Episode Transcript
Transcripts are displayed as originally observed. Some content, including advertisements may have changed.
Use Ctrl + F to search
0:00
Hi, guys. Welcome back or I
0:02
should probably say welcome back to myself because
0:04
today is first day that officially back on YouTube.
0:06
You might have noticed that I was absent on
0:08
YouTube for the last week. And
0:10
that is because YouTube suspended my channel.
0:13
Yep. They gave me a strike a
0:15
for what they say is medical disinformation,
0:18
which is absolute horse
0:20
hockey. We talked
0:22
a little earlier in the week on rumble, a
0:24
safe place to talk without censorship about
0:27
why their so called medical disinformation accusations
0:29
against me were stupid and
0:31
wrong. you can go over to rumble and see that
0:34
anytime. In fact, that is my subscription ask
0:36
for you for today. If you don't
0:38
mind, go to rumble dot com slash Liz
0:40
Wheeler and hit that subscribe button.
0:42
So if and when YouTube ever
0:45
dares to do that again, we can stay in touch
0:47
and you don't miss episodes or wonder where
0:49
I am. Welcome to the Liz Wheeler
0:51
Show. I'm Liz Wheeler. What I wanna talk
0:53
about today? I wanna talk about Elon
0:56
Musk is taking over Twitter.
0:58
It's official guys. It's real. It's
1:01
happening. I don't know if you're anything like
1:03
me. You wondered when he announced that a
1:05
couple months ago. What roadblocks
1:07
he would run into whether it
1:09
would actually come to fruition. And I feel like
1:11
it's kinda surreal. It's
1:13
kinda surreal that Elon Musk has actually
1:16
purchased Twitter. that this place that we love
1:18
and we hate might actually be restored
1:20
to a marketplace of ideas in
1:22
the political sphere. It's really really steady. So
1:24
I wanna talk about that in a little bit more depth and
1:26
what it means. It's not just oh
1:29
Elon Musk owning the lives in the way only
1:31
a billionaire can. This is really
1:33
significant to our society. I wanna talk
1:35
about that. I also wanna talk about Project
1:37
Veritas. Their
1:39
new release from an FBI
1:42
whistleblower is breathtaking
1:44
as we've come to expect from Jane So Keith and
1:46
his crew, their latest investigation
1:49
shows that the FBI is targeting you
1:51
and me again, shocker. And I
1:53
wanna talk about how that
1:55
impacts or how this will impact the
1:57
twenty twenty two mid term elections?
1:59
I also
2:01
want to talk about PayPal. Let
2:03
me tell you. If you still have money
2:05
in PayPal, get it
2:07
out of there. Get it out of there before
2:09
PayPal steals it from you, for
2:11
the crime of being a conservative, being
2:13
a Christian, really horrendous what
2:15
PayPal has done. I wanna talk about that. And then I wanna talk
2:17
about how everything that I just mentioned, Elon Musk.
2:19
Project Veritas. The FBI, venture
2:21
elections, and PayPal all tie
2:24
together. So let's get to it.
2:36
Okay, guys. I wanna talk to you first about
2:38
what I like about field of greens. So
2:41
back in the day, people grew
2:43
what they ate. I'm talking fresh vegetables
2:45
and fruits. That was the core of people's diets. It's
2:47
it's what they ate. But as Americans
2:49
have become now we eat premade
2:51
processed fast food. It's it's the easy
2:54
stuff. That's why we eat it, but it's not very healthy.
2:56
It's definitely not the six cups of veggies and fruits
2:58
recommended every day. I want to tell you today
3:00
about field of greens. Field of greens
3:02
is packed with a full spectrum of essential
3:04
vegetables and fruits, plus science
3:06
backed herbs and probiotics. This
3:08
is what we need to stay healthy in a world
3:10
where we're maybe too busy to grow our own food.
3:13
Field of greens works fast. You'll
3:15
have more energy. You'll look and feel healthier.
3:17
and it can even help you lose weight. In fact, next
3:19
time you're at the doctor and they compare your old lab
3:21
work to your new lab work, I bet the doc
3:23
will tell you that you crushed it. And you can
3:25
thank field of greens join me and take
3:27
field of greens and help you get started. I got you
3:30
fifteen percent off your first order and
3:32
that's not all. I got you another ten
3:34
percent off when you subscribe for recurring
3:36
orders just visit field of greens
3:38
dot com and use my promo code
3:40
Liz. That's field of greens dot
3:43
com code Liz. field
3:45
of greens dot com promo code list. You'll be
3:47
glad you did. Okay. Before
3:50
we get into the Elon Musk thing, I
3:52
have a little bit of an addendum to yes today's
3:54
episode. Yesterday, we talked about the new
3:56
prime minister of the UK
3:58
Rishi Sunak and the fact
4:00
that he's a freak tied to the World Economic
4:02
Forum. tied to he advocates
4:04
for especially, essentially, a surveillance
4:07
state. He advocates for central
4:09
bank digital currency, which is cryptocurrency
4:11
controlled by a litus like
4:13
Justin Trudeau. And
4:15
we talked about his financial conflict of interest.
4:18
After we filmed that episode, I was still
4:20
thinking about this and I
4:22
realized, I found
4:24
another insane conflict of
4:26
interest that actually rounds out Ricusenac's entire
4:29
character, so I wanted to add that
4:31
little addendum today to
4:33
yesterday's episode. Here
4:34
it is.
4:35
Rishi Sunak refused
4:38
a couple of years ago, to
4:40
disclose whether or not he
4:43
personally would profit from
4:45
Moderna's mRNA COVID vaccine.
4:48
This is when he was he he was serving
4:50
already in in UK government. He wasn't the prime
4:52
minister, but remember, Moderna?
4:56
has only ever brought one product
4:58
to market. This company as a whole, the
5:00
only product that they have is the mRNA, COVID
5:02
vaccine, Rishi Sunak, And
5:04
I wanna
5:04
read this directly from the Guardian. They say Sunak was
5:07
a founding partner of Thalim
5:09
Partners, a
5:10
major investor in Moderna, and one of the executives
5:12
managing its office. He left the firm in two
5:14
thousand thirteen returning to the UK to pursue his
5:16
political career. It's not known whether
5:18
the chancellor retained any investment
5:20
in the Thalim fund after leaming after
5:23
leaving because Thalim is a registered entity
5:25
in the Cayman Islands, a tax haven
5:28
which does not make company records public.
5:30
The Guardian writes ordinarily a partner in a hedge fund
5:32
would own a stake in the management company
5:34
and have money invested in its fund. A
5:36
year ago, Sunev
5:37
declared in a list of ministers' interest
5:40
that he was the beneficiary of a blind
5:42
trust. The contents of the trust have not
5:44
been disclosed to the public, Stock
5:45
market filings show that Thalim has
5:47
a five hundred million
5:50
dollar investment in Moderna, which
5:52
accounts for around twenty percent of all the money it
5:54
manages, about two point five billion dollars
5:57
I read that and I was like, what?
5:58
What?
5:59
Hello,
6:01
British people? Do you understand
6:03
what this means? the government of the
6:05
United Kingdom has purchased
6:07
literally billions of doses of the
6:09
Moderna vaccine. What
6:11
if? The person who is
6:13
now the prime minister of the government
6:15
of the United Kingdom is continuing
6:18
to purchase vaccines
6:20
that he personally profits from.
6:22
Even if it's in a blind trust, I don't care.
6:25
I
6:27
mean, holy Holy,
6:30
holy, oh my word.
6:32
The corruption of this
6:34
round it rounds out everything we talked about yesterday.
6:36
Right? how he he essentially wants
6:38
this global elite to control everything.
6:41
He prases the war he prases continuing
6:43
the war in Ukraine. He prases the vaccine
6:45
mandates. And with the rollout of the vaccines,
6:47
I should say, in the United Kingdom, he's
6:49
tied to the World Economic Forum. He wants to reshape
6:51
the economy into a stakeholder economy.
6:53
Claus Schwab's version of this, and
6:56
he very possibly profits
6:58
off of the Moderna vaccine that
7:00
the UK government that he's now administering
7:02
purchases. This
7:04
is like
7:05
corruption at a level that's
7:07
hard to even describe, except of
7:09
course, think about it from this perspective. Here
7:11
in the United States, The Senate Committee on
7:14
Health issued a report
7:16
saying that they believe that COVID-nineteen, the virus,
7:18
SARS CoV-two, actually leaked from a
7:20
lab. So my first reaction to seeing this headline
7:22
was, yeah, no kidding. Like, two
7:24
years behind US Congress. This
7:26
is what their report says. Based on
7:28
the analysis of the publicly available information,
7:31
it appears reasonable to conclude that the
7:33
COVID-nineteen pandemic was more likely than
7:35
not the result of a research related
7:37
incident. Yes.
7:41
Thank you for that senate committee
7:43
on hell. Thank you for that revelation.
7:45
But zooming out here for a second,
7:47
this is
7:49
intricately tied to
7:52
Rishi Sudhakar, the prime minister of the UK's,
7:54
invest meant in Moderna. Because
7:56
think about this, the US government
7:58
gave our taxpayer money
8:00
to eco health alliance, Peter Daseck's
8:02
eco health alliance that gave that money,
8:04
our money to the Wuhan Institute of Neurology,
8:06
to conduct gain of function research that
8:08
Fauci lied about. He claimed it wasn't gain of
8:10
function research, but we know he knows it was gain
8:12
of function research. to juice up viruses.
8:14
From that, what is the total virology?
8:17
This virus leaked whether or
8:19
not they had been tampering with it. Well, that's
8:21
yet to be determined. But What do
8:23
you think? Do you think it had been tampered
8:25
with or do you think that this was a wildly
8:27
occurring virus? I certainly know what
8:29
I think. we
8:31
paid for that. Our government paid for that.
8:33
And now the United States or
8:35
the United Kingdom's Prime Minister
8:37
is profiting. These elitist
8:39
are profiting over the so
8:41
called cure for
8:43
the virus that they paid
8:45
to create. This
8:48
is like sci
8:49
fi level stuff.
8:52
This is nasty, weird,
8:55
weird level stuff. a little
8:57
addendum to yesterday's show. If you didn't watch
8:59
yesterday's show, go back, listen to
9:01
I know Rishi is not claims to be a conservative. He's part
9:03
of the conservative party. He is no
9:05
such thing. He has a really, really shady background.
9:08
Go and take a listen to that if you haven't already.
9:10
Okay. Elon Musk. Let's talk about Elon
9:12
Musk. Elon Musk issued a
9:14
statement to Twitter advertisers after
9:17
he after he on yesterday show, we watched
9:19
that video of Elon Musk walking into
9:21
Twitter headquarters carrying the kitchen carrying the
9:23
kitchen sink, he said, entering Twitter
9:25
HQ, let that sink in.
9:27
Funny dad fun. And the
9:29
day after he issued a
9:31
statement to the advertisers that are
9:33
an integral part of Twitter, actually
9:35
talking about why he wanted to acquire
9:37
Twitter. there's been a lot speculation about the
9:39
why behind what he's done, but he's never
9:41
actually said in long
9:43
form why he's doing what he's doing. So I wanna
9:45
read that with you right now. Eelon
9:48
said, I wanted to reach out personally
9:50
to share my motivation in acquiring
9:52
Twitter. There has been much
9:54
speculation about why I bought Twitter
9:56
and what I think about advertising, most of
9:58
it has been wrong. The reason
9:59
I
9:59
acquired Twitter is because it is
10:02
important to the future of civilization
10:04
to have a common digital town
10:06
square
10:06
where a wide range of beliefs can be
10:09
debated in a healthy manner without resorting
10:11
to violence. There is
10:11
currently great danger that social
10:14
media will splinter into far right
10:16
wing and far left wing echo chambers
10:18
that generate more hate and divide
10:20
our society. Elan says
10:22
in the relentless pursuit of clicks,
10:24
much of traditional media has fueled
10:26
and catered to those polarized extremes,
10:29
as they believe that is what brings in
10:31
the money. But in doing so, the
10:33
opportunity for dialogues lost.
10:34
That is why I bought Twitter.
10:37
I didn't do it because it would be easy.
10:39
I didn't do it to make more money. I
10:41
did it to try to help humanity whom
10:43
I love. And I do so with
10:45
humility recognizing that failure and pursuing
10:47
this goal despite our best efforts, is a
10:49
very real possibility.
10:51
That said, Twitter obviously cannot become
10:53
a free for all hellscape where anything
10:55
can be said with no consequences. In addition
10:57
to adhering to the laws of our land, our
10:59
platform must be warm and welcoming
11:01
to all, where you can choose your desired
11:03
experience according to your preferences just
11:05
as you can choose, for example, to see movies
11:07
or play video games ranging from all ages
11:10
to mature. I also very
11:12
much believe he said that
11:14
advertising when done right can
11:16
delight, entertain, and inform you.
11:18
It can show you a service or product or
11:20
medical treatment that you never knew
11:22
existed, but is right for you. For this
11:24
to be true, it is essential to show Twitter
11:26
users advertising that is as
11:28
relevant as possible to their needs.
11:30
Low relevancy ads are spam and highly
11:32
relevant ads are actually content.
11:34
Fundamentally, Twitter aspires to be the most
11:36
respected advertising platform in the
11:38
world that strengthens your brand and grows
11:40
your enterprise. To
11:42
everyone who has partnered with us, I thank
11:44
you. Let us build something extraordinary
11:47
together. I don't know
11:49
about you guys. But I kind of get
11:51
the chills when I read that. Because
11:53
Elon Musk, he's not conservative. He's
11:55
not right wing. But he understands
11:58
that it's not just a matter
12:00
of conservatives
12:02
feeling unwelcome or conservatives
12:04
being censored in that personally
12:06
annoying or liberal
12:09
employees at Twitter deliberately
12:11
for
12:12
personal reasons trying to silence
12:14
conservatives and views that they don't like, he understands that this
12:16
is much bigger than you and
12:18
I. That this is
12:20
actually censorship and cancel culture, which
12:22
is what we're seeing play out on
12:24
Twitter right now is
12:27
actually a fundamental threat to our
12:29
citing. He identifies actually
12:31
one specific thing
12:33
that he wants to bring back
12:35
to Twitter where the real value of
12:38
a public square digital
12:41
forum lies. I
12:43
wanna talk about that in just a second. But first, I wanna talk
12:45
to you about beam organics. Did
12:47
you know that poor sleep can cause weight
12:50
gain? lude issues, poor mental health,
12:52
and lower productivity, and then if you sleep less
12:54
than six to seven hours per night, it's actually
12:56
linked to reduce white blood cell count. Why
12:58
blood cells are important? They protect your body against
13:00
illness and disease. Not many
13:02
people realize this, but having a consistent
13:04
nighttime routine is so important.
13:06
A better tomorrow starts tonight. Let me introduce you
13:08
to Beam Dream. Beam is the world's most
13:10
innovative functional wellness brand with unique
13:12
products for everything. from sleep
13:14
to recovery. And today, you get a
13:16
special discount available for Beam's
13:18
sleep product. It's called DreamPowder. It's their
13:20
best selling healthy hot cocoa It
13:23
contains natural sleep promoting premium
13:25
ingredients triple lab tested, no
13:27
THC, and you wake up refreshed.
13:29
In fact, you know, I'm a numbers gal. Ninety
13:31
eight percent of people surveyed fall asleep
13:33
faster when taking beam dream, and
13:35
ninety nine percent of people experience better
13:37
sleep quality. All you do, you just mix, beam, dream into
13:39
hot water, and milk, you stir it, and you enjoy
13:41
thirty minutes before bedtime. If you don't like it,
13:43
get your money back guaranteed. For a
13:45
limited time, get twenty dollars off when you go
13:47
to beam organics dot com
13:49
slash liz, and use code
13:51
liz at checkout. That's
13:53
BEAM organics dot
13:55
com slash liz and use code
13:57
liz for twenty dollars off. Beamorganics
13:59
dot com slash Liz
14:02
promo code
14:03
Liz. So
14:06
one of the things that Elon Musk mentions
14:09
specifically as being
14:12
critically important on
14:14
Twitter if Twitter is to be this
14:16
digital public forum is
14:18
investigative journalism. Individuals
14:21
who are not tied
14:23
to the corporate media, the so
14:25
called mainstream outlets, who
14:27
report important
14:29
stories, who
14:32
expose corruption, and
14:34
who hold entities, whether it's
14:36
politicians or corporations accountable. You
14:38
and I can probably think of any
14:40
number of these people from lives of TikTok
14:42
to Christopher Ruffo to
14:44
Project Veritas. Now, I don't need to
14:46
introduce you to Project Veritas. You, I'm
14:48
sure, are familiar with Project Veritas. It's
14:50
James O'Keefe's investigative journalism
14:53
operation, they conduct the the
14:55
undercover camera stings of
14:57
influential people, whether these are employees of Twitter,
14:59
whether they are campaign staff, whether
15:01
they are politicians themselves,
15:04
whatever whatever it may be, people who are
15:06
in positions power and infusing that power James
15:08
O'Keefe sends his investigative journalist in
15:10
for honest conversations, records
15:14
secretly records these conversations,
15:17
and then Airstem, this is
15:19
undercover journalism at its finest
15:21
while Project Veritas is currently banned
15:23
on Twitter. James O'Keefe is likewise
15:25
banned on Twitter. Most of James O'Keefe's
15:27
content, his staff has also been banned
15:29
on on Twitter. His content is
15:31
unwelcome on Twitter under
15:33
the well, I I guess we can call
15:35
it the previous administrators of Twitter now
15:37
that Elon Musk owns it, now that Elon is the
15:39
current administrator. But Project
15:41
Veritas is a perfect example of this. And
15:43
what Project Veritas released just
15:45
this week was FBI whistleblower
15:48
documents, a whistleblower at the
15:50
FBI came to project Veritas and
15:52
said, listen, I have something that you're gonna
15:54
wanna see. I have proof that
15:56
the FBI is targeting
15:58
conservatives In the lead
15:59
up to the twenty twenty two midterm
16:02
elections, specifically surrounding the midterm
16:04
elections, and this whistleblower gave
16:06
to James O'Keefe, a picture of an
16:08
internal FBI document. Now, this this
16:10
document is a
16:12
handout at the FBI telling agents
16:14
how to spot
16:16
election crimes leading up to the mid
16:18
term elections on November eighth. And you can see this
16:20
on your screen right now. You can see that there
16:22
are A number of
16:24
categories of crimes, some of which are
16:26
valid. The first one is campaign finance.
16:29
Law violations, that's valid. If you if you
16:31
go down to the third one, there's election
16:33
influence, election interference, there's
16:35
voter fraud, ballot fraud, voter intimidation,
16:37
voter suppression. Those are all
16:39
very valid crimes that perhaps the FBI would
16:41
do well to investigate a little more
16:43
closely after some of the
16:45
evidence that we've seen in previous elections
16:47
of usually left wing
16:49
activists or Democrats engaging
16:51
in these crimes. But if you
16:53
look at the second category, and
16:55
the 1234 the fifth category,
16:58
you will see
17:00
misinformation and disinformation
17:03
listed. And how does the FBI in this
17:05
internal document describe disinformation? They
17:07
say false or inaccurate information
17:11
intended to mislead others.
17:13
Disinformation campaigns on social media are
17:15
used to deliberately confuse,
17:17
trick, or upset the public. misinformation
17:20
is defined as false or
17:22
misleading information spread mistakenly
17:26
or unintentionally.
17:27
So my
17:29
first question here is
17:33
who exactly is the arbiter
17:35
of truth? Who determines what
17:38
is true and what is not. I
17:40
understand that there's objective truth, but there's
17:42
also opinion. There's also
17:44
a divergence of world
17:47
view that is at play in our midterm
17:49
elections. Let's use abortion as an example
17:51
and transgenderism as an
17:53
example. In the abortion debate, Pro
17:56
lifers say, well, life begins a conception
17:58
biologically a new human life is formed at the moment
17:59
that an egg fuses with this firm and becomes,
18:02
you know, a unique DNA, a
18:04
unique person. The proportion side says
18:06
a baby is not a baby, not a
18:08
unique human being from the moment of conception, but
18:10
only when the mother desires that
18:12
child. So who determines? Which is true and which is not?
18:14
With the FBI? The
18:17
same FBI that came after
18:20
Trump, same FBI that's raiding pro lifers, I
18:22
don't think so. What about the
18:24
transgender issue? You and
18:26
I understand that a
18:28
boy is a boy and a girl is a girl, but the left thinks that a boy
18:31
can be a girl if he wants to be a girl and a girl can
18:33
be a boy if she feels like a boy. So
18:35
who's the arbiter of truth? Who determines
18:37
what's what's disinformation or
18:39
misinformation and and the intention behind
18:41
it, this is really scary stuff.
18:43
This is like authoritarian type
18:45
stuff. and misinformation that
18:47
you you mistakenly or unintentionally
18:49
spread false information that can constitute
18:51
an election crime. So basically,
18:54
If you post a post
18:56
on Twitter and you're mistaken about
18:58
a hot button issue,
19:01
or not even mistaken. You say something that
19:03
the left disagrees with your definition of the
19:05
word. That could cause an FBI agent to
19:07
raid your home. Is that what I'm
19:10
seeing here? This kind of
19:12
corruption, let me just tell you, this kind of
19:14
corruption is distasteful
19:16
and off putting to everyone.
19:18
There might be a very fringe minority on the
19:20
left who want the FBI to raid
19:22
the home of pro lifers, but most
19:24
people don't. Most normal people even normal
19:27
Democrats don't want think that's an abuse of reason
19:29
they don't care about that is because they don't know
19:31
about it. The reason they don't know about it is
19:33
because on platforms like
19:36
Twitter where previously investigative
19:38
journalists thrived. Those
19:40
investigative journalists have been silenced and censored
19:43
and canceled so that information is
19:45
stifled and people don't hear about it. The
19:47
mainstream media, of course, the corporate media won't wouldn't
19:50
touch this. But this this is one
19:52
of the most important parts of what Elon Musk is
19:54
doing here. As
19:56
he understands that
19:58
investigative journalism
19:59
it
19:59
Independent journalists
20:03
are incredibly powerful. Perhaps the
20:05
most powerful people in our entire country. Again,
20:07
think of LEMS of TikTok. Do you think the vast majority of
20:09
people in our country would believe that
20:11
drag queen's story hours were happening in
20:13
the library near you, that
20:15
kindergarteners at your local elementary school are
20:17
being doc traded into queer
20:19
theory if she hadn't posted video
20:21
after video after video after video
20:23
of these groomer teachers grooming your children,
20:25
admitting that they groom your children. I
20:27
would argue that no, they wouldn't. Now
20:30
we get to PayPal. PayPal
20:32
is another example of this. PayPal,
20:34
if you have money in PayPal, I
20:36
give you full permission. You hit the
20:38
pause button right now on YouTube. You hit the
20:40
pause button right now on Apple. You hit the
20:42
pause button on Spotify. You hit the pause button
20:44
on rumble. You hit a pause
20:46
button on local wherever you're listening and you go get your
20:49
money out of PayPal. Trust
20:51
me. Get your money out of PayPal
20:53
a couple weeks ago. a
20:55
leaked document from PayPal, set the Internet
20:59
ablaze because this leaked document was
21:01
an updated user
21:03
agreement terms of service for YouTube
21:05
or for PayPal, in which PayPal
21:08
reserved the right to
21:10
find you two
21:12
thousand five hundred dollars. To
21:14
remove two thousand five hundred dollars from your account, just
21:16
siphon it out.
21:17
it If you
21:18
were engaging in misinformation
21:21
or disinformation or information related
21:23
activities. The outcry
21:25
was so loud that PayPal said, no.
21:27
No. No. No. You're not you're not correct. You made
21:29
a mistake. We've made a mistake. meant to
21:31
publish these. These these are not our terms of service.
21:33
Like, this was just some internal document that
21:35
was discussed, but it's not it's not real.
21:38
And a lot of conservatives were like, uh-huh,
21:40
sure. And a
21:41
lot of
21:42
conservatives left PayPal. A
21:45
lot of people were like, Well, maybe PayPal's being held accountable. Let's
21:47
just see how this plays out. Well, fast forward
21:49
two weeks, and PayPal actually added
21:53
this to their real terms of service. No
21:55
denying this corruption now. They
21:57
actually say you can see this on the
21:59
screen. They show you can see their terms of
22:01
service and then you can
22:03
see what they define
22:06
as bad behavior. So if you're
22:08
engaging in, let's say,
22:10
political activism, maybe you have a
22:12
consulting firm. Maybe you work for a
22:14
campaign. Maybe maybe I don't know. Maybe you're a right
22:16
wing news outlet and entertainment. I don't know. You
22:18
could do any number of things. If you articulate
22:20
anything related to transgenderism, you
22:22
articulate anything related to abortion.
22:24
You articulate anything related to
22:26
border security, illegal immigration,
22:28
any of the left hot button issues that they
22:31
claim make the rights for
22:33
wanting a secured border, wanting to protect life, wanting
22:35
to protect boys and girls, little boys
22:37
and girls, They would deem that as
22:39
intolerant and discriminatory, and they
22:41
would drain your PayPal
22:43
account of your money
22:45
It's in the PayPal terms of service. And this
22:47
is not a government entity. Right? Paypal? It's
22:49
a private business. How do you
22:51
hold them accountable? You hold them
22:54
accountable by independent
22:57
journalists, investigative journalists
22:59
blasting this story to Kingdom
23:02
com. circulating the stories so that the
23:04
people that use PayPal, not just
23:06
a not just a minority of people
23:08
who are very highly tuned into politics and
23:10
hear about this stuff. so
23:12
that everybody hears about this.
23:14
Because it doesn't matter if you're a Democrat
23:16
voter, Republican voter. The only
23:18
people that support these kind of policies
23:20
are very very far leftists. The
23:22
elitist who want to control us, the politicians
23:24
who want to control us,
23:26
and the crazy march who
23:28
support them. But the vast majority of voters aren't crazy marxists,
23:30
even voters on the left.
23:32
But without
23:35
a public square, a digital
23:37
forum that serves as a public square,
23:39
like Twitter under Elon will be,
23:41
this kind of story. just falls
23:43
to the wayside. It's lit's left on the cutting
23:45
room floor. The mainstream media is not gonna cover
23:47
it. It has to be covered by
23:50
you and by me. We
23:52
understand what the left wants
23:54
for us. We understand that this is
23:56
not a coincidence. This is not an
23:58
an isolated incident of one company
24:00
Paypal targeting us or
24:02
one FBI agent being a bad apple
24:04
going after a conservative. No, we understand
24:06
that this is a systemic world view
24:08
from the left. They hate us. They
24:10
have labeled us as extremists. They don't want
24:13
us to be able to participate in society.
24:15
And again, this is
24:17
not an inference that I am drawing, we
24:19
can see this happening before our very
24:21
eyes. We're gonna talk about that in just a second. But
24:23
first, I wanna talk to you about upside upside
24:25
is a great new app that I've been using and I I wanna share
24:27
it with you because we've all been cringing, right, at the
24:30
gas pump or, you
24:32
know, groaning when we get that eye popping check after eating
24:34
out at our favorite restaurant because inflation is
24:36
hitting us all where it hurts. It really hurts.
24:38
That's why I actually started using
24:40
upside upside is an incredible app
24:42
for anyone who buys gas or buys groceries
24:44
or dines out. So, you know,
24:46
all of us. With every purchase, I'm
24:48
actually earning cash back
24:50
thanks to upside. And and by the way,
24:52
it's not too good to be true. I've used it. It
24:54
works. To get started, all you have to do is
24:56
download the free upside app and, yes,
24:59
it's free. Use my promo code Liz five, and you can
25:01
get five dollars or more, cash back on your
25:03
first purchase of ten dollars or more.
25:05
Here's how it works. You claim
25:07
an offer, For whatever you're buying on
25:09
upside, you just check-in at the business, you pay as
25:11
usual at the business with a credit or
25:13
debit card, and then you get paid
25:15
by upside. In
25:17
comparison to credit card rewards or
25:19
loyalty programs, you can earn three times more
25:21
cash back with upside. It's a pretty
25:23
good deal. Upside users are earning more
25:25
than a million dollars every week.
25:27
So download the free upside app and use
25:29
promo code Liz five to get five dollars or
25:31
more cash back on your first purchase of ten
25:33
dollars or more That's
25:35
five dollars or more cash back on your
25:37
first purchase of ten dollars or more if you
25:39
use my promo code list five.
25:41
But first, download the free
25:43
upside app. Okay. So, congresswoman Myra
25:45
Flores from the state of
25:46
Texas is a
25:48
Republican Latina congresswoman
25:52
And she has been booted from
25:54
the congressional Hispanic caucus, which is
25:56
kind of laughable because she's
25:59
Hispanic. She's Latina. I mean,
26:01
I don't know what else you want me to say. I don't know if you
26:03
can be like very, very litigated or very,
26:05
very Hispanic. There's no superlative that you can
26:07
add to that. She is his She's Latina. That should be
26:09
the only barrier to entry to be congressional
26:12
Hispanic caucus. But the Democrats
26:14
in charge of the congressional Hispanic
26:16
caucus have determined that
26:18
she is not politically a Hispanic. She
26:20
does not politically align with
26:22
what they believe a Hispanic woman
26:25
should should it be? And so they have kicked
26:27
her out of the congressional Hispanic caucus
26:30
because she is a Republican. That is the
26:32
only reason because she is a Republican
26:34
She had the most hilarious response, which I wanna read
26:36
just because it made me laugh.
26:38
She tweeted my thoughts after the
26:40
rejection by the congressional Hispanic caucus.
26:43
Maybe I'm not the right type of taco. I
26:45
read that. I thought,
26:48
oh, well, that's hilarious. Yes. That's not only
26:50
witty, but it also shows that the
26:52
that the Democrats play identity politics.
26:54
They view Hispanic people,
26:56
Latino people, as as
26:58
this this this units this
27:00
monolithic unit that all has to think the
27:02
same based on their their heritage or the
27:04
color of their skin, it's so
27:06
insulting. This is what the left thinks of
27:09
us though. This is not an isolated
27:11
incident. This is how the left wants us
27:13
to be treated. If you have a certain color
27:15
skin or a certain ethnic background, then
27:17
they do not want you to be included.
27:19
in
27:21
your ethnic background in
27:23
groups that represent your ethnic
27:26
background if you happen to be Republican. This
27:29
is this is social ostracization. This is
27:31
this is they're trying to force group think on you.
27:33
They're stereotyping them. This
27:35
is insulting. So we see that
27:37
based on the color of our skin. We see
27:39
PayPal based on our political affiliation.
27:41
We see the FBI weaponized
27:43
against us based on or
27:45
dissent against Democrat candidates. This
27:48
is I mean, this is all stuff
27:50
that has happened just in the space of the
27:52
past two days.
27:54
And so, of course, that means there's a million other
27:57
examples that fit this bill, but
27:59
this is why it's so
28:01
important. It's monumental. what
28:04
Elon Musk is doing by buying
28:06
Twitter. And by recognizing
28:08
that the value of Twitter
28:11
as a digital public square
28:13
lies in the independent journalists
28:16
conducting investigative pieces that are
28:18
ignored by the corporate media. Because
28:20
all of these different elements
28:22
are corruption. Right? The FBI is
28:24
corrupt. The congressional Hispanic caucus is
28:26
corrupt. PayPal is corrupt. With this
28:28
poisonous ideology of Marxism, that
28:31
that plays out through their
28:33
identity politics. And
28:35
most people in our country
28:37
don't want that. Most
28:40
Democrats don't want that. Most
28:42
Republicans don't want that. Most
28:44
Liberals, most Conservatives, unless their
28:46
elected officials don't want
28:48
that. And so the old adage that
28:50
sunlight is the best disinfectant is actually
28:52
the case here.
28:54
It's it's The more that
28:56
we can talk about this, the more we can circulate
28:58
these stories, the more likely it is that
29:01
these institutions will feel
29:03
pressured not to behave in a
29:05
bad way. Also,
29:07
also, and this is
29:09
zooming out even further. There have
29:11
been a lot of alternative infrastructure
29:13
that have been built in the past few
29:16
years as the left has become
29:18
to sensor and cancel and
29:20
try to ostracize people whose
29:22
views they don't want you to
29:24
hear. And that's a good thing to build this
29:26
alternative infrastructure. It's a bold
29:28
work. It's it's the way that we it's a bold
29:30
work against being completely
29:33
canceled. It's the way that we hedge our bets. I
29:35
do this too. Most
29:37
conservatives, it was the way that we hedge our
29:39
bets against being
29:41
told that we're not allowed to believe what we believe and
29:43
we're not allowed to say what we believe, we're not allowed
29:45
to speak the truth, being told that we're hateful and racist,
29:47
and that's fine. But
29:49
at the same time, what that does when we
29:52
have conservative social
29:54
media and liberal social media,
29:57
or
29:58
conservative
29:59
banks and liberal banks.
30:02
Is it creates a segregated
30:05
society? And we
30:07
shouldn't want a segregated
30:09
society. We shouldn't have
30:11
Republican restaurants and Democrat
30:14
restaurants Republican banking
30:16
institutions and Democrat banking institutions.
30:18
Republican social media platforms and Democrat
30:20
social media platforms. We shouldn't want
30:22
to live like that. We
30:24
are one country
30:26
and one people. And the one
30:28
people, we can be made up of
30:30
very very different viewpoints, but
30:32
we shouldn't want to
30:34
be segregated in every
30:36
aspect of our lives from people
30:38
who disagree
30:40
with us. And so it's
30:42
this conundrum a little
30:44
bit of building these alternative this
30:46
alternative economy to
30:49
being canceled while also
30:51
understanding that truly the
30:53
solution to
30:55
the problem isn't
30:57
just building the alternative infrastructure.
30:59
The solution to the problem is
31:02
taking over the
31:04
existing infrastructure that's problematic.
31:06
And that is
31:08
what Elon Musk is doing. Elon
31:11
Musk is maybe the first to do
31:13
this in a significant way. to
31:15
say, look, Twitter is and
31:17
will be the largest platform
31:19
for political speech online in our country.
31:21
The most powerful online
31:23
platform for political speech in our country. And right now,
31:26
it's unfair. Right now, it's
31:28
unjust. Right now, it's tyrannical
31:30
and sure you can build alternatives, that's fine.
31:33
It gives people who have already been canceled a
31:35
voice. But truthfully, we should
31:37
take Twitter and we should
31:39
fix
31:40
it. And
31:43
that's the most powerful thing. that
31:45
you can possibly do to fight back
31:47
in this culture war, and Elon Musk is
31:49
doing it. Alright.
31:52
all right Now it's time for our video of
31:54
the day, and let's just say this one is
31:56
a real doozy. Let's talk about
31:59
dating preferences.
31:59
This
32:00
video was so good, you must watch
32:03
it, and I want to branch off and
32:05
talk about how it relates to fat
32:07
phobia and dating. A lot of times when people are
32:09
asked, why don't you date, fat people,
32:11
trans people, people of color,
32:13
whatever, they will say it's just a
32:15
preference I'm just not attracted to them. I can't make myself
32:17
be attracted to someone I'm just not attracted
32:19
to. The implication here being that
32:21
preferences are innate unchanging and
32:24
completely independent of any
32:26
outside factors or societal
32:28
norms. And therefore, that they are
32:30
inherently unproblematic. Like,
32:32
it's
32:32
not fat phobia. It's just who I am.
32:34
I can't help it. But I think
32:36
it's
32:36
actually a lot more complicated than
32:39
that. Our desires are not immune
32:41
to social conditioning. Although, of
32:43
course, you can't change your sexual
32:45
orientation. When we see a certain
32:47
type of body, glorified, praised
32:49
and labeled as desirable in media
32:52
from the time that we can
32:54
even process those messages, it's
32:56
not gonna not have an impact
32:58
on us. and the
33:00
fact is at least anecdotally lots of people report
33:02
being desired by many
33:05
people. But the piece that isn't there is
33:07
the social acceptance. And
33:09
again, that's also true for other marginalized identities.
33:12
Maybe you are sexually attracted to
33:14
fat people, but you can't see yourself
33:16
in a romantic relationship with
33:18
one because you've never seen that replicated in media.
33:20
Or maybe you love a fat person, but
33:22
you're too afraid of what your friends and family would
33:24
say if you introduce them
33:26
or you're too afraid of what it would say about
33:28
you to be with someone who is lower on
33:30
the desirability totem pole.
33:33
Wait a second. Wait a second.
33:34
Wait a second. So she says
33:36
that you can't change your sexual orientation.
33:39
You can't change who you're attracted to,
33:41
but she also says
33:43
If you're not attracted to morbidly
33:46
obese people, then you
33:48
are the problem. Society
33:51
has created you and your
33:53
attraction and you should change your
33:55
attraction. These people are too much.
33:57
Absolutely too much. You can't
33:59
make yourself attracted to people that you're
34:01
not attracted to, the
34:03
logical conclusion of what she's saying. Because
34:05
remember, she's not just talking about morbidly
34:07
obese. people here. She actually included trans people and people of color. So
34:09
let's let's just focus on the trans people for just
34:11
a second. The logical conclusion of what
34:13
this crazy woman is
34:15
saying is that If
34:18
you say you're a man, if you are
34:20
not attracted to a
34:22
another biological man who is
34:24
simply identifies and dresses
34:26
like a woman, then that
34:28
is a problematic lack of
34:30
attraction by you, created
34:32
by society, transphobic and you
34:34
really should be attracted to this person because
34:37
this crazy woman says that you
34:39
should be attracted to another man who says he's
34:41
a woman and that is a
34:44
real The logical conclusion of this is
34:45
absolutely bananas, which is why it's the bananas
34:48
video of the day.
34:50
Also, also, morbid
34:52
obesity is really, really
34:54
unhealthy. So there is this, like,
34:56
instinctual element of human nature
34:58
that finds
35:00
morbid obesity, less sexually attractive
35:02
than a healthy body. Doesn't
35:05
That's not a commentary on
35:08
the of people who suffer from obesity. It's not a commentary on the fact
35:10
that we should show people who are obese
35:12
respect. Of course not. But
35:14
it is just
35:16
a biological element, sort of
35:18
an evolutionary element that we recognize that being morbidly
35:20
obese is incredibly unhealthy. but,
35:24
you know, she's not interested in the truth. She's just interested in pretending she's a
35:26
victim. That is the bananas video of the day. Thank
35:28
you for watching today. Thank you for listening. I'm Liz
35:31
Wheeler. This is the Liz Wheeler
Podchaser is the ultimate destination for podcast data, search, and discovery. Learn More