0:00

Welcome to the Daily

0:03

Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated

0:06

to bringing you the most relevant,

0:21

independent

0:26

news as we see it from the last 24

0:29

hours.

0:32

Friday, June 2nd, 2023. Thank

0:35

you for joining me today. Guys, unfortunately, this

0:38

is exactly why I don't do interviews live.

0:41

Scott's not here. So we're going

0:43

to just try to repackage this. A

0:45

few other things we'll talk about today. I just kind of threw

0:47

a bunch of random stuff that we can get into today,

0:50

kind of make this a Daily Wrap Up episode

0:52

that I wasn't going to get to. As

0:54

you guys know, I rarely do live interviews these days

0:56

because of exactly this. Who knows what's

0:58

going on? Frustratingly enough, this is probably

1:01

the fourth time Scott and I have set this up and it

1:03

hasn't happened. I'm not sure what's going on. I'd love

1:05

to get his information out there. Regardless of

1:07

my frustration,

1:09

his work is important.

1:10

So I'll go over a couple of things to talk

1:12

about on that note, and I will go over a few other things

1:14

I think are important. I'll be updating the title when

1:16

I'm done. So I apologize for getting

1:19

people's hopes up about the interview today. But

1:22

I honestly don't know what happened. It may as well

1:24

be, or very well could be my fault. I

1:26

don't know. There's a lot of things flying around today.

1:29

Either way, I thought we were set for 10 o'clock today,

1:31

so

1:31

I'm not hearing back from him at the moment. I'll reach

1:34

out to him afterward and hopefully find out

1:36

what's going on. But let's

1:38

get into a bunch of other stuff today. I don't know how long

1:40

it'll be. I didn't have an organized

1:42

plan for the show today. I just kind of threw together

1:45

a few things, so it'll be a little bit

1:46

maybe more disjointed than previous

1:49

shows. But feel

1:51

free to jump in the chat. This is kind of an informal

1:53

jump into show today, so let's just talk about

1:56

a few things that are important.

1:58

And overall, I will start... with

2:00

the general point of East Palestine because it's

2:03

just incredible how this topic is continually

2:06

it's not even just ignored it's actually really

2:09

incredible to watch how this entire situation has gone

2:11

down that it's something that

2:13

there's so many contradictory points to all

2:15

this that we're in a situation where you have people that

2:18

are just

2:19

almost irrationally

2:21

screaming about the idea of the environment

2:23

and of course we should care about the environment

2:26

being polluted and manipulated

2:28

you know of course by the leading polluters in the world primarily

2:31

the military of the US government but we don't talk about that

2:33

in the context of concerns for the environment

2:35

they frame that as somehow means to an end

2:37

to justify freedom which is therefore necessary

2:40

to create more environmental freedom blah blah

2:42

blah yeah esg only applies when we

2:44

don't you know i'll actually make a point about esg in

2:46

a moment

2:48

but it's really it's it's amazing it's like the masks

2:51

right where we can see people that are screaming that

2:53

we're you know hurting the planet but then because

2:55

they have some rationalization about why it's necessary

2:58

despite the evidence while they scream trust

3:00

the science

3:01

that they were wearing masks and gloves

3:03

and which by the way we now see is probably

3:06

one of the most obvious point i mean it's it's

3:08

overwhelming and there's a reason that you don't hear

3:10

how serious it actually is in the

3:12

short period of time that masks were aggressively

3:15

used how dramatically that destroyed

3:17

the oceans and the sea life and

3:19

i mean it's incredible the micro

3:22

plastics and everything else involved and yet it's

3:24

odd that nobody talks about that because the

3:27

same people telling you they have to control your

3:29

lives to control to help

3:31

the environment

3:31

are the ones that are promoting the use

3:33

of the things that are to the most degree

3:36

right now hurting the environment you

3:38

see this everywhere right now i made this point the other day you

3:40

have you have the racists now that again

3:42

that doesn't mean that there aren't people that are racist that they're pointing

3:45

at but you have this block of people that are acting

3:47

with inherently racist tactics that

3:49

you're different because of your skin

3:51

as a white person that you are only

3:53

racist if you're white all these things that that

3:55

regardless of how you feel that just if it's justified

3:57

in your mind that is the definition of racist

3:59

So you have people that are pushing inherently

4:02

racist concepts and calling everybody else racist

4:04

you anti-fascist groups acting

4:06

with open fascism Yeah, I mean it's just everywhere

4:09

you look you have people out there is pointing out

4:11

I mean, it's the same kind of point, but you know, they're all anti-semitic

4:14

as they're actually subjugating

4:16

and suppressing and attacking Jewish

4:18

people in Israel. Yes, we're talking about the Israeli government

4:20

or Semites

4:22

everywhere else in the world or any number of completely

4:25

ridiculous contradictory tactics No back to East Palestine.

4:28

Isn't it interesting that they you know, I was playing a clip

4:30

today about Biden and It's

4:33

this I mean actually I think I could probably pull it up Let me see if I've

4:35

got it real quick since this is, you know reasonably

4:37

informal today

4:39

It was a clip that I recently shared. My point was not

4:42

that I

4:42

Care about the token visit

4:45

of Biden to East Palestine. Like what is he even gonna do?

4:47

Why do we really care that Trump or Biden

4:50

show up?

4:51

It's all politics. It's meaningless They don't

4:53

need to be there to execute things these people

4:55

need. It's all politics, right? So

4:57

I don't really care at all about whether or not he visits

5:00

Physically

5:01

other than the fact that just shows that he's at least there

5:03

to kick, you know, the illusory idea

5:05

that he cares about these people But

5:08

for me, it's more about the idea that he's repeatedly

5:10

lied about it And I think that's actually really important

5:13

not that we should be surprised that

5:15

the government lies or all of the politicians

5:17

whether you think They're politicians or not actively

5:19

lie to you on a regular basis

5:22

But it's still interesting to see this

5:24

repeated lie and then of course the most Frustrating

5:28

and insulting part of it again that it's

5:30

nothing unique to either it's not unique to a certain

5:32

party It's not unique to a certain White House

5:34

press secretary It is just what they do

5:36

but the embarrassing nature of how people continue

5:39

to tow that line Obfuscate the reality.

5:42

So here's this clip just I mean, there's no misunderstanding

5:44

how obvious this is. Yeah, we'll go. Yes He's

5:46

gonna do it. Yes. He said he would yes

5:49

And now it seems that we're just moving on to other topics so

5:51

repeated repeated repeated promises that he'll absolutely

5:54

do it He's as somebody present that keeps his word. He'll be there

5:56

and then

5:57

Doesn't do it again. That's not

5:59

unique That's just Tuesday for politics in the

6:01

Washington DC on either side of this But

6:04

it shows you something and I think people are beginning to truly

6:06

recognize how dishonest they are Discussion

6:08

that the president may go there in the near future.

6:10

I just don't have anything to share I know I know

6:12

there's a lot of interest on that By

6:16

the way, there's points I just I can't stop pointing

6:18

out how It's just she's so bad

6:21

at this job and

6:22

it shows you again It's kind of one of these points

6:24

we're making like it's inherently racist

6:26

to put somebody in a position Because

6:28

of their skin color or because of their sexual identity

6:32

Literally it despite regardless

6:34

of whether she's good at the job. I can I will

6:37

Proveable I can promise you and I can prove

6:39

to you There are people that were in fact in line

6:41

for that job that were way better credentialed

6:44

experience wise and yet she got picked Now

6:47

why is that they'll tell you why because

6:49

she's black and she's lesbian because we want equity want

6:51

equality and diversity

6:52

So that's racism Period it

6:54

doesn't matter your justification. You are making choices

6:57

based on people skin color and sexual identity.

6:59

What else do you call that? Oh, excuse me. We're

7:01

in the age of altering definitions to meet

7:03

the agenda or the narrative right herd immunity

7:05

vaccination

7:06

equality She'll

7:09

say a lot of things in here that are bad was my point that for

7:11

instance I love how she makes she she has these

7:13

tactics It's clearly somebody who knows how to

7:15

do this job is trying to keep give her little

7:17

tidbits like let me make something

7:20

clear She says that all the time and

7:22

then goes on to be like what am I gonna say next

7:24

which it's so in parent That's

7:26

just filling time let me make

7:29

something clear and then goes on to say something completely

7:31

belligerent and completely on not

7:35

Lacking even her understanding

7:37

like the idea that she doesn't understand who mr.

7:40

Munchkin is no excuse me minutian She

7:42

says that twice like it's just incredible. Sorry. I

7:45

shouldn't be just person It's just it's it's worth

7:47

making fun of because this shows you not just

7:49

for the point of making fun of somebody But it shows you

7:51

the inherent ridiculousness of our governmental

7:53

structure

7:54

on all sides by the way Yes, this

7:57

one side of it happened like the idea of the identity politics

7:59

is you for the most part to one side,

8:01

but you have just as much the level

8:04

of ridiculousness in different ways on either

8:06

side of the parties. Anybody paying attention sees

8:08

that very clearly.

8:09

I mean, I think what folks should understand

8:11

and what folks should, I think, feel at ease

8:14

is that the president has taken this very seriously.

8:16

Okay, so we should feel at ease that he's

8:19

taken it seriously. What

8:21

does that even mean? See, this is it's meaningless noise.

8:24

Taking it seriously. In what ways? Explain

8:26

for me how he's taken it seriously. He's done nothing different

8:28

than the other president. That's the same point. It's always. It's

8:31

just noise. Can we not meet the bar

8:33

for a presidential visit?

8:34

Look, I don't... I

8:38

want to be very clear here. There's

8:41

no reason to struggle. What

8:43

does that even mean? Let me

8:45

be very clear here and then struggle to

8:48

say something that makes any sense. The visit of Ohio,

8:51

the second is usually there with the pretty girl,

8:53

with the people there with the federal system. I've spoken

8:55

with every official in Ohio and

8:57

I will be out of doing some business. Is there a plan

8:59

for him to

9:00

go? I don't have any trips to preview

9:02

for you at this time. He's been to Ohio many

9:04

times before during his...

9:06

For the podcast, the dates are changing

9:08

progressively with every shift of the clip. So we're on March 3rd

9:10

starting in February. I'll be there at some point.

9:13

Like, look, plans change.

9:15

I'm not being ridiculous about this. Things can happen,

9:17

especially for the president. But so many things going on. But

9:19

the only point here is just repeatedly saying

9:22

you're going to do it. And then eventually just going to be like, look,

9:24

guys, I'm not going to make it. I've got other things going on. Instead,

9:26

you just keep kicking the can down the road. Now, it's not even

9:29

that big of a point.

9:30

It happens on all sides of politics, but it just shows

9:32

you that there is an inherent nature of dishonesty.

9:35

Whether you think that is some kind of means to an

9:37

end to do what's right. You won't understand

9:39

or, you know, that's the way they play this. That

9:41

they can't fill you in. You know, national security because

9:43

you just don't understand or it's not safe for you. It's

9:46

all noise and nonsense and narrative. The bottom

9:48

line is they lie to you all the time

9:50

because they want to achieve their goals. Period.

9:53

Now, the most important thing to realize is those

9:56

goals are not in your interest. But that's a whole

9:58

other step in the conversation. administration

10:00

so it's not an it's not unusual

10:03

for him to to go there look I don't

10:05

have anything to preview I don't

10:06

have anything to share our visit for the

10:11

president to to Ohio Democrats are

10:13

saying it's time and

10:16

he said when he was asked the question that he will

10:18

be there when is he going to be with these palestinian

10:21

and my past so I plans

10:23

are underway discussions are underway just don't

10:25

have anything locked in

10:26

about five weeks ago so that he would

10:29

be going to use palestine Ohio at some point

10:32

does the president still feel the need to visit Ohio

10:34

well the president I mean once the president

10:36

said it so I will keep we keep

10:38

that he keeps his word

10:40

if

10:43

he says the president said he's expecting to

10:45

at some time the president means what he

10:47

says I just don't have a trip to preview

10:49

at this time great

10:50

right so as long as he goes there sometime between now and

10:52

his death then then according to her he keeps his word

10:54

you understand that honesty

10:57

from the government it's

11:02

just quite silly isn't it now

11:05

there's so many things that we could get into regarding these palestine

11:08

that are just makes

11:10

it's overwhelming to see how obvious this is before

11:13

I get into that I want to do a quick shout out to the upcoming

11:15

event that's tonight technically is the VIP

11:18

event I'm not actually sure what that entails

11:20

if that's only the

11:22

people performing I'm not sure sure as

11:25

those you guys know I'm not I'm

11:27

only speaking and playing I'm not actually involved

11:29

with the administrative side of all of this this

11:32

is this is and by the way Courtney Turner deserves

11:34

all the credit for all the work that's gone to this as well as Scott

11:37

who had helped up until a point they've worked

11:39

their asses off to make this happen so make

11:41

sure you check this out I don't know if they're doing

11:43

like ticket sales at the door how that works

11:45

but if you haven't gotten one yet check it out

11:48

because tomorrow is the first day I'll be performing

11:50

tomorrow I think it's like 4

11:51

p.m. ish and

11:53

make sure that subject to change based on how these events

11:56

tend to go but as you see there's a

11:58

lot of people that will be there performing

11:59

A lot of people would have been added. You

12:02

know, I mean, you could see for yourself, guys, that there's plenty

12:04

of people in here that I'm sure we disagree with on plenty

12:06

of different things. That's the best part about this. You

12:08

need to have different perspectives and different people.

12:12

That's the only honest way to do this and

12:14

not have it be negative and vitriolic. Oh, you

12:16

have a, you're a different, you know, the point being

12:18

is that people who perceive the other side

12:20

as the enemy

12:20

are, in my opinion, either being fooled

12:23

or part of the problem. Because I'm

12:25

not saying that there aren't some people on the other

12:27

side, whatever that means, that are, might

12:29

actually be the enemy. But the bottom line

12:31

is your neighbor, who just because might, you know, be

12:33

swayed by the narrative or have a political standing

12:35

that's different, doesn't mean that they're,

12:37

the point is, they're on, you are the, as

12:40

the country, we are the people of this country. Your

12:42

government is the active effort to try to subjugate

12:45

these people,

12:46

all of them. I was making this point earlier, actually,

12:48

and now that, since I went into that, make sure, by the

12:50

way, you check this out. Go to the website here, rebelsforcause.com.

12:53

You can put in TLAV, promo code TLAV,

12:56

and get, you know, support the last American Backbond

12:58

and so on.

13:00

Before we go back to Scott C. Smith's stuff, I

13:02

was, since I'm mentioning that, I'm gonna go into this video, which is pretty

13:04

crazy. There was something else that the,

13:07

about the government, where was that? I

13:09

just threw these together. I'll

13:11

come back to some of this stuff. Well, Vigilant Fox points

13:13

something out that I thought was really concerning, which we've

13:15

heard more about, but as this continues to increase, the more

13:17

invasive actions of your government continuing

13:20

to show you that you

13:21

are the problem. Of

13:24

course, they'll tell you, well, as he

13:26

writes here, a new Supreme Court ruling allows the IRS to

13:28

now access your bank records secretly,

13:31

which how much, I mean, the point is we shouldn't, that's

13:33

just, now we see that.

13:35

Are we under the impression they've not

13:37

already been able to do that? Well, that's the point, is

13:39

they haven't been legally able, but now they can, secretly,

13:42

without your knowledge, and the point is, why does

13:44

that make sense?

13:46

Because you are the problem. You're the enemy. You're

13:48

the potential theft, or thief. You

13:52

are the potential criminal. Because

13:55

how else do they make this work? They

13:58

can't just continue to point outside. country because

14:00

the problem is they need to control your lives because

14:04

you are the issue because we

14:06

are pointing at the government right now more than ever in this

14:08

country's history as far as I can tell and saying look they

14:11

are the problem they don't

14:13

represent us anymore they don't care about

14:15

our safety they say a lot of things but

14:18

then they act against them on a regular basis meanwhile

14:20

they're murdering people overseas and in unprecedented

14:22

levels

14:23

in your name and

14:25

now because I'm saying that now the IRS is secretly

14:27

looking at my bank account is that what happens in a democracy

14:29

if that's even what we should want let alone

14:31

a Republic a free society

14:34

no that's what happens in an authoritarian totalitarian

14:37

government a technocratic

14:39

state going forward aggressively

14:41

quote it is now completely legal for the IRS to

14:43

secretly obtain bank records of third-party individuals

14:46

who are not under federal investigation how

14:48

does that make sense isn't there a legal standard where

14:50

you're supposed no it doesn't matter they can just decide

14:52

one day maybe on

14:53

political standing which by the way we've already seen

14:55

the IRS deciding to audit people based

14:57

on politics it's

15:00

a virus guys you talk about the woke mind virus

15:02

how about the political mind virus the

15:04

idea that we're simply living through reality of how politics

15:07

is a problem now I don't mean that in the sense

15:09

that be I

15:11

mean that in the sense of the way we perceive the political

15:13

game today there's

15:14

a different you know if you look up like the definition

15:16

of the word politic politicking whatever you want

15:19

to talk about there's a there's a it's necessary

15:21

in the concept of engaging with other people in a

15:23

society to come to like a parliamentary

15:25

kind of a public concept where you can have people

15:27

of a community coming together deciding what everybody

15:30

wants like that there's no way around that even from

15:32

an anarchistic society that's ultimately what we'd be

15:34

talking about

15:35

to some degree varying different the

15:38

problem though is when you get the career politicians

15:41

the people that are not just doing it as a public service

15:43

people aren't just standing up and doing it because you

15:46

know they want to fill a role to help better the society

15:48

but because they see a benefit in it

15:51

right it's advantageous for them to not

15:53

just play the role while they're also running

15:56

a business no no no some of them maybe still

15:58

today but most of them are career

15:59

politicians. That's what they do. That's

16:02

not how this was originally even set up, guys. The

16:05

whole concept, even with even with

16:07

even like court media for the crying out loud,

16:10

it was supposed to be a public service. There wasn't profit.

16:12

It was done from, it was tax dollars that were

16:14

used to do a public service to inform

16:16

people one hour a night about what was going on.

16:19

Even then, I guarantee you, it was being manipulated

16:21

to some degree, but the point was it got very quickly

16:23

turned into a profiteering business

16:25

like everything else. Like your medicine, like your

16:27

hospitals, like your prisons,

16:29

all at the, at the, at

16:31

your expense. All of it.

16:34

So we live in a world right now where we have a bunch of

16:37

career politicians that are actively

16:39

doing things at your expense to benefit lobbyists

16:42

and a lot of other concerning things that we, you

16:44

know, we can get into, but would

16:45

be a lot bigger conversation.

16:47

The globalist concepts, all the different varying,

16:50

and you know, the technocrats, the neocons,

16:52

and all these different overlapping agendas, all of which

16:54

just want to control your life.

16:57

If the IRS is trying to collect back taxes

16:59

from your friend, well, they

17:01

can still pull up your bank records as well. That's,

17:04

that's what it looks like to be completely unaccountable.

17:06

This is the direct text from the ruling. The

17:09

Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that

17:11

it's lawful for the IRS to secretly obtain

17:13

bank records of third parties, not just

17:15

because they're looking at you, but just tangentially be like,

17:17

how about them too? That's like when they say, hey,

17:20

give us all the bank records, excuse me, all of the,

17:23

I guess the transactions of literally

17:27

anybody in the DC area between the fifth and the seventh.

17:29

Why? Well, because January 6th.

17:33

Does that make sense to anybody?

17:35

Maybe if you're all wrapped up in the fervor of the

17:37

argument that it was some side of insurrection as

17:39

opposed to the most obvious psychological

17:41

operation that I think I've ever seen, now that it's

17:43

all fleshed out with hundreds of FBI

17:46

agents with multiple people on the ground from different

17:48

parts of the government, the military. You have examples

17:50

of both Antifa or rather just

17:52

left leaning groups screening on the record.

17:54

We got them. We tricked them. We did this. And on top

17:57

of that, you have Ukrainians there screening and Russian

17:59

that are

19:52

A

20:01

bunch of this will be easier, a little faster. This

20:04

picture here, it

20:07

just is absolutely unreal to

20:09

see that this is what was going on after

20:12

the so-called controlled burn. And

20:16

even then, it was still being pushed back on. Now

20:19

one of the things I wanted to get into with Scott Smith was about

20:22

the testing, which he is finding, as I've shown you many

20:24

times. The Guardian was pointing this out back

20:26

on March

20:27

17th. Data

20:30

from multiple places, Texas A&M, Scott

20:33

Smith. We've shown you at least four different

20:35

other independent experts that have been present

20:37

on the grounds. Some of them don't, I don't know what they're

20:39

doing now. It seems like they just stopped

20:41

talking about it, investigating. I'm not sure. Maybe

20:43

it's happening. We don't see it, but they've all found the

20:46

same thing. Levels of dioxins that are dramatically

20:49

higher than they should be, as well as many other chemicals

20:52

and nobody cares. And

20:55

in fact, not that you just don't care, but the EPA literally

20:57

says the opposite. They straight up still, and

20:59

this is what's so crazy. It's almost as if people hear

21:01

this and go, no, that can't be, yes. As

21:03

of right this moment,

21:08

it's actually

21:10

crazy to me to think about. There's so many

21:12

different things to get into, but right this moment, the EPA is

21:15

literally maintaining the idea that this is not

21:17

dangerous, that there's nothing going on, that

21:19

nobody is actually sick from what happened on that train,

21:22

despite the reality that,

21:24

I mean, this is from June. This is from yesterday.

21:28

My kids have been sick for three and a half

21:30

months. Oh, perfect correlation to when

21:32

this actually started, right? I

21:35

mean, it's actually, it's actually really unnerving

21:37

to go through this stuff, as we just went through the

21:39

other day. This is from May 29th.

21:42

Independent testing finds dangerous chemicals

21:44

at a farm well outside the area

21:47

that was supposed to even be dangerous.

21:49

Like they gave you a three mile area radius,

21:51

or actually I think it was less than that. This farm was three

21:53

miles out. I think it was only a mile. I forget

21:56

the actual number that you use, but the bottom line, we've

21:58

shown you evidence just...

21:59

Just with dioxins, which again, it's

22:02

not up for debate. What they did

22:04

with this, wherever

22:07

it was, 100% without question, caused

22:11

a massive surge of dioxins in the environment,

22:14

as well as everything else that happened. The not

22:16

controlled burn of the vinyl chloride, the way that they dumped

22:18

it, the way that it went into the soil. And this is all

22:20

combining. And I really think that not

22:22

just dioxins or one or the other, it's all combining

22:25

to make this

22:27

a toxic area. I

22:29

mean, how else do we explain this?

22:32

Everybody's sick in the area.

22:34

Their kids are sick, they can't breathe properly. They're

22:36

having rashes still to this day. They

22:39

have had people that have been tested and their doctors

22:41

have confirmed chemical

22:44

bronchitis. Animals,

22:46

more than we can, I mean, I've covered at least 10

22:49

plus different locations where, and

22:51

have three examples now of people

22:53

that have been seen by veterinarians

22:55

who say this is chemical poisoning.

22:59

Nothing. They must be lying.

23:02

I bet the doctors must be conspiracy theorists.

23:04

Sounds familiar. It's

23:07

incredible. So three miles

23:09

away, and they weren't even allowed to get testing

23:12

paid for by Norfolk because, well,

23:14

they're outside the area. Well,

23:17

I've showed you plenty of times in general that even just dioxins,

23:22

this is from 1995. Dioxins

23:25

may be creating a larger problem down the road. I've

23:28

shown you this many times, 1995, but

23:32

yet nobody seems to care about that. Grab

23:35

this one before I forget. Was

23:38

it Arctic? There

23:44

it is. We'll go to that one next.

23:47

The point is that they found CNN of all places

23:50

found speaking to an expert about dioxins.

23:52

The thing that everyone seems confused about today,

23:54

despite all the investigation happening long before

23:56

this, and they knew it was dangerous, they knew it was a problem, and

23:58

yet today they're like, what's, but I'll...

23:59

What is that? What do you mean? We

24:02

don't need to test for that. It's really insulting

24:04

to your intelligence It says

24:06

very clearly that when they looked into this stuff, they're

24:08

looking to fast food hamburgers chicken

24:10

pizza We're talking Pizza Hut Big Mac's right

24:13

there, Kentucky Fried Chicken You know what they found in

24:16

the food and the wrappers and everything else around it

24:18

that about eight to a hundred and fifty

24:20

times More dioxins in the EPA felt

24:23

would be safe. I

24:25

Mean, how do you even read something like that realize

24:27

that they did absolutely nothing? It actually

24:29

got way worse since then and

24:31

pretend that they're here to help you Now

24:35

the point is not only just that problem but that

24:37

they report even here which I've proven It's not just

24:40

CNN saying this that when dioxins

24:42

move into our ways right here when they

24:44

become airborne as Dioxins

24:47

become airborne. They travel thousands

24:49

of miles away Dioxin

24:52

and again, we're dealing with TCDD Which

24:55

as anybody will tell you that was anybody

24:57

not even if they're being honest and nobody will

24:59

dispute this TCDD is

25:01

just about I shouldn't say that as far as I can tell

25:04

the most dangerous chemical that we know

25:06

of

25:08

That's what that's Agent Orange again. That's

25:10

why they used it because it was a chemical weapon

25:12

It wasn't about default, you know the foliage

25:14

they used 20 times the amount It was a weapon

25:17

the same reason it was used to try to assassinate a Ukrainian

25:19

president You could look that up from Wikipedia

25:21

and yet somehow they're like, what's that? We're

25:23

confused. That's national security

25:26

for you The reality is this

25:28

is a problem. So when you see things like this that

25:30

went thousands of miles It's

25:33

not up for debate and then back to the point.

25:35

That's what they're finding Scott C. Smith

25:37

and everyone else they're finding levels of dioxins

25:39

that are dangerously above the level of safety

25:42

The Guardian can write this and yet we're still being

25:44

told we're lying by the EPA Again,

25:47

that doesn't mean because the Guardian writes it it's true.

25:49

It just shows you that even the corporate media

25:52

is pointing this out They're telling

25:54

you newly released data from independent

25:56

experts multiple have found chemical

25:59

dioxin levels that levels hundreds, hundreds

26:02

of times greater than the exposure threshold which

26:04

they tell you will cause cancer. Hundreds.

26:08

And then of course while that's happening, you know your fake

26:10

news, we again have people saying I've been sick

26:12

for three months. We have people that are vomiting

26:14

blood. We have people that have rashes that are oozing

26:16

things out of their face. I'm not making this up guys,

26:18

I've shown you all this.

26:20

And yet somehow it's fake news.

26:22

That's where we are today guys.

26:24

I mean what that shows you from my perspective

26:27

is not just that they're

26:28

exposed but that they're desperate.

26:30

They don't have another move unless,

26:33

so if we all see it, it's

26:35

right in front of us. You even have a corporate media to some

26:38

degree pointing it out. You got independent experts testing

26:40

and going yep they're right. And they go you're

26:42

wrong. Let's point over there UFOs. Look

26:45

at what's happening here. That's

26:47

desperation guys. That's

26:49

losing control of the narrative. We need

26:51

to do something about that. Just

26:54

like with the COVID-19 conversation. We have all the tools

26:56

in front of us right now to do something. And

26:58

you know what's stopping that? The aggressive

27:01

two party illusionists. All

27:04

the pundits out there that are desperately holding

27:06

on to this dying structure because it makes them

27:08

relevant. It makes them popular. It

27:10

makes them money.

27:12

Or just because they buy it because they're lost.

27:15

The bottom line is that the two party illusion

27:17

and all the people screaming at the top that we need to vote

27:20

for Trump or DeSantis or anything else within

27:22

this broken system while the other side is, it's

27:24

why we don't see this stuff. Why

27:27

are the people standing up about this not getting attention?

27:29

Where are all the large pundits out there that are, where

27:32

is this? Why is it in the conversation? This

27:34

is one of the most obvious environmental catastrophes

27:36

I've ever seen in my life. And the ongoing

27:39

consequences are right in your face.

27:42

Now somebody brings up the land grab and that's a great point

27:44

to make because that's an interesting conversation.

27:47

The very beginning of this, I don't know why it was

27:49

such a weird push by some people. Quite

27:51

honestly, it felt very dishonest to me that

27:53

it was only about that. That

27:55

there was no problem. There was not even, there's no sickness,

27:57

no, it was all faith. Well, possibly.

28:00

I guess only if you choose

28:02

to admit and ignore all of the evidence of

28:04

everything we've talked about that we've proven 50 times

28:07

over

28:08

But that doesn't mean we should ignore the idea of the land

28:10

grab just we shouldn't just pretend that means that's

28:12

all that's happening I'm not sure why people feel necessary.

28:14

It's important to grab onto one thing they think and ignore

28:17

everything else It's obvious people are sick. It's

28:19

obviously something happened

28:21

But it's possible that was all what it was for.

28:23

I think it's bigger than that, but we

28:25

see it happening We see them right now telling people

28:28

they're gonna be bought out and then of course we're gonna

28:30

find out I mark my words that it will not

28:32

be value that they should that they should

28:34

that they

28:36

Should be getting the acts the full value

28:38

of their homes I almost I'm willing to bet you

28:41

anything that it will come out and it will be

28:44

What they think it's worth based on the

28:46

current value, which is the absolute opposite

28:48

of what they promised So you ruin

28:50

everything and they get to pay them half the price for their homes.

28:52

That's a benefit to you We'll

28:56

see what happens cuz I mean don't forget

28:58

where this is. It's a very important agricultural area

29:00

There's all sorts of things that tie into bigger agendas.

29:02

We should not dismiss that The

29:04

other point about this was again just to show you and again, this

29:07

is just the dioxin point I only focused

29:09

on this because it seems to be the most obvious Problem

29:12

and one of the most obviously high-level problems.

29:14

It's it's the top as far as I can tell Again

29:18

showing you they've known about this. This is September 2000

29:21

They did a study on the dioxins and

29:23

how it spreads again showing

29:25

you they know that once it goes in the air like this

29:27

it goes thousands of miles

29:31

So the point is they did a study on this the

29:33

long-range air transport of dioxins

29:36

from North America sources So they're

29:38

making it very clear. Yes, it's coming from so why

29:40

don't we know that if it's that dangerous? Because

29:43

I think these companies have these groups these independent

29:46

these see me agencies Regulators

29:50

have been co-opted and taken over and captured

29:52

a long time ago

29:54

the FDA We just watched that happen the EPA

29:56

clearly doesn't care about your safety

29:58

Both with this and everything else we've talked about.

30:01

It's incredible. Now,

30:03

I'm not even saying that they may not even know that. Who

30:05

knows how that works, but the truth, the reality,

30:07

what's happened and what they haven't done without,

30:10

but despite the reality is not up for debate.

30:13

The point is they know it's coming from North

30:16

American sources that are making people right next

30:18

to them absolutely sick, especially

30:20

if they know that thousands of miles away

30:22

in the Arctic,

30:24

that it's also making people sick.

30:26

How is it possible you could not tell the Americans

30:28

that are living next to the source that

30:30

they're in danger when you're going, yep, these

30:33

women breastfeeding in the Arctic

30:36

are passing high levels of dioxin to their

30:38

babies because of North American sources

30:40

and the way the wind blows. Really

30:43

take a minute to think about how crazy that is.

30:46

And I went over this in depth in a previous show.

30:48

The bottom line is that the problem

30:51

of dioxins is going through the air sources

30:53

all the way to the Arctic and within 500 kilometers

30:56

in any direction, there is not a dioxin source

30:58

in this area.

30:59

Then none of it, nor Arctic Canada,

31:02

these Inuit families, the breastfeeding

31:04

of their children with dioxins because of

31:06

this. And yet we're being told

31:08

nothing's wrong. That's

31:09

not even to get into the other things he's finding.

31:12

And that's one of the points I want to get into him with is that he's finding

31:14

all sorts of things as he says here. This

31:19

is just the families telling them that they

31:21

won't even answer their questions. So the government,

31:23

the EPA, the media, North North, they

31:25

all tell us, yeah, we're here for everything. We're paying

31:27

for everything. We're answering every question and

31:29

every single person you talk to on, I have

31:31

no idea what's going on. I ask that one answer. I

31:34

won't even get responses.

31:36

It's like pulling teeth. They can't even get answers.

31:39

This guy says my vision is blurry. I have like

31:41

cognitive issues. He can't remember stuff. He's

31:43

had shortness of breath, throat issues like he burned

31:45

his throat this entire time.

31:48

He still has them as of the last time this this

31:50

article is posted. Now,

31:52

Scott Smith is telling you there are 50 different

31:54

chemicals where he what he's telling you is from petroleum

31:57

related compounds that appear to only come

31:59

from very.

31:59

intense coal factories which

32:02

again would put the same point so he's saying coal burning which

32:04

would indicate that this is from which I'm

32:07

willing to believe that this was misquoted I've

32:09

heard him point out it's not a controlled burn and

32:11

it's not a question beyond doubt it is an uncontrolled

32:14

burn by definition there's no oxygen

32:16

control flow it's not a controlled burn

32:19

but the point is that they finding that as

32:22

well as host of dioxins present well

32:25

as we just showed you hundreds of times

32:27

above the level that should be safe nobody's

32:30

telling you is that they're consistent with the people showing symptoms

32:33

it's a very clear pattern if you're closer to

32:35

these these chemicals they're finding then you have

32:37

the symptoms if you're not then they don't

32:40

if you if you're any investigator out there you

32:42

know what this is right that's not proof

32:45

that's correlation but the obvious at

32:47

reality with that with all the

32:49

evidence of the testing with the symptoms with

32:51

the symptoms that were supposed to be seen with things that they

32:54

said were spilt with the fact that everything

32:56

the only thing that's

32:58

going against the reality here is the EPA

33:01

saying nope not

33:03

happening end of

33:06

story oh so there's

33:08

no oh there's plenty of evidence all

33:10

the side effects the or volap with everything that's happening

33:12

what was built all the stuff we've proven it the test of people's

33:14

have the doctor and

33:17

diagnoses of the problem but no eps

33:19

is fake news and a story that

33:23

should make your blood boil as

33:26

it does mine now

33:33

one thing I want to point out what I think is very interesting I

33:38

know he's been tweeting a lot let's

33:40

see if it changes now since it usually does when I'm live oh

33:43

yep there it goes of course I find it

33:46

very interesting how that I was looking at that for the

33:48

last

33:49

hour and a half over and over and over over

33:52

and over and over so I took a picture and

33:54

it says oh he hasn't tweeted then that strange

33:57

hasn't tweeted over and

33:59

over and over and fresh the page, I went in private

34:01

pay, same thing. And then of course now right when

34:03

I'm live and you saw it, it was there. And now it shows up. I'm

34:06

not saying that's because of me. I just think that's interesting

34:08

timing as it always seems to be, but it's interesting

34:11

that I

34:12

I'll show you now, actually, um, beyond

34:14

question, there is suppression, almost

34:17

my opinion, more so than I've ever seen before.

34:20

Not censorship, which it's part of that,

34:22

but suppression and obfuscation. It levels

34:24

that I'm very concerned about. The point

34:27

is concerned because it's hard to prove that

34:29

you can't see it. If you don't see what's there,

34:32

I'm seeing direct messages, not showing

34:34

up. I'm

34:34

seeing people telling me that they're not seeing anything,

34:36

even though I'm messaging them or the fact that there, I

34:38

can prove to you that I have responses or

34:41

quoted tweets that when you look at the actual three, it's

34:43

not there. I'm responding to people in

34:45

the thread and you go back and look from anywhere else

34:47

and it's not even present. That's

34:49

not just a glitch guys. Talk to literally anybody

34:51

that's paying attention that right now, they're all, even Elon

34:53

supporters are on Twitter. I go, what's going on right

34:56

now?

34:57

I'll show you some interesting points about this and we'll get

34:59

into something else actually that I'll, this I'll probably finish

35:01

with this. You

35:04

might've seen this. This

35:07

was yesterday. There's a big

35:09

discussion about this that

35:12

the Daily Wire and Matt Wolf were putting out their documentary,

35:14

super contentious, apparently called What is a Woman.

35:18

Now they censored this on

35:21

Twitter, calling it hate speech.

35:24

They suppressed it. Here's Matt. Here's Matt

35:26

Walsh for anyone who doubted Twitter has now labeled a clip from our film,

35:29

hateful conduct and disabled retweets. The

35:31

trans activists are still in charge.

35:34

Well, no Elon Musk is in charge. That's

35:36

what you need to rectify with your mind guys. It's

35:39

not that this is some secret FBI informant. It's

35:41

not like this is the old employees that he didn't get rid of. This

35:44

is Elon Musk and his hire, Yakareno. Until

35:47

we can rectify that and make and realize

35:49

that we're kind of leapfrogging the obvious culprit here. We

35:53

are, we'll always be, that's a two party

35:55

illusion, stopping logic as always in my mind.

35:59

Elon Musk, Elon Musk just stepped in immediately.

36:02

Well, that's the point. Why

36:04

are you giving him a pass? Because it's partisan

36:07

politics. But the point is,

36:09

yeah, it did happen. Now what Elon

36:11

Musk followed up to this. So

36:16

this person, Jeremy says Twitter's canceling a

36:18

deal with the real wire to premiere. What is

36:20

a woman? So here's the interesting, they had a deal apparently.

36:23

And then they canceled it for a free platform

36:25

because of two instances of misgendering.

36:28

Elon says this was a mistake by many people

36:31

at Twitter. It is definitely allowed.

36:34

Whether or not you agree with using someone's preferred pronouns,

36:37

not doing so is at most rude and

36:39

certainly breaks no laws. Now this is Elon,

36:41

as far as I can tell, I guess, assuming that what

36:43

they were only talking about was misgendering. And

36:45

then he goes, well, that must be a mistake because we know that's allowed.

36:47

Well, that's not what we're really talking about.

36:50

That was the argument, but why? But

36:52

clearly what is a woman and the documentary

36:54

is still being suppressed on this platform. But

36:57

he follows up by saying continues to say, I

36:59

should note that I do personally use someone's preferred

37:01

pronouns, just as I use someone's preferred name, simply

37:04

from the standpoint of good manners. However, for the

37:06

same reason I object to rude behavior, ostracism

37:08

or threats of violence, if the wrong pronoun or name

37:11

is used. Right.

37:12

Then is this person steps in and

37:14

says, I appreciate your response, but why is this restriction

37:16

still on the video? Okay. So

37:19

well, after the fact of him pointing this out, in

37:21

fact, an hour later, it's still

37:23

being suppressed. So

37:26

I guess it wasn't a mistake. And then you're

37:28

being fixed. Okay. The

37:31

point is it's not though. Now

37:33

we've, today we can still see this being suppressed. Now

37:36

he's pointing out this, this documentary streams

37:38

at eight, eight yesterday. Elon says

37:41

that the decision to label the film was a mistake

37:43

or hate speech was a mistake, but currently the clips from

37:45

the film are still flagged and censored.

37:48

He said, we'll see what happens tonight.

37:51

Matt Taiti put something out saying, which is this is so

37:53

interesting to me, how this all went down. And

37:56

what it needs to show people and please

37:58

wake up from the two party. concept

38:00

guys that it shows you that people

38:02

were just like Matt and Elon and other people

38:05

that were just wholesale we support anything

38:07

on that side because we're supposed to it

38:10

just shows you that things have shifted now so how

38:12

does that make sense if they were all it

38:14

wasn't due diligence being done right

38:16

Matt Saidi was part of this and now it seems that he's been kicked

38:19

aside and he's now pointing

38:21

out the problem to some degree he

38:23

says unlocking meet the new Twitter same

38:25

as the old Twitter that's it that's

38:27

an indictment of the problem the bizarre what

38:29

is woman controversy I wrote about it you can

38:31

read his sub stack here and it's quite in-depth well

38:35

get into the snacks actually what I wanted to do is check this out

38:37

real quickly and see if there's anything that was updated

38:43

so it says here so now

38:48

it does it doesn't look like it is at the moment after

38:51

the follow-up the movie they don't really want to see

38:53

you to see it says 33 million

38:55

views now

38:58

the point here that I made is it

39:00

doesn't seem like Elon Musk is in

39:03

control which shouldn't be surprising

39:05

it's not like Elon Musk as somebody pointed out is independently

39:09

suppressing me that's not what I've ever meant but

39:11

the point is that if he's out the war out there saying

39:13

no it's been fixed and yet all the way

39:16

up until this morning it's still like well

39:18

actually this would have been late last night it was

39:20

still happening

39:22

I just find that interesting now why

39:24

why despite his clear direction

39:26

and statements did yackarino and whoever else make

39:29

this move

39:30

because that's what we're going to continue to see guys I

39:32

mean if we're only hoping that Elon

39:35

personally steps in which is what just

39:37

happened here and makes this happen

39:40

if that's all we're talking about then we're not really talking

39:43

about free speech are we we're talking about selective

39:45

high-level allowances by people on

39:47

the inside of the circle that's

39:50

not the same thing at all it'd be pretty childish

39:52

to argue with otherwise and in the meantime

39:55

even though this documentary which good it's out its

39:57

free speech should be

39:58

we are still seeing suppression on

39:59

a dramatic scale. There are

40:02

still doctors being censored around COVID-19 misinformation.

40:05

There are still people being suppressed and censored based on the conversations

40:07

about this topic in general.

40:10

It's very concerning to me.

40:12

Now the point that I want to make on this is many people

40:14

have been pointing out, this is a rabbit hole

40:16

post about this corporation celebrating pride month

40:18

has less to do with uplifting LGBT and more

40:20

to with ESG, which is not up for debate, guys.

40:23

They will argue they're doing it because they want to, but

40:25

the main point is that they have what

40:28

we've talked about, the environmental, social and governance

40:31

metrics. And what we see

40:33

is that most of these groups have funding

40:35

and resources and

40:38

connections that are now contingent on

40:40

them pushing these concepts.

40:42

Some of them don't care, but you see a lot

40:44

of them that are undermining their own business models to

40:46

do so. And why

40:48

does this even make sense for something like people?

40:50

Of course, the common, you know, what you're going to see right now on the conservative

40:53

point, and this is a fair point to make, is that it's

40:55

interesting that you have one day to celebrate your veterans,

40:57

but an entire month to celebrate, you know, what, less

41:00

than 1% of the population, or

41:02

actually if we're doing LGBTQ 8% apparently.

41:06

That's a good point, isn't it? I mean, doesn't that make sense?

41:08

It just, it shows you that whether or not you think

41:10

that this should be something celebrated, anybody should have a right

41:12

to celebrate whatever they want in regard to their own personal

41:14

engagement and you know, whatever else. The point though,

41:17

is that ultimately

41:19

it's being pushed at a level that doesn't

41:22

represent the actual, there's an agenda.

41:24

That's all it shows. When you have this much

41:27

fervor and push around something that represents a small

41:29

portion of the population, and again, what

41:31

I dramatically went over in depth in

41:33

my last show, and it

41:36

is being focused on children to a very

41:38

large degree. And I'm not saying that means everybody at

41:40

these rallies or everybody that is trans or everybody that

41:42

is gay is doing that, but

41:44

that has to be heard. Because that's not, that would be dumb to

41:46

say, because it's clearly not the case, but

41:50

this is happening. And if you want to go

41:52

through this and look in depth, I just went over this. Of

41:54

course, I guarantee you, there are going to people that have already

41:57

taken this out of context and argue that I'm just a

41:59

right wing conspiracy.

41:59

theorists and I'm anti-trans which is the exact opposite

42:02

of reality as I've made very clear.

42:04

This is about as in quotes

42:06

the dark and surreptitious agenda driving the trans

42:09

movement.

42:10

Not every trans person or every gay person but

42:12

the very very clear

42:15

foundation of this and how it is very

42:17

clearly being pushed and centered around children with very

42:19

explicitly sexual content in some

42:21

cases and that's a problem. It

42:24

doesn't matter whether you think that's just a side

42:26

note and we should focus on that. No if it's happening

42:28

at all this needs to be rectified

42:31

and what's happening is because of the fervor people are ignoring

42:34

that problem or I would argue some of them

42:36

are promoting that problem

42:39

and it's driving forward regardless and under this you

42:41

know again at the same point I always make about the idea taking

42:44

the Kavanaugh conversation. We get at these

42:46

points where people are screaming trust women and

42:50

literally stepping up and going but wait can't they

42:52

lie too? You're anti-woman you're

42:54

a bigot you're a racist you're a sexual predator

42:57

that's what happened.

42:58

We see that same thing happen now are those

43:00

real people maybe not some

43:02

of them must be but maybe not though we have to realize what a

43:05

controlled manipulated world we live in right now but

43:07

we see that same game played all over

43:09

the place. Oh

43:12

Israel just murdered people oh you are anti-jou

43:14

st racist what? It's

43:18

getting more cartoonish with every day now yes there

43:20

are people do exist right

43:22

saying Trump this or oh you you know

43:25

I mean you can see how it gets completely irrational

43:29

and it's in every political movement we see everywhere

43:32

because it's all about

43:34

agendas this is

43:36

a problem for sure. Now

43:38

we'll see how this goes forward but realize the ESG

43:40

point is completely this is aggressive and it's

43:42

behind the scenes and we have the Black Rock

43:44

Vanguard, State St, what is it

43:47

the other ones these those are the primary

43:49

ones leading in

43:51

the control the financial control

43:53

of the vast majority of these companies in the world

43:56

they obviously have an agenda we've

43:59

also shown you that people like the US government groups

44:01

like the US government the UK government already

44:03

have exceptions for

44:05

the most problematic things in the mind

44:07

of the people behind this very agenda which

44:09

shows you it's not even about what they say it's about which

44:12

is oil

44:14

nuclear weapons they go oh okay

44:16

well we're gonna say those are ESG when we

44:18

use them well because we use them for freedom which allows

44:20

us to have more freedom to promote that's not a joke

44:24

that's why you have a lot of these activists didn't believe this is

44:26

an honest movement going what what

44:29

do you mean you're gonna allow oil that's all what's the whole thing

44:31

we care about and they go shut up your conspiracy now they're now they're

44:33

the crazy ones

44:35

on a dime just like that you were on their

44:37

side now you're a conspiracy theorist because you point

44:39

out something that's valid big

44:41

problem isn't it the

44:45

last couple points i want to make before i leave

44:47

it leave it here you might

44:49

have seen this when we were talking about this a lot there's a lot

44:51

of this coming your way we've talked about the

44:54

combination and how this even possibly

44:56

makes sense a covid flu combo

44:58

vaccine they're still pushing a new thing we

45:00

want to make a new xbb one even though that's not

45:02

even what's happening vaccine they're

45:04

still pushing the platform they're still

45:06

pushing now new mrna injections

45:08

for rsv and for everything else i'm going to talk about

45:10

another one probably in the next show which is very

45:13

concerning

45:14

using machine learning to create the protein

45:16

it's a combination mrna platform

45:19

spike it's out of control guys and

45:21

we are watching the failure of

45:23

what they're standing on

45:25

talk about a house of cards are you know built on sand

45:27

you are standing on a situation that

45:30

has completely failed that fauci has

45:32

admitted that is literally killing people around

45:34

the world with excess death that were baffled about

45:36

with every possible side effect that we've screamed

45:38

they scream with fake news showing up right

45:40

now being proven by their own research

45:43

and they're going success so let's

45:45

build more it's

45:48

it's just like every other conversation isn't it all

45:51

the facts and they just go narrative and some

45:53

people follow along and that's the two-party paradigm

45:56

doing its work all they need is a small portion

45:58

and they call that the majority it's

45:59

The problem

46:02

though is that we have people that are so

46:05

misinformed and so willfully ignorant

46:07

that they don't even want to engage with the honest information

46:10

when it's presented to them. One of words points

46:12

out that this is just a sad reality that people are dealing

46:15

with that his dad is dying in the hospital from some

46:17

blood disease or cancer that in his opinion

46:19

is because of the five injections that he was manipulated

46:21

to take.

46:22

Don't you all talk about a place to get unvaccinated

46:24

blood? Now I don't know enough

46:26

about the group people are passing around. There

46:29

is one I think it's been posted down below but

46:31

I just don't know enough about them to claim that

46:33

I know that this is going to be something safe. But yeah there are

46:35

groups that are claiming that they have unvaccinated

46:37

blood that people can use.

46:39

But he follows up in saying the doctors only solution

46:41

so far has been to give him blood transfusions.

46:44

But of course you know that where this problem comes into

46:46

play right? We've talked about this a lot.

46:51

It's not a secret at this point

46:56

that the evidence shows that as this newest

46:58

as far as there's probably more sense than to be honest January 7,

47:00

2023 that SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine

47:04

sequences circulate the blood for 28 days.

47:07

We have evidence that the spike protein circulates

47:10

the blood within one hour

47:12

or is it one day? Anyway 11 out of 13

47:14

people had it within that first day in their

47:16

blood and

47:17

they're arguing that's fake news.

47:19

There's at least three peer viewed studies that I

47:22

can see that prove that it doesn't stay in your shoulder

47:24

muscle.

47:24

And despite that the American Red Cross still to

47:26

this day argues that they don't label or separate

47:29

vaxxed or unvaxxed. Why? Because

47:31

it doesn't end in your bloodstream. They are still holding that

47:33

argument.

47:34

That's not even up for debate anymore. Even the narrative

47:37

now says that it's some to get well it doesn't stay

47:39

exactly or or maybe it's even just because they don't they

47:41

don't aspirate properly whatever it doesn't matter though.

47:43

That's all narrative. It does end up in your bloodstream

47:46

according to the highest level peer viewed science and it's not

47:48

an accident. It's immediate and it continues. And

47:51

that we've excuse me talked

47:53

about the reality

47:58

that it does continue. to be made

48:00

in your bloodstream. Right, so as

48:03

the sequences end up in your bloodstream, well

48:05

so too does the lipid nanoparticles containing the

48:08

mRNA instructions to create the spike protein.

48:11

And the reality they're finding, based on peer reviewed science

48:13

that nobody has challenged, hasn't been retracted, the

48:15

mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis

48:17

of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

48:19

Sustained synthesis of the same spike

48:21

protein. All these arguments that it's not the same spike

48:24

protein, not true,

48:25

there are differences we can discuss, but

48:27

the reality is it doesn't really matter.

48:29

To the degree that people are getting sick. The

48:31

Salk Institute and plenty of others have found very clearly,

48:34

all the way back in 2021, that the spike protein

48:36

by itself, both in the injection as well as the

48:38

thing they tell you is floating around,

48:40

proving that the spike protein by itself can

48:42

cause disease, which means that's all you need. The

48:45

shedding of it, which has also been proven that we, Dr.

48:47

Luigi Warren has made it very clear,

48:49

it does indeed shed and the spike

48:52

protein can leave few things like your sweat

48:54

glands and everything else. It's on the record.

48:56

We've proven this with endless discussion. NPRV

49:00

science. So bottom

49:02

line is this is a problem. They know

49:04

it's a problem and they don't care. So

49:07

back to the point, this

49:09

is why he's concerned. Why isn't

49:11

it a problem to give them a bound back and nobody cares?

49:14

He said, I thought one of you spoke about someone to get this, now this

49:16

person of course, inserts his ignorance

49:18

into the conversation, which he's not asking Robert

49:20

C for his opinion.

49:21

He goes, why would vaccinated blood be bad?

49:24

Now maybe at this time he just wants to understand. That's

49:26

fair, right?

49:27

He says, why would I want them putting blood filled

49:29

with mRNA in my father to treat my father's

49:32

illness with the injections caused the illness to begin

49:34

with? Now, of course, the second part is his opinion,

49:36

which I agree is very highly likely,

49:38

according to people like Dr. Mihultra and Dr. McCullough,

49:41

who continue to say that anybody in these positions, it

49:43

should be a foregone conclusion that this is probably

49:46

what happened until we prove otherwise, because there's

49:48

enough evidence to make that case.

49:49

It's like any other investigatory tactic, medical

49:52

or otherwise.

49:54

It's overwhelmingly pointing in this direction. But

49:57

of course, this person falls up and says, that's not how vaccine.

50:00

work. Of course,

50:02

misunderstanding that this is not even a

50:04

normal vaccine concept, it's

50:07

not in your blood still after taking it.

50:09

Please read a book. You know what that reminds me

50:11

of? That absurd, childish weatherman

50:14

who still argues

50:15

that mRNA is mRNA and that's no such

50:17

thing as mod RNA despite me posting three

50:19

times in the peer-reviewed science directly from Pfizer

50:21

that literally says it is in fact N1

50:25

methyl-pseudoureidine modified

50:28

RNA. I mean

50:31

it's amazing, the fact that I can even remember that and say

50:33

that and this guy is leading, this guy is a person, not

50:35

just a weatherman, but he's a person that people listen

50:39

to and he's out there going, nope, it's just

50:41

normal stuff, it's all natural, go take

50:43

it because safe and effective, this is a real problem

50:45

today.

50:47

But this guy, and the point was that's what the guy

50:49

said, get a library card as he was attacking Tom

50:51

Rents, a library guard. Yeah,

50:53

that guy knows what he's talking about. Well either way, the point is

50:55

read a book, well I just, you know, say,

50:58

well how about a study? Will peer-reviewed work for you?

51:02

Nothing. Except

51:04

he went on to continue attacking people elsewhere in the

51:06

thread because it's not really about the

51:08

facts, is it? Because when you don't

51:10

have a response and it's like, whoa, trust

51:13

the science, oh it's peer-reviewed, oh well, but that,

51:15

yeah, it does exactly say what I said doesn't happen. So

51:17

I'll just move on. I'll move on and continue

51:19

to say the false narrative because it

51:22

makes me feel good when others

51:23

pat me on the head and say you're right and we're

51:25

on your side. All the bots and fake information

51:27

out there. It's

51:29

incredible. This is actually still happening. The

51:33

problem is it's not just still happening, they're

51:35

sprinting forward. Now

51:40

on this one last note that I wanted to point out, I

51:43

saw this pop up yesterday.

51:46

Now as far as I can tell, and I feel it's in the podcast,

51:49

Jamie is the, this is on, now it

51:51

looks, it's msn.com. That

51:54

msn.com website is super manipulative

51:56

sometimes because this is actually coming from a different website.

51:59

It's not MSN.

51:59

It's like okay something at some random.

52:02

I can't even find this on anything other than this and

52:04

a couple of fringe places Now what I've

52:06

looked into doesn't mean it's fake That would make sense

52:08

actually with how they don't want you to see this stuff if it

52:11

was true From what I can tell and maybe

52:13

has changed this morning somebody let me know the chat is

52:15

that this was put out

52:16

It's just Jamie Foxx left paralyzed and blind from

52:18

blood clot in his brain after receiving COVID vaccine

52:20

sources claim now What I understand

52:22

is this is one writer who is

52:24

claiming? He's got a source that he hasn't divulged

52:27

who say who they say is close to Fox

52:29

who says this Which doesn't

52:31

mean it's fake as far as I mean This is

52:34

not something we should dismiss But then we have reports

52:36

from like the day before where apparently his

52:38

family is saying he's out there playing pickleball And it's completely

52:40

fine. So I just want to realize this is apparently

52:42

being disputed,

52:43

but I'm sure it'll come out I'm pretty pretty

52:46

damn difficult to hide Jamie Foxx is paralyzed

52:48

and blind from blood clots in his brain But we'll find

52:50

out

52:51

but as always just be careful guys Because

52:53

there's a lot going on like here's a good example before

52:55

which I may touch on if I see more into it There

52:58

was a website that popped up that apparently

53:00

was claiming that had all these photos from

53:02

the hunter Biden laptop And

53:05

then it weirdly went down immediately Like

53:07

not immediately, but you know Reasonably

53:09

quick afterward now, I don't know

53:11

about that guys. That seems like a very suspicious

53:14

type of thing Certainly

53:16

could be Obviously the laptop is

53:18

real. I mean they're suing the guy for crying out loud It's obviously

53:21

his laptop and yet the childish infantile

53:23

corporate media is acting like it's not true because that's

53:25

what their their jobs depend on them

53:27

lying about that

53:29

but the reality is That

53:32

they're using these things to manipulate us

53:35

and they always do doesn't mean you should dismiss

53:37

anything You should consider all things but

53:40

could be questioned them all right

53:43

But I'm concerned that people are being set up to as always

53:45

to make them look ridiculous like things like

53:47

this possibly When

53:50

they have something like that that comes out I mean, how do you even

53:52

confirm these things right if it's just a website

53:55

with a bunch of image dumps? How do we know those

53:57

things are fake? How do

53:59

we know that there are? They're not intermixed with fake information.

54:02

My problem is that so many people,

54:05

and you know this guys, on either side of the two-party

54:07

illusion when it suits

54:09

their interests, like here's the problem. We know the laptop

54:12

is real, right? So they

54:14

don't, there's a lot, let's put it this way, there's far

54:16

too many people who would look at that website

54:18

and without any due diligence just be like

54:20

it's real because

54:21

we know the laptop is real. But

54:24

that's not the same thing, is it? We know that these

54:26

things can be weaponized against us, especially

54:29

today.

54:31

It's just my point is always is due diligence guys

54:33

and if we can't prove it, even if you want

54:35

it to be real, we have to put it down. It's

54:37

not important to be the first one to say something, especially

54:40

when that thing turns out to be fake.

54:42

But you know as well as I, there is way too

54:44

many people in this field, many of them with million

54:46

dollar, excuse me, million person followings on

54:48

Twitter that routinely lie about

54:50

things. Or just routinely don't care

54:52

about checking things and half

54:54

the things they post turn out to be completely fake

54:57

and then never follow up and correct it. But then

54:59

half their audience attacks you for saying that

55:01

we don't even know and they lied about why are you going to believe

55:03

the corporate moves site that it's fake? Well, no, my point is

55:05

we don't know that it's real and all you care about

55:07

is saying that it's

55:08

real and hiding the fact it just gets infuriating

55:11

because you know what far too many people are invested in this

55:13

because it's fun because it's like a reality

55:16

TV show because they like drama. They

55:18

like watching people attack each other like seeing people, you

55:20

know, they like seeing the

55:22

real world COVID-19

55:25

edition, right? That's what we're watching where

55:27

people are literally engaging

55:30

with these narratives like it's some sort of game,

55:33

getting excited about the new connections that they piece

55:35

together without proving any of it.

55:37

Now look, I'm not saying we shouldn't be asking questions

55:39

and following those leads, even when it's confirmation

55:41

bias, right? Lead into the thing like, look, when

55:43

I find a new thing and I think connects, I look immediately

55:46

for Lang room lever, you know that I've been talking about it, but

55:48

I don't assume that because I find something that

55:50

it then therefore confirms what I think is happening.

55:52

We have to back that up. We have

55:54

to take a step back and realize that we all

55:57

have that.

55:58

My point though, is that far too. many just literally

56:01

don't even care about that. It's not even about

56:03

actually finding the truth, it's about winning.

56:06

Winning the two-part, the

56:08

team sport politics game. And

56:11

again, that's the two-party illusion,

56:13

breaking logic.

56:17

So I'll leave it there for today. And unfortunately, as I said, there's

56:20

just, you know, so many things

56:22

we could get into. And I do have a lot I have to get into for

56:24

other things today in general. But I apologize

56:26

for whatever happened here today. I don't know what

56:29

actually happened. Like I said, it could be my fault.

56:31

In any case, I can't do live

56:33

interviews, because that happens quite often.

56:35

I'm going to go change this headline and make sure this or

56:38

excuse me, the headline, make sure

56:40

that it's, you know, correct for what we did today.

56:42

And I'll follow up with Scott and I'll let you guys know. But

56:44

there's plenty more to get into. I'm sure guys,

56:47

there's so much going on today and every day,

56:49

suppression of the reality, people being hurt.

56:53

But if you want to check us out at tomorrow at the rally, make sure you go

56:55

rebels for a cause.com. Get

56:57

your tickets now. It'll be fun. I'm going to be playing

56:59

my new song. And I think

57:01

guys will like it. I like it. It's

57:04

a good one. And I'll be recording it and putting it out. Actually,

57:06

I think I don't want to get anything away, but I think it'll be showing up

57:08

on an album that might be coming out. So

57:10

thank you for being here today, guys. I love you all. As

57:12

always, question everything. Come

57:15

to your own conclusions. Stay vigilant.