Podchaser Logo
Home
Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Released Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Michael Cohen’s Former Banker Testifies in Trump Trial

Saturday, 27th April 2024
Good episode? Give it some love!
Rate Episode

Episode Transcript

Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.

Use Ctrl + F to search

0:00

Live from the nation's capital, President Joe

0:02

Biden and comedian Colin Jost headline the

0:05

White House Correspondents Dinner. See all the

0:07

biggest stars together in one room live,

0:09

April 27th at 8pm on CNN and

0:11

streaming on Max. Quality.

0:14

Sleep is essential. That's why the sleep number

0:17

Smart Bad is designed for your ever evolving

0:19

sleep needs so you can choose what's right

0:21

for you whenever you like me. to Bad:

0:23

that's firmer, softer on either side, and helps

0:25

you sleep. But. A comfortable temperature sleep

0:27

number does that. J.D.

0:30

Power ranks Sleep Number number one in customer satisfaction

0:32

with mattresses purchased in store. And now, save 40%

0:34

on Sleep Number Limited Edition Smart Beds for a

0:36

limited time. For

0:39

J.D. Power 2023 award information,

0:41

visit jdpower.com/awards. Only at Sleep

0:44

Number stores or sleepnumber.com. This

0:49

is CNN Breaking News. Welcome

0:52

to The Lead. I'm Jake Tapper.

0:54

Right now, right this minute, a

0:56

new witness in Donald Trump's hush

0:58

money coverup trial, the prosecution just

1:00

called its third witness. His name

1:02

is Gary Farrow. Gary Farrow is

1:04

a banker who worked with Michael

1:07

Cohen at the time that the

1:09

payments were made to former Playboy

1:11

model Karen McDougall and porn

1:13

actress and director Stormy Daniels,

1:15

both of whom alleged romantic

1:18

entanglements of sorts with

1:20

Mr. Donald Trump. This comes after

1:22

Rona Graff was called as the second

1:24

witness in the trial. Rona

1:26

Graff, she's on the screen right there, she's a

1:28

longtime Trump assistant. She worked with Trump since

1:31

he hired her in 1987 after

1:33

she cold called the Trump

1:35

organization. Rona Graff testified two

1:37

contacts she maintained at the Trump

1:40

organization were for Karen

1:42

McDougall and Stormy

1:44

Daniels. Rona Graff was on the stand for less than half

1:46

an hour. Earlier today,

1:48

Trump's attorneys cross-examined David Pecker, the

1:50

former tabloid magnate and longtime friend

1:52

of Donald Trump. Let's

1:55

dive into all of this with

1:57

my panel. So, Jamie, put one

1:59

more thing. Grown a graph into context for

2:02

us a lot of people who

2:04

know Trump world were excited about

2:06

this testimony She was a vice

2:09

president for the firm. She was a

2:11

very important player in his world She

2:15

testified today and very testified very

2:17

briefly, right? So loyal Trusted

2:21

gatekeeper for those of us going

2:23

back who it wanted to interview Donald

2:26

Trump that's who you called She

2:29

was she knew everything was

2:31

going on her back when he was like a

2:33

real estate tycoon and that's it back in the

2:35

Ice age that would you know you want but?

2:40

She also her her desk was

2:42

right outside his

2:45

office she was within earshot

2:47

and She

2:49

she is the inner circle of

2:51

the inner circle she placed the

2:53

calls she made the schedule She

2:56

knew his travel arrangements Politico

2:58

had a headline on

3:00

a profile of her and it

3:02

was need to reach Trump Called

3:05

Rona, so she

3:08

knew everything that was going on And

3:10

she's someone who you know was brought in she

3:12

worked for Norma actually his other Executive assistant who

3:15

you know Trump has this thing with his executive

3:17

assistant his dad was the same way And they're

3:20

deeply attached and someone who really knows everything

3:22

does everything for him Rona was that person

3:24

and even when he went into the White

3:26

House Jake she was someone who still had

3:28

that direct line his old contacts would still

3:30

reach out to Rona to get her to

3:32

get A message to him she even trained

3:34

the former white the White House employee who

3:36

went on to set outside the Oval Office

3:38

I've been occupied that role Madeline Westerhouse and

3:40

obviously she was only on the stand briefly

3:42

But she was there to get some records

3:45

into the record and basically to say Stormy

3:47

Daniels was seen outside of Trump's office on

3:49

the 26th floor of Trump Tower and that

3:51

Kara McDougal and Stormy Daniels his contact numbers

3:53

were in his contacts interesting So let's

3:56

talk about the guy on the witness stand right

3:58

now. His name is Gary Faro He's

4:00

a former senior managing director at First for

4:02

Public Bank. He

4:04

was just asked about the issue of what

4:06

does KYC stand for. He says it means

4:08

know your customer, be sure they are who

4:10

they say they are, and email is right

4:13

now being shown to the jury. What

4:16

is the significance of Gary Farrow?

4:18

Why is he testifying? I

4:21

mean, obviously it's still underway, but it appears that he's

4:23

essentially Cohen's banker, if I sort of understand what it

4:25

was. So what would that mean, that he's just going

4:27

to testify as to the payments? Yeah,

4:29

the payments, the shell company, the mechanics of

4:31

the payments. Right. Obviously, we've

4:33

all been like focused on, largely or many of us,

4:35

been focused on sort of the more salacious elements of

4:37

this. They are more interesting. They

4:39

are more interesting, but the

4:42

crime actually has to do with all of

4:44

this somewhat banal record keeping stuff. So you know,

4:46

this is a case where I think we're

4:48

going to actually see quite a few somewhat

4:50

dull witnesses producing things

4:52

like documents, ledgers, invoices, things like that

4:54

just have to come into evidence to

4:57

complete this case. Which is not

5:00

meant as a bust on Gary Farrow. He

5:02

might be a very fascinating guy, but his

5:04

testimony itself is just about record

5:06

keeping. Well, he's got an interesting name again, too. Gary

5:08

Farrow. Again, we have the greatest

5:10

names of witnesses. Farrow, Packer, Graff,

5:13

anyway. I'm walking away from

5:15

that. But look, one thing to

5:17

just point out, you know, there's a couple

5:19

of tactics at play here. One

5:21

is if you're a prosecutor, and I used to do some multi-week

5:24

cases where you have good witnesses and bad

5:26

witnesses mixed in. You like the idea of

5:28

leaving them with something solid, unchallenged, good at

5:31

the end of the week. So

5:33

it may be that these are basically glorified

5:35

records custodians. They're basically introducing some paperwork for

5:37

the jury to look at at 4.30 before

5:39

they go home and go, oh,

5:41

there were checks or there were meetings or there

5:43

were contacts. It's also smart for the

5:45

defense at this point to keep it dull, you

5:48

know, to basically not spend any time

5:50

cross-examining people where you have no

5:52

real reason to gain anything because

5:55

they're not establishing criminality or they're

5:57

not establishing controversial points. So let

5:59

them go. continue to focus on

6:01

Cohen and wait for that moment. Well let

6:03

me just say so the email that was

6:05

just shown that now they're discussing it's

6:08

from Gary Farrow's assistant informing

6:10

him that Michael Cohen his client at the

6:13

time called on

6:15

October 11th 2016. Yeah

6:17

I'm sure we'll find out

6:19

why that matters. There are no cameras in

6:21

the courtroom. No no I know I know

6:24

I'm sure it'll be interesting but I just

6:26

want to like yes their

6:28

records folks but I don't know we should lose

6:30

sight of the significance of what GRAF actually put

6:32

into evidence. We'll come back to GRAF in a

6:34

second but Gary Farrow received another email two days

6:36

later. Please return Michael Cohen's call

6:38

when you are available today regarding

6:40

an important matter. So this is why this

6:43

matters is because he is trying to arrange the

6:45

payment to Stormy Daniels which is what all of this

6:47

is about. From Michael Cohen. From Michael Cohen maybe

6:49

it's not a salacious but this is actually what the

6:51

trial is about. And the crime itself. It is.

6:53

And Michael Cohen was contacting the bank because

6:55

they had been having this discussion about AMI

6:58

and David Pecker. AMI is the friend that owned

7:00

the National Enquirer. They had been having the discussion about

7:02

them making the payment to Stormy Daniels and essentially David

7:04

Pecker didn't want anything to do with it. He

7:06

did not want to be in

7:08

cahoots with a porn star making this payment to

7:10

her and it came to this point where Michael

7:12

Cohen was trying to reach Trump. He was under

7:14

pressure to do this and finally said I'm just

7:16

gonna do it myself and drew down a home

7:18

equity line. That's why this exchange happening right now.

7:20

And Farrow received another email

7:23

two days later. Please return Michael

7:25

Cohen's call when you are available

7:27

today regarding an important

7:29

matter. Farrow calls Cohen who

7:31

told him he wanted to open

7:34

a new LLC account. Cohen said

7:36

the account was for capital real

7:38

estate. Farrow says let me bring in

7:41

some other attorneys we have with us today to

7:43

discuss criminal defense attorney Bill Brennan,

7:45

trial attorney Misty Maris and Manhattan criminal

7:48

defense attorney Stacey Schneider. Stacey was also

7:50

a former contestant on The Apprentice and

7:52

knows the judge as well as a

7:54

district attorney Alvin Bragg as well as

7:57

Mr. Trump obviously from her time on

7:59

The Apprentice. Let's start with

8:01

you, Bill Brennan, because right now this

8:03

testimony from Gary Farrow, who

8:05

worked for Michael Cohen, it

8:07

looks like it's leading up towards

8:10

evidence of this LLC corporation,

8:13

which some might call a shell

8:16

corporation, to hide the payment that

8:18

he made to Stormy Daniels on

8:20

Trump's behest. That is the allegation

8:22

anyway, Mr. Brennan. Hello, Jake. Hello,

8:26

Jake. And I agree with the former prosecutors

8:28

that you may want to end

8:31

the week on, especially I think

8:33

they're not in session Monday, if

8:35

I'm correct about that. That's right.

8:37

Three-day weekend ended on innocuous testimony,

8:39

especially following up the 34-year-old, a

8:42

34-year employee, the

8:45

administrative assistant, who apparently spoke in

8:47

glowing terms of the defendant, said

8:50

he was respectful, he was wonderful to work for.

8:52

I don't think you want the jury, if you're

8:54

the prosecutor, if I'm prosecuting this case, left

8:57

with that to mull over for three days.

8:59

Plus, you need this type of boilerplate

9:03

innocuous testimony to corroborate

9:06

the later allegations

9:09

of Cohen and the papers that will

9:11

go in. So it's not going to

9:13

always be as salacious as Pekka was,

9:15

and you have to fill in with

9:17

these fill-in-the-blanks witnesses.

9:21

Stacey, tell us about Rona Graff. Do

9:24

you know her at all? Have you encountered her at

9:26

all? What is your experience

9:28

with her? She obviously was Trump's longtime

9:30

assistant, who testified for about half an

9:32

hour earlier today. Yes. Rona

9:35

is the loveliest woman on the planet when I

9:37

was on the show. We

9:40

wanted to stay in touch with Donald

9:42

Trump after the show. The person we

9:44

were told to contact is Rona. She

9:46

was indeed his gatekeeper. She

9:49

had an amazing relationship with Donald Trump.

9:51

I always wondered how she worked for

9:53

such a difficult boss. She

9:55

was always pleasant. And

9:58

I think this is very helpful. after

10:01

David Pekker's testimony, which was

10:04

really damaging for Donald Trump about

10:06

all this alleged nefarious conduct, to

10:08

have somebody soften him like Rona,

10:10

who still, you know, who's cared

10:12

about him all these years. I

10:14

understood I wasn't in the courtroom, but after

10:17

she got up and left to leave the

10:19

testimony, I think Donald Trump stood

10:21

up and touched her hand,

10:23

and that's a big difference from what his

10:26

behavior during jury selection, when the jurors were

10:28

entering the room he didn't even stand up

10:30

for them, but he stood up for Rona

10:32

today. So, Missy Maris, let me tell you

10:34

some of the stuff going on in the courtroom

10:36

right now, on

10:39

October 13th, 2016, email,

10:41

and again the significance of October 2016, A,

10:44

right before the presidential election, B, this

10:47

is during the hotbed of activity about

10:49

making sure that Stormy Daniels' story or

10:52

allegation does not get out there. On

10:55

October 13th email, Michael

10:57

Cohen, need account, open

10:59

for Michael Cohen, this is from Gary

11:01

Farrow, need account open for Michael Cohen,

11:03

immediately he wants no address on the

11:06

checks, he also notes

11:08

that an LLC not having an address

11:10

is not unusual, Farrow says

11:12

that Cohen called to set up

11:14

an account for resolution consultants, LLC.

11:17

I love the fact

11:19

that in any, any time there's any

11:22

story about allegations of misdeeds, the LLC

11:24

always has the most boring innocuous name,

11:26

and that's one for the history books,

11:28

resolution consultants LLC, I'm already falling asleep,

11:32

but obviously it was anything

11:34

but boring what was going on, Misty. Right,

11:36

certainly seeking a resolution, right, so there's

11:39

a couple of really important points here.

11:41

Number one, Jake, you nailed it, the

11:43

timing, remember this is all part of

11:45

the prosecution's narrative that this is right

11:47

around the time the Access Hollywood tape

11:50

has become public, Trump team is in

11:52

panic mode to get rid of this

11:54

Stormy Daniel story, so that's all going

11:56

to speak to some of the elements

11:59

that tie this payment directly to

12:01

the election. Now the other piece

12:03

is, every single document and communication

12:05

and transaction relating to this payment

12:08

is obviously a key and critical

12:10

part of the case. And

12:13

to have these shell companies, this

12:15

is all speaking to that idea

12:17

of a conspiracy trying to mask

12:19

these payments as something that they're

12:21

not. And remember, that is a

12:23

fundamental part of the prosecution's case

12:26

as far as this all being

12:28

unlawful conduct because the payments themselves

12:30

aren't unlawful. It's that were they

12:32

properly reported? Were they related to

12:34

the campaign? Were they related to

12:36

the election? So all of this

12:39

testimony, while foundational, authenticating documents, really,

12:41

really important to the merits of the prosecution's

12:43

case. Let me call on my favorite, my

12:46

fellow, rather, Philadelphia, Mr.

12:48

Brennan, and permit

12:50

me a moment of geographical snobbery

12:52

because Delaware is being raised. The

12:55

jury is seeing pages of documents that

12:57

show resolution consultants LLC was created by

12:59

Michael Cohen as a Delaware entity.

13:02

We like to make fun of

13:04

New Jersey and Philadelphia. And Bill,

13:06

maybe you can explain why Delaware

13:08

is always where these shady corporations

13:10

are headquartered. I

13:13

can, Jake, because Delaware

13:15

many years ago crafted

13:18

laws of incorporation were very favorable

13:22

for those who wish to incorporate. So that's why

13:24

we see, I think, Per Capita, it's

13:26

the out of the 50 states. It's the

13:28

number one. But I'd just like

13:31

to respond to a couple of comments that I heard. Probably

13:34

just the DNA that I have being

13:36

a defense lawyer. You know, you

13:38

have to remember that the defense here

13:40

is likely to be, and I think

13:42

we've seen a preview, is that payments,

13:45

if they were made, and if they

13:47

were made to these individuals, Ms. Clifford

13:49

and Ms. McDougal, they were paid to

13:52

avoid a very embarrassing and shameful

13:55

scenario that the defendant

13:57

would encounter with his wife and family. and

14:00

you know that that sells the people and

14:02

i think that when you

14:04

and look at what i was in court today you

14:06

know i just know what i've read what i've heard

14:08

from from you guys but uh... when

14:11

you think about this uh... prosecution

14:13

they have to get it to the other

14:15

crime to make the felony that they have

14:18

to show that if these things

14:20

were done they want to avoid uh...

14:22

personal problems they were to affect either

14:25

campaign finance laws or the election thought

14:28

i'd read or heard that mister pecker

14:31

stumbled into some type of meeting in

14:33

the way that were director kome and

14:35

secretary pompe over there and uh...

14:37

the prosecution seems to be saying we were in the

14:40

meeting with too big officials i mean that doesn't make

14:42

him a code of fear that makes him far as

14:44

gone i mean if you know the

14:46

guys tumblr animal general meeting that's proof of

14:48

nothing so i don't know

14:51

that peckers tech testimony with that

14:53

damaging so far i'd suspect

14:55

will fill in the gaps are at that

14:57

the bill the mooam with colin and i

14:59

suspect it will be a much more aggressive

15:01

line of course examination with them so

15:04

there is jurors are being shown emails

15:06

right now between colin and ferro setting

15:09

up a bank account for resolution consultants

15:11

l l c everyone stick

15:13

with me were close to wrapping for

15:15

the week in the manhattan hush money cover-up route even

15:18

here as we watch our prosecutors try to finish out

15:20

of the court adjourned for the weekend three-day weekend for

15:22

the jury we're back in a moment this

15:27

podcast is supported by sleep number quality

15:30

sleep is essential that's why the sleep number

15:32

smart bed is designed for your ever-evolving sleep

15:35

needs so you can choose what's right for

15:37

each of you whenever you like need a

15:39

bed that's firmer or softer on either side

15:41

helps you sleep at a comfortable temperature quiet

15:43

their snores sleep number does that only

15:46

sleep number smart beds let you each

15:48

choose your ideal comfort and support your

15:50

sleep number setting sleep number smart

15:53

beds learn how you sleep and provide

15:55

personalized insights to help you sleep better

15:57

all sleep number smart beds feature cooling

15:59

pressure-relieving comfort layers for soothing sleep throughout

16:01

the night. Temperature balancing bedding is

16:03

designed to move heat and moisture away when you're

16:06

hot. When you're cool, they hold their

16:08

energy to help warm you. Sleep Better

16:10

Together Jd Power ranked Sleep number number

16:12

one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased

16:14

and store and now see forty percent

16:17

on sleep number. Limited edition smart bed.

16:19

For a limited time for

16:21

Jdpower Twenty Twenty Three Award

16:23

information, visit jdpower.com/awards. I'm

16:29

Dr. Sanjay Gupta, CNN's chief medical

16:31

correspondent. This week on Chasing

16:33

Life, I'm sorry that the Great Barrier

16:36

Reef is no longer great, that we

16:38

value Amazon much more than the Amazon,

16:40

and that the waterfront neighborhood where you

16:42

were growing up could be condemned by

16:44

rising seas before you're old enough to

16:46

apply for a mortgage. That's my friend

16:48

Bill Weir, CNN's chief climate correspondent. He's

16:50

optimistic about the planet and he's optimistic

16:52

about our ability to take care of

16:54

it. Listen to Chasing Life

16:56

wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome

17:01

back to CNN's coverage of the

17:03

Manhattan hush bunny cover of trial.

17:06

We are still here in studio and the jury

17:08

is still listening to testimony. Cohen,

17:10

according to the paperwork being presented to

17:12

the jury about the LLC,

17:15

the corporation being set up

17:17

by Michael Cohen in order

17:19

to make payments to Stormy

17:21

Daniels, allegedly at Donald

17:23

Trump's behest, per the

17:25

paperwork Cohen described the entity. This is

17:28

resolution, what's it called? Resolution

17:30

consulting LLC or something like that? Consultants,

17:32

yeah. Consultants LLC. Describe the entity's

17:35

function to be management consultant, including

17:38

HR and marketing. Cohen was

17:40

the only authorized signatory for the account.

17:42

Now you were saying that this

17:45

may sound very boring and bookkeeper-y,

17:47

but actually it's not. It's

17:49

actually important. So let's talk

17:51

about why the prosecutors would be introducing

17:53

all this. Obviously it tells part of the story, but

17:56

part of what they need to prove is

17:59

that there was some... knowledge or awareness that

18:01

there would be legal implications concerning the way

18:03

that this payment was booked. One

18:05

of the pieces of circumstantial evidence that you

18:08

can produce as a prosecutor to help

18:11

shore up testimony like this is evidence

18:13

that you are doing something very sneaky,

18:15

you're concealing things like management consulting. There

18:17

was no management consulting going on, right?

18:19

So he was being consulted to manage

18:21

Stormy Daniels. Correct, right. So all

18:24

of this has an air of impropriety about it, right? It

18:26

has an air of impropriety about it. Well,

18:29

as you said, Delaware. Just joking. Right.

18:31

And then on, I just want to

18:33

go back to Ronograph too. It

18:36

was short, I guess she said she liked

18:38

him, whatever. But this is the gatekeeper who

18:40

worked for Donald Trump from 1987 for

18:43

decades. Cohen, by the

18:45

way, checked no on the form when asked

18:47

if the entity was associated with political fundraising

18:49

or a political action committee, unquote. Is that

18:51

significant? Yeah, I mean, it's a lie. Because

18:54

it was associated with... I mean, it's

18:56

definitely associated with political fundraising and some sort of

18:58

PAC. There was an ongoing campaign. Whether, I mean,

19:00

sure, there's some lawyerly way of trying to defend

19:02

that language, but the jury's not going to see

19:04

it that way. But make

19:06

your point about Graff. Yeah, Ronograph. So what is

19:09

she put into evidence? She put in evidence that

19:11

in the Trump organization records,

19:13

Ronograph, excuse me, Stormy Daniels contact

19:15

information was in there. Okay. The

19:17

prosecutors are slowly trying to establish

19:19

that this affair actually happened. With

19:22

Stormy Daniels. Correct. And that... Whatever

19:25

it was. The event. Whatever. Wasn't

19:27

really an affair. Whatever. The interaction. Yes. The

19:30

jury won't have to take Stormy Daniels word for it, right? Because

19:32

Trump has tried to say, oh, she's a liar. She's making it

19:34

all up to sell books and money. But why would he have

19:36

her contact info in her... But

19:39

by the way, this account, Farrah says the

19:41

bank did all of our work to establish Cohen's account,

19:44

but, quote, a deposit was never made in the

19:46

account, so the account never went live. So

19:48

it confirmed the account was not open. So why

19:50

does that matter? So this is a

19:53

debt account. It looks like a lot

19:55

of machinations that are designed to just

19:57

conceal this from scrutiny. Okay. what

20:00

Michael Cohen was doing. He's actually said

20:02

this publicly, that he wanted to not only

20:04

hide this from scrutiny, but also hide it

20:06

from his wife. He later said that. He

20:09

hid it from his own wife or from? From Michael Cohen's wife. So

20:11

it wasn't just easy for Michael Cohen to go and get $130,000.

20:15

He's talked about the immense pressure he was under,

20:17

and he only went to do it because he

20:19

essentially faced no other option to get this money.

20:21

And it felt like they needed to pay for

20:23

McDaniel's and do so quickly because she and her

20:25

attorney felt like they were dragging it out past

20:27

the election. And then once they hit the election,

20:29

they'd never get the money. Because Michael Cohen didn't

20:31

have millions of dollars in the bank. He had to

20:33

draw down a home equity line. Let

20:36

me go, I'll come back in one sec, but let me go out

20:38

to Paula Reed, who's outside the courthouse right now

20:40

with all the latest. Paula? Yeah,

20:44

Jake, I was just thinking about the gag

20:47

order and creative ways that Trump has found

20:49

a way around it because we do expect

20:51

him to speak after court, really, possibly in

20:54

a matter of minutes. We're always currently subject

20:56

to an expanded gag order where he can't,

20:58

as most defendants cannot, attack witnesses, attack members

21:00

of the jury. And it's been expanded to

21:03

include prosecutors and family members of the judge.

21:05

Now, I'm also monitoring the side stream while

21:07

I'm talking to you. They're still talking about

21:10

setting up that LLC. I agree with you,

21:12

Jake, not the most exciting thing we've seen

21:14

throughout the trial. But Trump has tried

21:16

to find ways of working around this

21:18

gag order because he has, according to

21:21

prosecutors, just blatantly violated it multiple times,

21:23

particularly going after Cohen, is trying some

21:25

work arounds like quoting other people,

21:27

including a Fox News host who raised questions

21:29

about the jury. He's also come out, we've

21:31

seen him a few times at the end

21:33

of court with a stack of articles and

21:36

quoted attacks on people he's not supposed to

21:38

directly attack. Now, it was clear from the

21:40

hearing earlier this week on the gag order

21:42

that that is probably going to be a

21:44

violation. So something we saw this morning for

21:46

the first time was him pointing to his

21:48

allies on the Hill, GOP allies, who are

21:50

now making many of these arguments for him.

21:52

Now, again, I'm looking down at the side

21:55

stream. Mr. Farro is just talking about the

21:57

urgency that Michael Cohen had while he was setting

21:59

up this LLC. But it's going

22:01

to be really interesting to watch as Trump

22:03

comes out of court if he continues this

22:05

tactic because he cannot directly attack people like,

22:07

for example, Matthew Colangelo, one of the prosecutors

22:10

here, who formerly worked at the Biden Justice

22:12

Department. It appears that now instead he's having

22:14

folks on the Hill do that and that

22:16

he and his allies will point to their

22:18

reports or their remarks. Now, I'm also curious

22:20

to see prosecutors' reaction to this. So I

22:22

definitely want to watch for in a couple

22:25

of minutes when Trump addresses the press. OK,

22:28

every time Michael Cohen spoke to me,

22:30

he gave a sense of urgency. And

22:32

this was one of those times testimony

22:34

from Greg Farrow, who was the banker

22:37

for Michael Cohen. And we are

22:39

hearing information about the

22:42

accounts that Michael Cohen set up

22:44

to allegedly pay Stormy Daniels, allegedly

22:46

at the behest of Donald Trump.

22:48

Farrow confirms that the new LLC

22:50

that Cohen wanted to open was Essential

22:53

Consultants LLC as opposed

22:55

to Resolution Consultants LLC.

22:58

Jim. Well, I shouldn't end on

23:00

personal motivation only LLC. That would

23:02

have been helpful. But look, I think there's a

23:04

couple of things that are interesting here. If I'm

23:06

the prosecution, I've got Farrow on the stand. I'm

23:08

going to do what I can to make him

23:10

go to the buzzer today. Do not leave time

23:12

for cross examination because if there is cross, they're

23:15

going to leave this jury with the weekend. It'll

23:17

be a friendly cross, frankly. It's not going to

23:19

be some big hostile Perry Mason moment. But you're

23:21

going to get him to concede Cohen being dishonest,

23:23

Cohen being in charge, Cohen committing misdeeds. It's

23:25

the first substantive moment of being able to

23:28

say this guy Cohen is the weasel at

23:30

the heart of everything. And if

23:32

you leave the jury with that for three days, it's

23:34

a great moment for the defense. So it'll be interesting

23:36

to see if they kind of start asking questions like

23:38

how do you like the weather in New York just

23:41

to get to five o'clock? What's your take on this?

23:43

No, I think that's astute inaccurate. I

23:45

would just say that the phrase that I was

23:47

searching for a little bit earlier concerning all these

23:49

machinations and the secrecy and the misrepresentations, it reflects

23:52

consciousness of wrongdoing. Right. But

23:54

Michael Cohen knew what he was doing was wrong. Because you

23:56

don't go through all of these efforts unless you're doing something

23:58

wrong. You feel bad about it. And I agree

24:00

that the defense is

24:03

going to be that this was all Michael Cohen's doing.

24:05

But can I say I see it completely differently

24:07

than you do, which is that it's Michael Cohen

24:09

out for his own good doing what he needs

24:11

to do. What I'm seeing these

24:13

dates and that Michael Cohen is urgently trying to

24:15

get in touch with this banker, they

24:17

are trying to paint a picture of Michael

24:19

Cohen is stressed. Michael Cohen is under pressure.

24:21

He has someone who he has in mind

24:24

as he is trying to open this count and desperately

24:26

get money that he doesn't really have access to and

24:28

that we already know he's hiding from his wife at

24:30

the time and concealing it. I think they're trying to

24:32

paint a different picture that he is actually under pressure

24:34

and he is stressed. But they know because October

24:37

2016 right before the election, they don't

24:39

want Stormy's story coming out. It's

24:41

October 26 when he calls back. I mean, we are

24:43

truly a week away from the election and they're saying

24:45

they're basically trying to frame Michael Cohen as someone who

24:47

is stressed. I'm not disagreeing with the image

24:49

they're trying to create. I'm saying how's that going to

24:51

play out? Do you think Michael Cohen is going to

24:54

come off as poor overworked Bob Cratchit from the Christmas

24:56

Carol with Scrooge leaning on him? Or is he going

24:58

to come off as a first class purger

25:00

and liar and disbarred lawyer? He

25:03

is going to come across also as

25:05

someone who used to be very loyal

25:07

to Donald Trump and did

25:09

his bidding. And that's what

25:11

this feels like. We're getting closer and

25:13

closer to the election. Resolution

25:16

went to essential. Essential Consultants

25:19

LLC. He's not setting this up

25:21

because he has a problem with

25:23

Stormy Daniels. He's setting this up

25:25

because Donald Trump has a problem

25:28

with Stormy Daniels and they don't want it

25:30

to come out before the election in

25:32

the wake of Access Hollywood. Right. Donald

25:35

Trump is fighting for his political life after the

25:37

Access Hollywood tape dropped a few weeks before just

25:39

to put everybody in the context of October 2016.

25:44

Along comes Stormy Daniels who is alleging

25:46

she had a sexual encounter with Donald

25:48

Trump. He does not want that information

25:50

to be known by voters in

25:52

October 2016 with the election coming

25:55

up. That's the story that

25:58

prosecutors are presenting. Michael

26:00

Cohen, according to the prosecution, set

26:03

up these accounts to pay

26:05

Stormy Daniels to hide the payments not

26:08

only from

26:10

Johnny Law but from his

26:12

wife, according to Michael Cohen.

26:14

Under business narrative for the

26:16

second LLC that Michael

26:18

Cohen was setting up, this one Essential

26:20

Consulting LLC, it states,

26:23

Cohen was opening the account for a

26:25

real estate consulting company to collect fees

26:27

for consulting regarding real estate. The prosecutor,

26:30

Mann Gold, she says she's at

26:32

a natural stopping point for the day.

26:34

It's 4.27 p.m. They said 4.30

26:37

would be the time that they would end

26:39

for the weekend. Judge Rashawn says, we will

26:41

call it a week and is giving the

26:43

jury instructions. This is exactly, Jim Trustee, what

26:45

you said you would do if you were

26:47

the prosecutor, establish some of these little facts.

26:49

Don't let the defense have a moment to

26:51

go at them. Yeah, I mean,

26:53

and look, there's nothing sinister about that. There's an

26:55

element of theater to trial. I think there'd be.

26:58

North Carolina 4.4 corner defense, right? It's

27:01

not 4 to 2 at halftime. Right,

27:04

right. But look, this is

27:06

essential. My point is not

27:08

that it's not important evidence. They're looking for

27:11

stuff that's not controversial. They don't want to

27:13

leave with their chin and have these moments

27:15

of really getting sidetracked long before Cohen gets

27:17

on the stand. And if you're the defense,

27:19

the fight is not whether or not there

27:21

was a relationship with Stormy. It's

27:24

not whether or not there was an NDA.

27:26

I mean, that's really not it. Ultimately, what

27:28

you're focusing on is Cohen and you're looking

27:30

at the ledger and you're saying, is the

27:32

difference between a crime and a not crime

27:34

that you didn't say for NDA after legal

27:37

services? That's a really thin divide between criminal

27:39

and non-criminal. And that's where jury instructions are

27:41

going to be huge way down the road,

27:43

but that's also where closing arguments are going

27:45

to go, I think. So, the Trump inside

27:47

the courtroom just hit his attorney

27:50

Todd Blanche on the arm and leaned over

27:52

to tell him something again, color that

27:54

we're not seeing because there

27:56

are no cameras in the courtroom in New York, which

27:58

many people, many legal experts, have. have disagreed

28:00

with. We are also waiting for Donald Trump

28:02

to come outside of the courtroom and speak

28:04

to the cameras you see the

28:07

place there that he will deliver the message. Yeah

28:10

I just wanted to say that you

28:12

know I think whether or not the relationship

28:14

with Stormy Daniels occurred I mean we all

28:16

take it for granted but in a trial

28:18

setting actually is a material fact because Trump's

28:21

position including I think the position his lawyer

28:23

took an opening in the opening statement is

28:25

that this interaction didn't occur. Well they say

28:27

it never happened. Correct and so every lie

28:30

that the prosecution can establish that

28:33

the defense is putting forth as part of

28:35

their defense helps them. Interesting

28:38

and but we know that I mean there are

28:40

pictures of Donald Trump with Stormy Daniels he he

28:42

doesn't deny knowing her right and she says that

28:44

she tried to get a job on celebrity

28:47

apprentice the issue is whether or not they

28:49

had any sort of sexual interlude so I'm

28:51

not sure and she's inconsistent on that too

28:53

they've got her on record saying it didn't

28:55

happen. Because she signed that NDA to begin

28:58

with Judge Marchand reminding jurors that the court

29:00

is dark on Monday and is going to

29:02

return Tuesday at 9 30 a.m. Eastern jurors

29:04

are exiting the courtroom which means that we

29:06

expect the defendant himself will exit the

29:08

courtroom as well but what

29:11

have they established so far factually if

29:14

anything that establishes that

29:16

Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump did have

29:19

a sexual encounter I don't think anything

29:21

as of now nothing. There are a lot of

29:24

people in Donald Trump's contacts you're

29:26

probably in his contacts that wrote

29:29

I'm probably in them I mean there are a lot

29:31

of people who are in the phone book that

29:34

said what's the

29:36

motivation for paying for all

29:38

of this money one

29:40

of the interesting things about David

29:42

Pecker's testimony about here

29:45

comes the defendant himself watching walking up to

29:47

the to the cameras it

29:50

is Friday afternoon 4 30

29:52

p.m. let's listen in city

30:00

limits, goodness.

30:03

This is only heightened indictment.

30:06

It's in order to try and win an

30:09

election, political opponent, and nothing

30:11

like this has ever happened. Eight days. As

30:14

you know, the economy is falling apart now.

30:16

Now you're seeing it very little growth. We're

30:18

killing it worse. Oil prices are

30:20

going up. And you have the

30:22

college campuses all over closed down. Our country

30:24

is going to hell. And

30:26

we sit here day after day after day, which

30:29

is their plan. They think they

30:31

might be able to kick out an election, but

30:33

I doubt it because the vote numbers are very good

30:35

for us. I just want

30:37

to say that I've invited Mike to debate.

30:39

You can do it anytime you

30:42

want, including the next meeting. Here we

30:44

are. I invited him to the court

30:46

yesterday. He has his tight up date

30:48

with his safety station. This is all

30:50

being done through Washington. It's

30:52

all well-coordinated attack. I want

30:55

to believe in a felony. So

30:58

I'm here. I'm ready winning

31:00

in April. And if you

31:02

want, I'll do it on Lending Night, Tuesday night,

31:04

or Wednesday night. We'll be in

31:07

Michigan, stating that he's destroyed because of the

31:09

auto industry. We're not going to have any

31:11

jobs left in Michigan. No

31:13

auto jobs left in Michigan. No more going

31:15

over to China and other places because we

31:17

think it is easy win day to

31:19

make your vehicle mandated. Well,

31:22

we're willing to do it. Lending

31:24

Night, Tuesday night, Wednesday night, Thursday

31:26

night, or Friday night on national television.

31:28

We're ready. Just tell me where. We'll

31:31

do it at the White House. It'll be very comfortable,

31:33

actually. But if you tell

31:35

me where, we're ready. He said yesterday not showing

31:37

up now. We heard nothing. But

31:40

he said that all I've learned is a very, very important thing.

31:42

I don't think he'll be there. Maybe he won't.

31:45

Maybe. Well, I'm not sure he has a choice. But

31:48

that's the story. So here we are.

31:50

We're ready, willing, and able. And

31:52

we don't see him. And I don't think he'll be here.

31:55

But maybe next week he'll do it. I doubt

31:57

it. But maybe he'll sort of change. and

32:00

everybody for being legal is a new

32:02

receptor through this like everybody else. And

32:05

anything is done. This is a case that

32:08

should have never been brought. Every

32:10

legal scholar, every legal

32:13

expert, Andy McDonoughton. Jonathan,

32:17

Andy, every single one, Jonathan Drennel

32:19

came out with a scathing report

32:21

on this trial today. Andy

32:24

McDonoughton scathing report. Martin

32:26

Drennel can't believe this is happening in

32:28

our country. This is the case here.

32:31

This is the case whatsoever. It's at the

32:33

schools. We have a conflicted judge

32:35

and it shouldn't be happening. Not in this country.

32:37

Thank you very much. Do you think he's

32:40

in this case? He's

32:42

wicked so far. All

32:46

right. Donald Trump, the 45th president of

32:49

the United States and the defendant in

32:51

this case, talking

32:53

after a full week of court. Let's

32:56

bring in CNN's Daniel Dale, our fact checker,

32:59

who's looking into everything we just heard from the

33:01

former former president, most of which was

33:04

criticizing the trial and

33:07

telling the world that he's ready to

33:09

debate President Biden whenever, wherever

33:11

it can happen. Daniel. Fair

33:15

enough. He said something that we fact checked,

33:17

I think, five times in the last couple of weeks. He

33:19

said this is a Biden indictment.

33:22

It's a well coordinated attack coming

33:24

out of Washington, completely baseless, zero

33:26

evidence whatsoever. This is an

33:28

indictment approved by a grand jury

33:30

of New York citizens. There

33:32

is no basis for any claim that President Biden had

33:34

a personal role in it. The

33:37

prosecutor behind it is Manhattan district attorney Alvin

33:39

Bragg, who's a locally elected official, does not

33:41

report to the federal government. Former

33:44

President Trump has repeatedly said that a former

33:46

DOJ official went over to work for Bragg.

33:48

That's Matthew Colangelo, who you've been talking about.

33:51

Zero evidence that President Biden had any

33:53

role in that personal employment decision. Colangelo

33:55

and Bragg were former colleagues in the

33:57

state attorney general's office. I

34:00

think it's also worth noting Jake that that when

34:02

former president Trump has every legal expert thinks this

34:05

case is a shame And so on the people

34:07

he named today. He named Mark

34:09

Levin who yes talks about the law

34:12

He's also a right-wing radio host who's

34:14

a frequent defender of Donald Trump Andy

34:17

McCarthy Sometimes criticizes Trump but is also

34:19

a conservative commentator Jonathan Turley a professor

34:21

who defended Trump in the impeachment context

34:23

and other things so yes They're even

34:26

liberal professors anti-Trump professors and so on

34:28

who have questioned this case But

34:30

those names are the regular the usual

34:32

suspects defending Donald Trump and I don't know he

34:34

talked about mission Michigan being destroyed No more auto

34:37

jobs. I think some of that was a prediction,

34:39

but it's worth noting There are more auto manufacturing

34:41

jobs today more people employed in Michigan in that

34:43

industry today than there were when Donald Trump left

34:45

office alright, Daniel Dale with just a

34:49

a combo platter of fact checks from

34:52

the feast that mr. Trump just Served

34:55

up. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Let's

34:57

talk more about the case Because

34:59

it is a fairly significant case just a step

35:01

back for one sec now that the trial is

35:03

over for the week I want I want to

35:06

talk about some of the takeaways from

35:09

the cross examination of David pecker

35:12

by Emile bovet who is

35:17

It was an interesting interesting Q&A

35:22

in this back and forth with Emile bovet

35:25

who is a defense attorney for mr. Trump Pekker

35:28

acknowledged that negative press for

35:30

Trump's foes was generally good for business

35:33

Pekker said that if the false doorman allegations

35:35

had been true. He would have run the

35:37

story after the election Bob

35:40

a elicited from pecker that catch and

35:42

kill the the term catch and kill Buying

35:44

a story in order to not run it so

35:46

that it doesn't run anywhere else to protect mr.

35:48

Trump in this case Allegedly catch and kill was

35:50

not discussed at the August 2015 meeting The

35:54

defense elicited from pecker that he wanted

35:56

nothing to do with the stormy Daniels

35:58

allegations and the defense made

36:01

sure to spell out for the jurors that

36:03

the karen mcdougall deal was

36:05

reviewed by an election law jam

36:09

do any of these stand out to you

36:11

as as important bits of information

36:14

for the defense of donald trump for

36:16

the defense i would say you know and

36:19

hopefully set this up an opening statement but

36:22

you need to just kind of pound

36:24

home that we're not fighting every single

36:26

fact that moves in this case we're

36:28

not fighting whether or not i wouldn't

36:30

be fighting the relationship still matter it's

36:32

no more than the doorman which was

36:34

demonstrably false you still pay money in

36:36

nuisance suits to people that probably don't

36:38

deserve that money so again

36:40

i you know i think that it's not

36:42

that the prosecution is doing a bad job

36:44

at all they're they're kind of leading in

36:46

a protective way where they're getting undeniable fax

36:48

out there's a lot of scandal a lot

36:50

of salaciousness in your opening as the defense

36:53

hopefully pull the teeth on that some of

36:55

the federal you're gonna hear all sorts of

36:57

stuff that sounds gross that makes you disrespect

36:59

any of the players that were involved but

37:01

that's not what this trial is about and

37:03

then you could hold to that in your

37:05

cross-examination by not challenging stuff you don't need

37:07

to challenge make everything a friendly cross until

37:09

you get to kon alcush what do you

37:11

make of the fact the

37:14

fact that the that david pecker had election

37:17

law an election law attorney look

37:19

at the karen mcdougall deal and

37:21

just remind folks the karen mcdougall

37:23

deal this was uh... a playboy

37:25

playmate who alleged having a ten

37:28

to eleven month relationship with donald trump she had

37:30

a story and what happened was

37:32

that the uh... the tabloid

37:34

magnate david pecker in a m i his

37:36

company uh... hired her gave

37:38

her a hundred fifty thousand dollars

37:40

to write a column for a different magazine

37:43

in their end to empire i think it was or

37:46

health and fitness or something like that she

37:48

never wrote anything she was paid a hundred

37:50

fifty thousand dollars but they had apparently

37:52

david pecker had an election attorney look at this this

37:54

deal was going on i think

37:56

right before the two thousand six election as well

38:00

that the implication would be that there

38:02

was no actual election law violation as a result

38:04

of these types of deals. Right, so he has

38:07

a lawyer took it over, apparently the lawyer blessed

38:09

it, right, and the deal with Stormy Daniels is

38:11

structurally very similar, right, so that's sort of the

38:13

implication. I don't think it actually is that potent

38:15

of an observation. I doubt we're going to

38:17

hear from that lawyer in the course

38:20

of this trial, which would be necessary to actually

38:22

make that useful. Let's

38:24

go to our attorneys outside the room

38:26

right now. I'll

38:29

start with Bill Brennan. What's

38:33

your big takeaway from today, if

38:35

anything, or if you want to look at the week

38:37

in general, if any gloves

38:39

were laid on Mr. Trump or not? Jake,

38:43

I really don't think so. I heard

38:45

on Kush lay out a

38:47

scenario, and certainly he could be correct with

38:50

regard to actions taken in furtherance of

38:54

a political motive, but any

38:56

married man in this position is

38:58

going to be very worried about a jury of one,

39:00

and that's the person he lives with. We

39:03

had another former president who

39:05

had been accused of a

39:08

dalliance with someone

39:10

not his wife and apparently denied it,

39:12

and then had to walk that back,

39:14

and from what

39:16

I had read at the time, it was a tougher spell

39:18

to his wife than it was to the country. I

39:21

think any married man on the jury, any

39:24

married person, a female on

39:26

the jury is going to get that in. I

39:29

also heard some talk about, well, look at

39:31

this, the Billy Bush tape comes out and the

39:33

timing, and here's when Cohen's going in. I

39:37

challenge anybody to tell me a

39:39

favorable time to have that

39:41

come out if you're married and have children, and

39:44

I really think that's going to resonate

39:46

with the jurors as far as Cohen and

39:49

this banker. This

39:51

also, I think, validates the

39:53

defense of not wanting

39:55

to be embarrassed or to deal with his

39:57

wife. Cohen wouldn't even tell his wife about that.

40:00

the hundred thirty thousand dollar loan so

40:02

i really think that there's a

40:04

strong narrative that if this if

40:06

it happened uh... that

40:08

it happened because the defendant was

40:11

worried about the implications

40:13

it would have on his family as

40:15

marriage and if that is what it's

40:17

limited to in the prosecution can't tie

40:19

it up to the other crime the

40:21

cases out the window so misty maris

40:23

uh... it is uh... it

40:26

has been said by david packer who so far this

40:28

week has been the key witness

40:31

uh... that he was doing this for trump uh...

40:34

and his campaign uh...

40:36

not necessarily exclusively but he did mention

40:38

the campaign any number of times

40:41

of what what's your take on what bill just said

40:43

well i think that's exactly what the defense

40:45

is going to say bill laid it out

40:48

that number one these payments on their own

40:50

are not illegal so the prosecution will have

40:52

to point to unlawful conduct in the other

40:54

piece of that if the extent that we're

40:56

looking at a campaign finance violation if the

40:59

concept of mixed motive that there's a reason

41:01

to make the payments that are outside of

41:03

the election now the flip side of that

41:05

is exactly what we heard today the timing

41:08

the timeline is really really critically important for

41:10

the prosecution case and of course

41:12

packer's testimony that was his perception that

41:14

this was all about the election that's what

41:16

he testified well that is going to be

41:18

part of how the prosecution uh...

41:21

tries to show that the intent was

41:23

directly related to the election and not

41:25

all of these other reasons why somebody

41:27

might make a payment like that stacy

41:29

schneider your take i

41:32

think david pecker damaged donald trump

41:34

this week i think that

41:36

the manhattan district attorney's office has

41:38

a plan and that's to prove

41:40

a local new york state violation

41:43

of its election law and they're slowly setting

41:45

it up with these witnesses to go that

41:47

route i don't think it's going to be

41:50

a federal violation although the d a's office

41:52

has signaled in the beginning of

41:54

this case in april fourth of twenty twenty

41:57

three when they announced the indictment that they

41:59

were looking at Donald Trump for allegedly violating

42:01

both state and federal election law, but I

42:03

think that they're really going for the New

42:06

York state angle here. We'll see with the

42:08

rest of the witnesses. All right,

42:10

Stacey and Misty and Bill, thanks to all of

42:12

you. Have a wonderful weekend. If you're just tuning

42:14

in, the Manhattan hush money cover-up trial wrapped for

42:16

the week. Donald Trump just spoke, he repeated the

42:19

other big story of the day, saying

42:21

that he is ready to debate President

42:23

Biden whenever, wherever. President

42:26

Biden said something similar today. We're going to take a

42:28

short break and we're back in a moment. As

42:37

we've been following Trump's hush money

42:39

cover-up trial in Manhattan, another major

42:41

political storyline played out. That is

42:43

a possible presidential debate. President

42:46

Biden in an interview on the Howard

42:49

Stern show on Sirius XM said he

42:51

would be happy to debate the

42:53

presumptive Republican nominee, Donald Trump. I

42:57

don't know if you're going to debate your

42:59

opponent. I am somewhere. I don't know when.

43:01

I'm happy to debate him.

43:05

Then Donald Trump responded to

43:07

Biden's willingness just

43:10

minutes ago when he walked out of court.

43:13

But we're willing to do it. Wednesday

43:16

night, Tuesday night, Wednesday night, Thursday night,

43:18

we're Friday night on national television. We're

43:21

ready. Just tell me where. We'll do

43:23

it at the White House. I would be very comfortable

43:25

actually. I'm

43:27

back with my panel. Let's turn to

43:29

our political wise women.

43:33

Trump ready to debate Joe

43:35

Biden. Joe Biden ready to debate Donald Trump. Well,

43:38

I mean, Trump basically has been saying this

43:40

nonstop. They put a thing up at his

43:42

rallies now talking about how they say that

43:44

Biden won't debate him. using

43:48

this. Although he wouldn't debate any of

43:50

his Republican opponents during the primaries, we should note.

43:53

And, you know, to be fair, I mean, they

43:55

still feel really good about that decision. They don't

43:57

feel like it was warranted whether or not it

43:59

was for integrity purposes. and intellectual purposes, who's to

44:01

say? I will say Biden's announcement

44:04

of this did not seem like some well-planned

44:06

campaign strategy. It was kind of off the

44:08

cuff because Howard Stern asked him, are you

44:10

going to debate Donald Trump? This has been

44:12

something of discussion when you talk to Biden's

44:14

surrogates, and they had never said outright, yes,

44:16

this debate will be happening. They'd kind of

44:18

not offered a real answer. So

44:20

it is notable. I don't think anyone believes that

44:23

Biden is going to take Trump over what is

44:25

offered to debate outside the courthouse in Manhattan tonight,

44:28

especially since Donald Trump says he's going back to Florida.

44:30

But it doesn't say he was willing to have the

44:33

debate at his at a Trump rally with

44:35

tomorrow night or something. When was it? I

44:37

think he was talking about next Wednesday when he

44:39

got to two events scheduled. I mean, no one

44:42

is taking that seriously. But I will say these

44:44

organizations did reach out to the campaigns and say

44:46

they did believe a debate was important and that

44:48

one should happen. Trump's campaign has tried to get

44:50

them to move the debates earlier to add more

44:53

because they believe it's to their benefit, whether

44:55

or not they do one or more than

44:58

one, it remains to be seen. What do you think? Take Caitlin's

45:00

point about Biden just sort of put

45:02

it out there as Biden does today.

45:05

I actually think this could be a

45:07

mistake and it doesn't take wind out

45:09

of Trump's state by Biden. Yes,

45:12

because Caitlin pointed out

45:14

that at the Trump rallies, he keeps

45:17

sort of goading Biden. When are you

45:19

going to debate? Well, now Biden has

45:21

said I'll debate and Trump is going

45:23

to what is Trump do every day

45:25

he wakes up looking for a fight.

45:27

Now he has one. Where is Biden?

45:30

He said he wanted to debate me.

45:32

I'm ready. Here I am Monday, Tuesday,

45:34

Wednesday. So I think Trump

45:37

will play into this. But they

45:39

could just point to precedent, which

45:41

is that one, we've never

45:43

had a general election start that early campaign

45:45

and to the debates aren't typically until closer

45:47

to the election. I think the

45:49

earliest they've ever been in September, in the

45:52

modern era. Very interesting stuff. Before

45:54

our attorneys go and enjoy their

45:56

Friday night, I just want to

45:58

get your final. final thoughts

46:01

on this momentous week, the first week ever,

46:04

where a former president of the United States

46:06

is a criminal defendant in court. Your

46:09

thoughts on what's happened so far? Well,

46:12

look, it is quite remarkable that we're here. But

46:15

in terms of the trial itself and how sort of I'm

46:17

thinking about it, fraud trials tend to

46:19

be tedious. They tend to get tedious. And

46:21

so there's going to be more tedious testimony.

46:24

But the common metaphor that prosecutors use is talking

46:26

about sort of building their case right brick. So

46:29

we're seeing a lot of bricks being inserted

46:32

here. Now, whether it will all add up to a

46:34

conviction at the end of the day remains to be

46:36

seen. But that's a process that's going on right now.

46:39

How do you think the prosecution has done with their

46:41

bricks? I think they've done

46:43

fine, but we're not at the main event yet. Right. Michael

46:46

Cohen, you mean? Well, Michael Cohen, for sure. But

46:49

also, you know, at some point

46:51

there is going to be need to

46:53

be some presentation indicating whether

46:55

to what extent Trump knew any of this

46:57

was unlawful. Right. We

46:59

haven't heard any of that yet. Now, all the stuff I

47:01

was talking about earlier, the circumstantial evidence surrounding the Michael

47:04

Cohen's shell companies and all that, the

47:06

defense's response is going to be Cohen did that.

47:09

Right. Jim? Well, I

47:11

agree with that. I think that more and more

47:13

it's looking like the critical intent stuff they need

47:16

is going to come from one guy and one

47:18

guy only. Michael Cohen? Yeah.

47:21

There was no, you know, I thought in the abstract, maybe Hope Hicks has

47:23

something not even mentioned in opening

47:25

statements. And by now the

47:27

defense has her statements, what they call

47:29

janks material, her prior statements. So both

47:31

sides kind of know what's coming from

47:34

these witnesses and they didn't flag her

47:36

an opening statement. And I think that

47:38

was a logical flashpoint on this issue

47:40

of intent. But really, I, again, not

47:42

to fast forward to utter boredom, but

47:44

when you talk about jury instructions, this

47:47

judge can dramatically affect the verdict by

47:49

either saying the government

47:51

has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt

47:53

that this was fully intended to be

47:55

election interference, my words, or

47:57

the judge could say, if you find

47:59

that some portion of the motivation was

48:01

to affect the election. Then you have

48:04

this mixed motivation model that I think

48:06

Misty made mention of where it's partly

48:08

personal in the wife, it's also partly

48:10

political aspirations. If you

48:12

have combinations allowed to support a

48:14

conviction by the jury instruction, then

48:17

two lawyers on the jury might run with that and

48:19

12 people could be unanimous. I think that's a real

48:21

scary part for the defense to deal with. Very interesting

48:23

stuff. You guys have been so great to have this

48:25

week. Thanks so much. Hope we're gonna see you next

48:28

week. And you can join Caitlin in just

48:31

a few hours on her show, the source,

48:33

her big guest tonight, former Attorney General Bill

48:35

Barr. That's tonight at 9 Eastern

48:37

here on CNN and only here on CNN.

48:40

Much more on the legal space coming up. We also

48:42

need to bring you up to date on a dramatic

48:44

situation unfolding a tornado on the ground near Lincoln, Nebraska.

48:47

That breaking news is next. I'm

48:53

Ina Curtin. Welcome to Be My Guest, the podcast.

48:56

One of the best gifts you can

48:58

give friends is spending time together. But

49:00

what's even better than that? Cooking with

49:02

them on Be My Guest, the podcast.

49:04

New friends and old stuff on my

49:06

barn for some conversation and great cooking.

49:08

We talk about food, life,

49:11

and everything in between. Listen

49:13

to Be My Guest, the podcast with

49:16

me, Ina Garten, and join us wherever

49:18

you get your podcasts. This

49:26

is CNN Breaking News. And

49:28

we have some breaking news off the

49:30

top of this hour, a dangerous storm

49:32

situation right now in Nebraska, as tornadoes

49:34

have been confirmed on the ground, and

49:36

a powerful storm is moving toward

49:39

the city of Omaha. Let's go straight to

49:41

CNN's Chad Myers in the CNN Weather Center.

49:43

Chad, you're actually quite familiar with

49:45

this area. Tell us about the situation unfolding right

49:47

now. Yeah, this was

49:49

a violent tornado just a few minutes ago across Highway

49:52

6, also I-80, just to

49:54

the east of the city limits of

49:56

Lincoln. Now this storm has continued to

49:58

move to the north. and will

50:00

be affecting Bennington, Blair and the like. But

50:03

this was a violent tornado on the ground

50:05

that crossed over the interstate. We do know

50:07

there's damage and also there are injuries here.

50:10

We just don't know how many, but yet,

50:12

look at the size of that tornado. Let's

50:14

get to the maps here, I'll show you

50:16

what's going on. It could be a continuously

50:19

violent night all the way through the morning

50:21

hours. We will see tornadoes likely on the

50:23

ground throughout the night, all the way from

50:25

really almost Texas into Nebraska. There's a red

50:28

box here, that's the tornado watch box, which

50:30

means they're possible. These pink boxes,

50:32

which means they're happening. So for

50:34

you, Bennington, Missouri Valley, that would

50:36

be Blair right over here. There's

50:38

I-680, Omaha, but what I'm concerned

50:40

about down here, south of Sarpy

50:42

County, these are more storms here

50:44

that are violently rotating and are

50:46

working toward Omaha proper, where the

50:48

storm here missed the western suburbs

50:50

of Omaha. Almost elkhorn, really,

50:52

but this is the area that I'm

50:55

most concerned about over the next 30

50:57

minutes or so. Now for Chanuk, Kansas,

50:59

you have some storms to your west

51:01

as well, they are also rotating. Down in

51:03

Texas, it is hail and a wind event

51:05

for you. We will watch the tornadoes because

51:08

they are on the ground right now. All

51:11

right, scary stuff. Meteorologist Chad Myers, thanks so

51:13

much. The other major story this hour. Day

51:15

four of testimony in Donald Trump's criminal hush

51:18

money coverup trial has just wrapped up for

51:20

the week. What a week it has been

51:22

for the former president today in court,

51:24

the defendant watched three witnesses

51:27

testify, including his former assistant,

51:29

Rona Graff, as well as David Packer,

51:31

his purported friend and former publisher of

51:34

the National Enquirer, testifying

51:36

about the deal that Packer says he helped

51:38

broker with adult film star

51:40

and director Stormy Daniels. Packer today in

51:43

his fourth day of testimony, admitting he

51:45

would kill stories, meaning he would buy

51:47

them and then not run them,

51:50

so as to influence the 2016 election and

51:52

quote, to help a presidential candidate,

51:54

that candidate being his friend, Mr. Trump.

51:56

Prosecutors say Trump's falsification of business records

51:58

owe a $1 billion those

52:01

hush money payments to Stormy Daniels

52:03

amount to an illegal conspiracy to

52:05

subvert the election by concealing

52:07

information from voters. We'll

52:09

see if the jury goes goes along with that

52:11

theory. That is just one of

52:13

the legal dramas starring Mr. Trump this week.

52:16

Yesterday his federal election subversion case was front

52:18

and center as the US

52:20

Supreme Court heard oral arguments on his

52:22

claim that presidents are immune

52:25

from prosecution for official acts

52:27

they commit while being president. The

52:29

justices seem to be leaning toward

52:31

rejecting his claims of sweeping immunity.

52:34

Trump also took a loss yesterday when a federal

52:36

judge upheld the verdict

52:38

and award in E. Jean Carroll's

52:40

defamation case against Mr. Trump denying

52:43

his motion for a new trial altogether.

52:46

This week Mr. Trump also finds himself listed as

52:50

an unindicted co-conspirator in both

52:52

Arizona and in Michigan's 2020

52:55

election subversion investigations and indictments.

52:57

Let's discuss all of this

53:00

with Ronan Farrow contributing writer at the

53:02

New Yorker who's done extensive reporting on

53:04

David Packer and his company AMI as

53:06

well as the Karen McDougal catch

53:09

and kill deal. Ronan's

53:11

a lawyer also the author of

53:13

catch and kill lies spies and

53:15

a conspiracy to protect predators.

53:18

Ronan good to see you again my friend so

53:20

today the defense tried to expose small

53:22

inconsistencies in Packer's statements. They focused

53:24

on a key August 2015 meeting

53:27

at Trump Tower with Packer and

53:29

Trump and Cohen where Packer

53:31

said he agreed to be the eyes and

53:33

ears of the Trump campaign flagging any negative

53:35

stories about Trump to Michael Cohen. The

53:37

defense asked did you ever

53:40

specifically use the term catch and

53:42

kill in the meeting and Packer replied no I did not

53:45

but then under redirect questioning from

53:47

the prosecution Packer reiterated the

53:49

content of the 2015 meeting

53:51

saying my understanding is those stories that

53:53

come up I would speak to my Michael Cohen and tell them

53:56

these are the stories that are going to be for sale that

53:58

if we don't buy them somebody else. will and then

54:00

Michael Cohen would handle by them

54:03

or try to make sure that they don't ever get published."

54:06

So even if the term catch and

54:08

kill wasn't used, you wrote a book

54:10

called Catch and Kill. Is that not Catch and

54:12

Kill? That

54:15

is the definition of this colloquial term

54:17

that has emerged around this, Catch and

54:20

Kill, which was a term that I

54:22

and other journalists around this first started

54:24

hearing from AMI employees.

54:27

It was something of a, you know, it's called

54:29

a neologism, it entered into the discourse partly

54:32

through this. And it was a practice the

54:34

inquirer had engaged in for a long time,

54:36

this sort of stick and carrot of we'll

54:39

buy up the unflattering stories, maybe we won't

54:41

run them. Also you

54:43

know, we'll run flattering stories about you.

54:45

They had done that with Hollywood celebrities

54:48

in the past. And here they were

54:50

clearly applying it in a political context.

54:52

And it was apparent to all of

54:54

us digging through the trail of money

54:56

on this, that even if the underlying

54:59

rumors about affairs or supposed to love

55:01

children didn't matter at all and we

55:03

didn't care, what

55:05

did matter was the potential election line

55:07

implications of the transactions. As you

55:09

pointed out on the stand today, Pekker

55:12

faced Emil Bovet, one of these Trump

55:14

lawyers who on cross-examination had two objectives.

55:16

He tried to pick apart Pekker's credibility

55:18

by looking at the long history of

55:20

cooperative statements he's made to law enforcement

55:23

over the past years about this and

55:25

finding any little difference. You know, did

55:27

he initially say that Hope Hicks was

55:29

present for some of that meeting that

55:31

you mentioned or did he not tried

55:34

to impeach his memory about those things? And

55:36

then the other thing Bovet was trying to

55:38

establish was were these deals

55:40

that were also just in the interest

55:42

of the national inquirer in the usual

55:44

sense that they would have sold issues

55:46

and that was the main objective of

55:48

these transactions. Here's the thing, David

55:51

Pekker has come off extremely well for

55:53

prosecutors in this case so far. He's

55:56

been very composed. He has a

55:58

sort of a vunkular manner. this case

56:00

so far and he is repeatedly

56:02

saying the main point which is the one you

56:04

highlighted which is in the face of

56:06

all of this he's saying no this was not the

56:08

normal course of business even if

56:11

they were on the margins ways in which

56:13

it might have benefited the inquirer in the

56:15

usual there was this other objective here to

56:17

subvert the election yeah and and pecker acknowledging

56:19

that the story that he helped kill that

56:21

he paid 150 thousand dollars to kill

56:24

one of the stories you helped break Karen

56:26

McDougal's silence being bought for a hundred fifty

56:28

thousand dollars that that would have

56:30

been in in in I forget if I

56:32

don't know if it was the prosecution or

56:34

mr. pecker but tabloid gold was

56:37

the term that was used because people who read

56:39

the National Enquirer would have bought a

56:41

lot of copies of it to read the story about

56:44

Donald J Trump and 1998 playmate of

56:47

the year pecker was the first

56:49

witness on the stand for four days what

56:51

do you know having researched this so much

56:53

for your book and for the article about

56:55

Karen McDougal what do you know about David

56:57

pecker and his relationship with without Trump that

56:59

the jury did not hear well

57:04

one thing is that it was a wider

57:06

deeper relationship than is being admitted into this

57:08

case there was a safe that

57:10

contained a lot of materials about

57:13

Trump those materials moved location several

57:15

times over the course of this

57:17

becoming an electoral issue there was

57:19

a list that I was shown

57:21

by a senior ami source of

57:24

Trump's stories not all of them terribly consequential

57:26

some of them were you know his feud

57:28

with Rosie O'Donnell but some of

57:30

them were also potentially on flattering ones so this

57:33

was a deep and wide relationship and

57:35

pecker saying over and over again

57:37

now this was about

57:39

trying to help Donald Trump get

57:41

into the White House is confirmation

57:43

of something that am I lied to a

57:45

lot of reporters including me about back when

57:48

these things were first emergent also

57:50

that safe helps helps explain perhaps why

57:53

mr. Trump has not criticized

57:55

David pecker at all I

57:58

want to ask you before you go because yesterday We

58:00

saw a major court ruling completely separate from the

58:02

Trump case Also on a

58:04

subject that you've broken a lot of stories about and

58:06

you think it could ultimately matter for Trump the

58:09

New York Court of Appeals overturned Harvey

58:11

Weinstein's 2020 conviction for

58:13

sex crimes Basically the court

58:15

said that the lower court made a mistake

58:17

by allowing women to testify about allegations of

58:19

sexual assault that were Separate from

58:22

the three for which he was actually

58:24

charged in that case You were at

58:26

the forefront of investigating reporting a multitude

58:28

of allegations against Weinstein You

58:30

say this ruling could come back

58:33

to haunt Trump's judge Juan. We're

58:35

Sean in Trump's trial explain Well,

58:39

it illuminates a shared legal issue that is

58:41

at the heart of both of these cases

58:44

of course for activists and for

58:47

Survivors of Harvey Weinstein's alleged crimes

58:50

It's an anguished moment to hear that

58:52

one of his convictions was overturned on

58:55

Essentially a question of legal technicality

58:57

the way the case was built

58:59

But for legal spectators It's less

59:01

surprising because this was always a

59:03

case where prosecutors Over-extended a

59:06

bit in the context of the New York rules

59:08

of evidence on what you can let into a

59:10

case He was being charged on

59:12

three alleged assaults and they let other

59:14

women with other accounts of unrelated assaults

59:17

Come in and testify and I have a new

59:19

piece out in the New Yorker detailing what exactly

59:21

the rules are and why that always Seems like

59:24

a bit of an overextension now This

59:26

doesn't matter that much for Harvey Weinstein's

59:29

immediate future his lawyers in California where

59:31

he asked to serve a separate 16-year

59:33

sentence that's essentially going to put him

59:35

away for Much

59:37

of the rest of his life Are

59:40

saying well, well it could help us on appeal

59:42

in California, but that's a much stronger case I've

59:44

been in touch with the prosecutors in that case

59:46

and California's rules for letting

59:48

in that kind of evidence of uncharged

59:50

alleged bad acts are much

59:53

more lax and permissive So that ruling

59:55

is less in jeopardy. He's less likely

59:57

to be affected. What it does affect

59:59

is the general case law on

1:00:01

what you can let in in terms

1:00:03

of uncharged acts in New York and

1:00:05

that is interesting in the context of

1:00:07

this Trump trial because the Trump trial

1:00:10

hinges on charges about one transaction from

1:00:12

Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels but much

1:00:14

of the case prosecutors are building is

1:00:16

about the wider pattern about uncharged acts

1:00:18

namely all of these AMI's. Interesting

1:00:22

Ronan Farrow always good to see you the

1:00:24

book Catch and Kill it's a great read

1:00:26

we've covered it before on the show thanks

1:00:28

so much for being here Ronan good to

1:00:30

see you. Also today both President Biden and

1:00:32

Donald Trump out with big announcements both saying

1:00:34

they would be willing to debate each other

1:00:36

the American people do deserve a formal discussion

1:00:38

on the most important issues of our time

1:00:40

when and where that might actually happen we

1:00:42

do not know. Plus a reversal

1:00:44

from a student at Columbia University who

1:00:47

led pro-Palestinian protests he said in

1:00:49

a rant that was televised and

1:00:51

at least broadcast at least in

1:00:53

part on Instagram live he said

1:00:56

that Zionists don't deserve to live

1:00:58

as other students

1:01:00

are echoing that wild clearly

1:01:02

anti-semitic claim and more demonstrations

1:01:05

are spreading is his

1:01:07

apology such as it is too

1:01:10

little too late we'll be right back. National

1:01:15

lead protests on campuses are spreading

1:01:17

to colleges throughout the country from

1:01:19

California to Indiana from Illinois to

1:01:22

Georgia at Emory University in

1:01:24

Atlanta clashes with police turned physical in

1:01:26

some cases as 28 people

1:01:28

were arrested prompting a group

1:01:30

of Democratic, Georgia state lawmakers to condemn quote

1:01:33

the excessive force used unquote

1:01:35

negotiations continue at Columbia University to find

1:01:38

a way to resolve the conflicts and

1:01:40

remove the tents before graduation one

1:01:42

of the issues being debate in all of

1:01:44

this is how much are these protests solely

1:01:47

rooted in concern for Palestinians in

1:01:49

opposition to what the Israel Defense

1:01:52

Forces is doing in Gaza because

1:01:54

we have seen sentiments expressed

1:01:57

by some of the groups behind the protests

1:02:00

that the Hamas terrorist attacks on civilians

1:02:02

on October 7th were mere

1:02:04

quote resistance and Some

1:02:07

have said that Israel should not

1:02:09

exist Other individuals associated

1:02:11

with the protests or in the

1:02:13

protests have said wildly hateful and

1:02:15

anti-semitic things Including as CNN's

1:02:17

Miguel Marcus reports for us now one

1:02:20

of the Columbia student leaders behind

1:02:23

the protests on that campus Zionists,

1:02:28

they don't deserve to

1:02:31

live comfortably let alone

1:02:33

Zionists don't deserve to

1:02:35

live Kamani James

1:02:37

a spokesperson for the student protest

1:02:39

at Columbia University Said

1:02:42

this more than once in a

1:02:44

personal social media post in

1:02:46

January the same way. We're very

1:02:48

comfortable Accepting that

1:02:51

Nazis don't deserve to live

1:02:54

Fascist don't deserve to live racist

1:02:57

don't deserve to live Zionists They

1:03:00

shouldn't live in this world Confronted

1:03:03

by CNN about his comments

1:03:05

James unapologetic, I

1:03:07

think we need to shift the conversation

1:03:09

from people's

1:03:11

comfort to the Hundreds

1:03:14

of thousands of people who

1:03:16

have been displaced the

1:03:18

tens of thousands of people who have been

1:03:20

murdered by Israel I

1:03:22

mean how do your words help? I

1:03:24

think it's very important. How do your

1:03:26

words help? I think

1:03:29

it's very important for people to

1:03:31

understand that the conflation of Anti-zionism

1:03:34

with anti-semitism is

1:03:37

woefully incorrect and wrong again, but

1:03:39

you apologize Again,

1:03:41

as I mentioned earlier We

1:03:44

believe in the sanctity of life here

1:03:46

at this encampment Despite his

1:03:49

calls for a class of

1:03:51

people to cease existing James

1:03:53

nearly daily Expresses his belief

1:03:55

that Israel is committing

1:03:57

genocide while Israel plans to move

1:03:59

forward forward with its genocide backed

1:04:01

by the United States and other

1:04:04

Western powers. It

1:04:06

is important to remember why we are here.

1:04:09

After being confronted, James released a

1:04:11

statement saying in part, I am

1:04:13

frustrated that the words I said

1:04:15

in an Instagram live video have

1:04:17

become a distraction for the movement

1:04:19

for Palestinian liberation. I misspoke

1:04:21

in the heat of the moment for which

1:04:24

I apologize. Some Jewish students

1:04:26

at Columbia say they have been called

1:04:28

Zionists by protesters

1:04:33

just for being Jewish. Other

1:04:35

Jewish students have taken an active part

1:04:38

in the protests for what they view

1:04:40

as an overbearing Israeli response to the

1:04:42

October 7th Hamas terror attack and

1:04:45

a weak US response to

1:04:47

continued bloodshed. It's possible that

1:04:49

pro-Palestine protests might make some Jewish

1:04:51

students feel uncomfortable, but I will

1:04:53

emphasize that, you know, the

1:04:56

pro-Palestine protests here at the encampment

1:04:58

are, you know, that they have

1:05:00

fundamental values against hate and bigotry.

1:05:06

Now with regard to Mr. James, the

1:05:08

Columbia university says that they

1:05:10

will not comment on individual cases. It's

1:05:13

not clear if he will face any

1:05:16

disciplinary measures because of what he has said

1:05:18

so far, but a couple of things are

1:05:20

interesting. Typically he's out here every day. Both

1:05:23

the negotiators that are negotiating with

1:05:25

the university for the protesters here

1:05:28

have distanced themselves from Mr. James

1:05:30

and he hasn't been seen.

1:05:32

Usually he's here at two 30 for their press

1:05:34

briefing. He's usually available to the press. We've not

1:05:36

seen him at all. He

1:05:39

says he misspoke. I mean, that was

1:05:42

quite at length over and

1:05:44

over saying that Zionists, which I mean,

1:05:47

as a matter of fact, most

1:05:49

Jews and for

1:05:51

that matter, most Americans are Zionists think that

1:05:53

Israel has a right to exist. Saying

1:05:56

that they, we have no right to live.

1:05:58

That's quite a. a misspeaking

1:06:01

Miguel. There's

1:06:04

a lot of misspeaking and a lot of

1:06:07

people are very upset on both sides about

1:06:09

the term Zionist and how it has become

1:06:11

come to be used. Jake. Yeah,

1:06:13

I'm familiar with it. I remember when

1:06:15

they used to call us neo-cons. Miguel,

1:06:17

thanks so much. The Politics Lead Now

1:06:19

and Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation Online, polluting

1:06:21

the 2024 presidential race. It's

1:06:24

the subject of a brand new episode

1:06:26

of the whole story this week featuring

1:06:28

reporting done from CNN's own Donio Sullivan.

1:06:30

Here's a preview. The

1:06:34

job of the journalist is to ask

1:06:36

the question, allow the person to speak

1:06:39

and just report the facts. What

1:06:42

was spoken? Would you like for me to pull up the

1:06:44

definition of journalist? That's okay, but thank you, Julie. Okay. I

1:06:47

have a God-given right

1:06:51

to speak my own truth. But there are facts,

1:06:53

right? The

1:06:56

facts have shown that the

1:06:59

election was stolen. Whether you're

1:07:01

willing to look at that and

1:07:03

accept that and really show

1:07:05

what's going on, that's your issue,

1:07:08

not ours. We want the

1:07:10

God-given freedom that our Constitution and our

1:07:12

Bill of Rights is based on. God-given

1:07:15

constitutional rights. Yes. They're

1:07:18

two different things, right? No, so they're not. Read,

1:07:21

R-E-A-D, the

1:07:23

Constitution. Read it out loud

1:07:25

to yourself so that you hear what the

1:07:27

words of the Constitution say. God

1:07:30

isn't mentioned in the Constitution. Sir.

1:07:46

Donie's with me now. What happened after she looked at them? We

1:07:49

found out that God isn't mentioned in the

1:07:51

U.S. Constitution. And look, that gets to a

1:07:53

broader point, and we've heard a lot about

1:07:55

Christian nationalism in this country over

1:07:57

the past year. You

1:08:00

know, I've spoken to many Christian pastors over these past

1:08:02

few months and they will say a lot of people

1:08:04

a lot of Trump supporters Will think that the Christian

1:08:06

God a very specific version

1:08:08

of the Christian God is all

1:08:11

over the US Constitution and

1:08:13

there's this conflation between

1:08:15

the United States and

1:08:17

between the

1:08:19

land of the Bible And it's

1:08:22

because of that that a lot of these

1:08:24

folks who are also convinced that the election

1:08:26

was stolen They now view

1:08:29

this as a kind of biblical crusade to

1:08:31

steal it back and to save America So

1:08:34

it's misinformation on top of

1:08:37

a very perverse view of patriotism and

1:08:39

Christianity Quite a thing. So there's this

1:08:41

new cue poll finding nearly three-quarters of

1:08:43

registered voters are very concerned or somewhat

1:08:46

concerned about other countries spreading

1:08:48

false information inside

1:08:50

the US to divide Americans But

1:08:54

to be quite frank, we don't need other countries

1:08:56

to be doing it. We're doing it to ourselves,

1:08:58

right? That's what your reporting shows. Absolutely Look,

1:09:02

I think the and we know from from reporting

1:09:04

from even what Secretary Lincoln

1:09:06

said today to CNN there's concerns there

1:09:08

that Russia China Iran Everybody else is

1:09:10

gonna be trying to poke and poke

1:09:12

divides in the United States. But as

1:09:15

you say Americans were

1:09:17

perfectly capable of creating myths

1:09:20

and disinformation ourselves And

1:09:22

also just the social media landscape has changed so much

1:09:24

in the past few years What

1:09:26

we'll also talk about in this documentary

1:09:28

on Sunday is after Trump

1:09:30

got kicked off Social

1:09:32

major social media sites after January 6

1:09:36

2021 so did a lot of his supporters because

1:09:38

they were sharing Q anon or election

1:09:40

conspiracy theories and a lot

1:09:43

of those people that got kicked off

1:09:45

the major social media platforms for sharing

1:09:47

misinformation have actually gone to alternative platforms

1:09:49

that have radicalized them

1:09:52

Further so it's like parlor Telegram

1:09:55

telegram especially telegram is

1:09:57

this place where you can

1:09:59

go in Starting

1:10:01

just reading about politics and very

1:10:03

quickly descend into a world of

1:10:05

racism, anti-Semitism, hate, and God knows

1:10:07

what else. All right, Donia Sullivan,

1:10:09

I can't wait to see it.

1:10:11

It's going to be terrifying,

1:10:14

I'm sure. Misinformation into Trump faithful.

1:10:16

It's an important report. Watch

1:10:18

it on the whole story with Anderson Cooper, Sunday night at

1:10:20

8, only here on

1:10:22

CNN. An American treasure, Donia Sullivan. Thanks so

1:10:24

much for being here. As you just heard

1:10:26

last hour, Donald Trump constantly needs a fact

1:10:28

check. But don't let his main

1:10:30

2024 challenger off the hook hear what President Biden

1:10:32

repeated just today that also needs a bit of

1:10:35

a closer look. Stay with us. In

1:10:41

our politics lead today, President Biden made a

1:10:43

surprise last minute appearance on Howard Stern's show

1:10:45

on SiriusXM this morning and signaled he's not

1:10:47

only willing but happy to face off against

1:10:49

Donald Trump in a presidential debate. I

1:10:53

don't know if you're going to debate your

1:10:55

opponent. I am somewhere. I don't know why.

1:10:57

I'm happy to be here.

1:11:00

And as he exited his criminal trial just

1:11:02

a few minutes ago, Mr. Trump responded to

1:11:04

that. I've

1:11:07

invited one to debate. You can do

1:11:09

it anytime you want, including tonight. On

1:11:11

Monday, 3 hours, I invited him to

1:11:13

the courthouse. We're willing to do it.

1:11:15

Monday night, Tuesday night. We're

1:11:18

ready. Just tell me where. We'll do it at

1:11:20

the White House. That would be very comfortable, I

1:11:22

assume. Let's bring in our

1:11:24

political panel, Bakari. Wise

1:11:30

move of Mr. Biden to put this out there. President

1:11:32

Biden to put this out there. There have, you know,

1:11:34

earlier he had said something like, well, we'll see because

1:11:36

I'm not sure if he can behave himself about Trump.

1:11:38

No, I think it was a wise move because today

1:11:41

was about pushing back on narratives. I think you saw

1:11:43

some of the articles come out or some of the

1:11:45

stories come out about the Biden

1:11:47

administration not giving long-form interviews versus New

1:11:49

York Times, etc. So the sit down

1:11:51

with Howard Stern. This is about showing

1:11:53

his vitality. I think people will be

1:11:56

interested to see Donald Trump versus Joe Biden.

1:11:58

I don't know how much substance will come out. come

1:12:00

out of that debate, it may be more like watching

1:12:02

a car crash. But here we are. I mean, it'd

1:12:04

be good pay-per-view TV. By the way, Ed

1:12:07

Seals, that'll be crashing. You're

1:12:10

here because your book. I just want to make

1:12:12

sure people know about your book. The

1:12:15

moment thoughts on the race reckoning that

1:12:17

wasn't and how we can all move

1:12:19

forward now. So congratulations on that. Thank

1:12:21

you. Hope everybody out there gets a

1:12:23

copy. Good move or bad

1:12:25

move by Joe Biden. Do you think that, I mean,

1:12:29

that's a lot to debate Donald Trump. It's a lot. It

1:12:32

is a lot, but he wants to be president of

1:12:34

the United States again. So he needs to debate his

1:12:36

opponent. I think that that makes sense. And I

1:12:38

think that American people want to see it. I

1:12:40

liked this interview because it really was not about

1:12:42

policy out of the With

1:12:45

Howard Stern. With Howard Stern. It was maybe six

1:12:47

minutes of policy talk and it went through Joe

1:12:49

Biden's entire story. Now you may think someone who

1:12:51

has been in politics for as long as Joe

1:12:53

Biden doesn't need to tell his personal story again.

1:12:56

But there are still a lot of voters who

1:12:58

don't know who he is. Don't don't understand why

1:13:00

he is wanting to serve the country. And he

1:13:02

kind of laid that out about his commitment, his

1:13:04

struggles, what he's overcome and what his passions are.

1:13:06

So I thought the interview was good. I thought

1:13:09

I was interested. It was Howard Stern. I mean,

1:13:11

I don't listen to much Howard Stern and never

1:13:13

really have, but he's a

1:13:16

lot easier on his

1:13:18

guest. Now I remember how it used to be the

1:13:20

shock jock. And now he looks like

1:13:22

young to remember when he was really young. Well,

1:13:24

he was fawning over the president in this interview

1:13:26

and I was quite surprised. Well, he wants I

1:13:29

think it's fair to say that Howard Stern

1:13:31

makes no bones about the fact that he

1:13:34

thinks Joe Biden should be reelected. It was

1:13:36

a very personal interview. Harry, he talked

1:13:39

about contemplating suicide after the death of

1:13:41

his first wife and daughter in that

1:13:43

horrific car crash. He also

1:13:45

said something that caught the ear of

1:13:47

our resident fact checker, Daniel Dale. Take

1:13:50

a listen. True

1:13:53

stories. Remember when they were desegregating

1:13:55

Linfield, the neighborhood into a you

1:13:59

know, 70 homes, build a

1:14:01

one suburbia. And I told

1:14:03

you, and there was a black family moving in

1:14:05

and there was people who were down there protesting.

1:14:07

I told you not to go down there and

1:14:09

you went down. Remember that? And

1:14:11

you came, you got arrested, be standing on the porch with

1:14:13

a black family. Right. And they brought

1:14:16

you back to police. And I said, yeah, mom,

1:14:18

I remember that. So

1:14:20

this is not the first time he's made this claim.

1:14:23

CNN's Daniel Dale ran a fact check on

1:14:25

it, found there's still absolutely

1:14:27

no evidence for it. And

1:14:30

we forget that because

1:14:32

Donald Trump is who Donald Trump is, that Joe

1:14:34

Biden does a lot of this too. Yeah, he

1:14:36

does a lot of this. You know, there are

1:14:38

a lot of things that Joe Biden says, you

1:14:41

know, oh, this happened 50 years ago where my

1:14:43

uncle or my father and so on and so

1:14:45

forth. And the fact checkers go in and they

1:14:47

say, wait a minute, we can find no evidence

1:14:49

for this whatsoever. But of course, the problem is

1:14:52

if you're trying to, you know, stick Joe Biden

1:14:54

with the idea that he says some dishonest things,

1:14:56

just look across the aisle. Right. And I think

1:14:58

that's the issue that has continuously run into opponents

1:15:00

of Joe Biden, especially Donald Trump, because, you know,

1:15:03

Joe Biden may say one or two things in

1:15:05

a day, I know a week, a month, a

1:15:07

year that the fact checkers say, wait a minute,

1:15:09

hold on a second. Donald Trump says that many

1:15:11

things in a day. So it just is a

1:15:13

big issue. Doug, I mean, it

1:15:15

is true that the Joe Biden is known for these

1:15:18

apocryphal stories, shall we say cannibalism being

1:15:20

one of the latest. Oh, yeah. That

1:15:22

his uncle in World War

1:15:25

II, the plane went down and may

1:15:27

have been eaten by cannibals. And Papa

1:15:29

New Guinea is actually out there saying, what are you talking

1:15:32

about? This never happened. But again,

1:15:34

do you think cannibals are going to

1:15:36

tell their story? It's

1:15:38

time to get the other side of the story.

1:15:40

Got to hear both sides. Well, look, you know,

1:15:42

when Donald Trump talked about asshole countries, he got

1:15:45

a lot of criticism for it, I think very

1:15:47

reasonably so. Papa New Guinea is not happy about

1:15:49

this. And as we look at what's going on

1:15:51

in Asia and obviously with

1:15:53

China on the move out there, this

1:15:55

does have ramifications. It's not just Uncle

1:15:57

Joe telling another crazy story. look,

1:16:00

we know that presidents want to seek friendly

1:16:02

audiences. They also are trying to communicate in

1:16:04

new ways. That's not entirely new. But

1:16:07

this weekend is the White House Correspondents

1:16:09

weekend. And there's a time honored tradition

1:16:11

of accepting the Trump years, the president

1:16:14

saying, White House Correspondents, what you do

1:16:17

is so vital to democracy. And

1:16:19

this week is Joe Biden snubbing the White

1:16:21

House Correspondents Association, snubbing mainstream media. What do

1:16:23

you mean, not going to the dinner tomorrow?

1:16:25

No, meaning that he's been fighting with

1:16:27

the New York Times this week. And where does he go?

1:16:29

It goes to Howard Stern. So he's going to tell the

1:16:32

White House press corps how important they are, but he doesn't

1:16:34

actually talk to them. I think that's a problem. Yeah. I

1:16:36

mean, the Times doesn't go to the dinner too, though. But

1:16:38

I mean, not that it matters. It's all inside baseball stuff.

1:16:40

But I hear what you're saying. He gave an interview Howard

1:16:43

Stern, who's not exactly a member of the White House Correspondents

1:16:45

Association. Not? And you're going to be on the red

1:16:47

carpet for us? Right. I'm

1:16:49

absolutely going to be on the red carpet and be in a tuxedo.

1:16:51

It's going to be the one time during the year in which I

1:16:53

wear a tie. If you're keeping caution

1:16:55

for a passer, I might have some chocolate

1:16:57

matzah, egg matzah, regular matzah for you to

1:16:59

partake in. It should be a fun time.

1:17:01

We'll have some CNN folks that will interview

1:17:03

and hopefully perhaps a few celebrities as well.

1:17:05

So one other thing I do have to

1:17:07

bring up because when we sat down here

1:17:09

during the commercial break, this is all anybody

1:17:11

was talking about. South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem

1:17:13

is getting a lot of attention after writing

1:17:15

in her upcoming book obtained by the Guardian

1:17:17

newspaper about how she killed her

1:17:19

dog after this puppy ate some chickens. A

1:17:22

CNN article describes, quote, she attempted to tame

1:17:24

the dog who she said behaved like a

1:17:26

trained assassin to try to train him with

1:17:28

an electric collar, but ultimately made the decision

1:17:30

to put her down the dog by

1:17:32

shooting her in a gravel pit after an incident

1:17:34

in which the dog attacked a local family's chickens

1:17:37

and bit them. It was not a pleasant job,

1:17:39

Noem writes, according to the Guardian, but it

1:17:41

had to be done. And after it was over,

1:17:43

I realized another unpleasant job needed

1:17:45

to be done. That's about her killing a

1:17:48

goat. In a post on Twitter, Governor

1:17:50

Noem said today, quote, we love animals, but tough decisions

1:17:52

like this happen all the time on

1:17:55

a farm. I did not grow up on a farm. Anybody here grow

1:17:57

up on a farm? But I didn't get to be a grow up

1:17:59

on a farm. and know how insane she

1:18:01

sounds. I got a letter for putting down

1:18:03

dogs. I mean, my goodness gracious, man's

1:18:05

best friend is a dog. My Twitter

1:18:07

profile picture is my childhood dog. So all

1:18:10

I ever talk about is how much I

1:18:12

love dogs. Now, I don't have really horses

1:18:14

in this bloke race. I try and watch

1:18:16

it passionately, nonpartisanly. But as a dog lover,

1:18:18

I hear that quote and I go, my

1:18:21

goodness gracious, she shouldn't be anywhere near the

1:18:23

white. I think somebody allowed that to be

1:18:25

written on the back and published. I was

1:18:27

a dog owner whose dog is poorly

1:18:30

trained. I'm offended by that. And

1:18:32

there was another way to do it. And the fact

1:18:34

that she felt like she should brag about it is

1:18:36

disgusting, but also kind of just... There's no go-go. Think

1:18:38

about me rocking criticism for transporting

1:18:41

his dog on the roof. This is miles worth

1:18:43

it. All right, we're gonna take this to the

1:18:45

bar. Thanks to all of you for

1:18:47

being here and I'll see you all out tonight,

1:18:49

I'm guessing. And Harry Enten, of course, as we

1:18:51

mentioned, will be on the red carpet

1:18:53

tomorrow in his tuxedo for CNN's coverage

1:18:55

of the White House Correspondents issue she did.

1:18:58

President Biden, comedian Colin Jost, headlined the event

1:19:00

that's tomorrow night at seven o'clock Eastern on

1:19:02

CNN and streaming on Max. And Harry, I'll

1:19:04

stop by, I promise. I don't want any

1:19:06

months ago. Up next,

1:19:09

breaking news about a former controversial governor

1:19:11

and his handling of one of the

1:19:13

biggest crises this country has seen in

1:19:15

decades. Back

1:19:19

with our health lead, four years after the

1:19:21

start of the global COVID pandemic, more information

1:19:24

continues to come to light about how some

1:19:26

states may have mishandled the crisis,

1:19:28

including in one of the hardest hit states, New

1:19:30

York. In March, 2020, then

1:19:32

Governor Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, issued

1:19:35

an advisory that forced New

1:19:37

York nursing homes to readmit patients

1:19:39

who had been hospitalized with COVID,

1:19:41

with no requirement to test them

1:19:43

first to make sure that they weren't contagious

1:19:45

and wouldn't spread the virus among the other

1:19:48

vulnerable residents of the nursing homes. Now, Cuomo

1:19:50

has attempted to defend the decision. He claimed

1:19:52

it was following guidance from the Trump administration,

1:19:55

and so the Trump administration disputes that. Critics

1:19:57

say the policy either way resulted in... thousands

1:20:00

of needless deaths. A 2021 investigation

1:20:02

by New York Attorney General Letitia

1:20:05

James, also a Democrat, found

1:20:07

that the New York State Department of Health

1:20:09

under Cuomo, quote, undercounted nursing home COVID deaths

1:20:11

by as much as 50 percent, unquote. And

1:20:13

a 2022 audit by New York

1:20:16

State's Comptroller, also a Democrat, concluded that

1:20:18

former Governor Cuomo's Health Department, quote, failed

1:20:20

to account for approximately 4,100 lives lost

1:20:23

due to COVID-19 in New York nursing

1:20:27

homes. Just last month, the chair

1:20:29

of the select subcommittee on the coronavirus

1:20:31

pandemic in the House

1:20:33

of Representatives, Congressman Brad Winthrop,

1:20:36

subpoenaed former Governor Cuomo. And

1:20:41

Ohio Republican Congressman Brad Winthrop, the chairman of

1:20:43

the subcommittee, joins us now. Chairman Winthrop, thanks

1:20:45

for joining us. You have an announcement to

1:20:47

break right here on the lead about how

1:20:50

former Governor Cuomo has responded to your subpoena.

1:20:52

What is the news? Yeah,

1:20:54

well, I do want to say, and we'll be putting

1:20:57

something out shortly, but I'll tell you here right now

1:20:59

that Governor Cuomo will be

1:21:01

coming, appearing before our select subcommittee on

1:21:03

the pandemic on June 11th. This will

1:21:05

be a transcribed interview at 10 a.m.

1:21:09

This is nine months after we initially started

1:21:11

reaching out to the governor to ask him

1:21:13

to come in and testify in

1:21:16

front of us. We were ignored

1:21:18

on many of our requests. There

1:21:20

were delays. We subsequently had to

1:21:22

issue a subpoena. We did that

1:21:24

on March 5th, subpoenaing

1:21:26

the governor for May 24th, and

1:21:28

it was only not until then

1:21:30

that he decided that he would

1:21:33

come in for a transcribed interview.

1:21:35

Just understand the difference between a

1:21:37

subpoena order deposition and a transcribed

1:21:39

interview. They're slightly different,

1:21:41

but both of them, you

1:21:44

cannot lie or

1:21:46

it's prosecuted. So

1:21:48

just to be clear, though, this will

1:21:50

be not public, and it won't be

1:21:52

under oath, even though obviously either way,

1:21:54

lying to Congress is a crime. You've

1:21:57

got it. We'll make it public eventually. but

1:22:00

it will not initially be public. Who

1:22:03

else from the Cuomo administration

1:22:07

are you going to talk to, if anyone? Well,

1:22:10

we already confirmed that we're going

1:22:12

to hear from Governor Cuomo's

1:22:15

former secretary, Melissa DeRosa. We're going

1:22:17

to speak to about three members

1:22:19

of his task force, medical

1:22:21

advisor Dr. Adams and Dr. Howard Zucker

1:22:24

from the New York Health Department. And

1:22:26

we're looking forward to hearing their versions

1:22:28

of what took place because the

1:22:31

governor wants to say that he

1:22:33

followed CMS guidelines, but if

1:22:36

you follow the dates, he did not.

1:22:38

The guidelines came out in

1:22:41

March 13th, 12

1:22:44

days before he issued his mandate

1:22:46

for the nursing homes to accept

1:22:49

COVID-19 patients. What are you

1:22:51

trying to learn from Governor Cuomo? Well,

1:22:54

I'm trying to learn why he would do

1:22:56

something like this. As a doctor who has

1:22:58

treated infections, it goes

1:23:00

against all medical common sense to take

1:23:02

someone who is highly contagious and put

1:23:04

them in amongst the most vulnerable. The

1:23:06

idea is to quarantine and to treat

1:23:08

them. And that is not what

1:23:10

took place here. And the question is why? What

1:23:13

kind of medical advice was he being given? What

1:23:15

was the motive for wanting to do this move

1:23:18

that clearly goes against, as I say, medical

1:23:20

common sense? And I think if

1:23:22

I did something like this as a physician, I

1:23:25

would be accused of medical malpractice. Your

1:23:27

press release states, quote, evidence also suggests

1:23:29

that former Governor Cuomo engaged in a

1:23:32

cover-up to hide the true New

1:23:34

York nursing home mortality rate from

1:23:36

the public and shift political blame

1:23:38

away from his administration. I

1:23:41

know, obviously, that both the New York

1:23:43

Attorney General and the New York Comptroller,

1:23:45

both of our Democrats, have said that

1:23:47

the Cuomo administration undercounted COVID

1:23:49

deaths from the nursing home rule.

1:23:52

But is there actual evidence of

1:23:55

an alleged cover-up, because Cuomo has

1:23:57

obviously been denying any wrongdoing? Well,

1:24:00

he's going to have the opportunity to deny

1:24:03

that again and take a look at what some

1:24:05

of the other people are saying actually took place

1:24:08

and whether it was intentional to

1:24:10

play those numbers down or whether

1:24:12

it was just miscounting. So

1:24:15

those are the types of things, Jake, that we need to

1:24:17

get to the bottom of. Nursing Homes

1:24:19

Aside, a Los Angeles Times analysis finds that between

1:24:21

2020 and 2023, quote, deaths

1:24:24

by age group as reported by local

1:24:26

health departments shows New York City recorded

1:24:28

a COVID death rate 40% higher than

1:24:31

Los Angeles counties. New York

1:24:33

got hit earlier than LA, giving LA more

1:24:35

time to prepare and the difference in vaccination

1:24:37

rates and mask mandates could have also been

1:24:39

factors. Given that, how difficult

1:24:41

does it determine how various policies

1:24:44

played a role in the discrepancy between

1:24:46

the death toll in Los Angeles and

1:24:49

the death toll in New York? Yeah,

1:24:52

well, you know, you're not going

1:24:54

to see necessarily the virus literally

1:24:57

being seen jumping to a vulnerable

1:24:59

patient in a nursing home, but

1:25:02

I think those numbers will speak

1:25:04

pretty clearly for themselves. And

1:25:07

again, it goes against medical advice and

1:25:09

it goes against medical common sense. And

1:25:11

so when you see numbers and you

1:25:13

say elderly, well, elderly, where? Were they

1:25:15

elderly that were in nursing homes? Nursing

1:25:18

homes where they accepted COVID-19 patients?

1:25:21

Were they in nursing homes where

1:25:23

the nursing home was prohibited from

1:25:25

testing patients being readmitted or admitted

1:25:28

for COVID-19? So a

1:25:30

lot of those things I think will speak for

1:25:33

themselves if we get the accurate data based on

1:25:35

all the surroundings of who was

1:25:37

placed where, when, and who

1:25:40

was infected with COVID and how many

1:25:42

people actually died subsequently. Republican

1:25:44

Congressman, Dr. Brad Wenstrup. Thank you so much.

1:25:47

Thank you, Dave. Thank you, Dave. The

1:25:50

lead did reach out to the former

1:25:52

governor for comment. A spokesman for Andrew

1:25:55

Cuomo told us, quote, there is no

1:25:57

news here. We agreed to do this

1:25:59

month. ago, we should

1:26:01

note that the committee in response to

1:26:04

that statement tells us that Cuomo did

1:26:06

not actually confirm a specific date for

1:26:08

his transcribed interview until two

1:26:10

days ago, Governor Cuomo has an

1:26:13

open invitation to appear on the lead to answer

1:26:15

any of our questions whenever he has

1:26:18

the time. Fresh off his

1:26:20

meetings in China, what Secretary of State

1:26:22

Anthony Blinken told CNN about interference already

1:26:25

in the 2024 presidential election here in the

1:26:27

United States. Back

1:26:33

with our world lead Secretary of State

1:26:35

Anthony Blinken just left China after spending

1:26:37

days trying to press Chinese leaders, including

1:26:39

Xi Jinping, on contentious issues that remain

1:26:41

between the two superpowers. CNN's Kylie Atwood

1:26:43

has been traveling with Blinken. She sat

1:26:46

down with the secretary right before he

1:26:48

left. Kylie, what do you have to

1:26:50

say? Well,

1:26:53

listen, he spoke to US concerns about

1:26:55

China meddling in the US elections. Listen

1:26:57

to part of our conversation where he

1:27:00

said that China is arguably already trying

1:27:02

to interfere in US elections. He

1:27:05

reported that he told President Biden

1:27:08

that China would not interfere in

1:27:10

the upcoming presidential elections in the

1:27:12

United States. But since then, there

1:27:14

have been reports of

1:27:16

online Chinese accounts that have

1:27:18

falsely mimicked Trump supporters. Do

1:27:21

you believe that these accounts violate

1:27:23

President Xi's commitment? What

1:27:25

I can tell you is this. President

1:27:28

Biden was very clear about that

1:27:30

with President Xi, and I repeated

1:27:32

that today in my meetings. But

1:27:34

they're not violating the commitment yet, as far as you

1:27:36

can tell? Well, again, I have to look at the

1:27:39

specific reports that you're referring to, but we

1:27:41

have seen generally speaking

1:27:45

evidence of attempts to influence

1:27:50

and arguably interfere, and we want

1:27:52

to make sure that that's cut off

1:27:54

as quickly as possible. Now,

1:27:59

we also said that the U.S. is concerned

1:28:01

about China seeking to mirror Russia

1:28:03

in terms of influence campaigns in

1:28:05

the United States, trying to drive

1:28:07

up divisions in the U.S. And

1:28:09

Jake, when it comes to those

1:28:11

protests, those anti-Israel protests that are

1:28:13

really surrounding U.S. college campuses right

1:28:15

now, he said that protests are

1:28:17

a hallmark of democracy. And here's

1:28:19

how he described the specific protests

1:28:21

that we have seen unfold. We

1:28:25

heard from Israel's

1:28:27

prime minister Netanyahu this week who

1:28:30

called these protests anti-Semitic and said

1:28:32

they must stop. Do you think

1:28:34

he's right? Look, the protests

1:28:37

in and of themselves are

1:28:39

not anti-Semitic. There are

1:28:42

protesters and there

1:28:44

are also activists

1:28:46

who may have other agendas who

1:28:50

clearly are engaged in rhetoric. That

1:28:53

is, but what we're also

1:28:55

seeing is people, young

1:28:57

people, people from

1:28:59

different walks of life who do feel

1:29:02

very passionately, who have

1:29:04

very strong emotions about this anger.

1:29:08

And I understand that.

1:29:10

But we've certainly seen instances

1:29:13

where that has

1:29:15

clearly veered from a totally

1:29:18

legitimate expression of views

1:29:21

and beliefs to, in

1:29:23

some instances, yes, clear expressions of

1:29:26

anti-Semitism. Now

1:29:28

what he also said was that

1:29:30

these protesters are really something that

1:29:33

the Biden administration is paying attention

1:29:35

to. But he wasn't specific, Jake,

1:29:37

in terms of how these protesters

1:29:39

could have an impact on Biden

1:29:41

administration policy, rejecting some of these

1:29:43

protesters who have been calling for

1:29:46

the U.S. to stop sending weapons

1:29:48

to Israel. Jake. All

1:29:50

right, Carly Atwood with Secretary of State

1:29:52

Blinken in Beijing. Thanks so much. We'll

1:29:54

be right back. Virginia's

1:30:00

Republican Governor Glenn Yunkin and

1:30:03

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. It's a packed

1:30:05

Sunday. That's Sunday morning at 9 Eastern and

1:30:07

again at noon here on CNN. You

1:30:09

can follow the show on X at the lead

1:30:11

CNN. If you ever miss an episode of the

1:30:14

lead, you can listen to the show once you

1:30:16

get your podcasts. Our coverage continues now with Wolf

1:30:18

Blitzer in the Situation Room. We'll see you soon.

1:30:25

Quality. Sleep is essential. That's why the

1:30:27

sleep number Smart Bad is designed for your

1:30:29

ever evolving sleep needs so you can choose

1:30:31

what's right for you whenever you like me.

1:30:33

to Bad: that's firmer, softer on either side,

1:30:35

and helps you sleep. But. A comfortable temperature

1:30:37

sleep number does that. Number

1:30:55

stores or sleepnumber.com.

Unlock more with Podchaser Pro

  • Audience Insights
  • Contact Information
  • Demographics
  • Charts
  • Sponsor History
  • and More!
Pro Features