0:00

Let me make it clear. Netanyahu

0:04

is a national historical disaster for Israel.

0:06

He has to go. Ben-Gvir is a

0:08

terrible event. Smotrych is

0:10

a terrible event. The Hilltop

0:13

Youth in the

0:17

territories, in the West Bank,

0:20

is a terrible event. What I

0:22

think about Ben-Gvir and his friends,

0:25

I spelled out in Israel, not in

0:28

Turkey, in Israel, in front

0:30

of them, in the most extreme

0:32

manner. I called them

0:34

enemies. I said

0:37

that they are butchers, that they are

0:39

killers, they are

0:41

murderers, they are terrorists. I said it

0:44

on my own people, on my own ministers.

0:48

In 2009, the Israeli

0:50

policy was absolutely

0:52

negative, was not really prepared to embark

0:58

on a meaningful process that

1:00

was essential. They have

1:02

not followed the policy that

1:04

I have outlined which carried

1:07

a real chance for peace. I

1:10

don't release the Israeli government from

1:14

2009 of its responsibility for the lack of

1:16

communication. I think that he is a danger

1:18

to Israel, that he should be immediately

1:21

fired, that he should be thrown out,

1:24

that he is bedtime because

1:29

of many reasons which have nothing to do with

1:32

Palestinians. Welcome

1:42

to The Daily Wrapper, a concise

1:45

show dedicated to bringing you

1:47

the most relevant, as

2:00

we see it from the last 24 hours. Friday,

2:06

December 8th, 2023. Thank you for joining me today.

2:08

I've got a huge show planned. I've got

2:10

a lot to talk about. Of course, I wasn't

2:13

able to get to a show yesterday. So

2:15

two days in the world of TLAB is a

2:18

lot to get into the show. But in general,

2:20

there's a lot I'm going to try to include today. So

2:22

it will probably be long. I'm going to try to kind

2:24

of outline what we're going to go through right now for

2:26

the show today. But there's quite a bit

2:29

to get into that I generally think

2:31

is very important. We're going to start with

2:33

some COVID-19 specific conversation. Stuff

2:35

that I only just saw today, in

2:37

fact, one of which is that there's

2:39

apparently a new variant JN1, which

2:41

I'm not saying in any way should be important or

2:44

matter to you, quite frankly, with what we know about

2:46

it, but that I believe it's the

2:48

indication that there's another agenda behind

2:50

it. And we're also going to

2:52

discuss a multitude of things that are

2:55

coming out, all of which you should

2:57

already know if you've been watching this show since 2020 or

2:59

before. But I want to reiterate

3:01

how much has been happening in

3:04

the world of medical freedom, COVID-19 injections, and

3:06

so on that I think are very important.

3:10

One of which overlaps with not

3:12

necessarily, well, I do think there's a

3:14

combination of the DNA contamination aspect in

3:16

this glitch they're discussing. I quite frankly,

3:19

this is definitely a real

3:21

conversation about this like mRNA glitch

3:23

misfire protein discussion. I think

3:27

it's a real conversation that is very important,

3:29

but I think it's almost a scapegoat. Not

3:32

because it's not real, but because there's a lot more

3:34

going on that we've already proven, as you well know,

3:37

that is almost this is meant to make

3:39

it seem as if it's like, don't worry, we'll just

3:41

fix this little tweak when it's far

3:43

more than just this one. But that is a

3:45

huge problem, as somebody rightly points out, but somehow

3:47

managed to win a Nobel Prize. Oh, but we're

3:49

finding all these mistakes that are coming out. It's

3:52

obvious what this was, which is

3:54

an important actually point to start on in before I list

3:56

off the rest and to flavor what we're going to look

3:58

at today. whether we're talking

4:00

about this government or that government or the the

4:02

true kind of string pullers of the world in

4:05

regard to the kind of super

4:07

national aspect or the intelligence apparatus or

4:09

the you know the groups

4:11

the What

4:13

people would call deep state or shadow governments or

4:16

these kind of entities the point being is

4:18

that there's always these these ruling factions Or even

4:20

just the financial industry all these

4:22

intersect the point being that these are the

4:24

kind of groups that are influencing the outcome

4:26

of elections of different group of whether or

4:28

not these injections are deployed whether or not

4:30

they're meant to hurt you and We

4:33

are my point being is that all these things kind

4:35

of blend over each other and if we're talking about

4:37

the fact that they're willing to deploy something like this

4:39

if that's the way you see it going down or

4:42

Rather just lying about the fact that it

4:44

was hurting everybody all the way to this very moment Consider

4:47

that in the context of what's going on with Israel.

4:50

It's amazing how we can see this coming Just

4:53

before October 7th or you know in

4:55

the midst and post the kovat 19 fervor You

4:58

have people that were on the right predominantly

5:01

that were very aware Look at all these

5:03

people trying to hurt you trying to depopulate

5:05

the planet However, you saw it very aware

5:07

who the what the problem was

5:10

then all of a sudden this starts and

5:12

many of those same people started trusting the

5:15

Exact same groups that

5:17

30 seconds ago. They were telling you were trying

5:19

to depopulate the planet I mean

5:21

the overlap is striking and you see the

5:23

same thing on the left by the way

5:26

because the left-right paradigm is the problem But

5:28

what I think is interesting is how obvious

5:30

it shows you either people within that didn't

5:32

mean what they were saying or how easily?

5:34

The two-party illusion will manipulate people's opinions on

5:36

a dime because they're so emotionally and emotionally

5:39

invested in the new thing

5:41

that day and just somehow managed to not connect

5:43

the dots and realize but wait a minute Look

5:46

at all these strings that tie together all the same

5:48

players that go right over here And they're the ones

5:50

telling you we all have to stand together. It's

5:52

really interesting So carry that with you today as

5:54

we go through it The point being is I

5:56

think all these things are largely connected in different

5:59

ways not necessarily in a conspiratorial

6:01

way, however you take that, I mean like

6:03

in the real sense, but more so that

6:05

there's always overlaps, but kind of never let

6:07

a good crisis go to waste kind of

6:09

mentality. Now we're going to talk

6:12

about primarily

6:14

the Gaza-Israel

6:16

conversation. We're going to have

6:18

a couple of points on foreign policy I think are important, comments

6:21

about Russia and how that plays into things,

6:23

but we're also going to get

6:25

in to start the main conversation with the point

6:28

about Reuters and the journalist that was killed in

6:30

Lebanon, the one that we talked about

6:32

the day that it happened. Not

6:34

hypothetically, not maybe, not blushing,

6:36

but based on the

6:38

evidence at hand, it was an undeniable

6:40

fact. So you're now being told

6:42

by the investigative teams that they've confirmed, even though

6:45

it was confirmed not because I said it, but

6:47

because the facts and the evidence were blatant.

6:49

They were self-evident. He was there. They were

6:51

clearly there with other people who didn't get

6:53

killed, who then testified that he was also

6:55

there, and we know that Israel fired in

6:58

that location because their own people said they

7:00

did it before it happened. It's

7:02

a one, two, and three reality. So we came out and said

7:04

he was killed. They fired on journalists

7:06

when there was not a military objective. They

7:08

killed him. Then even Reuters

7:10

kind of went real quiet about it. My

7:13

point is to show you that we talked about it then.

7:15

They're only just now getting to it, and guess what? Most

7:17

of the world is looking elsewhere. It's

7:19

not like it should be shocking that Israel targets and

7:22

kills journalists happens all the time. I'm

7:24

going to talk about that more today.

7:26

We're going to get into the false flag conversation

7:28

a little bit more today. A great article by

7:31

Ian Davis, or in this together from

7:33

Twitter, writing for Geopolitics and

7:35

Empire. It really,

7:37

really well sourced, well outlined,

7:41

all encompassing sort of article around the

7:43

different points about the potential of a

7:45

false flag, or as he called it,

7:47

a Lee hop, which we've mentioned before

7:49

in the past, which essentially means they allowed it to happen.

7:52

I think this is where it kind of lies for the most

7:54

part, or what makes the most sense. That

7:56

will then get us into the conversation of the

7:58

people involved on both sides. Whether

8:00

we're talking about the people that were taken

8:03

that are in Gaza, the people that were

8:05

hurt or killed in Israel, or the

8:07

other side of this, the Americans or the

8:09

Palestinians that are suffering or British in Gaza

8:11

and so on. And how very

8:14

clear that they were willing

8:16

to let Israelis or Palestinians be killed

8:18

or shot or suffer because

8:20

of this agenda. And I've

8:22

continued to allow that going forward. And guess what,

8:24

guys? Israelis are saying

8:26

that too. And it's important that Americans or

8:29

people in the West acknowledge and accept that

8:31

fact. It's an obvious reality.

8:34

It's interesting how our corporate media and our

8:36

governments want you to hear something else. It's

8:38

the same thing I've been telling you for a decade about the

8:40

two-state solution. They're still doing it. They'll

8:42

come out and say they want the two-state solution. And

8:45

they're right over there saying we will never allow

8:47

a two-state solution. And when

8:49

we say it, we call it conspiracy theorists, that

8:51

they don't want it. It's very

8:53

obvious. We're also going to get

8:56

into a lot more about the United Nations, the

8:58

resolution, the rather initiation of Article

9:01

99. We're going to talk about

9:03

the many different UN members that have been killed. We're going

9:05

to talk about a whole hell of a lot today. And

9:07

I think it's important that I

9:10

want everyone to do their best to try to pluck

9:14

the parts out they think are most important. Like I

9:16

want to challenge you all out there as much as

9:18

that we make clips and we do that. Find

9:21

the things you think are important. Screenshot

9:23

it. Take that or make your own clip

9:25

about it. But take something and get these

9:27

things out there. Because I'm increasingly seeing that

9:29

my work is important to continue day after

9:31

day in usually

9:33

long format because I think that's most important for me

9:35

to express my thoughts for you guys to enjoy. A

9:37

lot of people like the long content, but a lot

9:39

don't. So pluck these things out and make

9:42

them get

9:44

them in front of people that might not otherwise see it

9:46

in smaller versions. Because I think there's so much in here

9:48

that we're going to get to probably in the latter half

9:51

of the show that most people might not even see. You

9:53

know, not least of which because I talk for 10 minutes

9:55

before we even get into anything. But you

9:57

know, that's how we do. So let's start off with. The

10:00

wrong spot right here Coming

10:04

from Mufid Mustafa who shared

10:06

this original clip if you didn't know who

10:08

that was prime minister Ihud Omar it Former

10:11

Israeli prime minister who's speaking on the

10:13

record and saying Netanyahu Ben Kefir are

10:16

terrorists and murderers and have destroyed Israel

10:19

You might not be shocked to hear that. That's

10:21

what a lot of Israelis have been saying now

10:23

one thing I worry about is That

10:25

this is the situation where you see

10:27

a lot of Israelis begin to recognize the

10:30

problem But it's important we understand that even

10:32

the more moderate parts of the Israeli government

10:34

are still completely okay with continuing to murder

10:36

Gazans for the most part Palestinians This

10:40

I mean, I don't want to try to pretend that I know What

10:43

each individual person thinks or what they might

10:45

I think generally it's obvious Throughout policy and

10:47

history and votes and different ways you can

10:49

tell their mind that it's clear that even

10:52

the more Less extreme

10:54

elements of the Israeli government are still very

10:56

pro Zionists and still very much want well

10:59

Yeah, there's a lot of different angles you could take

11:01

that but most of them to support the overall agenda

11:03

of taking that area I think

11:05

that's important to understand. So at the very least The

11:08

Israeli people are starting to recognize that they're

11:10

being led by like just Religious

11:13

extremists, which is not what even if you

11:15

have Orthodox Jews that support the state of

11:17

Israel There's a lot of them that see

11:19

what even the religious Zionism party are doing

11:21

as absolutely crazy You know why because it

11:24

is they're absolutely religious

11:26

lunatics And this is not upward that

11:28

even the ADL will call these groups

11:30

terrorists specifically religious Zionism part of this

11:33

before a while ago did years

11:35

back addressing them as

11:37

terrorists and Yet today

11:39

we're called racist for pointing that out. It's a

11:41

very interesting dynamic. So you can see that the actual

11:43

people that are aware of

11:45

these different groups are are More

11:48

than willing to point out that they're lunatics, but it's interesting

11:51

when we say it from a Western perspective It

11:53

gets contorted into anti-semitism which sure maybe

11:55

there's an overlap But you

11:57

can't say that as an absolute and it's definitely not

12:00

where I'm coming from. Now,

12:02

before we get back into more Gaza conversation, I

12:06

want to make sure we go over some of the important things

12:09

happening elsewhere. Now, we just had

12:11

an excellent conversation with Whitney Webb, the

12:13

Cyber Threat Intelligence League, or CTI

12:15

League, and its impending false flag.

12:18

Really interesting conversation about

12:20

really how it specifically pertains to the

12:22

conversation Whitney and I have had a

12:24

lot around the potential

12:27

for the false flag elements of this,

12:29

whether coming from an Israeli aspect, an

12:31

outside or a foreign aspect, or specifically

12:34

sabotaging itself from a US perspective to

12:36

justify action, which is just basically play

12:38

number two from US foreign policy that

12:40

most people don't want to know about.

12:43

But what I think this leads into is the idea of

12:46

the overlap of the UN 8200 Israeli Zionist influence

12:49

on infrastructure in this country and

12:51

whether that might be initiated to justify what

12:54

they've always wanted, which is an attack on

12:56

Iran, or US pressure or violence

12:58

against Iran, which is not even up for

13:00

debate. And interestingly enough, as Whitney points

13:02

out, the head of

13:04

the CTI League is a

13:07

classic longtime Zionist Israeli entity

13:09

that aggressively

13:11

have been seeking his entire career

13:13

just that, US action

13:15

against Iran. And apparently, people

13:18

that join this league have all sorts of access

13:20

to national security elements behind the scenes because

13:22

of this one person's admission. It's just amazing

13:24

how the US government can scream and

13:28

then just let a funnel of people come in through this back

13:30

door who have access to nuclear facilities,

13:32

who have access to hospitals. And it's

13:34

just crazy, absolutely crazy

13:36

stuff because it's about what

13:39

they tell you, cybersecurity to keep you safe

13:41

from bad guys from outside. So

13:44

I think it's a really important conversation to see how this,

13:47

and of course, the point of this image is that

13:49

they see it mostly against you in the

13:51

United States and it's coming, and always

13:53

the impending threat of the false flag. So

13:56

the point is if something that happens, like

13:58

we've seen many times before, and they immediately

14:00

say it was an Iran cyber attack, which often

14:02

turned out to not be or Russia or China and

14:05

so on and All of

14:07

a sudden it gets marshaled quickly into some

14:09

kind of action before we can even prove

14:11

what happened sound familiar Happens all the time.

14:13

It's what we worry about Now

14:16

the note of the COVID-19 aspect which I think

14:18

is important form from this that our

14:20

thought in this and my constant Hypothesis

14:23

around where this will end up converging is

14:26

that this will take form I

14:28

hope this isn't the case. This is just what I see making the

14:30

most sense the combination of

14:32

sort of a vanilla Isis overlaps sort

14:34

of Domestic terrorism elements

14:36

that they claim is that whether

14:39

it's just somebody wearing a red hat or not Who

14:41

they claim is involved with working with let's just say

14:43

Iran There's your foreign overlap for

14:45

a vanilla Isis kind of concept who then

14:47

carries out with the help of that Foreign

14:50

element some sort of a cyber attack which

14:52

then let's just say hypothetically releases a biological

14:54

agent and then all of a sudden You've

14:56

got this perfect trifecta of everything. They've been

14:58

pushing a Complete justification no

15:00

matter which angle you look at to lock

15:02

you down to make digital IDs to put

15:04

in the biosecurity state That's scary, but

15:07

that's what I see this building to I

15:09

hope I'm wrong So on that

15:11

note, let's talk quickly about the COVID-19 discussion

15:13

I wanted to make sure we didn't miss

15:15

these things now ethical approach UK pointed out

15:17

something really interesting to me Thank you to

15:20

we are all hearts. I

15:22

think was Gaza before who shared

15:24

this with me Now just quickly

15:26

just to some dance and conversation.

15:28

They're just cutting to the chase. Here's what it

15:30

says And this is from the Parliament UK committee

15:33

Transcript and all it's

15:35

really high highlighting is Kate Birmingham Bingham's

15:38

orders on the record or rather

15:41

Just a statement referring to the orders on the

15:43

record in a UK transcript that discusses exactly what

15:45

we all know There's a

15:47

lot in here Just a quick point is dominant Cummings

15:49

who is in this back and forth is saying I

15:51

think fundamentally on vaccines And what really quickly just

15:53

so you can see it so you don't think this is So

15:57

House of Commons Health and Social Care Committee

16:00

in science and technology committee. So

16:03

basically it's getting to the responsibility element, who

16:05

is actually responsible in regard to the vaccination part.

16:08

And it says, I think fundamentally on vaccines, there

16:10

was a clear responsibility.

16:12

There was somebody who was actually in charge of

16:15

it, and it was Kate Bingham. She was

16:17

working with Patrick Valance. She built a team

16:19

of people who understood what they were doing.

16:22

She had the strength of character not to be pushed

16:24

around, as met from their perspective as a positive. And

16:26

here's how they frame this. We had

16:29

a kind of formal thing, which was, quote, you're

16:31

in charge of it. The whole vaccination

16:33

program and everything around it. You report

16:35

basically directly to the prime minister, it says.

16:38

That's still the quote. You don't report

16:40

to the Department of Health. That's interesting.

16:42

We knew this, right? That's politics superseding

16:45

health. Or the idea

16:48

was pointed out in the beginning, which was the

16:50

White House directing CDC policy and not the other

16:52

way around. It says so she knew who her

16:54

boss was on it. Right?

16:57

The government or the politicians, not

16:59

the health department, which was the exact opposite.

17:01

It goes on to say she built a

17:03

great team. And we also said to her,

17:06

that's the important part, treat this like a

17:08

wartime thing. We also know that now. Ignore

17:10

rules, direct quote, if lawyers get

17:12

in your way, come to us and

17:14

we'll find ways to bulldozing them out

17:16

of your way. Yeah. God forbid the

17:18

rules get in the way or lawyers

17:20

with all their legalities. No, just do

17:22

what we've decided is supposed to happen.

17:24

Guys, this is blatant. It

17:26

always was, but now it's coming out left

17:29

and right. This information is clear. The

17:31

law was not even, they

17:34

did what they, look, you could argue some

17:36

of them believed it was because we have to.

17:39

Right? We can't let the law get in the way of

17:41

saving the world, but that's

17:43

how they trick the people that can't, you know, have

17:46

people that aren't very bright. Right?

17:48

They make them, they get them all hyped up on the idea. You're

17:50

doing this for your government. You're doing this for your country, those kinds

17:52

of things. And usually there are

17:54

people that are easy to manipulate like that. The point is

17:56

that they did this, they allowed it to circumvent the law

17:59

and this is what. actually happen. A

18:01

few points, by the way, as you well know,

18:04

for years of coverage, there is an endless amount

18:06

of information showing you these things are not just

18:08

deadly, but willingly so, willfully

18:10

so, that they omitted information they knew would

18:12

hurt people. Quite frankly, I'm starting to believe

18:14

that they did this to hurt people, which

18:17

is not that contentious. Quite frankly, a lot

18:19

of people think that. I just don't have

18:21

the point to prove that. I mean,

18:24

I would even actually walk that back. And I quite

18:26

frankly think there's so much evidence to show that these

18:28

things were done from the

18:30

start in ways that, I mean, I would

18:32

say you could even straddle the line of

18:34

whether it was an experiment versus deliberate harm,

18:36

but it's kind of just, it's kind of

18:38

semantics at that point, right? If

18:40

you're willing to do this knowing it would hurt

18:43

people, even if you think it's an abstract, maybe

18:45

the information will save lives down the line, you're

18:47

still a horrible person. You're still experimenting on people

18:49

without their knowledge. So at this point, I think

18:51

we need to be honest about what this all

18:53

shows us. And now, Christy Lara

18:55

Grace, who, if you remember, we've talked

18:58

about in the past, former lipid nanoparticle

19:00

RNA biotech designer, project manager, consultant, right?

19:02

So she knows what she's talking about

19:04

when it comes to the lipid nanoparticles

19:06

and the conversation of

19:09

the COVID-19 technology or vaccine technology.

19:12

Now she types, right, N1

19:14

methyl pseudo uridylation, what we've

19:16

talked about a lot on the show of

19:18

mRNA. So this was the

19:20

mod RNA conversation, right? They keep saying our

19:23

mRNA to this very day. It's not. It's

19:26

never been mRNA. It is a modified RNA,

19:29

right? To say mRNA, that stands for

19:31

messenger RNA. This is not. It is

19:34

a modified RNA. It's different. They

19:36

love to conflate things to people that

19:38

don't understand, but it is a

19:40

modified N1 methyl pseudo uridine

19:42

modified RNA, which makes it not only

19:44

a genetically modified organism or

19:47

whatever you would call it, a genetically modified substance,

19:50

it, there's all sorts of extra problems.

19:52

It lasts longer, right? And this is

19:54

what gets into the conversation of why

19:57

it continues to circulate your body for months later,

19:59

if not. indefinitely. Which

20:01

they lied about. Stays right in

20:03

your shoulder muscles. You know how long they kept

20:06

saying that? Some people still actually say that. Now,

20:08

it says, she

20:11

goes on to say plus one

20:13

ribosomal frame shifting, quote, apparent errors

20:15

in protein synthesis, including frame shifting,

20:17

can be consequences of DNA mutation

20:19

or transcriptional errors. The

20:23

off target effect of ribosomal frame shifting

20:25

could include increased production of new B

20:27

cell antigens. Now, this is directly from

20:30

nature.com, the peer reviewed study. So

20:32

if you can read that deep in deeper, if you

20:34

want, the point is, it's this study is very clear.

20:36

It's not about whether it will, it's that we are

20:39

discovering this is the reality. Now, this is what I

20:41

said all the way back in September eight. And

20:44

we've been talking about it long before that, by the

20:46

way, I said, this is the first tweet

20:48

or the tweet that I'm. Quoting

20:52

a team of researchers has used lipid

20:54

nanoparticles loaded with MRA, the

20:57

starring technology in some covid vaccines to

20:59

noninvasively and selectively trigger cell

21:02

death in living mice's

21:04

blood stem cell. And

21:06

in second experiment, they used the nanoparticle system

21:08

to remove a sickle cell producing gene. My

21:10

point at the time was, well, this is

21:12

exactly what we're talking about. This is what

21:14

dual use tech looks like. It

21:16

can be a weapon or it can help

21:18

you. Who gets to decide? Well,

21:21

the very people that we don't trust. So

21:23

the point is that this is what it's always been, the

21:26

modified RNA, which, as I

21:28

said, this it all depends on how the

21:31

MRNA is programmed, which, again, we're talking about

21:33

the mod RNA and one methyl pseudo uridine

21:35

modified RNA. This is the

21:37

MRNA platform tech guys. This is what they

21:39

made. They can they can

21:41

give you something which could even after the

21:44

fact be initiated with something secondary. These are

21:46

all facts. Whether that is

21:48

what's happening, that's debatable. But

21:50

whether it can happen is not up for

21:53

debate. They designed a weapon platform

21:55

and they're using it to possibly help you. But

21:57

we can tell they're not because it's hurting everybody. So. Clearly

22:00

they either failed to make the good part of

22:02

it or they're trying to hurt you with the

22:04

Rippens platform That's what this is and we should

22:06

not mince words about this anymore The

22:09

point is that this as

22:12

it says can be used to trigger cell death So

22:14

we should first of all be asking that's

22:16

weird. Oh That's right.

22:19

I'll show you these two first

22:21

asking whether or not What

22:24

we're talking about today is in fact designed

22:26

to do that or these are byproducts of

22:29

trying something else It's up for you

22:31

to decide but I include these as well this

22:33

article I said this is why we have peer-reviewed

22:35

science finding that it is the very mRNA platform

22:37

itself. That's in causing myocarditis

22:39

in part That's not just one thing

22:43

But that is the peer peer-reviewed science

22:45

has found that yes These are causing

22:47

my it's a platform not the injection

22:49

not the antigen but the platform itself

22:51

that's causing myocarditis No matter what they

22:53

do going forward It's

22:55

still gonna cause myocarditis because the actual

22:58

fundamental platform itself is flawed or designed

23:00

that way This

23:02

is something Fauci's acknowledged that it's not working.

23:04

We need something different, but guess what they're

23:07

doing not that They're continuing down this line

23:09

the lipid nanoparticle mod RNA delivery system like

23:11

discussed above was it programmed to do this

23:14

or just a mistake Then remember

23:16

that Ralph Barrick from North Carolina University

23:18

Chapel Hill was funded by the US

23:20

government to create a myocarditis Inducing coronavirus

23:23

that's a fact it is this it

23:25

is this mod RNA platform the end

23:27

result of this weaponizing research It's

23:30

I've gone over the actual science from the 90s many times

23:33

He worked on literally trying to create

23:36

a myocarditis inducing Coronavirus and then we

23:38

literally have that happen and we don't

23:40

put these things together and

23:43

it says after his US funded government

23:45

efforts to weaponize A coronavirus to induce

23:47

myocarditis Interestingly exactly what is

23:49

happening today. He went on to attempts

23:51

to aerosolize it also on the record

23:54

to make it self-spreading using the bath

23:56

in the case of China. It's literally all

23:58

documented And this

24:00

overlapped with the work of Charles Lieber and

24:02

Robert Langer. Langer later going on to become

24:04

the co-founder of none other than Moderna, where

24:07

the lipid nanoparticle delivery system went

24:09

into effect as the COVID-19 injection.

24:12

It's pretty easy to see. Lieber

24:15

used a lipid nanoparticle system to create

24:17

a virus-sized transistor in 2011. Lieber

24:20

said this innovation was important because it

24:22

indicated that when a man-made structure is as

24:25

small as a virus or bacteria, it

24:27

can behave the way biological structures do. I've

24:30

always asked, is that not possibly what we're

24:32

literally dealing with? A

24:34

virus-sized transistor. I've openly wondered

24:37

since 2020 whether the virus-sized transistor might in

24:39

fact be COVID-19. Either way,

24:41

I feel all of this is converging, being

24:43

used to usher in a new stage of

24:46

control. Some of this may seem wild to

24:48

people. I just ask that you consider the

24:50

possibility. Now,

24:55

the point is all of that is getting into the

24:57

idea that now this is being proven because of this

24:59

other conversation. We talked about this many

25:02

times on May 6, 2023, the MOD RNA lie. This

25:06

is our sub-stack breaking it down as well. Dr.

25:09

Simon Godek writes, as of yesterday, the telegraph, one

25:11

in four who received the Pfizer injection,

25:20

experienced unintended immune responses. Now,

25:28

you guys, that's not a sore shoulder. That is

25:30

not a headache. That is not queasyness. Unintended

25:34

immune responses can be deadly. None

25:37

of them are positive, right? The point is an

25:39

unintended immune response is when you have

25:42

all the different things we've been dealing with.

25:44

The antibody-dependent enhancement, the

25:46

shingles, everything. So

25:49

there you go. One in

25:51

four, 25% of everyone that got these safe

25:54

and effective Nobel-winning prize shots that are changing

25:56

the world could have died, could

25:59

have had cancer. Could have had

26:01

myocarditis, could have had antibody-dependent enhancement, could

26:03

right now be suffering from a thousand different

26:05

things you're calling long COVID. Yep, that's

26:08

the successful injection that saved the world.

26:11

Obviously, I'm being facetious because it did not, and

26:13

in fact, quite frankly, I think the evidence is

26:15

plainly evident that it did not need to be

26:17

made. This thing was less than the flu. That's

26:20

according to the Ionitis group that this was always

26:22

less than the flu that still nobody is challenged.

26:26

He says just a little glitch, they say. 25% isn't a glitch.

26:30

The good news is that it's all coming out. There's

26:32

nowhere to hide. Heads must roll. Assuming

26:35

they do anything about it. Igor Chudov

26:37

points out, we were told that COVID

26:39

vaccines were extensively tested. We know they

26:41

weren't. Turns out that pseudouridine in them

26:43

causes random protein garbage to be generated.

26:45

Gosh, sure where people would listen when

26:47

we were talking about this a year

26:49

ago, exposing our bodies to

26:51

danger. It is called frame

26:53

shifting, the same as losing bits of a

26:56

computer code. Isn't that interesting?

26:59

Here's his sub stack. If you'd like to read more on it, I

27:01

recommend you do. Bohemian atmosphere

27:03

points out, it doesn't sound good. Here's BDC.

27:05

It is the translation process in the

27:08

ruble solums that can go slightly wrong,

27:10

the researchers say. Where were

27:12

these researchers when this first came out? All

27:14

this evidence was very clear, was static, right?

27:16

The information was there. The

27:18

end result is still get great protection, they say. What

27:20

can there be if you have to earn it that

27:23

it's protein? Wow. Still

27:25

good though, still good, still safe and effective, still safe

27:27

and effective, just don't mind the people dying in the

27:29

street, safe and effective. COVID

27:32

study, MRT vaccines could be fine

27:34

tuned. My God, fine tuned. Right?

27:37

After 2023, fine tuned. I

27:41

mean, this is just, this is my point.

27:43

They will drag this dead body of an

27:45

agenda as far as you'll let them. It's

27:50

just staggering to me. Now, I was

27:52

going to read something on that, but I'm just going to leave it

27:54

for now. Ology

27:56

17 also writes explosive study published in Nature, the

27:58

one we just read shakes the... of

28:00

mRNA technology. He's also sharing more

28:02

of another on another cancer drug at the

28:05

end of the article but here's the point

28:07

I want to read. Mistranslational events may increase

28:09

toxicity. This is exactly

28:11

the point. This is from

28:13

the same Nature article. These

28:16

findings are of particular importance

28:18

to our fundamental understanding of

28:20

how ribonucleotide modification affects mRNA translation.

28:22

Gee, don't you think we should have figured that out before

28:24

you gave it to everybody in the world? I mean

28:27

this is why this is so obvious. Good

28:29

thing we're figuring all this out on the fly. Ask

28:32

Netanyahu, he tested everybody in Israel

28:34

together to figure it all out. Like,

28:37

I mean it's not even up for debate. This is

28:39

as shockingly obvious as it's ever been. Good

28:42

thing we're understanding how this works

28:44

after three plus years and for

28:47

designing and optimizing feature mRNA, mRNA-based

28:49

therapeutics. Is that what we want?

28:51

To avoid mistranslation

28:53

events that may decrease efficacy

28:56

or increase toxicity. Now

28:58

see, I almost wonder whether that in and

29:00

of itself is the scapegoat. The

29:04

excuse. Even

29:06

if it's real. Without

29:08

any of this, it's still deadly. The

29:11

spike protein is still deadly, right?

29:13

All the things we talked about. Everything

29:16

involved in this, every angle of this

29:18

is explicitly dangerous. So

29:21

whether it, like let's just say they go, oh well

29:23

now we figured it out, right? We missed

29:25

it. The extra proteins, the

29:27

frame shifting. That's why it's hurting

29:29

more people. But you've been telling

29:31

us it wasn't hurting more people and that we were all conspiracy

29:33

theorists. No, no, you're right, but now we know why so you're

29:35

still wrong. Isn't that always how it

29:37

works? And they'll go, oh that's why

29:39

it wasn't working enough and that's why people were dying and

29:41

now we fixed it. So shut up and take the new

29:43

one. That's what that feels like to me. Sort

29:47

of like a tablet coming out and going, yep we know

29:49

it was the proximate cause but we're gonna make

29:51

it better this time. That's

29:53

what's going on while we're all paying

29:55

attention to elsewhere. Now while that's happening,

29:57

Mary Halle Bowden makes sure you... wants

30:00

you to understand that apparently

30:04

more than just Texas, they are

30:06

now moving to continue in 2023

30:10

forcing children to have injections to be able

30:12

to go and guys that includes the COVID-19

30:14

injection. In fact that's primarily what I think

30:17

it's about. It says from Texas

30:19

Children's Pediatric Clinic, we respect parents' right

30:21

to make medical decisions for their children.

30:24

If you do not consent to having

30:26

your child vaccinated against these diseases, we

30:28

respectfully ask that you establish care with another provider.

30:30

Right, same game we play. We respect your rights but

30:32

we're not going to listen to them. Right? It's like

30:35

saying we respect your right to sovereignty Iraq but we're

30:37

not going to leave when you ask us to. So

30:40

you don't then. Right?

30:43

Obviously you don't. Look,

31:06

just because a doctor believes one action

31:08

is the safest or right or medically

31:10

accurate way to go, never before the

31:12

COVID-19 mania was it that well I'm

31:14

going to omit you that you're not

31:17

allowed to come here anymore. I refuse

31:19

to help you because of your current

31:21

reality. That means you don't believe

31:23

in Hippocratic Oath. That means that

31:25

you are willing to hurt people because you have an

31:27

opinion. These are bad people or

31:31

people that believe they're acting because they're manipulated by

31:33

politics but either way I think it translates to

31:35

the same thing. Now it says we will continue

31:37

to care for your child during this 60-day period.

31:39

If you change your mind and plan to back

31:41

your child, well we'll do it for you.

31:45

Here she includes this. This is the actual dot

31:47

page from Texas Children's Pediatrics so you can read

31:49

it for yourself. And

31:52

while that's happening, you know, while they're telling you

31:54

you have to have to have this

31:56

dangerous injection that children do not need that will almost

31:58

guarantee they'll have myocarditis at some point. in your life, they're

32:01

doing it quietly while you're not

32:30

doing it. It's

32:34

not something that should be doing that. Now

32:36

either way, the point is they're now giving these as the

32:38

person asks, were you aware? Did your children inform you? Did

32:43

they ask you about whether or not

32:45

they were going to be giving children injections?

32:47

Well, of course, under

32:50

the skin, we don't have to ask you anymore. Or

32:52

is that happening

32:58

in very surreptitious ways? Or the

33:00

idea that these things are being given, which

33:02

I've already seen in combination shots

33:04

that people don't even realize they're getting? Here

33:08

the defender writes in a very concerning

33:10

article actually from two days ago,

33:13

FDA knew COVID vaccine safety monitoring

33:15

system was not sufficient. I

33:17

don't understand this. Now

33:20

this is problematic for many reasons. First

33:22

of all, the system is designed exactly the

33:24

way it's always been. It's

33:30

a signal system. It

33:32

was never meant to prove anything. That's

33:35

the way it was always designed. Now could it be

33:37

better? Sure. But to

33:39

argue that somehow only now

33:41

we're realizing that, oh, well, it just

33:43

wasn't sufficient. So yet again, it gives a

33:45

pass. It gives the illusion

33:47

that, well, we missed all the problems because the

33:50

system wasn't set up right. Well, the

33:52

system functioned perfectly as it was

33:54

supposed to before. I

33:56

shouldn't say perfectly. People have had

33:58

issues with it for a long time. My point. is it was functioning

34:00

the way it was designed to, up

34:03

until COVID-19 time. And

34:06

what it was like, just as I told you many

34:08

times, June rain in the UK on the record, 2006

34:11

with the Guardian says, these systems are not designed

34:13

to prove anything. The yellow card system is the

34:15

same. It's just a signal. And

34:17

when you get a large enough signal, knowing some

34:19

of them could be wrong, knowing some of them

34:21

could be lies, knowing all of that, you still

34:23

pause it, which they have every time before this

34:26

except COVID. Why? So now

34:28

to say, well, the system wasn't sufficient, is

34:30

giving them what they weren't. It's

34:32

saying, okay, well, this... I

34:41

don't agree with this. I

34:43

think it's obvious that VAERS is not perfect. The

34:45

system is set up in a way to be

34:47

able to accept everything. That's

34:50

a pass, I think. Now, another point is in

34:53

regard to the blood donation

34:55

discussion. As Dr. Ray

34:57

points out, look at this bill that's being

34:59

proposed in Illinois about blood donations, which probably

35:01

won't pass because of it, but it says,

35:03

requires a blood bank to test or have

35:05

tested donated blood for evidence of any COVID

35:07

vaccine and any other messenger, ribonucleic

35:10

acid, mRNA, vaccine components,

35:13

and requires a blood donor to disclose

35:15

during each blood donor screening process, whether

35:17

the blood donors received COVID vaccines or

35:19

any other mRNA vaccine. Problem is that

35:22

now it's already been happening this

35:24

whole time. So do you just

35:26

start from scratch, which would be a huge

35:29

deficit and problematic for the industry? I don't

35:31

know, but I do know there's

35:34

every reason to be worried about this. Now

35:36

the bill, whether passed or not, doesn't

35:38

change the fact that it is real.

35:40

As Patricia points out, T-Lavon Forum followers

35:42

and others have been long concerned. It's

35:45

about time. Red Cross was called out on

35:47

this long ago as birth, as

35:50

I called them up many times. This

35:52

is from September 22nd, and

35:56

by the way, as far as I can tell, they still, even

35:59

though even. Nobody holds this

36:01

line anymore. It's

36:04

shocking. They said we don't label

36:06

blood products as containing vaccine or unvaccinated

36:08

blood. Vaccinated or unvaccinated blood.

36:10

Why? Well, because they claim

36:13

the COVID vaccine does not enter your bloodstream and

36:15

poses no risk. Well, that's provably false.

36:17

You know why? Because I literally showed them a study

36:19

right there that says, well, guess what? Spike

36:22

protein mRNA vaccines. A's.

36:25

Oops. So you'd think an

36:27

honest organization would be like, whoa, Ryan, thank you

36:30

for informing us of the peer viewed study that

36:32

it should be my job to look for. Thank

36:34

you. We'll correct this right away and

36:36

make sure we don't hurt anybody. No, no, no. They ignored

36:39

it. They ignored it over and over and over and over.

36:41

And they've another study. And now we've got another one, Red

36:43

Cross. Do you have the courage to finally admit you're

36:45

wrong or are you going to continue hurting people with the

36:47

evidence of slapping you in the face? Well, they're going to

36:50

continue hurting people while the evidence laughs in the face. That's

36:52

what they're doing. It's right in front of them.

36:55

The vaccination of SARS-CoV-2, I'm going to vaccine persistence and

36:57

factors associated with cardiac involvement in recently

36:59

vaccinated patients. Persistence, meaning it

37:01

continues to circulate the blood. It is in

37:03

there routinely persists at the

37:05

30 days from vaccination and can be

37:07

detected in the heart. So

37:10

here they are forcing people to

37:12

take blood, not even allowing donors that are in

37:14

the family anymore. Why? When

37:16

they know they're wrong, they know and they don't care.

37:19

Think about how alarming that is. They're

37:24

all now. Over and

37:26

over and over. They

37:29

need to be held accountable because they're hurting

37:31

people and they don't care. Thank

37:34

you, Dr. Ray, for pointing this out. Some people are trying to stop

37:36

it. Here's one of the

37:38

conversations, September 24, 2022, vax Red

37:40

Cross blood donations. There's

37:42

been numerous examples, by the way, showing

37:44

babies that have gotten blood transfusions that

37:46

then die and all sorts of numerous things.

37:51

It's documented, but

37:53

they don't care. These are the people

37:55

we're dealing with. Now, Biden's administration

37:57

is expanding this legal— legal

38:00

team in response to a surge

38:02

in vaccine lawsuits two days ago.

38:04

Gee, I wonder why. Because

38:07

people are hurt. You know what I bet you

38:09

this is, guys? 90, I

38:11

bet you more than anything, that

38:22

this is predominantly people that went

38:24

along, trusted the science,

38:27

and are now being hurt by it. I

38:29

mean that, obviously, in the quotes, trusting the science.

38:31

And now they're suing because they're pissed off. It's

38:33

sort of like the hostages in the Israel conversation who

38:36

are now pointing at Netanyahu and their government, saying,

38:38

you're the ones hurting people, you're the ones murdering people,

38:40

you're the ones who are making it. I'm not going

38:42

to get to it right now. Same

38:45

thing. Their own people

38:47

are turning on them. Why? Because

38:49

these are bad people we're talking about. And usually

38:51

most of the people they're manipulating are not. They're

38:53

just being manipulated. And now they're starting to see

38:55

through it. Lastly, which

38:57

I'm just almost blown away by with what's

38:59

going on in the world, the elections, this,

39:02

I don't understand this. Other than the

39:05

worry that there really is some larger time-based agenda that

39:07

this needs to be, I don't know. But here's what

39:09

it says. The updated

39:11

COVID-19 vaccines, the

39:14

same ones, right? The ones that, what? I think it

39:16

was like 3% actually took. I'm

39:20

sure it's more than that now. And

39:25

they're not, I mean, they're aligned with what was

39:27

it again. I'm trying

39:30

to remember the exact variant numbers I forget now,

39:32

but they were aligned with one specific, one of

39:34

the later ones they went to, right? The studies

39:37

they already showed, already showed in the past, it

39:39

did not work for things in the past. So

39:41

now you're telling people, take this for whatever else,

39:43

even though it's almost guaranteed to cause some form

39:46

of immune response, whether because

39:48

of the frame shifting, because of the

39:50

DNA contamination, or because you're literally giving

39:52

them something that produces an antibody for

39:54

something that's not currently present, which will

39:56

cause antibody dependent enhancement, or that's how it's

39:59

done. We just think about how

40:01

these are scientifically proven realities, and we're still calling

40:03

it safe and effective. I just listed three. I'm

40:05

going to go off for an hour about these things. But

40:08

saying they're expected to provide

40:10

protection against new

40:12

variants, BHUH6 or JN1. Why

40:18

are they expected to do that, Mr. Science? Well,

40:21

because we hope they will, and we're going to tell you we're

40:23

expecting them because we think they might. So

40:25

you don't know, and you're pretending to, and

40:27

you're lying. Yes, which happens every single time.

40:30

You know how many times these older ones have worked for

40:32

the new thing? Never. Repeat,

40:35

I mean, over and over and

40:37

over. They push the bivalent and they quietly put

40:39

it aside and go back to the other, because they failed and

40:41

it hurt people. Probably the design.

40:44

Realize that they keep saying this. And understand that

40:46

in the article itself, it goes, there's no reason

40:48

to believe this is going to be any more

40:50

dangerous of all the same thing every single time.

40:53

And yet they keep pushing the thing that

40:55

is killing people around the world. The thing

40:57

that is causing heart attacks and strokes and

40:59

myocarditis and thrombosis and, I mean, it's just

41:01

unbelievable for something that is guaranteed

41:03

to be less than the flu when it first started.

41:06

God only knows how benign it is now after

41:08

all that's happened if it was ever actually there

41:10

to begin with. But don't worry, they're

41:13

going to keep pushing it. People

41:15

are dying. Close

41:19

me. Well, a couple

41:21

of foreign policy points before we get into the larger point.

41:24

I just thought this was interesting, right? There's a lot

41:26

of this stuff going around. I

41:28

just still am so blown away by

41:30

people can't see beyond the two-party illusion.

41:33

Now, the people that are invested in it financially,

41:37

whatever it is, I get why they stick around.

41:40

Typically because they're not honest and they care about something

41:42

other than the truth. There's a lot of people out

41:44

there that just can't pull themselves away from this. It's

41:47

so obvious to me how like

41:50

naive it all is. Like you just blindly go along

41:52

with it. Like here's a good, this is an example

41:54

I'm making with this. It's rare Republican win, this person

41:56

says. I'm not familiar with this word. Point

41:59

is it says... Senate Republicans blocked a

42:01

bill to fund the war in Ukraine.

42:04

So all these Republicans go, yeah, see, we're the

42:06

ones fighting for whatever,

42:09

the one that would not pro the war. But

42:11

they say demanding broader restrictions and

42:13

exchange and leaving the bills state

42:15

uncertain. And a

42:17

rare Republican win, they say. OK, why

42:19

exactly? Why is

42:21

it a rare Republican win? So

42:24

is the win that they stopped funding Ukraine? Because

42:26

that's not what happened. I can

42:28

guarantee you what this will amount to, the illusion

42:30

they don't want it when they do, they all

42:32

do. And ultimately, it is

42:34

them shoehorning in something else that you probably

42:37

don't want either. Demanding broader restrictions.

42:39

So you put in some arbitrary restriction that

42:41

makes it look like you were trying to

42:43

battle when this was guaranteed to begin with. So

42:46

if they give them their broader restrictions, what does that

42:48

mean? The bill passes. So

42:51

what's the win here? It's

42:53

fine tuning the still funding of Ukraine. This

42:55

is what frustrates me, is that we can't,

42:58

they don't, the dynamic is

43:00

so obvious. They're

43:02

all pro-war. There's people that speak

43:04

up and act like they're against it. Here's

43:07

a good example. Rashid

43:09

Talib screening

43:12

incessantly about the Palestinian cause and

43:14

then votes present when it comes

43:16

to the Zionism aspect. I mean, really? That

43:19

is the true picture of this. All

43:22

talk, no action. They will

43:24

sell you out for anything if it

43:26

benefits their agenda. The two-party illusion is

43:29

not your friend. Now,

43:31

Secretary Anthony Blinken says,

43:34

I've determined members of the Sudanese armed

43:36

forces have committed war crimes. Feel

43:39

free to laugh as this person talks

43:41

about people committing war crimes. And rapid

43:43

support forces have committed war crimes. Crimes

43:45

against humanity and ethnic cleansing in Sudan.

43:48

We stand with the people of Sudan

43:51

in their demands for peace and civilian

43:53

democratic rule. You

43:56

spelled Israel wrong. I mean,

43:58

it's so insulting. things to your anybody's intelligence,

44:01

like whether or not you think the Sudanese armed

44:03

forces are a problem. For

44:05

him to stand up and say this in such

44:07

a, like you realize the overlap to

44:09

whatever they say the Sudanese armed forces are doing

44:12

with what we can literally see on full

44:14

display, I mean it is a fraction of

44:16

what we're talking about. But because Israel has

44:18

a narrative around it, well we're

44:21

fighting Hamas and we're defending ourselves. Well those

44:23

are all just words. What's happening? Right?

44:25

What's happening? There's almost 2,000 people injured,

44:27

almost 20,000 killed, 7,000 plus children, 70% women and children.

44:33

Yeah but that put defending ourselves okay then

44:35

we'll just ignore it. What's

44:37

happening over here? Oh you mean the

44:39

Sudanese entities that you've been manipulating and funding

44:41

sometimes and then putting in proxy forces to

44:43

drive what you want and calling it all

44:45

terrorism and using that to coerce them to make deals

44:47

with Israel and if they do you ignore it all.

44:50

Yeah you clearly care about it don't you? You

44:52

know why this is happening? Because the

44:54

normalization deal is drifting away. That's

44:56

the only thing they care about.

44:58

This is Israel forcing the United

45:00

States government to force other countries

45:02

to normalize relations with them. And

45:05

if they do, well nothing matters. You can do whatever you

45:07

want and we'll call it freedom. If

45:09

you don't, you can do any good, no

45:11

matter what you do we'll call it terrorism.

45:13

That's the dynamic. Now if you want to

45:15

look more on this, Robert did a video about this a long

45:18

time ago, which by the way I didn't

45:20

realize they had censored so I had to

45:22

upload it just recently to bit shoot so there's

45:24

the video again. Foreign policy with Robert in the

45:26

cache, Israeli peace deals with Sudan, UAE, Bahrain explained.

45:29

And he gets into the whole normalization deals and

45:31

what they really mean. It's

45:33

embarrassing. The simplest point

45:35

that I've made about this, when

45:37

they made this deal, it was just taking Sudan in

45:39

particular. The

45:42

Sudanese government was

45:44

on the terrorist watch list. So

45:46

the point is they said well you're a terrorist. So

45:49

you would argue that means they were committing acts of

45:51

terror, so they went on the list. Okay, so

45:54

then, well just so it's clear,

45:56

assume that for the sake of

45:58

conversation, then Israel is a terrorist. Once

46:00

the normalization deals with the US goes, we'll normalize

46:02

with Israel. And the Sudanese come to talk,

46:04

they talk about normalizing, okay, and they say, well, if you

46:06

do that, we'll take you off the watch

46:09

list. So you see the point

46:11

there, right? I said it before. So either that

46:13

means, because nothing has changed. They have not changed their

46:15

actions. That means that they were

46:17

never actually committing terrorism. This was meant to be a

46:19

coercive tool. This is what Robert believes,

46:21

I think, to drive them to normalization. Or

46:24

they are terrorists, and they don't care about that,

46:26

as long as they're friends with Israel. There's

46:28

really no way to misunderstand that. That's what

46:30

I'm trying to show people every day, there's

46:32

so much that we're being shown that is

46:34

blatant, that shows you who they really are,

46:36

with their own actions. Just

46:39

look at the lines. And

46:41

this is included in general, this is from August 22nd of

46:43

this year. All across the world,

46:45

the US government is arming terrorists and destabilizing

46:47

nations in your name. That's a

46:49

good show, but just to make that point to think about

46:51

as we go forward, because that is truly the reality. On

46:56

that note, Secretary Carlson said something today I just

46:58

want to comment on. He said the

47:00

Biden administration is openly threatening Americans over

47:02

Ukraine, which the sentiment he's making here,

47:04

I actually completely agree with. In

47:07

a classified briefing in the house

47:09

yesterday, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin informed

47:11

members that if they don't appropriate

47:13

more money for Zelensky, he

47:16

says, quote, we'll send your

47:18

uncles, cousins, and sons to fight Russia. Pay

47:21

the oligarchs or we'll kill your kids. So

47:24

as far as I can tell, unless

47:26

there's some secret, something

47:30

that Tucker has access to, which certainly

47:32

likely, certainly possible, that have that quote

47:35

that I can't find anywhere else. That

47:38

does not appear to be a quote. It appears to

47:40

be the way Tucker perceived what they were saying, but I could

47:42

be wrong. Tucker may have some transcript

47:45

of some meeting that I don't see. My

47:48

point is, what ultimately seems to have

47:50

happened was that this is

47:52

how the game is played in corporate media,

47:55

or more specifically, the two party illusion.

47:58

He comes out and says. basically

48:00

the sentiment being that we

48:03

are we want to continue funding Ukraine so

48:06

if you don't help us do that this

48:08

will end up in a position where we are fighting

48:10

Russia because they go into

48:13

other countries after Ukraine that's what

48:15

they're actually saying right

48:17

so which exactly

48:20

was first of all is actually pretty ridiculous to

48:22

assume we know that Russia wants to do that

48:24

they never said that there's no action indicating they

48:26

want to do that but of course it's possible

48:29

really to me it seems to be

48:31

the US Empire an Israeli Empire projecting

48:34

onto Russia that they want they they would

48:36

love it was the old Soviet Union they can point

48:38

that whenever they wanted to it's not that anymore in

48:41

no way does that mean good guy it just means it's

48:43

not what they always claim it is so

48:46

what you're really hearing is what

48:48

they know that the Ukrainian Ozov movement

48:50

has explicitly said that they

48:52

will go on to spread the white race

48:54

around the world once they can they've said

48:57

that endlessly repeatedly but

48:59

yet we don't we go out you don't understand it's

49:01

sort of like what we hear from Israel it's absurd

49:03

so my point is when he

49:05

wants the right-wing party here right-wing people listening

49:07

to him to hear he's threatening to send

49:10

your uncles and cousins and sons which I

49:12

don't think he actually said unless there's something

49:14

I'm not seeing to fight Russia he of

49:16

course leaves out the context that what he's saying is

49:18

when Russia goes to fight other

49:20

countries the

49:23

way this reads is if you don't send

49:25

money to Ukraine we're gonna start sending

49:27

your people to fight in Ukraine against Russia

49:29

that's not what he actually said my

49:31

point is I just get so frustrated with how

49:33

easily a two-party illusion because of they know your

49:36

short your blind spots will

49:38

manipulate people here is

49:40

Biden doing the same thing Joe

49:43

Biden raised and again don't miss

49:46

right-wing left-wing

49:49

right-wing left-wing of the

49:51

same bird that's the same point he goes

49:53

Joe Biden raises the possibility of American troops

49:55

fighting Russian troops now if

49:57

you listen to him he goes on to say at

50:00

the end when Russia goes after other countries. Well,

50:02

again, all you're doing is

50:05

fear mongering about some

50:07

hypothetical future action that might take

50:09

place after this ends. And

50:11

there's, in my opinion, zero indication that's

50:13

gonna happen. There's no indication that Russia

50:15

has ever shown you that they

50:17

want to, like what they'll point that is,

50:20

what about the Donbass

50:22

in general, right? What about Crimea?

50:25

Well, those aren't what they're told. If you don't understand by

50:27

now that those are not what the US government claims they

50:29

are, then you don't care. The

50:31

evidence is blatant, self-evident around the world from

50:34

anybody that actually cares about the situation. Crimea

50:36

voted to become a part of, and it's

50:38

obvious, they're Russian speaking. They clearly have been

50:40

attacked by the Yalzov movement this entire time.

50:42

And you can see that today, just like

50:44

in Donbass. The point is

50:46

there's no indication that Russia actually is planning to

50:49

go around and topple countries around the world. And

50:51

quite frankly, I just don't even think it makes sense

50:53

anymore with the way, like there's, again,

50:55

not good guy. Quite frankly, I

50:57

think their actions are far more surreptitious and overlapping

50:59

with the great reset. This

51:02

is a dying empire speaking from a corner. That's

51:04

what I think is happening. You

51:06

better fight, we better stand up and fight Russia quickly,

51:08

or they're gonna, you know, it's all, I think, a

51:10

game to get you in the same position that they

51:12

want you in. It's more pliable for the, whatever

51:16

develops post these actions today, World War III,

51:18

whatever we're talking about. As long as

51:20

you're on their side, which is that we

51:23

have to marshal our forces to stop what they're

51:25

doing, when really it's what they're doing with you,

51:28

which causes everything else to happen. Now,

51:30

to bring this into the Israel conversation,

51:33

Al-Wihasim points out, and I've made this point

51:35

already, Gallant

51:37

is a maniac, and he's

51:39

openly, more than once

51:41

has said that it will do this

51:44

to Beirut, another civilian location.

51:47

Israeli Defense Minister Gallant threatened Lebanon.

51:50

Every person in Lebanon can take the map, the

51:52

aerial photograph of Gaza, you know, the completely

51:54

carpet bomb destroyed area, and place

51:56

it on aerial photograph of Beirut, and ask themselves

51:59

if this will happen. They want to happen

52:01

there now. Why would that happen there? What's

52:03

the argument are you now pretend you know claiming? They've

52:06

got tunnels under their civilian areas or

52:08

that's just gonna become the claim when you want to start

52:10

bombing the area You see how that works.

52:12

They've already established this You don't just get

52:14

to flow like what they're doing is saying we got away

52:16

with this or they think they did We'll

52:19

do it to you will bomb your civilian

52:21

Beirut area if you don't do what we

52:23

want. That's what they're saying Now About

52:28

the Reuters journalist there's a lot to

52:30

go through in the topic of Israel and Gaza. I

52:32

think it's very important Let's

52:34

set the tone about one of the early lies

52:36

that we caught in all this and the way

52:39

that not just Israel But the corporate media the

52:41

US government the Western governments in general absolutely

52:44

chose to ignore this a journalist

52:47

mind you from Reuters of

52:49

all places Didn't even

52:51

care one of the most obvious and

52:54

now proven even though it was proven the day it

52:56

happened They killed

52:58

this person Almost

53:00

two months later David Roth

53:02

Lindbergh points out Reuters Jurin

53:04

Reuters investigation admits that an

53:06

Israeli tank crew killed Reuters

53:09

visual visuals journalist Isom Abdallah

53:11

and at the time wounded six reporters one

53:13

of the woman it looks like she had

53:15

her leg almost blown off in Lebanon this

53:17

October 13th by firing two shells in quick

53:19

succession from Israel and everyone

53:21

else knows about it the same day Here's

53:24

one of the reports from committee to protect journalists

53:27

They call for accountability, which I guarantee

53:29

won't happen after reports find Israel likely

53:31

targeted journalists in Lebanon This of course

53:33

is likely but the reality is this

53:35

is being broken down. Not only this

53:38

is by French press agency And

53:40

air wars air this this is a provable

53:42

fact again. You didn't need this to be

53:44

able to prove it But

53:46

all this time later their investigation from

53:49

French press agency in our wars and it

53:51

confirmed that an Israeli excuse me Israeli attack

53:54

October 13th killed Reuters

53:57

journalists one

53:59

specifically in general And injured several others

54:01

from Al Jazeera French press agency

54:03

and Reuters This is a

54:05

3d model that was made to explain the geography

54:07

and how it happened And you know you remember all this we

54:10

showed you this right here. Or was it the Well,

54:13

it was that shot from a different angle So

54:16

this is a verified fact guys. We talked about this

54:18

on the 13th on the third the

54:20

day this happened Reuters

54:22

journalist killed by Israeli bombing and of course

54:24

we got all the shills. Oh, you're a

54:26

liar. That didn't happen Yeah,

54:29

of course none of them will come back and apologize because they're not here

54:31

for honesty and

54:33

it's again again Demonstrating our

54:35

value. I wouldn't state

54:37

that unless I felt this was proven of course

54:39

I can make mistakes But

54:42

I asked all of you to go back

54:44

and look at our track record and recognize

54:46

why this platform is important Again

54:50

shout out to Charlie Charlie Robinson microaggressions.

54:52

He has a new show There

54:55

I was just on and what he said

54:57

is he's like We have a DeLorean like stepping into our

54:59

show is like going back into DeLorean to see things and

55:01

I you know I appreciate that now there's plenty of other

55:03

people I think that are doing similar work Ahead

55:06

of the ahead of the curve and it's not because

55:08

we're psychic It's because we care enough to look at

55:10

these things that were objective and nonpartisan If

55:14

you believe in this platform guys, I there's a

55:16

reason that people were that were successful in this

55:18

because we are Constantly ahead

55:20

of these stories and even the

55:22

research that we're doing which Which

55:25

comes in part from a lot of other other journalists

55:27

as we aggregate for you Gives

55:29

you this information almost always before the corporate

55:32

media Well, Peter

55:34

Dow points out Israel is just

55:36

murdering journalists. He's right This

55:39

is even the New York Times strike that

55:41

killed Reuters journalist was quote

55:43

apparently deliberate See it goes even

55:45

further. Not only did we know that he killed it

55:47

that the Israeli government killed of this journalist But

55:50

guess what? I love how they frame

55:52

this to strike that killed journalist Reuters

55:54

journalist was apparently deliberate Is

55:57

apparently deliberate Israeli attack group

55:59

said Which by the

56:01

way most people reading these don't read any further than the

56:03

headline. Which to them, oh well somebody

56:05

said, probably a people in Palestine. No,

56:08

no it was the Human Rights Watch. A

56:10

gigantic human rights organization said, yeah,

56:12

they found that the killed journalists

56:14

and six colleagues were not near active fighting.

56:16

And it would have been clearly visible to

56:19

Israeli forces. What

56:21

is enough here? How many times have I said this just

56:23

in this topic? Where is the tipping point? You

56:26

see, when you start to recognize that this

56:28

is enough for anybody else, anywhere in the

56:31

world to have already been arrested. And

56:33

nothing's happening. Not from Trump, not from

56:36

Biden, not from DeSantis, not from anybody

56:38

in any leadership position in the US

56:40

government. Not anywhere else in the world,

56:42

not even the major human rights groups.

56:44

Why is nobody actually trying to marshal

56:47

this into some kind of accountability? I'm

56:49

just talking about Israel. There's got

56:51

to be somebody in Israel that is willing to

56:53

actually address this with what they've done. There's

56:55

people that speak up that want that in the

56:57

heart of power. Do something about it. These people

56:59

deserve to be in prison for this one thing

57:01

alone. Not even getting into the,

57:05

God only knows how many are actually being killed in

57:07

Gaza right now. Unbelievable.

57:10

Deliberately murdered this journalist. And

57:14

over 60 journalists have been killed

57:16

in the Israel-Gaza war. My

57:18

friend was one of them, this writer says, for the

57:20

New York Times. Oh,

57:22

and another interesting point. I was trying to find the way back

57:25

machine version of this. Let's just look at how this works. It's

57:27

always how this goes. So this is posted

57:29

on December 3rd. The same day,

57:31

they just literally changed the title entirely

57:33

to losing your life for doing your

57:36

job. And somebody said, come on,

57:38

that's stupid. Go back to the real life, whatever happened. And

57:40

then they changed it back the next day. This

57:43

is the state of current journalism, like mainstream journalism.

57:47

That would have been catastrophically

57:49

embarrassing back when

57:51

we pretended, you know, two sources and, you

57:53

know, every single minute change had to have

57:56

a little note and whatever. They don't care

57:58

anymore. It's a game of propaganda. Like because

58:01

this title was a little bit too harsh at the

58:03

moment probably and somebody from Israeli You

58:06

know a lobbying group said wow, you can't say

58:08

that we don't My

58:10

opinion obviously, but I just think it's hilarious Now

58:13

on one more point about why I think this

58:15

is actually so easy Why

58:17

it's so obvious that these are Manipulated

58:21

that everything's being manipulated the

58:24

social media the people in positions of power This

58:27

is just one example, but we know how all of this works, and

58:29

we'll even get to an APAC point in a moment But

58:32

grace caught something really interesting She

58:35

got wind of

58:37

it. I think there's actually the images right here Of

58:42

course it doesn't show it right now you got to be kidding me

58:46

Let me see Okay, just as

58:48

removed. That's the wrong one Well

58:51

like anyway, oh there's right there Somebody

58:56

So she finds out that advertising agencies which

58:58

we've already talked about Are

59:01

paying social media influencers a lot of

59:03

money? to promote

59:05

stories about Israel

59:08

in a positive light Think

59:10

about that so they have to literally pay people

59:12

to say things like this because it's that one

59:14

Everybody anywhere sees this and I've been saying this

59:16

from the beginning the people right now that are

59:19

all there I'll get to some of the examples

59:21

Interestingly still trying to gaslight for Israel It's

59:23

pretty much the people that have an agenda

59:26

and everybody else is either quiet or calling

59:28

this out It's really embarrassing

59:31

and grace got reached out to saying hey

59:33

I'm from movers community wanted to

59:35

personally reach out to a to for a paid

59:37

opportunity with the goal of promoting a positive view

59:39

of Israel So in other words can we bribe

59:42

you to be say something good about Israel and

59:44

of course grace has integrity so she said Does

59:47

anyone know first of all she

59:49

pointed out they censored it And

59:51

she said does anyone know what the community note said before

59:53

they censored it and he simply says I

59:55

remember seeing three notes On it one of them first of

59:57

all was the claim that you were lying

1:00:00

about the website because it was an

1:00:02

Israeli furniture company. See my point? So people

1:00:04

just constantly trying to get... And that's how the

1:00:06

community notes have been weaponized. We've seen this the

1:00:08

whole time. Right now, you're getting very one-sided, only

1:00:10

pro-Israel points as far as I can tell. People

1:00:12

that are lying through their teeth in provable ways

1:00:15

get nothing, even though people tag community notes when

1:00:17

it has to do with a negative

1:00:19

light for Israel. The other two, it

1:00:21

says, were addressed and they were no

1:00:23

note needed, which whatever that means.

1:00:25

So this seems like a coordinated

1:00:27

thing in my opinion. But her

1:00:30

point where they removed the post after...

1:00:35

And that's where there's the community notes and it says,

1:00:37

only visible to note contributors. That's

1:00:39

very weird. And he says,

1:00:41

they proposed a community note. Too bad it's gone.

1:00:43

I wish I had been able to view the

1:00:45

proposed note. I agree. So

1:00:47

this is highly coordinated activity. You may

1:00:50

consider redacting the names

1:00:52

in reposting it. The point is they've now

1:00:54

removed that post. Hilarious.

1:00:58

And the idea being that this is

1:01:00

about showing that they're paying people to

1:01:04

say good things about Israel. Why is that stuff

1:01:06

being censored? Because I think we know why. Now

1:01:08

one other point is the same kind of thing. You

1:01:11

know the whole game about you're not allowed to say from the river to the

1:01:13

sea? Right? Well, here's a video posted

1:01:15

all over Twitter that Elon doesn't seem to care

1:01:17

about, which in no way am I actually asking him

1:01:19

to censor it, just pointing out the contradiction, which

1:01:22

I've already made clear. It literally says from

1:01:24

the river to the sea, Israel will is

1:01:26

really sovereignty in the in the, um,

1:01:29

Likud founding documents, which

1:01:32

is Netanyahu's party, you

1:01:34

know? And so the point is that they're claiming it's

1:01:36

only about genocide, except

1:01:38

as Dan Cohen points out, well, when Zionists say

1:01:40

it, and he's simply saying it is

1:01:42

a call for genocide, they're projecting. But my point is

1:01:45

that this is completely okay. From Twitter's

1:01:47

perspective, they can literally sing a song about from

1:01:49

the river to the sea, Israel going to

1:01:51

be free. Why

1:01:53

is it only genocide in one direction? Right?

1:01:56

He tagged Elon and surprise, surprise, nothing.

1:01:59

People have. Tag community notes, nobody cares, nobody cares,

1:02:01

because this is not what it appears to be.

1:02:05

Now in this together, this

1:02:08

is Ian Davis, put out a great article for the

1:02:11

geopolitics and empire. Was Al-Aqsa flood,

1:02:13

this was the name for the

1:02:15

Hamas operation into Israel, or rather

1:02:18

specifically into first the settlements that are legally

1:02:20

occupied, or really all of it's legally occupied,

1:02:22

but was it

1:02:24

a false flag? When it

1:02:26

says elements within the Israeli state were willing

1:02:28

to allow the attack to proceed, possibly

1:02:32

a let it happen on purpose false flag terror

1:02:34

attack, the LIHOP false flag. And before we get

1:02:36

into the article itself, only one point I wanted

1:02:39

to make, don't forget, I'll include these for everybody

1:02:41

to go through themselves if you haven't seen it.

1:02:43

WikiLeaks is already verified, this is a real

1:02:46

document. Does that then prove that it's something

1:02:48

that they're abiding by?

1:02:51

But I think it's obvious because every single

1:02:53

point in this plan is

1:02:55

what's happening. And it's simply

1:02:57

an adaptation of the decisive

1:02:59

plan of 2017 by Schmochrich, what

1:03:02

it is. It's about first driving them to the

1:03:04

south and then driving them into the Sinai desert, which

1:03:07

by the way is what they're now calling for.

1:03:09

So it's very obvious. WikiLeaks have verified the document

1:03:11

is from the Israeli intelligence, ministry of intelligence. Then

1:03:14

we have the US Congress part of this,

1:03:16

the secret US Congress plan to forcibly displace

1:03:18

all Palestinians and to use foreign aid to

1:03:20

force them. We talked about this in this

1:03:23

show. The point was Turkey, Iraq, Yemen and

1:03:25

Egypt, they all get foreign aid from the

1:03:27

US government. The plan is to say, well,

1:03:29

if you don't take them, we'll

1:03:31

withhold that foreign aid that you need. But

1:03:34

if you take them, we'll give you more foreign aid. See

1:03:36

the point? This is how this is weaponized. This

1:03:39

is why these countries that get in these deals

1:03:41

are always manipulated. Or sort

1:03:43

of how many foreign policy experts have made clear

1:03:45

what the US government does is when they occupy

1:03:48

or help a country,

1:03:50

they force them to

1:03:53

basically outsource what they need from

1:03:55

the other countries. Then force the

1:03:58

country to produce what the US needs. So

1:04:01

then at any moment in time when they suddenly don't

1:04:03

want to go along with the US agenda is they

1:04:05

pull the rug out That country

1:04:07

can no longer succeed on its own because they've

1:04:09

outsourced all the necessities to foreign countries bringing it

1:04:11

in which they get charged over The top four

1:04:14

and that doesn't hurt that that hurts the people

1:04:16

and enriches the Yola garks, which is what they

1:04:18

always do That's just

1:04:20

part of the plan here with the

1:04:22

other one net and yeah And all

1:04:24

these are documented things verified documents directly

1:04:27

from these people net and Yahoo Vides

1:04:29

administration It says net and you have

1:04:31

draws up a new plan to quote

1:04:33

thin the population in Gaza to a

1:04:35

minimum Very

1:04:37

clear It's amazing how we can

1:04:39

have all these plans in real public and the public eye and

1:04:41

we all debate whether they want to kill them all We're

1:04:45

living in an illusion. These are people from the

1:04:47

government from the minute the media top. It's how

1:04:49

do we deny that? If

1:04:51

we have these provable entities or

1:04:54

rather documents that very clearly outlined that they want to

1:04:56

do these things We can see that that's

1:04:58

what's happening and they just go. No, that's not true. We're

1:05:00

doing this So you're listening

1:05:02

to the narrative when you can see it's happening

1:05:04

when they've got plans for it And they've been

1:05:06

looking at him and talking about him for years That

1:05:09

is willful ignorance They

1:05:12

know that they're trying to manipulate you with it

1:05:15

the new Arab rights Jewish far-right

1:05:17

groups are now demanding the restoration

1:05:21

of complete Jewish control

1:05:23

over all Aksa and Jerusalem

1:05:26

and the removal of the Islamic Walk

1:05:29

authority from the holy site, which

1:05:31

I believe is the overlap with Jordan I believe

1:05:34

and the point is this is exactly what

1:05:36

we're talking about This is

1:05:38

why we're seeing them plant Israeli

1:05:41

flags all over the places they're going through

1:05:43

in Gaza Because they're gonna give

1:05:45

it all back to them and let

1:05:47

them go home as Netanyahu lied. No

1:05:49

because they're taking this territory Mr.

1:05:52

Propagandas himself says his really flag

1:05:54

in Palestine square in quotes They're

1:05:57

not even hiding it guys. This is a

1:05:59

crime No matter what justification you think

1:06:01

you have, the international community has always

1:06:03

maintained this, and this is a crime.

1:06:05

You are continuing to take the territory

1:06:08

that is Palestine. They don't

1:06:10

care. And doing so, they're

1:06:12

driving all these people into desperate

1:06:14

situations and deaths. And

1:06:16

it's a mausage fault, apparently, even though I don't see any

1:06:18

examples of them even killing one of them this entire time.

1:06:22

But this is all part of the plan. Now,

1:06:25

Middle East Monitor points out, in the meantime, in the

1:06:27

process, which, oh, by the way, the

1:06:29

point to this is that when you talk about Al-Aqsa

1:06:31

and Jerusalem, that includes the West Bank. So Jordan made

1:06:33

it clear that if you start displacing people from the

1:06:36

West Bank, that means war. That was their term. So

1:06:39

understand these groups that seem to

1:06:41

basically be driving the bus, the

1:06:43

extremist elements of the current

1:06:46

party that are running all this, or the current

1:06:49

coalition, they want this. And

1:06:52

now their groups and extremists are screaming for it.

1:06:54

And these settlers are being allowed to beat up

1:06:56

and rape and torture and murder. I mean, right

1:06:58

now, in real time, people in West Bank. So

1:07:04

on top of that, Israel

1:07:06

has approved 1,738 settlement units in

1:07:09

occupied Jerusalem. What

1:07:14

do you think that means? How does

1:07:16

that not amount to more displacement of Palestinians

1:07:18

than West Bank? It does. Do

1:07:20

you realize that just one of these

1:07:22

kabut areas that houses however many

1:07:25

people, the huge communities?

1:07:28

That's one. That's one. They

1:07:31

want to do 1,738 of those in the West Bank. You

1:07:36

understand what that means? I mean,

1:07:39

guys, this is deliberate. This

1:07:41

is them trying to ethnically cleanse

1:07:43

the area through mass displacement,

1:07:45

through forced displacement. This

1:07:47

has never been legal. It's always been a crime. Even

1:07:50

the US government box when they do it, but they

1:07:52

don't stop them. Here we are again. In

1:07:55

the middle of all this, this

1:07:57

is a war on Palestine. They know it. You know

1:07:59

it. The government's no,

1:08:01

they don't care. They're part of it. Now

1:08:03

here's the article for me and Davis. Was

1:08:06

all loss of flood a false flag? Now

1:08:08

there's only basically 99% of

1:08:11

this we've been through in one direction or another. I wanted

1:08:14

to include it because he's a great writer. He also writes

1:08:16

for Whitney as well. And every

1:08:19

point in this is important and it's well sourced. I

1:08:21

just don't want to be redundant and go through all the other things

1:08:23

we talked about. But go through it, make sure you read this, it's

1:08:25

important. But I wanted to get to two main

1:08:27

points of this. First one, oh

1:08:31

I think I lost the, of course I did. The

1:08:39

end here, it says, was it a false flag? It

1:08:44

says, we know that Israel did not act on any

1:08:46

of the many warnings it received, including some from Hamas

1:08:48

itself. All loss of flood

1:08:50

was imminent. Instead, it left crucial surveillance controls

1:08:53

like the Nahal Oz

1:08:55

and key definitive military posts like Reem

1:08:57

dangerously exposed to precisely the wrong moment.

1:09:00

These so-called failures appear to have been too numerous

1:09:02

to have happened by chance. Some

1:09:05

degree of Israeli state complicity seems likely. Such

1:09:07

speculation does not infer that Hamas was incapable

1:09:09

of planning an ex-Gene operation. I think it

1:09:12

was down here more, right here. Searching

1:09:16

for the truth is not an act of disrespect to

1:09:18

the memory of those. Well I hate that he has

1:09:20

to say all this, like if you read the beginning,

1:09:22

it's like you have to bend over backwards to go

1:09:24

through like 11 paragraphs. They're saying, if I say terrorism

1:09:27

that doesn't mean, like, oh just really quickly I'll show

1:09:29

you. It's just so frustrating because honest,

1:09:31

intelligent people do not play these games.

1:09:34

First, because he says Israel refers to

1:09:37

the Israeli government and its intelligence defense forces. It

1:09:40

is not a reference to the people of Israel or the Jewish

1:09:42

people in general. You see my point? That's

1:09:45

the corporate media with their clumsy, lazy talking points

1:09:47

making this the way people think. Or

1:09:50

that Zionism somehow means all Jewish people. Like this

1:09:52

is ridiculous. He

1:09:54

says, no, Zionism means the

1:09:56

supporters, both Jewish and non-Jewish, of the political

1:09:59

goals of Zionism. Nothing more. Like

1:10:01

he has to lay these out because people that are maybe

1:10:03

in, you know, good intention, you don't know this, might

1:10:06

read this thinking when he says Zion and then he

1:10:08

means Jews. Right? When he means Israel, he

1:10:10

means the people in the country. He doesn't. He's

1:10:12

talking about what the words actually mean. Like,

1:10:14

for instance, Hamas means the active members of

1:10:16

Hamas. Right? Not everybody in

1:10:19

Gaza or the Gaza people. For

1:10:21

the terrorist. Right? He's saying it

1:10:23

says, has a very clear definition.

1:10:25

It has been given a consensus definition, but, oh

1:10:28

no, it does not have a clear definition, but

1:10:30

it's been given a consensus by the governments who

1:10:33

always avoid using the term when they are

1:10:35

the ones committing terrorist acts. Exactly. And

1:10:37

he's saying that basically using the word terrorist to discuss

1:10:39

them is, he says,

1:10:41

referring to them as terrorists, there's no tacit

1:10:43

approval of the terrorist attack. It's simply to

1:10:46

comply with international law, Hamas fighters would have had

1:10:48

to have made necessary distinction between combatants. Now, the

1:10:50

point is the evidence is still fleshing out. And

1:10:54

that is honest, regardless of the

1:10:56

screening talking points of how you're insulted by

1:10:58

X, Y and Z. He's

1:11:00

just an honest reporter. And that's why it's hard for

1:11:02

his propagandists to not be upset when you read this.

1:11:06

But to the point at the

1:11:08

end, it's simply saying the

1:11:10

state of Israel has cited the Al-Aqsa flood as the

1:11:13

cause of belly for its latest round of genocide. Rumors

1:11:16

circulating that the IDF and Israeli military intelligence

1:11:18

had supposedly lost all of its relevant footage,

1:11:20

right out of Epstein, 9-11, it's all the

1:11:22

same stuff. And

1:11:24

communication intercepted recordings of the

1:11:26

initial phase. The IDF command was

1:11:28

quick to quash those rumors, they claim, but

1:11:31

its official explanation is no less suspicious. It

1:11:34

stated that the recordings were, quote, preserved and accessible to

1:11:36

relevant parties. Oh, and this was the point saying –

1:11:40

oh, no, it's still right here. It added that

1:11:42

the video and audio recordings had been, quote, blocked

1:11:44

to those who are not required to deal with

1:11:46

them. Isn't

1:11:48

that suspicious? This apparently represents

1:11:51

a significant and inexplicable elevation of

1:11:53

the necessary security clearance that's never

1:11:55

happened before. There was some post

1:11:57

reported that when the IDF operatives, including – Relatively

1:12:00

senior IDF officers tried to

1:12:03

access the recordings in order to analyze

1:12:05

events and hopefully discover why it might

1:12:07

have happened They found

1:12:09

their normal permissions had been restricted. They

1:12:12

were no longer authorized to high-level senior

1:12:14

IDF members You know

1:12:16

exactly what that means at least how it the

1:12:18

perception Based on with all the

1:12:21

other evidence. I think it's very clear something they

1:12:23

were hiding some of the recordings the

1:12:25

Jerusalem Post wrote Wrote has

1:12:27

have either disappeared or were

1:12:29

simply downloaded from the network and

1:12:31

relocated under the directives of commanding

1:12:33

officers right Consequently,

1:12:36

we are unable to access them It

1:12:39

seems that someone made a deliberate choice to

1:12:41

either transfer or delete these recordings to ensure that

1:12:43

no one could listen to them Come

1:12:46

on guys How crazy is that the picture of what

1:12:48

happened on October 7th is not as clear-cut as we

1:12:50

have been led to believe The evidence

1:12:52

suggests that elements within the Israeli state were

1:12:54

willing to allow the attack to proceed if

1:12:57

not be a part of it Which is

1:12:59

also possible. It is distinctly possible that all

1:13:01

the flood was a lie-hop false flag or

1:13:03

let it happen on purpose I

1:13:06

think I think that's very important now

1:13:08

my point in all this is the evidence is overwhelming from

1:13:11

the Time

1:13:13

that it took from the unprecedented

1:13:16

actions around from the warnings from a year

1:13:18

ago to months before to people trying to

1:13:20

inform their officers being told they'll be Brought

1:13:22

to trial if they keep bringing up the

1:13:25

warnings to the eight window eight hour

1:13:27

windows to the Security team between the kaboose to air

1:13:29

a and the festival at a time when there is

1:13:31

apparently nobody standing at these gates Which I haven't seen

1:13:33

anybody else bring up by the way That

1:13:36

CNN video made it clear. There was a security

1:13:38

team Checkpoint that

1:13:41

they ran head-on into which it seems clear that they

1:13:43

shot those hostages in many cases Out

1:13:45

of time when there was still nobody manning

1:13:47

these checkpoints in the main areas So

1:13:50

we were telling me a security checkpoint was ready and

1:13:52

waiting for these people that it seems they maybe wanted

1:13:54

to shoot When there was nobody over

1:13:56

here, so they knew clearly but did not do

1:13:58

anything in the main places That's how do you

1:14:01

how do you explain that? Now Paul

1:14:03

M Davis makes it clear in his opinion.

1:14:06

He says it's now indisputable that Israel knew

1:14:08

of Hamas's attack plan for an entire year

1:14:11

They had a 40 40 page

1:14:13

Intel document code named Jericho wall

1:14:16

Described the exact details of the attack plan that

1:14:18

Hamas followed to a tee Which

1:14:21

to me almost more so suggest that

1:14:23

Israel was involved Right,

1:14:25

but it the point is what we can prove You

1:14:28

have to acknowledge this was at least and allowed

1:14:30

to happen concept Now that could

1:14:32

be for many reasons. It

1:14:35

could be enemies enemies

1:14:37

of Netanyahu Who

1:14:39

wanted to let it happen to push him

1:14:41

out of office, right? It could be an internal dispute

1:14:44

or it could be in a whole of Israel government action

1:14:46

to be able to justify The ethnic

1:14:48

cleansing we've always wanted and then

1:14:50

the bite the the bonus of pipelines

1:14:52

and oil reserves I

1:14:54

mean the point is that if those are things

1:14:56

that we should keep trying to flesh out But

1:14:59

we what we can see this should have already

1:15:01

been clearly discussed. They knew it they allowed it

1:15:04

According to the IDF Mossad officials. They didn't

1:15:06

act on it because they didn't believe that

1:15:08

Hamas had the capability They

1:15:11

said think about that for a second Why

1:15:14

exactly? Oh, he goes

1:15:17

on to say Israel constantly claims that

1:15:19

Hamas is an existential threat To

1:15:22

justify the four billion dollars way

1:15:24

more this year that it

1:15:26

received from USA from your tax dollars Well,

1:15:28

if Hamas is such a dire existential threat

1:15:31

to Israel, then why didn't it take the

1:15:33

intelligence seriously? See,

1:15:35

that's my point. It's an

1:15:37

intelligent person can see the contradictions in

1:15:39

plain sight Instead

1:15:41

they did the opposite They removed their troops from

1:15:44

the Gaza wall relied on remote controlled tech that

1:15:46

they knew Hamas plan to take out You can't

1:15:48

tell me this wasn't an inside job to give

1:15:50

Israel an excuse to finally do what it's always

1:15:52

wanted to do and take Gaza for itself to

1:15:54

exploit the oil and gas deposits and so on

1:15:56

and so on Well,

1:15:59

we talked about The

1:16:02

point is that it's obvious that something is

1:16:05

a riot here. Now

1:16:07

it's certainly also possible that the killing of them, the

1:16:09

genocide being committed, is all meant to shock you away

1:16:11

from realizing the biggest crime here. Well,

1:16:14

debatably biggest now with the genocide of thousands of

1:16:16

thousands of people. But evidence

1:16:18

shows Israel killed its own citizens on the 7th. We discussed

1:16:21

this on October 27th because

1:16:23

it's easy to prove. Here's just

1:16:25

one example of Heretz. Saying

1:16:30

very clearly, it also showed

1:16:32

that military helicopters fired and

1:16:34

hit some people at the concert.

1:16:38

But you don't need that. You have the people

1:16:40

at the Koosap area on the record saying that

1:16:42

they shot hostages. You got two people that survived

1:16:44

saying, yes, we saw them shoot hostages. You

1:16:47

know how people are coming back from Gaza saying, yes,

1:16:49

we saw them kill people and you were trying to

1:16:51

kill us when we were there? We'll

1:16:53

get to that next. Here

1:16:56

is another one. Angelo Giolani points

1:16:58

out, Israeli

1:17:01

army commander admits they handcuffed two couples inside

1:17:04

the house, then used tanks to destroy the

1:17:06

building. Fifteen civilians were

1:17:08

burned to death, including eight babies. Here's

1:17:11

what he says. Men,

1:17:13

two women, hand-capped. Inside

1:17:18

this house were

1:17:20

another 15 burned

1:17:22

people. Among them, eight

1:17:24

babies. In this form. They

1:17:27

concentrated them, and

1:17:30

they killed them, and

1:17:32

they burned them. Our

1:17:34

tanks attacked. Fired

1:17:36

on them. Yeah. Yeah. They

1:17:39

were blocked in these houses,

1:17:42

and we needed to

1:17:45

conquer back the whole settlement,

1:17:47

and it couldn't happen without the tanks.

1:17:51

And this is what we've already been admitted to, or

1:17:53

it's already been admitted. They needed

1:17:55

to take that back. That's been stated

1:17:57

by the tank. We also have a question.

1:18:00

up by the way that 25 year old girls that

1:18:02

openly admitted that yes we will first they were said

1:18:04

they were told to fire on the tanks or on

1:18:06

the houses the tanks then they said

1:18:08

well are there civilians then literally on the

1:18:10

record said we don't know shoot

1:18:13

anyway then the girl says

1:18:15

well I got out opened on open fire on the house

1:18:17

of my gun instead and then the other guy says

1:18:19

they fired their tanks so

1:18:21

yes every which way you look

1:18:23

at this they admitted to firing on these people but

1:18:25

here's the other side of it in

1:18:28

a meeting of the Israeli Finance Committee

1:18:30

Noam Dan who still has family

1:18:32

held in Gaza right now says

1:18:34

quote we know for sure that

1:18:37

three people were killed by our

1:18:39

fire right so this is

1:18:41

also now very clear people

1:18:43

that were there have admitted that Israeli

1:18:46

fire on the area where hostage were

1:18:48

held which is what we're

1:18:50

telling you that they either didn't know they were there

1:18:52

because they are they don't know where they are in

1:18:54

Gaza or when you realize it's the most surreal place

1:18:56

on the planet that they did know they were there

1:18:58

and bombed them anyway Hannibal directive

1:19:02

that they don't care about these people we've been telling it

1:19:04

from the beginning if they're bombing

1:19:06

this area they don't care about the hot and that's

1:19:08

what Israelis are saying and they're telling him

1:19:10

right now we know for sure that you've killed

1:19:12

three people so that what they're arguing here is

1:19:15

you're continuing to claim that you're doing this to

1:19:17

save hostage we know that's not true because your

1:19:19

bombing is killing them at the very

1:19:21

least it's secondary to your objective about Gaza

1:19:24

they are calling them out now

1:19:28

we just talked about this for you Israeli captives

1:19:30

admitted more fear of the IDF bonds than Hamas

1:19:32

and and provable lies and the rape allegation will

1:19:34

briefly touch on that in a second here

1:19:37

is an important article from the cradle this is

1:19:40

from two days ago quote we feared our government

1:19:42

would kill us and blame Hamas released

1:19:44

Israeli captives admit now this is

1:19:49

well sourced as well it's all highlighted so you

1:19:51

can't see it but all the links are here

1:19:53

directly to Israeli corporate media people that there's no

1:19:55

dismissing this because all the cradle we don't like

1:19:57

the great there's always somebody wants to do that

1:20:00

Oh, and the great don't even have that bunk fake

1:20:02

news site. If you're going to dismiss

1:20:04

something based on the name of a website without

1:20:06

even looking at what they're presenting, that's you being

1:20:08

stupid. It's the same as

1:20:10

dismissing because Fox News or CNN said it. If

1:20:13

you don't look first to find out if there's any kind

1:20:15

of source material, you're choosing to be willful and ignorant, despite

1:20:17

how often they lie. Here's

1:20:19

what it says. A recently released Israeli

1:20:22

captive held in Gaza revealed that she

1:20:24

feared Israel would kill her and

1:20:26

others through indiscriminate shelling and then blame

1:20:29

Hamas. According to YNET News and Israeli

1:20:31

publication on December 6th, Minear

1:20:34

Oz made the statement in a

1:20:36

meeting between her and other recently

1:20:39

released captives and their family members

1:20:42

on the one hand and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and

1:20:44

his War Cabinet on the other. So this is the

1:20:46

same dynamic he keeps seeing. It's

1:20:48

like I think it's the Knesset

1:20:50

set up where you have the

1:20:53

cabinet sitting there and then the

1:20:55

family members that are basically petitioning them to stop

1:20:57

firing and bring their family home. And

1:20:59

they yell at them saying, you don't have a,

1:21:02

I think it was Ben Gebir that said, you don't have a corner

1:21:05

of the market and all suffering. Like literally didn't

1:21:07

care that they were suffering and said, you don't have

1:21:10

a right to make us feel bad. Like this

1:21:12

is what they actually say to the people saying, stop

1:21:14

bombing, you're killing our families. And then Biden calls you

1:21:16

a racist because you're not allowing them to keep firing.

1:21:19

Which by the way, I'll just go ahead and

1:21:21

say, we'll get to in a minute. The US

1:21:23

government did definitely veto the ceasefire. I know it's

1:21:25

the title actually, but the point is they don't

1:21:28

care. They're continuing to allow this to continue. The

1:21:30

US is one of the only, I think the only group

1:21:32

that vetoed the ceasefire. Now

1:21:36

it says during the

1:21:38

meeting, the released captives and family members expressed

1:21:40

anger at Netanyahu for his war policy, which

1:21:42

put their lives in danger. Quote,

1:21:45

I was there and I know how

1:21:47

hard it is in captivity. Every day

1:21:49

in captivity was very difficult. I was

1:21:51

in a home when there was shelling

1:21:53

all around. We were sitting in the

1:21:55

tunnels and we were terribly afraid that

1:21:57

not Hamas, but Israel would kill us

1:21:59

to very. clear she's speaking to Netanyahu

1:22:02

and then they would say Hamas killed

1:22:04

you isn't that exactly what I was

1:22:07

saying and be called being called an anti-semite for

1:22:09

yeah so I very

1:22:11

much ask as she says as soon

1:22:13

as possible to start exchanging the prisoners

1:22:15

and everyone should return home even she called

1:22:17

the prisoners there is no priority

1:22:21

everyone is important they're

1:22:24

telling them stop what you're doing bring

1:22:27

our people home you're killing people and they

1:22:29

believe that they're dishonest enough to say they

1:22:31

would they Hamas killed you they see them

1:22:33

just like we do bar

1:22:36

Goldstein told what his family members who

1:22:38

returned from captivity and Gaza described to

1:22:40

him quote fortunately he says

1:22:43

I had the privilege of receiving my sister-in-law

1:22:46

Chen and her children they

1:22:49

were a they were under constant

1:22:51

threat from the IDF shelling he

1:22:55

told Netanyahu that quote you sat in front

1:22:57

of us and assured us that it does

1:22:59

not threaten their lives he lied to them

1:23:01

in fact I quite frankly still believed they

1:23:03

intended to make sure they didn't come home

1:23:06

same thing we're gonna get into with the pumping the water down the

1:23:08

tunnels you think that's not gonna put their family's lives

1:23:11

a threat they know it will by

1:23:13

the way which is already happening despite how the corporate media went

1:23:15

dark on it after they said they were thinking about it they've

1:23:17

already done it they're still doing it as far as I can

1:23:19

tell he told Netanyahu that quote

1:23:21

I just said that the shelling was dangerous

1:23:23

because the captives were not held in just

1:23:26

tunnel this is where it gets important not

1:23:30

just tunnels and homes but had been moved

1:23:32

on donkey carts through the streets of

1:23:34

Gaza exposing them to the bombing

1:23:36

which has killed almost 16,000 Palestinians

1:23:39

since the seventh or

1:23:41

so they're telling you they're driving them

1:23:43

around the moving locations and Israel you

1:23:46

think Israel doesn't see that but the

1:23:48

most intensive surveillance in the world how

1:23:50

do they not know they're killing their own people think

1:23:53

about it they

1:23:55

said you will be you will not be able

1:23:57

to recognize them on the street and you are

1:23:59

endangering their lives It is our

1:24:01

duty to return them now. These are the

1:24:03

people in Israel speaking to Netanyahu Another

1:24:06

captive who was released with her children also expressed

1:24:08

anger at the army shelling of the location where

1:24:10

she was held in Gaza And

1:24:12

that Israeli Apache helicopters had opened fire

1:24:14

at them as they were being target

1:24:17

taken from their home across the border

1:24:19

into Gaza It's

1:24:22

another person has come forward and say you were

1:24:24

shooting at us as we were being taken into Gaza

1:24:27

She said the free the feeling

1:24:29

we had there was that no

1:24:31

one was doing anything for us The

1:24:34

fact is that I was in a hiding

1:24:36

place that was shelled and we had to

1:24:39

be smuggled out while we were wounded You

1:24:41

hear that? So they were bombed

1:24:44

by Israel which wounded them and

1:24:46

it was Hamas that moved them away now Wouldn't you

1:24:48

argue that if it was everything Israel said that they

1:24:50

would let them die so they could blame it on

1:24:52

Israel It seems

1:24:54

pretty clear based on these people's testimony that a

1:24:56

mosque was doing everything It could to stop them

1:24:58

from being killed by IDF farming. That's not my

1:25:01

opinion being framed there That's what they're saying which

1:25:03

of course could be entirely different from the rest of them that come

1:25:05

out But I don't know why would we assume it? Why

1:25:08

wouldn't we take what we can currently see and at least

1:25:10

acknowledge that it could be just like that in the rest

1:25:12

of the conversation She

1:25:14

also expressed anger that the army was discussing flooding

1:25:17

the tunnels Under Gaza

1:25:19

with seawater to kill Hamas fighters

1:25:21

while her husband and others remain captive in the

1:25:23

same tunnels She says quote my

1:25:26

husband was separated from us three days before we

1:25:28

returned to Israel and he was taken to the

1:25:30

tunnels Are you and

1:25:32

you are talking about flooding the tunnels with seawater?

1:25:35

Are you shelling the route of tunnels? in

1:25:38

the exact area where they are she's

1:25:41

straight up calling them out guys a December

1:25:43

6 report from the gray zone further indicates

1:25:45

freed Israeli captives feared being killed We just

1:25:47

told you by their own army while in

1:25:49

Gaza According to a Facebook post

1:25:52

by Israeli television producer a guy levy quote

1:25:54

from the reports of the return of ducties

1:25:57

It is repeated that the

1:25:59

most horrifying captivity trauma they experienced

1:26:01

was the IDF bombing and

1:26:04

yet you're hearing the exact opposite from all the

1:26:06

Eli Davids and Ben Shapiro's and all the

1:26:08

liars out there because whoever is

1:26:10

directing them and telling them the wrong things and

1:26:13

you get the Israeli government saying exactly the

1:26:15

opposite. I mean it literally is real account

1:26:18

on twitter or the IDF account on twitter

1:26:20

taking weird screenshots and going look at how

1:26:22

much they were tortured and they're literally saying

1:26:24

the opposite. They're

1:26:26

the ones using these people guys. Levy

1:26:29

stated further that quote when they tell about them

1:26:31

they literally tremble in front of me. She's taught

1:26:33

and then they show the clip of them scared

1:26:35

and say look what Hamas did to them. Now

1:26:38

they're admitting it was the IDF bombing that made them feel

1:26:40

that way. That's the kind of propaganda we're dealing with. The

1:26:43

terms are of hell, of the brink

1:26:45

of death, of an earthquake, of

1:26:48

noise from another planet which

1:26:50

also caused permanent hearing damage. All

1:26:54

these things they keep highlighting that were somehow like

1:26:56

byproducts of what Hamas did all seem to

1:26:59

stem from what Israel was possibly intentionally doing

1:27:01

to them. The

1:27:03

fear of being murdered by the captors was

1:27:05

zero compared to the fear of dying in

1:27:07

the bombing. Prime Minister

1:27:09

Netanyahu that was their quote. Prime Minister Netanyahu

1:27:11

has vowed to both win the return of

1:27:14

all the Israelis held captive by Hamas and

1:27:17

also to defeat the Palestinian resistance groups

1:27:19

militarily. But of course many

1:27:21

who have a brain can view these

1:27:23

view these as contradictory goals and suggest

1:27:25

the captives can only be freed through

1:27:27

a ceasefire followed by negotiations. So

1:27:30

who exactly is Netanyahu acting on behalf of?

1:27:33

Who exactly is the Israeli military acting on

1:27:35

behalf of? If their people are calling for

1:27:37

a ceasefire demanding their people be freed the

1:27:39

vast majority of Israeli population are doing the

1:27:42

same. The majority of every population seems to

1:27:44

be doing the same. Who exactly is fighting

1:27:46

this war? I think you

1:27:48

know it's obviously not for freedom.

1:27:50

It's obviously not to defend yourself against

1:27:52

terrorists. This is about the Zionist agenda

1:27:54

and taking this territory. That's

1:27:57

not to say that Hamas is innocent. Clearly

1:28:00

things happen again all the

1:28:02

things that you think happened on the seventh

1:28:04

are now obviously flavored with the Israeli government

1:28:07

Allowing it to happen or just a simple

1:28:09

reality that Israel had been funding them per

1:28:11

admission of net yahoo himself

1:28:14

Which I'll get to again the second I'm

1:28:17

also seeking to exchange its Israeli captives

1:28:19

for thousands of Palestinians held captive in

1:28:21

Israeli occupation prisons Which by

1:28:23

the way as I've said and it's now been proven has

1:28:25

been on the table since day one Net

1:28:28

yahoo lied about it, which then shows you they didn't want

1:28:31

these people back he only admitted that

1:28:33

when he was forced to then broke

1:28:36

the ceasefire and Didn't

1:28:38

and I mean every step up the way

1:28:40

they have shown that they don't care about these people And

1:28:44

here's even a Heretz article Six

1:28:47

Israeli hostages held by Hamas

1:28:50

Confirmed killed in captivity which of course

1:28:52

the entire thing is implying that Hamas

1:28:54

did this But we know

1:28:56

that's not the case based on the

1:28:58

admission of other hostages it's

1:29:01

pretty simple guys and Here's

1:29:04

Eli David still trying to use these people

1:29:06

so I said the same thing before Hamas

1:29:10

had already told Israel that these this

1:29:12

family was killed by Israeli bombings. That's

1:29:14

the beeba family the two redhead

1:29:16

children and the mother They

1:29:19

already said this they said they were killed and that

1:29:21

was when they were trying to give those bodies back, right?

1:29:26

There's a reason that Israel went immediately

1:29:28

there was right when they think I

1:29:30

believe when they were told that they

1:29:32

immediately made a Propaganda push to use these children's

1:29:34

faces to push them out There's a reason that

1:29:37

these two children became the focal point for about

1:29:39

a few days At

1:29:41

that point they already knew they were dead You

1:29:44

could argue that a mosque killed them and lied about it My point is

1:29:46

Israel already knew that and then went on a push

1:29:48

to pretend that their goal was to get them home

1:29:51

Knowing they wouldn't come home Think

1:29:53

about how gross that is and here's

1:29:55

Eli David doing the same gross thing as he

1:29:57

always does The baby is still held hostage And

1:30:00

he says that when they already know that they've

1:30:02

been killed. Sadly,

1:30:04

how disgusting that is. And

1:30:06

they refuse to release him in a hostage deal. No,

1:30:09

they tried to give the bodies back and Israel refused, and

1:30:11

then tried to gaslight and point in other directions to

1:30:13

claim something else happened, because they didn't want anyone to

1:30:15

know that. Now,

1:30:18

why it needed to state this, I think

1:30:20

it's an obvious reality, but just because people

1:30:22

like Eli are going to try to misrepresent

1:30:25

everything, obviously this was a crime. Taking

1:30:28

any civilian is a war crime, and yes,

1:30:30

Hamas should be absolutely accountable for that. That

1:30:33

does not then remove the fact that Israel

1:30:35

bombings killed these families. And

1:30:38

as I said, sadly, they were killed by

1:30:40

Israeli airstrikes. Even released Israelis are admitting this.

1:30:46

Now, here's another interesting dynamic, speaking

1:30:48

to the people that were taken or involved in October 7.

1:30:52

This is an image, recently

1:30:54

been out. I wonder

1:30:56

how much Israel has that we're not seeing that proves

1:30:58

the things we're talking about. This

1:31:00

is Shani Luke. At

1:31:02

the moment, in this picture, still alive, and

1:31:05

I frankly don't think she's alive now. Again,

1:31:07

my hypothesis, based on the evidence we can

1:31:10

prove, it seems to me that she was

1:31:12

shot in this location, or somewhere during this

1:31:14

by IDF, or it could have

1:31:16

been by Hamas, but in the crossfire. Hamas

1:31:19

then, according to Newsweek, took her to a

1:31:21

hospital that her mother said that was the

1:31:23

case, and that hospital, days

1:31:25

later, was shut down due to fuel and bombed.

1:31:29

And we're seeing babies left behind. Why

1:31:32

would we assume, it seems

1:31:34

quite likely, that Israel is doing this where

1:31:36

these people are, guys? So

1:31:38

here's an image of her, alive, next

1:31:41

to a tank of the Israeli

1:31:43

forces. So explain this for

1:31:45

me. So you have an Israel tank that

1:31:48

they're hiding by, and we're supposed to pretend that

1:31:51

they then took them by the tank? Or

1:31:54

did something else happen? Did they not

1:31:56

want these people to admit what they saw? Take

1:31:59

a simple look. weren't for us to ask that today. The

1:32:05

US is weird dynamic

1:32:07

over the process of yesterday into

1:32:09

today. I think this

1:32:11

was leading into the ceasefire veto, which we all knew was going

1:32:13

to happen. The US government says no

1:32:16

deadline on the IDF to end the Gaza war,

1:32:19

basically saying you take as long as you need

1:32:21

while you're murdering children. Cause we're okay with that.

1:32:24

But then of course it was like, wait, wait, no,

1:32:26

no. Biden said they have to, a year. I

1:32:29

heard another one, another group said 25 days. He's

1:32:31

all over the map, but they said, they

1:32:33

said, times of Israel said, no, no, he said a

1:32:35

year you have a whole year to keep ethnically cleansing

1:32:37

them. But then, but then no, you gotta stop. I

1:32:39

mean, think about ridiculous that is. Think

1:32:43

about how grotesque that is to go.

1:32:45

Go. I mean, what, what do you think a year

1:32:47

is going to do? Like

1:32:49

really ask yourself if you're out, okay. If

1:32:51

you're saying kill less children, which is what they're saying,

1:32:54

please lessen how many children, why would

1:32:56

it be a year? You

1:32:58

think that's going to not happen in a year. Like

1:33:01

this is, this is obviously showing

1:33:03

you that they are not going to stop what's

1:33:06

happening. That's complicit. But

1:33:08

then of course it went back and said, no, no, wait.

1:33:10

He says they haven't given a deadline. So

1:33:12

just so you're clear as if

1:33:15

it was either better. Oh, you have a year. No,

1:33:17

no, no. You have no deadline. Take as long as

1:33:20

you need Netanyahu. That's what, that's what the ending point

1:33:22

was. And

1:33:24

just to make it even more clear. So you understand

1:33:26

why that's so important. This

1:33:29

is the Jewish news syndicate saying Biden is

1:33:31

the primary obstacle to Israeli victory. Why? Well,

1:33:35

in case you didn't know this, it says Israel cannot

1:33:37

fight the war without us risk resupply of

1:33:39

the IDF. It's just like Ukraine, isn't it?

1:33:42

As a consequence, Israel is beholden to

1:33:45

the administration's directives. You

1:33:47

might not know this. It might seem like the

1:33:49

exact opposite. Now, technically, when you're talking about influence,

1:33:52

it might very well might be. But

1:33:54

when we're talking about military support, it's

1:33:57

obvious that the U.S. government, if they were to

1:33:59

stop funding. this were earning, they

1:34:02

wouldn't be able to continue. Quite

1:34:04

literally, the U.S. government has the ability

1:34:06

to stop this today. They

1:34:09

chose not to. They chose

1:34:11

to actually veto the ceasefire, even. The

1:34:13

main point is they could just stop arming them, saying,

1:34:15

well, you're committing war crimes, and nobody in

1:34:17

this country wants that, so we're going to stop giving you

1:34:19

their money. But no, of course not, because

1:34:21

Biden's a coward. But

1:34:24

it says Israel's dependence on the United States

1:34:26

was stated bluntly by retired IDF Major

1:34:28

General. In a recent interview,

1:34:30

here's what he says, quote, all of our missiles, the

1:34:33

ammunition, the precision guided bombs, all the

1:34:35

airplanes and bombs, it's

1:34:37

all from the U.S. How

1:34:40

in the world does that make sense? Because

1:34:42

we're just being bled dry by a foreign

1:34:45

power that has complete control over the government.

1:34:48

How else do you see this? And of course, they

1:34:50

would love to make that about racism. It's not. It's

1:34:52

about another political party that's influencing our government, like all

1:34:54

sorts of governments are trying to do. And it happens

1:34:56

to be a Zionist entity. The

1:34:59

reason the whole racist overlay comes out is

1:35:01

because they're desperate that you don't see that.

1:35:04

The minute they turn off the tap, it says you can't

1:35:06

keep fighting. You have no capability.

1:35:09

Everyone understands that we can't

1:35:11

fight this war without

1:35:13

the United States, period. Then

1:35:16

it says his demand, Biden's,

1:35:20

that Israel minimize Palestinian civilian

1:35:22

casualties, endangers IDF soldiers and

1:35:24

renders the expansion of the ground offensive

1:35:27

into central and southern Gaza, where the

1:35:29

bulk of Hamas's forces are now located,

1:35:31

wherever they're currently at is where they

1:35:33

are, apparently, almost impossible to carry out.

1:35:37

So just hear what they're saying there. Just

1:35:40

always saying is minimize civilian casualties.

1:35:43

They go, no, we can't do that. That

1:35:45

puts us in danger. That puts

1:35:47

our whole operation in danger. So if

1:35:49

you understand how language works, that means that

1:35:51

they're not minimizing civilian casualties, but that would

1:35:53

hinder what they want to accomplish. So

1:35:56

you are a member of civilians and that is

1:35:58

okay. And clearly part of the plan. It's

1:36:01

as simple as it's ever been, 972 magazine

1:36:03

article, which admitted that coming from

1:36:06

eight, seven current and former IDF

1:36:08

members, admitting they're targeting them,

1:36:11

admitting they do it just to bring down buildings.

1:36:13

But yeah, we can't take facts and run with

1:36:15

a story. We've got to listen to narrative from

1:36:17

that now, right? So

1:36:19

if the U.S. government wanted to end this now,

1:36:21

they could, but they're not. That's,

1:36:25

if you have, that's complicity

1:36:28

if I've ever seen it. And

1:36:31

just one quick note on that. So

1:36:34

what we're talking about is the

1:36:36

endless nonstop bombing, round-the-clock engagement, murdering

1:36:38

civilians day by day. What was

1:36:40

it? Something like 100 to

1:36:42

200 children a day, something like 700 people.

1:36:45

I mean, it's just, it's grotesque. It's worse than

1:36:47

anything we've ever seen, and we all know that. But

1:36:50

it's okay, though, because Hamas and human shields is

1:36:53

whatever they say. Really,

1:36:55

the truth is that whatever they say doesn't change the reality

1:36:57

that this is a crime, no matter what they say. What?

1:37:02

Bombing, relentless bombing, nonstop, all

1:37:05

over civilians. And even if you want to

1:37:07

pretend that you agree Hamas, therefore we can

1:37:09

kill civilians, they, you're killing civilians.

1:37:12

Tens of thousands of civilians, day after day.

1:37:14

Okay. Also,

1:37:16

don't forget that they're the ones telling you

1:37:18

right now, the UN is Hamas, right? Both

1:37:21

IDF, Israel, and all their propagandists, Eli Davis,

1:37:23

the one I showed you last time, showing

1:37:26

you, literally stating these people are tools of

1:37:28

Hamas. Or, as he put it,

1:37:30

they are Hamas, right? Okay.

1:37:33

So, just so we understand, that's what they're doing.

1:37:35

Here's the IDF calling

1:37:37

on the group, they just said, are Hamas,

1:37:40

and going, hey, Hamas, did you hear a loud

1:37:42

noise yesterday? So that was the sound

1:37:44

of 12 Hamas rockets launched toward Israel's civilians in

1:37:46

southern Israel. The reason they say it

1:37:48

launched toward is because nothing happened. Because 99%

1:37:51

of these land in open fields, and the point

1:37:53

is, it's a fraction

1:37:56

of a fraction of a fraction of what's happening

1:37:58

in Gaza, if it even causes damage. Mind you,

1:38:00

understand that. But, the sound of

1:38:02

these rockets, man, it made us stressed out. That's what

1:38:04

they usually hear. But what they're saying is, Hey,

1:38:07

UN, why aren't

1:38:09

you calling this out? 12 rockets

1:38:11

that were fired. Hamas is the enemy of humanity and

1:38:13

makes itself a threat to the entire world by

1:38:15

firing 12 rockets that cause no damage

1:38:18

in an area that is currently bombing and

1:38:20

committing genocide in Gaza. That's a threat to

1:38:22

the whole world. But the

1:38:24

point is, is the UN Hamas

1:38:26

or not? Do you want

1:38:28

them to take action? If they do, are you OK with that?

1:38:30

Will you support it? How does that make sense if you just

1:38:32

told us they're working for Hamas? The

1:38:34

point is, Israel lies about anything all the time,

1:38:37

just like the US government does. Either

1:38:41

the point they made before, if a resolution comes

1:38:43

out from the UN they like, well, we support it and we'll

1:38:45

back it and we'll defend it to the death and say you

1:38:47

have to abide by what the UN says. But if the UN

1:38:49

says something they don't like, well, they're racist and nobody

1:38:51

believes in them and they're always working. It's

1:38:53

all or nothing all the time. So

1:38:56

either you want the UN to do something or you

1:38:59

think they're Hamas. You can't play it both ways, but

1:39:01

they do all the time because they're ridiculous. And

1:39:04

the larger point about what is it, 6000 tons

1:39:07

of bombs? That

1:39:09

was before the ceasefire, but you know, 12

1:39:11

rockets, no damage. Whoo, I'm stressed

1:39:13

out over here. I think somebody skinned their knee in

1:39:15

Israel. War crimes. Disgusting.

1:39:19

And here's that point right here. Eli

1:39:22

Davis. Here he is calling

1:39:24

out the recent discussion of him saying, well, more than

1:39:26

130 UN members have been killed. And

1:39:30

he goes, how many of them working for

1:39:32

Hamas? How many of them were flying rockets

1:39:34

from UN facilities? Does he

1:39:36

have evidence for any of this? No, of course

1:39:38

not. I'm not saying it's not possible. I'm

1:39:40

saying that they just blatantly stated this way

1:39:43

after the fact. My point was

1:39:45

they've now killed 100 members and

1:39:47

they're not even claiming anything. They didn't say the UN

1:39:50

is Hamas. They only pushed that out once

1:39:52

it became impossible to hide the fact that

1:39:54

they'd killed 130 members of the UN. That's

1:39:57

how this game is played. Ample

1:40:00

evidence shows no it doesn't but here's how it goes

1:40:02

on We

1:40:05

are not terrorists community notes yes

1:40:07

you are here's the evidence and what are they showing

1:40:10

No the idea this is evidence of them being a

1:40:13

Terrorist is hilarious and again. I am

1:40:16

literally the last person supporting the United Nations

1:40:18

of the body I support the

1:40:20

reality facts whether that ends up supporting as you

1:40:22

see it somebody that we don't agree with the

1:40:25

facts of facts What it says

1:40:27

here is the headmaster of the United Nations school

1:40:29

was a terrorist this Reuters article says and if

1:40:31

you read the article What is it tied to

1:40:33

the US the Israeli government making

1:40:36

an allegation they report as absolute fact

1:40:38

It's exactly what we always show you or

1:40:40

a film in Janine where their policies and

1:40:42

practices where they claim it implies They're working

1:40:44

with us It's the same way they tried

1:40:46

to tell you that these people being present

1:40:48

in this building that they said has a tunnel therefore

1:40:50

means They're all Hamas. This is what they always

1:40:52

do. Oh look at this one United

1:40:55

Nations Palestinian refugee agency teachers celebrating

1:40:58

on October 7th because to them

1:41:00

that means they want to kill all Jews no you Absolute

1:41:03

moron it means they're celebrating the fact

1:41:05

that Palestine was fighting back against his

1:41:07

occupier and at the

1:41:09

time They were celebrating how are you pretending

1:41:11

they knew everything that happened in

1:41:13

Israel? Like these people

1:41:15

are willfully stupid. They know that though. They

1:41:18

don't want it's a narrative control It's

1:41:21

all of these read them all for yourself guys.

1:41:23

It's absurd And then even

1:41:25

let's even say this even further Let's just

1:41:27

say one of these members ended up doing something or a

1:41:29

part of Hamas Does that then mean every

1:41:31

member of the UN or this agency is a

1:41:34

must know because that would be a really?

1:41:36

Childish naive assumption it

1:41:39

could mean that but you should prove it,

1:41:41

but this guy's not in the business of proving anything This

1:41:44

is the point I was making He's saying

1:41:46

they are Hamas It's

1:41:49

just stupid so Why

1:41:52

is the idea of asking the Hamas to

1:41:55

do something? Yeah, really

1:41:58

stupid. So here is One

1:42:00