0:00

What the fourth industrial revolution will

0:02

lead to is a fusion

0:05

of our physical, our

0:08

digital, and our

0:11

biological identities. The difference

0:14

of this fourth industrial

0:16

revolution is it doesn't change what

0:18

you are doing. It changes

0:21

you. If you take genetic

0:23

editing just as an

0:25

example, it's you who are

0:27

changed. And of course this has a

0:29

big impact on your identity. It

0:32

is important to use

0:34

the COVID-19 crisis as

0:37

a timely opportunity. So

0:40

people assume we are

0:43

just going back to the

0:45

good old world which we had,

0:47

and everything will be normal again

0:50

in how we are used to

0:52

normal in the old fashion. This

0:54

is, let's say, fiction. It will

0:57

not happen. The

1:01

cut which we have now is

1:05

much too strong in

1:08

order not to leave traces. Welcome

1:23

to The Daily Wrap-Up, a concise show dedicated

1:25

to bringing you the most relevant independent news

1:27

as we see it from the last 24

1:30

hours. Wednesday,

1:43

December 13, 2023. Thank you for joining me today. Again,

1:47

we have a timed show today which

1:49

I'm actually kind of happy that it's working

1:52

out this way. It's forcing me to at

1:54

least be able to do a

1:56

shorter show often it's outside my control.

2:00

joining Jason Burmus in about an hour, a little bit

2:02

more. So we have this much time to

2:04

get some stuff out that I thought was important for us

2:06

to discuss today. I'd like to start first before I even

2:08

get into what we're gonna be discussing. I

2:11

saw some people discussing in the chat.

2:13

I'd like to point out that Marshall,

2:15

who is a long-term, he's

2:19

been a part of this community since the very

2:21

beginning, very beginning. He's

2:23

probably one of the best people I've ever met in

2:25

my life and he sadly just lost somebody close to

2:28

him in his family and I just want

2:30

to let you guys know, first

2:32

of all, so you know why he's not here

2:34

and so on, but that you can send your

2:37

prayers, your love, your positive energy,

2:39

whatever it is to you that

2:41

means something and just sit

2:43

down and have a thought about him and his life

2:45

and what he's doing and send that positive energy to

2:47

him and his family. Because really, you

2:50

guys know him if you're in this community,

2:52

he's one of the most amazing people I've

2:54

known and I just hope that we can send

2:56

that positive energy to him because it's just

2:58

the kind of person that he is and what he's

3:00

been going through. You guys know it's just

3:03

so sad how in my experience, some of the worst things

3:05

happen to some of the best people and I just feel

3:07

like that's sadly the way the world tends to

3:09

work these days, but you know, hey, that's one of the things I

3:11

guess we're trying to change. But

3:14

today we're gonna get into to start an

3:16

important conversation around the digital ID, which I

3:18

felt was important, not just because

3:20

it's always, again, it's one of

3:22

those topics that we discussed during COVID-19 illusion after

3:24

it, into this next topic or any of the

3:26

others, has never even slowed down. We've

3:30

focused elsewhere as society, but it

3:32

has not even slowed down,

3:34

it's picked up speed. And I wanna make

3:36

sure we one, don't miss site of that

3:38

continual agenda, but I wanna make a couple

3:41

of important points to

3:43

show you how I think it's, they're

3:45

now beginning to use new agendas to

3:47

justify this and force this in. And

3:49

I think that this is one of

3:51

the central agendas around whatever

3:54

you feel, a

3:56

lot of us sense something changing right now. I

3:58

think that's very obvious. One

4:02

of the reasons being because they're literally telling you

4:04

that's happening. So it's not some secret

4:06

squirrel concept that we can sense. We all see

4:08

it because they're telling you, but there's things around

4:10

it, I think, that are a little bit more

4:13

unnerving, that we can't really define. We kind of

4:15

feel the outlines. We don't really know what this

4:17

is. We all seem to

4:19

sense this, the collapsing of certain things, the

4:21

rising of others. I think

4:23

this digital ID aspect is one of the

4:26

most central parts of the larger agenda that

4:28

ties to just everything that they're building as

4:30

we go forward that applies to war, applies

4:32

to health, applies to anything. I

4:35

think that's one of the main points I'm going to make today, is

4:37

that whatever the agenda is at the

4:39

moment seems to perfectly align with why we

4:41

need digital IDs. And it's just

4:43

one part of a larger agenda. Now, we're also going to get

4:46

into how much time

4:48

we have, some multiple of the things

4:50

I'd like to discuss around Zionism and

4:52

the ongoing agenda of the genocide

4:54

in Gaza and the agenda to create

4:58

one, what the Zionist entities have always

5:00

wanted to create in this area, which

5:03

then continues beyond Gaza. Interesting

5:05

how the group that tells you they are

5:07

going to take over things if you let

5:09

them grow is the one that's basically stated

5:11

that's exactly what they will do and have

5:14

the plan for, whether it's the Greater Israel

5:16

Project or any other concept that involves multiple

5:18

other countries' territories, or just the US government

5:20

classic foreign policy of stealing what isn't theirs.

5:23

That seems to be the interesting sort of accused out

5:25

of that, which you are guilty concept, but we need

5:27

to see that it is a gigantic

5:31

discussion that ties into so many different

5:33

things. I mean, right there,

5:35

you could loop this right back into

5:37

the conversation of digital IDs for immigration or

5:39

different sorts of migration and how

5:42

that's used against us. Now, I'd like to

5:44

make sure we talk about a couple

5:47

of important things around the grouping that

5:49

was recently seen dressed down, almost naked,

5:51

blindfolded, and how that's an important conversation

5:53

to what ultimately ended up happening. A

5:56

lot of people in this hear the

5:58

discussion points. are

6:00

terrorists, no, those are civilians, and

6:02

then sort of choose what they

6:04

already wanted to choose and go on

6:06

to the next talking point. Meanwhile,

6:09

there's people that actually care about the truth

6:11

and find out and say

6:13

this is what it turned out to be. I mean,

6:15

now there are 14 stories down the line and it's

6:17

only been 15 minutes. Like that's how the

6:19

world's working right now. And that, I don't think

6:21

it's the majority, but enough people to make that

6:23

make a difference. So the point

6:25

is that one point turned out to

6:27

be not terrorists. Surprise, surprise. Even according

6:29

to them, they're claiming only a fraction

6:31

of those people were Hamas members. Then

6:34

it turns out, as I felt was

6:36

the truth from the beginning, that none

6:38

of them are. And ultimately, these are

6:40

people that they're manipulating. Civilians they've taken

6:42

from schools in different UN locations that

6:44

they have now filmed multiple times to

6:47

get certain propaganda elements out and

6:49

they're caught for doing it. Filming two different

6:51

things twice or one thing twice and claiming

6:53

it was an organic event where they were

6:55

giving up their weapons. They're being

6:57

caught every time faking this stuff and it

6:59

just keeps going forward, which shows you only

7:01

really two things. That the governments are okay

7:03

with that lie and are willing to lie

7:05

for it and the people

7:07

online that are towing it are invested in the

7:10

agenda. Quite frankly, I think pretty much everybody else,

7:13

it's not difficult. If somebody tells you, you

7:16

know, kind of like something basic, let's just say

7:18

it's nighttime and they're saying it's daytime outside. Well,

7:20

it doesn't take some special thought process to go,

7:23

no, it's not. It's clearly daytime.

7:25

So when you're looking at something like

7:27

this and you can prove that dynamic

7:29

and ultimately it's just somebody refusing to

7:31

acknowledge it, when there are objective realities,

7:33

that's what's ultimately happening. And I think

7:36

most people aren't dishonest

7:38

enough to go along with something that they just

7:40

inherently can tell is false. I think that's a

7:42

lot of what this agenda is. So

7:45

I'd like to start with an

7:47

interesting discussion around some

7:49

COVID-19 stuff to lay the

7:51

table for where this digital ID kind

7:53

of concept was already going and how

7:55

I see it building into the next

7:57

discussion. So first, this was just sent to me. I

8:00

mean, I think this is for

8:02

the TLAB audience, this is old news or,

8:05

no, for the TLAB audience, it's

8:07

old news. We've talked about this. But for the people

8:09

that are involved in this conversation and

8:11

you might've seen TLAB talking about it, it's

8:14

either conspiracy theory or

8:17

some fantasy, some ridiculous made up

8:20

story. Now that

8:22

it's actually being discussed as for

8:24

the podcast, Japan approves world's first

8:27

self-amplifying mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, of

8:29

course, without publishing efficacy or safety

8:32

data because who needs that in

8:34

the age of mRNA platforms? But

8:37

my point is that this is not new. Self-amplifying

8:41

was actually the first aspect of

8:43

this that was discovered as we've discussed long in

8:45

the past. So I always thought it was strange

8:47

that they acted like the one they did first

8:50

was the original and then acted like

8:52

this was some new futuristic step. I already showed

8:54

you that on the

8:56

Pfizer documentation that in

8:58

the very beginning, they listed the Pfizer shot as

9:00

self-amplifying. That's not debatable.

9:03

I've shown you this many times. So

9:05

now for this new thing, new self-amplifying

9:07

shot to come out, it's

9:10

very concerning to me for what the idea

9:12

is here. First of all, because they're

9:14

basing this off of an mRNA platform technology

9:16

that has utterly and

9:19

completely failed. Just

9:22

so you know, utterly and completely failed. There's

9:24

no, period. There's no conversation. Even

9:27

Fauci admits in his sell.com

9:29

article that this was at least it didn't go the way

9:31

they wanted it to. So we need to take some steps

9:33

back and reevaluate, but they didn't do that. They

9:36

sprinted into everything else, flew an RSV

9:38

and rapidly pushed out the same failing

9:41

process. It was in part

9:43

the actual platform itself

9:46

that was failing. And

9:52

this all include the show we did about this. Peer-reviewed

9:56

study that found quite specifically that

9:58

it was the mRNA platform. that was

10:01

actually driving myocarditis, not in

10:04

addition to everything else. Because the

10:07

reality is the spike protein itself is

10:09

cytotoxic, it's dangerous. We knew that right

10:11

in the beginning. We made that claim very clearly in the beginning,

10:13

based on the science. And it was conspiracy theory

10:15

until eventually it was accepted, but it's different though. Now

10:18

that's always how it works. Some difference of narrative

10:20

that makes it not exactly the same thing, but

10:22

it might be dangerous, we're still trying to figure

10:25

it out, we'll look over there quickly. New story.

10:29

The point is that the

10:31

self amplifying is what I

10:33

believe in part is already happening. Quite

10:35

frankly, I think we might be all the way past the

10:37

concept of, we might be dealing

10:39

with self spreading concepts today, which are different. Just

10:42

very quickly what it says here, and this

10:44

is generally the simplistic idea of it, it

10:46

says both mRNA and self

10:48

amplifying mRNA are RNA vaccines. Well,

10:51

to be clear, we're dealing with

10:53

mod RNA in both cases,

10:55

because it's different. Modified RNA

10:58

is the N1 methyl pseudoureidine

11:00

modified RNA, which is one of

11:02

the primary reasons this is so

11:04

damaging. These are damaging in

11:06

themselves. The mod RNA is why it

11:08

goes on seemingly forever. To make

11:10

it very simple, there's multiple facets here, but

11:12

it says these are vaccines

11:15

that use it by a genetic code against it. Even

11:18

that is very simplified, but when an mRNA

11:20

vaccine is injected into an individual, the

11:23

mRNA instructs cells to make a

11:25

specific protein, and then simulates

11:27

immune responses. Which by the way, that's

11:29

not even accurate in my opinion. It

11:32

simply primes your body to make a

11:34

certain protein, which then your body naturally

11:36

responds to. From that point

11:38

forward, it's your body that is failing because of what

11:40

the injection has done to you. The

11:44

injection is the thing that stimulates. I

11:46

guess you could read that both ways, but it does seem

11:48

to make it sound like the injection is doing the stimulating

11:51

when really it's your body responding to what it has primed

11:53

your body to create. And it

11:55

says a self amplifying mRNA vaccine

11:57

takes this concept further by making...

12:00

multiple mRNA copies, which

12:03

ends up generating more spike protein. Now, is that not

12:05

what it sounds like it's already doing? Think

12:07

about this for a second. It's just, these are just

12:09

semantics at this point. If what it's already doing is

12:12

sustained synthesis of the spike protein,

12:15

right? Which was

12:19

one of the most important studies that has come out

12:21

peer reviewed discussing the

12:23

E innate

12:26

immune suppression. This was

12:28

peer reviewed, at least severe. It

12:33

says the spike protein is neurotoxic on this

12:35

one here. Just mRNA vaccines promote sustained synthesis

12:37

of the spike protein. So that

12:39

other means that they knew all along this was

12:41

self amplifying or even further in regard to self-suspreading,

12:44

which would simply mean the same concept except then

12:46

once it leaves, it continues to spread, catch, in

12:48

fact, the spread again and so on, right? That's

12:50

the idea. Oh, really

12:52

the idea of being through a

12:54

vaccinology lens, that that

12:56

would be the thing that gets you

12:59

to produce immunity, which, okay,

13:01

well, isn't that just a virus then is that

13:03

just something spreading and catching? Like it's just interesting

13:05

how they are almost acting

13:07

like they've created what was already happening, even

13:09

though they're the ones hurting people. But ultimately the

13:12

idea that this is, or back

13:15

to the point of being either this

13:18

was about creating this and lying

13:20

about it, or

13:22

now, well, either they

13:25

glide about it to begin with, or they

13:27

accidentally made this happen the first time. Right? There's only a

13:29

couple of ways you could look at that, but either way,

13:31

why in the world are we at a point where they're

13:33

telling you they're now going to go past the

13:35

thing that pretty much everyone's acknowledged as

13:37

a failure, including theology, different

13:40

scales and levels of failure. Obviously, here's the point that

13:42

he's him and Robert Kadlek are saying, yeah, a couple

13:44

of screw ups. We're going to do it better next

13:46

time. The rest of us seem to go, you guys

13:48

should be in prison for killing people. Got a different

13:50

scale, right? But either way,

13:53

they're standing on the

13:55

rubble of this thing and building harder and

13:57

faster and even going further in the direction of

13:59

the. very same gene editing mRNA

14:02

platform technology. It's mind-blowing. And

14:05

Japan, of all people, they were some of

14:07

the ones calling some things out early. But

14:09

anyway, the point is this is still happening,

14:11

rapidly. And if it's self-amplifying, guys, we're

14:13

now going dangerously close, even to the

14:16

stated narrative of the level of self-spreading

14:18

concepts. Now, you know what? Just for the sake

14:20

of, for those that may not remember, I want

14:23

people to remember what this really looks like. I

14:26

realize that this is not new. This is a

14:28

video from 2020 in a massive UN support, UN-backed

14:33

EU kind of symposium about these

14:36

steps. And this guy's self-amplifying

14:38

is a step in this direction. I

14:40

believe this is already happening, quite

14:42

frankly. Since

14:45

the outbreak of COVID-19, the

14:48

word virus has been dominating media

14:50

headlines as well as our daily

14:52

lives. Did you

14:54

know that one approach that has

14:56

been proposed to control virally transmitted

14:58

diseases is by releasing a virally

15:01

transmitted vaccine? Unlike

15:03

traditional vaccines, infectious vaccines

15:05

do not require any

15:07

individual consent. Infectious

15:09

solutions are also being developed for food

15:11

and agriculture. Yeah,

15:14

and that was the insect allies discussion we've had many

15:16

times. They've been doing this for a very long time.

15:21

I talked about this in 2021 and well before that,

15:23

by the way, right here,

15:25

self-spreading vaccines, self-amplifying mRNA vaccines,

15:27

and COVID vaccine, menstrual disruption,

15:30

May 2nd, 2021. And of

15:32

course, it was wild, crazy,

15:34

dangerous conspiracy theory until

15:37

they said it today, right? Fake news until we

15:39

tell you. The sad thing

15:41

is this was already happening. It was already there. You

15:43

can look up the links in this discussion and it

15:45

goes back a long way. But the real point is

15:47

how this is going to be used beyond

15:49

the illusion we're discussing. First

15:52

of all, just quickly, I wanted to make this

15:54

point about Pierce Morgan or anybody else who has

15:56

gone through four, five, six, however many ridiculous boosters

15:58

they were dumb enough to to

16:00

put in their body. Piers Morgan is

16:02

having chronic COVID according to Igor Todav

16:04

which I agree with because his boosters

16:07

caused IgG4 immune tolerance. And

16:10

this is and this was one of the most important

16:12

parts of this I think. I

16:14

get you know the article's not popping up but I'll give

16:16

you his actual post on this. And

16:20

this is in regard to the allergy overlap the

16:22

concept that this has turned your all these different

16:25

things are all failures by the way. Like unless

16:27

this was designed this way and then these just

16:29

obviously criminals but none of these things

16:31

seem to like work together if that makes sense and

16:34

it's in different ways. You're all like the idea that

16:36

this happens seems to

16:38

like lessen how dangerous it is for the

16:40

arguably the people that didn't take it. And

16:42

even the people that did even though it

16:44

can become fatal that it's like this low

16:46

level illness as opposed to some massive outbreak.

16:48

This seems like they were just literally testing

16:50

with the population. But the

16:52

point is that this is just however many

16:54

examples you need how many times in a row

16:56

we can see their failures or at the very

16:58

least even if you think it was just

17:00

all good intentions why in the world

17:02

we keep letting them muscle people and

17:04

the population into doing the next thing

17:06

when they keep screwing up. I

17:09

think about that the joke can make about foreign policy. It's

17:11

not a joke. They're literally

17:13

batting zero literally batting zero.

17:16

We're gonna fight for freedom and then whoops destroy

17:18

the country. We're gonna spread all

17:20

sorts of human you know equity and sustainability

17:22

oops and we destroyed their country. Over

17:25

and over or you can be intelligent enough

17:27

to go maybe they're trying to destroy these

17:29

countries for their own benefit. Same

17:32

point here. Here's a cloth mask that

17:34

will keep you safe. Oh made you sick. Here's

17:36

a shot that's gonna kill you all. It's ridiculous

17:39

how often we can see that the thing they

17:41

keep telling you will keep you safe. In fact

17:43

not only doesn't keep you safe it does the

17:45

exact opposite. Do

17:47

I need to say it? They don't care about you

17:49

guys but anyway the point is he

17:52

says his immune system cannot overcome the virus due

17:54

to COVID vaccines. His tweet shows

17:56

what IgG4 immune tolerance looks like. He

17:59

says who else has had the latest were

20:00

baffled. Except there's this whole category

20:02

that you seem to be looking right over. You

20:04

guys know exactly what's happening. It

20:06

seems to be all the things being caused by

20:08

the shot that you pretend isn't causing the things

20:10

you've admitted that it causes. But think

20:13

about how uncomfortable this must be for them to be knowingly

20:15

lying at a point when we can see they're lying and

20:17

they know we know they're lying and they just keep pretending

20:19

we don't. As

20:21

he writes, or the article says, life

20:23

insurance insurers have been consistently sounding alarm

20:25

over these unexpected or excess deaths. You

20:27

know, except all the life insurance people

20:30

and doctors,

20:32

people that have been speaking up going, this is because of

20:34

the shots and I can see it exactly based on my

20:36

information, but they don't listen to those guys. Those

20:38

are all dangerous conspiracy theorists, even though they're giving

20:40

you the answer that you seem not able to

20:42

find. It goes on to say which claimed 158,000

20:45

more Americans in the first nine months of 2023, 2023 than in the same

20:51

period in 2019, 2023.

20:53

So we're now two

20:56

years into the life saving

20:58

miracle MRI shot that was going to change

21:00

the world. And yet it's

21:02

still better than it was during the year that

21:04

everybody had COVID and no shots. How

21:07

does that possibly make sense? The point is a

21:09

child could see that doesn't make sense. Now as

21:12

an objective person, I could say, sure,

21:14

maybe there's another example for a reason.

21:17

But think about how willfully ignorant and

21:19

dangerous it is to ignore the only

21:22

thing that currently lines up for the

21:24

possibility that maybe something else adds up.

21:27

That's just called willful ignorance, as we

21:29

all know, it says, well, with the

21:31

worst of COVID behind us, annual deaths

21:33

for all causes should be back to

21:35

pre pandemic levels. We're baffled or

21:37

even lower because of the loss of so many sick

21:40

and for Americans. Think about that. People

21:42

died. They're the ones telling us that had

21:44

a huge amount of people die. So like

21:46

simple mathematics and statistics should mean that the numbers should

21:49

be going down. Unless with

21:52

COVID out of the way, and them telling you this isn't

21:54

COVID, then unless something else is happening.

21:57

Instead, the death toll remains alarming,

21:59

disturbing. This is their quotes, urgent

22:01

detention, according to the insurance industry.

22:06

These reports used by insurers to inform

22:08

decisions show that deaths occurring disproportionately

22:10

among young working age people. You

22:12

know, the ones least affected by

22:14

the COVID-19 illusion. Nonetheless,

22:17

America's chief health manager, the CDC, opted

22:20

in September to archive its excess

22:22

deaths webpage with a note stating,

22:25

these data sets will no longer be

22:27

updated. Doesn't that just put

22:29

a perfect little chilling point on it? So

22:31

we're going, we're so confused, we can't figure it out.

22:33

So let's just stop looking. Does that

22:36

seem like that makes sense? We'll just ignore

22:38

it because we don't know. I

22:40

mean, they know we know

22:43

they're lying, guys. Think about this. This

22:46

is why the White House is putting fences,

22:49

this is why they see you as the enemy. You

22:52

know why? Because you are. You

22:55

may not know that yet, but you are. So

22:58

they're, like I was talking about this with somebody

23:00

today, actually, right? They have these visions at night

23:02

when they're going to bed of how Gaddafi was

23:04

dragged through the street because of a mob that

23:07

saw him as the enemy, right? That's how they

23:09

see this. Grouping of people that

23:11

not only are angry with them, but know they

23:13

have a right to be. Not just

23:16

angry. These

23:18

people should be in prison. Now I argue, I

23:21

hope, I don't think anybody should hope

23:23

for violence against them because that is

23:25

just being like them. I hope these people go to prison,

23:27

go through a trial, and end up in jail for the

23:29

rest of their lives. That's what I hope, because they

23:31

deserve that. They want you to

23:33

be the kind of violent entity they are because

23:35

they'll use that against you. But I'm promising you,

23:38

they know we know that they're lying. And

23:40

they are now trying to just create the, like leaning

23:43

into the very small percentage of people that actually believe

23:46

what they're saying and acting like we all think that. And

23:48

if you don't, you're crazy. Even though they know it's not

23:50

working, what else are they going to do? So

23:53

we'll just stop looking at it and

23:56

continue telling us that we're crazy. Vaccines

23:58

were given to more than 270. million people,

24:00

among them babies, pregnant women and workers,

24:02

under employer mandate. The therapeutics

24:05

warp speed found Trump's program. Emergency

24:08

use authorization must be part of any

24:10

post pandemic analysis in light of more

24:12

than one million reports of possible harm

24:14

to the Bay Area's report and a

24:16

new Yale University study validating a chronic

24:18

post vaccination syndrome, you know, called long

24:20

vax. But we don't

24:23

talk about that. We don't, we don't lean

24:25

into that. Like how embarrassing it is that we

24:27

can come full circle to where the very same

24:29

people are going, oh, but there is a thing

24:31

called long back, but still pretend that long COVID

24:33

makes sense, even though that's never actually been proven

24:35

that all they ever did was have a

24:38

compilation of symptoms. By the way, as I

24:40

proved on this show, long COVID had a

24:42

bigger compilation of symptoms than even COVID did

24:44

make sense of that for me. Well, I

24:47

will for you, because it meant that they

24:49

combined everything. You had the flu, you

24:51

had the cold, you had vaccine side effects, you had a

24:53

stroke, a heart that was all long COVID overlap, because

24:55

what it meant was anything under the sun

24:58

was suddenly not related to the vaccine.

25:00

We dumped into some COVID secondary aspect like

25:03

SIDS or SADS or any number of things, which

25:05

literally mean we don't know, but we still use

25:07

it as a diagnosis. Senator

25:11

Ron Johnson adds to this the same point, bigger than

25:13

COVID. Why are so many dying early? A

25:17

COVID vaccine, perhaps he writes

25:19

there's reports 25.5 US deaths

25:21

per million COVID vaccine doses.

25:25

25.5 US deaths per million

25:27

COVID doses versus 0.46 flu

25:30

vaccine deaths per million. Now

25:33

those numbers, I promise you are not

25:35

accurate under recorded,

25:38

I promise you. Even

25:41

that is a 55 fold

25:43

increase. So really they're stated

25:45

or rather they're reported numbers

25:48

show you a 55 fold increase in

25:50

death compared to the flu versus flu to

25:52

COVID shots. And that's

25:55

their stated. That's what they show you. And

25:58

we just go forward. Bay

28:00

is it rather it says EU excess

28:02

mortality above baseline in May

28:04

2023 and it's never stopped Anywhere

28:07

you look that had a high vaccination

28:09

rate is completely confused about the exact

28:11

identical alignment of their excess death We're

28:13

so confused by that weirdly enough the places

28:16

that didn't have a high vaccination rate completely

28:18

confusingly Don't have a high back to have

28:20

a excess death. Is that confusing? No,

28:22

it's the exact opposite. It's the clearest thing I've ever seen in

28:25

my life, but let's pretend like we're baffled by it

28:27

And Of

28:29

course Brooke Jackson points out some positive news,

28:31

which by the way is both good

28:33

and bad Oh, of course, they you

28:35

see that and suddenly just disappears Moderna Pfizer

28:38

chief commercial officers both exit

28:41

companies Now

28:44

part of me goes good like it shows you that they

28:46

realized that we see them But at the same time these

28:48

people just get to leave their jobs and we act like

28:51

nothing now Well, can I quit my job? No, you're you're

28:53

pretty much a war criminal at this point, right?

28:55

You should be in prison for not

28:57

only lying about the knowingly dangerous things you

28:59

sold but continuing to to this very day

29:03

but on top of that These

29:07

people I think it's good that we can see that

29:09

things are shifting But I ultimately think that these people

29:12

should not be able to just side-step Exo

29:14

stage left just kind of walk out of the

29:16

way But I think that it's interesting how people

29:18

within the company might be aware that that's kind

29:21

of indicative of a problem Right brats fleeing the

29:23

ship kind of an analogy Now

29:27

on the point of The

29:30

excess deaths and other amazingly obvious things that

29:32

nobody wants to talk about Another

29:35

example of this. I mean remember we did an

29:37

article about this I quickly looked I wasn't able to

29:39

find the show if you guys remember posted the

29:41

chat 2020 we did this show

29:44

about prion disease and The

29:49

ALS kind of brain issue the Canada

29:51

I shall grab that real quick. I know that always pops

29:53

up Or

29:57

even just watch a bunch of I put baffling yelling BFF,

30:00

boot, pop-tack, boot-swung. Look at

30:02

this. Brain buster, mystery brain

30:04

illness, baffles Canadian doctors as cases

30:06

spread. This was 2022. That

30:09

was the same thing, exactly the same conversation. It's never

30:12

gone away. They were baffled in 2020, they

30:14

were baffled in 2021, they're baffled

30:16

today. Even though it's very

30:18

obvious that you can see this, and I'll

30:20

show you why. Well again, deadly prion disease

30:22

are rising in the United States, and we

30:24

aren't exactly sure why. Otherwise known

30:26

as we're baffled, guys, we're baffled. Well,

30:30

I can show you why. At

30:32

least a possibility that they don't seem to be able to

30:34

entertain. 2021, COVID-19 RNA-based vaccines

30:37

and the risk of prion disease. What?

30:40

You guys know this already. Here's the one that came out in 2020

30:43

that we talked about, or rather, excuse me. I thought I

30:45

could've sworn that was 2020. Oh, it is, yeah, I

30:47

thought so. But it does say accepted 2021.

30:50

I don't think it would be released if it wasn't. Anyway, I

30:52

thought we did this in 2020, maybe I was wrong, maybe it was

30:55

2021. But the point is, COVID-19

30:57

RNA-based vaccines and the risk of prion disease. And I'll read

30:59

this to you like I did all the way back then.

31:02

It says, regulatory

31:28

approval of the RNA-based vaccines, all

31:30

of them for SARS-CoV-2 was premature

31:33

and the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.

31:35

One of the most prescient studies of the entire thing

31:38

because they screamed this was fake news. They

31:40

forced them, they said, you guys are dangerously

31:43

misinforming people. And guess what? They were right

31:45

way ahead of everybody else. Not

31:48

even just because of prion disease, but because

31:50

that's exactly what is happening. A premature, didn't

31:53

they just come out and say the, what was it?

31:57

One of my shows covered it, but it was... Folding,

32:01

something folding, what was it? Maybe

32:09

not, look at my show. But we just talked about producing

32:12

incorrect proteins, right? They're

32:15

now admitting this. Yeah, it's this

32:17

show right here you guys can watch. The mRNA

32:19

glitch. You

32:21

know, the thing that won the Nobel Prize

32:23

for being so successful. Oops, a glitch. Oops,

32:26

cause prions. Oops, causes blood clots. Oops, causes

32:28

myocarditis. Oops, causes everything else

32:30

we've discussed. Thrombosis

32:32

and vaccine induced thrombosis, thrombocytopenia. Oh

32:35

my God, what an amazing product that we

32:37

missed. I can't

32:39

even speak right now. Made mistakes on 47 times,

32:42

but it's amazing and Nobel Prize worthy. Protein

32:45

folding. But there was some other word for it. It was like

32:48

time folding or stamp folding, something like that. But

32:50

anyway, the point is that it's just that obvious.

32:53

We have all this information, but they just keep pretending

32:55

that we don't see it. Now, this is where it

32:57

comes into the digital ID point. Right?

33:00

So the first thing, this

33:02

was one of the major reasons they wanted this,

33:04

or at least they pretended this was the case.

33:06

And by the way, we can go back before COVID-19

33:09

and show you the push for digital ID. But

33:12

post COVID-19 illusion, well,

33:15

we have to know who's been vaccinated, right?

33:17

How do we live our lives without knowing

33:19

for sure? Oh, well, digital ID is the

33:21

only solution. You need to know

33:24

who's been vaccinated and who hasn't been. Some

33:26

of the vaccines that will come on down the

33:28

line will be multiple. There'll be multiple shots. So

33:31

you've got to have the reasons

33:33

to do with the healthcare more generally, but certainly

33:35

for a pandemic or for

33:39

the vaccines, you've got to have a proper digital

33:41

infrastructure and many countries don't have that. And in

33:43

fact, most countries don't have that. Right.

33:49

And the point is, this is

33:51

2021, I believe. Make

33:54

sure. No, no, excuse me. This was this year, but

33:56

it was January. So the point was earlier. It's not,

33:58

it wasn't... December it

34:00

was the beginning of this year and so

34:02

the bottom line or let me double check though

34:05

Actually the article I see here was written in 2023

34:07

I double-checked earlier because this is going around

34:10

and I want to make sure it wasn't a newer one

34:13

Yeah, he did see did say this early But the point

34:15

is this was a conversation was had way

34:17

back in the beginning multiple shots and

34:19

all this kind of conversation and so

34:21

this is the article from Reclaim

34:24

the net Tony Blair and this is

34:26

January 19th calls for weft and WTO

34:28

to introduce digital infrastructure That monitors vaccination

34:31

status. That's it. That's the only reason that's

34:33

it Just because we had to because we got to

34:35

make sure you're healthy and safe Okay,

34:37

so things then shift. No and then I wanted to grab this really

34:40

quickly Make sure we see if I

34:42

eat that pops up. It was the

34:45

Unit or the real ID ID

34:48

2020 That

34:51

pops up This is there

34:53

was a woman that probate that Resigned

34:55

in protest from the 20 the ID 2020

34:58

here it is Isn't

35:00

interesting how many people like from the State Department

35:02

even from the Knesset in regard to Israel Gaza right

35:05

now or But in this case

35:07

during the FDA the ZDZ All these people like

35:09

resign in protest and we don't think about that

35:11

like it's like they're telling you they

35:13

know it They see it that the only honest ones that

35:15

are willing to tell you and they resign in protest. This

35:18

was 2020 ID 2020 which

35:20

if you don't remember was the idea about having an ID

35:22

a national ID which is I'll get to in a second

35:24

They're still pushing that which overlaps with the

35:27

digital aspects of this she resigned

35:30

And spoke out calling it techno

35:32

solutionism that combined that

35:34

ID with digital passports vaccine

35:36

information Let's also not forget that

35:39

the EU in general on their

35:41

vaccine passport. I Doubt I'll

35:43

have that coming up. Let me see That

35:50

doesn't look like it but oops and

35:52

it's still vaccine maybe that's why Remember

35:56

we showed you this where They

36:00

the listing for the vaccine passport in

36:02

2018 predicting that would happen between 2020

36:04

and 2021. All

36:07

this stuff was on the record, right? So my

36:09

point is that they clearly

36:11

pushed this knowing before I ever got

36:13

to COVID that they were wanting that.

36:15

Then they used this to justify the

36:17

overlap of these two things and say,

36:20

well, we need immunity passports, not just

36:22

COVID, whatever happens in the future and

36:25

lock that in with your identification. Here

36:29

it is in 2022. Can digital ID ease the... Oh,

36:31

excuse me. And so that's the point about going into

36:33

the next step. So now today, right, we're dealing

36:36

with other things. Still the

36:38

kind of underpinnings of like the immunity, COVID,

36:41

even other illnesses, right? But suddenly

36:44

there's a bigger conversation happening, right? What's going on with

36:46

the southern border? What's going to happen to these 2.5

36:49

million Palestinians when all of these countries

36:51

are too cowardly to deny the Israeli

36:53

ethnic cleansing program? Well,

36:55

suddenly we've got this big problem. Hamas

36:57

might be secretly everywhere. It's the weaponized

37:00

migration idea. Well, guess what they're

37:02

proposing. This is before today, anyway, as well. This

37:04

is 2022. Can the digital ID ease

37:06

UK's burdening... Is

37:09

that burdening or burgeoning? Yeah, I guess

37:11

burdening migration crisis. So

37:13

the digital IDs for that or anything else

37:15

they see in your future. So here's the

37:17

discussion from fails, of course. National ID cards,

37:20

2016 to 2023, facts and

37:22

trends, and include the UK in here. And

37:25

it's just simply talking about what you might

37:27

expect, biometrics, electric national ID cards. Here

37:31

is from June 24th, this

37:33

year from the Department of Homeland Security.

37:35

Outlines the digital ID initiative

37:37

for travel, immigration, citizenship, status,

37:39

employment, residency, right? They're answering

37:42

all your calls, Republicans. You're

37:44

going, what? We can't just let these people

37:46

in the country. Well, here you go. Here's

37:48

your problem reaction solution for you. Just like

37:50

that. We'll tag every one of them or

37:52

even better. We'll tag all of

37:54

you so we know who doesn't fit in. Does that

37:56

make you feel better? I think this is how

37:58

this works. When you petition... a corrupt government

38:00

for what you believe is your political agenda,

38:02

they usually don't do what you want. They

38:05

use what you want to achieve what they

38:07

want. This is the two-party

38:09

illusion from screaming about these governments don't care about

38:11

what you think. And you know

38:13

what? A lot of these big time pundits in the

38:15

field of everything, whether we're talking about a Tucker or Elon or

38:17

Bannon or all the rest of them, we're all the left in

38:19

the same way. They

38:22

know this. They're using you just

38:24

like the government's using them. But it's

38:26

a, you know, as they say, S-H-I-T rolls

38:28

downhill, right? The point is that they will

38:31

continue to abuse your trust to get what

38:33

they want. Now, I can

38:35

be wrong, of course, about which ones are what and who's

38:37

lying. But at the end of the day, anyone that believes

38:39

the government is going to be used

38:41

to change your life doesn't understand how government

38:44

works. We

38:46

have an entire history long before the US,

38:48

the United States of America to see how

38:50

this always works, guys. And

38:53

now they're literally showing you who they are,

38:55

whether it is Zionism and genocide

38:57

in Gaza or what they just did to the

38:59

world. And the people are trusting those same people

39:01

because suddenly we care about the

39:04

state of Israel. Right. The

39:06

idea is these are the same people doing the same agenda. If

39:08

you think they just tried to depopulate the world, why are you

39:10

listening to them? Because

39:12

somehow you listen to the right

39:15

or left wing superstar that told you today's

39:17

different. You know it. You

39:19

know better. Now, here's Klaus Schwab

39:22

just to bring you back to what he originally said. This

39:24

was during COVID-19. What

39:26

was it going to be? A cyber polygon. We

39:28

all thought that was strange, right? How in the world

39:30

do you go from a pandemic to

39:33

a cyber pandemic? It

39:35

was clumsy, disjointed, didn't really make much

39:38

sense, but it's because they just were getting I

39:40

feel like they felt there was a desperate need to

39:42

rush this. Maybe

39:44

they were wrong. Maybe something changed. But this

39:46

was very clumsy when they pushed this out.

39:48

But it's now happening, as we all can

39:50

see, right in front of us. We

40:07

have a very insufficient attention to

40:10

the frightening scenario of a

40:13

comprehensive cyber attack which

40:15

will bring to a

40:17

complete halt the power

40:20

supply, transportation, hospital services,

40:22

our society as a

40:24

whole. COVID-19

40:28

cases would be seen

40:31

in this respect, small

40:34

disservice in comparison to

40:37

a major cyber attack.

40:42

I mean even going as far as to call it a

40:44

cyber pandemic. Now by the way,

40:46

if the predictive programming

40:48

is through the roof right now. I

40:51

just saw Jay Dyer share another video.

40:54

It's a trailer for

40:57

a new movie about civil war in the United States.

41:00

And it's literally what you just

41:02

saw. I guarantee there's

41:04

going to be a cyber digital

41:06

overlap to how their lives are affected. But

41:09

it was really seemingly focused on just the

41:13

unsettled, dangerous nature of domestic terrorism.

41:15

That's where it's going to be

41:17

about. But let's not

41:19

forget, we just got pushed. We have

41:21

things coming out about the Obama produced

41:24

film on Netflix talking about the cyber

41:26

attacks and the PSYOPS. We have the

41:28

new Mission Impossible

41:30

movie talking about the digital. I mean

41:32

it's just being forced into your consciousness right

41:34

now. I very much think that

41:37

there's something coming. I'm

41:39

not trying to scare anybody at all. The last

41:42

person is going to be hyperbolic and try to

41:44

hype up fear. But my point is not because

41:46

we should just worry that something because they're literally

41:48

telling you whether they believe it's

41:50

happening because China or because

41:52

they're going to do it and blame China. It doesn't really matter.

41:55

I think we all sense that they are

41:57

clearly building towards something. My

42:00

worry is that we are going to take the bait in

42:02

the sense of CCP Joe or

42:04

whatever the two party paradigm is pushing

42:06

in your face. I

42:09

know it's just as

42:11

likely that China would do something like this as

42:13

any other government. But I think with what we

42:15

can literally see playing out right now, does it

42:18

not make more sense to ask whether or not

42:20

Israel, for example, might try to apply

42:23

pressure to a government they used to

42:25

completely control and might now be saying

42:27

stop killing civilians or

42:30

anything or any other element to this? My

42:32

point is we shouldn't box out anything. They're an

42:35

ally. It could be France for all we

42:37

know for some reason. The point is it's not outside

42:39

the realm of possibility that there might

42:41

be more happening than we think based on the

42:44

two party talking points. I

42:46

mean, look, it doesn't matter what's going on. I'm willing to

42:48

bet you one of them will blame Russia, one will blame

42:50

China. As much as those

42:52

are always certainly possibilities, it's just becoming very lazy

42:55

that it always ends up in the same direction

42:58

when most likely it's going to be your own

43:00

government based on our own history, doing something to

43:02

you in order to achieve their agenda against the

43:04

people they're blaming. All

43:06

of those are possible. Now Jason

43:08

Bassler put on an excellent post today going

43:10

over one of my recent clips coming from

43:12

kind of overlapping the CTI again. And

43:15

they just writes going into election season expected

43:17

to expect to see a lot more claims

43:19

of cyber attacks as the sensationalist umbrella term

43:21

acts as a perfect pretext for the evisceration

43:23

of online anonymity and distraction from

43:26

the war machine. I like you. I

43:28

love these little spotlights he's doing. He's doing a great work

43:31

there. Here's our conversation. The

43:34

CTI league is the cyber threat

43:36

intelligence league and it's impending false

43:38

flag. And what he discusses the

43:40

worry that this could be used

43:42

to blame Iran or somebody else.

43:44

Let's not forget that WikiLeaks exposed

43:46

a long time ago that the

43:48

US government, the CIA, absolutely has

43:50

the tools to be able to carry out a

43:53

cyber attack and leave the digital footprint of whoever

43:55

they want. It's just

43:57

like a deep fake thing. a

44:00

certain way does not ever mean that that's the way it

44:02

is. It could or not

44:04

ever but doesn't always mean that's the way it is. So

44:07

then her point is this the person behind this league

44:10

is somebody who has a very clear track record of

44:12

trying to bring the U.S. to war with Iran for

44:14

Israel's interests and is now capable

44:17

of basically carrying out a false flag that

44:19

we would never know. And I'm only to

44:21

bet your government doesn't even care about that.

44:25

Important to think about. Now I'm going to play

44:27

a clip really quickly that I want to just to think

44:29

this is where we're like right now with this

44:31

discussion. Oh by the way I forgot to say

44:33

that I want to include in the beginning. I

44:36

was on Sean Atwood show today with Monica Perez

44:38

and Ricky from Union of

44:40

the Unwanted. We had a

44:42

great conversation about Hunter Biden but we kind of

44:44

got into this other discussion about the Alex

44:47

Jones, Elon Musk, Trump and Andrew Tate all

44:49

this kind of this dynamic. I mean I

44:51

feel like almost everybody other than people in

44:54

the two-party paradigm are skeptical of what this

44:56

feels like. Even them. I know plenty

44:58

of Republicans and people that are like it just feels

45:00

weird. I mean not

45:03

least of which because Elon Musk is literally

45:05

like great reset champion and all of these

45:07

people who are screening about all these bad

45:09

things are suddenly supporting you know. I

45:11

mean how about just Donald Trump who

45:14

still maintains that these injections are like the best

45:16

thing in the world. There's really no

45:18

justification for that and you never really was. Either

45:21

he's okay that is hurting people for

45:24

his own benefit for his legacy

45:27

or he wants to have he was a part of what happened. So

45:30

you got these people all combining to

45:32

basically try to shift journalism onto Twitter

45:34

even though we've still never seen source

45:36

material from the supposed Twitter files. All

45:40

the weirdness that happened there Matt, Taibbi basically

45:42

got pushed out. Who the hell knows? The

45:44

point is it was not genuine. 90% of

45:47

what they showed was already proven before and most

45:50

of what they showed you anyway were things that

45:52

were never backed up with any kind of tangible

45:54

source material that you could verify for yourself even

45:56

though I argue they were all basically true. It's

45:59

what... point it wasn't about true or false

46:01

at that point, it was about conditioning

46:03

you to be blindly accepting

46:06

of whatever screen

46:08

shots you saw, which all rested on the clout

46:10

of the person showing them to you. We're just

46:12

getting re-engineered right back into the old style of

46:15

it's in the newspaper, it's real. That's how

46:17

our grandparents used to think, that's what they're doing to you

46:19

in a digital world. I wish we could

46:21

see that. I know a lot of people do, but this

46:23

next clip is about the world that's already being built and

46:26

all of it ties together, whether it

46:28

comes from a biosecurity standpoint or a

46:30

foreign policy angle, it's all driving

46:32

you in the same direction. Let's

46:59

also be clear, the

47:01

future is not just happening, the

47:04

future is built by us, by

47:07

a powerful community as you

47:09

here in Cessna. You

47:14

know, the whole idea that

47:16

humans have this soul

47:19

or spirit and they have free

47:21

will and nobody knows what's happening

47:23

inside me, so whatever I choose,

47:25

whether in the election or

47:27

whether in the supermarket this is my

47:29

free will, that's over. Free will, that's

47:31

over. That's over.

47:34

Today we have the technology to

47:37

hack human beings on a massive

47:39

scale. Yeah, I mean everything is

47:41

being digitalized, everything is being

47:43

monitored. In this time of crisis you

47:46

have to follow science. It's often said

47:48

that you should never allow a good

47:50

crisis to go to waste because a

47:52

crisis is an opportunity to

47:54

also do good reforms that in normal

47:56

times people will never agree to, but

47:58

in a crisis... you see we

48:01

have no chance, so let's do

48:03

it. The vaccine won't help us. The

48:05

vaccine will help us, of course. It

48:07

will make things more manageable. Surveillance. People

48:09

could look back in 100 years and

48:13

identify the coronavirus epidemic

48:15

as the moment when

48:17

a new regime of

48:19

surveillance took over, especially

48:21

surveillance under the skin,

48:24

which I think is maybe the most important

48:26

development of the 21st century, is

48:29

this ability to hack human

48:32

beings, to grow under

48:34

the skin, collect biometric data,

48:37

analyze it and understand people better

48:39

than they understand themselves. This, I

48:42

believe, is maybe the most important event of

48:44

the 21st century. By hacking

48:47

organisms, elites may gain the

48:49

power to re-engineer the future of

48:51

life itself, because once you can

48:53

hack something, you can usually also

48:55

engineer it. Natural selection

48:58

is replaced by intelligent design.

49:00

The era of inorganic life

49:02

is now beginning. In

49:05

the coming decades, AI and

49:07

biotechnology will give us

49:09

godlike ability to re-engineer

49:11

life and even to

49:13

create completely new life forms.

49:15

We are about to enter a new

49:18

era of inorganic life shaped

49:21

by intelligent design, our

49:24

intelligent design. Can

49:27

you imagine in 10 years

49:30

when we are sitting here,

49:32

we have an implant in our brains, and

49:35

I can immediately feel, because

49:38

you all will have implants, I

49:41

can re-measure your brainwaves, and

49:44

I can immediately tell you how some people

49:47

react, or I can

49:49

feel how some people react to

49:51

your answers. Is it, is it a

49:53

problem? Do you

49:56

all answer? Is it imaginable? vaccinated

52:00

if I may answer. Yeah, I mean,

52:02

I'm very pro-vaccination. The

52:05

science is unequivocal. Can you imagine, in ten

52:07

years when we are sitting here, we have

52:10

an implant in our brains,

52:13

and I can immediately

52:15

feel, because you all will have

52:18

implants. Just think of spasms planted

52:20

into our brains. Basically, it

52:23

implanted in your skull. But

52:26

it would be flush with

52:28

your skull. So you

52:30

basically take

52:33

out a chunk of skull, put the

52:35

neural device in there, you

52:40

insert the electrode threads very carefully into

52:42

the brain. It doesn't

52:45

change what you are doing. It

52:47

changes you if you take genetic

52:50

editing. It's the fusion of

52:52

the physical, the digital, and

52:55

the biological world. That's

52:58

really the essence of the

53:00

force industrial revolution. A

53:02

merger with biological intelligence

53:05

and machine intelligence. An effort for man

53:07

to merge with machine in a healthy

53:09

way. To beat machines, you basically have to

53:11

merge with machines. As

53:14

work is changing, is a universal basic

53:16

income really a solution

53:19

to this problem? I think ultimately we

53:21

will have to have some kind of universal basic

53:23

income. I think some kind of

53:25

a universal basic income. So

53:30

that was generally what I was trying to play. But

53:33

I realized that that's not the video that I was looking for. I took this

53:35

whole time to find the right one. So I'm

53:37

not going to play it again. I made a video

53:39

that's much more well put together than

53:41

that. Anyway,

53:44

you got the general gist of that. But

53:47

the point is that all of these overlaps are

53:49

very similar. I think it's very important that we

53:51

recognize where this all seems to be going. I'm

53:53

thinking I'll just end with that video, the

53:55

one I was going to show here in a second. Let

54:00

me just grab it real quick. Point

54:04

in general is that this is definitely inevitable, guys, and

54:06

it is coming our way. And I'll include some

54:09

articles from Derek and others we've done this. I

54:12

mean, this is from July 17, 2022. And

54:16

NYU School of Law, and this is very real,

54:18

they put out an entire statement. It's actually right

54:20

here. And my School

54:22

of Law warns digital ID. The

54:25

what they're doing, quote, is paving a

54:27

digital road to hell. I

54:30

mean, think about that. That's their statement. And

54:32

I'm just mean, blindly support. You know, people

54:34

are so weirdly resistant and I get it

54:36

to anything associated with like what we see

54:38

is the mainstream, like the whole Harvard thing

54:40

today. It's like, therefore everything. That's just so

54:42

funny how they clearly know how to

54:44

use your own party

54:48

alignment against you. And it's very

54:50

obvious. It's the same thing we saw during a good

54:53

example I made during the whole trans conversation was

54:55

you had people like on the right in this

54:57

case were screaming about and rightly so the Second

54:59

Amendment. Why it's important. It's absolute. And then suddenly

55:01

accept those trans people. They're crazy. Can't have guns.

55:03

You know, it's like it's

55:06

very clearly or planned

55:08

to get you to contradict what you thought

55:10

was absolute. And it's very obvious how this

55:12

gets used against us. My point is just

55:14

question everything while considering everything.

55:17

Question everything. How it works.

55:19

But this is where it's going. A digital road

55:21

to hell. And he also exposes

55:24

the digital idea of the human rights scam that

55:26

tries to force this on people in other countries

55:28

that don't want it or need it because they

55:30

act like if they don't have it, they're suffering

55:32

when in reality you're going to drive them into

55:35

the suffering. And just discussion right

55:37

here from 2022 and one of my shows

55:39

Twitter pipeline to the digital ID, which is where

55:41

this is all going. Now, it looks

55:44

like we only have about 10 minutes or so left. I just

55:46

wanted to go through. I think we'll just use one of these

55:48

points that I was referencing. I

55:51

was going to go through and I plan on doing. Oh,

55:53

I'll give you these these opening notes of this topic because

55:55

I think there's updates on what's happening in

55:58

general. We just discussed. how

56:01

they had vetoed the ceasefire,

56:04

which triggered all sorts of good conversations

56:06

about how does that possibly make sense?

56:09

How is it possible that the U.S.

56:11

government has the ability to veto what

56:13

everybody else wants, which is what happens?

56:15

Everybody else votes for ceasefire, and the

56:17

U.S. goes, no. And there's multiple permanent

56:19

antibodies in this that can do that.

56:22

It shouldn't happen that way. But the good

56:24

thing is there is a process which just makes

56:26

it even more impossible, even though it's clear what

56:28

the majority wants, and they have initiated

56:30

that in order

56:33

to trigger a vote where

56:35

the next process they don't have a veto

56:37

power. Now, as I understand it, that has

56:40

just happened, as yesterday, actually, and the United

56:42

Nations General Assembly does vote to demand an

56:44

immediate ceasefire. My point was that

56:46

the only question now is whether Israel will

56:48

care. Seeing as how they

56:50

are seemingly still bombing without question today,

56:52

it's obvious that they don't care. So

56:55

just again, recognize how obvious this is. The

56:58

very party that—I mean, it's, of course, that are now

57:00

calling them just Hamas, which is

57:03

just a testament to how wildly desperate and

57:05

clumsy they are with this narrative, that anybody

57:07

that doesn't agree with them is racist, anti-semite,

57:09

terrorist, Hamas, whatever will make you believe me,

57:11

kind of a narrative. The

57:14

point, though, is that they have devoted to demand a

57:16

ceasefire. Israel has used UN resolutions

57:18

against anybody they don't like. It's just like they've—but

57:20

ignored any time it goes against them, with the

57:22

Golan Heights or anything else. All

57:25

this is demonstrating is that they

57:27

are the entity that is not

57:29

congruent with international law. They

57:31

are the entity that is actually acting

57:33

outside of the structure they pretend we're all abiding by.

57:36

So does the U.S. government, for that matter. But

57:39

in this case—and I'll try to make

57:41

this point as we end—it's not Hamas in this case.

57:44

It's not what's happening. That's

57:46

not to say Hamas is not

57:48

breaking laws or didn't violate

57:51

international law with what they did. But

57:53

it still simply points out that the

57:55

one who is actively, continuously, in everything

57:57

they do, including the illegal occupation,

57:59

that they've never, they are the ones completely

58:02

acting outside the law. And

58:06

to make this even more clear, what

58:08

have I been telling you since the beginning of, I mean,

58:10

well, well, well before this, for a decade. Israel's

58:13

government does not want a two-state solution.

58:16

It's not new today because CNN finally admits

58:18

that. It has always been the reality.

58:21

They've always made it clear when speaking

58:23

to Hebrew publications or to Israeli people

58:25

in Israel that they will never allow

58:27

that because they don't want it. And

58:31

then when they speak to Biden or CNN Fox

58:33

News, they just lie about it. Yes,

58:35

they knowingly lie. We see it

58:37

happening today. And Biden

58:40

lies in response. They want this. So did

58:42

Donald Trump. Dutifully lies, knowing

58:44

they don't want that. I didn't even

58:46

really bet you that you would tell them they don't want it. And

58:48

they still lie. Who knows about that's my opinion.

58:51

But here it is today. Biden

58:53

says Israeli government doesn't want two-state solution

58:55

because that's the truth. The

58:58

truth is they never have. That's

59:00

always been clear if you simply listen to what

59:02

they've publicly said in Israel as opposed to what

59:04

the US government always claimed that they want it.

59:07

Now think about that in the context of how does that

59:10

make sense then? And their arguments about

59:12

how Hamas has always been the one to

59:14

say no, even though the reality is even

59:16

the times that they did, or rather just

59:18

the Palestinian society that ultimately it

59:21

was because, as people have admitted and Netanyahu

59:23

was exposed for, he made sure it was

59:25

so overflowing with poison pills that they would

59:27

never accept it. So and then of course,

59:29

realizing that they were funding Hamas in order

59:31

to make sure that they were divided. So

59:33

it's clear at four or five different levels

59:35

that they were in fact not just not

59:37

wanting it, but actively sabotaging it

59:39

so they could blame them for not doing

59:41

it. I'm so glad these

59:44

things are finally starting to drip out to people that

59:46

care, but they don't

59:48

want a two-state solution. And even more so,

59:50

Ryan Grim points out one of these tweets

59:52

directly from the Israeli government representatives. This person,

59:58

Minister of Communications, member of the Knesset. on

1:00:00

behalf of Netanyahu's own party. Here's

1:00:03

what he says. We respect

1:00:05

and cherish the president of the United States, Joe Biden, who

1:00:07

went out of his way during the most difficult period of

1:00:09

the state Israel. This is true friendship,

1:00:11

but we live here. This is our

1:00:13

country, the historical estate of our ancestors,

1:00:16

which is actually incorrect in the full

1:00:18

one-sided way. They were all living in

1:00:20

this area peacefully before Zionism entered

1:00:22

the stage. There will be no Palestinian state

1:00:24

here, it says. We say that again. There

1:00:26

will be no Palestinian state here, he says.

1:00:29

We will never allow another state to be established between the

1:00:31

Jordan and the sea. Right, so it's

1:00:34

always good when you make it clear that you want to ethnically

1:00:36

cleanse and genocide this group from

1:00:39

the Jordan to the sea, that's okay. But

1:00:41

when the other side says it in the sense

1:00:43

of we want freedom and self-determination, that's the only

1:00:45

one that means genocide. Not this very clear genocidal

1:00:48

statement, that one doesn't. But anyone

1:00:50

that opiques, you get the

1:00:52

point. It's so transparent. They're

1:00:55

telling you, we never want this and never have

1:00:57

wanted, we'll never allow and never have allowed the

1:00:59

thing you've always pretended we want. And

1:01:02

in the words of President Biden, the security of the Jewish people

1:01:04

is at stake here. A Palestinian state

1:01:06

would endanger him. Thank

1:01:09

you. I guess instead of her, him, I

1:01:11

don't know. The point is that that's the opposite of what

1:01:13

we've always been told. As

1:01:16

he says, the reference between the Jordan and the sea

1:01:18

almost feels thrown to mock US discourse. Obvious.

1:01:24

And in case you missed it, the media won't tell you

1:01:26

this, but Israel has killed 9,420 Palestinians in just nine weeks.

1:01:31

Just nine weeks. So

1:01:35

let's do the math on that real quick. What

1:01:38

do you think that comes out to? Comes

1:01:47

out, that's a little below 150 children

1:01:50

every day. 150

1:01:53

children, babies, toddlers, adolescents, children. Nine

1:02:00

hundred and nine thousand four hundred twenty.

1:02:03

I mean how in the world are pretending this is not exactly

1:02:05

what it looks like Thank

1:02:08

you to oh, that's usually actually tab talk

1:02:10

tagged Massey on that Another

1:02:14

journalist killed which brings the total to 87 over 130 UN members The

1:02:20

cradle reports Israeli armies dropped more than 22,000

1:02:23

guided an unguided bomb supplied by the US on Gaza

1:02:25

within the first six weeks of the war according

1:02:28

to a previously undisclosed intelligence figures I

1:02:33

mean, I just can't even fathom what these people must

1:02:35

be going through and Dan

1:02:38

Cohen writes the times of Israel published

1:02:40

its customary wartime pro genocide op-ed this

1:02:42

time from member of the Knesset Avigdor

1:02:45

Lieberman saying there is no innocent people in

1:02:47

Gaza But listen to Biden when he tells

1:02:49

you that their pin port targeting only Hamas and they want

1:02:51

a two-state solution, right guys And Of

1:02:55

course just for good measure realize that they told

1:02:57

you that wasn't true right in the beginning emphasis

1:03:00

on damage not accuracy and Don't

1:03:04

forget that they just sent more tank shells,

1:03:06

you know The tank shells that were already used to

1:03:09

kill innocent Israeli civilians on October 7th They

1:03:11

just send more the Biden has bypassed Congress

1:03:13

to approve the sale of shells Though they

1:03:15

bypassed it because Congress might not allow it

1:03:18

and this is the world we're living in Now

1:03:21

I'm gonna leave it there in it's a time guys, but thank you for

1:03:23

tuning in today I Will most

1:03:25

definitely be doing the show tomorrow if I need to get

1:03:27

the rest of the stuff out There's this point about the

1:03:29

people that have been kidnapped and you've been marched around and

1:03:31

in fact using them as human shields Well, I'll just show

1:03:33

you that really quickly I'll and maybe

1:03:35

I'll end with that the point is guys

1:03:37

that they have already been caught using these

1:03:40

people that they kidnapped these

1:03:42

civilians doctors From

1:03:45

the school the UN school and they're now

1:03:47

using them marched around to go into other

1:03:49

Palestinian areas You know what that's called. That's

1:03:52

called human shields. They don't

1:03:54

care. They really don't care How obvious is it? I'll include

1:03:56

both these videos include all the links in case you want

1:03:58

to look at this today The

1:04:00

reality is obviously that they don't care there. Oh,

1:04:02

I'm sorry. I'm not showing it Here's

1:04:05

the video just so you guys can see here. They're using

1:04:07

these people as human shields

1:04:09

They're using those doctors and everybody else and

1:04:11

march them into areas that they're going in

1:04:13

with their weapons and hoping

1:04:15

that so that way They're in front of them. So

1:04:17

take somebody get shot. It's gonna be them. It's now

1:04:19

it's nighttime They're marching them all over the place not

1:04:21

into some prison cell, but from area to area to

1:04:23

area It's being reported all over the place. That is

1:04:26

human shield. That's what this is. That's

1:04:28

what you're looking at Just like that It's

1:04:32

amazing, isn't it? That's

1:04:38

a doctor right there and all these people being corralled into here who

1:04:40

knows what's gonna happen to them We're not

1:04:42

talking about Hamas here guys. We're talking about

1:04:44

a genocidal entity that is willing to pat

1:04:46

ethnically cleanse this population It's

1:04:48

time to stand up for him Thank

1:04:50

you for tuning in guys. Thank you for being here

1:04:56

I'll be joining Jason in about two minutes. So

1:04:58

make sure you tune in and again, I'll be doing a

1:05:00

show tomorrow Okay, it's important to get this stuff out But

1:05:03

more and more we will continue to expand and talk

1:05:06

about as many other things as we can guys But

1:05:08

I really want to emphasize how important I think this

1:05:10

is to all of those other topics And

1:05:12

I'm sure some of you disagree, but as

1:05:14

we've shown in the past I think it's important

1:05:17

that we trust our gut and it includes you

1:05:19

everybody. There's something internal innate You should listen to

1:05:21

yourself trust your instincts Thank you for

1:05:23

being here. I love you all as always question everything

1:05:26

come to your own conclusions stay vigilant