0:23

Welcome to a special edition video

0:25

today. It is June 2nd, 2023. I

0:29

wanted to follow up with something I did today that I actually forgot

0:31

to include. I think it's a really important quick little video

0:33

I want to do to encapsulate something that I think is

0:36

incredibly important. And it has to do

0:38

with parents, children, the transgender

0:42

movement, and how the children seem

0:44

to be not just the focus of children, but how this

0:46

is affecting the dynamic between parents and

0:48

their children, and parents and the state, and

0:50

parents and the schools.

0:52

And how this is

0:53

alarmingly driving forward in a way that

0:55

creates a situation where parents have no ability

0:58

to even stand up and ask questions

1:00

about what's going on with their children while they're

1:02

in the state-controlled schooling system.

1:05

It's very concerning. So I want to start off with

1:07

something that I was going to play a moment ago in this

1:10

video that I think is one of the most

1:12

alarming videos I think I've seen in a really long time. Now

1:15

this is a woman who is speaking

1:19

in a political forum about

1:23

what happened to her when she tried

1:27

to ask questions about the

1:29

curriculum for her children. And

1:32

not only the way that she didn't get any answers

1:34

about that, but that they acted like

1:37

she was the persecutor

1:40

simply for asking what was going

1:42

on. Because I argue that there's

1:44

a weird momentum today where

1:47

even people that may not have what you would argue is

1:49

the nefarious agenda, they just buy into

1:51

what is in my opinion a nefarious agenda for whatever

1:53

reason,

1:54

believe that when people ask, sort of like with the vaccine

1:57

conversation, where people ask, you know, what's in the injection?

1:59

And they go, oh. Oh, here's another one of those people. Maybe

2:02

not. Maybe they just genuinely care

2:05

what's inside of it and they're gonna take it anyway. Or maybe

2:07

they are asking because they're one of those people,

2:09

whatever you think that means. But you know this is happening

2:11

today. Doctors are now kicking people out of

2:13

their offices for asking for second opinions, which

2:16

is completely counter to the entire situation.

2:18

Now we have parents who are simply going, well, what's

2:20

in the curriculum?

2:22

And you have parents, so she'd be teachers, teacher,

2:24

you know, school boards, who act

2:26

like that's a problem. That

2:29

they feel threatened

2:30

because in their minds, some people I would

2:32

argue think, oh, well, she's gonna go after the

2:35

trans community and that's what this is really about.

2:37

Maybe. Or

2:39

maybe she just wants to know what's in the curriculum. All

2:43

assumption. The problem is

2:45

the state, the agenda, is completely siding

2:47

with those people because that is working for where

2:50

this is all really going. Now that's a secondary conversation

2:52

for this video today, where it's all really going. I

2:54

have plenty of work on where I think this is connecting to

2:56

the larger agendas, but let's just focus

2:59

on this one small point.

3:00

This video is unnerving.

3:06

My name is Nicole Solis, and I

3:08

am a mother from Rhode Island who was sued

3:11

by the teachers union simply

3:13

because I wanted to know what my kindergartner

3:15

would be learning in school. And

3:18

here's how this happened. I asked to see

3:20

the curriculum, and my school told me I had to submit

3:22

a public records request. The curriculum

3:24

wasn't posted online and it wasn't available

3:26

in a school district. Then I asked them

3:28

if they were teaching gender theory, and they told me that

3:30

they don't call children boys and girls, and

3:33

they embed the values of gender identity

3:35

into every classroom, including kindergarten, and

3:37

they didn't want to answer any of my

3:40

questions further. They told me that they

3:42

would communicate with me only through public records

3:44

requests, and that is the only way I could

3:46

get my questions answered. And when I

3:48

did submit the public records request that they told me

3:50

to submit, and I submitted hundreds, because I had

3:52

hundreds of questions, my school

3:54

board then put my name on the agenda

3:57

of a public school board meeting, and

3:59

held a... public school board meeting to discuss

4:01

suing me for submitting the request that

4:03

they told me to submit. In

4:05

a five hour long school board meeting, they

4:08

openly debated my moral character,

4:11

my political motivations. They said

4:13

that I was causing chaos, wreaking

4:15

havoc, harming the district, harming children.

4:18

One school board member even said she felt unsafe

4:21

and started to cry because,

4:24

as you see, I'm really scary standing

4:26

here right now. And

4:29

they really just tarred and feathered me

4:31

for asking questions. And

4:34

they had never met me before, and this

4:36

was the first school board meeting that I had ever

4:38

been to in my life.

4:41

They wanted to send a message to other

4:43

parents that if you ask questions, they will come

4:45

after you. Well, at the end of this meeting, they decided

4:48

that they wouldn't sue me for asking questions

4:50

because they never intended on actually

4:52

suing me. They just wanted to publicly humiliate

4:54

me in a school board meeting that was a show trial.

4:58

And when that happened, then the Teachers Union, the largest

5:00

teachers union in the country, the NEA, did

5:03

file a lawsuit against me to bully

5:05

me and harass me with frivolous litigation

5:08

and to send a message to other parents that if you

5:10

ask questions

5:11

about public education, they

5:13

will come after you.

5:18

Wow. As

5:21

I said, this is one of the most clear

5:23

examples of how this entire movement has

5:25

been weaponized. Now, to be clear,

5:27

I am discussing the trans movement in this

5:30

point, but it's larger than that. We see the

5:32

same tenets of the same psychological

5:34

operation, manipulation in a lot

5:37

of other areas. We saw it with the vaccination on

5:39

Vax First Vaxed and how we are the enemy and how

5:41

we're putting people's lives, and the

5:43

facts on the table today show you the exact opposite,

5:46

but

5:46

it didn't matter, did it? It wasn't about

5:48

the facts, it was about control. You

5:51

become the persecutor. The moment

5:53

you even ask questions, just like with the

5:55

other conversations, this is dangerous

5:57

and it feels a bit like a runaway train of a political.

6:00

agenda. This needs to stop. Now,

6:02

what I mean by that is that the train is that we've

6:04

seen this get like my point, first of all, is that

6:06

I don't they don't care about that. It's not like they planned

6:09

it to be safe and and not

6:11

affect your lives. And then it went out of control. I don't think that's

6:13

even the case. I don't think they care.

6:15

I think we've seen this in every possible facet,

6:17

whether foreign policy, medical, anything.

6:20

The agenda is what's important. And whatever

6:22

maximizes the agenda, they this is what they

6:24

do directly at your expense.

6:27

But what I mean by runaway train is that you you

6:29

have a narrative, you have an agenda, which is that you

6:31

know, you can, again, getting into the absurdity

6:34

of saying from every academic, high

6:36

level conversation regarding the trans movement, it's

6:38

well, gender dysphoria,

6:40

right? They have a disorder, and we're treating that disorder, except

6:42

the entire movement has completely moved past that. No,

6:45

no, no, we can do what we want. We can be what we want. I can

6:47

wake up tomorrow and be a man. Next day, I can be a woman.

6:50

And you're teaching kids that you're teaching

6:52

kids. And of course, that that would be one thing,

6:54

except that leads to puberty

6:56

blockers, hormone treatments, invasive

6:59

surgeries, all of which have potentially fatal and

7:02

infertility risks. And way

7:04

more than that, which I get into in depth my recent

7:06

show,

7:07

the dark and surreptitious agenda driving the transgender

7:09

movement, as I've made in possibly

7:12

clear,

7:12

does not mean every trans person is doing this doesn't mean

7:15

every trans person is involved with this. It doesn't mean anything

7:17

other than the movement, like every other co opted

7:19

lying, dishonest movement is

7:21

being used against us.

7:23

There's a lot of trans people that are speaking out about this,

7:25

just like you have a lot of people in any one of these groups that are speaking

7:27

out and saying that doesn't represent me, even though

7:30

if you those very same people are

7:31

then being attacked as anti trans, even as they're trans,

7:34

that's also happening. It's

7:36

the same thing we see in every other conversation.

7:40

This is a political manipulation

7:42

that I argue has really nothing to do with

7:44

transgender or sexual identity. It's about

7:46

a means to an end for a larger agenda, again, which we're not

7:48

even get into today.

7:50

The bigger point, though, is

7:52

that this is real. Janet

7:55

Street Porter, thinking

7:57

of children as state assets may be the way

7:59

forward. I

8:00

might get into who that is.

8:03

This is the way they see this. Now,

8:05

even if you think that's for an honest, good

8:07

intentions because they want to help children and make sure they're

8:10

safe, which is what he's arguing, it doesn't matter

8:12

because what we're seeing is how that translates

8:14

to action, which is that you don't

8:16

have a right to step in. That

8:18

it, you know, whether they say it's for the best interest

8:20

of the child, all we want to do is make sure that they have all the

8:22

things they need. The point is when parents step

8:24

in and seemingly, even if it's

8:26

just the perception of the people going to the side, countering

8:29

what they want to do, you are now the enemy.

8:32

We saw this during the mass conversation where they said

8:34

the parents were threatening and being violent

8:37

and calling them domestic terrorists, calling them misogynistic,

8:40

calling them right wing conspiracy theorists

8:42

because they were saying the

8:43

truth. Not my opinion. What

8:46

has now come to pass as the truth according

8:49

to all the metrics they set out, the peer of

8:51

each science, the observational information, the

8:53

everything.

8:55

And here we are. He's

8:57

persecuted for it. The person

8:59

on the record crying and saying that they feel threatened.

9:03

I'm not going to say they don't actually feel threatened. It wouldn't surprise

9:05

me if they do. They're threatened by mean

9:08

words. The

9:10

problem though is that whether or not they're honest about

9:13

that, and I promise you some of them are abusing

9:15

that man or

9:17

woman to pretend that what you're doing is threatening

9:19

because that's a Trump card. You're

9:22

done. People are too afraid to

9:24

stand up and be like, that's not true because then you become

9:26

the focus. You become canceled. The

9:29

problem is people care about that. That's

9:31

why I've built what I'm doing in a way that doesn't matter.

9:34

Try and cancel me. See how that works out.

9:37

This is alarming. And at the

9:39

end of the day, what we're seeing is children focused

9:41

on in a way that is unnerving. Why

9:44

you are talking about sexual identity to

9:46

a child is beyond me. That's not

9:49

the same thing as sexual education in an anatomy

9:51

sense. This is about

9:53

sexual pleasure. This is about sexual

9:55

positions. This is about anal sex. It's about

9:58

fellatio. It's about masturbation.

9:59

things are not supposed to be on the table

10:02

when we're talking to children. And that's when they then say,

10:04

no, no, no,

10:04

it's just about identity. No, it's not. It is about sexual

10:07

identity. And children who have not gone through puberty

10:10

don't understand that. And yet you

10:12

argue that they somehow know what they're going

10:14

to be? Maybe. Certainly

10:17

something we can discuss, but that's not how we then

10:19

jump to go, well, we'll just give you dangerous chemicals

10:21

in the meantime until we figure this out.

10:24

That's not about equality, identity.

10:26

That is an agenda. And it's alarming

10:28

whether it's profit or something worse. Janet

10:31

Street Porter, who wrote that article writes, when I said

10:33

in the N.D.

10:34

that children should be regarded as state

10:36

assets, of course, I don't mean the state owns

10:38

them. The state should invest in the next generation

10:41

instead of penny pinching.

10:43

To all the trolls, try reading the whole column

10:45

before wasting your time trashing me. That was 2020, mind you. British

10:51

journalist, Independent, UK. Well, she said

10:53

independent, so we'll look there. But I checked all the rest of them,

10:55

too. What's funny to me is that when you look for it,

10:57

not the same one, it's not there. So

11:00

to all her screeching about try reading it first,

11:02

it looks like it's pretty much impossible to find. Whether

11:04

I put quotes in it or not, whether I read the general

11:06

mail on the page and search for it or directly from her own

11:09

page, I don't find it.

11:11

Neither on the independent or any of the ones that she

11:13

says that's where they were. I searched for the search bar, nothing.

11:17

I'm sure you could find it somewhere, but clearly it's

11:19

not just easily accessible. I checked the evening standard,

11:21

checked all of them. I even

11:23

just searched for it online. In quotes

11:25

specifically, and what do you know? Nowhere.

11:28

Despite the places posting this image

11:31

that she criticized and saying, you didn't even read

11:33

it, but guess what? It doesn't even seem to be there.

11:36

I wonder why. Whether Brave,

11:39

Google, doesn't matter. Here's

11:41

an interesting point. Janet Street Porter, who wrote that article,

11:44

reveals her ordeal of having a $25 backstreet abortion

11:47

on a stranger's kitchen table at 16. I'll

11:51

let that speak for itself. Here,

11:56

apologies for Nazi comparison. Comment on Loose Woman, which

11:58

is a show that's not a good idea. They run

12:00

it just this is the kind of people we're talking

12:02

about in my opinion 2015 Jan

12:07

district Porter wants to ban children from restaurants

12:09

like so this is the person telling you that they need to

12:12

be assets of the state

12:15

That's concerning well to end in

12:17

general because I want this to be quick video we've talked about

12:19

this a lot This is not about

12:22

people making choices in their lives or

12:24

whoopi Goldberg Ignorantly pretending like

12:26

we're trying to stop her from going to drag shows it

12:28

is about the focus of Children the

12:30

idea that we have young kids in front of sexual

12:33

content.

12:34

They will love to bend that into me meaning

12:36

I hate trans people. I don't care what the woman

12:38

a trans person or whatever you want to call it if it

12:40

is Sexual content it

12:42

is not appropriate for children

12:44

I don't care what you think is going on and what narrative you bent

12:46

this into here We have Disney going

12:48

all LGBTQ pride messaging on their theme

12:50

parks to children

12:52

now again My point is not that the idea

12:55

of pride month is the is the problem

12:57

now But it is in the inclusion of

12:59

the focus and what this is now being pushed the

13:01

idea that well what this is now saying Not that you

13:03

equality. It's about saying you could do what you want

13:07

Talk to your local doctor without your parents consent

13:09

about puberty blockers because now in the UK They're

13:12

telling them you don't have to have your parents permission

13:14

That's what this is leading to right now Not the flag

13:16

itself is inherent with the problem except for

13:18

now also that flag is now including image

13:21

colors that are provably Tied

13:23

back to a flag that was for men minor

13:25

attracted persons 2009 That's what

13:28

that flag was created and it was put forward by

13:30

one of the flags voted on picked by the community

13:33

to be the flag from a minor attracted

13:35

persons

13:36

Now they just claimed that's the trans colors,

13:39

which why that why would they need three different colors for

13:41

trans?

13:42

Because

13:42

that doesn't make sense because technically you should argue that's one

13:44

group which is what they say you see the point overall

13:48

It's very obvious to me that this is more

13:50

than that Now, of course,

13:52

they will make this about me secretly hating

13:54

trans or hating gay people, which is so obviously

13:56

not the truth Just like when I say Israel killed

13:59

people they go you hate Jews

13:59

No, you go ahead and play that game

14:02

all you want because people aren't buying it anymore This

14:06

was the oh there's a bunch of I'm just in

14:08

your time gonna skip it There's a few other examples I could make in

14:10

the thread But here's one of them the Lego group the

14:12

world's largest toy company, you know for children are

14:15

promoting identity politics What there's your

14:17

colors right there? specific almost promoting

14:19

the specific colors

14:21

Gender ideology, it's not gender

14:23

ideology guys. This is sexual ideology.

14:26

It is sexual identity There's no

14:28

way around that

14:30

So if you want to know more about this

14:32

and the reality that they don't really care about

14:34

what's going on in this movement about the Fact that there are

14:36

provable examples of people in you

14:39

know, dual use bathrooms that are being abused

14:41

people caught on camera masturbating

14:44

as dressed as a woman but with a penis in front of

14:46

children or the YMCA very clearly Telling

14:50

children young girls that are in a shower with

14:52

grown men that call themselves women that

14:54

actually still have full penises That they're

14:56

bigots for pointing it out

14:58

We're in a world now where you have a seven-year-old girl

15:00

who is traumatized by seeing a grown man's

15:03

penis right in front of her in A shower that she didn't

15:05

expect because nobody warned anybody and

15:07

when they go that's wrong. You're a bad person

15:10

That's the problem. I'm not saying

15:12

that means everybody any in any other That

15:15

doesn't mean anything other than that one point and

15:17

that one point is happening to some degree

15:19

and is possible end of conversation Feel

15:21

free to make this about how I hate everything

15:23

because the proof is obviously there my work speaks for itself This is about

15:26

something far darker And

15:28

we can't talk about this

15:30

without including the general conversation about what's

15:32

really going on here and how people that may have good intentions Whether

15:34

or not you think what they're doing is is mental illness or

15:37

some kind of sexual that's for you to decide your personal

15:39

choice But I do think people in this

15:41

movement not all of them and I can prove that are

15:43

part of what this is That's

15:46

an important distinction But

15:48

it needs to stop Because

15:51

it is a problem the movement itself and where it's

15:53

focusing. Thank you for tuning in today guys as always question

16:00

Everything comes to your own conclusions. Stay

16:02

vigilant.