Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Live from the nation's capital, President Joe
0:02
Biden and comedian Colin Jost headline the
0:05
White House Correspondents Dinner. See all the
0:07
biggest stars together in one room live,
0:09
April 27th at 8pm on CNN and
0:11
streaming on Max. Quality.
0:14
Sleep is essential. That's why the sleep number
0:17
Smart Bad is designed for your ever evolving
0:19
sleep needs so you can choose what's right
0:21
for you whenever you like me. to Bad:
0:23
that's firmer, softer on either side, and helps
0:25
you sleep. But. A comfortable temperature sleep
0:27
number does that. J.D.
0:30
Power ranks Sleep Number number one in customer satisfaction
0:32
with mattresses purchased in store. And now, save 40%
0:34
on Sleep Number Limited Edition Smart Beds for a
0:36
limited time. For
0:39
J.D. Power 2023 award information,
0:41
visit jdpower.com/awards. Only at Sleep
0:44
Number stores or sleepnumber.com. This
0:49
is CNN Breaking News. Welcome
0:52
to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper.
0:54
Right now, right this minute, a
0:56
new witness in Donald Trump's hush
0:58
money coverup trial, the prosecution just
1:00
called its third witness. His name
1:02
is Gary Farrow. Gary Farrow is
1:04
a banker who worked with Michael
1:07
Cohen at the time that the
1:09
payments were made to former Playboy
1:11
model Karen McDougall and porn
1:13
actress and director Stormy Daniels,
1:15
both of whom alleged romantic
1:18
entanglements of sorts with
1:20
Mr. Donald Trump. This comes after
1:22
Rona Graff was called as the second
1:24
witness in the trial. Rona
1:26
Graff, she's on the screen right there, she's a
1:28
longtime Trump assistant. She worked with Trump since
1:31
he hired her in 1987 after
1:33
she cold called the Trump
1:35
organization. Rona Graff testified two
1:37
contacts she maintained at the Trump
1:40
organization were for Karen
1:42
McDougall and Stormy
1:44
Daniels. Rona Graff was on the stand for less than half
1:46
an hour. Earlier today,
1:48
Trump's attorneys cross-examined David Pecker, the
1:50
former tabloid magnate and longtime friend
1:52
of Donald Trump. Let's
1:55
dive into all of this with
1:57
my panel. So, Jamie, put one
1:59
more thing. Grown a graph into context for
2:02
us a lot of people who
2:04
know Trump world were excited about
2:06
this testimony She was a vice
2:09
president for the firm. She was a
2:11
very important player in his world She
2:15
testified today and very testified very
2:17
briefly, right? So loyal Trusted
2:21
gatekeeper for those of us going
2:23
back who it wanted to interview Donald
2:26
Trump that's who you called She
2:29
was she knew everything was
2:31
going on her back when he was like a
2:33
real estate tycoon and that's it back in the
2:35
Ice age that would you know you want but?
2:40
She also her her desk was
2:42
right outside his
2:45
office she was within earshot
2:47
and She
2:49
she is the inner circle of
2:51
the inner circle she placed the
2:53
calls she made the schedule She
2:56
knew his travel arrangements Politico
2:58
had a headline on
3:00
a profile of her and it
3:02
was need to reach Trump Called
3:05
Rona, so she
3:08
knew everything that was going on And
3:10
she's someone who you know was brought in she
3:12
worked for Norma actually his other Executive assistant who
3:15
you know Trump has this thing with his executive
3:17
assistant his dad was the same way And they're
3:20
deeply attached and someone who really knows everything
3:22
does everything for him Rona was that person
3:24
and even when he went into the White
3:26
House Jake she was someone who still had
3:28
that direct line his old contacts would still
3:30
reach out to Rona to get her to
3:32
get A message to him she even trained
3:34
the former white the White House employee who
3:36
went on to set outside the Oval Office
3:38
I've been occupied that role Madeline Westerhouse and
3:40
obviously she was only on the stand briefly
3:42
But she was there to get some records
3:45
into the record and basically to say Stormy
3:47
Daniels was seen outside of Trump's office on
3:49
the 26th floor of Trump Tower and that
3:51
Kara McDougal and Stormy Daniels his contact numbers
3:53
were in his contacts interesting So let's
3:56
talk about the guy on the witness stand right
3:58
now. His name is Gary Faro He's
4:00
a former senior managing director at First for
4:02
Public Bank. He
4:04
was just asked about the issue of what
4:06
does KYC stand for. He says it means
4:08
know your customer, be sure they are who
4:10
they say they are, and email is right
4:13
now being shown to the jury. What
4:16
is the significance of Gary Farrow?
4:18
Why is he testifying? I
4:21
mean, obviously it's still underway, but it appears that he's
4:23
essentially Cohen's banker, if I sort of understand what it
4:25
was. So what would that mean, that he's just going
4:27
to testify as to the payments? Yeah,
4:29
the payments, the shell company, the mechanics of
4:31
the payments. Right. Obviously, we've
4:33
all been like focused on, largely or many of us,
4:35
been focused on sort of the more salacious elements of
4:37
this. They are more interesting. They
4:39
are more interesting, but the
4:42
crime actually has to do with all of
4:44
this somewhat banal record keeping stuff. So you know,
4:46
this is a case where I think we're
4:48
going to actually see quite a few somewhat
4:50
dull witnesses producing things
4:52
like documents, ledgers, invoices, things like that
4:54
just have to come into evidence to
4:57
complete this case. Which is not
5:00
meant as a bust on Gary Farrow. He
5:02
might be a very fascinating guy, but his
5:04
testimony itself is just about record
5:06
keeping. Well, he's got an interesting name again, too. Gary
5:08
Farrow. Again, we have the greatest
5:10
names of witnesses. Farrow, Packer, Graff,
5:13
anyway. I'm walking away from
5:15
that. But look, one thing to
5:17
just point out, you know, there's a couple
5:19
of tactics at play here. One
5:21
is if you're a prosecutor, and I used to do some multi-week
5:24
cases where you have good witnesses and bad
5:26
witnesses mixed in. You like the idea of
5:28
leaving them with something solid, unchallenged, good at
5:31
the end of the week. So
5:33
it may be that these are basically glorified
5:35
records custodians. They're basically introducing some paperwork for
5:37
the jury to look at at 4.30 before
5:39
they go home and go, oh,
5:41
there were checks or there were meetings or there
5:43
were contacts. It's also smart for the
5:45
defense at this point to keep it dull, you
5:48
know, to basically not spend any time
5:50
cross-examining people where you have no
5:52
real reason to gain anything because
5:55
they're not establishing criminality or they're
5:57
not establishing controversial points. So let
5:59
them go. continue to focus on
6:01
Cohen and wait for that moment. Well let
6:03
me just say so the email that was
6:05
just shown that now they're discussing it's
6:08
from Gary Farrow's assistant informing
6:10
him that Michael Cohen his client at the
6:13
time called on
6:15
October 11th 2016. Yeah
6:17
I'm sure we'll find out
6:19
why that matters. There are no cameras in
6:21
the courtroom. No no I know I know
6:24
I'm sure it'll be interesting but I just
6:26
want to like yes their
6:28
records folks but I don't know we should lose
6:30
sight of the significance of what GRAF actually put
6:32
into evidence. We'll come back to GRAF in a
6:34
second but Gary Farrow received another email two days
6:36
later. Please return Michael Cohen's call
6:38
when you are available today regarding
6:40
an important matter. So this is why this
6:43
matters is because he is trying to arrange the
6:45
payment to Stormy Daniels which is what all of this
6:47
is about. From Michael Cohen. From Michael Cohen maybe
6:49
it's not a salacious but this is actually what the
6:51
trial is about. And the crime itself. It is.
6:53
And Michael Cohen was contacting the bank because
6:55
they had been having this discussion about AMI
6:58
and David Pecker. AMI is the friend that owned
7:00
the National Enquirer. They had been having the discussion about
7:02
them making the payment to Stormy Daniels and essentially David
7:04
Pecker didn't want anything to do with it. He
7:06
did not want to be in
7:08
cahoots with a porn star making this payment to
7:10
her and it came to this point where Michael
7:12
Cohen was trying to reach Trump. He was under
7:14
pressure to do this and finally said I'm just
7:16
gonna do it myself and drew down a home
7:18
equity line. That's why this exchange happening right now.
7:20
And Farrow received another email
7:23
two days later. Please return Michael
7:25
Cohen's call when you are available
7:27
today regarding an important
7:29
matter. Farrow calls Cohen who
7:31
told him he wanted to open
7:34
a new LLC account. Cohen said
7:36
the account was for capital real
7:38
estate. Farrow says let me bring in
7:41
some other attorneys we have with us today to
7:43
discuss criminal defense attorney Bill Brennan,
7:45
trial attorney Misty Maris and Manhattan criminal
7:48
defense attorney Stacey Schneider. Stacey was also
7:50
a former contestant on The Apprentice and
7:52
knows the judge as well as a
7:54
district attorney Alvin Bragg as well as
7:57
Mr. Trump obviously from her time on
7:59
The Apprentice. Let's start with
8:01
you, Bill Brennan, because right now this
8:03
testimony from Gary Farrow, who
8:05
worked for Michael Cohen, it
8:07
looks like it's leading up towards
8:10
evidence of this LLC corporation,
8:13
which some might call a shell
8:16
corporation, to hide the payment that
8:18
he made to Stormy Daniels on
8:20
Trump's behest. That is the allegation
8:22
anyway, Mr. Brennan. Hello, Jake. Hello,
8:26
Jake. And I agree with the former prosecutors
8:28
that you may want to end
8:31
the week on, especially I think
8:33
they're not in session Monday, if
8:35
I'm correct about that. That's right.
8:37
Three-day weekend ended on innocuous testimony,
8:39
especially following up the 34-year-old, a
8:42
34-year employee, the
8:45
administrative assistant, who apparently spoke in
8:47
glowing terms of the defendant, said
8:50
he was respectful, he was wonderful to work for.
8:52
I don't think you want the jury, if you're
8:54
the prosecutor, if I'm prosecuting this case, left
8:57
with that to mull over for three days.
8:59
Plus, you need this type of boilerplate
9:03
innocuous testimony to corroborate
9:06
the later allegations
9:09
of Cohen and the papers that will
9:11
go in. So it's not going to
9:13
always be as salacious as Pekka was,
9:15
and you have to fill in with
9:17
these fill-in-the-blanks witnesses.
9:21
Stacey, tell us about Rona Graff. Do
9:24
you know her at all? Have you encountered her at
9:26
all? What is your experience
9:28
with her? She obviously was Trump's longtime
9:30
assistant, who testified for about half an
9:32
hour earlier today. Yes. Rona
9:35
is the loveliest woman on the planet when I
9:37
was on the show. We
9:40
wanted to stay in touch with Donald
9:42
Trump after the show. The person we
9:44
were told to contact is Rona. She
9:46
was indeed his gatekeeper. She
9:49
had an amazing relationship with Donald Trump.
9:51
I always wondered how she worked for
9:53
such a difficult boss. She
9:55
was always pleasant. And
9:58
I think this is very helpful. after
10:01
David Pekker's testimony, which was
10:04
really damaging for Donald Trump about
10:06
all this alleged nefarious conduct, to
10:08
have somebody soften him like Rona,
10:10
who still, you know, who's cared
10:12
about him all these years. I
10:14
understood I wasn't in the courtroom, but after
10:17
she got up and left to leave the
10:19
testimony, I think Donald Trump stood
10:21
up and touched her hand,
10:23
and that's a big difference from what his
10:26
behavior during jury selection, when the jurors were
10:28
entering the room he didn't even stand up
10:30
for them, but he stood up for Rona
10:32
today. So, Missy Maris, let me tell you
10:34
some of the stuff going on in the courtroom
10:36
right now, on
10:39
October 13th, 2016, email,
10:41
and again the significance of October 2016, A,
10:44
right before the presidential election, B, this
10:47
is during the hotbed of activity about
10:49
making sure that Stormy Daniels' story or
10:52
allegation does not get out there. On
10:55
October 13th email, Michael
10:57
Cohen, need account, open
10:59
for Michael Cohen, this is from Gary
11:01
Farrow, need account open for Michael Cohen,
11:03
immediately he wants no address on the
11:06
checks, he also notes
11:08
that an LLC not having an address
11:10
is not unusual, Farrow says
11:12
that Cohen called to set up
11:14
an account for resolution consultants, LLC.
11:17
I love the fact
11:19
that in any, any time there's any
11:22
story about allegations of misdeeds, the LLC
11:24
always has the most boring innocuous name,
11:26
and that's one for the history books,
11:28
resolution consultants LLC, I'm already falling asleep,
11:32
but obviously it was anything
11:34
but boring what was going on, Misty. Right,
11:36
certainly seeking a resolution, right, so there's
11:39
a couple of really important points here.
11:41
Number one, Jake, you nailed it, the
11:43
timing, remember this is all part of
11:45
the prosecution's narrative that this is right
11:47
around the time the Access Hollywood tape
11:50
has become public, Trump team is in
11:52
panic mode to get rid of this
11:54
Stormy Daniel story, so that's all going
11:56
to speak to some of the elements
11:59
that tie this payment directly to
12:01
the election. Now the other piece
12:03
is, every single document and communication
12:05
and transaction relating to this payment
12:08
is obviously a key and critical
12:10
part of the case. And
12:13
to have these shell companies, this
12:15
is all speaking to that idea
12:17
of a conspiracy trying to mask
12:19
these payments as something that they're
12:21
not. And remember, that is a
12:23
fundamental part of the prosecution's case
12:26
as far as this all being
12:28
unlawful conduct because the payments themselves
12:30
aren't unlawful. It's that were they
12:32
properly reported? Were they related to
12:34
the campaign? Were they related to
12:36
the election? So all of this
12:39
testimony, while foundational, authenticating documents, really,
12:41
really important to the merits of the prosecution's
12:43
case. Let me call on my favorite, my
12:46
fellow, rather, Philadelphia, Mr.
12:48
Brennan, and permit
12:50
me a moment of geographical snobbery
12:52
because Delaware is being raised. The
12:55
jury is seeing pages of documents that
12:57
show resolution consultants LLC was created by
12:59
Michael Cohen as a Delaware entity.
13:02
We like to make fun of
13:04
New Jersey and Philadelphia. And Bill,
13:06
maybe you can explain why Delaware
13:08
is always where these shady corporations
13:10
are headquartered. I
13:13
can, Jake, because Delaware
13:15
many years ago crafted
13:18
laws of incorporation were very favorable
13:22
for those who wish to incorporate. So that's why
13:24
we see, I think, Per Capita, it's
13:26
the out of the 50 states. It's the
13:28
number one. But I'd just like
13:31
to respond to a couple of comments that I heard. Probably
13:34
just the DNA that I have being
13:36
a defense lawyer. You know, you
13:38
have to remember that the defense here
13:40
is likely to be, and I think
13:42
we've seen a preview, is that payments,
13:45
if they were made, and if they
13:47
were made to these individuals, Ms. Clifford
13:49
and Ms. McDougal, they were paid to
13:52
avoid a very embarrassing and shameful
13:55
scenario that the defendant
13:57
would encounter with his wife and family. and
14:00
you know that that sells the people and
14:02
i think that when you
14:04
and look at what i was in court today you
14:06
know i just know what i've read what i've heard
14:08
from from you guys but uh... when
14:11
you think about this uh... prosecution
14:13
they have to get it to the other
14:15
crime to make the felony that they have
14:18
to show that if these things
14:20
were done they want to avoid uh...
14:22
personal problems they were to affect either
14:25
campaign finance laws or the election thought
14:28
i'd read or heard that mister pecker
14:31
stumbled into some type of meeting in
14:33
the way that were director kome and
14:35
secretary pompe over there and uh...
14:37
the prosecution seems to be saying we were in the
14:40
meeting with too big officials i mean that doesn't make
14:42
him a code of fear that makes him far as
14:44
gone i mean if you know the
14:46
guys tumblr animal general meeting that's proof of
14:48
nothing so i don't know
14:51
that peckers tech testimony with that
14:53
damaging so far i'd suspect
14:55
will fill in the gaps are at that
14:57
the bill the mooam with colin and i
14:59
suspect it will be a much more aggressive
15:01
line of course examination with them so
15:04
there is jurors are being shown emails
15:06
right now between colin and ferro setting
15:09
up a bank account for resolution consultants
15:11
l l c everyone stick
15:13
with me were close to wrapping for
15:15
the week in the manhattan hush money cover-up route even
15:18
here as we watch our prosecutors try to finish out
15:20
of the court adjourned for the weekend three-day weekend for
15:22
the jury we're back in a moment this
15:27
podcast is supported by sleep number quality
15:30
sleep is essential that's why the sleep number
15:32
smart bed is designed for your ever-evolving sleep
15:35
needs so you can choose what's right for
15:37
each of you whenever you like need a
15:39
bed that's firmer or softer on either side
15:41
helps you sleep at a comfortable temperature quiet
15:43
their snores sleep number does that only
15:46
sleep number smart beds let you each
15:48
choose your ideal comfort and support your
15:50
sleep number setting sleep number smart
15:53
beds learn how you sleep and provide
15:55
personalized insights to help you sleep better
15:57
all sleep number smart beds feature cooling
15:59
pressure-relieving comfort layers for soothing sleep throughout
16:01
the night. Temperature balancing bedding is
16:03
designed to move heat and moisture away when you're
16:06
hot. When you're cool, they hold their
16:08
energy to help warm you. Sleep Better
16:10
Together Jd Power ranked Sleep number number
16:12
one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased
16:14
and store and now see forty percent
16:17
on sleep number. Limited edition smart bed.
16:19
For a limited time for
16:21
Jdpower Twenty Twenty Three Award
16:23
information, visit jdpower.com/awards. I'm
16:29
Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's chief medical
16:31
correspondent. This week on Chasing
16:33
Life, I'm sorry that the Great Barrier
16:36
Reef is no longer great, that we
16:38
value Amazon much more than the Amazon,
16:40
and that the waterfront neighborhood where you
16:42
were growing up could be condemned by
16:44
rising seas before you're old enough to
16:46
apply for a mortgage. That's my friend
16:48
Bill Weir, CNN's chief climate correspondent. He's
16:50
optimistic about the planet and he's optimistic
16:52
about our ability to take care of
16:54
it. Listen to Chasing Life
16:56
wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome
17:01
back to CNN's coverage of the
17:03
Manhattan hush bunny cover of trial.
17:06
We are still here in studio and the jury
17:08
is still listening to testimony. Cohen,
17:10
according to the paperwork being presented to
17:12
the jury about the LLC,
17:15
the corporation being set up
17:17
by Michael Cohen in order
17:19
to make payments to Stormy
17:21
Daniels, allegedly at Donald
17:23
Trump's behest, per the
17:25
paperwork Cohen described the entity. This is
17:28
resolution, what's it called? Resolution
17:30
consulting LLC or something like that? Consultants,
17:32
yeah. Consultants LLC. Describe the entity's
17:35
function to be management consultant, including
17:38
HR and marketing. Cohen was
17:40
the only authorized signatory for the account.
17:42
Now you were saying that this
17:45
may sound very boring and bookkeeper-y,
17:47
but actually it's not. It's
17:49
actually important. So let's talk
17:51
about why the prosecutors would be introducing
17:53
all this. Obviously it tells part of the story, but
17:56
part of what they need to prove is
17:59
that there was some... knowledge or awareness that
18:01
there would be legal implications concerning the way
18:03
that this payment was booked. One
18:05
of the pieces of circumstantial evidence that you
18:08
can produce as a prosecutor to help
18:11
shore up testimony like this is evidence
18:13
that you are doing something very sneaky,
18:15
you're concealing things like management consulting. There
18:17
was no management consulting going on, right?
18:19
So he was being consulted to manage
18:21
Stormy Daniels. Correct, right. So all
18:24
of this has an air of impropriety about it, right? It
18:26
has an air of impropriety about it. Well,
18:29
as you said, Delaware. Just joking. Right.
18:31
And then on, I just want to
18:33
go back to Ronograph too. It
18:36
was short, I guess she said she liked
18:38
him, whatever. But this is the gatekeeper who
18:40
worked for Donald Trump from 1987 for
18:43
decades. Cohen, by the
18:45
way, checked no on the form when asked
18:47
if the entity was associated with political fundraising
18:49
or a political action committee, unquote. Is that
18:51
significant? Yeah, I mean, it's a lie. Because
18:54
it was associated with... I mean, it's
18:56
definitely associated with political fundraising and some sort of
18:58
PAC. There was an ongoing campaign. Whether, I mean,
19:00
sure, there's some lawyerly way of trying to defend
19:02
that language, but the jury's not going to see
19:04
it that way. But make
19:06
your point about Graff. Yeah, Ronograph. So what is
19:09
she put into evidence? She put in evidence that
19:11
in the Trump organization records,
19:13
Ronograph, excuse me, Stormy Daniels contact
19:15
information was in there. Okay. The
19:17
prosecutors are slowly trying to establish
19:19
that this affair actually happened. With
19:22
Stormy Daniels. Correct. And that... Whatever
19:25
it was. The event. Whatever. Wasn't
19:27
really an affair. Whatever. The interaction. Yes. The
19:30
jury won't have to take Stormy Daniels word for it, right? Because
19:32
Trump has tried to say, oh, she's a liar. She's making it
19:34
all up to sell books and money. But why would he have
19:36
her contact info in her... But
19:39
by the way, this account, Farrah says the
19:41
bank did all of our work to establish Cohen's account,
19:44
but, quote, a deposit was never made in the
19:46
account, so the account never went live. So
19:48
it confirmed the account was not open. So why
19:50
does that matter? So this is a
19:53
debt account. It looks like a lot
19:55
of machinations that are designed to just
19:57
conceal this from scrutiny. Okay. what
20:00
Michael Cohen was doing. He's actually said
20:02
this publicly, that he wanted to not only
20:04
hide this from scrutiny, but also hide it
20:06
from his wife. He later said that. He
20:09
hid it from his own wife or from? From Michael Cohen's wife. So
20:11
it wasn't just easy for Michael Cohen to go and get $130,000.
20:15
He's talked about the immense pressure he was under,
20:17
and he only went to do it because he
20:19
essentially faced no other option to get this money.
20:21
And it felt like they needed to pay for
20:23
McDaniel's and do so quickly because she and her
20:25
attorney felt like they were dragging it out past
20:27
the election. And then once they hit the election,
20:29
they'd never get the money. Because Michael Cohen didn't
20:31
have millions of dollars in the bank. He had to
20:33
draw down a home equity line. Let
20:36
me go, I'll come back in one sec, but let me go out
20:38
to Paula Reed, who's outside the courthouse right now
20:40
with all the latest. Paula? Yeah,
20:44
Jake, I was just thinking about the gag
20:47
order and creative ways that Trump has found
20:49
a way around it because we do expect
20:51
him to speak after court, really, possibly in
20:54
a matter of minutes. We're always currently subject
20:56
to an expanded gag order where he can't,
20:58
as most defendants cannot, attack witnesses, attack members
21:00
of the jury. And it's been expanded to
21:03
include prosecutors and family members of the judge.
21:05
Now, I'm also monitoring the side stream while
21:07
I'm talking to you. They're still talking about
21:10
setting up that LLC. I agree with you,
21:12
Jake, not the most exciting thing we've seen
21:14
throughout the trial. But Trump has tried
21:16
to find ways of working around this
21:18
gag order because he has, according to
21:21
prosecutors, just blatantly violated it multiple times,
21:23
particularly going after Cohen, is trying some
21:25
work arounds like quoting other people,
21:27
including a Fox News host who raised questions
21:29
about the jury. He's also come out, we've
21:31
seen him a few times at the end
21:33
of court with a stack of articles and
21:36
quoted attacks on people he's not supposed to
21:38
directly attack. Now, it was clear from the
21:40
hearing earlier this week on the gag order
21:42
that that is probably going to be a
21:44
violation. So something we saw this morning for
21:46
the first time was him pointing to his
21:48
allies on the Hill, GOP allies, who are
21:50
now making many of these arguments for him.
21:52
Now, again, I'm looking down at the side
21:55
stream. Mr. Farro is just talking about the
21:57
urgency that Michael Cohen had while he was setting
21:59
up this LLC. But it's going
22:01
to be really interesting to watch as Trump
22:03
comes out of court if he continues this
22:05
tactic because he cannot directly attack people like,
22:07
for example, Matthew Colangelo, one of the prosecutors
22:10
here, who formerly worked at the Biden Justice
22:12
Department. It appears that now instead he's having
22:14
folks on the Hill do that and that
22:16
he and his allies will point to their
22:18
reports or their remarks. Now, I'm also curious
22:20
to see prosecutors' reaction to this. So I
22:22
definitely want to watch for in a couple
22:25
of minutes when Trump addresses the press. OK,
22:28
every time Michael Cohen spoke to me,
22:30
he gave a sense of urgency. And
22:32
this was one of those times testimony
22:34
from Greg Farrow, who was the banker
22:37
for Michael Cohen. And we are
22:39
hearing information about the
22:42
accounts that Michael Cohen set up
22:44
to allegedly pay Stormy Daniels, allegedly
22:46
at the behest of Donald Trump.
22:48
Farrow confirms that the new LLC
22:50
that Cohen wanted to open was Essential
22:53
Consultants LLC as opposed
22:55
to Resolution Consultants LLC.
22:58
Jim. Well, I shouldn't end on
23:00
personal motivation only LLC. That would
23:02
have been helpful. But look, I think there's a
23:04
couple of things that are interesting here. If I'm
23:06
the prosecution, I've got Farrow on the stand. I'm
23:08
going to do what I can to make him
23:10
go to the buzzer today. Do not leave time
23:12
for cross examination because if there is cross, they're
23:15
going to leave this jury with the weekend. It'll
23:17
be a friendly cross, frankly. It's not going to
23:19
be some big hostile Perry Mason moment. But you're
23:21
going to get him to concede Cohen being dishonest,
23:23
Cohen being in charge, Cohen committing misdeeds. It's
23:25
the first substantive moment of being able to
23:28
say this guy Cohen is the weasel at
23:30
the heart of everything. And if
23:32
you leave the jury with that for three days, it's
23:34
a great moment for the defense. So it'll be interesting
23:36
to see if they kind of start asking questions like
23:38
how do you like the weather in New York just
23:41
to get to five o'clock? What's your take on this?
23:43
No, I think that's astute inaccurate. I
23:45
would just say that the phrase that I was
23:47
searching for a little bit earlier concerning all these
23:49
machinations and the secrecy and the misrepresentations, it reflects
23:52
consciousness of wrongdoing. Right. But
23:54
Michael Cohen knew what he was doing was wrong. Because you
23:56
don't go through all of these efforts unless you're doing something
23:58
wrong. You feel bad about it. And I agree
24:00
that the defense is
24:03
going to be that this was all Michael Cohen's doing.
24:05
But can I say I see it completely differently
24:07
than you do, which is that it's Michael Cohen
24:09
out for his own good doing what he needs
24:11
to do. What I'm seeing these
24:13
dates and that Michael Cohen is urgently trying to
24:15
get in touch with this banker, they
24:17
are trying to paint a picture of Michael
24:19
Cohen is stressed. Michael Cohen is under pressure.
24:21
He has someone who he has in mind
24:24
as he is trying to open this count and desperately
24:26
get money that he doesn't really have access to and
24:28
that we already know he's hiding from his wife at
24:30
the time and concealing it. I think they're trying to
24:32
paint a different picture that he is actually under pressure
24:34
and he is stressed. But they know because October
24:37
2016 right before the election, they don't
24:39
want Stormy's story coming out. It's
24:41
October 26 when he calls back. I mean, we are
24:43
truly a week away from the election and they're saying
24:45
they're basically trying to frame Michael Cohen as someone who
24:47
is stressed. I'm not disagreeing with the image
24:49
they're trying to create. I'm saying how's that going to
24:51
play out? Do you think Michael Cohen is going to
24:54
come off as poor overworked Bob Cratchit from the Christmas
24:56
Carol with Scrooge leaning on him? Or is he going
24:58
to come off as a first class purger
25:00
and liar and disbarred lawyer? He
25:03
is going to come across also as
25:05
someone who used to be very loyal
25:07
to Donald Trump and did
25:09
his bidding. And that's what
25:11
this feels like. We're getting closer and
25:13
closer to the election. Resolution
25:16
went to essential. Essential Consultants
25:19
LLC. He's not setting this up
25:21
because he has a problem with
25:23
Stormy Daniels. He's setting this up
25:25
because Donald Trump has a problem
25:28
with Stormy Daniels and they don't want it
25:30
to come out before the election in
25:32
the wake of Access Hollywood. Right. Donald
25:35
Trump is fighting for his political life after the
25:37
Access Hollywood tape dropped a few weeks before just
25:39
to put everybody in the context of October 2016.
25:44
Along comes Stormy Daniels who is alleging
25:46
she had a sexual encounter with Donald
25:48
Trump. He does not want that information
25:50
to be known by voters in
25:52
October 2016 with the election coming
25:55
up. That's the story that
25:58
prosecutors are presenting. Michael
26:00
Cohen, according to the prosecution, set
26:03
up these accounts to pay
26:05
Stormy Daniels to hide the payments not
26:08
only from
26:10
Johnny Law but from his
26:12
wife, according to Michael Cohen.
26:14
Under business narrative for the
26:16
second LLC that Michael
26:18
Cohen was setting up, this one Essential
26:20
Consulting LLC, it states,
26:23
Cohen was opening the account for a
26:25
real estate consulting company to collect fees
26:27
for consulting regarding real estate. The prosecutor,
26:30
Mann Gold, she says she's at
26:32
a natural stopping point for the day.
26:34
It's 4.27 p.m. They said 4.30
26:37
would be the time that they would end
26:39
for the weekend. Judge Rashawn says, we will
26:41
call it a week and is giving the
26:43
jury instructions. This is exactly, Jim Trustee, what
26:45
you said you would do if you were
26:47
the prosecutor, establish some of these little facts.
26:49
Don't let the defense have a moment to
26:51
go at them. Yeah, I mean,
26:53
and look, there's nothing sinister about that. There's an
26:55
element of theater to trial. I think there'd be.
26:58
North Carolina 4.4 corner defense, right? It's
27:01
not 4 to 2 at halftime. Right,
27:04
right. But look, this is
27:06
essential. My point is not
27:08
that it's not important evidence. They're looking for
27:11
stuff that's not controversial. They don't want to
27:13
leave with their chin and have these moments
27:15
of really getting sidetracked long before Cohen gets
27:17
on the stand. And if you're the defense,
27:19
the fight is not whether or not there
27:21
was a relationship with Stormy. It's
27:24
not whether or not there was an NDA.
27:26
I mean, that's really not it. Ultimately, what
27:28
you're focusing on is Cohen and you're looking
27:30
at the ledger and you're saying, is the
27:32
difference between a crime and a not crime
27:34
that you didn't say for NDA after legal
27:37
services? That's a really thin divide between criminal
27:39
and non-criminal. And that's where jury instructions are
27:41
going to be huge way down the road,
27:43
but that's also where closing arguments are going
27:45
to go, I think. So, the Trump inside
27:47
the courtroom just hit his attorney
27:50
Todd Blanche on the arm and leaned over
27:52
to tell him something again, color that
27:54
we're not seeing because there
27:56
are no cameras in the courtroom in New York, which
27:58
many people, many legal experts, have. have disagreed
28:00
with. We are also waiting for Donald Trump
28:02
to come outside of the courtroom and speak
28:04
to the cameras you see the
28:07
place there that he will deliver the message. Yeah
28:10
I just wanted to say that you
28:12
know I think whether or not the relationship
28:14
with Stormy Daniels occurred I mean we all
28:16
take it for granted but in a trial
28:18
setting actually is a material fact because Trump's
28:21
position including I think the position his lawyer
28:23
took an opening in the opening statement is
28:25
that this interaction didn't occur. Well they say
28:27
it never happened. Correct and so every lie
28:30
that the prosecution can establish that
28:33
the defense is putting forth as part of
28:35
their defense helps them. Interesting
28:38
and but we know that I mean there are
28:40
pictures of Donald Trump with Stormy Daniels he he
28:42
doesn't deny knowing her right and she says that
28:44
she tried to get a job on celebrity
28:47
apprentice the issue is whether or not they
28:49
had any sort of sexual interlude so I'm
28:51
not sure and she's inconsistent on that too
28:53
they've got her on record saying it didn't
28:55
happen. Because she signed that NDA to begin
28:58
with Judge Marchand reminding jurors that the court
29:00
is dark on Monday and is going to
29:02
return Tuesday at 9 30 a.m. Eastern jurors
29:04
are exiting the courtroom which means that we
29:06
expect the defendant himself will exit the
29:08
courtroom as well but what
29:11
have they established so far factually if
29:14
anything that establishes that
29:16
Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump did have
29:19
a sexual encounter I don't think anything
29:21
as of now nothing. There are a lot of
29:24
people in Donald Trump's contacts you're
29:26
probably in his contacts that wrote
29:29
I'm probably in them I mean there are a lot
29:31
of people who are in the phone book that
29:34
said what's the
29:36
motivation for paying for all
29:38
of this money one
29:40
of the interesting things about David
29:42
Pecker's testimony about here
29:45
comes the defendant himself watching walking up to
29:47
the to the cameras it
29:50
is Friday afternoon 4 30
29:52
p.m. let's listen in city
30:00
limits, goodness.
30:03
This is only heightened indictment.
30:06
It's in order to try and win an
30:09
election, political opponent, and nothing
30:11
like this has ever happened. Eight days. As
30:14
you know, the economy is falling apart now.
30:16
Now you're seeing it very little growth. We're
30:18
killing it worse. Oil prices are
30:20
going up. And you have the
30:22
college campuses all over closed down. Our country
30:24
is going to hell. And
30:26
we sit here day after day after day, which
30:29
is their plan. They think they
30:31
might be able to kick out an election, but
30:33
I doubt it because the vote numbers are very good
30:35
for us. I just want
30:37
to say that I've invited Mike to debate.
30:39
You can do it anytime you
30:42
want, including the next meeting. Here we
30:44
are. I invited him to the court
30:46
yesterday. He has his tight up date
30:48
with his safety station. This is all
30:50
being done through Washington. It's
30:52
all well-coordinated attack. I want
30:55
to believe in a felony. So
30:58
I'm here. I'm ready winning
31:00
in April. And if you
31:02
want, I'll do it on Lending Night, Tuesday night,
31:04
or Wednesday night. We'll be in
31:07
Michigan, stating that he's destroyed because of the
31:09
auto industry. We're not going to have any
31:11
jobs left in Michigan. No
31:13
auto jobs left in Michigan. No more going
31:15
over to China and other places because we
31:17
think it is easy win day to
31:19
make your vehicle mandated. Well,
31:22
we're willing to do it. Lending
31:24
Night, Tuesday night, Wednesday night, Thursday
31:26
night, or Friday night on national television.
31:28
We're ready. Just tell me where. We'll
31:31
do it at the White House. It'll be very comfortable,
31:33
actually. But if you tell
31:35
me where, we're ready. He said yesterday not showing
31:37
up now. We heard nothing. But
31:40
he said that all I've learned is a very, very important thing.
31:42
I don't think he'll be there. Maybe he won't.
31:45
Maybe. Well, I'm not sure he has a choice. But
31:48
that's the story. So here we are.
31:50
We're ready, willing, and able. And
31:52
we don't see him. And I don't think he'll be here.
31:55
But maybe next week he'll do it. I doubt
31:57
it. But maybe he'll sort of change. and
32:00
everybody for being legal is a new
32:02
receptor through this like everybody else. And
32:05
anything is done. This is a case that
32:08
should have never been brought. Every
32:10
legal scholar, every legal
32:13
expert, Andy McDonoughton. Jonathan,
32:17
Andy, every single one, Jonathan Drennel
32:19
came out with a scathing report
32:21
on this trial today. Andy
32:24
McDonoughton scathing report. Martin
32:26
Drennel can't believe this is happening in
32:28
our country. This is the case here.
32:31
This is the case whatsoever. It's at the
32:33
schools. We have a conflicted judge
32:35
and it shouldn't be happening. Not in this country.
32:37
Thank you very much. Do you think he's
32:40
in this case? He's
32:42
wicked so far. All
32:46
right. Donald Trump, the 45th president of
32:49
the United States and the defendant in
32:51
this case, talking
32:53
after a full week of court. Let's
32:56
bring in CNN's Daniel Dale, our fact checker,
32:59
who's looking into everything we just heard from the
33:01
former former president, most of which was
33:04
criticizing the trial and
33:07
telling the world that he's ready to
33:09
debate President Biden whenever, wherever
33:11
it can happen. Daniel. Fair
33:15
enough. He said something that we fact checked,
33:17
I think, five times in the last couple of weeks. He
33:19
said this is a Biden indictment.
33:22
It's a well coordinated attack coming
33:24
out of Washington, completely baseless, zero
33:26
evidence whatsoever. This is an
33:28
indictment approved by a grand jury
33:30
of New York citizens. There
33:32
is no basis for any claim that President Biden had
33:34
a personal role in it. The
33:37
prosecutor behind it is Manhattan district attorney Alvin
33:39
Bragg, who's a locally elected official, does not
33:41
report to the federal government. Former
33:44
President Trump has repeatedly said that a former
33:46
DOJ official went over to work for Bragg.
33:48
That's Matthew Colangelo, who you've been talking about.
33:51
Zero evidence that President Biden had any
33:53
role in that personal employment decision. Colangelo
33:55
and Bragg were former colleagues in the
33:57
state attorney general's office. I
34:00
think it's also worth noting Jake that that when
34:02
former president Trump has every legal expert thinks this
34:05
case is a shame And so on the people
34:07
he named today. He named Mark
34:09
Levin who yes talks about the law
34:12
He's also a right-wing radio host who's
34:14
a frequent defender of Donald Trump Andy
34:17
McCarthy Sometimes criticizes Trump but is also
34:19
a conservative commentator Jonathan Turley a professor
34:21
who defended Trump in the impeachment context
34:23
and other things so yes They're even
34:26
liberal professors anti-Trump professors and so on
34:28
who have questioned this case But
34:30
those names are the regular the usual
34:32
suspects defending Donald Trump and I don't know he
34:34
talked about mission Michigan being destroyed No more auto
34:37
jobs. I think some of that was a prediction,
34:39
but it's worth noting There are more auto manufacturing
34:41
jobs today more people employed in Michigan in that
34:43
industry today than there were when Donald Trump left
34:45
office alright, Daniel Dale with just a
34:49
a combo platter of fact checks from
34:52
the feast that mr. Trump just Served
34:55
up. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Let's
34:57
talk more about the case Because
34:59
it is a fairly significant case just a step
35:01
back for one sec now that the trial is
35:03
over for the week I want I want to
35:06
talk about some of the takeaways from
35:09
the cross examination of David pecker
35:12
by Emile bovet who is
35:17
It was an interesting interesting Q&A
35:22
in this back and forth with Emile bovet
35:25
who is a defense attorney for mr. Trump Pekker
35:28
acknowledged that negative press for
35:30
Trump's foes was generally good for business
35:33
Pekker said that if the false doorman allegations
35:35
had been true. He would have run the
35:37
story after the election Bob
35:40
a elicited from pecker that catch and
35:42
kill the the term catch and kill Buying
35:44
a story in order to not run it so
35:46
that it doesn't run anywhere else to protect mr.
35:48
Trump in this case Allegedly catch and kill was
35:50
not discussed at the August 2015 meeting The
35:54
defense elicited from pecker that he wanted
35:56
nothing to do with the stormy Daniels
35:58
allegations and the defense made
36:01
sure to spell out for the jurors that
36:03
the karen mcdougall deal was
36:05
reviewed by an election law jam
36:09
do any of these stand out to you
36:11
as as important bits of information
36:14
for the defense of donald trump for
36:16
the defense i would say you know and
36:19
hopefully set this up an opening statement but
36:22
you need to just kind of pound
36:24
home that we're not fighting every single
36:26
fact that moves in this case we're
36:28
not fighting whether or not i wouldn't
36:30
be fighting the relationship still matter it's
36:32
no more than the doorman which was
36:34
demonstrably false you still pay money in
36:36
nuisance suits to people that probably don't
36:38
deserve that money so again
36:40
i you know i think that it's not
36:42
that the prosecution is doing a bad job
36:44
at all they're they're kind of leading in
36:46
a protective way where they're getting undeniable fax
36:48
out there's a lot of scandal a lot
36:50
of salaciousness in your opening as the defense
36:53
hopefully pull the teeth on that some of
36:55
the federal you're gonna hear all sorts of
36:57
stuff that sounds gross that makes you disrespect
36:59
any of the players that were involved but
37:01
that's not what this trial is about and
37:03
then you could hold to that in your
37:05
cross-examination by not challenging stuff you don't need
37:07
to challenge make everything a friendly cross until
37:09
you get to kon alcush what do you
37:11
make of the fact the
37:14
fact that the that david pecker had election
37:17
law an election law attorney look
37:19
at the karen mcdougall deal and
37:21
just remind folks the karen mcdougall
37:23
deal this was uh... a playboy
37:25
playmate who alleged having a ten
37:28
to eleven month relationship with donald trump she had
37:30
a story and what happened was
37:32
that the uh... the tabloid
37:34
magnate david pecker in a m i his
37:36
company uh... hired her gave
37:38
her a hundred fifty thousand dollars
37:40
to write a column for a different magazine
37:43
in their end to empire i think it was or
37:46
health and fitness or something like that she
37:48
never wrote anything she was paid a hundred
37:50
fifty thousand dollars but they had apparently
37:52
david pecker had an election attorney look at this this
37:54
deal was going on i think
37:56
right before the two thousand six election as well
38:00
that the implication would be that there
38:02
was no actual election law violation as a result
38:04
of these types of deals. Right, so he has
38:07
a lawyer took it over, apparently the lawyer blessed
38:09
it, right, and the deal with Stormy Daniels is
38:11
structurally very similar, right, so that's sort of the
38:13
implication. I don't think it actually is that potent
38:15
of an observation. I doubt we're going to
38:17
hear from that lawyer in the course
38:20
of this trial, which would be necessary to actually
38:22
make that useful. Let's
38:24
go to our attorneys outside the room
38:26
right now. I'll
38:29
start with Bill Brennan. What's
38:33
your big takeaway from today, if
38:35
anything, or if you want to look at the week
38:37
in general, if any gloves
38:39
were laid on Mr. Trump or not? Jake,
38:43
I really don't think so. I heard
38:45
on Kush lay out a
38:47
scenario, and certainly he could be correct with
38:50
regard to actions taken in furtherance of
38:54
a political motive, but any
38:56
married man in this position is
38:58
going to be very worried about a jury of one,
39:00
and that's the person he lives with. We
39:03
had another former president who
39:05
had been accused of a
39:08
dalliance with someone
39:10
not his wife and apparently denied it,
39:12
and then had to walk that back,
39:14
and from what
39:16
I had read at the time, it was a tougher spell
39:18
to his wife than it was to the country. I
39:21
think any married man on the jury, any
39:24
married person, a female on
39:26
the jury is going to get that in. I
39:29
also heard some talk about, well, look at
39:31
this, the Billy Bush tape comes out and the
39:33
timing, and here's when Cohen's going in. I
39:37
challenge anybody to tell me a
39:39
favorable time to have that
39:41
come out if you're married and have children, and
39:44
I really think that's going to resonate
39:46
with the jurors as far as Cohen and
39:49
this banker. This
39:51
also, I think, validates the
39:53
defense of not wanting
39:55
to be embarrassed or to deal with his
39:57
wife. Cohen wouldn't even tell his wife about that.
40:00
the hundred thirty thousand dollar loan so
40:02
i really think that there's a
40:04
strong narrative that if this if
40:06
it happened uh... that
40:08
it happened because the defendant was
40:11
worried about the implications
40:13
it would have on his family as
40:15
marriage and if that is what it's
40:17
limited to in the prosecution can't tie
40:19
it up to the other crime the
40:21
cases out the window so misty maris
40:23
uh... it is uh... it
40:26
has been said by david packer who so far this
40:28
week has been the key witness
40:31
uh... that he was doing this for trump uh...
40:34
and his campaign uh...
40:36
not necessarily exclusively but he did mention
40:38
the campaign any number of times
40:41
of what what's your take on what bill just said
40:43
well i think that's exactly what the defense
40:45
is going to say bill laid it out
40:48
that number one these payments on their own
40:50
are not illegal so the prosecution will have
40:52
to point to unlawful conduct in the other
40:54
piece of that if the extent that we're
40:56
looking at a campaign finance violation if the
40:59
concept of mixed motive that there's a reason
41:01
to make the payments that are outside of
41:03
the election now the flip side of that
41:05
is exactly what we heard today the timing
41:08
the timeline is really really critically important for
41:10
the prosecution case and of course
41:12
packer's testimony that was his perception that
41:14
this was all about the election that's what
41:16
he testified well that is going to be
41:18
part of how the prosecution uh...
41:21
tries to show that the intent was
41:23
directly related to the election and not
41:25
all of these other reasons why somebody
41:27
might make a payment like that stacy
41:29
schneider your take i
41:32
think david pecker damaged donald trump
41:34
this week i think that
41:36
the manhattan district attorney's office has
41:38
a plan and that's to prove
41:40
a local new york state violation
41:43
of its election law and they're slowly setting
41:45
it up with these witnesses to go that
41:47
route i don't think it's going to be
41:50
a federal violation although the d a's office
41:52
has signaled in the beginning of
41:54
this case in april fourth of twenty twenty
41:57
three when they announced the indictment that they
41:59
were looking at Donald Trump for allegedly violating
42:01
both state and federal election law, but I
42:03
think that they're really going for the New
42:06
York state angle here. We'll see with the
42:08
rest of the witnesses. All right,
42:10
Stacey and Misty and Bill, thanks to all of
42:12
you. Have a wonderful weekend. If you're just tuning
42:14
in, the Manhattan hush money cover-up trial wrapped for
42:16
the week. Donald Trump just spoke, he repeated the
42:19
other big story of the day, saying
42:21
that he is ready to debate President
42:23
Biden whenever, wherever. President
42:26
Biden said something similar today. We're going to take a
42:28
short break and we're back in a moment. As
42:37
we've been following Trump's hush money
42:39
cover-up trial in Manhattan, another major
42:41
political storyline played out. That is
42:43
a possible presidential debate. President
42:46
Biden in an interview on the Howard
42:49
Stern show on Sirius XM said he
42:51
would be happy to debate the
42:53
presumptive Republican nominee, Donald Trump. I
42:57
don't know if you're going to debate your
42:59
opponent. I am somewhere. I don't know when.
43:01
I'm happy to debate him.
43:05
Then Donald Trump responded to
43:07
Biden's willingness just
43:10
minutes ago when he walked out of court.
43:13
But we're willing to do it. Wednesday
43:16
night, Tuesday night, Wednesday night, Thursday night,
43:18
we're Friday night on national television. We're
43:21
ready. Just tell me where. We'll do
43:23
it at the White House. I would be very comfortable
43:25
actually. I'm
43:27
back with my panel. Let's turn to
43:29
our political wise women.
43:33
Trump ready to debate Joe
43:35
Biden. Joe Biden ready to debate Donald Trump. Well,
43:38
I mean, Trump basically has been saying this
43:40
nonstop. They put a thing up at his
43:42
rallies now talking about how they say that
43:44
Biden won't debate him. using
43:48
this. Although he wouldn't debate any of
43:50
his Republican opponents during the primaries, we should note.
43:53
And, you know, to be fair, I mean, they
43:55
still feel really good about that decision. They don't
43:57
feel like it was warranted whether or not it
43:59
was for integrity purposes. and intellectual purposes, who's to
44:01
say? I will say Biden's announcement
44:04
of this did not seem like some well-planned
44:06
campaign strategy. It was kind of off the
44:08
cuff because Howard Stern asked him, are you
44:10
going to debate Donald Trump? This has been
44:12
something of discussion when you talk to Biden's
44:14
surrogates, and they had never said outright, yes,
44:16
this debate will be happening. They'd kind of
44:18
not offered a real answer. So
44:20
it is notable. I don't think anyone believes that
44:23
Biden is going to take Trump over what is
44:25
offered to debate outside the courthouse in Manhattan tonight,
44:28
especially since Donald Trump says he's going back to Florida.
44:30
But it doesn't say he was willing to have the
44:33
debate at his at a Trump rally with
44:35
tomorrow night or something. When was it? I
44:37
think he was talking about next Wednesday when he
44:39
got to two events scheduled. I mean, no one
44:42
is taking that seriously. But I will say these
44:44
organizations did reach out to the campaigns and say
44:46
they did believe a debate was important and that
44:48
one should happen. Trump's campaign has tried to get
44:50
them to move the debates earlier to add more
44:53
because they believe it's to their benefit, whether
44:55
or not they do one or more than
44:58
one, it remains to be seen. What do you think? Take Caitlin's
45:00
point about Biden just sort of put
45:02
it out there as Biden does today.
45:05
I actually think this could be a
45:07
mistake and it doesn't take wind out
45:09
of Trump's state by Biden. Yes,
45:12
because Caitlin pointed out
45:14
that at the Trump rallies, he keeps
45:17
sort of goading Biden. When are you
45:19
going to debate? Well, now Biden has
45:21
said I'll debate and Trump is going
45:23
to what is Trump do every day
45:25
he wakes up looking for a fight.
45:27
Now he has one. Where is Biden?
45:30
He said he wanted to debate me.
45:32
I'm ready. Here I am Monday, Tuesday,
45:34
Wednesday. So I think Trump
45:37
will play into this. But they
45:39
could just point to precedent, which
45:41
is that one, we've never
45:43
had a general election start that early campaign
45:45
and to the debates aren't typically until closer
45:47
to the election. I think the
45:49
earliest they've ever been in September, in the
45:52
modern era. Very interesting stuff. Before
45:54
our attorneys go and enjoy their
45:56
Friday night, I just want to
45:58
get your final. final thoughts
46:01
on this momentous week, the first week ever,
46:04
where a former president of the United States
46:06
is a criminal defendant in court. Your
46:09
thoughts on what's happened so far? Well,
46:12
look, it is quite remarkable that we're here. But
46:15
in terms of the trial itself and how sort of I'm
46:17
thinking about it, fraud trials tend to
46:19
be tedious. They tend to get tedious. And
46:21
so there's going to be more tedious testimony.
46:24
But the common metaphor that prosecutors use is talking
46:26
about sort of building their case right brick. So
46:29
we're seeing a lot of bricks being inserted
46:32
here. Now, whether it will all add up to a
46:34
conviction at the end of the day remains to be
46:36
seen. But that's a process that's going on right now.
46:39
How do you think the prosecution has done with their
46:41
bricks? I think they've done
46:43
fine, but we're not at the main event yet. Right. Michael
46:46
Cohen, you mean? Well, Michael Cohen, for sure. But
46:49
also, you know, at some point
46:51
there is going to be need to
46:53
be some presentation indicating whether
46:55
to what extent Trump knew any of this
46:57
was unlawful. Right. We
46:59
haven't heard any of that yet. Now, all the stuff I
47:01
was talking about earlier, the circumstantial evidence surrounding the Michael
47:04
Cohen's shell companies and all that, the
47:06
defense's response is going to be Cohen did that.
47:09
Right. Jim? Well, I
47:11
agree with that. I think that more and more
47:13
it's looking like the critical intent stuff they need
47:16
is going to come from one guy and one
47:18
guy only. Michael Cohen? Yeah.
47:21
There was no, you know, I thought in the abstract, maybe Hope Hicks has
47:23
something not even mentioned in opening
47:25
statements. And by now the
47:27
defense has her statements, what they call
47:29
janks material, her prior statements. So both
47:31
sides kind of know what's coming from
47:34
these witnesses and they didn't flag her
47:36
an opening statement. And I think that
47:38
was a logical flashpoint on this issue
47:40
of intent. But really, I, again, not
47:42
to fast forward to utter boredom, but
47:44
when you talk about jury instructions, this
47:47
judge can dramatically affect the verdict by
47:49
either saying the government
47:51
has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt
47:53
that this was fully intended to be
47:55
election interference, my words, or
47:57
the judge could say, if you find
47:59
that some portion of the motivation was
48:01
to affect the election. Then you have
48:04
this mixed motivation model that I think
48:06
Misty made mention of where it's partly
48:08
personal in the wife, it's also partly
48:10
political aspirations. If you
48:12
have combinations allowed to support a
48:14
conviction by the jury instruction, then
48:17
two lawyers on the jury might run with that and
48:19
12 people could be unanimous. I think that's a real
48:21
scary part for the defense to deal with. Very interesting
48:23
stuff. You guys have been so great to have this
48:25
week. Thanks so much. Hope we're gonna see you next
48:28
week. And you can join Caitlin in just
48:31
a few hours on her show, the source,
48:33
her big guest tonight, former Attorney General Bill
48:35
Barr. That's tonight at 9 Eastern
48:37
here on CNN and only here on CNN.
48:40
Much more on the legal space coming up. We also
48:42
need to bring you up to date on a dramatic
48:44
situation unfolding a tornado on the ground near Lincoln, Nebraska.
48:47
That breaking news is next. I'm
48:53
Ina Curtin. Welcome to Be My Guest, the podcast.
48:56
One of the best gifts you can
48:58
give friends is spending time together. But
49:00
what's even better than that? Cooking with
49:02
them on Be My Guest, the podcast.
49:04
New friends and old stuff on my
49:06
barn for some conversation and great cooking.
49:08
We talk about food, life,
49:11
and everything in between. Listen
49:13
to Be My Guest, the podcast with
49:16
me, Ina Garten, and join us wherever
49:18
you get your podcasts. This
49:26
is CNN Breaking News. And
49:28
we have some breaking news off the
49:30
top of this hour, a dangerous storm
49:32
situation right now in Nebraska, as tornadoes
49:34
have been confirmed on the ground, and
49:36
a powerful storm is moving toward
49:39
the city of Omaha. Let's go straight to
49:41
CNN's Chad Myers in the CNN Weather Center.
49:43
Chad, you're actually quite familiar with
49:45
this area. Tell us about the situation unfolding right
49:47
now. Yeah, this was
49:49
a violent tornado just a few minutes ago across Highway
49:52
6, also I-80, just to
49:54
the east of the city limits of
49:56
Lincoln. Now this storm has continued to
49:58
move to the north. and will
50:00
be affecting Bennington, Blair and the like. But
50:03
this was a violent tornado on the ground
50:05
that crossed over the interstate. We do know
50:07
there's damage and also there are injuries here.
50:10
We just don't know how many, but yet,
50:12
look at the size of that tornado. Let's
50:14
get to the maps here, I'll show you
50:16
what's going on. It could be a continuously
50:19
violent night all the way through the morning
50:21
hours. We will see tornadoes likely on the
50:23
ground throughout the night, all the way from
50:25
really almost Texas into Nebraska. There's a red
50:28
box here, that's the tornado watch box, which
50:30
means they're possible. These pink boxes,
50:32
which means they're happening. So for
50:34
you, Bennington, Missouri Valley, that would
50:36
be Blair right over here. There's
50:38
I-680, Omaha, but what I'm concerned
50:40
about down here, south of Sarpy
50:42
County, these are more storms here
50:44
that are violently rotating and are
50:46
working toward Omaha proper, where the
50:48
storm here missed the western suburbs
50:50
of Omaha. Almost elkhorn, really,
50:52
but this is the area that I'm
50:55
most concerned about over the next 30
50:57
minutes or so. Now for Chanuk, Kansas,
50:59
you have some storms to your west
51:01
as well, they are also rotating. Down in
51:03
Texas, it is hail and a wind event
51:05
for you. We will watch the tornadoes because
51:08
they are on the ground right now. All
51:11
right, scary stuff. Meteorologist Chad Myers, thanks so
51:13
much. The other major story this hour. Day
51:15
four of testimony in Donald Trump's criminal hush
51:18
money coverup trial has just wrapped up for
51:20
the week. What a week it has been
51:22
for the former president today in court,
51:24
the defendant watched three witnesses
51:27
testify, including his former assistant,
51:29
Rona Graff, as well as David Packer,
51:31
his purported friend and former publisher of
51:34
the National Enquirer, testifying
51:36
about the deal that Packer says he helped
51:38
broker with adult film star
51:40
and director Stormy Daniels. Packer today in
51:43
his fourth day of testimony, admitting he
51:45
would kill stories, meaning he would buy
51:47
them and then not run them,
51:50
so as to influence the 2016 election and
51:52
quote, to help a presidential candidate,
51:54
that candidate being his friend, Mr. Trump.
51:56
Prosecutors say Trump's falsification of business records
51:58
owe a $1 billion those
52:01
hush money payments to Stormy Daniels
52:03
amount to an illegal conspiracy to
52:05
subvert the election by concealing
52:07
information from voters. We'll
52:09
see if the jury goes goes along with that
52:11
theory. That is just one of
52:13
the legal dramas starring Mr. Trump this week.
52:16
Yesterday his federal election subversion case was front
52:18
and center as the US
52:20
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on his
52:22
claim that presidents are immune
52:25
from prosecution for official acts
52:27
they commit while being president. The
52:29
justices seem to be leaning toward
52:31
rejecting his claims of sweeping immunity.
52:34
Trump also took a loss yesterday when a federal
52:36
judge upheld the verdict
52:38
and award in E. Jean Carroll's
52:40
defamation case against Mr. Trump denying
52:43
his motion for a new trial altogether.
52:46
This week Mr. Trump also finds himself listed as
52:50
an unindicted co-conspirator in both
52:52
Arizona and in Michigan's 2020
52:55
election subversion investigations and indictments.
52:57
Let's discuss all of this
53:00
with Ronan Farrow contributing writer at the
53:02
New Yorker who's done extensive reporting on
53:04
David Packer and his company AMI as
53:06
well as the Karen McDougal catch
53:09
and kill deal. Ronan's
53:11
a lawyer also the author of
53:13
catch and kill lies spies and
53:15
a conspiracy to protect predators.
53:18
Ronan good to see you again my friend so
53:20
today the defense tried to expose small
53:22
inconsistencies in Packer's statements. They focused
53:24
on a key August 2015 meeting
53:27
at Trump Tower with Packer and
53:29
Trump and Cohen where Packer
53:31
said he agreed to be the eyes and
53:33
ears of the Trump campaign flagging any negative
53:35
stories about Trump to Michael Cohen. The
53:37
defense asked did you ever
53:40
specifically use the term catch and
53:42
kill in the meeting and Packer replied no I did not
53:45
but then under redirect questioning from
53:47
the prosecution Packer reiterated the
53:49
content of the 2015 meeting
53:51
saying my understanding is those stories that
53:53
come up I would speak to my Michael Cohen and tell them
53:56
these are the stories that are going to be for sale that
53:58
if we don't buy them somebody else. will and then
54:00
Michael Cohen would handle by them
54:03
or try to make sure that they don't ever get published."
54:06
So even if the term catch and
54:08
kill wasn't used, you wrote a book
54:10
called Catch and Kill. Is that not Catch and
54:12
Kill? That
54:15
is the definition of this colloquial term
54:17
that has emerged around this, Catch and
54:20
Kill, which was a term that I
54:22
and other journalists around this first started
54:24
hearing from AMI employees.
54:27
It was something of a, you know, it's called
54:29
a neologism, it entered into the discourse partly
54:32
through this. And it was a practice the
54:34
inquirer had engaged in for a long time,
54:36
this sort of stick and carrot of we'll
54:39
buy up the unflattering stories, maybe we won't
54:41
run them. Also you
54:43
know, we'll run flattering stories about you.
54:45
They had done that with Hollywood celebrities
54:48
in the past. And here they were
54:50
clearly applying it in a political context.
54:52
And it was apparent to all of
54:54
us digging through the trail of money
54:56
on this, that even if the underlying
54:59
rumors about affairs or supposed to love
55:01
children didn't matter at all and we
55:03
didn't care, what
55:05
did matter was the potential election line
55:07
implications of the transactions. As you
55:09
pointed out on the stand today, Pekker
55:12
faced Emil Bovet, one of these Trump
55:14
lawyers who on cross-examination had two objectives.
55:16
He tried to pick apart Pekker's credibility
55:18
by looking at the long history of
55:20
cooperative statements he's made to law enforcement
55:23
over the past years about this and
55:25
finding any little difference. You know, did
55:27
he initially say that Hope Hicks was
55:29
present for some of that meeting that
55:31
you mentioned or did he not tried
55:34
to impeach his memory about those things? And
55:36
then the other thing Bovet was trying to
55:38
establish was were these deals
55:40
that were also just in the interest
55:42
of the national inquirer in the usual
55:44
sense that they would have sold issues
55:46
and that was the main objective of
55:48
these transactions. Here's the thing, David
55:51
Pekker has come off extremely well for
55:53
prosecutors in this case so far. He's
55:56
been very composed. He has a
55:58
sort of a vunkular manner. this case
56:00
so far and he is repeatedly
56:02
saying the main point which is the one you
56:04
highlighted which is in the face of
56:06
all of this he's saying no this was not the
56:08
normal course of business even if
56:11
they were on the margins ways in which
56:13
it might have benefited the inquirer in the
56:15
usual there was this other objective here to
56:17
subvert the election yeah and and pecker acknowledging
56:19
that the story that he helped kill that
56:21
he paid 150 thousand dollars to kill
56:24
one of the stories you helped break Karen
56:26
McDougal's silence being bought for a hundred fifty
56:28
thousand dollars that that would have
56:30
been in in in I forget if I
56:32
don't know if it was the prosecution or
56:34
mr. pecker but tabloid gold was
56:37
the term that was used because people who read
56:39
the National Enquirer would have bought a
56:41
lot of copies of it to read the story about
56:44
Donald J Trump and 1998 playmate of
56:47
the year pecker was the first
56:49
witness on the stand for four days what
56:51
do you know having researched this so much
56:53
for your book and for the article about
56:55
Karen McDougal what do you know about David
56:57
pecker and his relationship with without Trump that
56:59
the jury did not hear well
57:04
one thing is that it was a wider
57:06
deeper relationship than is being admitted into this
57:08
case there was a safe that
57:10
contained a lot of materials about
57:13
Trump those materials moved location several
57:15
times over the course of this
57:17
becoming an electoral issue there was
57:19
a list that I was shown
57:21
by a senior ami source of
57:24
Trump's stories not all of them terribly consequential
57:26
some of them were you know his feud
57:28
with Rosie O'Donnell but some of
57:30
them were also potentially on flattering ones so this
57:33
was a deep and wide relationship and
57:35
pecker saying over and over again
57:37
now this was about
57:39
trying to help Donald Trump get
57:41
into the White House is confirmation
57:43
of something that am I lied to a
57:45
lot of reporters including me about back when
57:48
these things were first emergent also
57:50
that safe helps helps explain perhaps why
57:53
mr. Trump has not criticized
57:55
David pecker at all I
57:58
want to ask you before you go because yesterday We
58:00
saw a major court ruling completely separate from the
58:02
Trump case Also on a
58:04
subject that you've broken a lot of stories about and
58:06
you think it could ultimately matter for Trump the
58:09
New York Court of Appeals overturned Harvey
58:11
Weinstein's 2020 conviction for
58:13
sex crimes Basically the court
58:15
said that the lower court made a mistake
58:17
by allowing women to testify about allegations of
58:19
sexual assault that were Separate from
58:22
the three for which he was actually
58:24
charged in that case You were at
58:26
the forefront of investigating reporting a multitude
58:28
of allegations against Weinstein You
58:30
say this ruling could come back
58:33
to haunt Trump's judge Juan. We're
58:35
Sean in Trump's trial explain Well,
58:39
it illuminates a shared legal issue that is
58:41
at the heart of both of these cases
58:44
of course for activists and for
58:47
Survivors of Harvey Weinstein's alleged crimes
58:50
It's an anguished moment to hear that
58:52
one of his convictions was overturned on
58:55
Essentially a question of legal technicality
58:57
the way the case was built
58:59
But for legal spectators It's less
59:01
surprising because this was always a
59:03
case where prosecutors Over-extended a
59:06
bit in the context of the New York rules
59:08
of evidence on what you can let into a
59:10
case He was being charged on
59:12
three alleged assaults and they let other
59:14
women with other accounts of unrelated assaults
59:17
Come in and testify and I have a new
59:19
piece out in the New Yorker detailing what exactly
59:21
the rules are and why that always Seems like
59:24
a bit of an overextension now This
59:26
doesn't matter that much for Harvey Weinstein's
59:29
immediate future his lawyers in California where
59:31
he asked to serve a separate 16-year
59:33
sentence that's essentially going to put him
59:35
away for Much
59:37
of the rest of his life Are
59:40
saying well, well it could help us on appeal
59:42
in California, but that's a much stronger case I've
59:44
been in touch with the prosecutors in that case
59:46
and California's rules for letting
59:48
in that kind of evidence of uncharged
59:50
alleged bad acts are much
59:53
more lax and permissive So that ruling
59:55
is less in jeopardy. He's less likely
59:57
to be affected. What it does affect
59:59
is the general case law on
1:00:01
what you can let in in terms
1:00:03
of uncharged acts in New York and
1:00:05
that is interesting in the context of
1:00:07
this Trump trial because the Trump trial
1:00:10
hinges on charges about one transaction from
1:00:12
Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels but much
1:00:14
of the case prosecutors are building is
1:00:16
about the wider pattern about uncharged acts
1:00:18
namely all of these AMI's. Interesting
1:00:22
Ronan Farrow always good to see you the
1:00:24
book Catch and Kill it's a great read
1:00:26
we've covered it before on the show thanks
1:00:28
so much for being here Ronan good to
1:00:30
see you. Also today both President Biden and
1:00:32
Donald Trump out with big announcements both saying
1:00:34
they would be willing to debate each other
1:00:36
the American people do deserve a formal discussion
1:00:38
on the most important issues of our time
1:00:40
when and where that might actually happen we
1:00:42
do not know. Plus a reversal
1:00:44
from a student at Columbia University who
1:00:47
led pro-Palestinian protests he said in
1:00:49
a rant that was televised and
1:00:51
at least broadcast at least in
1:00:53
part on Instagram live he said
1:00:56
that Zionists don't deserve to live
1:00:58
as other students
1:01:00
are echoing that wild clearly
1:01:02
anti-semitic claim and more demonstrations
1:01:05
are spreading is his
1:01:07
apology such as it is too
1:01:10
little too late we'll be right back. National
1:01:15
lead protests on campuses are spreading
1:01:17
to colleges throughout the country from
1:01:19
California to Indiana from Illinois to
1:01:22
Georgia at Emory University in
1:01:24
Atlanta clashes with police turned physical in
1:01:26
some cases as 28 people
1:01:28
were arrested prompting a group
1:01:30
of Democratic, Georgia state lawmakers to condemn quote
1:01:33
the excessive force used unquote
1:01:35
negotiations continue at Columbia University to find
1:01:38
a way to resolve the conflicts and
1:01:40
remove the tents before graduation one
1:01:42
of the issues being debate in all of
1:01:44
this is how much are these protests solely
1:01:47
rooted in concern for Palestinians in
1:01:49
opposition to what the Israel Defense
1:01:52
Forces is doing in Gaza because
1:01:54
we have seen sentiments expressed
1:01:57
by some of the groups behind the protests
1:02:00
that the Hamas terrorist attacks on civilians
1:02:02
on October 7th were mere
1:02:04
quote resistance and Some
1:02:07
have said that Israel should not
1:02:09
exist Other individuals associated
1:02:11
with the protests or in the
1:02:13
protests have said wildly hateful and
1:02:15
anti-semitic things Including as CNN's
1:02:17
Miguel Marcus reports for us now one
1:02:20
of the Columbia student leaders behind
1:02:23
the protests on that campus Zionists,
1:02:28
they don't deserve to
1:02:31
live comfortably let alone
1:02:33
Zionists don't deserve to
1:02:35
live Kamani James
1:02:37
a spokesperson for the student protest
1:02:39
at Columbia University Said
1:02:42
this more than once in a
1:02:44
personal social media post in
1:02:46
January the same way. We're very
1:02:48
comfortable Accepting that
1:02:51
Nazis don't deserve to live
1:02:54
Fascist don't deserve to live racist
1:02:57
don't deserve to live Zionists They
1:03:00
shouldn't live in this world Confronted
1:03:03
by CNN about his comments
1:03:05
James unapologetic, I
1:03:07
think we need to shift the conversation
1:03:09
from people's
1:03:11
comfort to the Hundreds
1:03:14
of thousands of people who
1:03:16
have been displaced the
1:03:18
tens of thousands of people who have been
1:03:20
murdered by Israel I
1:03:22
mean how do your words help? I
1:03:24
think it's very important. How do your
1:03:26
words help? I think
1:03:29
it's very important for people to
1:03:31
understand that the conflation of Anti-zionism
1:03:34
with anti-semitism is
1:03:37
woefully incorrect and wrong again, but
1:03:39
you apologize Again,
1:03:41
as I mentioned earlier We
1:03:44
believe in the sanctity of life here
1:03:46
at this encampment Despite his
1:03:49
calls for a class of
1:03:51
people to cease existing James
1:03:53
nearly daily Expresses his belief
1:03:55
that Israel is committing
1:03:57
genocide while Israel plans to move
1:03:59
forward forward with its genocide backed
1:04:01
by the United States and other
1:04:04
Western powers. It
1:04:06
is important to remember why we are here.
1:04:09
After being confronted, James released a
1:04:11
statement saying in part, I am
1:04:13
frustrated that the words I said
1:04:15
in an Instagram live video have
1:04:17
become a distraction for the movement
1:04:19
for Palestinian liberation. I misspoke
1:04:21
in the heat of the moment for which
1:04:24
I apologize. Some Jewish students
1:04:26
at Columbia say they have been called
1:04:28
Zionists by protesters
1:04:33
just for being Jewish. Other
1:04:35
Jewish students have taken an active part
1:04:38
in the protests for what they view
1:04:40
as an overbearing Israeli response to the
1:04:42
October 7th Hamas terror attack and
1:04:45
a weak US response to
1:04:47
continued bloodshed. It's possible that
1:04:49
pro-Palestine protests might make some Jewish
1:04:51
students feel uncomfortable, but I will
1:04:53
emphasize that, you know, the
1:04:56
pro-Palestine protests here at the encampment
1:04:58
are, you know, that they have
1:05:00
fundamental values against hate and bigotry.
1:05:06
Now with regard to Mr. James, the
1:05:08
Columbia university says that they
1:05:10
will not comment on individual cases. It's
1:05:13
not clear if he will face any
1:05:16
disciplinary measures because of what he has said
1:05:18
so far, but a couple of things are
1:05:20
interesting. Typically he's out here every day. Both
1:05:23
the negotiators that are negotiating with
1:05:25
the university for the protesters here
1:05:28
have distanced themselves from Mr. James
1:05:30
and he hasn't been seen.
1:05:32
Usually he's here at two 30 for their press
1:05:34
briefing. He's usually available to the press. We've not
1:05:36
seen him at all. He
1:05:39
says he misspoke. I mean, that was
1:05:42
quite at length over and
1:05:44
over saying that Zionists, which I mean,
1:05:47
as a matter of fact, most
1:05:49
Jews and for
1:05:51
that matter, most Americans are Zionists think that
1:05:53
Israel has a right to exist. Saying
1:05:56
that they, we have no right to live.
1:05:58
That's quite a. a misspeaking
1:06:01
Miguel. There's
1:06:04
a lot of misspeaking and a lot of
1:06:07
people are very upset on both sides about
1:06:09
the term Zionist and how it has become
1:06:11
come to be used. Jake. Yeah,
1:06:13
I'm familiar with it. I remember when
1:06:15
they used to call us neo-cons. Miguel,
1:06:17
thanks so much. The Politics Lead Now
1:06:19
and Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation Online, polluting
1:06:21
the 2024 presidential race. It's
1:06:24
the subject of a brand new episode
1:06:26
of the whole story this week featuring
1:06:28
reporting done from CNN's own Donio Sullivan.
1:06:30
Here's a preview. The
1:06:34
job of the journalist is to ask
1:06:36
the question, allow the person to speak
1:06:39
and just report the facts. What
1:06:42
was spoken? Would you like for me to pull up the
1:06:44
definition of journalist? That's okay, but thank you, Julie. Okay. I
1:06:47
have a God-given right
1:06:51
to speak my own truth. But there are facts,
1:06:53
right? The
1:06:56
facts have shown that the
1:06:59
election was stolen. Whether you're
1:07:01
willing to look at that and
1:07:03
accept that and really show
1:07:05
what's going on, that's your issue,
1:07:08
not ours. We want the
1:07:10
God-given freedom that our Constitution and our
1:07:12
Bill of Rights is based on. God-given
1:07:15
constitutional rights. Yes. They're
1:07:18
two different things, right? No, so they're not. Read,
1:07:21
R-E-A-D, the
1:07:23
Constitution. Read it out loud
1:07:25
to yourself so that you hear what the
1:07:27
words of the Constitution say. God
1:07:30
isn't mentioned in the Constitution. Sir.
1:07:46
Donie's with me now. What happened after she looked at them? We
1:07:49
found out that God isn't mentioned in the
1:07:51
U.S. Constitution. And look, that gets to a
1:07:53
broader point, and we've heard a lot about
1:07:55
Christian nationalism in this country over
1:07:57
the past year. You
1:08:00
know, I've spoken to many Christian pastors over these past
1:08:02
few months and they will say a lot of people
1:08:04
a lot of Trump supporters Will think that the Christian
1:08:06
God a very specific version
1:08:08
of the Christian God is all
1:08:11
over the US Constitution and
1:08:13
there's this conflation between
1:08:15
the United States and
1:08:17
between the
1:08:19
land of the Bible And it's
1:08:22
because of that that a lot of these
1:08:24
folks who are also convinced that the election
1:08:26
was stolen They now view
1:08:29
this as a kind of biblical crusade to
1:08:31
steal it back and to save America So
1:08:34
it's misinformation on top of
1:08:37
a very perverse view of patriotism and
1:08:39
Christianity Quite a thing. So there's this
1:08:41
new cue poll finding nearly three-quarters of
1:08:43
registered voters are very concerned or somewhat
1:08:46
concerned about other countries spreading
1:08:48
false information inside
1:08:50
the US to divide Americans But
1:08:54
to be quite frank, we don't need other countries
1:08:56
to be doing it. We're doing it to ourselves,
1:08:58
right? That's what your reporting shows. Absolutely Look,
1:09:02
I think the and we know from from reporting
1:09:04
from even what Secretary Lincoln
1:09:06
said today to CNN there's concerns there
1:09:08
that Russia China Iran Everybody else is
1:09:10
gonna be trying to poke and poke
1:09:12
divides in the United States. But as
1:09:15
you say Americans were
1:09:17
perfectly capable of creating myths
1:09:20
and disinformation ourselves And
1:09:22
also just the social media landscape has changed so much
1:09:24
in the past few years What
1:09:26
we'll also talk about in this documentary
1:09:28
on Sunday is after Trump
1:09:30
got kicked off Social
1:09:32
major social media sites after January 6
1:09:36
2021 so did a lot of his supporters because
1:09:38
they were sharing Q anon or election
1:09:40
conspiracy theories and a lot
1:09:43
of those people that got kicked off
1:09:45
the major social media platforms for sharing
1:09:47
misinformation have actually gone to alternative platforms
1:09:49
that have radicalized them
1:09:52
Further so it's like parlor Telegram
1:09:55
telegram especially telegram is
1:09:57
this place where you can
1:09:59
go in Starting
1:10:01
just reading about politics and very
1:10:03
quickly descend into a world of
1:10:05
racism, anti-Semitism, hate, and God knows
1:10:07
what else. All right, Donia Sullivan,
1:10:09
I can't wait to see it.
1:10:11
It's going to be terrifying,
1:10:14
I'm sure. Misinformation into Trump faithful.
1:10:16
It's an important report. Watch
1:10:18
it on the whole story with Anderson Cooper, Sunday night at
1:10:20
8, only here on
1:10:22
CNN. An American treasure, Donia Sullivan. Thanks so
1:10:24
much for being here. As you just heard
1:10:26
last hour, Donald Trump constantly needs a fact
1:10:28
check. But don't let his main
1:10:30
2024 challenger off the hook hear what President Biden
1:10:32
repeated just today that also needs a bit of
1:10:35
a closer look. Stay with us. In
1:10:41
our politics lead today, President Biden made a
1:10:43
surprise last minute appearance on Howard Stern's show
1:10:45
on SiriusXM this morning and signaled he's not
1:10:47
only willing but happy to face off against
1:10:49
Donald Trump in a presidential debate. I
1:10:53
don't know if you're going to debate your
1:10:55
opponent. I am somewhere. I don't know why.
1:10:57
I'm happy to be here.
1:11:00
And as he exited his criminal trial just
1:11:02
a few minutes ago, Mr. Trump responded to
1:11:04
that. I've
1:11:07
invited one to debate. You can do
1:11:09
it anytime you want, including tonight. On
1:11:11
Monday, 3 hours, I invited him to
1:11:13
the courthouse. We're willing to do it.
1:11:15
Monday night, Tuesday night. We're
1:11:18
ready. Just tell me where. We'll do it at
1:11:20
the White House. That would be very comfortable, I
1:11:22
assume. Let's bring in our
1:11:24
political panel, Bakari. Wise
1:11:30
move of Mr. Biden to put this out there. President
1:11:32
Biden to put this out there. There have, you know,
1:11:34
earlier he had said something like, well, we'll see because
1:11:36
I'm not sure if he can behave himself about Trump.
1:11:38
No, I think it was a wise move because today
1:11:41
was about pushing back on narratives. I think you saw
1:11:43
some of the articles come out or some of the
1:11:45
stories come out about the Biden
1:11:47
administration not giving long-form interviews versus New
1:11:49
York Times, etc. So the sit down
1:11:51
with Howard Stern. This is about showing
1:11:53
his vitality. I think people will be
1:11:56
interested to see Donald Trump versus Joe Biden.
1:11:58
I don't know how much substance will come out. come
1:12:00
out of that debate, it may be more like watching
1:12:02
a car crash. But here we are. I mean, it'd
1:12:04
be good pay-per-view TV. By the way, Ed
1:12:07
Seals, that'll be crashing. You're
1:12:10
here because your book. I just want to make
1:12:12
sure people know about your book. The
1:12:15
moment thoughts on the race reckoning that
1:12:17
wasn't and how we can all move
1:12:19
forward now. So congratulations on that. Thank
1:12:21
you. Hope everybody out there gets a
1:12:23
copy. Good move or bad
1:12:25
move by Joe Biden. Do you think that, I mean,
1:12:29
that's a lot to debate Donald Trump. It's a lot. It
1:12:32
is a lot, but he wants to be president of
1:12:34
the United States again. So he needs to debate his
1:12:36
opponent. I think that that makes sense. And I
1:12:38
think that American people want to see it. I
1:12:40
liked this interview because it really was not about
1:12:42
policy out of the With
1:12:45
Howard Stern. With Howard Stern. It was maybe six
1:12:47
minutes of policy talk and it went through Joe
1:12:49
Biden's entire story. Now you may think someone who
1:12:51
has been in politics for as long as Joe
1:12:53
Biden doesn't need to tell his personal story again.
1:12:56
But there are still a lot of voters who
1:12:58
don't know who he is. Don't don't understand why
1:13:00
he is wanting to serve the country. And he
1:13:02
kind of laid that out about his commitment, his
1:13:04
struggles, what he's overcome and what his passions are.
1:13:06
So I thought the interview was good. I thought
1:13:09
I was interested. It was Howard Stern. I mean,
1:13:11
I don't listen to much Howard Stern and never
1:13:13
really have, but he's a
1:13:16
lot easier on his
1:13:18
guest. Now I remember how it used to be the
1:13:20
shock jock. And now he looks like
1:13:22
young to remember when he was really young. Well,
1:13:24
he was fawning over the president in this interview
1:13:26
and I was quite surprised. Well, he wants I
1:13:29
think it's fair to say that Howard Stern
1:13:31
makes no bones about the fact that he
1:13:34
thinks Joe Biden should be reelected. It was
1:13:36
a very personal interview. Harry, he talked
1:13:39
about contemplating suicide after the death of
1:13:41
his first wife and daughter in that
1:13:43
horrific car crash. He also
1:13:45
said something that caught the ear of
1:13:47
our resident fact checker, Daniel Dale. Take
1:13:50
a listen. True
1:13:53
stories. Remember when they were desegregating
1:13:55
Linfield, the neighborhood into a you
1:13:59
know, 70 homes, build a
1:14:01
one suburbia. And I told
1:14:03
you, and there was a black family moving in
1:14:05
and there was people who were down there protesting.
1:14:07
I told you not to go down there and
1:14:09
you went down. Remember that? And
1:14:11
you came, you got arrested, be standing on the porch with
1:14:13
a black family. Right. And they brought
1:14:16
you back to police. And I said, yeah, mom,
1:14:18
I remember that. So
1:14:20
this is not the first time he's made this claim.
1:14:23
CNN's Daniel Dale ran a fact check on
1:14:25
it, found there's still absolutely
1:14:27
no evidence for it. And
1:14:30
we forget that because
1:14:32
Donald Trump is who Donald Trump is, that Joe
1:14:34
Biden does a lot of this too. Yeah, he
1:14:36
does a lot of this. You know, there are
1:14:38
a lot of things that Joe Biden says, you
1:14:41
know, oh, this happened 50 years ago where my
1:14:43
uncle or my father and so on and so
1:14:45
forth. And the fact checkers go in and they
1:14:47
say, wait a minute, we can find no evidence
1:14:49
for this whatsoever. But of course, the problem is
1:14:52
if you're trying to, you know, stick Joe Biden
1:14:54
with the idea that he says some dishonest things,
1:14:56
just look across the aisle. Right. And I think
1:14:58
that's the issue that has continuously run into opponents
1:15:00
of Joe Biden, especially Donald Trump, because, you know,
1:15:03
Joe Biden may say one or two things in
1:15:05
a day, I know a week, a month, a
1:15:07
year that the fact checkers say, wait a minute,
1:15:09
hold on a second. Donald Trump says that many
1:15:11
things in a day. So it just is a
1:15:13
big issue. Doug, I mean, it
1:15:15
is true that the Joe Biden is known for these
1:15:18
apocryphal stories, shall we say cannibalism being
1:15:20
one of the latest. Oh, yeah. That
1:15:22
his uncle in World War
1:15:25
II, the plane went down and may
1:15:27
have been eaten by cannibals. And Papa
1:15:29
New Guinea is actually out there saying, what are you talking
1:15:32
about? This never happened. But again,
1:15:34
do you think cannibals are going to
1:15:36
tell their story? It's
1:15:38
time to get the other side of the story.
1:15:40
Got to hear both sides. Well, look, you know,
1:15:42
when Donald Trump talked about asshole countries, he got
1:15:45
a lot of criticism for it, I think very
1:15:47
reasonably so. Papa New Guinea is not happy about
1:15:49
this. And as we look at what's going on
1:15:51
in Asia and obviously with
1:15:53
China on the move out there, this
1:15:55
does have ramifications. It's not just Uncle
1:15:57
Joe telling another crazy story. look,
1:16:00
we know that presidents want to seek friendly
1:16:02
audiences. They also are trying to communicate in
1:16:04
new ways. That's not entirely new. But
1:16:07
this weekend is the White House Correspondents
1:16:09
weekend. And there's a time honored tradition
1:16:11
of accepting the Trump years, the president
1:16:14
saying, White House Correspondents, what you do
1:16:17
is so vital to democracy. And
1:16:19
this week is Joe Biden snubbing the White
1:16:21
House Correspondents Association, snubbing mainstream media. What do
1:16:23
you mean, not going to the dinner tomorrow?
1:16:25
No, meaning that he's been fighting with
1:16:27
the New York Times this week. And where does he go?
1:16:29
It goes to Howard Stern. So he's going to tell the
1:16:32
White House press corps how important they are, but he doesn't
1:16:34
actually talk to them. I think that's a problem. Yeah. I
1:16:36
mean, the Times doesn't go to the dinner too, though. But
1:16:38
I mean, not that it matters. It's all inside baseball stuff.
1:16:40
But I hear what you're saying. He gave an interview Howard
1:16:43
Stern, who's not exactly a member of the White House Correspondents
1:16:45
Association. Not? And you're going to be on the red
1:16:47
carpet for us? Right. I'm
1:16:49
absolutely going to be on the red carpet and be in a tuxedo.
1:16:51
It's going to be the one time during the year in which I
1:16:53
wear a tie. If you're keeping caution
1:16:55
for a passer, I might have some chocolate
1:16:57
matzah, egg matzah, regular matzah for you to
1:16:59
partake in. It should be a fun time.
1:17:01
We'll have some CNN folks that will interview
1:17:03
and hopefully perhaps a few celebrities as well.
1:17:05
So one other thing I do have to
1:17:07
bring up because when we sat down here
1:17:09
during the commercial break, this is all anybody
1:17:11
was talking about. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem
1:17:13
is getting a lot of attention after writing
1:17:15
in her upcoming book obtained by the Guardian
1:17:17
newspaper about how she killed her
1:17:19
dog after this puppy ate some chickens. A
1:17:22
CNN article describes, quote, she attempted to tame
1:17:24
the dog who she said behaved like a
1:17:26
trained assassin to try to train him with
1:17:28
an electric collar, but ultimately made the decision
1:17:30
to put her down the dog by
1:17:32
shooting her in a gravel pit after an incident
1:17:34
in which the dog attacked a local family's chickens
1:17:37
and bit them. It was not a pleasant job,
1:17:39
Noem writes, according to the Guardian, but it
1:17:41
had to be done. And after it was over,
1:17:43
I realized another unpleasant job needed
1:17:45
to be done. That's about her killing a
1:17:48
goat. In a post on Twitter, Governor
1:17:50
Noem said today, quote, we love animals, but tough decisions
1:17:52
like this happen all the time on
1:17:55
a farm. I did not grow up on a farm. Anybody here grow
1:17:57
up on a farm? But I didn't get to be a grow up
1:17:59
on a farm. and know how insane she
1:18:01
sounds. I got a letter for putting down
1:18:03
dogs. I mean, my goodness gracious, man's
1:18:05
best friend is a dog. My Twitter
1:18:07
profile picture is my childhood dog. So all
1:18:10
I ever talk about is how much I
1:18:12
love dogs. Now, I don't have really horses
1:18:14
in this bloke race. I try and watch
1:18:16
it passionately, nonpartisanly. But as a dog lover,
1:18:18
I hear that quote and I go, my
1:18:21
goodness gracious, she shouldn't be anywhere near the
1:18:23
white. I think somebody allowed that to be
1:18:25
written on the back and published. I was
1:18:27
a dog owner whose dog is poorly
1:18:30
trained. I'm offended by that. And
1:18:32
there was another way to do it. And the fact
1:18:34
that she felt like she should brag about it is
1:18:36
disgusting, but also kind of just... There's no go-go. Think
1:18:38
about me rocking criticism for transporting
1:18:41
his dog on the roof. This is miles worth
1:18:43
it. All right, we're gonna take this to the
1:18:45
bar. Thanks to all of you for
1:18:47
being here and I'll see you all out tonight,
1:18:49
I'm guessing. And Harry Enten, of course, as we
1:18:51
mentioned, will be on the red carpet
1:18:53
tomorrow in his tuxedo for CNN's coverage
1:18:55
of the White House Correspondents issue she did.
1:18:58
President Biden, comedian Colin Jost, headlined the event
1:19:00
that's tomorrow night at seven o'clock Eastern on
1:19:02
CNN and streaming on Max. And Harry, I'll
1:19:04
stop by, I promise. I don't want any
1:19:06
months ago. Up next,
1:19:09
breaking news about a former controversial governor
1:19:11
and his handling of one of the
1:19:13
biggest crises this country has seen in
1:19:15
decades. Back
1:19:19
with our health lead, four years after the
1:19:21
start of the global COVID pandemic, more information
1:19:24
continues to come to light about how some
1:19:26
states may have mishandled the crisis,
1:19:28
including in one of the hardest hit states, New
1:19:30
York. In March, 2020, then
1:19:32
Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, issued
1:19:35
an advisory that forced New
1:19:37
York nursing homes to readmit patients
1:19:39
who had been hospitalized with COVID,
1:19:41
with no requirement to test them
1:19:43
first to make sure that they weren't contagious
1:19:45
and wouldn't spread the virus among the other
1:19:48
vulnerable residents of the nursing homes. Now, Cuomo
1:19:50
has attempted to defend the decision. He claimed
1:19:52
it was following guidance from the Trump administration,
1:19:55
and so the Trump administration disputes that. Critics
1:19:57
say the policy either way resulted in... thousands
1:20:00
of needless deaths. A 2021 investigation
1:20:02
by New York Attorney General Letitia
1:20:05
James, also a Democrat, found
1:20:07
that the New York State Department of Health
1:20:09
under Cuomo, quote, undercounted nursing home COVID deaths
1:20:11
by as much as 50 percent, unquote. And
1:20:13
a 2022 audit by New York
1:20:16
State's Comptroller, also a Democrat, concluded that
1:20:18
former Governor Cuomo's Health Department, quote, failed
1:20:20
to account for approximately 4,100 lives lost
1:20:23
due to COVID-19 in New York nursing
1:20:27
homes. Just last month, the chair
1:20:29
of the select subcommittee on the coronavirus
1:20:31
pandemic in the House
1:20:33
of Representatives, Congressman Brad Winthrop,
1:20:36
subpoenaed former Governor Cuomo. And
1:20:41
Ohio Republican Congressman Brad Winthrop, the chairman of
1:20:43
the subcommittee, joins us now. Chairman Winthrop, thanks
1:20:45
for joining us. You have an announcement to
1:20:47
break right here on the lead about how
1:20:50
former Governor Cuomo has responded to your subpoena.
1:20:52
What is the news? Yeah,
1:20:54
well, I do want to say, and we'll be putting
1:20:57
something out shortly, but I'll tell you here right now
1:20:59
that Governor Cuomo will be
1:21:01
coming, appearing before our select subcommittee on
1:21:03
the pandemic on June 11th. This will
1:21:05
be a transcribed interview at 10 a.m.
1:21:09
This is nine months after we initially started
1:21:11
reaching out to the governor to ask him
1:21:13
to come in and testify in
1:21:16
front of us. We were ignored
1:21:18
on many of our requests. There
1:21:20
were delays. We subsequently had to
1:21:22
issue a subpoena. We did that
1:21:24
on March 5th, subpoenaing
1:21:26
the governor for May 24th, and
1:21:28
it was only not until then
1:21:30
that he decided that he would
1:21:33
come in for a transcribed interview.
1:21:35
Just understand the difference between a
1:21:37
subpoena order deposition and a transcribed
1:21:39
interview. They're slightly different,
1:21:41
but both of them, you
1:21:44
cannot lie or
1:21:46
it's prosecuted. So
1:21:48
just to be clear, though, this will
1:21:50
be not public, and it won't be
1:21:52
under oath, even though obviously either way,
1:21:54
lying to Congress is a crime. You've
1:21:57
got it. We'll make it public eventually. but
1:22:00
it will not initially be public. Who
1:22:03
else from the Cuomo administration
1:22:07
are you going to talk to, if anyone? Well,
1:22:10
we already confirmed that we're going
1:22:12
to hear from Governor Cuomo's
1:22:15
former secretary, Melissa DeRosa. We're going
1:22:17
to speak to about three members
1:22:19
of his task force, medical
1:22:21
advisor Dr. Adams and Dr. Howard Zucker
1:22:24
from the New York Health Department. And
1:22:26
we're looking forward to hearing their versions
1:22:28
of what took place because the
1:22:31
governor wants to say that he
1:22:33
followed CMS guidelines, but if
1:22:36
you follow the dates, he did not.
1:22:38
The guidelines came out in
1:22:41
March 13th, 12
1:22:44
days before he issued his mandate
1:22:46
for the nursing homes to accept
1:22:49
COVID-19 patients. What are you
1:22:51
trying to learn from Governor Cuomo? Well,
1:22:54
I'm trying to learn why he would do
1:22:56
something like this. As a doctor who has
1:22:58
treated infections, it goes
1:23:00
against all medical common sense to take
1:23:02
someone who is highly contagious and put
1:23:04
them in amongst the most vulnerable. The
1:23:06
idea is to quarantine and to treat
1:23:08
them. And that is not what
1:23:10
took place here. And the question is why? What
1:23:13
kind of medical advice was he being given? What
1:23:15
was the motive for wanting to do this move
1:23:18
that clearly goes against, as I say, medical
1:23:20
common sense? And I think if
1:23:22
I did something like this as a physician, I
1:23:25
would be accused of medical malpractice. Your
1:23:27
press release states, quote, evidence also suggests
1:23:29
that former Governor Cuomo engaged in a
1:23:32
cover-up to hide the true New
1:23:34
York nursing home mortality rate from
1:23:36
the public and shift political blame
1:23:38
away from his administration. I
1:23:41
know, obviously, that both the New York
1:23:43
Attorney General and the New York Comptroller,
1:23:45
both of our Democrats, have said that
1:23:47
the Cuomo administration undercounted COVID
1:23:49
deaths from the nursing home rule.
1:23:52
But is there actual evidence of
1:23:55
an alleged cover-up, because Cuomo has
1:23:57
obviously been denying any wrongdoing? Well,
1:24:00
he's going to have the opportunity to deny
1:24:03
that again and take a look at what some
1:24:05
of the other people are saying actually took place
1:24:08
and whether it was intentional to
1:24:10
play those numbers down or whether
1:24:12
it was just miscounting. So
1:24:15
those are the types of things, Jake, that we need to
1:24:17
get to the bottom of. Nursing Homes
1:24:19
Aside, a Los Angeles Times analysis finds that between
1:24:21
2020 and 2023, quote, deaths
1:24:24
by age group as reported by local
1:24:26
health departments shows New York City recorded
1:24:28
a COVID death rate 40% higher than
1:24:31
Los Angeles counties. New York
1:24:33
got hit earlier than LA, giving LA more
1:24:35
time to prepare and the difference in vaccination
1:24:37
rates and mask mandates could have also been
1:24:39
factors. Given that, how difficult
1:24:41
does it determine how various policies
1:24:44
played a role in the discrepancy between
1:24:46
the death toll in Los Angeles and
1:24:49
the death toll in New York? Yeah,
1:24:52
well, you know, you're not going
1:24:54
to see necessarily the virus literally
1:24:57
being seen jumping to a vulnerable
1:24:59
patient in a nursing home, but
1:25:02
I think those numbers will speak
1:25:04
pretty clearly for themselves. And
1:25:07
again, it goes against medical advice and
1:25:09
it goes against medical common sense. And
1:25:11
so when you see numbers and you
1:25:13
say elderly, well, elderly, where? Were they
1:25:15
elderly that were in nursing homes? Nursing
1:25:18
homes where they accepted COVID-19 patients?
1:25:21
Were they in nursing homes where
1:25:23
the nursing home was prohibited from
1:25:25
testing patients being readmitted or admitted
1:25:28
for COVID-19? So a
1:25:30
lot of those things I think will speak for
1:25:33
themselves if we get the accurate data based on
1:25:35
all the surroundings of who was
1:25:37
placed where, when, and who
1:25:40
was infected with COVID and how many
1:25:42
people actually died subsequently. Republican
1:25:44
Congressman, Dr. Brad Wenstrup. Thank you so much.
1:25:47
Thank you, Dave. Thank you, Dave. The
1:25:50
lead did reach out to the former
1:25:52
governor for comment. A spokesman for Andrew
1:25:55
Cuomo told us, quote, there is no
1:25:57
news here. We agreed to do this
1:25:59
month. ago, we should
1:26:01
note that the committee in response to
1:26:04
that statement tells us that Cuomo did
1:26:06
not actually confirm a specific date for
1:26:08
his transcribed interview until two
1:26:10
days ago, Governor Cuomo has an
1:26:13
open invitation to appear on the lead to answer
1:26:15
any of our questions whenever he has
1:26:18
the time. Fresh off his
1:26:20
meetings in China, what Secretary of State
1:26:22
Anthony Blinken told CNN about interference already
1:26:25
in the 2024 presidential election here in the
1:26:27
United States. Back
1:26:33
with our world lead Secretary of State
1:26:35
Anthony Blinken just left China after spending
1:26:37
days trying to press Chinese leaders, including
1:26:39
Xi Jinping, on contentious issues that remain
1:26:41
between the two superpowers. CNN's Kylie Atwood
1:26:43
has been traveling with Blinken. She sat
1:26:46
down with the secretary right before he
1:26:48
left. Kylie, what do you have to
1:26:50
say? Well,
1:26:53
listen, he spoke to US concerns about
1:26:55
China meddling in the US elections. Listen
1:26:57
to part of our conversation where he
1:27:00
said that China is arguably already trying
1:27:02
to interfere in US elections. He
1:27:05
reported that he told President Biden
1:27:08
that China would not interfere in
1:27:10
the upcoming presidential elections in the
1:27:12
United States. But since then, there
1:27:14
have been reports of
1:27:16
online Chinese accounts that have
1:27:18
falsely mimicked Trump supporters. Do
1:27:21
you believe that these accounts violate
1:27:23
President Xi's commitment? What
1:27:25
I can tell you is this. President
1:27:28
Biden was very clear about that
1:27:30
with President Xi, and I repeated
1:27:32
that today in my meetings. But
1:27:34
they're not violating the commitment yet, as far as you
1:27:36
can tell? Well, again, I have to look at the
1:27:39
specific reports that you're referring to, but we
1:27:41
have seen generally speaking
1:27:45
evidence of attempts to influence
1:27:50
and arguably interfere, and we want
1:27:52
to make sure that that's cut off
1:27:54
as quickly as possible. Now,
1:27:59
we also said that the U.S. is concerned
1:28:01
about China seeking to mirror Russia
1:28:03
in terms of influence campaigns in
1:28:05
the United States, trying to drive
1:28:07
up divisions in the U.S. And
1:28:09
Jake, when it comes to those
1:28:11
protests, those anti-Israel protests that are
1:28:13
really surrounding U.S. college campuses right
1:28:15
now, he said that protests are
1:28:17
a hallmark of democracy. And here's
1:28:19
how he described the specific protests
1:28:21
that we have seen unfold. We
1:28:25
heard from Israel's
1:28:27
prime minister Netanyahu this week who
1:28:30
called these protests anti-Semitic and said
1:28:32
they must stop. Do you think
1:28:34
he's right? Look, the protests
1:28:37
in and of themselves are
1:28:39
not anti-Semitic. There are
1:28:42
protesters and there
1:28:44
are also activists
1:28:46
who may have other agendas who
1:28:50
clearly are engaged in rhetoric. That
1:28:53
is, but what we're also
1:28:55
seeing is people, young
1:28:57
people, people from
1:28:59
different walks of life who do feel
1:29:02
very passionately, who have
1:29:04
very strong emotions about this anger.
1:29:08
And I understand that.
1:29:10
But we've certainly seen instances
1:29:13
where that has
1:29:15
clearly veered from a totally
1:29:18
legitimate expression of views
1:29:21
and beliefs to, in
1:29:23
some instances, yes, clear expressions of
1:29:26
anti-Semitism. Now
1:29:28
what he also said was that
1:29:30
these protesters are really something that
1:29:33
the Biden administration is paying attention
1:29:35
to. But he wasn't specific, Jake,
1:29:37
in terms of how these protesters
1:29:39
could have an impact on Biden
1:29:41
administration policy, rejecting some of these
1:29:43
protesters who have been calling for
1:29:46
the U.S. to stop sending weapons
1:29:48
to Israel. Jake. All
1:29:50
right, Carly Atwood with Secretary of State
1:29:52
Blinken in Beijing. Thanks so much. We'll
1:29:54
be right back. Virginia's
1:30:00
Republican Governor Glenn Yunkin and
1:30:03
Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. It's a packed
1:30:05
Sunday. That's Sunday morning at 9 Eastern and
1:30:07
again at noon here on CNN. You
1:30:09
can follow the show on X at the lead
1:30:11
CNN. If you ever miss an episode of the
1:30:14
lead, you can listen to the show once you
1:30:16
get your podcasts. Our coverage continues now with Wolf
1:30:18
Blitzer in the Situation Room. We'll see you soon.
1:30:25
Quality. Sleep is essential. That's why the
1:30:27
sleep number Smart Bad is designed for your
1:30:29
ever evolving sleep needs so you can choose
1:30:31
what's right for you whenever you like me.
1:30:33
to Bad: that's firmer, softer on either side,
1:30:35
and helps you sleep. But. A comfortable temperature
1:30:37
sleep number does that. Number
1:30:55
stores or sleepnumber.com.
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More