look at this this was

10:57

a stepping stone that's my opinion but I think the evidence

10:59

is clear so

11:01

this not necessarily completely

11:03

interconnected with that point but when

11:05

we start to get into the

11:08

concept of nanotechnology and and different

11:10

overlaps it becomes I guess

11:13

the point is whatever nanotech we're discussing

11:15

which was utilized the lipid nanoparticles within

11:18

this injection and then finding out that

11:20

those themselves are contaminated those themselves are

11:22

actually even to the point to where

11:24

have other ingredients we were unaware of

11:26

all sorts of stuff the point is

11:28

well what are we talking about when

11:30

it comes to appeal well same kind

11:32

of concept we're talking about newer like nanotech

11:34

type of technology that could include any number

11:36

of different things that you're unaware of now

11:39

I'm not saying these are the same thing

11:41

what I'm saying is when you're stemming from

11:43

the same kind of people that have their

11:45

fingers in all these multifaceted areas that all

11:47

weirdly seem to kind of intersect in certain

11:49

areas we need to start asking whether there's

11:51

something else going on doesn't

11:53

always prove that they're all interconnected but they could be

11:56

and it concerns me and bottom line is I did

11:58

a show about this Gates-Weft-backed

12:02

Edible Coding for Food Already in Use. Because it

12:04

was. This was April 20th, 2023. Now

12:08

as this becomes more and more prominent, as usual,

12:10

you'll probably find the larger ones out there start

12:12

making a big point about it. But as usual,

12:14

demonstrating our value of how far ahead of the

12:17

story and many others we tend to be, make

12:19

sure you take note of that and recognize where

12:21

the source material will still be found when all

12:23

these larger accounts scream about it. But

12:26

what's interesting is this is a video, which

12:28

I'll play for you, of a simple organic

12:30

bag of apples where she pulls the sticker

12:32

away and what do you know, lo and

12:34

behold, it says the Gates

12:36

Appeal applied to these underneath

12:38

that sticker, which shows you that the

12:41

place chose to do that. But I

12:43

find it hard to believe that Kroger

12:45

made a unilateral decision. I'm

12:47

willing to bet you that if you go and do this work, you'll

12:49

find it pretty much covering this wherever you look. In

12:52

any case, it happened here, and it makes

12:54

me very concerned about why one, organic food

12:56

at all would include something that is very

12:58

clearly not organic. I don't care if you're

13:01

using natural – you

13:03

could make anything, quote, natural

13:05

ultimately. You use natural substances to make

13:07

plastics. It doesn't make them natural in the organic

13:09

sense. This is what we're

13:11

talking about here. They're trying to pretend like this is

13:14

just an organic artificial peel. It's just

13:16

hilarious to me how they're trying to –

13:18

it's sort of like ESG of pretending that

13:20

nuclear weapons and oil and gas are still

13:22

compliant if you're the U.S. government using them,

13:24

which is literally what they're doing, the U.K.

13:26

as well. But I said I discussed this

13:28

in April of last year. The simple fact that

13:30

this is being covered shows a deliberate

13:32

effort to hide this from us. Now, why would

13:34

that need to happen if this is supposed to

13:37

be some positive thing or ultimately if it's supposed

13:39

to be something that we all accept as safe

13:41

and effective? Gala

13:54

apples. Oh, it's all about the Fuji apples. Come on,

13:56

lady. I

14:03

want to keep

14:05

it continuously recording. I

14:08

can't see it, but hopefully y'all can see me. Are

14:14

you kidding me? Now,

14:20

here's the thing, though. Obviously

14:27

the point to make is somebody could lie, which

14:29

is why she's like, I'm not going to cut

14:31

the shot, but she could have stuck that there,

14:33

right? The point for me, whether

14:36

or not... I

14:39

look into this briefly, and I'm seeing other

14:41

examples of this. My point is

14:43

that this is clearly a bag of organic

14:45

apples, you can tell. Anyone that

14:47

shops here knows what those look like. That's definitely

14:50

the appeal sticker on there, or on

14:52

the bag itself. So

14:54

how in the world do you overlap organic

14:56

with anything like that? Well, this

14:58

is where we get into the world where things

15:00

become... What's

15:03

the right word for it? It's

15:05

the very concept of technocracy in general, acting

15:07

like, well, these things are now basically

15:11

trying to argue that this thing is organic

15:13

even though it's not natural, because

15:16

of some bastardization of the terms,

15:18

what we understand, right? It's

15:20

like passing some law that

15:23

says that, well, artificial intelligence is now

15:25

a real human. That's where these things tend

15:27

to go, the mindset. And so here,

15:30

they're selling you something that you should

15:32

look into that has an artificial

15:35

fake layer

15:39

over the fruit, which you ingest, which

15:41

I did research on, which shows that

15:43

there are definitely things that are not safe for

15:46

you as much as most of these things are

15:48

like that, generally accepted as safe, does not actually

15:50

mean safe. I'm

16:00

so crushed out. Thanks, sugar. And

16:10

then the last

16:12

point to make is, you know, maybe you think this is

16:14

no big deal. Well, you know what? Whether or not you

16:16

think it's a big deal, what I do

16:18

think is a big deal, regardless, is that I have a choice.

16:21

And that is taking that choice away from you. It

16:24

just makes me really uncomfortable to think about what else

16:26

is going on. And we're talking

16:28

tiny things here, guys. Think

16:30

about how much bigger these things get. Now watch the

16:33

show. I mean, I'd make the

16:35

point when I go through this to say, look,

16:37

this is not some bombshell, you

16:39

know, dioxin PFAS, these Palestine kind of

16:41

concept. This is like, okay, well, here

16:43

it's not the earth shattering. But

16:46

you read this and you're going, well, this is not, there's

16:49

a side effect here. This has some kind of

16:51

effect. Like bottom line is it's not the way

16:53

they describe it, where it's just benign. That

16:55

as well just be the skin of the fruit,

16:57

which is the way they try to sell it

16:59

to you. It's very much not. And it definitely

17:01

has artificial things that definitely have byproducts that definitely

17:03

cause something beyond the

17:06

natural eating

17:08

of an apple and so on. I just think

17:10

that's so incredibly unnerving. So make

17:12

sure you check that out, share this with people.

17:14

If you see more examples of that, send it

17:16

to me because I really want to understand the

17:18

overlap and then why more so, well rather who

17:20

is doing that, right? Is that the company putting

17:22

the sticker on or is that somehow being done

17:24

at the store level very, very unnerving

17:26

to me. Now this brings us into the larger point,

17:29

right? About where all of these kind of control

17:31

mechanisms go. Why are they doing all this? What

17:33

is the ultimate point? Now the most basic

17:37

surface level point here about

17:39

health is control, right?

17:42

Now an appeal cover on

17:44

fruit doesn't seem to make sense for control,

17:46

right? Not first and really maybe not

17:48

at all. The point is it's about,

17:50

you know, these kinds of things are about trying

17:52

to control your health and what you think you

17:54

need. Okay. But then when you realize that this

17:56

goes beyond, I don't

17:59

know, having. driver's license.

18:02

Well you can say, yep that's me, I can prove it,

18:04

we're safe, we're all on the same page. Okay well then

18:06

it gets into the realm of a digital driver's license. Well

18:08

it's safer I guess. You can't lose it, the government can

18:10

check. Okay well this doesn't even get into the realm of

18:12

how that can be used against you. But

18:15

my point is to take this even further.

18:17

Now this may be a stretch for some

18:19

people that have maybe new to this, but

18:21

if you guys have been watching this show,

18:23

the stuff we've talked about, the Whitney and

18:25

I long-term in-depth conversations, you know where this

18:28

ultimately goes. Where literally it is already taking

18:30

place. The smart dust level, the nanotechnology level.

18:32

By the way we passed that a

18:35

decade ago and yet we're still

18:37

looking back at cameras and robots. Like we are

18:40

left in the dust right now. The level that

18:43

they are at is so far ahead of

18:45

where our minds are currently focused. I was saying this the

18:47

other day and I wake up. It's

18:50

not that they don't still use cameras and

18:52

don't still have motion sensors and these kind

18:54

of things right. They exist and in some

18:56

level they always will until we go so

18:58

far past it. My point though is that

19:00

if we're fixated on whether there are

19:02

cameras or listening devices and we're missing the

19:04

fact that they're using Wi-Fi 3D mapping in

19:06

our homes, well you're at level one, they're

19:08

at level 47 and we won't even understand

19:12

how to get to level two. You get

19:15

what I'm saying. Like we're so far out of it.

19:17

So what I'm talking about is the idea of how

19:19

these things can be used in

19:21

sophisticated ways in regard to

19:24

tracking control and so on. And this

19:26

gets into the idea of how your

19:29

health using the fear of

19:31

a pathogen can drive you to make choices

19:33

that then position you in a way where

19:36

you're either beholden to them for X, Y,

19:38

and Z health infrastructure

19:40

or you're literally of the

19:42

ability to be able to be shut off

19:46

in some manipulated way. We've talked about

19:49

the kill switch. We've talked about the

19:51

different nanotech manipulations of let's say what

19:54

you can and can't do. Whether you are like we've

19:56

what's the one we just talked about not just the

19:58

kill switch but the idea oh That's what it was

20:00

of being able to turn off your influence all

20:03

of a sudden. They just you you have this

20:05

the Nanotech in your body where all of a

20:07

sudden these things can be executed to shut off

20:09

you and these are not hypothetical now I'm rattling

20:11

all this off while you're staring at this page

20:13

So somebody new may think this sounds crazy, but

20:15

we've talked about all this before We've

20:17

gone over there their NIH studies We've gone

20:19

over the Lieber Langer overlap of all of

20:21

this different work. They've been doing for 15

20:24

years or more So

20:26

this is where it gets really concerning for me about

20:28

how all this intersects now back to this article you're

20:30

staring at Derek Rose

20:32

and I talked about this impending future of

20:34

social credit social impact investing

20:37

and digital IDs So this again is

20:39

the is the surface level of where our minds are

20:41

at. We understand the idea of

20:43

social credit, right? Here's what you did yesterday

20:45

and here's why now you can't buy this

20:48

or enter there because you didn't meet some

20:50

societal level That we argue

20:52

is mandatory Right, you said the

20:54

wrong word you voted for the wrong person like

20:56

that's where this goes Social

20:59

impact investing that's the ESG side

21:02

of this that is saying that well as

21:04

a collective, you know Your neighborhood or this

21:06

business or even actually just individually depending how

21:08

it works Did not achieve this or

21:10

did not lower their carbon footprint

21:12

enough so now you have to be

21:14

penalized and then pull

21:16

basically companies and people in power can invest

21:19

in Basically you become

21:21

a human casino, which by the way, we're

21:23

already doing very clearly But the

21:25

digital ID is how they then trap you

21:27

into this you can then be turned off

21:29

But my point again is where this goes

21:31

beyond all of these things When

21:34

this gets into the kind of dystopian future

21:36

mindset Well, let's talk about how the steps

21:38

in that direction before we come back To

21:40

end on the segment with the point that was making

21:42

in the beginning about the smart dust eventuality

21:46

or really the 10

21:48

day 10 years ago point we already reached a number of

21:50

light years past and we don't even understand but The

21:54

International Monetary Fund put this out Central

21:57

Bank digital currency virtual handbook people

22:00

to see last

22:04

updated last month that this is

22:07

not going away. This is not

22:09

hyperbole, this is not conspiracy theory,

22:11

this is in your face literally

22:14

about to happen when the time

22:16

is right for them, which is

22:18

the transition whether forced or justified

22:20

by whatever else into central

22:22

bank digital currencies, CBDCs. Not

22:25

necessarily the same thing as cryptocurrency or

22:28

blockchain, but they can be. It

22:30

just means a digital currency backed by a

22:32

central bank, most likely going to involve some

22:34

form of the new technology, but

22:37

nonetheless it is coming. And

22:40

when you have a central bank digital currency, let me

22:47

see if I've got this still, I believe I do. Yeah,

22:49

it's right here. Just straight from

22:51

the really, really,

22:53

really big horse's mouth.

22:56

Analysis on CBDC in particular

22:58

for the use of general

23:00

to the general use, we

23:03

tend to establish the equivalence with

23:05

cash and there is

23:07

a huge difference there. For

23:10

example in cash, we don't know for

23:12

example who is using a $100

23:15

bill today, we don't know who is using

23:18

the 1,000 peso bill today. A

23:21

key difference with the CBDC

23:24

is that central bank will have

23:26

absolute control on

23:29

the rules and regulations that will

23:31

determine the use of that expression

23:34

of central bank's liability

23:36

and also we will have the

23:39

technology to enforce that.

23:41

Those two issues are extremely

23:43

important and that makes a

23:46

huge difference with respect to what cash is.

24:00

finally met with the vision. And

24:03

that's where we are, where these

24:05

moves have been made because

24:07

suddenly they're technologically capable of

24:09

things they've been discussing, right?

24:12

So what he's saying is, well, you know, we can actually use

24:15

these and then we have the ability to

24:17

decide what you can and can't use them

24:19

for. And even more so then is where

24:21

you get into the digital infrastructure for how

24:23

we can then turn you on and off.

24:25

So you can turn the money off, right?

24:28

Or ultimately you can still engage with the system

24:31

unless your social credit score, like, and this

24:33

is where it all comes together. We're rather

24:35

the other way around, quite frankly, that you

24:37

do the wrong thing, that your score lowers,

24:39

and then ultimately they say, well, you cannot

24:41

use your money here because you haven't met

24:44

this metric. And

24:46

this is what I'm trying to explain to people that maybe don't

24:48

know this. I know you guys are well aware for the most

24:50

part, but this is not even

24:52

debatable. This is what's coming.

24:54

Now they argue this is not, now

24:56

what we're discussing is a nefarious government

24:59

kind of, you

25:01

know, has nothing to do with what's for your safety,

25:03

what's in your best interest, or the interest of

25:05

society, it's about control. The

25:07

only difference that they're saying is, no, no, we're

25:09

doing all those things for you. That's

25:11

the only difference. Because we're not, I mean, you would

25:14

just hurt them say it from his mouth. That's

25:16

what's happening. Now you may come out and

25:18

say, but, but, but Ryan, they wouldn't just

25:20

do that because you express something they didn't

25:22

agree with, even

25:24

though we're literally watching that happen in real time

25:27

all over the place, right? The

25:29

only difference is they just aren't utilizing your, the ability

25:31

to, I mean, look at it this way, guys. I

25:33

even take that, I didn't even finish it, but I

25:35

take it back already. We've already seen them turn off

25:37

credit cards. We've seen them shut down bank accounts. Not

25:41

maybe to everybody anywhere breaking a

25:43

certain rule, but specific cases. So

25:45

it's already been there. It's precedent.

25:47

It's already happening. So all that

25:49

changes is suddenly now everybody has

25:51

something that can be turned off

25:53

at a master central location. And

25:56

they just go, okay, fine. All you anti-baxxers you're

25:58

turned off or whatever. it

26:00

is of the day. Oh, you don't you you think Israel's

26:02

killing people? Turned off. You

26:04

can't drive to school that day. You can't take

26:06

your kids to work. I mean, it's constant. And

26:09

if you don't think that is happening guys,

26:11

they're telling you it's on the writing

26:13

is on the wall. Writing

26:16

is literally being sent to you via email. But

26:19

this comes from the United

26:21

Nations, the UNDP. What

26:24

does it stand for again? The digital... Forget

26:27

now, hold on. What

26:32

was it again? Is the United Nations digital public

26:35

infrastructure? I know that's what

26:37

we're gonna talk about the DPI, the digital

26:39

public infrastructure. In any case, if the UN

26:41

digital... they count for this whole push and

26:43

it says digital public infrastructure, which is the

26:45

main point here, is essential for

26:48

countries to improve their economies and well-being of

26:50

their people. Not at all, really, in all.

26:52

Like in fact the opposite. It definitely can

26:54

benefit you. In no way is it

26:56

a necessity to benefit your people. This is how they're trying

26:58

to lie about this, which is by the way what Derek

27:00

has been writing about for a long time. And

27:05

this was... oh, I guess I did forget to

27:07

open that one. Hold on. I

27:09

grabbed both. I decided on this one, but let's

27:12

see. There

27:16

it is. First century looking at this one,

27:18

this is the... I still can't... this

27:20

bolds me away that people, average people, don't see this.

27:24

The New York... the NYU School

27:26

of Law July

27:29

17th, 2022, when he wrote this article, they

27:31

literally said, quote, the digital

27:33

ID infrastructure, the direction you're taking, will

27:35

quote, is paving a digital road to

27:38

hell. I can't... that's the NYU School

27:40

of Law. It

27:42

seems kind of crazy that nobody's paid...

27:44

heeded that warning. Or

27:46

when he discussed the fact that they're pushing this

27:49

very point that I just said. Digital ID is

27:51

a human right. Well, not

27:53

even remotely. I mean, it's... you're

27:56

making that... the argument in

27:58

order to force this on people that don't... want

28:00

and are the guys that by them saying no

28:02

you're hurting your own people it's the exact opposite

28:05

as he says exposing the digital ideas of human

28:07

rights scam this is dangerous what they're doing and

28:09

people are attuned to it but

28:14

what they're saying is well it's it's essential

28:16

for you to better your lives well you

28:18

know isn't this the choice of the peoples

28:20

of their individual countries well yeah

28:22

that's the illusion we sell ourselves about the

28:24

way democracy works even though none of our

28:27

voices matter when it comes to this or

28:29

5g for that matter or any number of

28:31

things war you know we all

28:33

pretend like it's just the system and you know

28:35

vote harder and blah blah blah no there's so

28:37

many examples that prove that we don't matter we

28:40

just love to pretend or rather the two-party illusion

28:43

leaders love to

28:45

pretend like it matters because it gives them power but

28:49

it says join us for the launch of

28:51

the 50 and 5 initiative to discuss how

28:53

building inclusive inclusive digital

28:56

public infrastructure well isn't at the very point that

28:58

it's public that makes it inclusive you don't need

29:00

to call it inclusive it's just because they love

29:02

the buzzwords can foster strong economies

29:05

and equitable societies these

29:08

are the same people that are literally

29:10

murdering people in real time stealing from

29:12

everybody that can have anything of value

29:14

and disregarding any legal resolution that goes

29:16

against what they want but equitable and

29:18

inclusive guys rules based international order except

29:20

anything we do shut up now

29:23

Derek writes it's important for you to understand

29:25

we see through the propaganda we will not

29:27

stand on the sidelines and watch you cram

29:29

digital ID down our throats we understand

29:31

that some of you mean well but

29:34

you must respect our bodily autonomy and right

29:36

to be free of the digital prison so

29:39

what you're looking at here the

29:41

50 and 50 this is literally

29:43

about the pathway to implementing the

29:45

digital public infrastructure whether you

29:47

like it or not is that subtone there that's what's

29:49

happening 50 and 50 implement this

29:52

is about 50 in five as

29:54

a country led advocacy group

29:57

why I was in problem that was advocacy group

29:59

by 20 It says the 50 in

30:01

5 campaign will help 50 countries

30:04

design, launch, and scale

30:06

components of their digital public infrastructure whether you

30:08

like it or not. That's

30:11

what this is. Now of course

30:13

there's, I'm not even worth getting into,

30:15

there's a really terrible website out there

30:17

that constantly misreports lies and just misframes

30:20

things and that's where I first saw this saying

30:22

that they signed a treaty with

30:24

Bill Gates. 50 countries

30:26

signed the treaty with Bill Gates. That's not really

30:28

what happened. This is a Bill and Melinda Gates

30:30

Foundation, Rockefeller, all these groups with these countries are

30:32

signing on to this digital

30:35

infrastructure future of which the Bill

30:37

and Melinda Gates Foundation is a part. Now

30:40

saying they're signing treaty with Bill Gates

30:42

is a willfully ignorant

30:44

misrepresentation of what's happening here. Bill Gates

30:46

clearly is involved and you look up

30:48

our work about the Derek's

30:53

series about exposing Bill Gates. We're

30:55

very aware of his

30:57

work and all this but I think sites

30:59

like that are designed to make the truth

31:01

look ridiculous to people that might otherwise be

31:04

interested, right? So just we need to pay

31:06

attention to that.

31:12

Digital public infrastructure says which refers

31:14

to a secure and interoperable network

31:16

of components that include digital payments,

31:18

ID, data exchange system is essential

31:20

for participation in markets and society

31:23

in a digital era. Well

31:25

again, the point is it's only necessary

31:27

or essential in a world that's designed

31:29

that way. Now yes, people

31:32

love to pretend like this is the next step,

31:34

the future and it certainly might be but

31:36

you don't need to make it all or nothing. That's the

31:38

whole point. It can be a choice but

31:41

never when it's a control structure or something about

31:44

using this to dictate your lives and

31:49

the well-being of people. Now explain to me

31:51

why digital ID in any way improves the

31:53

well-being of people at all. Maybe

31:55

convenience but that comes with a lot

31:57

of downside, doesn't it? And

32:02

here's the main point that this is

32:04

the executive director of the Ethiopian National

32:06

ID program which says digital public infrastructure

32:09

such as our national digital ID system

32:12

is foundational to reach and deliver services

32:14

to everyone in Ethiopia. Well, not really.

32:17

You've been doing it. Well, you could have

32:19

been doing it, say for the Western boot

32:21

on the necks of your people which you

32:23

allow for your own benefit, right? Not this

32:25

individual person, but the government I'm more speaking

32:27

to. The reality

32:29

is you don't need digital IDs to be able to give

32:31

people what they need. You're pretending this

32:33

makes it better and mark my words, it'll only

32:35

make it worse. That's the lie that we're seeing.

32:38

But the point is this is what this is really

32:40

about. The digital infrastructure,

32:43

they're building the infrastructure to have a global

32:47

ID system starting

32:49

with the national digital ID system which could

32:51

easily then just be merged together. That's what

32:53

this is. And again, if you

32:55

think that sounds crazy, you're not listening when

32:58

they literally tell you this is what

33:00

they want to stop terrorism, to stop misinformation,

33:04

whatever they claim when really it's going to

33:06

do none of that. Now

33:11

here is a clip of

33:16

Efrenne Fangensen and

33:18

Eva Blar. Or

33:21

I guess that's her tag. I'm not going to

33:23

screw her last name up for sure. You're familiar.

33:25

She's the one that's been speaking about the Dutch

33:27

farming and a lot of different things. I'll play

33:29

this clip for you. Just to show you that

33:31

this is new. They're talking about this right now

33:33

for the most part, discussing this,

33:35

as she says, vaccine passports were a

33:37

precursor to CBDC and digital ID which

33:40

will be used to dictate the

33:42

parameters for participation in society, including

33:44

the imposition of personal carbon allowances,

33:47

none of which should be something that we accept.

33:50

It doesn't matter whether you think this is

33:53

the right thing for the at-large, the greater

33:55

good. It is not up for individuals to

33:57

politically decide because especially for how easy it

33:59

is. it is for extreme extremist

34:03

politicians to drive people's decision making process

34:05

to decide for everybody else based on

34:07

what you think is right, you know,

34:09

easily and how often that's used against

34:11

us every single day. If

34:15

we can to the next step of

34:18

okay, there is CBDC, what else? Digital

34:20

ID, where else are they taking it?

34:22

So I mean, their vision in your

34:25

eyes, the European Union has been extremely

34:27

clear about what their vision was. Funnily

34:29

enough, even when they spoke

34:31

about digital identity years ago, in some

34:34

of their documents they mentioned

34:36

vaccine passports as a

34:39

precursor to digital identity and then

34:41

suddenly the pandemic hit. And

34:43

it was like ID 2020, is that

34:45

the initiative you're talking about? I think

34:47

so, yeah, ID 2020 I think it's

34:50

called, yes. And it's like okay, here

34:52

now everybody needs to have digital vaccine

34:54

passports with a QR code in order

34:56

to take part in normal everyday life.

34:58

The next step is that it's not

35:00

just your vaccine data, of course, or

35:02

your vaccination record, it's everything else. And

35:04

why do we think that they are

35:06

monitoring our carbon emissions right now? Because,

35:10

well, you know, they're saying they're doing it

35:12

to raise awareness. Of course, nobody raises

35:14

awareness for free so that that information

35:16

can be used and that you can

35:19

be again controlled and monitored and limited

35:22

in your freedom. So once that

35:24

digital identity is there combined with

35:27

central bank digital currencies, if

35:30

I stand here at the bar and I want

35:32

to order a beef, like a cheeseburger,

35:35

steak or what not, and I do

35:37

that only with my central bank digital

35:39

currencies because I have no other means

35:41

of paying it, it immediately can register,

35:43

oh, okay, this is Eva,

35:46

she just ordered a burger that is

35:48

so many carbon credits that we are

35:50

going to detract from her account. And

35:52

next time that I try to buy

35:55

one and I've surpassed my limit, it's

35:57

just, CBDC don't work today.

36:00

because you've surpassed your limit. Do you want to buy

36:02

more into yours? Do you want to buy more credit?

36:05

Yeah. And then they'll make money off it.

36:07

And then they'll make money off of it.

36:09

If they decide to allow you. Yeah. Yeah.

36:11

Which is again, you know, we're

36:13

gonna walk straight

36:15

into a truth your society just like

36:17

we did with COVID. And this time,

36:20

it's gonna be worse. It's gonna be

36:22

worse. I agree with you. And for

36:24

everyone that may think that

36:26

something we said here is a conspiracy

36:28

theory, you should go to the WAF

36:31

website and look for a personal carbon

36:33

allowance. And you'll find the documents that

36:35

they have about personal carbon allowance. They

36:37

talked exactly about that. You are

36:40

going to be monitored for

36:42

every step, every transaction, every

36:45

consumption habit you have, because

36:47

it's all tied into the climate agenda.

36:49

They all speak about it super openly.

36:53

So the reason for that clip, guys, I mean,

36:55

this is super surface level. They're talking about open,

36:58

yeah, my point is to show you that this is in

37:01

the public mainstream conversation, maybe not

37:03

on CNN and Fox News. Right?

37:06

Well, I mean, it's hilarious is they're not even

37:09

like we still call them mainstream media, but it

37:11

seems like the majority of people in the mainstream

37:13

don't even like them anymore. It just shows you

37:15

how broken all this is. But my

37:17

point is that everybody sees this, it is public,

37:19

it's right in your face. And it

37:21

is coming. And you've got these people

37:23

in certain positions with influence shouting

37:25

people down for making very basic

37:28

and obvious static objective reality points

37:30

that you can prove. And

37:32

it just continues to show you how alarming all

37:34

this is. Now, one little point is to show

37:36

you how this is used. Right?

37:38

We already saw this. We floated this during the

37:40

conversation when the red, the red, was

37:42

it the red

37:44

star tick or whatever that tick was going around?

37:47

This is how they proposed these kinds of concepts

37:49

already. And they just mentioned the idea of meat.

37:51

Right? Now, this gets into the idea of the biotech

37:53

overlap of it. Right? But the point is that these

37:55

are the things they've already discussed. Can we give you

37:57

something to make you stop eating meat? How about we

37:59

just start penalizing you for doing so. And

38:01

these are, again, very surface level points. I

38:04

think it goes way,

38:06

way beyond whether they care

38:08

about you eating meat. It is about control.

38:10

Lone Star Tech, thank you. Two

38:13

examples. So one is that people

38:15

eat too much meat, right? And if

38:17

they were to cut down on their

38:19

consumption on meat, then it

38:21

would actually really help the planet. But

38:24

people are not, which by the way, I

38:26

wholeheartedly disagree with. It's such

38:28

a nonsensical point. It all comes from

38:30

the idea that the production and

38:33

their methane leads to the, it's such a

38:35

ridiculous concept that I'm not gonna go into

38:37

it all now. I mean, even

38:39

then, it turns out that it's not even

38:41

their farts, but actually what they're breathing is

38:43

more, and yet it becomes cow farts. Like it's

38:45

just so dumbed down and ridiculous. And all that

38:47

leads to this idea that we somehow need to

38:49

reduce the carbon, which it's all an illusion. And

38:52

in no way means we are not destroying the

38:54

planet. The very people who are leading the

38:56

one way to destroy the planet are the ones acting

38:58

like that so we need to stop. It's

39:00

an anti-human agenda at its core. Not

39:03

willing to give up meat. Some people will

39:05

be willing to, but other people, they may be willing

39:07

to, but they sort of, they have a weakness of

39:09

will. They say, wow, this steak is just too juicy.

39:11

I can't do it. I'm one of those, by the

39:13

way. So

39:15

here's a thought, right? So it turns out

39:18

that we know a lot about, so we

39:20

have these intolerance to, so

39:22

for example, I have milk intolerance, and

39:25

there's some people are intolerant to crayfish.

39:28

So possibly we can use human engineering

39:30

to make it the case that we're

39:32

intolerant to certain kinds of meat, to

39:34

certain kinds of bovine proteins. And

39:37

there's actually analogs of this in life. There's

39:39

this thing called the Longstar Tick, where if

39:41

it bites you, you will become allergic to

39:43

meat. Or you can, is the

39:45

point. Not every time, but it's possible. And

39:48

it's reasonably common. I can sort of describe

39:50

the mechanism. The bottom line is that

39:52

that's something that, we saw that weird

39:54

thing come up right around the same time. My point

39:56

is, well, obviously they floated this many times about how

39:58

can we utilize this. And the larger

40:00

point is we saw during the COVID illusion,

40:03

how often things were used like this. The

40:05

idea that it's like, well, we

40:07

should just do this because it's the best thing for the

40:09

planet, right? I don't mean to

40:11

give you an example, you all in a million

40:13

different ways, these things that were used or floated,

40:16

you know? Why don't we just force vaccines for

40:18

school because we know it's the right thing? Okay,

40:20

so the point is about whether, how far

40:23

they will take that line? How far will

40:25

they go to just to take the action

40:27

that they convinced enough people

40:29

was the right thing for everybody? I

40:32

mean, it's all over the place, which I guess

40:34

here's an important moment to include the thing

40:37

we've discussed many times, which

40:42

is the, oh, let's see if I can find it. It's

40:44

been a while. There

40:47

it is. The

40:49

idea of compulsory bio-enhancement.

40:54

Now this gets a little bit off

40:56

on the tangent, but the point is

40:58

the same about what they might be

41:00

capable of. This is 2019, simply saying

41:02

that compulsory, forced, moral bio-enhancement should be

41:04

secret. Now, all it

41:06

really says is this is to say that

41:08

it's morally preferable to basically

41:11

force people to take bio-enhancements like that, something

41:13

that would maybe stop you from wanting to

41:15

eat meat without you knowing about

41:17

it because it's better for the world. They've

41:20

made this argument a million times, guys. I mean,

41:22

I shouldn't be facetious. I've seen at least three

41:24

different studies, but I've seen this discussed more times

41:26

than I can count. About, well, we should just

41:28

do this or put this in the water because

41:30

it's better for everybody. That's, I

41:32

think, where we're at, the level here. And

41:35

whether those are actual arguments or just continually

41:37

floating the idea that we need to think

41:39

in a greater good mindset,

41:43

I'll throw back the Corbett sectional work from 2015 discussing

41:46

what was called Sesame Credit, which

41:49

still exists, which is basically the

41:51

social credit scoring in

41:54

China. Creepy

41:56

new social credit, social engineering

41:59

experiment. That's exactly what it sounds like.

42:01

It is social credit. Deciding what

42:03

you can and can't do based on whether

42:05

or not you are jaywalking or

42:07

not, or taking too long in

42:09

certain parts of the society, like this

42:12

is engineering for the benefit

42:14

of the government under a guise about

42:16

making society better. They don't care about that.

42:19

So on the idea of social credit, let's

42:22

first give you a couple of examples of

42:24

how this is not a new thing. It's

42:26

been going on in China for a long

42:28

time, something that the US government acts like

42:31

they hate but salivate after and constantly take

42:33

action in the direction of every second. James

42:35

Melville points out, this is China showing

42:37

you that they're basically shaming citizens who

42:39

do the wrong thing by showing their

42:41

faces on a billboard and their

42:43

IDs. As he says, dystopian

42:45

or welly in his cell. All

42:52

you're seeing is these people's names with all their

42:54

information, just scrolling on the screen. Here's

42:56

what you shouldn't be like. Here's

42:59

Joe who jaywalked yesterday. Don't be like Joe. That's

43:01

what's happening right there, guys. That is the world,

43:03

by the way, that you're already living

43:05

in. Maybe you didn't know that. I'll

43:08

show you what I mean next. Here is another clip,

43:10

social credit score in China. Just showing you

43:12

what is happening. This is not even a

43:14

new video and is literally already building in

43:16

this country. Thanks

43:20

to advances in artificial intelligence and

43:23

facial recognition and a web of more

43:25

than 200 million surveillance

43:27

cameras, are people bothered

43:29

by privacy concerns? We

43:31

think a lot of camera keeps

43:34

the safety. It's really good.

43:36

We can accept it. Companies

43:39

are experimenting with the algorithms to

43:41

help the government create the new

43:43

national social credit system. And by the

43:45

way, that's the point about the propaganda we

43:47

get. No, it's good and safe and we

43:49

should accept it. Oh, thanks, corporate media. The

43:51

bad guy China thing is okay. That's

43:54

what you get from that, really? Even

43:57

though their tone is all dark and it's all

43:59

about recording. and privacy, what

44:01

they find the guy that's like, hey, okay, from

44:04

China. So stupid. The

44:06

government also has pilot projects. In

44:08

one, citizens are required to do

44:10

hours of unpaid work to get

44:12

benefits. And scores are

44:15

docked for things like littering,

44:17

a messy yard, gossip, even

44:19

jaywalking. Which by the way,

44:21

plenty of people both on the left and the

44:24

right would love that. Video

44:26

of offenders. But according to the things that they want,

44:28

right? It's that same game, right? They

44:30

love to go, yes, censor them because they're dumb and

44:33

we don't agree with them. Acting like that's not gonna

44:35

eventually come back and hurt you, right? Plenty

44:38

of people we could give examples for. The

44:40

idea is if they were the ones, they could be

44:42

like, okay, well, you're not allowed to like, you know,

44:45

you can see how both left

44:47

and the right have this perspective,

44:49

but for different principled points, right?

44:52

About the board, you know, I could go off

44:54

forever about the obvious paradigm differences. The point would

44:56

be that they would love this if they could

44:58

apply it against their bad guy enemy American

45:01

side, right? Like the left or the bad guys, the

45:03

right or the bad guy. I know you're all Americans

45:05

and your governments are the ones pitting you against each

45:07

other using things just like this. This

45:10

is shown on the local news. And

45:14

information collectors like Joi Ni

45:17

are paid to report on their neighbors.

45:19

Her quota, 10 entries a month.

45:25

Yeah, so tell on your neighbor, right? Say

45:27

something, say something guys. That's the world. Now

45:30

this on a quick little side

45:33

note is exactly where we already are. Maybe

45:35

you didn't know that, but it's not for

45:37

what? It's not for this. It's not for

45:39

minor infractions of societal, you know, faux

45:42

plause, no, no, no. What we're dealing

45:44

with is stuff like this. And you may even agree

45:46

with this, but don't miss for

45:48

one second that this is the same thing. Our

45:51

posters of Israeli hostages drawing awareness

45:54

or baiting pro Palestinians into getting canceled

45:57

and they tear them down. Now, regardless of what your

45:59

thought is. about these posters or whether you

46:01

should tear them down. Noting

46:04

for how the obvious point that these

46:07

are posters in other places of the world where no

46:09

one's going to be able to see them and go,

46:11

oh, I know where they are, which is the whole

46:13

point of these posters or any missing person poster. So

46:15

it's obvious to understand that these are for

46:17

propaganda or just to go make sure you

46:19

know this is happening, which, okay,

46:22

like maybe you agree with that, maybe you don't.

46:24

But it's not, it's like the argument of saying,

46:26

tearing these down is like because you're, the

46:28

people tearing them down are by and large, in

46:31

my opinion, because they know this is a propaganda

46:33

tool, even if it's about real people. As

46:36

opposed to you're trying to stop them from being saved

46:38

because you hate Jews. Like it's this very clumsy kind

46:40

of thing that's continued to happen. Or

46:42

because people think that these are about people that may,

46:45

like there's a whole level of this.

46:47

So it's realized that Israelis who have come back from

46:49

Gaza are some of the ones that are most insulted

46:51

about this. Knowing that they are not

46:53

trying to save them, knowing that they're killing them as

46:55

they continue to bomb. So they are angry, which by

46:57

the way they've stated this. My point

46:59

is that you're seeing these people get paraded

47:01

around. Here are the,

47:04

here, meet Joe who just tore these posters down.

47:06

And it's Eli Davids of the

47:08

world, the, what's his name? Elon,

47:11

Levy. These are the

47:13

people that are doing this. Do me this. Here's

47:16

stop antisemitism. This is all they seem to do right now,

47:18

right? Here, meet Dr.

47:21

Nocer, whatever her name is. She

47:24

shared antisemitic things. That's what they're doing. Update.

47:27

Here's this person. She was been fired from her job

47:29

because, you know, and when you dive into it, it

47:31

turns out what they do. Well, they said free Palestine

47:33

on Twitter. Oh my God, what a terrorist. But

47:36

that's how this works. So this is the same

47:38

thing, which society is rapidly leaning

47:40

into, aren't they? You

47:45

can go down and look, this is just all it's

47:47

doing. Cancel this person. Why? Because she tore down this

47:49

poster, right? That she's been identified as

47:51

this person. It's crazy.

47:53

It is literally crazy. Whether or not you think

47:55

they're doing it because they hate a certain person

47:57

or not, pretty sure she has the freedom to do it.

48:00

to do that is not exactly what you guys

48:02

are arguing for like it's just such a crazy

48:04

invasive and does not forget this is stemming predominantly

48:07

from a foreign country's interest

48:11

And are you okay with that Americans that they're

48:14

actively trying to get you fired from your job

48:16

for like this gets really interesting Doesn't it again?

48:18

I'm not you could decide for yourself whether

48:20

you think you should do it or not It's bad to take them

48:22

down. It's not even about that ultimately Now

48:25

here's what's even more interesting and I wasn't sure if this

48:27

was real until I found out that it was This

48:30

is being discussed from this perspective by

48:32

lots of kind of quasi-independent platforms Pro-palefinian

48:36

activists were tearing these posters down

48:39

because in their mind It's obviously propaganda, which

48:41

is what it is Even if it's about

48:43

real people because these are people that they're

48:45

actively not trying to take home they're actively

48:47

refusing hostage exchanges while lying about it actively

48:49

bombing where they might be and Many

48:52

of them have already dead who they keep putting

48:54

these posters up because they were killed

48:56

by Israel bombing per hostages that came home

48:59

So do you still think it's okay to put that person's picture

49:01

up in New York City? Even though

49:04

we know the IDF killed them per hostages

49:06

that came home and said that family died

49:08

or the Bebas family who? Their

49:10

own father said on a video that they were

49:12

killed by IDF bombings So should

49:14

we still allow those but I mean you see the

49:16

point you can decide for yourselves whether or not That's

49:18

the right thing to do but to argue that it's

49:21

somehow but hatred for anybody My

49:23

point is now they're putting these posters up

49:25

and they're putting razor blades in them Somebody

49:28

not every put everybody everywhere because we're

49:30

not dumb like that We're not hyperbolic

49:32

somebody out there is putting posters up with razor

49:34

blades on them So when somebody tears them down

49:36

they cut their hands now What does

49:39

that seem like something that would be indicative

49:41

of how bad this pro-palefinian person was or

49:43

the other way around? Doesn't

49:45

matter what your cause that's disgusting.

49:48

I mean it really is guys that's In

49:51

case the point is that this is happening

49:53

and we are seeing a lot of this where

49:55

they're showing people dry You know trucks driving around

49:57

with their faces on a thing this person's an anti

50:00

semi-agent pretty crazy.

50:02

Okay. And you could

50:04

look for yourself where these counts stem back to

50:06

who funds them. It's obvious. Now

50:08

back to the point we

50:10

were talking about this or Willian future, which

50:13

we seem to have some trappings of already. The

50:17

point is that this is what China's already been

50:19

dealing with or rolling out

50:21

for a long time that the US government

50:24

quite frankly supports, in my opinion, and Israel

50:26

has facilitated with US technology over the years.

50:28

It's a provable topic, but

50:32

social credit, right? So what's

50:34

the point to bring this back around to

50:36

where this is stemming from? So as we

50:38

talked about using vaccine, rather actually I should

50:40

include this too. Eric,

50:46

excellent work. And this is a part

50:48

two, excuse me, or

50:52

not a part two, but a two-part series.

50:57

This one is called the

51:01

rise of authoritarianism from parasite stress

51:03

theory to lockstep. Now, parasite stress

51:05

theory was a government study about

51:08

what would it take to drive people

51:11

to accept authoritarianism. And this quick

51:13

point, they basically argue that a parasite,

51:16

a pathogen, whether that is

51:18

bacteria or virus or whatever you think, a

51:21

pathogen of some kind, or rather the point they

51:23

make is we don't even need something real. This

51:25

is in their own study. All we need is

51:27

the threat and

51:29

people will accept authoritarian government. Now it's amazing

51:31

we can't factor all these interesting points together

51:33

and go, maybe they did this on purpose

51:35

to drive this authoritarian government and accept their,

51:37

yeah, shocking, I know. The

51:40

point is that this is

51:42

how they drive you there. And

51:44

this is what I think was happening, right? So this

51:46

is the reality, the idea of, and

51:48

again, lockstep being the part of that larger

51:50

document from the Rockefeller discussion, that

51:53

they said, okay, we want to drive

51:56

you into a digital infrastructure. This

51:58

was a plan that's been there for a very long time. So how

52:00

do we do that? We use a thread of a pathogen to

52:02

drive you into being so afraid of that pathogen

52:05

and what appears to have been possibly nothing

52:08

to accept us to digitally

52:10

track your adherence to that

52:12

passport and Let's

52:15

not forget long before COVID-19 illusion

52:19

ID 2020 was floating around

52:21

remember that The

52:23

ID 2020 was about the

52:25

overlap of your digital identification

52:28

Identification at this time not digital

52:30

yet but the Identification

52:32

that overlap with a digital infrastructure

52:34

using microchips and different stuff

52:37

stored with your vaccine Information

52:39

that's what it was from the very beginning people

52:41

denied at the time, but it was obvious public

52:44

then in 2020 a Defector

52:47

part of the group spoke out on

52:50

this but the beat right when they

52:52

saw the overlap. They called it quote

52:54

techno solutionism Saying

52:56

that what they were doing was inter

52:59

was using COVID-19 to drive this in

53:01

using immunity passports It's

53:03

amazing that we can't pay attention to the warnings

53:05

when people in the FDA resign in protest or

53:07

on and on and on The point is she

53:09

was part of this program of using your ID

53:12

as a as a tool to drive

53:14

you into their control network Then

53:16

once COVID-19 illusion came along they used the

53:18

parasite stress theory to drive you into accepting

53:21

it She spoke up and said this is

53:23

techno solutionism they're manipulating you with these passports

53:25

and she drifted away never to be thought

53:27

of again and It's

53:30

still happening Thank God We have enough independent media

53:32

out there that put enough of a pushback on

53:34

this to where it didn't didn't just roll right

53:36

over The top of us, but it is still

53:38

coming Make sure

53:40

I don't forget to include this for you. This is an important

53:42

article that Derek was way ahead on But

53:45

let's not also let's also not forget

53:48

the EU and their own

53:50

roadmap for implementation

53:52

of exactly this This

53:56

is important to understand because the whole point that

53:58

this was from 2008 past

54:02

2022. So explain for

54:05

anybody, whoever wants to

54:07

try, how the EU can write a

54:10

roadmap, a five-year

54:12

roadmap, that

54:14

five years ago, or maybe

54:17

six years ago now, planned

54:19

for a vaccination passport in

54:22

2022. Which, by the way, just so happened between

54:24

2021 and 2022, they

54:27

tried to roll it out. That's

54:30

the plan. You see, it was long

54:32

sought. We screwed

54:35

it up with our awareness and our pushback,

54:38

but it has always been coming. Here is 2023, still not

54:42

going away. Now, with the added benefit

54:44

of their blockchain-based agent, here's

54:46

what this says. This is from 2023. Oh, here. I

54:52

missed that earlier. Let me see if

54:54

I say better view on this. I don't like the PDFs. Of

54:58

course not. It's

55:01

just available here, but I couldn't find

55:03

it on there. Anyway, here is the

55:05

PDF version. This is called Innovative Blockchain-Based

55:07

Agent Digital Passport

55:09

Solution. Now,

55:11

this generally just sounds like a digital passport for

55:13

all sorts of things, right? But this is what

55:15

it says. In this paper, we mean by digital

55:18

health passport, a digital passport

55:20

or immunity passport. It's right there.

55:22

That stores information about an

55:24

individual's personal data, health status, travel

55:26

history, health conditions, medical and drug

55:28

records. This is now, guys. So

55:32

just realize that even though we all

55:34

pushed back and it was clearly not

55:36

taken, this is new. This is now

55:38

being rolled around this year. So what

55:40

will come along that will justify, will

55:42

rationalize this again. No one's

55:44

going to take these things when there's nothing you

56:30

you testlinecleansox.org

57:02

wilson Involve

57:06

the impact by

57:10

multiple visits determined

57:14

by the and

57:25

in east all right

57:28

good times let me know in the chat what's the last thing

57:30

you heard first person to it somebody very quickly jump on the

57:32

chat let me know the last thing you heard from me and

57:35

then I'll start again good

57:38

times for those in the podcast we just dropped

57:41

out something happened who knows let

57:45

me get this back for you real quick actually

57:50

here I'll do this so we don't have any dead air let

57:52

me play something

57:54

real quick while I grab this back let me know in

57:56

the chat what you heard last from me guys was last

57:59

thing you heard Let's

58:04

do... nice blanking. Well,

58:09

I guess I'll just do this. I'll just keep going then. Let's

58:12

see where we were. Okay.

58:16

Well, it doesn't... I

58:22

mean, it... All right. Well, I guess

58:24

we'll just go... We'll guess. So,

58:26

I don't know where I was. It

58:29

doesn't look like it was that long ago. Apparently,

58:38

nobody knows where we were. Is anybody paying attention? Okay,

58:40

let's keep going. So, I was

58:44

talking about the EU passport. At

58:46

least let me know whether you heard that or not. And

58:48

we don't have to be redundant. So,

58:54

2018 is when this passport was...

58:57

This road map was placed out, right? And

58:59

the idea is that the European

59:02

Union had this planned out five

59:04

years back. Between

59:06

2021 and 2022, it literally says, for

59:09

a common vaccination passport. Just

59:11

showing you that this is planned, right? This is

59:14

a planned outline. Here

59:17

is today.

59:20

2023, this is recent new

59:22

study from this year, innovative

59:25

blockchain-based agent digital passport solution.

59:29

It says in this paper, we mean

59:31

by digital health passport, a digital passport

59:33

or immunity passport that stores information about an

59:35

individual's personal data, health status, travel history,

59:37

health conditions, and medical and drug records. This is

59:40

now, guys. So, my point is this is not...

59:43

We didn't accept it during COVID-19, the illusion,

59:46

right? The point is that this is

59:48

being still developed at a time when we don't have

59:50

any reason to want this. So, what's going to happen

59:52

to justify it? The

59:55

damn near... No one's going to want to take this.

59:57

Now, it talks about using a secure mobile digital passport

59:59

agent. and the

1:00:01

jade agent framework. So no more about that, let me

1:00:03

know. An

1:00:07

agent-based secure, in

1:00:13

any case, it's just

1:00:15

frustrating. You need building points on

1:00:17

all of this, and I just don't know what you guys heard and

1:00:20

what you didn't. So I guess we'll just leave it there and hope

1:00:22

you didn't miss out on those points. So

1:00:24

the point is

1:00:27

that we're talking about today's digital passport. And

1:00:30

how this is building from

1:00:33

the justification for the vaccine

1:00:37

passport discussion for the digital infrastructure and

1:00:39

how this is all building forward based

1:00:42

on the illusion, or

1:00:44

could be the illusion of a pathogen, all

1:00:47

in the justification to push you into this

1:00:49

new digital infrastructure based on the illusion of

1:00:51

your health. Here

1:00:54

is kind of a

1:00:56

point back to the earlier vaccination

1:01:02

development side of this during the COVID-19 illusion

1:01:04

that I thought was really alarming. And

1:01:06

this is where it gets into the conversation

1:01:08

about the smart dust, nanotechnology

1:01:13

side of it. And

1:01:15

this is where I think this is all meant

1:01:17

to be going. And my point from the beginning

1:01:19

about how our minds are still kind of stuck

1:01:21

back in this older physical

1:01:25

real world concept, even though there is

1:01:27

ultimately something, it's physical. But my

1:01:29

point is if we're thinking cameras and that kind

1:01:31

of stuff, and they're a far different level, we

1:01:33

need to start catching up with that. So

1:01:37

the digital, or rather the

1:01:39

risk of your health was the justification

1:01:42

for a digital vaccine passport, or rather

1:01:44

just a vaccine passport, which would then

1:01:46

be digitalized because it's necessary, which would

1:01:48

then justify your digital ID, justify the

1:01:50

money you would need within the digital

1:01:52

infrastructure. And the point was that this

1:01:54

was all stepping further into

1:01:56

that even while it was happening. And this is a

1:01:58

point PC. familiar with posted

1:02:00

this and I want to make sure we go

1:02:03

over this overlap because I don't think they achieved

1:02:05

a lot of this during the COVID-19 illusion because

1:02:08

of what we were just saying. We pushed back on

1:02:10

a lot of it. So a lot of this has been building

1:02:12

behind the scenes as we discussed, like we said here, which

1:02:16

was the, where was it? In

1:02:22

any case, this one, they're still working

1:02:24

on the digital passport for any

1:02:26

number of things while nobody clearly wants

1:02:29

that. And

1:02:32

this says Bill Gates provided $14 million of

1:02:35

initial funds for a biotech

1:02:37

company, Particles for Humanity, which

1:02:39

was 2019, which

1:02:41

was building on an onpatient medical record,

1:02:44

embedding vaccination information into

1:02:46

the skin. So you

1:02:48

see my point is we're still

1:02:50

thinking vaccine passport digital on your

1:02:52

phone when they're long since past

1:02:54

that point. It

1:02:59

says it is run by the

1:03:01

co-executor of Epstein's Will Boris, Nick,

1:03:03

Nick, Nick Nickolick and Moderna co-founder,

1:03:05

none other than Robert Langer. Now

1:03:09

here is it goes over all these different screenshots

1:03:12

and so on, which we'll just pull up here. We

1:03:15

can show you that Particles for Humanity, Bill and the

1:03:17

Gates Foundation, May 2020. Almost

1:03:22

$4 million, not a huge amount.

1:03:25

Here's the actual website you can look at from today,

1:03:27

but let's get into what it actually said. Well,

1:03:30

first of all, the actual site is no longer there or

1:03:32

rather just doesn't load, which I increasingly

1:03:34

find it humorous how many of these

1:03:37

interestingly telling things don't load or deleted

1:03:39

or are suddenly no longer there. You

1:03:41

know, it's just very telling, but

1:03:44

of course we have it on the way back machine. So

1:03:47

this was again 2019 that Bill

1:03:50

and the Gates Foundation funded in 2020 in May. You

1:03:55

think of the timing. Here's what it says,

1:03:57

applying academic research to developing world needs. Problem,

1:04:01

technologies that could benefit billions, often

1:04:03

languish in academic research labs. Solution,

1:04:07

well, use successful biotech model to

1:04:09

accelerate progress with people experiencing transit,

1:04:12

you know, just what they're trying

1:04:14

to, this infrastructure they want to

1:04:16

build. Initial

1:04:19

funding, Bill and the Gates Foundation. Pilot

1:04:21

phase, now this is what they're actually talking about

1:04:24

building with that infrastructure. Proencapsulation

1:04:27

technologies, single

1:04:30

injection vaccines for full immunization,

1:04:33

vaccination tracking system for

1:04:35

high coverage. So this is

1:04:37

being done in 2019 and then funded

1:04:40

to fruition in 2020. Interesting,

1:04:43

right? Food fortification

1:04:45

technology. Food

1:04:48

fortification, you don't say, like appeal

1:04:50

maybe to stabilize essential

1:04:52

nutrients or whatever. I'm

1:04:56

hoping you guys are following with the connections I'm making here

1:04:58

in regard to the point of what this all, maybe

1:05:01

it's nothing or maybe

1:05:03

it's everything. And maybe this is something that

1:05:05

is far more interconnected. We realized it's not

1:05:07

all in the same location. It's not all

1:05:09

vaccines or all health and the food era

1:05:11

or all foreign policy, whatever it is. These

1:05:14

things interestingly intersect and it concerns me.

1:05:17

And that's where we're going to get

1:05:19

to definitely today, the Pfizer overlap in

1:05:21

Gaza today. And

1:05:23

we'll get there after this segment. I'm

1:05:25

just trying to keep your mind where all this intersects

1:05:28

for at least as I feel it does now, this

1:05:30

again, 2019 single injection

1:05:32

vaccine for full immunization. Now in case I

1:05:34

didn't make that clear, I'm

1:05:36

worried that there's more going on with

1:05:38

the nano smart dust, you know, nanotechnology

1:05:41

field that nobody's asking questions about. We

1:05:43

don't really understand what is possible, what can be

1:05:45

relayed, what it could be doing, whether it can

1:05:48

continue to circulate through your body and what that

1:05:50

can then do. We

1:05:52

know these are possible, but can that

1:05:54

be on an appeal sticker? Can

1:05:56

it be inside an injection? You

1:05:59

know, I've plenty. of thoughts about it, but

1:06:01

I'm very, very worried about where this goes. I'm not

1:06:03

even trying to say that's happening just yet. All I'm

1:06:05

trying to show you is that it's possible. And I

1:06:07

don't know why we would question that when we literally

1:06:09

just caught them in some mass, whatever you

1:06:11

want to call, whatever you think COVID-19 was. Some

1:06:14

people think it was depopulation, something, it was a

1:06:16

massive experiment. Whatever it was, it's not what we

1:06:18

were told. I

1:06:20

just don't even know how anybody can still think otherwise. But

1:06:23

single injection vaccine for full immunization.

1:06:27

3 million people die annually, they say, from

1:06:29

vaccine preventable diseases. They talk about a single

1:06:31

injection, which by the way, has

1:06:35

time released particles shown as this little

1:06:37

orange dot. Okay,

1:06:40

well, time released particles. Now,

1:06:44

if that was, let's just say

1:06:46

the nano lipid particles, not

1:06:49

saying that that's what they claim it is, right? They're claiming it. No,

1:06:52

it's just a fatty layer that removed

1:06:54

and ultimately releases the mRNA instructions to train your

1:06:56

body how to make a spike protein. All of

1:06:58

those things are dangerous, by the way. The lipid

1:07:00

nanoparticles themselves, the mRNA, MOD, in

1:07:02

fact, and one methyl pseudouretine RNA,

1:07:05

it's not an mRNA, it's not

1:07:07

natural. And the spike

1:07:09

protein, all those are deadly in their own right. Why

1:07:12

you'd want all three of them together seems like

1:07:14

complete lunacy to me, but time

1:07:16

released particles. So my point is that could be

1:07:18

what we're dealing with. We

1:07:21

wouldn't know. How would we know any better?

1:07:23

And why would this be the focus for

1:07:25

this new thing before this starts? And it's

1:07:27

not something we utilize, especially since they went

1:07:29

experimental with everything else. Boosters

1:07:32

automatically delivered. See

1:07:35

my point? So you

1:07:37

get a shot and then in six, in

1:07:41

a month, you get your next one, whether you

1:07:43

wanted it or not, doesn't that seem

1:07:45

a little bit concerning with what we just

1:07:47

came from? Problem, most vaccines require multiple boosters. Solution,

1:07:51

single injection. Encapsulate

1:07:54

technology to release each booster at the right time

1:07:56

or not. And you die, you know. You

1:08:00

get to try out the new technology, right? Or

1:08:03

rather they just go, oh well you got extra sick,

1:08:05

so you know it's working. Or it released all three

1:08:07

at the same time, you know, or any number of

1:08:09

other things that could go wrong, like we're literally watching

1:08:11

play out today. The

1:08:13

tracking system is what concerns me the most. Problem.

1:08:17

Challenging the reliability, determine

1:08:21

who has been vaccinated as patient, medical

1:08:24

records are spotty, especially during

1:08:26

vaccine campaigns. Solution. On

1:08:29

patient, medical record embedding vaccination

1:08:31

into your skin. Invisible

1:08:35

data only readable by custom low-cost

1:08:37

mobile technology. So it's not super

1:08:39

high tech. In regard to what they can

1:08:41

use to see it, enables valuable auditing

1:08:43

vaccine campaign to ensure high coverage.

1:08:47

How do we know that's not already happening? Look at

1:08:49

this. Gavi expert. Expert

1:08:52

on vaccine tracking. Remember Gavi? Oh

1:08:58

wait, that would pop up. Put

1:09:04

that low, don't grab the Gavi link. I think

1:09:12

that's in there. That's that picture I used before for sure. But

1:09:18

in your skin that

1:09:21

was essentially outlined, long

1:09:23

and capable of, long before COVID-19,

1:09:26

so why wouldn't this have been something that was utilized?

1:09:28

Maybe it was. Food

1:09:30

fortification. Problem.

1:09:33

Many nutrients are unstable in heat and light or cause

1:09:35

sensory issues, limiting the

1:09:37

potential of food fortification. Solution? Well, a

1:09:40

micronutrient encapsulation technology, otherwise known

1:09:43

as appeal. That's

1:09:46

exactly what we're talking about. So isn't it a

1:09:49

little bit disconcerting that all these things

1:09:51

come together and intersect before COVID ever started? All

1:09:54

based from the same discussion point and the

1:09:56

same necessity and the same objective even though

1:09:58

they see. like completely disconnected

1:10:01

things? You getting my point? Here

1:10:06

is the most unnerving thing

1:10:08

for me. Robert

1:10:10

Langer. Bob Langer

1:10:12

was a part of this. Bob Langer was

1:10:14

the co-founder of Moderna, the

1:10:16

technology used in the injections, and Moderna

1:10:18

itself, and goes all the way

1:10:21

back to the overlap of some of the most nefarious things we've

1:10:23

been discussing. The Lieber-Langer overlap

1:10:25

and the works that they've been working

1:10:27

with, the invasive technology that has been

1:10:30

the outline for many of the things we're discussing. I mean, it's really

1:10:33

hard not to see how the overwhelming overlap to all

1:10:35

of this. Here

1:10:41

it is. Here

1:10:44

is, I'll show you the article I was discussing

1:10:46

there, from the vaccine, it's called Vaccine,

1:10:48

Bait and Switch. As millions

1:10:50

pulled from WHO, Trump gives billions to

1:10:52

Gates founded Gavi. Gotta

1:10:55

start putting these pieces together, guys. So

1:11:00

here is the MIT news, we've

1:11:02

shown you this many times, from 2019. Remember

1:11:05

this? Storing

1:11:07

medical information below the skin's surface. Now

1:11:09

it doesn't have to look like this. That's

1:11:11

just what they showed you, and this

1:11:13

was a Gates product, or

1:11:16

at least associated with Bill and Melinda Gates

1:11:18

Foundation. Right here,

1:11:20

Bob Langer, the coronavirus common denominator.

1:11:22

Ties with Charles Lieber.

1:11:24

Now I'm not gonna go super in

1:11:26

depth on this because it's a lot of information to go over,

1:11:28

but just to give you the basic overlap. And

1:11:32

this as well, which is where my mind goes with this. The

1:11:35

Charles Lieber connection, from nanotechnology

1:11:37

to COVID-19 to technocracy. Now

1:11:41

here's just a quick, well, first of all, before

1:11:45

I go into this more in-depth

1:11:48

point on that, Charles Lieber,

1:11:50

who don't forget was arrested in

1:11:53

the beginning of COVID-19 for trying

1:11:55

to bring genetic material, or

1:11:58

rather specifically for the funding, but... that he

1:12:00

was caught with Chinese nationals bringing genetic

1:12:03

material in their sock. There's

1:12:05

no way you pretend like that wasn't some kind of

1:12:08

smuggling operation, and yet all he got charged with

1:12:10

was withholding information about what he was getting paid with

1:12:12

China. There's a lot

1:12:14

more. He is a central part of this. Here's what

1:12:16

he was working on in 2011. Virus-sized

1:12:20

transistors. Now

1:12:23

they've edited this page many times, but the gist of

1:12:25

it is still present. Ultimately

1:12:27

saying, it

1:12:30

says this innovation was important because

1:12:33

it indicates that when a mad-made structure is as small

1:12:35

as a virus or bacteria, it can

1:12:37

behave the way biological structures do, as

1:12:39

I always point out. Could this not have been an invention, an

1:12:42

innovation that was accidentally released or on

1:12:44

purpose that literally became what we were

1:12:47

dealing with, if you believe there was

1:12:49

something there? Certainly possible. Maybe

1:12:51

that was the test. Either way,

1:12:53

the point is a virus size transistor that does act like

1:12:55

biology. It can

1:12:57

act like a virus that can spread. This is the

1:12:59

same overlap. So overlap that work with somebody like Robert,

1:13:04

Bob Langer, who was working on the

1:13:06

other side of this. Talking

1:13:09

about the actual nanotech side. Both of

1:13:11

them intersect in regard to the surveillance, the internal

1:13:13

biosurveillance. That's

1:13:16

what all of this is ultimately about. Here,

1:13:19

I just put together a quick thread, which

1:13:21

I'm going to show you. I just put together a quick

1:13:24

thread, which I hope you'll check out to show you how these

1:13:26

in my mind kind of come together. And

1:13:28

this was what we already discussed. A

1:13:31

team of researchers has used lipid

1:13:34

nanoparticles loaded with mRNA, the starring

1:13:36

technology in some COVID vaccines to

1:13:38

noninvasively and selectively trigger cell death

1:13:41

in mice. In the

1:13:44

second experiment, they use those same nanoparticles to

1:13:46

remove a dangerous cell. It's

1:13:49

pretty simple, right? Literally using the things

1:13:51

that are in this COVID injection simply

1:13:53

aimed in a different way. I

1:13:57

said... This

1:14:00

is what dual tech looks like. It's

1:14:03

your COVID injection. It is

1:14:05

everything being done in these labs in regard

1:14:07

to vaccine technology. That's what this is, guys.

1:14:09

These are dual use. That's what they know.

1:14:18

In case the mod RNA, the whole

1:14:20

pseudouretine RNA is programmed. This

1:14:22

is the mRNA platform, guys. That's what this is. So,

1:14:26

and I said, and this is why we have peer reviewed

1:14:28

science finding that it is the very mRNA

1:14:30

platform itself that is in fact causing

1:14:32

myocarditis. In part, the lipid

1:14:35

nanoparticle mod RNA delivery system like

1:14:37

discussed above. Was it

1:14:39

programmed to do this? Or was this

1:14:41

just a mistake? Then,

1:14:43

of course, remember that Ralph Farick from North

1:14:46

Carolina University Chapel Hill was in fact funded

1:14:48

in the 90s by

1:14:50

the US government to create

1:14:52

a myocarditis inducing coronavirus. Is

1:14:56

this mod RNA platform the end result of

1:14:58

that weaponizing research? Of

1:15:00

course, after he got funded by the

1:15:03

US government to weaponize coronavirus, to induce

1:15:05

myocarditis, amazing that we don't

1:15:07

overlap that with what's literally happening right

1:15:09

now, a coronavirus causing myocarditis, he

1:15:12

went on to attempt to aerosolize it, to

1:15:16

literally make it a self-spreading agent

1:15:19

using bats in the caves of

1:15:21

China. All of it documented. And

1:15:24

here's the show where we discuss it. Of course, always

1:15:26

including every bit of source material. And

1:15:29

this overlapped with the work of Charles Lieber

1:15:31

and Robert Langer. Langer led her

1:15:33

going on to become the co-founder of none of the

1:15:35

then Moderna, where the

1:15:37

lipid nanoparticle delivery system went into

1:15:39

effect as the COVID-19 injection. Lieber,

1:15:43

of course, used this lipid nanoparticle system

1:15:45

to create a virus size transistor in

1:15:47

2011. Lieber said

1:15:50

this innovation was important because it indicated that

1:15:52

when a man-made structure was as small as

1:15:54

a virus or bacteria, it can behave the

1:15:56

way biological structures do. I

1:15:59

have openly wondered. since 2020, whether this

1:16:01

virus-sized transistor might in fact be COVID-19. Either

1:16:04

way, I feel all of this is converging,

1:16:06

being used to usher in the new stage

1:16:08

of control. So if this may

1:16:11

seem wild, I just ask that you consider these possibilities.

1:16:16

Then, asking

1:16:18

yourself if that's interestingly possible,

1:16:21

the idea that this might not even be present,

1:16:23

right? That ultimately what we're dealing with is

1:16:25

something that is a manipulation, a wholesale lie.

1:16:27

Now, whether that's coming from the idea that

1:16:29

you believe viruses don't exist, or the idea

1:16:31

that this is something that doesn't even need

1:16:33

to based on what we can prove, and

1:16:36

this might've been a massive experiment, then let's

1:16:38

just for sake of conversation, let's revisit this

1:16:40

tweet. Because I find this really

1:16:42

fascinating. Now, I don't trust China's government any more than

1:16:44

I trust the US government, or the WHO

1:16:46

for that matter. I don't trust any of these groups, you

1:16:48

shouldn't. Really, even if you

1:16:51

did want to, you shouldn't anyway. You don't trust

1:16:53

any person in a position of power, it's stupid.

1:16:56

But the interesting point is, from the right-wing side

1:16:59

of this, the argument was, what? China didn't

1:17:01

tell us, right? The Wuhan

1:17:03

flu, they withheld it, and that became a

1:17:05

marching point from all the people on the

1:17:07

hardcore right. The China didn't let us know,

1:17:09

and the WHO is working together. Certainly possible,

1:17:12

right? Okay, well, isn't that

1:17:14

the same group that seems largely now arguing

1:17:17

that this wasn't even really there, that

1:17:19

that's the illusion? Well, okay, so let's just say, then

1:17:21

let's go through that track. They

1:17:24

didn't let us know, but then it became, we argued

1:17:26

it wasn't really as dangerous as we thought it was,

1:17:28

it wasn't really even there, maybe. Okay, well, doesn't that

1:17:30

then interestingly open this conversation that maybe they were telling

1:17:32

you the truth, or maybe they were

1:17:34

lying to you in a different way? Let's

1:17:37

not forget, January 14th, 2020, it

1:17:39

says, preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese

1:17:42

authorities have found no

1:17:44

clear evidence of human-to-human

1:17:46

transmission. Okay, I find

1:17:48

this fascinating, because there's a lot of people

1:17:50

out there, especially in the right side of

1:17:52

the no-wing, no-virus conversation, who would still argue

1:17:55

China bad guy, and that China lied. Well,

1:17:57

if they lied to us about

1:17:59

their... being a problem, which was the point,

1:18:01

but then your argument becomes today that there

1:18:04

is no virus doesn't mean think about the

1:18:06

contradiction there. I find that fascinating. Doesn't

1:18:10

have to mean China's the good guy or China's

1:18:12

on your side. It could just simply mean that

1:18:14

they were of the mind that this was some

1:18:16

kind of an act against them or against other

1:18:18

people and maybe spoke up and said it wasn't

1:18:20

there. Or maybe the plan was to lie

1:18:22

to you and they're all working together. My

1:18:24

point is simply that I find it

1:18:26

interesting how much two party politics rule

1:18:28

the day. We follow along with

1:18:30

the screamers the top of the two party paradigm. Very

1:18:33

interesting to me. And then

1:18:35

I'll include this our interview with Danny ran

1:18:37

core from September 2022. Data

1:18:41

proves the COVID-19 is actually an

1:18:43

illusion. Now, of course, an illusion doesn't

1:18:46

mean fake. Can the

1:18:48

point is that he proves

1:18:51

this unequivocally that if

1:18:53

they had wanted to make this, you would not

1:18:55

have needed anything to do it, which

1:18:58

doesn't then mean that that's what happened. But

1:19:00

what he's simply proving to you is that using

1:19:02

the data we have with the combination of

1:19:04

the. You know the

1:19:06

combination of fluid ammonia and COVID-19

1:19:09

the cycle threshold the PCR test

1:19:11

false positive need you on and

1:19:13

on you literally and

1:19:15

of course the vanishing flu the

1:19:17

vanishing pneumonia that suddenly became COVID

1:19:19

it's quite obvious. And

1:19:22

we do know that this was if it

1:19:24

was real very, very it was less than

1:19:26

the flu according to the guy is group

1:19:28

and peer reviewed science. So you

1:19:30

can decide either way we were

1:19:32

lied to and it was an illusion. Possibly

1:19:35

to the point to where it wasn't even really there, which

1:19:37

then again opens up this interesting point about whether they maybe

1:19:39

did say this and it was true. But

1:19:41

overall. I just want us to be

1:19:43

very, very on guard for where this goes. You

1:19:46

know how they're already discussing, you know,

1:19:48

going right back to Robert Langer's work

1:19:50

in 2019 using the same discussion systems

1:19:52

for on patient medical record tracking embedded

1:19:55

in your skin. And there's been

1:19:57

any number of things that have happened around this that could

1:19:59

have been that. So

1:20:02

bringing this into the conversation of today, keeping

1:20:05

all this in mind for where I still see

1:20:07

all this going and the vaccine passport in dovetailing

1:20:10

or rather on the heels of the digital infrastructure

1:20:13

conversation or rather you can look at it

1:20:15

either way that that came first, it didn't

1:20:17

happen though. Right, so whether

1:20:19

they try to roll it in again after the fact

1:20:21

or not, the point is they want you in this

1:20:24

digital infrastructure, whether you like it or not. So

1:20:26

that can be turned off so you can be controlled.

1:20:29

And if you don't think that's why you're

1:20:32

not listening to what they tell you, they're

1:20:34

openly telling you this is that future. So

1:20:36

the question then becomes what is being done

1:20:38

now in

1:20:40

the sense of whether this might be something

1:20:42

being driven into reality. I've

1:20:45

been openly worrying about what happens in Gaza

1:20:47

in the health aspect. We've talked about it

1:20:50

many times. We talked

1:20:52

about the flooding, which

1:20:54

very clearly in my opinion was done

1:20:56

to make the situation unstable. I

1:21:00

mean, there's rain, there's hard downfall every

1:21:02

year but I've never seen it

1:21:04

like the way we saw with these floods that

1:21:06

were up to those wastes and don't forget right

1:21:08

before that they were saying we're gonna flood the

1:21:10

tunnels with seawater and then weirdly no one in

1:21:12

the corporate media talked about it again, not really.

1:21:16

So I'm convinced that was in order to make

1:21:18

it flood in order to make this as dangerous

1:21:20

and unhealthy as possible. That's my

1:21:22

personal opinion based on what they've already done but

1:21:25

on top of that, the destruction

1:21:27

of the sanitation, destruction of the hospitals,

1:21:29

destruction, no water, no, I mean, they're guaranteeing

1:21:31

this will be a problem just like it

1:21:33

in Yemen, creating the color outbreak

1:21:35

on purpose, that's what they do.

1:21:38

Even going as far as to potentially I would ask

1:21:40

the question whether it was done, like

1:21:42

literally seated amongst the population

1:21:45

to create it as opposed to just letting it

1:21:47

get so bad that it naturally happened itself. Either

1:21:49

way, it's deliberate in my opinion. So

1:21:51

this brings us to that we now have this

1:21:54

actual discussion being had. A

1:21:56

soldier with a fungal infection dies. Fear

1:21:59

is great. of Gaza diseases spreading

1:22:01

into Israel. I mean, isn't this

1:22:03

literally what we predicted would happen? It's not hard to

1:22:05

see it coming. The question is what they

1:22:07

do now. But here

1:22:09

is Eden, points

1:22:12

out some really interesting things. I'm not familiar with his

1:22:15

work, but this is where I saw this first. He says

1:22:17

the Pfizer lab, the Gaza War edition.

1:22:20

Pfizer is again using Israelis as

1:22:22

a laboratory, using them

1:22:24

as laboratory rats to test their products. Again,

1:22:26

the Israeli Ministry of Health and Israeli doctors

1:22:29

are taking part. And again, patients are not

1:22:31

being informed that they are lab rats. Now

1:22:34

here is, let me

1:22:38

get her, I don't open this real

1:22:40

quick. Oh, I went away anyway. Here's what her actual

1:22:42

title is. You

1:22:45

know, I'm starting to get really frustrated by how

1:22:47

selectively these things work. Maybe it's just me. But

1:22:50

like this, for example, where's the translate

1:22:52

button? See right

1:22:54

here. Look at that, translate

1:22:56

post. Huh, okay. Got it, okay,

1:22:59

this one. Oh, weird, no translate button, isn't that

1:23:01

funny? Quite

1:23:03

frankly, I think it's deliberate. But, you know, call me

1:23:05

a conspiracy theorist, plenty do. Now

1:23:08

I just can't see, but she says, she's a

1:23:10

health correspondent. She's part of the health ministry, the

1:23:12

point. But like, there's no translate button, which usually

1:23:14

is, I wonder why. But

1:23:16

we can do this. Here's

1:23:18

what it says. In light of several

1:23:20

cases of soldiers who were injured in Gaza

1:23:23

and who suffer from fungal infection,

1:23:25

recently doctors in several hospitals requested

1:23:28

to import into Israel an

1:23:31

experimental drug for

1:23:33

the treatment of fungi from the

1:23:35

Pfizer company and the

1:23:37

drug is called Phosmanojepics. Ridiculous.

1:23:43

I almost can't believe it. Phosmanojepics.

1:23:48

What are these names they come up with? So,

1:23:50

he says his first tweet included this, her, the

1:23:52

search, her, that's just her statement

1:23:54

right there. She said, it says

1:23:57

the follow up of what was reported by Israeli TV. By

1:24:01

Khan News, the reporter, who stated that the Israeli

1:24:03

soldier has died from an infection that was caused

1:24:05

by fungus that is found in Gaza two

1:24:08

weeks ago. That's

1:24:10

what it says here. Basically

1:24:13

the exact same thing. So

1:24:18

he says, they stated the fungi and mold

1:24:21

that is present in the soil of Gaza

1:24:24

contaminated their wounds and that the soldier who

1:24:26

got contaminated by the two types of fungus

1:24:28

died because of the fungus, which is very

1:24:30

strange. She also stated that 10

1:24:32

more soldiers have the same problem. Now

1:24:36

why would you be using an experimental Pfizer drug?

1:24:38

There's plenty of other things that can treat this.

1:24:42

It says in her report, they stated it never happened

1:24:44

the previous wars. So that's very telling to me that

1:24:46

they have tried to use experimental medicine, but they didn't

1:24:48

manage to save the soldier's life. So

1:24:50

again, it didn't work, but you're still using

1:24:52

it because that's the point. We are now

1:24:54

being told that Israeli doctors now asked to

1:24:56

use this experimental drug.

1:24:59

It says what is the drug according

1:25:02

to Wikipedia? It is an experimental antifungal

1:25:04

drug being developed by AMPLIX

1:25:07

Pharmaceuticals now owned by Pfizer and

1:25:10

specifically, interestingly, one

1:25:13

of the primary focal points, Candida Orys.

1:25:19

Now it doesn't have to mean anything, but I'll

1:25:21

explain more about if you don't remember that what that

1:25:23

is and why that's interestingly overlapped with COVID-19. The

1:25:26

experimental drug is supposed to treat

1:25:28

various fungal infections including Candemia,

1:25:31

which is that point. It

1:25:37

says that this they're saying basically caused Aspergiosis

1:25:41

is a fungal infection of usually the lung

1:25:43

caused by a genus and of the lung.

1:25:45

Very interesting. A common mold that is breathed

1:25:47

infrequently from the air. It's

1:25:49

a common infection enough to claim that wounded soldiers

1:25:51

who suffer from it are the first are

1:25:54

dying. It doesn't make any sense to the point. So

1:25:56

it's a common thing it seems. So

1:25:58

we're missing some information is the point. I

1:26:00

mean you can read all the same stuff right here in their article.

1:26:05

But see this is it says, Candemia is

1:26:07

defined as the presence of Candida species in

1:26:09

the blood. This is not a new problem.

1:26:12

Remember, this was the huge thing about circulating through

1:26:15

the hospitals during COVID was Candida Oros. It

1:26:23

says, you know, this is interesting. It's bringing us to the drug.

1:26:25

It says, which hospital is now asking to approve the use of

1:26:27

this drug or the soldiers? Well, three

1:26:29

of the major Israeli hospitals. Why?

1:26:32

Because it turns out they all took part

1:26:34

in the phase two trials of this drug. Now, of

1:26:36

course, you could argue, well, it's because they know it

1:26:39

works. Well, or not. Assuming

1:26:41

seems to be a very dangerous thing. These will

1:26:43

always is, but especially when you're dealing with the

1:26:45

Israeli government right now. The

1:26:48

study was conducted between October 2018 and March 2020. 21

1:26:52

participants received the drug. Five

1:26:54

of them died. But

1:26:57

of course, like mRNA, according

1:26:59

to Pfizer, quote, their deaths were

1:27:01

deemed unrelated to the study treatment.

1:27:05

Five out of 21, but just completely random,

1:27:07

right? They don't the odds of that are. I

1:27:11

mean, this is getting obviously to becoming a

1:27:13

pattern. How easy it is to

1:27:15

go. Well, it's unrelated. Goes

1:27:21

on to say, one of these

1:27:23

really doctors who depart in the phase

1:27:25

two clinical trial is Dr. Galia Rave,

1:27:27

Rave, director of the Infectious Diseases Department

1:27:30

at the Shiba Hospital, who said, who

1:27:33

was one of the leading pro-vaccinating doctors

1:27:35

during COVID-19 pandemic. And

1:27:39

saying Israel, the soldiers are being sent

1:27:42

to war in Gaza by those who

1:27:44

allow it to happen for hours during

1:27:46

the October 7th attacks by a government

1:27:48

led by the prime minister who pushed

1:27:51

a secret government agreement and turned Israel

1:27:53

into Pfizer's lab, as they openly called it. Israeli

1:27:55

soldiers who are sent to a death trap in Gaza,

1:27:57

if they get wounded, are going to be treated with

1:27:59

this. new drug that

1:28:02

has questionable efficacy and safety exactly like

1:28:04

the mRNA shots by the same people

1:28:06

who pushed the COVID jab. I

1:28:08

mean, it's kind of hard to miss these overlaps. I

1:28:11

find this really alarming for

1:28:14

many different reasons. And more so

1:28:16

than any is the idea that how do we even

1:28:18

know that's actually what's happening. Scares

1:28:23

me. Here is the drug itself. As you

1:28:25

can see right here, treatment

1:28:28

of patients with life-threatening invasive fungal infections,

1:28:30

one of them specifically Candida auris, which

1:28:34

again, that's the problem that

1:28:36

was circulating through hospitals. Now,

1:28:38

Candida albacron is the one

1:28:41

predominant in your mask. Now, there is an overlap.

1:28:43

Specifically, the reusing of those masks was

1:28:45

one of the reasons Candida auris was

1:28:48

spreading largely throughout the hospitals. So yet

1:28:50

again, their own mandate

1:28:54

caused the problems. They let her abuse, you

1:28:56

know, it's just so insulting how

1:28:59

often this happens. Now,

1:29:04

here's the article you can read for yourself. I want

1:29:06

to point out, oh, that's right. I forgot I'm going to read a couple things

1:29:08

in the beginning here. Now, it says the

1:29:10

death of a badly wounded IDF soldier in

1:29:12

an Israeli hospital who was infected with a

1:29:14

dangerous strain of fungus while fighting in the

1:29:16

Gaza Strip has raised concerns about disease in

1:29:19

Gaza affecting troops and possibly straining these Israeli

1:29:21

civilians. Another thing we should ask is whether this

1:29:23

was done to them. And this is just

1:29:25

a byproduct of using this in Gaza. Something

1:29:27

we should ask.

1:29:30

According to the Akon Public Broadcaster

1:29:32

Report, the soldier was brought to

1:29:34

Asuta Ashad Medical Center two weeks

1:29:36

ago with several limb injuries despite

1:29:39

round-the-clock care. So get this, limb

1:29:41

injuries. So

1:29:44

that's all we're being told. Things that shouldn't

1:29:46

threaten his life, but because

1:29:48

of this fungal infection and despite

1:29:50

round-the-clock care, he died. That

1:29:54

seems very strange to me, guys. That is

1:29:56

not, I mean, think about, I

1:29:58

mean, I guess this is a hypothetical. how some new

1:30:01

thing would start because of these converging problems,

1:30:03

but you could argue that would be Israel's fault anyway for

1:30:05

what they're doing to the area. But

1:30:08

that this would become something that would instantly kill

1:30:10

somebody. That sounds like something

1:30:12

new and different. That doesn't

1:30:14

sound like some candida infection with just a

1:30:16

– this is, in my opinion,

1:30:19

something else that's going on. Now,

1:30:23

it says military medical officials have

1:30:26

not yet determined his cause of death. Really?

1:30:31

Again, that adds to the point. It's something

1:30:34

that is not normal. There's something new happening

1:30:36

or being lied to entirely. Do

1:30:38

not fall prey to the fear-mongering about

1:30:40

the new illness or whatever that question.

1:30:42

Everything. But also question whether this

1:30:44

is real and if this is something they're trying to

1:30:46

use against people there for the very same reason. But

1:30:50

they confirm there are isolated cases of

1:30:52

similar fungal infections among wounded soldiers

1:30:54

returning from Gaza. Now,

1:30:57

it says civilian experts who spoke

1:30:59

with the Times of Israel warned

1:31:01

that cases of potentially deadly fungal

1:31:03

infections and other serious afflictions are

1:31:05

less isolated than has been reported.

1:31:07

So basically, they're downplaying. So think about

1:31:10

this. Think about the idea that everyone

1:31:12

– the argument is that China withheld

1:31:14

everything and that was what caused it

1:31:16

to spread, probably on design, maybe. And

1:31:18

then here we have Israel literally downplaying

1:31:21

the illness as their own

1:31:23

mainstream media is going, well, they're downplaying.

1:31:25

It's less isolated than they're telling you.

1:31:27

Is that the same thing? It's just

1:31:30

so frustrating how we apply these things. You know, if

1:31:32

Iran or China does it, well, they're a bad guy. Israel

1:31:34

does it. There must be a good reason. It's just

1:31:37

a child that shall we are with these things. If

1:31:40

this is a real illness, what they're doing is

1:31:42

putting people's lives at risk by not telling you

1:31:44

the truth, which is exactly what I predict Israel

1:31:46

would do for its own interests at the expense

1:31:48

of literally everybody else, including its own population, just

1:31:50

like our government. But it says all

1:31:52

Israeli hospitals have reported that a significant percentage

1:31:54

of wounded soldiers, a significant

1:31:57

percentage – that's crazy – have

1:31:59

come back. with serious antimicrobial

1:32:01

resistant infections. And

1:32:04

you know why those things are

1:32:06

happening, sort of like the antibiotic

1:32:08

resistant problems, because of what they

1:32:10

have been doing. They're overuse of

1:32:12

these products. The overuse of antimicrobial

1:32:14

hand spray, everything. That's

1:32:17

why these things happen, not because

1:32:19

of some other justification or anti-vaxxers.

1:32:21

Antibiotic resistant

1:32:24

problems are because of the

1:32:26

egregiously overused antibiotics in cattle

1:32:28

and meat and everything else. Endless

1:32:31

peer reviewed studies have found that we just don't care. So

1:32:35

that's one thing to consider there, if that's even really happening. But

1:32:37

it's saying they picked them up through contact with contaminated

1:32:40

soil. Well, gee, why is that

1:32:42

a problem? Maybe because they've been flooding the area

1:32:44

with them. It says among other factors, this

1:32:46

is from their epidemiologist, but it says he

1:32:48

noted that currently there are not large numbers

1:32:50

of soldiers with sick with the

1:32:52

illness spreading among Gazans. So

1:32:55

that's the only mention I see about this

1:32:57

idea that it is spreading in Gaza. Now,

1:32:59

why would that be the downplayed point? Wouldn't

1:33:01

you be arguing that they're sick everywhere in Gaza and

1:33:03

that's, I mean, interesting, right? Now

1:33:06

here's a couple of points I don't wanna miss. It says he noted that

1:33:08

currently there are not

1:33:11

large numbers of soldiers sick with the illness spreading

1:33:13

among the Gazans. So

1:33:16

it's interesting. So what are they, I guess that's what

1:33:18

I just read there, but what's the argument they're trying

1:33:20

to say there? Right, is it, to

1:33:25

me, the insinuation, and I'm just

1:33:27

trying to read the tea leaves here, who

1:33:29

knows whether this is benign or not, but

1:33:31

ultimately that this seems to suggest that, well,

1:33:33

okay, why are, they're

1:33:36

not a large number of, basically how

1:33:38

this might have been some kind of a deliberate thing

1:33:40

is my only point about how that would affect some

1:33:43

and others, some that I consider. This

1:33:46

one says diseases don't have borders. We

1:33:48

need to take this seriously. Of course, that just adds

1:33:50

to maybe they just mean it, or

1:33:52

maybe it's leaning into the idea

1:33:54

that this opens that idea to, well, borders

1:33:57

no longer matter when this kind of thing

1:33:59

happens. WHO, exactly what's

1:34:01

happening. Then it says there have also been 160,000 cases

1:34:03

in Gaza

1:34:07

in the last couple of months of acute

1:34:10

respiratory infections, I guess

1:34:13

including COVID-19 and

1:34:15

RSV, literally no sense. But

1:34:18

what's funny about this is that Gaza fared

1:34:22

reasonably well during the COVID-19

1:34:24

illusion. Interesting now that

1:34:26

they start seeing this surge of almost over 150,000 cases

1:34:28

of COVID-19. Weirdly

1:34:32

after they give about 12-13,000 injections of whatever,

1:34:34

who knows? We just

1:34:37

talked about it. Just

1:34:40

throwing out the facts. Who knows if that's what's

1:34:42

causing it or not. Now

1:34:46

Muhammad Shehita points out, extremely

1:34:49

dangerous, same similar discussion. IDF soldier dies

1:34:51

with this infection. He says Israel's assault

1:34:53

and siege on Gaza created perfect conditions

1:34:55

for the breeding of treatment resistant deadly

1:34:57

fungus that killed one soldier. So he's

1:35:00

taking us at face value. This

1:35:02

disease can soon spread locally and

1:35:04

beyond. PS, Israel destroyed

1:35:07

Gaza's health system by design.

1:35:09

He says per Haaretz, Israeli experts

1:35:12

acknowledged the siege and war are

1:35:14

in fact creating an incubator to spread

1:35:16

diseases. Which by the way again is

1:35:18

by design. They've made statements about this.

1:35:20

I think you

1:35:22

can read the specialist one down below. Gaza's overcrowded

1:35:25

bombed and besieged hospitals are unable to diagnose patients

1:35:27

let alone treat the diseases. A

1:35:29

catastrophe has arrived with this fungus if it is real.

1:35:31

We shouldn't dismiss that possibility.

1:35:33

He says the warnings to stop

1:35:35

immediate before deadly and untreatable diseases wipe out

1:35:37

a significant portion of the population and spread

1:35:40

beyond their borders. Senior Israeli

1:35:42

public figures are calling to weaponize the spread

1:35:44

of the deadly disease to bring victory

1:35:47

closer. Retired Israeli general says

1:35:49

the spread of disease in Gaza will bring victory

1:35:51

closer. See? Now

1:35:53

you could argue that's just by well let it happen

1:35:56

it's their fault or you did it. Either

1:35:58

way it's the same ultimate outcome. You're

1:36:00

letting this be a problem which then

1:36:02

obviously risks the other countries, too Didn't

1:36:05

you just say that got disease has no borders?

1:36:08

So by letting this be a problem doesn't that

1:36:10

affect Egypt and well? Yeah, but of course this

1:36:12

is exactly what you'd expect from the Israeli government

1:36:16

Do what you do what you all say we're supposed to but

1:36:18

we'll do what we want Right you

1:36:20

you follow the UN resolutions or you're a terrorist,

1:36:22

but we'll ignore it whenever we want to same thing

1:36:24

the US government does guys But

1:36:27

he says Israeli sources say the most likely origin

1:36:29

of this dangerous fungus may be the soil contaminated

1:36:31

with sewage water in Gaza Or

1:36:34

that's the argument and they made this happen Israel's

1:36:36

destruction of infrastructure and cutting fuel electricity

1:36:39

to Gaza raise the likelihood of this

1:36:43

Well, we talked about this

1:36:45

candida distinction I

1:36:47

find it really interesting how this weirdly

1:36:50

overlaps now, don't forget that Pfizer bought

1:36:53

this in Right

1:36:56

when there started to become this focal point down. What do

1:36:58

you know a Candida outbreak in

1:37:01

all the hospitals So

1:37:03

Pfizer goes perfect more ways to make money on the back

1:37:05

of what we're causing or however you want

1:37:07

to view it So they buy the company that is working on

1:37:09

a product that apparently seems to be doing I haven't done that

1:37:11

much of a deep dive On it just yet. I plan on

1:37:13

it foes mango those

1:37:16

man ojib. How do I say it again? Those

1:37:19

man ojib ix guys weird and tight and weird things

1:37:21

they use why would you just call it something simple?

1:37:24

Probably so it's more difficult to keep track of Leave

1:37:27

the way That

1:37:30

this is a drug designed to treat fungal outbreaks

1:37:32

one of the leading examples of that

1:37:35

during COVID was Candida or us Now

1:37:38

suddenly that seems to be at the very least

1:37:40

a drug that's being used to treat something that

1:37:42

seems likely to be Candida related seeing as how

1:37:44

this drug they're using and is

1:37:47

being done on the back of an action that

1:37:49

Israel carried out against a population that they want

1:37:51

to ethnically cleanse and Then

1:37:53

they step in with the Pfizer drug to treat it

1:37:57

Or yes, I kind of already said that but either way the

1:37:59

point is the Pfizer overlap to it all. I just

1:38:01

find it almost impossible. And

1:38:04

then again, the point was that you did see these things. You

1:38:07

saw the candida or us or

1:38:09

other candida albacon coming

1:38:11

from the mass use which was easily

1:38:13

proven. WHO

1:38:17

calls mask induced infection worldwide

1:38:20

threat. Right? Because it's

1:38:22

a real thing. It's there's no denying it. It's

1:38:24

causing these problems. People

1:38:27

can D to outbreak blamed on COVID. And that's the other

1:38:29

one. That's the candida or us

1:38:32

claiming that that was what was causing these

1:38:34

outbreaks in the hospitals.

1:38:38

But then it turned out now looking back at the

1:38:40

studies are finding that the reuse of their masks and

1:38:42

the same kind of stuff they were doing was the

1:38:44

leading cause of it. But they blamed COVID like literally

1:38:46

everything else. Your

1:38:49

mask may be causing a candida growth in

1:38:51

your mouth. Look at

1:38:54

the albacon. I'm

1:38:57

saying it correctly. All

1:39:01

the cons with an S. Right.

1:39:04

So the point is, it's very interesting

1:39:06

to overlap with COVID as we're talking about this from

1:39:08

Pfizer with the drug they're using. Overall,

1:39:11

I just want us to be weary of weary

1:39:14

of how this wary of how

1:39:17

this goes forward. What

1:39:20

would be the justification? Now back to the very

1:39:22

earliest part of it, the digital passport,

1:39:24

the vaccine passport, right? The

1:39:26

use of these different technologies. How

1:39:29

much is the idea of a self spreading vaccine

1:39:31

to treat the very problem that they're currently dealing

1:39:34

with? Right? Now, if you want something to

1:39:36

overlap with the digital, the with

1:39:39

the nano technology side of it, a

1:39:43

smart dust, the idea that they're

1:39:45

already outlining these and nanotechnology nanoparticles,

1:39:47

the way that they just said

1:39:49

they can aerosolize mRNA nanoparticles to

1:39:51

deliver a vaccine. Maybe this becomes the

1:39:53

justification to be used. Maybe they've already done that

1:39:57

by doing spraying something over the area. And that's

1:39:59

what all they. are different possibilities and

1:40:01

if you think they're not possible, you're

1:40:03

not listening, they'll tell you. Here

1:40:06

it is from 2020 where they're literally saying this

1:40:08

is your future. Since

1:40:12

the outbreak of COVID-19, the word

1:40:14

virus has been dominating media headlines

1:40:16

as well as our daily lives.

1:40:20

Did you know that one approach

1:40:22

that has been proposed to control

1:40:24

virally transmitted diseases is by releasing

1:40:26

a virally transmitted vaccine? Unlike

1:40:29

traditional vaccines, infectious vaccines

1:40:31

do not require any

1:40:33

individual consent. Infectious

1:40:36

solutions are also being developed for

1:40:38

food and agriculture and are currently

1:40:40

making their way through the regulatory

1:40:42

approval process. However, do

1:40:45

we really want to intentionally

1:40:47

disperse these modified viruses outside

1:40:49

the lab? Is

1:40:51

this a forward march of science or

1:40:53

a mistake? Well, you know, we

1:40:57

saw where it went. Now here's the last point on

1:40:59

this segment and then it looks like we're already about

1:41:01

close to two hours so I'll just give you some

1:41:03

highlights. I think we'll kind of wrap there. What Chief

1:41:05

Nerd points out, a new study shows

1:41:08

COVID-19 vaccinated children have

1:41:10

significant changes in their saliva

1:41:12

which may cause long-term oral health

1:41:14

consequences. How interesting. Well,

1:41:17

just so we're clear, the mask itself causes

1:41:20

all of that. So the

1:41:22

mask was proven, I mean it's not even proven,

1:41:24

it's a static reality that we've accepted from a

1:41:26

long time before COVID that when you wear

1:41:28

a mask it dries your mouth and

1:41:31

then the mouth being more dry. One

1:41:34

of the key reasons or benefits of saliva in

1:41:36

your mouth is that it keeps the bacteria

1:41:38

from becoming, it keeps it, it suppresses it to

1:41:40

a degree. But when your mouth

1:41:42

dries out, well that bacteria because we're prominent and

1:41:45

then is easily breathed back into your lungs. It's

1:41:47

a basic reality. So when you wear the

1:41:49

mask for long terms of period of time you're more likely

1:41:52

to get things like bacterial pneumonia which I did a lot

1:41:54

of work around. Right, that was this

1:41:56

discussion. Last lead

1:41:58

to bacterial pneumonia. Pterod pneumonia,

1:42:00

oral, thrush and systemic inflammation and maybe

1:42:02

the cause of long haul COVID in

1:42:04

part along with the injections and the

1:42:07

problems that are causing But

1:42:09

what's interesting, right? Is

1:42:13

it what this is discussing is a combination of all of

1:42:15

it That the

1:42:17

vaccine itself are in fact

1:42:19

causing lower secretions of that

1:42:22

saliva And then you wear a

1:42:24

mask that causes it to go even lower

1:42:26

So this just adds one more layer of

1:42:28

what I've always been saying that every single

1:42:30

choice seems to be Combining to

1:42:32

make the worst possible problem for you

1:42:36

Right the mask increases your illness in general

1:42:38

the injection adds to that Chris increases the

1:42:40

saliva now These are all of you have

1:42:42

by design, but my god, it seems like

1:42:45

one of the most It's miraculous

1:42:47

how many of these things lined up to hurt

1:42:49

you just right? I Find

1:42:52

this to be by design. You're my honest

1:42:54

opinion scary Now

1:42:59

what did I title tonight? Yeah, so

1:43:01

we'll talk about that the evacuation part that

1:43:03

I do think is very important Now we're

1:43:06

gonna get into some important stuff here in

1:43:08

general that I'll save for probably tomorrow But

1:43:12

just to give you some of the quick overviews and we'll focus on

1:43:14

the Evacuation which I think

1:43:16

is the main part which basically is the ethnic

1:43:18

cleansing which we have planned from the beginning Just

1:43:21

an update for where we are. This

1:43:23

is from today 11,422 children have been killed in Gaza

1:43:26

in just 11 weeks There

1:43:30

is no precedent for this guys. It is unparalleled

1:43:35

11,422 children Almost

1:43:38

30,000 people have been killed

1:43:40

the vast majority of them women and children There's

1:43:43

no way you can look at this without

1:43:45

understanding. This is not There's

1:43:48

only two or two things either. They do not care

1:43:50

or they're targeting civilians Either

1:43:53

way the this illusion of

1:43:56

pinpoint targeting Hamas. I mean, there's

1:43:58

nobody with a brain who's still buying And

1:44:01

yet they somehow managed to let this continue. Now,

1:44:05

101 journalists killed. Unbelievable.

1:44:11

In just one day, 24 hours, 241 deaths. Bringing

1:44:17

in total to over 21,000. Now

1:44:20

this again, the numbers are depending on who you're looking

1:44:22

to. This I

1:44:24

have seen repeated by the UN

1:44:27

and other locations about this high death toll from

1:44:29

just the last 24 hours. It's

1:44:32

in your face. Now,

1:44:35

just breathing this headline should make you uncomfortable. Israel

1:44:38

expanding ground offensive into

1:44:41

central Gaza refugee

1:44:43

camps. Refugees. I

1:44:46

mean, it's just right on the face. They're

1:44:50

literally invading refugee camps

1:44:52

because Hamas or so we're

1:44:54

told. With nothing to back that up

1:44:56

whatsoever. But you know, we killed

1:44:58

400 people in a refugee camp to maybe kill one guy

1:45:01

that turns out wasn't there. But

1:45:03

you know, Hamas human shield though. I

1:45:05

mean, there's just no logical. This is

1:45:07

in your face insulting. No

1:45:09

matter what you think happened on October 7th, if

1:45:11

everything that ever said is true, what

1:45:14

you're doing right now in Israel or in Gaza

1:45:16

is offensive. I mean, it

1:45:18

is disgusting. They're knowingly doing

1:45:20

this while these people act like what we see

1:45:23

isn't what we see. And

1:45:26

even they have begun. Macron just said you absolutely have to

1:45:28

stop what you're doing. He just

1:45:30

said something like that today. And yet

1:45:32

nothing changes. And even then, here's how insulting this

1:45:34

is. Actually, I think there's only a couple quick parts

1:45:36

of this. I just simply

1:45:38

put showed that they're the UN and expressing grave

1:45:40

concern as they should, regardless of

1:45:43

what you think of them, because they're murdering civilians

1:45:45

every single day. Bombing

1:45:47