0:01

Zionism, is racism.

0:04

Israel cannot be both. Israel

0:06

is either a racist Jewish

0:09

state or it's a democratic

0:11

state for everybody. And that's what I would

0:13

like Israel to be. I'd like a

0:16

democratic solution, one state

0:18

with equal rights for

0:21

all its inhabitants. Your

0:24

organization, Human Rights Watch, issued

0:27

a report last

0:29

year about Israel

0:32

and the conclusion was it

0:34

is an apartheid state. And

0:36

there are four major human

0:39

rights groups in the last two years

0:41

who issued similar reports, which is the

0:43

same conclusion. Israel is

0:46

an apartheid state. So apartheid

0:49

is racism, apartheid

0:51

is discrimination. But

0:55

Israel is the only member of

0:57

the United Nations that I know, which

1:00

is officially racist. And

1:02

I say this because of the

1:06

July 2018 nation state

1:08

law, which says

1:11

the Jews have a unique,

1:14

unique right to

1:16

self-determination in Israel. Unique

1:19

means exclusive. It means Arabs

1:22

have no right to self-determination.

1:24

It means even if Arabs

1:26

became a majority, they would

1:28

still have no right to

1:31

self-determination. So most certainly Zionism

1:33

is a racist

1:36

ideology and it is largely

1:38

responsible for the Anakba

1:40

that has unfolded throughout the

1:42

last century and continues today.

2:07

Welcome to the Daily Wrap Up. It's

2:09

a nice show dedicated to bringing you

2:11

the most relevant, independent news as we

2:13

see it from the last 24 hours.

2:19

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2024. Thank

2:22

you for joining me today. I think there's a bunch of

2:24

stuff to talk about. More

2:27

or too much to fit into one show today, but I'm

2:29

going to try to get as much as I can in

2:31

regard to the bigger topics. You've probably seen

2:33

a lot of this going around. We've seen

2:35

Israel now bombing Lebanon. We've seen Israel

2:37

bombing Iran. We're going to talk about

2:39

both of those things. And

2:42

seemingly being openly discussed and even openly

2:44

admitted. Because the argument

2:46

is, well, if we just say Hamas

2:48

is there, and we've already stated otherwise

2:50

that we can attack Hamas wherever they

2:52

are, then we can do that. Does that sort of

2:54

sound familiar? It should. It's

2:57

the exact same thing the US government does all

2:59

around the world. Mission creep from

3:01

originally around the 9-11 discussion became just

3:03

anywhere we say we think you're present.

3:07

There we are. More terror in the

3:09

world than ever before they started their war

3:11

on terror. The reality is we've hopefully by

3:13

now come to understand they were the ones

3:15

creating it. Arming them, funding

3:17

them, using them to destabilize the more moderate partners of

3:19

the countries that they wanted to take control of. This

3:22

is what these governments have done. This is not

3:24

even, this is provable information at

3:26

this point. And it's really, it's like most of

3:28

what we'll talk about today, it really comes down

3:31

to people that just have a reflexive dismissal of

3:33

anything that does not align with what they've been

3:35

told is the agenda or rather the narrative. It's

3:38

alarming, but I see that number dwindling as the

3:40

days go by. We're

3:42

going to actually start today about something interesting.

3:45

In regard to specifically Tucker Carlson, his

3:47

website, and just as a point that

3:49

I don't think is unique to Tucker

3:51

Carlson, but people in that level of

3:53

the field and the amount of information

3:55

that they are taking from you listed

3:57

plainly right on their website. I

4:00

think you need to understand how this is literally

4:02

the exact same thing that everybody else is doing.

4:05

Tucker Carlson Network is just another data mining

4:07

advertising platform. I'll show it to you myself.

4:09

Now, I'm not going to say that in

4:11

plot. We know for sure that means Instant

4:13

Tensions or he doesn't even aware of that.

4:15

I don't know. You can decide the intent

4:17

and the information around it. But I think

4:19

it will behoove you to understand that subscribing

4:22

to Fox News or CNN is really at this point,

4:24

as far as I can tell, no different than subscribing

4:27

to Tucker Carlson's new network. And

4:29

I think that's important to understand. Don't

4:31

we all understand that the direction this is all

4:33

going? But I guess it's okay because the good

4:35

guy is taking all your data. That becomes the

4:37

biggest problem. No, no, no. The good Elon billionaire

4:39

technocrat is the one we're leaning into. He's building

4:41

the exact same thing they're doing, but he's the

4:43

good guy. Come on, we got to be

4:45

smarter than this. But we're going to talk about after

4:47

that the Vanilla Isis illusion. And

4:50

this is because of a new article coming out

4:52

from the Wall Street Journal. A

4:55

new study was done by the military rather

4:57

an independent entity that they tapped to do

4:59

it. And they found out that

5:01

there is no U.S. military extremism problem. You might

5:03

be shocked to hear that seeing as that was

5:05

like 50 percent, shouldn't be hyperbolic,

5:08

a large portion of the corporate media is

5:10

focused for a really long time. Not even

5:13

real. And this is exactly the same

5:15

dynamic. You'll see these overlaps everywhere you look. Recognize

5:18

that because these two entities are very, very

5:20

close, as you should know. But you'll

5:22

see the same thing in every single entity

5:24

we talk. Like we could talk about any

5:26

level of these extremists or the allegations therein.

5:28

We can see the anti-Semitism allegation be used

5:30

in the exact same way. It doesn't mean

5:32

that there aren't white supremacists or racists, but

5:34

it clearly means that by alleging that that

5:36

is anybody under this banner or who wears

5:38

a red hat, that's the

5:41

definition of ignorance. You are

5:43

rather more so specifically – the

5:46

point being is we've always discussed that broad-stroking a

5:48

group of people is ignorant. I think that is

5:51

the correct word for it. And now

5:53

it's a crowning achievement by anybody in power as

5:55

long as you say it about the right group.

5:58

It's crazy. Now the point is that there – The

6:00

study shows that there are not

6:02

actually less than they find in the actual society inside

6:04

the US military. Of course, people who don't want to

6:06

hear that are going to say that the military did

6:09

it, and you should ask that, and that's denying the

6:11

reality. But the point is the facts aren't

6:13

there. And just like we saw

6:15

after the January 6th discussion, where all these

6:17

investigations were done, into literally anybody

6:19

who was present, including journalists and people who

6:22

were just walking by, and somebody who had

6:24

no idea what was going on, and every

6:26

single one of those open investigations were called

6:28

domestic terrorism, then they

6:31

can turn around and go, oh my God, there's

6:33

400,000% more of domestic terrorism investigations. Yeah, because you

6:35

investigated Grandma from the corner who didn't even know

6:37

what was going on. Same thing

6:39

is happening right now in regard to Israel

6:41

and this conversation. It's the same thing happening

6:43

in regard to colleges of which these groups

6:46

do not support. Quite frankly, their

6:48

woke agenda disgusts me, but the point is it's

6:50

still not okay that they are being accused of

6:52

something. It's this interesting dynamic we'll get into about

6:54

how one side of them is saying, there's

6:57

a racist movement trying to get rid of all

6:59

these black authority leaders in colleges. And

7:01

then you've got the other side going, these are all

7:03

these racist college leaders who hate Jews. Hold

7:05

on a second. And they don't line

7:07

up together. And both of them largely probably think they're

7:10

on the same side. It just shows you

7:12

that there are manipulations playing in all of

7:14

this. We're going to talk about a brief moment

7:16

about the judicial reform discussion, which kind

7:18

of came back and then it looks like it was kind

7:20

of stopped again, but we'll talk about

7:23

what that means. And

7:25

of course, the bombing of Lebanon

7:27

and how incredibly, you know, Israel has

7:29

been pushing the concept that they're already in a

7:31

multi-front war. And as I've continually shown you, like

7:34

you'd think that they could have seen this before this all

7:36

started and come out right out of the gate and said,

7:38

we're already involved in a multi-front war, which they kind of

7:40

have said in the past, but it didn't happen that way.

7:43

We're focused on Hamas. This is really focused. Now,

7:45

of course, because the other entities are actually

7:47

clearly in support of the Palestinian people. And

7:50

now all of a sudden you're seeing actions taken

7:52

by Israel, which are drawing them into this conflict.

7:55

They're going to say, well, we have always been in a multi-front

7:57

war. Why? Because they just made that

7:59

the reality. But they want you to think that's

8:01

the case from the beginning because everything they seem

8:03

to do right now is wildly reactive

8:06

Which is why most people aren't buying it, you

8:09

know, they get caught for something and then the two days

8:11

later There's a narrative that comes out that seems to counteract

8:13

what we all literally saw with her own eyes Based

8:16

on words. It's it repeatedly

8:18

happens now. We're gonna talk about that as well

8:20

as Iran Of course

8:22

it happened on the Soleimani death anniversary Which

8:24

is not by accident guys and as I

8:26

understand it there is at least a hundred

8:28

killed At this memorial a

8:30

memorial for a slain commander so I can promise

8:32

you that there were civilians there You

8:35

think Israel cares about that? They say well, there was a

8:37

Hamas purpose in there So all of that doesn't matter this

8:39

is actually a really great point to make when we get there About

8:42

the idea that here's another example of how literally

8:45

apparently by their narrative They can kill an

8:47

endless amount of people as long as they claim that

8:50

we got a Hamas member. Can we prove in that? Hundreds

8:53

of people die and they go well Hamas Right

8:56

Oh, I says Al Qaeda so

8:58

we can invade Syria. We can invade Iraq. We can invade Afghanistan

9:00

a bad guy We

9:02

all see through that today except for the

9:04

people that are invested in the status quo We're

9:07

also going to talk about oh Well,

9:10

I'm just gonna say in general We're gonna get into a

9:12

lot of parts about the Israel gods of conversation And again,

9:14

I'm focusing on some main parts to start and we'll see

9:17

how much we get to in the general part of the

9:19

show But the main parts we are going to get into

9:21

in In general the

9:23

updates on what's actually going on on

9:25

the ground We're gonna talk about the

9:27

continuing gods of settlement conversation and we're

9:29

gonna talk about this illusion the manipulation

9:31

therein around Antisemitism and the game

9:33

that's played to censor people, but we're gonna get into

9:36

a lot more about Israel including

9:39

42 Nova survivors from the

9:41

Nova festival who are suing Israel and

9:43

as Orwell rightly pointed out Are those the same

9:46

people that you involve involuntarily? Committed

9:49

because they were having problems and now suddenly they're

9:51

angry and suing Israel. Wait a minute It's

9:53

almost like exactly what we thought was happening was

9:55

happening where they were putting people in involuntary Committing

10:00

people that voluntarily because

10:02

they might have something to say and I'm not saying we've proven

10:04

that but it's interesting the way this

10:06

is going forward and aside from that we

10:08

can prove I think what at least 15 people

10:11

now have come out and said all of the things we're

10:13

saying right security people at the

10:15

Koozma area helicopter pilots tank pilots random people

10:17

in the IDF civilians who were

10:19

shot at both in in Israel as well as

10:21

coming back from Gaza I mean it just never

10:23

stops and all of them have said they shot

10:25

us they shot at us they killed people the

10:28

bombings killed people Hannibal directive was

10:30

admitted by a colonel we just all just keep

10:32

going through the motions apparently we know they did

10:34

this but we're gonna pretend like we can't tell

10:36

for sure because Biden Blinken hold

10:38

the line now let's

10:40

start well

10:44

a quick shout out to an excellent show I was just

10:46

on this morning which I plan on inviting him on as

10:48

well we talked about this at the end I was on

10:50

David Knight show which I know you guys have been asking

10:52

for and it was a really great conversation as

10:54

he wrote just we talked about the floor I had

10:56

cover-up and Gaza aren't a burkhardt a lot of different

10:58

things great great discussion and

11:01

of course what I what I think I want to talk about which we didn't

11:03

get into because there was just so a lot of good stuff

11:05

we talked about what's his clear discussion about

11:07

the two-party illusion which we both clearly agree

11:09

on and the fact that clearly it

11:11

seems that Trump as well as Alice Jones do not

11:13

appear to be on your side doesn't

11:16

mean necessarily when I say that that I think

11:18

that they know that that's

11:20

a big difference there I don't know that I would

11:22

never claim that I don't speak for their intent I'm

11:24

not ridiculous like the corporate media and

11:26

I can clearly point out that anybody as I've

11:28

said many times who is committed to invested in

11:32

the two-party illusion or

11:34

just in case you don't think that the two-party system will

11:37

end up deceiving you whether they know that or

11:39

not you mark my words you

11:41

look back at what we've already done it's an easy thing to prove

11:45

great show we'll have him on pretty soon I

11:47

also was on a the show I think

11:49

it's a new one it's entitled classified

11:51

on our iconic it

11:54

was a great discussion we had in regard to

11:56

Elon Musk connections to cutter and a

11:58

lot of different discussions about you know,

12:00

the larger topics of today, make sure you check it out, it was

12:02

a great conversation. Now on the note of Elon

12:04

Musk, I want to just start with this point, so I thought this was interesting.

12:07

There's so many of these two divides we

12:09

have, these false divide and conquer tactics,

12:13

right? Whether it is race, whether it is religion,

12:15

and it really ends up just simply pinning us

12:17

against each other because of narratives that suit the

12:19

interests of the government, especially when we fail to

12:21

focus on what they're doing to our lives and

12:23

only pretend like your neighbor who has a different

12:26

flag suddenly is the one causing all your problems.

12:29

But this is, Elon Musk tweeted this out, night and day

12:31

difference he says, and it says, crazy idea, let's

12:33

divide a country into half capitalists and half communists

12:36

and check in on it 70 years

12:38

later. I'm just so

12:40

tired of this, like do you realize how many

12:42

examples there are of both of those things leading

12:44

to exactly what, I mean, how can we

12:46

not, how can we literally be standing in

12:49

a capitalist society, a democracy, whatever you want

12:51

to call it, that has driven us to,

12:53

in my opinion, a worse position than any

12:55

of these other places. And I'm not talking

12:57

about the death toll, I'm talking about the

12:59

danger of where we are creeping into, not

13:01

just kinetic prison, you know, kinetic war, prison

13:03

time. We're talking about something far more nefarious,

13:05

far more invasive, the technocratic direction,

13:07

the, I mean, you know,

13:09

we've talked about a lot of this stuff, the medical direction,

13:12

the technology overlapping, the biotechnology, the

13:15

nanotechnology, these things are terrifying to

13:17

me. And

13:19

that is where we are. And we're talking,

13:21

the whole point is those are all under

13:23

the banner of totalitarianism. We are watching them

13:25

build a totalitarian, technocratic, medical

13:30

elite type society, right? Where your, your scientism is

13:32

the word I was looking for. And

13:35

then we stand back and go for communism is the

13:37

only problem. I mean, it's just so childish. Any

13:40

one of these governments, now look, I can concede

13:42

possibly that one might have more of an intent,

13:44

a tendency than the other to quick

13:46

in a more rapid fashion, centralized power at the top.

13:49

I could give you that. I don't know if I

13:51

agree with that. I would have to see, but either

13:53

way, the point is all

13:55

of them, any government of

13:57

any kind can eventually lead to exactly

14:00

what we're dealing with because guess what guys the

14:02

whole point is that government is

14:04

the problem but with everything under

14:07

the sun for them if they get you

14:09

debating on two things that are basically under

14:11

the same umbrella for them well then it stays

14:13

that way forever right

14:16

we all want independence and different parties and nobody votes

14:18

for left and right anymore but it still stays the

14:20

same right because guess why the top people of the

14:22

illusion screaming at you other every day as

14:24

i wrote it's so sad that we can't move past

14:26

this naive perception that it's only certain types of

14:29

government or violent authority as i put it that

14:31

are the problem think about that

14:33

they're all violent authority guys every single one of them if

14:35

you break the law how do you think they enforce it

14:37

at the butt of a gun doesn't matter if it's

14:39

communism or it doesn't matter it's the same thing talk

14:43

to somebody who by the way i've never got a chance to speak

14:45

to i'd love to talk to him larkin rose i

14:48

line more much more with his ideology than

14:50

really anything else the idea of you know

14:52

as i've talked about the anarchistic mindset but

14:55

i think i'm all over the map really when it comes to a lot

14:57

of certain certain things but at the end of the day the

15:00

idea that we pretend that only one controlling factor over

15:03

your life is the bad one and we need to

15:05

let this one do you not see that as the

15:07

same thing as the good technocrat of elon versus the bad

15:09

technocrat it's the same thing you

15:11

accept your own control structure because you pick

15:13

one it's all government

15:16

and as long as they get you fighting

15:18

for government they really

15:20

don't care what flavor you choose no

15:23

i'm sure you disagree i'm sure plenty of you disagree with

15:25

that i

15:27

hope you can see the light in that now

15:29

one last little point i just thought was interesting same kind of

15:32

thing right names naming

15:34

names we're told right infamous

15:37

Epstein list set for today apparently

15:40

right because it's very common for the government to go here's a

15:42

lot of secret information that we don't think you should see but

15:44

we're going to give it to you anyway because you were i

15:47

mean really like i

15:49

mean it's certainly possible excuse

15:51

me it's certainly possible that this came

15:53

out for some specific reason i wouldn't question everything

15:56

but the idea that this is already being leaned

15:58

into by a lot of people in Independent media

16:00

as if this is going to be some big

16:02

bombshell and maybe it will be but we have

16:05

to at the very least flavor this Immediately with

16:07

this could either be very selective or

16:09

people could be added to it that weren't there for

16:12

political reasons This is coming from your controlling

16:14

structure This is

16:16

after a New York federal court ordered court documents

16:18

unsealed, right? So are we have the mind that

16:20

they're not capable of just not doing that and

16:22

pretending and giving you fake documents like this game

16:24

We play where they are just bound by the law Except

16:26

they're there they're and literally everywhere else we look but that

16:29

one that one they will be gone by is low

16:33

But my point is that this is interesting First

16:35

of all ask yourself how the world is possible that

16:38

this Ridiculous list that hasn't like my point in the

16:40

sense of what they're gonna drip out to you now

16:42

hasn't been shown till now Despite

16:44

the fact that there are people who have put together pretty

16:46

obvious lists out there So

16:49

let's see what happens. I'm willing to bet you anything.

16:51

This is going to be used during the election and

16:53

it's going to be used manipulatively to

16:57

think about now on that same

16:59

note about data, which let's not forget Epstein

17:01

was obsessed with technology and the same discussions

17:03

as well as You know everything else he

17:05

did This is

17:07

on TechCrunch deal deal dive Tucker Carlson

17:09

is a media startup founder again This

17:11

is on the 21st of this year

17:14

of October now, this just gets into

17:16

some of the basic information This is just really what I

17:18

want to show you just very quickly. No, I know people

17:20

will Attack or be angry

17:22

because I've I've I guess I'm not

17:24

calling anybody out here I'm just highlighting

17:26

what is on the public Tucker Carlson

17:28

network privacy policy page If

17:31

you find that somehow insulting or you

17:33

should ask why that why does it bother

17:35

you that I'm showing you something That's plating in public on

17:37

his website. My point in all this is to show you

17:40

that this is your But

17:45

in through just because it's Tucker's network So

17:48

I'll comment more at the end So this this was last updated

17:50

in 20 second, which is by the way one of the points

17:52

just like any of these rest of these They can update it

17:54

whenever they want. Maybe they'll notify you

17:57

in a weird abstract way. Maybe not It doesn't say

17:59

they necessarily have to If there's not enough information changing

18:01

and they just said well, just check check it every now and

18:03

again Yeah, check the

18:05

17 page policy that nobody looks at really ever that's

18:08

that's how this game gets played But it says the

18:10

owner of this website, which is last country Inc the

18:12

website being Tucker Carlson calm

18:16

and this is his company last

18:18

country Inc working with Public

18:21

square by the way a little brief research

18:23

on that platform But you know if there's

18:25

anything you think is interesting the connection there.

18:27

Let me know public Public

18:29

square and then a couple of others that were connected to it

18:32

a guy named Patel I believe is the

18:34

CEO and working with them But it says

18:36

this privacy policy or the policy details our

18:38

practices in collecting using disclosing and otherwise processing

18:40

your personal information So by the way right

18:42

there none of that happens on the last American bag of on

18:44

or plenty of websites that I support nothing

18:47

Literally no doubt exchange whatsoever unless you

18:49

let's say enter your email address to

18:51

subscribe Or you know

18:53

the kind of basic things that websites will often do

18:55

which are you know engaged with the like? But my

18:57

point is what you'll see when we get into is

19:00

about IP addresses Phone

19:03

data location data what

19:05

you're doing off this site all

19:07

this is on there Which makes

19:09

me really uncomfortable? But

19:12

a lot of websites do not do any of this

19:14

and in fact There's ones out there that do literally

19:16

none of that like there's people that are leaning into

19:18

as we all should and it's problematic

19:20

for me Just because you know It's hard

19:22

to shift into some new entire platform or

19:24

rather just style air leaning into these new

19:26

kind of decentralized directions of internet which do

19:28

not Nescentitate these things, but it

19:31

also comes along with a huge shift in how

19:33

we operate devices We use and so on but

19:35

we really should I really should But

19:37

it says under scope the policy applies to the

19:40

personal information we collect a process related to Visitors

19:42

of our website which apparently now that's me just

19:44

by being here where this policy is

19:47

posted right there Right

19:49

so right there, so just the put their little telling you because I

19:51

looked at this website That's

19:53

that and that you're taking their taking your

19:55

information It says including the

19:58

Tucker Karl the TCN network and

20:00

the tuckercarlson.com sites, so both of them.

20:02

Individuals who use, access, download, or otherwise

20:04

interact or engage with the products, tools,

20:06

services, features available through the sites. Individuals

20:08

who simply register for or

20:11

participate in events outside of the website,

20:13

surveys, research, and promotions. All this seems

20:15

pretty general, right? Individuals who describe, who

20:18

receive news, information, and other communications from

20:20

us. Current former and prospective business partners,

20:22

vendors, service providers, and individuals who communicate

20:24

or otherwise interact or engage with us,

20:26

or the services available through the sites,

20:29

or online services. So all of that

20:31

they're taking information from. Now,

20:33

personal information collected. As

20:36

further described below, we may collect personal information

20:38

directly from you. I really

20:40

don't know why anybody's okay with that at this point and where

20:42

we are in the world right now. It

20:45

says, automatically through your use

20:47

of our services as both

20:49

sites and from other

20:51

third-party sources. We may collect

20:53

the following personal information directly from you. So this is

20:55

first, just what I've taken from you. Contact

20:58

information. When you contact us, including if

21:00

you send us a message or sign up and

21:02

so on, we'll make collect your name, email, address,

21:04

phone number. That seems common. Communications

21:07

interactions. When you email or call or otherwise

21:09

communicate, we'll collect, maintain records of our communications

21:11

interactions, payments, and purchases. When you make a

21:13

payment through our service, we may collect and

21:16

purchase payments. This is all pretty benign. Professional

21:18

information. We may collect personal information

21:20

related to your professional occupation. Now, you know,

21:22

that may not alarm anybody, but quite frankly,

21:24

that's, you know, this is where, like when

21:26

I was working with SuperU, unpaid

21:29

at the time, as you guys remember, I just was just

21:31

a consultant because I liked what they were doing and I believed in it. I

21:36

was adamant about this and I had too

21:38

much frustration by the sort

21:40

of mainstream people they hired to run the main thing.

21:42

We stopped this. We didn't allow

21:44

any of this. I don't want literally anything

21:47

other than what's necessary to act, just makes

21:49

the website function. That's it. Now,

21:51

I don't mean because we want to get your personal information about

21:54

what you look at on the website so we can offer you

21:56

an advertisement or none of that. I don't want your personal occupation

21:58

unless you want to tell me. I don't want any. Exchange

22:00

of personal data whatsoever all

22:02

of this should be choice We should just not blindly accept

22:04

that this is the way the world works today because it

22:06

doesn't have to Because this is how

22:09

you make money from these places You

22:11

think they make money by at donations like we

22:13

do no no you sell advertising data you

22:16

sell advertising you sell personal information Despite what

22:18

they may say Then

22:21

it goes on to say if you participate in

22:23

surveys and so on with them events and registration

22:25

details now it goes into saying personal information collected

22:27

from third parties We

22:30

may also collect and receive certain personal

22:32

information about you from third party sources

22:34

Such as from data analytics and marketing

22:36

providers public databases joint marketing partners social

22:38

media platforms on third parties So ask

22:40

yourself why this platform is reaching out

22:42

into the world to collect data on

22:44

you Doesn't that seem weird?

22:47

I mean that when you

22:49

look at what the rest of them do this is what

22:51

they do They're trying to get literally everything that you could

22:53

put forward, but that's that's right there Why

22:56

would Tucker Carlson's network need to ask

22:58

Twitter about what you said that day or Public

23:01

databases elsewhere that are collecting information about

23:03

you and then at that point How do you

23:05

know that that information doesn't violate what they said they would

23:07

get because this is not their database This

23:10

hypothetical it gets worse worse lead and

23:12

prospect information We may receive lead and

23:14

prospect information from third parties about prospective

23:16

customers who may be interested in our

23:18

services. So now They're

23:20

taking data about you either or not You're on this website

23:22

just in case they want to send you an advertisement about

23:24

hey check out our services That's

23:27

you know minor but uncomfortable We may also engage

23:30

with third parties to enhance or update our

23:32

customer information For example, we

23:34

may receive certain personal information about you from

23:36

data analytics and marketing providers for marketing and

23:38

advertising purposes So we can sell you new

23:40

thing I'm not going to sell

23:43

you anything. I Don't know

23:45

why people I mean look if

23:47

you don't mind about any of this and have to be able to listen probably

23:49

don't care I do My

23:51

dad I think increasingly as even some of

23:53

Tucker's work has highlighted the technocratic future with

23:56

the data collection is a big problem That's

23:58

how this is being used So

24:01

when they're saying that they will advertise

24:03

toward you, it's about the monetary side of

24:05

this, which you may not disagree with. Third-party

24:08

platforms, if you post information about this

24:10

platform, about his network, or engage with

24:12

them on third-party platforms, so you chat

24:14

with him on Twitter, such

24:17

as social media platforms, we may collect personal information

24:19

about you from that platform. It's

24:21

pretty damn invasive. This is not even

24:23

getting started. Personal information collected automatically.

24:26

We and our third-party service

24:28

providers may automatically collect or

24:30

derive certain personal information about

24:32

you related to your interaction with our services, including

24:34

through the use of cookies, pixel

24:36

tags, web beacons, and similar technology.

24:39

The personal information we may

24:41

automatically collect includes things

24:43

like your IP address. Why do they

24:46

need that? Your

24:48

IDET, your location, is not the same thing

24:50

as your IP address. That's your personal computer

24:52

IP address. Access dates and times,

24:55

hardware, software information. Why exactly do they

24:58

need to know what kind of computer you have or what

25:00

you're using or what kind of other data or backup technology

25:02

you're using? Viewed pages,

25:04

clicked links, searches, features, used

25:06

items viewed, time spent within the

25:09

services, your interactions with us within the

25:11

services, and other activity and use of

25:13

information. Now, that is constant in this, just

25:16

like the government. Very

25:18

specific this and there and it stops here and then

25:21

other things too. Oh, okay.

25:23

So regardless of how specific that encapsulates pretty

25:25

much anything else they want to include.

25:27

Other activity and use of information. Right?

25:30

What is that? What other activity and use of information? We don't

25:32

know. Under

25:35

device and browser information, details

25:37

about the device you're using to

25:39

gain access to our services, including

25:41

the hardware model, operating system, browser

25:43

type, language, unique device identifiers. That

25:48

is invasive. Internet service provider,

25:50

referring and exiting URLs, clickstream

25:52

data, operating system, and

25:54

similar device and browser information. Wow. Like

25:58

am I the only one that finds this to be almost... More

26:00

invasive than most of the things we see I guess I just

26:02

doubt most of them are honest about it You know they tell

26:04

you no, we won't take any of that and they do it

26:06

anyway, please. This is on the surface I'll give them that But

26:10

then it says location data approximate or general

26:12

location data from your device That's

26:16

a big no-no for most people that care about

26:18

freedom Generally, we may collect

26:20

use instead of purposes for collecting may

26:23

collect use disclose and otherwise process the

26:25

information We collect for several purposes including

26:27

services and support now a lot of

26:29

these are just the general things to

26:31

make your experience better And

26:34

other things that's how these things work But

26:37

you know to service support, you know, if you need

26:39

help with the platform technical support It's not working for

26:41

me analytics improvement same game the better understand how you

26:44

access needs of service We can better help you and

26:46

improve the system and you can tell us how it

26:48

needs to be Communication to respond to your inquiries and

26:50

questions, you know, you get all this but although I

26:53

don't you don't need an IP address Browser history, you

26:55

know the data you're using from your phone. You don't

26:57

need that to be able to go Hey, can I

26:59

help you? What's your problem with the website? That's just

27:01

a general statement. They will make it better So

27:04

give us personal information. It doesn't really make sense to me

27:07

customized and personalization customization

27:09

personalization To tailor

27:12

content, which is always what this is about We

27:15

may send or display on the services including

27:18

to offer location customization and

27:20

to otherwise personalize your experience and

27:22

offerings So I just want to make sure you see that

27:24

it's just really about the same kind of thing We say are we

27:26

here for most of them, right? We want to tailor advertising just to

27:28

you and we know how that's worked marketing

27:31

advertising for marketing advertising with emotional purposes

27:33

For example to send you promotional information

27:35

about our services including information about events

27:38

and new offerings So sending

27:40

you things repeatedly about what they're going to be doing

27:43

Common to comply with applicable legal or regulatory

27:45

obligations Now this this is where I get concerned when

27:47

I was at super you one of the big things

27:49

that I was really adamant about And

27:51

we set up legal protections for Was

27:54

if we were to be if we were to

27:56

be called on by the government to say hey We need to

27:58

know about your certain your person and this X, Y,

28:00

and Z. First of all, we go,

28:02

we have nothing. Here is our username.

28:04

That's what we have. On top of that,

28:06

though, we basically

28:09

insulated the entire thing so where we would say, look, this

28:12

is what we have public. That's all we know. So

28:14

we intentionally put ourselves between the

28:16

government and you because I

28:19

was going to – my point

28:21

is I would do everything I could before I let them push

28:23

past us to get to you because they want to censor your

28:25

video. So this is saying,

28:27

well, if they ask, right, applicable

28:29

legal or regulatory obligations, including as part of

28:31

a judicial proceeding, to respond to

28:33

a subpoena, warrant a court order or other

28:35

legal process, or as part of an

28:37

investigation or request. So they simply go, hey, we need Ryan's

28:40

data from the platform. Here you go. Whether

28:43

formal or informal, from law enforcement

28:45

or governmental authorities. So right there. Whether – they could

28:47

simply go, hey, we need that data. Well,

28:49

if it's an applicable legal or regulatory obligation, if it includes

28:52

a judicial process, to respond to a subpoena, they will give

28:54

it to you. Not me.

28:57

Try to get the data that we have

28:59

from the last American Vagabond, the fringe small

29:01

things that even exist. I will never give

29:03

that up. Auditing, reporting, and other

29:05

internal operations to conduct financial, tax, and

29:07

accounting audits, audits and assessments

29:09

of our operations, including our privacy,

29:12

security, and financial controls, as well as for

29:14

risk and compliance purposes. We may also use

29:16

your personal information to maintain appropriate business records

29:18

and enforce our policies and procedures. Now, my

29:20

point in this is all

29:23

of this is under the context of your information. So

29:25

why would they

29:27

need your personal IP address

29:30

and computer model

29:34

and other personal data, which we'll get into, to

29:36

be able to do an audit for their business?

29:40

I think there's much more to this than we think. We

29:42

may also use that to business records

29:44

and enforce policies and procedures. I just don't

29:46

get how that makes sense. General business and

29:48

operational support to assess and implement

29:50

mergers, acquisitions, reorganizations, bankruptcies,

29:53

and other business transactions. I only include that to

29:55

show you that, well, you may be okay now because Tucker

29:57

owns it. A year later.

29:59

Oh, sorry. Sorry, we got bought out, acquisitions, and

30:01

that point is they've been connecting, they've been

30:03

accessing all of this data to

30:06

assess and implement mergers. That's

30:08

literally what it says. They're talking about how

30:10

they're using this, right? Purposes for collection. This

30:13

one is to assess and implement mergers based

30:15

on your personal data. Why? Because it's valuable.

30:18

So you may think you're good because Tucker owns

30:20

it, but who knows if that changes. Personal

30:23

information disclosures. Say we may disclose the personal information

30:26

that we collect. So some of which we've already

30:28

discussed for the purposes described

30:30

above and as

30:32

otherwise directed or consented to buy

30:35

you to the following

30:37

recipients. Affiliates and subsidiaries, business partners, like

30:39

a lot of the different normal things you might

30:41

expect if you sign on for these programs. But

30:43

here's what I thought was concerning. Other

30:46

third parties. In some circumstances,

30:48

we may also disclose personal information to

30:50

other third parties, whatever that may mean,

30:52

such as social networks, internet service providers, such

30:55

as, so more than that, operating systems and

30:57

platforms and others throughout the course

30:59

of our general business operations. Talk

31:02

about broad. So just

31:04

other. So my point is, if you think that all this makes

31:06

sense so far, who God only knows

31:08

what these random unaccounted for third parties they'll

31:10

work with and probably benefit from will do

31:13

with that data. It says

31:15

we may also disclose your personal information in

31:17

the following circumstances. Support of business transfers, compliance

31:20

and legal obligations. We already generally talked about these, but

31:22

that's the same point. We may

31:24

disclose personal information to third parties to the extent

31:26

required by applicable law, legal obligations. But here's the

31:28

point. If they don't have that

31:30

data, there's nothing to give up. Right?

31:33

So they create the dynamic where they go, oh, well,

31:35

we got it because the law says, well, I don't have anything

31:37

to give. They

31:39

may disclose personal information in response to subpoenas, court

31:42

orders, same thing. Other disclosures. General,

31:44

broad. We

31:46

may disclose personal information in other ways, not

31:49

described above. Well, that's convenient.

31:52

That we notify you of or that we obtain your

31:54

consent for. But this

31:56

is that or otherwise authorized or required by law

31:59

or throughout the day. the course of our general

32:01

business operations. It's the same kind of concept

32:03

we just discussed, and then they make a note about this down here, that

32:06

we notify you of or that we obtain your

32:08

consent for. We'll understand that this, when you sign

32:10

the platform, is your consent. Then

32:14

when you get a updated terms of service in four

32:16

years when you barely glance at it because nobody does,

32:18

well, you won't know the change. Notwithstanding,

32:21

it says anything else described in this

32:23

policy, and here's the point, we

32:26

may disclose the aggregated, de-identified, and

32:28

other non-identifiable data. Okay,

32:32

so despite everything we just said, we may just anonymize

32:34

it and sell it to people. That's

32:37

what that says. What

32:39

it says here specifically is quality control, analytics,

32:42

research, development of the other, and de-identified

32:48

information worked in Israel, where they literally knew

32:50

who they were and it was a lie,

32:53

same thing. Well, you can decide for yourself.

32:55

Frankly, I don't want this. Here's

32:58

where it gets even more concerning for me, cookies

33:00

and cracking technologies. We in our third party service

33:02

providers use cookies, which we all know about, we

33:05

all know what these are, but they say pixel

33:07

packs, web beacons, and other similar

33:09

tracking technologies and mechanisms to

33:11

automatically collect browsing activity, like

33:14

it works as browsing activity, device,

33:16

and similar information within our services.

33:20

Why do you think that's okay? Then

33:23

it says, it

33:26

goes on to say, cookies, in case you don't know,

33:29

are small text files stored on a user's device?

33:31

Nobody likes these things. It's always invasive and

33:34

it's something that is, I don't like the

33:36

idea that any site is putting something stored

33:38

on my computer. This

33:41

concerns me. I don't know

33:43

why somebody who was acting like, the whole thing

33:45

of the last country, Inc.

33:47

is about an anti-woke, privacy,

33:51

patriot mindset. Well,

33:54

other than the fact that Tucker is running it, this is the

33:56

same you're going to get on corporate media. fact

34:00

is they go, we promise we won't do X, Y, and

34:02

Z, but other services and other purposes, and should we decide?

34:06

But it says, allow us to serve better

34:08

targeted advertisements. So again, they're targeting advertisements

34:10

toward you based on the personal data

34:12

they scoop from you in order to

34:14

make money. That may not bother you.

34:17

You may just accept that's the way the world works today. I

34:19

do not. It

34:23

says, we may, and this is called pixel

34:25

tags, sometimes called web

34:27

beacons or clear gifts. It

34:29

says any tiny graphics with a unique identifier, similar

34:31

in function to cookies. While

34:34

cookies are stored locally on your device, pixel tags

34:36

are embedded invisibly within web pages and

34:38

online content. We may

34:40

then use in connection with our

34:43

services to, among other things, track

34:45

the activities of users and help

34:47

us manage content and compile user

34:50

usage statistics on

34:52

other websites. Doesn't

34:54

that seem a little alarming? You're using

34:56

pixel tags that embed these things in other websites

34:58

and then tracking what you do on those websites?

35:00

That's literally what it says. That

35:03

bothers me. Third

35:05

party analytics. These third party companies may

35:08

use cookies, pixels, and other tracking technology to collect

35:10

user data. Okay, so for girls of

35:12

whatever else they just said, they go, but we also have

35:14

third parties we're working with, which may do whatever they want.

35:17

Which you may not think that's what that means, but when

35:19

it says, and other tracking technologies

35:21

to collect your data, that could mean

35:24

literally anything that can track your data. And

35:29

that's in there. So if you just skim past

35:31

that and go, they wouldn't pay, they wouldn't do it. I

35:33

trust Tucker. Well, it says right there. Do you trust the

35:35

third parties that you don't know who they are or what

35:37

their goals are? All

35:39

of this falls back on the idea that you're supposed

35:41

to trust it because Tucker wouldn't do that. Well,

35:43

you may be right. I hope you're

35:46

right. Targeted advertising. It says we may share

35:48

certain information with these third party ad companies.

35:52

And we, and we, and they may use cookie,

35:54

spicel tags, other tools. So there's three groups that

35:56

could potentially use these things, both on your computer

35:58

and websites you visit. other

36:00

tools again, whatever that means to collect

36:02

usage and browsing information within our services

36:05

as well as on third party sites and Services

36:08

such again as IP address location

36:10

information device ID now That is

36:13

very different than the style

36:15

the model That is your

36:17

unique device ID cookie and

36:19

advertising ID and other identifiers

36:22

Whatever that means as well as

36:24

browsing information Do you want them

36:26

to know you're looking at porn sites? Do you want them

36:28

to know like you have to understand how invasive this becomes?

36:31

Especially when you just sit back and let this happen But

36:34

then it says even better Currently our

36:37

systems do not recognize browser

36:39

do not track signals. You gotta love that

36:42

Even though we just found out that the incognito window from

36:45

Google was a lie. Anyway, right? They just gave oh you

36:47

busted us Nobody cares though What

36:49

they're literally saying is go ahead you can you like it says up

36:52

the top, you know, you can choose this Well, go ahead and choose

36:54

it. They'll go. Well, sorry. We don't recognize that Managing

36:58

your preferences it says we make

37:00

available several ways for you to

37:02

manage your preferences and privacy

37:04

choices It sort of

37:07

sounds like you if you just skim you'd be like, oh,

37:09

well, they'll give me options to say no And yet that's

37:11

not what's happening Now you

37:13

can read all these they're basically the same You

37:15

can review and update some of the personal information we maintain

37:17

about you by logging in and this is in regard to

37:19

and it Says some this is about like your I your

37:21

username that kind of stuff You

37:25

can also update certain preferences that your communication But

37:27

again, it says some of your personal information and

37:29

I'll show you why this is relevant Then here

37:31

it says we may send periodic promotional emails that

37:33

you already get that right? So they're taking

37:35

that information. Oh And

37:39

this though this point was about you may opt

37:41

out of receiving Advertisements rather specifically to

37:43

your email. You're not gonna opt out of the

37:45

advertisements that pop up while you're on the website

37:49

Then it says cookie preferences Says

37:53

to prevent cookies from tracking your activity on

37:55

the site or visits across multiple websites get

37:57

this you can set your browser to block

37:59

them That's what it says.

38:02

It literally says right here, currently our systems do

38:04

not recognize browsers do not track signals. Okay, so

38:06

I guess we're just going to pretend that doesn't

38:08

contradict each other. But on top of that, they're

38:10

not saying that you can do anything on this

38:12

website. They're saying take your browser and set

38:14

it to no ads or

38:16

whatever. So there is no option

38:19

for you on this website to stop what

38:21

they're doing. That's what it says. You

38:24

can also delete cookies, right? So, well, Adam, you can delete

38:26

them as you go every time

38:28

you use it. The help portion of our toolbar

38:30

and your browser will, on the toolbar

38:32

of most browsers, not in the website, will tell

38:34

you how to prevent the device from accepting new

38:36

cookies, how to have the browser notify you when

38:38

you receive a new cookie, and how to delete

38:40

cookies, which pretty much everybody knows about for the most

38:42

part. My point is when you start using

38:44

this and you forget about it, it'll go on and you'll just become normal.

38:47

Visitors to our sites who disable cookies

38:51

will be able to browse the sites, but some features

38:53

may not function properly. Of

38:55

course. So you're going to have most

38:57

people that go, well, I trust Tucker. My bet is

38:59

you disable these things and it won't work. And

39:02

you'll want to see what he said that day, so you'll turn it back on. Your

39:04

preferences are browser and device specific,

39:07

which means that you need to set the preference

39:10

for each browser and device that you

39:12

use to access our services. Isn't that

39:14

fun? In addition, if you delete

39:16

or block cookies, you may need to reapply

39:18

those preferences every time. So

39:20

really, nothing. The answer is there is no way to change it. We're

39:23

going to take it, but you can mess with your websites, download apps,

39:25

whatever you need to do on your side. We'll

39:27

pretend like that's them giving you options. Industry

39:30

ad choice programs. You can also

39:32

control how participating third parties ad

39:34

companies use the information

39:37

that they collect about your business

39:39

to our websites and those

39:41

of third parties in order to display more relevant targeted

39:43

advertising to you. Right.

39:46

So what they're saying is you can't stop that,

39:48

but you can control how these parties use that

39:50

information. You

39:52

hear the difference? It's very clear in all of

39:54

this. External links and features. Our

39:57

services may contain links to third party websites or

39:59

other social media platforms. features or provide

40:01

certain third-party connections or integrated

40:03

services. We already just discussed how

40:05

all those third parties are able to access your data on

40:07

their own side but they're not involved in this

40:09

discussion. Then

40:11

it says, any access to and use

40:13

of such linked websites, features, or third-party

40:16

connections or integrated services is not governed

40:18

by this policy. It's right there. Our

40:21

hands are tied. We gave it to them but we can't control

40:23

it. Well, that's your choice then. You are in charge of it.

40:25

You could just simply say no. But

40:27

instead, it says it's governed by the privacy

40:29

policies of those third parties. I

40:32

guess we hope they have one, right? We

40:34

are not responsible and of course they're not naming those third

40:36

parties so you have no way to find out. If we

40:38

are not responsible, it says

40:40

we are not responsible for the information practices

40:42

of such third parties. Well, that's convenient. You

40:45

give it to them, why wouldn't you care? Isn't

40:48

the whole point that this is about freedom and all the

40:50

stuff you're talking about but you just hand over data to

40:52

groups that don't have any kind of policy? Think about how

40:55

hypocritical that is. Including

40:58

it says their collection, use, and disclosure of

41:00

your personal information. You should review

41:02

the privacy policies and terms for any third

41:04

parties before proceeding to those websites

41:06

or using those features. The third

41:08

parties that you're barely even aware are functioning in the

41:11

background of the site you're using. They're telling you go

41:13

find out which ones we used and look at their

41:15

privacy policies assuming it's even easy to find or even

41:17

present. This is hollow.

41:21

Am I crazy? Again, what's

41:24

going on in the world today? This is minor. But

41:27

it just doesn't, it should bother people that

41:30

somebody who is presenting themselves as against

41:33

all of this is actively parling a part in

41:35

exactly this. But now I can give you the possibility

41:37

that maybe he isn't aware of this. Maybe

41:40

he was lied to. Maybe he doesn't understand why this

41:42

is problematic. I'm not trying to pretend that I know

41:44

what's going on but I do know that this is

41:46

problematic. Nobody should

41:48

be aligned with this. And

41:50

it says we may retain additional and personal

41:53

information as necessary. And it goes to a

41:55

list for tax compliance, accounting and record keeping.

41:57

The point is that they leave the door

41:59

open. When you

42:01

just say as necessary, right,

42:03

it comes down to the idea and it just says,

42:05

and to comply with a legal obligation. So there's so

42:07

many different ways this could apply to then include new

42:09

things, assuming you're checking this privacy

42:11

policy every 30 seconds for the new updates that

42:14

day. It says, we have

42:16

implemented reasonable precautions designed to

42:18

protect the information we collect from loss,

42:20

misuse, and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and

42:22

destruction. Not destroying this.

42:25

We need to be aware that despite our best

42:27

efforts, no data security measures

42:30

can guarantee security. Well,

42:32

exactly. That's not, that's, I get that. That's a fair

42:34

statement. Still exactly why you

42:36

should not be taking the data. Because

42:38

all you're doing is creating a dynamic

42:40

where people are insecure for your own

42:42

benefit. Now you may maybe stand back

42:44

and say, well, that's where it's benefit because we supported

42:46

them and we wanted to grow. So it's our benefit.

42:49

Well, that's fine. Then just accept that you're

42:51

leading into the problematic data collection system and

42:53

advertising targeted advertising that we've always tried to

42:56

get away from because Tucker Carlson said, or

42:59

rather maybe not, but it's happening. The

43:02

policy is current as of the date of the

43:04

set forth above. We may, and then of course

43:06

we may change, update, modify this policy to reflect

43:08

changes in our practices, services, applicable

43:10

law, period. And

43:12

say when or how often, just whenever, whenever we want

43:14

to. We encourage you to review this page regularly for

43:17

the latest updates. Nobody

43:19

does that. So

43:21

I hope that was important. I think

43:23

it was, I think it's an important point to

43:25

realize that whether or not people are a

43:28

shill or fighting against you, some secret,

43:30

whatever. It's not always that simple.

43:33

He may believe what he's doing. He may believe

43:35

the two party paradigm is going to save us

43:37

all. But I ultimately think that no matter what

43:39

you stand on, no matter what your perception, your

43:41

political party, or aware that they're all lying, this

43:43

is a problem. We all know that. And

43:46

of course, just in general, you need

43:49

to subscribe to view this content. Again,

43:51

shouting out our, you know, our

43:53

demonstrating our value that we will

43:56

never put things behind a paywall. And

43:58

despite we do things like Rockfin. or subscribe

44:00

star, the point is they are accessible about seven other

44:02

locations despite that. If you want to support us through

44:04

those platforms, you can subscribe to them. And Substack for

44:06

that matter. I was just about to write something on

44:08

that today, so get ready. I'm going to be putting

44:10

some new stuff out there on Substack

44:12

as me writing and some other

44:14

things coming out. But anyway, the point is it's

44:17

all free. Substack everything because that's how we should

44:19

be operating in my opinion. But I'm not

44:21

going to begrudge somebody for making money. But

44:23

when it comes down to that versus what you claim as

44:25

your objective to spread the truth, and I'm not even speaking

44:27

about Tucker. I'm just making a broad point. It

44:29

should be something that we ask. Now

44:33

on this larger point, and it's interesting

44:35

that Tucker played a central role in

44:37

this conversation, and in many ways calling it out. This

44:40

is the Wall Street Journal from yester, excuse

44:42

me, two days ago, the

44:44

military's phantom extremists. How

44:47

embarrassing this must be for all the people that were screaming

44:49

about how this was going to end the world. But you

44:51

know, it's the same people that were screaming, North Korea is

44:53

going to end the world. The biggest thought to our democracy

44:55

until they look somewhere else and they said Venezuela is the

44:58

biggest threat to our democracy and it's going to end the

45:00

world. I looked over here in the Syria is the biggest

45:02

threat to our democracy. Well, you know, anyone could have been.

45:04

The point was they are just paranoid

45:07

schizophrenic basically, screaming about whatever the government points

45:09

at that day. This

45:12

was always an illusion. The

45:15

evidence was staggeringly clear. So

45:17

let's go through this just so you can see what is

45:19

now being put out, even by the corporate media question

45:22

everybody, including us, including the corporate media, just because they say

45:24

it does not make it true, just because it aligns what

45:27

we think also doesn't make it true. Question at all. I

45:30

think the facts definitely back this up and it

45:32

says, good news. The US military isn't packed with

45:34

violent extremists. That's the gist of a

45:36

new report commissioned by the Pentagon in 2021. Of

45:39

course, you could argue right there that the Pentagon has a

45:41

vested interest in not letting that be

45:44

the case. That's certainly a valid point. But

45:46

again, I think the rest of the information backs up that

45:48

this is actually the case. And

45:50

it released quietly this report with

45:53

very little notice last month. You

45:56

shouldn't be surprised if you didn't know about it because you're not going

45:58

to hear CNN or any of them come out and say, say, yeah,

46:00

we're ridiculous. The result

46:02

won't surprise Americans who have spent any

46:05

time in uniform. But it should calm

46:07

the media frenzy, probably not, about right-wing

46:09

radicals in the armed forces. Now,

46:12

this was about the concept of, as we've

46:14

termed vanilla ISIS, the MAGA trap, the

46:16

idea that they were pretending that there was a domestic

46:18

terrorism problem that was

46:21

stemming from white supremacy that was somehow in

46:23

a weird way working with foreign entities from

46:25

around the world, despite that, the

46:27

most comically ridiculous way, of contradicting exactly

46:29

what they tell you they live by,

46:31

their ideology. But who cares, because they're

46:34

working together, they're bad guys, and that's kind of how this was

46:36

pushed. And it fell flat. That doesn't

46:38

mean they didn't still push it aggressively like every other

46:40

agenda. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin

46:42

ordered an independent study to

46:44

get greater fidelity, he said, on extremism in the

46:46

ranks. The think tank tasked with

46:49

the report, the Institute for Defense Analysis, quote,

46:51

found no extremists in the

46:54

military, or excuse me, found

46:56

no evidence, excuse me, that the number of

46:58

violent extremists in the military is disproportionate. Meaning,

47:01

and I think it does say right there, to US society.

47:05

Well, right there, there's an opening, you could argue, well, that's

47:07

because it's that bad in the society. So all you're really

47:09

pointing out is that it's just as bad as anywhere else,

47:11

which is a problem. But it's not really what

47:13

it's saying, and the facts don't actually back that up. But I'm

47:15

sure that that's where you'll see that argument made. A

47:18

review of Pentagon data suggests, quote,

47:21

fewer than 100 substantiated cases per

47:23

year of extremist activity by members of

47:25

the military in recent years, the report

47:28

says, far less than

47:30

what we're being told. The figure, this figure,

47:32

that figure, excuse me, could include a range

47:34

of conduct and ideological bent.

47:37

Not simply white supremacy floated in the press. And you see,

47:39

this is the game that's always played. You look at the

47:42

general broad numbers and you just make it what you want.

47:45

Despite the fact that extremist,

47:50

Israeli, or whatever you wanna talk about, there's plenty

47:52

of extremist aspects out there in the world. So

47:55

the point is that these are people they claim have an

47:57

ideological bent. You can see the same

47:59

thing coming from the... left of this conversation radically driving in

48:01

their trans agenda into you know there's all these different

48:03

things that are happening the point is that it's not

48:06

unique to white supremacy take

48:09

a court material that says researchers found

48:11

that quote the prevalence of extremist and

48:14

gang related activity that are reflected in

48:16

court martial opinions it's limited to

48:18

fewer than 20 cases says

48:20

2012 that's crazy gang activity

48:22

isn't typically political and excluding these cases

48:25

the number falls to one a

48:27

year you heard that

48:29

right one a year and

48:32

this is what they went this far

48:34

for you ever how dumb this was

48:36

right this is the system CNN

48:39

September 4th 2021 right supremacy

48:41

with a tan but you

48:43

just can't make up that kind of stupidity I

48:46

mean I don't care whether you think it's an

48:48

agenda or it's a private this is just dumb

48:51

like at the barest lowest common denominator level how

48:54

exactly you can you call it white you get the point we're

48:56

all about this when it was coming out the

48:59

point is they were wrong they lied to you or

49:01

they didn't do their due diligence so you

49:03

shouldn't listen to them even

49:05

the January 6th story it says isn't what

49:07

you've heard isn't that interesting the

49:10

IDA again which is the Institute

49:12

for Defense Analysis found

49:15

that quote of the more than 700 federal

49:18

cases in which charges were publicly

49:20

available a year after these events

49:23

fewer than 10 were in

49:25

the military at the time so where does

49:27

this even come from where were these allegations made because

49:30

this is an obvious agenda this is probably one of the

49:32

most obvious which I feel like it's becoming a common statement

49:34

but my god these things are obvious these days it

49:37

says quote there's no evidence that service members are

49:39

were charged at a different rate than the members

49:41

of the general population then of

49:43

course when I'll make a point in a minute about how

49:45

this was not even remotely what actually happened on January or

49:47

January 6th and and that truth

49:50

in media has broken this down I mean that we've

49:52

broken this down it's plainly evidence that they were involved

49:54

with trying to drive this into reality that people like

49:56

Ray Epps were pushing them to go in and they

49:59

just ignored that blatant Even said on the record that

50:01

he was the one behind it. I mean it's obvious

50:05

You have evidence of the antifa members. They are members

50:07

of a Ukrainian Ozov member who was there screaming

50:09

in Russian. Let's go This

50:12

was a multifaceted This

50:14

was an agenda that was much larger than January

50:16

6th much larger than the two two-party system And

50:19

we're still seeing it play out mind you and I'll make a point a second But

50:22

it says researchers deserve credit for noting that

50:24

the risk to the military for widespread polarization

50:27

and division in the ranks may be A

50:29

greater risk than the radicalization of a few

50:31

service members Exactly what

50:33

anybody logical and honest is saying you're

50:36

dividing everybody you're polarizing people based

50:38

on party lines, which only hurts

50:40

the country That's what

50:42

they're doing and lying about that making it anybody

50:45

that supports Trump is suddenly a terrorist That's as

50:47

stupid as saying anybody supports Palestine is suddenly a

50:49

terrorist. Oh There you go.

50:51

We're all Republicans out there who are currently doing

50:53

that Don't you remember 30 seconds ago being called

50:55

a terrorist because you wore a red hat? Can't

50:57

you recognize how that's happening again? Too

51:00

many don't care. This is

51:02

a welcome rebuke to the narrative that a the military

51:04

is a breeding ground for domestic terrorism The

51:06

press carried a story everywhere in

51:08

2021 including calls for tips Literally

51:11

putting an article out that says have

51:13

you witnessed far-right extremism inside the military

51:15

because what does that do? Drives people

51:17

to call based on anything. I saw

51:19

rag a MAGA hat today and that goes

51:22

down as another note That's how this works

51:25

and now we're finding out that they lied

51:27

That's how that works But the press interest

51:29

in military extremism has outstripped the actual extremists

51:31

available to cover a ran survey

51:34

found that among veterans support for extremist

51:36

groups and extremist ideals is Similar

51:39

to or less than the general public. So

51:42

the point is there is no real point to be

51:44

made here. There's no Threat from

51:46

the military as they've made the case I

51:48

mean because really this comes down to I

51:50

think what they wanted it to be which

51:53

was January 6th with a military insurrection They

51:56

really tried to push that it was obviously not the case

51:59

now as you could see And

52:01

by the way, again, I'm not saying this is the

52:03

case just because the Wall Street Journal said or because

52:05

the study said. It's because the evidence is already there.

52:07

This just confirms what we've already proven. Well, you

52:10

can see everybody, everywhere,

52:13

including independent media, in the two-party paradigm,

52:15

of course, inside the US military's battle

52:17

with white supremacy, how the US military has failed to address

52:19

white supremacy. All

52:22

of them wrong. All of them lying.

52:24

Or not doing their jobs. Unless

52:26

you realize their job is to lie to you, then they're doing their job perfectly. It

52:29

just goes on and on and on. It's just crazy. Crazy.

52:33

Then, of course, again, these kind of ridiculous articles came

52:35

out where they were then trying to conflate this. Right?

52:38

It was about the idea that, well, now they're working

52:40

with Iran. Now they're working

52:42

with Hamas. Now they're working with whoever we could point

52:45

at to make it seem as if the people who

52:47

are... Now, again, this is different. Right? Now the conversation

52:49

is flipped because most people that are... I would

52:51

argue, well, I don't want to say that because I find it really difficult

52:53

to discern right now. But

52:56

at least what they want you to think is that most Republicans

52:58

support Israel. Again, it's

53:00

an interesting shift from the fact that 30 seconds ago

53:02

they were the ones being called terrorists based on these

53:05

kind of illusions and the same thing as being done

53:07

not to Hamas but to Palestinians.

53:10

Nobody is supporting Hamas here. Well, not here.

53:13

People are. They have a right

53:15

to do so. You don't get to decide what people

53:17

can support and simply dictate that off-limits. But

53:20

the bottom line is I'm supporting the Palestinian people. Why

53:24

would I support a group that Israel literally

53:26

funded, which is Hamas? See if

53:29

I can get it right. I

53:32

had it up somewhere in here. I knew I would

53:34

bring it up. Shoot.

53:37

We'll come back to it. The

53:39

point, though, as

53:42

we've proven – I mean, I should just grab

53:45

it since I mentioned it, but we've proven many

53:47

times over, like so of many others writing about

53:49

this, that Israel openly funded

53:51

Hamas. I just don't get why that can't

53:53

come into the mainstream conversation. Where are all

53:56

the corporate media? You realize they all

53:58

know this. This is our retts on October 9. saying

54:00

if they want to thwart the two-state solution,

54:03

which by the way they right at this

54:05

moment pretended they were wanting, while secretly saying,

54:07

if we want to make sure we stop

54:09

it, well we have to fund Hamas, bolster

54:11

transferring money to Hamas. And this is part

54:13

of our strategy, and it goes on to

54:15

say to divide the Palestinian people. It's

54:18

very, very public and obvious. So

54:22

it's interesting that we can't recognize

54:25

that the very entity that was funding these groups are the

54:27

ones using them, just like they continue to this very day.

54:30

Now, we've talked about this overlap in regard to

54:32

the vanilla ISIS conversation.

54:37

This is Whitney's outstanding article, which I highly recommend

54:39

you check out from March 2nd, 2022. Ukraine,

54:42

the new al Qaeda, and it's exactly what it sounds like.

54:45

The game, the illusion that al Qaeda

54:47

was some group fighting with, no, it was a US

54:49

proxy entity, along with Israel, as we've seen them treat

54:52

the supposed rebels on the border and the Golan

54:54

Heights. So

54:56

just like they did this before, Ukraine, which has been

54:58

set up from a long time ago, by the way,

55:01

as I've said many times, this was not just the Ozov

55:03

movement, which is the Ozov movement, is

55:06

the group they created starting here in

55:08

1948, that documents prove the CIA has

55:10

been cultivating fascism, predominantly

55:12

from the Ukrainian Nationalists, which are a

55:14

fascist entity. And

55:19

they leaned into them, they set them up, Michael Lebed,

55:21

who was a literal Nazi war criminal, and they set

55:23

him up in the United States. They gave him a

55:25

business called Prolog. They let him sell media to you,

55:27

to people in the country.

55:30

And why we can't recognize how nefarious that is,

55:33

just like with the NASA conversation and Project Paperclip.

55:35

But the point is, he also

55:37

did it in Ukraine. And since then, they have been cultivating

55:39

this very clear entity, as there

55:41

were stop points coming out from the FBI elements,

55:43

from the CIA elements, telling you this was building,

55:46

just like we told you it was, and that's exactly what he

55:48

writes about. The fact that this

55:50

was meant to be blamed on Russia to pretend that

55:53

they were the ones creating terrorism inside of Ukraine to

55:55

justify this agenda. It's blatantly clear. But

55:59

it didn't work. It failed

56:01

because people are paying attention. The

56:03

Patriot Front, January 6, and the Vanillaisis-Siop is something we've

56:05

been talking about for a while. But

56:07

don't forget the larger point is that January 6

56:09

itself, in my opinion,

56:11

is something we can prove. Well, they failed

56:13

false flag meant to blame Russia and you, whether

56:16

or not you're Republican but what they just say you are, using

56:19

the CIA-grown Ozov Battalion or movement.

56:22

And this comes back to – this is project – operation

56:24

aerodynamic or I think it was

56:26

operation aerodynamic, project aerodynamic. It

56:29

has a CIA program to train extremists,

56:31

just like they did in Afghanistan, to

56:34

mire Russia into a battle. It's

56:37

amazing that I can talk about this every –

56:39

I mean, constantly since 2021 or whatever it started

56:41

and yet people still don't know this. You know,

56:43

Laura Loomer will come in and give you a

56:45

fraction of the story, leave out the Israel overlap

56:47

because Israel is obviously funding these entities and

56:49

yet that's what people fixate on. You know, I'm going

56:54

to grab this real quick. As

56:58

I've shown you many times, 2018, rights

57:00

groups in Israel demand that Israel stop arming neo-Nazis.

57:03

That should confuse you if you've never seen it before, but it's

57:05

the reality. They were literally arming the

57:07

Ozov militia at the time, Ozov movement. Now

57:13

we have here the

57:16

one I followed up with, March 8, 2023, which was

57:19

January 6th was always a very clear government operation and

57:21

important – oh, that was the second part. But

57:24

this is the point here. If you watch this, it's all there.

57:26

All the source links are always down there for you. This

57:29

guy, Sergei Vinyin,

57:31

I believe, he is an Ozov

57:33

member movement. It's all documented in the show. He's

57:36

with the Ozov movement. And

57:38

yet here he is next to Jake on January 6th,

57:41

filmed, as we show in this show,

57:43

screaming, let's go in Russian. How

57:46

do you not put that together? And then, of course,

57:48

you've got the Antifa members, more

57:50

than one, on the record on

57:53

film, which we show in this show, saying, we did it.

57:55

We tricked them. I can't believe it. And somehow they magically

57:57

couldn't find that in their investigation. This

58:00

was what this was all about, guys. They were

58:02

trying to create the illusion to justify the larger

58:05

agenda. Now,

58:07

just a quick side note. I saw this today. My brother actually said this to

58:09

me. Don't fall

58:12

for these obvious traps. Right

58:14

now you've got pro-Palestine protesters who are

58:17

doing a sit-in inside the Capitol. Now,

58:19

what's hilarious in this is California. These

58:23

are Jews for ceasefire, or Jewish voices for

58:25

ceasefire, I think, or for peace, I think,

58:27

is the name of the group. And

58:30

of course they always get called anti-Jew,

58:32

hate-Jew, like Ben Shapiro called them trash.

58:35

Why? Because they disagree with what the

58:37

war is about. So we're protecting

58:40

the idea that somehow we're the ones

58:42

against these people. It's hilarious. We're against

58:44

anybody killing innocent people. I'm

58:46

supporting Jewish people here, supporting Muslims over there, supporting

58:48

Christians over here. I support anybody who needs support.

58:52

However, Ben Shapiro and the rest

58:54

of them have very specific things that they will

58:56

not allow. You aren't allowed to say ceasefire, because

58:58

then you're trash. Anti-Jew, apparently, somehow,

59:00

even though you're Jewish. It's

59:03

just insulting and obvious. But the point

59:05

is, pro-Palestine protesters occupy and

59:07

shut down the state Capitol. Well, guess

59:09

what? Everybody. Insurrection! Insurrection! Insurrection! Some of

59:11

them joking, some of them not. Now, my point

59:13

was, it doesn't matter whether you're joking or not.

59:15

It doesn't matter whether you're trying to make a

59:17

pithy point about how clearly, how it was done

59:19

to call them. If you do that, you are

59:21

doing what they want from you. You're

59:24

stepping in and you're calling an insurrection, which

59:26

then ultimately creates the

59:28

same dynamic. If you're going to pretend that they called it

59:30

an insurrection when it wasn't, and that's a huge deal, even

59:33

pretending, even joking about this

59:35

undermines your point. They

59:37

want that from you. Neither of these

59:40

were insurrections. Both of them should be supported, because these

59:42

are people fighting for what they believe is their right

59:44

to protest. They commit a

59:47

crime. I don't support that. Just like

59:49

we talk about on October 7th. It's ridiculous that one

59:51

person or two people or ten of them can do

59:53

things that then they pretend represents everybody.

59:56

Here's an Aussie flag we claim we put out that somebody marched into the

59:59

middle of this thing and said, Canada we call them

1:00:01

all Nazis the entire time. It's childish.

1:00:03

It is ignorant and we all see through

1:00:05

it Some people just choose to go into it

1:00:07

because it works for their agenda Hundreds

1:00:10

of pro-palestine protesters other activists are occupying and

1:00:12

it's a sit-in guys. They're literally sitting down.

1:00:14

They're not being violent They're not breaking anything.

1:00:16

They're sitting there. That is what an hockey.

1:00:18

That is what a protest is Whether

1:00:21

or not it's in the capital now you can argue

1:00:23

they're violating a law of some kind But you go

1:00:25

as far as to argue that it's an insurrection is

1:00:27

exactly what they want from you Marjorie Taylor Greene literally

1:00:29

called the last one on insurrection and she was not

1:00:31

joking Because they want you to

1:00:33

fall into this trap The self stupid

1:00:36

they think you are prove them wrong, please Now

1:00:39

let's not forget This agenda goes

1:00:41

back a long way if you forgot our

1:00:44

coverage on this. This is from May 2022

1:00:46

the Buffalo shooter, right? He was linked

1:00:48

to the Ozov movement as well

1:00:50

as this I forget this one Blanken

1:00:53

up top of my head you guys remember in the chat

1:00:55

Oh here it is that the hero here on Ukraine the

1:00:57

guy who was in Ukraine fighting with all of his Nazi

1:00:59

stuff And then we have the Buffalo shooter and

1:01:03

the point This

1:01:05

is what we're talking about. These are shooters in the

1:01:07

United States that are being driven by ideology

1:01:10

from the Ukraine manipulation What

1:01:13

did they say then? Russia's radicalizing people Russia

1:01:15

has a white supremacy problem They were pushing this

1:01:17

narrative aggressively and they still try but it's just

1:01:19

fallen so flat because you know I quite frankly

1:01:22

people like Laura Loomer are ridiculous a clown in

1:01:24

my opinion and and they come out and they

1:01:26

destroy any kind of Momentum they might have had

1:01:28

because they're just bad at what they do. But

1:01:31

in this case It's

1:01:35

obvious that it was connected to the Ozov movement

1:01:37

connected to the larger agenda in regard to claiming

1:01:41

That this was something that was being done to the

1:01:43

United States And of course that you that's used to

1:01:45

manipulate both the people in this country to think that

1:01:47

that's happening and then Maybe before they

1:01:49

even get into blaming it on somebody Right

1:01:52

just saying oh, of course Taking

1:01:57

it home think well, it's because of ideology the white supremacy in

1:01:59

the military What happened because of this? In

1:02:01

reality, it's a CIA operation to train extremism that, by the

1:02:03

way, literally calls on people to come from all over the

1:02:05

world to continue to spread the white race around the world.

1:02:07

That is what your government is supporting. That is an open

1:02:09

statement by these people. The

1:02:12

Kassim Brigades in

1:02:14

Gaza, this is December 21st, kill

1:02:17

Ukrainian mercenaries. Now, we already talked about this. It's

1:02:19

not unique to one field or another. We

1:02:22

already have proof that they

1:02:24

are – he's saying, hey, Mom, I'm in Ukraine.

1:02:26

All right, in Gaza, this is a Ukrainian mercenary.

1:02:30

Freddie Pontoan has done some great work on this too. Ozov

1:02:33

in the Gaza occupation. And

1:02:37

again, going back to this, we have to realize this is as

1:02:39

obvious as it gets. These groups

1:02:41

have been working with Israel for a very long time. Neo-Nazis.

1:02:47

And then again, to conclude this, in case you didn't see it, Israel

1:02:50

funded the very group that they're telling you is responsible

1:02:52

for all of this, and yet we don't talk about

1:02:54

that. Now,

1:02:57

the judicial reform is a big topic in all

1:02:59

of this. I find

1:03:01

this to be really important not only because it's

1:03:04

against essentially trying to create a situation

1:03:06

where Netanyahu is

1:03:08

above the law, knowing that literally – I mean, I

1:03:10

shouldn't say that. Most people, the vast majority, do not

1:03:12

support him. But it's

1:03:14

also important because

1:03:16

it shows you that this is not

1:03:18

just about what happened on October 7th, long before this

1:03:20

started. People were protesting

1:03:22

aggressively outside his home, outside of the Knesset, because they

1:03:24

did not want him in power. They did not want

1:03:26

what they were going to do here. As it

1:03:29

simply says, this – a leak came out. This was

1:03:31

on the 28th. It

1:03:34

seems like an imitation – oh, and the point he's making here

1:03:36

– I'll skip past this – is, of course,

1:03:38

again, one of the obvious overlaps. These countries might as well

1:03:40

be one and the same at this point. The

1:03:42

government – excuse me, the government's terrible mistake I just made

1:03:44

there. Not the same thing. The government

1:03:46

is different than the country. You are the country. The point

1:03:48

– well, they said, well,

1:03:51

just like happened in the United States, where

1:03:53

they leaked a conservative

1:03:55

draft about the abortion

1:03:57

conversation, which then drove certain balls. That's the same

1:03:59

thing he's saying, which both should have been investigated,

1:04:01

but they never are. They leak whatever they want

1:04:03

all the time. But it

1:04:05

says if the leak is correct, the court indeed intends

1:04:08

to strike down the law that eliminated

1:04:10

what they call the reasonableness standard that

1:04:12

will pass by the Knesset in July.

1:04:16

Those who followed the court's hearing concerning

1:04:18

the petitions against the legislation could have

1:04:20

estimated that this would be overcome, but

1:04:24

it was assumed by a very thin margin. Hold

1:04:27

on. I want to make sure I miss a part up

1:04:29

here. The bottom line is that this is something that would

1:04:31

have allowed them to circumvent – or rather basically the court

1:04:34

– the judges were allowed

1:04:36

to strike down something if they thought

1:04:38

that it was unjustified or

1:04:40

otherwise not appropriate. And so they're

1:04:43

trying to skip past that and allow them to

1:04:45

be simply – that was the judicial reform conversation

1:04:48

to now which they've struck this down. And this

1:04:51

is on the 28th, mind you. Now, according to the

1:04:53

Wednesday's report, this is the case. Channel

1:04:56

12 framed the decision as a second

1:04:58

judicial overhaul according to the report. The

1:05:00

Supreme Court justices have objected to the

1:05:02

short amount of time dictated by the

1:05:04

former president. This was intended

1:05:07

apparently to ensure that they both

1:05:09

– that this person retired and

1:05:11

would not – and would take part in

1:05:13

the decision. Basically, the timing of it would

1:05:15

have allowed certain people to vote that would have otherwise not

1:05:17

been able to, and they argued that those votes would have

1:05:19

allowed this to pass or not. They're basically trying to manipulate

1:05:21

the timing to get one up on the

1:05:24

other side, which that's politics for you.

1:05:26

They're always lying, always deceiving. According to

1:05:28

this really law, the two are allowed to sign a verdict

1:05:30

within 90 days of the retirement. The deadline is

1:05:32

January 12th. The claim

1:05:34

is therefore that the leaked decision, which would have

1:05:36

been controversial anyway, would have been overturned if the

1:05:38

majority opinion supporters of those two had retired. An

1:05:42

opposing claim can be made against the government. I

1:05:45

think basically –

1:05:48

right here I think – acting

1:05:52

Supreme Court presidents will have to

1:05:54

investigate the reported leaked draft. Such

1:05:56

leaks are lifeblood of journalism. But

1:06:00

anyway, the point was basically they're

1:06:02

saying, well, it's back. This

1:06:05

is now happening back, but here is where it was essentially struck down. High

1:06:08

court strikes down key part of Netanyahu's judicial

1:06:10

overhaul. This was today. Oh, excuse

1:06:12

me, yesterday. Now, I

1:06:15

want to read you the top parts here. It says,

1:06:17

Israel's Supreme Court struck down a key component of Benjamin

1:06:19

Netanyahu's contentious judicial overhaul. Really, just trying to give himself

1:06:21

absolute power. The

1:06:23

court narrowly voted to overturn a law

1:06:25

passed in July that prevents judges from

1:06:28

striking down government decisions that they deem

1:06:30

unreasonable. It's right there. A senior Israel

1:06:32

Defense Forces spokesman has indicated the military

1:06:34

offensive in Gaza could apparently last throughout

1:06:37

2024. Just

1:06:41

come, just think about that for a second. Can

1:06:43

you imagine what's going on right now all

1:06:46

the way until the end of this year for 12 months? I

1:06:50

mean, this is about driving people, and we'll see what

1:06:52

we all get to today, it's about driving people to

1:06:55

accept the fact that they need to be

1:06:57

moved, as Israel wants,

1:06:59

which they've cut out and said now. It's blatant. Despite

1:07:01

the fact that you can still engage on Twitter and

1:07:03

people go, you're a liar. He literally

1:07:05

said it out of his own mouth. But, you know, people, these

1:07:07

people fighting for narratives online aren't even paying attention to what they're

1:07:09

saying. They have certain talking points, the hab's bar that they just

1:07:12

go for. The point, though, is

1:07:15

that this is going

1:07:17

to drive to a point to where people are, I

1:07:19

mean, almost out of a sheer sense of humanity. Despite

1:07:23

knowing that this is the dynamic, knowing

1:07:25

that Israel is trying to force this in, because

1:07:27

they will, if we accept the fact that they're

1:07:30

just going to keep bombing, no matter what we

1:07:32

say, no matter what we do, save a military

1:07:34

invasion to stop them, which at this point, quite

1:07:36

frankly, I think is something we should discuss. But

1:07:40

aside from that, the

1:07:43

point is that they're, I just

1:07:46

lost the thread there for a second, but it was in 2024

1:07:48

going through the end of the discussion or end of the year.

1:07:52

There it

1:07:54

is, the idea that they're driving these people into

1:07:56

other locations so people might just feel like, well,

1:07:58

I know it's wrong. We know what they're doing

1:08:00

is illegal, but it's I guess the only choice we have.

1:08:03

Let's move them somewhere else. So Israel, let's just murder them

1:08:05

all. That's kind of

1:08:07

what I think this is being driven toward, right? And if you're, how

1:08:09

in the world do you get to pretend that what they're doing will

1:08:11

take another 12 months? All

1:08:14

they're really doing is pretending to get engaged in

1:08:16

battles and bombing everything. Tensions

1:08:18

in the Middle East were raised yesterday when US helicopters exchanged

1:08:20

fire with Iran back to the crews and

1:08:22

small boats in the Red Sea after they

1:08:24

received distress calls from a commercial container ship.

1:08:27

The US helicopters sank three boats. Right,

1:08:30

because you know it's common for the US government

1:08:32

to work alongside other world powers to suppress a

1:08:34

starving nation that they've been suppressing for 20 years.

1:08:36

It's typical. Right, how dare they act

1:08:39

in support of the just cause? How dare they? Now,

1:08:42

I made the point with Robert, just because I

1:08:44

think it's an objective point, that if they are

1:08:46

in fact bombing these ships, and some of them

1:08:48

may in fact be commercial vessels and not military,

1:08:51

first of all it matters whether Israel's using them, because

1:08:53

that's certainly possible. They're all about human shields

1:08:55

despite the narrative. But

1:08:59

either way, we have

1:09:01

to be honest about the fact that if they're doing so,

1:09:03

then whether you agree with it or not is different, that

1:09:05

it would arguably be breaking the law. That's

1:09:08

totally different. You can still go good, because they're breaking

1:09:10

the law too, it's all, it's your decision. But I

1:09:12

think it's important that we just acknowledge that reality. But

1:09:16

there's difference as well when we're talking about the shipping lanes.

1:09:19

They have every right to shut down their territorial

1:09:21

waters, and then should these ships push in anyway,

1:09:23

well then you could argue they have a legal

1:09:25

right. Well you see, this is all

1:09:27

the dynamic that's getting manipulated, and frankly, I don't think a

1:09:29

lot of this is being lied about anyway. I'll

1:09:32

show you what I mean in a second. I mean, I believe that this

1:09:34

is happening. I'll also believe, as we'll show

1:09:36

you in a second, that they're lying about these two. Right,

1:09:39

they don't need to wait for another rocket to fly. They'll

1:09:42

just wake up that day, they've already done three or

1:09:44

whatever, and just go, well, let's just report they did,

1:09:46

and then take action. Who is going to

1:09:48

argue? Same thing Israel does. Dana's

1:09:51

shipping giant Merck announced a 48 hour

1:09:53

pause on all transit through the Bob

1:09:55

Hill Mandev straight. So

1:09:57

arguably what they're doing is working, which connects the...

1:10:00

Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden and Indian

1:10:02

Ocean. That's the one on the other side of

1:10:04

the Yemen continent, or Yemen country. And

1:10:07

the point is the other side of that is the, shoot

1:10:12

Persian Gulf, or the blanket

1:10:14

on the Ayrshman name, hold on, make sure I don't miss

1:10:16

and say it wrong. The

1:10:21

Gulf of Oman, but the Strait of Hormuz, that's what

1:10:23

it was. It's been a minute since I've

1:10:25

been focusing on all this stuff, so the over, oh, you can't see the

1:10:27

map I'm looking at, but the other side from the Strait of Hormuz between

1:10:30

Africa and Yemen is the Spab al-Mandeb Strait.

1:10:32

Largely, in my opinion, why the US government

1:10:34

has been desperately starving this country to death

1:10:37

in order to take over control of that

1:10:39

area for exactly this purpose, and they failed.

1:10:42

Right, so now, because this happened, this is

1:10:44

what they were preparing for, now they don't

1:10:46

have control over that passageway. Not really. And

1:10:49

I think this entire thing has been about trying to do that

1:10:51

because they always knew this was coming. It

1:10:55

says, Netanyahu has continued to push back against calls for

1:10:57

a ceasefire in Gaza, and said on Saturdays the war

1:10:59

was expected to go on for many more months. These,

1:11:03

I mean, it just really is unbelievable that

1:11:05

the entire, whatever you wanna call it, civilized

1:11:07

society is just, which apparently doesn't exist. It's

1:11:09

just sitting back and just letting this happen.

1:11:12

I'll tell you, if I had any more ability to do anything, I

1:11:15

would be doing it right now. This

1:11:17

is unreal how much this is going on. The fact they're

1:11:19

going, it may just last throughout 2024. And

1:11:22

they just let it happen? US gives them

1:11:24

more weapons? We're gonna get into why that's

1:11:26

illegal anyway. More

1:11:28

than 21,000 people have been killed in Gaza since

1:11:30

the war began, the illegal occupation of

1:11:32

genocide. According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, which even

1:11:35

the BBC and AP have confirmed is accurate, more

1:11:37

than 55,000 have been injured. Israel

1:11:40

and military officials say that at least 170 soldiers have been killed during

1:11:43

the ground invasion, which came

1:11:45

after 100, then it's now 1200 because 200 of

1:11:47

those were Hamas members they burned,

1:11:49

because they conflated them with their own people because

1:11:51

they burned them alongside their own people. We know

1:11:54

that now. They've been admitted by people who were

1:11:56

there. And about 240 hostages, which I think Hamas

1:11:58

argues it was less than that. And they've

1:12:00

already killed I think 30 plus of

1:12:02

their own people per people who came

1:12:05

back from Gaza not Hamas Per

1:12:07

Israeli Jews who came back and said they killed

1:12:09

them alongside me But you

1:12:12

know fact who cares about the facts when you're involved in

1:12:14

a political battle So

1:12:18

that's all happening He's

1:12:20

losing control and the main

1:12:22

argument here is that if the longer he can maintain

1:12:25

this the longer he'll stay in power And

1:12:27

the US government seems to be completely okay with

1:12:29

that. So what do you know? He ventures out

1:12:31

into Lebanon, right? So now he's spreading this out

1:12:33

now, of course They've argued from the beginning that

1:12:35

we're not from the beginning But for a

1:12:37

while before October 7th that there was a

1:12:40

threat coming from all these locations Well, the

1:12:42

reality is that they're illegally occupying pretty much

1:12:44

all of them Syria, right

1:12:46

Lebanon Gaza Yemen

1:12:49

for the Houthis. I mean that's they're working with

1:12:52

Israel United States I mean all of these are

1:12:54

illegal occupations every single one of them So

1:12:57

they're the occupier which means every one of

1:12:59

these locations have you remember the legal right

1:13:01

to armed rebellion per the 4th Geneva Convention

1:13:04

and Yet they

1:13:06

go terrorists everybody because we don't like

1:13:09

that. They're defending themselves Israel

1:13:12

bombs Beirut the capital the civilian

1:13:14

don't forget how many times we've

1:13:16

heard Gantz Gout

1:13:18

all of them say you you you know, Lebanon you

1:13:20

better listen we can do the same thing to you

1:13:23

He said that openly and what I say

1:13:25

he's threatening to bomb He's threatening to genocide

1:13:28

a civilian city of Beirut and

1:13:30

here we go here We now it's

1:13:32

now it's beginning for reportedly killed and

1:13:34

as Robert writes, this is a declaration of war on Lebanon Of

1:13:36

course it is we will now see

1:13:39

if Hezbollah responds which quite frankly I don't know how they

1:13:41

don't and they might have already responded Hasboul

1:13:43

is not something first of all Hezbollah Houthis.

1:13:46

These are not terrorist organizations Now you

1:13:48

could argue that Hamas is far more in that vein But

1:13:51

things have shifted since the illusion over the

1:13:53

brother the argument that they're all about policy

1:13:55

resistance They were being funded by Israel in

1:13:57

order to keep them divided and then things

1:13:59

have changed since 2006 a lot and

1:14:01

many argue that they have you know new people have

1:14:04

grown up that the situation has changed now They do

1:14:06

not support Israel, but you could argue that there's more

1:14:08

overlap than we think but

1:14:11

the interesting part of it is that the Who

1:14:13

these Hezbollah these are popular movements that are voted

1:14:15

in by the people and all they can do

1:14:18

is just go We disagree because we don't like

1:14:20

you this guy ha he was sitting over here

1:14:22

in Saudi Arabia and Riyadh for 10 years He's

1:14:24

the real leader. None of the people want him.

1:14:26

They didn't vote for him Nobody but the US

1:14:28

government in Israel want them there And

1:14:31

that's how this works. What happened to Guaido Remember

1:14:33

Guaido is the only village, you know valid president

1:14:35

of Venezuela except until we need oil. They shut

1:14:37

up Guaido You don't count anymore. So

1:14:40

your interests are more important than democracy

1:14:43

Yeah, it always has been if

1:14:45

they cared more about democracy or whatever you want to

1:14:48

pretend that means they would have fought for Guaido No

1:14:50

matter what but nope, they need oil from Maduro So

1:14:53

they just kind of shoved him aside because they're

1:14:55

all used that way So

1:14:57

when you think about Hezbollah, do not think of

1:14:59

some terrorist organization run by Iran That's the

1:15:02

most naive and willfully ignorant view

1:15:04

about the facts. It's not

1:15:06

true Now I'm not gonna say that you

1:15:08

might not disagree with some of the things they do You

1:15:11

also might aggressively disagree with some of the

1:15:13

things the US military might do So

1:15:15

think about that for a second and ask yourself why that's

1:15:17

different Now

1:15:20

the cradle rights Iran vows retaliation after top

1:15:22

commander killed in Israel killed in Israel attack

1:15:24

on Syria So my point showing you this

1:15:26

this was from December 25th. It's on

1:15:29

Christmas So they're gonna they

1:15:31

love to try to act like they fire they

1:15:33

started it always You know ignoring

1:15:35

75 years of illegal occupation and

1:15:37

apartheid and brutal like the point is they

1:15:40

always make that argument So

1:15:42

let's just talk about today in Lebanon Beirut. Well,

1:15:44

does this matter? Does it matter that Israel bombed

1:15:47

and killed their commander not Hamas an

1:15:49

Iran commander in Syria

1:15:52

which by the way, they're allies. They're allowed to work

1:15:55

with each other. It's just silly to pretend otherwise Iran

1:15:58

is not terrorism It's

1:16:00

just so painfully stupid to watch

1:16:02

people engage with it as if that is

1:16:04

all you know that because the u.s. Government

1:16:06

said This entire country is

1:16:08

just terrorism or their military just terrorists. Well

1:16:11

based on that same logic. You would say

1:16:13

all the u.s. Military is But

1:16:15

of course, it's not an even application My

1:16:18

point is they already killed somebody in regard

1:16:20

to both the what was in this case. We're talking about

1:16:22

iran But then this leads

1:16:24

into the iran discussion as well But this

1:16:26

also overlaps with the lebanon discussion because israel

1:16:29

is making the allegation that all of it

1:16:31

is iran. So when they bomb Syria

1:16:33

when they bomb Beirut or Lebanon in general

1:16:35

or any other overlap they say it's because

1:16:37

iran was there. How long did we cover

1:16:39

this? so Realize

1:16:42

that they are driving this into reality.

1:16:44

They're bombing people in Syria It's an

1:16:46

illegal bombing the United States bombs a

1:16:48

rock an illegal bombing. They're

1:16:51

literally occupying the area It's the same argument for

1:16:53

Gaza. They are breaking the law. They're

1:16:56

bombing these places all over there They're driving

1:16:58

this into reality. This is the multi-front war.

1:17:00

They want ready ponto writes Iran rejects the

1:17:02

u.s. Claim Iran

1:17:05

targeted a tanker off the Indian coast Right.

1:17:08

So this is saying Iran's foreign ministry says Rejected

1:17:11

Monday as worthless Washington's claim that a drone

1:17:13

attack targeted a tanker off the coast of

1:17:15

India and was fired from Iran Right.

1:17:18

So just the Houthi aspect of this before we even get into

1:17:20

the Iran overlap From Yemen the

1:17:23

argument that I have no doubt they've even stated themselves

1:17:25

that they're doing this in Support

1:17:27

of what's going on with Gaza god forbid

1:17:30

they support the largest genocide or support They

1:17:33

are fighting against the most obvious genocide in

1:17:35

our history in our living memory, right that

1:17:37

god forbid But

1:17:41

the reality clearly is That

1:17:44

they're using this right who's these

1:17:47

fire to rocket just like we talked about Saudi

1:17:49

Arabia now we have to You

1:17:54

Iran simply says we didn't do that. Well, it doesn't matter.

1:17:56

They've already moved because of it. In fact, they've

1:17:59

already literally bombed it wrong Because of it and we'll

1:18:01

talk about that next No, you

1:18:03

could argue Iran is lying certainly possible But

1:18:05

just realize how many times just like the John

1:18:08

Bolton the lipid mines and a whole discussion

1:18:10

they lied to you. It was provable They

1:18:13

had nothing other than them Iran moving boats in

1:18:15

their own harbors And they called

1:18:17

that a credible threat and then went on to

1:18:19

carry out a bunch of false flags because that's what Bolton does His

1:18:23

history is shockingly clear Elliott Abrams

1:18:25

John Bolton, you know Trump's fantastic

1:18:27

cabinet US

1:18:30

warship down for drones over the Red Sea and

1:18:32

the Pentagon said on Sunday a day after the

1:18:34

India flagged oil tanker Was hit by an attack

1:18:37

drone allegedly from Iran As

1:18:39

I mentioned a moment ago US airstrikes hit

1:18:41

what they claim are the PMU cut the

1:18:44

of Hezbollah sites in Iraq after attack on

1:18:46

US troops right a legal attack unoccupied

1:18:49

on an occupier So

1:18:51

when they respond and bomb them their body illegal

1:18:53

acts no, there's no way around this They

1:18:56

have the right to armed rebellion doesn't matter whether you disagree with it

1:18:58

That is the law now guess what you guys love to tell us.

1:19:00

Well, if you don't like the law then try to change it It

1:19:03

is the law though, isn't it? I? Think

1:19:06

the bottom line is it's not even about for me

1:19:08

the law or what the US government has dictated It's

1:19:10

about the simple reality that these people are oppressed. They

1:19:12

are the ones who are being occupied They

1:19:15

are the oppressed. I Don't

1:19:18

know why we can't see that by now. Now. Here's my

1:19:20

first news writing Israel is under attack from seven fronts This

1:19:23

was on the 27th of December According

1:19:26

to you have gallant inside

1:19:28

and outside of Palestine. Guess

1:19:31

what he says? We're at a multi-front war and Are

1:19:34

coming under attack from seven theaters?

1:19:37

Gaza Lebanon Syria West

1:19:39

Bank Gaza Iraq Yemen

1:19:42

and Iran Think about

1:19:44

that They're literally this was

1:19:46

on the 27th. That's before most of this happened.

1:19:49

They're creating the dynamic They're

1:19:51

driving this in because when they have that

1:19:53

because of their own actions the

1:19:55

US government's probably gonna be obligated to step in God

1:19:58

forbid Now,

1:20:01

the drone strike in Beirut killed a senior

1:20:03

Hamas leader, they claim. This

1:20:05

drone strike hit a Hamas office in Beirut. Now

1:20:07

ask yourself how this makes sense. First

1:20:10

of all, what about the civilians who also

1:20:12

died in this bombing? Right? This

1:20:14

is Lebanon we're talking about. What

1:20:17

about the fact that

1:20:19

there are Hamas leaders literally comfortably living

1:20:22

in offices in Qatar that Israel said

1:20:24

they wouldn't go after, that Netanyahu literally

1:20:26

is working with to discuss the exchange.

1:20:30

I mean it's just such a blatant mis- I mean this

1:20:33

is about creating the illusions of fighting

1:20:35

the terrorists while taking

1:20:37

out anybody that they don't like. I

1:20:40

think it's very obvious because they're maintaining

1:20:43

their Hamas leadership right now. And

1:20:46

somebody asking for the link for that, it's an open statement.

1:20:48

Netanyahu blatantly said we will not go after

1:20:50

them until after the war. And

1:20:53

the point is that what we're talking about is maintaining

1:20:55

the leadership element. The only real thing you

1:20:58

would argue needs to be taken out to

1:21:00

clearly eliminate this other than

1:21:02

the ongoing bombings or just pretending

1:21:04

like that's what they were doing. But

1:21:07

no, they're comfortably living over here. The

1:21:09

same country that's protecting them is working to make deals

1:21:11

about the hostages. If you can't see

1:21:14

how that doesn't make sense, you just don't want to. A

1:21:16

US official told The Washington Post that Israel was

1:21:19

responsible for the strike that killed Salah

1:21:21

Al-Aure, the Hamas member, the deputy chief

1:21:23

of Hamas's political bureau. The

1:21:25

Israeli attack on the Lebanese capital marks a huge

1:21:28

escalation and could provoke a major war, which I

1:21:30

almost guarantee to happen. Hezbollah is

1:21:32

not going to let this fly, just based

1:21:34

on their policy, their actions

1:21:36

in the past. Hamas has confirmed

1:21:39

that Al-Aure was killed and released a

1:21:41

statement on his assassination. The

1:21:43

cowardly assassinations carried out by the Zionist occupation

1:21:45

against the leaders and symbols of our Palestinian

1:21:47

people inside and outside Palestine will not succeed

1:21:49

in breaking the will instead fast as our

1:21:51

people and then undermining the continuation of their

1:21:53

valiant resistance. Now this is Hamas, of course,

1:21:55

speaking on this. And remember that Hamas is funded and has

1:21:58

been funded by Israel. Let

1:22:00

that flavor the possibilities that's going that are going on

1:22:02

here. But for me We're

1:22:05

talking about the Fact

1:22:07

it's just like with Soleimani when they bombed which by

1:22:10

the way, we're gonna talk about next when they bombed

1:22:13

Under the flag of peace by the way Diplomatic

1:22:16

invitation bombed him in the Syria in the

1:22:18

airport It's the same conversation.

1:22:20

It doesn't matter that you think Hamas is X Y and

1:22:22

Z There is supposed to

1:22:24

be some kind of a process to this Especially when

1:22:26

you're talking about the reality that other civilians have been

1:22:29

killed I Just

1:22:32

think this is so over the top and we can watch what

1:22:34

they're doing and again, like I said to start I think

1:22:37

that it's Just

1:22:40

gonna get worse Until I mean again

1:22:42

again the kind of thing that we have the

1:22:44

ability to do which is just speak out and stand up

1:22:46

and try to it

1:22:49

requires somebody who actually has authority to make

1:22:51

this really stop Which is really

1:22:53

frustrating to me because they know they're caught just like

1:22:55

Netanyahu, but they get they're just gonna keep rolling this

1:22:57

out That is my biggest problem

1:22:59

right now But it

1:23:01

says so far Israel is not officially taking credit

1:23:03

for the attack But Israel officials are often ambiguous

1:23:06

about their operations in neighboring countries if confirmed the

1:23:08

drone strike would mark the first Israeli attack I'll

1:23:10

be root since the 2006 Lebanon war what's

1:23:13

they were destroyed? Israel and Hezbollah

1:23:15

have been trading fire across these

1:23:17

Israel Lebanon border since October 7th

1:23:20

the main point for this guys You know

1:23:23

why because Israel is

1:23:25

occupying Lebanon It's

1:23:27

a fact What's

1:23:29

interesting to me Is

1:23:32

that that doesn't come into play in the

1:23:34

conversation? So that makes Lebanon the occupied that

1:23:36

makes Israel the occupier big surprise So

1:23:39

that means they have a right to armed rebellion So

1:23:42

when they bomb this location, it's a crime just like everything

1:23:44

else. They're doing it doesn't matter whether you say, you know

1:23:46

This person was there Now

1:23:50

war monitor says confirmed by all the

1:23:52

news outlets he was assassinated by a

1:23:54

drone strike in Lebanon Iran blast updates

1:23:56

apparently deadly explosions target Soleimani death anniversary

1:23:59

just to jump over to this. So the point is, as

1:24:02

this is happening, right, so

1:24:04

this happens yesterday, the next day, we

1:24:06

see bombing in Iran. Like, how do you not

1:24:08

connect these? The argument is clearly

1:24:10

that they're, in my opinion, trying to drive

1:24:12

this into reality, because this is what desperation

1:24:15

looks like. You're trying to create

1:24:17

a literal world war, kinetic or otherwise, in

1:24:19

the hopes that you don't lose power. Listen

1:24:23

to people that know Netanyahu. They think he is

1:24:25

a maniac. That's why his people

1:24:27

don't support him, but yet we're allowing this guy to

1:24:29

drive us into the war? Blast

1:24:32

kills nearly 100 at slain

1:24:34

commander memorial. Iran bows

1:24:36

revenge. And there you go. And

1:24:39

now it's beginning. Hezbollah, that was

1:24:41

just attacked, and we're going to see them rise

1:24:43

up. And now Iran is literally battling the revenge.

1:24:46

Nasrallah says that Hezbollah is prepared to wage

1:24:48

no limit war on Israel. So there's Lebanon

1:24:50

telling you, or rather Hezbollah saying, there's no

1:24:53

limitation at this point. Which, why would there

1:24:55

be if we've literally watched what they've been

1:24:57

being, has been being done to them over

1:24:59

and over and over. Now

1:25:04

hold on a sec. I thought I had the, I

1:25:09

wanted to grab a, I

1:25:12

guess I didn't put it in the beginning. That's too bad. Hold on,

1:25:14

let me close some of this. Here

1:25:20

it is. So we'll come back to this in a second, but I wanted

1:25:23

to make this point. So

1:25:25

we're talking about Lebanon, right? In one of

1:25:27

these cases. One of the things the Israeli

1:25:29

government keeps screaming about is, UN Security

1:25:31

Council resolution 1701, you know, literally while

1:25:34

they ignore every other security resolution passed about

1:25:36

what they should do. Because that's what a

1:25:38

hypocrite looks like. The point though,

1:25:40

is that what it says is the one they're calling on is

1:25:42

a resolution that intended to resolve the 2006 Lebanon war, which calls

1:25:44

for full secession of

1:25:48

hostilities and the withdraw of Israel

1:25:50

troops from Lebanon. So can you tell me which one

1:25:52

didn't happen? I'll give you one

1:25:54

guess. You probably won't need more than one. They

1:25:57

never stopped occupying the territory, just like we're seeing in...

1:26:00

Literally every other location because they never intended to

1:26:02

they were hoping they could take advantage of this like they do in every

1:26:04

other deal We're talking about the

1:26:07

Zionist government It says

1:26:09

it was unanimously approved by the United Nations

1:26:11

on October August 2006 Loving's

1:26:13

cabinet unanimously approved the resolution So

1:26:16

Lebanon was all for it on the same day that

1:26:18

has the Hezbollah leader said that the militia would honor

1:26:21

the call for ceasefire it's

1:26:23

stopped and Israel never

1:26:25

stopped occupying territory You see we go forward

1:26:28

and the argument becomes that well Hezbollah fired

1:26:30

at this point Wait, you never met your

1:26:32

obligation and the cowardly US government is too

1:26:34

afraid to make that statement because you know

1:26:36

You can make up your own mind why?

1:26:41

So this is where we are in this conversation

1:26:43

where we're provably dealing with Occupation

1:26:48

illegal occupation and claiming that because

1:26:51

they're Responding or even just in

1:26:53

general the point is that they are the occupier

1:26:55

and it's the same dynamic that applies to what's going on

1:26:57

in Gaza and This is

1:26:59

what we're this is what I'm talking about

1:27:01

and what I'm expecting the US government is

1:27:03

now weighing strike options on the

1:27:06

starving nation of Yemen Because

1:27:10

of the Red Sea attacks right my point is how do we

1:27:12

know these are all happening the way they say they are They've

1:27:15

admitted to some but I've proven to you like just like Iran

1:27:17

said we didn't do that What do

1:27:20

they need to prove do they ever try to prove anything they

1:27:22

say they did this and we did that There's

1:27:24

no way you can ever find out They do that

1:27:27

all the time and that doesn't then mean that's not

1:27:29

possible They didn't do it all other times, but you

1:27:31

have to admit they do this just like Israel does

1:27:34

land in an open field now we kill all those people and

1:27:38

Several has little members killed in Israeli strikes

1:27:40

as erupting tensions royal on the border So

1:27:42

this has gone way beyond just the bombing

1:27:44

in Beirut. They're now seen

1:27:47

Skirmishes increase on the border and we've seen has little

1:27:50

members killed I'm sure this is times of Israel so

1:27:52

I can almost guarantee that Israeli people killed do what

1:27:54

they just pretend didn't happen This

1:27:57

is getting increasingly dangerous guys far more than

1:27:59

we thought before Now

1:28:01

let's talk about – now we are – I'm on a

1:28:04

half hour here. Let me see, gauge where I'm going to get to. That

1:28:08

was mostly what I wanted to get into today. Now the rest

1:28:10

of it is all just stuff we get into today or tomorrow.

1:28:12

That's all important to Gaza and Israel. But I

1:28:14

wanted you to see this. This is an 18-year-old article that

1:28:17

really highlights a specific tendency around

1:28:20

authority in the Zionist state,

1:28:22

illegal Zionist state of Israel. And

1:28:25

I've never ever – I've made the point

1:28:27

plenty of times. I don't even mean every IDF member. Plenty

1:28:29

of them have had issues with what they were told to

1:28:31

do, just like in the U.S. military. But

1:28:34

there is a very clear thread, as Abby

1:28:37

Martin's work has pointed out, as plenty of

1:28:39

others have made very clear to the manipulated

1:28:41

people of Israel who lean into

1:28:43

the same thing just like we see with the U.S. military. This

1:28:46

is 18 years ago, not guilty, the

1:28:49

Israeli captain who emptied his rifle into

1:28:51

a Palestinian schoolgirl, as

1:28:54

an Israeli army officer who fired an

1:28:56

entire magazine of his automatic rifle into a

1:28:58

13-year-old Palestinian girl and then said he would

1:29:00

have done the same even

1:29:03

if she was 3 years old, was

1:29:05

acquitted on all charges by a

1:29:08

military court. That

1:29:10

was Wednesday, the 15th of November 2005. Think about that.

1:29:17

Of course. It says – let's see where

1:29:19

we start on here. After

1:29:21

the verdict, Amman's father said the army never intended

1:29:23

to hold the soldiers accountable. That's the father, of

1:29:25

course. They did not charge him within

1:29:27

the murder, only with small offenses, and now they

1:29:29

say he's innocent of those, even though they shot

1:29:31

his daughter many times. The

1:29:34

military court created the soldier of illegal use of his

1:29:36

– cleared him of the equal use of his weapon,

1:29:38

conduct on becoming an officer, and preventing the course

1:29:41

of justice by asking soldiers under his command to

1:29:43

alter their accounts of the incident. This

1:29:45

is literally written by the corporate media. Quite a

1:29:47

bit different back then. Now

1:29:50

it says – what's

1:29:52

the main part here? This is important. The

1:29:56

army's official account said that Amman, the

1:29:58

young girl, schoolgirl, showed up. I

1:30:00

think she was 13, was

1:30:05

that she was shot for crossing into a

1:30:07

security zone, carrying her school

1:30:10

back, a backpack, which soldiers,

1:30:12

they claim, feared might have contained a bomb.

1:30:14

Which I guess you could argue is somehow,

1:30:16

you know, it's about the dehumanization,

1:30:18

right? The lack of concern for their – like

1:30:20

the idea that certainly you could argue that might

1:30:23

be possible, but is the argument then to just

1:30:25

shoot that child 50 times? Because

1:30:27

maybe? Certainly sounds like

1:30:29

what we're seeing today, doesn't it? Do

1:30:31

you know any other country that acts like that, that does

1:30:34

that, if – not only does it, but

1:30:36

then literally removes the accountability and says you didn't even

1:30:38

break the law? Because you know what?

1:30:40

They might have had a – guess what though? There was no bomb.

1:30:43

Right, so there wasn't a bomb. So

1:30:46

the mere allegation that there might have been a

1:30:48

bomb with no reason to expect that there would

1:30:50

be one was enough to

1:30:52

murder this girl. Three

1:30:54

– he said it would do it if it was a three-year-old child. How

1:30:58

do you not understand the kind of mentality that that is?

1:31:03

It says it is still not known why the

1:31:05

girl ventured into the area, but witnesses described her

1:31:07

as at least 100 yards from the military post,

1:31:09

which wasn't in any case well protected. So

1:31:12

save for a bomb, there's really no

1:31:14

logical reason why they would have done this. But

1:31:17

here's where it gets even more alarming. A

1:31:19

recording of radio exchanges between this person,

1:31:22

only known as Captain R, of course, because

1:31:24

they just don't want you to know who

1:31:26

he is, because they know that you think

1:31:29

this is disgusting, and his troops obtained by

1:31:31

an Israeli television, they got the radio exchanges,

1:31:33

they revealed that from the beginning soldiers identified

1:31:35

Amon as a child. Now

1:31:38

it says in the recording, a soldier in

1:31:40

a watchtower radioed a colleague in the Army

1:31:42

Post's operations room and described Amon as, quote,

1:31:44

a little girl, who was, quote,

1:31:46

scared to death. So

1:31:49

it's a child who is now somehow, for

1:31:51

whatever reason, wandering in this direction, doesn't know what's

1:31:53

happening and is scared. After

1:31:56

soldiers first opened fire, because that's how quickly that happened,

1:31:58

she dropped her school back. which

1:32:00

was then hit by separate bullets establishing

1:32:03

that it did not contain an

1:32:05

explosive. So she's

1:32:07

alive at this point. They fired

1:32:09

at her, she got the bag, and it

1:32:12

begins moving away. They

1:32:14

fired on the bag. Okay, so not an

1:32:16

explosive. At that point, she

1:32:18

was no longer carrying the bag, so

1:32:20

there goes your justification, and

1:32:22

the tape revealed that she

1:32:24

was in fact heading away from the Army post when

1:32:27

she was shot in the back. This

1:32:29

is what we're talking about. So

1:32:31

how do you pretend that that was justified, regardless

1:32:34

of the explanation? Although the military

1:32:36

speculated that Amman might have been trying to lure

1:32:38

the soldiers out, see, this is what you do. So

1:32:40

now you just manufacture a hypothetical that might have

1:32:42

justified? Well, I guess we'll never know. So all

1:32:45

you're really saying is, we can do whatever we want, we can

1:32:47

kill whoever we want, as long as we feel like there might

1:32:49

be a justifiable reason whether or not it ends up being

1:32:51

true. Is that not exactly...

1:32:53

...we can

1:32:58

get away with this. Not

1:33:00

even the U.S. government, guys. I mean, it's unreal. It says,

1:33:05

Captain R made the decision to lead some of

1:33:07

his troops into the open. Shortly

1:33:09

afterwards, he can be heard on the recording saying

1:33:11

that he has shot the girl, believing her dead,

1:33:14

then went on to, quote, confirm the kill. I

1:33:18

and another soldier are going a little nearer forward, basically just,

1:33:20

you know, so went over and shot her a couple more times

1:33:22

just to be sure. That's what happened. Palestinian

1:33:25

witnesses said they saw the captain shoot Amman twice

1:33:27

in the head, walk away, turn back, and fire

1:33:29

a stream of bullets into her body. Because that

1:33:31

makes sense, right? It's

1:33:34

vindictive. On the

1:33:36

tape, Captain R then, quote, clarifies to the soldiers

1:33:38

under his command why he killed Amman. He

1:33:41

says, quote, this is Commander. Anything

1:33:44

that's mobile, that moves

1:33:46

in the security zone, even if it's a

1:33:48

three-year-old, needs to be killed. So

1:33:52

it's just a whitewash. There's no accountability.

1:33:56

Just because you set some arbitrary number, you know, and

1:33:58

by the way, those things rapidly. Change like the distance

1:34:00

they're allowed to go out into the ocean to fish

1:34:02

Changes they don't even know when so they always worry

1:34:04

they're gonna get killed just by going out in the

1:34:06

water Which is the same thing they say if you

1:34:08

go past this line you get shot no

1:34:10

questions asked and They arbitrarily change

1:34:13

that line based on their own interest whenever they want

1:34:15

to and don't inform anybody about it That's why it

1:34:17

happens often people go out and get shot. Nobody

1:34:19

cares because no one's reporting on it So

1:34:25

a child So it's

1:34:27

not possible that a tiny child could be confused about what's

1:34:29

going on and walk in that direction because she wants to

1:34:31

be protected Now that

1:34:33

may outrage some people that are you know Even

1:34:35

children are very aware that they're not going to

1:34:37

protect by Israeli soldiers My point is simply that

1:34:39

they do just continue to argue that doesn't

1:34:41

matter what happened Just the hypothetical is enough

1:34:44

to murder people because we say so That's

1:34:47

the kind of mindset I'm talking about At

1:34:50

no point that Israel troops come under attack The

1:34:53

prosecution case was damaged when a soldier who initially

1:34:55

said he had seen Captain

1:34:57

R. Point his weapon at the girl later said

1:34:59

he had fabricated the story. So

1:35:01

ask yourself why he would do that That

1:35:04

is what got him off So here's

1:35:06

the crazy part guy. He did shoot her. It's

1:35:09

on tape So here is

1:35:11

a perfect example of how the Israeli government will willfully lie

1:35:13

to you to cover up their crimes Knowingly

1:35:16

guys, that's the point They

1:35:18

then asked or however you want to think

1:35:20

this happened. Somebody asked these this person to

1:35:22

say I lied about that Even

1:35:25

though you have on video the person doing what

1:35:27

he just pretended he lied about so somebody got

1:35:29

to him somebody Forced coerced

1:35:31

asked nicely and he lied and

1:35:34

that got that person got off and there was no justice for

1:35:36

him on Welcome to

1:35:38

Israel Captain R. Claims that he had

1:35:40

not fired the shots at the girl but near her However,

1:35:43

of course the inspectors the doctors and everybody

1:35:45

else said he was lying, but you know

1:35:48

That's how this works in Israel Now

1:35:52

here is what somebody said in response to this. Thank you

1:35:54

to Pelham for sharing the story This

1:35:56

person says I see you provided no context for

1:35:59

the soldiers actions Obviously on

1:36:01

purpose Well,

1:36:03

I'm always one that gets angry about the fact that there no

1:36:05

she has a link right there. So this guy's just People

1:36:09

are angry I guess that I say dumb and stupid but I think

1:36:11

sometimes it applies but I Posted

1:36:15

this I said, here you go bud. Does that work for you?

1:36:18

Literally citing that they say we saw her and

1:36:20

we you know Literally was scared to death and

1:36:22

then we prove that you shot as she was

1:36:24

walking away. That's not enough context for you He

1:36:28

says you're letting hatred get in the way.

1:36:30

Did you read what you posted? Well, yeah,

1:36:33

man it's right, I mean these are people that

1:36:35

are I Don't even know

1:36:37

like I think this becomes a point that we're trying to just act

1:36:39

like you're right Even though it's obvious that

1:36:41

you know, you see what I highlighted what

1:36:43

I typed was very simple So

1:36:45

obviously I see what I posted right? He simply

1:36:47

says he radioed someone in the

1:36:49

operations room Yeah, man, that's literally

1:36:52

what it says right there. And then they proved she was walking

1:36:54

away It

1:36:56

says the person who shot the girl would not have been in

1:36:58

the operations room like this guy didn't read it Think

1:37:00

about how ridiculous that is He

1:37:03

read this screenshot and

1:37:05

then responded because that's what smart people do

1:37:07

a la Twitter files, right? No,

1:37:09

no You read the entire article because the whole point is

1:37:11

that it's obvious when you read this the context is clear

1:37:13

and even to the Point where you know, they lied and

1:37:15

they got nothing happened Have

1:37:18

you got anything else something that is relevant?

1:37:20

It's ridiculous. This person just makes fun of

1:37:22

them. You're so intense I'm missing the

1:37:24

point Mike Pompeo swings

1:37:26

in Every civilian casualty in

1:37:29

Gaza is the direct fault of Hamas Like

1:37:31

I just don't get why anybody to pretend

1:37:33

that this is a logical argument You can

1:37:35

feel free to argue that it's all happening

1:37:38

because of Hamas But to just arbitrarily just

1:37:40

go there's no fault whatsoever. No matter what

1:37:42

they do because October 7th That's

1:37:45

all they're doing because of us Hamas did this

1:37:47

so everything we do is now legal. That's what

1:37:50

these ridiculous people are doing The

1:37:52

fastest way to end the war is to support Israel on

1:37:54

its mission destroy him off. Okay, let's pretend like we all

1:37:56

did that So we go again. We

1:37:58

support you go What

1:38:00

changes? Is that the fastest way

1:38:03

we lie, we cheat, we steal Pompeo? No,

1:38:05

it's the exact thing that's already happening, because nothing will change,

1:38:08

other than the fact that we go do it then. And

1:38:11

they keep going, and they keep bombing, and they

1:38:13

keep trying to achieve exactly what they're trying to

1:38:15

achieve, which is not about Hamas. Pompeo

1:38:17

knows this. This guy's ridiculous. He's an obvious

1:38:19

manipulator from the moment he... I've ever seen

1:38:21

his work. This guy stems back to some

1:38:24

of the most obvious and egregious manipulations long

1:38:26

before Trump's administration. And

1:38:28

he simply says, Adam says, no, it's the fault of the ones

1:38:30

who supply and the ones who drop the bombs, you

1:38:32

utter donkey. I mean, exactly. I mean,

1:38:35

just think about how insulting it is. And he's... I mean, look

1:38:37

at him. Like, these days, I think that they're actively trying to

1:38:39

avoid getting ratioed, probably using fake sites

1:38:41

to up these things. But how often do you get 4.4 thousand comments?

1:38:45

It's just... what's ridiculous

1:38:47

is to somehow pretend, like, no

1:38:49

matter what happened first, that your

1:38:52

actions are somehow not

1:38:54

your fault. I

1:38:56

mean, really think about how wild that is. How,

1:38:59

like, reimagining how

1:39:01

we live in the world, that

1:39:03

is. Great

1:39:05

reset, reimagining everything, apparently including accountability.

1:39:07

Unless it's you, right? Government says

1:39:09

they want you to think, and that's the case no matter

1:39:11

what. But Israel can do whatever it

1:39:13

wants, as long as it just screams the word

1:39:15

Hamas. That sound familiar? Right. Everything we see from

1:39:18

U.S. foreign policy is exactly the same. Freedom!

1:39:21

ISIS! Doesn't matter that

1:39:23

we killed 90% of civilians on the drone campaign. Because

1:39:25

freedom, you know? But

1:39:27

we're finally paying attention. Well, let's

1:39:30

remember, if we're talking about human shields, which is

1:39:32

the entire argument for why that even makes sense, Israel

1:39:36

has already been accused of that by the

1:39:38

UN, by her rats, or by Human

1:39:41

Rights Watch, by Selam, and this

1:39:43

international. I mean,

1:39:45

pretty much every international group has acknowledged

1:39:47

the obvious and publicly stated

1:39:50

reality that they have a policy called

1:39:52

the Naval Procedure. 2013, Palestinian children tortured,

1:39:54

used as shields by Israel. Israel

1:40:00

per the United Nations. Reuters,

1:40:03

Israeli soldiers who used Palestinian

1:40:06

boy and nine year old as

1:40:08

human shields, avoid jail. Defense

1:40:10

for Children International and International Human

1:40:13

Rights Group. Israel forces use five

1:40:15

Palestinian children as human shields. That's

1:40:17

2023. This

1:40:20

is from 2017. Generally human shields.

1:40:22

Since the beginning of the occupation in 1967, Israeli

1:40:26

security forces have repeatedly used

1:40:28

Palestinians in the West Bank and

1:40:31

the Gaza Strip as human shields.

1:40:33

Israeli soldiers routinely used Palestinian civilians

1:40:35

as human shields by forcing them

1:40:37

to carry out life-threatening tasks. It was

1:40:39

also following a high court petition against

1:40:42

this practice, which was filed

1:40:44